Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped soil bacterium in the family Rhizobiaceae that causes crown gall disease, a neoplastic condition, in a wide range of dicotyledonous plants by transferring a segment of DNA called T-DNA from its tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmid into the host plant's genome via a type IV secretion system.^[1] This interkingdom DNA transfer, triggered by plant-derived phenolic compounds such as acetosyringone, integrates the T-DNA into the plant cell nucleus, where it expresses bacterial oncogenes that disrupt phytohormone balance, leading to uncontrolled cell proliferation and tumor formation at infection sites like wounds on roots, stems, or crowns.^[2] First identified as a plant pathogen in 1907, A. tumefaciens thrives as a saprophyte in diverse soil environments, particularly around plant roots, and utilizes opines—unique carbon and nitrogen compounds produced by transformed plant cells—as a nutrient source, establishing a parasitic relationship.^[1] The bacterium's genome, exemplified by strain C58, consists of one circular chromosome, one linear chromosome, and two plasmids, including the Ti plasmid essential for virulence, enabling it to serve as a model organism for studying horizontal gene transfer, host-microbe interactions, and bacterial secretion systems.^[3] Economically, crown galls reduce plant vigor and yield in horticultural crops such as grapes, apples, and cherries, with infections often entering through wounds and potentially leading to secondary complications like graft failure, though the disease does not typically cause plant death.^[2] Beyond pathology, A. tumefaciens has revolutionized plant biotechnology since the 1980s, when the Ti plasmid's T-DNA was repurposed as a vector for stable genetic transformation, facilitating the creation of transgenic plants resistant to pests, herbicides, or environmental stresses.^[1] Its natural ability to deliver DNA across kingdoms has made it indispensable for fundamental research in genome biology, chemical signaling, and synthetic biology applications.^[4]

Taxonomy and Classification

Nomenclature and History

_Agrobacterium tumefaciens was first identified as the causative agent of crown gall disease, a neoplastic condition forming tumor-like galls on infected plants, through the pioneering work of American plant pathologists Erwin F. Smith and C. O. Townsend in 1907. They isolated the bacterium from galls on Paris daisy (Chrysanthemum frutescens) and demonstrated its role via transmission experiments, inoculating healthy plants with extracts from infected tissues to reproduce the disease symptoms, thereby fulfilling key postulates for establishing bacterial etiology. Initially named Bacterium tumefaciens, this discovery marked the first recognition of a bacterium inducing tumors in plants, shifting understanding of plant pathology from purely environmental or viral causes to microbial agents.^[5] In 1942, bacteriologist H. J. Conn reclassified the organism into the newly proposed genus Agrobacterium, renaming it Agrobacterium tumefaciens to reflect its isolation from soil environments and distinction from related rhizobia. Conn's work emphasized the bacterium's prevalence in agricultural soils, where non-pathogenic strains were commonly found, highlighting its ecological niche beyond infected plant tissues. This taxonomic shift facilitated broader studies on its soil-borne nature and pathogenicity.^[5] Key advancements in the 1970s revealed the genetic basis of A. tumefaciens virulence through the discovery of the tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmid, a large extrachromosomal element essential for gall formation. Researchers including Zaenen et al. (1974) identified the Ti plasmid as the tumorigenicity principle by showing that its loss abolished pathogenicity, while subsequent studies by Chilton et al. (1977) demonstrated that a specific segment of the plasmid, termed T-DNA, integrates into the plant genome, transferring oncogenic genes that drive uncontrolled cell proliferation. These plasmid discoveries transformed A. tumefaciens from a mere pathogen into a model for horizontal gene transfer, laying foundational insights into bacterial-plant interactions.^[5] In 2022, the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes issued Judicial Opinion 127, clarifying the nomenclature by designating strain ATCC 4720 as the authentic type strain of A. tumefaciens and distinguishing it from the non-pathogenic Agrobacterium radiobacter. This reclassification resolved long-standing synonymy issues, ensuring that the pathogenic crown gall agent retains its specific epithet while separating it taxonomically from saprophytic soil isolates.^[6]

Phylogenetic Position

Agrobacterium tumefaciens belongs to the domain Bacteria, phylum Pseudomonadota, class Alphaproteobacteria, order Hyphomicrobiales, family Rhizobiaceae, and genus Agrobacterium. This classification reflects its position within the diverse group of Gram-negative, soil-dwelling bacteria known for their interactions with plants. Phylogenetic analyses consistently place A. tumefaciens in a monophyletic clade alongside other members of the Rhizobiaceae family, highlighting its evolutionary ties to environmentally adaptable microbes.^[7]^[8] The bacterium exhibits close phylogenetic relatedness to symbiotic nitrogen-fixing genera such as Rhizobium and Sinorhizobium, which share the same family and often co-occur in rhizosphere environments. These relationships are supported by sequence similarities in housekeeping genes, including 16S rRNA, recA, and atpD, indicating a common ancestor within Alphaproteobacteria. While Rhizobium and Sinorhizobium primarily form mutualistic associations via nodulation genes (nod genes) that promote nitrogen fixation in plant roots, A. tumefaciens has adapted analogous genetic mechanisms for pathogenesis, with virulence (vir) genes on its Ti plasmid showing homology to symbiotic host recognition systems in rhizobia. This evolutionary adaptation underscores a divergence from symbiosis to opportunistic pathogenicity while retaining core genomic features for plant cell interaction.^[9]^[10] Within the A. tumefaciens species complex, strains are delineated into genomovars based on genetic divergences identified through 16S rRNA sequencing and multi-locus sequence analysis (MLSA). Recent phylogenetic studies have refined these distinctions, revealing 15 genomospecies within the A. tumefaciens species complex. These analyses employ concatenated sequences from multiple loci to resolve intra-species diversity, with tumorigenic strains carrying tumor-inducing (pTi) plasmids responsible for crown gall formation across various genomospecies, while rhizogenic (hairy root-inducing) strains form a distinct subclade. Such genomovar classifications aid in understanding strain-specific virulence and ecological niches.^[11] Pathogenic strains of A. tumefaciens are thought to have evolved from non-pathogenic soil saprophytes through the horizontal acquisition of Ti plasmids carrying virulence determinants. This transition likely occurred within the broader evolutionary history of the Rhizobiaceae, enabling a shift from free-living decomposition to plant-associated lifestyles. Phylogenetic reconstructions suggest this divergence predates the diversification of many angiosperm hosts, aligning with the bacterium's broad host range across eudicots.^[12]

Morphology and Physiology

Cellular Structure

Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacterium typically measuring 0.8 μm in width and 2.0 μm in length.^[13] These bacilli exhibit polar growth, elongating primarily from one pole, which contributes to their characteristic morphology essential for navigating soil environments.^[14] The cell wall of A. tumefaciens consists of a thin peptidoglycan layer, a mesh-like polymer that provides structural integrity, sandwiched between the inner cytoplasmic membrane and the outer membrane.^[15] The outer membrane is asymmetric, featuring lipopolysaccharides (LPS) in its external leaflet, which play a key role in mediating bacterial adhesion to surfaces during infection.^[16] For motility, A. tumefaciens possesses a polar tuft of 4–6 flagella, each approximately 10–12 nm in diameter, composed primarily of flagellin proteins FlaA and FlaB, enabling swimming toward plant wounds.^[17] This motility facilitates initial host contact, a prerequisite for virulence.^[18] The type IV secretion system (T4SS) apparatus, crucial for T-DNA transfer, is visible via electron microscopy techniques such as cryo-EM, which has resolved its multi-subunit architecture spanning the inner and outer membranes.^[19] Under environmental stress in soil, A. tumefaciens produces exopolysaccharides that form a protective capsule-like layer, shielding cells from desiccation, predation, and other abiotic factors.^[20]

Metabolic Characteristics

Agrobacterium tumefaciens is an aerobic heterotroph capable of utilizing a variety of carbon sources, including sugars such as glucose and sucrose, amino acids, and organic acids like succinate, to support growth and energy production.^[21] This metabolic versatility allows the bacterium to thrive in diverse soil environments by exploiting plant-derived nutrients, with genome-scale models confirming uptake rates for glucose at approximately 4.5 mmol·g⁻¹ dry weight·h⁻¹ under aerobic conditions.^[21] Additionally, it demonstrates a unique metabolic niche through the catabolism of opines, specialized compounds produced by infected plant tissues, which serve as exclusive carbon and nitrogen sources for the bacterium, enhancing its competitive advantage in tumor environments.^[21] Optimal growth occurs at 28°C and at a pH around 7.0, conditions that align with typical soil habitats near plant roots.^[22] The bacterium exhibits chemotaxis toward plant wound signals, such as the phenolic compound acetosyringone, mediated by the VirA and VirG proteins encoded on the Ti plasmid, which direct motility toward potential infection sites.^[23] Key enzymatic activities include the production of β-galactosidase, which facilitates lactose metabolism by hydrolyzing it into glucose and galactose, enabling utilization of this disaccharide as a carbon source in nutrient-limited settings.^[24] The respiratory metabolism of A. tumefaciens relies on an aerobic electron transport chain incorporating cytochromes, including cytochrome c-556 and components of the NADH oxidase system, for efficient oxygen-dependent energy generation via the Entner-Doudoroff pathway and tricarboxylic acid cycle.^[25] Unlike some soil bacteria, it lacks the capacity for complete denitrification, limiting its anaerobic respiration to partial nitrate reduction without progression to dinitrogen gas.^[26]

Habitat and Ecology

Soil Environment

Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a ubiquitous saprophytic bacterium in soil environments, particularly within the rhizosphere of dicotyledonous plants, where it utilizes organic matter for nutrition. It persists as a free-living organism in the soil and can enter a viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state under nutrient-limiting or stressful conditions, enabling long-term dormancy. Additionally, it survives on plant debris, maintaining viability for months to years in natural settings.^[27]^[28]^[29] Population densities of A. tumefaciens in soil can reach up to 10⁶ cells per gram, especially in areas with prior plant infections or galls. The bacterium shows enhanced persistence in neutral to alkaline soils with pH greater than 6, where survival rates are significantly higher compared to acidic environments.^[30] A. tumefaciens demonstrates robust tolerances to abiotic stresses prevalent in soil. It survives desiccation through exopolysaccharide production and surface attachment, which protect cells from drying. The bacterium is also resilient to UV radiation, aided by soil particulates and inherent repair mechanisms. Temperature tolerance spans 4–40°C, with optimal growth at 22°C, though it remains viable across this range in natural habitats.^[31]^[32] The global distribution of A. tumefaciens is widespread, predominantly in temperate regions, with elevated densities in agricultural soils associated with wounded or susceptible plants. Its prevalence is higher in cultivated areas due to increased opportunities for persistence on crop debris and soil disturbance.^[33]

Interactions with Plants and Microbes

Agrobacterium tumefaciens colonizes the rhizosphere of various plants, where it forms biofilms on root surfaces to establish persistence in this nutrient-rich but competitive environment.^[34] In the rhizosphere, it engages in intense competition with other soil bacteria, such as Pseudomonas species, through mechanisms involving motility, quorum sensing, and biofilm dynamics. For instance, Pseudomonas aeruginosa produces diffusible exoproducts that inhibit A. tumefaciens biofilm formation and disperse pre-existing biofilms, particularly under iron-limited conditions typical of the rhizosphere, thereby enhancing P. aeruginosa's dominance for attachment sites.^[35] Conversely, A. tumefaciens deploys a type VI secretion system (T6SS) equipped with effectors like Tae and Tde to target and kill competitors, including Bacillus subtilis, allowing it to outcompete these Gram-positive bacteria in soil niches.^[36] Beyond pathogenic strains, non-pathogenic relatives such as Agrobacterium radiobacter (now classified as Rhizobium radiobacter) exhibit beneficial interactions with plants by promoting growth and enhancing resistance. These strains colonize plant roots without causing disease, forming aggregates and dense biofilms at root maturation zones, which contribute to increased shoot and root biomass in crops like barley and Arabidopsis.^[37] Certain A. radiobacter isolates also solubilize insoluble phosphates through acid production, making phosphorus more available to plants and thereby supporting improved nutrient uptake and overall growth in mycorrhizal associations.^[38] Additionally, R. radiobacter F4 induces systemic resistance against foliar pathogens, such as powdery mildew in barley, via the jasmonate signaling pathway, independent of its fungal host.^[39] A. tumefaciens influences microbial communities through quorum sensing (QS) mediated by acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs), which it produces as signaling molecules for its own conjugal transfer and virulence regulation. These AHLs, such as 3-oxo-C8-HSL, can participate in interspecies cross-talk in the soil microbiome, potentially altering competitor behaviors by eavesdropping on QS signals to trigger antibiotic production or disrupt community dynamics.^[40] For example, AHLs from A. tumefaciens may activate QS responses in neighboring bacteria, leading to enhanced antagonism or altered biofilm formation among rhizosphere inhabitants.^[41] Furthermore, A. tumefaciens possesses quorum quenching capabilities via the enzyme BlcC, which hydrolyzes its own AHL signals but could indirectly affect competitors by modulating local AHL concentrations in mixed communities.^[42] In soil microbiomes, A. tumefaciens frequently co-occurs with nitrogen-fixing Rhizobium species, facilitating potential horizontal gene transfer (HGT) events that shape microbial evolution. Notably, the Ti plasmid of A. tumefaciens can be transferred ex planta to Rhizobium strains, such as R. leguminosarum, under laboratory conditions mimicking soil conjugation, endowing recipients with virulence traits and demonstrating the plasmid's mobility in natural settings.^[43] Such HGT is widespread among rhizobia and agrobacteria, enabling the exchange of symbiosis and pathogenicity genes within soil bacterial consortia, which may influence nodule formation and plant interactions.^[44] This co-occurrence underscores A. tumefaciens' role in microbial gene pools, potentially contributing to the adaptation of soil bacteria to plant hosts.

Genome and Plasmids

Chromosomal Genome

The chromosomal genome of strain C58 (now classified as Agrobacterium fabrum C58, commonly referred to as A. tumefaciens C58) comprises two replicons: a circular chromosome of 2,841,490 base pairs (bp) and a linear chromosome of 2,075,560 bp, sequenced in 2001 as part of the complete genome assembly.^[45] The circular chromosome encodes 2,789 protein-coding genes, while the linear chromosome contains 1,882 such genes, together providing the core genetic framework for cellular maintenance and basic physiology.^[46] The overall GC content of the chromosomal regions is approximately 58%, reflecting a typical composition for alphaproteobacteria.^[45] Key functional regions on the circular chromosome include genes essential for DNA replication, such as those associated with the origin of replication (oriC) and chromosomal partitioning, ensuring faithful segregation during cell division.^[45] Central metabolism is predominantly housed here, with pathways like glycolysis represented by genes encoding enzymes such as phosphofructokinase (pfkA) and enolase (eno), enabling energy production from carbohydrates in soil environments.^[47] Flagellar biosynthesis genes, organized in flh and fla operons (e.g., flaA, flaB, flgK, and flhA), are also primarily located on the circular chromosome, supporting motility via peritrichous flagella for chemotaxis toward plant wound sites.^[48] The linear chromosome complements these functions, harboring repABC-like genes adapted for its unusual replication and stability, as well as additional metabolic and transport genes.^[45] The chromosomal genome exhibits plasticity, evidenced by 25 insertion sequence (IS) elements distributed across both chromosomes, which facilitate genetic rearrangements and adaptation to varying soil conditions.^[46] Accessory elements include the cryptic plasmid pAtC58, a 542,779 bp replicon with 550 genes, many of unknown function but including a conjugal transfer system that may contribute to horizontal gene transfer without direct ties to virulence.^[45] This multipartite structure underscores the bacterium's evolutionary flexibility while maintaining essential housekeeping capabilities on the chromosomes.^[47]

Ti Plasmid and Virulence Factors

The tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmid is a large, conjugative extrachromosomal element approximately 200 kb in size that carries the genetic determinants essential for the pathogenicity of Agrobacterium tumefaciens.^[49] This plasmid enables the bacterium to incite crown gall tumors in susceptible plants by facilitating the transfer of oncogenic DNA into host cells. Structurally, the Ti plasmid is divided into distinct regions, including the transfer DNA (T-DNA) segment, which spans 20-30 kb and is delimited by 25-bp imperfect direct repeats known as border sequences that define the boundaries for processing and transfer.^[49] Adjacent to the T-DNA lies the virulence (vir) region, encompassing about 35 kb and organized into six major operons (virA, virB, virC, virD, virE, and virG; with virF and virH often absent or non-essential in some strains such as nopaline-type Ti plasmids).^[49]^[50] Central to the Ti plasmid's virulence are the proteins encoded by the vir operons, particularly the VirB1 through VirB11 factors that assemble the type IV secretion system (T4SS), a multiprotein complex responsible for exporting the T-DNA and associated effector proteins across the bacterial membrane.^[49] The VirB operon alone encodes these 11 proteins, forming a pilus-like structure (T-pilus) and channel that is indispensable for DNA transfer into plant cells, with mutations in any VirB component abolishing virulence.^[49] Other vir operons contribute supporting roles, such as VirD proteins for T-DNA border nicking and VirE for protective coating, but the T4SS machinery is the core export apparatus.^[49] Ti plasmids exist in several types distinguished by their specificity for opines—unique amino acid derivatives synthesized by infected plant cells that serve as nutrients for the bacterium. The nopaline-type (nos) Ti plasmids, such as pTiC58, catabolize nopaline, while octopine-type (ocs) plasmids, like pTiA6, utilize octopine; these differences arise from distinct opine biosynthesis and catabolism gene clusters within the T-DNA and adjacent regions.^[51] Succinamopine-type Ti plasmids, exemplified by pTiEU6, are characterized by genes for succinamopine utilization, representing a less common variant with a fully sequenced 235-kb plasmid that includes a 42-kb vir region.^[52] These type-specific opine systems confer ecological advantages by restricting nutrient access to compatible Agrobacterium strains.^[51] The long-term maintenance of the Ti plasmid in A. tumefaciens populations relies on dedicated stability mechanisms, including partitioning genes in the repABC cassette, where repA and repB ensure equitable segregation during cell division, and repC initiates replication at low copy numbers (typically 4-7 per cell) through an oriV origin.^[49] Additionally, addiction systems, such as toxin-antitoxin modules (e.g., the pasT/pasA system in pTiC58), promote plasmid retention by inducing post-segregational killing of cells that lose the plasmid, as the unstable antitoxin degrades faster than the stable toxin.^[49] These features collectively ensure the plasmid's stable inheritance, even under non-pathogenic conditions.^[49]

Genetic Exchange Mechanisms

Agrobacterium tumefaciens facilitates horizontal gene transfer among bacterial populations primarily through conjugation mediated by the tumor-inducing (Ti) plasmid. This process requires direct cell-to-cell contact established via a type IV secretion system (T4SS) encoded by the tra and trb regions of the Ti plasmid. The Tra/Trb T4SS assembles a conjugative pilus composed of TrbC pilin subunits, which bridges donor and recipient cells, enabling the transfer of a single-stranded DNA copy of the Ti plasmid. Central to initiation is the relaxase enzyme TraA, a member of the MOBQ family, which specifically nicks the plasmid at its origin of transfer (oriT) sequence—sharing homology with oriT of the broad-host-range plasmid RSF1010—and remains covalently attached to the 5' end of the transferred strand. The nicked DNA is then processed into a relaxosome complex, recruited to the T4SS channel by the type IV coupling protein (T4CP) TraG, and translocated to the recipient cell, where it circularizes and replicates.^[53] Conjugation in A. tumefaciens is tightly regulated by a quorum-sensing system involving the transcriptional activator TraR and its cognate autoinducer, N-3-oxo-octanoyl-homoserine lactone (3-oxo-C8-HSL), produced by TraI. This system ensures transfer occurs at high cell densities, typically activated by opines—unique carbon-nitrogen compounds secreted by infected plant tumors—that induce tra gene expression and elevate Ti plasmid copy number up to eightfold, thereby enhancing dissemination efficiency. Transfer frequencies for wild-type Ti plasmids reach approximately 10^{-1} to 10^{-2} transconjugants per donor cell under optimal laboratory conditions, reflecting the system's high proficiency compared to many other conjugative plasmids.^[53]^[54] In addition to conjugation, A. tumefaciens is capable of natural transformation, the uptake and incorporation of exogenous linear DNA from the environment, particularly under stressful conditions such as nutrient limitation. Competence for transformation develops without artificial induction, allowing the bacterium to acquire DNA in soil microcosms at frequencies around 10^{-8} to 10^{-9} transformants per recipient cell when exposed to 0.5 μg DNA per gram of sterile soil. The process involves binding and uptake of extracellular DNA through competence-related proteins (encoded by com-like genes), followed by integration into the genome via RecA-mediated homologous recombination, enabling stable acquisition of beneficial traits. These genetic exchange mechanisms play a critical ecological role in soil environments by promoting the spread of Ti plasmids and associated virulence factors within Agrobacterium populations, particularly at plant wound sites where opines accumulate. Conjugation facilitates rapid dissemination of pathogenicity determinants, enhancing collective virulence and adaptation to plant hosts, while natural transformation allows opportunistic incorporation of diverse genetic elements from lysed cells or other microbes, contributing to genomic plasticity and long-term evolutionary success in rhizosphere niches.^[53]

Infection and Virulence Mechanisms

Attachment and T-Pilus Formation

Agrobacterium tumefaciens exhibits motility through a polar flagellar system consisting of 2 to 6 flagella, enabling swimming in aqueous environments toward plant wound sites.^[55] This motility is complemented by chemotaxis, where the bacterium senses and migrates up gradients of phenolic compounds, such as acetosyringone, released from injured plant tissues; this process is mediated by the VirA sensor kinase and ChvE sugar-binding protein, which broaden the phenolic recognition profile. Chemotaxis ensures efficient localization to potential infection sites, with mutants defective in this response showing reduced virulence.^[56] Upon reaching the plant surface, A. tumefaciens initiates stable attachment via the type IV secretion system (T4SS)-encoded T-pilus, a key virulence structure. The T-pilus assembles from VirB2, the major pilin subunit, which undergoes N-terminal processing, cyclization, and polymerization into a flexible, filamentous appendage approximately 10 nm in diameter and extending 1-2 μm from the bacterial cell surface.00456-7) VirB5 localizes to the pilus tip, facilitating specific interactions with host cells, while the pilus structure's positive charges in the lumen support its role in bridging bacteria and plant surfaces.00456-7) T-pilus formation requires induction of the vir regulon by plant-derived signals, as detailed in the regulation of vir genes. Adhesion is further enhanced by the T-pilus binding directly to plant cell wall components, particularly cellulose, establishing initial reversible contact that progresses to irreversible attachment.^[57] Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) on the bacterial outer membrane and exopolysaccharides, such as cyclic β-1,2-glucans and unipolar polysaccharides, contribute to surface hydrophobicity and biofilm formation, stabilizing the bacterium on the host tissue.^[58] These components collectively promote close apposition of bacterial and plant membranes, priming subsequent infection steps.^[17]

T-DNA Transfer Process

The T-DNA transfer process in Agrobacterium tumefaciens initiates within the bacterial cytoplasm through the action of the VirD1 and VirD2 proteins, which form a site-specific endonuclease complex. This complex recognizes the 24–25 bp imperfect direct repeat border sequences flanking the T-DNA on the Ti plasmid and introduces a nick primarily at the bottom strand between nucleotides 3 and 4 of the right border sequence. VirD2, serving as the relaxase, covalently attaches to the 5′ end of the resulting single-stranded T-DNA (T-strand) via a 5′ phosphodiester bond to its conserved tyrosine residue at position 29, protecting this end from exonucleases and marking it for export.^[59]^[60] The T-strand-VirD2 complex is then mobilized and exported across the bacterial and plant cell membranes via the VirB/VirD4 type IV secretion system (T4SS), a multiprotein channel analogous to conjugation machinery in other bacteria. VirD4 acts as a recruitment factor, linking the T-complex to the VirB apparatus at the inner membrane, while VirB proteins (VirB1–11) assemble the translocon, including a pilus-like structure that facilitates docking to the plant cell. This export delivers the T-strand into the plant cytoplasm as a linear, single-stranded molecule, often accompanied by bacterial effector proteins such as VirE2, which is secreted separately and subsequently associates with the T-strand.^[59]^[60] In the plant cell, VirE2 proteins cooperatively coat the unprotected 5′–3′ polarity of the T-strand, forming a mature T-complex that shields the DNA from host nucleases and endows it with a rigid, helical structure conducive to transport. The T-complex traffics to the nucleus through interactions between the bipartite nuclear localization signals (NLS) on VirD2 and VirE2 and host importin α proteins (e.g., AtIMPα), which mediate active transport via the nuclear pore complex; additional plant factors like VIP1 may stabilize this interaction. Once in the nucleus, the VirD2-bound 5′ end directs site-specific integration, while the VirE2-coated 3′ end is displaced.^[59]^[60] Integration of the T-DNA into the plant genome occurs via host DNA repair pathways, predominantly non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) or microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ), often at sites of double-strand breaks and facilitated by polymerase θ (PolQ). The 3′ end of the T-strand is extended by host DNA polymerases using the plant genome as a template, and the ends are ligated, resulting in stable incorporation typically as a single copy with short filler DNA sequences at junctions. The T-pilus from the preceding attachment step ensures proximity for efficient T4SS-mediated delivery. Overall, successful T-DNA transfer and integration achieve relatively low efficiency, with estimates indicating that only approximately 0.1–1% of bacteria at an infection site result in transformed plant cells, reflecting stochastic barriers in export, protection, and repair.

Regulation of Vir Genes

The regulation of virulence (vir) genes in Agrobacterium tumefaciens is primarily controlled by the VirA/VirG two-component signal transduction system, which responds to plant-derived signals to activate the expression of genes essential for pathogenesis.^[61] VirA, a transmembrane histidine kinase, serves as the sensor protein that detects phenolic inducers such as acetosyringone, which are released from wounded plant tissues. Upon binding these inducers, VirA undergoes autophosphorylation at a conserved histidine residue, initiating a phosphate transfer cascade.^[62] This phosphate group is then transferred to an aspartate residue on the VirG response regulator protein, activating its DNA-binding activity.^[63] Phosphorylated VirG functions as a transcriptional activator, binding to vir-box promoter sequences upstream of approximately 11 vir operons on the Ti plasmid to induce their expression.^[50] This activation includes a positive feedback loop, as VirG also upregulates its own transcription, amplifying the regulatory response and ensuring robust vir gene induction during infection.^[64] In the absence of inducers, unphosphorylated VirG exists primarily in a monomeric form, maintaining low basal levels of vir gene expression; phosphorylation promotes dimerization, enabling efficient binding to vir boxes and full transcriptional activation.^[65] Chromosomal loci further modulate vir gene regulation, integrating environmental cues with the VirA/VirG system. The ChvD protein, an ATP-binding cassette transporter homolog, positively influences vir gene expression, potentially by exporting regulatory molecules or maintaining cellular homeostasis. Similarly, ChvE, a periplasmic sugar-binding protein, enhances vir induction in response to plant-derived monosaccharides and contributes to bacterial attachment via cellulose fibril production, thereby linking regulation to host interaction.^[66] Environmental factors such as temperature and pH also fine-tune this process, with optimal vir gene expression occurring at around 22°C and slightly acidic pH (5.5–6.0), conditions mimicking wounded plant wound sites.

Pathogenesis

Disease Symptoms and Crown Gall

Agrobacterium tumefaciens causes crown gall disease, characterized by the formation of tumorous proliferations known as galls, primarily at the crown (the soil line region), roots, or sites of wounding in over 600 species in more than 90 families of eudicots, including economically important plants such as roses (Rosa spp.), grapes (Vitis* vinifera), apples (Malus domestica*), and cherries (Prunus spp.).^[67]^[2] These galls typically appear as hard, woody, irregular masses that range from small nodules to large, lumpy tumors up to several inches in diameter, disrupting the plant's vascular tissue and impeding nutrient and water transport.^[68]^[69] In addition to localized tumor formation, crown gall infection leads to systemic effects, including stunted growth, wilting, chlorosis, reduced vigor, and in severe cases, plant death due to girdling of the vascular system or diversion of resources to the proliferating galls.^[2]^[70] The galls themselves are rough and tumorous, often cracking the bark and providing entry points for secondary pathogens, further exacerbating plant decline.^[71] Histologically, crown galls exhibit unorganized cell division and proliferation in the affected plant tissues, resulting in a disorganized mass of undifferentiated cells due to an imbalance in auxin and cytokinin hormones.^[2] This leads to the characteristic neoplastic growth without normal tissue differentiation, such as vascular elements or organized meristems.^[67] Following infection, a latency period typically ensues, with visible galls emerging 2-4 weeks post-inoculation under favorable conditions like warm soil temperatures above 68°F (20°C), though latent infections can remain symptomless for months or longer before activation by wounding or environmental stress.^[71] Once formed, these galls persist for years, often enlarging over time and rendering the plant chronically susceptible to further disease and stress.^[2]

Role of T-DNA Genes: Hormones and Opines

The transferred DNA (T-DNA) segment of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid contains oncogenes that encode enzymes for synthesizing plant growth hormones, primarily auxins and cytokinins, which disrupt hormonal balance in infected plant cells to promote tumorigenesis. The iaaM gene encodes tryptophan monooxygenase, which converts tryptophan to indole-3-acetamide, while the iaaH gene encodes indoleacetamide hydrolase, which further processes indole-3-acetamide into indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), the main plant auxin. These genes lead to elevated auxin levels that induce cell enlargement and vascular differentiation in transformed cells.^[72] The ipt gene encodes isopentenyl transferase (also known as tmr), which catalyzes the transfer of an isopentenyl group from dimethylallyl pyrophosphate to adenosine monophosphate, forming the cytokinin precursor isopentenyl adenosine-5'-monophosphate and subsequently zeatin-type cytokinins. This results in excessive cytokinin production that stimulates uncontrolled cell division and inhibits root formation, contributing to the undifferentiated, proliferative state of crown gall tumors.^[72] Together, the auxin and cytokinin genes cause a hormonal imbalance that drives neoplastic growth without requiring external hormone supply.^[49] In parallel, T-DNA oncogenes direct the synthesis of opines, specialized amino acid derivatives that serve as exclusive carbon and nitrogen sources for A. tumefaciens, enhancing its persistence in the host environment. The nos gene (nopaline synthase) encodes an enzyme that reductively condenses L-arginine with α-ketoglutarate to produce nopaline, a key opine in nopaline-type Ti plasmids. Similarly, the ocs gene (octopine synthase) catalyzes the condensation of L-arginine with pyruvate to form octopine, and it can also utilize other substrates like ornithine, lysine, or histidine to generate related compounds such as octopinic acid, lysopine, and histopine in octopine-type Ti plasmids. These opines are secreted by transformed plant cells and are catabolized solely by A. tumefaciens through dedicated plasmid loci, such as the noc operon for nopaline or occ operon for octopine, which encode transporters and degradative enzymes. This specificity allows the bacterium to exploit tumor tissues as a nutrient-rich habitat.^[73]^[49] T-DNA composition varies across A. tumefaciens strains, with octopine-type, nopaline-type, and agropine-type variants reflecting adaptations in opine production and virulence. Octopine-type T-DNAs typically include ocs along with genes like mas1 and mas2 for mannopine synthesis, while nopaline-type T-DNAs feature nos and sometimes additional nopalinic acid production. Agropine-type T-DNAs, a subclass often associated with octopine plasmids, encode enzymes for agropine and agropinic acid (via ags genes) in addition to mannopine, and incorporate virulence enhancers such as the 6b oncogene, which encodes a protein that promotes hormone-independent cell proliferation, enlarges tumor size, and facilitates root-like structures in galls. These variants optimize pathogenesis by tailoring opine profiles to strain-specific catabolic capabilities.^[49]^[74] The opine system confers an evolutionary advantage by enabling A. tumefaciens to construct a private nutritional niche within plant tumors, minimizing competition from other soil microbes that lack the corresponding catabolic genes. Opines like nopaline and octopine are produced in high concentrations (up to 200 pmol mg⁻¹ fresh weight in tumors) and serve as inducible energy sources, supporting bacterial growth and conjugation of the Ti plasmid during infection. This niche exclusivity reduces interspecies competition, as evidenced by the inability of non-opine-utilizing bacteria to colonize opine-rich galls, thereby enhancing the pathogen's fitness and long-term survival in the rhizosphere.^[75]^[49]

Disease Cycle and Management

Infection Cycle

Agrobacterium tumefaciens primarily survives in the soil as a saprophytic bacterium, persisting at low densities in bulk soil and higher levels in the rhizosphere of host plants, with long-term viability observed for over 16 years even after removal of infected material. During winter, populations enter a state of dormancy, with pathogenic strains and Ti plasmids dropping below detectable levels (less than 10³ copies per gram of soil), limiting activity in cold conditions. Infections peak in spring, particularly April, when densities can reach 5 × 10⁴ to 10⁶ colony-forming units (CFU) per gram in bulk soil and up to 1.5 × 10⁷ CFU per gram in the rhizosphere, coinciding with increased plant wounding and active growth following winter dormancy.^[27]^[76]^[27] The infection cycle initiates with chemotaxis, where free-swimming A. tumefaciens cells detect and migrate toward wound-released phenolic compounds, such as acetosyringone, from injured plant tissues, guiding the bacteria to susceptible sites like roots or stems. Upon arrival, attachment occurs within hours, mediated by bacterial surface structures including cellulose fibrils, cyclic β-1,2-glucans, and unipolar polysaccharides, which enable stable binding to plant cell walls despite host defenses. This attachment induces virulence gene expression via the VirA/VirG two-component system, which senses the phenolics and activates the transfer of T-DNA from the Ti plasmid.^[1]^[77]^[78]^[79] T-DNA transfer follows rapidly, typically within 24-48 hours of induction, involving excision of a single-stranded T-DNA segment bordered by 25-bp direct repeats, processing by VirD1/VirD2 proteins, coating with protective VirE2, and export through a type IV secretion system (VirB/VirD4) into the plant cell nucleus for integration into the host genome. Over the subsequent weeks, the integrated T-DNA expresses genes for auxin and cytokinin biosynthesis, driving uncontrolled cell proliferation and formation of crown galls—irregular, tumor-like growths at the infection site. Mature galls, developing in days to weeks, synthesize opines (e.g., nopaline or octopine) as exclusive carbon and nitrogen sources, which are released into the surrounding environment to support bacterial proliferation within the gall tissue.^[1]^[77]^[78]^[79]^[80] Bacterial spread remains primarily local, confined to the gall and adjacent tissues, with limited systemic movement within the host plant; however, as galls erode or are damaged, bacteria are shed back into the soil, facilitating re-infection or dissemination via contaminated tools, water, or erosion. In perennial hosts, this cycle repeats annually, with opine utilization and Ti plasmid conjugation enhancing population fitness and persistence during favorable seasons.^[27]^[76]^[81]^[1]

Control and Prevention Strategies

Control and prevention of crown gall disease caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens primarily target the pathogen's dependence on plant wounds for entry and its persistence in soil, integrating multiple approaches to minimize economic losses in crops such as stone fruits, grapes, and ornamentals.^[82] These strategies exploit vulnerabilities in the infection cycle, where the bacterium enters through damaged tissues, to disrupt transmission and establishment.^[83] Cultural methods emphasize reducing opportunities for bacterial entry and spread. Preventing wounds during planting, pruning, or cultivation is essential, as A. tumefaciens requires physical damage to infect host plants; techniques include careful handling of seedlings and avoiding mechanical injury from machinery.^[82] Tool sterilization with 10% bleach or 70% alcohol between uses prevents pathogen dissemination on contaminated equipment, particularly in nurseries and orchards.^[83] Planting resistant rootstocks, such as GF677 or Cadaman AV in stone fruits and peaches, or tolerant grape cultivars like those bred against related Agrobacterium species, significantly lowers disease incidence by limiting gall formation at the graft union.^[84]^[85] Chemical controls are applied prophylactically or curatively but offer limited long-term efficacy due to the soilborne nature of the pathogen. Bactericides such as oxytetracycline (Terramycin), used as a 400 ppm root dip for 30 minutes before planting, effectively suppress A. tumefaciens populations and reduce gall development in crops like pecans and roses.^[86]^[87] Copper-based compounds, including copper sulfate or hydroxide, are sprayed on wounds or galls to disinfect surfaces and inhibit bacterial growth, though penetration into soil or plant tissues is poor, necessitating repeated applications.^[88]^[89] Gall disinfectants, often formulations of copper or antibiotics, are painted directly on emerging tumors to limit bacterial proliferation, but these do not eradicate systemic infections.^[87] Biological controls leverage competitive microorganisms to outcompete or antagonize A. tumefaciens. Non-pathogenic strains of Agrobacterium radiobacter, such as K84 and its transfer-deficient mutant K1026, are applied as root dips or soil inoculants; these produce the antibiotic agrocin 84, which selectively inhibits pathogenic strains while K1026's plasmid interference prevents Ti plasmid transfer, reducing tumorigenesis by over 90% in field trials on stone fruits and ornamentals.^[90]^[91] Bacteriophages, like the lytic phage PAT1 isolated from soil, target A. tumefaciens specifically, lysing cells and preventing gall formation; synergistic application with the antimicrobial peptide Ascaphin-8 has shown up to 85% disease suppression in greenhouse studies on tomatoes and roses since 2024.^[92] Integrated strategies combine these methods for sustainable management, particularly in high-value horticultural systems. Quarantine measures, including certification of pathogen-free nursery stock and restricting movement of infected material, prevent introduction into clean fields, as A. tumefaciens spreads via contaminated tools or propagules.^[93] Soil solarization, covering moist soil with clear plastic for 4-6 weeks in summer, raises temperatures to 45-50°C, reducing A. tumefaciens populations by 70-90% in the top 20 cm and suppressing crown gall incidence in subsequent plantings of cherries and ornamentals.^[94]^[95]

Biotechnological Applications

Plant Genetic Transformation

Agrobacterium tumefaciens has been harnessed for plant genetic transformation by disarming its Ti plasmid, removing oncogenic genes while retaining the machinery for T-DNA transfer. The binary vector system separates the Ti plasmid into two components: a helper plasmid containing the vir region responsible for T-DNA processing and transfer, and a smaller binary plasmid that includes the T-DNA borders flanking the gene of interest. This design, first described in 1983, facilitates easier cloning and manipulation in E. coli before transfer to A. tumefaciens. The T-DNA borders define the transferable segment, ensuring precise integration of the desired DNA into the plant genome without tumor-inducing sequences.^[96] This system enabled the first stable transformations of model plants in the 1980s, such as tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) in 1983 using engineered T-DNA constructs. Arabidopsis thaliana followed in 1986 via root explant transformation, establishing it as a key model for genetic studies. These advancements paved the way for commercial applications, including Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), where the cry1Ac gene for insect resistance was integrated using Agrobacterium-mediated methods, leading to widespread adoption since the mid-1990s. The standard protocol involves co-cultivation of plant explants—such as leaf discs for tobacco or root segments for Arabidopsis—with A. tumefaciens harboring the binary vector. Explants are immersed in a bacterial suspension (optical density ~0.5–1.0 at 600 nm) for 10–30 minutes, then co-cultured on hormone-supplemented media for 2–3 days to allow T-DNA transfer. Transformed cells are selected using antibiotics like kanamycin, which targets a resistance marker (e.g., nptII) within the T-DNA, followed by regeneration into whole plants on selective media.^[97] Transformation efficiency depends on bacterial strain and media additives; for instance, the GV3101 strain, derived from C58 background with disarmed pTiC58, achieves high rates in dicots due to its virulence and antibiotic sensitivities.^[98] Including acetosyringone (typically 100–200 μM) in co-cultivation media induces vir gene expression, significantly boosting T-DNA transfer by mimicking plant wound signals.^[99]

Recent Advances and Synthetic Biology

Recent advances in Agrobacterium tumefaciens have focused on engineering the bacterium to overcome limitations in transformation efficiency, particularly for recalcitrant crops, while expanding its utility in synthetic biology applications. Innovations since 2023 emphasize modular vector systems and genetic modifications to the virulence machinery, enabling more precise and scalable gene delivery. These developments build on the bacterium's natural T-DNA transfer mechanism to facilitate genome editing and multi-gene engineering in plants, with emerging explorations into non-plant hosts.^[100] Ternary vector systems, first developed in the early 2000s and refined in subsequent years (including 2018–2025), represent a key advancement by utilizing three compatible plasmids: a T-DNA binary vector, a virulence (vir) gene helper plasmid, and an additional auxiliary plasmid for enhanced stability and expression. This configuration addresses copy number instability and low vir gene expression in traditional binary systems, achieving up to 5-10-fold higher transformation efficiencies in monocots like maize and rice, which are notoriously difficult to transform. For instance, a ternary system incorporating pGreen3 vectors and a pVS1-based helper, described in 2019, has improved CRISPR/Cas9 delivery in recalcitrant maize lines by stabilizing large constructs and boosting T-DNA transfer rates. These systems are particularly valuable for stacking multiple transgenes, reducing the need for sequential transformations and minimizing off-target integrations.^[101]^[102]^[103] Engineering efforts have targeted overexpression of vir genes to create super-infective strains, dramatically increasing transformation efficiency by 10- to 100-fold in various plant species. In 2024, super-infective ternary vectors were developed by integrating genes for salicylic acid degradation, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) production, and ethylene degradation into the helper plasmid, countering plant defense responses and enhancing infectivity in crops like tomato and wheat. These strains, such as modified LBA4404 derivatives, exhibit elevated VirG and VirE2 expression, leading to higher T-DNA delivery without compromising bacterial viability. Complementing these genetic tweaks, nanomaterials like graphene oxide nanoparticles have been incorporated into delivery protocols to protect T-DNA from degradation and improve bacterial adhesion to plant cells, resulting in 2-3-fold efficiency gains in protoplast and tissue transformations.^[104]^[100]^[102]^[105] In synthetic biology, A. tumefaciens is increasingly positioned as a versatile chassis for assembling and delivering multi-gene cassettes, enabling complex metabolic pathways in plants. Toolkits developed by 2025 include modular expression systems like multiplex expression cassette assembly (MECA), which facilitate the stacking of up to six genes in a single T-DNA for pathway engineering, such as in secondary metabolite production. These approaches leverage the bacterium's type IV secretion system for programmable DNA transfer, with recent protocols optimizing inducible promoters for precise temporal control. While initial demonstrations of human cell transformation occurred in 2001 using HeLa cells, post-2001 efforts have been limited, focusing instead on refining plant-centric applications rather than expanding to mammalian systems.^[4]^[106]^[107] Specific protocols for ornamentals have advanced, as seen in 2025 leaf-cutting transformation methods for jonquil (Narcissus jonquilla), where A. tumefaciens outperformed A. rhizogenes in stable integration rates, achieving over 20% efficiency without tissue culture via detached leaf inoculation. Omics-guided improvements, including dual transcriptomics and metabolomics, have further refined these strains; a 2025 study on Hypericum perforatum co-cultivation revealed how A. tumefaciens reprograms host gene expression for better T-DNA acceptance, informing targeted vir gene edits that enhance compatibility in medicinal plants. These insights from integrated omics data underscore the potential for data-driven strain optimization, promising broader adoption in crop improvement.^[108]^[109]

References

[1]
Agrobacterium tumefaciens: a Transformative Agent for ...
Mar 9, 2023 · Agrobacterium tumefaciens incites the formation of readily visible macroscopic structures known as crown galls on plant tissues that it infects.
[2]
[PDF] Agrobacterium tumefaciens as an agent of disease
tumefaciens has served as a model system for the study of type IV bacterial secretory systems, horizontal gene transfer and bac- terial–plant signal exchange.
[3]
Genome sequence of the plant pathogen and ... - PubMed
Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a plant pathogen capable of transferring a defined segment of DNA to a host plant, generating a gall tumor.
[4]
Agrobacterium tumefaciens: A Bacterium Primed for Synthetic Biology
Agrobacterium tumefaciens is an important tool in plant biotechnology due to its natural ability to transfer DNA into the genomes of host plants.
[5]
Historical account on gaining insights on the mechanism of crown ...
Most cited as allegedly the first to isolate the causal bacterium was Smith and Townsend (1907). The authors named the causal organism Bacterium tumefaciens.
[6]
Judicial Opinions 123–127 - Microbiology Society
Dec 19, 2022 · Opinion 127 grants the request to assign the strain deposited as ATCC 4720 as the type strain of Agrobacterium tumefaciens , thereby correcting ...
[7]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?id=358
[8]
Agrobacterium tumefaciens - GBIF
Classification ; kingdom; Pseudomonadati ; phylum; Pseudomonadota ; class; Alphaproteobacteria ; order; Hyphomicrobiales ; family; Rhizobiaceae ...
[9]
Phylogenetic analysis of the family Rhizobiaceae and ... - PubMed
The three biovars of Agrobacterium were located separately, whereas Agrobacterium rubi clustered with A. tumefaciens. Phylogenetic locations for the species of ...
[10]
Rhizobium meliloti genes required for nodule development ... - PNAS
Rhizobium meliloti genes required for nodule development are related to chromosomal virulence genes in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. T. Dylan, L. Ielpi, S.
[11]
Evaluation of sequence-based tools to gather more insight into the ...
In this study, we evaluated different phylogenetic analysis approaches for their use to improve Agrobacterium taxonomy and tried to gain more insight in the ...
[12]
Modular evolution of secretion systems and virulence plasmids in a ...
Jan 13, 2022 · tumefaciens emerged ~ 48 million years ago (Mya) with a 95 ... Plant-pathogenic Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains have diverse type ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
[13]
Mechanisms and Regulation of Polar Surface Attachment in ... - NIH
Agrobacteria are typically short, motile rod-shaped cells (averaging 0.8 × 2 um) with several flagella localized at and around a single pole of the cell [6].Missing: dimensions | Show results with:dimensions
[14]
Agrobacterium tumefaciens divisome proteins regulate the transition ...
Table 1. Quantitation of cell size and constriction of ftsZ mutants. Average Cell Length (μm +/− SD), Average Cell Area (μm2 +/− SD), Average Constriction ...
[15]
Peptidoglycan and Muropeptides from Pathogens Agrobacterium ...
May 19, 2008 · Peptidoglycan (PGN) is a unique and essential structural part of the bacterial cell wall. PGNs from two contrasting Gram-negative plant ...Article · Results · DiscussionMissing: adhesion | Show results with:adhesion
[16]
(PDF) Plasmid pSa Causes Loss of LPS-mediated Adherence in ...
Sep 7, 2025 · When cured of the pSa plasmid, infectivity and site adherence are restored. This indicates that LPS produced by pSa-containing agrobacteria is ...
[17]
Function and Regulation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens Cell Surface ...
Agrobacterium tumefaciens attaches stably to plant host tissues and abiotic surfaces. During pathogenesis, physical attachment to the site of infection is a ...
[18]
Multiple Flagellin Proteins Have Distinct and Synergistic Roles in ...
Mutational analysis suggested that FlaA along with another secondary flagellin is required to assemble a functional filament and render proficient motility.
[19]
Exopolysaccharides of Agrobacterium tumefaciens - PubMed
Exopolysaccharides are required for bacterial growth as a biofilm and they protect the bacteria against environmental stresses. Five of the exopolysaccharides ...Missing: capsule soil
[20]
Reconstruction and analysis of a genome‐scale metabolic model for ...
Jan 12, 2021 · The genome‐scale metabolic model for Agrobacterium tumefaciens exhibited its physiological features, and metabolic response to its living ...
[21]
UNIT 3D.1 Laboratory Maintenance of Agrobacterium - PMC - NIH
Growth occurs optimally at 28°C. At temperatures above 30°C, A. tumefaciens begins to experience heat shock and is likely to result in errors in cell division ( ...Missing: optimal | Show results with:optimal
[22]
virA and virG are the Ti-plasmid functions required for chemotaxis of ...
virA and virG are thus required for chemotaxis of A. tumefaciens towards acetosyringone. This suggests a multifunctional role for virA and virG: at low ...
[23]
Binding-protein-dependent lactose transport in Agrobacterium ...
Lactose transport and beta-galactosidase were induced in batch cultures by lactose, melibiose [O-alpha-D-galactoside-(1----6)alpha-D-glucose], and isopropyl- ...
[24]
Cytochromes c-556 from three genetic races of Agrobacterium ...
1. The soluble cytochromes c-556 from three strains of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, B6, II Chrys and Apple 185 have been purified to homogeneity.Missing: aerobic respiration
[25]
Transcription and activities of NOx reductases in Agrobacterium ...
Sep 30, 2008 · Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a partial denitrifier as it lacks the genes encoding nitrous oxide reductase (Baek and Shapleigh, 2005; Rodionov et ...
[26]
Seasonal Fluctuations and Long-Term Persistence of Pathogenic ...
Almost all agrobacteria, including both pathogenic and nonpathogenic forms, are able to live as saprophytes in soil by consuming nutrients of soil or plant ...Missing: million | Show results with:million
[27]
The viable but nonculturable state in Agrobacterium tumefaciens ...
We present evidence that Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Rhizobium meliloti can become VBNC in response to inoculation into tap water from a specific source. In ...
[28]
(PDF) Isolation and detection of Agrobacterium tumefaciens from soil
Oct 12, 2017 · Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a rod shaped, flagellated, soil borne pathogen, gram negative bacteria include pathogenic and nonpathogenic strains.
[29]
Friend and/or Foe: Separating Rhizobium and Agrobacterium
Nov 11, 2014 · ... cells per gram of soil having been recorded (Kuykendall et al. 2005). Crown gall caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, copyright Christoph Müller ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[30]
[PDF] Agrobacterium tumefaciens
Agrobacterium tumefaciens. E. Dewars and A.G. Matthysse. Department of Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Methods. Abstract. ○ The ...
[31]
Crops Pathology and Genetics Research - Publication : USDA ARS
... temperature on growth and survival of Agrobacterium tumefaciens were investigated. At temperatures above 37 degrees C and below 15 degrees C in-vitro ...Missing: tolerance | Show results with:tolerance
[32]
Economic Loss from Crown Gall - Bio-Care Technology
Crown gall disease, caused by the soil bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens ... The disease is widely distributed in temperate countries and both pathogenic and ...
[33]
Pathogenic and non‐pathogenic Agrobacterium tumefaciens, A ...
Nov 11, 2010 · This study illustrates that besides A. tumefaciens, strains of the species A. rhizogenes and A. vitis are also able to build biofilms on abiotic as well as on ...Missing: phosphate | Show results with:phosphate
[34]
Inhibition and dispersal of Agrobacterium tumefaciens biofilms by a ...
A compound from Pseudomonas aeruginosa culture fluids disperses and inhibits Agrobacterium tumefaciens biofilms, especially in iron-limited conditions.
[35]
Agrobacterium tumefaciens Deploys a Versatile Antibacterial ... - NIH
Jan 11, 2021 · Proposed antibacterial strategy of A. tumefaciens to compete with bacterial competitors. A. tumefaciens C58 deploys two types of effectors.
[36]
The Abundance of Endofungal Bacterium Rhizobium radiobacter ...
R. radiobacter strain F4 (RrF4), isolated from P. indica DSM 11827, induces growth promotion and systemic resistance in cereal crops, including barley and ...
[37]
Two strains isolated from tumours of Prunus persica are able to ...
In this work, we have tested the ability to solubilize phosphate of the type strains of Agrobacterium species and that of several isolates from tumours of ...<|separator|>
[38]
(PDF) Non-pathogenic Rhizobium radiobacter F4 deploys plant ...
Aug 7, 2025 · RrF4-colonized plants show increased biomass and enhanced resistance against bacterial leaf pathogens. Mutational analysis showed that, similar ...
[39]
Production of Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Quorum-Sensing Signals ...
We evaluated four acyl-HSL bioreporters, based on tra of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, lux of Vibrio fischeri, las of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and pigment ...<|separator|>
[40]
Acyl-homoserine lactone-dependent eavesdropping promotes ...
Jul 5, 2012 · Many Proteobacteria use acyl-homoserine lactone (AHL)-mediated quorum sensing to activate the production of antibiotics at high cell density ...Bacterial Strains And Growth · Results · Quorum Sensing Can Promote...
[41]
Quorum Quenching in Agrobacterium tumefaciens: Chance or ... - NIH
In the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens, an enzyme (BlcC) that destroys the bacterium's QS signal has been recently described.
[42]
Transfer of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens TI Plasmid to Avirulent ...
Summary: A mutant of A. tumefaciens strain B6S3, carrying the R factor RP4, was able to transfer its TI plasmid to various avirulent Agrobacterium strains ...
[43]
Horizontal Transfer of Symbiosis Genes within and Between ...
Horizontal transfer of symbiosis genes between rhizobial strains is of common occurrence, is widespread geographically, is not restricted to specific rhizobial ...
[44]
Science | AAAS
Insufficient relevant content. The provided URL (https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1066811) leads to a "Page not found" error, indicating the page is inaccessible or does not exist. No details on the chromosomal genome of *Agrobacterium tumefaciens* C58, such as chromosome sizes, gene numbers, GC content, or functional regions, are available from the content.
[45]
[PDF] The Genome of the Natural Genetic Engineer Agrobacterium ...
The 5.67-megabase genome of the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 consists of a circular chromosome, a linear chromosome, and two plasmids. ...
[46]
Reconciliation of Sequence Data and Updated Annotation of the ...
Feb 4, 2013 · Two groups independently sequenced the Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58 genome in 2001. We report here consolidation of these sequences ...
[47]
Agrobacterium tumefaciens possesses a fourth flagelin gene located ...
Agrobacterium tumefaciens possesses a fourth flagelin gene located in a large gene cluster concerned with flagellar structure, assembly and motility.Missing: C58 biosynthesis
[48]
The Agrobacterium Ti Plasmids - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a plant pathogen with the capacity to deliver a segment of oncogenic DNA carried on a large plasmid called the tumor-inducing or Ti ...
[49]
[PDF] Fundamentals of Agrobacterium and its applications in plant ...
Most Ti/Ri plasmids contain opine utilization genes (octopine, nopaline, mannopine, agropine, agrocinopine, succinamopine, etc.). Ti plasmids used to be ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[50]
Complete Sequence of Succinamopine Ti-Plasmid pTiEU6 Reveals ...
Sep 1, 2019 · Agrobacterium tumefaciens is the etiological agent of plant crown gall disease, which is induced by the delivery of a set of oncogenic genes ...
[51]
https://plantgene.sivb.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/PlantGENE_StanGelvin.pdf
[52]
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31386108/
[53]
Motility and Chemotaxis in Agrobacterium tumefaciens Surface ... - NIH
The biofilm-forming plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens drives swimming motility by utilizing a small group of flagella localized to a single pole or the ...Missing: peritrichous | Show results with:peritrichous
[54]
Chemotaxis, induced gene expression and competitiveness in the ...
Chemotaxis to inducer phenolics is selectively reduced or abolished by mutations in certain nod genes governing nodulation efficiency or host specificity.
[55]
Attachment of Agrobacterium to plant surfaces - Frontiers
Jun 4, 2014 · Agrobacterium tumefaciens binds to the surfaces of inanimate objects, plants, and fungi. These bacteria are excellent colonizers of root surfaces.Missing: peptidoglycan | Show results with:peptidoglycan
[56]
Pathways of DNA Transfer to Plants from Agrobacterium ...
Aug 25, 2019 · Transfer of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid to avirulent agrobacteria and to Rhizobium ex planta. J. Gen. Microbiol 98:477–84.
[57]
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2014.00252/full
[58]
https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-phyto-082718-100101
[59]
virA and virG control the plant-induced activation of the T-DNA ...
We show that the pTiA6 vir loci are organized as a single regulon whose induction by plants is controlled by virA and virG.Missing: seminal paper
[60]
Phosphorylation of the VirG protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens by ...
Agrobacterium tumefaciens virulence genes are induced by plant signals through the VirA-VirG two- component regulatory system. The VirA protein is a ...
[61]
Phosphorylation of the VirG protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens by ...
In this report, we demonstrate that the VirG protein is phosphorylated by the VirA protein and that the phosphate is directly transferred from the ...
[62]
Agrobacterium tumefaciens responses to plant-derived signaling ...
Jul 7, 2014 · Vir genes are directly involved in T-DNA cleavage from the Ti plasmid, T-DNA processing, transferring and integration into plant nuclei, ...
[63]
virG, an Agrobacterium tumefaciens transcriptional activator, initiates ...
The Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid virG locus, in conjunction with virA and acetosyringone, activates transcription of the virulence (vir) genes.Missing: Stachel seminal paper
[64]
Constitutive Activation of Two-Component Response Regulators
Phosphorylation of VirG is thought to induce dimerization and vir box binding to activate the expression of the virulence (vir) genes. Finally, VirG shares ...
[65]
The Agrobacterium tumefaciens virulence gene chvE is part of ... - NIH
The Agrobacterium tumefaciens virulence determinant ChvE is a periplasmic binding protein which participates in chemotaxis and virulence gene induction.
[66]
Crown gall - American Phytopathological Society
Jan 1, 2002 · DISEASE: Crown gall. PATHOGEN: Agrobacterium tumefaciens. HOSTS: Members of 93 families of plants. Author Clarence I. Kado
[67]
[PDF] Crown Gall - Plant Pathology
Symptoms. Gall Formation. Crown gall is most readily identified by the lumpy, rough tumors that form on roots, lower stems, and lower branches (Figure 2).Missing: latency | Show results with:latency
[68]
https://plantpathology.mgcafe.uky.edu/files/ppfs-gen-01.pdf
[69]
(PDF) Crown gall (Agrobacterium spp.) and grapevine - ResearchGate
Feb 18, 2019 · Galls on roots, trunks and cordons can disrupt the vine's vascular tissues, and severe infections may result in yield reductions or vine death.Missing: histology latency
[70]
Crown Gall Disease of Nursery Crops
Latent infections are symptomless and usually occur when soils are cool. Gall symptoms typically develop at the infected wound the following season; on rare ...Missing: histology period
[71]
Regulation of Oncogene Expression in T-DNA-Transformed Host ...
Jan 23, 2015 · These genes are transferred by the T-DNA of the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens and include the oncogenes IaaH, IaaM and Ipt, which, ...
[72]
Structural basis for high specificity of octopine binding in the plant ...
Dec 21, 2017 · ... pH 7) supplemented with ammonium chloride (NH4Cl, 1 g/L) and ... Agrobacterium tumefaciens can obtain sulphur from an opine that is ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[73]
Co‐transformation using T‐DNA genes from Agrobacterium strain ...
Jun 16, 2025 · Further mutational analysis of each gene identified 6b, in combination with iaaH, iaaM and ipt, as the major factor required for non‐cell ...
[74]
Fitness costs restrict niche expansion by generalist niche ...
Nov 1, 2016 · The opine niches are constructed in the plant tumor cells through the expression of the opine synthase genes nos and ocs encoded by the T-DNA.
[75]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5270578/
[76]
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.7.3358-3365.2002
[77]
(PDF) Agrobacterium tumefaciens: Biology and application in ...
Jul 22, 2024 · This review delves into the intricate biological interactions between A. tumefaciens and plant cells, including the critical steps of bacterial ...
[78]
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382747256_Agrobacterium_tumefaciens_Biology_and_application_in_genetic_engineering
[79]
Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation: biology and ...
Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a soil phytopathogen that naturally infects plant wound sites and causes crown gall disease via delivery of transferred (T)-DNA ...Missing: enhancers | Show results with:enhancers
[80]
None
### Life Cycle Phases of Agrobacterium tumefaciens
[81]
Crown gall on walnuts: assessing origin of infection, disease ...
Dec 13, 2018 · The infection process. Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a soilborne pathogen that requires a wound to infect plants. The bacterium survives in soil ...
[82]
Crown Gall / Floriculture and Ornamental Nurseries / Agriculture
The bacterium Agrobacterium tumefaciens is common in many agricultural soils. When the plant is wounded, the bacterium attaches to an exposed plant cell and ...
[83]
Management strategies and resistance of almond rootstocks against ...
Oct 21, 2025 · Crown gall, caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, is a persistent challenge to almond (Prunus dulcis) cultivation, threatening orchard ...
[84]
[PDF] Midwest Grape Production Guide - Plant Pathology
There are no current chemical or biological control recommendations for crown gall on grapes. Use of Resistant Cultivars for Grape Disease Management. In an ...
[85]
[PDF] Four Bactericides Tested for Crown Gall Control, Vol.7, Issue 4
Control provided Treatments with Terramycin (400 ppm active material for 30 minutes or 800 ppm active for 10 minutes) have provided good control for crown gall ...Missing: streptomycin disinfectants
[86]
Evaluation of Chemical and Biological Products for Control of Crown ...
Aug 21, 2024 · The findings of this study indicate that the use of biological and chemical products could help to suppress crown and root gall disease in rose plants.Missing: streptomycin disinfectants<|separator|>
[87]
Transmission and Management of Pathogenic Agrobacterium ...
Jan 3, 2024 · Copper-based bactericides are often used on plants in an attempt to prevent further disease once detected. However, there is no evidence to ...
[88]
Effect of certain chemicals on the vitro growth of Agrobacterium ...
Chlorthion, Copper sulphate and 2,4-Xylenol at effective concentrations selectively destroy the crown gall tumours without affecting contiguous healthy tissues.
[89]
Biological Control of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Colonization ... - NIH
Both strains K84 and K1026 were very efficient in controlling the sensitive strains, but some tumors appeared with both treatments. In the biocontrol of ...Missing: pathogenic interference
[90]
Biological Control of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Colonization, and ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Both strains K84 and K1026 were very efficient in controlling the sensitive strains, but some tumors appeared with both treatments. In the ...
[91]
Synergistic Biocontrol of Agrobacterium tumefaciens by Phage PAT1 ...
Sep 25, 2025 · Agrobacterium tumefaciens (A. tumefaciens) is a globally significant bacterial plant pathogen responsible for crown gall disease in nearly 600 ...
[92]
preventing and limiting the spread of crown gall in vineyards
Crown gall, caused by Agrobacterium vitis and A. tumefaciens, severely impacts grapevine yield. Preventive measures include using healthy planting material and ...Missing: sterilization | Show results with:sterilization
[93]
Integration of soil solarization and potential native antagonist for the ...
Among all the diseases affecting cherry, crown gall disease caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Smith and Townsend) Conn. is the main limiting factor in ...
[94]
Effect of soil solarization on total Agrobacterium spp. population ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Effect of soil solarization on total Agrobacterium spp. population, inoculated Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and on the development of crown gall.
[95]
Efficient CRISPR-mediated base editing in Agrobacterium spp. - PNAS
Dec 28, 2020 · We developed a CRISPR-mediated base-editing approach to efficiently modify the genome of Agrobacterium. We show that single-nucleotide changes can be ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[96]
T-DNA Binary Vectors and Systems - PMC - NIH
This binary system permitted facile manipulation of Agrobacterium and opened up the field of plant genetic engineering to numerous laboratories. In this review, ...
[97]
A Simple and General Method for Transferring Genes into Plants
Transformed petunia, tobacco, and tomato plants have been produced by means of a novel leaf disk transformation-regeneration method.
[98]
Evaluation of four Agrobacterium tumefaciens strains for the genetic ...
Oct 26, 2012 · The highest transformation rate (65 %) was obtained with the Agrobacterium strain GV3101, followed by EHA105 (40 %), AGL1 (35 %), and MP90 (15 %).
[99]
Acetosyringone promotes high efficiency transformation of ...
The rate of transformation ranged from 55 to 63 percent when acetosyringone (AS), a natural wound response molecule, was added to an Agrobacterium tumefaciens ...
[100]
Engineering Agrobacterium for improved plant transformation - PMC
Mar 6, 2025 · ... cytokinin and auxin‐producing genes found in many Ti plasmids. iaaH and iaaM are two genes that influence auxin biosynthesis; together they ...Mining Agrobacterium... · Genetic Alterations To... · Agrobacterium T‐dna Genes...
[101]
Empowering Agrobacterium: Ternary vector systems as a new ...
This Ti (Tumor-inducing) plasmid of A. tumefaciens is a complex genetic structure crucial for plant transformation. It contains virulence genes related to plant ...3.1. Historical Development... · 5. Ternary Vector System... · 5.1. Structure And Rationale...
[102]
Enhancing Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation ... - Frontiers
Jul 22, 2024 · Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is an essential tool for functional genomics studies and crop improvements. Recently developed ternary ...
[103]
Novel Ternary Vector System United with Morphogenic Genes ...
The novel ternary vector system, using pGreen3 vectors and a pVS1-based helper plasmid, enhances CRISPR/Cas delivery in maize, especially in recalcitrant lines.Abstract · RESULTS · DISCUSSION · MATERIALS AND METHODS
[104]
Development of super-infective ternary vector systems for enhancing ...
The ChvG/ChvI two-component system further plays a crucial role in activating additional Vir genes [12, 13], enhancing the Agrobacterium's ability to interact ...
[105]
Application of graphene oxide in Agrobacterium-mediated genetic ...
Feb 14, 2025 · The purpose of this study was to improve the efficiency of genetic transformation by constructing a delivery system based on GO.
[106]
[PDF] AGROBACTERIUM 2025 - KU Leuven
Sep 15, 2025 · I will present how development of a synthetic biology toolkit in Agrobacterium may offer new ways to dissect and rebuild the core virulence ...
[107]
Multiplex Expression Cassette Assembly: A flexible and versatile ...
Aug 23, 2024 · MECA is a flexible, efficient and versatile method for building complex genetic circuits, which will not only play a critical role in plant synthetic biology.
[108]
Stable transformation mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens in ...
Jun 25, 2025 · We report a simple leaf-cutting-transformation (LCT) method without aseptic operation using Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation with detached leaves.
[109]
Dual omics comparison: how Agrobacterium tumefaciens and ...
Oct 24, 2025 · Transcriptome profiling revealed extensive reprogramming of gene expression in response to both Agrobacterium strains. Core genes for signal ...