Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Chromosome conformation capture

Chromosome conformation capture (3C) is a molecular biology technique designed to map the three-dimensional (3D) organization of chromosomes within the nucleus by quantifying the frequency of physical interactions between specific genomic loci. Introduced in 2002, the method relies on formaldehyde crosslinking of chromatin to preserve spatial proximities, followed by restriction enzyme digestion, intramolecular ligation of nearby fragments, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification to detect and measure interaction frequencies, thereby generating a contact matrix that reveals chromatin folding patterns.^[1] Subsequent advancements have expanded 3C into a family of high-throughput variants, including 4C (circular chromosome conformation capture), which profiles interactions from a single bait locus to all others genome-wide; 5C (carbon copy chromosome conformation capture), enabling multiplexed analysis of interactions among multiple predefined loci; and Hi-C, a genome-wide all-to-all interaction mapping approach that uses deep sequencing to produce comprehensive contact maps at kilobase resolution or better.^[2] These methods have evolved to incorporate nucleosome-level resolution (e.g., Micro-C using micrococcal nuclease) and multiway interaction capture, addressing limitations like enzymatic biases and noise in earlier protocols.^[3] The primary applications of 3C-based techniques lie in elucidating how chromatin architecture influences gene regulation, revealing structures such as topologically associating domains (TADs), enhancer-promoter loops, and A/B compartments that segregate active and inactive genomic regions.^[2] Disruptions in these 3D configurations, often detected via Hi-C, are implicated in developmental disorders, cancers, and other diseases by altering long-range regulatory interactions.^[3] By integrating with complementary approaches like imaging and multi-omics, 3C methods continue to provide insights into dynamic chromatin changes during processes such as cell differentiation and meiosis, underscoring the functional importance of spatial genome organization.^[1]

Fundamentals

Chromatin organization basics

Chromatin consists of DNA packaged with histone and non-histone proteins into a hierarchical structure that compacts the genome while allowing access for cellular processes. The fundamental unit is the nucleosome, formed by approximately 147 base pairs of DNA wrapped around an octamer of core histone proteins (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4), with linker DNA connecting adjacent nucleosomes and often bound by histone H1.^[4] These nucleosomes further fold into higher-order structures, including chromatin loops, topologically associating domains (TADs), and large-scale compartments (A and B). TADs are megabase-scale regions of frequent self-interaction, typically spanning 100 kilobases to 1 megabase, that insulate regulatory interactions and are stabilized by proteins like CTCF and cohesin. A compartments represent transcriptionally active, gene-rich euchromatin, while B compartments correspond to inactive, gene-poor heterochromatic regions.^[5] The three-dimensional (3D) organization of chromatin within the nucleus is essential for regulating key genomic functions, including transcription, DNA replication, and repair. Spatial proximity enables long-range interactions, such as enhancer-promoter looping, which can span distances up to several megabases and facilitate precise gene activation by bringing distant regulatory elements into contact. This architecture also influences replication timing, with early-replicating domains often enriched in open chromatin, and supports efficient DNA repair by clustering damage sites or juxtaposing repair factors. Disruptions in 3D structure, such as altered looping, have been linked to dysregulation of these processes, underscoring its functional significance. Individual chromosomes occupy distinct territories in the interphase nucleus, a non-random radial arrangement first visualized through fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) microscopy in the 1980s. Pioneering studies by Thomas Cremer and colleagues demonstrated that human chromosomes maintain separate territories, with gene-poor regions positioned toward the nuclear periphery and gene-rich regions more centrally, influencing transcriptional activity. This territorial organization, building on earlier Rabl and Boveri models from the late 19th century, laid the groundwork for molecular investigations into how chromatin folding modulates genome function. Techniques such as chromosome conformation capture have since enabled quantitative mapping of these spatial interactions at high resolution.

Principles of 3C technology

Chromosome conformation capture (3C) technology relies on the biochemical preservation of spatial interactions within the chromatin fiber to infer three-dimensional genome organization. The method captures pairwise interactions between genomic loci by fixing proteins and DNA in their in vivo configurations, followed by enzymatic processing to generate quantifiable ligation products. This approach assumes that the frequency of detected interactions corresponds to the likelihood of physical proximity in the nucleus, enabling quantitative mapping of chromatin contacts.^[1] The molecular mechanism begins with formaldehyde crosslinking, which covalently links proteins to DNA and proteins to each other, stabilizing transient chromatin interactions. Typically, cells are treated with 1-2% formaldehyde for 10 minutes at room temperature to achieve efficient fixation without excessive damage to DNA structure; this concentration and duration balance crosslinking yield with downstream enzymatic accessibility.^[6] The crosslinked chromatin is then lysed, and a restriction enzyme, such as HindIII, which recognizes 4-6 base pair sequences, is used to digest the DNA into fragments. Digestion occurs under conditions that ensure complete cleavage, often overnight at 37°C, generating sticky ends at restriction sites.^[6] Subsequently, under dilute conditions to favor intramolecular ligation, the ends of nearby fragments—brought into proximity by crosslinking—are joined by DNA ligase, forming chimeric DNA molecules that join sequences originally distant in the linear genome but close in three-dimensional space. Finally, crosslinks are reversed through proteinase K digestion and heat treatment (e.g., 65°C for several hours), purifying the ligation products for analysis, typically by PCR to quantify specific junctions.^[1]^[6] A central principle of 3C is that the frequency of ligation products between two loci directly reflects their spatial proximity in vivo, as crosslinking probability increases with physical closeness, and ligation efficiency is enhanced for juxtaposed fragments.^[1] This frequency decays with genomic distance s along the chromosome, often following a power-law relationship in polymer models of chromatin, where the interaction probability P(s) scales as s^{-1}, indicating a basic decay consistent with random coil or equilibrium globule configurations.^[7]

P(s) \propto s^{-1}

Historical Development

Invention of 3C

Chromosome conformation capture (3C) was developed by Job Dekker, Karsten Rippe, Martijn Dekker, and Nancy Kleckner in 2002 while working in Nancy Kleckner's laboratory at Harvard University. The method was introduced in a seminal paper published in Science, where it was applied to investigate long-range chromatin interactions at the yeast mating-type switching locus on chromosome III.^[1] This locus was chosen to explore spatial organization during meiosis, revealing how distant genomic regions come into proximity to facilitate double-strand break formation and recombination. The technique's core innovation involved formaldehyde crosslinking to preserve transient chromatin contacts in intact nuclei, followed by restriction digestion, ligation, and PCR-based detection of proximity events. The development of 3C was motivated by the limitations of prior methods like fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), which provided qualitative snapshots of chromatin conformation in individual cells but struggled to quantify average interaction frequencies across cell populations. FISH, while valuable for visualizing spatial arrangements, was low-throughput and prone to variability due to its reliance on fixed cell imaging, making it inadequate for statistical analysis of dynamic, long-range interactions. 3C addressed these challenges by enabling quantitative measurement of interaction frequencies between specific loci in large populations of cells, offering a population-averaged view of chromatin architecture that was both reproducible and scalable for targeted studies. This approach thus provided a biochemical means to infer three-dimensional folding from ligation efficiencies, where higher contact frequencies indicated closer spatial proximity. A key application of 3C shortly after its invention demonstrated enhancer-promoter looping at the murine β-globin locus, as reported by Tolhuis et al. in late 2002. Using 3C, they showed frequent interactions between the locus control region (an enhancer) and the β-major globin promoter in erythroid cells, confirming a looping model for transcriptional activation that brought regulatory elements into close contact despite their linear separation.^[8] This finding validated 3C's utility in mammalian systems and highlighted its ability to capture functional chromatin loops driving gene expression. The "one-vs-one" design of 3C distinguished it as a targeted method, employing custom PCR primers to query interactions between two predefined genomic regions of interest, rather than surveying the entire genome. This focused strategy allowed precise quantification of specific contacts, such as those between regulatory elements, while minimizing bias from unbiased sequencing approaches that would emerge later. By normalizing interaction frequencies against a control locus, 3C provided reliable data on relative proximities, establishing a foundation for understanding how chromatin folding influences nuclear processes like gene regulation and DNA repair.

Progression to genome-wide methods

Following the invention of chromosome conformation capture (3C), which focused on targeted pairwise interactions, subsequent methods expanded to genome-wide scales by increasing throughput and reducing bias. In 2006, the 4C technique was developed to profile interactions between one specific genomic locus and all others across the genome, employing circularization of ligation products followed by inverse PCR amplification for unbiased detection.^[9] Also in 2006, the 5C method enabled mapping of interactions between large sets of predefined genomic regions (many-versus-many), utilizing ligation-mediated amplification of multiplexed primers for high-throughput analysis via microarrays or sequencing.^[10] A pivotal advancement occurred in 2009 with the introduction of Hi-C, which achieved comprehensive all-versus-all contact profiling across the entire genome through proximity-based ligation of crosslinked fragments, followed by adaptor attachment and massively parallel sequencing on Illumina platforms.^[11] This approach generated the first genome-wide chromatin contact maps in human and mouse cell lines, revealing plaid-like patterns that signified large-scale chromatin compartments characterized by self-associating active and inactive domains. The transition from PCR-centric detection in 4C and 5C to biotinylated adaptor ligation and deep sequencing in Hi-C marked a key innovation, dramatically improving scalability and enabling unbiased capture of billions of interactions without prior locus selection. Building on these foundations, the 2010s saw Hi-C evolve further through refined data analysis, culminating in the identification of topologically associating domains (TADs) as stable, megabase-scale chromatin units with enriched intra-domain contacts, first systematically characterized in mammalian genomes in 2012.^[12]

Standard Methods

3C, 4C, and 5C

The chromosome conformation capture (3C) method captures pairwise interactions between specific genomic loci through a series of biochemical steps that preserve and detect spatial proximity. Cells or nuclei are first fixed with 1-2% formaldehyde for 5-10 minutes at room temperature to covalently cross-link proteins to DNA, stabilizing chromatin interactions in their native three-dimensional configuration.^[13] The cross-linked chromatin is then permeabilized and digested overnight with a restriction enzyme, typically a 6-cutter such as HindIII or a 4-cutter like MboI for finer resolution, generating sticky-end fragments averaging 1-4 kb in length.^[13] To promote ligation of spatially proximal fragments, the ends are filled in with dNTPs and Klenow polymerase to create blunt ends, followed by intra-molecular ligation under highly dilute conditions (e.g., 10-20 ng/μL DNA) using T4 DNA ligase at 16°C overnight, favoring chimeric molecule formation over random intermolecular joins.^[13] Cross-links are reversed by proteinase K digestion at 65°C, and the DNA is purified via phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation, yielding a 3C library enriched for ligation junctions. Specific interactions are quantified using TaqMan quantitative PCR with primers flanking the expected ligation sites for each locus pair, where signal intensity reflects interaction frequency normalized against a control such as the BAC clone containing both loci.^[13] Building on 3C, the 4C (circular chromosome conformation capture) method enables unbiased genome-wide profiling of all interactions involving a single "viewpoint" locus, revealing its contact landscape. The protocol initiates with the core 3C steps—formaldehyde fixation, primary restriction digestion (e.g., with HindIII), and blunt-end ligation under dilute conditions—to generate the initial interaction library.^[14] A secondary digestion is then performed with a frequent-cutting enzyme like DpnII (4-cutter, ~256 bp fragments) to trim ligated products into smaller pieces, followed by a second ligation step that circularizes these fragments at low DNA concentration (~0.3 ng/μL), enriching for closed loops containing the viewpoint.^[14] Inverse PCR amplification is carried out from the viewpoint using one primer internal to the viewpoint fragment (facing outward toward potential partners) and a second primer in the adjacent known sequence, producing linear fragments of all interacting regions. Amplified products are labeled (e.g., with Cy5) and hybridized to genome-wide microarrays or, in later variants, deep-sequenced to map contacts at ~1 kb resolution, with normalization to random ligation controls.^[14] The 5C (chromosome conformation capture carbon copy) technique scales up to multiplexed detection of interactions among hundreds to thousands of predefined fragments within targeted genomic regions, such as multi-megabase domains. It starts with 3C library preparation, using formaldehyde cross-linking of 10^7-10^8 cells, digestion preferably with a 4-cutter enzyme like NlaIII for ~300 bp fragments to enhance resolution, and blunt-end ligation in dilute solution to capture proximities. Pooled bait-prey primer sets (e.g., 300-500 pairs) are designed with universal tails: bait primers (forward, T7-tailed) anneal to one end of target fragments, and phosphorylated prey primers (reverse, T3-tailed) to the opposite ends of potential partners, at concentrations of 2-5 nM each. These are hybridized to 1-5 μg of 3C DNA at 48°C overnight, then ligated with Taq DNA ligase to create specific nested products only for true interactions. Universal-tailed PCR (30-35 cycles) pools and amplifies all ligation products in 96- or 384-well format, followed by pooling, purification, and quantification via custom microarrays (probing ~40-mer sequences) or 454 sequencing (~10^5 reads per library), enabling interaction matrices with sub-kb precision. These targeted methods—3C for pairwise queries, 4C for one-to-all scans, and 5C for many-to-many networks—provide ~1 kb resolution dictated by restriction fragment sizes, making them ideal for hypothesis-driven investigations of specific regulatory elements or domains rather than unbiased genome-wide mapping.^[15] Experiments typically start with 10^7 cells and yield 10^6-10^7 unique chimeric molecules post-ligation, sufficient for thousands of PCR reactions or array hybridizations while minimizing background noise from random ligations.^[2]

Hi-C protocol

The Hi-C protocol, introduced in 2009, enables genome-wide, unbiased detection of chromatin interactions by adapting chromosome conformation capture principles to high-throughput sequencing, producing comprehensive maps of pairwise contacts across the entire genome.^[11] This method builds briefly on prior targeted approaches like 3C, 4C, and 5C by scaling to all-vs-all interactions without predefined bait regions.^[11] It typically requires approximately 10^7 cells for standard applications in mammalian systems, though optimizations allow scaling to fewer cells for specific uses.^[16] The workflow emphasizes proximity-based ligation under dilute conditions to minimize artifacts such as random collisions or unligated fragments.^[11] The protocol commences with formaldehyde crosslinking of intact cells to preserve three-dimensional chromatin structure, typically at 1-2% formaldehyde for 10 minutes at room temperature, followed by quenching with glycine.^[16] Cells are lysed in a buffer containing detergents like Igepal CA-630 or NP-40, and nuclei are isolated by centrifugation. The chromatin is then digested overnight at 37°C with a restriction enzyme; the original protocol used HindIII (a 6-bp cutter producing fragments averaging several kb), while later optimizations employ 4-bp cutters such as DpnII (GATC) or MboI for denser fragmentation and higher resolution of ~1-5 kb.^[11]^[17] Digestion efficiency is verified by agarose gel electrophoresis, aiming for near-complete cleavage to avoid uncut DNA artifacts.^[16] Post-digestion, the overhangs are filled in with biotin-14-dCTP (along with dATP, dGTP, and dTTP) using Klenow fragment DNA polymerase I at 37°C for 45 minutes, incorporating biotin specifically at ligation junctions for subsequent enrichment.^[16] The ends are blunted if necessary, and proximity ligation is performed under highly dilute conditions (e.g., ~1-5 nM DNA concentration) with T4 DNA ligase at 16°C for 4-6 hours, promoting intramolecular joins between spatially close fragments while suppressing random intermolecular ligations that could introduce noise from unligated or uncut DNA.^[11]^[16] Crosslinks are reversed by proteinase K digestion at 65°C overnight, followed by DNA purification via phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. The purified DNA is sheared to 300-500 bp fragments using sonication (e.g., via Covaris), then end-repaired, A-tailed, and size-selected on agarose gels to enrich for ligated products.^[16] Biotinylated junctions are captured on streptavidin beads, washed stringently, and the bound DNA is adapter-ligated for library preparation before PCR amplification (typically 10-15 cycles to avoid bias). Paired-end sequencing on platforms like Illumina is performed, with a depth of 100-400 million reads recommended for mammalian genomes to achieve sufficient coverage for population-level contact maps at megabase to kilobase resolutions.^[17] Common troubleshooting focuses on restriction fragment biases, where varying enzyme efficiencies due to sequence context (e.g., GC content or methylation) can skew contact frequencies; this is mitigated by using methylation-insensitive enzymes like DpnII and confirming uniform digestion via quality control assays such as PCR across multiple loci.^[17] Dilution during ligation remains essential to control artifacts from uncut or undigested DNA, with ligation efficiency assessed by gel analysis showing a shift to higher-molecular-weight bands.^[11]

Advanced Variants

Single-cell and low-input techniques

Single-cell and low-input techniques in chromosome conformation capture address the limitations of bulk methods by enabling analysis of chromatin interactions in individual cells or small numbers of starting cells, thereby uncovering cell-to-cell heterogeneity that is averaged out in population-level data. These adaptations are essential for studying dynamic processes in heterogeneous tissues, such as embryonic development, where cell states vary significantly. By reducing input requirements to as few as one cell, these methods facilitate high-resolution profiling in rare or precious samples without the need for millions of cells typical in standard Hi-C protocols.^[18] A foundational method is single-cell Hi-C (scHi-C), introduced in 2013, which applies combinatorial indexing to generate sparse contact maps from individual mammalian cells. This technique builds on Hi-C by processing single nuclei to capture long-range interactions while assigning unique barcodes to each cell for demultiplexing. Another key approach is Dip-C, a single-cell conformation capture method that integrates transposon-based amplification to reconstruct diploid 3D genome structures with haplotype resolution, applied to human cells to reveal stochastic folding patterns.^[18]^[19] Protocol highlights include microfluidics-based isolation of individual nuclei to ensure high purity and viability, followed by in situ chromatin digestion and ligation under dilute conditions to favor intra-molecular contacts. Split-pool barcoding then enables multiplexing, with methods like sciHi-C allowing simultaneous processing of up to 10,000 cells through iterative rounds of combinatorial labeling, substantially increasing throughput compared to early scHi-C implementations that handled dozens of cells. Biotin enrichment and paired-end sequencing follow to recover ligation products, though overall recovery remains challenging due to the sparsity of single-cell data.^[18] These techniques achieve a typical resolution of approximately 100 kb, limited by the low signal yield of about 0.25–1% of possible contacts per cell, which captures broad domain organization but misses fine-scale loops in many cases. Analysis of scHi-C data has revealed substantial cell-to-cell variability in topologically associating domains (TADs), with individual cells showing dynamic inter-TAD contacts and compartmentalization despite conserved overall folding principles. In applications to embryos, single-nucleus Hi-C in Drosophila has profiled chromatin folding during development, highlighting stochastic domain boundaries and their role in gene activation timing. Challenges persist, including high technical noise from random ligation events and low ligation efficiency, often resulting in only ~1% capture rate of true interactions, necessitating advanced normalization and imputation strategies for reliable interpretation.^[18]^[20]^[21]^[20]

Capture and immunoprecipitation-based methods

Capture and immunoprecipitation-based methods enrich for specific chromatin interactions by targeting sequence features or protein-binding sites, thereby improving the detection of rare or low-frequency contacts that are challenging to resolve in unbiased approaches like Hi-C. These techniques integrate elements of chromosome conformation capture with hybridization capture or antibody-based pull-down, enhancing signal-to-noise ratios and enabling focused analysis of regulatory elements such as enhancers and promoters. By prioritizing interactions mediated by particular proteins or genomic loci, they facilitate high-resolution mapping of functional chromatin architectures. Sequence capture methods utilize targeted hybridization to enrich Hi-C libraries for predefined genomic regions, allowing efficient interrogation of specific interactions across the genome. Capture-C, introduced in 2016, employs oligonucleotide probes on microarrays or in solution to hybridize and capture ligation junctions involving bait regions of interest after initial 3C library preparation, enabling multiplexed analysis of multiple loci with high sensitivity from limited cell numbers. This approach has been applied to study promoter-enhancer interactions in human cells, revealing conformational changes associated with gene regulation. Similarly, HiChIP, developed in 2016, combines Hi-C with chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) using antibodies against proteins like H3K27ac or cohesin, followed by biotinylation of ligation junctions and streptavidin pull-down to enrich for protein-mediated contacts. HiChIP achieves approximately a 10-fold increase in the yield of informative reads compared to standard Hi-C, making it particularly useful for mapping enhancer-promoter networks in primary cell types such as T helper cells. Both methods reduce sequencing depth requirements while preserving genome-wide context, though Capture-C is more locus-specific and HiChIP emphasizes protein-directed interactions. Immunoprecipitation-based variants directly target protein-DNA complexes to isolate chromatin loops anchored by transcription factors or architectural proteins. ChIA-PET, established in 2009, performs ChIP against factors like RNA polymerase II or estrogen receptor alpha prior to proximity ligation and paired-end sequencing, generating maps of long-range interactions bound by specific proteins across the human genome. This method has elucidated the interactome of estrogen receptor alpha in breast cancer cells, identifying thousands of enhancer-promoter contacts that drive hormone-responsive gene expression. Building on this, PLAC-seq, introduced in 2016, incorporates in situ proximity ligation before ChIP and biotin-streptavidin enrichment, optimizing for high-efficiency capture of loops mediated by proteins such as CTCF. PLAC-seq demonstrates superior sensitivity over earlier immunoprecipitation methods, detecting CTCF-anchored loops at kilobase resolution with reduced background noise, and has been instrumental in characterizing domain boundaries in mouse embryonic stem cells. These techniques excel in dissecting the functional roles of specific proteins in 3D genome organization, such as loop extrusion by cohesin-CTCF complexes. ChIP-loop represents an early extension of 3C principles to protein-targeted analysis, integrating immunoprecipitation to validate interactions between specific genomic elements bound by a protein of interest. First described in 2005 using MeCP2 in a Rett syndrome model, ChIP-loop performs cross-linking, digestion, and ligation as in 3C, followed by ChIP to enrich for loops involving the target protein, such as silent chromatin domains regulating imprinted genes like DLX5. Genome-wide adaptations of ChIP-loop, often through sequencing, extend this to broader interactomes, providing a framework for integrating protein occupancy with 3D structure to uncover disease-associated conformational defects. Overall, these methods have revolutionized the study of targeted chromatin dynamics, offering enriched datasets that link protein binding to regulatory outcomes like enhancer activation.

Emerging high-resolution methods

Recent advancements in chromosome conformation capture (3C) technologies have focused on achieving higher resolution to map chromatin interactions at the nucleosome scale, overcoming limitations of standard Hi-C methods that typically resolve structures at kilobase levels. These emerging techniques, developed primarily after 2020, employ refined enzymatic digestions, optimized crosslinking, and innovative barcoding strategies to enhance signal-to-noise ratios and capture multi-way interactions.^[2] Micro-C represents a pivotal high-resolution variant, utilizing micrococcal nuclease (MNase) to digest chromatin at nucleosome boundaries, enabling mapping of interactions at approximately 100-200 base pair resolution. Introduced in 2015 and upgraded through Micro-C XL in subsequent years, this method incorporates long crosslinkers like disuccinimidyl glutarate (DSG) combined with formaldehyde, along with insoluble chromatin isolation to reduce noise and improve detection of fine-scale features such as sub-topologically associating domains (sub-TADs) and enhancer-promoter loops. Micro-C XL has revealed nucleosome-level chromatin organization, including periodic patterns in contact frequencies that reflect nucleosome positioning and histone modifications. In plant systems, Micro-C XL applied to Arabidopsis thaliana has uncovered enhancer-promoter interactions and three-dimensional chromatin folding at unprecedented detail, highlighting evolutionary conservation of regulatory elements.^[22] Hi-C 3.0, refined in 2023, introduces protocol optimizations such as dual crosslinkers (formaldehyde and DSG) and dual restriction enzymes (e.g., DpnII and DdeI) to generate more reliable interaction signals and higher valid contact rates exceeding 50%. This upgrade doubles the detection of chromatin loops compared to earlier Hi-C versions and improves compartment identification, particularly in challenging plant tissues with rigid cell walls and metabolites. In cotton (Gossypium spp.), Hi-C 3.0 has been adapted for high-throughput analysis during somatic embryogenesis, elucidating dynamic chromatin interactions that underpin developmental transitions and gene regulation. These enhancements facilitate the study of sub-TAD structures and provide clearer insights into genome folding in non-model organisms.^[23] SPRITE (split-pool recognition of interactions by tag extension), established in 2019, employs an iterative split-pool barcoding approach with religation to capture multi-way chromatin contacts, including higher-order hubs involving DNA, RNA, and proteins, without sequence bias. Unlike pairwise-focused methods, SPRITE maps ensemble-averaged three-dimensional nuclear organization, revealing inter-chromosomal interactions and nuclear body associations at genome-wide scales. Its ability to detect simultaneous multi-contact events has advanced understanding of chromatin hubs in gene regulation.^[24] Targeted variants like Region Capture Micro-C integrate CRISPR guides or biotinylated probes to enrich specific genomic regions, boosting throughput and resolution for focused studies of regulatory elements while maintaining nucleosome-level detail. In 2025, the Exo-C method combined chromosome conformation capture with exome sequencing to simultaneously detect structural variants and point mutations, leveraging interaction data to phase variants and identify disease-associated rearrangements with enhanced accuracy. These innovations collectively enable finer dissection of chromatin architecture, with advantages in revealing sub-TAD dynamics and integrating multi-omics for functional genomics.^[25]^[26]

Data Analysis

Contact map generation and normalization

Contact map generation begins with the processing of paired-end sequencing reads obtained from Hi-C experiments, which capture ligation junctions between chromatin fragments. After aligning reads to a reference genome using tools such as HiCUP, which handles mapping and initial artifact removal, valid interaction pairs are identified by parsing the alignments to retain only those spanning ligation sites while discarding uncut fragments or non-proximal ligations. Pairs are then filtered to remove self-circles (intra-fragment ligations), random ligations (non-restriction-site joins), and PCR duplicates, typically retaining 1-5% of raw reads as valid contacts depending on library quality.^[27] These filtered pairs are binned into a square matrix representing the genome, where rows and columns correspond to genomic loci divided into fixed-size bins (e.g., 10 kb or 40 kb), and each entry counts the number of read pairs connecting bin i to bin j.^[28] Raw contact maps are systematically biased by experimental and sequencing factors, including restriction enzyme efficiency (creating uneven fragment lengths), sequence mappability (repetitive regions align poorly), and GC content (affecting fragmentation and amplification).^[29] These biases lead to uneven row and column sums in the matrix, confounding biological interpretation by inflating or depleting apparent interaction frequencies. Normalization aims to correct these by estimating and removing locus-specific visibility factors, assuming the expected contact probability decays smoothly with genomic distance in the absence of structure. One seminal approach is Iterative Correction (ICE), introduced in 2012, which iteratively adjusts the matrix to equalize row and column sums, effectively removing restriction-site biases through a data-driven balancing process. This method models biases as multiplicative factors B_i and B_j for loci i and j, yielding a normalized contact frequency of C'_{ij} = \frac{C_{ij}}{B_i B_j}, where B_k represents the estimated coverage vector for locus k derived from iterative l1-norm minimization until convergence (typically 50-100 iterations). The normalization ensures symmetry in the final matrix, enabling downstream eigenvector analysis of compartments. Knight-Ruiz (KR) matrix balancing offers a faster alternative for large matrices, solving the doubly stochastic normalization via Sinkhorn-like iterations with geometric means, converging in under 20 steps for typical Hi-C data and preserving sparsity. For explicit bias modeling, HiCNorm employs Poisson regression to jointly correct for GC content, fragment length, and mappability as offsets in a generalized linear model, providing a parametric estimate of unbiased frequencies suitable for low-coverage datasets.^[30] Tools like cooltools integrate these methods (ICE, KR) into Python workflows for scalable processing, while HiCUP facilitates upstream filtering to enhance normalization accuracy.

Detection of loops and domains

Detection of loops and domains in chromosome conformation capture (3C) data involves computational algorithms that analyze normalized contact frequency maps to identify topologically associating domains (TADs) and chromatin loops, which represent key structural features of the 3D genome. TADs are self-interacting genomic regions typically spanning 100 kb to 1 Mb, characterized by high intra-domain contact frequencies and relative insulation from neighboring regions, thereby organizing the genome into modular units that influence gene regulation. Chromatin loops, often enhancer-promoter interactions, are mediated by architectural proteins such as CTCF and cohesin, forming point-to-point contacts that bring distant regulatory elements into proximity.^[31] Several methods have been developed to delineate TAD boundaries from Hi-C contact maps. The insulation score, introduced by Crane et al., quantifies boundary strength by aggregating contacts in sliding windows along the diagonal of the matrix; low scores indicate strong insulation at TAD borders, allowing automated detection of domain edges. TADbit employs a breakpoint detection algorithm based on penalized likelihood maximization under a Poisson model to segment chromosomes into optimal TADs, providing tools for modeling and visualization of these domains. For identifying loops, algorithms focus on detecting significant or peak interactions in contact maps. Fit-Hi-C assigns statistical confidence to intra-chromosomal contacts by modeling expected frequencies with non-parametric splines and negative binomial distributions, highlighting interactions that deviate from random polymer expectations. The Arrowhead algorithm, implemented in the Juicer toolkit, identifies loop apexes as triangular patterns of enriched contacts converging at specific genomic coordinates, facilitating the annotation of CTCF-anchored loops at high resolution.^[31] Brief motif analysis of loop anchors often reveals convergent CTCF binding sites, though detailed regulatory implications are explored elsewhere.^[31] Evaluation of detected features typically assesses the enrichment of interactions within TADs compared to inter-TAD contacts, confirming that intra-domain frequencies are significantly higher (often by 2- to 10-fold), which validates the modular organization and biological relevance of these structures.

Integration with other omics data

Chromosome conformation capture (3C) techniques, such as Hi-C, are frequently integrated with epigenomic and transcriptomic datasets to provide a multidimensional view of genome organization and function. Overlaying Hi-C contact maps with ChIP-seq data, for instance, allows researchers to correlate chromatin loops and topologically associating domains (TADs) with specific protein bindings, such as CTCF at loop anchors, revealing how architectural proteins enforce spatial proximity between regulatory elements. Similarly, combining Hi-C with ATAC-seq identifies overlaps between chromatin interactions and open chromatin regions, highlighting accessible loci involved in long-range regulation, while integration with RNA-seq elucidates co-expression patterns linked to enhancer-promoter contacts, thereby mapping dynamic transcriptional landscapes. These approaches enable the annotation of interaction hotspots with functional epigenetic marks, facilitating a deeper understanding of how 3D structure influences gene activity across cell types.^[32]^[33]^[34] Key resources and tools support this multi-omics integration, with the 4D Nucleome (4DN) project serving as a central hub for accessing harmonized Hi-C datasets alongside complementary omics layers like ChIP-seq and RNA-seq from diverse tissues and conditions. The 4DN Data Portal provides standardized pipelines for data harmonization and visualization, enabling users to query interactions in the context of broader genomic features. For visualization, the Juicer software suite processes raw Hi-C data into contact matrices and overlays them with external tracks such as ChIP-seq peaks or RNA-seq expression profiles, allowing interactive exploration of multi-layered genomic data. Recent advancements include automated pipelines like scCross, which unify single-cell Hi-C with transcriptomic and epigenomic data for joint embedding and analysis, streamlining the identification of cell-type-specific regulatory networks.^[35]^[36]^[37]^[38] As of 2025, emerging deep learning methods, such as TRUHiC for enhancing sparse contact maps and benchmarks for differential Hi-C analysis, further improve accuracy in detecting structural variations and integrating multi-omics data.^[39]^[40] Specific applications of this integration include correlating Hi-C-derived loops with expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) to pinpoint genetic variants that modulate chromatin architecture and gene expression. For example, joint analyses across multiple tissues have shown that eQTLs often localize near loop boundaries, suggesting that variants disrupting these structures contribute to expression variability. In variant prioritization, recent chromatin-exome combinations leverage Hi-C to assess how structural variants alter interaction profiles, such as creating novel TADs (neo-TADs) in genomic rearrangements, thereby guiding the functional interpretation of noncoding mutations. These correlations extend the detection of loops and domains by linking them to heritable regulatory effects.^[41]^[42]^[26] The primary benefits of such integrations lie in resolving causal relationships in gene regulation, where Hi-C data distinguishes direct physical interactions from mere correlative associations observed in transcriptomic profiles alone. By overlaying spatial contacts with functional omics, researchers can infer mechanistic pathways, such as how enhancer hijacking via neo-TAD formation rewires regulatory circuits in rearranged genomes. This multi-omics framework enhances predictive power for regulatory outcomes, prioritizing variants with high-confidence structural impacts and advancing genome-wide association studies toward functional validation.^[43]^[44]

Applications

Gene regulation mechanisms

Chromosome conformation capture techniques, particularly Hi-C, have elucidated how chromatin loops facilitate long-range interactions between enhancers and promoters, thereby driving gene expression. These loops physically juxtapose distal regulatory elements, enabling transcription factors and co-activators to coordinate activation of target genes. In human cells, Hi-C data reveal approximately 10,000 such loops genome-wide, many of which connect active promoters to enhancers and correlate with increased transcriptional output.01497-4) Disruptions to these loops, such as those observed in the Hox gene clusters, lead to altered gene expression patterns by preventing enhancer-promoter contacts.^[45] A central mechanism underlying loop formation is the CTCF-mediated loop extrusion model, where cohesin complexes actively extrude chromatin fibers to form loops until halted by CTCF-bound sites. In this process, cohesin loads onto DNA and reels in intervening chromatin bidirectionally, creating loops that stabilize enhancer-promoter interactions. CTCF acts as a directional barrier, with its binding motifs oriented to impede extrusion efficiently. Hi-C analyses confirm that loop anchors are enriched for CTCF occupancy, supporting this model's role in organizing regulatory networks.30530-7)^[46] At a broader scale, Hi-C identifies A and B chromatin compartments, where phase separation principles contribute to spatial segregation of active and repressed genomic regions. A compartments, characterized by open chromatin and high gene density, associate with transcriptional activation, while B compartments feature condensed, heterochromatic structures linked to gene silencing. This compartmentalization influences regulatory element accessibility and correlates with epigenetic marks that reinforce active or repressed states. Hi-C further reveals super-enhancers as dense clusters of interacting enhancers, often forming through loop-mediated aggregation that amplifies target gene expression. These clusters exhibit strong self-interactions in contact maps, integrating multiple regulatory inputs for robust transcriptional control. DNA motif analysis of loop anchors consistently shows a bias toward convergent CTCF orientations, where motifs face each other to facilitate stable loop closure and precise regulatory wiring.^[47]01497-4)

Disease associations

Chromosome conformation capture (3C) technologies have revealed how disruptions in topologically associating domains (TADs) contribute to developmental diseases, particularly through misregulation of key genes. In limb malformations such as brachydactyly and polydactyly, structural variants (SVs) at the EPHA4 locus alter TAD boundaries, leading to ectopic enhancer-promoter interactions that upregulate genes like EPHA4 or PAX3 in patient-derived fibroblasts and mouse models.^[48] These findings demonstrate that Hi-C analysis of patient cells can detect SV-induced ectopic chromatin contacts, providing a mechanistic link between 3D genome rewiring and pathogenic phenotypes.^[48] In cancer, 3C methods uncover neo-loops and neo-TADs formed by somatic SVs, which hijack enhancers to drive oncogene activation. For instance, genomic rearrangements in various tumor types create novel chromatin loops that connect distant regulatory elements to proto-oncogenes, as identified through Hi-C profiling across hundreds of cancer genomes.^[49] Normalization of Hi-C data is crucial in these analyses to account for biases from aneuploidy and copy number variations, which can otherwise distort contact frequency estimates and lead to misinterpretation of structural changes. Additionally, ChIA-PET has been applied to map disease-specific chromatin loops mediated by factors like CTCF or cohesin in cancer cells, highlighting alterations in loop anchors that promote tumor progression.^[50] Recent advances integrate 3C with exome sequencing in the Exo-C approach to simultaneously detect SVs and point mutations affecting chromatin architecture in cancers. This method, applied to pediatric tumor samples, identifies noncoding point mutations that disrupt loop motifs or TAD boundaries, contributing to oncogenesis without altering protein-coding sequences.^[26] Such point mutations can subtly alter enhancer accessibility, as briefly noted in loop detection algorithms that prioritize motif integrity for accurate identification.^[26]

Evolutionary and developmental biology

Chromosome conformation capture techniques, particularly Hi-C, have revealed dynamic changes in topologically associating domains (TADs) during cellular differentiation processes. In skeletal muscle stem cells, Hi-C data show a marked reorganization of chromatin architecture as quiescent satellite cells activate and progress through myogenic lineage stages, with significant loss of TAD border insulation and enhancer-promoter looping early in activation, while over 60% of TAD borders remain stable across differentiation. This rewiring is driven by factors like PAX7, whose reduction correlates with diminished long-range interactions essential for myogenic gene expression. Similar dynamics occur during aging, where geriatric muscle stem cells exhibit increased long-range contacts and weakened TAD insulation, contributing to impaired regenerative potential.^[51] In embryogenesis, Hi-C and its high-resolution variant Micro-C have illuminated the establishment of 3D chromatin structures prior to zygotic genome activation. During early Drosophila development, Micro-C maps at 100-bp resolution across nuclear cycles 1–8 and later stages identify over 3,600 boundaries and 1,000 loops that form as early as the pre-cellular embryo, persisting through mitosis and facilitating the deployment of developmental genes bound by factors like GAF and Zelda. Single-cell Hi-C in mouse post-gastrulation embryos further demonstrates cell-to-cell variability in chromosome conformations, with most nuclei showing plastic structures that cluster into mesoderm and ectoderm lineages, while specialized cells like primitive erythrocytes adopt compact, stable folding with elevated long-range contacts. In plants, low-input Hi-C during male gametophyte development in Arabidopsis uncovers stage-specific shifts in chromatin loops and compartments, linking 3D reorganization to pollen viability and reproductive success.^[52]^[53]^[54] Evolutionarily, Hi-C has highlighted conserved chromatin loops across species, particularly in Hox gene clusters that coordinate body patterning. In butterflies, unlike Drosophila where a large insertion splits the Hox cluster into separate TADs, Hi-C reveals a single encompassing TAD with inter-looping between Antennapedia (ANT-C) and Bithorax (BX-C) complexes, mediated by shared CTCF sites; disrupting these loops via CRISPR-Cas9 reduces Hox gene expression and induces morphological defects. Cross-species Hi-C comparisons, including aligned contact maps from Drosophila melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura, show 57% conservation of chromatin states for orthologous genes, with evolutionary rearrangements like neo-X chromosome formation altering long-range interactions but preserving core TAD structures. Such analyses also detect synteny in genomic rearrangements, where inter-chromosome inversions rarely disrupt pre-existing 3D folding, underscoring the robustness of chromatin organization amid evolutionary change. Recent advances link heterochromatin dynamics to transcription in developmental contexts, with Hi-C showing compartment shifts that modulate gene silencing across species.^[55]^[56]^[55]^[57]

References

[1]
Capturing Chromosome Conformation - Science
Job Dekker et al. ,. Capturing Chromosome Conformation.Science295,1306-1311(2002).DOI:10.1126/science.1067799. Export citation. Select the format you want to ...
[2]
Systematic evaluation of chromosome conformation capture assays
Sep 3, 2021 · Chromosome conformation capture (3C) assays are used to map chromatin interactions genome-wide. Chromatin interaction maps provide insights ...
[3]
Advances in the multimodal analysis of the 3D chromatin structure ...
Apr 25, 2024 · This review divides these methodologies into sequencing-based and imaging-based methodologies, tracing their development over time.
[4]
Spheroid Chromatin Units (ν Bodies) - Science
Spheroid Chromatin Units (ν Bodies). Ada L. Olins and Donald E. OlinsAuthors Info & Affiliations. Science. 25 Jan 1974 ... nucleosomes with short DNA linkers ...
[5]
Analysis of long-range chromatin interactions using Chromosome ...
The basic steps of 3C are: 1) Formaldehyde crosslinking, 2) Digestion with a restriction enzyme, 3) intra-molecular ligation, and 4) ligation product detection ...
[6]
Non-backtracking walks reveal compartments in sparse chromatin ...
Jul 9, 2020 · Resulting dependence turns out to be fairly close to the fractal globule contact probability, P(s)\sim s^{-\alpha } with \alpha \approx 1 at ...
[7]
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-68182-0
[8]
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00781-5
[9]
Chromosome conformation capture technologies and their impact in ...
Apr 30, 2016 · Chromosome conformation capture carbon copy or 5C allows obtaining information on the contacts established by multiple genomic fragments in a ...
[10]
None
Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
[11]
Hi-C: A Method to Study the Three-dimensional Architecture of ... - NIH
May 6, 2010 · This method was used in the research reported in Lieberman-Aiden et al., Science 326, 289-293 (2009). I. Crosslinking, Digestion, Marking of ...
[12]
HI-C 2.0: AN OPTIMIZED HI-C PROCEDURE FOR HIGH ... - NIH
Previous high resolution Hi-C libraries have used MboI or DpnII [13] to fragment DNA with restriction endonucleases to an average length of ~500 bp.
[13]
Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure
Sep 25, 2013 · Here we introduce single-cell Hi-C, combined with genome-wide statistical analysis and structural modelling of single-copy X chromosomes,Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
[14]
Three-dimensional genome structures of single diploid human cells
Aug 31, 2018 · J. Dekker, K. Rippe, M. Dekker, N. Kleckner, Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295, 1306–1311 (2002).
[15]
Robust single-cell Hi-C clustering by convolution- and random-walk ...
We describe scHiCluster, a single-cell clustering algorithm for Hi-C contact matrices that is based on imputations using linear convolution and random walk.
[16]
Order and stochasticity in the folding of individual Drosophila genomes
Jan 4, 2021 · In single nuclei, the dependence of the contact probability on the genomic distance, Pc(s), has a shape comparable to that observed in the bulk ...Missing: ∝ | Show results with:∝
[17]
Mapping nucleosome-resolution chromatin organization and ...
Jan 2, 2024 · To overcome the resolution limit (~1000 bp) in Arabidopsis 3D genome research, we used Micro-C-XL to map nucleosome-resolution chromatin ...
[18]
An upgraded method of high-throughput chromosome conformation ...
Jul 3, 2023 · This upgraded method, termed Hi-C 3.0, was applied to cotton leaves for trial. In comparison with the conventional Hi-C 2.0, Hi-C 3.0 can obtain more than 50% ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[19]
Region Capture Micro-C reveals coalescence of enhancers and ...
Chromosome conformation capture (3C) methods effectively capture large-scale three-dimensional (3D) genome structure but struggle to achieve the depth necessary ...Missing: review 2023-2025
[20]
Combining chromosome conformation capture and exome ...
May 7, 2025 · We present a novel method based on chromatin conformation capture that can be used to simultaneously detect structural variants and point mutations in the ...Missing: Micro- | Show results with:Micro-
[21]
HiC-Pro: an optimized and flexible pipeline for Hi-C data processing
Dec 1, 2015 · HiC-Pro is an optimized and flexible pipeline for processing Hi-C data from raw reads to normalized contact maps.
[22]
The Hitchhiker's Guide to Hi-C Analysis: Practical guidelines - PMC
The aim of this paper is to provide guidelines for analyzing and interpreting data obtained with genome-wide 3C methods such as Hi-C and 3C-seq that rely on ...
[23]
HiCNorm: removing biases in Hi-C data via Poisson regression - PMC
Sep 27, 2012 · We propose a parametric model, HiCNorm, to remove systematic biases in the raw Hi-C contact maps, resulting in a simple, fast, yet accurate normalization ...
[24]
HiCNorm: removing biases in Hi-C data via Poisson regression
Sep 27, 2012 · We propose a parametric model, HiCNorm, to remove systematic biases in the raw Hi-C contact maps, resulting in a simple, fast, yet accurate normalization ...<|separator|>
[25]
Integration of Hi-C and ChIP-seq data reveals distinct types of ...
We have analyzed publicly available K562 Hi-C data, which enable genome-wide unbiased capturing of chromatin interactions, using a Mixture Poisson ...
[26]
Integrated ATAC, ChIP, HiC and RNA Seq - CD Genomics
ATAC-seq, ChIP-seq and Hi-C are techniques to study the mechanisms that govern the dynamic structural and spatial organization of chromatin.
[27]
Linking genome structures to functions by simultaneous single-cell ...
Jun 8, 2023 · We obtained similar results using other single-cell Hi-C clustering methods (fig. S3H). This observation echoes recent findings in Drosophila ...
[28]
The 4D Nucleome Data Portal as a resource for searching and ...
The 4D Nucleome (4DN) Network aims to elucidate the complex structure and organization of chromosomes in the nucleus and the impact of their disruption in ...Missing: omics | Show results with:omics
[29]
Current state and future aims of the 4D nucleome project
Aug 3, 2023 · The four-dimensional nucleome (4DN) consortium studies the architecture of the genome and the nucleus in space and time.
[30]
Juicer provides a one-click system for analyzing loop-resolution Hi ...
Juicer comprises three tools, which are designed to be run one-after-another. First, Juicer transforms raw sequence data into a list of Hi-C contacts (pairs of ...Missing: omics | Show results with:omics
[31]
scCross: a deep generative model for unifying single-cell multi ...
Jul 29, 2024 · Leveraging our model, we generate data sets at onefold (1X) and fivefold (5X) of the original count of Ast cells' single-cell multi-omics data.Missing: Accio | Show results with:Accio
[32]
Joint analyses of multi-tissue Hi-C and eQTL data demonstrate ... - NIH
Apr 30, 2019 · We performed various joint analyses of eQTL and high-throughput chromatin conformation capture (Hi-C) data from 11 human primary tissue types ...
[33]
Identifying genetic variants associated with chromatin looping and ...
Sep 18, 2024 · We observed that ~64% (5933 out of 9426) iQTL SNPs overlap with eQTLs or hQTLs (Fisher's exact test p-value < 0.00001, OR = 1.43; see Methods; ...
[34]
Integrating multi-omic features exploiting Chromosome ... - Frontiers
In particular, a novel sequencing technique called Chromosome Conformation Capture allows the analysis of the chromosome organization in the cell's natural ...Missing: Accio 2024
[35]
Integration of Hi-C with short and long-read genome sequencing ...
Oct 29, 2022 · Integration of Hi-C with short and long-read genome sequencing reveals the structure of germline rearranged genomes.
[36]
Temporal dynamics and developmental memory of 3D chromatin ...
Apr 29, 2014 · In this study, we describe the 3D organization of Hox gene clusters at high resolution during the implementation of temporal colinearity in ...<|separator|>
[37]
Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain ...
Model based on loop extrusion makes it possible to recapitulate Hi-C maps accurately using only CTCF ChIP-Seq results. (A, i and ii) Extrusion complex loads ...
[38]
Dissecting super-enhancer hierarchy based on chromatin interactions
Mar 5, 2018 · Super-enhancers (SEs) are putative enhancer clusters with unusually high levels of enhancer activity and enrichment of enhancer-associated ...
[39]
Disruptions of Topological Chromatin Domains Cause Pathogenic ...
We demonstrate that disruption of TADs can rewire long-range regulatory architecture and result in pathogenic phenotypes. We show that distinct human limb ...
[40]
Disruption of chromatin folding domains by somatic genomic ...
Feb 5, 2020 · Disruption of chromatin folding domains by somatic genomic rearrangements in human cancer. Kadir C. Akdemir,; Victoria T. Le, ...
[41]
ChromLoops: a comprehensive database for specific protein ...
Disruption of chromatin loops is associated with many diseases, such as cancer and polydactyly. A few methods, including ChIA-PET, HiChIP and PLAC-Seq, have ...
[42]
Multiscale 3D genome reorganization during skeletal muscle stem ...
Feb 17, 2023 · Chromatin loops are dynamically remodeled during SC lineage progression. Chromatin loops manifest as foci in high-resolution Hi-C contact maps.
[43]
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/genetics/articles/10.3389/fgene.2015.00040/full
[44]
Single cell Hi-C identifies plastic chromosome conformations ...
Jun 29, 2023 · Here we use single cell Hi-C to map chromosomal conformations in post-gastrulation mouse embryo cells and study their distributions and correlations.
[45]
Dynamic changes in 3D chromatin structure during male ...
Feb 10, 2025 · Here, we use the optimized single-nucleus and low-input Hi-C methods to investigate changes in 3D chromatin structure in four types of male gametophyte nucleus ...
[46]
Evolutionary patterns and functional effects of 3D chromatin ... - Nature
Jul 26, 2024 · Notably, butterflies exhibited chromatin loops between Hox gene cluster ANT-C and BX-C, unlike Drosophila. Our CRISPR-Cas9 experiments in ...
[47]
Development and evolution of Drosophila chromatin landscape in a ...
Nov 1, 2024 · The cross-linked cells were used to prepare Hi-C libraries with Proximo Hi-C kits v4.0 (Phase Genomics) according to the manufacturer's protocol ...Results · Methods · Chip-Seq Experiments And...
[48]
Chromatin conformation, gene transcription, and nucleosome ...
Jan 10, 2025 · On Hi-C with 4-μm ActD treatment, we again observed a decrease in loop frequency with transcriptional inhibition at the wild-type loci (Fig. 4C) ...