Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Commencement speech

Definition and Purpose

Core Objectives

The core objectives of a commencement speech center on inspiring graduates to embrace their post-academic futures with resilience and purpose, while reflecting on the intellectual and personal growth achieved during their studies.^[1] These addresses typically seek to motivate by emphasizing optimism, determination, and the potential for meaningful contributions beyond the university setting, often through anecdotes of perseverance and innovation.^[2] This motivational aim aligns with the ceremonial context, where speakers reinforce the value of education as a foundation for lifelong problem-solving and ethical decision-making.^[3] A second key objective involves celebrating the graduates' accomplishments and acknowledging the collective efforts of families, educators, and institutions that enabled their success.^[2] By highlighting specific milestones—such as overcoming academic challenges or mastering disciplines—the speech fosters a sense of communal pride and closure, marking the transition from student life to professional or civic engagement.^[4] This celebratory function serves to validate the sacrifices invested, including financial and emotional commitments, thereby strengthening institutional bonds and alumni loyalty.^[1] Finally, commencement speeches aim to impart practical wisdom and forward-looking guidance, distilling lessons from the speaker's career or historical precedents to equip graduates for real-world uncertainties.^[4] Effective delivery often includes counsel on adaptability, ethical leadership, and the pursuit of excellence, avoiding overly prescriptive directives in favor of reflective insights that encourage independent judgment.^[2] This advisory role underscores the speech's role in bridging academic ideals with pragmatic realities, promoting a realistic assessment of opportunities and obstacles ahead.^[3]

Distinctions from Other Public Addresses

Commencement speeches are distinguished from other public addresses by their embedded role within formal academic rituals, specifically graduation ceremonies that confer degrees and mark the collective transition of students from educational institutions into professional or independent adulthood. This ceremonial context imposes constraints absent in standalone keynotes or lectures, requiring speakers to align with institutional traditions of celebration and optimism rather than introducing novel ideas or challenging norms. For instance, while conference keynotes often set an event's thematic agenda through field-specific insights or motivational frameworks tailored to professional audiences, commencement addresses prioritize reflective acknowledgment of the graduates' shared journey and universal exhortations to perseverance and purpose, avoiding deep dives into specialized knowledge.^[1]^[5] In contrast to political speeches, which seek to rally support for policies or ideologies through persuasive argumentation and audience mobilization, commencement addresses eschew partisanship and controversy to foster unity among diverse stakeholders—graduates, families, and faculty—focusing instead on inspirational narratives that reinforce the value of education as a rite of passage. This non-advocacy stance stems from the event's purpose: to honor academic milestones without commandeering the platform for external agendas, as evidenced by widespread criticism of speakers who deviate into political grandstanding, which undermines the genre's expected tone of uplift and leavened realism.^[6]^[7] Rhetorically, commencement speeches integrate congratulatory, didactic, and epideictic elements—praising virtues like resilience and curiosity—more akin to eulogies or toasts than to informational TED talks, which emphasize innovative concepts through structured storytelling and evidence. They typically employ personal anecdotes, metaphors, and calls to action centered on life transitions, rather than data-heavy analysis or problem-solving frameworks, reflecting their origin in oratorical education traditions where eloquence served moral and motivational ends over empirical persuasion. This blend results in a genre that motivates through aspirational optimism, often recycling motifs like embracing failure or pursuing passions, tailored explicitly to the graduates' liminal moment rather than a broader audience's immediate needs.^[8]^[9]

Historical Development

Origins in Educational Traditions

The tradition of orations and disputations at the conclusion of academic studies emerged in the medieval universities of Europe, where such public performances served as both examinations and demonstrations of scholarly proficiency. Founded in the 12th century, institutions like the University of Bologna (c. 1088) and the University of Paris emphasized oral defenses in scholastic disputations, during which candidates argued theses on logic, theology, and philosophy before faculty and peers.^[10]^[11] These rites, often conducted in Latin, integrated rhetorical training central to the trivium—grammar, logic, and rhetoric—as foundational to higher learning, preparing graduates for clerical, legal, or teaching roles.^[9] This European model influenced English universities such as Oxford and Cambridge, where ceremonial addresses and debates persisted into the early modern period, underscoring oratory's role in certifying intellectual maturity.^[12] Transplanted to the American colonies, the practice manifested at Harvard College's first commencement in late September 1642, attended by nine Master of Arts candidates and colonial dignitaries including Governor John Winthrop.^[12]^[13] The ceremony featured morning orations in Latin, Greek, and Hebrew by select graduates, followed by afternoon disputations on topics spanning grammar, rhetoric, ethics, physics, and metaphysics, all conducted in Latin to affirm linguistic and dialectical command.^[12]^[9] Early American commencements prioritized student-led performances over external invitations, aligning with the curriculum's heavy emphasis on classical languages and public speaking to cultivate virtuous leaders for Puritan society.^[9]^[13] Historians note these events as "gala days" drawing public crowds, with post-ceremony banquets reinforcing communal celebration of rhetorical achievement, as documented in contemporary accounts like New England's First Fruits (1643).^[12] This student-centric format, rooted in medieval pedagogical methods, evolved gradually but preserved oratory as a capstone of educational attainment.^[9]

Evolution in Modern Universities

In the early 20th century, university commencement speeches in the United States largely transitioned from student-delivered orations in classical languages, a staple of 19th-century ceremonies emphasizing rhetorical training, to addresses by invited guest speakers, reflecting the declining emphasis on oratory in higher education curricula.^[9] This shift allowed institutions to feature prominent academics, statesmen, or local dignitaries, with ceremonies evolving into public spectacles that highlighted institutional prestige rather than graduate proficiency in Latin or Greek debates.^[14] By mid-century, particularly after World War II, speeches incorporated broader societal themes amid social upheavals like the civil rights movement and Vietnam War protests, with increased mentions of equality and national challenges; quantitative analysis of 825 addresses from 1890 to 2020 shows civil rights references rising steadily over decades, correlating with heightened gender-inclusive language such as more frequent female pronouns starting in the 1970s.^[15] Female speakers emerged more prominently from the 1970s onward, often at women's colleges, though overall sentiment dipped negatively during the 1970s amid cultural turbulence.^[15] Speech lengths trended shorter, averaging around 2,710 words but decreasing over time to suit larger, more diverse audiences.^[15] From the late 20th century into the 21st, speaker selection expanded to include celebrities, business leaders, and tech figures—such as Bill Gates at Harvard in 2007 or Steve Jobs at Stanford in 2005—prioritizing inspirational narratives over academic discourse, with nearly half of notable speeches post-2010 featuring non-traditional voices.^[9] However, this era saw rising controversies, including a surge in disinvitation attempts, peaking at 46 in 2016 (up from 34 in 2013), often targeting speakers with conservative or dissenting views amid campus activism that FIRE data attributes to ideological pressures rather than broad consensus.^[16]^[17] Analyses indicate a partisan skew, with Democratic-leaning speakers outnumbering Republicans 5:1 in recent seasons, reflecting academia's documented leftward tilt that influences invitations and amplifies protests against perceived ideological threats.^[18] In the 2020s, events like the 2024 graduation season—marked by protests, walkouts, and relocated ceremonies over geopolitical issues—underscored ongoing tensions, prompting some institutions to favor apolitical or internal speakers to avoid disruption, though content remains focused on personal resilience and societal contribution.^[19]^[20] This evolution highlights a causal link between campus cultural dynamics and speech practices, where empirical trends in deplatforming reveal selective pressures favoring alignment with prevailing institutional biases over diverse discourse.^[21]

Rhetorical Structure and Elements

Typical Format and Duration

Commencement speeches typically endure for 5 to 15 minutes, with principal addresses at major university ceremonies often extending to 10 to 20 minutes to accommodate substantive content without fatiguing large audiences of graduates and families.^[2] ^[22] Student or secondary speakers, by contrast, are constrained to shorter durations of 3 to 5 minutes to maintain ceremony pacing, as evidenced by guidelines from institutions like Harvard Extension School and Lake Forest College.^[23] ^[24] This brevity aligns with delivery rates of 200 to 250 words per minute, yielding scripts of 1,000 to 2,500 words for main speeches, though exceeding 750 words risks disengagement.^[2] ^[25] Structurally, these addresses follow a tripartite framework emphasizing past reflections, present acknowledgments, and future orientations, a pattern observed across analyzed university speeches.^[26] The introduction opens with greetings to graduates, faculty, and attendees, often incorporating thanks to the institution and a concise personal connection to the occasion to establish rapport.^[27] The body draws on anecdotes or shared institutional memories to evoke nostalgia, interspersed with practical wisdom, humor, or calls to societal contribution, avoiding excessive self-reference to prioritize audience relevance.^[2] Closings reinforce inspiration through optimistic exhortations or mottos, ending on an uplifting note without protracted summaries.^[26] Variations occur by context: high school speeches skew shorter (under 10 minutes) and more anecdotal, while professional or advanced degree ceremonies may incorporate thematic depth tied to career transitions.^[28] Empirical reviews of transcripts confirm this format's prevalence, with effective speeches balancing authenticity and concision to sustain attention amid ceremonial formalities.

Key Themes and Techniques

Commencement speeches frequently emphasize themes of personal growth and societal contribution, drawing from analyses of hundreds of addresses delivered at universities. A review of 100 such speeches identified four pervasive pieces of advice: pursuing ambitious dreams with minimal competition, committing to hard work in meaningful pursuits, embracing mistakes as pathways to learning, and prioritizing kindness toward others.^[29] These align with broader patterns observed in 58 Stanford University addresses spanning 1893 to 2009, where modern speeches highlight following one's passion and viewing failure as an interim step toward success, often in the context of serving others and adapting to a changing world.^[30] Additional recurrent motifs include fostering curiosity, resilience against setbacks, and lifelong exploration of interests, framed as essential for navigating life's uncertainties and contributing to community welfare.^[1] Rhetorically, effective commencement addresses employ techniques that blend inspiration with accessibility, evolving from early formal, academic styles to contemporary personal narratives. Speakers often integrate humor and self-deprecation to disarm audiences and build rapport, such as joking about clichés inherent to the genre or personal shortcomings, as evidenced in examinations of over 300 speeches where levity distinguished memorable deliveries.^[31] Personal anecdotes serve as core illustrative devices, providing relatable examples of perseverance or discovery, while a clear central message—either affirming graduates' uniqueness through self-trust or urging humility via service—anchors the content for impact.^[31] Brevity is prioritized, typically limiting speeches to 10-20 minutes to maintain focus and avoid dilution, with motivational tones reinforced by optimistic phrasing and calls to action that tie individual agency to broader ethical responsibilities.^[1] This structure facilitates transitions from reflection on education to forward-looking exhortations, often incorporating vivid metaphors or success stories to pragmatically motivate graduates toward opportunity management and challenge resolution.^[32]

Speaker Selection and Preparation

Criteria for Invitations

Primary criteria for inviting commencement speakers emphasize oratorical skill, inspirational relevance to graduates, and professional eminence. Institutions such as Ohio State University prioritize candidates with strong public speaking abilities who can convey meaningful messages aligned with the graduating class's experiences and future challenges.^[33] Leadership in a relevant field, often evidenced by national or international stature and name recognition, is a core factor, particularly for major ceremonies involving thousands of graduates.^[33] Selection processes typically involve advisory committees comprising faculty, staff, students, and administrators who solicit nominations and evaluate candidates against institutional standards. For instance, Bowie State University's policy requires the candidate pool to reflect the university's mission, demonstrate significant societal or academic contributions, and serve as role models, with recommendations submitted to the president at least one year in advance.^[34] Alignment with core values—such as innovation, inclusivity, or public service—is mandatory, ensuring the speaker reinforces educational objectives rather than introducing discord.^[33]^[34] Diversity considerations influence pool composition at some institutions, mandating broad representation by race, gender, and academic discipline to promote inclusivity.^[34] Relatability factors, including alumni status or narratives of personal triumph over adversity, are favored to foster connection, as seen in selections at Purdue Global and the University of Michigan-Dearborn, where speakers' career progression stories yielded high attendee satisfaction rates exceeding 95%.^[35] Amid institutional efforts to avoid polarization, policies increasingly exclude overtly political figures to prioritize unity, a shift evident in post-2024 selections at multiple universities aiming to sidestep partisan backlash.^[35]^[20] This approach reflects causal pressures from campus protests and media scrutiny, though it may limit exposure to diverse viewpoints; empirical data from prior cycles show controversial invites correlating with higher disinvitation rates but also elevated media coverage.^[36]

Challenges in Delivery

Commencement speeches impose strict time limits, typically ranging from 10 to 20 minutes for guest speakers and shorter for student addresses, compelling orators to condense substantive advice into focused, memorable segments without extraneous detail.^[37] ^[38] This brevity challenges speakers to balance inspiration with precision, as historical data reveals a trend of declining speech lengths over decades, correlating with efforts to sustain audience attention amid varying emotional tones.^[39] Exceeding allotted times risks disengaging listeners in prolonged ceremonies, where graduates often endure heat, formal attire, and sequential programming. Engaging a heterogeneous audience—comprising recent graduates, families, faculty, and administrators—exacerbates delivery hurdles, as restlessness and diverse expectations demand adaptive techniques like humor, personal anecdotes, and avoidance of overused tropes.^[40] Institutions advise originality to represent the class authentically while steering clear of clichés, yet achieving this in real-time proves difficult without prior rehearsal to refine pacing and vocal projection.^[41] Large venues, frequently outdoors, introduce acoustic inconsistencies and environmental distractions, further testing speakers' ability to project clarity and maintain eye contact across expansive crowds. Public speaking anxiety compounds these issues, with up to 75% of individuals reporting discomfort in such settings, intensified by the ceremonial stakes and scrutiny from video recordings shared widely online.^[42] Even seasoned figures rehearse extensively to counteract physiological responses like trembling or rushed delivery, as unmitigated nerves can undermine message efficacy despite prepared content.^[43] Recent declines in high-profile acceptances reflect broader hesitancy tied to potential real-time disruptions, underscoring the performative risks inherent in live execution.^[44]

Notable Examples

Historical Speeches

One of the earliest documented commencement addresses in American higher education was delivered by Barnabas Binney at Rhode Island College (now Brown University) on September 7, 1774, during a ceremony that emphasized classical oratory and moral philosophy as core to liberal arts education.^[45] Binney, a graduating student, exemplified the prevailing tradition where valedictorians or class representatives presented Latin disputations or English orations on themes drawn from rhetoric, ethics, and theology, reflecting the colonial colleges' roots in European university practices that prioritized public demonstration of scholarly attainment.^[9] Throughout the 18th and early 19th centuries, commencement speeches remained predominantly student-led, often conducted in Latin to showcase linguistic proficiency and engage in scholastic debates, with content focusing on virtues like piety, civic duty, and intellectual humility; for instance, Princeton University's orations from this era routinely underscored the responsibilities of educated elites in maintaining social order and moral leadership amid national formation.^[46] These addresses, typically lasting 10-20 minutes, served less as inspirational homilies and more as capstone exercises in elocution, aligning with the era's view of universities as training grounds for clergy and statesmen rather than broad societal motivators.^[9] A pivotal shift toward invited external speakers occurred in the mid-19th century, introducing diverse perspectives and broader public engagement. Frederick Douglass's address, "The Claims of the Negro, Ethnologically Considered," delivered on July 12, 1854, at Western Reserve College's commencement in Hudson, Ohio, stands as a landmark example, where the formerly enslaved abolitionist systematically dismantled pseudoscientific racial hierarchies by invoking biblical monogenism, linguistic evidence from ancient texts, and cultural achievements of African civilizations to affirm human equality and critique pro-slavery ethnology.^[47] Douglass's 45-minute speech, attended by over 1,000 amid tense antebellum debates, challenged the audience's assumptions without direct abolitionist rhetoric, instead prioritizing empirical refutation of polygenesis claims popularized by figures like Samuel George Morton, thereby influencing intellectual discourse on race.^[48]^[49] Other notable 19th-century addresses included those at Harvard, where speakers like Leslie Stephen in 1869 deviated from rote Latin exercises to advocate rationalism and skepticism toward dogma, foreshadowing secular themes in higher education, though such innovations were exceptions amid predominantly religious and patriotic content.^[9] By the late 1800s, as universities expanded, speeches increasingly addressed industrial-era challenges, with University of Michigan commencements featuring orators like Cushman K. Davis in 1886, who emphasized practical application of knowledge to national progress, marking a transition from insular scholasticism to outward-looking counsel.^[50] These historical examples illustrate how commencement speeches evolved from ritualistic student performances to platforms for societal critique, laying groundwork for 20th-century expansions in scope and celebrity involvement.

Contemporary Addresses

Contemporary commencement addresses, disseminated widely via online video platforms since the early 2000s, have often emphasized personal resilience, self-awareness, and mortality as counterpoints to institutional optimism. Unlike earlier speeches focused on civic duty, modern examples frequently draw from speakers' biographical struggles, achieving resonance through anecdotal narratives rather than abstract exhortations. These addresses, while varying in tone, commonly urge graduates to prioritize intrinsic motivations over external validations, reflecting a cultural shift toward individualism amid economic uncertainties post-2000. Steve Jobs delivered a seminal address at Stanford University on June 12, 2005, structuring it around three personal stories: dropping out of college, being fired from Apple, and confronting a pancreatic cancer diagnosis. He advised graduates to "stay hungry, stay foolish," connecting disparate life experiences retrospectively and stressing that death clarifies priorities by reminding individuals that "almost everything—all external expectations... just evaporates." The speech, transcribed by Stanford, has amassed over 43 million YouTube views by 2025, influencing entrepreneurial mindsets and cited in leadership analyses for its ethos-driven persuasion rooted in Jobs' verified biography.^[51]^[52]^[53] David Foster Wallace's "This is Water" speech at Kenyon College on May 21, 2005, critiqued the "default setting" of self-centered thinking that fosters mundane misery, using a fish parable to illustrate awareness of everyday realities like grocery store frustrations. Wallace argued that "the really important kind of freedom involves attention and awareness and discipline," positing conscious choice over autopilot cynicism as a defense against solipsism, drawn from his literary insights rather than prescriptive platitudes. Published posthumously in collections, it remains a staple in philosophy discussions for its empirical observation of cognitive biases, with transcripts enduring online despite Wallace's later suicide.^[54]^[55] Other influential 21st-century examples include J.K. Rowling's 2008 Harvard address, which highlighted failure's role in resilience based on her pre-Harry Potter welfare experiences, and Admiral William McRaven's 2014 University of Texas speech, distilling Navy SEAL training into 10 life lessons like making one's bed to build discipline. These speeches, measured by citation frequency and viewership, demonstrate causal links between narrative authenticity and audience retention, outperforming formulaic deliveries in empirical sharing metrics.^[56]

Controversies and Criticisms

Disinvitations and Political Bias

Disinvitations of commencement speakers, often driven by student and faculty protests, have disproportionately affected individuals perceived as holding conservative or heterodox views. The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) documents that, from 2000 to the present, disinvitation attempts targeted speakers with conservative perspectives nearly three times more frequently than others, with 97 such efforts against conservatives out of broader deplatforming incidents on campuses.^[21] Between 1998 and 2023, at least 174 commencement speakers faced disinvitation attempts, including 60 at public institutions, many stemming from ideological objections rather than logistical issues.^[57] Prominent examples illustrate this trend. In May 2014, former U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice withdrew from delivering the Rutgers University commencement address after protests by students and faculty accused her of war crimes related to the Iraq War, despite her initial invitation and $35,000 honorarium.^[58] Similarly, in April 2014, Brandeis University revoked an honorary degree and commencement participation for Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a critic of Islamist ideology and advocate for women's rights, following pressure from Muslim advocacy groups who deemed her views anti-Islam.^[59] These cases, among others tracked by FIRE, highlight how protests amplify demands for ideological conformity, with universities often yielding to avoid disruption.^[17] Underlying these disinvitations is a systemic political imbalance in speaker selection, exacerbated by the left-leaning orientation of higher education faculty and administrators. Empirical studies of commencement addresses reveal a marked overrepresentation of liberal figures; for instance, an analysis of 1,875 speakers at 52 universities from 1989 to 2024 found a rise in liberal-identifying honorees, particularly post-2011, with conservatives more prevalent only at public institutions.^[60] In 2025, Democrats outnumbered Republicans 5:1 as speakers at the top 100 universities, per a review of invitations.^[18] Young America's Foundation's annual survey similarly reported 40% more liberal than conservative speakers at elite schools in recent years.^[61] This skew, attributable to institutional preferences for viewpoints aligning with prevailing academic norms, incentivizes "safe" liberal choices to preempt protests, while conservative invitees face heightened scrutiny and cancellation risks.^[62] Such patterns underscore causal dynamics where ideological homogeneity in academia—evidenced by faculty donation data showing 95%+ Democratic leanings in social sciences—fosters environments hostile to diverse political discourse at ceremonial events.^[63]

Protests and Free Speech Issues

Protests against commencement speakers have frequently disrupted university graduation ceremonies, raising concerns about the application of free speech principles in academic settings. These incidents often involve student activism targeting speakers perceived as holding controversial political views, leading to demands for disinvitation or onstage interruptions that can silence invited addresses. Such actions exemplify the "heckler's veto," where audience objections effectively suppress speech, contrasting with First Amendment protections that generally safeguard invited speakers from censorship by university administrators or disruptive protesters.^[64]^[65] A notable surge in disinvitations occurred during the 2014 commencement season, dubbed "disinvitation season" by critics, with over two dozen speakers withdrawing or being pressured to step down amid student protests. For instance, former U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice withdrew from Rutgers University after protests citing her role in the Iraq War, while International Monetary Fund Managing Director Christine Lagarde canceled her appearance at Smith College following opposition from students and faculty over economic policies. Similarly, Brandeis University rescinded an honorary degree for Ayaan Hirsi Ali due to backlash against her criticisms of Islam, highlighting patterns where speakers challenging progressive orthodoxies faced disproportionate scrutiny. These cases, tracked by organizations monitoring campus speech, predominantly targeted conservative or dissenting figures, suggesting an ideological imbalance in tolerance rather than uniform opposition to controversy.^[66]^[67]^[68] In recent years, protests intensified following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks on Israel, intertwining commencement events with geopolitical tensions. At Duke University's 2024 ceremony, hundreds of students walked out and booed comedian Jerry Seinfeld, citing his public support for Israel, while the University of Southern California canceled its main commencement address and a pro-Palestine valedictorian's speech amid safety concerns from threats. Harvard's 2024 event featured speaker Fatima Mousa Mohammed, who used the platform to denounce Israel, drawing criticism for platforming one-sided rhetoric while pro-Israel voices faced exclusion elsewhere. Disruptions extended to chants like "Free Palestine" at the University of Utah's 2024 commencement, pausing the president's remarks. Data from speech advocacy groups indicate that post-October 7, 2023, retaliation against dissenting views occurred nearly daily on campuses, with protests often shielding certain ideologies while targeting others, underscoring systemic biases in institutional responses.^[69]^[64]^[70] These episodes have prompted debates on the boundaries of free expression at graduations, where courts have ruled that schools may regulate disruptive conduct but must avoid viewpoint discrimination. Critics argue that yielding to protests erodes intellectual diversity, as evidenced by the predominance of left-leaning speakers in recent decades—fewer than 10% of top university commencements featured conservative figures in analyses from 2019—fostering environments where ideological conformity trumps open discourse. Universities' decisions to disinvite or censor, often justified by "safety" or "inclusivity," have been challenged as pretextual, particularly given the rarity of reciprocal protests against progressive speakers.^[65]^[68]^[71]

Cultural and Societal Impact

Influence on Graduates and Society

Commencement speeches aim to inspire graduates at a pivotal life transition, yet empirical evidence of their lasting influence remains sparse. An experimental study priming college students with other-serving (altruistic) versus self-serving messages from simulated speeches found no significant difference in subsequent altruistic attitudes, suggesting that such addresses may not substantially alter core values or behaviors in the short term.^[72] Quantitative analyses of speech content highlight recurring themes of personal agency, resilience, and merit-based success, but lack longitudinal data linking these to graduates' career trajectories or life outcomes.^[73] Anecdotal reports from alumni occasionally credit motivational shifts to specific speeches, such as Steve Jobs' 2005 Stanford address emphasizing following passion, though causal attribution is unverifiable amid confounding factors like individual agency and economic conditions. On career choices, speeches often advocate risk-taking and innovation, aligning with cultural narratives of self-determination, but no rigorous studies demonstrate causal effects on employment rates, entrepreneurial ventures, or professional paths. For instance, surveys of graduates rarely isolate speech content as a predictor of post-graduation decisions, with broader influences like market demands and networks predominating. Critics argue that the genre's emphasis on optimism and intention overlooks structural barriers, potentially fostering disillusionment when real-world results diverge from rhetorical promises.^[74] Societally, commencement addresses serve as public rituals reinforcing ideals like meritocracy and the American Dream, with linguistic strategies in U.S. speeches legitimizing individual effort as the primary path to prosperity.^[75] Their dissemination via media and social platforms extends reach beyond campuses, shaping broader discourse on success and responsibility; for example, viral speeches from figures like Oprah Winfrey in 2013 at Harvard amplified messages of empathy and perseverance to millions. However, this amplification can embed prevailing cultural biases, such as an overreliance on personal virtue amid systemic inequalities, contributing to a societal expectation of self-optimization without addressing collective failures. In recent years, politicized addresses have sparked debates on free speech and institutional values, indirectly influencing public perceptions of higher education's role in civic life.^[76] Overall, while speeches reflect and propagate societal norms, their aggregate impact appears more symbolic than transformative, with measurable effects confined to transient inspiration rather than enduring policy or behavioral shifts.

Empirical Analysis of Effectiveness

Empirical studies on the effectiveness of commencement speeches are limited, with most research focusing on content analysis rather than measurable outcomes such as changes in attitudes, behaviors, or career trajectories. Available evidence from surveys and experiments indicates low retention of speech content over time and negligible short-term effects on key psychological variables like altruism. No large-scale longitudinal studies have demonstrated causal links between exposure to commencement addresses and long-term graduate outcomes, such as employment success or civic engagement.^[77]^[78] A 2012 survey of 232 Stanford University alumni from the past 40 years found that only 59.5 percent recalled the speaker at their graduation, 37.9 percent remembered specific content, and 28.8 percent could recall a theme or quote. Recall rates were higher for more recent graduates (since 2000), with 93.1 percent remembering the speaker, 70.9 percent specific content, and 54.7 percent a theme or quote, suggesting that impressions fade rapidly post-graduation due to factors like excitement, environmental distractions (e.g., heat, cited by 15 percent of respondents), and personal transitions. This implies that while speeches may resonate momentarily amid the ceremony's emotional context, sustained memory—and thus potential influence—is uncommon.^[78] An experimental study published in 2022 tested the impact of simulated commencement speech excerpts on altruistic attitudes among 240 U.S. college students, randomly assigning participants to other-serving (altruism-focused) or self-serving messages drawn from real speeches at top-ranked universities. Using the New Helping Attitude Scale (NHAS), researchers found no statistically significant difference in post-exposure scores between groups (analyzed via Student's t-test), failing to support the hypothesis that altruistic priming elevates prosocial attitudes. Participants' baseline NHAS scores were also lower than U.S. adult population norms, indicating college students may be less receptive to such brief interventions. The study concluded that one-time, short messages from commencement-style speeches do not produce measurable short-term priming effects on altruism.^[77] The scarcity of rigorous, outcome-oriented research underscores a gap in understanding causal effectiveness, as most analyses remain descriptive of rhetorical themes (e.g., calls to "help others" appearing in over half of sampled speeches) without tracking behavioral changes. Anecdotal reports of inspiration exist, but without controlled or longitudinal data, claims of broad societal or personal impact lack empirical substantiation, aligning with observations that graduates often prioritize immediate post-ceremony experiences over speech directives.^[74]^[78]

References

[1]
The commencement address as a distinctive literary genre.
May 15, 2024 · The commencement address is a rather odd literary genre. Its purpose is to inspire and motivate; its tone, uplifting and optimistic, yet hopefully leavened ...
[2]
Ten Suggestions for a Successful Commencement Address - PMC
The message should be uplifting and should deal with education, wisdom, the future, and what the graduates have accomplished. It is about the sacrifices made by ...
[3]
[PDF] How to Write a Commencement Speach - Carnegie Mellon University
A strong commencement speech should be meaningful. It might reflect on lessons learned or obstacles overcome. But it doesn't need to be a downer. Avoid being ...<|separator|>
[4]
9.4 Commencement addresses and ceremonial speeches - Fiveable
They inspire, motivate, and celebrate achievements while providing guidance for the future. These speeches blend personal stories, humor, and wisdom to create ...
[5]
What is a Keynote Speech? Insight & Tips for Event Success
Oct 25, 2024 · A keynote speech is the main address at an event, designed to set the theme, inspire the audience, and unify attendees around a central message.
[6]
Commencement speeches aren't for political grandstanding - The Hill
May 29, 2025 · Put simply, the podium granted to these commencement speakers doesn't belong to the speaker. It is a platform designed for a specific purpose ...
[7]
The Strange Ritual of Commencement Speeches - The Atlantic
May 8, 2024 · A commencement address has to be about the graduates: It is their day. Getting the “trite ideas out”—Pursue your passions! Turn failure into ...
[8]
Commencement speech: structural and pragmatic characteristics
Feb 5, 2024 · A commencement address may be considered to be a combination of three types of discourse: political, didactic and congratulatory. It is noted ...
[9]
Commencement Speeches: History of the Graduation Tradition | TIME
May 13, 2016 · The commencement speech is a very old custom and it goes with the idea that oratory was one of the central things that students were learning.
[10]
Graduation: Fact Sheet - EveryCRSReport.com
May 7, 2015 · The tradition of degree ceremonies originated in Europe in the 12th century in the medieval universities of Paris and Bologna, and later in the ...<|separator|>
[11]
The Medieval University
The teaching took the form of reading and explaining texts; the examinations were oral disputations ... Orator wrote ceremonial letters and addresses. Most of ...
[12]
Harvard 1642: America's First Commencement - We're History
May 8, 2019 · The first university commencement in English America took place in 1642 in Cambridge, Massachusetts, at Harvard College.
[13]
History of Harvard's Oldest Tradition | Commencement Office
The first 'Happy Observance of Commencement' at Harvard College was held in the autumn of 1642, with nine scholars in the graduating class.
[14]
Evolving Graduation Ceremonies and Historic Commencement ...
May 1, 2024 · In modern times, as oration is less stressed and appreciated, graduation ceremonies changed. To honor graduates, a speaker was chosen to address the crowds.
[15]
None
### Summary of Quantitative Findings on Commencement Speeches (1890–2020)
[16]
Campus Speaker Disinvitations: Recent trends (Part 1 of 2)
Jan 24, 2017 · 2016 featured a record number of disinvitations to speakers from colleges and universities, 46 in total. The previous record of 34 was set in 2013.
[17]
Campus Deplatforming Database - FIRE
This research documents the ways and reasons that deplatforming attempts occur on college and university campuses from 1998 to the present.
[18]
Democrats Outnumber Republicans 5 to 1 as Commencement ...
May 14, 2025 · Trends show that commencement speakers are often left-leaning, as found by the College Fix's 2023 and 2024 analyses and the Washington ...<|separator|>
[19]
Highlights from this year's commencement addresses
Jun 5, 2024 · It's been a tumultuous graduation season, marked by cancelled speeches, relocated ceremonies, walkouts and protests, and, of course, ...
[20]
Colleges shun politics in graduation speaker invites
Apr 10, 2025 · Top colleges are spurning politics in their choices of commencement speakers as the first year of President Trump's second term unfolds.
[21]
New Report: The Push Against Campus Speakers Is Getting More ...
So far, FIRE has discovered 192 incidents in which students or faculty have pushed for speakers invited to campus (both for commencement and other speaking ...
[22]
How to Write a Commencement Speech as a Guest Speaker (Ideas ...
Jan 8, 2024 · As a general rule of thumb, aim for a speech that's 10 to 15 minutes long. Give yourself enough time to cover all the main ideas you want to ...
[23]
[PDF] Commencement Speech Guidelines - Harvard Extension School
A successful Commencement speech needs to convey a message that is specific to the speaker and that also has significance for a wide audience.
[24]
Senior Class Speaker - Commencement - Lake Forest College
Applicants should compose a commencement speech that is no more than 500 words in length and is no longer than 5 minutes. A successful speech is one that ...
[25]
10 Steps To Writing A Graduation Speech | Thesaurus.com
May 12, 2022 · Aim for a speech that falls between 500 and 750 words, and time yourself to make sure you don't exceed 10 minutes during delivery. 10. Practice, ...
[26]
Graduation Speeches: Speeches You Give in Pointy Hats
Most all student graduation speeches include the past, present, and future format. Present: Opening statement and the thank you. Past: The shared memory. Future ...
[27]
6 tips to write a great graduation speech (with examples) - Lingoda
Jan 3, 2024 · The overall goal of graduation speeches is to inspire and move your audience. But there are lots of ways to do this, and picking the right ...
[28]
How to write an inspiring graduation speech - Greenlight
Feb 26, 2024 · Most college and university commencement speeches last around 5-10 minutes, so high school speeches are typically shorter. You can guide ...
[29]
This writer analyzed 100 graduation speeches — here are the 4 tips ...
here are the 4 tips they all share · 1. Dream big · 2. Work hard · 3. Make mistakes · 4. Be kind.
[30]
All Talk: 58 Commencement Speeches Analyzed
The analysis of 58 speeches found they shifted from formal to personal, but themes like "follow your passion" and "failure is just a stop on the way to success ...Missing: common | Show results with:common
[31]
Anatomy Of A Great Commencement Speech - NPR
May 20, 2014 · What makes a good commencement address great? We read more than 300 speeches and singled out the qualities that made them rise to the top.
[32]
Investigating pragma-rhetorical strategies utilized by American ...
Aug 9, 2025 · This study explores how commencement speakers utilize success stories pragma-rhetorically to motivate the graduates to behave wisely to take ...<|separator|>
[33]
Commencement Speaker Selection | Office of Academic Affairs
Policies, Guidelines and Forms ... Nominations will be made through the university's Commencement speaker nomination portal, which is always open.
[34]
VI 1.08 Policy on Commencement Speaker Selection | Bowie State
Similarly, the Chair of the Committee will be required to submit a complete list of recommended speakers to the President at least one full year in advance of ...
[35]
How Are Commencement Speakers, Honorary Degrees Selected?
Jun 13, 2024 · Amid the 2024 division, higher education institutions cite unifying selection criteria for honorary degrees and commencement speakers.
[36]
Selecting commencement speakers: An art or a science?
Mar 30, 2016 · Many colleges now prioritize student input and diversity when choosing commencement speakers. They are also developing screening processes to ...
[37]
Graduate With Style: Commencement Speech Tips From Toastmasters
B - Brevity - Speak for 10-20 minutes. This will force you to focus on the most important aspects of your message while helping to make the overall event more ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[38]
How long should a commencement speech be? - Quora
Apr 10, 2017 · The ideal length of a good commencement speech should be between Five to Ten minutes. But you should not go over 18 to 20 minutes. Do not rush ...How long should I speak during a graduation speech? - QuoraHow do commencement speeches differ from regular speeches?More results from www.quora.com
[39]
[PDF] A Quantitative Analysis of Commencement Speeches - CAUSEweb
with other speeches, showing the average speech length can vary by college and the years for which speeches exist. The overall speech length has varied over ...
[40]
Let the Speeches Commence! - Toastmasters International
A compelling graduation speech offers insights from experience, like J.K. Rowling's advice, and can use humor, such as Stephen Colbert's, to engage restless ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[41]
Commencement Challenge Speaker - University of Tampa
Tips for a Successful Speech · Content · Originality · Clichés · Quotations · Humor · Practice.
[42]
Nervousness | Communication Within the Curriculum
If public speaking makes you nervous, then you are not alone. As many as 75% of college students have reported having anxiety about public speaking ...
[43]
4 Steps To Deliver The Best Graduation Speech ‍ - Orai
Feb 16, 2024 · What are some tips for delivering a successful commencement speech? Deliver a winning commencement speech by planning early, rehearsing well ...
[44]
Who'd Want to Give a Commencement Speech Anymore?
May 25, 2024 · The appeal of being a commencement speaker, however, seems to be waning. Just three Fortune 50 chief executives appear to be commencement speakers this year.
[45]
Barnabas Binney at Rhode Island College (Brown University), 1774
We've hand-picked over 350 addresses going back to 1774. Search by name, school, date or theme.
[46]
Commencement Orations - Princeton & Slavery Project
Princeton's 19th-century orators emphasized the moral and social duties of educated white men in the United States, imbuing Princeton students with a sense of ...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
[47]
[PDF] The claims of the Negro, ethnologically considered - Loc
AN ADDRESS, Before the Literary Societies OF WESTERN RESERVE COLLEGE, At Commencement, July. 12, 1854. BY FREDERICK DOUGLASS. ROCHESTER: PRINTED BY LEE, MANN & ...
[48]
Frederick Douglass Gives a Commencement Address
Jun 3, 2021 · In 1854 Frederick Douglass was the invited speaker. It had been nearly a decade since the publication of Douglass' first autobiography.
[49]
Frederick Douglass' 1854 speech | CWRU Newsroom
Feb 4, 2020 · The speech refuted common arguments favoring slavery, and urged students to fight for abolition.
[50]
University of Michigan Commencement Addresses
University of Michigan Commencement Addresses ; 1885, June 25, Rev. Dr. Samuel Lunt Caldwell President of Vassar College ; 1886, July 1, Hon. Cushman Kellogg ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[51]
'You've got to find what you love,' Jobs says - Stanford Report
Jun 12, 2005 · This is a prepared text of the Commencement Address delivered by Steve Jobs, CEO of Apple Computer and of Pixar Animation Studios, on June 12, 2005.
[52]
Why Steve Jobs' Commencement Speech Still Inspires 10 Years Later
Jun 12, 2015 · The speech emphasized triumph over adversity. Each of the three vignettes from Jobs life involve struggle or sacrifice. Stories of triumph over ...
[53]
Why Steve Jobs' 2005 commencement speech is the most watched ...
Jun 7, 2021 · Jobs' speech followed three stories from his life: one, in which he tells an anecdote about dropping out of college; another, about the lessons ...
[54]
This is Water by David Foster Wallace (Full Transcript and Audio)
right up there with Hunter ...
[55]
This is Water - Alumni Bulletin - Kenyon College
If you worship money and things-if they are where you tap real meaning in life-then you will never have enough. Never feel you have enough. It's the truth.
[56]
Commencement Speeches That Never Fail to Inspire - Rolling Stone
May 28, 2020 · From Will Ferrell and Oprah Winfrey to Pres. Barack Obama and David Foster Wallace, these speakers deftly sent graduates out into the world.
[57]
Politicians as commencement speakers remain a risky proposition
May 15, 2023 · Dividing the audience with speaker choice can undercut the joy of graduation, says George Mason professor emeritus.Missing: disinvitations bias
[58]
Condoleezza Rice declines to speak at Rutgers after student protests
May 5, 2014 · Condoleezza Rice, former US secretary of state announced on Facebook Saturday that she would not be speaking at the Rutgers University commencement this year.
[59]
Brandeis Cancels Plan to Give Honorary Degree to Ayaan Hirsi Ali ...
Apr 8, 2014 · Brandeis University said Tuesday that it had reversed course and would not award an honorary degree to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a campaigner for women's rights.
[60]
Organizational Contexts of Speech on College Campuses, 1989–2024
May 27, 2025 · To address this gap, we analyze the political orientations of 1,875 commencement speakers at 52 universities between 1989 and 2024. Findings ...Missing: imbalance | Show results with:imbalance
[61]
YAF's 24th Annual Commencement Speakers Survey
YAF's 24th Annual Commencement Speakers Survey Finds 40% More Liberal Speakers Than Conservatives At Top 100 Schools. Young America's Foundation's (YAF) ...
[62]
The Disappearance of Conservative Commencement Speakers
May 28, 2014 · In an increasingly polarized political atmosphere, the current lack of Republican commencement speakers at top universities and colleges makes ...
[63]
ERIC - ED674061 - The Politics of Commencement Speakers
Findings indicate a rise in liberal speakers, particularly since 2011, and a higher prevalence of conservative speakers at public institutions and universities ...Missing: disinvitations bias
[64]
8 Controversial Commencement Speakers Throughout History
Here are examples that show how controversial commencement speakers and students who protest them may or may not have First Amendment protections.<|control11|><|separator|>
[65]
Graduation Speech Controversies | The First Amendment ...
Jan 1, 2009 · Court has established that students have limited free speech rights · Court has upheld the censoring of student graduation speeches · The original ...
[66]
Colleges Across the Country Disinvite Commencement Speakers
Presented by FIRE and College Pulse, the 2026 College Free Speech Rankings is the largest survey of campus free expression ever performed. Explore Rankings.
[67]
Pomp and protest: 11 controversial college commencement speakers
May 16, 2014 · Over the past two years, two dozen graduation speakers have either withdrawn or been disinvited by universities because of their personal or ...
[68]
The Skewed Line-Up of Commencement Speakers - Reason.com
May 16, 2019 · Although they have not entirely escaped threatened protests, walk-outs, and disinvitations (as evident this year by Concordia dumping Harvey ...
[69]
Student protests caused mostly minor disruptions at several ... - NPR
May 12, 2024 · At Duke University, crowds of students booed and walked out on commencement speaker Jerry Seinfeld over his ongoing support for Israel. At ...
[70]
A year in campus speech controversies — What does the data reveal?
Oct 15, 2024 · Students, faculty, and invited speakers faced retaliation nearly every single day after October 7 for expressing their political beliefs.
[71]
[PDF] The Problems of Commencement Speech
Apr 25, 2025 · Courts have recognized differences among speech by public school students in various contexts.71. There are relevant differences between.
[72]
Quantifying the Impact of College Commencement Speeches
CONCLUSION: I found that other-serving and self-serving instructions were balanced in commencement speeches at top-ranked U.S. colleges. Additional research is ...
[73]
[PDF] A Quantitative Analysis of Commencement Speeches - CAUSEweb
Commencement speeches mark a critical transition point in the lives of graduates. The messages conveyed in these speeches offer advice for the future and ...
[74]
Commencement Speech Morality | Social Philosophy and Policy
Jul 10, 2025 · Commencement Speech Morality encourages graduates to address injustices, solve problems, and make the world better, viewing the world as their ...
[75]
Legitimating meritocracy as part of the American Dream through the ...
This paper proposes the study of four strategies, which flesh out all commencement speeches, as key points in a genre which emphasizes the core values in ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[76]
We Watched Dozens of Graduation Speeches. Here's What We Found.
Jun 8, 2025 · The New York Times studied videos of addresses posted online, including those by President Trump, Kermit the Frog and a slew of celebrity speakers.
[77]
Quantifying the Impact of College Commencement Speeches: An ...
Oct 7, 2022 · OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that priming college students with other-serving, altruistic messages raises their altruistic attitudes ...
[78]
Speak, Memory | STANFORD magazine
Overall, 59.5 percent could recall who spoke at their graduation, 37.9 percent could remember specific content from the speech, and 28.8 percent could remember ...