Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

FlatBuffers

FlatBuffers is an efficient, cross-platform library that enables direct access to serialized data without the need for or unpacking, minimizing allocation and overhead. Developed by , it was originally created in 2014 at the company's Fun Propulsion Labs for game development and other performance-critical applications, particularly to enhance efficiency in resource-constrained environments like games. The library supports schema-based data definition through a dedicated called flatc, which generates code for reading and writing data in multiple programming languages, including C++, C#, C, Go, , Kotlin, , Lobster, , , , , , and . Key features of FlatBuffers include its mechanism, which allows applications to query and modify structured directly from the serialized without deserialization steps, resulting in significant gains over traditional formats. It achieves by avoiding allocations during and supports forward and for schema evolution, ensuring long-term maintainability in evolving software projects. Unlike more general-purpose serialization methods, FlatBuffers has a small runtime footprint with no external dependencies beyond the (STL) in C++, making it suitable for embedded systems and real-time applications. In benchmarks, FlatBuffers demonstrates superior speed and lower resource usage compared to alternatives like and , particularly in decode, traverse, and deallocation operations for statically typed data. It also includes FlexBuffers, a schema-less extension for handling dynamic or irregularly structured data while retaining similar efficiency benefits. Widely adopted in open-source projects and industries focused on gaming, networking, and , FlatBuffers continues to evolve under the Apache 2.0 license, with ongoing releases addressing new language support and optimizations.

Overview

Introduction

FlatBuffers is an open-source, cross-platform library developed by , designed for efficient binary in performance-critical applications such as game development. It enables the serialization of structured into a compact format that supports direct access without the need for or unpacking, thereby reducing memory allocations and CPU overhead, particularly in resource-constrained environments like and systems. This approach contrasts with traditional methods by allowing applications to read and write in-place, enhancing speed and efficiency. At its core, FlatBuffers operates by storing data in a single contiguous buffer where nested structures are referenced via offsets, such as unsigned 32-bit offsets (uoffset_t) for tables, unions, strings, and vectors. These offsets provide relative addressing within the buffer, enabling access to serialized data across different programming languages and schema versions while maintaining strong forward and . The library supports a wide range of languages, including C++, C#, , , and , making it versatile for cross-platform use. Released under the 2.0, FlatBuffers is freely available and hosted on , where it is actively maintained by and the open-source community. Its design prioritizes minimal runtime overhead, allowing for faster data access compared to formats requiring deserialization, which is especially beneficial in high-performance scenarios.

Motivations and Goals

FlatBuffers was developed to address key inefficiencies in traditional data formats, such as and , which often incur significant overhead from parsing serialized data into temporary structures, multiple memory allocations, and unnecessary data copying. These issues are especially pronounced in performance-critical scenarios like game development, where frequent serialization and deserialization for tasks such as asset loading and networking can lead to bottlenecks in processing and increased on resource-constrained devices. The library's core goals center on enabling data access, allowing applications to read and query serialized data directly from the without unpacking or allocation, thereby minimizing and improving overall efficiency. This approach ensures high memory efficiency, making it particularly suitable for platforms where bandwidth and storage limitations are prevalent, while also supporting evolution to maintain backwards and forwards compatibility without requiring version-specific code changes. Additionally, FlatBuffers aims to provide a runtime with no external dependencies, facilitating easy integration into diverse environments and reducing deployment complexity. While extensible to any performance-sensitive application, its design particularly targets game engines and real-time systems, where rapid data handling is essential. A key trade-off in this design is the emphasis on superior read performance and low at the expense of more complex write operations and reduced human readability compared to text-based formats.

History

Development and Initial Release

FlatBuffers was developed by Wouter van Oortmerssen at Google's Fun Propulsion Labs, with contributions from Derek Bailey. The library originated from the need to address serialization bottlenecks in performance-critical applications, particularly in game development, where traditional methods like incurred high overhead from parsing, unpacking, and memory allocation. This initiative aimed to enable efficient data handling on resource-constrained devices, such as mobile hardware, by allowing direct access to serialized data without deserialization steps. FlatBuffers was first publicly released as an open-source project on on June 17, 2014. Its early adoption was driven by requirements in Google's internal tools and game engines, with a strong emphasis on cross-platform compatibility across operating systems like Windows, macOS, , and from the outset.

Evolution and Maintenance

FlatBuffers employs a date-based versioning scheme in the format YY.MM.DD, where YY represents the year minus 2000, MM the month (01-12), and DD the day, emphasizing stability and semantic versioning principles to minimize disruptions for users. This approach allows releases to align closely with development cycles, as seen in versions like 25.02.10 released on February 10, 2025, which included enhancements such as 6 compatibility and compiler performance optimizations including dependency upgrades and error handling improvements. Post-initial release, FlatBuffers saw significant milestones that expanded its applicability and robustness. In 2017, with was introduced, enabling support for efficient remote procedure calls in C++ and Go, which broadened its use in distributed systems. Around 2016, FlexBuffers were added as a schema-less variant, addressing needs for dynamic while maintaining access, particularly useful in scenarios like configuration files or ad-hoc exchange. Language support grew with official by 2019, providing memory-efficient for systems programming, and support around the same period, facilitating and macOS development with generated structs for reading and writing buffers. Schema features, such as field IDs for ordered additions and rules, were refined to enhance forwards and backwards , allowing schemas to evolve without breaking existing binaries. Maintenance of FlatBuffers is led by , with substantial community involvement through open-source contributions under the 2.0 license. The project has amassed over 3,260 commits on as of 2025, reflecting ongoing development and issue resolution. Active tracking occurs via GitHub's issue tracker, where enhancements like performance optimizations—such as dependency upgrades and error handling improvements in version 25.02.10—address challenges in build times and cross-language consistency. Community pull requests, numbering over 67 open as of late 2025, continue to drive expansions and bug fixes, ensuring the library remains performant across its supported platforms.

Design and Architecture

Schema Language

The FlatBuffers language, also known as the Interface Definition Language (IDL), serves as a declarative mechanism to define structured data types for and deserialization, enabling the generation of type-safe code in various programming languages. This approach ensures that data structures such as tables, structs, enums, and unions are precisely specified, facilitating efficient binary representation without requiring runtime parsing of the schema itself. Key elements of the schema include namespaces, which organize declarations into scoped containers similar to C++ namespaces or Java packages, as in namespace MyGame;. Tables form the primary construct for defining extensible objects, consisting of a name and a list of fields with types such as scalars, strings, or other defined types; fields can be marked as required or optional, with tables supporting polymorphism through unions. Structs, in contrast, define fixed-size data aggregates with all fields being required and no support for defaults or deprecation, making them suitable for simple, immutable value types like coordinates. Enums provide named constants, optionally backed by a specific type such as byte, while unions allow a single field to hold one of multiple table types, automatically including a companion _type field to indicate the active variant. The syntax of the schema language resembles that of C-family languages, promoting familiarity for developers. A basic table declaration follows the form table Name { field1:type; field2:type = default; }, as exemplified by:
namespace MyGame.Sample;
table Monster {
  pos:Vec3;
  mana:short = 150;
  name:string;
}
struct Vec3 {
  x:float;
  y:float;
  z:float;
}
This defines a Monster table with a vector position, a default mana value, and a string name, alongside a supporting struct for the position. Fields support defaults for scalars (e.g., = 150), while non-scalar fields default to null if omitted; deprecation is handled via attributes like (deprecated), allowing fields to be phased out without breaking compatibility. Additionally, schemas can incorporate external definitions using include "other.fbs"; directives, enabling modular organization akin to . The compilation process utilizes the flatc compiler to translate files (typically with .fbs extension) into language-specific code, generating accessors and builders that ensure direct, type-checked data handling at . By pre-generating this code—via commands such as flatc --cpp myschema.fbs for C++ output—the system eliminates the need for schema interpretation during execution, enhancing performance and safety.

Data Structures and Buffers

FlatBuffers serializes data into a single contiguous byte , referred to as a flat buffer, which serves as both the in-memory representation and the persistent storage . This begins with a 32-bit unsigned offset (uoffset_t) that points to the location of the root object within the buffer, enabling direct access without the entire content. The employs little-endian byte order for all scalars and enforces strict rules—where each scalar and struct is aligned to its own size—to guarantee consistent behavior across different platforms and architectures. Key components of the flat buffer include offsets for navigation and specialized representations for different data types. The root offset at the buffer's start leads to the root table or struct, while nested objects are referenced using relative offsets: tables employ indirect offsets to their positions, allowing for flexible hierarchies, whereas structs are embedded inline as fixed-size blocks of data without additional indirection. Tables are preceded by virtual tables (vtables), which are shared metadata structures containing a 16-bit field count, the table's byte size, the object's byte size, and an array of 16-bit offsets (voffset_t) to each field, including defaults for optional or added fields to support versioning. Structs, in contrast, consist of inline scalars aligned to the size of their largest member, omitting vtables due to their fixed nature and lack of compatibility features. Vectors in FlatBuffers are supported as native typed arrays, such as [float] for an array of 32-bit floating-point numbers, stored contiguously in memory and prefixed by a 32-bit element count for length information, with access mediated by an offset from the parent object. Strings are represented as specialized byte vectors, consisting of a 32-bit length prefix followed by the UTF-8 encoded bytes and a terminating null byte, also accessed via offsets; this design allows for automatic deduplication when the same string appears multiple times in the buffer, as identical instances share the same offset reference. The memory layout of a flat buffer is optimized for , with no inherent waste between fields—fields follow immediately after preceding ones, ordered by the definition—but optional may be inserted to meet scalar requirements. Vtables are typically placed at the end of the buffer after all objects, promoting and minimizing redundancy. The total buffer size is determined by the and content, encompassing the , vtables, offsets, and any , resulting in a compact representation where the final size equals the cumulative bytes written during plus metadata overhead.

Serialization and Access Mechanisms

FlatBuffers employs a programmatic through the FlatBufferBuilder class, which constructs serialized data incrementally in a depth-first, manner to minimize memory allocations and temporary objects. This allows developers to add fields to tables and vectors step-by-step, such as creating strings or sub-objects before referencing them in parent structures, culminating in a call to finish the buffer. For dynamic building, FlatBuffers supports input from files using the flatc , which serializes the data into a FlatBuffer based on a provided , enabling schema-guided conversion without manual coding. The command flatc --binary schema.fbs input.json generates the output , facilitating integration with existing workflows while leveraging FlatBuffers' efficiency. Reading in FlatBuffers occurs without a traditional deserialization step, relying instead on generated accessor methods that provide direct, pointer-like access to data fields by following offsets within the . For instance, methods like monster->hp() retrieve values immediately, traversing nested structures on demand to access properties such as positions or inventories. Vtables in the format aid this by mapping field offsets efficiently. Error handling during access emphasizes safety through optional verification and bounded operations; the Verifier class performs bounds checks on offsets, depths, and string terminations to prevent crashes from malformed or untrusted buffers, returning a success indicator. Safe APIs, such as generated accessors, return default values for missing fields without exceptions, while unsafe —via memcpy or raw pointers—for structs bypasses checks for peak performance but requires careful handling of and . For hybrid scenarios requiring schema-optional reading, FlexBuffers extend FlatBuffers by allowing dynamic parsing of variable data, such as JSON-like structures, into buffers that can be accessed without predefined schemas, blending flexibility with principles. This mode is invoked via flatc with the --flexbuffers flag, supporting mixed static and dynamic payloads in applications like configuration or scripting.

Key Features

Zero-Copy Data Access

FlatBuffers enables data access by maintaining the serialized data in its original binary buffer, where access is performed through offsets and generated getter methods that mimic direct reads. This eliminates the need for or unpacking the data into a secondary , avoiding allocations and the creation of temporary objects during deserialization. Instead, the buffer's structure—comprising nested objects like structs, tables, and vectors—allows in-place traversal using virtual tables (vtables) to locate fields and handle defaults with minimal indirection. The primary benefits of this mechanism include substantial reductions in CPU overhead for read operations, with benchmarks showing FlatBuffers to be significantly faster than alternatives; for example, circa 2014 tests on 64-bit using a representative game demonstrated decode, traverse, and deallocation for 1 million operations taking 0.08 seconds for FlatBuffers compared to 302 seconds for and 583 seconds for RapidJSON. In managed environments such as , zero-copy access further minimizes garbage collection by leveraging direct operations on ByteBuffers, preventing object proliferation and associated costs. Overall, this results in lower usage and improved , particularly valuable in resource-constrained settings. Zero-copy access is especially suited to use cases involving large datasets, such as game assets in high-performance applications, where only subsets of the data are accessed at —including support for buffers larger than 2 GiB via 64-bit offsets in C++ since version 23.5.26. It also supports memory-mapped files () for disk-based scenarios, enabling efficient loading of persistent data without full copies into . However, FlatBuffers' design prioritizes read efficiency over mutability; write operations necessitate constructing the entire anew, as there is no support for dynamic resizing or in-place modifications. Consequently, it is not ideal for applications requiring frequent updates, where rebuilding the buffer could introduce overhead.

Backwards and Forwards Compatibility

FlatBuffers provides robust mechanisms for backwards and forwards , allowing to evolve without breaking existing applications or interchange. Backwards compatibility ensures that code compiled against an older schema version can successfully read serialized with a newer schema, while forwards compatibility allows code compiled against a newer schema to read older data by handling missing elements gracefully. This is achieved through the use of virtual tables (vtables), which map indices to offsets in the serialized , preserving the of existing fields even as new ones are added. When a reader encounters a generated from a different version, the vtable ensures that access remains consistent by aligning indices appropriately, without requiring or overhead. For forwards , a newer reader processing older data ignores any added or deprecated fields in the , as these are positioned at the end of the table and thus absent from the legacy ; for any missing fields, the reader supplies values, such as 0 for integers or empty strings for scalars, ensuring seamless operation. Deprecated fields, marked with the deprecated keyword in the , are excluded from to prevent accidental use, further supporting safe without altering binary data. In the case of backwards compatibility, an older reader accessing newer data can retrieve required fields, which maintain their positions and offsets, while optional fields added later are simply skipped if not present in the reader's , avoiding errors from unrecognized elements. To handle type changes safely, unions can be employed, where new variants are appended to the end of the union definition, allowing older readers to process only known types via a type discriminator. Schema evolution follows strict rules to maintain : new s must be added at the end of table definitions to avoid shifting offsets, names can be changed since they are not serialized (affecting only and representations), and version tracking can be implemented informally through annotations or dedicated s, though no built-in versioning system enforces this automatically. The FlatBuffers compiler, flatc, supports compatibility validation via the --conform flag, which checks a new against a base version (e.g., flatc --conform schema_v1.fbs schema_v2.fbs) to ensure adherence to these rules and prevent breaking changes. Additionally, FlexBuffers extend this flexibility to schema-less scenarios, enabling dynamic data without rigid definitions.

Language Support and Tools

Supported Programming Languages

FlatBuffers provides runtime support for a wide array of programming languages, with varying levels of feature completeness as detailed in the official support documentation. The core supported languages include C, C++, C#, Dart, Go, Java, JavaScript, Kotlin, Lua, PHP, Python, Rust, Swift, TypeScript, and Lobster. These bindings allow developers to generate language-specific code from FlatBuffers schemas, facilitating zero-copy access to serialized data structures. The official support levels are as follows:
LanguageSupport LevelNotes
C++FullRichest feature set
C#GoodLacks JSON parsing, reflection
CGoodLacks simple mutation; basic reflection
DartGoodLacks JSON parsing, reflection, simple mutation
GoGoodLacks JSON parsing, reflection, optional scalars
JavaGoodLacks JSON parsing, reflection, buffer verifier
JavaScriptGoodLacks JSON parsing, reflection, simple mutation
KotlinGoodInherits from Java
LobsterGoodLacks JSON parsing, reflection, simple mutation
LuaGoodLacks JSON parsing, reflection, simple mutation
PHPWork in progress (WiP)Limited support; codegen in progress
PythonBasicLacks JSON parsing, reflection, simple mutation
RustGoodLacks JSON parsing, reflection
SwiftGoodLacks JSON parsing, reflection
TypeScriptGoodLacks JSON parsing, reflection, simple mutation
Implementation variations exist to accommodate different language paradigms and performance needs. For instance, the C++ binding is native and offers a option, allowing inclusion without traditional compilation steps for easier integration. Scripting languages such as , Lua, , and PHP rely on generated code bindings that integrate with their runtime environments, often distributed via package managers like for JavaScript or PyPI for Python. FlatBuffers operates cross-platform without external dependencies beyond standard library features, supporting Windows, macOS, , , , and web environments through JavaScript or . It requires only a C++11-compliant for building the core , ensuring broad compatibility on any platform that meets this baseline. The framework's extensibility is enhanced by community-contributed ports and the schema 's ability to produce idiomatic code tailored to each language's conventions, such as structs in or classes in . Contributions for new bindings are encouraged through the project's official guidelines, fostering ongoing expansion.

Compiler and Tooling

The FlatBuffers compiler, known as flatc, is a command-line that processes schema definition files (typically with a .fbs extension) to generate language-specific and headers for efficient data and deserialization. It supports compiling s into code for numerous programming languages, enabling developers to create type-safe accessors and builders without runtime parsing overhead. For instance, running flatc --cpp monster.fbs produces C++ header files containing classes for the defined Monster , facilitating direct manipulation. flatc offers extensive command-line options to customize output and processing. Core options include language generators such as --cpp for C++, --java for Java, and --python for Python, allowing multiple outputs in a single invocation (e.g., flatc --cpp --java schema.fbs). Data conversion features enable transforming between formats: --binary or -b generates binary FlatBuffers from JSON input, while --json or -j exports binary buffers to human-readable JSON, with --strict-json enforcing FlatBuffers-specific formatting. Schema-related options include --schema to serialize the schema itself into a binary format for runtime use, and --reflect-types or --reflect-names to include reflection metadata for dynamic inspection. Additional flags like -o PATH specify output directories, -I PATH add include paths for schema imports, and -M generates Makefile rules for build integration. For schema-less scenarios, --flexbuffers supports generating FlexBuffers data, which extends FlatBuffers for dynamic typing. Beyond core compilation, flatc integrates with auxiliary tools for validation and . The built-in verifier, generated via options like --cpp with enabled, allows runtime buffer validation to ensure before access, preventing errors from malformed inputs. The API, activated by compiling the reflection schema (reflection.fbs) with --reflect-types, enables runtime schema inspection and generic data handling without predefined . FlexBuffers tooling, invoked through --flexbuffers, provides utilities for creating and parsing dynamic buffers akin to but with binary efficiency, useful for ad-hoc data structures. These components collectively support robust development workflows. flatc exhibits broad platform compatibility, executing on major operating systems including Windows, macOS, and distributions, with binaries available via package managers or source builds. It seamlessly integrates with popular build systems: scripts can invoke flatc during configuration for C++ projects, while plugins handle Java/Kotlin code generation in environments. This tooling ecosystem ensures efficient incorporation into diverse software pipelines.

Usage

Defining Schemas and Code Generation

FlatBuffers schemas are defined using a simple Interface Definition Language (IDL) in files with the .fbs extension, which specifies the structure of data to be serialized. The schema language resembles C-family syntax and supports key constructs such as for organizing definitions, for flexible objects with optional fields, structs for fixed-size immutable data, enums for named constants, and for polymorphic types. For instance, a basic schema might begin with a namespace declaration like namespace MyGame.Sample;, followed by definitions such as a struct for a vector: struct Vec3 { x:float; y:float; z:float; }, an enum for colors: enum Color:byte { Red = 0, Green, Blue = 2 }, and a for a monster entity: table Monster { pos:Vec3; name:string (required); inventory:[ushort]; }. Tables use vtables for offsets to fields, enabling optional and default values (e.g., mana:short = 150;), while structs are inline and require all fields to be present without defaults. Unions allow a field to hold one of several table types, declared as [union](/page/Union) Equipment { Monster, Weapon }, and the root type of the buffer is specified with root_type Monster; to indicate the top-level object. Once the schema is written, is performed using the FlatBuffers , flatc, which produces language-specific access classes and functions from the .fbs file. The command flatc --cpp monster.fbs (replacing --cpp with the target language flag, such as --java or --python) generates header or source files containing classes like Monster with getter and setter methods, automatically handling defaults, optionals, and . For example, in C++, this yields monster_generated.h with methods like Monster::GetPos() returning a Vec3 struct and monster->MutateMana(short mana) for modifications. The generated code includes offsets and builders for serialization but focuses on safe, access at runtime, integrating seamlessly with the FlatBuffers . Best practices for schema management emphasize modularity and compatibility. Schemas can include other files using include "definitions.fbs"; to reuse common types across projects, with flatc generating code only for the primary file's definitions while incorporating includes. For versioning, add file_identifier "MONS"; (a four-character string) after the root_type to embed an identifier at the buffer's start, allowing runtime verification of schema compatibility without parsing the entire buffer. To ensure evolutionary changes do not break existing data, validate schemas with flatc --conform old_schema.fbs new_schema.fbs, which checks against a base schema for adherence to evolution rules like adding optional fields or changing defaults only in non-breaking ways. Common pitfalls in schema design include introducing breaking changes that invalidate prior data, such as removing required , altering types incompatibly, or reordering in structs, which can cause deserialization failures in deployed systems. Developers should avoid deprecating without providing defaults and instead append new optional to tables to maintain forwards and backwards .

Building and Accessing Data

FlatBuffers provides mechanisms for serializing data into a binary buffer and deserializing it for access, leveraging generated code from schemas to ensure and efficiency. The primary tool for building data is the FlatBufferBuilder class, which constructs the buffer in a depth-first manner, allowing fields to be added sequentially without intermediate parsing steps. This process begins by creating strings, structs, or sub-s, followed by starting a , adding s or values for fields, and ending the table to obtain an for the constructed object. For instance, to build a simple with a and short integer field, the builder would start a , create the , add it along with the short value using methods like AddOffset and AddShort, and then end the table. Once all components are assembled, the root object's is passed to the Finish method to complete the buffer, resulting in a contiguous byte array ready for storage or transmission. Accessing data from a FlatBuffer involves loading the byte and retrieving the root object using a generated accessor , such as GetRootAsMonster for a schema-defined Monster . This returns a pointer or reference to the root , from which fields can be directly read via generated methods like hp() for an or name() for a , enabling access to the underlying data. Limited in-place is supported for scalar fields in tables using generated Mutate methods on the table instance, such as MutateMana(short mana), which modify the directly if the field is present and return a indicating whether the succeeded. For optional fields, accessors typically return or default values if the field is absent, necessitating explicit checks to avoid errors during reads. Additionally, validation can be performed by verifying the size against expected minimums or using verifier functions generated by the compiler to ensure structural correctness before access. Advanced handling includes vectors of primitives, tables, or strings, which are created by first populating an array of elements and then using CreateVector to add the offset to the parent ; access involves indexing the vector (e.g., (2)) or iterating with forEach-like methods for processing elements without copying. Unions, representing types, require first checking the field to resolve the active , then to the appropriate table accessor (e.g., if type is , as via union()). For prototyping, FlatBuffers supports conversion from to binary buffers using the flatc compiler tool, which parses a JSON file matching the and outputs a FlatBuffer, facilitating rapid iteration without full code integration. This pathway aids in testing data flows but is not intended for due to its textual overhead.

Adoption

Notable Users and Projects

FlatBuffers has been adopted by several major technology companies for performance-critical applications. , its developer, utilizes it internally for tools and in the Android ecosystem, where it is integrated into the platform's external libraries for efficient data handling. has employed FlatBuffers since 2015 to enhance Android app performance, particularly for serialization in client-server communications, resulting in significant reductions in memory usage and parsing times. In the gaming industry, FlatBuffers supports data serialization in prominent frameworks and engines. The open-source Cocos2d-x incorporates FlatBuffers to serialize game data, enabling access for assets and scenes. leverages it through dedicated plugins and packages, such as FlatSharp and FlatBuffersImporter, for asset pipelines and runtime data processing in game development. Beyond corporate use, FlatBuffers integrates with key open-source projects. It serves as a serialization option in since 2017, supporting operations in C++ and Go for high-throughput RPCs. Dolt, a version-controlled SQL database, adopted FlatBuffers in 2022 as its primary storage format to enable and evolution. In machine learning, Lite uses FlatBuffers to store model structures, allowing efficient on-device inference without additional parsing. For robotics, FlatBuffers has been used in ROS via the flatbuffers package for real-time data sharing in distributed systems, with ongoing discussions for enhanced ROS 2 support as of 2025. As of 2025, additional adoptions include the (OSRM) backend upgrading to FlatBuffers version 25.2.10 for improved performance. It is also utilized in FlatCityBuf, a cloud-optimized format for 3D city models based on CityJSON.

Applications in Games and Industry

In the industry, FlatBuffers facilitates efficient asset loading for elements such as levels and animations by enabling access to serialized data, thereby eliminating parsing overhead and reducing load times in performance-critical scenarios. This approach is particularly beneficial for real-time networking in multiplayer games, where rapid and deserialization support low-latency data exchange without the need for unpacking steps. Additionally, its memory-efficient design optimizes gaming applications by minimizing heap allocations, which helps reduce battery consumption and thermal output during intensive sessions. Beyond gaming, FlatBuffers finds applications in embedded systems, where its small code footprint and low memory requirements make it suitable for resource-constrained devices that demand direct data access without additional parsing. In mobile development for and , it supports UI data binding by allowing structured binary data to be read in-place, enhancing app responsiveness. For databases, FlatBuffers enables efficient storage of structured data through compact binary representations that support schema evolution, improving query performance in storage engines. In machine learning, it serves as the underlying format for model interchange in frameworks like Lite, providing serialization for deploying models across diverse hardware without deserialization costs. Its integration with has become more prevalent in architectures, enabling RPC calls for high-throughput systems. There is also a noticeable shift from toward FlatBuffers in performance-oriented applications, driven by the need for faster reads and reduced memory usage in and contexts. The impact of FlatBuffers includes significant performance gains, such as up to 40 times faster data access in certain benchmarks compared to traditional formats, which helps mitigate issues like application crashes from garbage collection pauses. In broader evaluations, it demonstrates read speeds that are orders of magnitude quicker than and , establishing its value for scale in interactive and industrial applications.

Comparisons

With Protocol Buffers

FlatBuffers and (Protobuf) share several foundational similarities as serialization formats. Both were developed by engineers at and employ schema-based definitions to structure data, using compact binary encoding for efficient storage and transmission. They also prioritize schema evolution, supporting backward and to allow seamless updates without breaking existing codebases. Key architectural differences distinguish the two. FlatBuffers enables deserialization, allowing direct access to data fields in the buffer without a parsing step or allocation of separate in-memory objects, whereas Protobuf requires unpacking the into generated objects, incurring overhead and memory allocation. FlatBuffers generates significantly smaller code—often an less—by omitting runtime descriptors, in contrast to Protobuf's larger footprint that includes descriptor support for dynamic features. Additionally, FlatBuffers provides native support for vectors and unions, enabling efficient handling of arrays and polymorphic data, while Protobuf relies on repeated fields with more limited expressiveness for such structures. In terms of , FlatBuffers excels in read-heavy scenarios due to its access, offering substantially faster decoding and traversal times compared to Protobuf. Official benchmarks on a test object with arrays, strings, and scalars show FlatBuffers decoding and traversing 1 million instances in 0.08 seconds, versus 302 seconds for Protobuf Lite—a of approximately 3775 times—while also using zero additional memory post-decode compared to Protobuf's 760 bytes per object. Encoding is similarly efficient, with FlatBuffers completing 1 million serializations in 3.2 seconds against Protobuf's 185 seconds, though FlatBuffers buffers are slightly larger (344 bytes vs. 228 bytes). FlatBuffers also supports superior to individual fields without full deserialization, making it ideal for scenarios like iterative . Independent comparisons confirm read speeds can be up to 10 times faster in typical use cases, though write performance varies based on workload. Trade-offs between the formats reflect their design priorities. Protobuf remains more mature for remote procedure calls (RPC), serving as the default serialization for due to its established ecosystem and dynamic features. In contrast, FlatBuffers is preferred for performance-critical applications like games and static data handling, where low-latency access and minimal overhead are paramount, though it may require more careful schema management for complex evolutions.

With JSON and Other Formats

FlatBuffers, as a format, offers distinct advantages over text-based formats like , primarily in efficiency and reliability for structured . Unlike , which is human-readable and prone to parsing errors due to its dynamic typing, FlatBuffers enforces at , eliminating runtime parsing issues. Benchmarks demonstrate that FlatBuffers produces payloads approximately four times smaller than equivalent representations using RapidJSON (344 bytes versus 1475 bytes for a sample ) and achieves decoding and traversal speeds over seven thousand times faster (0.08 seconds versus 583 seconds for one million operations). This efficiency stems from FlatBuffers' access model, where is read directly from the buffer without unpacking, contrasting with 's need for full parsing and allocation. However, FlatBuffers sacrifices 's readability, making it less suitable for or ad-hoc exchange. Compared to other binary formats, FlatBuffers provides faster random access than and Thrift, which typically require the to be available at for deserialization, introducing overhead in read-heavy scenarios. Benchmarks across C++ serializers show FlatBuffers among the top performers in both and deserialization speed, outperforming and Thrift by factors of 2-5x in decode times for complex objects. It shares zero-copy capabilities with Cap'n Proto, enabling without deserialization, but FlatBuffers simplifies compatibility through virtual tables (vtables), which allow unset fields to occupy no space and support forward/backward evolution without padding overhead in many cases. Relative to Simple Binary Encoding (SBE), FlatBuffers has a smaller due to its flexible handling, though SBE may edge out in raw encoding speed for fixed-layout financial data. These differences position FlatBuffers as more versatile for evolving schemas compared to the more rigid SBE. Choosing between FlatBuffers, , and alternatives depends on application needs: FlatBuffers excels in read-intensive, schema-known environments like applications and games, where its performance minimizes and memory use. remains preferable for prototyping, debugging, or web-based data interchange due to its universality and ease of inspection. Cap'n Proto is better suited for remote calls (RPC) requiring seamless with networking, leveraging its RPC-focused over FlatBuffers' data-centric approach. In benchmarks tailored to and contexts, FlatBuffers consistently outperforms by 5-10x in size and speed for structured payloads, underscoring its impact in resource-constrained settings.

References

  1. [1]
    FlatBuffers Docs
    - **Description**: FlatBuffers is an efficient cross-platform serialization library.
  2. [2]
    FlatBuffers: a memory efficient serialization library
    Jun 16, 2014 · Monday, June 16, 2014. Today, we are releasing FlatBuffers, a C++ serialization library that allows you to read data without unpacking or ...
  3. [3]
    Releases · google/flatbuffers - GitHub
    Dec 23, 2024 · FlatBuffers Version 25.9.23. Sep 23 · v25.9.23 ; v25.2.10. Feb 10 · v25.2.10 ; v25.1.24. Jan 24 · v25.1.24 ; v25.1.21. Jan 21 · v25.1.21 ; v24.12.23.
  4. [4]
    FlatBuffers: Memory Efficient Serialization Library - GitHub
    FlatBuffers is a cross platform serialization library architected for maximum memory efficiency. It allows you to directly access serialized data without ...Releases · Issues 97 · Pull requests 67 · Discussions
  5. [5]
    FlatBuffers Internals
    It shares many properties mentioned above, in that all data is accessed over offsets, all scalars are aligned to their own size, and all data is always stored ...
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
    White Paper - FlatBuffers Docs
    This document tries to shed some light on to the "why" of FlatBuffers, a new serialization library. Motivation. Back in the good old days, performance was ...Motivation · Flatbuffers · Tables
  8. [8]
    FlatBuffers: A Memory-Efficient Serialization Library
    Jun 17, 2014 · By Wouter van Oortmerssen, Fun Propulsion Labs at Google. Game developers, we've just released FlatBuffers, a C++ serialization library that ...
  9. [9]
    Versioning · google/flatbuffers Wiki - GitHub
    FlatBuffers has a version in the format: YY.MM.DD Where YY is the current year minus 2000 (eg, 2023 is 23 ). The MM is the month from Jan ( 1 ) to Dec ( 12 ).
  10. [10]
    Announcing out-of-the-box support for gRPC in the Flatbuffers ...
    Aug 17, 2017 · Flatbuffers now has zero-copy gRPC support, using gRPC's slice buffers directly. This is fully supported in C++ and low-cost in Go.Missing: integration | Show results with:integration
  11. [11]
    FlexBuffers (Schema-less version) - FlatBuffers Docs
    FlexBuffers' design and implementation allows for a very compact encoding, combining automatic pooling of strings with automatic sizing of containers.Missing: date | Show results with:date
  12. [12]
    Rust - FlatBuffers Docs
    FlatBuffers supports both reading and writing FlatBuffers in Rust. To use FlatBuffers in your code, first generate the Rust modules from your schema.
  13. [13]
    Swift - FlatBuffers Docs
    FlatBuffers supports reading and writing binary FlatBuffers in Swift. To use FlatBuffers in your own code, first generate Swift structs from your schema.
  14. [14]
    Evolution - FlatBuffers Docs
    FlatBuffers enables the schema to evolve over time while still maintaining forwards and backwards compatibility with old flatbuffers.Rules · Examples · Table Evolution · Union EvolutionMissing: scheme | Show results with:scheme
  15. [15]
    Schema - FlatBuffers
    Identifiers must always be exactly 4 characters long. These 4 characters will end up as bytes at offsets 4-7 (inclusive) in the buffer. For any schema that has ...
  16. [16]
    FlatBuffers Compiler ( flatc )
    The main compiler for FlatBuffers is called flatc and is used to convert schema definitions into generated code files for a variety of languages.
  17. [17]
    Tutorial - FlatBuffers Docs
    flatbuffers::Offset<> is a just a "typed" integer tied to a particular type. It helps make the numerical offset more strongly typed. let weaponOne = builder.
  18. [18]
    C++ - FlatBuffers Docs
    To use FlatBuffers in C++, generate C++ classes from your schema, include the generated header and FlatBuffers header, then read or write FlatBuffers.Missing: 2017 | Show results with:2017<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Benchmarks - FlatBuffers Docs
    The benchmark object is a set of about 10 objects containing an array, 4 strings, and a large variety of int/float scalar values of all sizes, meant to be ...Missing: motivation | Show results with:motivation
  20. [20]
    Java - FlatBuffers Docs
    ### Summary: Zero-Copy, Garbage Collection, and Heap Allocations in FlatBuffers Java
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    flatbuffers/docs/source/flatc.md at master · google/flatbuffers
    Insufficient relevant content. The provided text is a partial GitHub page snippet with navigation and metadata but lacks the full content of `flatc.md`. No usage syntax, options, examples, or details on reflection, binary schema, JSON conversion, verifier, FlexBuffers, platform support, or build system integration are present.
  23. [23]
    Building - FlatBuffers Docs
    The distribution main build system is configured by cmake which allows you to build the project for any platform.<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    platform/external/flatbuffers - Git at Google - Android GoogleSource
    FlatBuffers is a cross platform serialization library architected for maximum memory efficiency. It allows you to directly access serialized data without ...
  25. [25]
    Improving Facebook's performance on Android with FlatBuffers
    Jul 31, 2015 · In our exploration of alternate formats, we came across FlatBuffers, an open source project from Google. FlatBuffers is an evolution of protocol ...Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
  26. [26]
    flatbuffers Namespace Reference - cocos2d-x
    Mar 31, 2015 · Functions. (4) Vector2. (Vector2, 8). (Vector3, 12). flatbuffers::Offset< Node3DOption >, (flatbuffers::FlatBufferBuilder &_fbb, ...
  27. [27]
    iBicha/FlatBuffersImporter: Google's FlatBuffers (.fbs files ... - GitHub
    Google's FlatBuffers (.fbs files) importer for Unity. FlatBuffers. FlatBuffers is an efficient cross platform serialization library for C++, C# ...
  28. [28]
    List of companies using Flat/FlexBuffers outside of Google #6424
    Jan 25, 2021 · Some large ones include Facebook, Apple, Netflix, Tesla, EA, Nintendo, NVidia. It's hard to know who really all uses it, because most ...Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
  29. [29]
    Why We Chose Flatbuffers | DoltHub Blog
    Aug 22, 2022 · All of the tuples for the keys go back to back in key_items , and delimiters for the individual tuples in the items array go in key_offsets .<|control11|><|separator|>
  30. [30]
    tflite::impl::FlatBufferModel Class Reference | Google AI Edge
    May 10, 2024 · Builds a model based on a pre-loaded flatbuffer. Caller retains ownership of the buffer and should keep it alive until the returned object is destroyed.
  31. [31]
    flatbuffers - ROS Package Overview
    a community-maintained index of robotics software.
  32. [32]
    What do you use FlatBuffers for? - Google Groups
    I use FlatBuffers to serialize data for sending with ZeroMQ. The purpose is to move data from a C++ application that runs planning for a robot arm to the Java ...Missing: announcement motivations
  33. [33]
    Optimize Production with PyTorch/TF, ONNX, TensorRT & LiteRT
    Oct 3, 2025 · It uses conversion tools that will take a model from PyTorch, JAX, or TensorFlow and convert it into the FlatBuffers .
  34. [34]
    Efficient Data Exchange between WebAssembly Modules - MDPI
    Sep 20, 2024 · Google FlatBuffers: Designed for performance, FlatBuffers allows in-place data access without a parsing step, making it fast and suitable for ...
  35. [35]
  36. [36]
    Why FlatBuffers vs other options?
    ### Summary: FlatBuffers vs Protocol Buffers (Protobuf)
  37. [37]
    JSON vs Protocol Buffers vs FlatBuffers | by Kartik Khare - codeburst
    Mar 4, 2018 · The primary difference between protobufs and flat buffers is that you don't need to deserialize the whole data in the latter before accessing an ...<|control11|><|separator|>