Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Garbage

Garbage, also known as refuse or trash, encompasses discarded solid materials from human activities, including putrescible organic matter like food scraps and non-degradable items such as plastics and metals, deemed worthless or uneconomical for further use.^[1]^[2] Globally, municipal solid waste generation reached 2.1 billion tonnes in 2023, with projections estimating an increase to 3.8 billion tonnes by 2050 due to population growth and urbanization, outpacing demographic expansion.^[3] Primary management methods include landfilling, incineration, and recycling, though landfills remain dominant and generate significant methane emissions—accounting for 15.5% of U.S. human-related methane—alongside leachate that contaminates soil and groundwater.^[4]^[5] These practices trace back to ancient civilizations employing rudimentary disposal like open pits, evolving into modern sanitary landfills in the 20th century to mitigate but not eliminate pollution risks such as habitat destruction and vector-borne diseases.^[6]^[7] Debates persist over recycling efficacy versus landfilling costs, with empirical data highlighting variable recovery rates and the causal role of poor waste segregation in perpetuating environmental degradation.^[8]

Definitions and Classification

Terminology and Etymology

The term "garbage" entered Middle English around 1422, derived from Anglo-French and Old French "garbage," originally denoting the entrails or refuse of poultry, such as giblets discarded after preparation.^[9] ^[10] Over time, its meaning expanded in English to encompass worthless or offensive discarded matter, particularly food scraps and other putrescible solids, by the late 16th century, while excluding liquids or gases unless contextually specified.^[10] In technical and legal contexts, "garbage" refers to readily putrescible solid wastes, such as organic residues from food handling, preparation, and consumption, distinct from broader categories like hazardous materials.^[11] The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) incorporates "garbage" within its definition of solid waste as any discarded garbage or refuse, including nonhazardous sludges and materials from wastewater treatment, but emphasizes municipal solid waste (MSW) as everyday discards from households, institutions, and commercial operations that do not pose substantial health risks.^[1] "Garbage" is differentiated from synonymous terms like "trash," which typically denotes dry, non-putrescible discards such as paper or packaging; "refuse," a general term for rejected matter encompassing both garbage and trash; and "waste," a wider category that may include liquids, industrial byproducts, or recyclable materials.^[12] ^[13] These distinctions, while sometimes overlapping in colloquial use, reflect historical and regulatory nuances, with "garbage" emphasizing decomposable, odorous solids in municipal contexts.^[14]

Types of Garbage

Garbage is classified primarily by material composition, encompassing organic materials that are biodegradable and inorganic materials that are not, with the latter further divided into potentially recoverable fractions and non-recoverable residues. This categorization reflects empirical analyses of municipal solid waste (MSW) streams, where organic components dominate in volume across regions. Globally, organic waste, including food scraps and yard trimmings, accounts for approximately 30-50% of MSW generation.^[3] Inorganic fractions vary by local consumption patterns but consistently include durable goods and packaging discards. Organic garbage consists of biodegradable matter such as uneaten food residues, vegetable peels, and garden clippings, which decompose via microbial action and contribute to methane emissions if unmanaged. These materials form the bulk of wet waste in developing regions, often exceeding 50% of total MSW composition in low-income countries due to higher reliance on fresh produce and limited packaging.^[3] Yard waste, including leaves and branches, adds to this category, comprising up to 15% of MSW in temperate climates during seasonal peaks.^[15] Inorganic garbage includes non-biodegradable items derived from synthetic or processed materials. Recyclable subsets encompass paper and cardboard (from printed matter and packaging), metals (ferrous and non-ferrous scraps), glass (bottles and containers), and plastics (single-use films and rigid items). Plastics, in particular, represent 12-15% of global MSW but exhibit recovery rates below 10%, with only 9% effectively recycled due to contamination and sorting challenges.^[16] Non-recyclable inorganic waste features textiles (clothing and fabrics), disposable hygiene products like diapers, and rubber or leather scraps, which resist breakdown and accumulate in disposal sites.^[3] Within broader garbage streams, hazardous subsets arise from everyday discards containing toxic, reactive, or corrosive elements, such as alkaline batteries (leaking heavy metals like mercury or cadmium) and household paints or cleaners. These materials, though comprising less than 1% of MSW volume, pose disproportionate risks due to leachate potential and are frequently regulated apart from standard garbage flows.^[17] Examples include spent fluorescent bulbs and aerosol cans, which enter municipal waste inadvertently despite separation guidelines.^[18]

Sources and Generation

Household and Municipal Sources

Municipal solid waste (MSW), primarily originating from households and municipal activities, totals approximately 2.24 billion tonnes annually as of 2020, equivalent to a global per capita generation rate of 0.79 kilograms per person per day.^[19] Projections indicate this volume will rise to 3.4 billion tonnes by 2050 without intervention, driven by population growth, urbanization, and increasing consumption in developing regions.^[20] High-income countries generate the highest per capita rates, with the United States producing about 2.2 kilograms per person per day in 2018, compared to averages below 0.5 kilograms in low-income nations.^[21]^[22] Key drivers of household MSW include packaging materials, which constitute roughly one-third of U.S. municipal waste, and food waste, accounting for significant portions of discards in both volume and environmental impact.^[23] Globally, food waste from households and supply chains contributes 8-10% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, primarily methane from decomposition in landfills.^[24] Single-use items, fueled by convenience-oriented consumption patterns, exacerbate generation rates, particularly in affluent societies where disposable plastics and processed goods dominate waste streams.^[25] Urban areas exhibit higher MSW volumes per capita than rural regions, often 1.5 to 2 times greater, owing to denser populations and greater reliance on packaged, pre-prepared foods.^[26] Composition differs markedly: urban waste features elevated plastics (up to six times higher than rural) and paper from commercial packaging, while rural waste contains more organic matter from agriculture and home cooking.^[27] These disparities reflect lifestyle variances, with urban households producing more non-biodegradable refuse tied to retail and delivery services.^[28]

Industrial and Commercial Sources

Industrial and commercial waste streams encompass materials discarded from production facilities, businesses, and construction sites, often surpassing municipal solid waste in aggregate volume due to high-density outputs like debris and process residues. Unlike household waste, these are typically managed through specialized private or regulatory frameworks, including on-site treatment or dedicated recycling programs. Globally, such wastes are projected to grow alongside economic expansion, with the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) highlighting their role in total waste exceeding 2 billion tonnes annually when including non-municipal categories.^[3] Construction and demolition (C&D) activities represent the dominant industrial source, generating inert materials such as concrete, wood, metals, and asphalt. These account for more than one-third of all societal waste production worldwide, driven by urbanization and infrastructure development. In 2022, global C&D waste volumes were estimated at over 700 million tonnes, with recovery rates varying widely; for instance, the European Union achieved 89% recycling or reuse by 2020 through policy mandates.^[29]^[30] Manufacturing contributes further through sector-specific scraps and byproducts, including metal shavings from fabrication (e.g., 10-15% of input materials in steel production) and chemical sludges from processing, which require hazardous classification in many jurisdictions. Commercial sources, such as retail outlets, offices, and hospitality, yield packaging, paper, plastics, and obsolete equipment, often collected via business-specific services. Retail packaging alone constitutes a significant fraction, with global plastic packaging waste from commerce exceeding 100 million tonnes yearly, much of it derived from single-use items in supply chains. Electronic waste (e-waste), a rapidly growing commercial subset from device upgrades and business disposals, totaled 62 million tonnes in 2022, equivalent to 7.8 kg per capita globally, yet only 22.3% underwent documented recycling due to informal handling and export challenges.^[31]^[32] Despite advancements in resource efficiency—such as lean manufacturing reducing waste intensity by up to 20-30% per unit of output in EU industries from 2010-2022—absolute industrial and commercial waste volumes have risen with GDP growth and consumption, decoupling efforts insufficient to offset scale increases. For example, U.S. manufacturing waste management volumes expanded post-2020 following a pandemic dip, reflecting production rebounds.^[33]^[34]

Agricultural and Special Wastes

Agricultural wastes encompass organic byproducts from farming activities, primarily crop residues such as straw, husks, and stalks, as well as animal manure. Globally, crop residue generation is estimated at 3,803 million tonnes annually, representing a substantial volume often underutilized or mismanaged.^[35] In developing countries, agricultural wastes can constitute 30-40% of total crop mass produced, frequently subjected to open burning or uncontrolled disposal due to limited infrastructure, contributing to air pollution and lost resource potential.^[36] Manure from livestock, while nutrient-rich for soil amendment when composted, generates significant methane emissions under anaerobic storage conditions, accounting for approximately 4% of global agricultural greenhouse gases when mismanaged in lagoons or piles.^[37] Special wastes refer to non-municipal solid wastes requiring distinct handling due to volume, composition, or potential hazards, excluding highly regulated categories like nuclear materials. Examples include sewage sludge, the semisolid residue from wastewater treatment, which globally arises from treated sewage affecting roughly 54% of waste streams and is often land-applied, incinerated, or landfilled despite containing pathogens and contaminants.^[38] Medical wastes from healthcare facilities, comprising infectious sharps, pathological materials, and chemical residues, total an estimated 5.9 million tons annually in the U.S. alone, with 15% classified as hazardous worldwide, posing risks of disease transmission if improperly segregated or treated.^[39]^[40] Generation rates for medical waste vary from 0.3 to 8.4 kg per hospital bed per day across 78 countries, underscoring variability tied to healthcare intensity and underscoring the need for specialized incineration or autoclaving to mitigate environmental release.^[41] These categories highlight underemphasized contributors to overall waste burdens, particularly in agrarian economies where agricultural volumes dwarf urban municipal streams yet receive less formalized oversight.

Management Processes

Collection and Transportation

Garbage collection primarily occurs through curbside pickup in residential and urban areas, where households place waste in designated bins for retrieval by specialized trucks. These trucks employ either manual methods, relying on workers to load waste, or automated systems using mechanical arms to lift and empty standardized bins, which enhance safety and operational efficiency by minimizing manual labor exposure to hazards.^[42]^[43] Automated side-loader trucks, in particular, can be up to 68% more cost-effective per ton collected in standardized residential routes compared to manual systems.^[44] Collection frequency in urban residential areas is typically weekly, aligning with municipal schedules to balance resident convenience and logistical capacity, though commercial areas may see daily pickups to manage higher volumes.^[45] After curbside retrieval, trucks transport waste to transfer stations, intermediate facilities where garbage is consolidated into larger vehicles for efficient long-distance hauling to processing or disposal sites, thereby optimizing fuel use and reducing overall transportation costs.^[46]^[47] Technological advancements, such as GPS-enabled route optimization, further improve efficiency by minimizing travel distances and idle times, achieving average fuel cost reductions of approximately 13% in fleets adopting these systems.^[48] However, challenges persist, including bin contamination from improper sorting by residents, which complicates handling and increases processing demands, and illegal dumping, where waste is discarded in unauthorized locations to evade collection fees, leading to environmental hazards and additional cleanup expenses for municipalities.^[49]^[50] Globally, collection infrastructure varies starkly by income level; high-income countries achieve waste collection rates exceeding 90%, supported by robust public systems, whereas low-income countries collect less than 50% of generated waste, with much of the remainder unmanaged through open dumping or burning.^[19] These disparities underscore the role of economic resources in maintaining effective collection networks, with transfer stations playing a critical role in scaling operations where direct hauling to distant sites is impractical.^[51]

Sorting and Initial Processing

Sorting of garbage begins with separation to facilitate subsequent processing, either at the source or at specialized facilities known as materials recovery facilities (MRFs). At-source sorting involves households or generators preliminarily dividing waste into categories such as recyclables, organics, and residuals, which reduces downstream contamination but relies on public compliance and education efforts.^[52] In contrast, central sorting at MRFs processes mixed waste streams, distinguishing between "clean" MRFs that handle pre-sorted materials and "dirty" MRFs that manage unsorted municipal solid waste, using a combination of automated and manual techniques to isolate valuables.^[53] Initial processing at MRFs typically employs mechanical methods to segregate materials by physical properties: vibrating screens separate by size, air classifiers by density, and magnets recover ferrous metals, followed by eddy currents for non-ferrous items.^[54] Optical sorters, utilizing near-infrared spectroscopy to identify plastics and other polymers, represent an advancement, while emerging AI-driven systems with computer vision and robotic arms enhance precision in detecting and picking items, though their global deployment remains nascent with market growth indicating adoption primarily in industrialized regions as of 2025.^[55] Manual inspection supplements these technologies, particularly for quality control, as human oversight catches irregularities that automation may miss.^[56] Contamination—defined as non-target materials mixed into sorted streams—poses a persistent challenge, with rates documented at 12% in residential recycling carts in a 2023-2025 municipal study, often comprising food residues, non-recyclables, or improperly rinsed items that degrade material purity and increase processing costs.^[57] Higher contamination levels, frequently exceeding 20% in mixed streams, stem from inconsistent at-source practices and necessitate additional rejection or cleaning, empirically reducing the marketable yield of recyclables.^[58] In developing countries, sorting remains predominantly labor-intensive and informal, with an estimated 15-20 million waste pickers globally performing manual separation from dumpsites or streets, recovering materials amid health risks and low efficiency due to lack of mechanization.^[59] This approach, while contributing to recycling volumes—such as in Brazil where informal workers handle significant portions of urban waste—highlights disparities, as formal MRF infrastructure covers only a fraction of generation in regions like Asia and Africa.^[60]

Treatment Methods

Mechanical and Biological Treatment

Mechanical biological treatment (MBT) integrates mechanical separation techniques with biological stabilization to process residual municipal solid waste, diverting recyclables and organics while reducing the volume and biodegradability of the remaining material for safer landfilling or further use. Mechanical steps precede biological ones, enabling efficient sorting of metals, plastics, and glass via screening, air classification, and magnets, followed by shredding to homogenize the organic fraction. This pre-treatment enhances biological decomposition by increasing surface area for microbial action and boosting bulk density to optimize handling.^[61]^[62] Shredding, a core mechanical process, employs low-speed, high-torque shredders to reduce particle size, elevating waste density from about 400 to 600 pounds per cubic yard and thereby cutting transportation volumes and costs.^[63] This size reduction not only facilitates compaction but also improves downstream separation efficiency and combustion uniformity if waste proceeds to energy recovery, though in MBT it primarily prepares organics for stabilization. Shredding shredded waste biodegrades faster than unshredded material due to greater microbial accessibility, though it demands robust equipment to handle heterogeneous inputs like construction debris or appliances.^[64]^[65] Biological components of MBT focus on organic fractions, typically 40-60% of municipal waste, using aerobic or anaerobic methods to convert putrescibles into stable products. Aerobic composting involves forced aeration and turning to promote thermophilic microbial activity, yielding a nutrient-rich compost suitable for soil amendment after pathogen reduction via temperatures exceeding 55°C for several days. While effective for green and food wastes, composting is constrained by emission of odors from volatile compounds and risks of incomplete pathogen die-off if moisture or aeration falters, necessitating enclosed systems in urban settings.^[66]^[67] Anaerobic digestion complements composting by processing wet organics in sealed digesters, where bacteria hydrolyze, acidify, and methanize substrates to generate biogas—60-70% methane—capturable for electricity or heat at efficiencies up to 5-7 kWh per cubic meter of biogas produced. Yields reach 90.6 cubic meters of methane per ton of food waste under optimized conditions, such as a carbon-to-nitrogen ratio around 25:1, with the residual digestate providing a liquid fertilizer after solids separation. This method excels for high-moisture wastes like sewage sludge or food scraps, offering energy recovery absent in composting, but requires pretreatment to mitigate inhibitors like lignins and precise pH control to avoid process inhibition.^[68]^[69]^[70] MBT efficacy varies by plant design and input composition, with mechanical recovery rates for recyclables often 10-20% and biological stabilization reducing biodegradable mass by 20-50%, thereby lowering landfill leachate and gas potential. European facilities, for instance, achieve higher diversion through integrated MBT, but economic viability hinges on gate fees and output markets, with biological stages demanding skilled operation to balance energy inputs against outputs like biogas. Limitations include incomplete separation of contaminants into biological streams, potentially compromising end-product quality, and higher upfront costs compared to direct landfilling.^[71]^[72]^[73]

Thermal Treatment and Energy Recovery

Thermal treatment of municipal solid waste (MSW) primarily encompasses incineration processes, where waste is combusted at high temperatures to reduce its volume and enable energy recovery through waste-to-energy (WTE) facilities. Incineration typically achieves a volume reduction of approximately 90% and a mass reduction of 75-85%, converting the majority of waste into ash, flue gases, and recoverable heat, with ash comprising 15-25% by weight of the input.^[74]^[75] Globally, thermal treatment accounts for about 11-18% of managed MSW, serving as a key method in regions with limited landfill capacity or high waste generation.^[76]^[77] Adoption rates vary significantly by country; in Japan, roughly 75-80% of MSW undergoes incineration, supported by over 1,000 facilities as of fiscal year 2023, while Switzerland processes around 50% via incineration following recycling.^[78]^[79]^[80] WTE plants capture combustion heat to produce steam, driving turbines for electricity generation or district heating. In Europe, where such facilities number around 500 and process 96 million tons annually, electrical conversion efficiencies typically range from 15-25%, though combined heat and power systems can achieve overall energy recovery efficiencies up to 80-90% under optimal conditions.^[81]^[82] These rates provide a practical alternative for non-recyclable residuals, generating baseload energy equivalent to powering millions of households, as evidenced by European plants supplying electricity to 20 million people and heat to 15 million in recent years.^[83] Empirical data indicate that while high recycling targets (e.g., 50-70%) are aspirational, actual MSW recycling rates often fall below 50% globally, making thermal treatment's verifiable volume reduction and energy yields a complementary strategy for managing the residual fraction that idealized recycling scenarios overlook.^[76]^[84] Contemporary incinerators incorporate rigorous emissions mitigation technologies to address historical concerns over pollutants like dioxins and furans. Systems such as wet scrubbers, activated carbon injection, baghouse filters, and selective catalytic reduction effectively capture particulate matter, heavy metals, and organic toxins, reducing dioxin emissions to ultra-low levels compliant with directives like the EU Waste Incineration Directive (2000/76/EC).^[84]^[85] For instance, state-of-the-art facilities achieve dioxin concentrations below 0.1 ng TEQ/Nm³ through multi-stage flue gas cleaning, including rapid quenching to prevent reformation and adsorption via powdered activated carbon.^[86] These controls, verified through continuous monitoring, ensure that modern WTE operations emit far less per unit of energy than unregulated predecessors or equivalent fossil fuel combustion, prioritizing causal pollutant pathways over unsubstantiated blanket prohibitions.^[87]^[88]

Chemical Treatment

Chemical treatment in garbage management primarily involves stabilization and solidification techniques applied to hazardous subsets, such as industrial contaminants or leachate-prone materials within municipal solid waste streams, to immobilize toxins and prevent environmental release.^[89] These methods chemically bind hazardous constituents—often heavy metals or organic pollutants—reducing their solubility and mobility through reactions with reagents like cement, lime, or polymers, thereby controlling leachate generation and ensuring compliance with toxicity limits like the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP).^[90] Neutralization adjusts pH to deactivate pathogens or corrosive elements, while encapsulation seals wastes in inert matrices to block migration.^[91] Such treatments are niche, comprising less than 1% of global waste processing volumes, as they target specialized hazardous fractions rather than bulk municipal garbage, which is predominantly handled via mechanical, biological, or thermal means.^[21] Their application is concentrated on industrial-tainted garbage or sludges co-mingled in waste streams, where empirical testing confirms reduced leachability; for instance, Portland cement stabilization has demonstrated over 90% immobilization of lead and cadmium in contaminated soils and wastes under controlled conditions.^[92] Lime stabilization exemplifies this for semi-solid wastes like sewage sludge occasionally integrated into garbage disposal, raising pH above 12 to pasteurize and stabilize organics, with dosages typically 10-20% by dry weight to maintain stability for weeks.^[93] This process, while effective for pathogen reduction—achieving 99.99% inactivation—it generates additional alkaline residues requiring careful handling.^[94] Limitations arise from high reagent costs and specificity to low-volume hazardous subsets, rendering chemical methods uneconomical for undifferentiated garbage; causal analysis shows they excel in leachate control by altering waste chemistry fundamentally, but scalability is constrained without site-specific validation.^[95] Polymer encapsulation, using sulfur or synthetic binders, offers durable barriers for volatile organics, with field studies reporting minimal contaminant release over decades in stabilized landfills.^[92] Overall, these techniques prioritize causal containment over volume reduction, informed by rigorous leach testing rather than broad assumptions of efficacy.^[96]

Disposal Practices

Landfilling Techniques

Modern sanitary landfills represent the predominant engineered approach to municipal solid waste (MSW) disposal, designed to isolate waste from the surrounding environment through multi-layered containment systems, unlike unregulated open dumps that allow unrestricted leachate and gas migration.^[97] These facilities feature bottom liner systems typically comprising a low-permeability composite barrier, such as a geomembrane overlying compacted clay soil or a geosynthetic clay liner, to prevent leachate from infiltrating groundwater.^[97] Above the liner, leachate collection systems—consisting of gravel drainage layers and perforated pipes—intercept and convey contaminated liquids to sumps for pumping, treatment, and disposal, thereby maintaining hydraulic head below regulatory thresholds (often under 1 foot) to minimize percolation through the liner.^[97]^[98] Landfill gas management systems further enhance containment by extracting biogas, primarily methane (CH₄) and carbon dioxide (CO₂), generated from anaerobic decomposition of organic waste. Vertical wells or horizontal collectors embedded in the waste mass, connected to vacuum blowers, capture and flare or utilize the gas for energy production; advanced systems achieve methane recovery efficiencies of 75-85% under EPA default models and optimized operations.^[99]^[100] Globally, approximately 37% of MSW is landfilled, with the United States disposing of about 50% of its generated MSW (146.1 million tons in 2018) in such facilities, reflecting their role as a reliable, low-cost endpoint for non-recyclable residuals.^[101]^[102] Engineered landfills are sited with geological considerations, such as low groundwater tables and seismic stability, and operated in cells filled sequentially to allow compaction and daily cover with soil or alternative materials to control vectors and odors. Post-closure, final caps (often vegetated geomembranes over drainage layers) and ongoing monitoring ensure long-term integrity, with typical operational lifespans of 30-50 years depending on site volume and input rates, countering concerns over rapid capacity exhaustion through expandable designs and regional permitting.^[103]^[104] These techniques demonstrably reduce contamination risks compared to legacy dumps, as evidenced by regulatory compliance data showing leachate head controls and gas capture mitigating over 75% of potential emissions in compliant sites.^[99]

Alternative Disposal Methods

Ocean dumping of municipal garbage was historically practiced in various coastal regions but has been progressively restricted internationally. The Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of Wastes and Other Matter, adopted in London in 1972, established regulations to control marine pollution from dumping, categorizing wastes and prohibiting certain types such as high-level radioactive materials, while requiring permits for others.^[105] The 1996 Protocol to the Convention further adopted a precautionary approach, banning all dumping except for specified materials like dredged material and inert geological matter, effectively curtailing ocean disposal of household garbage in signatory nations.^[106] In the United States, the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 prohibited most ocean dumping of wastes, leading to a sharp decline in such practices by the 1980s.^[107] Open burning of waste remains a common alternative in resource-constrained settings, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where formal collection systems are limited. Estimates indicate that open burning accounts for 40% to 65% of total municipal solid waste disposal in these regions, often as an informal method to reduce volume when landfilling or transport is unavailable.^[108] In low-income countries, up to 90% of waste may be managed through open burning or dumping, reflecting infrastructural gaps rather than deliberate policy.^[109] Deep-well injection, involving the subsurface emplacement of wastes into porous geological formations, is predominantly applied to liquid effluents such as industrial wastewater or produced water from oil and gas operations, rather than solid garbage.^[110] Its use for solid waste is rare due to technical challenges in handling non-fluid materials, with applications limited to slurried or dissolved forms under strict regulatory oversight in permitted locations.^[111] Concepts for space-based disposal of earthly garbage, such as launching compacted waste into solar orbit or the sun, have been proposed in theoretical discussions but remain negligible in practice owing to prohibitive costs, energy requirements, and lack of operational feasibility as of 2025.^[112] No large-scale implementations exist, with efforts confined to speculative engineering analyses rather than deployment.

Environmental Impacts

Land and Water Pollution

Landfill leachate, generated by the percolation of water through decomposing waste, contains dissolved organic matter, inorganic macrocomponents, heavy metals such as chromium, manganese, nickel, cadmium, and arsenic, and xenobiotic organic compounds, posing risks of soil and groundwater contamination.^[113]^[114] In modern municipal solid waste landfills equipped with composite liner systems, including geomembranes and clay layers, median leakage rates into groundwater are reported at 33 to 44 liters per hectare per day, substantially lower than unlined sites but indicating incomplete prevention of contaminant migration over time.^[115] Empirical monitoring data from operational landfills demonstrate that leachate collection and treatment systems can remove over 85% of heavy metals and nearly 100% of trace organics, though long-term liner degradation may increase soil accumulation of persistent pollutants like lead and mercury.^[116] Mismanaged or legacy landfills exacerbate land and water pollution through uncollected leachate seeping into aquifers and surface waters, with concentrations of heavy metals often exceeding regulatory standards; for instance, cadmium and arsenic levels in leachate from older sites have been documented above permissible limits, leading to measurable soil enrichment and downstream water body impairment.^[117] Microplastics, derived primarily from the fragmentation of buried plastics, constitute a growing contaminant in leachate and surrounding soils, with groundwater samples near landfill sites showing up to 92% of detected microplastics originating from waste degradation.^[118] Concentrations in dumping site soils range from 10 to 3,457 microplastic particles per milligram of dry weight, predominantly fragments, highlighting the role of poor waste containment in terrestrial and aquatic microplastic dispersion.^[119] Waste recycling processes, particularly for electronics and batteries, introduce additional pollution risks to land and water via releases during dismantling and extraction; lithium-ion battery processing has been linked to heavy metal leaching, including copper, nickel, and lead, into soils and wastewater, with unregulated facilities in regions like Bangladesh showing elevated soil lead concentrations prior to remediation efforts.^[120]^[121] Toxic organic solvents and electrolytes from battery disassembly further contaminate nearby water streams when containment fails, as evidenced by case studies of abandoned recycling sites where groundwater exhibited persistent chemical signatures from improper handling.^[122] These site-specific impacts underscore the need for stringent process controls, as empirical data from monitored recycling operations reveal that inadequate wastewater treatment can result in detectable toxin plumes extending beyond facility boundaries.^[123]

Atmospheric Emissions and Climate Effects

The anaerobic decomposition of organic waste in landfills generates methane (CH₄), comprising about 50% of landfill gas, with the remainder primarily carbon dioxide (CO₂).^[99] This process occurs under oxygen-limited conditions, where bacteria break down food scraps, paper, and yard waste, which together represent over half of municipal solid waste in many regions. Globally, landfills account for roughly 20% of anthropogenic methane emissions, a figure derived from inventories tracking waste decomposition rates and gas composition.^[124] Methane's 100-year global warming potential (GWP) of 28–34 times that of CO₂ amplifies its climate impact, though its atmospheric lifetime is shorter (about 12 years) compared to CO₂. The waste sector contributes approximately 3% of global anthropogenic GHG emissions, equivalent to around 1.6 GtCO₂-equivalent annually as of recent assessments, with landfills driving most of this through methane.^[125] ^[126] Open dumping in developing regions exacerbates emissions, as uncontrolled decomposition releases unmitigated methane without capture systems. Incineration, by contrast, primarily emits CO₂ and minor N₂O, but the carbon originates from both biogenic sources (e.g., wood, food; short-cycle, regrowable biomass) and fossil sources (e.g., plastics; locked in for geological timescales). Biogenic CO₂ from incineration does not represent a net atmospheric addition, as it recycles recently fixed carbon, whereas fossil-derived CO₂ does, comprising 20–50% of incinerator outputs depending on waste composition.^[127] ^[128] Landfill gas capture systems mitigate emissions by extracting 60–90% of generated methane, which can be flared to CO₂ (reducing GWP impact by over 95%) or converted to energy via turbines or engines, displacing fossil fuel equivalents and yielding net GHG reductions of up to 1 ton CO₂-equivalent per ton of waste processed.^[129] Waste-to-energy incineration similarly offsets emissions through electricity generation, often achieving lifecycle savings of 0.5–1.5 tons CO₂-equivalent per ton of waste when biogenic fractions dominate and fossil displacement is factored in, though fossil plastic combustion necessitates separate accounting.^[130] Comprehensive management integrating capture, recovery, and reduced landfilling can render solid waste systems net-zero or negative in GHG terms relative to baseline practices.^[130]

Biodiversity and Ecosystem Disruption

Garbage disrupts biodiversity primarily through physical entanglement and ingestion by wildlife, habitat fragmentation from disposal sites, and the transport of invasive species. In marine environments, plastic debris has been documented to entangle or be ingested by at least 914 species, including 81 of 123 marine mammal species, all seven sea turtle species, and 203 of 406 seabird species, leading to injury, starvation, and population declines. Approximately 15% of these affected species are listed on the IUCN Red List, highlighting risks to vulnerable taxa, with global distribution of microplastics exacerbating widespread ingestion across ocean basins. Terrestrial waste accumulation, such as in unmanaged dumps, similarly poses ingestion risks to scavenging birds and mammals, though engineered landfills with liners reduce direct leachate exposure to wildlife. Landfill sites initially cause localized habitat loss by converting natural areas, disrupting ecosystems through soil compaction and vegetation removal, but post-closure reclamation often mitigates these effects by restoring or creating habitats that support biodiversity. Studies in Northern Italy demonstrate that reclaimed landfills can develop into secondary habitats hosting diverse flora and fauna, with species richness comparable to surrounding areas after vegetation establishment and soil stabilization. However, improper management prolongs disruption, as seen in wetland dumping where garbage smothers aquatic plants and alters hydrology, reducing habitat suitability for amphibians and invertebrates. A notable case of localized ecosystem collapse involves the decline of vulture populations in India, where exposure to diclofenac-contaminated livestock carcasses discarded at open dumps and killing sites caused a 99% drop from approximately 50 million birds in the 1980s to fewer than 500,000 by 2000, cascading to affect scavengers and increase feral dog populations. This pharmaceutical residue, ingested via carrion at waste sites, induced visceral gout and kidney failure in Gyps vultures, illustrating how waste disposal practices amplify chemical toxicities in food webs. Bans on veterinary diclofenac since 2006 have slowed further declines, but recovery remains limited due to persistent environmental residues. Waste transport facilitates the spread of invasive species, particularly via marine debris that serves as rafts for alien organisms; surveys identified 67 non-native species associated with floating plastics, enabling transoceanic dispersal and establishment in new habitats. On land, solid waste streams can inadvertently carry propagules of invasives through contaminated shipments or leachates, though marine vectors pose greater global risks compared to localized terrestrial movements. These pathways underscore a contrast between acute, site-specific disruptions like vulture declines and diffuse, propagating threats from debris dispersal.

Direct Health Risks

Improperly managed garbage serves as a breeding ground for disease vectors such as rats and flies, facilitating the transmission of pathogens including bacteria and parasites to humans through direct contact, contaminated food, or water.^[131] Rodents like rats can harbor zoonotic diseases such as leptospirosis and salmonellosis, spreading them via urine, feces, or bites, while flies mechanically transmit enteric pathogens like Salmonella and Shigella from waste to human environments.^[132] In areas with accumulated solid waste, these vectors proliferate, increasing risks of vector-borne illnesses, though standardized epidemiological measurements remain limited.^[131] Historically, poor garbage disposal contributed to cholera outbreaks by exacerbating sanitation failures, as decaying waste mingled with sewage and contaminated water sources, enabling Vibrio cholerae propagation; for instance, 19th-century epidemics in London and Bengal were tied to unregulated waste accumulation alongside fecal matter in drinking water.^[133]^[134] Modern epidemiological data indicate that in regulated municipal waste systems with proper collection and containment, direct pathogen exposure risks to the general population are minimal, as vector proliferation and leachate spread are controlled, though isolated studies note potential associations with adverse birth outcomes near legacy sites.^[135] Waste workers, particularly in informal sectors, face elevated direct health hazards from handling unsegregated garbage, including cuts from sharps, musculoskeletal injuries, and infections from biohazards. Surveys report injury prevalence exceeding 40% annually among informal waste pickers, with common incidents involving lacerations (up to 40%) and contusions, often due to lack of protective gear and training; these rates substantially surpass those in formal waste management, where recordable injuries averaged 3-5 per 100 full-time equivalents in 2023.^[136]^[137]^[138] Incineration residues pose toxin inhalation risks if uncontained, but regulated facilities encapsulate ash to prevent direct exposure.^[135]

Socioeconomic Disparities in Waste Exposure

In developed nations, stringent regulations and local opposition—often termed "not in my backyard" (NIMBY) phenomena—have prompted the export of waste, including plastics, to less-regulated developing countries, thereby displacing environmental burdens to poorer populations without achieving net reductions in global waste volumes.^[139]^[140] Prior to China's 2018 import ban, which halted over half of global plastic waste flows, developed economies shipped substantial volumes to Asian destinations; for instance, China alone imported approximately 600,000 metric tons in 2017, representing about 55.7% of worldwide plastic waste imports, much of it from Europe and North America.^[141]^[142] This redirection intensified post-ban as waste was rerouted to countries like Malaysia, Vietnam, and Indonesia, where inadequate infrastructure amplified local exposure risks for low-income communities handling or residing near processing sites.^[143] Informal waste pickers in developing regions bear disproportionate occupational hazards, scavenging recyclable materials from dumpsites with minimal protective equipment, leading to elevated risks of injury, respiratory issues, and chemical exposure. Globally, these workers number in the millions, comprising roughly 0.5-1% of the workforce in affected urban areas and handling up to 80% of collected recyclables in some low-income countries, yet they often lack access to sanitation, training, or healthcare.^[144]^[59] Studies indicate that proximity to landfills increases their likelihood of common health disorders by 1.7 times annually, compounded by vulnerabilities such as poor ventilation during sorting and direct contact with leachates.^[145] Urban poor populations worldwide experience heightened waste exposure due to residential proximity to unregulated dumpsites, where socioeconomic factors correlate with site location and inadequate mitigation. In the United States, lower socioeconomic status (SES) households are more likely to live near hazardous waste facilities, with studies showing increased toxic exposure and associated mortality risks in such areas.^[146]^[147] Globally, in developing cities, informal settlements adjacent to open dumps face chronic pollution from uncollected waste, exacerbating health inequities without corresponding economic benefits from waste management jobs.^[148] This pattern persists as wealthier areas enforce siting restrictions, effectively externalizing costs to marginalized groups.^[149]

Economic Dimensions

Global Costs and Market Size

In 2020, the direct global costs of managing municipal solid waste totaled approximately $252 billion, covering collection, treatment, and disposal operations.^[150] These figures exclude hidden costs associated with pollution, biodiversity loss, and adverse health outcomes, which elevate the total economic burden to as much as $361 billion annually.^[151] Absent systemic improvements in waste handling, projections indicate these combined costs could nearly double to over $640 billion per year by 2050, driven by rising waste volumes from population growth and urbanization.^[150] The global waste management industry, which includes private and public services for waste handling, recycling, and remediation, generated revenues exceeding $1.4 trillion in 2024.^[152] This market reflects expenditures by governments, businesses, and households, with growth fueled by regulatory demands and technological adoption, projecting expansion to $2.3 trillion by 2033 at a compound annual growth rate of about 5-7%.^[153] In high-income regions like North America, private enterprises dominate operations; for instance, in the United States, the private sector controls 53% of solid waste facilities, with firms like Waste Management, Inc., leading in collection and landfill services across residential, commercial, and industrial segments.^[154]^[155] In developing countries, where collection coverage often falls below 50%, uncollected waste imposes substantial indirect costs through heightened disease transmission and environmental degradation.^[51] Mismanaged waste globally contributes to up to one million premature deaths yearly, primarily from respiratory and diarrheal illnesses, with economic losses from health impacts and remediation far exceeding direct management expenses in low-income settings.^[156]^[157] These disparities underscore that investing in efficient systems yields net savings by mitigating externalities, though subsidies for inefficient practices in some regions can distort incentives and inflate long-term fiscal burdens.^[3]

Economics of Recycling and Recovery

Recycling processes for many waste materials are frequently uneconomic on a net basis, as the costs of collection, sorting, and processing often exceed the market value of the recovered materials when compared to virgin production alternatives.^[158] For plastics, global recycling rates remain below 10 percent, with the economic disadvantage stemming from recycled plastics commanding lower prices than virgin counterparts due to quality degradation and contamination issues during mechanical recycling.^[159] In contrast, virgin plastic production benefits from lower feedstock costs, rendering recycling unviable without external supports like subsidies or regulatory mandates that artificially inflate demand.^[160] Paper recycling achieves higher rates, approximately 68 percent in the United States as of 2018, driven by established markets for recovered fiber in packaging and tissue products.^[21] However, aluminum stands as a notable exception where recycling proves economically superior, requiring only 5 percent of the energy for virgin production and yielding costs of $0.20 to $0.50 per kilogram versus $2.50 to $3.50 for primary aluminum.^[161] United States aluminum can recycling rates hover around 50 percent, reflecting inherent profitability from high-value scrap markets rather than reliance on subsidies.^[162] Global recycling markets exhibit volatility, exemplified by China's 2018 National Sword policy, which banned most waste imports and imposed strict contamination limits, causing plastics imports to plummet 99 percent and disrupting supply chains worldwide.^[163] This led to stockpiling, landfill diversions, and price crashes for recyclables in exporting nations, underscoring dependence on low-cost processing in developing economies and the fragility of subsidized systems.^[164] Waste-to-energy (WTE) recovery, involving incineration with energy capture, demonstrates greater economic feasibility in densely populated urban areas where high waste volumes support tipping fees and power sales revenues to offset capital-intensive operations.^[165] Techno-economic analyses indicate positive returns in such settings through optimized siting and scale, though profitability hinges on local energy prices and regulatory frameworks rather than material recovery alone.^[166] Overall, these dynamics reveal that market-driven recovery favors high-value, low-contamination streams like metals, while broader recycling efforts for mixed wastes persist primarily due to policy interventions rather than intrinsic cost advantages.^[167]

Incentives and Private Sector Roles

In competitive markets for waste collection, privatization has been associated with cost reductions of 20 to 40 percent compared to municipal operations, primarily through efficiencies in labor, routing, and equipment utilization.^[168] For instance, a 2000 analysis of Detroit's system projected 30 percent savings, equating to over $6.4 million annually from a $21 million budget, by introducing private bidding.^[169] These gains arise from market competition incentivizing operational streamlining, though outcomes depend on sustained rivalry among providers. Pay-as-you-throw (PAYT) pricing schemes, where households pay per volume of waste disposed, exemplify demand-side incentives that curb generation without mandates. Empirical studies indicate PAYT programs achieve 14 to 27 percent reductions in municipal solid waste quantities, alongside 32 to 59 percent drops in disposal costs, by aligning user fees with actual usage rather than flat taxes.^[170] In nine U.S. communities examined from 1996 to 1998, such systems consistently lowered overall waste volumes through behavioral shifts toward reuse and recycling.^[171] Private firms drive technological advancements in waste processing, such as AI-enabled sorting systems that enhance material recovery rates via machine learning and robotics. These innovations, deployed in facilities by companies like AMP Robotics, automate identification of recyclables with hyperspectral imaging, reducing contamination and labor needs while boosting throughput.^[172]^[55] Similarly, private investment in biogas production from organic waste has expanded markets, with the U.S. sector valued at $6.08 billion in 2023 and projected to grow at 2.7 percent annually, converting landfill-bound materials into renewable energy via anaerobic digestion.^[173] However, in regions with private monopolies, such as those dominated by firms like Waste Management, Inc., service prices have risen due to limited competition, with estimates suggesting national costs inflate by about one-third compared to competitive scenarios.^[174]^[175] Consolidation through acquisitions has displaced local operators, fostering pricing power that offsets potential efficiencies and raises fees for municipalities renegotiating contracts.^[176]

Historical Evolution

Ancient and Pre-Industrial Practices

In ancient settlements, waste disposal primarily involved ad-hoc accumulation in middens—large refuse heaps containing organic remains, pottery shards, and other debris—which served as both disposal sites and indicators of daily life. Archaeological excavations at Troy (modern Hisarlık, Turkey), dating to around 3000 BCE during its early Bronze Age phases, reveal layers of such built-up trash exceeding 15 meters in depth over nearly 2,000 years, reflecting repeated occupation without systematic removal and contributing to urban mound formation.^[177] These middens, common across prehistoric and early historic sites, often formed outside dwellings or in peripheral areas, with evidence of intermingled food waste, animal bones, and tools, but lacked engineered separation or processing.^[178] By the classical period, some urban centers began rudimentary infrastructure to mitigate health risks from unchecked dumping. In Rome, the Cloaca Maxima, constructed around 600 BCE under King Tarquinius Priscus, functioned initially as an open-channel drainage system to reclaim marshy land near the Forum and control flooding, later adapting to carry stormwater mixed with human and household waste to the Tiber River.^[179]^[180] Similarly, Athenian laws circa 500 BCE prohibited street dumping, mandating waste transport beyond city walls, though enforcement relied on fines rather than organized collection.^[181] Pre-industrial practices overwhelmingly featured open dumping in streets, rivers, or outskirts, fostering vermin proliferation and disease vectors without treatment like composting or incineration on a societal scale. This contributed to recurrent epidemics, including the 14th-century Black Death (bubonic plague caused by Yersinia pestis), where piled refuse in European cities like London and Pistoia exacerbated rat infestations and flea transmission, amplifying mortality rates estimated at 30-60% in affected areas.^[182]^[183] Archaeological and historical records indicate no widespread mechanical or chemical processing; disposal evolved reactively from observed health crises, such as plague outbreaks prompting sporadic edicts for cleaner streets, yet systemic waste management remained absent until industrial urbanization.^[184]

Industrial Era Developments

The rapid urbanization accompanying the Industrial Revolution in the 19th century generated unprecedented volumes of solid waste in growing cities, overwhelming traditional individual disposal practices and necessitating organized municipal responses. In Britain and the United States, householders had previously managed refuse through backyard dumps or street scattering, but by the mid-1800s, dense populations amplified health hazards from accumulating garbage.^[185] ^[186] Recurrent cholera epidemics, including major outbreaks in London in 1831, 1849, and 1854, underscored the links between poor sanitation—including unmanaged waste—and disease transmission, prompting investments in infrastructure like sewer systems to separate human waste from streets and reduce contamination risks. Engineer Joseph Bazalgette's London sewer network, authorized after the 1858 "Great Stink" from Thames pollution exacerbated by urban refuse, began construction in 1859 and was largely operational by 1865, correlating with the decline of cholera deaths in the city.^[133] ^[187] Similar imperatives drove sewer expansions in other industrial centers, such as Manchester, where mid-century innovations in pipe design facilitated broader wastewater diversion away from garbage heaps.^[188] For solid waste, technological shifts emerged in the 1870s, including precursors to sanitary landfills through controlled dumping methods aimed at covering refuse to limit vermin and odors, as experimented in parts of Britain and early U.S. urban areas. The first dedicated garbage incinerator, known as a "destructor," was installed in Nottingham, England, in 1874 by Manlove, Alliott & Co. to a design by Albert Fryer, enabling high-temperature burning of refuse to reduce volume and generate steam.^[189] ^[190] This marked an initial foray into thermal treatment, though adoption was slow due to operational costs and emissions concerns. Regulatory frameworks solidified these changes; Britain's Public Health Act of 1875 empowered local authorities to enforce waste collection and disposal, shifting responsibility from individuals to municipalities. In the United States, early ordinances proliferated in the 1880s, with cities like New York establishing dedicated street-cleaning departments to systematize garbage removal and prohibit open dumping, reflecting a transition to public oversight amid rising public health advocacy.^[191] ^[192] These measures laid groundwork for formalized services, though enforcement varied and often prioritized visible street cleanup over comprehensive landfill engineering.^[193]

Post-1970s Modernization and Globalization

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), enacted in 1976, established the foundational U.S. regulatory framework for managing solid and hazardous waste, granting the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) "cradle-to-grave" authority over waste generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal.^[194] This legislation mandated tracking systems for hazardous materials, standards for treatment facilities, and prohibitions on open dumping, fundamentally shifting waste handling from ad hoc practices to structured oversight that minimized environmental releases and promoted conservation.^[195] By the 1980s, RCRA's implementation spurred investments in landfills with liners and leachate controls, alongside early hazardous waste minimization programs, reducing unregulated dumping that had previously contaminated soil and groundwater.^[196] In the European Union, waste policies advanced through directives emphasizing hierarchy—prevention, reuse, recycling, recovery, and disposal—with the 1990s marking a pivot toward source reduction and restricted transboundary movements.^[197] The 1999 Landfill Directive set binding targets to cut biodegradable municipal waste landfilled by 65% from 1995 levels by 2016, incentivizing diversion to alternatives like composting and incineration across member states.^[198] These measures, building on earlier frameworks like the 1991 Waste Framework updates, integrated extended producer responsibility elements for packaging and electronics, fostering infrastructure for separate collection and processing that raised EU municipal waste recycling rates from under 10% in the early 1990s to over 40% by the 2010s.^[199] Globalization amplified waste volumes through expanded consumerism and manufacturing, with developed nations exporting recyclables to processing hubs in Asia starting in the 1980s; China absorbed up to 56% of the world's plastic waste exports by 2012, handling over 7 million tons annually at peak.^[200] This trade, formalized under Basel Convention protocols from 1992, peaked in the mid-2010s as low labor costs enabled disassembly and remelting, but exposed environmental risks in recipient regions, culminating in China's 2017 ban on 24 waste categories effective 2018, which rerouted 45% of cumulative global plastic scrap flows and forced exporters like the U.S. and EU to bolster domestic capacity.^[201]^[141] Technological modernization paralleled policy, with waste-to-energy (WTE) incineration expanding post-1970s to recover heat from non-recyclables; in the U.S., facilities grew to process over 15% of municipal solid waste by the early 1990s, evolving into advanced plants with emission controls under RCRA subtitles that generated electricity from 34 million tons combusted annually by the 2020s.^[202]^[74] Globally, WTE capacity surged, particularly in Europe and Asia, where modern units equipped with selective catalytic reduction reduced dioxin outputs by over 99% compared to 1970s designs, integrating into grids to offset fossil fuels while diverting landfilling.^[203] Emerging innovations include AI-enhanced sorting, deployed in pilots since the early 2020s to boost recovery rates via computer vision and robotics that identify materials at conveyor speeds exceeding human capability; in 2025, Tetra Pak invested in Recycleye systems across UK sites to separate beverage cartons from mixed streams with 95% accuracy, addressing contamination that hampers traditional recycling.^[204] Plasma gasification, tested in projects like China's industrial-scale trials converting municipal waste to syngas at temperatures above 5,000°C, offers potential for near-zero emissions via vitrified slag byproducts, though scalability remains limited by high energy inputs and capital costs in operational pilots.^[205]

Policies and Regulations

International Agreements

The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal, adopted in 1989 and entering into force in 1992, establishes global standards to minimize hazardous waste generation and regulate its transboundary shipment, requiring prior informed consent from importing countries and prohibiting exports to states lacking capacity for environmentally sound management. It has 190 parties as of 2025, with amendments in 2019 extending controls to non-hazardous plastic scrap and waste to curb unregulated exports from developed to developing nations.^[206] Despite these provisions, enforcement remains challenged by the absence of formal sanctions or compliance mechanisms, leading to persistent illegal trafficking estimated at millions of tons annually, though it has demonstrably reduced documented hazardous waste exports to vulnerable regions.^[207]^[208] The Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, adopted in 2001 and effective from 2004, targets the elimination or restriction of POPs—highly toxic, bioaccumulative chemicals often found in legacy wastes and industrial byproducts—by requiring parties to manage contaminated sites and dispose of POPs-containing wastes through destruction technologies that achieve specific destruction and removal efficiency levels.^[209] With 185 parties, it has led to the phase-out of several POPs and safer waste handling protocols, but outcomes are mixed due to gaps in monitoring stockpiles and transboundary contamination, particularly in regions with limited technical capacity. The Paris Agreement on climate change, adopted in 2015, indirectly addresses garbage through nationally determined contributions (NDCs) that incorporate waste sector emissions reductions, such as methane capture from landfills, which account for about 5% of global anthropogenic methane.^[210] Over 100 parties include waste management in their NDCs, promoting circular economy practices to align with 1.5°C goals, yet implementation varies widely without dedicated waste articles, resulting in uneven progress on landfill gas recovery and organic waste diversion.^[211] Negotiations for a global plastics pollution treaty, initiated under UNEP in 2022, aimed to create a legally binding instrument covering the full lifecycle of plastics but adjourned without consensus at the fifth intergovernmental session (INC-5.2) in August 2025, delaying adoption amid disputes over production caps and chemical controls.^[212] Unlike Basel's focus on hazardous wastes, international frameworks bind primarily high-risk categories, leaving non-hazardous municipal garbage largely unregulated transnationally and reliant on voluntary guidelines.^[213]

National and Local Frameworks

In the United States, landfill regulations for municipal solid waste are primarily governed by Subtitle D of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which establishes federal minimum criteria enforced at the state level, including requirements for liner systems, leachate collection, groundwater monitoring, and post-closure care to prevent environmental contamination.^[214] States implement these through their own permitting processes, such as design standards for daily cover and operational controls to minimize odor and vectors, with variations like Ohio's prohibitions on hazardous or infectious waste acceptance.^[215] Effectiveness depends on consistent state enforcement rather than uniform stringency, as evidenced by compliance efforts addressing site-specific risks like methane emissions.^[216] In the European Union, the Landfill Directive (1999/31/EC) mandates progressive reductions in biodegradable municipal waste landfilled, culminating in bans on untreated waste in many member states and restrictions on recyclable materials from 2030, aiming to divert waste toward recycling and recovery.^[217] These frameworks have correlated with decreased landfilling rates where paired with national taxes and infrastructure incentives, but outcomes vary by enforcement rigor, with successful diversions in countries like Germany outperforming others due to integrated monitoring and penalties.^[218]^[219] China's national "Zero-Waste Cities" pilot, launched in 2019 across 11 cities and five special zones, promotes waste minimization through targets for industrial solid waste control, agricultural utilization, and prohibitions on illegal dumping, with a systematic index for evaluation by 2020.^[220] Despite these ambitions, illegal dumps and transfers persist as prominent challenges, underscoring that policy stringency alone insufficient without robust local enforcement mechanisms.^[221] Incentive-based systems demonstrate higher efficacy when enforcement incentivizes compliance over prohibition. Germany's Pfand deposit-refund scheme, mandating returns of €0.25 for single-use PET bottles since 2003, achieves a 98% return rate as of 2023, driven by retailer redemption infrastructure and consumer financial motivation rather than punitive measures.^[222] This contrasts with stricter bans elsewhere, highlighting enforcement through market integration as key to sustained diversion.^[223]

Enforcement Challenges

Enforcement of waste management regulations faces significant practical obstacles worldwide, particularly due to the prevalence of informal sectors that operate beyond oversight. In India, informal waste pickers and recyclers handle approximately 60% to 80% of plastic waste collection, often bypassing formal collection systems and regulations due to economic incentives and lack of integration into official frameworks.^[224]^[225] This evasion contributes to inconsistent compliance, as these actors prioritize immediate recovery over environmental standards, complicating authorities' ability to track and penalize non-compliance. Illegal dumping and corruption further erode enforcement efficacy, enabling waste to be diverted into unregulated channels. Globally, illegal waste trafficking exploits weak implementation of complex legal frameworks, with criminals profiting from transboundary shipments that evade detection due to insufficient specialized knowledge among law enforcement.^[226] In the United States, illegal dumping sites proliferate in communities, posing health risks from hazardous materials and attracting further violations, yet persistent challenges in surveillance allow perpetrators to avoid capture.^[227] Corruption risks are heightened in waste trade, where bribes or inadequate verification facilitate illegal exports, undermining international controls like the Basel Convention. Monitoring technology gaps exacerbate these issues, as authorities lack integrated digital tools for real-time tracking and verification. A 2024 OECD report highlights that while technologies such as GPS-enabled containers and AI-driven anomaly detection exist, their underutilization stems from resource constraints and fragmented data systems, leaving vast waste streams unmonitored.^[228] Consequently, fines prove ineffective without robust enforcement capacity; experimental studies indicate that escalating penalties can deter violations only up to a context-specific threshold, beyond which they fail to curb illegal activities due to perceived low detection risks.^[229] Disruptions like China's 2018 ban on most waste imports revealed enforcement vulnerabilities even in developed regions, amplifying contamination backlogs. The ban, which imposed a 0.05% contamination limit on plastics, forced exporters to redirect materials domestically, but high impurity levels in shipments led to processing failures and stockpiles in the EU, where paper recyclers reported chronic oversupply and operational crises by 2019.^[230] This resulted in increased landfilling of recyclables, as inadequate pre-sorting and verification mechanisms failed to meet standards, highlighting how sudden regulatory shifts strain existing enforcement infrastructures without adaptive capacity.^[163]

Controversies and Debates

Efficacy of Recycling Programs

Recycling programs are promoted for conserving resources, reducing energy use, and minimizing landfill dependence, yet empirical assessments reveal substantial limitations in net efficacy across materials and regions. While proponents emphasize potential savings in virgin material extraction, studies indicate that actual outcomes often fall short due to low recovery rates, high processing costs, and contamination, leading to many designated recyclables ending up landfilled or incinerated. For instance, in the United States, only about 32.1% of municipal solid waste (MSW) was recycled or composted in 2018, with the remainder primarily landfilled. Globally, the World Bank estimates that approximately 13.5% of MSW is recycled, with much of the rest openly dumped or unmanaged, highlighting systemic inefficiencies rather than comprehensive resource recovery.^[21]^[231] Material-specific analyses underscore variability: aluminum and metals demonstrate viable efficacy, with recycling processes achieving up to 90% efficiency in sorting and reprocessing, saving 95% of the energy required for primary production and enabling indefinite recyclability without quality loss. This reduces reliance on energy-intensive mining, yielding clear net environmental benefits when collection rates are high. In contrast, plastics exhibit low efficacy; U.S. recycling rates for plastics hovered at 8.7% in 2018, with 75.6% landfilled, and independent estimates place effective recycling as low as 5% when accounting for downstream losses. Energy savings claims for plastic recycling are often overstated, as virgin production from petroleum can be cheaper and less carbon-intensive in scenarios of low oil prices or inefficient recycling infrastructure.^[232]^[233]^[234] Contamination exacerbates these issues, with U.S. curbside programs reporting inbound rates of 17% by weight, and broader estimates reaching 25%, rendering batches unprocessable and diverting them to landfills at additional cost. Sorting and cleaning expenses frequently exceed benefits for low-value materials like mixed plastics or glass, where transportation emissions can offset localized gains. Peer-reviewed life-cycle assessments affirm that mechanical recycling of select plastics reduces environmental impacts compared to landfilling, but program-wide net benefits diminish when factoring in collection logistics and rejection rates, often requiring subsidies to sustain operations. Proponents' resource-saving narratives thus warrant scrutiny against data showing that for many municipalities, alternatives like advanced landfilling or incineration with energy recovery may yield comparable or superior outcomes without the administrative overhead.^[235]^[236]^[237]

Landfills Versus Alternatives

Modern sanitary landfills, engineered with composite liners, leachate collection systems, and daily covers, achieve near-zero leakage rates during operational phases by maintaining leachate depths below 30 cm over liners and recirculating or treating collected fluids to prevent groundwater contamination.^[238]^[239] These systems causally limit pollutant migration compared to unlined historical dumps, with post-closure monitoring extending protection for decades.^[240] Landfills generate methane through anaerobic decomposition, but gas collection systems capture 75-85% of emissions in well-managed U.S. facilities, converting it to renewable energy via flares or electricity generation, offsetting fossil fuel use.^[99]^[241] This recovery reduces net greenhouse gas impacts, particularly when combined with high-efficiency extraction exceeding 80%.^[242] Incineration alternatives incur higher capital costs—up to four times that of solar energy plants per unit capacity—and operational expenses averaging $337 per ton versus $144 for landfilling, driven by pollution controls and ash management.^[243]^[244] Life-cycle assessments indicate incineration emits 69% more climate-impacting gases than landfilling for mixed municipal waste, even accounting for energy recovery, due to immediate CO2 releases from combustion outweighing landfill methane when gas capture exceeds 81%.^[243]^[242] While incineration proponents highlight volume reduction, empirical emissions data show it produces more nitrogen oxides, particulates, and toxics than managed landfills with methane utilization.^[245] Post-closure reclamation demonstrates landfills' long-term viability, with U.S. sites repurposed into functional landscapes; for instance, Harborside International in Chicago transformed a former landfill into a 36-hole golf facility, and Bayonne Golf Club in New Jersey exemplifies stable terrain restoration on capped waste mounds.^[246]^[247] Environmental advocacy often critiques landfills as "out of sight, out of mind" solutions perpetuating waste generation, yet engineering analyses emphasize their capacity for vast volumes of non-recyclables and proven containment over hyped alternatives lacking similar scalability.^[248] For organic fractions in arid or cold climates, where decomposition rates slow—reducing cumulative methane yields—life-cycle data favor landfilling with gas recovery over incineration, as lower biogenic emissions and avoided transport/processing burdens yield net environmental gains absent in wetter regions favoring diversion.^[249]^[242]

Regulatory Overreach and Green Policies

The European Union's Directive on single-use plastics, effective from July 3, 2021, prohibited items such as plastic straws, cutlery, and plates, prompting a shift to alternatives like paper products.^[250] However, life-cycle assessments indicate that paper straws generate higher raw material demands and end-of-life environmental impacts compared to plastics, potentially exacerbating resource depletion without net reductions in pollution.^[251] Similarly, studies on plastic bag bans reveal unintended increases in greenhouse gas emissions, as consumers opt for thicker reusable bags requiring more material production or revert to non-plastic disposables with greater carbon footprints.^[252] ^[253] While such policies have demonstrably lowered visible plastic litter on shorelines—evidenced by post-ban surveys showing reduced bag proportions in debris—critics argue the benefits are overstated relative to costs, with municipal waste management expenses rising sharply as recyclables shift from revenue-generating to net liabilities.^[254] ^[255] Zero-waste mandates, often pursued under circular economy rhetoric, frequently overlook economic realities, leading to market failures where high diversion targets ignore viable disposal hierarchies and inflate taxpayer burdens without commensurate emission cuts.^[256] In jurisdictions enforcing organics bans or mandatory sorting, disposal costs can surge by factors tied to compliance infrastructure, yielding marginal waste reductions of 4% or less against policy goals.^[257] Market-driven waste-to-energy (WTE) facilities offer a pragmatic counterpoint to subsidized recycling programs, converting non-recyclable refuse into energy while minimizing landfill use and pollutants—outcomes that empirical models show surpass the inefficiencies of over-reliant diversion schemes.^[258] Unlike recycling, which often demands ongoing subsidies to offset low market values for sorted materials, WTE leverages thermodynamic efficiency for baseload power, though both face economic hurdles without gate fees or incentives.^[203] ^[259] Regulatory insistence on recycling quotas, absent rigorous cost-benefit scrutiny, risks prioritizing symbolic gestures over scalable solutions, as private WTE operators demonstrate lower long-term environmental footprints when unburdened by ideologically driven mandates.^[260]

References

[1]
Criteria for the Definition of Solid Waste and Solid and Hazardous ...
Sep 8, 2025 · "Solid waste" means any garbage or refuse, sludge from a wastewater treatment plant, water supply treatment plant, or air pollution control facility and other ...
[2]
RCW 82.18.010: Definitions. - | WA.gov
(3) "Solid waste" means garbage, trash, rubbish, or other material discarded as worthless or not economically viable for further use. The term does not include ...
[3]
Global Waste Management Outlook 2024 | UNEP
Feb 28, 2024 · Municipal solid waste generation is predicted to grow from 2.1 billion tonnes in 2023 to 3.8 billion tonnes by 2050. In 2020, the global direct ...
[4]
Wastes | US EPA
Jun 17, 2025 · Municipal solid waste landfills are the third-largest source of human-related methane emissions in the U.S., accounting for 15.5 percent of ...Waste Generation · Effects · Roe Indicators
[5]
An overview of the environmental pollution and health effects ...
Waste landfilling and environmental pollution. Landfills have been regarded as the leading avenues that contribute towards emission of greenhouse gases (GHG) ...Waste Landfilling · Types Of Waste Landfills · Sanitary Landfills
[6]
The Hidden Damage of Landfills - University of Colorado Boulder
Apr 15, 2021 · Landfills release methane, destroy habitats, cause water contamination, and pose health risks, including increased congenital malformations and ...
[7]
A Short History of Solid Waste Management - Klumm Bros.
Aug 18, 2021 · Waste management services date back to at least 500 BCE, if not earlier. Citizens of Athens, in ancient Greece, had to drag their waste at least 1.5 kilometers ...
[8]
Waste Management - Our World in Data
We need to ensure that waste is managed correctly. On this page, you find our data and visualizations on waste management.
[9]
garbage, n. & adj. meanings, etymology and more
The earliest known use of the word garbage is in the Middle English period (1150—1500). OED's earliest evidence for garbage is from 1422. garbage is of ...
[10]
Garbage - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
Used figuratively for "worthless, offensive stuff" from 1590s. Garbage can is from 1901. Garbage collector "trash man" is from 1872; Australian shortening garbo ...
[11]
40 CFR § 243.101 - Definitions. - Legal Information Institute
(l) Food waste means the organic residues generated by the handling, storage, sale, preparation, cooking, and serving of foods, commonly called garbage. (m) ...
[12]
What is the difference between trash, garbage, litter, rubbish, waste?
Sep 5, 2015 · "Garbage" is often food waste, "trash" is things thrown away, "litter" is discarded items, "rubbish" is no longer needed, and "waste" is ...Difference between "garbage" and "trash"? - English Stack ExchangeAmE: "take out the trash" vs. "take out the garbage" [closed]More results from english.stackexchange.com
[13]
FAQs • What is the difference between garbage and trash?
Garbage is defined food, food containers, organic waste, clothing, etc. Trash is defined as yard waste, such as grass clippings, weeds, twigs leaves, etc.
[14]
Garbage Definition: 3k Samples | Law Insider
Garbage means solid wastes from the domestic and commercial preparation, cooking, and dispensing of food, and from the handling, storage, and sale of produce.
[15]
Guide to the Facts and Figures Report about Materials, Waste ... - EPA
Sep 22, 2025 · The materials composition of municipal solid waste generation by product category is illustrated in Figure 15 of the 2018 Data Tables. This ...Missing: classification | Show results with:classification
[16]
Plastic pollution is growing relentlessly as waste management and ...
Feb 22, 2022 · Only 9% of plastic waste is recycled (15% is collected for recycling but 40% of that is disposed of as residues). Another 19% is incinerated, 50 ...
[17]
Learn the Basics of Hazardous Waste | US EPA
Mar 24, 2025 · Household Hazardous Waste. Mixed Radiological Wastes. Pharmaceutical hazardous wastes. Solvent-Contaminated Wipes. Universal Waste. Used Oil.
[18]
Defining Hazardous Waste: Listed, Characteristic and Mixed ... - EPA
Dec 17, 2024 · Spent solvent wastes, · Electroplating and other metal finishing wastes, · Dioxin-bearing wastes, · Chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons production, ...
[19]
Solid Waste Management - World Bank
Feb 11, 2022 · In 2020, the world was estimated to generate 2.24 billion tonnes of solid waste, amounting to a footprint of 0.79 kilograms per person per day.
[20]
Global Waste to Grow by 70 Percent by 2050 Unless Urgent Action ...
Sep 20, 2018 · WASHINGTON, September 20, 2018—Without urgent action, global waste will increase by 70 percent on current levels by 2050, according to the ...
[21]
National Overview: Facts and Figures on Materials, Wastes ... - EPA
Sep 11, 2025 · The total generation of municipal solid waste (MSW) in 2018 was 292.4 million tons (US short tons, unless specified) or 4.9 pounds per person per day.
[22]
Trends in Solid Waste Management - World Bank
Sep 20, 2018 · Worldwide, waste generated per person per day averages 0.74 kilogram but ranges widely, from 0.11 to ... User fees range from an average of $35 ...
[23]
Design Sustainable Packaging - Net Zero Action Accelerator
According to the EPA, packaging accounts for about one-third of municipal waste generated in the U.S.1 Plastic packaging accounts for almost 18% of the waste ...
[24]
[PDF] Food Wastage Footprint & Climate Change
Global food loss and waste generate annually 4.4 GtCO2 eq, or about 8% of total anthropogenic GHG emissions (5). This means that the contribution of food ...
[25]
Single-Use Plastics 101 - NRDC
Jan 9, 2020 · Single-use plastics are goods that are made primarily from fossil fuel–based chemicals (petrochemicals) and are meant to be disposed of right ...
[26]
Municipal solid waste generation rates in urban and rural...
Municipal solid waste generation rates in urban and rural areas Variations in socioeconomic assumptions result in different municipal solid waste (MSW) ...
[27]
Urban and Rural MSW Stream Characterization for Separate ... - MDPI
The differences between the rural and urban areas in MSW composition are evident. The plastic fraction is significantly higher in urban areas, almost six-times ...1. Introduction · 2. Materials And Methods · 3. Results
[28]
Analyzing the relationship between municipal solid waste ...
Sep 16, 2025 · This study examines the relationship between land use patterns and MSW generation across the urban ecosystem of Kota city, India, to identify ...
[29]
waste management can help address triple planetary crisis - UNEP
Jun 27, 2024 · Construction and demolition waste now accounts for more than a third of all waste generated by society. We often don't think of this as ...
[30]
Environmental and socio-economic effects of construction and ...
Jan 15, 2024 · The recovery rate of construction and demolition waste (CDW) in the European Union (EU) is at 89 % and thus high relative to other waste streams ...Missing: UNEP | Show results with:UNEP
[31]
[PDF] Executive Summary - E-Waste Monitor
In 2022, a record 62 billion kg of e-waste was generated globally (equivalent to an average of 7.8 kg per capita per year); 22.3 per cent of this e-waste mass ...
[32]
Global e-Waste Monitor 2024: Electronic Waste Rising Five Times ...
Mar 20, 2024 · A record 62 million tonnes (Mt) of e-waste was produced in 2022, Up 82% from 2010;; On track to rise another 32%, to 82 million tonnes, in 2030; ...
[33]
Trends of Industrial Waste Generation in Manufacturing Enterprises ...
This study focuses on the amount of waste generated in manufacturing companies. Panel data from 27 European Union countries from 2010–2022 were analyzed.
[34]
Manufacturing Waste Management Trend | US EPA
Aug 20, 2025 · Waste managed by the manufacturing sectors generally increased from 2014 to 2018, decreased from 2018 to 2020, and then increased again through ...
[35]
A comprehensive review on agricultural waste production and onsite ...
Sep 27, 2024 · Globally, crop residue was estimated at 3803 Mt, equivalent to 60,848 million British thermal units (MBTU) and 1534.37 tonnes of oil equivalent ...
[36]
Agricultural Waste: Challenges and Solutions, a Review - MDPI
In developing countries, agricultural waste often represents up to 30–40% of total crop mass [17], while in developed nations, it ranges between 10–20% due to ...
[37]
Manure Management: Emissions & mitigation strategies » AgLED
Manure management accounts for about 10% of total global livestock GHG emissions (5% nitrous oxide (N2O) and 4% methane (CH4)) and 7% of global agricultural ...Contribution To Emissions · Mechanisms · Mitigation Strategies And...Missing: residues | Show results with:residues<|separator|>
[38]
The untapped potential of sewage sludge and wastewater
Oct 25, 2023 · The remains of the roughly 54% of sewage waste that is treated are generally used for agriculture, burned, buried in landfills or stored for ...
[39]
Medical Waste 2023 - PureWay Compliance
Feb 1, 2023 · Therefore, according to Slate.com, it is estimated that it creates approximately 5.9 million tons of garbage annually—which could be even more ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[40]
Health-care waste - World Health Organization (WHO)
Oct 24, 2024 · Health-care waste includes 85% non-hazardous waste and 15% hazardous waste, such as infectious, sharps, chemical, and radioactive waste.
[41]
Medical waste management in the modern healthcare era: A ...
A comprehensive meta-analysis of medical waste management practices across 78 countries reveals that generation rates range from 0.3 to 8.4 kg/bed/day, with a ...
[42]
How Automated Side Load Trash Trucks Improve Efficiency in Waste ...
Feb 21, 2024 · Unlike traditional types of garbage trucks, automated side loaders use mechanical arms to lift and empty bins, reducing the need for manual ...
[43]
Advances in automation - Waste Today
Feb 15, 2023 · Developed initially to improve safety and efficiency, automated collection trucks have evolved and increased in popularity as haulers cope with ...
[44]
When Is a Side Loader Garbage Truck More Efficient Than Other ...
These factors combine to make side loaders 68% more cost-effective per ton collected than manual systems in standardized residential areas, according to Waste ...<|separator|>
[45]
Garbage Collection How often do garbage trucks collect trash?
May 10, 2023 · Generally, residential areas receive weekly pickups, while commercial and industrial areas may have daily pickups. Some cities also offer bi- ...
[46]
What Really Happens at Waste Transfer Stations - Dumpsters.com
Oct 1, 2025 · If the waste transfer station is connected to a materials recovery facility, waste will be sorted and screened to collect any recyclable items ...
[47]
Where Does Trash Go After You Throw It Away? | TDS
Jan 18, 2024 · If trash is dropped off at a transfer station, it's temporarily held and sorted there before heading to a landfill or waste-to-energy facility.Recycling Centers · Waste-To-Energy Facilities · Where Does Trash Go Faq
[48]
Rethinking Routing - Waste360
... GPS tracking for their fleets see, on average, a 13.2 percent reduction in fuel costs and a 13.4 percent reduction in overtime expenses. The key to such ...
[49]
Trash Pick-Up Solutions: Addressing Common Challenges and ...
Sep 17, 2024 · Illegal dumping: Dumping waste in unapproved areas can lead to environmental damage, health hazards, and increased costs for communities.<|separator|>
[50]
Stop the Trash: Illegal Dumping Prevention | LVT
Mar 30, 2023 · The legal definition of illegal dumping is the disposal of trash ... Improper waste disposal releases harmful chemicals and pollutants ...
[51]
How the World Bank is tackling the growing global waste crisis
May 16, 2025 · In low-income countries, the problem is even worse—with 60 percent of solid waste going uncollected and 93 percent improperly managed. Without ...
[52]
What is the Waste Sorting Process? - SL Recycling
Jun 7, 2023 · Waste sorting involves categorizing waste by material or recyclability, starting with individual separation and ending with disposal or ...
[53]
The Large, The Small, The Clean And The Dirty: Equipping MRFs
Clean MRFs handle pre-separated recyclables, while dirty MRFs process raw waste. Clean MRFs are smaller, processing less than 50 tons/day, and dirty MRFs ...
[54]
Deep Dive: Sorting Recyclables at a Modern MRF - Atlantic Packaging
MRFs sort recyclables using machines and people, separating materials by type, using screens, air classifiers, magnets, optical sorters, and manual labor.
[55]
How AI Is Revolutionizing the Recycling Industry - State of the Planet
Jun 18, 2025 · Modern waste facilities are incorporating AI into their systems using robots equipped with AI vision systems, high resolution cameras, hyperspectral imaging.
[56]
What on Earth is the MRF?
The MRF receives, separates and prepares materials to be sold for recycling using a combination of equipment and manual labor.
[57]
[PDF] 2023-2025 CITY-WIDE WASTE CHARACTERIZATION STUDY
Nov 28, 2024 · The contamination in the recycling stream was 12%. ▫. The organics stream was primarily composed of yard waste (84%), food waste (12%), paper ( ...
[58]
[PDF] State of Recycling
... contamination rates,12 and other factors. Figure 11 to the right shows how efficient MRFs are in converting received recyclables into outbound commodities.
[59]
Waste Pickers - WIEGO
Global Estimates. It is estimated that 15–20 million people in the world work as informal waste pickers. · Statistics on Waste Pickers in Brazil. Of the 281,000 ...Missing: manual | Show results with:manual
[60]
Beyond the bin: Decent work deficits in the waste management and ...
Aug 26, 2024 · Employment in the waste and recycling industry is estimated at 6.9 million, representing 0.2 per cent of total global employment, although this ...
[61]
A mini review on the main challenges of implementing mechanical ...
Feb 26, 2023 · MBT specifically involves the mechanical separation of the recoverable materials contained in MSW along with the biological stabilization of ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
[62]
https://www.aishred.com/release/size-reduction-of-municipal-solid-waste.html
[63]
From Waste to Wins: How Efficient Shredding Cuts Costs and ...
Aug 14, 2025 · With the M&J 4000M in place, transfer stations can boost waste density from roughly 400 to 600 pounds per cubic yard. This can reduce daily ...
[64]
Effects of shredding of wastes on the treatment of municipal solid ...
In this study, shredding the MSW is an effective method of improving waste biodegradation compared to the trends established with un-shredded solid waste. The ...
[65]
[PDF] Technical and Economic Analysis of the Shredding of MSW Prior to ...
Pre-shredding MSW can improve WTE by reducing particle size, increasing bulk density, and enhancing combustion, while reducing fire risks.
[66]
Composting | US EPA
Aug 20, 2025 · Composting is nature's way of recycling and is one of the most powerful actions we can take to reduce trash in landfills and build healthy soil.
[67]
Composting of organic fraction of municipal solid waste in a three ...
Sep 15, 2024 · The study aims to determine the impact of aeration, turning mechanisms, bulking agents, degradation rate, and process parameters on compost quality.
[68]
Biogas production from organic solid waste through anaerobic ...
This process, without oxygen, decomposes organic matter by means of microorganisms, converting it into biogas, with a yield of 5–7 kWh/m³. This reduces ...
[69]
Biogas production from anaerobic digestion of food waste and ...
Yields from anaerobic digestion can be as high as 3,200 standard cubic feet (scf), 90.6 m3, methane per ton of raw food waste. Assuming an electricity cost of ...
[70]
Evaluation of the efficiency of dry anaerobic digester in the ... - Nature
Oct 21, 2024 · The present study showed that in the C/N ratio of 25, the production volume of biogas and CH4 is efficient. Studies also recommend a C/N ratio ...
[71]
Performance of mechanical biological treatment of residual ...
The shares of the output fractions, especially of the recyclables and RDF determine the overall efficiency of MBT technology in diverting waste from landfills.Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
[72]
Efficiency of biological and mechanical-biological treatment plants ...
Feb 29, 2024 · This work presents an exhaustive analysis of the existing plants in Spain which evaluates their typology as well as their performance.Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
[73]
Environmental Comparison of Different Mechanical–Biological ...
May 11, 2022 · The aim of this work is to assess and compare, from an environmental point of view, the performance of seven selected MBT plants currently operating in ...Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
[74]
Energy Recovery from the Combustion of Municipal Solid Waste ...
May 2, 2025 · The amount of ash generated ranges from 15-25 percent (by weight) and from 5-15 percent (by volume) of the MSW processed. Generally, MSW ...Missing: 2023 | Show results with:2023
[75]
[PDF] Municipal Solid Waste Incineration - MIT
The reductions are approximately 75 percent by weight and 90 percent by volume. The residues arising from air pollution control (APC) are, however, ...
[76]
Global trends in municipal solid waste treatment technologies ...
Jul 15, 2023 · About 11%, 19% and 70% of collected MSW is used for energy recovery, recycling and end up in landfills, respectively. Nearly world's 3.5 billion ...
[77]
Municipal solid waste treatment around the world - Ecostar Srl
Jun 16, 2025 · ... waste-to-energy incineration accounts for 18%. Municipal solid waste management treatment around the world. National policies, supported by ...<|separator|>
[78]
Municipal solid waste generation and disposal in FY2023
Mar 27, 2025 · 2.Waste incineration plants · Number of plants: 1,004 (decreased 1.2% from 1,016 in FY2022) · Capacity: 174,598 t/day (174,646 t/day in FY2022) ...
[79]
Is incineration repressing recycling? - ScienceDirect.com
... Japan has sustained very high rates of incineration (79%). ... The life cycle approach for assessing the impact of municipal solid waste incineration on the ...
[80]
[PDF] Switzerland - European Environment Agency (EEA)
Mar 1, 2025 · The incineration rate and recycling rate have stagnated, at around. 50% between 2010 and 2022. The share of composting shows a steady increase ...
[81]
Setting the record straight about Waste-to-Energy - ESWET
Jul 29, 2025 · In 2019, in Europe, WtE generated 43 billion kWh of electricity and 99 billion kWh of heat, supplying 20 million citizens with electricity and ...
[82]
The Confederation of European Waste-to-Energy Plants - CEWEP
Waste-to-Energy is a hygienic method of treating waste, reducing its volume by about 90%. Modern European Waste-to-Energy plants are clean and safe, meeting ...
[83]
Waste-to-Energy Cycle - CEWEP
Waste-to-Energy Plants in Europe can supply 18 million inhabitants with electricity and 15.2 million inhabitants with heat.
[84]
Busting the myth: waste-to-energy plants and public health - NIH
Jun 26, 2023 · ... thermal treatment of waste in the world. It is important to realise that achieving material recycling rates above 50 % is exceptionally ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[85]
Technologies for dioxin control at municipal waste combustors ...
These add-on systems are: selective catalytic reduction reactors (SCR), wet scrubbers (WS) and carbon filtration reactors (CF). Each add-on system will be ...
[86]
Fate of dioxins in a municipal solid waste incinerator with state-of ...
Nov 15, 2021 · This study provided new insight for the accurate estimation of dioxin emissions and a typical case report of MSW incineration with ultra-low dioxin emissions.
[87]
[PDF] Modern Technologies To Reduce Emissions Of Dioxins And Furans ...
Dioxins and furans are toxic byproducts of waste combustion. Air pollution control equipment and various waste incinerators are used to reduce their emissions.
[88]
[PDF] A modern flue-gas cleaning system for waste incineration plants P
ABB's TCR system uses bag filters, scrubbers, filsorption, and SCR denox. Filsorption removes dioxins, and the system is modular for retrofitting.
[89]
[PDF] Solidification/Stabilization Resource Guide - EPA
Solidification can be accomplished by a chemical reaction between the waste and solidifying reagents or by mechanical processes. Contaminant migration is often ...
[90]
Factors affecting hazardous waste solidification/stabilization: A review
The material used for solidification/stabilization (S/S) not only solidifies the hazardous waste by chemical means but also insolublizes, immobilizes, ...
[91]
Disposal Methods of Hazardous Waste - Mintek Resources
Nov 6, 2022 · Stabilization refers to the mixing of reagents to chemically reduce the toxicity and the mobility of contaminates in a soil or waste. For ...
[92]
[PDF] STABILIZATION/SOLIDIFICATION PROCESSES FOR MIXED WASTE
The four stabilization/solidification processes discussed are Grout/Portland Cement Stabilization, Sulfur Polymer Encapsulation (SPE), Polymer Encapsulation ( ...
[93]
Lime Stabilization of Waste Activated Sludge - Brieflands
The lime stabilization process consists of adding a lime slurry to the liquid sludge to achieve a pH higher than 12. The needed lime dose varies with the kind ...
[94]
[PDF] Fact Sheet: USING LIME TO STABILIZE BIOSOLIDS
Lime treatment controls conditions in biosolids that may support the growth of pathogens. It converts sewage sludge into a usable product and is sanctioned by ...
[95]
Chemical Treatment of Waste - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The chemical treatment of waste refers to reducing its hazardous nature by using some specific chemicals such as acids, bases, oxidizers, reducers, etc.
[96]
Hazardous Waste Stabilization, Treatment and Landfill Services
Hazardous waste requiring stabilization is treated by a chemical process where approved reagents are added in predetermined ratios to pass the TCLP. All ...
[97]
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills | US EPA
Mar 11, 2025 · A municipal solid waste landfill (MSWLF) is a discrete area of land or excavation that receives household waste.
[98]
Leachate Collection and Management System - American Landfill
Leachate is collected via drainage layers and pipes, pumped to a sump, then to a storage tank. It is then transported for treatment, or recirculated back into ...
[99]
Basic Information about Landfill Gas | US EPA
Sep 12, 2025 · Learn about methane emissions from landfills, how landfill gas is collected and treated, and the types of landfill gas energy projects.
[100]
Data Corner: Digging into landfill methane recovery
Jul 20, 2021 · The U.S. EPA assumes an average collection efficiency of 75%. At the same time, existing regulations do not incentivize denser well placement ...
[101]
Landfill Facts - Business Waste
Jul 9, 2025 · There's no exact figure for how much garbage goes to landfill every year around the world in total, but it's estimated that 37% of global waste ...How Many Landfills · How Much Waste · Landfill Statistics
[102]
Municipal Solid Waste Factsheet | Center for Sustainable Systems
Municipal Solid Waste (MSW), commonly called “trash” or “garbage,” includes durable goods (tires, furniture), nondurable goods (newspapers, plastic plates/cups) ...
[103]
Basic Information about Landfills | US EPA
Jun 25, 2025 · Modern landfills have come a long way in the last few decades, due to updated regulations and better understanding of the science. Modern ...
[104]
(PDF) Landfill Lifespan Estimation: A Case Study - ResearchGate
Dec 13, 2017 · The average life expectancy of existing landfill sites varies from 30 to 50 years depending on waste generation capacity and landfill site size.
[105]
Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping of ...
The purpose of the London Convention is to control all sources of marine pollution and prevent pollution of the sea through regulation of dumping into the sea ...
[106]
Marine Pollution: Ocean Dumping - NOAA
The London Protocol implements a precautionary approach that prohibits all dumping except those wastes or other matter described in Annex 1 of the Protocol. The ...
[107]
About the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act | US EPA
Nov 15, 2024 · The Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act was enacted by the US Congress in 1972 to protect and preserve our ocean and coastal resources.
[108]
The Open Burning of Plastic Wastes is an Urgent Global Health Issue
Jan 12, 2024 · The scale of open burning among LMICs is estimated to range from 40% to 65% of total municipal solid waste [11,12,13]. Open burning is a large ...
[109]
[PDF] End open burning: - ICLEI Africa
In low-income countries across the continent, it is estimated that 90% of waste is burned or dumped (Cogut, 2016; Kaza et al, 2018; UNEP, 2018 in Mebratu ...Missing: prevalence | Show results with:prevalence
[110]
Deep Well Injection
Deep well injection is a liquid waste disposal technology. This alternative uses injection wells to place treated or untreated liquid waste into geologic ...
[111]
General Information About Injection Wells | US EPA
Jun 24, 2025 · An injection well is used to place fluid underground into porous geologic formations. These underground formations may range from deep sandstone or limestone, ...Definition of injection well · UIC Well classes · Use of injection wells
[112]
[PDF] Waste Management Options for Long-Duration Space Missions
High-velocity disposal methods are not feasible from a size, mass, power, and/or cost stand-point. No- or low-velocity disposals are feasible, although more ...
[113]
[PDF] Present and Long-Term Composition of MSW Landfill Leachate
Landfill leachate contains dissolved organic matter, inorganic macrocomponents, heavy metals, and xenobiotic organic compounds. High concentrations are ...
[114]
Assessment of Heavy Metals and Organics in Municipal Solid Waste ...
Leachates have high organic content and basic pH. Organic content is inversely proportional to landfill age. Cr, Mn, Ni, Cd, and As exceeded standards. Three ...
[115]
Assessment of Municipal Solid-Waste Landfill Liner Performance
Sep 17, 2025 · An analysis of landfill liner performance reported median leakage rates of 44 and 33 L ha − 1 day − 1 for geomembrane and composite liners, ...
[116]
[PDF] a far cry from the past modern landfills
Mar 28, 2006 · Research has shown that leachate treatment facilities at modern landfills are capable of removing 100 percent of the trace organics and over 85.
[117]
Concentration of heavy metals in leachate, soil, and plants in ... - NIH
Landfill leachate contains many pollutants, including toxic substances and heavy metals, and usually has high COD [14].
[118]
Plastic Waste Degradation in Landfill Conditions - NIH
Both of the nearby landfill sites had 92% of the microplastics that were found in the groundwater, which were derived from the fragmentation of the buried ...
[119]
Waste dumps as microplastic hotspots: a comparative investigation ...
The MPs concentrations in dumping sites ranged between 10 and 3,457 MPs mg/kg. Fragments were the predominant shape in samples from both years, 32% and 36% in ...
[120]
Environmental impacts, pollution sources and pathways of spent ...
Oct 13, 2021 · ... processing and disposal of spent batteries leads to contamination of the soil, water and air. The toxicity of the battery material is a ...
[121]
Pervasive health threats of unregulated battery recycling
Jan 14, 2021 · A remediation and public education effort at an abandoned battery recycling facility in Bangladesh eliminated most lead soil contamination, ...
[122]
[PDF] Environmental Impact Analysis of Waste Lithium-Ion Battery ...
Jun 1, 2024 · Recycling lithium-ion batteries causes heavy metal and organic solvent pollution, air pollutants like dust and gases, and toxic wastewater.
[123]
Environmental impact of emerging contaminants from battery waste
Without proper containment, the metal nanostructures contained can then leach into the surrounding soil and water streams. Modelling studies to analyze the ...
[124]
Managing Methane in the Waste Sector - RMI
landfills and wastewater — accounted for almost 20 percent of all human-related methane emissions — the third largest source globally, after ...
[125]
The potential of proper waste management in climate change ...
The waste sector is directly responsible for around 3% of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. ... Thus, the 3% direct GHG emissions from the sector ...
[126]
Chapter 2: Emissions trends and drivers
Global GHG emissions continued to rise since AR5, but the rate of emissions growth slowed ( high confidence). GHG emissions reached 59 ± 6.6 GtCO2-eq in 2019 ( ...
[127]
Fossil vs biogenic CO2 emissions - IEA Bioenergy
Fossil fuels release carbon locked for millions of years, while bioenergy returns carbon from the biogenic cycle. Fossil fuel use increases total carbon, while ...
[128]
Fossil and biogenic CO2 from waste incineration based on a ...
Furthermore, heat and electricity production from the incineration of biogenic waste is considered as a renewable energy source, while fossil CO2 emissions are ...
[129]
Benefits of Landfill Gas Energy Projects | US EPA
Apr 18, 2025 · It is estimated that an LFG energy project will capture roughly 60 to 90 percent of the methane emitted from the landfill, depending on system ...
[130]
Curbing global solid waste emissions toward net-zero warming futures
Nov 16, 2023 · Implementing abrupt technical and behavioral changes could result in a net-zero warming solid waste system relative to 2020.
[131]
Solid Wastes Provide Breeding Sites, Burrows, and Food for ...
We conclude that solid waste accumulation is a risk factor for zoonotic and vector-borne disease transmission. However, measurements are not standardized, (107, ...
[132]
Insects, Rodents, and Pets as Reservoirs, Vectors, and Sentinels of ...
Insects (eg, houseflies, cockroaches), rodents (rats, mice), and pets (dogs, cats) act as reservoirs of AMR for first-line and last-resort antimicrobial agents.
[133]
Cholera in Victorian London | Science Museum
Jul 30, 2019 · Sanitation and good hygiene practices such as washing walls and floors, removing the foul-smelling sources of miasmas—decaying waste and sewage— ...
[134]
Understanding India's sanitary revolution and the decline of cholera ...
Nov 2, 2023 · In the nineteenth century Bengal did not have a sewage drainage system, and water sources were largely unregulated and infested by faecal waste.
[135]
Municipal Solid Waste Management and Adverse Health Outcomes
Apr 19, 2021 · Health effects included mortality, adverse birth and neonatal outcomes, respiratory conditions, cancer, gastroenteritis, vector-borne diseases, ...
[136]
383 Incidence and injury patterns among electronic waste workers ...
Thirty-five (39.3%) workers sustained at least an injury within one week of the study. Common types of injuries sustained were cuts (40.4%), bruises/contusions ...Missing: rates | Show results with:rates<|separator|>
[137]
Occupational injuries and health-seeking behavior of informal sector ...
Two hundred and four (48.3%) workers suffered from injury in the past 12 months. A shorter duration of the job, a lack of safety training, and a lack of ...
[138]
Injury rates for waste industry workers fell in 2023, but illnesses rose
Nov 8, 2024 · The total recordable illness rate for solid waste collection workers in 2023 was 13.8 per 100 FTE, up significantly from 5.8 in 2022.Missing: informal | Show results with:informal
[139]
Our Plastic Crisis Has Made NIMBYism Global - Earth911
Jan 26, 2021 · Wealthy nations like the U.S. export their plastic recycling to poorer countries, resulting in global NIMBYism with environmental and social ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
[140]
'Waste colonialism': world grapples with west's unwanted plastic
Dec 31, 2021 · And the way they've found is exporting to poorer countries without effective waste management systems or environmental legislation and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[141]
The Consequences of China's Import Ban On Plastic Waste - Earth.Org
Apr 7, 2022 · In 2017, the year before China's strict import ban came into effect, the country imported almost 600000 metric tons of plastic waste.
[142]
China's plastic import ban increases prospects of environmental ...
Jan 18, 2021 · Before the ban, mainland China was undoubtfully the single largest importer of plastic waste, importing about 55.7% of world's plastic waste ( ...
[143]
[PDF] Data from the global plastics waste trade 2016-2018 ... - Greenpeace
Apr 23, 2019 · China's ban caused global plastic exports to drop by about half from 2016-2018, with waste redirected to less-regulated areas, and exports ...
[144]
Waste Pickers at the Forefront of a Global Just Transition and Plastic ...
Apr 8, 2024 · Roughly 0.5-1% of the global workforce is involved in this crucial yet often undervalued profession, with 80% of waste collectors operating ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage<|separator|>
[145]
Occupational Health Risk of Waste Pickers: A Case Study of ... - NIH
Aug 30, 2021 · The results indicated that, in the last one year, waste pickers exposed to landfill sites were 1.7 times more likely to develop a common health disorder.Missing: manual | Show results with:manual
[146]
[PDF] The Inequitable Placement of Hazardous Waste Facilities
Dec 5, 2023 · Other studies have similar conclusions, where a lower SES increases the likelihood of toxic waste exposure and cancer mortality (Martuzzi et al.
[147]
Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Residential Proximity to ...
Finally, longitudinal survey data provide unique opportunities to examine how living near hazardous sites is related over time to racial and socioeconomic ...
[148]
Waste Mismanagement in Developing Countries: A Review of ...
Mar 24, 2019 · In Ibadan, Nigeria, more than 60% of HW handlers did not discriminate between HW and MSW during collection and handling stages. Similarly, 66% ...3.2. Marine Litter · 3.5. Open Dumping And... · 3.6. C&d Waste Open Dumping
[149]
Targeting minority, low-income neighborhoods for hazardous waste ...
Jan 19, 2016 · Minority and low-income neighborhoods and communities in transition are disproportionately targeted by industries that follow the path of least resistance.
[150]
World must move beyond waste era and turn rubbish into resource
Feb 28, 2024 · In 2020, the global direct cost of waste management was an estimated USD 252 billion.
[151]
UNEP Report Calls for Shift to Zero Waste to Prevent Runaway ...
Feb 29, 2024 · In 2020, the global direct cost of waste management was an estimated USD 252 billion – or as much as USD 361 billion, if the hidden costs of ...
[152]
Waste Management Market Size | Industry Report, 2033
The global waste management market size was estimated at USD 1,424.35 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 2,365.14 billion by 2033, growing at a ...
[153]
Waste Management Market Size to Hit USD 2.30 Trillion by 2034
The global waste management market is projected to reach USD 2.30 trillion by 2034, from USD 1.20 trillion in 2024, with a 6.72% CAGR from 2025 to 2034.
[154]
U.S. Solid Waste Industry, The: How Big is It?
The private sector owned 53 percent of the solid waste facilities and the public sector owned 47 percent. Of this, the publicly traded companies owned 12 ...
[155]
Waste Management, Inc. (WM) Company Profile & Facts
Waste Management, Inc., through its subsidiaries, provides environmental solutions to residential, commercial, industrial, and municipal customers.
[156]
Mismanaged waste 'kills up to a million people a year globally'
May 13, 2019 · Living near rubbish doubles the risk of contracting diarrhoea, the report found, which is a major cause of death in the developing world.
[157]
A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050
Sep 20, 2018 · By 2050, the world is expected to generate 3.40 billion tons of waste annually, increasing drastically from today's 2.01 billion tons.
[158]
Impact on virgin vs. recycled plastics prices and implications for a ...
Nov 22, 2024 · The trends show virgin plastics prices substantially lower than recycled plastics in the United States and basic price parity between the two markets.
[159]
[PDF] The U.S. Plastics Recycling Economy: Current State, Challenges ...
Oct 18, 2024 · estimated global rate of 9 % (Geyer et al. 2017) ... Karali, et al (2024) estimates global impacts of primary plastic production to be 5.3%.
[160]
Why is less than 10% of the world's plastic being recycled?
Apr 18, 2025 · A new OECD report confirms what many in the industry already suspected: less than 10% of plastic is recycled globally. The number has barely moved in decades.
[161]
What is Aluminum Recycling and Why Analyze Its Costs?
Jun 5, 2025 · Recycled aluminum production costs range from $0.20 to $0.50 per kilogram, while primary aluminum production costs between $2.50 and $3.50 per ...
[162]
[PDF] NORTHEAST RECYCLING MARKETS MAY 2024
May 30, 2024 · ALUMINUM RECYCLING RATE 2018 EPA DATA: • CANS: .670 MT, 50.4 ... EPA PAPER RECYCLING RATE 2018: 45,970 MT, 68.2%. • CORRUGATED BOX ...
[163]
Piling Up: How China's Ban on Importing Waste Has Stalled Global ...
Mar 7, 2019 · Even before China's ban, only 9 percent of discarded plastics were being recycled, while 12 percent were burned. The rest were buried in ...<|separator|>
[164]
Impact of China's National Sword Policy on the U.S. Landfill and ...
Feb 21, 2022 · For example, in 2018, China's imports plunged by 95.4% compared to baseline levels and the trade flow of global plastic scrap plummeted by 45.5% ...
[165]
[PDF] Profitability, Scalability and Optimized Siting for Waste-to-Energy ...
We develop calibrated capital and operating expense cost curves based on literature data to study the techno-economic characteristics of WtE supply chains.
[166]
Modeling and Assessing Economical Feasibilities for Waste to ...
May 9, 2025 · Our study analyses and estimates the profitability of a WtE incineration plant(s) in the city of St. Petersburg and the connected Leningrad region.
[167]
Plastics recycling: challenges and opportunities - PMC
However, while technically feasible it has generally been found to be uneconomic without significant subsidies because of the low price of petrochemical ...
[168]
Private Benjamins: The Debate Over Privatizing Waste Collection
A report that argued that privatizing the collection and processing of waste and recyclables can produce cost savings of 20 percent to 40 percent.
[169]
Detroit Could Collect Savings from Privatized Garbage Pickup
Dec 1, 2000 · Shaving 30 percent from Detroit's total refuse collection bill would save the city more than $6.4 million out of an annual budget that currently stands at $21. ...
[170]
Does Pay-As-You Throw Pay Off? - Waste360
Research findings from a 1996 through 1998 study indicate the country now enjoys a 14 percent to 27 percent reduction in waste, and a 32 percent to 59 percent ...
[171]
Pay-As-You-Throw Trash Pricing - BioCycle
Sep 20, 2004 · A later study found that in seven of nine communities in the states of California, Michigan and Illinois, MSW waste generation decreased by 20 ...
[172]
Turning Trash Into Treasure: How AI Is Revolutionizing Waste Sorting
May 31, 2024 · "AI is transforming waste management through automated sorting systems that utilize robotics and machine learning to accurately categorize waste ...
[173]
U.S. Biogas Market Size And Share | Industry Report, 2030
The U.S. biogas market size was estimated at USD 6.08 billion in 2023 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 2.7% from 2024 to 2030.
[174]
Monopoly and the U.S. Waste Knot | Composting for Community
Dec 4, 2018 · A smaller competing company estimates that monopoly control of the industry costs the country one-third more for solid waste and recycling ...
[175]
How Monopolies Took Over Trash Collection and Undermined ...
Dec 22, 2020 · Big Waste corporations pushed out thousands of local businesses, drove up trash collection costs, and adopted perverse incentives to send more goods to ...
[176]
[PDF] How Waste Monopolies are Choking Environmental Solutions, and ...
Waste companies passed on the higher costs by renegotiating recycling contracts with towns, cities, and counties. Currently, local governments that can't ...
[177]
We can learn a lot from Troy's trash - The Conversation
Jul 14, 2025 · Over nearly 2,000 years, Troy ended up with 15 meters of built-up debris. Archaeologists can see nine major building phases in it, each made up ...Missing: ancient practices middens
[178]
Midden: An Archaeological Garbage Dump - ThoughtCo
Jul 19, 2019 · Middens are ancient trash heaps that provide archaeologists with clues about past human life and habits. Middens can improve soil over ...
[179]
Cloaca Maxima - The Great Sewer of Ancient Rome - UNRV.com
It became more than just a sewer system. It was also used for draining marshy areas for construction and for flood control. In the realm of ancient engineering, ...
[180]
Cloaca Maxima - The 'Great Sewer' of Ancient Rome - Atlas Obscura
Apr 11, 2017 · The sewer was constructed as an open drainage system during the reign of Tarquinius Priscus, and was originally used to empty the marshlands and ...
[181]
The history of waste: a reflection of how societies have changed
Sep 1, 2025 · The first attempts to organise waste management date back to ancient Greece. In Athens, a rudimentary system required citizens to dispose of ...
[182]
Path to Pistoia: Urban Hygiene Before the Black Death
Oct 3, 2019 · ... waste disposal. All of these were recognized as impacting people's ... plague coincide with the Black Death. Yet understanding fear as ...Missing: garbage | Show results with:garbage
[183]
[PDF] DRIVERS OF EARLY WASTE DISPOSAL ACTIVITIES IN ENGLAND
massive sources of nearby waste. This perhaps triggered the Black Death (Plague), which had killed the population by 33% (England) and 15% (London). People ...Missing: pre- garbage
[184]
Why the Black Plague? History of the World's Quest for Trash Removal
Feb 17, 2023 · Death Ships, Vermin and the Pathogen Responsible for the Black Plague Demonstrate Our Misunderstanding of Waste Disposal Through the Ages ...Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
[185]
American Waste Practices - Disposable America
Waste practices in the 18th and most of the 19th century were largely the responsibility of the individual householder.
[186]
A Timeline of Waste Management Innovations Through the Ages
Aug 23, 2025 · The history of waste management is as old as human civilization itself. Managing refuse, trash, and unwanted materials has always been crucial ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[187]
The Story of London's Sewer System - The Historic England Blog
Mar 28, 2019 · When completed in the mid-1870s, the new sewage network's enclosed design, which captured sewage and rainwater, virtually eliminated cholera. Dr ...
[188]
Slums and suburbs: water and sanitation in the first industrial city
Feb 11, 2021 · The expansion of the network and innovations in sewer design in the mid-19th century, including the development of egg-shaped, clay sewer pipes ...
[189]
First Waste-to-Energy (WtE) plant | Guinness World Records
The first WtE plant was built in Nottingham, UK, in 1874. Designed by Stephen Fryer, these incinerators were originally known as “destructors”.
[190]
1874 - Furnace incinerator for refuse at Nottingham, England
The first UK incinerators for waste disposal were built in Nottingham by Manlove, Alliott & Co. Ltd. in 1874 to a design patented by Albert Fryer.
[191]
History of Waste Management - The Recycle Guide
Early recycling included feeding vegetable waste to livestock and using green waste as fertilizer. Pigs were often used as an efficient method of disposing of ...
[192]
A Brief Look at the Origins of Municipal Trash Collection
Jun 24, 2024 · The Indus Valley civilization and ancient Greece were among the first civilizations to organize waste collection. These societies had designated ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[193]
[PDF] American Wasteland: A History of America's Garbage Industry, 1880 ...
As the staunchest advocates for waste management reform, "modernizers" like George. Waring developed "modern" waste management solutions based on nineteenth.
[194]
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Overview | US EPA
Sep 5, 2025 · RCRA gives EPA the authority to control hazardous waste from the "cradle-to-grave." This includes the generation, transportation, treatment, storage and ...
[195]
RCRA Explained: The Resource Conservation & Recovery Act
May 3, 2025 · Signed into law in 1976, RCRA reshaped waste management, impacting industries, municipalities, and even households by regulating disposal ...
[196]
What is the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act? - OSHA.com
May 23, 2024 · The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) serves as the cornerstone legislation governing the management of both hazardous and non-hazardous waste.Introduction To Rcra · Regulatory Framework And... · Rcra's Impact On Waste...
[197]
[PDF] Waste management policies and policy instruments in Europe
Dec 31, 2005 · During the early 1990s many environment administrations started to embrace source reduction and pollution prevention goals, as also reflected in ...<|separator|>
[198]
Landfilling down as Europe shifts to better waste management
Jun 10, 2009 · The Landfill Directive set targets for progressively reducing the amount of biodegradable municipal waste landfilled in the period to 2016. A ...Missing: effects | Show results with:effects
[199]
The Evolution of EPR in the EU: From Waste Policy to Circular ... - 3E
Jun 10, 2025 · For the first time, these directives introduced take-back obligations, collection targets, recycling quotas, and system requirements for ...Missing: effects | Show results with:effects
[200]
China's ban on imports of 24 types of waste is a wake up call to the ...
Dec 29, 2017 · Since the 1980s China has become the world's largest importer of waste. In 2012, up to 56% of global exported plastic waste ended up in China.
[201]
The Chinese import ban and its impact on global plastic waste trade
Jun 20, 2018 · China, which has imported a cumulative 45% of plastic waste since 1992, recently implemented a new policy banning the importation of most plastic waste.
[202]
The State of Waste-to-Energy in the US | WMW
May 10, 2023 · Nevertheless, the sector started to grow and by the early 1990s more than 15 per cent of MSW were treated in waste incinerators. By this time ...
[203]
Waste to energy, indispensable cornerstone for circular economy - NIH
Jan 29, 2024 · On national and regional scales, comparable results were observed: Incinerators of the 1970s were a comparatively large source of pollution ( ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[204]
Tetra Pak: Behind its Latest Investment in AI Waste Sorting
Sep 25, 2025 · Packaging giant Tetra Pak has partnered with British start-up Recycleye to install AI-powered waste sorting technology across three UK ...
[205]
[PDF] Analysis on Development of Plasma Gasification for Waste Treatment
In a word, plasma gasification technology is developing rapidly in China and is gradually moving towards industrial application. Plasma waste treatment ...
[206]
Basel Convention on Hazardous Wastes - State Department
In 2019, Parties to the Basel Convention adopted amendments to Annexes II, VIII, and IX that subject the majority of exports of plastic waste and scrap to the ...
[207]
[PDF] THE CASE FOR U.S. RATIFICATION OF THE BASEL CONVENTION ...
Sep 3, 2016 · MEAs, the Basel Convention has no formal enforcement mechanism and no provisions for formal legal sanctions for non- compliance.110.
[208]
The Basel Convention: From Hazardous Waste to Plastic Pollution
Oct 7, 2021 · The Basel Convention is the first attempt to establish an agreement on global standards for hazardous waste, including the trade and disposal of toxic waste.
[209]
Conventions | United Nations Development Programme
The Basel (1989), Rotterdam (1998) and Stockholm (2001) Conventions are key multilateral environmental agreements governing hazardous chemicals and waste. They ...
[210]
The Paris Agreement | UNFCCC
The Paris Agreement is a legally binding international treaty on climate change. It was adopted by 195 Parties at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP21) in ...
[211]
[PDF] Connections between the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda
The majority of climate actions relate to improving waste management, using waste as a source of energy, recycling and reuse; and recovering methane from.<|control11|><|separator|>
[212]
Second Part of the Fifth Session (INC-5.2) - UNEP
Press Release: Talks on global plastic pollution treaty adjourn without consensus (15 August 2025). ENB Logo. Daily coverage from IISD: Earth Negotiations ...
[213]
International Cooperation on Plastic Pollution
Aug 15, 2025 · The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal is an international agreement aiming to ...
[214]
Requirements for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills (MSWLFs) | US EPA
Sep 17, 2025 · Nearly all MSWLFs are required to monitor the underlying groundwater for contamination during their active life and post-closure care periods.
[215]
Municipal Solid Waste Landfills - Ohio EPA
Jul 12, 2021 · MSW landfills cannot accept hazardous waste, regulated PCB wastes, bulk liquids or wastes containing free liquids, untreated infectious waste ...
[216]
Landfill regulations & compliance efforts - Waste Today
Mar 5, 2018 · This article aims to review the intent, purpose and structure of landfill regulations in the US.
[217]
Landfill waste - Environment - European Commission
Oct 16, 2025 · Introduces restrictions on the landfilling of all waste that is suitable for recycling or energy recovery from 2030 onwards · Limits the share of ...
[218]
Diversion of waste from landfill in Europe | Indicators
Dec 17, 2024 · Policies proven successful in reducing landfilling include landfill bans and taxes, and incentives for recycling and recycling infrastructure.
[219]
How have waste management policies impacted the flow of ...
Jun 1, 2023 · Landfill ban and deposit refund scheme correlated with decrease in landfill waste. Landfill ban also associated with increase in energy ...
[220]
[PDF] Work Plan on “Zero-waste City” Pilot Program in China
Efforts must be made to solve current prominent problems such as the large amount of solid waste generation, poor recycling, illegal transfer and dumping and ...
[221]
Welcome To China's Zero Waste Cities - CWR
Mar 18, 2019 · Ten pilot “zero waste cities” will control the increase of industrial solid waste, utilise agricultural wastes & prohibit illegal dumping.
[222]
Deposit return schemes in Europe: Their impact and future - TOMRA
Mar 27, 2025 · Germany today boasts drinks container return rates exceeding 98%, and Norway achieves 92%. Lithuania jumped from a return rate below 34 ...
[223]
Germany - Bottle Bill Resource Guide
Amount of Deposit. Single-use containers: 25¢ EUR (see up-to-date deposits here.) Reusable containers: 8-15¢ EUR [3] ; Reclamation System. Return to retail.
[224]
Is India the World's Largest Plastic Polluter? Causes and Solutions
Sep 25, 2024 · It is estimated that 60% of India's plastic waste is handled by this unregulated sector. However, without formal recognition or support, much of ...
[225]
Waste pickers in India's informal sector contribute up to 80% of ...
Dec 18, 2023 · In India, 80 percent of plastic collection relies on the informal sector, with an average of over 10,000 waste pickers per city. Although India ...
[226]
New insights into corruption in waste management and trade
Nov 30, 2023 · We conclude that complex legal frameworks and their weak implementation open up spaces for criminals to profit from illegally managing or trading in waste.
[227]
Illegal Dumping | US EPA
Aug 13, 2025 · Illegal dumping is a serious problem in many US communities. It can threaten public health, safety, property values, and quality of life.
[228]
[PDF] Digital Technologies for Better Enforcement of Waste Regulation ...
Apr 22, 2024 · Whilst the integration and connection of various digital tools is a gap, the full potential of digitalisation remains underutilised. There is ...
[229]
Maximal fines and corruption: An experimental study on illegal ...
Jun 30, 2024 · We find that increasing fine rate may become crime encouraging, or at least ineffective, beyond a context-specific fine threshold.
[230]
Operation National Sword - Wikipedia
By 1 January 2018, China had banned 24 categories of solid waste and had also stopped importing plastic waste with a contamination level of above 0.05 percent, ...
[231]
EU paper recyclers 'in crisis' as China waste import ban bites - Euractiv
China's ban on waste imports has thrown Europe's paper recycling sector “in a crisis situation,” leading to a chronic oversupply of recovered paper that sent ...
[232]
World Bank: Global waste generation could increase 70% by 2050
Sep 23, 2018 · The World Bank estimates overall waste generation will increase to 3.40 billion metric tons by 2050. An estimated 13.5% of today's waste is recycled and 5.5% ...
[233]
[PDF] a circularity case for - aluminiumcompared with glass and plastic
Once the aluminium can is collected for recycling, the efficiency of the combined recycling process (sorting, reprocessing and thermal processing) is 90%.
[234]
U.S. Plastic Recycling Economy | NIST
Oct 25, 2024 · In 2018, 8.7 % of plastics were recycled in the U.S., 15.8 % incinerated with energy recovery, and 75.6 % sent to landfill (U.S. Environmental ...
[235]
Federal study finds 86% of US plastic landfilled in 2019
May 4, 2022 · The study also found that only about 5% of discarded plastic in the U.S. was recycled in 2019, while 86% was landfilled and 9% was burned to ...
[236]
[PDF] 2020 State of Curbside Recycling Report
Feb 13, 2020 · This study documents a first-of-its-kind national average inbound contamination rate estimate of 17 percent by weight. The Recycling Partnership.<|separator|>
[237]
Recycling Contamination: Cost, Impact, and Fixes - Ecorithms
Apr 13, 2025 · In the United States, approximately 25% of items placed in recycling bins are not actually recyclable. This high contamination rate leads to ...
[238]
[PDF] Environmental Impacts of Recycling Compared to Other Waste ...
Overall, the LCA studies reviewed concluded that mechanical recycling of waste plastics has a lower environmental impact than other disposal options, ...
[239]
Why Every Landfill Liner Leaks But Not All Leakage Matters
The standards also require landfills to have a leachate collection system designed to maintain the depth of the leachate over the liner less than 30 cm.
[240]
Long-term groundwater protection efficiency of different types of ...
Sep 9, 2019 · Leakage rate from modern landfills is considered to be zero until the post-closure time when bottom liner system fails. Pivato [7] constructed ...Missing: control | Show results with:control
[241]
Sustainable municipal landfill leachate management
This review examines the difficulties in landfill leachate management (LLM), focusing on its impact on water, soil, and air quality.
[242]
How Landfill Methane Can Reduce Carbon Emissions in Georgia
Modern gas collection systems can now recover up to 85% of methane emissions from landfills, compared to earlier systems that often captured less than 50%.
[243]
Life cycle GHG emissions of MSW landfilling versus Incineration
Apr 1, 2022 · Generally, MSWI is preferred for GHG emissions, but landfills with high gas collection (81-93%) and energy recovery can have less emissions. ...
[244]
[PDF] Life Cycle Analysis of Incineration vs. Landfilling
Incineration is 69% worse for climate and 134% worse overall than landfilling. Incineration costs $337/ton vs $144/ton for landfilling, and human health costs ...
[245]
[PDF] The High Cost of Waste Incineration
Waste incineration is the most expensive waste management method, costing $190M-$1.2B to build, and more than most energy sources, including 4x more than solar.Missing: comparison studies
[246]
[PDF] How does Trash Incineration compare to Landfilling?
Incineration is more expensive and polluting than landfilling, with worse global warming pollution, and more pollution from nitrogen oxides, particulate matter ...
[247]
7 "Reclaimed" Golf Courses You Need To See - GolfPass
Apr 19, 2016 · Harborside International Chicago. Original Chicago landfill reclaimed. I was there for the construction. Shaped the 36 holes on the landfill, ...
[248]
Top golf courses built on landfills in the United States
The list of noteworthy reclamation projects includes high-end private clubs like Bayonne Golf Club in New Jersey and Trinity Forest in Dallas.Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
[249]
Burn or bury? A social cost comparison of final waste disposal ...
This paper evaluates the two well-known final waste disposal methods, incineration and landfilling. In particular we compare the social cost of two best- ...
[250]
A Review of Landfill Microbiology and Ecology - PubMed Central - NIH
Climate variability introduces another scale of heterogeneity to landfill function, with literature suggesting that local external climate directly influences ...
[251]
EU restrictions on certain single-use plastics - Environment
From 3 July 2021, single-use plastic plates, cutlery, straws, balloon sticks and cotton buds cannot be placed on the markets of the EU Member States.
[252]
Environmental and Economic Impacts of Substituting Single-Use ...
While paper straws have high raw material and EoL impacts, plastic straws show lower emissions but raise concerns about resource depletion and pollution.
[253]
The unintended consequences of plastic bag bans - Plastics Today
Apr 23, 2019 · The unintended consequences of plastic bag bans. A huge increase in ... banning plastic shopping bags increases greenhouse gas emissions,” said ...
[254]
The paradox of plastic bag legislation: How bans and taxes affect ...
Dec 15, 2024 · ... bans may also have unintended consequences, potentially increasing plastic bag usage. ... alternatives, which can lead to higher emissions ...
[255]
Plastic bag bans and fees reduce harmful bag litter on shorelines
Jun 19, 2025 · Plastic bag policies significantly reduced the proportion of plastic bags in shoreline litter. Although less common, taxes or fees on plastic bags may be even ...<|separator|>
[256]
Reduce Waste and Increase Recycling in New York
Costs to local governments—and taxpayers—have skyrocketed: Municipalities were once getting paid for recyclables, but now they must pay to recycle. Instead of ...
[257]
Circular Economy: Challenges | NIST
Jan 4, 2023 · Multiple market failures serve as a barrier to the adoption of a sustainable economy. Many of these, amount to mismatches in incentives.
[258]
Dynamic Pricing and Organic Waste Bans: A Study of Grocery ...
Dec 14, 2023 · In contrast, an organic waste ban, simulated by a ten-fold increase in disposal costs, reduces waste by only 4% and decreases profits and ...
[259]
https://www.quora.com/Are-waste-to-energy-plants-profitable-without-government-subsidies-and-or-gate-fees
[260]
Are waste to energy plants profitable without government subsidies ...
Mar 28, 2018 · Generally, waste-to-energy plants struggle with profitability without subsidies or gate fees due to high operational costs. Explore my Quora ...
[261]
Energy from Waste - the Impact of Recycling | DBDH
At modern waste cogeneration plants, non-recyclable waste is converted to energy, reducing landfill use and providing significant environmental benefits.