Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Iconic memory

Iconic memory is a fleeting form of sensory memory that temporarily retains a high-fidelity representation of visual stimuli for approximately 250–500 milliseconds after the stimulus offset, enabling the integration of visual information across saccades and the perception of a continuous visual scene.^[1] The concept of iconic memory emerged from pioneering experiments by George Sperling in 1960, who demonstrated its existence through a partial-report paradigm contrasting with whole-report tasks. In whole-report conditions, participants could recall only about 4 out of 12 briefly presented letters (50-msec exposure), suggesting limited immediate access. However, in partial-report trials, where an auditory cue post-exposure indicated which row of letters to report, participants accurately recalled nearly all 3 items from the cued row (about 2.8 on average), extrapolating to a full capacity of around 9 letters—indicating that the visual information was initially available in large quantity but decayed rapidly before full report. This brief storage, often termed "informational persistence," distinguishes iconic memory from longer-lasting visible persistence or afterimages. Iconic memory exhibits a large capacity, potentially holding detailed representations of entire visual scenes (up to 9–12 items or more in structured arrays), but its duration is severely limited, with evidence of sudden decay rather than gradual fading over intervals beyond 100–300 ms.^[2]^[3] While traditionally viewed as pre-attentive, recent research indicates that iconic memory formation and access may require some attentional resources, influencing its role in visual search, change detection, and transfer to working memory.^[2] Impairments in iconic memory duration have been linked to conditions like mild cognitive impairment, underscoring its importance in everyday visual processing.^[1]

Overview and Definition

Key Characteristics

Iconic memory refers to a high-capacity visual sensory store that briefly retains a detailed representation of visual stimuli after their offset. While traditionally viewed as pre-attentive, research indicates that iconic memory formation and access require attentional resources, rather than operating entirely passively.^[4]^[5] The duration of iconic memory is typically short, lasting approximately 250-500 milliseconds before rapid decay occurs, though estimates can extend to around 1 second in conditions with minimal masking. Its capacity is substantial, enabling the storage of approximately 9 items in classic letter array tasks, potentially up to 12 or more for structured visual scenes, far exceeding the limited slots of visual working memory. This high capacity was inferred from experiments showing that participants could access more information when cued to report specific portions of a display, revealing the store's potential before information loss.^[6]^[5]^[7] Iconic memory is distinct from short-term memory, which relies on active rehearsal to maintain information for seconds to minutes, and long-term memory, which involves consolidation processes for enduring storage. In contrast, iconic memory fades quickly without transfer to higher-level systems, emphasizing its role as an initial, automatic buffer for visual input. It parallels echoic memory, the auditory equivalent, but is specific to the visual modality.^[8]^[5] Key experiments, such as Sperling's partial report procedure, have demonstrated iconic memory's fleeting nature by showing rapid decay of accessible information when report cues are delayed, underscoring its brief persistence without immediate readout.^[9]

Historical Background

The concept of iconic memory emerged in the early 1960s through experimental investigations into brief visual presentations, with George Sperling's seminal 1960 study introducing the partial report paradigm to demonstrate a high-capacity, short-duration visual store that retains detailed information beyond the stimulus offset.^[9] Sperling's work was complemented by Averbach and Coriell, who in 1961 explored short-term visual storage using masking techniques to reveal decay rates around 250-300 milliseconds and selective readout processes.^[10] Research on iconic memory evolved within the broader framework of sensory memory during the 1960s and 1970s, as psychologists sought to characterize its role as a pre-attentive buffer in information processing, with studies emphasizing its rapid decay and large capacity compared to short-term memory.^[11] This period saw intense debates over the nature of visual persistence, including whether iconic memory represented a unified phenomenon or distinct types, such as neural aftereffects versus informational storage, influencing models like the Atkinson-Shiffrin multi-store system that incorporated sensory registers as initial input stages.^[12]^[11] A key milestone came in 1980 when Max Coltheart clarified the distinction between visible persistence—a phenomenological afterimage lasting about 100-200 milliseconds—and informational persistence, or iconic memory proper, which supports high-fidelity recall without subjective visibility and persists for roughly 300 milliseconds.^[11] More recently, a 2022 study demonstrated that perceptual training in contrast detection, aided by higher-order aberration-corrected vision, can enhance iconic memory duration and capacity in adults, suggesting plasticity in this sensory store even later in life. Ongoing research continues to explore the role of attention in iconic memory processes.^[13]^[4]

Components

Visible Persistence

Visible persistence constitutes the phenomenal, conscious experience of a visual afterimage that continues briefly after the physical stimulus has ceased, providing a subjective sense of the image fading over time.^[14] This afterimage typically endures for up to 200 ms, depending on stimulus conditions, and is related to but distinct from iconic memory's informational storage, as the two exhibit fundamentally different properties.^[15] To measure visible persistence, researchers often employ partial report paradigms augmented with backward masking, in which a patterned mask is presented immediately following the target stimulus to disrupt and temporally isolate the persisting afterimage, allowing estimation of its duration through report accuracy as a function of mask onset delay.^[15] This technique reveals how the afterimage's visibility decays rapidly, with performance dropping sharply as the mask interval shortens below 200 ms. The duration of visible persistence is modulated by stimulus attributes such as luminance, where higher levels accelerate decay and shorten persistence, often to under 100 ms for bright stimuli.^[16] Similarly, lower contrast prolongs the afterimage at low spatial frequencies by reducing the signal-to-noise ratio in early visual processing, while adaptation effects—such as prolonged exposure to surrounding light—can suppress persistence through neural fatigue, diminishing the afterimage's intensity and length. Representative examples of visible persistence include the trailing streaks perceived during rapid motion of luminous objects, such as a sparkler swung in the dark, where the afterimage creates an illusory path extending the object's trajectory.^[17] Phosphenes induced by eye pressure also exemplify this phenomenon, manifesting as lingering spots of light that persist briefly after the mechanical stimulation ends, highlighting the perceptual continuity in transient visual events.^[18]

Informational Persistence

Informational persistence refers to the component of iconic memory that maintains a precategorical representation of visual information after stimulus offset, enabling above-chance reporting of specific details through cognitive access rather than ongoing perception. This storage allows observers to retrieve information from the visual array even when the stimulus is no longer physically present, bridging the gap between initial sensory input and attentional selection.^[19]^[20] Evidence for informational persistence comes from partial report paradigms, where post-stimulus cues direct attention to subsets of the display, yielding higher recall accuracy than whole-report conditions. For instance, in Sperling's (1960) experiment using a 3x4 array of 12 letters briefly presented (50 ms exposure), whole-report recall averaged about 4 items (33%), whereas partial reports with immediate auditory cues achieved approximately 2.8 items out of the 3 in the cued row (93% accuracy), extrapolating to a capacity of about 9 letters—demonstrating that the visual information was initially available in large quantity but decayed rapidly.^[21] As the delay between stimulus offset and cue increases to around 1 second, recall declines rapidly, reflecting the temporal decay of this informational trace. Recent replications have reported somewhat lower capacities (around 4 items), suggesting variability across studies.^[22] This persistence plays a crucial role in facilitating the transfer of visual information from sensory registers to higher-level attentional processes, preventing immediate loss of potentially relevant details. Capacity estimates indicate that informational persistence can hold representations sufficient for large arrays, with partial report performance suggesting availability of 9 or more items under optimal conditions before decay limits access.^[21] Unlike visible persistence, which manifests as a phenomenological afterimage tied closely to stimulus luminance and decaying within 150-200 milliseconds, informational persistence exhibits slower decay rates—often extending to about 1 second—and supports reportable knowledge independent of perceptual experience.^[15]^[23] Note that while some literature includes visible persistence as a layer of iconic memory, others, such as Coltheart (1980), emphasize their distinction.

Neural Mechanisms

Brain Regions Involved

The primary visual cortex (V1) serves as the initial site for iconic storage, where neural activity persists briefly after stimulus offset to maintain a high-fidelity representation of visual input.^[24] In macaque studies using single-neuron recordings, decaying V1 responses post-stimulus predicted behavioral measures of iconic memory duration and accuracy, with persistence times aligning closely to observed decay rates of 45–70 ms.^[24] Extrastriate areas, including V2 and V4, contribute to feature binding within iconic memory, integrating basic elements like orientation and color detected in V1 into coherent percepts during this early sensory phase.^[25]

Physiological Processes

Iconic memory is sustained by persistent neural activity in the visual cortex, where neurons continue firing for 45–70 ms after the offset of a visual stimulus, providing a brief neural substrate for high-capacity visual storage.^[24] This duration aligns with the temporal characteristics of iconic memory observed in behavioral paradigms, reflecting the transient nature of sensory traces before transfer to higher-order processing. Electrophysiological recordings from macaque primary visual cortex (V1) have identified delayed spiking activity lasting 45–70 ms post-stimulus, directly linking this firing pattern to the neural basis of iconic memory maintenance.^[24] Decay of iconic memory traces is primarily driven by the action of inhibitory interneurons, which employ GABAergic modulation to actively shorten neural persistence and reset cortical activity for new inputs. GABA release from these interneurons imposes an exponential decay profile on excitatory firing, with time constants on the order of hundreds of milliseconds that match the observed duration of iconic storage. This inhibitory control ensures efficient temporal resolution in visual processing, preventing overlap from successive stimuli.^[26]

Experimental Methods

Sperling's Partial Report

In 1960, George Sperling developed the partial report paradigm to investigate the capacity and duration of iconic memory, using a brief visual display of letters arranged in a matrix.^[27] Participants viewed a 3x3 array of nine letters or a similar 4x4 configuration, presented tachistoscopically for approximately 50 milliseconds to minimize rehearsal and capture sensory storage.^[27] Immediately following the display, a tone sounded—high for the top row, medium for the middle, and low for the bottom—indicating which row to report, with the cue delivered at varying delays to probe memory decay.^[27] In the whole report condition, participants attempted to recall all items from the array, typically reporting about 4 to 5 letters on average, suggesting a limited immediate memory span.^[27] The partial report condition, by contrast, required recall of only the cued row of 3 or 4 items, yielding high accuracy of approximately 2.5 to 3 items per row when the tone was immediate.^[27] This performance extrapolates to an estimated total capacity exceeding 9 items, calculated simply as the number of correctly reported items in the cued row multiplied by the total number of rows in the array, indicating that far more visual information is initially available than can be accessed in a full recall attempt.^[27] A key finding emerged from varying the delay between stimulus offset and the tone cue: recall accuracy remained high for cues presented up to about 100-200 milliseconds post-display but declined sharply thereafter, demonstrating that iconic memory decays rapidly, with most information lost within approximately 300 milliseconds.^[27] This temporal sensitivity highlighted iconic memory as a fleeting sensory buffer, distinct from longer-lasting short-term memory processes.^[27]

Variations and Extensions

One notable adaptation of the partial report paradigm involves replacing the auditory tone with a visual bar cue, where a horizontal bar appears post-stimulus to indicate the row for reporting or a vertical bar to specify the column, thereby minimizing reliance on auditory processing and isolating visual selection mechanisms. This approach, introduced in early extensions, demonstrated superior performance with bar cues compared to less precise indicators, highlighting the role of spatial compatibility in accessing iconic stores. Temporal variations further refine the paradigm by systematically delaying the cue onset after stimulus offset, allowing measurement of decay rates, or by incorporating pattern masks immediately following the display to disrupt persistence and isolate informational components. For instance, a circle cue presented amid pattern masking has been used to probe location-specific persistence, revealing that masking accelerates the loss of positional information while bar cues maintain higher report accuracy under similar conditions. These manipulations confirm the core duration of iconic memory at approximately 250 ms, as performance declines sharply beyond this window across cue delays from 0 to 500 ms. Contemporary extensions integrate advanced techniques to explore neural underpinnings during partial report tasks. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) adaptations have identified sustained activity in occipito-temporal regions correlating with partial report superiority, suggesting iconic memory involves persistent higher-order visual processing. Similarly, eye-tracking implementations monitor gaze patterns to assess attentional deployment, revealing that fixations during the retention interval predict report accuracy in iconic tasks, particularly in developmental contexts. Recent perceptual training studies from 2022 have extended the paradigm by incorporating repeated contrast detection tasks, demonstrating enhancements in iconic persistence and short-term maintenance through visual learning, with trained participants showing up to 20% improved partial report performance.^[13] More recent work as of 2024 has examined readout latency in perception and iconic memory using partial report in non-human primates, revealing neuronal correlates in primary visual cortex that support the persistence of information beyond stimulus offset.^[28] Overall, these variations and extensions underscore context-dependent effects, such as attention modulation, where pre-cue attentional allocation boosts the fidelity of iconic representations, while divided attention reduces accessible information to coarse scene summaries.^[4] Such findings affirm the robustness of the ~250 ms duration while revealing attentional and perceptual influences on iconic accessibility.^[29]

Functions and Applications

Temporal Integration

Iconic memory facilitates temporal integration by retaining a fading representation of a previous visual stimulus, enabling it to overlap with and combine into a unified percept with subsequent inputs, thereby ensuring perceptual continuity in scenes with rapid changes. This mechanism operates within the brief window of iconic persistence, typically around 100-300 milliseconds, preventing the perception of flicker or discontinuity during dynamic visual events.^[30] For instance, in apparent motion phenomena like the phi phenomenon, where stationary lights flashed in alternation create an illusion of continuous movement, the persistence of the initial stimulus in iconic memory integrates with the second to produce smooth motion, effective at interstimulus intervals of approximately 100-200 milliseconds.^[30] Experimental evidence demonstrates that this integration is limited by the duration of iconic storage; when the interval between stimuli exceeds this timeframe, the prior representation decays sufficiently to preclude overlap, resulting in discrete rather than fused perceptions. In studies using sequential displays, performance in identifying integrated features drops sharply beyond 150-200 milliseconds, confirming that iconic memory's temporal combinatorial properties are constrained and fail under longer separations.^[31] In practical applications, such as reading, iconic memory bridges the brief gaps during saccadic eye movements—lasting about 200 milliseconds—allowing integration of information from successive fixations to maintain textual continuity without perceptual interruption.^[32]

Role in Visual Perception

Iconic memory plays a critical role in everyday visual perception by providing a brief, high-capacity buffer that bridges discontinuities in the visual stream, such as those caused by eye movements or blinks, yet its limitations often lead to perceptual failures like change blindness. Change blindness occurs when observers fail to detect substantial alterations in a scene, particularly when changes coincide with saccades or blinks, due to the overwriting of the iconic representation of the pre-change scene by the post-change input. This phenomenon arises because iconic memory's transient nature—lasting approximately 200-500 ms—does not allow sufficient time for transfer to more durable working memory without attentional intervention, resulting in the loss of detailed scene information during these interruptions.^[33] During rapid eye movements known as saccades, which typically last 20-50 ms, iconic memory contributes to saccadic suppression, a mechanism that reduces visual sensitivity to mask the motion blur that would otherwise smear the retinal image and disrupt stable perception. By briefly storing the pre-saccadic visual input, iconic memory helps maintain perceptual continuity, preventing the experience of distracting blur as the eyes shift focus across the visual field. Experiments have demonstrated that this suppression is perceptual rather than purely neural, originating early in visual processing to ensure seamless scene integration despite the high-speed retinal displacement.^[34] Further evidence for iconic memory's adaptive role comes from studies showing pre-saccadic enhancement, where attentional shifts to the saccade target amplify iconic representations just before the eye movement, facilitating smoother transitions and more stable post-saccadic perception. In these experiments, observers exhibit improved detection and acuity at the impending fixation point, underscoring how iconic memory is modulated to prioritize relevant visual details for continuity. This enhancement helps counteract potential disruptions from the brief iconic decay, ensuring that key scene elements remain accessible across eye movements.^[35] Beyond these dynamics, iconic memory's constraints contribute to inattentional blindness, where unexpected stimuli go unnoticed because they fail to engage the limited attentional resources needed to consolidate iconic traces into awareness.

Development and Variations

Across the Lifespan

Iconic memory develops rapidly in early life, with basic visual responses to brief stimuli evident in newborns, but more defined components, such as the ability to track moving objects and maintain brief visual representations across saccades, emerging by 2-4 months. By 6 months, partial report analogs reveal an adult-like duration and capacity, with infants holding approximately 5 visual items in iconic memory, nearly matching the 6-item capacity observed in adults, indicating that this sensory buffer is functionally mature early in infancy to support visual exploration.^[36]^[37] Iconic memory capacity reaches near adult levels early in childhood, with developmental improvements in attentional access and transfer to working memory reflecting advances in executive control and visual attention. Aging brings subtle declines in iconic memory post-60 years, with older adults showing reduced partial report superiority due to slower visual encoding and identification processes, effectively shortening the accessible duration to approximately 150-300 ms compared to 300-500 ms in younger adults. This impairment arises from age-related slowing in neural transmission within early visual pathways, limiting the time available for information extraction before decay.^[38]^[39] A 2005 study found that individuals with mild cognitive impairment exhibit pronounced deficits, with iconic memory decay accelerating to about 70 ms, underscoring its role as an early marker of neurodegenerative changes.^[1]

Individual Differences

Individual differences in iconic memory arise from perceptual training, neurological disorders, demographic traits, and physiological modulators, influencing its capacity, quality, and persistence beyond age-related changes. Perceptual training enhances iconic memory performance in adults through targeted visual exercises. A 2022 study on young adults demonstrated that contrast detection training, combined with higher-order aberration correction, significantly improved iconic memory quality, yielding a 0.52 increase in partial report sensitivity (d') across various cue delays (precue: 0.75, simultaneous: 0.95, postcue: 0.26; all p < 0.05), while baseline information maintenance also rose (Cohen's d = 0.80).^[13] These gains suggest perceptual learning strengthens the fidelity of visual traces, potentially extending effective duration for information access by 50-100 ms in post-cue conditions, though the underlying decay constant remained stable. Neurological disorders reveal distinct alterations in iconic memory. In schizophrenia, patients display reduced capacity, with lower recall accuracy in partial report tasks across delays up to 1000 ms compared to controls, linked to informational persistence deficits that limit transfer to working memory (p < 0.05 for group differences).^[40] Conversely, in autism spectrum disorder, iconic memory remains intact in children, enabling comparable item recall after brief exposures, while meta-analyses highlight enhanced perceptual functioning that may amplify visible persistence and sensory detail retention.^[41]^[42] Demographic variations are subtle, with minimal sex differences observed; perceptual tasks show no significant disparities between males and females, aligning with broader patterns in visual sensory processing.^[43] Expertise in visual arts confers advantages, as drawing experts exhibit superior visual memory, detecting changes in images with 48% higher sensitivity for originals and 54% for reproductions than novices, reflecting specialized enhancements in short-term visual retention relevant to iconic traces.^[44] Physiological modulators like arousal and sleep deprivation further shape iconic memory dynamics. Elevated pre-stimulus arousal, indexed by pupil dilation, boosts initial stimulus availability but accelerates decay, reducing persistence for subsequent processing.^[45] Sleep deprivation impairs capacity in visual tasks dependent on iconic memory, exacerbating vulnerabilities due to its brief duration (under 500 ms) and limited storage, with performance declines noted after 24-36 hours of restriction.^[46]

References

[1]
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.0408402102
[2]
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00126
[3]
Iconic memory requires attention - PMC
The standard model of iconic memory considers it a pre-attentive store of visual information (Sperling, 1960). Here, we evaluated this model using two distinct ...
[4]
Iconic Memory - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Visual sensory memory, sometimes called iconic memory, is a short-lived (0.25–2 sec) representation of visual information that is eliminated by visual masking ( ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[5]
Fast decay of iconic memory in observers with mild cognitive ...
Feb 1, 2005 · Best reflected in the partial-report superiority effect, the duration of iconic memory has been estimated to be ≈300–500 ms for young adult ...
[6]
Capacity and duration of iconic memory from partial reporting of brief ...
It has been widely accepted that iconic memory has a capacity of minimally 9 elements and a duration of approximately 0.3 seconds. However, Sperling's ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
[7]
Iconic Memories Die a Sudden Death - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
Apr 19, 2018 · Iconic memory is characterized by its large storage capacity and brief storage duration, whereas visual working memory is characterized by its ...Method · Results · Sudden Death And Gradual...
[8]
[PDF] Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual ...
Footnote 15). Page 13. THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE IN BRIEF VISUAL PRESENTATIONS to study whole and partial reports in a vastly different visual presentation from.
[9]
Short‐Term Memory in Vision - Averbach - 1961 - Wiley Online Library
Experiments are performed that demonstrate some of the functional properties of short-term storage in the visual system, its decay, readout and erasure.
[10]
Iconic memory and visible persistence
1980, Vol. 27 (3),183-228. Iconic memory and visible persistence. MAX COLTHEART. Birkbeck College, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, England. There are three ...
[11]
Human Memory: A Proposed System and its Control Processes
This chapter presents a general theoretical framework of human memory and describes the results of a number of experiments designed to test specific models.
[12]
Article Improving iconic memory through contrast detection training ...
In this study, we attempted to improve iconic memory and baseline information maintenance for short-term memory in normal adults through perceptual learning.
[13]
Iconic memory and visible persistence
It follows that informational persistence or iconic memory cannot be identified with visible persistence, since they have fundamentally different properties.
[14]
Limits to the usability of iconic memory - Frontiers
Traditionally, iconic memory is taken as having two components: the first a high-density, retinotopic visible persistence existing up to 200 ms from stimulus ...
[15]
[PDF] Spatial frequency and visual persistence: Cortical reset.
Increases in stimulus duration and luminance increased the strength of the reset signals and thereby decreased persistence, in agreement with the psychophysical ...
[16]
Eye movements and visible persistence explain the mislocalization ...
... 200–300 ms after stimulus offset. Subsequently, the forward shift decreased ... Iconic memory and visible persistence. Perception & Psychophysics, 27 (3) ...
[17]
The neural signature of phosphene perception - PubMed Central - NIH
Jan 20, 2010 · Artificial percepts (phosphenes) can be induced by applying transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over human visual cortex.
[18]
[PDF] Iconic Memory, Location Information, and Partial Report
Using Averbach and Coriell's (1961) version of the partial-report task, Mewhort et al. (1981) found that as the decay of the probe was increased, partial-report.
[19]
[PDF] On the Relations among Different Measures of Visible and ...
Following Coltheart (1980), we refer to the first phe- nomenon as visible persistence, and to the second as informational persis- tence. Visible and ...
[20]
[PDF] Capacity and duration of iconic memory from partial reporting of brief ...
The objective of this study is to replicate the fourth ex- periment conducted by Sperling in 1960 which examined the duration of information in brief visual ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[21]
Sensory registration and informational persistence - PubMed
One conception is that visual information persists in a visual memory that begins at stimulus offset and lasts for 150-300 ms, independently of exposure ...
[22]
https://www.tqmp.org/ReplicationStudies/vol19-3/r001/r001.pdf
[23]
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2943863/
[24]
Mechanisms of Persistent Activity in Cortical Circuits - PubMed Central
A commonly observed neural correlate of working memory is firing that persists after the triggering stimulus disappears.
[25]
Neurophysiological Bases of Exponential Sensory Decay and Top ...
The temporal constant of this decay is of a few hundred milliseconds, suggesting that it may be related to the decay of iconic memory, however, the nature and ...
[26]
Perceptual Weighting of V1 Spikes Revealed by Optogenetic White ...
Apr 13, 2022 · White noise optogenetic stimulation is a powerful tool for understanding how patterns of spiking in neuronal populations are decoded in generating perception ...Experimental Design And... · Results · Comparing Neuronal...Missing: persistent | Show results with:persistent
[27]
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093759
[28]
Visual percepts modify iconic memory in humans | Scientific Reports
Sep 6, 2018 · Our visual system briefly retains a trace of a stimulus after it disappears. This phenomenon is known as iconic memory and its contents are ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[29]
Infants Get Five Stars on Iconic Memory, Tests: A Partial Report Test ...
Our results show a five-object iconic memory capacity in 6-month-olds. That this nearly matches adults' six-object capacity points to particularly rapid ...Missing: modern extensions
[30]
A neuronal basis of iconic memory in macaque primary visual cortex
Dec 20, 2021 · The worth of iconic memory is measured as extra viewing time in milliseconds, e.g., the worth would be 100 ms if a masked stimulus would need to ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[31]
Temporal characteristics of iconic memory - Nature
May 19, 1977 · Iconic memory is regarded as having temporal combinatorial properties which allow perceptual integration of two or more sequential displays.Abstract · About This Article · Cite This Article
[32]
(PDF) Temporal characteristics of iconic memory - ResearchGate
Aug 9, 2025 · Iconic memory is regarded as having temporal combinatorial properties which allow perceptual integration ... mechanism of excitation; (4) 4 ...
[33]
Iconic storage and saccadic eye movements | Behavioral and Brain ...
Feb 4, 2010 · (1977) Temporal characteristics of iconic memory. Nature 267:241–243 ... Temporal integration in visual memory. journal of Experimental ...
[34]
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-15890-w
[35]
Perceptual saccadic suppression starts in the retina - Nature
Apr 24, 2020 · Our results demonstrate a far-reaching contribution of visual processing mechanisms to perceptual saccadic suppression, starting in the retina.
[36]
Presaccadic attention sharpens visual acuity | Scientific Reports
Feb 20, 2023 · The results revealed that presaccadic attention sharpens acuity, which can facilitate a smooth transition from peripheral to foveal representation.Missing: iconic | Show results with:iconic
[37]
No iconic memory without attention - ScienceDirect
Attention is required for the formation of iconic memory, and the ability to report iconic memory items decreases with decreased attention.
[38]
leveraging blink-induced suppression for imperceptible position and ...
The Role of Iconic Memory in Change-Detection Tasks. Perception 29, 3 (2000) ... Change Blindness Phenomena for Virtual Reality Display Systems. IEEE ...
[39]
Infants Get Five Stars on Iconic Memory Tests - Sage Journals
Oct 5, 2010 · Infants Get Five Stars on Iconic Memory Tests: A Partial-Report Test of 6-Month-Old Infants' Iconic Memory Capacity.
[40]
Development of Visual Memory in Infants - ScienceDirect.com
Preverbal infants encode and retain some information about their visual world from the first hours of life. Even neonates demonstrate recognition memory.
[41]
Adult age, information processing, and partial report performance
The present study examined the hypothesis that poorer partial report performance on the part of older adults involves age-related differences in the speed of ...Missing: 150 ms
[42]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6870295/
[43]
Fast decay of iconic memory in observers with mild cognitive ... - PNAS
Feb 1, 2005 · In the visual modality, iconic memory (1) was first demonstrated by the partial-report superiority effect (2). After a brief presentation of a 3 ...
[44]
Iconic decay in schizophrenia - PubMed - NIH
Pathologically increased iconic decay could reduce the number of items that can be transferred into working memory before the information is lost and could thus ...
[45]
An examination of iconic memory in children with autism spectrum ...
These findings suggest that iconic memory is an intact skill for children with ASD, a result that has implications for subsequent information processing.
[46]
Enhanced visual functioning in autism: An ALE meta‐analysis - PMC
Autistics often exhibit enhanced perceptual abilities when engaged in visual search, visual discrimination, and embedded figure detection.
[47]
Gender differences in short term memory and perception
Results revealed that short term memory showed statistically significant increase in females compared to males. Perceptual ability showed an insignificant ...<|separator|>
[48]
Drawing experts have better visual memory while drawing | JOV
Critically, experts showed better memory for both the original and the drawing than did novices, suggesting that experts have specialized advantages for ...Missing: iconic | Show results with:iconic
[49]
Pre-stimulus pupil-linked arousal enhances initial stimulus availability and accelerates decay in iconic memory
### Summary of Abstract and Findings on Arousal Effects on Iconic Memory Decay
[50]
Full article: Sleep deprivation: Impact on cognitive performance
Nov 25, 2022 · It is believed that visual tasks would be especially vulnerable to sleep loss because iconic memory has short duration and limited capacity ( ...<|control11|><|separator|>