Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Illinois General Assembly

The Illinois General Assembly is the bicameral state legislature of Illinois, vested with the state's legislative power under Article IV of the Illinois Constitution of 1970.^[1] It comprises a Senate of 59 members, each representing one of 59 legislative districts and serving staggered four-year terms, and a House of Representatives with 118 members elected from 118 representative districts for two-year terms.^[1] ^[2] The General Assembly convenes annually in Springfield at the Illinois State Capitol to enact statutes, approve the state budget, confirm gubernatorial appointments, and override executive vetoes by a three-fifths majority in each chamber.^[3] ^[4] Established by Illinois's first constitution upon statehood in 1818, the legislature has undergone structural changes, including the abolition of multi-member districts and cumulative voting for the House in 1980 following the adoption of the current single-member district system.^[4] Its powers include the ability to block administrative regulations and propose constitutional amendments, subject to voter approval.^[1] As of the 104th General Assembly in 2025, Democrats maintain supermajorities, holding 78 seats in the House to Republicans' 40 and a substantial majority in the Senate, enabling unified party control over legislative priorities amid ongoing debates over fiscal policy and redistricting practices that have favored the majority party.^[5] ^[6] Historically, the body has been marked by internal leadership struggles and late-session rushes to pass omnibus bills, contributing to criticisms of opaque processes, though it has also addressed key state issues such as pension reforms and infrastructure funding.^[7] ^[8] Notable alumni include Abraham Lincoln, who served in the House from 1834 to 1842, advocating for internal improvements and banking reforms during his tenure.^[9]

Historical Development

Establishment and Early Evolution

The Illinois General Assembly was established through the state's first constitution, ratified on August 26, 1818, which vested legislative authority in a bicameral body comprising a Senate and a House of Representatives, both elected by qualified voters and modeled on the structure of the U.S. Congress to ensure separation of powers and representation.^[10] This framework built upon the Illinois Territory's legislative experience, where an elected bicameral assembly had operated since 1812 under provisions of the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which mandated a lower house elected by popular vote and an upper council appointed initially but later adapted for territorial governance.^[11]^[12] The 1818 document specified an initial House membership of no fewer than 27 nor more than 36, with the Senate sized at one-third to one-half thereof, resulting in 28 representatives and 14 senators for the inaugural session based on early population enumerations from the territory's counties.^[10] The first session convened on October 5, 1818, in Kaskaskia, the territorial and initial state capital, where lawmakers qualified Governor Shadrach Bond and organized essential state functions, including the creation of circuit courts and provisions for county governance amid a sparse population of approximately 40,000. Early legislative priorities centered on pragmatic state-building, such as ratifying land grants from federal cessions, authorizing surveys for internal improvements like roads, and enacting statutes to regulate elections and taxation, reflecting the frontier economy's reliance on agriculture and migration rather than expansive policy ambitions.^[3] These sessions, held annually thereafter until constitutional adjustments, adapted Northwest Ordinance principles of limited government and public land management to Illinois' transition from territory to statehood, completed with congressional admission on December 3, 1818.^[13] As the state grew, the General Assembly's operations evolved with the relocation of the capital to Vandalia in 1820, where subsequent sessions addressed expanding infrastructure needs, including river navigation improvements and militia organization, while maintaining the bicameral form without immediate alterations to chamber sizes.^[14] This period marked a foundational emphasis on empirical governance tailored to demographic realities, with lawmakers drawn primarily from settler communities and focused on enabling economic settlement over ideological reforms.

Changes in Size and Apportionment

The Illinois General Assembly's size expanded significantly in the 19th century to reflect rapid population growth following statehood. The 1818 constitution initially fixed the House of Representatives at 28 members and the Senate at 14 members, apportioned based on counties with adjustments after the first census.^[10] The 1848 constitution responded to demographic shifts by allowing the House to range from 70 to 100 members and the Senate from 19 to 33 members, with reapportionment tied to federal censuses every four years to account for settlement patterns.^[15] By the 1870 constitution, amid further urbanization and agricultural expansion, the legislature standardized at 153 House seats and 51 Senate seats, structured as 51 multi-member districts electing one senator and three representatives each, with decennial reapportionment mandated but often neglected in practice.^[16]

Constitution Year	House Seats	Senate Seats	Apportionment Basis
1818	28	14	County-based, post-census adjustment^[10]
1848	70–100	19–33	Census-driven expansion for population growth^[15]
1870	153	51	51 districts, three representatives per district^[16]

Neglect of reapportionment under the 1870 framework caused acute malapportionment by the mid-20th century, as urban population surges in Chicago and suburbs outpaced rural areas, yet districts retained outdated boundaries favoring downstate representation—e.g., in 1950, Cook County voters (over half the state's population) elected fewer legislators than sparsely populated rural districts.^[17] Reform attempts in the 1950s, including a 1954 constitutional amendment creating a bipartisan commission for redistricting, aimed to address over-representation but yielded limited immediate change due to legislative resistance tied to self-preservation.^[17] The U.S. Supreme Court's Baker v. Carr decision in 1962 enabled federal judicial oversight of state apportionment under equal protection clauses, prompting Illinois courts to invalidate malapportioned maps and enforce population-based equality.^[18] The 1970 constitution, ratified after a convention influenced by these rulings, set the Senate at 59 members and the House at 177 (three per Senate district via cumulative voting), aligning seats with 1970 census data to achieve roughly equal population per district while preserving minority party access.^[19] However, the larger House size drew criticism for inefficiency and higher costs, leading to the 1980 Cutback Amendment, a voter-initiated measure that reduced House seats to 118 single-member districts—effectively halving multi-member setups—while retaining the 59 Senate seats, driven by empirical arguments for streamlined operations amid stable population ratios post-1980 census.^[20] ^[21] Subsequent apportionments, such as after the 2020 census, have maintained these dimensions, with districts redrawn every decade to track demographic shifts like suburban growth, ensuring causal alignment between voter numbers and representation without further size alterations.^[3]

Major Constitutional Reforms

The 1970 Illinois Constitution marked a comprehensive overhaul of the legislative branch, consolidating and modernizing the General Assembly's structure under Article IV, which delineates its powers, procedures, and limitations. This document replaced the 1870 Constitution amid widespread demands for reform following fiscal mismanagement, corruption scandals, and inefficiencies exposed during the Great Depression era, when earlier constitutional rigidities hindered responses to economic crises. Article IV established a bicameral legislature with defined session schedules—convoking annually on the second Wednesday in January without a fixed durational cap on regular sessions—while empowering the governor with expanded veto authority, including the amendatory veto to suggest changes and the item veto for appropriations, thereby balancing legislative dominance with executive oversight.^[1]^[22] A pivotal post-1970 reform was the Cutback Amendment, ratified by voters on November 4, 1980, which abolished the cumulative voting system—a holdover from the 1870 Constitution that permitted voters to concentrate multiple votes on fewer candidates in multi-member House districts, often entrenching machine politics and minority party representation at the expense of broader competition. The amendment reduced the House of Representatives from 177 to 118 members, aligned Senate districts accordingly to 59 seats, and shifted to single-member districts with plurality voting, aiming to streamline operations, cut costs, and enhance accountability amid criticisms of legislative bloat and partisan entrenchment. Approved by 68.8% of voters (2,112,224 yes votes), it responded to public frustration with the prior system's facilitation of undemocratic outcomes, such as the Democratic supermajority's insulation from electoral shifts, though it arguably concentrated power further in majority parties.^[23]^[20]^[21] The 1970 Constitution also imposed structural limits on direct democratic bypasses of the Assembly, confining constitutional initiatives to amendments of Article IV itself—requiring signatures from at least 8% of votes cast for governor in the preceding election, distributed across at least two-thirds of congressional districts—while prohibiting statutory initiatives or veto referendums. This framework, rooted in delegates' intent to prevent populist overreach that could undermine representative deliberation, as seen in failed broader initiative proposals during the convention, preserved the Assembly's gatekeeping role over policy but drew criticism for insulating legislators from public pressure on issues like taxation and redistricting. Veto power expansions under the same constitution, evolving from weaker nineteenth-century provisions, further recalibrated legislative authority by allowing gubernatorial line-item reductions in budgets, a tool invoked frequently to counter Assembly spending tendencies amid ongoing fiscal challenges.^[24]^[25]^[26]

Composition and Structure

House of Representatives

The Illinois House of Representatives comprises 118 members, each representing a single-member district with equal population, as stipulated in the state constitution.^[1] Members serve two-year terms without term limits, resulting in all seats being contested in every even-numbered year election cycle. This structure, distinct from the Senate's 59 members on staggered four-year terms, enables the House to function as a body with higher turnover and potentially greater responsiveness to shifting public sentiments due to frequent electoral accountability.^[1] The House's larger size facilitates more localized representation compared to the Senate, with districts averaging around 107,000 residents each based on decennial census reapportionment. Among its procedural distinctions, the House holds the sole power to initiate impeachment proceedings against state officers, requiring a majority vote, after which the Senate conducts trials for conviction by a two-thirds supermajority. This mirrors federal bicameral dynamics but underscores the House's role in originating accountability measures for executive and judicial misconduct.^[1] Partisan control of the House has favored Democrats since 1997, with the party securing a supermajority of 78 seats to Republicans' 40 following the 2024 elections, maintaining a Democratic trifecta alongside the governorship and Senate.^[27] Representation metrics reveal an urban-rural divide reflective of Illinois's population distribution, where Cook County and surrounding urban areas account for approximately 40 districts—over one-third of the chamber—despite comprising a smaller geographic area, emphasizing metropolitan influence amid downstate rural underrepresentation proportional to population sparsity.^[28]^[29]

Illinois Senate

The Illinois Senate comprises 59 members, each elected from a single-member legislative district coextensive with two Illinois House of Representatives districts, enabling representation of larger and more diverse constituencies than those served by House members.^[1] This structure, established under Article IV, Section 1 of the Illinois Constitution of 1970, positions the Senate as the upper chamber tasked with providing institutional continuity and deliberation amid the House's biennial elections.^[1] Senators serve four-year terms, with elections staggered so that roughly half—either 29 or 30 seats—are contested every two years during even-numbered years.^[1] Following each decennial redistricting, the General Assembly reapportions the Senate into three classes by law, assigning one class to a two-year term to reset the cycle and maintain the stagger thereafter.^[30] The Senate's extended terms and broader district footprints promote relative stability, insulating it from the short-term electoral pressures that drive more frequent policy responsiveness in the House, and facilitating a focus on sustained oversight rather than immediate constituent demands.^[1] In advisory capacities, the Senate holds exclusive authority to confirm gubernatorial appointments to executive department heads, agency directors, and certain judicial positions, ensuring scrutiny of executive branch selections through committee hearings and floor votes requiring simple majorities.^[4] It also serves as the court for impeachment trials initiated by the House, where conviction demands a two-thirds vote of senators present under oath, as exercised in rare historical instances such as the 2010 proceedings against a circuit judge.^[1] While lacking a formal supermajority cloture rule, senators have historically employed prolonged speeches to delay action, as in 2000 when Senator Peter Fitzgerald conducted an hours-long address protesting library funding disputes, thereby amplifying minority leverage in a chamber designed for measured debate.^[31] This dynamic underscores the Senate's role in tempering hasty legislation, with its composition yielding slower evolution in policy priorities compared to the House's turnover.^[1]

Districting and Representation

The Illinois Constitution mandates decennial legislative redistricting by the General Assembly in the year following each U.S. Census, establishing 59 legislative districts that must be compact, contiguous, and substantially equal in population, with each district electing one state senator and subdivided into two representative districts for House members.^[32] This process, governed by Article IV, Section 3, places map-drawing authority with the legislative majority, subject to gubernatorial veto, fostering opportunities for partisan advantage as the controlling party designs boundaries to optimize electoral outcomes.^[33] Courts have historically deferred to legislative enactments unless procedural deadlines are unmet, allowing political considerations to supersede strict adherence to compactness criteria.^[34] The 2021 redistricting cycle exemplified these dynamics, with the Democrat-controlled General Assembly approving maps that entrenched a supermajority, yielding 78 Democratic seats in the 118-member House and 41 in the 59-member Senate following the 2022 elections, despite statewide Democratic vote shares hovering around 55% in gubernatorial races.^[35] Analyses of the enacted plans reveal suboptimal compactness, with districts often elongated to connect urban Democratic strongholds while isolating rural Republican areas, contributing to low competitiveness—fewer than 10% of districts classified as competitive based on partisan lean metrics.^[36] Such configurations exhibit partisan bias, as measured by proxies like vote-seat disproportionality, where wasted votes (votes beyond the margin needed to win a district) disproportionately burden Republicans, enabling sustained one-party dominance.^[37] Efforts to introduce independent commissions, including bipartisan constitutional amendment proposals, have repeatedly stalled, with the 2021 process relying on legislative self-apportionment amid criticisms of gerrymandering that predetermine outcomes and diminish voter influence.^[38] This structure causally reinforces policy inertia aligned with the map-drawers' interests, as uncompetitive districts reduce incentives for cross-partisan compromise and amplify urban over rural representation imbalances inherent to Illinois's demographic geography.^[39] Recent challenges to the 2021 maps by Republicans were dismissed by the Illinois Supreme Court on procedural grounds, underscoring the entrenched nature of the legislature-led system.^[40]

Elections and Membership

Term Lengths and Qualifications

Members of the Illinois House of Representatives serve two-year terms, commencing on the third Wednesday in January following their election, with no constitutional limits on the number of terms.^[1] Eligibility requires United States citizenship, attainment of age 21, and residency in the legislative district for one year preceding the election.^[1] Members of the Illinois Senate serve four-year terms under normal circumstances, also beginning on the third Wednesday in January after election, similarly without term limits imposed by the state constitution.^[1] Qualification standards mirror those for the House but raise the minimum age to 25 years.^[1] To ensure legislative continuity and prevent wholesale replacement of the chamber, Senate terms are staggered: following decennial redistricting, approximately one-third of seats initially receive two-year terms, with the remainder assigned four-year terms, creating a cycle where roughly half the Senate faces election every two years thereafter.^[1] Beyond these minima, the Illinois Constitution bars General Assembly members from simultaneously holding other state civil or military offices during their tenure, aiming to avert conflicts of interest, though it does not explicitly disqualify individuals based on felony convictions.^[1] State law further restricts felons on parole or probation from serving until completion of their sentence, reflecting broader ethical constraints on public officeholders.^[41]

Election Processes and Cycles

Elections for the Illinois General Assembly occur every even-numbered year, with all 118 House seats contested for two-year terms and approximately half of the 59 Senate seats (typically 25 to 34 districts) contested for four-year terms in a staggered rotation established under the 1970 Illinois Constitution to prevent full turnover of the upper chamber. The partisan primary election, where major parties nominate candidates through voter selection, is conducted on the third Tuesday in March.^[42] The general election follows on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November, determining the officeholders via plurality vote within single-member districts.^[43] Candidates seeking a major party nomination must file a statement of candidacy and nominating petitions with the Illinois State Board of Elections by early December of the preceding year, gathering signatures from registered voters equal to at least 5% of the votes cast in the party's last primary for that office (subject to minimums like 614 signatures and maximums around 13,000 depending on the district).^[44] Independent candidates face analogous petition thresholds for direct general election ballot access under the Election Code.^[45] These requirements, combined with fundraising demands, empirically favor incumbents, who leverage established donor networks and name recognition; historical data indicate legislative incumbents secure reelection in over 90% of contested races nationally, with Illinois patterns reflecting similar dominance due to process mechanics amplifying resource disparities.^[46] Campaign finance rules under the Illinois Election Code mandate disclosure to the State Board of Elections and impose per-election-cycle limits, such as $14,600 from corporations or labor organizations as adjusted for 2025 inflation, alongside caps on individual and PAC contributions to curb undue influence while requiring timely reporting.^[47]^[48] Such regulations promote accountability but elevate barriers for non-incumbent or outsider candidates lacking party infrastructure, empirically correlating with reduced ideological and demographic diversity in nominations, as self-funded or grassroots efforts struggle against incumbents' average fundraising edges exceeding 5:1 in competitive districts.^[46]

Restrictions and Ethical Standards

The Illinois Constitution, in Article IV, Section 2(l), prohibits members of the General Assembly from holding dual offices by barring appointment to any public office created by the legislature or whose emoluments were increased within five years prior to the appointment during their elected term, aiming to prevent self-serving expansions of authority or compensation.^[1] This provision reflects an intent to mitigate conflicts of interest, though courts have interpreted it narrowly, allowing certain concurrent roles unless explicitly incompatible under common law doctrines, as seen in Attorney General opinions ruling positions like state senator and assistant state's attorney as incompatible due to divided loyalties in prosecutorial functions.^[49] Empirical application reveals gaps, with historical instances of legislators attempting to retain local offices or executive roles, often resolved through resignation rather than preemptive enforcement, underscoring reliance on post-facto judicial or ethical review. Under the State Officials and Employees Ethics Act (5 ILCS 430/) and Illinois Governmental Ethics Act (5 ILCS 420/), legislators must file annual Statements of Economic Interests disclosing income sources, assets over $1,200, liabilities exceeding $5,000, and business relationships that could pose conflicts, with requirements extending to spouses and minor children for jointly held interests following 2021 amendments.^[50]^[51] These disclosures, filed with the Secretary of State and reviewed by ethics officers, intend to promote transparency, yet compliance data from the Legislative Inspector General (LIG) indicates persistent violations, such as incomplete filings or unreported gifts, with over 100 complaints investigated annually but few resulting in formal sanctions beyond fines averaging under $5,000.^[52] Post-term restrictions on lobbying remain limited, lacking a mandatory cooling-off period; while legislators cannot negotiate lobbying employment during their term under proposals like SB3636 (unpassed as of 2022), former members may immediately register as lobbyists, enabling direct influence peddling as evidenced by patterns where ex-legislators represent entities they formerly regulated, contributing to Illinois's ranking among states with high legislative corruption indices due to unchecked revolving doors.^[53]^[54] Enforcement, handled by the bipartisan Legislative Ethics Commission and LIG, exhibits systemic weaknesses, as the commission—composed partly of legislative appointees—has dismissed or buried inspector general findings of serious misconduct, such as a 2020 case where evidence of improper influence was rejected despite substantiation, fostering a self-policing dynamic that correlates with low expulsion rates; since 2000, Illinois has recorded zero legislative expulsions for ethics breaches, compared to rare national instances, linking lax oversight to recurrent scandals where violations erode public trust without proportional accountability.^[55]^[56]^[57]

Leadership and Internal Organization

Officers and Roles

The Speaker of the Illinois House of Representatives is elected by House members at the organizational session following general elections, typically on the second Wednesday in January of odd-numbered years, after the Secretary of State confirms a quorum of elected members.^[58] The Speaker presides over House proceedings, authenticates official documents including acts, orders, warrants, and subpoenas, and establishes the schedule for regular, perfunctory, and veto sessions.^[59]^[60] This role includes enforcing House rules, such as quorum requirements—defined as a majority of elected members—and directing procedural matters like bill assignments and debate limitations.^[60] Historically, the Speakership has centralized significant administrative influence, particularly under Michael Madigan, who held the position from 1983 to 2021 (with a brief interruption in 1995–1997), enabling control over committee compositions, legislative priorities, and voting timelines.^[61] This concentration allowed the Speaker to determine which bills advanced, shaping the chamber's output amid Illinois' fiscal challenges.^[62] In the Illinois Senate, the Lieutenant Governor serves as President and presides over sessions, maintaining order and announcing decisions, though day-to-day duties often delegate to others due to the office's executive responsibilities.^[63] The Senate elects a President pro tempore from the majority caucus, appointed by the President, who assumes presiding duties in the Lieutenant Governor's absence and assists in rule enforcement, including quorum calls requiring a majority of 59 senators.^[64] These officers ensure procedural adherence but hold less unilateral agenda control compared to the House Speaker.^[65]

Party Leadership Dynamics

Party leaders in the Illinois General Assembly are selected by their respective partisan caucuses within each chamber, with the majority leader chosen from the party holding the most seats and the minority leader from the opposing party.^[66] These caucuses—Democratic and Republican for both the House and Senate—vote internally to elect leaders, who then influence the legislative agenda by prioritizing bills, allocating debate time, and coordinating floor strategy.^[60] This process centralizes power in chamber leadership, particularly under sustained one-party control, where the majority leader, often aligned with the Speaker in the House or President in the Senate, can expedite or sideline measures without broad cross-party input.^[62] Democratic supermajorities have dominated both chambers since the mid-2010s, with the party holding 78 of 118 House seats and 41 of 59 Senate seats following the 2022 elections, enabling veto overrides without Republican support.^[67] This dominance, unbroken since Democrats regained full control in 2003 after a period of Republican majorities in the 1990s and early 2000s, has reduced deliberative checks, as majority leaders can advance partisan priorities—such as expansive tax hikes or regulatory expansions—with minimal opposition amendments or hearings.^[68] Critics argue this stifles substantive debate, fostering rushed passage of complex bills and policy polarization, as evidenced by the legislature's ability to enact multimillion-dollar budgets or social reforms in single sessions without bipartisan negotiation.^[69] ^[70] Party whips, serving as assistant leaders, play a key role in vote coordination by tracking member positions, enforcing caucus discipline through personal outreach, and ensuring quorum and attendance for critical roll calls.^[71] In conference settings—informal caucus meetings—whips and leaders strategize on whipping votes, often linking compliance to committee assignments or campaign support, which amplifies agenda control under Democratic majorities but can marginalize minority input on polarized issues like fiscal policy.^[62] Historically, such dynamics shifted during brief Republican control, including Senate majorities from 1995 to 2003 and House majorities until 2007, when divided leadership prompted more compromise on budgets and reforms, contrasting the post-2003 era's accelerated partisan outputs.^[68] This pattern underscores how supermajority stability erodes adversarial deliberation, prioritizing efficiency over rigorous scrutiny.^[72]

Committee System Overview

The committee system in the Illinois General Assembly serves as the primary mechanism for initial legislative review, with both the House of Representatives and Senate maintaining standing committees organized by policy areas such as appropriations, revenue, and public health.^[73] The House operates 49 standing committees, while the Senate has 33, alongside a smaller number of special or select committees for targeted issues.^[73] Upon introduction, bills are typically referred by the chamber's Rules Committee (House) or Assignments Committee (Senate) to one or more relevant standing committees for substantive examination, including public hearings where stakeholders provide testimony and data.^[74] Committees may amend bills, conduct votes to recommend passage, hold, or indefinite postponement, functioning as gatekeepers that determine whether legislation advances to the full chamber floor.^[75] Committee chairs, appointed by the majority party leadership—currently Democrats, who hold supermajorities in both chambers—are vested with significant authority to set agendas, schedule hearings, and prioritize bills, often leading to selective advancement aligned with party priorities.^[4] This structure enables chairs to bottleneck bills by withholding hearings or subcommittee referrals, a practice particularly evident in the House Rules Committee, where thousands of measures have historically languished without debate.^[76] Empirical data from recent sessions underscore this gatekeeping role: in the 104th General Assembly (2025), lawmakers introduced nearly 7,000 bills, yet over 90% failed to become law, with the majority dying in committee due to lack of advancement—disparities show 40% of Republican-sponsored bills versus 23% of Democratic ones stalled early.^[77]^[78] Joint committees, numbering three in total, facilitate bicameral coordination on fiscal and administrative matters, such as budget oversight, by merging House and Senate members to review cross-chamber issues and recommend actions, though they too operate under majority influence.^[73] Causally, the committee system's reliance on chair discretion and sequential referrals contributes to legislative delays, as bills can remain pending for sessions without resolution, impeding timely responses to empirical needs unless prioritized by leadership—evident in patterns where non-partisan or minority-initiated reforms often fail to emerge from committee scrutiny.^[79] This framework, while designed for specialized vetting, amplifies bottlenecks in truth-seeking legislation by filtering proposals through partisan lenses before broader debate.^[75]

Sessions and Procedures

Annual and Special Sessions

The Illinois General Assembly convenes its regular annual session each year on the second Wednesday of January, as mandated by Article IV, Section 5(a) of the state constitution.^[80] This session typically extends until the end of May, with adjournment sine die occurring around May 31, allowing legislators to address the bulk of the legislative agenda, including budget bills and policy measures.^[74] Unlike some states with strict day limits, Illinois imposes no constitutional cap on the regular session's length, though practical constraints and statutory deadlines, such as the June 30 fiscal year-end, influence its duration.^[80] Following the spring adjournment, the General Assembly reconvenes for an annual fall veto session in October, primarily to consider gubernatorial vetoes, overrides, and any unfinished business from the regular session.^[81] This session usually spans two non-consecutive weeks, such as October 14–16 and October 28–30, providing a structured opportunity to revisit bills without extending into full legislative operations.^[82] Adjournment rules under the constitution permit reconvening for veto-related matters, ensuring continuity while limiting scope to prevent indefinite extensions.^[80] Special sessions may be called outside the regular and veto schedules by the governor through a proclamation specifying the purpose, restricting business to that topic, impeachments, or appointment confirmations; alternatively, the presiding officers of both houses may issue a joint proclamation as provided by law.^[80] These sessions occur irregularly, often in response to fiscal emergencies or impasses, such as budget shortfalls, with historical usage showing sporadic invocation rather than routine application— for instance, multiple calls during multi-year budget standoffs in the 2010s but fewer in stable periods.^[83] The constitution's continuous body provision allows carryover of unfinished items into special sessions if relevant to the called purpose, maintaining operational efficiency without defaulting to perpetual meetings.^[80]

Legislative Process for Bills

Bills in the Illinois General Assembly are introduced exclusively by members of either chamber, with revenue-raising measures required to originate in the House of Representatives pursuant to Article IV, Section 8(d) of the Illinois Constitution.^[84] Upon introduction, a bill undergoes its first reading, which consists of a formal announcement of its title and number, followed by referral to a substantive standing committee or the Rules Committee for initial assignment.^[85] This step ensures targeted review, as committees hold public hearings where testimony from stakeholders, experts, and the public is solicited, though attendance and participation vary by bill complexity and political priority.^[75] If a committee recommends passage—typically via a "do pass" motion—the bill advances to second reading on the chamber floor, where amendments may be proposed and debated, subject to Rules Committee approval for floor amendments to maintain procedural order.^[85] Amendments offered during this stage can substantially alter the bill's content, including "gut-and-replace" tactics that excise the original body after the enacting clause and substitute entirely new provisions, a practice frequently employed in Illinois to expedite unrelated policy changes or circumvent introduction deadlines, though it has drawn criticism for reducing transparency and public input.^[86] Following any amendments, the bill receives a third reading, limited to debate on its merits without further changes, and requires a simple majority vote for passage in the originating chamber. Upon passage, the bill is transmitted to the opposite chamber, repeating the three-reading and committee process.^[85] If the second chamber passes it without changes, it proceeds toward enactment; however, any amendments necessitate return to the originating chamber for concurrence by simple majority.^[87] Failure to concur triggers formation of a conference committee, comprising equal members from each chamber, tasked with reconciling differences through negotiation and producing a conference report for approval by both houses without further amendment.^[71] This bicameral reconciliation underscores the assembly's structure, yet empirical data reveals low overall success rates, with only about 6% of roughly 7,000 bills introduced in the 103rd General Assembly (2023-2024) achieving passage through both chambers.^[78] Such rates reflect rigorous filtering via committees and floor debates, alongside session deadlines that concentrate activity and amplify tactics like gut-and-replace in the final weeks.^[84]

Handling Vacancies and Absences

Vacancies in the Illinois General Assembly are filled by appointment made by the appropriate political party committee of the vacating member's district or county, as specified in state statute, with the appointment required within 30 days of the vacancy's occurrence.^[88] The appointee must belong to the same political party as the predecessor, ensuring partisan continuity in the interim.^[1] For House seats, which carry two-year terms, the appointee serves the remainder of the unexpired term until the next general election.^[89] In the Senate, where terms are staggered at two or four years, an appointee to a vacancy with more than 28 months remaining serves only until the next general election, after which a special election fills the balance of the term; otherwise, the appointee completes the term.^[30] This appointment process, rooted in the Illinois Constitution and election statutes, has faced occasional debate over whether special elections should replace or supplement appointments to enhance democratic legitimacy, particularly in cases tied to scandals.^[90] However, statutory mandates have prevailed without legislative change for state legislative seats, unlike temporary discussions around U.S. Senate vacancies during high-profile corruption probes. Vacancies often stem from resignations following criminal convictions, deaths in office, or expulsions; for example, the 1970 death of Secretary of State Paul Powell, a former House member, triggered a vacancy amid posthumous revelations of hidden cash assets, while multiple convictions in the 2000s and 2010s—such as those of representatives linked to bribery or patronage schemes—necessitated prompt party appointments to maintain operational continuity.^[88]^[91] These disruptions can alter committee balances and voting dynamics, as appointees may shift policy priorities from their predecessors. A majority of elected members constitutes a quorum in each chamber—59 in the 118-member House and 30 in the 59-member Senate—enabling business to proceed unless challenged and verified absent.^[1] Absences during contentious votes, such as budget impasses or ethics reforms, have occasionally approached quorum thresholds, forcing adjournments or compelled attendance under chamber rules, though outright quorum-busting walkouts remain rare in Illinois compared to multistate patterns.^[60] Such delays underscore the practical impacts of vacancies and absences on legislative momentum, as reduced numbers risk stalling sessions and amplifying minority influence until resolved.^[92]

Powers and Oversight Mechanisms

Core Legislative Powers

The legislative power of the State of Illinois is vested exclusively in the General Assembly, as established by Article IV, Section 1 of the Illinois Constitution, empowering it to enact statutes on all subjects not prohibited by the Constitution or federal law. This authority encompasses the creation, amendment, and repeal of laws addressing criminal justice, civil rights, public health, education, transportation, and economic regulation, among other domains. Bills forming the basis of these statutes must pass both houses by majority vote, with the Senate and House each retaining the ability to amend or reject proposals originating in the other chamber, ensuring bicameral deliberation.^[1]^[93] A key derivative power is the initiation of constitutional amendments under Article XIV, Section 3, requiring a three-fifths supermajority vote of elected members in each house for proposal, followed by ratification by a majority of voters at a general election. This mechanism has facilitated targeted revisions, such as those addressing legislative apportionment or fiscal constraints, without necessitating a full constitutional convention, though voter approval imposes a direct check on legislative overreach. The General Assembly further holds authority to levy state taxes and regulate fiscal policy, with revenue-related bills permissible for origination in either house under Article IV, Section 8(b), though practical conventions often favor House initiation for appropriations due to its broader representation. In exercising these powers, the legislature may preempt local ordinances to enforce statewide uniformity, particularly in areas of economic or public safety concern, as permitted by Article VII's home rule framework, which allows general laws to limit municipal authority absent explicit constitutional bar; this preemptive capacity has empirically standardized policies across jurisdictions, mitigating fragmented regulation as seen in state overrides of local firearms and minimum wage variations.^[1]^[94]^[95]

Budgetary Authority and Fiscal Processes

The Illinois General Assembly exercises exclusive authority over state appropriations, as stipulated in Article VIII, Section 2 of the Illinois Constitution, which mandates that appropriations for a fiscal year shall not exceed funds estimated by the General Assembly to be available during that year.^[96] This provision imposes a structural balanced budget requirement, compelling the legislature to enact an annual budget bill aligning expenditures with projected revenues, primarily through the General Revenue Fund (GRF) for core operations like education and human services.^[97] The process begins with the governor's proposed budget, typically presented in February, followed by legislative action; while constitutional deadlines aim for enactment before the July 1 fiscal year start, the Assembly has frequently missed targets, as seen in the 793-day budget impasse from July 2015 to July 2017, which accrued over $15 billion in unpaid bills.^[96]^[97] Despite the balanced budget mandate, Illinois has sustained multi-year fiscal imbalances, evidenced by persistent pension underfunding and reliance on one-time revenue measures to close GRF gaps. The state's five public pension systems faced an unfunded liability exceeding $140 billion as of fiscal year 2023, with funded ratios averaging below 45%, the lowest nationally, driven by decades of actuarially required contribution shortfalls averaging 60% from 1995 to 2015.^[98] These deficits manifest in non-GRF funds and off-balance-sheet obligations, such as vendor payment delays totaling $24 billion in 2024—equivalent to $38,800 per taxpayer—allowing short-term GRF balance at the expense of long-term solvency.^[99] Such practices contributed to credit rating downgrades, including multiple cuts to junk status equivalents in the 2010s by agencies like Moody's and S&P, reflecting structural revenue shortfalls projected at $3-5 billion annually without reforms.^[100] Recent upgrades to A2 by Moody's in October 2025 mark progress via backlog paydowns, yet Illinois retains the lowest state rating, underscoring ongoing vulnerabilities.^[101] Debt issuance requires a three-fifths supermajority vote in each chamber under Article VII, Section 9 of the Constitution when exceeding annual appropriations, intended to curb unchecked borrowing.^[94] In practice, evasion tactics have included accumulating payables as informal debt—peaking at $17 billion during the 2017 impasse—moral obligation bonds tied to non-GRF revenues, and pension ramp-up laws deferring full funding without formal borrowing.^[102] These maneuvers bypass supermajority thresholds by reclassifying obligations, perpetuating a cycle of deficits where GRF "balances" mask aggregate imbalances exceeding $200 billion in total liabilities, including pensions and bills, as of 2024. Empirical analysis reveals that without addressing pension amortization—currently stretched over 30 years with escalating contributions consuming 25% of GRF by 2025—fiscal stability remains illusory, as revenue growth (3.8% in FY2026) lags expenditure pressures.^[100]^[99]

Veto Procedures and Overrides

The Governor of Illinois may exercise veto authority over bills passed by the General Assembly within 60 calendar days of presentation, as specified in Article IV, Section 9 of the Illinois Constitution.^[1] This includes a total veto, rejecting the entire bill; an amendatory veto, returning the bill with specific recommendations for changes that the General Assembly may accept or override; and, for appropriation bills, an item veto to strike specific provisions or a reduction veto to decrease funding amounts in individual items while allowing the remainder to become law.^[103]^[84] These mechanisms enable targeted fiscal restraint, particularly through item and reduction vetoes, which have been used to curb legislative spending proposals without nullifying non-appropriation elements. To override a veto, the General Assembly must approve the bill by a three-fifths supermajority of elected members in each chamber: 71 votes in the 118-member House of Representatives and 36 votes in the 59-member Senate.^[84]^[104] This threshold exceeds the simple majority (60 votes in the House, 30 in the Senate) required for initial passage, preserving gubernatorial leverage by demanding broader consensus for overrides and mitigating risks of hasty legislative dominance in divided government scenarios.^[103] In practice, the supermajority requirement has sustained a power balance favoring executive influence on contentious or fiscal measures, as partial party alignments or intra-chamber dissent often fall short of the necessary votes. Illinois lacks a pocket veto mechanism; if the Governor neither signs nor acts on a bill within the 60-day window, it automatically becomes law, regardless of session adjournment.^[105] Historically, override rates have remained low, reflecting the threshold's deterrent effect— for instance, during the early 20th century under divided governance, only about 10% of vetoes were overridden amid frequent executive use of the power.^[106] Under governors with strong fiscal control, such as during budget disputes, overrides have been infrequent, underscoring the veto's role in enforcing restraint against legislative majorities. In the 2020s under Democratic Governor J.B. Pritzker, veto usage has emphasized spending controls, with over 500 bills signed annually alongside targeted vetoes on appropriation items and policy measures, yet overrides have been rare due to party alignment despite the legislature's Democratic supermajority.^[107] A notable exception occurred in February 2020, when both chambers overrode Pritzker's veto of a sales tax exemption for a farm bureau event, marking his first such reversal after the House voted 80-30 and the Senate 50-2.^[108] This scarcity of overrides—amid hundreds of vetoes on fiscal expansions—highlights how the three-fifths barrier, even in unified government, compels negotiation over confrontation, though critics argue it yields to legislative priorities when supermajorities align with the executive.^[69]

Joint Committee on Administrative Rules

The Joint Committee on Administrative Rules (JCAR) is a bipartisan legislative committee of the Illinois General Assembly, consisting of 12 members equally divided between the House and Senate with proportional party representation, established in 1977 to oversee the implementation of statutes through administrative rulemaking. Under the Illinois Administrative Procedure Act (5 ILCS 100), JCAR reviews all proposed, adopted, emergency, and peremptory rulemaking actions by state agencies for statutory compliance, procedural adherence, fiscal impact, and substantive reasonableness, issuing reports, recommendations, or objections as needed.^[109] Agencies must submit rules to JCAR within specified timelines, allowing the committee 45 days (or 28 for emergency rules) to evaluate and respond, with public input encouraged during review. JCAR's primary mechanism for intervention is the objection, which suspends a rule's effectiveness for up to 90 days pending legislative resolution or agency revision; stronger actions include recommendations for modification or filing prohibitions that halt rulemaking entirely without gubernatorial involvement.^[109] This authority, expanded in 2004 to include permanent vetoes over new rules, functions as a legislative veto, bypassing full bicameral approval and presentment to the governor.^[110] However, scholars argue this process violates the Illinois Constitution's separation of powers and presentment requirements under Article IV, Section 14, as it enables a committee to nullify executive actions without enacting new law, rendering it presumptively unconstitutional absent judicial affirmation—which Illinois courts have not provided despite decades of use.^[111]^[112] Empirically, JCAR's objections have imposed causal limits on bureaucratic expansion but infrequently, relative to the volume of regulatory activity. From the 1980s onward, as Illinois agencies promulgated thousands of rules annually amid growing administrative scope, JCAR issued objections in low single digits per year on average; for instance, audits from the 2000s noted sporadic interventions without systematic halts, while the 2024 annual report documented review of 341 proposed rulemakings yielding only 1 filing prohibition, 6 objections, and 2 recommendations.^[113] This pattern persisted into the 2020s, with notable blocks like the 2022 rejection of a COVID-19 emergency rule (9-0-2 vote) and a 2025 objection to prison mail policies, yet overall restraint suggests limited deterrence against executive overreach in an era of expanding agency authority.^[114]^[115] Critics contend JCAR's bipartisan structure and infrequent blocks fail to robustly constrain rulemaking despite regulatory proliferation—Illinois' administrative code exceeding 20,000 pages by the 2010s—allowing agencies to interpret statutes expansively with minimal legislative pushback, particularly under unified Democratic control of the General Assembly since 2003.^[110] While objections have occasionally forced revisions, such as in environmental or correctional rules, the committee's reactive role and constitutional vulnerabilities undermine its efficacy as a bulwark against unchecked executive delegation, prioritizing procedural review over substantive reversal.

Controversies and Institutional Challenges

Corruption Scandals and Convictions

The Illinois General Assembly has been embroiled in numerous corruption scandals, contributing to the state's national reputation for public malfeasance. Between 1976 and 2010, Illinois recorded 1,828 federal public corruption convictions, ranking third nationwide behind New York and California, with the Northern District of Illinois—encompassing Chicago—leading all federal districts in such convictions.^[116] Over the subsequent four decades, the state has averaged more than one federal corruption conviction per week, highlighting systemic vulnerabilities including pay-to-play arrangements where legislative influence was exchanged for financial benefits.^[117] Federal investigations have repeatedly uncovered ties between campaign contributions, no-show jobs, and favorable legislation, with at least dozens of current and former General Assembly members facing indictments or convictions since the 1970s.^[118] One prominent case involved Governor Rod Blagojevich, whose corruption prompted direct action by the General Assembly. Arrested by federal authorities on December 9, 2008, Blagojevich faced charges including racketeering conspiracy for attempting to sell the U.S. Senate seat vacated by Barack Obama, among other pay-to-play schemes demanding payments for official acts.^[119] The Illinois House of Representatives impeached him on January 9, 2009, by a vote of 114-1, citing abuse of power and betrayal of public trust.^[120] The Senate convicted him unanimously on January 29, 2009, removing him from office and barring him from future public roles in Illinois, a decision upheld despite later federal commutation of his prison sentence.^[121] Former House Speaker Michael Madigan exemplified entrenched legislative corruption in a scheme involving Commonwealth Edison (ComEd). Convicted on February 12, 2025, of 10 federal counts including bribery, conspiracy, and wire fraud, Madigan abused his position from 2011 to 2019 to secure legislative favors for the utility in exchange for approximately $1.3 million in payments to allies via no-show jobs and subcontracts.^[122] Prosecutors detailed how Madigan directed ComEd to hire and pay consultants, including his longtime confidant Michael McClain—who was separately convicted in 2024—to influence bills benefiting the company, such as rate hikes and regulatory relief.^[123] On June 13, 2025, Madigan was sentenced to 7.5 years in prison, with the judge noting the scheme's erosion of public faith in government.^[124] This case, rooted in federal probes like Operation Greylord's successors, underscored how lax ethics enforcement facilitated quid pro quo arrangements, with Madigan's decades-long control over House proceedings enabling such abuses.^[125] Additional scandals have implicated legislators in similar patterns. State Representative Luis Arroyo pleaded guilty in 2020 to federal bribery charges for accepting casino payments in exchange for sponsoring gambling legislation.^[126] Federal data from 2000 to 2020 show over 890 convictions in Illinois, with legislative pay-to-play often involving utility, construction, and gaming interests trading donations for policy wins, as evidenced by patterns in indictments of assembly members since 2019.^[127] These cases reveal a causal link between inadequate disclosure rules and repeated exploitation of legislative authority for personal gain, per analyses of federal prosecution records.^[128]

Fiscal Mismanagement and Debt Crises

The Illinois General Assembly has overseen a persistent pension funding crisis, with the state's five major public pension systems accumulating an unfunded liability exceeding $142 billion as of late 2024, equivalent to over 19% of the state's gross domestic product.^[129]^[130] This shortfall stems from decades of underfunding contributions while expanding benefits, resulting in funded ratios below 50% across systems like the Teachers' Retirement System and State Employees' Retirement System.^[131] Legislative efforts have prioritized short-term compliance with a 1995 funding ramp-up law through mechanisms such as pension obligation bonds and intra-fund transfers, rather than addressing root causes like automatic benefit increases tied to salaries.^[132] These avoidance strategies, including high-interest debt issuances to "fund" pensions without altering liabilities, have exacerbated long-term burdens without achieving solvency.^[133] For instance, lawmakers have repeatedly certified minimum contributions via accounting maneuvers, delaying required payments and projecting insolvency risks for systems like the Teachers' Retirement System by the mid-2030s absent deeper cuts.^[134] Such gimmicks reflect a causal disconnect between expenditure growth—driven by collective bargaining enhancements—and revenue realities, as pension costs consumed over 20% of the general fund by fiscal year 2025.^[135] Credit rating agencies have penalized this pattern, with Standard & Poor's downgrading Illinois to BBB+ in 2017—the lowest rating ever for a U.S. state—citing chronic budget impasses and pension inaction that inflated debt service to unsustainable levels.^[136] Although upgrades to A2 by Moody's in October 2025 marked progress through payment normalization, Illinois retained the nation's worst rating, underscoring unresolved structural deficits where spending outpaced revenue growth by factors exceeding 5% annually in peak years.^[101]^[137] Proposals for revenue boosts, such as the 2020 constitutional amendment for a graduated income tax, failed voter approval by a 57% to 43% margin, highlighting limits of tax hikes in resolving embedded pension flaws.^[138] Empirical analyses indicate that even successful implementation would generate insufficient surplus to close the gap, as prior flat-rate increases and sales tax expansions failed to curb liability growth amid ongoing benefit accruals and demographic pressures from an aging workforce.^[139] This persistence of unbalanced fiscal policies has driven population outflows and economic stagnation, with net domestic migration losses correlating to higher per-capita debt burdens than peer states.^[98]

Gerrymandering and Partisan Imbalances

The Illinois General Assembly enacted new legislative district maps on August 10, 2021, following a process controlled by Democrats who overrode Governor J.B. Pritzker's amendments to the initial proposal passed in June.^[35] These maps demonstrably advantaged Democratic candidates, with independent analyses indicating a partisan efficiency gap exceeding 10% in favor of Democrats, meaning the configuration packs Republican voters into fewer districts while spreading Democratic support to maximize seats won.^[140] Post-2021 elections reflected this design: in 2022, Democrats secured 78 House seats and 41 Senate seats against statewide popular vote margins closer to 55-45%, and incumbent reelection rates surpassed 95% in both chambers, as only a handful of seats saw competitive general election challenges. Historically, Republican majorities gerrymandered districts in 1991 during a brief period of GOP control, yielding temporary advantages that eroded with demographic shifts and electoral losses by the mid-1990s.^[141] In contrast, the 2021 Democratic maps have sustained supermajorities into the 2024 cycle, where incumbents again prevailed in over 90% of races amid minimal turnover, fostering reduced incentives for cross-aisle compromise and enabling policies diverging from median voter preferences, such as expansive spending without fiscal restraint, as competition indices rank Illinois legislative districts among the least competitive nationally.^[142] Legal challenges to the 2021 maps, including a federal court review in October 2021 that scrutinized racial gerrymandering claims but ultimately upheld the plans after remedial adjustments, and a 2025 Illinois Supreme Court suit by House Republicans alleging unconstitutional partisan bias, were dismissed on timeliness grounds rather than merits.^[143]^[40] Proposals for reform, such as establishing an independent redistricting commission to replace legislative control—modeled after systems in states like California—have gained traction among advocacy groups but faced repeated legislative defeat, including a failed 2016 ballot initiative and ongoing resistance in 2025 sessions.^[38])^[144]

Criticisms of One-Party Dominance

The Democratic Party achieved supermajorities in both chambers of the Illinois General Assembly following the 2012 elections, holding at least 60 seats in the 118-member House and 37 in the 59-member Senate since the 98th session began in January 2013.^[145] This control has enabled the enactment of expansive progressive policies, such as increased spending on social programs and public employee pensions, while consistently sidelining Republican proposals for structural reforms. Critics argue that the lack of meaningful opposition has fostered legislative complacency, as evidenced by the repeated failure of bills to impose term limits on legislators or leadership roles, despite public support exceeding 70% in polls, and the defeat of measures like a 2014 constitutional amendment initiative that was halted by judicial intervention before reaching voters.^[146] Similarly, Republican-backed spending cap legislation, such as proposals to align state budget growth with gross domestic product increases, has advanced in committee but stalled in full sessions, allowing unchecked expenditure growth amid rising liabilities.^[147] Empirical data links this one-party dominance to adverse economic outcomes, including a sustained exodus of residents and businesses. U.S. Census Bureau estimates indicate Illinois suffered a net domestic migration loss of 93,247 people in the 2023 fiscal year, continuing a trend where the state lost over 113,000 residents between 2020 and 2021 alone, ranking second nationally for population decline.^[148] ^[149] High combined state and local tax burdens—placing Illinois 15th-worst in overall tax climate per the Tax Foundation—correlate directly with these outflows, as 61% of departing households in surveys cite taxes as the primary factor, alongside a hostile regulatory environment for enterprises.^[150] ^[151] Corporate relocations have accelerated, with the number of businesses exiting the state tripling since 2020, driven by property tax rates averaging 2.23%—the highest in the U.S.—and income tax hikes enacted without bipartisan veto threats.^[152] Periods of greater partisan balance prior to 2013, when Republicans held closer to 40% of seats and influenced budget negotiations, coincided with relatively slower debt accumulation compared to the post-supermajority era, where unfunded pension obligations ballooned to over $140 billion by 2023 without offsetting reforms.^[153] This shift underscores how supermajority rule has diminished incentives for fiscal prudence, as evidenced by the state's credit rating stagnation at near-junk levels for much of the decade, contrasting with temporary bipartisan compromises in earlier divided governments that occasionally curbed deficit spending.^[70]

Recent Developments and Reforms

2020s Legislative Sessions

The 104th Illinois General Assembly, comprising the House and Senate sessions from 2025 to 2026, continued the Democratic supermajority established in prior decades, enabling swift passage of legislation aligned with the governor's priorities.^[154] During the spring session from January to May 31, 2025, lawmakers introduced over 6,700 bills but advanced 436 through both chambers for gubernatorial review, reflecting a pattern of high-volume filing with selective prioritization amid constitutional adjournment deadlines.^[155]^[156] Key enactments included amendments to insurance codes for mental health reimbursements and higher education faculty diversification programs, alongside fiscal adjustments tracked by business interests where approximately 31 of 250 monitored bills cleared both houses.^[157]^[158] Governor J.B. Pritzker signed most into law, with vetoes limited by partisan alignment, though specific override attempts awaited the fall session.^[159] The fall veto session, held October 14–16 and 28–30, 2025, centered on reviewing spring vetoes and addressing immediate fiscal pressures, including Chicago-area transit shortfalls projected at mid-2026 escalating into 2027 without new revenues like proposed $1.50 package delivery taxes or governance consolidations under a Northern Illinois Transit Authority.^[81]^[160] Energy discussions involved omnibus proposals to mitigate rising prices and integrate federal policy uncertainties, building on prior state mandates for emissions reductions while confronting grid reliability constraints from accelerated transitions.^[161]^[162]^[163] Earlier 2020s sessions, such as the 102nd (2021–2022), similarly featured minimal gridlock on priority bills but faced criticism for rushed end-of-session rushes exceeding 400 measures annually under one-party dominance.^[154]

Ongoing Reform Efforts

In early 2025, House Republican lawmakers introduced a package of ethics reform bills aimed at combating corruption through enhanced oversight mechanisms, including stricter disclosure requirements for conflicts of interest and prohibitions on post-employment lobbying by former officials.^[164]^[54] These measures, such as amendments to the Illinois Governmental Ethics Act via bills like HB2795 and SB1815, sought to impose penalties for ethical violations and limit revolving-door employment practices, but most stalled in committee or failed to advance beyond introduction, reflecting passage rates for minority-sponsored reforms below 20% in recent sessions.^[165]^[166]^[167] Proposals for legislative term limits have seen renewed GOP advocacy in 2025, often tied to broader constitutional amendments like HJRCA0020, which initially targeted gubernatorial terms but highlighted barriers to extending limits to the General Assembly itself.^[168] These efforts face empirical hurdles, as supermajority Democratic control (78-40 in the House and 41-18 in the Senate) enables procedural blocks, with no such bills reaching a floor vote amid historical data showing zero successful term limit impositions since the 1970 Constitution.^[4] Similarly, Republican-led pushes for independent redistricting commissions persist, exemplified by bipartisan ballot initiative campaigns launched in August 2025 to amend map-drawing processes via citizen-led commissions, yet these encounter resistance, with "next to zero appetite" in Springfield for ceding partisan advantages.^[169]^[170] The recurring failure of these reforms stems causally from one-party dominance, where the majority party's ability to control committee assignments and voting calendars prioritizes self-preservation over structural changes, as evidenced by the 14% passage rate for GOP-initiated bills in the 2024-2025 session out of over 6,700 filed.^[167] This dynamic perpetuates vulnerabilities to corruption and gerrymandering by entrenching incumbents and reducing electoral competition, with independent analyses confirming that without cross-aisle consensus—rare under current imbalances—viability remains low despite public support for ethics and redistricting overhauls in polls.^[38]^[54]

Impact of Federal and Economic Pressures

In 2025, federal policy shifts, including the enactment of H.R. 1 (Public Law 119-21) on July 4, which incorporated corporate tax cuts and tariffs, reduced Illinois' projected state revenues by decoupling from federal tax provisions, contributing to a $267 million deficit forecast for fiscal year 2026.^[171]^[172] Governor JB Pritzker responded by issuing Executive Order 2025-05 on September 23, directing state agencies to identify 4% spending reductions to mitigate economic slowdowns from these measures, while the General Assembly incorporated cautious revenue estimates into Senate Bill 2510, the FY2026 budget appropriations bill passed in June.^[173]^[174] These pressures also stalled progress on transit and energy legislation during the October veto session, as federal delays in $2.1 billion for Chicago-area transit projects—targeted by the Trump administration amid shutdown threats—forced lawmakers to seek alternative state funding amid warnings of a "fiscal cliff" for regional transit agencies.^[161]^[175] Economic factors, particularly inflation in the early 2020s, have intensified strains on Illinois' public pension systems, where unfunded liabilities exceeded $140 billion as of mid-2025, rendering plans only 51.6% funded statewide.^[176]^[131] Higher-than-assumed inflation triggers cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) that compound debt growth, as actuarial assumptions often underestimate sustained price increases, prompting the Assembly to allocate nearly $12.2 billion annually—or 11% of operational spending—to pensions without structural reforms sufficient to offset these dynamics.^[177]^[178] Empirical data from IRS migration reports reveal Illinois' net domestic outmigration of 83,839 residents in 2023 and over 100,000 annually in 2021-2022, correlating with the state's 13% effective tax rate on income—one of the highest nationally—and resulting in $10.6 billion in lost adjusted gross income in 2023 alone.^[179]^[180]^[181] This exodus, with 51% of surveyed residents citing taxes as a primary departure factor, shrinks the tax base and amplifies revenue shortfalls, compelling the Assembly to confront declining per-capita fiscal capacity amid policies that sustain high burdens.^[182] Critics, including analysts at the Illinois Policy Institute, contend that the Assembly's historical dependence on federal infusions—such as post-pandemic aid that temporarily masked deficits—has delayed accountability for state-level failures, including pension underfunding and tax policies accelerating a decade-long population decline of over 1 million when adjusted for births and deaths.^[183]^[184] Illinois ranks among states sending more revenue to Washington than received, yet this net donor status has not prompted diversification from federal reliance, leaving budgets vulnerable to policy reversals like 2025's tax reforms.^[185]

References

[1]
Illinois Constitution - Article IV - Illinois General Assembly
The legislative power is vested in a General Assembly consisting of a Senate and a House of Representatives, elected by the electors from 59 Legislative ...
[2]
https://www.ilga.gov/Legislation/Glossary
[3]
Legislative Branch - Illinois.gov
The Illinois General Assembly is the legislature of the U.S. state of Illinois. It has two chambers, the Illinois House of Representatives and the Illinois ...
[4]
Illinois General Assembly - Ballotpedia
Its primary duties are to pass bills into law, approve the state budget, confirm appointments to state departments and agencies, act on federal constitutional ...Senate · House of Representatives · Sessions · Redistricting
[5]
Members - Illinois General Assembly
House Members - 104th General Assembly. Officers of the General Assembly. Report List. Democrats: 78. Republicans: 40.
[6]
2025 Illinois legislative session - Ballotpedia
At the beginning of the 2025 legislative session: Democrats held a majority in the Illinois state House and state Senate. Illinois was one of 15 Democratic ...
[7]
Illinois General Assembly Has Long History Of Leadership Fights
Jan 24, 2020 · The building known today as the Old State Capitol was the seat of Illinois government in the mid-1800s. Last weekend, lawmakers elected Don ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
[8]
ANALYSIS: Late-night legislating not unusual in Illinois, but process ...
Illinois lawmakers approved a $46 billion budget after an all-night session, with debates over transparency and process.Missing: notable | Show results with:notable
[9]
Lincoln in the Illinois State Legislature - National Park Service
Sep 15, 2021 · Abraham Lincoln spent more years as an Illinois state representative than his entire time as US congressman and US president combined.Missing: facts | Show results with:facts<|separator|>
[10]
[PDF] CONSTITUTION OF ILLINOIS (1818)
1 – The judicial power of this state shall be vested in one supreme court, and such inferior courts as the general assembly shall, from time to time, ordain and ...
[11]
Laws of Illiniois Territory - Western Illinois University
The Territory was initially administered by a Territorial Governor and judges. The first elected territorial legislature met in 1812. The laws passed by the ...
[12]
Laws of Illinois - The Northwest Territory - WIU
The Ordinance allowed for the formation of a legislature when the area reached a population of 5000 men. The Territorial Legislature could write and adopt laws ...
[13]
[PDF] FIFTEENTH CONGRESS. Ses s . I. Ch . 66, 67. 1818. - GovInfo
An act to enable the people of the Illinois territory to form a constitution and state government, and for the admission of such state into the union on an ...<|separator|>
[14]
The Six Capitols of Illinois
Illinois' first capital city was the Mississippi River town of Kaskaskia. It was here in 1778 that George Rogers Clark defeated the British during the ...
[15]
1. CHANGING TIMES AND CONSTITUTIONS: 1818 AND 1848
The new constitution reduced it to 100--75 representatives and 25 senators. Suffrage was limited to white, male citizens over 21 years of age. As in 1818, a ...
[16]
Constitution of the State of Illinois, 1870 | HistoryKat
To change this block alignment, the state was divided into fifty-one districts, each of which was entitled to elect one senator and three representatives; in ...
[17]
[PDF] Redistricting in the Midwest
The districts of the Illinois General Assembly were generally representative of ... For 110 years, until Illinois voters abolished this system in. 1980 (at the ...Missing: 1950s | Show results with:1950s
[18]
Baker v. Carr (1962) - Federal Judicial Center |
Baker v. Carr questioned if a federal court could challenge a state's apportionment plan. The Supreme Court ruled it could, reversing a lower court dismissal.
[19]
[PDF] The Legislative Article of the 1970 Illinois Constitution
The 1870 Constitution established a bicameral legislature with 51 districts. Each district elected one senator to a four-year term and three representatives to ...
[20]
The Cutback at 10:
In 1980 Illinois voted to reduce the size of the Illinois House from 177 to 118 members and eliminate cumulative voting, the unique method of selecting ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[21]
The Cutback Amendment of 1980 - jstor
In 1979, Pat Quinn, a young political activist, led a movement and sponsored an amendment to the 1970 Illinois state constitution to cut back on the size of the ...Missing: 1950s | Show results with:1950s
[22]
[PDF] Illinois Constitution
Jun 30, 2025 · The Illinois Constitution gives legislative power to the Illinois General Assembly. The General Assembly is made up of two houses; the House ...<|separator|>
[23]
Cutback Amendment - Governor Pat Quinn Portrait
On November 4, 1980, Illinois voters approved the Cutback Amendment, a constitutional amendment which reduced the size of the Illinois House from 177 ...
[24]
Illinois Constitution
ARTICLE IV THE LEGISLATURE SECTION 1. LEGISLATURE - POWER AND STRUCTURE The legislative power is vested in a General Assembly consisting of a Senate and a ...
[25]
[PDF] 1970 ILLINOIS CONSTITUTION
CONSTITUTIONAL INITIATIVE FOR LEGISLATIVE ARTICLE. Amendments to Article IV of this Constitution may be proposed by a petition signed by a number of electors ...
[26]
ILLINOIS - State Democracy Research Initiative
Nov 3, 2023 · Illinois has constitutional voter initiatives and legislatively referred amendments but does not have statutory initiatives or veto referendums.<|separator|>
[27]
Illinois House of Representatives - Ballotpedia
Illinois has a Democratic trifecta. The Democratic Party controls the office of governor and both chambers of the state legislature. This page contains the ...
[28]
State Partisan Composition
Every election impacts the partisan composition of state legislatures. Current party control of state legislatures and government can be accessed below.Missing: Illinois | Show results with:Illinois
[29]
Full Text of HJR0016 - Illinois General Assembly
1. HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION. 2, WHEREAS, The State of Illinois is often regarded as having. 3, two distinct regions, the urban Cook County area and downstate.
[30]
Constitution of the State of Illinois Art. IV, § 2 - Codes - FindLaw
(a) One Senator shall be elected from each Legislative District. Immediately following each decennial redistricting, the General Assembly by law shall ...
[31]
LIBRARY FEUD SPURS FITZGERALD FILIBUSTER - Chicago Tribune
Oct 5, 2000 · Bringing a feud with Gov. George Ryan and the state's Republican Establishment to the Senate floor, Fitzgerald delivered an hourslong ...
[32]
Constitution of the State of Illinois Art. IV, § 3. Legislative Redistricting
(b) In the year following each Federal decennial census year, the General Assembly by law shall redistrict the Legislative Districts and the Representative ...Missing: reapportionment | Show results with:reapportionment
[33]
Illinois - All About Redistricting
Illinois' congressional lines are drawn by the state legislature, as a regular statute, subject to gubernatorial veto.Missing: apportionment | Show results with:apportionment
[34]
[PDF] Redistricting and Reapportionment - Jenner & Block LLP
Jun 30, 2025 · 10, 2001), the court found that “the Illinois constitution does not require that congressional districts be compact,” and that political factors ...
[35]
Redistricting in Illinois - Ballotpedia
The Illinois General Assembly is responsible for drawing both congressional and state legislative district lines. Illinois enacted a congressional map on ...Missing: malapportionment | Show results with:malapportionment
[36]
[PDF] 2021 Illinois Congressional Redistricting Analysis (maps updated ...
Aug 9, 2021 · District plans created to solely prioritize compactness tend to pack Democratic voters, since Democrats are heavily concentrated in the Chicago ...
[37]
[PDF] Illinois' 2021 Redistricting Cycle
Below are a series of tables containing summary data on the congressional and state legislative districts in Illinois. This data is provided at the state level ...
[38]
Redistricting Reform - CHANGE Illinois
This practice, known as gerrymandering, predetermines outcomes, increases polarization, and produces uncompetitive elections, career politicians, and ...
[39]
[PDF] REDISTRICTING IN ILLINOIS - Paul Simon Public Policy Institute
Colegrove lived in the 7th Congressional. District, which at that time had a population of 914,000 and there were many Illinois Congressional Districts, which ...Missing: 1950s | Show results with:1950s
[40]
Supreme Court rules House Republicans waited too long to ...
Apr 9, 2025 · House Republican Leader Tony McCombie, R-Savanna, along with a group of individual voters, asked the court to reject the current legislative map ...
[41]
State legislature candidate requirements by state - Ballotpedia
Illinois. Article IV of the Illinois Constitution states: "To be eligible to serve as a member of the General Assembly, a person must be a United States ...
[42]
Election Schedule | Peoria County Elections, IL
General Primary Election: Even numbered years, third Tuesday in March (In 2022 ONLY the General Primary Election is scheduled for June 28, 2022)
[43]
https://www.sangamonil.gov/departments/a-c/county-clerk/elections/election-information/future-election-dates-election-calendars
[44]
Getting on the Illinois Ballot: How many Signatures does it Take?
May 24, 2018 · In order to run for an elected office, candidates are required to collect a certain number of petition signatures for their nomination. The ...
[45]
https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs3.asp?ActID=678&ChapterID=10
[46]
Advantage, Incumbent - FollowTheMoney.org
May 7, 2008 · THE INCUMBENCY ADVANTAGE. The 2006 legislative elections were typical in that the majority of legislative races featured an incumbent running ...
[47]
Illinois 2025 Campaign Contribution Limits Published
Feb 5, 2025 · The amount corporations and labor organizations may contribute in each election cycle increased from $13,700 to $14,600 to any candidate ...Missing: rules | Show results with:rules
[48]
10 ILCS 5/9-8.5 - Illinois General Assembly
A candidate political committee may not accept contributions from a ballot initiative committee or from an independent expenditure committee. (b-5) Judicial ...
[49]
[PDF] 21-001 COMPATIBILITY OF OFFICES State Senator and Assistant ...
Feb 9, 2021 · The offices of State Senator and Assistant State's Attorney are incompatible, and one person may not hold both simultaneously.Missing: ban | Show results with:ban
[50]
https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ILCS/details?ActID=2529&ChapterID=2&ChapAct=5%2BILCS%2B430%252F&SeqStart=500000&SeqEnd=1900000
[51]
[PDF] ILLINOIS GOVERNMENTAL ETHICS ACT & STATE OFFICIALS and ...
This booklet reflects new changes to the Illinois Gov- ernmental Ethics Act and reporting requirements for filing a Statement of Economic Interests.
[52]
FAQs - Legislative Inspector General - Illinois General Assembly
The LIG's summary report of investigations are required to include the following: Section 25-63 of the State Officials and Employees Ethics Act (5 ILCS 430/25- ...
[53]
SB3636 102ND GENERAL ASSEMBLY - Illinois General Assembly
Provides that no legislator may, during his or her term of office, negotiate for employment with a lobbying entity. Amends the State Officials and Employees ...
[54]
5 bills to push back against Illinois' culture of political corruption
Mar 13, 2025 · Two bills would restrict lobbying by state leaders. Most states require a minimum 1-2 year cooling off period before a former lawmaker can ...
[55]
[PDF] Operational Rules for Legislative Ethics Commission
Rule 5-50. Timekeeping; Inspector General. The Legislative Inspector General shall quarterly submit records documenting time worked by the Legislative ...
[56]
Illinois watchdog's report of 'serious misconduct' was 'squashed' by ...
Feb 7, 2020 · Illinois' legislative inspector general investigates complaints against state lawmakers, but a commission of their peers can – and did – bury those findings.Missing: expulsions | Show results with:expulsions<|separator|>
[57]
State legislatures rarely expel lawmakers. We found 19 ... - PolitiFact
Apr 13, 2023 · We searched Google, news archives and databases and found 19 instances of legislators being expelled going back to 2000, across all 50 states.
[58]
House Rules - Illinois General Assembly
If a quorum of members elected is present, the Secretary of State shall then call for nominations of members for the Office of Speaker. All nominations require ...Missing: agenda | Show results with:agenda
[59]
[PDF] Office of the Speaker of the House - Illinois Secretary of State
Administratively, the Speaker signs and authenticates all acts, proceedings, orders, writs, warrants and subpoenas issued by the House.
[60]
[PDF] state of illinois - rules of the house of representatives
legislation by the General Assembly authorizing the unit of local government to ... Assembly of the State of Illinois. (7) House. "House" means the House ...<|separator|>
[61]
Michael Madigan: The Rise and Fall | Capitol News Illinois
Feb 12, 2025 · The only interruption to Madigan's nearly four decades as Speaker comes in 1994, amid the so-called "Republican Revolution" of that year's ...
[62]
Madigan's rules: How Illinois gives its House speaker power to ...
Those rules allow the speaker to influence the makeup of legislative committees; how lawmakers vote; and when, if ever, the bills get voted on.<|separator|>
[63]
[PDF] Lieutenant Governor - Illinois General Assembly
Overview The Illinois Constitution says the Lieutenant Governor "shall perform the duties and exercise the powers in the Executive Branch that may be dele-.
[64]
[PDF] Senate Rules - Illinois General Assembly
(a) The President shall appoint from within the Majority Caucus a Majority Leader and a. President Pro Tempore. The Minority Leader shall appoint from within ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[65]
State Senate President Pro Tempore - Ballotpedia
The Senate president pro tem mainly presides over the Senate chamber in a supervisory role and ensures that members follow the body's rules and procedures. ...
[66]
Pulling back the curtain - The human equation
There are four caucuses in the Illinois General Assembly. Each is broken down by chamber (House and Senate) and partisan affiliation (Republican and Democrat).
[67]
Illinois Democrats maintain control of all levers of state government
Nov 10, 2022 · Illinois Democrats would hold every statewide elected office and maintain supermajorities in the General Assembly while extending their majority on the ...
[68]
Party control of Illinois state government - Ballotpedia
The below chart shows the state's legislative party competitiveness score from 1880 to 1990. The chart offers a look into competitiveness prior to Ballotpedia's ...
[69]
Illinois checks, balances? Not under Pritzker
Oct 13, 2025 · As veto session begins and power goes back to the Democratic majority state legislature, the consequences of a single-party state are more ...
[70]
Opinion: How Illinois Became a One-Party State - Chicago Magazine
Oct 19, 2021 · 8, 2001, George Ryan stood on the steps of the Kankakee County Courthouse and announced he would not seek a second term as governor of Illinois.
[71]
Legislative Definitions - Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel
Whip Assistant floor leader in each house for each party. They assist with strategy and roundup members for voting.
[72]
With Most States Under One Party's Control, America Grows More ...
Jun 11, 2019 · It is the first time in more than a century that all but one state legislature is dominated by a single party, and lawmakers have pushed in ...
[73]
List of committees in Illinois state government - Ballotpedia
There are three joint committees of the Illinois General Assembly. The Illinois Senate has 33 standing committees. The Illinois House has 49 standing committees ...
[74]
Illinois State Legislature FAQ
Illinois' legislative branch is made up of the House and Senate, and is called the Illinois General Assembly (ILGA).
[75]
The Legislative Process - Illinois Legislative History
Jun 11, 2024 · The legislative process begins with a member of the Senate or the House of Representatives introducing a bill.Missing: system structure
[76]
Rules Committee: Where thousands of Illinois bills go to die
Dec 19, 2018 · Most bills introduced in the Illinois House never make it to the floor for discussion but die in the Rules Committee instead.Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[77]
Illinois lawmakers pass almost 100 bills on final day
Jun 23, 2025 · 40% of GOP's vs 23% of Democrats' bills died in infancy Portion of all bills and by party of chief sponsor stuck in the Illinois House Rules ...
[78]
16 missed chances for state lawmakers to help out Illinoisans
Jul 8, 2025 · Despite passing 416 bills, Illinois lawmakers let 16 good pieces of legislation die as they churned through almost 7,000 bills during this past ...
[79]
[PDF] GENERAL ASSEMBLY Illinois House of Representatives
(b) All legislative measures pending before the House or any of its committees are automatically re-referred to the Rules Committee on the 31st consecutive day ...
[80]
https://www.ilga.gov/constitution/articleIV.asp
[81]
[PDF] October 2025 - Illinois General Assembly
Oct 1, 2025 · October 2025. VETO SESSION. ILLINOIS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. 104th General Assembly Emanuel “Chris” Welch, Speaker. STATE HOLIDAY. SESSION.
[82]
Veto session preview: Federal issues top of mind as lawmakers ...
Oct 13, 2025 · The General Assembly will return for the annual fall veto session from Oct. · Federal immigration and law enforcement actions in the Chicago area ...
[83]
Special Sessions - National Conference of State Legislatures
Unlike regular sessions, there is no specific timing for special (or extraordinary) sessions. They occur intermittently to deal with the specific issues or ...Missing: frequency | Show results with:frequency
[84]
[PDF] CHAPTER 3 - Illinois General Assembly
Revisory bills are exempt from the constitutional single-subject requirement, so a revisory bill can affect many laws on a variety of subjects and may be ...Missing: 1950s | Show results with:1950s
[85]
[PDF] How A Bill Becomes Law in Illinois
A bill goes through the first and second houses, then to the Governor. It can become law in changed or original form, after vetoes or conference committee.
[86]
[PDF] STATE OF ILLINOIS 97th GENERAL ASSEMBLY HOUSE OF ...
Speaker, Members of the Legislature. House Bill 1981, I move to concur with Amendment #4, which is actually a gut and replace Amendment because the Bill.
[87]
Illinois Legislative History Research: Legislative Process - UIC Law
Mar 20, 2025 · In Illinois, a bill must pass both the House and Senate in identical form, be read three times in each chamber, and may use the "agreed bill ...<|separator|>
[88]
10 ILCS 5/25-6 - Illinois General Assembly
Sec. 25-6. General Assembly vacancies. (a) When a vacancy occurs in the office of State Senator or Representative ...Missing: leadership | Show results with:leadership
[89]
How vacancies are filled in state legislatures - Ballotpedia
State legislative vacancies can be filled through special elections, governor appointments, board of county commissioners appointments, political party ...
[90]
The powers of the state legislature in filling senatorial vacancies
Article V, section 9 of the Illinois Constitution addresses the power of the Governor to appoint all officers of the State for which there is no provision ...<|separator|>
[91]
These are the 10 best-known Illinois public officials convicted of crimes
Jun 23, 2025 · Here are 10 of the best-known Illinois public officials charged with crimes, encompassing both elected and unelected figures.
[92]
Capital Closeup: A regionwide review of the requirements for a ...
Feb 6, 2025 · That was the head count during the scheduled start of the 2025 legislative session in Minnesota, and this unusual situation brought attention to ...
[93]
Constitution of the State of Illinois Art. IV, § 1 | FindLaw
The legislative power is vested in a General Assembly consisting of a Senate and a House of Representatives, elected by the electors from 59 Legislative ...
[94]
Illinois Constitution - Article VII - Illinois General Assembly
"Units of local government" means counties, municipalities, townships, special districts, and units, designated as units of local government by law, which ...
[95]
Preemption of Local Laws in Illinois - Giffords
Dec 31, 2023 · The amended FOID Card Act explicitly states that its provisions are a denial and limitation of home rule powers and functions under Art. VII, § ...
[96]
Illinois Constitution - Article VIII - Illinois General Assembly
Constitution of the State of Illinois. ARTICLE VIII. FINANCE. SECTION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS (a) Public funds, property or credit shall be used only for ...
[97]
[PDF] Illinois State Budget Fiscal Year 2026
Feb 19, 2025 · There is a total embargo on the budget for fiscal year 2026 until. 12:00 p.m., Wednesday, February 19, 2025. This prohibition includes ...
[98]
Illinois' economic future pressured by worst pension crisis in nation
Feb 4, 2025 · Nationwide analysis from the Equable Institute reveals Illinois state pensions remain fiscally unstable, underscoring the need for systemic ...
[99]
Illinois taxpayers each owe $38,800 for state's unpaid bills
Oct 3, 2025 · Illinois taxpayers in 2024 owed an average of $38800 each, ranking No. 3 in the U.S. Illinois earned an “F” for fiscal management.
[100]
The State of Illinois FY2026 Enacted Budget | Civic Federation
Aug 12, 2025 · General funds appropriations and revenues rose by 3.8% compared to FY2025. The table below reports the details. While the budget remains ...
[101]
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/illinois-achieves-highest-credit-rating-211447556.html
[102]
Illinois fiscal collapse began long before the 2-year budget impasse
Jun 1, 2017 · The debt taxpayers owe worsened by more than $20 billion over the four-year tax hike period. New money didn't solve Illinois' finances. Instead, ...Missing: constitution evasion
[103]
Illinois' gubernatorial veto procedures
Aug 2, 2017 · The governor can exercise the veto power in four different ways: a total veto, an amendatory veto, an item veto and a reduction veto.Missing: reforms | Show results with:reforms
[104]
What you should know about Veto Session in Illinois - Nicole La Ha
Nov 12, 2024 · Veto Session allows members of the legislative branch to check the work of the executive branch, which may include overturning gubernatorial vetoes.Missing: reforms | Show results with:reforms
[105]
Illinois's Legislative Process - University of Illinois LibGuides
Jan 30, 2020 · Learn how to identify and track recent bills that are introduced in the Illinois General Assembly. Online help.
[106]
[PDF] The Governor's Veto in Illinois - Digital Commons@DePaul
The three Illinois constitutions approved in the nineteenth century show a progression from a veto possessed by a council of revision, to a weak gubernatorial ...Missing: reforms | Show results with:reforms
[107]
Final tally: 591 bills signed, 8 vetoed by governor
Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker on Tuesday signed the final three bills of the 599 sent to him by the Illinois General Assembly during the spring legislative ...
[108]
In First For Pritzker, General Assembly Overrides Veto - NPR Illinois
Feb 5, 2020 · Illinois Senators overwhelmingly override Gov. JB Pritzker's veto of a sales tax exemption Wednesday, a day after member of the House did the same.
[109]
https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ILCS/ilcs3.asp?ActID=524&ChapterID=10
[110]
An Empirical Critique of JCAR and the Legislative Veto in Illinois
Nov 2, 2015 · Since late 2004, JCAR has possessed veto power over agency rulemaking, meaning the committee may permanently stop implementation of new rules ...
[111]
[PDF] The Legislative Veto in Illinois: Why JCAR Review of Agency ...
Apr 30, 2016 · It focuses on the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules (“JCAR”), a bipartisan legislative committee that is authorized to review rules.
[112]
[PDF] Why JCAR Review of Agency Rulemaking is Unconstitutional
Apr 30, 2016 · It focuses on the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules (“JCAR”), a bipartisan legislative committee that is authorized to review rules.
[113]
Joint Committee on Administrative Rules 2000 Audit
Objections made ... We conducted a compliance audit of the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules as required by the Illinois State Auditing Act.
[114]
Illinois Joint Committee on Administrative Rules blocks governor's ...
Mar 22, 2022 · The Illinois General Assembly's Joint Committee on Administrative Rules (JCAR) on February 15, 2022, voted 9-0-2 to block an emergency rule ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[115]
Oversight panel objects to new Illinois prison mail policy
Sep 16, 2025 · Bill Cunningham, D-Chicago, chair of the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules, told IDOC staff during a committee meeting in Chicago. “We ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[116]
Study: Illinois No. 3, Chicago No. 1 when it comes to corruption
There were 1,828 public corruption convictions between 1976 and 2010 in Illinois, behind New York and California. When population is taken into account, ...
[117]
Madigan will see plenty of corrupt Illinois cronies during 7.5 years in ...
Jun 13, 2025 · Illinois averages over one public corruption conviction a week, and that's just the federal cases. Local prosecutions add to that tally. In 40 ...Missing: scandals | Show results with:scandals
[118]
The Dishonor Roll: General Assembly - Chicago Tribune
Feb 12, 2024 · As part of the series “Culture of Corruption,” the Tribune has compiled a list of roughly 200 convicted, indicted or generally notorious public ...
[119]
Illinois Governor Charged in Scheme to Sell Obama's Seat
Dec 9, 2008 · The governor of Illinois brazenly put up for sale his appointment of Barack Obama's successor in the United States Senate, federal prosecutors said Tuesday.
[120]
HR0005 96TH GENERAL ASSEMBLY
8, Rod R. Blagojevich, Governor of the State of Illinois, is ; 9, impeached for cause and that the following article of.
[121]
Ill. Senate Votes to Remove Blagojevich From Office Over ... - PBS
Jan 29, 2009 · Embattled Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich has been convicted at his impeachment trial by the state Senate and removed from office.Missing: General | Show results with:General
[122]
Former Illinois Speaker of the House Michael J. Madigan Convicted ...
Feb 12, 2025 · ... convicted former Speaker of the Illinois House of ... Madigan Sentenced to Seven and a Half Years in Prison After Corruption Conviction.
[123]
Former Illinois Speaker of the House Michael J. Madigan Sentenced ...
Jun 13, 2025 · A federal judge in Chicago today sentenced former Speaker of the Illinois House of Representatives MICHAEL J. MADIGAN to seven and a half years in federal ...
[124]
Ex-Speaker Madigan sentenced to 7 ½ years in prison for bribery ...
Jun 13, 2025 · Former House Speaker Michael Madigan, was sentenced to 7 ½ years in prison for 10 convictions on bribery and corruption charges.Missing: scandals | Show results with:scandals
[125]
Madigan is latest as Illinois averages 1 corruption conviction a week
Feb 12, 2025 · Madigan is latest as Illinois averages 1 corruption conviction a week – for 40 years · Former Illinois House Speaker Madigan guilty of bribery, ...
[126]
[PDF] Corruption Convictions Trend Downward: - Political Science
Nov 2, 2023 · ... state's metropolitan area, the corruption rate ... Former Illinois State Representative Luis Arroyo pleaded guilty to federal bribery charges.
[127]
Unmasking 'Crooked, Illinois' as nation's top corrupt state
Feb 4, 2020 · According to new federal figures obtained by the I-Team, there have been 891 convictions for public corruption in Illinois since the year 2000, ...
[128]
Feds targeted these Illinois politicians for corruption in 2022
Dec 26, 2022 · Illinois saw more than its fair share of corruption and misconduct again in 2022, but some politicians stood out in a crowded field.
[129]
and Resolving Illinois' Pension Funding Challenges: Volume II
Nov 4, 2024 · Volume II of the state pension report covers Illinois' five public pension systems: the Teachers' Retirement System (TRS), the State Employees' Retirement ...
[130]
Report shows Illinois government pension crisis worst in U.S.
Jul 31, 2025 · By that measure, Illinois ranks as the nation's worst: unfunded obligations equal 19.02% of state GDP, up from 18.52% a year ago. In other words ...
[131]
ISSUE BRIEFS | Pension Challenges Facing Illinois - Equable Institute
Apr 14, 2025 · Equable released briefs analyzing two vital Illinois pension issues: the cost of changes to Tier 2 and the sources of Chicago's pension ...
[132]
https://www.wsj.com/articles/illinoiss-magic-pension-trick-1517776081
[133]
Pritzker's accounting gimmicks can't fix pension crisis, but real ...
Feb 21, 2020 · Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker previously floated a pension plan that included pawning-off state assets, taking on more high-interest debt and ...
[134]
[PDF] Special Pension Briefing
The State Employees' Retirement System (SERS) had unfunded liabilities of $30.2 billion, approximately 20.9% of the total unfunded liabilities of the five ...
[135]
An Increase in Pension Obligations Adds to States' Unfunded ...
Jul 30, 2025 · Illinois' unfunded pension liability was the largest of any state at 197.2% of its own-source revenue, followed by New Jersey (162.4%), ...
[136]
Illinois has the lowest credit rating on record for a U.S. state
Jun 1, 2017 · S&P cited Illinois lawmakers' failure to pass a budget and the lengthy budget impasse as reasons for its one-notch credit downgrade.
[137]
The sad but true history of Illinois' credit rating
Aug 4, 2014 · Illinois has the lowest credit rating in the nation. The sad truth is Illinois hasn't been a AAA-rated state since February 1979 – when a ...
[138]
Illinois Allow for Graduated Income Tax Amendment (2020)
The ballot measure was defeated. A "yes" vote supported repealing the state's constitutional requirement that the state personal income tax be a flat rate and ...Missing: failure | Show results with:failure
[139]
Official Illinois progressive tax explainer ranges from misleading to ...
Sep 18, 2020 · Progressive income tax proponents put factually inaccurate and misleading claims into a constitutionally required pamphlet intended to ...Missing: referendum | Show results with:referendum
[140]
Redistricting Report Card - Gerrymandering Project
... congressional and state legislative maps to account for changes in population. In many states, the politicians who control this process draw district lines ...Missing: compactness | Show results with:compactness
[141]
[PDF] Legislative Redistricting in Illinois: An Historical Analysis
Self-preservation is a strong human characteristic, especially among Illinois legislators who have had to draw political boundaries for their next election.Missing: malapportionment | Show results with:malapportionment
[142]
A Tale of Two Midwestern Gerrymanders: Illinois and Ohio
Dec 2, 2021 · Gerrymanders by Democrats in Illinois and Republicans in Ohio seek to build upon their dominance of their respective states.
[143]
FEDERAL COURT SENDS ILLINOIS REDISTRICTING MAPS TO ...
Oct 19, 2021 · CHICAGO – A federal court ruled today that state legislative redistricting plans adopted by the Illinois General Assembly and signed on June 4 ...
[144]
Election lawyers, Obama alumni renew Illinois redistricting reform ...
Aug 19, 2025 · Former federal officials are backing an effort to reform the state legislature's redistricting process. Congressional districts would be ...
[145]
Election yields Democratic supermajorities in Illinois General ...
Nov 7, 2012 · After yesterday's election, Democrats will have a supermajority in both the Illinois House and Senate after inauguration on Jan. 8, 2013.
[146]
Term limit measure blocked by judge for November ballot
Jun 27, 2014 · A Cook County judge blocked a measure limiting legislative term limits, a setback for governor candidate Bruce Rauner. CHICAGO (WLS) -- A ...Missing: caps | Show results with:caps<|separator|>
[147]
New bills would help keep state spending in check - Illinois Policy
Feb 25, 2025 · House Bill 3014 and Senate Bill 1546 would tie Illinois' spending growth to GDP growth, potentially saving billions of dollars as the state needs to live ...Missing: rule | Show results with:rule
[148]
Another annual Census migration report, another 93000 net loss of ...
Oct 18, 2024 · 203,758 residents moved into Illinois from other states, while 297,005 Illinoisans left for other states, resulting in the net loss of the ...
[149]
Census: Illinois lost more than 113,000 people in one year
The latest estimates, released Tuesday, pegged the state's population at 12671469 as of July 1, 2021, down by 113776, or 0.9 percent, from 2020.<|separator|>
[150]
Why Are People Fleeing Illinois? - The Heritage Foundation
Feb 14, 2023 · And all Illinoisians labor under some of the highest taxes in the country. Here are the highlights: 15th-worst overall tax climate. 13th-highest ...Missing: business correlation
[151]
Illinois is Midwest's biggest people loser
Mar 5, 2025 · High taxes were the No. 1 reason why Illinoisans considered leaving the state. Polling from NPR Illinois and the University of Illinois found 61 ...
[152]
Businesses moving out of Illinois triples since pandemic
Aug 12, 2025 · The most significant barrier would-be businesses face is the high tax burden inflicted in Illinois because of the state's pension crisis.Missing: correlation | Show results with:correlation
[153]
Column: Illinois and the effect of one-party rule
May 21, 2014 · Democracy can be cruel because elections deprive the demos of the delight of alibis and the comfort of complaining. Illinois voters have ...
[154]
2020 Illinois legislative session - Ballotpedia
At the beginning of the 2020 legislative session: Democrats held a veto-proof supermajority in the Illinois state House and state Senate. Illinois was one of 15 ...
[155]
ISACo News and Views - 2025 End of Session Summary
Jun 2, 2025 · During the 2025 spring legislative session, 6,744 bills were filed. ... legislation approved during the second year of the 104th General Assembly.Missing: passed | Show results with:passed
[156]
https://www.senatorli.com/2025/10/24/state-lawmakers-return-for-veto-session/
[157]
Illinois 2025-2026 104th General Assembly Legislation - LegiScan
Provides that the Illinois Emergency Management Agency and Office of Homeland Security (IEMA-OHS) shall, in consultation with the Mutual Aid Box Alarm System ( ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[158]
[PDF] 2025 End of Session Report - Illinois Chamber of Commerce
Of the roughly 250 bills the Illinois Chamber was tracking at the onset of the 104th General. Assembly, only 31 would make it pass both houses. Below you will ...
[159]
2025 State Legislative Session Takeaways: Illinois
Aug 15, 2025 · The Illinois General Assembly will reconvene on October 14 until October 30 for a veto session.
[160]
Lawmakers 'ready to move' on transit reform, but funding agreement ...
Oct 7, 2025 · Chicago-area transit agencies face a funding shortfall in the middle of 2026 that increases substantially in 2027.Missing: mandates | Show results with:mandates
[161]
https://news.wttw.com/2025/10/22/illinois-lawmakers-head-back-springfield-transit-funding-energy-and-hemp-regulation
[162]
Preparing for Illinois Veto Session: What's in the Energy Omnibus ...
Oct 2, 2025 · Illinois veto session is scheduled for six days in October, starting on Tuesday, October 14. This short fall session is named 'veto session' ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
[163]
IL lawmakers could address energy prices, transit, taxes during veto ...
Oct 12, 2025 · (The Center Square) – The Illinois General Assembly's fall veto session begins Tuesday, and taxes are expected to be part of the ...<|separator|>
[164]
Windhorst Weekly – March 21, 2025
Mar 21, 2025 · REP. WINDHORST, HOUSE REPUBLICANS PRESENT ETHICS PROPOSALS TO CONTINUE THE FIGHT FOR REFORM SPRINGFIELD – House Republican lawmakers ...
[165]
Bill Text: IL HB2795 | 2025-2026 | 104th General Assembly - LegiScan
Amends the Illinois Governmental Ethics Act. In a provision involving ethical principles for legislators in the event of a conflict situation, defines conflict ...
[166]
Bill Text: IL SB1815 | 2025-2026 | 104th General Assembly - LegiScan
Amends the State Officials and Employees Ethics Act. Provides that an employer shall not knowingly offer employment, compensation, or fees for services to a ...
[167]
When GOP gets just 14% of state legislation, Illinois has a legislative ...
Jun 20, 2025 · 6745 bills were filed in the Illinois General Assembly this session, but only a small fraction passed both houses.
[168]
IL HJRCA0020 | 2025-2026 | 104th General Assembly - LegiScan
Sep 18, 2025 · Proposes to amend the Executive Article of the Illinois Constitution. Provides that a person may not be elected to the office of Governor ...
[169]
Amid Texas remap battle, bipartisan effort begins in Illinois to reform ...
Aug 20, 2025 · A bid to establish a ballot initiative in 2026 to reform the redistricting process for Illinois state legislative map-making has kicked off, ...
[170]
https://capitolnewsillinois.com/news/jeffries-illinois-redistricting-push-meets-cool-reception-in-springfield/
[171]
Illinois' budget on track for deficit as new federal policies create ...
Oct 10, 2025 · The governor's office now projects a $267 million deficit for the current fiscal year 2026 budget. · Corporate tax cuts enacted at the federal ...
[172]
Executive Order 2025-05 - Illinois.gov
September 23, 2025. WHEREAS, on July 4, 2025, the federal government enacted Public Law 119-21 (House Resolution 1 of the 119th Congress) (H.R. 1), ...
[173]
Pritzker directs agencies to limit spending in response ... - NPR Illinois
Sep 23, 2025 · Governor's order cites fears of slow economic growth triggered by tariffs, 'One Big Beautiful Bill'
[174]
Comprehensive Overview Of 2025 Illinois Legislative Session From ...
Jul 10, 2025 · SB 2510 (Welch/Sims) created the fiscal year (FY) 2026 budget appropriation bill. The budget is based on estimated general funds revenues of ...Missing: Assembly | Show results with:Assembly
[175]
Trump targets $2B for Chicago transit in shutdown pressure campaign
Oct 3, 2025 · GREENWIRE | The Trump administration said it's delaying $2.1 billion funding for transit projects in Chicago, and blaming it on ...
[176]
Illinois' pension debt eases, but challenges remain
Aug 21, 2025 · Illinois' pension debt shows slight improvement, but with $140B still unfunded, progress remains slow and vulnerable to market shifts and ...
[177]
[PDF] The primary driver of Chicago's unfunded liabilities today is Interest ...
Apr 13, 2025 · In addition, high rates of inflation could cause actual COLA's paid to be higher than what is assumed. Generally, the only path forward to stop ...<|separator|>
[178]
How Illinois' Spending Compares to Other States - Civic Federation
Apr 9, 2025 · A comparative analysis of state expenditures finds that Illinois allocates a larger portion of its operational expenditures to pension obligations than most ...Missing: 2024 | Show results with:2024<|separator|>
[179]
Illinois population drop, departures among worst in U.S.
Dec 29, 2023 · Illinois lost 83,839 residents who moved to other states, one of the highest rates in the U.S. and driving a 10th consecutive year of ...
[180]
IRS: Illinois loses $10 billion in income from 87000 people moving out
Jun 28, 2024 · Last year's IRS migration report found 105,000 fewer individuals, taking with them $10.6 billion. The year before that, nearly 101,000 people ...
[181]
Don't pretend Illinois is not losing population — Mark Glennon
Nov 1, 2024 · We lost a net 100,016 people in 2021, and another 107,826 in 2022 and a further loss of 32,826 people in 2023 according to those estimates, ...
[182]
Illinois still losing taxpayers to outmigration, new study shows
May 29, 2025 · A 2023 poll found that 51% of Illinois residents cited high taxes as the primary reason they'd consider leaving the state. According to the ...
[183]
2024 State of the State: Federal rescue is over, so Illinois needs ...
Feb 20, 2024 · The pandemic had an upside for Illinois state finances – infusing federal dollars as state revenues exceeded projections. Now federal aid is gone.
[184]
Illinois Forward 2026: How the state can spend responsibly
Feb 12, 2025 · That is the underlying and recurring problem with Illinois' budgets: spending outpaces revenue, even with major tax hikes. The enormous growth ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms<|separator|>
[185]
Illinois state gets less federal money than it sends - MSN
Data: Rockefeller Institute of Government; Map: Alex Fitzpatrick/Axios Illinois is one of only 13 U.S. states that sends more money to federal government ...