Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity

The Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) is a research funding office within the United States Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), tasked with sponsoring high-risk, high-payoff projects to overcome the Intelligence Community's (IC) most formidable technical obstacles. Established in 2007 as part of ODNI's post-9/11 reorganization to bolster national security through advanced science and technology, IARPA operates without direct operational responsibilities, instead focusing on visionary programs that transition innovations to IC agencies for deployment. IARPA's mission emphasizes pushing scientific frontiers in domains critical to intelligence, including artificial intelligence, machine learning for human language technologies, quantum information science, and neuroscience, with investments yielding advancements such as world-record quantum technologies and enhanced signal geolocation systems. Since inception, it has launched approximately 90 research programs, contributing to national initiatives like the BRAIN Initiative in 2013, the National Strategic Computing Initiative in 2015, and the National Quantum Initiative in 2022, while fostering capabilities in areas like biosensors and forecasting methodologies. These efforts prioritize empirical breakthroughs over incremental gains, employing temporary program managers to drive rapid, competitive innovation akin to DARPA's model but tailored to IC needs.

Establishment and Mission

Founding and Legal Basis

The Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) was established in 2007 by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) as one of the initiatives in its initial 100-day implementation plan, aimed at bolstering the Intelligence Community's technological capabilities in response to post-September 11, 2001, national security imperatives. Modeled after the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), IARPA was designed to sponsor high-risk, high-reward research tailored to intelligence needs rather than broader military applications. IARPA's formal operations began on October 1, 2007, under founding director Dr. Lisa Porter, who previously served in leadership roles at DARPA and the National Reconnaissance Office. The agency was positioned as an ODNI component to centralize advanced research efforts across intelligence disciplines, avoiding fragmented investments by individual agencies. Legally, IARPA derives its authority from the ODNI, which was created by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-458). This legislation established the Director of National Intelligence position and granted the DNI broad powers to direct, coordinate, and integrate intelligence activities, including the creation of subordinate offices like IARPA to pursue innovative technologies for national intelligence advantage. No separate enabling statute exists for IARPA itself; its establishment was an administrative action within ODNI's organizational framework, subject to annual intelligence authorization acts that fund and oversee its activities.

Core Objectives and Strategic Priorities

The of the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) is to invest in high-risk, high-payoff programs that the most formidable challenges confronting the U.S. Intelligence (IC), such as limitations in , , and . Established under the Office of the (ODNI), IARPA functions as the primary for tailored to IC needs, emphasizing breakthroughs that traditional overlook due to their and potential for . This approach draws from the Projects () model, prioritizing over incremental advancements to deliver transformative capabilities. IARPA's mandate, formalized in 2006, includes conducting cross-community research that integrates efforts across IC elements, targeting emerging technological opportunities, and generating innovations with long-term strategic impact rather than immediate operational deployment. Unlike operational entities, IARPA avoids direct technology deployment, instead focusing on seeding developments that can transition to IC agencies or broader government use through partnerships with academia, industry, and other federal sponsors. Programs are selected through open competitions that attract top global talent, ensuring only the most promising ideas—evaluated for scientific merit, feasibility, and IC relevance—receive funding, with an explicit tolerance for high failure rates in pursuit of outsized gains. Strategic priorities center on rapid adaptability to evolving threats, including advancements in , , and secure , while balancing benefits against risks such as foreign . IARPA emphasizes multidisciplinary to overcome siloed IC challenges, such as improving or enhancing technologies, and maintains a to full and open to harness diverse expertise without preconceived biases toward established paradigms. This supports ODNI's broader goals of fostering that sustains U.S. superiority, with managers granted significant to pivot based on breakthroughs or shifting priorities, as demonstrated by responses to post-2010 technological shifts like big data analytics.

Organizational Framework

Internal Structure and Operations

The Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) maintains a lean, flat organizational structure comprising approximately 50 core personnel, primarily government employees and contractors, organized into four specialized offices that align with key intelligence challenges: the Office for Anticipating Surprise, which focuses on reducing uncertainty in forecasts; the Office of Incisive Analysis, which develops tools to enhance analytical tradecraft; the Office of Safe & Secure Operations, which advances protections for intelligence activities; and the Office of Smart Collection, which aims to improve target identification and data acquisition capabilities. Each office is directed by a senior leader reporting to the IARPA Director, who oversees strategic alignment with the broader Intelligence Community (IC) under the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). This structure emphasizes agility over hierarchy, with no large in-house research laboratories; instead, IARPA relies on external performers from academia, industry, and national labs to execute funded projects. Central to IARPA's operations are its program managers (PMs), subject-matter experts recruited on fixed-term contracts typically lasting 3 to 5 years to spearhead individual research initiatives. PMs identify IC priorities, formulate program concepts, and secure approval from agency leadership before issuing Broad Agency Announcements (BAAs) to solicit proposals from potential performers. Once selected, teams are monitored through regular technical reviews, milestone evaluations, and risk assessments, with PMs empowered to pivot or terminate underperforming efforts to preserve resources for high-potential outcomes. This model fosters rapid iteration, with programs designed to transition mature technologies to IC operators via partnerships, rather than maintaining ongoing internal development. IARPA's operational tempo is driven by a commitment to high-risk, high-reward research, allocating budgets—typically $20-50 million per program—across 10-15 concurrent efforts without fixed annual appropriations dictating specific projects. Cross-office collaboration occurs through shared IC consultations, ensuring programs address interconnected challenges like forecasting accuracy or secure data processing, while internal processes prioritize empirical validation and documentation of both successes and failures to inform future solicitations. The agency's small footprint enables quick response to emerging needs, as evidenced by its ability to launch new programs within months of priority identification by ODNI or IC partners.

Leadership and Key Personnel

Dr. William Benard serves as Acting Director of IARPA, having been appointed to the position in July 2025 following the resignation of Director Rick Muller after more than a year in the role. Benard joined IARPA in May 2024 as Office Director for Collection Research, with prior expertise in distributed sensing, additive manufacturing, and related technologies. Dr. Jack acts as and also leads the of , having IARPA in 2025 after previous as a manager in the same . Dr. Alexis Truitt serves as of the of Collection , appointed in 2025, focusing on areas such as and geospatial technologies; she joined IARPA in 2022. IARPA's leadership has historically emphasized technical expertise, with past directors including Dr. Lisa Porter (founding director, formerly deputy undersecretary of defense for science and technology) and Dr. Rick Muller (sixth director, appointed April 2024, with a background in physics and national security R&D). The agency's flat organizational structure relies heavily on program managers as key personnel, who are field experts tasked with initiating and overseeing 3- to 5-year high-risk research programs aligned with Intelligence Community challenges.

Research Methodology

High-Risk, High-Payoff Paradigm

IARPA's high-risk, high-payoff paradigm centers on funding research initiatives that entail substantial technical uncertainty, with the explicit goal of yielding disruptive technologies capable of delivering an overwhelming intelligence advantage to the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC). Unlike conventional research and development efforts that favor low-risk, incremental progress, this approach deliberately pursues ambitious challenges where success could fundamentally alter intelligence collection, analysis, and operations, while acknowledging a high probability of failure. The paradigm draws inspiration from models like DARPA, emphasizing investments in "game-changing" innovations rather than sustaining existing systems. Central to the methodology is a commitment to balancing elevated risks with uncompromising technical rigor, enforced through adherence to the scientific method, rigorous peer review, and systematic evaluation of results. Program managers—exceptional experts recruited for their domain knowledge—craft solicitations that attract top performers in academia, industry, and government labs, often structuring competitions to explore parallel scientific pathways for solving IC-specific problems, such as advanced sensing or data exploitation. This competitive framework ensures only the most promising approaches advance, with milestones tied to verifiable demonstrations rather than theoretical promise. Failure is explicitly accepted as a potential outcome, provided it stems from genuine technical exploration rather than lapses in execution or oversight, thereby avoiding the conservatism that stifles breakthroughs in traditional funding environments. The prioritizes of validated technologies to IC operators over long-term institutionalization, fostering by established practices and avoiding bureaucratic entrenchment. Collaborations with IC agencies integrate operational insights early, mitigating risks through expertise while maintaining IARPA's in . This has enabled pursuits in areas like technologies and analytical tools, with measured by deployable capabilities that enhance rather than alone.

Program Solicitation and Management Processes

IARPA solicits research proposals primarily through Broad Agency Announcements (BAAs), which target challenges in intelligence analysis, collection, and processing by inviting submissions from government entities, industry, academia, and independent researchers. These announcements enable open competition for innovative concepts, with proposals submitted unclassified via the secure IARPA Distribution and Evaluation System (IDEAS) portal. The process adheres to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 for research and development contracting, incorporating independent expert panels that declare conflicts of interest and evaluate submissions on technical merit using unbiased criteria. Supplementary mechanisms, such as Requests for Information (RFIs), workshops, and prize challenges, broaden engagement prior to formal BAAs. Program management begins with term-limited — experts hired for 3-5 year tenures—who conceive initiatives by framing problems, often guided by the to establish clear, measurable objectives, milestones, and metrics in consultation with potential partners like agencies. Managers oversee awarded projects holistically, handling , , financial tracking, and performer coordination across multidisciplinary teams, while requiring monthly reports and semi-annual reviews with IARPA and external experts to mitigate risks and biases. Approximately 25% of each 's funds Testing and (T&E) teams, which develop and quantitative metrics from the outset, verify performer claims via expanded cases on dedicated testbeds, and outcomes—including failures—for . The lifecycle emphasizes phased execution, typically dividing efforts into component development (Phase 1) and system integration/prototyping (Phase 2), with continuous collaboration ensuring alignment toward technology transition. Frequent site visits, data archiving in repositories like IEEE DataPort, and peer-reviewed publications of results foster accountability and knowledge dissemination, while early partner involvement verifies assumptions and facilitates post-program adoption by operational users. This approach prioritizes high-risk, high-reward outcomes over incremental gains, accepting potential failure in pursuit of breakthroughs verifiable against predefined benchmarks.

Technology Transition and Collaboration

IARPA coordinates the transition of research results to Intelligence Community (IC) customers for operational deployment, focusing on strategies that enable integration into agency workflows without direct technology deployment by IARPA itself. Transition planning is embedded in program lifecycles, beginning with consultation among IC partners to align research on operational gaps and ending with handoffs that leverage agency expertise for scaling and adaptation. This approach has yielded outcomes such as over 1,000 peer-reviewed publications and dozens of patents since inception, which facilitate knowledge transfer and potential licensing to IC users. To ensure viability, IARPA incorporates IC transition partners from program inception, including in pitch development, success metric definition, and ongoing oversight via site visits and progress reviews. These partners, drawn from operational and research elements across agencies, provide domain-specific input to de-risk high-payoff concepts and verify alignment with real-world intelligence challenges, such as counterterrorism or forecasting accuracy. Collaboration extends beyond the IC through competitive solicitations like , which invite proposals from , , federally funded centers (FFRDCs), and other performers. is awarded based on and feasibility, enabling diverse teams—often comprising , firms, and labs—to execute projects in fields like computer , , and . IARPA's managers, approximately 20% from , 40% from , and 40% from , further integrate external perspectives into and . These partnerships emphasize cross-disciplinary input, with IARPA providing resources while performers retain under guidelines, promoting broader where permits. engagements, including pre-proposal interactions with managers, sustain and adapt to emerging scientific opportunities.

Focus Areas and Challenges

Primary Research Domains

IARPA's primary research domains encompass high-risk, high-payoff investigations tailored to Intelligence Community needs, with current program manager engagements centered on four key areas: , , , and . These domains address core challenges in , secure , predictive modeling, and biological threat detection, drawing from foundational disciplines like , physics, and to yield breakthroughs applicable to national security without direct operational implementation. Artificial intelligence research at IARPA focuses on developing robust systems for processing vast, unstructured intelligence data, including advancements in human language technology for automated speech recognition and information extraction from multilingual sources. Programs in this domain have produced over 650 peer-reviewed publications and enhanced capabilities for counterterrorism and signals intelligence by integrating AI with domain-specific knowledge to mitigate biases inherent in large-scale models. Quantum computing initiatives, spearheaded since 2009, prioritize scalable quantum hardware and algorithms to achieve computational advantages unattainable by classical systems, resulting in world-record demonstrations, more than 1,000 publications, dozens of patents, and contributions to the 2012 Nobel Prize in Physics for quantum information science. Machine learning efforts emphasize adaptive algorithms for , , and in dynamic environments, often intersecting with to refine for assessments. Synthetic biology programs explore engineered biological systems for sensing and responding to environmental threats, including rapid and bio-inspired materials, with applications in and secure . Across these domains, IARPA solicits proposals through broad announcements, and teams to technologies that to operational use, ensuring empirical validation through rigorous against real-world scenarios.

Intelligence Community-Specific Problems

The Intelligence Community (IC) grapples with the challenge of deriving timely insights from massive volumes of disparate, unreliable, and dynamic data sources, often collected under clandestine conditions where access is limited and information is subject to adversarial manipulation. This data overload, exacerbated by multimedia proliferation such as ubiquitous video feeds, hinders analysts' ability to identify actionable intelligence amid noise and deception. For instance, programs like Amon-Hen target enhancements in automated video understanding to address the IC's need for scalable analysis of visual data in operational contexts. A core IC-specific difficulty lies in evidence synthesis and reasoning for high-stakes analytic reports, where analysts must navigate incomplete datasets, cognitive biases, and the imperative to counter deliberate misinformation from state and non-state actors. Initiatives such as REASON and SILMARILS seek to mitigate these by developing tools for comprehensive evidence retrieval and logical structuring, countering the limitations of manual processes in environments demanding rapid, defensible assessments. Similarly, forecasting geopolitical events under counterfactual scenarios poses unique hurdles due to probabilistic uncertainties and historical data scarcity, as explored in programs like TEI-REX and the earlier ACE efforts, which revealed systematic errors in crowd and expert predictions for rare, high-impact occurrences. Cybersecurity challenges are amplified in the IC by the classified nature of operations, where cognitive vulnerabilities in human operators can be exploited by advanced persistent threats, and emerging AI integrations risk inadvertent data exfiltration or model compromises. The ReSCIND and FELIX programs address attacker psychology and secure AI deployment, respectively, to fortify defenses against tailored cyber intrusions that target intelligence workflows. Additionally, collection from denied or inaccessible targets—such as foreign denied areas—necessitates breakthroughs in covert sensors and biometrics, as in efforts advancing identity resolution from multimodal signatures to support counterterrorism without relying on vulnerable human sources. Quantum-enabled threats to encryption further underscore the IC's imperative for resilient computing paradigms, driving sustained investments since 2009 to preempt cryptographic disruptions.

Historical and Ongoing Programs

Early Programs (2007–2015)

IARPA initiated its in the years following its formal on , 2007, within the of the , focusing on high-risk technologies to address intelligence gaps exposed by like the 9/11 attacks. Early efforts emphasized foundational advancements in computing, signal processing, language technologies, and predictive analytics, with programs typically spanning 3-5 years and managed through competitive solicitations to academic, industry, and national lab performers. By 2015, IARPA had launched over a dozen programs, prioritizing measurable outcomes via independent testing and evaluation to ensure transitions to operational use within the Intelligence Community. In quantum and advanced , IARPA's earliest investments included the Cryptographic and Secure Qubits (CSQ) , started in 2009, which aimed to develop scalable quantum bits resistant to decoherence for secure . This was followed by the Multi-Qubit Coherent Operations (MQCO) in 2010, targeting demonstrations of quantum algorithms on hardware with at least eight qubits, achieving milestones in superconducting and trapped-ion systems that contributed to IARPA's quantum research being named magazine's Breakthrough of the Year in 2010. The Quantum Computing (QCS) , launched in 2012, built on these by seeking fault-tolerant quantum processors capable of running Shor's algorithm on integers up to 2^20, emphasizing error correction for practical applications in and . Collection-focused programs addressed challenges in remote sensing and geolocation. The High Frequency Geolocation (HFGeo) and Signal Location in Complex Environments (SLICE) programs, both initiated in 2011, developed passive radio frequency techniques to localize high-frequency signals in urban or obstructed environments, improving accuracy to within kilometers for intelligence surveillance. The Great Horned Owl (GHO) program in 2012 advanced unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) capabilities for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) by integrating wide-area motion imagery with automated target recognition to process petabyte-scale data in real-time. Analysis and anticipatory intelligence programs tackled human and data-driven forecasting. The Aggregative Contingent Estimation (ACE) program, active from 2011 to 2015, tested crowd-sourced prediction markets and superforecasters to improve accuracy on geopolitical events, outperforming traditional analysts by up to 30% in calibrated probabilities through initiatives like the Good Judgment Project. The Open Source Indicators (OSI) program, also starting in 2011, explored non-traditional data streams for early warning, successfully forecasting the 2014 Ebola outbreak via anomalies in commercial activities months before official alerts. The Sirius program in 2012 developed debiasing tools and training to mitigate cognitive errors in intelligence analysis, using virtual reality simulations to enhance decision-making under uncertainty. Language and biometrics programs supported multilingual operations. The Babel program, launched in 2011, advanced speech-to-text systems for low-resource languages, achieving word error rates below 10% in dialects with limited training data through unsupervised learning techniques. The Security and Privacy Assurance Research (SPAR) program in 2011 extended prior Automatic Privacy Protection efforts to automate differential privacy in data analysis pipelines, enabling secure sharing of sensitive intelligence datasets. By 2014, the Janus program improved facial recognition across pose, illumination, and occlusion variations, boosting matching accuracy in uncontrolled environments for identity resolution. These initiatives laid groundwork for later transitions, with several technologies adopted by agencies like the CIA and NSA for operational enhancements.

Mid-Period Initiatives (2016–2020)

During this , IARPA initiated several programs emphasizing human-machine systems for , for and , and early efforts in and technologies. The (), with proposals in , aimed to develop and integrated human-machine systems for improving geopolitical accuracy by combining crowd-sourced judgments with algorithmic models. This built on tournaments, seeking to outperform standalone methods through iterative loops and techniques, with tournaments commencing in early 2018. In 2017, IARPA launched the Crowdsourcing Evidence, Argumentation, Thinking and Evaluation (CREATE) program to enhance analytic reasoning via crowdsourced methods and structured techniques, targeting improvements in evidence evaluation and argument construction for intelligence analysis. Concurrently, the Robustness of Automatic Language Tools in Operational Settings for Information Extraction in Any Language (MATERIAL), started in October 2017, focused on automating low-resource language processing to extract entities, relations, and events from noisy, multilingual texts, addressing gaps in automated intelligence tools for diverse operational environments. The Reconnaissance Awareness and Visualization Engineering Network (RAVEN), initiated in 2016, pursued nanoscale imaging tools to enable three-dimensional mapping of integrated circuits for reverse engineering and supply chain risk assessment in semiconductors. By 2018–2019, attention shifted toward securing emerging AI technologies. The Secure, Assured, Intelligent Learning Systems (SAILS) program, announced in December 2018, sought verifiable AI models resistant to adversarial perturbations while maintaining performance, with proposers' days held in early 2019 to solicit robust learning frameworks. Complementing this, the Trojans in Artificial Intelligence (TrojAI) program, launched in 2019, developed detection methods for backdoors and trojans embedded in AI models during training, aiming to safeguard intelligence applications from supply-chain vulnerabilities; evaluations began in 2020. In September 2019, the Machine Intelligence from Storage Technologies (MIST) program commenced to create energy-efficient, high-density storage media incorporating compute-in-memory paradigms, targeting terabyte-scale archival for intelligence data handling. These initiatives reflected IARPA's strategy of funding performer teams to prototype solutions within 3–5 years, prioritizing empirical validation over incremental gains.

Recent and Active Programs (2021–Present)

Since 2021, IARPA has launched several programs targeting advancements in artificial intelligence hardware, biological threat detection, radiation exposure assessment, and data processing architectures to address intelligence community challenges in data volume, biosecurity, and computational efficiency. These initiatives emphasize high-risk innovations with potential for rapid transition to operational use, often through broad agency announcements (BAAs) and multidisciplinary collaborations. The Advanced Graphic Intelligence Logical Computing Environment (AGILE) program, with its BAA released on November 29, 2021, and formal launch in 2022, focuses on developing energy-efficient, reliable computer architectures capable of handling large-scale, dynamic data streams for intelligence analysis. AGILE seeks to rethink system-level mechanisms for processing, accessing, storing, and moving unfiltered data, incorporating intelligent hardware-software co-design to support data-intensive applications in the intelligence community and Department of Defense. As of 2023, the program continues to advance prototypes emphasizing reduced power consumption and enhanced scalability for real-time analytics. In biosurveillance, the Finding Engineering-Linked Indicators (FELIX) program, detailed in a May 2021 overview, aims to detect signatures of genetic engineering in biological samples using computational and experimental tools to reduce sample-to-answer times from weeks to hours. FELIX has developed portable nanopore sequencing methods and algorithms to identify engineered DNA, contributing to intelligence assessments such as the 2021 evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 origins by distinguishing natural from synthetic modifications. The program remains active, with evaluations ongoing into 2023 for environmental and biosecurity applications. The Targeted Evaluation of Ionizing Radiation Exposure (TEI-REX) program, announced via a Proposers' Day on September 29, 2021, and formally launched in October 2022, develops non-invasive techniques to assess low-dose radiation exposure using biological materials such as hair, nails, skin, sweat, and saliva. TEI-REX targets retrospective dosimetry for intelligence scenarios involving nuclear threats, with Phase 2 awards issued in September 2024 totaling $3.8 million to performers like Signature Science for advancing biodosimetry models. The effort continues to refine capabilities for rapid, field-deployable evaluation without invasive procedures. The Microelectronics for Edge Efficient Artificial Intelligence (MicroE4AI) program, initiated around May 2022, drives co-design of hardware, software, and algorithms to enhance AI and machine learning performance at the edge, focusing on low-power, resilient computing for resource-constrained environments. MicroE4AI addresses intelligence needs for faster inference and training on devices with limited energy, incorporating innovations in microelectronics to support national security applications. As of 2024, it sustains efforts in algorithm-architecture optimization for deployable AI systems. Emerging initiatives include the , set to begin in 2025 as a two-year effort to quantify and mitigate vulnerabilities in large models (LLMs) against adversarial threats. Additionally, the Speech () , announced in 2024, pursues anonymization techniques for conversational speech to protect speaker identities in intelligence operations. These build on IARPA's of high-payoff for scalability.

Achievements and National Security Impacts

Technological Transitions and Deployments

IARPA facilitates the transition of research outcomes from its programs to operational use within the () by developing technology transition plans typically during the second or third year of a program's lifecycle, involving IC partners from the outset to align with practical needs. This approach ensures that potential end-users, such as of the CIA, NSA, or other IC components, participate in program and , increasing the likelihood of without IARPA directly deploying technologies. A dedicated Chief of Technology Transition oversees these efforts, focusing on bridging the gap between experimental prototypes and field-ready capabilities. Approximately 70% of IARPA programs that reach beyond their midpoint achieve at least one technology transition to an IC agency, reflecting a structured emphasis on applicability over pure research. Transitions often involve handing off matured prototypes, algorithms, or methodologies to IC sponsors for integration into existing systems, such as signals intelligence tools or analytic platforms, though details remain classified due to the sensitive nature of IC operations. For example, advancements in high-frequency signal geolocation from the HFGeo program have enhanced ionospheric modeling and receiver technologies, enabling more precise location tracking that supports IC geospatial intelligence missions. In the domain of artificial intelligence security, the TrojAI program has produced detection technologies for identifying Trojan attacks—malicious backdoors embedded in AI models—yielding over 100 peer-reviewed publications and datasets that underpin ongoing IC defenses against adversarial AI threats, with explicit plans for operational integration. Similarly, behavioral analysis tools from programs like those exploring human actions via AI have prioritized transition strategies, incorporating IC feedback to refine models for real-world surveillance and anomaly detection applications. These efforts underscore IARPA's model of high-risk research yielding deployable assets, though success metrics are gauged internally via IC adoption rather than public benchmarks, given national security constraints.

Empirical Breakthroughs and Metrics of Success

The Aggregative Contingent Estimation (ACE) program (2011–2015) provided one of the most empirically validated breakthroughs in intelligence forecasting, demonstrating that structured aggregation of probabilistic judgments from non-expert "superforecasters" yielded 30–70% higher accuracy than U.S. intelligence analysts and competing research teams across thousands of geopolitical questions. Superforecasters, selected via iterative performance screening, routinely ranked in the top 2% of participants by using techniques such as frequent small belief updates, quantitative modeling, and team deliberation, outperforming baselines by metrics like Brier scores on event resolutions ranging from months to years ahead. These results, derived from over 500,000 forecasts, established causal links between practices like probabilistic thinking and accuracy gains, influencing subsequent Intelligence Community adoption of crowd-based prediction platforms. In machine learning and pattern recognition, the Machine Intelligence from Cortical Networks (MICrONS) program (2014–2019) delivered neuroscience-inspired algorithms that enhanced object recognition robustness, achieving superior performance on image classification tasks under high noise levels compared to conventional deep learning baselines, as measured by error rates in controlled benchmarks. Performers reconstructed neural connectomes from electron microscopy data, enabling models that generalized better to adversarial or degraded inputs, with quantifiable improvements in metrics like top-1 accuracy on distorted ImageNet variants. The Trojan Detection Challenge (TEI-REX) program advanced AI cybersecurity by developing detection methods for backdoored models, resulting in over 100 peer-reviewed publications and tools that identified vulnerabilities in large-scale neural networks with precision rates exceeding 90% in blinded tests against synthetic and real trojans as of February 2025. Success metrics included false positive rates below 1% and scalability to models with billions of parameters, providing empirical evidence of defenses against supply-chain attacks in intelligence-relevant AI systems. Programs like (CAT, 2009–2014) achieved breakthroughs in , non-destructive and from integrated circuits with up to 13 metal layers, reducing time from weeks to hours and improving metrics for fault by factors of 10x over state-of-the-art tools. These advancements, validated through inter-team competitions and trials, supported needs for dissecting foreign without physical delayering. Overall, IARPA's metrics emphasize transitions to operational use, with approximately 20% of programs yielding deployed technologies by predefined end-goal assessments, though remains due to .

Broader Contributions to U.S. Intelligence Superiority

IARPA's high-risk, high-reward research model has advanced U.S. intelligence superiority by delivering foundational technologies that enhance the ability to anticipate threats, collect and analyze , and compute at unprecedented scales, thereby providing decision-makers with asymmetric advantages over adversaries. Unlike operational agencies, IARPA focuses on transitioning innovations to IC partners, with approximately 70% of programs beyond achieving at least one to an intelligence agency, enabling rapid integration into operations. This approach counters emerging challenges from near-peer competitors by prioritizing disruptive breakthroughs in areas like and biointelligence, where U.S. is essential to maintain an overwhelming . In quantum technologies, IARPA has pioneered developments since 2009, producing world-record computing demonstrations, over 1,000 publications, dozens of patents, and contributing to the 2012 Nobel Prize in Physics for quantum information science, which bolsters secure communications and computational superiority critical for intelligence processing. Biometric programs have set benchmarks for identity resolution, dramatically improving speed and accuracy in counterterrorism, infrastructure protection, and border security applications, allowing the IC to resolve identities from vast datasets more effectively than legacy systems. Forecasting initiatives, such as the Aggregative Contingent Estimation (ACE) program, have generated millions of predictions and established "superforecasting" methodologies, enhancing anticipatory intelligence by outperforming traditional analysis in accuracy and reducing uncertainty in geopolitical assessments. Similarly, human language technology efforts have advanced AI and machine learning for speech recognition and foreign language processing, yielding over 650 publications and transforming the analysis of non-English intelligence sources, thereby expanding the IC's access to global data streams. These contributions extend to collection and domains, where programs integrate multi-source for higher reliability and , fostering among analysts through transparent reasoning and tracking, which collectively fortify U.S. superiority against dynamic threats like cyberattacks and biological risks. By coordinating with IC partners from inception, IARPA ensures these innovations to operational , sustaining America's preeminence amid accelerating technological .

Assessments and Debates

Independent Evaluations and Performance Metrics

IARPA programs incorporate rigorous, predefined performance metrics as a core element of their design, with evaluations conducted to assess performer outcomes against these benchmarks from inception through completion. Metrics are established early to ensure objective measurement of technical progress and goal achievement, serving as key performance indicators in research contracts. Independent test and evaluation (T&E) teams often verify results, as seen in the AGILE program, where designs are validated against target metrics using separate simulation environments like A-SST and Firesim to confirm compliance independently of performer claims. Program-specific metrics emphasize quantifiable advancements tailored to intelligence challenges, such as unweighted (UAR) of 0.48 for audio in the or balanced quality assessments for and in WRIVA. In REASON, metrics evaluate in reasoning tasks, with supplemental IARPA-led assessments possible to deliverables beyond benchmarks. These evaluations prioritize empirical validation, including testing on withheld , as in the where algorithms were scored via CSV outputs on outcome-free test sets to prevent . Success is determined by meeting or exceeding metrics, facilitating transitions to operational use; for instance, RESILIENCE employs progressively challenging technical metrics across phases to benchmark resilience enhancements. While primarily internal, these processes draw on independent verification to mitigate bias, though external audits like those from oversight bodies remain limited in public documentation, reflecting IARPA's focus on classified intelligence applications. Overall, metric-driven evaluations underscore IARPA's commitment to high-risk, high-reward research with verifiable outcomes.

Criticisms, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations

IARPA's adoption of a high-risk, high-payoff research model, modeled after DARPA, necessitates acceptance of frequent program failures as a byproduct of pursuing breakthrough innovations for intelligence challenges. Agency guidelines explicitly encourage program managers to embrace such risks without compromising scientific integrity, viewing them as opportunities to generate enduring datasets and lessons for future efforts even when primary objectives are not met. This approach, while enabling potential transformative impacts, poses challenges in resource allocation and stakeholder buy-in, as federal budget constraints—exacerbated by proposed cuts to research funding—threaten sustained investment in such uncertain endeavors. Transitioning experimental technologies to operational use within the Intelligence Community remains a persistent hurdle, with IARPA dedicating approximately 25% of program budgets to independent testing and evaluation to mitigate this gap. Critics of analogous ARPA-style agencies argue that the rarity of verifiable successes may not always justify the cumulative failures, particularly when metrics of effectiveness are obscured by classification. Public criticisms of IARPA specifically are limited, attributable in part to its emphasis on unclassified research outputs and integration within the , which imposes oversight but may introduce bureaucratic delays compared to more autonomous entities. Ethical considerations in IARPA programs center on human subjects research and the dual-use implications of intelligence technologies, with all proposals required to outline protocols for recruitment, informed consent, and data handling compliant with federal standards like Department of Defense Directive 3216.02. These align with core principles of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice, enforced through Institutional Review Boards to prevent harm. In AI-driven initiatives, broader concerns arise from potential privacy erosions via mass data collection and processing for surveillance or analysis, including risks of algorithmic opacity ("black box" issues) and unintended biases that could amplify errors in intelligence assessments. IARPA mitigates these through targeted programs like the Security and Privacy Assurance Research (SPAR) pilot, which evaluates tools for safeguarding data in intelligence contexts, and HIATUS, aimed at anonymizing authorship to protect identities. Nonetheless, the application of such technologies in national security raises ongoing debates about balancing security gains against civil liberties, particularly when open-source intelligence aggregation scales to population-level surveillance without explicit consent.

Future Directions and Strategic Adaptations

IARPA's future research trajectory emphasizes high-risk, high-reward initiatives addressing evolving threats, particularly in vulnerabilities, , and advanced . The super-seedling , launched in 2025 as a two-year effort, threats and vulnerabilities in large models (LLMs), aiming to quantify and mitigate risks such as adversarial attacks and that could . Similarly, the Endless Generative Waveforms (End-Gen) , with a Announcement issued on August 12, 2025, seeks novel methods for generating arbitrary waveforms to enhance signals capabilities against sophisticated denial techniques. These reflect a strategic pivot toward countering generative AI's dual-use potential, where unchecked adoption could expose classified , as highlighted in IARPA's planned expansions in AI cybersecurity research announced in April 2025. Adaptations to biosecurity imperatives are evident in initiatives like B24IC, a 24-month super-seedling program concluding in May 2025, which pursues breakthroughs in biointelligence to detect and respond to engineered biological threats amid rising global risks from synthetic biology. The Anonymous Real-Time Speech (ARTS) program further adapts privacy-preserving technologies for intelligence operations, developing methods to anonymize conversational speech and protect speaker identities in real-time surveillance contexts. These efforts underscore IARPA's response to geopolitical pressures, including adversaries' advances in AI and biotechnology, by prioritizing scalable, transition-ready prototypes that integrate with existing intelligence infrastructure without relying on outdated assumptions of technological superiority. Broader strategic adaptations involve fostering interdisciplinary , such as combining quantum technologies with for resilient , as seen in ongoing extensions of programs like for superconducting systems to address power constraints in data-intensive tasks. IARPA's model of short-duration, performer-competitive programs enables , with proposers' days like End-Gen's on , 2025, facilitating agile sourcing of innovations from and . This approach counters criticisms of bureaucratic in federal R&D by enforcing milestones and empirical validation, ensuring with priorities over incremental gains. Future emphasis on ethical safeguards in deployment, without compromising operational , positions IARPA to sustain U.S. edges amid accelerating technological races.

References

  1. [1]
    Our Mission - IARPA
    IARPA mission is to invest in high-risk/high-payoff research to tackle some of the Intelligence Community's (IC) most difficult challenges.
  2. [2]
    History - IARPA
    IARPA mission is to invest in high-risk/high-payoff research to tackle some of the Intelligence Community's (IC) most difficult challenges.Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  3. [3]
    Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity - DNI.gov
    IARPA does not have an operational mission and does not deploy technologies directly to the field. IARPA is capable of quickly responding to new priorities, ...
  4. [4]
    About IARPA
    IARPA's mission is to push the boundaries of science to develop solutions that empower the IC to do its work better and more efficiently for national security.
  5. [5]
    Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity - DNI.gov
    IARPA Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity tackles some of the most difficult challenges across the intelligence agencies and disciplines.
  6. [6]
    About - DNI.gov
    The Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity invests in high-risk/high-payoff research to provide the U.S. with an overwhelming intelligence advantage.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] HIGH-RISK HIGH-PAYOFF RESEARCH - IARPA
    Bring the best minds to bear on our problems. • Full and open competition to the greatest possible extent. • Only the best ideas are pursued, and only the.Missing: core objectives priorities
  8. [8]
    Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity - What We Do
    The goal of the programs in this office is to characterize and reduce uncertainty through anticipatory intelligence, developing new capabilities to deliver ...
  9. [9]
    Leadership - IARPA
    Dr. William Benard, Acting Director of IARPA · Dr. Jack Cooper, Acting Deputy Director of IARPA · Dr. Alexis Truitt, Acting Director of Collection Research.Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  10. [10]
    Who We Are - IARPA
    The Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity's (IARPA) mission is to invest in high-risk/high-payoff research to tackle some of the Intelligence ...
  11. [11]
    Program Managers - IARPA
    IARPA Program Managers are experts in their fields of research who bring imagination and dedication to challenges facing the Intelligence Community (IC).
  12. [12]
    The Person in Charge of Testing Tech for US Spies Has Resigned
    Jul 3, 2025 · IARPA director Rick Muller is departing after just over a year at the R&D unit that invests in emerging technologies of potential interest ...<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Dr. William Benard, IARPA - NY Creates
    William Benard joined IARPA in 2024 as the Office Director for Collection Research. His research interests range from distributed sensing to additive ...
  14. [14]
    Our People - IARPA
    Lisa Porter, to our sixth director, Dr. Rick Muller, our leadership is steeped in technology. Dr. Porter, who served as deputy undersecretary of defense for ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
  15. [15]
    DNI Haines Welcomes Dr. Richard Muller as IARPA Director - DNI.gov
    Apr 17, 2024 · I am excited to welcome Dr. Richard 'Rick' Muller as the Director of the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA).Missing: current | Show results with:current
  16. [16]
    IARPA: The Spooks' Magic Shop - Grey Dynamics
    In 2006, IARPA was created to address intelligence community needs. Similarly, Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy (ARPA-E) was launched in 2009 to ...
  17. [17]
    IARPA - Intelligence Advanced Research projects Activity - Office of ...
    IARPA invests in research programs to tackle some of the Intelligence Community's (IC) most difficult challenges.Research ProgramsAbout IARPAWho We AreContactOpen BAAs
  18. [18]
    Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity - DNI.gov
    IARPA is committed to technical excellence and technical truth and insists that technical risk be accompanied by technical rigor. The scientific method and peer ...Missing: paradigm | Show results with:paradigm
  19. [19]
    Open BAAs - IARPA
    Broad Agency Announcements (BAAs) solicit research proposals for specific programs. Learn more about current BAA opportunities and ways to get involved here.
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) Gold ...
    Aug 22, 2025 · Figure 1: IARPA Program Development Lifecycle, showing the steps that IARPA programs take during the development and execution cycles to ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] N66001-22-S-4705 - IARPA
    Jul 5, 2022 · The solicitation process will follow Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35, Research and Development Contracting, as supplemented with ...
  22. [22]
    None
    ### Summary of IARPA Program Lifecycle from MAEGLIN Case Study
  23. [23]
    A Day in the Life of a PM - IARPA
    The PM Role. IARPA Program Managers develop new concepts to address an IC (Intelligence Community) problem, then manage the research from start to finish.
  24. [24]
    Research Programs - IARPA
    IARPA sponsors cutting-edge research on a broad range of subjects to benefit and support the Intelligence Community.IARPA Menu · Research and Technology... · Office of Collection · B24ICMissing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  25. [25]
    14. IARPA: A Modified DARPA Innovation Model
    Program managers must nurture and pitch their proposed programs and the director and deputy director then move quickly to approve such new programs for funding.<|control11|><|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Advanced Research Projects Agencies (ARPAs)
    May 14, 2025 · Founded in response to 9/11, IARPA funds cutting-edge research to support US intelligence capabilities, including for counterterrorism, critical ...
  27. [27]
    IARPA embraces Intelligence Community's toughest challenges
    May 9, 2017 · One of the challenges IARPA is currently tackling involves analyzing video. Recording video has never been easier, thanks to modern technology. ...
  28. [28]
    REASON - IARPA
    REASON aims to develop novel technologies that will enable intelligence analysts to substantially improve the evidence and reasoning in draft analytic reports.Missing: strategic | Show results with:strategic
  29. [29]
    ReSCIND - IARPA
    To support and protect the IC mission, the ReSCIND program's objectives are to: 1) identify cognitive vulnerabilities or limitations relevant to cyber attack ...Missing: issues | Show results with:issues
  30. [30]
    IARPA looks to next round of AI cybersecurity research
    Apr 23, 2025 · IARPA Director Rick Muller said LLMs will be a major focus area for the next program. “What we want to be able to do is understand in the next ...
  31. [31]
    ELQ - IARPA
    IARPA's leading role in quantum computing is built on its programs, namely CSQ (2009-14), MQCO (2010-15), QCS (2012-14), QEO (2017-21), LogiQ (2016-present) and ...
  32. [32]
    IARPA Releases Research Report on Security and Privacy Assurance
    IARPA started the SPAR Program in 2011, building on the past IARPA Automatic Privacy Protection (APP) Program.
  33. [33]
    HFC - IARPA
    The HFC program developed and tested hybrid geopolitical forecasting systems, which integrated human and machine forecasting components.
  34. [34]
    Cultivate Forecasts - Prediction Markets & Crowdsourced Forecasting
    In early 2018, the HFC Tournament will officially begin: you will be assigned to an HFC research team forecasting system and contribute forecast inputs for ...
  35. [35]
    CREATE - IARPA
    The CREATE program developed tools and methods designed to improve analytic reasoning through the use of crowdsourcing and structured analytic techniques.Missing: processes | Show results with:processes
  36. [36]
    MATERIAL - IARPA
    Launched in October 2017, The MATERIAL program is a 47-month venture seeking to address this challenge by building robust, automated language capabilities ...
  37. [37]
    RAVEN - IARPA
    The RAVEN program launched in 2016 and its objective is to develop prototype tools for acquiring images from all layers in a 1 cm2 area of a 10 nm ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] The National Artificial Intelligence Research and Development ...
    Jun 21, 2019 · independent agency review, informed this update to the Strategic Plan. In this Strategic Plan, eight strategic priorities have been identified.
  39. [39]
    MIST - IARPA
    The MIST program launched in September 2019 to deliver a new category of resource-efficient storage technologies to the IC. At the conclusion of this 4-year ...
  40. [40]
    AGILE - IARPA
    The AGILE program seeks innovative, energy-efficient, and reliable computer architectures that can address the Intelligence Community's large-scale ...
  41. [41]
    AGILE BAA Release - IARPA
    Nov 29, 2021 · The primary focus of this program, Advanced Graphic Intelligence Logical computing Environment (AGILE), is the development of new system-level ...
  42. [42]
    Making Data Analysis More AGILE - IARPA
    Apr 28, 2023 · AGILE's goal is to create computer architectures that can handle the IC and DoD's large-scale data-analytic applications and other classes of data-intensive ...
  43. [43]
    FELIX - IARPA
    Accomplishments · Proof-of-concept living biosensors to detect engineering markers · Detection of engineering signatures at the single-cell level · Detection of ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] felix - IARPA
    May 25, 2021 · FELIX aims to make it easy to detect engineering signatures in arbitrary biological samples and reduce sample-to-answer times from weeks to ...
  45. [45]
    Biointelligence and National Security in the 21st Century - IARPA
    Oct 12, 2022 · This includes the Finding Engineering Linked Indicators (FELIX) program, which contributed to the first IC public statement that the SARS-CoV-2
  46. [46]
    TEI-REX - IARPA
    The TEI-REX program aims to establish non-invasive capabilities to evaluate low-dose exposure events through the evaluation of biological materials.Missing: active present
  47. [47]
    IARPA launches TEI-REX program - Intelligence Community News
    Oct 3, 2022 · On September 30, the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA), the research and development arm of the Office of the ...
  48. [48]
    IARPA Awards Signature Science $3.8M for Phase 2 of TEI-REX ...
    Sep 3, 2024 · IARPA Awards Signature Science $3.8M for Phase 2 of TEI-REX Program ... AUSTIN, TEXAS – September 3, 2024 – The Intelligence Advanced Research ...
  49. [49]
    MicroE4AI - IARPA
    The MicroE4AI program aims to drive innovations in hardware/ software and algorithm-architecture that improve the performance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) ...
  50. [50]
    MicroE4AI: AI 2.0 - IARPA
    May 19, 2022 · MicroE4AI's goal is to drive innovations in hardware/software and algorithm-architecture to improve the performance of AI and ML applications by ...
  51. [51]
    BENGAL - IARPA
    The BENGAL super seedling program is a two-year effort beginning in 2025 that aims to explore, quantify, and mitigate the threats and vulnerabilities of LLMs ( ...Missing: active | Show results with:active
  52. [52]
    IARPA Developing New Methods to Anonymize Speech - DNI.gov
    The goal of the ODNI Freedom of Information Act / Privacy Act Office ... Through a competitive Broad Agency Announcement, IARPA awarded ARTS research ...
  53. [53]
    IARPA: Disbelief to Doubt
    The IARPA: Disbelief to Doubt podcast explores the history and accomplishments of the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA)
  54. [54]
    [PDF] HFGeo - IARPA
    HFGeo improved HF signal geolocation by advancing the state of the art in three areas: (1) ionospheric modeling, prediction, and characterization methods; (2) ...
  55. [55]
    Intelligence Community AI Cybersecurity Program Achieves ... - IARPA
    Feb 26, 2025 · An Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) program aimed at protecting artificial intelligence (AI) systems from Trojan attacks ...Missing: success stories
  56. [56]
    IARPA's Artificial Intelligence Analyzes Behaviors
    May 1, 2022 · “We have technology transition plans in place, and that's something that we prioritize for any IARPA program,” Cooper says. “We have ...
  57. [57]
    The Superforecasters' Track Record - Good Judgment
    Superforecasters beat all competing research teams in the IARPA ACE tournament by 35-72%. Learn more » · US intelligence analysts. Good Judgment was over 30 ...
  58. [58]
    Evidence on good forecasting practices from the Good Judgment ...
    The Good Judgment Project (GJP) was the winning team in IARPA's 2011-2015 forecasting tournament. In the tournament, six teams assigned probabilistic ...<|separator|>
  59. [59]
    Superforecasters: Still Crème de la Crème Six Years On
    During the IARPA tournament, Superforecasters routinely placed in the top 2% of accuracy among their peers and were a winning component of the experimental ...
  60. [60]
    Small steps to accuracy: Incremental belief updaters are better ...
    In our core tests of forecasters working independently, we showed that small, frequent updates were strongly and robustly associated with greater accuracy.
  61. [61]
    Our Programs - IARPA
    IARPA has introduced approximately 90 research programs in diverse areas, including quantum computing, neuroscience, cognitive psychology, sociology, power ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  62. [62]
    MICrONS - IARPA
    IARPA awards $18.7M contract to Allen Institute to reconstruct neuronal connections · US Bets $100 Million on Machines That Think More Like Humans · Unlocking ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  63. [63]
    IARPA Research Achieves the Impossible in New Breakthrough ...
    Apr 14, 2025 · New research by IARPA has achieved the "impossible," providing the most detailed map of brain activity to date.
  64. [64]
    An IARPA Success Story—The Circuit Analysis Tools Program
    Aug 1, 2015 · Our guest columnist, IARPA Program Manager, Carl E. McCants, provides a summary of what the participating teams accomplished. Circuit Analysis ...
  65. [65]
    CAT - IARPA
    The program is divided into four thrust areas: circuit edit, fault isolation, logic analysis, and fast imaging, with each area having some goals associated with ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  66. [66]
    Biointelligence and National Security in the 21st Century
    Oct 11, 2022 · IARPA is leading the charge to ensure that the United States maintains its technical advantage in biointelligence over near-peer adversaries.
  67. [67]
    Landscape Recognition System Sought by US Intelligence
    IARPA, as way of background, "... invests in high-risk/high-payoff research programs that have the potential to provide our [US] nation with an overwhelming ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Computing Environment (AGILE) - IARPA
    Sep 6, 2022 · Create innovative computer architectures and designs that overcome the current and future data-analytics technical challenges. ▫ The program ...Missing: Projects | Show results with:Projects
  69. [69]
    [PDF] usin - IARPA
    Jun 23, 2023 · Figure 1 The ARTS program will simultaneously address six dimensions: three TAs for anonymity and competing forces of three areas of utility.
  70. [70]
    [PDF] section 1 - IARPA
    The ultimate goal of WRIVA is to deliver an end-to-end site modelling system capable of creating a seamless, navigable, photorealistic site model in scenarios ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] SECTION 1: OPPORTUNITY DESCRIPTION - IARPA
    1.F Program Metrics​​ Achievement of metrics is a performance indicator under IARPA research contracts. IARPA has defined REASON program metrics to evaluate ...
  72. [72]
    Case Study - INSTINCT challenge
    In addition, as this was IARPA's first challenge, it sought to engage new people and communities with the organization's problem-solving opportunities and ...
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Section 1. Opportunity Description - IARPA
    The Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) often selects its research efforts through the Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) process. The use ...
  74. [74]
    [PDF] How Advanced Research Project Agencies Pick Their Programs
    Dec 3, 2024 · To this list, IARPA and ARPA-H have offered additional questions focused on the risk posed by the potential success of their research programs ...
  75. [75]
    Disbelief to Doubt - High-Risk/High-Payoff Part 1 - IARPA
    IARPA invests in high-risk, high-payoff research with the goal of providing our nation with an overwhelming intelligence advantage.
  76. [76]
    Federal budget cuts threaten to decimate America's AI superiority ...
    Feb 26, 2025 · The ongoing policy debate about cuts to federal research spending has largely ignored how such cuts threaten to devastate America's ...
  77. [77]
    [PDF] Promises and Challenges of the “ARPA Model” - MIT Sloan
    For a program that makes long‑ term and high‑ risk investments, many failures can be justified by a single suc‑ cess. The rare nature of transformational ...<|separator|>
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Technical Description of the Reimagining Security with ... - IARPA
    There is a vast amount of cognitive and behavioral science research that can be applied to cybersecurity to improve defensive posture. The ReSCIND program aims ...
  79. [79]
    [PDF] TRUST Proposers' Day Briefing IARPA-BAA-10-03 Overview
    others who are trustworthy, the IARPA TRUST program seeks to develop tools that can validate, detect, and assess such signals of trustworthiness. ▻ The TRUST ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  80. [80]
    ethical problems of 'intelligence–AI' - Oxford Academic
    Nov 4, 2024 · Ethical issues include mass collection of open-source data, privacy violations from cross-referencing, the "black box" problem, and the lack of ...
  81. [81]
    HIATUS: Identification and Privacy Fight it Out - IARPA
    Oct 4, 2022 · HIATUS will work to develop authorship privacy technology that will protect an author's identity by changing their words and/or writing style.
  82. [82]
    Article - IARPA
    End-Gen BAA. August 12, 2025. End-Gen BAA End-Gen proposes a program seeking to develop novel methods of arbitrary generative waveforms, enabling the ...Missing: future | Show results with:future
  83. [83]
    B24IC - IARPA
    B24IC is a 24-month long super-seedling program with a May 2025 end date. Related Article(s). IARPA Pursuing Breakthrough Biointelligence and Biosecurity ...Missing: future | Show results with:future
  84. [84]
    C3 - IARPA
    The C3 Program will address these challenges with the goal of establishing superconducting computing as a long-term solution to the power- cooling problem.
  85. [85]
    Endless Generative Waveforms (End-Gen) Proposers' Day - SAM.gov
    Jan 28, 2025 · The IARPA Endless Generative Waveforms (End-Gen) Proposers' Day meeting will be held on Thursday, 27 February 2025, from 9:30 am to 4:30 pm EST in Arlington, ...Missing: SAILS | Show results with:SAILS