Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Microbial corrosion

Microbial corrosion, also known as microbially influenced corrosion (MIC) or microbially induced corrosion, is the deterioration of metals and alloys caused by the metabolic activities of microorganisms, such as bacteria, fungi, and algae, which form biofilms on material surfaces and accelerate electrochemical corrosion processes.^[1] These microorganisms alter the local environment at the metal interface by producing corrosive byproducts like hydrogen sulfide (H₂S), sulfuric acid, and organic acids, or by creating differential aeration cells within biofilms that promote localized pitting and crevice corrosion.^[2] MIC has been recognized since the 1830s, initially linked to iron-oxidizing bacteria, and remains a significant challenge in industries due to its insidious nature, often resulting in unexpected failures of corrosion-resistant materials like stainless steels and nickel alloys.^[3] The primary mechanisms of microbial corrosion involve both direct and indirect microbial actions. Direct mechanisms include the microbial use of metals as electron donors in metabolic processes, such as sulfate-reducing bacteria removing hydrogen from cathodic sites, while indirect mechanisms encompass the generation of aggressive metabolites that lower pH or increase ion concentrations, thereby enhancing anodic and cathodic reactions.^[1] Biofilms, consisting of microbial communities embedded in extracellular polymeric substances, create microenvironments with steep chemical gradients—such as oxygen depletion and sulfide enrichment—that drive localized corrosion rates far exceeding those of abiotic processes.^[2] Key microorganisms implicated include sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) like Desulfovibrio species, which thrive in anaerobic conditions and produce H₂S to facilitate sulfide-induced pitting; iron- and manganese-oxidizing bacteria that deposit tubercules promoting under-deposit corrosion; and acid-producing bacteria such as Thiobacillus that generate sulfuric acid through sulfur oxidation.^[1] These activities are particularly prevalent in aqueous environments with temperatures between 25–60°C and nutrient availability.^[2] MIC occurs in diverse settings, including marine structures, oil and gas pipelines, cooling water systems, and nuclear waste repositories, where it accounts for up to 20–50% of total corrosion-related failures.^[3] Economically, it imposes substantial costs, estimated at over $100 billion annually in the United States as of the 2020s, representing about 20% of total corrosion costs.^[4] In marine environments, for instance, SRB and iron-oxidizers contribute to rapid degradation of ship hulls and offshore platforms, while in power generation, biofilms in cooling towers exacerbate scaling and pitting.^[3] Mitigation strategies focus on preventing biofilm formation through biocides, cathodic protection, and material coatings, though challenges persist due to microbial adaptability and the need for long-term testing to assess MIC susceptibility; recent research as of 2025 highlights advances like microbial extracellular polymeric substances for corrosion inhibition and improved understanding of direct electron transfer mechanisms.^[1]^[5]

Fundamentals

Definition and Overview

Microbial corrosion, also known as microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC), is defined as the deterioration of materials, primarily metals and concrete, resulting from the presence or activity of microorganisms that alter the electrochemical environment at the material surface.^[6] This process involves microbes forming biofilms on surfaces and producing metabolic byproducts such as acids and sulfides, which accelerate existing corrosion mechanisms like pitting and stress cracking.^[6] For instance, sulfate-reducing bacteria, key components of biofilms that produce corrosive hydrogen sulfide in anaerobic zones, contribute to these effects, though detailed mechanisms are complex.^[7] Unlike abiotic corrosion, which relies solely on chemical or physical reactions with the environment, MIC occurs through indirect mechanisms where microorganisms act as catalysts rather than direct corroders, modifying local conditions like pH, oxygen levels, and ion concentrations to enhance material degradation.^[8] This catalytic role distinguishes MIC by integrating biological activity into traditionally non-biological electrochemical processes, often leading to localized damage that is harder to predict and mitigate.^[6] The global economic impact of MIC is substantial, with estimates attributing approximately 20% of total corrosion costs—around $500 billion annually—to microbial activity, particularly in industries like oil and gas where around 20% of pipeline corrosion failures are linked to MIC.^[4]^[9] Materials commonly affected include carbon steel, stainless steel, copper alloys, and concrete, with lesser impacts on non-metallics such as polymers and ceramics due to microbial acid production or enzymatic degradation.^[10] These effects underscore MIC's role as a pervasive challenge in infrastructure maintenance worldwide.^[9]

History and Discovery

Early observations of microbial corrosion date back to the late 19th and early 20th centuries, when reports linked unusual corrosion patterns in metallic structures, such as ship hulls and water pipes, to biological growths or "slime" formations. In 1910, Richard H. Gaines analyzed sulfur-rich corrosion products from iron pipes buried in soil and hypothesized that bacterial activity, particularly involving iron and sulfur bacteria, was accelerating the degradation process by producing corrosive metabolites.^[11] These initial insights, though not widely recognized at the time, laid the groundwork for attributing corrosion not solely to chemical or physical factors but to biological influences.^[7] A pivotal milestone occurred in 1934, when C.A.H. von Wolzogen Kühr and L.S. van der Vlugt proposed the cathodic depolarization theory, suggesting that sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) enhance corrosion by enzymatically consuming hydrogen at the cathode, thereby depolarizing it and accelerating the electrochemical reaction on iron surfaces. This theory, based on laboratory experiments with anaerobic environments, shifted scientific focus toward microbial roles in anaerobic corrosion and remains a foundational concept despite later refinements.^[12] Post-World War II, particularly in the 1950s and 1960s, the oil and gas industry experienced frequent pipeline failures attributed to microbial activity, prompting expanded research that identified a broader range of corrosive microbes beyond SRB, including acid-producing bacteria.^[13] By the 1970s, conferences organized by the National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE), now part of AMPP, formalized MIC as a distinct field, fostering international collaboration and standardizing terminology and investigation methods.^[14] In the modern era from the 1980s onward, understanding evolved toward biofilm-centric models, with J. William Costerton's 1978 work establishing biofilms as structured microbial communities that protect cells and create microenvironments conducive to corrosion.^[15] The 2010s brought genomic advances, including metagenomic analyses that revealed complex microbial consortia in corrosive biofilms, highlighting synergistic interactions among diverse species in environments like oil reservoirs.^[16] By the 2020s, research has extended MIC recognition to non-metallic materials, such as concrete in sewer systems via biogenic sulfuric acid production, and emphasized how climate change—through rising temperatures, humidity, and flooding—exacerbates MIC risks to aging infrastructure worldwide.^[17]^[18]

Microorganisms Involved

Bacteria

Bacteria represent the predominant microorganisms implicated in microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC), with several key groups driving corrosion through distinct metabolic activities that accelerate metal degradation. Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), such as Desulfovibrio and Desulfotomaculum, are among the most significant contributors, as they reduce sulfate to hydrogen sulfide (H₂S), which reacts with metals to form corrosive sulfides.^[19]^[20] Acid-producing bacteria (APB), exemplified by Acidithiobacillus species (formerly classified under Thiobacillus), generate organic and inorganic acids like sulfuric acid through the oxidation of reduced sulfur compounds, directly lowering pH and dissolving protective oxide layers on metals.^[21]^[22] Iron-oxidizing bacteria (IOB), including Gallionella, oxidize ferrous iron (Fe²⁺) to ferric iron (Fe³⁺), leading to the deposition of tubercular iron oxides that create differential aeration cells and promote localized pitting.^[23]^[24] Iron-reducing bacteria (IRB), such as Shewanella species, reduce ferric iron to ferrous iron, which can dissolve passive films and facilitate further corrosion by enabling electron transfer to the metal surface.^[25]^[26] MIC-causing bacteria can be broadly categorized by oxygen requirements, influencing their prevalence in specific systems. Anaerobic bacteria like SRB thrive in oxygen-depleted environments, such as buried pipelines or sediment layers, where they utilize sulfate as a terminal electron acceptor in the absence of oxygen.^[12] In contrast, aerobic bacteria, including Pseudomonas species, dominate in oxygenated surface biofilms, oxidizing organic substrates and contributing to initial biofilm establishment that later supports anaerobic niches beneath.^[27] Facultative anaerobes like certain Shewanella strains bridge these conditions, adapting to fluctuating oxygen levels in dynamic systems.^[25] Central to bacterial roles in MIC are unique metabolic processes that interface with metal surfaces. The sulfate reduction pathway in SRB involves the dissimilatory reduction of sulfate (\ce{SO4^2-}) to sulfide (\ce{HS^-}) using electrons from organic matter or hydrogen, producing H₂S that diffuses to metal interfaces and forms metal sulfides.^[12]^[28] APB metabolize hydrocarbons and other organics to yield corrosive acids, such as acetic or formic acid, which protonate metal surfaces and enhance anodic dissolution.^[8]^[29] Extracellular electron transfer (EET), prominent in IRB like Shewanella, enables direct contact or mediated electron flow from bacterial cytochromes or pili to metal oxides, accelerating cathodic reactions and uniform corrosion.^[25]^[30] These bacteria preferentially colonize environmental niches that support growth, such as nutrient-rich, low-flow areas where organic carbon and electron donors accumulate, fostering biofilm development.^[31] In pipelines and cooling systems, stagnant zones with deposited sediments provide ideal conditions for SRB proliferation.^[19] Bacterial consortia amplify MIC risks, as seen in synergistic interactions between SRB and APB, where APB-generated acids lower pH to optimize SRB activity, creating microenvironments that enhance overall corrosion rates.^[32]^[7] Detection of MIC-associated bacteria relies on methods tailored to their viability and abundance in complex samples. Traditional culturing isolates SRB and APB on selective media under anaerobic or acidic conditions, providing phenotypic confirmation but underestimating unculturable populations.^[33] Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) targeting the 16S rRNA gene offers sensitive, species-specific quantification, detecting as few as 10 copies per reaction in biofilms or water samples.^[34]^[35] Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) assays measure active bacterial biomass rapidly, correlating luminescence to cell counts and distinguishing viable from dormant cells in real-time monitoring of pipelines.^[36] These complementary techniques enable early identification of corrosive risks.

Fungi and Other Microbes

Fungi contribute to microbial induced corrosion (MIC) through distinct mechanisms compared to bacteria, particularly in environments where their eukaryotic structure allows for specialized interactions with materials. Key fungal species involved include Fusarium oxysporum, which has been isolated from natural biofilms and shown to corrode galvanized steel by altering surface chemistry; Aspergillus niger, a facultative filamentous fungus that induces pitting corrosion on magnesium alloys and aluminum in seawater-like conditions; and Cladosporium resinae, commonly found in fuel systems where it degrades hydrocarbons at oil-water interfaces.^[37]^[38]^[39] These fungi promote corrosion primarily via hyphal penetration, where filamentous hyphae physically invade material surfaces, causing mechanical stress and disbonding of protective coatings such as polyurethane, and through the production of organic acids like citric acid, which lower the local pH to 4.0–5.0 and accelerate metal dissolution.^[39]^[40] In acidic or fuel-rich environments, fungi dominate due to their ability to metabolize complex substrates, with Cladosporium resinae thriving in aviation fuels and contributing to biomass accumulation that exacerbates degradation. In concrete structures, fungi such as Aspergillus and Penicillium species have been detected in up to 60% of corroded sewage pipe samples, where hyphal expansion generates internal pressures of 0.3–2.5 N/mm², leading to cracking and contributing significantly to overall degradation through mechanical and chemical means.^[40]^[41] Beyond fungi, other microbes like archaea, algae, and protozoa play supportive roles in MIC. Methanogenic archaea, such as Methanobacterium species, thrive in anaerobic settings and synergize with sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) by consuming hydrogen and facilitating electron transfer, thereby enhancing corrosion rates on carbon steel pipelines.^[42] Algae in cooling water systems form dense mats that trap bacteria and provide nutrients through organic acid and oxygen production, indirectly promoting localized corrosion on heat exchanger surfaces.^[43] Protozoa occasionally influence MIC by grazing on bacterial populations within biofilms, potentially altering community dynamics and corrosion rates on metal surfaces, though their role remains secondary and context-dependent.^[44] Fungi exhibit slower growth rates than bacteria but demonstrate persistence in oligotrophic (low-nutrient) conditions, such as desiccated fuel tanks or carbonated concrete, where they can remain dormant for extended periods.^[39] Fungal spores enhance this resilience, surviving desiccation, starvation, and certain biocides better than vegetative cells, allowing reactivation when moisture and substrates become available and complicating MIC control efforts.^[39] Detection of these microbes in MIC contexts relies on microscopic identification for initial visualization of hyphae or spores, complemented by molecular techniques such as internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing for precise fungal species identification and environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis for archaea using 16S rRNA targeting.^[45] These methods enable comprehensive profiling of microbial communities without cultivation biases.^[45]

Mechanisms of Corrosion

Biofilm Formation and Attachment

Biofilm formation represents the initial and critical stage of microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC), where microorganisms transition from a planktonic (free-floating) state to a sessile community adhered to metal surfaces, creating a structured matrix that facilitates subsequent corrosive activities. This process begins with the adsorption of organic molecules forming a conditioning film on the substrate, which alters surface properties and promotes microbial attachment. In the context of MIC, biofilms on metals like steel or pipelines can accelerate localized corrosion by concentrating reactive species and shielding microbes from environmental stresses.^[8] The development of biofilms occurs in distinct stages, starting with reversible attachment, where planktonic bacteria approach the surface via flagella or pili and weakly bind through van der Waals forces and electrostatic interactions, allowing detachment if conditions are unfavorable. This is followed by irreversible adhesion, during which bacteria produce adhesins and begin secreting extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) to anchor firmly to the surface. Microcolony formation then ensues as cells multiply and cluster, leading to maturation where a three-dimensional architecture develops with water channels for nutrient transport and waste removal. Finally, dispersion releases cells to colonize new areas, perpetuating the cycle. These stages are well-documented in MIC contexts, particularly with sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) that dominate anaerobic niches.^[46]^[47]^[48] EPS forms the primary structural component of biofilms, comprising 50-90% of the dry mass and consisting mainly of polysaccharides (up to 60%), proteins (up to 40%), extracellular DNA (eDNA), and lipids. In MIC, polysaccharides provide mechanical stability and hydration, while proteins and eDNA enhance adhesion and protect against shear forces; notably, EPS traps corrosive ions like sulfide or chloride, creating microenvironments that intensify localized attack on metals. The composition varies with microbial species and environmental conditions, but its protective role is essential for biofilm persistence on corroding surfaces.^[49]^[50]^[51] Surface properties significantly influence initial microbial attachment in MIC. Metal surface roughness increases attachment sites by providing shelters from fluid shear, with studies showing higher biofilm biomass on roughened steel compared to polished surfaces. Hydrophobicity of the substrate also plays a key role; hydrophobic metals favor attachment of hydrophobic bacteria via stronger van der Waals interactions. Conditioning films, thin organic layers (e.g., from proteins or humic acids) adsorbed prior to microbial arrival, precondition the surface by increasing its wettability and providing nutrient cues, thereby enhancing adhesion rates by up to several fold.^[52]^[49]^[53] Within biofilms, microbial interactions drive community development and stratification. Quorum sensing, a cell-to-cell signaling mechanism via autoinducer molecules, coordinates gene expression for EPS production and virulence factors once a critical population density is reached, promoting synchronized biofilm maturation in MIC consortia. Biofilms exhibit vertical stratification, with aerobic microbes dominating oxygen-rich outer layers for initial colonization, while anaerobic species like SRB thrive in the inner, oxygen-depleted zones near the metal interface, fostering synergistic metabolic gradients that sustain the community.^[4]^[48]^[54] Quantification of biofilms in MIC studies relies on methods assessing biomass and structure. Crystal violet staining is a standard technique for measuring total adhered biomass, where the dye binds to EPS and cells, and absorbance at 590 nm correlates with biofilm density, enabling high-throughput evaluation. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) provides detailed 3D visualization and quantification, using fluorescent stains (e.g., SYTO 9 for live cells) to map thickness, viability, and spatial distribution, revealing channel architectures critical for MIC progression. These approaches confirm biofilms' role in amplifying corrosion rates.^[55]^[56]^[57]

Biochemical and Electrochemical Processes

Microbial corrosion involves intricate biochemical mechanisms where microorganisms produce corrosive metabolites that degrade metallic materials. Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) generate hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) through the dissimilatory reduction of sulfate, acting as a corrosive agent that forms metal sulfides and accelerates iron dissolution.^[12] Sulfur-oxidizing bacteria produce sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄) via the oxidation of reduced sulfur compounds, leading to acidic attack on metals and concrete.^[8] Acid-producing bacteria (APB) secrete organic acids, such as acetic and lactic acids, which lower the local pH and promote metal ion release.^[22] Additionally, iron-reducing bacteria employ enzymes like reductases to dissolve passivating layers, such as Fe₂O₃, by reducing Fe(III) to more soluble Fe(II) species, thereby exposing the underlying metal to further corrosion.^[58] These biochemical processes interface with electrochemical reactions, altering the corrosion kinetics on metal surfaces. Anodic acceleration occurs through local acidification, which enhances metal dissolution via the reaction:

\text{Fe} \rightarrow \text{Fe}^{2+} + 2\text{e}^-

This is exacerbated by proton donation from microbial acids, increasing the anodic current density.^[6] Cathodic depolarization is facilitated by microbes consuming adsorbed hydrogen (H₂), removing the barrier to hydrogen evolution and shifting the corrosion potential to more negative values, thus promoting overall corrosion rates.^[11] Direct electron uptake by microbes, particularly dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria, allows extracellular electron transfer from the metal to microbial cells, bypassing traditional mediators and directly oxidizing the substrate.^[59] A key biochemical reaction in SRB-mediated corrosion is the sulfate reduction half-reaction:

\text{SO}_4^{2-} + 8\text{H}^+ + 8\text{e}^- \rightarrow \text{HS}^- + 4\text{H}_2\text{O}

This produces sulfide ions that react with Fe²⁺ to form FeS, a less protective corrosion product.^[11] Acid corrosion is represented by:

\text{H}^+ + \text{Fe} \rightarrow \text{Fe}^{2+} + \frac{1}{2} \text{H}_2

where microbial acids supply H⁺ to drive the process.^[60] Biofilms create microenvironments that intensify these processes through steep pH gradients, often spanning 2-5 units from the bulk solution to the metal interface, and oxygen (O₂) depletion zones that favor anaerobic metabolism.^[61] These gradients, with aerobic outer layers and anaerobic cores, enable spatially separated redox reactions, enhancing charge transfer efficiency.^[62] Research in the 2020s has modeled microbial corrosion as exhibiting microbial fuel cell-like behavior, where biofilms function as bioanodes with direct electron uptake, coupling microbial respiration to metal oxidation and generating localized electrochemical cells that sustain accelerated degradation. As of 2025, studies highlight the biofilm-metal interface as a hotspot for localized corrosion, with models integrating microbial fuel cell dynamics to predict degradation rates.^[63]^[64]

Impacts in Specific Industries

Oil and Gas Pipelines

Microbial corrosion, particularly microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC), accounts for 30-50% of internal corrosion failures in oil and gas pipelines, with sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) being primary contributors in sour gas environments where hydrogen sulfide (H2S) levels are elevated.^[29]^[65] This prevalence is heightened in systems transporting hydrocarbons contaminated with water, as biofilms harboring SRB accelerate localized attack on carbon steel pipelines.^[66] Key factors promoting MIC in these pipelines include stagnant or low-flow conditions that allow biofilm accumulation, temperatures between 20-60°C optimal for SRB activity, and nutrient availability from hydrocarbons and dissolved sulfates in produced or injection waters.^[67] Under-deposit corrosion is common, where microbial biofilms trap corrosive species, leading to pitting depths of up to several millimeters within months under severe conditions.^[68] Additionally, SRB-generated H2S can induce sulfide stress cracking, exacerbating embrittlement and crack propagation in high-stress pipeline sections.^[12] Notable case studies illustrate these impacts. In the 1980s North Sea operations, SRB-induced pitting caused multiple pipeline leaks, with biofilms leading to perforations in carbon steel lines exposed to seawater injection systems.^[69] The 2010s shale gas boom in regions like the Marcellus further amplified MIC risks, as produced waters rich in SRB from hydraulic fracturing fluids contaminated gathering pipelines, resulting in accelerated corrosion rates.^[70]^[71] Monitoring MIC in oil and gas pipelines typically involves corrosion coupons and electrochemical probes to detect SRB populations and biofilm activity, enabling early intervention.^[72] The economic toll is substantial, with MIC contributing to annual costs of $2-5 billion in the US oil and gas sector alone, driven by repairs, downtime, and integrity management.^[73]^[74]

Infrastructure and Concrete Structures

Microbial corrosion significantly affects civil infrastructure, particularly concrete structures such as bridges, tunnels, and marine installations, where biofilms of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria like Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans (formerly Thiobacillus thiooxidans) thrive in humid, sulfide-rich environments. These bacteria oxidize hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) to sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄), initiating biogenic acidification that degrades the alkaline concrete matrix.^[41]^[75] The process begins when H₂S, often from anaerobic zones below the waterline or in polluted air, diffuses into concrete pores and reacts with oxygen and moisture under bacterial catalysis: H₂S + 2O₂ → H₂SO₄. This acid production neutralizes the high pH of fresh concrete (typically 12–13) to below 9 within months to years, dissolving calcium hydroxide and other cementitious components, leading to surface softening, cracking, and eventual spalling where layers of concrete detach due to expansive ettringite formation.^[41]^[75] In severe cases, pH can drop to 2 or lower, accelerating mass loss rates up to 25 mm per year in exposed surfaces.^[76] Fungi contribute to concrete deterioration by penetrating microcracks with their hyphae, which expand as they grow and absorb moisture, widening fissures and promoting further ingress of corrosive agents. Fungal activity also produces organic acids that exacerbate acidification, though less aggressively than bacterial sulfuric acid production.^[77]^[78] In reinforced concrete, microbial corrosion indirectly accelerates rebar degradation by lowering the concrete's protective pH barrier, allowing chlorides from deicing salts or seawater to reach the steel and initiate pitting corrosion. This leads to rust expansion (rust jacking), which exerts tensile stresses causing cracks and delamination in structures like bridges and tunnels. For instance, in marine environments, MIC-enhanced chloride attack has contributed to substructure failures in coastal bridges, with corrosion rates on embedded steel increasing by factors of 2–5 compared to abiotic conditions.^[79]^[77] Such degradation is prevalent in urban infrastructure exposed to high humidity and pollutants like SO₂, which can form additional acids, as well as in marine structures where biofilms colonize aggregates and pores. Studies from the 1970s to 2020s document concrete mass losses of 2–20% in simulated or field-exposed samples over 1–10 years, depending on exposure severity.^[17]^[80] Biofilms on concrete aggregates provide nucleation sites for microbial attachment, amplifying localized attack in humid, stagnant conditions.^[41] The economic burden is substantial, with examples including the replacement of 11% of concrete pipes in Los Angeles due to MIC costing USD 400 million, while annual global expenditures for biodeterioration maintenance exceed billions of dollars.^[81]^[82]

Nuclear Waste Storage

Microbial induced corrosion (MIC) poses significant challenges to the long-term integrity of nuclear waste storage facilities, particularly in deep geological repositories where engineered barriers such as stainless steel canisters, concrete vaults, and bentonite clay seals are designed to contain radionuclides for thousands of years. In these anaerobic, high-radiation environments, extremophilic microorganisms, including sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) such as Desulfovibrio spp. and Desulfosporosinus spp., as well as radiation-resistant species like Deinococcus radiodurans, can colonize surfaces and initiate corrosion processes. SRB, for instance, produce hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) through sulfate reduction, leading to pitting and uniform corrosion on metal barriers by forming metal sulfides; this can accelerate corrosion rates on carbon steel up to 40-fold and on stainless steel up to 4-fold compared to abiotic conditions.^[83]^[84] Radiation-resistant microbes like Deinococcus thrive in these extreme settings, potentially contributing to biofilm formation that clogs storage tanks and exacerbates corrosion by creating differential aeration cells. A key concern is the microbial mobilization of radionuclides, where processes such as the reduction of U(VI) to U(IV) by SRB can alter solubility and facilitate transport through barriers, though this often results in immobilization via precipitation; however, for elements like selenium and technetium, microbial transformations may enhance mobility under repository conditions. Biofilms formed by these microbes not only promote electrochemical corrosion but also generate gases such as H₂, CH₄, and CO₂ through fermentation and methanogenesis, leading to pressure buildup in concrete vaults and canisters that could compromise structural integrity over 10-100 years by accelerating barrier failure. In stainless steel canisters, microbial H₂ production from anaerobic corrosion can induce embrittlement, while in bentonite seals, microbial activity degrades clay minerals (e.g., smectite to illite via Fe(III) reduction), reducing swelling capacity and permeability control.^[83]^[85]^[86] Case studies from the Yucca Mountain repository highlight these risks, with 2000s research demonstrating that SRB and iron-reducing bacteria can degrade bentonite clay seals by altering mineralogy and increasing porosity, potentially shortening the barrier lifespan from millennia to centuries under saturated conditions. More recent 2020s reports, including those on Opalinus clay and compacted bentonite simulations, show microbial H₂ production from waste-form corrosion accelerating canister degradation in anaerobic environments, with SRB enhancing uniform corrosion rates on carbon steel by up to 14 times. These findings underscore the selective pressure of high-radiation and low-nutrient conditions favoring extremophiles, which can sustain activity at temperatures up to 80-100°C and pH levels of 7-10.^[84]^[87]^[86] Research efforts, including IAEA guidelines from the 2010s emphasizing microbial monitoring in repository design, have identified gaps in long-term data on gas net production and extremophile interactions with multi-barrier systems. For example, the IAEA's assessments of spent nuclear fuel storage stress the need for evaluating MIC in wet environments to predict radionuclide release pathways, yet uncertainties persist regarding microbial adaptation over repository lifetimes exceeding 10,000 years. Ongoing studies recommend incorporating microbial factors into performance assessments to mitigate risks like pressure-induced cracking in concrete vaults.^[88]^[83]

Aviation Fuel Systems

Microbial corrosion in aviation fuel systems primarily arises from the proliferation of hydrocarbon-degrading microorganisms at the fuel-water interface, where water accumulation enables biofilm formation and subsequent material degradation. Key culprits include fungi such as Hormoconis resinae (formerly Cladosporium resinae), which thrives on kerosene-based fuels, and bacteria like Pseudomonas species and Bacillus licheniformis that form dense interfacial mats. These organisms metabolize fuel components, producing acidic byproducts and viscous slimes that accelerate corrosion. Over 100 microbial species have been isolated from contaminated aviation fuels, though fewer than a dozen, including the aforementioned, are recognized as primary pathogens responsible for most damage.^[89]^[90]^[91] The damage manifests as pitting and crevice corrosion on aluminum alloy tanks and fuel lines, often exacerbated by organic acids from microbial metabolism, leading to structural weakening. Slime accumulation clogs fuel filters, injectors, and pumps, potentially causing engine starvation and in-flight failures. For instance, biofilms adhering to tank interiors can detach as debris, compromising fuel flow and necessitating frequent maintenance. These effects are particularly severe in integral wing tanks, where access for cleaning is limited.^[92]^[93]^[94] Historical incidents highlight the risks, with the U.S. Air Force documenting a surge in jet fuel degradation cases in the early 1960s, linked to fungal growth in JP-4 fuels during storage and distribution, prompting widespread investigations. Modern commercial aviation faces ongoing challenges, with studies indicating microbial contamination in 5-20% of stored fuel samples, often due to inadequate water drainage in hydrant systems. Factors promoting growth include phase separation in jet fuels like Jet A-1, where water settles at the bottom, and extreme temperature swings from -50°C at altitude to 50°C on the ground, fostering condensation and nutrient availability. Biofilms at these interfaces produce corrosive metabolites, intensifying the issue.^[95]^[96]^[97] The economic burden is substantial, with the U.S. Air Force alone incurring up to $1.2 billion annually in microbiologically influenced corrosion-related maintenance for aircraft, part of a broader $6 billion corrosion budget. Industry-wide, these costs encompass filter replacements, tank inspections, and downtime, estimated at $1-2 billion globally. Mitigation relies on standards like ASTM D6469, which outlines rapid tests for microbial contamination in fuels, ensuring compliance during fueling and storage to prevent proliferation.^[98]^[99]^[100]

Wastewater and Sewerage Systems

In wastewater and sewerage systems, microbial corrosion primarily manifests through the biogenic sulfuric acid attack on concrete infrastructure, driven by the sulfur cycle involving sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) such as Desulfovibrio species and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB) like Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans (formerly Thiobacillus). Under anaerobic conditions prevalent in organic-rich sewage, SRB reduce sulfate to hydrogen sulfide (H₂S), which diffuses into the air phase of pipes and is oxidized by SOB on moist concrete surfaces to form sulfuric acid (H₂SO₄). This acid lowers the concrete pH to as low as 1-2, dissolving calcium hydroxide and other hydration products to produce expansive gypsum and ettringite, leading to cracking and material loss.^[77]^[101] Corrosion rates in these systems typically range from 1 to 12 mm/year for ordinary Portland cement (OPC) concrete, with severe cases reaching up to 15 mm/year near sewage levels, significantly shortening pipe service life from 75-100 years to under 20 years. Affected materials include concrete pipes, manholes, and masonry structures, where initial surface degradation exposes embedded rebar to further corrosion, compromising structural integrity and leading to collapses. Globally, MIC accounts for 10-20% of concrete sewer failures, with notable examples including widespread degradation in Austrian systems after just 9 years of operation and the replacement of 11% of concrete pipes in Los Angeles at a cost of USD 400 million. In European contexts, cities like Hamburg have faced extensive pipe replacements due to MIC-induced weakening and collapse of 20th-century infrastructure. Influencing factors include anaerobic, nutrient-laden environments that favor SRB activity, as well as low flow velocities that promote H₂S accumulation and biofilm stability by reducing shear forces.^[77]^[101]^[77] Monitoring efforts in wastewater systems rely on H₂S sensors for real-time detection of gas concentrations exceeding 1 mg/L, which signal high corrosion risk, alongside endoscopic inspections (e.g., CCTV or borescope) to assess internal pipe deterioration and biofilm presence. These systems incur substantial global costs, estimated at USD 10-20 billion annually for repairs and maintenance, with total corrosion in U.S. wastewater systems costing about $36 billion yearly (of which MIC is a significant portion) and total sewer pipeline rehabilitation in Australia estimated at up to AUD 125 billion over 20 years.^[77]^[101]^[101]

Prevention and Control

Chemical and Physical Methods

Chemical methods for preventing microbial corrosion primarily involve the use of biocides to target and eliminate corrosive microorganisms, such as sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). Glutaraldehyde, a widely adopted aldehyde-based biocide, is commonly applied in oil and gas systems at dosages of 50-200 ppm to inhibit SRB growth and disrupt biofilms.^[102] This biocide achieves significant reductions in SRB populations, with studies showing up to five orders of magnitude decrease in cell numbers when circulated continuously or during pigging operations.^[103] Quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs), such as didecyldimethylammonium chloride, serve as cationic surfactants that penetrate biofilms and kill sessile SRB at similar dosages, providing additional corrosion inhibition by altering surface properties.^[104] Blends of glutaraldehyde and QACs enhance overall performance, reducing required concentrations and improving penetration into established biofilms compared to single agents.^[105] Physical and material-based strategies complement biocides by creating barriers or altering environments to deter microbial attachment and activity. Epoxy linings applied internally to pipelines form a durable, impermeable barrier that resists microbial penetration and reduces corrosion rates in aqueous environments.^[106] Corrosion-resistant alloys, including duplex stainless steels like 2205 grade, offer inherent resistance to MIC through stable passive oxide layers that limit pitting initiation by SRB.^[107] Superhydrophobic surfaces, engineered via nanostructured coatings, minimize water adhesion and bacterial colonization.^[108] Cathodic protection systems, particularly impressed current methods, mitigate MIC by shifting the metal potential to values more negative than -950 mV versus the copper-copper sulfate electrode (CSE), suppressing anodic reactions and limiting SRB-driven depolarization.^[109] Mechanical cleaning techniques, such as pipeline pigging with scrapers, remove accumulated biofilms and deposits, preventing stagnation zones where microbes proliferate.^[110] Flow management strategies maintain velocities above 1.0 m/s to shear nascent biofilms and avoid low-flow conditions that favor microbial settlement.^[111] Industry standards like NACE SP0106 guide internal corrosion direct assessment for pipelines, emphasizing biocide application, monitoring, and integration of physical controls to address MIC risks.^[112] Challenges include emerging biocide resistance in microbial populations, driven by sublethal exposures that select for tolerant strains, and stringent environmental regulations in the 2020s, such as EU Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR) enforcement on aldehyde releases and U.S. EPA scrutiny of QACs due to aquatic toxicity concerns as of 2025.^[113]^[114]^[115] Combined chemical and physical approaches yield 50-80% reductions in MIC rates, as demonstrated in field applications integrating biocides with cathodic protection and coatings.^[6]

Biological Inhibition Strategies

Biological inhibition strategies for microbial corrosion (MIC) leverage beneficial microorganisms or their derived products to mitigate corrosion processes, offering sustainable alternatives to chemical interventions. These approaches exploit competitive interactions among microbes, production of protective metabolites, or biomineralization to disrupt harmful biofilms or seal corrosion sites. By introducing non-corrosive microbial communities, these methods can reduce corrosion rates while minimizing environmental impact, particularly in applications like pipelines and concrete structures.^[116] Beneficial microbes, such as certain Pseudomonas species, form protective biofilms that consume oxygen or produce siderophores, thereby limiting the anaerobic conditions favored by corrosive sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB). For instance, Pseudomonas stutzeri has been shown to inhibit SRB-induced corrosion on steel by outcompeting them for resources and altering local electrochemical environments. Similarly, sulfate-oxidizing bacteria can outcompete SRB through bio-competitive exclusion, reducing sulfide production and associated pitting corrosion in anaerobic systems.^[117]^[118] Key mechanisms underlying these strategies include competitive exclusion, where beneficial microbes occupy niches and deplete nutrients essential for corrosive species, and the secretion of antimicrobial metabolites like bacteriocins that directly suppress harmful populations. Engineered microbial consortia, developed in studies from the 2010s, have demonstrated significant corrosion reductions; for example, multispecies communities reduced general corrosion rates on carbon steel by up to 70% compared to SRB monocultures by promoting protective layering and metabolic antagonism.^[118]^[119] Natural inhibitors derived from biological sources, such as plant extracts containing tannins from green tea, exhibit antimicrobial properties that disrupt MIC biofilms without synthetic additives. These polyphenols interfere with microbial adhesion and enzyme activity, reducing corrosion initiation on metal surfaces. Additionally, enzymes like urease, produced by certain bacteria, facilitate calcite precipitation to seal corrosion pits; urease hydrolyzes urea to produce ammonia, increasing pH and generating carbonate ions that precipitate with Ca²⁺ to form CaCO₃, which acts as a barrier against further degradation. This biomineralization helps in passivating exposed metal areas.^[120] In practical applications, probiotic coatings incorporating beneficial bacteria have been applied to pipelines to establish protective biofilms that inhibit SRB activity and extend asset life in oil and gas systems. In infrastructure, self-healing concrete utilizes bacteria-induced CaCO₃ precipitation (MICP) to autonomously repair cracks, with embedded spores activating upon water ingress to precipitate minerals and prevent MIC propagation in wastewater or marine environments. These bacterial systems, often using ureolytic strains like Sporosarcina pasteurii, achieve crack sealing efficiencies of over 80% in lab tests, enhancing durability.^[121]^[122] Recent advances in the 2020s involve synthetic biology to engineer designer microbes with tailored traits, such as enhanced siderophore production or quorum-sensing disruption, for targeted MIC control in harsh environments. These genetically modified consortia promise greater specificity and efficacy, as seen in engineered communities that restructure microbiomes to favor corrosion-resistant states. However, challenges persist, including microbial stability under extreme pH, temperature, or salinity, and regulatory hurdles for field deployment due to biosafety concerns and ecological impact assessments.^[123]^[124]^[125]

References

[1]
[PDF] "Microbially Influenced Corrosion Studies of Engineered Barrier ...
Microbially influenced corrosion may be defined as accelerated corrosion of susceptible metals as a result of the direct, indirect, or both, actions of ...
[2]
[PDF] Microbiologically influenced corrosion and its mitigation: (A review)
Microbial corrosion is intensified when the acidic metabolic products of microbes and bacteria further corrode metal surfaces. It is estimated that ...
[3]
[PDF] Mitigation of Microbiologically Induced Corrosion (MIC) and ...
Aug 6, 2021 · Abstract. Microbiologically influenced corrosion, MIC, refers to the situations where the corrosion of metals is influenced.
[4]
Microbiologically influenced corrosion—more than just ... - NIH
MIC has been defined by NACE and ASTM as “corrosion affected by the presence or activity, or both, of microorganisms” (ASTM G193 2022), as adapted from Little ...
[5]
Microbiologically influenced corrosion: The gap in the field - Frontiers
Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC) is caused by a set of intricate bioelectrochemical interactions between a diverse group of microorganisms and ...
[6]
Microbiological Corrosion - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Microbiological corrosion is defined as a type of corrosion that deteriorates metal surfaces through the metabolic activity of microorganisms, involving a three ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
[7]
Microbially Influenced Corrosion of Steel in Marine Environments - NIH
Sep 12, 2023 · This review provides a summary of the current research on microbial corrosion in marine environments, including corrosive microbes and biocorrosion mechanisms.
[8]
Microbiologically influenced corrosion—more than just ...
The purpose of this review is to provide microbiologists with background information on the non-microbial aspects of microbiologically influenced corrosion.
[9]
Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion - Ohio University
It is estimated that MIC (microbiologically influenced corrosion) accounts for 20% of all corrosion damages. It is a problem in many industries such as oil ...
[10]
Corrosion of Iron by Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria: New Views of an ...
Jan 30, 2014 · In conclusion, SRB act as either direct or indirect catalysts of anaerobic iron corrosion (EMIC and CMIC, respectively) and there are species- ...
[11]
Corrosion of Iron by Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria - PubMed Central - NIH
The aforementioned “classical” cathodic depolarization theory by von Wolzogen Kühr and van der Vlugt (37) attributed such metal damage to the microbial ...
[12]
[PDF] investigation of sulfate-reducing bacteria - Ohio University
Later reports provided evidence that iron and sulfur bacteria can be linked to the corrosion of the interior and exterior of water pipes (Gaines, 19 10).
[13]
Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC)
The mid-1970s produced work by Costello, who introduced an alternative reaction of reduction of biogenic hydrogen sulphide [20]. Costello basically kept Miller.<|control11|><|separator|>
[14]
Biofilms: Microbial Life on Surfaces - Volume 8, Number 9 ... - CDC
Sep 9, 2002 · Based on observations of dental plaque and sessile communities in mountain streams, Costerton et al. (5) in 1978 put forth a theory of biofilms ...
[15]
Genome-Resolved Metagenomic Analysis Reveals Roles for ...
Jan 19, 2016 · There have been many studies of microbial consortia in oil field environments (10–34). These have used culture-based (16–21), 16S rRNA gene ...
[16]
A critical review of marine biofilms on metallic materials - Nature
Mar 24, 2022 · The purpose of this review is to compile the current literature and knowledge gaps surrounding the development of multi-species biofilms in marine conditions ...
[17]
Projections of corrosion and deterioration of infrastructure in United ...
Apr 30, 2022 · Climate change can accelerate infrastructure deterioration in coastal areas because increased temperature and humidity can promote steel corrosion.<|control11|><|separator|>
[18]
a comprehensive review of the impact of Sulphate Reducing ...
Nov 12, 2023 · Sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are known to cause significant damage to metallic structures through the process of microbial-induced corrosion ...
[19]
Sulphate reducing bacteria influenced corrosion of a low carbon ...
Sulphate Reducing Bacteria (SRB) increased the corrosion rate of carbon steel in seawater at 15 °C and reduced the rate from 20 to 25 °C.
[20]
Microbially Influenced Corrosion of Stainless Steel by ... - NIH
Oct 16, 2019 · Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans is an acidophilic bacterium that oxidizes ferrous iron and reduced inorganic sulfur compounds under aerobic ...
[21]
Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion on Stainless Steel
Aug 4, 2023 · Ferritic SSs are known for their outstanding stress corrosion cracking ... However, when the concentration increased, pitting accelerated.
[22]
[PDF] Iron-Oxidizing Bacteria: A Review of Corrosion Mechanisms in Fresh ...
Jul 29, 2010 · Iron-oxidizing bacteria (IOB) influence corrosion in fresh and marine environments, with freshwater IOB including Gallionella, Leptothrix, and ...
[23]
(PDF) The role of iron-oxidizing bacteria in biocorrosion: a review
Jan 14, 2019 · This review summarizes recent work on the role of iron-oxidizing bacteria (FeOB) in MIC. By virtue of producing complex 3-dimensional biofilms.<|separator|>
[24]
Advances in microbial corrosion of metals induced via extracellular ...
May 8, 2025 · Abundance of Fe(III) during cultivation affects the microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) behaviour of iron reducing bacteria Shewanella ...
[25]
Uniform and Pitting Corrosion of Carbon Steel by Shewanella ...
May 31, 2018 · Accelerated cathodic reaction in microbial corrosion of iron due to direct electron uptake by sulfate-reducing bacteria. Corros Sci 66:88–96 ...
[26]
The Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion and Protection of Pipelines
Oct 12, 2024 · ... corrosion (MIC) is one of the main causes of pipeline corrosion. MIC accounts for about 20% of the total cost of the corrosion of metallic ...
[27]
Gene Sets and Mechanisms of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Biofilm ...
SRB respire using sulfate as a terminal electron acceptor, reducing it to hydrogen sulfide. SRB are of primary concern because they accelerate metallic ...
[28]
(PDF) Microbiologically influenced corrosion in oil and gas industries
Aug 6, 2025 · This paper/project reviews the current understanding of MIC in oil and gas industry that has been developed through research activities over the recent past.
[29]
Extracellular electron transfer mechanisms between microorganisms ...
Microbes transfer electrons to mineral-associated metal ions and vice versa, using mechanisms like c-type cytochromes and nanowires, despite cell membrane ...
[30]
Recent challenges and research progress in microbiologically ...
There are a wide variety of microbial species in DWDS consortia, including sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), iron-oxidizing bacteria (IOB), acid-producing ...Missing: rich | Show results with:rich
[31]
(PDF) Nitrate Modulates Microbial Interaction and Biocorrosion ...
Jul 4, 2025 · Acid-producing bacteria (APB) play a significant role in pipeline corrosion by producing corrosive metabolites. Current APB mitigation ...
[32]
Application of Denaturing High-Performance Liquid ...
Aug 7, 2013 · Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) participate in microbially induced corrosion (MIC) of equipment and H2S-driven reservoir souring in oil ...
[33]
High-throughput qPCR and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing ...
Feb 7, 2022 · Next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods and especially 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing have become indispensable tools in microbial ecology.
[34]
Real-Time Quantitative Broad-Range PCR Assay for Detection of ...
Broad-spectrum PCR targeting the 16S rRNA gene in the quantitative real-time format can achieve an analytical sensitivity of 1 to 10 CFU per reaction in water.
[35]
A Fast and Easy ATP-Based Approach Enables MIC Testing for Non ...
ATP measurements have been successfully and routinely performed for the detection or confirmation of viable bacterial cells, including those in the VBNC state, ...
[36]
Corrosion Behavior of Galvanized Steel Exposed to Fusarium ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Corrosion Behavior of Galvanized Steel Exposed to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cumini Isolated from a Natural Biofilm.
[37]
Effect of the Fungus, Aspergillus Niger, on the Corrosion Behaviour ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Accordingly, Aspergillus niger, a facultative filamentous fungus, has been discovered to be capable of causing MIC pitting corrosion on ...
[38]
[PDF] The Role of Fungi in Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion - DTIC
Microorganisms can accelerate rates of partial reactions m corrosion processes and/or shift the mechanism for corrosion. ' Most laboratory and field MIC ...Missing: oxysporum | Show results with:oxysporum
[39]
A critical review of the physiological, ecological, physical and ...
Apr 15, 2022 · The mechanisms of concrete corrosion by bacterial mineral acids are relatively well understood, however, few studies have investigated fungal ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[40]
Microbiologically induced deterioration of concrete - A Review - PMC
Feb 4, 2014 · Bacteria and microscopic fungi are the main microorganisms influencing the concrete biodeterioration. Biogenic organic acids (acetic, lactic, ...Missing: percentage biomass expansion
[41]
Methanogenic archaea and sulfate reducing bacteria induce severe ...
This study investigated the mechanism of microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) that led to failure of X52 steel pipelines after hydrostatic testing.Missing: aiding | Show results with:aiding
[42]
Chapter 26 - Microbiological Control-Cooling System
Microbiological fouling in cooling systems is the result of abundant growth of algae, fungi, and bacteria on surfaces. Once-through and open or closed ...
[43]
[PDF] Effects of Grazing on Bacteria-Mediated Corrosion of Metals ... - DTIC
protozoa may influence bacterial activities on metal surfaces, implying that they can indirectly influence corrosion rates, there probably would be no point ...
[44]
Complementary DNA/RNA-Based Profiling - Frontiers
Nov 6, 2019 · DNA and RNA-based sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene and transcripts were used to assess the phylogenetic diversity of microbial communities at assets ...
[45]
Beyond Risk: Bacterial Biofilms and Their Regulating Approaches
The use of bacterial biofilms for prevention and control of corrosion is a relatively new direction and deserves special attention. Biofilm Formation Process.
[46]
Microbial Biofilms: Features of Formation and Potential for Use ... - NIH
Traditionally, the biofilm formation model includes five stages: (1) adsorption, (2) adhesion, (3) formation of microcolonies, (4) maturation, and (5) ...
[47]
The biofilm-metal interface: A hotspot for microbiologically ...
Many microorganisms, including bacteria, archaea, diatoms, and fungi, have been reported to contribute to corrosion processes. As the vast majority of subjects ...
[48]
Biofilms: Microbial Life on Surfaces - PMC - PubMed Central
EPS may account for 50% to 90% of the total organic carbon of biofilms (38) and can be considered the primary matrix material of the biofilm.
[49]
Extracellular Polymeric Substances and Biocorrosion/Biofouling - NIH
The EPS components determine the cohesion, integrity and stress resistance of biofilms and are considered to be the key components determining the physical, ...
[50]
Effect of biofilm structure and components on microbiologically ...
Nov 1, 2025 · Biofilm structural components significantly changed corrosion rate and morphology of steel. The uniform biofilm induces the formation of a ...Effect Of Biofilm Structure... · Introduction · Bacterial Species And Steel
[51]
Influence of Different Stainless Steel Finishes on Biofilm Formation ...
Surface roughness is another important characteristic of stainless steel, which is believed to be one of the significant factors to reduce bacterial attachment ...
[52]
Impact of conditioning films on the initial adhesion of Burkholderia ...
Mar 1, 2012 · Conditioning films may significantly impact bacterial initial adhesion by altering the physicochemical properties of solid surfaces such as ...
[53]
Gene Sets and Mechanisms of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria Biofilm ...
Oct 29, 2021 · Gene sets and mechanisms of sulfate-reducing bacteria biofilm formation and quorum sensing with impact on corrosion.
[54]
Critical Assessment of Methods to Quantify Biofilm Growth and ... - NIH
These assays are suitable for high-throughput workflows in 96-well microplates and they use crystal violet staining to quantify adhered biofilm biomass as well ...
[55]
Quantitative Analyses of Biofilm by Using Crystal Violet Staining and ...
Sep 28, 2022 · In this method, crystal violet staining [30,31,32] biofilms are extracted into sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) solution and the absorbance by 590 ...Missing: biomass MIC
[56]
Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy for Analysis of Pseudomonas ...
Apr 2, 2019 · The amount of adherent biofilm biomass is determined by staining with crystal violet dye and quantifying the absorbance of bound dye ...
[57]
Hydrologic Alteration and Enhanced Microbial Reductive ... - NIH
Our results demonstrate that removing inhibitory Fe(II) via mimicking hydrologic flow of groundwater increases reduction rates and overall Fe-oxide dissolution.
[58]
Direct microbial electron uptake as a mechanism for stainless steel ...
These results demonstrate that S. oneidensis can directly consume electrons from iron-containing metals and illustrate how direct metal-to-microbe electron ...
[59]
Fundamentals and critical appraisal of electrochemical techniques ...
Apr 15, 2025 · This review fundamentally examines the electron transfer mechanisms ad microbial interactions with corroding metal surfaces.2.1. 1. Biofilm Conductivity... · 4.2. Biofilm Monitoring... · 4.4. Potentiodynamic...<|control11|><|separator|>
[60]
A hotspot for microbiologically influenced corrosion - Cell Press
Mar 19, 2025 · (A) Oxygen concentration gradients within biofilms create distinct aerobic and anaerobic zones that influence microbial community structure and ...
[61]
An Electrochemist Perspective of Microbiologically Influenced ...
Microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) is a type of corrosion where microorganisms are the main perpetrators in the degradation process of a wide range ...
[62]
Bibliometric Analysis of Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion (MIC ...
Nov 18, 2017 · It has been estimated that almost 40% of internal and 20% to 30% of external corrosion on underground pipelines is related to MIC.6 Maxwell, et ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[63]
Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria-Induced Corrosion Behavior of L415 ...
Oct 14, 2025 · Microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) caused by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) poses a severe threat to oil and gas transmission ...
[64]
The Microbiologically Influenced Corrosion and Protection of Pipelines
Oct 12, 2024 · Microbial corrosion is the deterioration of materials associated with microorganisms in environments, especially in oil- and gas-dominated ...
[65]
Effect of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria (SRB) on the Corrosion of Buried ...
Enhanced corrosion of buried pipeline steel by SRB in soil environments has been reported. Previous research has shown that the corrosion rate of steel ...
[66]
Biodeterioration problems of North Sea oil and gas production—A ...
The North Sea is both a highly corrosive and highly biologically productive environment. ... Microbial Corrosion, The Metals Society, London (1983), pp. 84-89.
[67]
Unraveling the source of corrosive microorganisms from fracturing ...
Jun 18, 2025 · In this study, microbial community analysis was conducted to unravel the source of corrosive microbes in oil and gas pipelines.
[68]
Identification of Persistent Sulfidogenic Bacteria in Shale Gas ...
Feb 20, 2020 · This study explores the potential for sulfide production by persistent microorganisms recovered from produced water samples collected from the Marcellus shale ...
[69]
Monitoring oil pipeline microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC ...
Aug 22, 2025 · The corresponding MIC pit depths were 10.5, 8.9 μm, and no well-defined pits, respectively for the three biocide treatment conditions. The ...
[70]
The Macro Impact of Microbial Corrosion on the Oil & Gas Industry
Oct 7, 2022 · The annual cost of all forms of corrosion in US oil & gas industry is $13.4 billion, and microbial corrosion account for approximately $2 ...Missing: economic | Show results with:economic
[71]
Understanding Microbial Corrosion - Part 1 - Inspectioneering
Oct 27, 2022 · 2020: MIC was responsible for $3 to $7 billion annually in cost to steel infrastructure corrosion in the international oil and gas industry [3].
[72]
[PDF] Evaluation, Presentation and Repair of Microbial Acid-Produced ...
Oct 28, 2011 · converted into sulfuric acid by the aerobic Thiobacillus bacteria that grow on the concrete surfaces above the wastewater flow. H2S+2O2 → H2SO4.
[73]
Sewer Sediment and Control a Management Practices Reference ...
Although the rate of concrete loss depends on a series of factors including ettringite formation, it is not uncommon to see concrete loss of 1 in. per yr in ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[74]
Review on Microbially Influenced Concrete Corrosion - PMC - NIH
Since hyphae are small, they allow the fungus to grow in concrete cracks and fissures [79,84]. Fungi influence concrete corrosion in two different ways [93].
[75]
[PDF] Investigation of Best Practices for Maintenance of Concrete Bridge ...
The deterioration that these microorganisms exert on concrete range from increase in crack sizes, solubilization of cement components, concrete corrosion, and ...
[76]
[PDF] susceptibility of bridge steel and concrete components to - ROSA P
the activity of the four common MIC related bacteria (SRB, IRB, SLYM and APB) on the steel coupon surface below the layers of marine growth. 71. Page 92 ...
[77]
Microbiologically Induced Concrete Corrosion: A Concise Review of ...
Jun 16, 2022 · Uncoated concrete specimens displayed weight loss of over 2% after immersion in 3% sulfuric acid for 7 days [48]. For FA-GPm and SRPCm, the ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[78]
[PDF] Influence of biological sulfuric acid on corrosion mechanism of alkali ...
May 22, 2021 · According to statistics, the amount of structural damage and component failure caused by marine microbial corrosion has reached. 20% of the ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[79]
Review on Microbially Influenced Concrete Corrosion - MDPI
Similar to bacteria, fungi can colonize concrete structures and cause concrete degradation in environments with sufficient nutrients, meaning energy and organic ...
[80]
Microbiologically induced deterioration of concrete: a review - SciELO
This review presents how microorganisms induce the deterioration of concrete, including the organisms involved and their colonization and succession on concrete ...Missing: percentage biomass expansion
[81]
Impact of microbial processes on the safety of deep geological ... - NIH
Mar 16, 2023 · This paper will provide an exhaustive understanding about the influence of microorganisms in the safety of planned radioactive waste repositories.
[82]
[PDF] CNWRA 93-014, "Review of Microbially Influenced Corrosion of ...
The roles of anaerobic SRB, aerobic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria, and iron-oxidizing and iron- reducing bacteria in the corrosion of mild steel are discussed with ...
[83]
Influence of microbial uranium reduction processes on the final ...
These investigations showed clear differences in the reduction behavior of sulfate- and iron-reducing bacteria relevant to nuclear waste disposal. This ...
[84]
On the corrosion of ductile cast iron by sulphate reducing bacteria ...
Our results contribute to the understanding of how microbial activity drives the corrosion of ductile cast iron made structures (e.g., canisters) in long-term ...
[85]
Anaerobic microbial corrosion of carbon steel under conditions ...
Dec 15, 2021 · Our results indicate that nitrate-reducing bacteria could represent a potential threat to waste canisters under nuclear repository conditions.<|control11|><|separator|>
[86]
[PDF] The Impact of Microbially Influenced Corrosion on Spent Nuclear ...
The existing data regarding the impact of microbial influenced corrosion (MIC) on spent nuclear fuel (SNF) storage does not allow a clear assessment to be made.
[87]
Spectroscopic and Microscopic Characterization of Microbial ...
These microbial contaminants have been linked to fuel system fouling and corrosion. The fungus Hormoconis resinae, a common jet fuel contaminant, is used in ...
[88]
Characterization of microbial contamination in United States Air ...
Twelve genera, including Bacillus and Staphylococcus, were found in USAF fuel. Bacillus licheniformis was most prevalent. Some organisms were previously ...Missing: incidents 1960s
[89]
[PDF] Fuelcare - ECHA Microbiology
In the early cases of contamination, the fungus Cladosporium resinae (now known as Hormoconis resinae) was the predominant organism. Subsequently, many other ...
[90]
Fuel System Contamination & Starvation - Duncan Aviation
The most commonly found microbial organism is Cladosporium resinae, better known as FUEL BUGS. Fuel bugs produce a sludge-like substance that causes corrosion ...
[91]
https://echamicrobiology.com/app/uploads/2018/09/kathonjetfueldataENG-copy.pdf
[92]
Microbiological Contamination in Aircraft Fuel Tanks - Sofema Online
Jul 22, 2020 · Contaminated fuel can cause significant damage to the aircraft and engine. Damage can range from fuel system corrosion, clogging of fuel ...Missing: Cladosporium | Show results with:Cladosporium<|control11|><|separator|>
[93]
[PDF] MICROBIAL CONTAMINATION OF AIR FORCE ... - DTIC
fuels, sporadic incidents of microbiological contamination of fuels had occurred. In 1960 and 1961, the USAF became alarmed at the increase in incidents ...
[94]
https://sofemaonline.com/about/blog/microbiological-contamination-in-aircraft-fuel-tanks
[95]
[PDF] An Analysis of Microbial Contamination in Military Aviation Fuel ...
Mar 3, 2003 · Are significant levels of microorganisms growing in military aviation fuel systems, and if so, are there any common variables? Forty aviation ...
[96]
AFRL discovering what's “bugging” military aircraft - AF.mil
Sep 11, 2016 · The Air Force spends approximately $6 billion annually on corrosion issues, of which up to $1.2 billion is potentially spent on ...
[97]
Air Force researches microbiologically induced corrosion in aircraft
The Air Force spends approximately $6 billion annually on corrosion issues, of which up to $1.2 billion is potentially spent on MIC. Add to that the costs of ...Missing: aviation | Show results with:aviation
[98]
Aviation Fuel Testing for Microbial Contamination - Conidia Bioscience
A helpful guide to testing aviation fuel for microbial contamination. Discover how to test aviation fuel without using a laboratory or sending fuel off-site ...Missing: 2046 | Show results with:2046
[99]
Bio-corrosion in concrete sewer systems: Mechanisms and ...
Apr 15, 2024 · Bio-corrosion escalates costs and reduces sewer lifespan. Hydrogen sulfide to sulfuric acid is key in concrete deterioration.
[100]
[PDF] Glutaraldehyde
Microbiocides are usually administered in slugs as shock kill doses for maximum effect. ... (50-200 ppm v/v glutaraldehyde), with the risk of exposure, by ...
[101]
A green biocide enhancer for the treatment of sulfate-reducing ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Experimental results showed that EDDS reduced the glutaraldehyde dosages considerably in the inhibition of SRB biofilm establishment and the ...
[102]
Comprehensive Review on the Use of Biocides in Microbiologically ...
Aug 30, 2023 · Biocides contain substances that destroy cell enzymes. In this way, they kill corrosive microorganisms and destroy biofilms. They can be used to ...
[103]
Synergistic Inhibition of Microbial Sulfide Production by ... - NIH
Glutaraldehyde and quaternary ammonium compound blends have also been found to be more effective in killing SRB and general aerobic bacteria than the ...
[104]
Benefits of Epoxy Pipe Liners for Corrosion Protection
Nov 6, 2024 · Epoxy pipe liners offer exceptional corrosion resistance, durability, cost-effectiveness, improved flow, and are environmentally friendly.
[105]
[PDF] Advanced Coatings for the Corrosion Protection of Metals
Among the materials in which we find this type of corrosion, are stainless steel, aluminium ... Duplex Stainless Steels Localized Corrosion Resistance. Corrosion ...<|separator|>
[106]
Developing super-hydrophobic and corrosion-resistant coating on ...
Formation of super-hydrophobic and corrosion-resistant coatings can provide significant corrosion protection to magnesium alloys.
[107]
Influence of Cathodic Protection Potential On Corrosion of Carbon ...
... protection, the protection potential of −850mV (CSE) is essential. Extensive research has been carried out on microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC).
[108]
Controlling microbiologically influenced corrosion in pipelines
The main result of the study was that very few cleaners completely removed the fungal contaminants. Visually the surfaces looked clean, but fungi remained after ...Nace: What Types Of... · Nace: In Your Experience... · Nace: What Improvements...
[109]
Effect of fluid flow on biofilm formation and microbiologically ...
Low fluid flow (0.2 m/s) allows biofilm formation, leading to MIC, especially pitting corrosion. Higher flow (1.0 m/s) prevents biofilm formation and reduces ...Missing: prevent | Show results with:prevent
[110]
https://blogs.ampp.org/protectperform/controlling-mic-in-pipelines
[111]
Biocides as drivers of antibiotic resistance: A critical review of ...
Biocides promote the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the environment. Sub-inhibitory biocide exposure leads to cross-resistance with antibiotics.Missing: 2020s bans
[112]
The dual role of microbes in corrosion | The ISME Journal - Nature
Sep 26, 2014 · Metal corrosion results from (bio) chemical reactions that release either electrons or ions from the metal. Corrosive chemicals, like acids, ...
[113]
Pseudomonas stutzeri Inhibits SRB Corrosion of X70 Steel
Apr 5, 2023 · Many types of microorganisms are involved in MIC, which can be divided into aerobic, anaerobic and facultative, according to different ...
[114]
Bio-competitive exclusion of sulfate-reducing bacteria and its ...
The bio-competitive exclusion (BCX) method is a practical, environment-friendly, and low-cost method of controlling sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and ...Missing: bacteriocins | Show results with:bacteriocins
[115]
Effect of Multispecies Microbial Consortia on Microbially Influenced ...
The multispecies microbial consortia yielded lower general corrosion rates compared to D. desulfuricans or for the uninoculated control.
[116]
An overview on the potential of natural products as ureases inhibitors
This work compiles the state-of-the-art researches focused on the potential of plant natural products (present in extracts or as pure compounds) as urease ...Missing: calcite | Show results with:calcite
[117]
Toward Self-Healing Coatings: Bacterial Survival and Calcium ...
Apr 24, 2024 · The study shows bacterial spores can survive in paint films and grow, filling cracks with calcium carbonate, demonstrating self-repair ...Missing: probiotic pipelines CaCO3
[118]
Evaluation of Microencapsulation Techniques for MICP Bacterial ...
Aug 28, 2019 · The biological self-healing process of concrete is mainly mediated by the microbial precipitation of CaCO3, and so measurement of the repaired ...Missing: pipelines CaCO3
[119]
Harnessing bacterial power: advanced strategies and genetic ...
Jun 19, 2025 · All bacteria involved in biocorrosion, often form complex biofilms on metal surfaces, which protect them from adverse environments and enhance ...
[120]
Engineering synthetic microbial communities to restructure the ...
Jun 25, 2025 · By engineering microbes with targeted functional traits, SynComs enhance nutrient assimilation, bolster plant defence, and fortify resilience ...
[121]
[PDF] The Living Regulatory Challenges of Synthetic Biology
ABSTRACT: The rapidly emerging technology of synthetic biology will place great strain upon the extant regulatory system due to three atypical characteristics ...Missing: inhibition 2020s