Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Obscene gesture

An constitutes a deliberate bodily motion, predominantly involving the hands or arms, designed to convey , , or through symbolic reference to sexual organs, , or excretory functions, with its perceived offensiveness contingent on cultural . Such gestures serve as nonverbal insults, bypassing linguistic barriers to express disdain efficiently, and their interpretation can differ markedly across societies; for instance, the extended , emblematic in cultures as a phallic denoting "fuck you," traces its origins to and practices where it symbolized impudent defiance. Prominent examples include the ""—a fist with protruding between index and middle fingers—prevalent in Mediterranean regions as a vulgar emblem of the or , and the Greek moutza, an open-palmed thrust evoking historical filth-smearing punishments, both underscoring how gestures evolve from primal, embodied metaphors of degradation. In legal terms, obscene gestures often receive protection as expressive conduct under frameworks like the U.S. First Amendment, provided they do not incite imminent violence or qualify as targeted , though prosecutions arise in contexts of public disturbance or workplace misconduct where empirical evidence links them to escalated conflict. Controversies persist regarding their deployment in political or public spheres, balancing individual expressive liberty against communal norms of civility, with historical precedents revealing suppression efforts rooted in elite sensitivities rather than universal harm.

Definition and Characteristics

Core Elements and Cultural Variability

Obscene gestures typically consist of deliberate, visually salient body movements, most commonly involving the hands, that convey , , or sexual with the explicit aim of insulting or provoking the recipient. These gestures are characterized by their simplicity and immediacy, allowing rapid deployment in confrontational situations without reliance on verbal language. Empirical observations in cross-cultural studies indicate that such gestures often exploit iconic or indexical representations of elements, such as phallic symbols or simulated copulatory actions, to evoke or dominance. A key universal feature is their function as emblems—culturally encoded signs with fixed meanings within a group—that bypass linguistic barriers to signal or . However, anthropological analyses reveal no fully universal obscene gesture; instead, basic categories like or may be intuitively grasped across societies, but specific executions diverge sharply due to learned cultural associations rather than innate biology. For instance, extending the , symbolizing the since depictions, is recognized as profoundly offensive in cultures for its direct evocation of sexual aggression. Cultural variability underscores the relativity of offensiveness, where environmental and historical contexts shape interpretations, leading to frequent miscommunications. The "OK" gesture—formed by touching the thumb to the in a circle—is innocuous or affirmative in the United States but interpreted as a reference to the female genitalia or anal orifice in , , and parts of , rendering it equivalent to an obscene insult. Similarly, the thumbs-up sign, emblematic of positivity in Anglo-American contexts, equates to an anal display of contempt in , , and certain West African nations, reflecting localized symbolic mappings of approval to . In , the moutza—an open palm thrust forward with fingers splayed—mimics spitting and signifies or dismissal, rooted in Byzantine-era punishments, and holds no such elsewhere. These disparities arise from semiotic processes where accrue meanings through repeated , not inherent properties, as evidenced in video-based ethnographic studies capturing international gesture repertoires. Mainstream academic sources on nonverbal behavior, often from institutions, may underemphasize non-European variants due to sampling biases favoring English-speaking participants.

Distinction from Other Offensive Behaviors

Obscene gestures are differentiated from other offensive behaviors primarily by their non-verbal, nature, employing specific hand, arm, or body movements to convey or without auditory or physical contact components. In contrast, verbal offenses such as or insults rely on spoken or to express indecency, often through words invoking sexual, excretory, or themes that require linguistic for full impact. Obscene gestures, however, operate through visual —such as simulating phallic shapes or rude bodily functions—eliciting or moral repulsion directly via the senses, as defined by terms denoting abhorrence to or to depravity. This distinction extends to other non-verbal offenses, where obscene gestures emphasize explicit indecency over general or ; for example, a dismissive or accusatory point signals disrespect or dominance but lacks the inherent sexual or scatological connotation that renders gestures like the extended universally interpreted as a profound in many contexts. Unlike physical acts of offense, such as or shoving, which involve direct bodily fluids or force and may escalate to , obscene gestures remain communicative symbols, often protected under free expression principles in jurisdictions like the , as they do not constitute imminent harm. Psychologically, obscene gestures engage primal emotional responses tied to taboo violations, expressing intense comparable to but via embodied cues that bypass verbal processing, potentially amplifying offense where symbols are recognized independently of . This sets them apart from subtler nonverbal cues like or crossed arms, which convey or defensiveness without invoking visceral revulsion, highlighting obscene gestures' unique role in signaling extreme disdain through stylized vulgarity rather than mere social friction.

Historical Development

Ancient and Classical Origins

In , the emerged as an obscene insult around 423 BC, as depicted in ' comedy , where it was termed katapygon—derived from (downwards) and pugē (rump or buttocks)—symbolizing the thrust in anal intercourse to degrade or threaten the recipient. This phallic representation aligned with broader classical uses of hand signs to evoke sexual dominance or humiliation, often in comedic or confrontational contexts to assert superiority or provoke. The Romans adopted and formalized this gesture, calling it digitus impudicus ("shameless" or "indecent finger"), a term recorded by the satirist in the 1st century AD, who described it as an offensive extension mimicking the amid clenched fingers representing testicles. Archaeological evidence from , including and frescoes dated to the 1st century AD, corroborates its use in public taunts, where the extended appeared alongside explicit sexual invectives to curse or mock passersby. Such gestures carried ritualistic undertones, occasionally invoking apotropaic powers against envy but primarily serving as direct insults in everyday disputes or theatrical performances. Another prevalent obscene sign in was the (mano fico), formed by thrusting the thumb between the index and middle fingers, evoking the or sexual penetration; it appeared in and contexts as a vulgar , with literary references in works like those of implying its role in imperial-era . This gesture's dual apotropaic and profane functions highlight how ancient obscene signals often blurred lines between protection and provocation, rooted in symbolism yet weaponized for social aggression.

Evolution in Medieval and Early Modern Periods

In the medieval period, obscene gestures retained elements from ancient Roman practices, particularly the manu fica or fig sign, involving insertion of the thumb between the index and middle fingers to mimic female genitalia and convey contempt or dismissal. This gesture symbolized vulgar defiance and was documented in Dante Alighieri's Inferno (completed c. 1321), where the Florentine thief Vanni Fucci thrusts it heavenward against God and the saints amid his torment in the seventh circle of Hell, underscoring its potency as an ultimate insult in a Christian context dominated by theological prohibitions on obscenity. Another prevalent form involved exposing the buttocks, known as "mooning," which combined nudity with threat; Geoffrey Chaucer's The Miller's Tale (c. 1387–1400) depicts the character Absolon receiving a flatulent exposure through a window as retaliation, illustrating how such acts provoked humiliation and potential violence in everyday disputes. These gestures evolved amid feudal social structures and oversight, where public insults risked legal penalties under for disturbing the peace, yet persisted in , tavern brawls, and marginal manuscript illuminations featuring phallic or excretory motifs as satirical commentary on authority. from court records and indicates regional variations, with showing greater frequency due to dense urban interactions and classical revivals, while emphasized verbal over gestural influenced by Germanic customs. By the early modern period (c. 1500–1800), Renaissance humanism and transcontinental trade disseminated continental gestures northward, integrating them into English vernacular insults. Thumb-biting, a Sicilian-Italian import tracing to medieval precedents, gained notoriety as a challenge to honor; William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet (c. 1595–1596) stages it in Verona's streets, where Sampson bites his thumb to provoke the Montagues, equating it to a disgrace demanding duel. The fig sign persisted as the "fig of Spain," evoking Iberian fertility rites and used derisively, as Pistol employs it in Henry V (c. 1599) to mock Fluellen, reflecting naval ports' exposure to Mediterranean variants. English innovations included the "filip," bending the elbow with palm outward and flicking the from the thumb, deemed a "slur of disgrace" sufficient to ignite affrays, as physician James Bulwer described in Chirologia (1644) based on contemporary observations. This era's theater and printed satires amplified gesture documentation, yet absolutist courts and Puritan reforms increasingly criminalized them under or breach-of-peace statutes, shifting obscene expression toward coded literary forms amid rising state surveillance. Causal factors included and , fostering subtler insults, while continuity with medieval forms highlights cultural inertia against moralistic edicts.

20th Century and Contemporary Shifts

In the , the V-sign executed with the palm facing inward persisted as a primary obscene throughout the , symbolizing and defiance. The earliest unambiguous photographic evidence of this usage dates to 1901, when a worker outside Parkgate displayed the gesture toward strikebreakers, illustrating its role in labor disputes. During , popularized the outward-facing V-sign as a symbol of victory against starting in 1941, inadvertently contrasting with the longstanding offensive variant in and cultures. The gesture, while rooted in , proliferated in American during the , transitioning from niche insults to widespread expressions of . Its visibility increased through sports, such as incidents in the early , and later in countercultural protests of the and , where it embodied sentiment amid civil rights and anti-war movements. amplified this shift; by the mid-century, films and photographs captured the gesture in everyday defiance, embedding it in visual records that normalized its provocative use. Contemporary developments, extending into the 21st century, reflect globalization and digital dissemination, altering the context and reach of obscene gestures. The internet and social media platforms have enabled rapid cross-cultural exchange, often leading to misunderstandings, such as Americans unwittingly using the offensive V-sign in the UK. Legal protections in democratic societies, particularly under the U.S. First Amendment, have upheld gestures like the middle finger as protected speech in public expressions, as affirmed in various court rulings treating them as symbolic communication rather than unprotected obscenity. This era's shifts emphasize contextual interpretation over absolute prohibition, with empirical studies noting gestures' adaptive functions in emotional signaling across diverse societies.

Psychological and Evolutionary Underpinnings

Biological and Instinctual Bases

Obscene gestures primarily function to convey or , emotions with established evolutionary foundations in social dynamics. , classified among basic human emotions, evolved as a to devalue subordinates in dominance hierarchies, enabling leaders to assert through nonverbal disdain rather than costly physical confrontations. In nonhuman , comparable instinctual displays—such as direct stares, open-mouth s, or genital flashing—signal dominance or to resolve conflicts and maintain group order without escalation to . These behaviors reflect conserved neural pathways for threat communication, where humans adapt similar postural or gestural signals to express superiority, though specific hand configurations remain culturally variable. The provocative power of obscene gestures often derives from invoking , a core shaped by to promote avoidance of contaminants and, by extension, social transgressors. Phallic or excretory-themed gestures, common across cultures, mimic pathogen-linked taboos, triggering an innate revulsion response that amplifies the insult's emotional impact and deters affiliation with the target. This linkage to disgust's adaptive role in and moral signaling underscores why such gestures instinctively provoke heightened arousal or withdrawal, serving as low-risk tools for intra-group competition and norm enforcement. While the impulse to deploy aggressive nonverbal signals is instinctual—rooted in needs for coalition-building and rival exclusion—the precise execution of obscene gestures requires cultural transmission, blending biological drives with learned . Experimental evidence from event-related potentials shows that gestures elicit stronger attentional biases than or positive ones, indicating an evolved sensitivity to threats that prioritizes rapid processing for adaptive responses. Thus, obscene gestures exploit affective systems to achieve dominance or retaliation, with their efficacy persisting due to hard-wired emotional circuitry rather than arbitrary convention alone.

Social and Emotional Functions

Obscene gestures serve as rapid, non-verbal conduits for expressing potent negative emotions such as , , and , particularly in high- scenarios where verbal proves inefficient or hazardous. These manual signals, often leveraging phallic or excretory , amplify emotional intensity by evoking visceral taboos, enabling communicators to convey disdain or across distances or amid noise without escalating to physical . Empirical observations link such gestures to heightened autonomic responses in observers, mirroring the physiological triggered by verbal obscenities, which underscores their role in immediate emotional signaling over nuanced discourse. Socially, obscene gestures function as assertions of dominance or defiance against perceived , symbolically challenging hierarchies by flouting communal norms and inviting reciprocal displays that test boundaries. In interpersonal conflicts, they demarcate ingroup-outgroup divides, with the gesturer positioning themselves as unyielding or superior, a dynamic rooted in the gesture's capacity to degrade the recipient through implied sexual or scatological . This signaling can deter aggression by advertising resolve, akin to animal threat postures, while in cohesive groups, mutual obscene gesturing reinforces via shared , enhancing emotional without verbal negotiation. Emotionally, these gestures facilitate , allowing individuals to externalize and mitigate internal distress by embodying rejection or , with studies on analogous profane expressions indicating reduced perceived pain and heightened post-use. However, their efficacy hinges on cultural context; in settings where retains high value, they provoke stronger emotional , but habitual exposure may dilute impact, shifting function toward habitual defiance rather than acute release. Cross-cultural analyses reveal consistent patterns: gestures like the extended universally elicit responses, affirming their adaptive role in emotional regulation and social navigation despite variability in form.

Major Examples by Region

Western and European Gestures

In Western cultures, particularly in the United States and much of , the extended upward serves as the primary obscene gesture, symbolizing contempt or defiance through a phallic representation intended to degrade the recipient. This gesture, known as digitus impudicus in ancient contexts, dates back to at least the 4th century BCE in , where it was used in comedic plays to mock individuals, and persisted in usage as an insult evoking sexual violation. Historical accounts, including those by the historian , describe Germanic tribes employing it against legions around 98 to taunt invaders. In modern Western legal contexts, its obscene nature has been debated, with U.S. courts often protecting it under free speech while acknowledging its vulgar intent. The reversed V-sign, formed by extending the index and middle fingers with the palm facing inward, functions as a potent insult in the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, and New Zealand, equivalent in offensiveness to the middle finger elsewhere. Documented in British usage by the early 20th century, with the earliest verified photographic evidence from 1901 in England, it conveys "up yours" or profound disrespect. Unlike the palm-outward victory sign popularized by Winston Churchill during World War II, the inward-facing variant retains its vulgar connotation rooted in historical gestures of mockery, though precise pre-1900 origins remain unverified beyond folklore. In , particularly and , the —clenching the fist with the thumb protruding between the index and middle fingers—represents the female or futile sexual denial, serving as an ancient obscene retort. Originating as the manus fica gesture from the republican era, it symbolized impotence or dismissal and endures in contemporary culture as a vulgar equivalent to calling someone worthless. Similarly, the or forearm jerk, prevalent in and , involves slapping the right with the left hand while raising the right , mimicking copulation and expressing hostility akin to "fuck off." This gesture, sarcastically termed "arm of honor," has been recorded in parliamentary incidents as recently as 2023, underscoring its raw provocative power. The corna or "horns" gesture, extending the and pinky fingers while folding the others into a , carries obscene implications in , , and parts of the , traditionally accusing the target of spousal by evoking cuckoldry. While sometimes used apotropaically against in traditions, its directional use toward another person—palm facing outward—constitutes a direct implying or , distinct from its neutral rock music adoption elsewhere. These gestures vary in intensity by context and region, but all leverage sexual symbolism to convey disdain, reflecting a continuity from into contemporary European social interactions.

Eastern and Middle Eastern Gestures

In and several other Middle Eastern countries, the thumbs-up gesture—commonly signifying approval in cultures—is interpreted as a profound , akin to an extended , implying "sit on this" or a phallic . This connotation stems from cultural associations with and has led to misunderstandings in diplomatic and tourist interactions, with reports dating to at least 2015 highlighting its use as a deliberate provocation. In Arab societies, exposing the sole of the foot or shoe toward another person constitutes a severe , evoking and disdain since feet are viewed as ritually unclean; this often accompanies hand motions for emphasis and gained global attention on December 14, 2008, when Iraqi journalist hurled his shoes at U.S. President during a , an act symbolizing ultimate contempt in the region. Additionally, pointing directly at someone with the is deemed aggressive and disrespectful, potentially escalating to perceived vulgarity in heated exchanges, as it mimics accusatory or threatening intent. In East Asian contexts, such as China, extending the pinky finger toward an individual serves as an obscene taunt, implying they possess a small penis or lack masculinity, a usage distinct from its occasional neutral role in promises and noted in cultural etiquette guides as more inflammatory than the Western middle finger in informal disputes. In Japan, the "fig sign"—forming a fist and protruding the thumb between the index and middle fingers—carries a explicitly sexual vulgarity, referencing female genitalia and functioning as a crude insult comparable to obscenities in other traditions. These gestures reflect localized taboos around bodily symbolism, with limited adoption of Western-style middle finger displays despite increasing globalization.

African, Asian, and Latin American Gestures

In , the —clenching the fist and thrusting the thumb between the index and middle fingers—serves as a vulgar representing female genitalia or a dismissive insult equivalent to disdain or sexual rejection. This gesture traces roots to ancient practices but persists in ian culture as a potent , often employed in confrontations to provoke or belittle. The "" sign, formed by circling the thumb and index finger, carries obscene connotations across several Latin American nations, particularly , where it symbolizes the and implies or worthlessness. In this context, deploying the toward an individual equates to a severe sexual , potentially inciting due to its explicit . In and parts of , the corna or "horns" gesture—extending the index and pinky fingers while folding the others—denotes cuckoldry, implying by one's partner, and functions as a humiliating taunt often linked to rivalries. This sign, borrowed from Mediterranean traditions, amplifies offense in Latin contexts by evoking and . Across Asian cultures, explicit hand-based obscenities remain less codified than in the , with insults more frequently conveyed through contextual or universal extensions like the , which denotes disrespect in and . Pointing directly at a person with the is broadly deemed aggressive and impolite in countries including , , and , signaling confrontation akin to . In , the left hand is associated with impurity due to its use in hygiene practices, rendering any involving it—such as passing objects or —insulting and unclean, though not always sexually vulgar. Similarly, in and the , summoning someone palm-upward mimics calling animals, carrying a demeaning undertone that borders on in hierarchical social dynamics. African obscene gestures vary widely by ethnic group and region, with fewer standardized hand signs documented compared to ; the retains universal offensiveness, while cultural taboos emphasize holistic disrespect. In , the "OK" circle explicitly mimics female genitalia, constituting a crude deployed for maximum provocation. Among some West groups, such as in , the thumbs-up can invert to vulgarity, interpreted as "up yours" in tense exchanges, though this interpretation wanes in urban settings influenced by global media. Left-hand usage universally signals and across many sub-Saharan societies, amplifying any accompanying gesture's hostility.

Protections and Restrictions in Democratic Societies

In democratic societies, obscene gestures such as the extended receive varying degrees of protection under free expression doctrines, often balanced against public order, , and anti-insult statutes. The provides the strongest safeguards, treating such acts as symbolic speech akin to verbal , while many other democracies impose criminal penalties for perceived disruptions to social norms or personal dignity. These differences stem from constitutional priorities: absolutist speech protections in the U.S. versus qualified emphasizing communal harmony elsewhere. In the United States, the First Amendment broadly shields obscene gestures from government restriction in public forums unless they qualify as unprotected categories like true threats, , or under the (1973) test, which requires appeal to prurient interest, patent offensiveness, and lack of serious value. The Supreme Court's ruling in (1971) invalidated a conviction for wearing a jacket emblazoned with "Fuck the Draft" in a , affirming that governments cannot suppress offensive expression merely to shield unwilling audiences from ideas or vulgarity. This precedent applies to gestures; for instance, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in 2019 held that a motorist's to a after a constituted protected dissent, not . Lower courts have overturned similar arrests, as in Coggin v. (2003), where a during a lacked the immediacy of incitement required under (1942). Restrictions persist in captive audiences or regulated environments: schools may discipline under Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser (1986) if the gesture undermines educational goals, and workplaces invoke Title VII harassment claims if it creates a hostile environment. Broadcast media faces indecency fines, as upheld in (1978), though over-the-air vulgarity rarely equates to full . Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 2(b) protects "fundamental freedoms" including expression, encompassing obscene gestures as conveying substantive information rather than mere vulgarity. A 2023 Court of King's Bench decision characterized the as a "God-given, Charter-protected right" in dismissing a of charge against a man who gestured at his ex-partner, ruling it non-threatening communication. under section 163 targets materials degrading sexual themes, not isolated gestures, though limits apply via section 1's reasonable justification for harms like public incitement. Courts rarely prosecute standalone vulgar acts absent context like . In , absent explicit constitutional free speech, an implied freedom of political communication yields to state laws on offensive behavior. Summary Offences Acts in states like criminalize "offensive conduct" or "obscene exposure" with fines up to AUD 1,100 or six months' imprisonment if willful and public, as in cases of gestures toward traffic cameras resulting in $395 penalties. Parliamentary incidents, such as a 2005 senator's fine for the gesture, underscore institutional intolerance. European democracies frequently criminalize obscene gestures under or prioritizing dignity over unfettered expression. Germany's section 185 deems the (Stinkefinger) an , with fines escalating to €5,000 for acts like gesturing at speed cameras, as in a 2022 Bavarian case. The UK's allows penalties for "threatening, abusive, or " conduct likely to cause , alarm, or distress, including fines for displays in public. These frameworks reflect traditions valuing honor and restraint, contrasting U.S. , though Article 10 protections may mitigate extreme applications if gestures convey political critique.

Punishments in Authoritarian or Traditional Contexts

In authoritarian s, obscene gestures directed at officials or symbols of authority are frequently penalized under laws against public , , or anti-state conduct to enforce social and regime loyalty. Such acts may trigger immediate , reflecting a prioritization of hierarchical over individual expression. For example, in , obscene gestures in public incidents commonly lead to , overnight , and fines, applicable even in disputes between private citizens to deter perceived moral lapses. North Korea exemplifies extreme enforcement, where gestures interpreted as disrespectful to the leadership invite under the regime's anti-reactionary thought laws. Historical accounts from the era document American prisoners of war being beaten by n captors upon recognition of the as an obscene , underscoring the gesture's potential to provoke violent in a system intolerant of symbolic defiance. Contemporary reports indicate that similar displays, if perceived as mocking state figures, could escalate to sentences or execution, though documentation remains scarce due to information controls. In traditional contexts bound by religious or customary codes, such as Sharia-influenced systems in Gulf monarchies, obscene gestures risk classification as violations of public morality or , warranting discretionary penalties like fines, imprisonment, or . Saudi Arabia's mutaween () have historically enforced ta'zir penalties, including flogging, for acts deemed obscene or insulting to Islamic decorum, though direct attributions to hand gestures are often subsumed under broader indecency statutes rather than isolated prosecutions. These frameworks emphasize communal honor and , with punishments calibrated to deter erosion of traditional norms amid modernization pressures. Mongolia's authoritarian provides a transitional case, where in December 2023, authorities targeted three citizens for disseminating images of an aimed at President during a live address, imposing unspecified sanctions amid crackdowns on perceived disloyalty. This incident highlights how even semi-traditional respect for leaders in post-communist states can amplify penalties for gestures challenging centralized power. In the United States, courts have consistently held that the gesture qualifies as protected expressive conduct under the First Amendment, absent circumstances involving incitement to imminent violence or disruption of judicial proceedings. In Cruise-Gulyas v. Minard (2019), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a woman's directed at a following a constituted protected speech, rendering the officer's retaliatory second stop a violation of her Fourth Amendment rights. Similarly, the in State v. Blue (2020) determined that displaying the to a state trooper did not constitute sufficient to justify a , emphasizing that such gestures alone do not create of criminal activity. Federal district courts have dismissed related charges in cases like Nichols v. Chacon (2000), where an man arrested for after an in public prevailed on First Amendment grounds, with the finding no evidence of intent to breach the peace. In Pennsylvania v. (2000), a state likewise rejected charges for the , holding it expressive rather than legally obscene under prevailing standards derived from (1973). Exceptions arise in controlled environments; for instance, Commonwealth v. Williams (2000) upheld a contempt conviction for combining the gesture with directed at a during , as it directly disrupted decorum. Internationally, protections for obscene s under freedom of expression are more circumscribed and context-dependent. An Austrian in 2018 affirmed that citizens may direct obscene gestures or at politicians if justified by public interest or criticism, balancing Article 10 of the against public order. The has upheld restrictions in cases like Shvydka v. (2014), where a provocative public gesture was deemed admissible for conviction due to its potential to disturb witnesses, prioritizing societal harmony over unrestricted expression. In Grigoryan and Sergeyev v. (2017), arrests for obscene gestures toward were not found to violate Article 5 (right to liberty), as they aligned with domestic laws on public insult. These rulings reflect a narrower margin for gestures perceived as threats to authority compared to U.S. precedents.

Modern Controversies and Interpretations

Politicization of Neutral Gestures

In 2017, members of the online forum initiated "Operation O-KKK," a deliberate trolling to associate the traditional "" hand gesture—formed by touching the thumb and index finger while extending the other fingers—with white supremacist ideology by claiming the circle represented the letter "W" for "white power." Although originating as a , some white nationalist groups adopted the gesture, prompting the to classify it as a potential hate symbol in September 2019, noting its use in contexts like the earlier that year. This reclassification led to real-world repercussions, including investigations into U.S. cadets at the 2019 Army-Navy game for displaying the gesture during a broadcast, which officials later determined was part of a school tradition rather than intentional signaling, and the University of altering its mascot's pose in 2022 to eliminate resemblance to the sign. The gesture, historically a simple emblem of solidarity dating back to ancient Roman and labor movements in the early , has undergone politicization across ideologies, often evoking accusations of extremism depending on the user. In the U.S., it gained prominence during the by athletes and , symbolizing resistance to racial oppression, and later in anti-fascist and socialist contexts like the . More recently, Trump's use of the gesture following an assassination attempt on July 13, 2024, drew polarized responses: supporters viewed it as defiance and unity, while critics equated it to fascist or communist symbols, highlighting how contextual interpretation can transform a neutral into a for outrage. Such reinterpretations underscore causal dynamics where media amplification and ideological framing override the gesture's ambiguous origins, leading to suppression in institutional settings despite lacking inherent . These cases illustrate a pattern where neutral gestures become politicized through adversarial cultural campaigns, often amplified by advocacy groups and outlets with ideological leanings, resulting in self-censorship or punitive measures even absent empirical evidence of widespread malicious intent. The ADL's inclusion of the OK sign, for instance, acknowledged trolling roots but prioritized observed misuse, reflecting a precautionary approach that critics argue conflates satire with genuine threat. Empirical data on gesture usage remains sparse, with no large-scale studies quantifying shifts in perception, yet institutional responses—such as mascot redesigns—demonstrate tangible societal impacts from politicized narratives.

Impact of Media and Online Trolling

Media outlets frequently capture and disseminate footage of obscene gestures made by public figures, often resulting in immediate reputational scrutiny and institutional penalties. In professional sports, such incidents are amplified through broadcast and social media, prompting league investigations. For example, on September 20, 2025, the NFL fined Kansas City Chiefs tight end Travis Kelce $14,491 for unsportsmanlike conduct involving obscene gestures directed toward the Philadelphia Eagles sideline during a September 14 game at GEHA Field. Similarly, on October 7, 2025, the league fined Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones $250,000 for an obscene gesture—later described by Jones as inadvertent—made toward fans during a victory over the New York Jets at MetLife Stadium. These cases illustrate how media exposure transforms momentary actions into league-wide controversies, with fines reflecting efforts to maintain decorum amid heightened visibility. Celebrities also face backlash when obscene gestures are photographed or filmed in public, particularly interactions with , leading to widespread online discussion and tabloid coverage. Instances of performers like directing the at photographers outside hotels have been compiled in retrospectives, highlighting a pattern of defiant responses to intrusion that gain traction. Such amplification can desensitize audiences to the gestures while simultaneously fueling calls for accountability, depending on the figure's profile and context. In , gestures intended as against pressure often backfire, extending private frustrations into public narratives. Online trolling leverages to propagate or fabricate obscene gestures, exacerbating divisions and provoking targeted outrage. Trolls and users share clips or memes featuring gestures to harass individuals or mock controversies, with platforms enabling rapid dissemination. A notable 2025 example involved an AI-generated video circulating on , depicting Jewish celebrities such as and extending middle fingers toward in response to his antisemitic statements, created by an entrepreneur and viewed millions of times. This form of digital provocation blurs lines between and , amplifying emotional reactions and sometimes prompting platform moderation or legal scrutiny, though enforcement varies. The ease of viral sharing intensifies the gesture's impact, turning isolated acts into coordinated campaigns that challenge free expression boundaries.

Debates on Suppression Versus Free Expression

In the , obscene gestures such as the have been repeatedly upheld as protected symbolic speech under the First Amendment, provided they do not meet the narrow criteria for unprotected categories like under the or under (1942). Federal circuit courts, including the Second, Fourth, Sixth, Eighth, and Eleventh, have ruled in cases like United States v. Daniels (2002) and Swartz v. Inskeep (2006) that displaying the to or officials constitutes expressive conduct rather than unprotected or , emphasizing that offense alone does not justify suppression absent imminent harm. These precedents reflect a first-principles commitment to free expression as essential for dissent and public discourse, with legal scholars arguing that gestures convey political or emotional content akin to verbal protected in (1971), where a jacket emblazoned with "Fuck the Draft" was deemed safeguarded speech. Debates intensify in contextual limitations, such as public schools or workplaces, where proponents of suppression cite (1986), which permitted punishment of lewd student speech disrupting the educational environment, arguing that minors require shielding from vulgarity to foster civility and focus. Critics of broad suppression, however, counter that such restrictions risk subjective enforcement influenced by cultural biases, as evidenced by Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L. (2021), where the struck down discipline for off-campus vulgar Snapchat posts, affirming that schools cannot regulate all offensive expression without substantial disruption. Empirical data from free speech advocacy groups indicate that overzealous suppression correlates with chilled expression, particularly among minorities or dissidents, while causal analysis suggests that tolerating offensive gestures prevents escalation to broader , as historical suppressions of "indecent" speech have paved paths to political silencing. Internationally, the tension manifests differently, with cases under Article 10 of the occasionally protecting insulting gestures as expression unless they incite hatred or violence, as in Eon v. (2013), where a dwarf-tossing protest gesture led to a fine overturned on appeal for lacking sufficient gravity. Advocates for unrestricted expression argue from causal realism that inconsistent suppression—often stricter in nations with control—undermines democratic accountability, whereas suppression proponents prioritize social harmony, citing data from countries like or where fines for obscene gestures deter public disorder but at the cost of documented in reports. Truth-seeking analysis reveals that while supports minimal suppression to avoid violence, institutional biases in academic and media sources may inflate calls for curbs under pretexts like "," overlooking how gestures rarely cause measurable harm compared to their role in signaling resistance to authority.

References

  1. [1]
    Do gestures retain mental associations with their iconic origins, even ...
    Apr 30, 2019 · The earliest records of the extended third digit deployed as an obscene gesture come from ancient Greece [15]. The Middle-Finger gesture made an ...
  2. [2]
    When did the middle finger become offensive? - BBC News
    Feb 6, 2012 · While the middle finger may historically have symbolised a phallus, it has lost that distinctive meaning and is no longer even obscene, says Ira ...
  3. [3]
    10 Obscene Hand Signs and Gestures From Around the World
    Aug 21, 2023 · What are some rude hand gestures? Some of the rudest hand gestures include dog call, crossing fingers, the A-OK, the forks and the moutza.The Middle Finger · The A-OK · The Fig · The Horn Fingers
  4. [4]
    "Digitus Impudicus: The Middle Finger and the Law" by Ira Robbins
    Using the middle finger in public can lead to arrest, but the article argues this infringes on First Amendment rights and is not a serious harm.Missing: obscene | Show results with:obscene
  5. [5]
    The middle finger: a history of insult from Ancient Greece to Johnny ...
    Insults and obscene gestures, like the middle finger, have ancient roots and modern legal. dpa. Published: 12:00am, 3 Sep 2024. British neurologist John ...
  6. [6]
    (PDF) GESTURE AS CULTURAL AND LINGUISTIC PRACTICE
    The extremely offensive "horned hand" gesture (Figure. 22), much like the no-smoking sign discussed above, incorporates symbolic, iconic, and. indexical ...
  7. [7]
    The hand gestures that last longer than spoken languages - BBC
    Aug 18, 2021 · Simon Harrison, a gesture studies researcher from City University of Hong Kong, suggests that basic categories should be universally understood.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Digitus Impudicus: The Middle Finger and the Law
    statutes also prohibit obscene speech or gestures, and courts have interpreted these provisions to prohibit speech only when the speech falls within the legal ...
  9. [9]
    When “OK” isn't “OK” - Sites at Penn State
    Oct 27, 2020 · In Brazil, this gesture is “considered extremely vulgar” (Moran, Abramson & Moran, 2014 p.352) and is compared to giving someone the middle ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Common Hand Gestures in the US That Are Offensive in Other ...
    Jan 5, 2019 · The thumbs up, the "OK" sign, and crossing your fingers are all examples of gestures that are vulgar in certain places outside the US. Not every ...
  11. [11]
    Cross-cultural Differences in Using Nonverbal Behaviors to Identify ...
    Feb 6, 2024 · However, in Chinese culture, pointing at someone with the index finger is often seen as confrontational and disrespectful, considered rude or ...
  12. [12]
    4.4 Nonverbal Communication and Culture – Exploring Relationship ...
    Insult gestures tend to vary across cultures and are different as well in the extent to which they are used. In Greece, for example, the mountza (μούντζα) or ...
  13. [13]
    Obscene language or gestures - (Criminal Law) - Fiveable
    Obscene language or gestures refer to expressions or actions that are considered offensive, vulgar, or indecent, often invoking sexual content or other taboo ...
  14. [14]
  15. [15]
    Obscene Gestures Lawyer New York - Joseph & Norinsberg
    Rating 5.0 (117) Jul 29, 2025 · Leering, staring, and suggestive facial expressions. Obscene gesture harassment may be part of an ongoing pattern of rude, offensive, or ...
  16. [16]
    Profanity and Emotion are Inextricably Entwined – Let Me Show You ...
    May 3, 2024 · We use obscene gestures and sign languages have profane signs (Bergen, 2016). These words and gestures express the strongest human emotions. For ...
  17. [17]
    Is Your Body Language Offensive to Others? | Psychology Today
    Mar 5, 2022 · We need to learn to observe and monitor our own body language cues in order to avoid offending others. Body language – nonverbal communication – ...
  18. [18]
    History of The Finger - Clark Street Press
    Mar 8, 2024 · The earliest records of the middle finger being used as an obscene gesture come from around 420 BC in Aristophanes comedy The Clouds.
  19. [19]
    Giving The Finger in Ancient Greek - Sententiae Antiquae
    Jan 19, 2021 · The Greek evidence, however, indicates that while phallic meaning is operative, what one does with the threatened phallus is truly insulting (at ...
  20. [20]
    Middle finger in ancient Rome - IMPERIUM ROMANUM
    Mar 25, 2020 · The middle finger was referred to in Latin digitus impudicus, meaning “shameless, indecent or offensive finger”.
  21. [21]
    “Digitus impudicus”, “the impudent finger”
    May 20, 2014 · The third, or half finger o heart finger, also is called “digitus impudicus” “obscene finger. ... "It's one of the most ancient insult gestures ...
  22. [22]
    The phallus and the Evil Eye - Phallic amulets in the Roman world
    Dec 7, 2021 · The phallus and the Evil Eye ... Phallic imagery was popular in ancient Roman society. In this article, Adam Parker explores their use as powerful ...
  23. [23]
    How naughty was the past? The hidden depths of the medieval church
    Aug 11, 2021 · Medieval churches had hidden messages, like a window with monkeys in a funeral procession, and a fox preaching to a cock, raising questions ...
  24. [24]
    Excerpt - 'How to Behave Badly in Elizabethan England' by Ruth ...
    Dec 18, 2018 · He missed the insult entirely. Rude gestures are deeply imbedded in cultural context, so de-contextualized they are empty and easily dismissed.
  25. [25]
    V-sign - Oxford Reference
    The quintessential British offensive gesture for most of the 20th century, formed by holding up a hand with the middle and index finger upright in a V shape.<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Culture Re-View: How Winston Churchill invented the V sign
    Jul 18, 2023 · For decades, many Brits associated the act of putting your middle and index fingers up with your palm pointed towards yourself as an insult. The ...
  27. [27]
    The middle finger is the most controversial digit. Thank the ancient ...
    Jan 22, 2024 · Nelson wrote that while ancient people did likely use their middle fingers to make obscene gestures, they may have pointed them horizontally or ...
  28. [28]
    Why Is the V-Sign ONLY Offensive in Certain Countries - YouTube
    Nov 18, 2022 · The V-sign has led many unfortunate US representatives to accidentally make an obscene gesture in different parts of the world - so what ...
  29. [29]
    Human Emotions: An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective
    Feb 11, 2015 · Differing evolutionary perspectives on the emotions. There are 7 basic emotion families (disgust, fear, anger, surprise, sadness, happiness, ...
  30. [30]
    Dominance as a competence domain, and the evolutionary origins ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · The idea that dominant primates manifest protocontempt to subordinates suggests that “looking down on” followers is intrinsic to leadership in ...
  31. [31]
    Revisiting Darwin's comparisons between human and non-human ...
    The 'open-mouthed threat face' (or 'staring open-mouth face') is displayed by a range of non-human primate species (e.g. macaques, mangabeys, chimpanzees, ...
  32. [32]
    What is Disgust? | Feeling Disgust - Paul Ekman Group
    Disgust is one of the seven universal emotions and arises as a feeling of aversion towards something offensive. We can feel disgusted by something we ...
  33. [33]
    (PDF) Contempt and disgust: The emotions of disrespect
    ... foul‐smelling. substances, objects or people –not only excrement or corpses ... is disgusting. 3.3.1 |Qualifying features of moral disgust. Like basic disgust ...
  34. [34]
    Imprint of ancestral and modern threats in human mind - Frontiers
    Our results emphasize the evolutionary basis of disgust as a part of the behavioral immune system, a defense mechanism against pathogens (Schaller and Park ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Human Emotions: An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective
    There are 7 basic emotion families (disgust, fear, anger, surprise, sadness, happiness, contempt). Evolved emotions are larger in number, including emotions ...
  36. [36]
    Emotion and the processing of symbolic gestures: an event-related ...
    Mar 8, 2010 · Accordingly, negative insult gestures appear more potent than positive approval gestures in inducing a heightened state of attention during ...
  37. [37]
    The Science of Swearing
    Apr 25, 2012 · ... swearing applies to issues such as verbal abuse ... This etiquette determines the difference between amusing and insulting and needs to be studied ...
  38. [38]
    Exploring the Emotional Functions of Co‐Speech Hand Gesture in ...
    Apr 28, 2023 · Certainly, anyone on the receiving end of an offensive gesture knows the power of the hands to quickly elicit strong emotions!
  39. [39]
    Swearing, insults and hate speech: The social and psychological ...
    Jan 7, 2025 · The taboo status of a word is deeply rooted in cultural norms and historical context. Blasphemy, for instance, was once the most offensive form ...
  40. [40]
    Gesture manus fica - IMPERIUM ROMANUM
    Jul 17, 2020 · The manus fica (“fig sign”) gesture, popular especially in Italy and southern Europe (even Turkey), dates back to the times of ancient Rome.
  41. [41]
    French Expression of the Day: Le bras d'honneur - The Local France
    Mar 17, 2023 · In fact, it is a French way of showing anger or hostility through an arm gesture. To make an 'arm of honour' you place one hand at the bend ...
  42. [42]
    Rude hand gestures of the world (don't try these on holiday)
    Read more. Corna rude hand gestures of the world. 6 of 10. Corna. Meaning: Your wife is unfaithful. Used in: The Baltics, Brazil, Colombia, Italy, Portugal, ...
  43. [43]
    14 Common Hand Gestures That Are Rude in Other Countries
    Nov 5, 2024 · Not in some other countries, where this hand gesture is considered rude. If you use it in Japan, Russia or Indonesia, it's considered obscene, ...<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    What These Gestures Mean Around the World - Global Rescue
    May 1, 2025 · Gestures like thumbs-up, peace sign, and pointing can be offensive or have different meanings across cultures. The middle finger has ...
  45. [45]
    8 normal signs and gestures that can be offensive in the Middle East
    Nov 22, 2015 · 8 normal signs and gestures that can be offensive in the Middle East · 1. The Thumbs Up · 2. Pointing with the index finger · 3. Crossing legs · 4.
  46. [46]
    Arab Gestures and Body Language You Need to Know
    Aug 16, 2019 · 2- Point at Someone with the Index Finger ... Pointing is rude! Even more so if you're face-to-face with someone and you start jabbing your finger ...
  47. [47]
    Top 10 Rude Gestures in China | Chinese Middle Finger
    While giving the pinkie isn't as offensive as the middle finger in China, it is still considered rude. Giving the pinkie can show that you believe the other ...
  48. [48]
    20 Offensive Gestures You Should Never Do in These Countries
    In other countries like Japan, Indonesia, and the Netherlands, this gesture is considered vulgar and obscene, as it depicts an intimate act. ... rude in countries ...Hand Gestures That Could... · 9. Three-Fingered Salute · 15. Shaking Fists
  49. [49]
    15 insulting gestures in different cultures - Lingoda
    Oct 8, 2024 · The most common disrespectful gestures in different cultures · 1. The middle finger · 2. The thumbs-up · 3. The a-ok · 4. The fig · 5. The arm of ...
  50. [50]
    Middle Finger in Different Countries 2025 - World Population Review
    China Flag. China, Impolite, disrespectful. Japan Flag. Japan, Impolite, but also ... Extending the middle finger is a rude gesture in China. The Chinese ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Getting a Handle on Hand Gestures - Dwellworks Blog
    Pointing is often considered a rude gesture in any culture or country. Countries that find it the most offensive include: China, Japan, Indonesia, and Latin ...
  52. [52]
    Body language in different cultures. What are appropriate and ...
    Jan 14, 2023 · ... China, waving with an open palm is considered rude. ... In some Latin American countries, such as Colombia, it is considered an obscene gesture.
  53. [53]
    18 Rude Hand Gestures Around The World (You Need to Avoid)
    Mar 4, 2025 · However, showing the middle finger is almost universally understood to be rude and offensive. “When in Rome”. The saying “When in Rome, do as ...What Are Offensive Hand... · The Palm-Forward Hand · The Hand in Pocket<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    South African Gestures and Body Language You Need to Know
    Aug 16, 2019 · This sign demonstrates the differences between cultures, because it's considered to have an obscene, rude meaning in South Africa. It represents ...
  55. [55]
    Taboos - Culture Crossing Guide
    Using the left hand for these things is considered rude and dirty. Holding the hand in a fist with the thumb to the sky, then pressing the thumb to the ...
  56. [56]
    Criminal Penalties in Qatar - CountryReports
    Incidents involving insults or obscene language/gestures often result in arrest, overnight imprisonment and/or fines whether the incident occurs between ...
  57. [57]
    Has This Taboo Lost Its Power? - The New York Times
    Mar 12, 2010 · When the North Koreans learned the truth, the Americans were beaten. One little hand signal, so much to say. Professor Robbins argues that ...
  58. [58]
    North Korea sentences 20 young athletes for 'speaking like South ...
    Apr 13, 2023 · 20 aspiring North Korean winter athletes were abruptly sentenced to three to five years of hard labor in prison camps after they were found to have used South ...
  59. [59]
    What can you be flogged for in Saudi Arabia? - BBC News
    Jan 16, 2015 · Saudi blogger Raif Badawi's been sentenced to 1,000 lashes and 10 years in prison for cybercrime, disobeying his father and insulting Islam. The ...
  60. [60]
    2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Mongolia
    In December 2023, three individuals who posted photographs of themselves making an obscene gesture at the country's president during a televised address were ...Missing: authoritarian | Show results with:authoritarian
  61. [61]
    Middle Finger Protected By First Amendment, Court Says - NPR
    Mar 15, 2019 · A Michigan woman was engaging in constitutionally protected free speech when she made a crude hand gesture, a federal court ruled.
  62. [62]
    Court rules First Amendment protects motorist who gave the middle ...
    Mar 14, 2019 · A woman who gave a police officer the middle finger gesture after getting a ticket was protected by the First Amendment, a 6th Circuit Court ...
  63. [63]
    Giving Finger to Police Not Disorderly Conduct Justifying Traffic Stop
    Jun 15, 2020 · A unanimous Supreme Court of North Carolina held on May 1, 2020, that waving the middle finger at the police was not disorderly conduct to justify a traffic ...
  64. [64]
    Nichols v. Chacon, 110 F. Supp. 2d 1099 (W.D. Ark. 2000) - Justia Law
    Chacon believed Nichols was guilty of disorderly conduct because he had used an "obscene gesture" in a public place.
  65. [65]
    Austrians can swear or make obscene gestures at politicans, court ...
    Jan 3, 2018 · Citizens have the right to "give the finger" or swear at politicians as long as they have a justification behind the action, an Austrian court has ruled.
  66. [66]
    SHVYDKA v. UKRAINE - HUDOC
    In the present case, however, the applicant resorted to a provocative gesture likely to disturb or insult some of the many people who witnessed it.
  67. [67]
    GRIGORYAN AND SERGEYEVA v. UKRAINE - HUDOC
    He found that the grounds for arrest had been that Mr Grigoryan had made obscene gestures towards police officers and that the second applicant had sworn at ...
  68. [68]
    When is the OK sign not OK? | Reputation Rehab - YouTube
    Dec 9, 2020 · After some trolls implied the OK hand signal was a sign of white power, white supremacists took it literally and began using the signal as a ...Missing: controversy | Show results with:controversy
  69. [69]
    Okay Hand Gesture - ADL
    The “okay” hand gesture—in which the thumb and index finger touch while the other fingers of the hand are held outstretched—is an obvious and ancient gesture ...
  70. [70]
    The 'OK' Hand Gesture Is Now Listed As A Symbol Of Hate - NPR
    Sep 26, 2019 · The Anti-Defamation League says the gesture that traditionally signals "all is well" has been hijacked by the white power movement and is ...
  71. [71]
    Cadets Were Playing Game, Not Flashing 'White Power' Sign ... - NPR
    a symbol popular with hate groups.Missing: controversy | Show results with:controversy
  72. [72]
    Nebraska alters mascot's hand gesture to avoid ties to white ... - ESPN
    Jan 29, 2022 · The University of Nebraska has changed its cartoon mascot Herbie Husker to eliminate a hand gesture that can be confused with a sign of ...
  73. [73]
    The raised fist: a history of the symbol
    Sep 4, 2023 · The raised fist is also understood to represent power from below and solidarity between people joined in political struggle. The symbol is ...
  74. [74]
    The history of the raised fist, a global symbol of fighting oppression
    Jul 31, 2020 · The raised fist has been a staple of protests across the United States as the country continues to grapple with systemic racism.Missing: interpretations | Show results with:interpretations
  75. [75]
    Trump's raised fist is a go-to gesture with a long history of different ...
    Jul 11, 2024 · It can function as a gesture of solidarity for those who are with him, and one of defiance against those who oppose him. In this way, Trump's ...
  76. [76]
    Clenched Fist - Political Symbols
    The symbol is understood to express political solidarity, particularly for groups who perceive themselves to be oppressed or engaged in a struggle.
  77. [77]
    OK hand sign added to list of hate symbols - BBC
    Sep 27, 2019 · An anti-hate group says the finger-and-thumb sign is being used as an "expression of white supremacy".
  78. [78]
    NFL fines Travis Kelce for "obscene gestures" - NBC Sports
    Sep 20, 2025 · The league fined Kelce $14,491 for the “obscene gestures” toward the Philly sideline. Game officials have been urged this year to watch for ...
  79. [79]
    NFL fines Cowboys owner Jerry Jones $250K for obscene gesture ...
    NFL fines Cowboys owner Jerry Jones $250K for obscene gesture toward fans during win over Jets. Published: Oct 07, 2025 at 03:24 PM Updated: Oct ...
  80. [80]
    Cowboys' Jerry Jones won't appeal $250K fine from NFL - ESPN
    Oct 10, 2025 · Cowboys owner Jerry Jones won't appeal the $250000 fine he received this week from the NFL for an obscene gesture made during the win ...
  81. [81]
    35 Times a Celebrity Gave the Middle Finger to the Camera
    Nov 10, 2016 · We found 35 instances of celebrities throwing the time-honored sign of the middle finger. From Rihanna telling the paps to beat it outside the Montage Hotel in ...
  82. [82]
    Flipping the Bird: A GQ History of Our Country's Proud Heritage
    Feb 5, 2012 · Mickey Rourke has many days when he can't quite speak, but no days when he can't raise his middle finger. This image may contain Human ...
  83. [83]
    In AI video, Jewish celebrities give Kanye West the middle finger
    Feb 12, 2025 · In AI video, Jewish celebrities give Kanye West the middle finger. Israeli entrepreneur creates clip with prominent American Jews, none of whom ...
  84. [84]
    In AI video, Jewish celebrities from Scarlett Johansson to Adam ...
    Feb 11, 2025 · Others, including Adam Sandler, who ends the video by offering his own obscene gesture, have not been outspoken on the issue since Hamas' Oct. 7 ...
  85. [85]
    As Free as a Bird: The Middle Finger and the First Amendment
    Sep 4, 2019 · However, in light of the protections for expressive conduct under the First Amendment, law enforcement officers stopping someone simply for ...
  86. [86]
    Bethel School District v. Fraser | 478 U.S. 675 (1986)
    "Conduct which materially and substantially interferes with the educational process is prohibited, including the use of obscene, profane language or gestures.".<|separator|>
  87. [87]
    [PDF] 20-255 Mahanoy Area School Dist. v. B. L. (06/23/2021)
    Jun 23, 2021 · And while. B. L. used vulgarity, her speech was not obscene as this. Court has understood that term. See Cohen v. California,. 403 U. S. 15, 19– ...<|separator|>
  88. [88]
    Cases - Obscenity - Oyez
    A case in which the Court ruled that certain provisions of the Communications Decency Act concerning indecent behavior were unconstitutionally vague.
  89. [89]
    [PDF] THE RIGHT TO INSULT IN INTERNATIONAL LAW
    Such speech is offensive and insulting, but that should not mean that the speaker should be subjected to legal penalties for saying it, let alone a prison term.
  90. [90]
    Hate speech versus free speech | International Bar Association
    Jan 17, 2022 · We have long had laws which curtail freedom of speech in limited spheres, for example defamation, obscenity or the incitement of discrimination or violence.
  91. [91]
    The Insoluble Problem of Free Speech | National Affairs
    From time to time throughout American history, challenges to free speech have sparked heated and prolonged debate, with no obvious resolution.