Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Pemoline


Pemoline is a synthetic chemically identified as 2-amino-5-phenyl-2-oxazolin-4-one, formerly marketed under the brand name Cylert for the of attention-deficit hyperactivity (ADHD) in children. It exhibits pharmacological effects akin to other CNS stimulants but with minimal sympathomimetic activity, primarily enhancing mental alertness and reducing fatigue through presumed dopaminergic mechanisms, though its exact site of action remains unclear. Approved by the FDA in 1975, pemoline was prescribed as an alternative to amphetamines for ADHD management due to its reportedly lower potential. However, accumulating evidence of severe , including at least 13 cases of acute hepatic failure by the late 1990s—some fatal—prompted a warning in 1999 and ultimate voluntary market withdrawal by the manufacturer in 2005, as the risks outweighed therapeutic benefits. Common side effects included , appetite suppression, and potential withdrawal symptoms like upon abrupt discontinuation, underscoring its limited long-term safety profile. Despite its obsolescence in clinical practice, pemoline's history highlights tensions between efficacy for neurodevelopmental s and organ-specific toxicities in .

Medical Uses

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Pemoline was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 1975 for the treatment of (ADHD) in children aged 6 years and older. ADHD is characterized by core symptoms including persistent inattention, hyperactivity, and that interfere with functioning or development. The drug, a structurally dissimilar from amphetamines and , was indicated to alleviate these symptoms by enhancing focus and reducing hyperactive and impulsive behaviors in affected individuals. In clinical practice, pemoline served as an alternative for ADHD patients who experienced intolerance or inadequate response to first-line agents such as . Its once-daily dosing regimen was noted for convenience compared to more frequent administrations required by some amphetamine-based treatments. Recommended dosing for ADHD began with an initial oral dose of 37.5 mg administered once daily in the morning, with increments of 18.75 mg added at weekly intervals based on clinical response and tolerability, up to a maximum of 112.5 mg per day. required gradual to minimize potential side effects while achieving symptom control, and regular of liver function was mandated due to associated risks.

Narcolepsy

Pemoline was approved for the treatment of narcolepsy to address excessive daytime sleepiness by promoting sustained wakefulness through enhancement of central dopaminergic neurotransmission, distinct from the orexin deficiency underlying the disorder. Clinical evaluations, including objective sleep laboratory assessments, demonstrated that pemoline at doses of 18.75 to 112.5 mg per day improved patients' ability to maintain alertness and perform tasks compared to placebo, with efficacy observed in multiple-dose regimens. These effects stem from its action as a mild dopamine reuptake inhibitor and indirect agonist, fostering vigilance without the rapid onset of intense stimulation seen in other agents. In comparison to amphetamine-based stimulants like or , pemoline offered advantages in management due to its reduced abuse liability and absence of marked euphoric or peripheral sympathomimetic effects, positioning it as a lower-risk option for chronic use in non-substance-abusing populations. Studies confirmed its alerting properties with minimal development in short-term trials, though long-term data emphasized careful patient selection to balance benefits against risks. Recommended dosing for in adults initiated at 37.5 mg daily, with incremental increases of 18.75 mg weekly based on response, typically reaching 56.25 to 112.5 mg per day in divided doses to sustain throughout the day. Higher ranges up to 200 mg daily in divided administration were reported in some protocols, but efficacy plateaued beyond intermediate doses in controlled evaluations, underscoring the need for individualized . Pemoline remains available in limited markets, such as , for this indication at adjusted lower doses.

Available Forms and Administration

Pemoline was formulated primarily as oral immediate-release tablets under the brand name Cylert, available in strengths of 18.75 mg, 37.5 mg, and 75 mg for . Chewable tablets were also supplied, typically in 37.5 mg strength, to accommodate pediatric patients. These forms facilitated precise dose , with tablets designed for swallowing or chewing as needed. Administration occurs as a single oral dose taken each morning to align with the drug's duration of effect and minimize interference with . For children aged 6 years and older, the initial dose is 37.5 mg daily, with increments of 18.75 mg added weekly based on clinical response, up to a maximum of 112.5 mg per day. Dosage adjustments should occur under medical supervision, with regular monitoring for efficacy and safety, particularly given the drug's historical association with hepatic risks. Pemoline tablets may be taken with or without , as is not significantly affected by meals, though ingestion with is sometimes recommended to mitigate gastrointestinal discomfort such as stomach ache or . Discontinuation after prolonged use warrants gradual tapering under guidance to potentially avoid rebound symptoms like or depressive mood, consistent with practices for CNS stimulants.

Efficacy and Clinical Evidence

Evidence from Controlled Trials

In randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials conducted primarily in the 1970s through 1990s, pemoline demonstrated statistically significant reductions in ADHD symptoms compared to placebo, particularly on standardized rating scales such as the Conners scales. For instance, a crossover study in children with ADHD examined dose responses from 18.75 mg to 112.5 mg, revealing linear improvements in Conners Teacher Rating Scale scores, math performance, on-task behavior, and noncompliance, with doses greater than 18.75 mg showing effects beginning 2 hours after ingestion and lasting through the seventh hour. Subgroup analyses in pediatric populations highlighted consistent efficacy across children, with effect sizes for pemoline in treating ADHD symptoms estimated at approximately 0.5 in early trials, aligning with moderate improvements observed for other psychostimulants. In adolescents, a 12-week randomized trial of pemoline (target dose titrated upward) versus in those with comorbid ADHD, , and reported greater proportions rated as "much improved" or "very much improved" on the Clinician’s Global Impression-Improvement scale (p < 0.05), alongside significant reductions in parent-rated Conners Hyperactivity-Impulsivity scores among treatment completers (p < 0.01). Response rates in these trials varied by population and but indicated pemoline's ability to achieve clinically meaningful symptom reductions, with broader reviews of over 180 placebo-controlled psychostimulant studies, including those on pemoline, confirming response rates of 70-80% in school-aged children for hyperactivity and inattention domains. Children generally exhibited more robust dose-dependent responses on teacher-observed measures than adolescents with comorbidities, where intent-to-treat analyses showed attenuated but still favorable differences versus .

Long-Term Outcomes and User Reports

In retrospective chart reviews of college students diagnosed with ADHD, pemoline demonstrated sustained efficacy in maintaining symptom control over multi-year treatment periods, with consistent improvements in and academic performance reported in responders. One such analysis covering up to two years of therapy found pemoline effective and well-tolerated, with lower abuse potential relative to alternatives like . Aggregated patient experiences highlight high satisfaction with pemoline's long-term use for ADHD management, emphasizing reliable focus enhancement and minimal "crash" upon discontinuation. On , pemoline received an average rating of 9.8 out of 10 from 19 user reviews, with 100% reporting positive outcomes, including sustained benefits without the pronounced seen in shorter-acting stimulants. Compared to amphetamines and , pemoline exhibits reduced rebound hypersomnolence, contributing to smoother daily functioning in extended therapy scenarios as noted in pharmacological overviews. This profile aligns with observations of consistent effects in longitudinal assessments of responders, where pemoline supported ongoing symptom remission over months to years in pediatric and adolescent cohorts.

Comparisons to Other Stimulants

Pemoline demonstrates efficacy comparable to in treating ADHD symptoms, with clinical trials showing similar improvements in and hyperactivity, though pemoline often exhibits a longer duration of action that persists into evening hours at home and school settings. In one comparative study of children with ADHD, pemoline received higher mean treatment ratings (3.5 versus 2.7) than , reflecting clinician preferences for its profile in certain responders. Relative to amphetamines like , pemoline and extended-release produced consistent symptom reductions across multiple outcome measures in stimulant-responsive children, positioning both as viable options when underperforms. Pemoline's abuse liability is empirically lower than that of amphetamines, which directly release dopamine and exhibit higher reinforcing effects leading to dependence; pemoline's indirect modulation via increased dopamine synthesis results in reduced euphoric potential and minimal self-administration in preclinical models. Adverse event analyses and post-marketing data confirm rare reports of dependence on pemoline compared to the neurotoxic and high-abuse risks associated with amphetamines, which deplete monoamine stores more aggressively. Methylphenidate occupies an intermediate position, with abuse potential higher than pemoline but lower than amphetamines in human and animal studies. In terms of side effects, pemoline produces fewer sympathomimetic effects—such as or —than amphetamines or , owing to its pharmacological profile that avoids direct catecholamine release. Discontinuation rates in treatment algorithms reflect this tolerability, with pemoline showing lower dropout (10% versus 32%) than in head-to-head evaluations, often serving as a second-line agent for patients intolerant to first-line stimulants. Some patients report a smoother, more gradual onset with pemoline compared to the rapid peak-trough dynamics of immediate-release , potentially improving daily adherence in school or work settings.

Pharmacology

Pharmacodynamics

Pemoline primarily acts as an inhibitor of the (DAT), blocking the of into presynaptic neurons and thereby elevating extracellular concentrations in key brain regions, including the . This mechanism contributes to enhanced neurotransmission, which underlies its stimulant properties. Animal studies support this mediation, demonstrating increased motor activity and CNS stimulation consistent with elevated levels rather than direct receptor . In addition to reuptake inhibition, pemoline promotes the presynaptic of and norepinephrine, amplifying synaptic availability of these catecholamines, though its potency in this regard is weaker than that of derivatives. This dual action on and norepinephrine systems, particularly in prefrontal areas with sparse expression, supports improved vigilance and attention without the intense euphoric effects associated with stronger releasers. The relative weakness of its releasing effects correlates with low potential, as evidenced by animal models showing minimal or dependence behaviors compared to traditional stimulants. Pemoline exhibits negligible direct activity at or norepinephrine receptors, distinguishing it from agents that primarily bind postsynaptic sites and contributing to its profile of sustained over acute reward-driven highs. Preclinical from studies further indicate that these pharmacodynamic effects enhance arousal and motor function via , with limited involvement.

Pharmacokinetics

Pemoline is rapidly absorbed from the after , with peak concentrations typically reached within 2 to 4 hours post-dose. Approximately 50% of the drug binds to proteins. The elimination of pemoline in is approximately 12 hours in adults, though pediatric studies indicate a shorter mean of about 7 hours, with prolongation observed as age increases. details are limited, but the drug crosses into at concentrations roughly 50% lower than during elimination. Pemoline undergoes partial hepatic metabolism, producing minor metabolites, with approximately 50% excreted unchanged via the kidneys. Pharmacokinetic parameters exhibit interindividual variability, particularly influenced by age-related differences in clearance. Specific involvement remains undetailed in available studies.

Adverse Effects

Hepatotoxicity

Pemoline has been linked to rare instances of idiosyncratic , typically presenting as acute hepatocellular injury that may progress to fulminant hepatic failure without dose dependence or predictable latency. The underlying mechanism is hypothesized to involve metabolic , where reactive metabolites formed via hepatic bioactivation overwhelm pathways in susceptible individuals, rather than intrinsic or . Postmarketing surveillance detected elevated signals of associated with pemoline as early as 1978, with a of approximately 24 (95% 4.67–124.1) compared to non-users. Absolute incidence estimates range from 1:10,000 to 1:20,000 patient-years, reflecting the rarity despite heightened against a low population background rate of 1–2 per million annually. From its 1975 market introduction through 2005, 21 U.S. cases of pemoline-attributable were documented, including 13 fatalities or transplants, amid millions of prescriptions issued over three decades. This low case volume underscores the infrequency relative to exposure, though underreporting in voluntary systems may underestimate true occurrence. To address risks, protocols mandated baseline serum assessment followed by testing every two weeks, with discontinuation advised if levels rose to three times the upper normal limit or showed persistent elevation. Such monitoring facilitated early intervention, enabling reversal of transaminitis in non-fulminant cases, though severe outcomes sometimes arose without preceding biochemical warnings.

Other Common and Rare Side Effects

Common side effects of pemoline, observed in clinical use and post-marketing reports, primarily affect the and include , which is the most frequently reported , often occurring early in and typically resolving with dosage adjustment or becoming transient. Decreased leading to is also common, usually manifesting in the initial weeks of treatment, with weight often stabilizing or increasing after 3 to 6 months despite continued use. Other frequently noted effects encompass , , , , stomach ache, and skin rash, which share characteristics with those of other central nervous system stimulants and exhibit dose-dependent intensity. Rare non-hepatic side effects, derived from isolated case reports and surveillance data, include hallucinations, convulsive seizures, dyskinetic movements involving the tongue, lips, face, or extremities, and precipitation of Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome in predisposed individuals. In pediatric patients, long-term administration has been associated with growth suppression, though specific incidence rates remain undocumented in pre-withdrawal trials. Additional uncommon events reported sporadically include mild , drowsiness, , , and allergic reactions manifesting as or swelling. These rarer effects generally resolve upon discontinuation, underscoring their reversibility, though empirical frequency data from controlled ADHD trials are limited, with most descriptions relying on voluntary reporting rather than quantified rates.

Overdose and Acute Toxicity

Symptoms and Management

Acute overdose of pemoline primarily manifests as an intensification of its and cardiovascular effects, including or hyperactivity, , , restlessness, , hallucinations, and severe . In severe cases, symptoms may progress to seizures, potentially followed by , muscle twitching or choreoathetotic movements, , and evidenced by elevated creatine phosphokinase levels. These manifestations typically onset within hours of and reflect the drug's pharmacodynamic profile rather than idiosyncratic . Management is supportive, as no specific antidote exists. Gastrointestinal decontamination via activated charcoal is advised for recent ingestions in conscious patients, while gastric lavage may be considered if symptoms are not yet severe; emesis induction is contraindicated due to seizure risk. Benzodiazepines, such as diazepam, are employed to mitigate agitation, seizures, hyperactivity, and involuntary movements, with monitoring of vital signs, oxygenation, temperature, and cardiac rhythm essential. Severe hypertension or hyperthermia warrants targeted interventions like sodium nitroprusside or cooling measures, respectively. Reported pediatric cases demonstrate a generally benign course, with symptoms resolving within 48 hours and no fatalities attributed solely to acute overdose, suggesting a wider relative to more potent stimulants like amphetamines.

Drug Interactions

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interactions

Pemoline's pharmacokinetic interactions remain poorly characterized due to limited human studies on its hepatic , which produces metabolites including a pemoline conjugate, pemoline dione, , and polar compounds, without documented involvement of specific enzymes. No clinical reports confirm alterations in pemoline clearance from CYP inducers or inhibitors, such as anticonvulsants, though theoretical risks exist given its liver-dependent . Pharmacodynamic interactions predominate, stemming from pemoline's stimulation via enhanced activity. Concurrent administration with inhibitors (MAOIs) is contraindicated due to potentiation of monoamine effects, potentially leading to hypertensive crises or exacerbated sympathomimetic responses, as observed in clinical combinations of stimulants and MAOIs. Additive central effects with other psychostimulants, such as amphetamines or , heighten risks of overstimulation, including and , without evidence of pharmacokinetic mediation. Antiepileptic drugs may lower the when used with pemoline, necessitating close monitoring for changes in seizure control. Coadministration with antihypertensive agents requires caution due to potential blood pressure elevations from pemoline's mild sympathomimetic activity. Food has minimal impact, with rapid gastrointestinal absorption unaffected by meals. may reduce pemoline's efficacy in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder management through competitive central effects. Overall, psychostimulant interactions with pemoline are more frequently pharmacodynamic than pharmacokinetic.

Chemistry

Chemical Structure and Properties


Pemoline, chemically known as 2-amino-5-phenyl-2-oxazolin-4-one, is a derivative of the oxazolidinone class featuring a 4-oxazolidinone ring system substituted with an amino group at position 2 and a at position 5. Its molecular formula is C₉H₈N₂O₂, with a of 176.17 g/mol. This distinguishes it within the broader category of stimulants, sharing the 4-oxazolidinone core with compounds like .
Pemoline exists as a white to off-white solid, with a of 255–256 °C and an estimated of 308 °C. It exhibits low in , necessitating specific strategies for pharmaceutical use, but demonstrates good in (DMSO) at up to 28 mg/mL. The compound's is approximately 10.5, reflecting its weakly basic character due to the amino functionality. Stability is maintained under storage conditions.

Synthesis and Manufacturing

Pemoline is synthesized via the condensation of ethyl mandelate, the ethyl ester of , with in a alcoholic , such as , which directly precipitates the product as 2-imino-5-phenyl-4-oxazolidinone. This method, originally patented in , forms the basis of early industrial production and involves heating the reactants under to facilitate the cyclization and formation, yielding pemoline with the characteristic oxazolidinone ring structure. Abbott Laboratories, the primary manufacturer of pemoline under the Cylert brand, developed an improved process patented in 1997 that replaces with to minimize impurities from guanidine byproducts, such as derivatives. In this variant, alkyl mandelate (e.g., methyl mandelate) and are dissolved in an alcohol solvent like , treated with base, refluxed briefly (e.g., at 66°C for 2 hours), cooled, and acidified with to pH ≤4.0, precipitating pemoline in high yield (up to 85-90%) and purity exceeding 99.8% without extensive purification. Manufacturing standards emphasized control of reaction conditions to limit degradation pathways, including to or oxidation to pemoline dione, ensuring product stability during scale-up. Abbott's processes adhered to pharmaceutical-grade purity requirements, targeting minimal residual solvents and , though specific compendial monographs for pemoline were limited due to its eventual market withdrawal.

History

Development and FDA Approval

Pemoline, a distinct from amphetamines in structure and mechanism, emerged from pharmaceutical research aimed at identifying alternatives for treating hyperkinetic disorders in children. Early clinical investigations in the 1970s focused on its potential efficacy for minimal brain dysfunction syndrome (now recognized as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, or ADHD), with double-blind, placebo-controlled trials demonstrating improvements in behavior, cognition, and perceptual function as evaluated by parents, teachers, and physicians. These pivotal studies, involving pediatric populations, established pemoline's effects through , supporting its positioning as a longer-acting option compared to traditional amphetamines. The U.S. (FDA) approved pemoline on January 27, 1975, under (NDA) 016832 for Cylert tablets (18.75 mg, 37.5 mg, and 75 mg), indicated for the treatment of attention-deficit disorder in children and adolescents. Approval extended to management, based on evidence of wakefulness promotion without the short duration of action seen in amphetamines. Premarketing trials reported transient liver enzyme elevations in 1% to 3% of participants, primarily youths, but no instances of clinically significant or fatalities, contributing to an initial safety profile deemed favorable relative to existing stimulants. Abbott Laboratories marketed Cylert as a non-amphetamine with reduced abuse potential and smoother , emphasizing its empirical benefits in controlled settings over short-term use. Regulatory approval reflected the era's reliance on efficacy data from relatively small-scale trials, prioritizing behavioral outcomes while monitoring for common side effects like suppression.

Post-Approval Surveillance and Reports

Following FDA approval of pemoline in 1975 for , postmarketing surveillance through voluntary reporting systems identified early signals of . Between 1975 and 1989, the agency received 12 reports of and 6 fatalities in pediatric patients attributed to pemoline-induced . These cases involved acute elevations in liver enzymes, with onset typically after several months of , prompting recommendations for periodic serum monitoring in labeling updates.60465-2/abstract) Surveillance data continued to accumulate into the via the FDA's MedWatch program, highlighting a pattern of idiosyncratic hepatic reactions despite monitoring protocols. This led to regulatory adjustments, including a black box warning added to pemoline labeling in 1996 emphasizing the risk of potentially fatal , accompanied by a letter urging baseline and monthly . By 1999, the warning was further strengthened to restrict use to patients unable to tolerate other stimulants, reflecting ongoing reports of acute . MedWatch reports of severe hepatotoxicity escalated, totaling 21 cases by 2005, with an estimated reporting rate for 10 to 25 times higher than background population rates. Internationally, post-approval monitoring in , where pemoline remains available as Betanamin at lower doses (typically 18.75–37.5 mg/day versus up to 112.5 mg/day in the U.S.), has documented no hepatic adverse events despite widespread pediatric use since the 1980s. This contrast underscores variability in pharmacovigilance outcomes potentially influenced by dosing regimens and reporting practices.

Market Withdrawal in the United States

In May 2005, Abbott Laboratories voluntarily discontinued sales and marketing of its branded product Cylert (pemoline) in the United States, citing declining market demand as the primary factor. This action followed years of heightened scrutiny over rare but severe cases of acute liver failure linked to the drug, with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) having strengthened labeling warnings in prior years to mandate monthly liver function testing. Despite the voluntary halt by Abbott, generic versions of pemoline remained available initially. On October 24, 2005, the FDA formally withdrew approval for all generic pemoline products after determining that the overall risk of life-threatening liver toxicity outweighed the drug's therapeutic benefits for (ADHD). The agency had documented at least 13 cases of pemoline-associated resulting in death or transplantation among approximately 2 million patients treated since approval, a rate estimated at 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 20,000 users despite monitoring requirements. This decision prompted generic manufacturers to cease production and distribution, rendering pemoline entirely unavailable in the U.S. market by late October 2005. In the immediate aftermath, the FDA issued guidance urging patients on pemoline to consult their healthcare providers promptly to transition to alternative ADHD treatments, such as or derivatives, which lacked pemoline's specific profile but carried their own cardiovascular risks. No mandatory stockpiling or phased recall was required, as existing supplies were limited due to Abbott's earlier cessation, minimizing abrupt disruptions but necessitating rapid prescribing shifts for an estimated small subset of non-responders to first-line stimulants. The withdrawal narrowed pharmacologic options for ADHD management at a time when non-stimulant alternatives like were emerging but not yet dominant.

Controversies and Regulatory Debates

Risk-Benefit Assessments

Pemoline exhibits efficacy in managing (ADHD) symptoms, with response rates around 60% in pediatric patients, as evidenced by improvements in core domains like inattention and . Clinical studies demonstrate dose-dependent effects, where doses above 18.75 mg produce measurable reductions in hyperactivity and enhance academic performance starting 2 hours after administration and lasting through 7 hours. Comparative trials indicate pemoline may yield higher treatment satisfaction scores than (3.5 versus 2.7 on average), with lower discontinuation rates due to inefficacy (10% versus 32%). Hepatotoxicity risks include liver enzyme elevations in approximately 2% of treated patients, often and reversible upon discontinuation.91186-A/pdf) Severe outcomes, such as requiring transplantation or resulting in death, have been documented in at least 13-15 cases since approval in 1975, equating to an incidence 10-25 times the general population background rate of . These events occurred amid widespread use, with identifying 12 cases and 6 deaths in youth between 1975 and 1989 alone. The causality of severe aligns with an idiosyncratic rather than dose-proportional , as cases lack uniform with dosage, duration, or rechallenge patterns.91186-A/pdf) Absolute risk remains low—potentially on the order of 1 in tens of thousands given exposure estimates from claims data showing thousands of prescriptions annually—contrasting with the functional gains in over half of responders, where ADHD persistence elevates morbidity risks like and underachievement absent . This disparity highlights a favorable profile for select cases unresponsive to first-line agents, predicated on baseline liver function monitoring to detect early elevations.

Criticisms of Regulatory Decisions

In 1996, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) notified Abbott Laboratories, the manufacturer of Cylert (pemoline), that the drug demonstrated an unfavorable risk-to-benefit ratio based on reports of acute hepatic failure, including 13 cases resulting in death or liver transplantation as of May 1996. Abbott challenged this assessment, disputing the FDA's epidemiological interpretation of postmarketing data and asserting that the drug's efficacy in treating attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), particularly in patients unresponsive to alternatives like methylphenidate or amphetamines, warranted its retention with enhanced monitoring requirements such as baseline and periodic liver function tests. By 2005, when petitioned for pemoline's market citing 21 total cases of (13 fatal or requiring transplant), the absolute number of severe adverse events remained low relative to decades of use since , with earlier surveillance from to 1989 documenting only 12 instances of and 6 deaths among pediatric users. maintained that its voluntary discontinuation of Cylert in May 2005 stemmed from declining market demand following FDA-imposed restrictions, rather than insurmountable safety issues, and generic manufacturers subsequently ceased after FDA of approvals in November 2005. Viewpoints questioning the FDA's regulatory trajectory emphasized that the elevation (10- to 25-fold above background rates of ) translated to rare absolute occurrences, potentially manageable through clinician adherence to labeling directives, and argued that outright deprived a subset of ADHD patients of a non-amphetamine option amid comparable or higher risks from first-line stimulants, such as cardiovascular events or abuse potential. This perspective highlighted inconsistencies in risk tolerance, as drugs like acetaminophen—linked to hundreds of annual U.S. deaths—persist on the due to broad and mitigable dosing errors, suggesting pemoline's fate reflected heightened postmarketing scrutiny disproportionate to empirical harm incidence.

Alternative Viewpoints on Risk Incidence

In , pemoline remains available under the trade name Betanamin for treating conditions such as and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), with no documented cases of hepatic toxicity reported as of 2017 despite ongoing clinical use. This absence contrasts sharply with U.S. experiences, prompting speculation about population-specific factors, such as genetic differences in or variations in concomitant medication use, though direct comparative studies are lacking. Methodological critiques of U.S. highlight the limitations of voluntary reporting to the FDA, which between 1975 and 2000 captured 12 cases of and 6 fatalities in youths but suffered from incomplete follow-up, absence of exposure denominators, and potential stimulated reporting after 1996 label warnings increased awareness. Such systems, reliant on passive submissions, can inflate perceived incidence by overrepresenting severe outcomes while undercapturing mild or asymptomatic events, leading some analysts to argue that the signal's strength was overstated without prospective data to establish true rates. When benchmarked against background rates in U.S. youth aged 5-19—estimated at 0.5 per million person-years for idiopathic cases—the pemoline-associated reports, totaling around 18 severe events over initial marketing decades amid widespread pediatric prescriptions, yield an attributable risk that some experts contend borders on statistical noise rather than a robust drug-specific . This perspective underscores the challenge of distinguishing idiosyncratic reactions from coincidental failures in ADHD cohorts, where underlying comorbidities may elevate baseline vulnerability without pemoline's involvement.

Society and Culture

Pemoline was classified as a Schedule IV under the , with code number , indicating a low potential for relative to Schedule III substances and limited physical or liability despite its effects. This scheduling reflected assessments that pemoline's risk was minimal, as it lacked the euphoric potency of higher-scheduled amphetamine-like s and showed rare reports of diversion or dependence in clinical use. Following its voluntary market withdrawal by manufacturers in 2005 due to hepatotoxicity concerns—unrelated to —the drug ceased to be available for prescription in the U.S., though its Schedule IV status persists for any residual or illicit materials, with the monitoring analogs under existing frameworks. Internationally, pemoline's legal status varies by jurisdiction. In , it is designated as a psychotropic substance under national regulations, permitting its continued medical availability for indications such as , with prescriptions subject to oversight but no outright as of 2024. Other countries impose prescription-only restrictions without controlled substance scheduling equivalent to the U.S. model, prioritizing medical access over abuse controls given pemoline's profile.

Availability and Non-Medical Use

Pemoline was voluntarily withdrawn from the U.S. market by in May 2005, with the FDA formally withdrawing approval later that year due to risks of severe liver toxicity, including cases requiring transplantation or resulting in death. Similar withdrawals occurred in in September 1999 and the in September 1997, reflecting regulatory concerns over across and parts of . In the , pemoline is no longer authorized for marketing, aligning with broader restrictions on its use due to safety profiles. Despite these withdrawals, pemoline remains available in under the brand name Betanamin, primarily indicated for , , and certain depressive states at doses such as 10 mg or 50 mg tablets. Japanese regulatory data emphasize its role in managing sleep attacks and mental relaxation, with prescriptions controlled and not formally approved for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Non-medical use of pemoline has been minimal, attributable to its pharmacokinetic profile featuring a delayed (typically 2–3 hours) and subdued euphoric effects relative to amphetamines or , which reduces its appeal for recreational diversion. As a Schedule IV in jurisdictions where classified, it exhibits low compared to higher-scheduled stimulants, with surveillance data indicating rare instances of or misuse for cognitive enhancement among students or professionals. Reports of off-label or non-prescribed use, such as for enhancement, remain anecdotal and infrequent, lacking the diversion patterns seen in more rapidly acting alternatives.

Perceptions in Medical and Public Discourse

In medical discourse, pemoline is predominantly viewed as a disfavored historical option for ADHD management, supplanted by stimulants like and amphetamines that avoid its idiosyncratic risk, estimated at 10–25 times the general population background rate based on postmarketing reports of approximately 13 fatal or transplant-requiring cases by 2005. emphasize safer profiles in first-line therapies, reflecting a post-withdrawal prioritizing risk avoidance over pemoline's documented moderate efficacy in select cases, including adolescents and adults where alternatives underperform. Yet, analyses and commentary note lingering appreciation for its smoother onset, longer duration without , and utility in stimulant-tolerant patients, positioning it as a lost alternative in nuanced treatment algorithms. Public perceptions, shaped by regulatory alerts and campaigns, frame pemoline as emblematic of hazards, with amplification of rare hepatic events—such as the six youth deaths reported to the FDA from to 1989—fostering a narrative of inherent danger despite low absolute incidence in millions of prescriptions. This contrasts with evidence-based views debunking equivalence to amphetamines, as pemoline exhibits negligible self-administration in animal models, absence of reports, and minimal dependence signals in over a of , underscoring a stigma-driven caution that overlooks its category B safety in and reduced diversion risk. advocates and select commentators critique this risk-centric lens as paternalistic, arguing could preserve access for non-responders to standard therapies under monitoring protocols.

Ongoing Research and Future Directions

Investigations into Fatigue and Other Indications

A double-blind, randomized, crossover trial conducted by Weinshenker et al. in 1992 evaluated for in 41 patients with (MS). Participants received 18.75 to 75 mg/day of pemoline or over 12 weeks, with 46.3% reporting excellent or good relief on pemoline compared to 19.5% on (p=0.06 via ), indicating a modest, marginally significant benefit. However, higher doses linked to efficacy were associated with poor tolerability due to adverse effects such as and . In contrast, a 1995 parallel-group trial by et al. involving 93 patients compared (200 mg/day), pemoline (up to 50 mg/day), and over six weeks using a fatigue severity scale. showed significant improvement over (p<0.01), but pemoline did not differ meaningfully from , with no added cognitive benefits observed in either drug group. These findings highlight pemoline's inconsistent efficacy in fatigue, potentially limited by dose-response trade-offs with side effects. For non-MS chronic fatigue, a 2001 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled by Breese et al. tested psychostimulants in 41 HIV-negative patients with persistent unresponsive to standard treatments. (20 mg/day) yielded 41% significant improvement, (37.5 mg/day) 36%, versus 9% for , suggesting pemoline provided favorable relief in a subset of cases without specifying MS etiology. Earlier experimental work, such as a 1968 study on fatigued subjects, demonstrated pemoline's effects on performance metrics like time, supporting wakefulness enhancement in acute models. Historical extended pemoline to associated with , though controlled data remain sparse; drug references note its application for mental -related , often at 37.5-75 mg/day, prior to market . Overall, small-scale trials indicate modest benefits in select cohorts, but limited replication and hepatic risks curtailed further investigation post-2005 U.S. .

Potential Reforms or Re-evaluations

Postmarketing pharmacovigilance data from the U.S. documented 21 cases of associated with pemoline use since its approval in 1975, with 13 resulting in death or , amid widespread exposure involving hundreds of thousands of patients primarily treated for ADHD. This translates to an estimated incidence of severe on the order of 1 in 10,000 patient-years, underscoring its idiosyncratic nature rather than dose-dependent toxicity. Such rarity has informed discussions on revisiting pemoline's risk-benefit profile, particularly for refractory ADHD cases where alternatives like or amphetamines fail, as historical controlled trials showed comparable efficacy to these agents with generally milder short-term side effects excluding liver risks. Advances in for drug-induced (DILI) suggest potential for pre-treatment screening to predict , given pemoline's likely immune-mediated akin to other idiosyncratic hepatotoxins where specific HLA alleles (e.g., HLA-B*5701 for abacavir ) confer elevated risk. Although no pemoline-specific HLA associations have been definitively identified, general DILI research supports testing for relevant genetic markers to stratify patients and avert adverse events in high-risk genotypes. Meta-analyses of safety in ADHD populations, while excluding withdrawn pemoline, reveal higher overall adverse event rates for active agents versus , including cardiovascular concerns with amphetamines, implying pemoline's liver risk—when mitigated—may align with or undercut these profiles under strict protocols. A restricted reintroduction could involve mandatory and serial liver (e.g., every 2 weeks initially, then monthly), coupled with pharmacogenetic screening and patient registries for , mirroring risk evaluation and mitigation strategies (REMS) for other high-risk therapeutics. Pre-withdrawal black-box warnings emphasized such , yet studies showed suboptimal adherence, highlighting the need for reformed enforcement via electronic health integration or prescriber to enhance causal detection of early elevations. These measures, informed by causal in idiosyncratic reactions, could recalibrate pemoline's utility without overlooking empirical signals that prompted its 2005 .

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] CYLERT® - accessdata.fda.gov
    CYLERT (pemoline) has a pharmacological activity similar to that of other known central nervous system stimulants; however, it has minimal sympathomimetic ...
  2. [2]
    Pemoline | C9H8N2O2 | CID 4723 - PubChem - NIH
    A central nervous system stimulant, it was used to treat hyperactivity disorders in children, but withdrawn from use following reports of serious ...
  3. [3]
    FDA Alert: Pemoline Market Withdrawal - NEJM Journal Watch
    Dec 9, 2005 · The FDA has concluded that the overall risk of liver toxicity from Cylert and generic pemoline products outweighs the benefits of this drug.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  4. [4]
    Pemoline (oral route) - Side effects & dosage - Mayo Clinic
    Jul 1, 2025 · Pemoline belongs to the group of medicines called central nervous system (CNS) stimulants. It is used to treat children with attention-deficit hyperactivity ...
  5. [5]
    Pemoline: Uses, Interactions, Mechanism of Action | DrugBank Online
    Pemoline belongs to the group of medicines called central nervous system (CNS) stimulants. It is used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Identification · Pharmacology · Categories · References
  6. [6]
    Pemoline (Cylert®) In The Treatment Of Childhood Hyperkinesis
    This was achieved with minimal side effects on a once-daily dosage regimen, indicating that pemoline is a highly useful clinical alternative to the amphetamines ...<|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Pemoline Dosage Guide + Max Dose, Adjustments - Drugs.com
    Initial dose: 37.5 mg orally every morning. Maintenance dose: May increase by 18.75 mg a day at one week intervals, up to a maximum of 112.5 mg/day.Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
  8. [8]
    Pemoline - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Side Effects When used in the treatment of narcolepsy or other conditions, stimulants commonly produce side effects, including irritability, talkativeness ...
  9. [9]
    objective studies on methylphenidate, pemoline, and protriptyline
    Methylphenidate, pemoline, and protriptyline were studied for their treatment efficacy in narcolepsy. A low, intermediate, and high dose level of each drug was ...
  10. [10]
    Pemoline - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Since pemoline became available in 1975, 15 cases of acute hepatic failure during pemoline treatment have been reported to the FDA, 12 of which resulted in ...Missing: approval | Show results with:approval
  11. [11]
    Evaluation of treatment with stimulants in narcolepsy - PubMed - NIH
    This paper briefly reviews sleep laboratory studies on the treatment efficacy of methylphenidate, pemoline, dextroamphetamine and methamphetamine.
  12. [12]
    pemoline
    Pemoline has been used to treat narcolepsy in adults (50 to 200 mg divided twice daily) as well as depression and schizophrenia, but these uses are ...
  13. [13]
    Pemoline - Wikipedia
    Pemoline, formerly sold under the brand name Cylert among others, is a stimulant medication which was used in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity ...
  14. [14]
    Pemoline (By mouth) | Allina Health
    Sep 4, 2017 · You may take this medicine with or without food. Read and follow the ... Nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, pain in your upper stomach.
  15. [15]
    Cylert (Pemoline): Side Effects, Uses, Dosage, Interactions, Warnings
    Withdrawal symptoms may occur if you suddenly stop taking this medication. Additional Information. Our Cylert (pemoline) Side Effects Drug Center provides a ...Drug Description · Indications · Side Effects · Precautions
  16. [16]
    Pemoline effects on children with ADHD: a time-response by dose ...
    ... Conners Teacher Rating Scale. Results: There were linear effects of medication, with pemoline doses greater than 18.75 mg having an effect beginning 2 hours ...Missing: randomized | Show results with:randomized
  17. [17]
    A Randomized Controlled Trial of Pemoline for Attention-Deficit ...
    There was also greater reduction in ADHD severity on the parent-rated Conners Hyperactivity-Impulsivity scale in pemoline-treated study completers compared to ...
  18. [18]
    A randomized controlled trial of pemoline for attention-deficit ...
    Results: Pemoline had greater efficacy than placebo for ADHD as determined ... There was also greater reduction in ADHD severity on the parent-rated Conners ...
  19. [19]
    Childhood attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder - APA PsycNet
    More than 180 placebo-controlled investigations demonstrate that psychostimulants (PSs)--methylphenidates, amphetamines, or pemoline--are effective in reducing ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Pemoline therapy in college students with attention deficit ... - PubMed
    The authors concluded that pemoline is effective and safe in students with ADHD and has a lower abuse potential than methylphenidate and dextroamphetamine, the ...Missing: satisfaction | Show results with:satisfaction
  21. [21]
    Pemoline Therapy in College Students with Attention Deficit ...
    Jul 9, 2010 · The authors studied the efficacy and safety of pemoline, using retrospective chart review of treated students with ADHD over a 2-year period.Missing: maintenance | Show results with:maintenance
  22. [22]
    Pemoline Reviews & Ratings - Drugs.com
    Pemoline has an average rating of 9.8 out of 10 from a total of 19 reviews on Drugs.com. 100% of reviewers reported a positive experience, while 0% reported a ...Missing: satisfaction | Show results with:satisfaction
  23. [23]
    Cylert Reviews & Ratings - Drugs.com
    Cylert has an average rating of 9.8 out of 10 from a total of 13 reviews on Drugs.com. 100% of reviewers reported a positive experience, while 0% reported a ...Missing: satisfaction | Show results with:satisfaction
  24. [24]
    Relative Efficacy of Long-Acting Stimulants on Children With ...
    Dexedrine Spansule and pemoline tended to produce the most consistent effects and were recommended for 10 of the 15 children who were responders to medication.
  25. [25]
    Pemoline, methylphenidate, and placebo in children with ... - PubMed
    One major difference between drugs was the apparently longer action of pemoline, since its effects at home and school tended to persist when the drug was ...
  26. [26]
    Efficacy and Safety of Methylphenidate and Pemoline in Children ...
    The mean treatment rating was higher for pemoline (3.5 vs 2.7). Discontinuation was higher in the methylphenidate group (32% [n = 77] vs 10% [n = 25]) for lack ...
  27. [27]
    Relative efficacy of long-acting stimulants on children with ... - PubMed
    Dexedrine Spansule and pemoline tended to produce the most consistent effects and were recommended for 10 of the 15 children who were responders to medication.Missing: ADHD | Show results with:ADHD
  28. [28]
    Methylphenidate and pemoline do not cause depletion of rat brain ...
    Sep 1, 1989 · Methylphenidate and pemoline do not cause depletion of rat brain monoamine markers similar to that observed with methamphetamine · Authors.
  29. [29]
    Potential Adverse Effects of Amphetamine Treatment on Brain and ...
    Amphetamine stimulants have been used medically since early in the twentieth century, but they have a high abuse potential and can be neurotoxic.
  30. [30]
    Pharmacology of methylphenidate, amphetamine enantiomers and ...
    Dec 4, 1998 · Racemic methylphenidate remains the drug of choice for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methylphenidate appears to produce ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Drug Class Review on Pharmacologic Treatments for ADHD - OHSU
    Pemoline has a pharmacological activity similar to that of other known central nervous system stimulants; however, it has minimal sympathomimetic effects and is ...
  32. [32]
    Treatments for ADHD: Pharmaceutical Therapies - Medications
    Dexedrine purportedly has a "smoother" onset of action and "drop-off" than Ritalin. ... Cylert (pemoline) has a gradual onset of action. Using the ...
  33. [33]
    Stimulant Medication Therapy in the Treatment of Children With ...
    ... dopamine, norepinephrine axis in the central nervous system. 4. The three major stimulants--methylphenidate, dextroamphetamine, and pemoline--appear to be ...
  34. [34]
    Pemoline Magnesium - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    To avoid gastrointestinal distress, psychostimulants should never be taken on an empty stomach. Small tics induced by psychostimulants are best managed by dose ...Missing: upset | Show results with:upset
  35. [35]
    Evidence of lack of abuse or dependence following pemoline ...
    A review of the literature revealed no published case reports of euphoria, abuse, dependence or withdrawal. While there have been a few reports of tolerance, it ...Missing: wakefulness | Show results with:wakefulness
  36. [36]
    Pharmacokinetics of pemoline in plasma, saliva and urine following ...
    1 Pemoline concentrations were measured in plasma and saliva following a single oral dose (37.5 or. 50.0 mg) to healthy volunteers.
  37. [37]
    Pemoline Pharmacokinetics and Long Term
    The pharmacokinetic behaviour of pemoline was studied in 28 children, aged 5 to 12 years, diagnosed as having the attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity.Missing: maintenance | Show results with:maintenance<|control11|><|separator|>
  38. [38]
    Pemoline pharmacokinetics and long term therapy in children with ...
    The pharmacokinetic behaviour of pemoline was studied in 28 children, aged 5 to 12 years, diagnosed as having the attention deficit disorder with ...
  39. [39]
    Pemoline-associated hepatic injury - PubMed
    Mechanism was judged to be idiosyncratic, and the idiosyncrasy was probably metabolic rather than immunologic. Publication types. Case Reports. MeSH terms.
  40. [40]
    Four Cases of Severe Hepatotoxicity Associated With Pemoline
    May 1, 1998 · During the last 3 years we encountered four cases of marked liver dysfunction in children on pemoline. Two of these progressed to fulminant ...Missing: incidence | Show results with:incidence
  41. [41]
    A surveillance method for the early identification of idiosyncratic ...
    Results: As early as 1978, there was a significant signal indicating that pemoline was associated with acute liver failure, with an RR of 24.08 (95% CI 4.67, ...
  42. [42]
    Petition to Remove the Attention Deficit Drug Pemoline (Cylert) from ...
    Mar 24, 2005 · Pemoline is known to have caused at least 21 cases of liver failure, including 13 resulting in liver transplantation or death.
  43. [43]
    Pemoline Advanced Patient Information - Drugs.com
    Dec 23, 2024 · withdrawal side effects (for example, mental depression, unusual behavior, or unusual tiredness or weakness) occurring after the medicine is ...
  44. [44]
    Pemoline Side Effects: Common, Severe, Long Term - Drugs.com
    Dec 23, 2024 · Gastrointestinal side effects including anorexia, weight loss, nausea, and stomach ache have been reported. Anorexia and weight loss tend to ...Missing: administration food upset
  45. [45]
    Pemoline ingestion in children: a report of five cases and review of ...
    The authors describe five pediatric cases of excessive pemoline ingestion. Based on their experience compared with previously reported cases in the literature, ...Missing: management | Show results with:management
  46. [46]
    Pemoline Ingestion in Children: A Report of Five Cases and Review ...
    Mar 8, 2013 · The authors describe five pediatric cases of excessive pemoline ingestion. Based on their experience compared with previously reported cases in the literature,
  47. [47]
    Pemoline (PIM 940) - Inchem.org
    Psychiatric - Agitation, confusion, mood elevation, increased wakefulness, talkativeness, irritability and panic attacks are typical. Chronic abuse can ...
  48. [48]
    Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions in the ...
    No published reports of drug interactions involving pemoline were found. The alpha2-adrenergic agonists clonidine and guanfacine have been implicated in ...
  49. [49]
    Pemoline Interactions Checker - Drugs.com
    Pemoline Interactions. There are 109 drugs known to interact with pemoline, along with 11 disease interactions, and 2 alcohol/food interactions.
  50. [50]
    Drug interactions with psychostimulants - PubMed
    Methylphenidate appeared to be involved primarily in pharmacokinetic interactions ... pemoline were more often involved in apparent pharmacodynamic interactions.
  51. [51]
    Pemoline | 2152-34-3 - ChemicalBook
    Apr 23, 2023 · Chemical Name: Pemoline ; CBNumber: CB4180793 ; Molecular Formula: C9H8N2O2 ; Molecular Weight: 176.17 ; MDL Number: MFCD00083197.
  52. [52]
    Pemoline CAS#: 2152-34-3 - ChemicalBook
    Pemoline ; refractive index, 1.5570 (estimate) ; storage temp. Store at RT ; solubility, DMSO: soluble28mg/mL ; pka, pKa 10.5 (Uncertain) ; form, solid.Missing: stability | Show results with:stability
  53. [53]
    US5677463A - Process for the preparation of 2-imino-5-phenyl-4 ...
    A compound, 2-imino-5-phenyl-4-oxazolidinone, otherwise known as pemoline, has a central nervous stimulating effect while being substantially free of ...
  54. [54]
    Synthesis of Pemoline - [www.rhodium.ws]
    Using Sodium Metal as the Base: Slowly add 2.3 grams (0.1 mole) of sodium metal cut into small pieces to 50ml MeOH. Let the exothermic reaction subside and cool ...
  55. [55]
    Abbott Laboratories Pharmaceutical Products Division
    May 23, 2023 · On January 30, 1976, the Agency approved NDA 017703 for CYLERT (pemoline) chewable tablets, 37.5 mg, for use in the treatment of ADHD. On ...
  56. [56]
  57. [57]
    [PDF] center for drug evaluation and research - accessdata.fda.gov
    Approval Date: 5/13/98. Indication(s): TREATMENT OF ATTENTION DEFICIT ... Cylert (pemoline) Chewable Tablets, 37.5mg. We also acknowledge receipt of ...Missing: trials | Show results with:trials
  58. [58]
    Pemoline hepatotoxicity and postmarketing surveillance - PubMed
    Between 1975 and 1989, 12 cases of jaundice and 6 deaths in youths ascribed to pemoline hepatotoxicity were reported to the FDA.Missing: 1975-2005 | Show results with:1975-2005
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Pemoline removed from US market - E-lactancia
    Overall, FDA stated, the reporting rate for liver failure among pemoline users is 10 to 25 times higher than would be expected in the general population.
  60. [60]
  61. [61]
    Cylert, Generics Withdrawn From the Market - Medscape
    Oct 25, 2005 · Abbott ceased production of the drug in May 2005, citing declining sales. Generic versions will now also be discontinued. The FDA has received ...Missing: United States
  62. [62]
    FDA withdraws approval of ADHD drug - NBC News
    Oct 24, 2005 · The move means drug manufacturers will no longer produce generic versions of pemoline, which was developed by Abbott Laboratories and sold under ...Missing: United | Show results with:United
  63. [63]
    Pemoline removed from US market - Managed Healthcare Executive
    FDA stated that it had received 13 reports of liver failure that resulted in liver transplant or death among patients receiving pemoline despite the existence ...Missing: hepatotoxicity | Show results with:hepatotoxicity
  64. [64]
    Efficacy and safety of methylphenidate and pemoline in children with ...
    The mean treatment rating was higher for pemoline (3.5 vs 2.7). Discontinuation was higher in the methylphenidate group (32% [n = 77] vs 10% [n = 25]) for lack ...
  65. [65]
    a case study of pemoline using pharmacy claims data - PubMed
    Results: Of 1,279,296 prescription claims for CNS stimulants, 17,256 (1.3%) were for pemoline. Nine hundred thirteen patients received pemoline and had 90 days ...Missing: total | Show results with:total
  66. [66]
    Public Citizen Petitions FDA to Take Pemoline Off the Market
    Mar 24, 2005 · Between the 1975 approval and 1996, there were 193 adverse drug reactions involving the liver ascribed to pemoline reported to the FDA that ...
  67. [67]
    center for drug evaluation and research - accessdata.fda.gov
    Jan 5, 1996 · Although stud- ies indicate that pemoline may act in animals through dopaminergic mechanisms, the exact mechanism and site of action of the drug ...
  68. [68]
    [PDF] center for drug evaluation and research - accessdata.fda.gov
    Sep 9, 1996 · Generic Name: PEMOLINE. Sponsor: ABBOTT LABORATORIES. Approval Date: 9/9/96. Indication(s): TREATMENT OF ATTENTION DEFICIT. DISORDER. Page 2 ...Missing: manufacturing process
  69. [69]
    Abbott Says Decision To Discontinue Cylert Stems From Demand ...
    Mar 24, 2005 · Significant decline in pemoline sales is reason behind the ADHD agent's discontinuation, not liver safety issues raised in a Public Citizen ...Missing: voluntary October
  70. [70]
    ADHD Medications and Risk of Serious Cardiovascular Events in ...
    Dec 12, 2011 · ADHD medications included stimulant-class medications (methylphenidate, amphetamines, pemoline) and atomoxetine, a selective norepinephrine ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Controlled Substance by DEA Code Number
    Abbreviations: "NARC" = Narcotic, "CSA SCH" = CSA Schedule, "CSCN" = Controlled Substance Code Number. Controlled Substances - by Controlled Substance Code ...
  72. [72]
    Drug Scheduling - DEA.gov
    A Listing of drugs and their schedule are located at Controlled Substance Act (CSA) Scheduling or CSA Scheduling by Alphabetical Order. These lists ...Missing: Pemoline | Show results with:Pemoline
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Controlled Substances List
    Dec 12, 2024 · Pemoline. P. ―. Pentazocine. P. ―. Pentedrone. N. ―. Pentobarbital. P. ―. *1:N=Narcotic、SRM=Stimulant' Raw Material、P=Psychotropic、O=Opium、C ...<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    Off-label psychopharmacologic prescribing for children
    Sep 15, 2008 · In May 2005, Abbott Laboratories announced their voluntary withdrawal of this drug from the U.S. market, and the FDA finally withdrew approval ...
  75. [75]
    Pemoline - Expert Committee on Drug Dependence Information ...
    Pemoline is available for medical use in a number of countries, where it may be indicated in child and adult psychiatry for attention deficit disorders. It ...
  76. [76]
    BETANAMIN Tablets 50mg | Kusuri-no-Shiori(Drug Information Sheet)
    Possible adverse reactions to this medicine · generalized fatigability, nausea, yellowness in skin or conjunctiva [severe liver disorder] · unable to stop taking ...Missing: toxicity | Show results with:toxicity
  77. [77]
    BETANAMIN Tablets 10mg | Kusuri-no-Shiori(Drug Information Sheet)
    For narcolepsy and somnolence disease which is similar to narcolepsy, for adults, take 1-10 tablets (10-100 mg of the active ingredient) at a time, twice daily, ...<|separator|>
  78. [78]
    PSA - Getting Diagnosed with ADHD in Japan : r/japanlife - Reddit
    Nov 10, 2015 · Betanamin was not approved for ADHD treatment in Japan, and that was supposed to be strictly controlled and only prescribed for Narcolepsy after extensive ...
  79. [79]
    Pemoline, Methylphenidate, and Placebo in Children With Minimal ...
    An eight-week double-blind comparison between pemoline (Cylert), methylphenidate (Ritalin) hydrochloride, and placebo was carried out on 60 hyperactive children ...Missing: alternative | Show results with:alternative<|control11|><|separator|>
  80. [80]
    Pemoline Problems | Science | AAAS
    Jan 3, 2006 · Despite warnings to physicians by the manufacturer about complications if misused or mis-prescribed, by fall of 2000 the FDA had received notice ...
  81. [81]
    A double-blind, randomized, crossover trial of pemoline in fatigue ...
    Nineteen patients (46.3%) experienced excellent or good relief of fatigue with pemoline, and eight patients (19.5%) with placebo (p = 0.06, Fisher's exact test) ...
  82. [82]
    A double‐blind, randomized, crossover trial of pemoline in fatigue ...
    Pemoline may be an effective short-term treatment for fatigue associated with MS, but its adverse effects are not well tolerated by many patients.<|separator|>
  83. [83]
    Fatigue therapy in multiple sclerosis: results of a double ... - PubMed
    Both pemoline and amantadine have been used to treat MS fatigue, but their relative efficacy is not known. Methods: Amantadine, pemoline, and placebo were ...
  84. [84]
    Fatigue therapy in multiple sclerosis - Neurology
    Amantadine was significantly better than placebo in treating fatigue in MS patients, whereas pemoline was not.
  85. [85]
    A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ... - PubMed
    Conclusions: Many patients with HIV- and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-unrelated fatigue respond favorably to treatment with methylphenidate or pemoline.
  86. [86]
    stimulant effects on performance of fatigued subjects - PubMed
    Magnesium pemoline: stimulant effects on performance of fatigued subjects. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1968 Jan-Feb;9(1):56-60. doi: 10.1002/cpt19689156.
  87. [87]
    Pemoline (Cylert, PemADD) - Davis's Drug Guide
    In long-term therapy, dosage should be reduced gradually to prevent withdrawal symptoms. Abrupt cessation of high doses may cause extreme fatigue and mental ...
  88. [88]
    Pemoline-associated Fulminant Liver Failure: Testing the ... - PubMed
    Hepatotoxicity has been commonly reported in association with pemoline; however, only two reports of cases of fatal liver failure have been published.Missing: FDA 1975-2005<|separator|>
  89. [89]
    Comparative efficacy and tolerability of medications for attention ...
    Comparative efficacy and tolerability of medications for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children, adolescents, and adults
  90. [90]
    Case Characterization, Clinical Features and Risk Factors in Drug ...
    May 12, 2016 · HLA alelles associated to hepatotoxicity. Compounds, Number of Cases, HLA Allele ... For example, pemoline, which has been withdrawn due to ...
  91. [91]
    The Importance of Patient-Specific Factors for Hepatic Drug ... - MDPI
    Moreover, additional associations of co-amoxiclav hepatotoxicity with HLA ... HLA-B*5701 genetic screening to guide initial antiretroviral therapy for HIV.
  92. [92]
    Safety of Stimulants Across Patient Populations: A Meta-Analysis
    May 9, 2025 · Stimulant Safety in Other Mental Disorders ... In this meta-analysis, stimulants showed higher likelihood of AEs compared with placebo.
  93. [93]
  94. [94]
    A Study of Compliance With FDA Recommendations for Pemoline ...
    Pemoline had greater efficacy than placebo for ADHD as determined by significantly more Clinician's Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) ratings of 1 (very ...Missing: satisfaction | Show results with:satisfaction