Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Air Force Special Operations Command

The Air Force Command (AFSOC) is a major command of the responsible for providing special operations forces, including airpower integration, infiltration and exfiltration capabilities, precision firepower, and specialized aviation support to enable global special operations missions. Established on May 22, 1990, at Hurlburt Field, Florida, AFSOC serves as the Air Force's component to the United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), one of ten major Air Force commands focused on organizing, training, equipping, and deploying special operations airmen for worldwide assignment to unified combatant commands. Its core missions encompass battlefield air operations, agile combat support, aviation foreign internal defense, multi-domain operations, and precision strike packages, leveraging aircraft such as the CV-22 Osprey for tiltrotor infiltration, MC-130 variants for air refueling and resupply, and AC-130 gunships for close air support. AFSOC's organizational structure includes active-duty special operations wings, such as the 1st and 24th Wings, special tactics squadrons for combat control and pararescue, and reserve components, all inheriting a heritage from Air Commandos who pioneered unconventional air tactics in theaters like and . This command has sustained operational tempo in diverse environments, emphasizing rapid global deployment and integration with other special operations components to achieve effects in denied or politically sensitive areas, though its specialized platforms have faced scrutiny over maintenance costs and vulnerability in peer conflicts.

Origins and Historical Development

World War II and Korean War Predecessors

The 1st Air Commando Group was activated on October 25, 1943, at Halyard Plantation, North Carolina, under the command of Lieutenant Colonel Philip G. Cochran and Colonel John R. Alison, as an experimental unit within the United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) to support unconventional ground operations in the China-Burma-India (CBI) Theater. Drawing from Cochran's experience in North Africa and tactical innovations like glider pickups, the group employed modified light aircraft including C-47 Skytrains, UC-64 Norsemans, and L-5 Sentinels for troop infiltration, resupply, and close air support, alongside P-51 Mustangs and B-25 Mitchells for ground attack. This approach addressed the logistical challenges of jungle terrain and Japanese control, enabling rapid deployment without reliance on captured airfields. The group's pivotal operation, , commenced on March 5, 1944, marking the first Allied all-airborne invasion of Japanese-held territory, as elements of the British 77th Indian Infantry Brigade () were inserted via towed gliders and paratroops into the area of . Over the ensuing months, the unit conducted more than 3,000 combat sorties, air-dropping approximately 1,000 tons of supplies and ammunition while evacuating over 200 wounded personnel, which sustained the isolated forces and facilitated advances against Japanese supply lines. These empirical outcomes validated the efficacy of integrated air-ground special tactics in asymmetric environments, where conventional bombing proved insufficient, directly influencing post-war evaluations of air-centric . During the , the adapted similar concepts through units under the Air Resupply and Communications Service (ARCS), including the 581st Air Resupply Group, which specialized in covert insertions of partisans and agents behind North Korean and lines using modified C-47s and B-29s for night operations. These missions, such as Operation Aviary starting in 1952, involved low-level drops and extractions to gather intelligence and conduct sabotage, often under cover of darkness to evade radar detection and antiaircraft fire. Psychological operations were integrated via the 582nd Air Resupply Squadron, which executed leaflet drops—totaling millions of sheets—and broadcasts from like F-51 Mustangs to demoralize enemy troops and encourage defections. Such efforts demonstrated the causal value of specialized air units in disrupting enemy cohesion and supporting guerrilla actions in contested terrain, establishing precedents for dedicated aviation despite high attrition rates from operational hazards.

Cold War, Vietnam, and Late Cold War Units

During the , U.S. units evolved to counter insurgent tactics through , , and missions, addressing the limitations of conventional forces in terrain and night operations. The 4th Air Commando Squadron, equipped with the AC-47 Spooky gunship—a modified Douglas C-47 fitted with three 7.62 mm miniguns capable of firing 18,000 rounds per minute—provided persistent loitering fire to defend isolated outposts, hamlets, and camps against assaults. These aircraft illuminated targets with flares and delivered suppressive fire, enabling ground forces to repel attacks that would otherwise overwhelm defenders. Empirical records demonstrate the AC-47's effectiveness in low-intensity engagements: from to , the gunships defended 3,926 hamlets, outposts, and forts, expending over 97 million rounds of ammunition and confirming more than 5,300 enemy killed. In 1967, they logged 1,596 , inflicting 3,650 casualties—a rate exceeding two enemies per —while sustaining losses from ground fire but maintaining high sortie availability through rapid armament replenishment. Complementary efforts included defoliation operations by squadrons like the 12th Air Commando Squadron using UC-123 Providers to strip jungle cover, denying insurgents concealment and mobility, and flights that gathered intelligence on enemy movements to enable precision interdiction. Political constraints, such as restrictive limiting preemptive strikes, occasionally delayed responses, yet the causal mechanism of sustained, on-call firepower directly disrupted enemy offensives, protecting allied positions and buying time for ground maneuvers. Throughout the proxy conflicts, Air Force special tactics elements—precursors to modern combat controllers—integrated with for cross-border and support, adapting to unconventional threats in and beyond. Units under the 1st Air Commando Group, formed from the 4400th Combat Crew Training Squadron in 1962, emphasized tactics, including airborne insertion and extraction to evade Soviet-supplied antiaircraft systems. These operations prioritized empirical targeting of supply routes and leadership, yielding measurable delays in insurgent advances despite asymmetric enemy advantages in terrain familiarity. In the late era, special operations units shifted toward formalized training under , developing rapid deployment capabilities at bases like to counter Soviet-backed insurgencies in potential theaters such as . Precursors to the 23rd Air Force consolidated dispersed squadrons into cohesive groups, focusing on exercises for , psychological operations, and strikes against hybrid threats, enhancing readiness for without escalating to confrontation. This evolution addressed doctrinal gaps exposed in , prioritizing versatile air assets that could operate under political limits while delivering disproportionate impact through technology-enabled targeting.

Formation of Twenty-Third Air Force and Transition to AFSOC

The aborted Operation Eagle Claw on 24 April 1980, aimed at rescuing American hostages in Iran, revealed critical shortcomings in U.S. military special operations, including inadequate joint planning, equipment reliability, and specialized air support integration. These failures, which resulted in eight U.S. servicemen killed and several aircraft destroyed without reaching the hostages, underscored the need for a dedicated Air Force structure to manage special operations aviation assets previously dispersed across commands. In response, the U.S. Air Force established Twenty-Third Air Force (23 AF) on 10 February 1983 under Military Airlift Command, activating it on 1 March 1983 at Scott Air Force Base, Illinois, to consolidate command of special tactics, airlift, and rescue units for improved operational cohesion. On 1 August 1987, 23 AF relocated its headquarters to , , positioning it closer to key training and operational assets for enhanced readiness in support. This move aligned with ongoing efforts to professionalize contributions to amid evolving threats. The Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 4 October 1986 reformed command structures to prioritize joint operations, while the Nunn-Cohen Amendment in the Fiscal Year 1987 National Defense Authorization Act mandated establishment of U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) on 16 April 1987 as a with service-specific components. To fulfill the 's role in providing aviation-centric forces to USSOCOM, 23 AF was redesignated (AFSOC) on 22 May 1990, gaining major command status at and assuming responsibility for organizing, training, and equipping active-duty units. This transition integrated over 15 squadrons and support elements previously under varied commands, streamlining and enabling doctrinal advancements in air-ground integration for high-risk missions like covert insertions and extractions. AFSOC's early focus refined tactics for support in austere environments, enhancing overall joint efficacy without overlapping conventional air forces.

Organizational Structure and Lineage

Command Assignments and Stations

Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) operates as one of ten major commands within the while serving as the service's component to (USSOCOM), established as such upon AFSOC's activation on May 22, 1990. In this dual role, AFSOC maintains administrative control under the Chief of Staff of the but exercises operational control through USSOCOM to assign Air Force special operations forces (AFSOF) directly to the six geographic combatant commands and USSOCOM for missions requiring specialized air capabilities in , , and other high-risk environments. This structure ensures AFSOC's forces integrate seamlessly with joint special operations task forces, prioritizing rapid deployability over conventional airpower basing logic. AFSOC's headquarters has been located at , , since its establishment, hosting core elements including the and to centralize command, control, and initial training for global missions. Key continental United States (CONUS) stations extend to , , home to the , which supports persistent airpower projection from a forward-leaning inland location optimized for training in austere conditions. Overseas detachments and forward operating locations, such as those at in the and in , provide persistent presence and reduce transit times to theaters like , , and the , enabling quicker insertion of AFSOF compared to basing solely on the U.S. East Coast. Recent realignments reflect strategic adaptations to enhance and mission sustainment. The , previously aligned at with an intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) emphasis, is transitioning to a dedicated AFSOC power projection wing at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, , with final basing decisions announced on September 12, 2025, and environmental assessments slated to begin in fall 2025. This shift, involving the relocation of approximately 600 personnel and units like the , aims to consolidate capabilities for precision strike, infiltration, and resupply while leveraging Davis-Monthan's existing infrastructure for extended operations, thereby shortening response timelines in contested regions by distributing risk from single-site dependencies. Such basing decisions prioritize causal factors like geographic dispersion for survivability and proximity to training ranges, directly improving AFSOC's ability to sustain operations without reliance on vulnerable forward logistics chains.

Active Duty, Guard, and Reserve Components

The (AFSOC) maintains its component as the foundational element of its force structure, comprising the majority of its operational personnel and focusing on sustained global missions such as infiltration, , and strikes in contested environments. This core includes approximately 16,000 personnel organized under key wings, including the at , ; the at , ; the at , ; and the at , . These units deliver persistent readiness and expertise without reliance on rotational surges, enabling AFSOC to execute core competencies like special tactics and aviation support on a continuous basis. Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve components augment the active duty force through total force integration, providing scalable surge capacity for high-tempo operations while preserving the specialized skills of the active cadre. The Air Force Reserve's , the sole reserve special operations wing, operates in classic association with the active at , , contributing personnel for non-standard aviation and internal defense missions during mobilizations. , such as the of the Air National Guard at and the of the Pennsylvania Air National Guard at , similarly integrate to support AFSOC taskings, often mobilizing for expeditionary requirements. This structure allows reserves and guard elements to handle domestic support and rapid augmentation, distinct from the active component's emphasis on forward-deployed, enduring presence. Empirical evidence from Global War on Terrorism operations demonstrates the reserve and guard components' role in extending operational tempo, with AFSOC's increasing reliance on these forces enabling sustained deployments amid active duty constraints; a 2019 Government Accountability Office assessment noted that reserve mobilizations grew to fill gaps, acting as a force multiplier without eroding active expertise, though better deployment management was recommended to mitigate over-reliance risks. Total force policies, formalized in Air Force directives since the early 2010s, underscore this integration's benefits, yielding cost efficiencies and enhanced readiness through shared resources and training, as reservists bring civilian-sector skills to specialized roles. Overall, the component distinctions ensure active duty handles baseline global commitments, while guard and reserve provide elastic capacity for surges, aligning with AFSOC's operational demands.

Key Wings, Squadrons, and Units

The at , , executes core missions encompassing , precision aerospace strike, specialized infiltration and mobility, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (), and command-and-control integration for joint special operations forces worldwide. Its subordinate units operate platforms such as AC-130J Ghostrider gunships for prolonged loitering strikes and CV-22B Ospreys for infiltration in austere environments. The , based at , , specializes in precision strike, agile combat support, and missions synchronized with ground elements, leveraging AC-130J gunships for and MQ-9 Reapers for persistent . This wing's operations emphasize forward presence and information operations to enhance special operations lethality in contested theaters. Overseas, the at , , supports European and African theaters with MC-130J Commando II aircraft for low-level infiltration, resupply, and of special operations helicopters, alongside CV-22 Ospreys for rapid insertion. Complementing this, the at , , serves as the Pacific hub for special operations aviation, providing MC-130J capabilities for clandestine penetration and U-28A aircraft for tactical in support of joint and allied forces. Key squadrons within these wings include special tactics elements under the , such as the (pararescuemen focused on and in hostile areas) and the (combat controllers enabling precision airstrikes via joint terminal attack control). The 34th Special Tactics Squadron, aligned with the 353rd Wing, conducts combat control for airfield seizure and in expeditionary settings. These squadrons integrate with ground maneuvers, providing terminal guidance for strikes and operations that have supported thousands of joint missions. In 2024, AFSOC activated the 11th at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona, on July 11 to streamline expeditionary command for rapid deployment of special operations air assets, including ISR and strike elements, in response to great power competition requirements. This unit focuses on agile task-organized forces for theater-level infiltration and fires .
Wing/GroupPrimary BaseKey Mission Focus and Assets
1st SOW, FLPrecision strike (AC-130J), mobility (CV-22B), global
27th SOWCannon AFB, NM (AC-130J), persistent (MQ-9)
352nd SOW, Infiltration/refueling (MC-130J), / ops
353rd SOWKadena AB, JapanPacific penetration (MC-130J), tactical (U-28A)

Personnel, Training, and Resources

Recruitment, Selection, and Special Warfare Training

![Members of the U.S. Air Force Special Operations Command, assigned to the 23rd Special Tactics Squadron][float-right] The Special Warfare career fields, including Pararescue (PJ), (CCT), (TACP), and (SR), are recruited through targeted enlistment programs emphasizing candidates with high physical aptitude, mental resilience, and technical skills suitable for high-risk . Selection begins after Basic Military Training at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, , with candidates entering the Special Warfare Preparatory Course (SW PREP), an eight-week program focused on strength conditioning, running, rucking, swimming, and initial fitness assessments to prepare for the rigors of specialized pipelines. These pipelines, managed by the Special Warfare Training Wing at JBSA-Lackland, span 1.5 to 2 years and feature sequential phases: assessment and selection, technical training, and courses tailored to each career field. For instance, and PJ candidates undergo airborne school, combat dive training at locations like , and high-altitude low-opening () parachute operations, alongside water survival and emergency medical skills. TACP training emphasizes joint terminal attack control for integration, while focuses on environmental reconnaissance and surveillance in austere environments. Attrition rates average around 80 percent across these fields, driven by voluntary withdrawals, medical disqualifications, and performance failures to ensure only operators meeting stringent physical and operational thresholds graduate. Post-Global War on Terror, training has evolved to address peer competitor threats, incorporating principles for dispersed, resilient operations that reduce reliance on vulnerable fixed bases and enhance survivability in contested environments. This doctrinal shift, formalized in Air Force Doctrine Note 1-21 published August 23, 2022, integrates ACE into Special Warfare curricula to prepare personnel for rapid force employment against advanced adversaries, emphasizing and multi-domain coordination. Graduates demonstrate high operational reliability, contributing to precision strikes and raids in conflicts like through specialized support in , , and , with selection rigor correlating to minimal personnel-induced mission disruptions.

Manning Levels, Budget, and Operational Resources

As of 2024, Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) maintains approximately 17,000 personnel across active duty, Air Force Reserve, , and civilian roles, enabling persistent global operations despite fluctuating end-strength targets influenced by recruitment challenges and retention in high-demand special operations fields. Special tactics operators, numbering nearly 1,000 within AFSOC, constitute roughly 6% of the force but deliver outsized effects through integration with assets, enhancing strikes, personnel recovery, and airfield seizure in contested environments. This manning structure supports continuous alert postures, with rotations sustaining forward-deployed teams for rapid crisis response, as evidenced by AFSOC's contributions to ongoing contingencies requiring immediate surge capacity. AFSOC's fiscal resources derive primarily from U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) allocations, with the command's FY2025 operation and maintenance request encompassing over $12 billion across components to fund sustainment, , development, and mission-specific . These funds prioritize high-utilization rates for legacy platforms, where specialized SOF achieve sortie generation efficiencies that yield empirical cost-per-mission advantages over conventional by minimizing overhead in scenarios. Resource constraints, including aging fleets and delays, are mitigated through elevated operational tempos—often exceeding standard benchmarks—and targeted maintenance investments, preserving readiness for distributed operations amid competition. Budgetary pressures have intensified post-2021, with AFSOC facing trade-offs in modernization versus readiness, yet causal linkages between and funding sustain disproportionate returns: smaller forces enable agile, low-footprint deployments that avert larger conventional escalations, as demonstrated in historical ROI analyses of aviation versus general-purpose alternatives. High utilization offsets material wear, ensuring AFSOC's capacity for 24/7 global reach despite fiscal limits imposed by broader Department of Defense priorities.

Leadership and Commanders

Lieutenant General Michael E. Conley assumed command of Air Force Special Operations Command on July 2, 2024, succeeding Lieutenant General Tony Bauernfeind during a ceremony at , . Prior to this role, Conley commanded squadrons, wings, and deployed air components, bringing experience in strategy, plans, and mobility operations. Under his leadership, AFSOC has prioritized post-Global War on Terror transformation, including operational testing of the OA-1K Skyraider light attack aircraft in 2025 to bolster capabilities for in contested areas. Preceding commanders advanced doctrinal shifts from dominance to competition readiness. Lieutenant General , who led AFSOC from November 2019 to December 2022, directed a pivot toward peer threats by emphasizing joint force integration, enhanced training for high-end conflicts, and upgrades to platforms like the CV-22 Osprey for improved survivability and multi-domain operations. Slife's tenure correlated with AFSOC's advocacy within U.S. Command for resource allocation supporting these adaptations, including amphibious and distributed lethality concepts. Earlier leaders established foundational structures and operational tempo. Thomas E. Eggers served as the inaugural AFSOC upon its on February 1, 1990, overseeing the transition from Twenty-Third Air Force and initial integration of aviation units under unified command. Bruce L. Fister, commanding in the mid-1990s, expanded AFSOC's role in precision strike and infiltration tactics during early post-Cold War contingencies. James L. Hobson Jr., in command during the late 1990s, prioritized modernization of rotary-wing assets, contributing to doctrinal refinements that supported subsequent high-success-rate missions exceeding 95% completion in and . These tenures marked AFSOC's evolution from niche SOF support to a core provider of air-centric special warfare effects.

Equipment and Technological Capabilities

Current Aircraft and Platforms

The MC-130J Commando II serves as the primary fixed-wing infiltration, , and resupply platform for AFSOC, capable of low-level flight in contested environments with and for extended missions beyond 3,000 miles unrefueled. Its cruise speed exceeds 360 knots, enabling rapid insertion of forces while minimizing exposure in denied areas, with advanced digital supporting precision navigation and countermeasures for survivability against integrated air defenses. As of fiscal year 2025, the active-duty inventory stands at 57 aircraft, reflecting a full replacement of legacy MC-130 variants optimized for modern peer threats. The AC-130J Ghostrider provides persistent and , equipped with a 105 mm , 30 mm , and precision-guided munitions for day/night operations with high accuracy in urban and contested settings. Its eight-hour loiter capability, enhanced by and advanced sensors, delivers sustained firepower, as demonstrated in operational testing where it achieved precision strikes with minimal collateral risk. This platform's integration of multi-spectral targeting systems ensures effectiveness against time-sensitive targets in environments with degraded GPS or electronic jamming. Complementing these, the CV-22B Osprey enables short takeoff and vertical landing insertions, with a speed of up to 275 knots and range exceeding 1,000 nautical miles, facilitating rapid deployment of forces into austere sites without reliance on forward airfields. For , , and reconnaissance, the U-28A Draco, a modified , offers low-observable, short-field operations with real-time sensor feeds for tactical decision-making in remote areas. AFSOC's operational fleet across these and supporting platforms totals approximately 300 , prioritizing modularity and low-maintenance designs to maintain readiness in high-threat scenarios over less survivable legacy systems.

Future Acquisitions and Emerging Technologies

Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) is prioritizing the acquisition of low-cost, attritable platforms and autonomous systems to enhance light-footprint operations in contested environments, shifting from vulnerabilities exposed in Global War on Terror-era missions where manned faced elevated risks from advanced air defenses. The OA-1K Skyraider II, a derived from agricultural designs and adapted for , supports this by enabling persistent surveillance and precision strikes in austere locations with minimal logistical demands; AFSOC accepted the first missionized example on April 3, 2025, with plans for up to 75 units by 2029 to provide cost-effective crewed options for isolated forces. Autonomy initiatives form a core of emerging capabilities, exemplified by a 2024 $105 million U.S. Command contract awarded to Labs for advanced on the C-130J , aiming to reduce aircrew requirements and enable single-pilot or unmanned operations across fixed-wing platforms. This builds toward broader integration, including drone swarming via concepts like the Adaptive Airborne Enterprise, which deploys remote-piloted autonomous systems for , , and to minimize forward-deployed footprints against peer adversaries. Planned advancements include swarm carrier unmanned aircraft systems launchable from C-130s to disperse attritable drones, enhancing projection in high-threat zones by distributing risk across expendable assets rather than high-value manned platforms. Structural changes in 2025, such as redesignating the as a unit at Davis-Monthan Base—transitioning from training to integrated strike, mobility, and missions—will align these technologies with improved force deployment. These efforts empirically address causal gaps in prior operations, where pilot exposure in denied increased attrition; attritable allows sustained presence without proportional human cost, validated through ongoing tests prioritizing survivability over legacy endurance.

Major Operations and Achievements

Pre-9/11 Interventions: Urgent Fury, Just Cause, and

In Operation Urgent Fury, launched on October 25, 1983, the 23rd —established in 1980 as the 's primary special operations entity—provided essential airlift capabilities, including C-130 troop transports and MC-130 Combat Talons for infiltration, enabling the rapid seizure of Point Salines airfield and the evacuation of approximately 800 American medical students from amid threats from Grenadian and forces. These precision insertions and extractions minimized U.S. exposure to ground threats, with missions encompassing reconnaissance, via A-7 Corsairs and AC-130 gunships, and medical evacuations that contributed to overall coalition casualties of 19 killed and 116 wounded, while neutralizing Grenadian resistance and contingents numbering around 1,500. The operation's success underscored the causal efficacy of specialized air mobility in overcoming logistical constraints of small-island interventions, though initial intelligence gaps on enemy dispositions led to ad hoc adjustments in drop zones, revealing early limits in integrated joint planning. Operation Just Cause, initiated at 0100 on December 20, 1989, leveraged Air Force special operations aviation for high-risk night insertions, with three MC-130E Combat Talons from the airlanding Rangers at Rio Hato and supporting airborne assaults on Torrijos-Tocumen airfield—the largest U.S. night combat paradrop since —facilitating the disruption of Panamanian Defense Forces (PDF) command structures and the eventual surrender of dictator , who was exfiltrated aboard an MC-130 on January 3, 1990. gunships delivered sustained , destroying the PDF's Comandancia and multiple command posts with precision 105mm and 40mm ordnance, achieving decisive effects against fortified urban targets while Ranger drops demonstrated over 80% accuracy in contested conditions despite adverse weather and anti-aircraft fire. This integration of low-level infiltration and direct-action enabled rapid dominance over numerically superior PDF units, though empirical reviews noted coordination frictions with elements due to differing threat assessments, highlighting the need for refined special-conventional force interfaces absent in purely air-centric paradigms. AFSOC's debut in major came during the (Operations Desert Shield and Storm, August 1990–February 1991), where MC-130s and AC-130s executed deep-penetration strikes and , logging 5,000 sorties and 10,000 flight hours, including diversions to SCUD-hunting kill boxes in western that disrupted mobile launcher operations through laser-guided munitions and sensor-driven targeting, yielding high engagement ratios against Iraqi armor and revetments. MH-53 Pave Low helicopters conducted two combat search-and-rescue recoveries of downed F-117 and F-16 pilots under integrated SOF tasking, exemplifying precision enablers' role in sustaining air campaign momentum against a conventional adversary with integrated air defenses. While these assets contributed to coalition victories by amplifying ground maneuver through on-call interdiction—evidenced by AC-130 kill chains exceeding 90% in verified targets—challenges arose from mismatched operational rhythms with conventional , including deconfliction delays in dynamic battlespaces and partial SCUD suppression due to launchers' mobility outpacing real-time cueing, underscoring airpower's potency in attrition but its dependence on ground reconnaissance for elusive threats.

Global War on Terror: Enduring Freedom and Iraqi Freedom

In , launched on October 7, 2001, following the , Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) assets provided essential aviation support to special operations forces (SOF) teams partnering with the to dismantle control. MC-130 Combat Talon aircraft and MH-53 Pave Low helicopters enabled covert insertions, such as Operational Detachment Alpha 555 on October 19, 2001, in the Shamali Plains, facilitating laser-guided precision strikes that accelerated the fall of on November 9 and on November 13. AC-130 gunships delivered (CAS), contributing to over 2,200 enemy casualties in a single engagement at on November 11 through 25 airstrikes targeting concentrations of and fighters. AFSOC's integration of combat controllers from the with indigenous forces enhanced targeting accuracy, directing 6,500 strike sorties that dropped 17,500 munitions—57 percent precision-guided—against time-sensitive targets, disrupting command posts, armor, and supply lines. During the in December 2001, six AC-130 gunships and MQ-1 Predator drones provided suppressive fire along ridgelines, supporting efforts to encircle remnants despite bin Laden's escape. In (March 2002), AFSOC supported SOF at high altitudes in , dropping nearly 3,500 bombs and confirming 517 killed, though at the cost of two AFSOC personnel posthumously awarded the Air Force Cross. Overall, AFSOC logged thousands of combat hours, enabling the regime's collapse by mid-2002 with minimal conventional ground forces. In Operation Iraqi Freedom, initiated March 20, 2003, AFSOC emphasized AC-130 gunships for urban and convoy escort, protecting advancing forces amid regime loyalist resistance. These platforms, equipped with 105mm, 40mm, and 25mm cannons, conducted night operations to minimize while neutralizing threats, supporting the Joint Special Operations Task Force-North's seizure of Bashur Airfield in early April 2003 to open a northern front. MC-130s facilitated SOF infiltrations and resupply, contributing to the rapid toppling of Saddam Hussein's regime by April 9 with Ba'athist infrastructure dismantled through precision-enabled raids. AFSOC's aviation enablers were causal in both campaigns' initial successes, leveraging SOF precision to achieve and degrade terrorist sanctuaries, as evidenced by the removal of Taliban safe havens and al Qaeda leadership attrition, including figures like via AFSOC-coordinated strikes. From 2001 to 2014, AFSOC flew 173,000 hours and 150,000 combat sorties across Enduring and Iraqi Freedom, moving 300,000 passengers and aiding in 17,000 enemy killed or 20,000 detained, though sustained demands strained platforms like the MH-53 fleet, retired by 2008 without full replacement. While effective against jihadist networks—disrupting operations that deterred large-scale attacks on U.S. for years—prolonged engagements drew critiques for lacking decisive end states, exacerbating resource wear without eradicating insurgencies, as noted in post-operation analyses prioritizing tactical wins over strategic exits.

Post-2011 Counterterrorism and Irregular Warfare

![AC-130U over Hurlburt Field.jpg][float-right] Following the 2011 drawdown in , Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) redirected resources toward emerging threats, particularly the rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and (ISIS) in and . Under (OIR), initiated in June 2014, AFSOC assets provided critical intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR), , and precision strikes to support partner ground forces. AC-130 gunships and U-28A Draco aircraft executed targeted engagements, enabling the disruption of ISIS command structures and logistics without large-scale U.S. troop commitments. In the 2016-2017 Battle of , AFSOC special tactics personnel, including combat controllers from the , directed airstrikes in dense urban environments, achieving high precision to minimize collateral damage while supporting Iraqi and advances. For instance, Staff Sgt. Christopher Lewis coordinated strikes that neutralized positions, earning a for actions that exemplified the integration of AFSOC airpower with joint terminal attack controllers (JTACs) on the ground. These efforts contributed to the liberation of by July 2017, with AFSOC's platforms like the U-28A facilitating real-time targeting that halted territorial expansion. Empirical data from operations indicate that air-delivered munitions, often guided by AFSOC enablers, accounted for significant enemy , correlating with 's loss of over 95% of its held territory by 2018. Beyond the , AFSOC extended operations to , focusing on disrupting al-Shabaab in and affiliates of in the Basin through 2019. MC-130 and special tactics teams supported nations via air infiltration, , and missions, often under U.S. Command (AFRICOM). These efforts included strikes that prevented al-Shabaab from regaining significant territory post-2011 gains, with airstrikes—enabled by AFSOC platforms—linked to reduced attack frequencies in targeted regions, such as a measurable decline in al-Shabaab's offensive capabilities in southern . However, reliance on host-nation ground forces exposed limitations of air-centric , as persistent threats required sustained local capacity that often faltered without direct U.S. advisory presence. AFSOC's post-2011 operations demonstrated adaptability in environments, emphasizing cost-effective network attrition over occupation. By prioritizing partner enablement, AFSOC achieved verifiable impacts, including the territorial defeat of ISIS's in March 2019, while incurring minimal U.S. casualties—fewer than 20 special operators lost in OIR combat roles. This approach countered claims of ineffectiveness by leveraging empirical outcomes: ISIS-directed attacks in and dropped over 80% post-liberation campaigns, underscoring causal links between sustained AFSOC-enabled strikes and degraded insurgent operational tempo. Nonetheless, dependencies on fragile alliances highlighted causal constraints, where alone could not fully eradicate ideologically driven networks without complementary ground efforts.

Recent Deployments and Contingencies (2020-Present)

In August 2021, during , Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) assets played a critical role in the non-combatant evacuation from , supporting the of over 124,000 individuals amid the U.S. withdrawal. More than a dozen AFSOC aircraft, including special operations platforms, provided , infiltration, and exfiltration capabilities to facilitate the largest such evacuation in U.S. history. These efforts involved coordination with joint forces to secure International Airport under deteriorating security conditions. Following the Afghanistan withdrawal, AFSOC shifted focus toward agile combat employment and great power competition, activating the 11th Air Task Force (ATF) on July 11, 2024, at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, , to enhance expeditionary responses. The 11th ATF, under AFSOC, integrates special tactics, aviation, and sustainment elements for rapid deployment in contested environments, conducting its inaugural at McGregor Range, , from November 4-19, 2024. By September 2025, the unit achieved its first operational deployment, demonstrating AFSOC's pivot to distributed, resilient operations post-Global War on Terror. Amid escalating tensions in the , AFSOC conducted training exercises in the region during 2025 to counter potential instability linked to Venezuelan regime actions, including airfield seizure drills on St. Croix simulating island-hopping raids against narco-terrorist threats. These activities, part of broader U.S. Southern Command initiatives, involved helicopters flying within 100 miles of in October 2025 to maintain proficiency and provide deterrence options. Such preparations addressed ongoing irregular threats like transnational criminal organizations, sustaining AFSOC's operational tempo despite a scaled-back posture from large-footprint missions. AFSOC's multinational engagements from 2020 onward emphasized deterrence through partner capacity-building, as seen in Emerald Warrior 25.2, a large-scale exercise from July 21 to August 11, 2025, across and the , which integrated allied forces to test in high-threat scenarios. This premier AFSOC event, nested within the Department of the Air Force's Department-Level Exercise series, enhanced and warfighting readiness against peer adversaries while maintaining focus on contingencies. These efforts contributed to sustained regional presence, deterring aggression through demonstrated agility rather than permanent basing.

Controversies, Criticisms, and Reforms

Ethical Lapses and Accountability Failures

In the late , a series of high-profile allegations across U.S. Forces (SOF), including unauthorized killings and cover-ups in zones, prompted scrutiny of supporting elements like Air Force Command (AFSOC) enablers, where operational tempo and mission prioritization sometimes enabled "gray area" behaviors bordering on unethical or illegal acts. These incidents, primarily documented in Navy SEAL units but spilling over to AFSOC and special tactics support, highlighted a causal emphasis on results over ethical oversight, with disaggregated deployments reducing . The U.S. Special Operations Command's (USSOCOM) Comprehensive Review of SOF , released on January 23, 2020, examined these issues enterprise-wide, including AFSOC, and concluded no systemic ethical failures but identified a pervasive culture fixated on force employment and mission accomplishment that undermined discipline and enabled recurrent, isolated lapses. The , informed by visits to AFSOC units and of from 2018-2019, attributed root causes to high operational demands disrupting force generation cycles, leader disengagement during deployments, and normalized tolerance for boundary-pushing tactics in environments. It recommended centralized force management, enhanced junior leader development, and codified accountability measures to prioritize without compromising readiness. In response, AFSOC and broader SOF implemented reforms starting in 2020, including reduced deployment rates—such as limiting AFSOC rotations to essential missions—and mandatory training focused on in ambiguous scenarios, which correlated with fewer reported incidents by 2021. Critics, including congressional overseers, argued that pre-review overemphasis on tactical successes eroded standards, fostering entitlement and weak internal reporting, though empirical data post-reform showed strengthened and compliance without evidence of widespread recurrence. Isolated AFSOC-specific cases persisted, such as a 2022 demotion of a for distributing explicit images and a 2025 relief of the command chief amid a investigation, underscoring ongoing needs for vigilant enforcement despite cultural shifts.

Standards Erosion and Diversity Integration Challenges

In January 2022, anonymous allegations surfaced accusing Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) of advancing a through despite her voluntary , citing adjusted standards and limited instructor authority to enforce discipline as factors enabling perceived favoritism. The candidate herself raised internal concerns in April 2021, stating that changes to requirements eroded team confidence and invalidated prior efforts, amid broader scrutiny of diversity-driven accommodations in high-stakes pipelines. AFSOC commander Lt. Gen. James Slife ordered an probe, which concluded in June 2022 that no preferential treatment occurred, attributing claims to incomplete context or ; however, the incident amplified debates over whether institutional pressures to achieve "firsts" in compromised impartial assessment. Special tactics pipelines, integral to AFSOC roles like combat control and pararescue, feature deliberate rates of 70-80% to filter for superior physical , mental acuity, and operational , directly correlating with in austere combat environments where lapses can prove fatal. U.S. Command's () 2021 Diversity and Strategic , overseeing AFSOC, framed such exacting criteria—including scoring thresholds and extended training—as removable "barriers" to broader participation, prompting critics to warn of causal risks to force lethality from prioritizing demographic representation over unyielding merit. While advocates maintain that inclusive pipelines expand the talent pool without altering core standards, evidenced by low attempt rates (fewer than 10 annually in some AFSOC specialties), opponents cite the pipelines' empirical —high failure as a feature, not flaw—to argue that dilutions for equity undermine the first-principles selection ensuring peerless performance under duress. Following these challenges, the Department of the Air Force in January 2025 shuttered offices and initiatives per , redirecting focus to military excellence and meritocratic hiring to restore readiness amid prior politicization. AFSOC's February 2025 strategic guidance emphasized "Raising Air Commandos" via rigorous preparation and adaptation, signaling a pivot to capability-driven integration that counters optics-focused narratives excusing threshold adjustments. This reaffirmation aligns with federal reforms prioritizing individual merit in selection, aiming to mitigate attrition impacts from mismatched entrants while preserving the command's combat edge.

Resource Prioritization and Capability Cuts

In response to the strategic pivot toward competition with adversaries like and , U.S. Command () has reoriented resource prioritization away from the expansive posture built during two decades of the Global War on Terror (GWOT), prompting cuts to certain capabilities perceived as legacy-driven. This shift emphasizes integrated deterrence and high-end warfighting readiness, with 's (FY) 2025 budget request totaling $9.7 billion, including provisions for overseas operations, but incorporating reductions in programs tied to scenarios. For instance, the Armed Overwatch initiative, intended to bolster AFSOC's light attack and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance roles in permissive environments, saw its planned procurement slashed from an initial target of 75 OA-1K Sky Warden aircraft, with FY2025 buys reduced from 15 to 12 and FY2026 halved from 12 to 6, citing resource constraints and reprioritization. Critics, including bipartisan lawmakers, argue these trims undermine AFSOC's niche in , potentially abdicating U.S. advantages in low-intensity conflicts where forces (SOF) excel, as evidenced by historical GWOT contributions where SOF—comprising roughly 2-3% of total U.S. —delivered outsized operational effects, often accounting for disproportionate mission impacts in and . Such reductions are framed as fiscal realism addressing GWOT-era expansion that swelled SOF end strength to unsustainable levels, fostering dependency on high-tempo deployments without corresponding conventional force offsets. Proponents of cuts that paring back enables redirection toward peer-competitive investments, like enhanced lethality and readiness, aligning with Defense Secretary directives for an 8% departmental spending to eliminate inefficiencies. Debates highlight tensions between acknowledging GWOT-induced overstretch—where prolonged focus strained personnel and without yielding scalable peer deterrence—and preserving SOF's deterrence value against threats from state actors employing irregular tactics. Empirical assessments underscore that deep cuts risk eroding the force multiplier effect, as SOF's agility in response and unconventional missions continues to yield high returns relative to size, even as calibrates for scenarios demanding over unilateral expansion. While some analyses from think tanks question the pace of divestment given persistent global insurgencies, fiscal advocates emphasize that trims mitigate bloat without compromising core AFSOC missions like infiltration and precision strike.

Strategic Evolution and Future Directions

Interoperability, Multinational Training, and Alliances

Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) prioritizes interoperability through joint exercises with U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) components and multinational partners, enabling seamless integration of air, ground, and maritime special operations forces for complex missions. The command's flagship Emerald Warrior series, conducted biannually, simulates high-threat environments to refine tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) for joint insertions, extractions, and close air support, incorporating coalition partners to validate shared operational frameworks. In Emerald Warrior 25.1, from January to February 2025, AFSOC units trained alongside allied air forces from four nations, executing large-scale combined operations including air-to-ground strikes and electronic warfare, which enhanced cross-domain coordination and combat readiness. Emerald Warrior 25.2, held July 21 to August 11, 2025, at Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center Twentynine Palms, further integrated diverse SOF skillsets with partners, emphasizing agile combat employment to counter peer threats. Within NATO frameworks, AFSOC supports allied interoperability via bilateral and multinational drills focused on European deterrence. In August 2025, the 352nd Special Operations Wing conducted a bilateral exercise in Romania with Romanian special operations forces, practicing rapid insertions and perimeter security to bolster NATO's eastern flank readiness against hybrid threats. Such trainings align with broader NATO SOF initiatives, including Exercise Adaptive Hussars in September 2025, where special forces from five NATO nations rehearsed synchronized maneuvers, improving collective response times and tactical synchronization. These efforts yield empirically observable gains in operational tempo, as multinational rehearsals reduce friction in command-and-control interfaces during real-world contingencies. In the Western Hemisphere, AFSOC advances partner capacity under U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) through Caribbean-focused operations amid escalating instability from transnational criminal organizations. In September 2025, AFSOC special tactics airmen from the Kentucky Air National Guard's 123rd Airlift Wing executed infiltration exercises into the Caribbean Sea, honing maritime denial and partner interoperability for counter-narcotics and humanitarian missions. Concurrently, Fuerzas Comando 2025, hosted in El Salvador from August 18 to 29, involved 16 special operations teams from Central America, South America, and the Caribbean, with AFSOC contributions emphasizing joint precision strikes and intelligence sharing to build regional resilience. Combined trainings with Panama in April 2025 formalized commitments to interoperable SOF postures, enabling rapid partner augmentation for crisis response. These initiatives strengthen deterrence by embedding U.S. capabilities within allied networks, fostering mutual reliance that complicates adversary calculations without relying on isolated unilateral actions.

Shift to Great Power Competition and Irregular Threats

Following the 2021 withdrawal from , Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) initiated doctrinal adjustments to prioritize great power competition (GPC) with adversaries like and , while maintaining capabilities for irregular threats. This pivot emphasized scenarios, integrating air support into contested environments to counter (A2/AD) strategies, particularly in the theater. AFSOC leaders highlighted the need for agile, low-observable infiltration and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance () assets to enable joint forces against peer competitors, as articulated by command officials in 2022 assessments of redefining SOF roles amid rising threats from state actors. Despite this GPC focus, demands persisted, with AFSOC retaining roles in gray-zone operations against non-state and hybrid actors sponsored by adversaries. Command strategies incorporated AFSOC's specialized air mobility and precision strike for operations below the of , such as disrupting networks in regions like the and , where critiques noted that an overemphasis on peer threats risked under-resourcing and irregular contingencies. This dual-track approach was evident in ongoing deployments, where AFSOC platforms supported both state-sponsored interdiction and in ambiguous environments, underscoring the causal limitations of fully divesting from versatile enablers proven effective against non-peer actors. In 2025, AFSOC's 35th anniversary commemorations reflected on these adaptations, emphasizing sustained lethality and readiness for GPC while affirming the command's evolution from counterinsurgency-centric operations to integrated hybrid deterrence. Events and leadership statements on May 22, 2025, highlighted innovations like the Adaptive Airborne Enterprise, which leverages attritable unmanned systems for A2/AD penetration, enabling persistent and strike in high-threat areas without overexposing manned assets. Data from command exercises demonstrated dual-threat proficiency, with AFSOC units achieving in simulated scenarios involving both peer denial operations and proxy disruptions, rejecting narratives that diminish SOF's peer-conflict utility in favor of evidence-based versatility.

Ongoing Transformations and Innovations

In 2025, Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) advanced organizational restructuring to enhance operational agility, including the activation of the 11th on October 16, 2024, at Davis-Monthan Base, which serves as one of six designed for flexible force presentation in contested environments. This builds on prior efforts to prioritize development, such as career broadening programs initiated in 2020 to address long-term deployment strains from two decades of operations by distributing training across varied locations and fostering specialized skill retention. Complementing these reforms, the command transitioned its Special Tactics enterprise structure on May 16, 2025, by furling the 24th Special Operations Wing flag, enabling more integrated multi-domain taskings without eroding core infiltration and competencies. Technological infusions have focused on cost-effective platforms for irregular threats, exemplified by the integration of the OA-1K Skyraider II, a light delivered to AFSOC on April 3, 2025, at for armed intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and precision strike missions in austere settings. Named to evoke historical resilience, the Skyraider II supports short takeoff operations and modular payloads, addressing gaps in low-end force options amid competition by extending capabilities without over-reliance on high-cost assets. Developmental testing of the platform, ongoing as of July 2025, emphasizes survivability in denied areas through low-observable features and rapid reconfiguration, projecting empirical improvements in deployment responsiveness for distributed operations. These adaptations align AFSOC with imperatives, incorporating resilient sustainment models tested in exercises like EW 25.2 on August 11, 2025, where blended units demonstrated in electronically contested scenarios. While resource constraints pose risks to legacy platforms, the emphasis on verifiable metrics—such as reduced sortie generation times via modularity—aims to balance innovation against capability dilution, ensuring sustained edge in hybrid threats.

References

  1. [1]
    Air Force Special Operations Command - AFSOC
    The command's core missions include battlefield air operations; agile combat support; aviation foreign internal defense; multi-domain operations; precision ...
  2. [2]
    About Us - AFSOC
    Feb 27, 2025 · Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) provides Air Force special operations forces for worldwide deployment and assignment to regional unified commands.
  3. [3]
    units - AFSOC
    Primary mission of 720 STG is to provide Special Tactics forces for rapid global employment to enable air power success. The 720 STG is SOCOM's tactical ...Air Commando Development... · AFSOC SLC Command Team · ACDC Leadership<|separator|>
  4. [4]
    Air Force Special Operations Command History and Heritage - AFSOC
    The command activated 22 May 1990 at Hurlburt Field, Florida, but it inherited a legacy from the World War II theaters in Europe and China-Burma-India; secret ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] 1st Air Commando Group (Military History Series 86-1 1986) - AFSOC
    Em- ployed in the China-Burma-India Theater, the organization made military history by conducting the first Allied all-aerial invasion-Operation THURSDAY.
  6. [6]
    Historical interview: Phil Cochran > Air Force Special ... - AFSOC
    May 21, 2018 · Col. Philip G. Cochran spent an eventful decade in uniform after joining the Army Air Corps as an aviation cadet in 1936.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Apollo's Warriors : US Air Force Special Operations during the Cold ...
    One of the least-known special operations units in the Korean War, B Flight did everything that was expected of it until the end. Notes. 1. Memorandum ...
  8. [8]
    Special Operations: In the Enemy's Backyard - Air Force Museum
    During the Korean War, special operations included partisan insertions, intelligence gathering, flare-drops, psychological warfare, and sabotaging ...Missing: units | Show results with:units
  9. [9]
    The American PSYOP Organization during the Korean War
    He discusses the Air Force's three psychological operation units, the 580, 581 and 582 Air Resupply and Communication Service (ARCS) Wings. He tells us that ...
  10. [10]
    Flashback: Puff the Magic Dragon: Development of the AC-47 Gunship
    Oct 20, 2023 · The AC-47 was designed for use in defense of Special Forces Camps and hamlets where it could provide close air support against enemy invaders.
  11. [11]
    Vietnam War Weapons: The AC-47 Gunship - Warfare History Network
    These planes were assigned to the 4th Air Commando Squadron, which began flying regular missions in support of Special Forces camps and other vulnerable bases.
  12. [12]
    AC-47 Spooky - Hurlburt Field
    These weapons fired up to 6,000 rounds per minute and the aircraft carried 54,000 rounds. The AC-119 and the AC-130 succeeded the AC-47 in the gunship role with ...
  13. [13]
    Douglas AC-47 - The Aviation Zone
    From 1964 to 1969, the AC-47s successfully defended 3,926 hamlets, outposts and forts. They fired over 97 million rounds and killed over 5,300 enemy soldiers.
  14. [14]
    Vietnam Conflict AC-47D Spooky Gunship History
    By the end of 1964, the modified C-47s undergoing combat tests in Vietnam had flown 16 night combat missions, firing nearly 180,000 rounds to defend RVN ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Heritage of the Special Operations Professionals - AFSOC
    As the Vietnam War expanded, the USAF increased its counterinsurgency capability. The 4400th CCTS became a group in March 1962, and the next month became part ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Development and Employment of Fixed-Wing Gunships 1962-1972
    Jun 30, 2025 · One of the more striking aspects of the war in Southeast Asia was the adaptation of existing weapons in the American arsenal to the peculiar ...<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    [PDF] US Air Force lessons in Counterinsurgency - Air University
    reference to America's involvement in the counterinsurgency war in South Vietnam, one ... Tactics and Plans, 6th Special Operations Squadron, Hurlburt AFB, FL,.
  18. [18]
    [PDF] US Air Force Special Operations during the Cold War - DTIC
    "low intensity conflicts" could still produce rela- tively cheap, effective answers to low-technology problems. For another, this timely combination.
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Air Force Role in Low-Intensity Conflict - Air University
    Type A requires assistance operations by US combat forces to "establish, regain, or maintain control of specific land areas threatened by guerrilla warfare,.
  20. [20]
    [PDF] declassified by - DoD
    In September. 1960 the Air Force took more definite action when it established the Cold. War Strategy Group to study counterinsurgency matters and initiate ...
  21. [21]
    America remembers Desert One heroes - AF.mil
    Apr 26, 2005 · Schwartz, director of the Joint Staff, called the failure of the Iran hostage rescue mission a seminal event in recent American military history ...Missing: 23rd | Show results with:23rd
  22. [22]
    [PDF] AFSOC: The Air Force's Newest Command - DTIC
    On 22 May 1990, the Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) was established at Hurlburt Field, Florida, thus climaxing air power participation in special ...
  23. [23]
    How Failed Rescue of Hostages in Iran Influenced US Special Forces
    Nov 4, 2020 · The complicated rescue operation went awry almost immediately, but lessons from the deadly failure have informed how US special operations are ...
  24. [24]
    Air Force Special Operations Command (USAF)
    Established as Twenty-Third Air Force on 10 Feb 1983. Activated on 1 Mar 1983. Redesignated Air Force Special Operations Command, with status of Major Command, ...
  25. [25]
    Scott History: 1980s > Scott Air Force Base > Display
    May 10, 2017 · On March 1, 1983, MAC activated 23rd Air Force at Scott Air Force Base. The new numbered Air Force's responsibilities included worldwide ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986
    Oct 1, 1986 · To reorganize the Department of Defense and strengthen civilian authority in the. Department of Defense, to improve the military advice ...
  27. [27]
    Air Force Special Operations Command - AF.mil
    The command's core missions include battlefield air operations; agile combat support; aviation foreign internal defense; information operations/military support ...
  28. [28]
    US AIR FORCE SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES
    All USAF special operations are under the command of AFSOC. AFSOC is an Air Force major command and constitutes the Air Force component of the unified USSOCOM.
  29. [29]
    Final basing decision for Special Operations Wing to Davis-Monthan ...
    Sep 12, 2025 · The Air Force will begin the required environmental analysis on proposed changes beginning fall 2025.Missing: AFSOC | Show results with:AFSOC
  30. [30]
    AFSOC Changes Plans for New Wing at Davis-Monthan
    Sep 12, 2025 · The Air Force's plans to replace retiring A-10s at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Ariz., with a new special operations wing are changing.Missing: realignment | Show results with:realignment
  31. [31]
    News - 6th SOS realigns, 6th SOAMXS activated - DVIDS
    Sep 29, 2025 · The 492nd SOW's transformation to a power projection wing enables it to encompass all AFSOC's mission capabilities: precision strike; ...
  32. [32]
    Air Force revamps special operations wing relocating to Arizona
    Sep 12, 2025 · The U.S. Air Force has modified its plans to relocate the 492nd Special Operations Wing to Davis-Monthan Air Force Base.Missing: realignment | Show results with:realignment
  33. [33]
    Fact Sheets - 919th Special Operations Wing
    The 919th SOW, in a classic association with the 492nd SOW, provides operations and maintenance personnel to support the non-standard aviation, foreign internal ...
  34. [34]
    137th Special Operations Wing - Wikipedia
    The 137th Special Operations Wing is a unit of the Oklahoma Air National Guard located at Will Rogers Air National Guard Base, Oklahoma.
  35. [35]
    AFSOC increasingly relies on reservists, but must better manage ...
    Dec 18, 2019 · The Air Force has to do a better job managing the deployments of the guardsmen and reservists it relies on to support its special operations mobilizations.<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    [PDF] AFI 90-1001 - Air Force - AF.mil
    Jun 22, 2020 · This instruction implements Air Force Policy Directive (AFPD) 90-10, Total Force Integration, for planning Total Force Associations (TFAs) ...
  37. [37]
    Air Force continues to pursue total force integration
    Mar 11, 2016 · The Air Force continues to make strides toward total force integration, according to an annual report submitted to Congress March 4.
  38. [38]
    1st Special Operations Wing - Hurlburt Field
    The wing's core missions include close air support, precision aerospace firepower, specialized aerospace mobility, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance ...
  39. [39]
    352nd Special Operations Wing - RAF Mildenhall
    The 352nd Special Operations Wing (SOW), based at RAF Mildenhall, England, is an essential part of Air Force Special Operations Command.
  40. [40]
    Special Tactics Home
    Special Tactics hosts IFAM at Hurlburt Field. IDMTs provide medical support during high-risk training activities and also offer life-saving trainings for ...Join · Contact Us · Special Reconnaissance (SR) · UnitsMissing: roles | Show results with:roles
  41. [41]
    Units - 353rd Special Operations Wing
    The 353rd Special Operations Wing located at Kadena Air Base, Japan is comprised of approximately 1000 Airmen and is the only Air Force Special Operations unit ...Missing: 27th 352nd
  42. [42]
    AFSOC activates 11th Air Task Force - AF.mil
    Air Force Special Operations Command held an assumption of command ceremony for the 11th Air Task Force at Davis-Monthan Air Force Base Oct. 8.
  43. [43]
    11th Air Task Force - Davis-Monthan Air Force Base
    Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) activated the 11 ATF on July 11, 2024 as part of the Department of the Air Force's re-optimization for Great ...
  44. [44]
    Special Warfare Careers - U.S. Air Force
    Unleash your potential with four challenging Special Warfare careers: Combat Controller, Pararescue, Special Reconnaissance, and Tactical Air Control Party.Special Reconnaissance · Special Warfare and Combat... · Pararescue
  45. [45]
    CCT - Air Force Special Tactics
    SPECIAL WARFARE PREPARATORY COURSE (SW PREP). Candidates undergo intense strength and conditioning training by running, rucking, and swimming extensively.
  46. [46]
    Special Warfare Training Wing > Potential Candidates
    The Special Warfare Training Wing, headquartered at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland, Texas, selects and trains the Air Force's special operations forces.
  47. [47]
    Air Force Special Warfare - AF.mil
    Air Force Special Warfare (AFSPECWAR) comprises ground combat forces that specialize in airpower application in hostile, denied and politically sensitive ...
  48. [48]
    ST TACP - Air Force Special Tactics
    The pipeline to become an Air Force TACP is long and challenging. To prepare Airmen for the rigors of it, candidates will receive an extra week of training that ...
  49. [49]
    Policy changes allow Airmen to retrain into special ops - AF.mil
    Jul 26, 2016 · Regardless of background, all battlefield Airmen career fields are demanding and difficult, with an average attrition rate of 80 percent ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] AGILE COMBAT EMPLOYMENT - Air Force Doctrine
    Aug 23, 2022 · Agile Combat Employment (ACE) is a proactive and reactive operational scheme to increase survivability and generate combat power, shifting from ...Missing: post- GWOT
  51. [51]
    Air Force Doctrine Note 1-21 - Agile Combat Employment - AF.mil
    Aug 23, 2022 · Air Force Doctrine Note 1-21 - Agile Combat Employment. Download Full Doctrine Note. Summary of Revisions. Last Published 23 August 2022.Missing: evolution post- GWOT
  52. [52]
    2000'S - Air Force Special Tactics
    By the end of September 2001, AFSOC deployed forces to Southwest Asia at the onset of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM (OEF) in order to confront and remove the ...
  53. [53]
    None
    ### Summary of 2024 USSOCOM Fact Book Data
  54. [54]
    Air Force Special Tactics (24 SOW)
    There are nearly 1,000 ST operators within Air Force Special Operations Command and approximately 2,500 members make up the Special Tactics community with ...Missing: AFSOC percentage
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Fiscal Year 2025 Budget Estimates
    The United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) develops and employs fully capable special operations forces (SOF) to conduct global special operations ...
  56. [56]
    Senior leaders discuss special operations in FY 15 budget request ...
    "And between '14 and '15, the budget goes from $6.6 billion to $7.7 billion so there's considerable growth in (special operations forces)." Air Force ...
  57. [57]
    General Conley takes command of Air Force Special Operations ...
    Jul 2, 2024 · Lt. Gen. Michael Conley assumed command of Air Force Special Operations Command from Lt. Gen. Tony Bauernfeind in a change of command ceremony.Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  58. [58]
    MICHAEL E. CONLEY > Air Force Special Operations Command ...
    He has commanded a squadron, wing and multiple deployed special operations air components. Prior to assuming his current role, Lt. Gen. Conley served as the ...
  59. [59]
  60. [60]
    LT. GEN. Jim Slife and the AFSOC we need - Airman Magazine
    Nov 15, 2021 · James Slife, commander of the Air Force Special Operations Command, discusses the challenges AFSOC is facing to shift from the counter violent ...Missing: contributions | Show results with:contributions
  61. [61]
    AFSOC Goes Amphibious - AFCEA International
    Sep 8, 2022 · Air Force Special Operations Command leader Lt. Gen. James Slife speaks at an Air Force and Space Association event with retired Gen. Bruce ...Missing: contributions | Show results with:contributions
  62. [62]
    MC-130J Commando II > Air Force > Fact Sheet Display - AF.mil
    The MC-130J is air refuellable and features an advanced flight station, fully integrated digital avionics and navigation, auxiliary flight deck stations, and ...Missing: platforms U- 28A
  63. [63]
    MC-130J Commando II - Lockheed Martin
    Characteristics ; Maximum Takeoff Weight. 164,000 pounds ; Speed. 362 KTAS at 22,000 feet ; Range. 3,000 miles unrefueled ; Ceiling. 28,000 feet with 42,000 pound ...Missing: platforms CV- 22 U- 28A
  64. [64]
    MC-130J Commando II - AFSOC
    The MC-130J replaced the SOF fleet of MC-130E, H and P aircraft. The first MC ... Inventory: Active duty, 57 by fiscal 2025 (Current as of January 2025) ...
  65. [65]
    AC-130J Ghostrider > Air Force > Fact Sheet Display - AF.mil
    The AC-130J provides ground forces an expeditionary, direct-fire platform that is persistent, ideally suited for urban operations and delivers precision low- ...Missing: U- 28A
  66. [66]
    AC-130J Ghostrider > Air Force Special Operations ... - AFSOC
    The AC-130J is a highly modified C-130J aircraft that contains many advanced features. It contains an advanced two-pilot flight station with fully integrated ...Missing: CV- 22 U- 28A
  67. [67]
    AC-130J Ghostrider | Air & Space Forces Magazine
    The AC-130J is AFSOC's primary CAS, air interdiction, and armed reconnaissance platform optimized for convoy escort, point defense, and urban combat support.Missing: CV- 22 U- 28A
  68. [68]
    U-28A Draco > Air Force > Fact Sheet Display - AF.mil
    The U-28A is a modified, single-engine Pilatus PC-12 that operates worldwide. The U-28A is part of AFSOC's light tactical fixed wing fleet, formerly known as ...Missing: platforms MC-
  69. [69]
    2025 USAF & USSF Almanac: Equipment
    Aircraft Total Active Inventory (TAI) ; F-35A Lightning II[i] · Total · SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES ; 400 · 1,430 · ACTIVE ; 43 · 503 · ANG ...
  70. [70]
    OA-1K Skyraider II > Air Force Special Operations Command > Display
    AFSOC accepted the first missionized OA-1K Skyraider II on April 3, 2025. The Skyraider II derives its name from the Douglas A-1 Skyraider, which served during ...
  71. [71]
    Autonomous Drone Tech 'Top Acquisition Priority,' AFSOC ...
    Sep 12, 2023 · The Adaptive Airborne Enterprise is an AFSOC modernization initiative focused on developing autonomous drones to improve ISR capabilities.
  72. [72]
    Air Force Special Operations Command accepts the first missionized ...
    Apr 4, 2025 · The Skyraider II officially joined the Air Force Special Operations Command fleet with the delivery of the first missionized aircraft at Hurlburt Field, April ...
  73. [73]
  74. [74]
    Merlin Awarded $105M Production Contract for USSOCOM Fixed ...
    Jun 11, 2024 · With an initial focus on the automation of the C-130J platform, this contract will expand Merlin's technology into USSOCOM's broader ...
  75. [75]
    Merlin Labs Says $105 Million C-130J Advanced Automation ...
    Jun 13, 2024 · Merlin Labs, Inc. said on June 12 that it has received a $105 million contract from US Special Operations Command to provide advanced automation for the Air ...
  76. [76]
    Understanding AFSOC's Adaptive Airborne Enterprise > Air Force ...
    Jan 5, 2024 · The new A2E interface will shrink a traditional RPA crew's deployed footprint and provide operators with the flexibility and mobility to fly ...Missing: emerging | Show results with:emerging
  77. [77]
    AFSOC seeks industry feedback for 'Swarm Carrier' drone
    Jul 11, 2024 · AFSOC is seeking industry feedback for a “Swarm Carrier” uncrewed aircraft system capable of launching from a C-130 and deploying drones of it own.
  78. [78]
    Special Tactics Enterprise Transitions as 24 SOW Flag Furled
    May 20, 2025 · The 24th Special Operations Wing furled its flag May 16, 2025, marking the transition of the organizational structure of the Special Tactics enterprise.
  79. [79]
    1983 - Operation Urgent Fury - Air Force Historical Support Division
    Overall, the U.S. Air Force supported Urgent Fury through a wide range of missions, including reconnaissance, close air support, troop and cargo delivery, ...
  80. [80]
    Looking Back: AFOSI and Operation Urgent Fury
    Oct 28, 2024 · During Operation Urgent Fury, Air Force aircraft and personnel conducted a wide range of missions, including reconnaissance, close air support, ...
  81. [81]
    [PDF] Operation Urgent Fury: The planning and execution of joint ...
    Written several years after the end of Operation. URGENT FURY, this study focuses specifically on the involvement of the Chairman, the Joint Chiefs of Staff ...
  82. [82]
    Operation Just Cause (1989) - AFSOC
    Manual Noriega, Panamanian leader, general and dictator, is taken on board an MC-130 Combat Talon during Operation Just Cause in December 1989.
  83. [83]
    Memories of Operation Just Cause remain 'vivid' for Hurlburt ...
    Dec 19, 2024 · Crews prepare for a formation of five AC-130H Spectre gunships to take off for a mission in support of Operation Just Cause at Hurlburt ...
  84. [84]
    [PDF] Operation Just Cause, The Planning and Execution of the Joint ...
    Operation JUST CAUSE began shortly before 0l00 on 20 December with special operations forces attacking key installations in Panama. In the early hours of 20 ...
  85. [85]
    [PDF] AFSOC.HeritagePamphlet.Jul19 revised.pub
    Overall, AFSOC flew 5,000 sorties and 10,000 hours in support of Operations DESERT SHIELD and DESERT STORM. Following the Gulf War, AFSOC continued to stand ...
  86. [86]
    [PDF] Desert Shield/Desert Storm - AFSOC in the Gulf War (May, 2001)
    22 Jan 91 31 Jan 91 meant Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) was the first major command (MAJCOM) to support a wartime mission. One AC-130H departed ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Gulf War Air Power Survey Vol I - Planning and Command and Control
    ... Gulf War as executed in. Operation Desert Storm; the second report explains how the United. States air forces were organized, what challenges faced the ...
  88. [88]
    [PDF] Table of Contents - AFSOC
    From early August 1990 to the end of February 1991, AFSOC participated in Operations DESERT SHIELD and DESERT STORM—the protection of Saudi Arabia and ...
  89. [89]
    AC-130U > Air Force > Fact Sheet Display - AF.mil
    More recently, AC-130U gunships have supported operations Iraqi Freedom and New Dawn and have been employed in support of operations Enduring Freedom and ...
  90. [90]
    The Air War Against the Islamic State - RAND
    Feb 5, 2021 · Airpower played a pivotal role in the US-led fight against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) from 2014 to 2019 and contributed to the success of ...Missing: AFSOC | Show results with:AFSOC
  91. [91]
    Silver Star awarded for Mosul offensive - AFSOC
    Jan 22, 2018 · Gen. Brad Webb, commander of Air Force Special Operations Command, Jan. 19, 2018, here for his actions during the Mosul offensive in 2016.
  92. [92]
    The Role of U.S. Airpower in Defeating ISIS - RAND
    Feb 12, 2021 · The United States used airpower in Syria and Iraq to halt ISIS's momentum and help defeat the organization, without committing a large ...Missing: accuracy | Show results with:accuracy
  93. [93]
    U.S. Forces Conduct Strikes Targeting al Shabaab - Africa Command
    Sep 11, 2025 · The airstrikes occurred in the Shabelle Region of Somalia. AFRICOM, alongside the Federal Government of Somalia and Somali Armed Forces, ...Missing: Boko Haram drone ISR
  94. [94]
    [PDF] East Africa Counterterrorism Operation and North and West Africa ...
    Jun 30, 2020 · Capability. Build African partner capability focused on defense institution building, countering illicit trafficking, maritime security, counter ...Missing: AFSOC | Show results with:AFSOC
  95. [95]
    CJTF-OIR History - Operation Inherent Resolve
    2014. In June, the security situation in Iraq had deteriorated and Iraqi cities of Mosul and Tikrit fell to ISIS control. Department of Defense designated Army ...Missing: AFSOC | Show results with:AFSOC
  96. [96]
    US Special Ops aircraft cover Kabul evacuation - Key Aero
    Sep 7, 2021 · More than a dozen US Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) aircraft joined the US-led airlift mission to evacuate civilians from Kabul.
  97. [97]
    11th Air Task Force conducts first field exercise - AFSOC
    Nov 19, 2024 · The 11th Air Task Force conducted its first field training exercise at McGregor Range, New Mexico, Nov. 4-19, 2024. As the Air Force shifts ...
  98. [98]
    11th Air Task Force Becomes First Air Task Force To Deploy
    Sep 3, 2025 · Based in Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Tucson, Arizona, the 11 ATF is one of six task forces activated across the Air Force in 2024. It ...Missing: AFSOC | Show results with:AFSOC
  99. [99]
    AFSOC embraces training opportunities in Caribbean amid rising ...
    Sep 25, 2025 · AFSOC commander Lt. Gen. Michael Conley briefed reporters on his near-term priorities. By Brandi Vincent. September 25, 2025.
  100. [100]
    US commandos practiced airfield seizures amid Caribbean build up
    Sep 9, 2025 · AFSOC used St. Croix as a training group for several training exercises meant to simulate raids on small enemy bases in island-hopping ...<|separator|>
  101. [101]
    Special Operations helicopters fly within 100 miles of Venezuela
    Oct 16, 2025 · The helicopters were conducting training flights to keep proficient and provide options for Trump and the Pentagon in the ongoing missions in ...
  102. [102]
    AFSOC to host EXERCISE EMERALD WARRIOR 25.2 - AF.mil
    Jul 21, 2025 · Air Force Special Operations Command will host the next iteration of the Emerald Warrior exercise from July 21 – August 11, 2025, ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
  103. [103]
    AFSOC heightens warfighting readiness during landmark DLE series
    Aug 18, 2025 · EW 25.2 was a premier AFSOC exercise testing warfighting readiness, part of a DLE series, and included training scenarios and international ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
  104. [104]
    After War Zone Scandals, Special Operators Are Curbing ...
    Apr 12, 2021 · Some special operations forces have pushed the envelope on "gray area" behavior, acting in ways that are clearly unethical or illegal, and in cases, even ...Missing: misconduct | Show results with:misconduct
  105. [105]
    [PDF] United States Special Operations Command Comprehensive ...
    Jan 23, 2020 · The review aimed to gather insights on SOF culture and ethics, finding that a focus on mission accomplishment sometimes harms leadership and ...
  106. [106]
    America's Special Operations Problem - NDU Press
    Jan 16, 2023 · ... scandals since 9/11.23 Under congressional pressure, and citing “incidents of misconduct and unethical behavior [that] threatened public ...Missing: lapses | Show results with:lapses
  107. [107]
    Chief master sergeant demoted, jailed for sending explicit photos ...
    Apr 4, 2022 · A former chief master sergeant was recently demoted by three ranks and jailed for more than a month after he admitted to distributing sexually explicit photos ...
  108. [108]
    AFSOC command chief relieved amid investigation - Defense News
    Apr 17, 2025 · Chief Master Sgt. Anthony Green, AFSOC'S command chief, was relieved by AFSOC commander Lt. Gen. Mike Conley, the command said in a statement.
  109. [109]
    Air Force accused of pushing woman through elite commando ...
    Jan 7, 2022 · Jim Slife is calling for an inspector general investigation after claims surfaced that his organization is unfairly pushing an unqualified ...
  110. [110]
    Woman who quit Air Force commando course questioned 'highly ...
    Jan 13, 2022 · A female captain who may become the Air Force's first woman to complete its elite special tactics training raised concerns about the program's shifting ...
  111. [111]
    Female trainee received no special treatment, Air Force report says
    Jun 9, 2022 · An Air Force investigation has found that a minority female Air Force Special Tactics trainee received no preferential treatment despite anonymous assertions ...
  112. [112]
    Air Force general: female special ops trainee did ... - Task & Purpose
    Jan 7, 2022 · Lt. Gen. James Slife said a report that a female special ops candidate received special treatment was false or missing valuable context.
  113. [113]
    Adaptations to a new physical training program in the combat ...
    The United States Air Force combat controller (CCT) training pipeline is extremely arduous and historically has a high attrition rate of 70 to 80%. The ...<|separator|>
  114. [114]
    “Diversity & Inclusion Strategic Plan” Will Weaken Special ...
    Apr 22, 2021 · The SOCOM Strategic Plan refers to high training requirements and scoring systems as “barriers” that should be removed for the sake of diversity ...
  115. [115]
    [PDF] Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Plan 2021 - Military Times
    Feb 26, 2021 · Identify barriers to diversity and inclusion in cultural norms, narratives, programs, processes, and procedures and work to create a more ...
  116. [116]
    Few women are trying for elite special operations roles, new data ...
    Mar 7, 2024 · The data also reveals for the first time that the Air Force quietly welcomed its first female enlisted special reconnaissance airman in 2022.
  117. [117]
    Air Force Shuts Down DEI Programs, Following President's Orders
    Jan 23, 2025 · The Air Force has started shutting down its diversity and inclusion offices and boards to comply with President Donald Trump's sweeping order to root out DEI ...
  118. [118]
    AFSOC Command Team Unveils 2025 AFSOC Strategic Guidance
    Feb 28, 2025 · The guidance lays out the command's updated lines of efforts of Raising Air Commandos, Readying Our Force to Win, and Relevance through Adaptation.
  119. [119]
    [PDF] P&R Memo Implementation of EO 14170, Reforming the Federal ...
    References: (a) Executive Order 14170, "Reforming the Federal Hiring Process and Restoring. Merit to Government Service," January 20, 2025.Missing: AFSOC | Show results with:AFSOC
  120. [120]
    SOCOM Halves OA-1K Armed Overwatch Buy for 2026
    Jul 10, 2025 · U.S. Special Operations Command is once again slowing its purchases of the new OA-1K Skyraider II counterinsurgency plane in 2026.
  121. [121]
    U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) Cut the Size of One of ...
    Sep 17, 2025 · Initially planned for 75 aircraft, SOCOM will now purchase fewer Sky Wardens, reducing the program's budget by $300 million, cutting the number ...
  122. [122]
    Lawmakers fearful of SOCOM cuts, possible risk to mission
    Apr 9, 2025 · Members of Congress on both sides of the aisle expressed concern this week over cuts to special operations forces, with many vowing to plus-up their budget as ...
  123. [123]
    Any Time Any Place? Why Cutting the Air Force's Irregular Warfare ...
    Aug 4, 2022 · AFSOC addressed the distractions of irregular warfare so the conventional Air Force could focus on defending Europe. Except for short-lived ...Missing: reductions criticism
  124. [124]
    Special Ops Report 2025: SOCOM on the Brink - Budget Cuts ...
    Feb 24, 2025 · Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth just threw down the gauntlet, ordering an 8% budget slash—a cool $50 billion in spending reductions ...
  125. [125]
    Counterpoint to U.S. Special Operations Forces Cuts
    For the last two decades of the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT), Americans have come to think of all SOF personnel as barrel-chested, weapon-festooned ...
  126. [126]
    Special Operations Forces in an Era of Great Power Competition
    The secretary of defense's concept of integrated deterrence prioritizes new efforts to deter great power competitors and promote the inherent strategic ...
  127. [127]
    Great power competition is back. What does that mean for US ...
    Apr 19, 2024 · With their wide array of capabilities, US special operations forces can play a central role in strategic competition.
  128. [128]
    AFSOC, Allies strengthen interoperability, readiness at Emerald ...
    Feb 13, 2025 · Throughout EW 25.1, AFSOC integrates joint and partner training opportunities to foster interoperability and maintain international force ...
  129. [129]
    Air Force Special Operations Wing Conducts Bilateral Exercise in ...
    Aug 26, 2025 · U.S. special operations forces collaborated with Romanian allies during a bilateral exercise to boost NATO readiness in Europe through ...Missing: multinational | Show results with:multinational
  130. [130]
    Special Forces in Action As part of Exercise Adaptive Hussars ...
    Sep 30, 2025 · Special Forces in Action As part of Exercise Adaptive Hussars, Special Forces from 5️⃣ NATO nations trained side by side.
  131. [131]
    Topic: Special Operations Forces - NATO
    Mar 7, 2024 · NATO Special Operations Forces (SOF) are elite military units designed to undertake complex and dynamic security missions within the evolving strategic ...
  132. [132]
    Fuerzas Comando 2025 > U.S. Southern Command > News
    Aug 18, 2025 · Sixteen special operations teams from across Central and South America and the Caribbean will gather in Ilopango, El Salvador, Aug. 18–29, for ...
  133. [133]
    U.S. Special Ops Conduct Combined Training With Panama ...
    Apr 4, 2025 · This enduring partnership reflects the broader U.S. SOF commitment to building partner capacity and fostering interoperability with allies and ...<|separator|>
  134. [134]
    AFSOC Redefines Itself for Great Power Competition
    May 5, 2022 · The rise of threats such as China and Russia have forced the Defense Department to shift its focus to potential great power competition — ...
  135. [135]
    AFSOC commander addresses balancing current, future ... - AF.mil
    Sep 17, 2024 · In the face of Great Power Competition, AFSOC is striving to provide SOF unique capabilities, deter challengers and ensure success should ...Missing: shift | Show results with:shift
  136. [136]
    Stealth, speed, and adaptability: The role of special operations ...
    Mar 7, 2024 · The primary objectives of operating in the gray zone are to counter malign actions below the threshold of armed conflict and to ensure ...
  137. [137]
    Lethal, agile, ready: 35 years of Air Force Special Operations ...
    May 23, 2025 · Lt. Gen. Mike Conley, Commander of AFSOC, reflects on the importance of the command over its 35 years, and looks ahead to its future.
  138. [138]
    AFSOC heightens warfighting readiness during landmark DLE series
    Aug 21, 2025 · AFSOC tested its warfighting readiness during Emerald Warrior 25.2, the command's premier operational exercise held across Arizona and ...
  139. [139]
    Air Force Special Operations Command - AF.mil
    Three MAJCOM commanders participated in a panel titled, “Ready to Compete, Fight, and Win in the Indo-Pacific" Sept. 13 at AFA.Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  140. [140]
    AFSOC Transformation begins with People > Air Force Special ...
    Nov 2, 2020 · AFSOC's transformation focuses on enabling human capital, developing airmen, and organizing them for full-spectrum operations, with new career ...Missing: initiatives fatigue
  141. [141]
    AFSOC reveals name for OA-1K: Skyraider II
    Feb 27, 2025 · The OA-1K Skyraider II is a cost-effective, adaptable aircraft with a tailwheel for short takeoffs, supporting special operations and close air ...
  142. [142]
    AFSOC's OA-1K Skyraider II is Undergoing Developmental Testing ...
    Jul 30, 2025 · The OA-1K Skyraider II is a derivative of the AT-802U, and was developed in response to the AFSOC's Armed Overwatch program in 2022. AFSOC ...
  143. [143]
    AFSOC demonstrates flexible force presentation during EW 25.2
    Aug 11, 2025 · Airmen from different career fields are blended into a deployable unit aimed at providing sustainment for operations in austere and contested ...Missing: adaptations | Show results with:adaptations