Body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs) are a group of psychiatric disorders characterized by repetitive, self-directed actions that target one's own body, often resulting in physical damage, distress, or functional impairment.[1] These behaviors typically involve excessive grooming or manipulation, such as pulling, picking, biting, or scratching, and are driven by an irresistible urge that provides temporary relief but perpetuates a cycle of habit formation.[2]In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), BFRBs are classified under obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, distinct from both obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and non-suicidal self-injury due to their focus on body manipulation rather than intrusive thoughts or intentional harm.[3] The most clinically significant examples include trichotillomania (hair-pulling disorder), involving recurrent pulling of one's hair leading to noticeable hair loss; excoriation disorder (skin-picking disorder), characterized by repeated picking at the skin resulting in lesions or scarring; and other related habits like onychophagia (nail-biting) or cheek-biting, which may range from mild to severe.[1] These behaviors often begin in childhood or adolescence and can co-occur with anxiety disorders, affecting quality of life through social embarrassment, medical complications, or emotional burden.[4]BFRBs affect approximately 1–5% of the population, with higher rates reported in clinical samples among females for skin-picking and, to a lesser extent, trichotillomania, though community studies suggest similar gender prevalence for the latter; onset is typically before age 20, and behaviors can persist chronically without treatment.[5][6]The etiology is multifactorial, with genetic factors playing a role—heritability estimates up to 76% for trichotillomania—alongside neurobiological dysregulation in habit-formation circuits and environmental triggers like stress.[7][2]BFRBs can lead to significant psychosocial consequences, including shame, avoidance of social situations, and secondary infections from tissue damage, yet effective treatments exist.[8] Cognitive-behavioral therapy, particularly habit reversal training (HRT), is the first-line intervention.[2] Pharmacological options like N-acetylcysteine or SSRIs may serve as adjuncts, with ongoing research into agents such as memantine for refractory cases.[9] Early intervention is crucial, as untreated BFRBs often follow a chronic course with fluctuating severity.[10]
Definition and Characteristics
Definition
Body-focused repetitive behavior (BFRB) refers to a cluster of psychiatric conditions involving recurrent, self-directed actions that target one's own body, typically resulting in physical damage, noticeable hair loss, skin lesions, or significant emotional distress, despite repeated efforts to resist or stop these behaviors.[11] These behaviors often manifest as excessive self-grooming, such as manipulating hair, skin, or nails, and are driven by an irresistible urge that provides temporary relief or sensory satisfaction.[12]In the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), published in 2013 by the American Psychiatric Association, BFRBs are classified within the chapter on obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, reflecting their shared features with conditions like obsessive-compulsive disorder, such as repetitive actions and attempts at control.[11] This categorization marks a shift from earlier DSM editions, where specific BFRBs like trichotillomania were grouped under impulse-control disorders not elsewhere classified.[11] The DSM-5 explicitly recognizes trichotillomania (hair-pulling disorder), defined as recurrent pulling of one's hair leading to hair loss; excoriation (skin-picking) disorder, involving repeated picking resulting in skin lesions; and a category for other specified obsessive-compulsive and related disorder termed "body-focused repetitive behavior disorder," which covers impairing behaviors like nail biting or cheek biting.[11][13]The term "body-focused repetitive behavior" emerged in the early 2000s as an umbrella concept to unify these diverse disorders, building on prior recognition of individual behaviors and drawing from 1970s research on habitual self-grooming as forms of stereotypy or impulse dyscontrol.[13] It was popularized by advocacy groups like the Trichotillomania Learning Center (rebranded as the TLC Foundation for Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors, which announced in October 2025 that it would wind down operations by the end of the year and integrate into the International OCD Foundation), which expanded focus beyond hair pulling to include related conditions, and was formally integrated into diagnostic nomenclature with the DSM-5's introduction of the broader category.[14][15] This evolution highlights a growing understanding of BFRBs as interconnected phenomena rooted in neurobiological and psychological mechanisms, rather than isolated habits.[1]
Common Manifestations
Body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs) typically involve recurrent, self-directed actions targeting one's own body, such as hair pulling (trichotillomania), skin picking (excoriation disorder), nail biting (onychophagia), cheek biting, lip biting, and teeth grinding, which result in noticeable physical damage like bald patches, skin lesions, or shortened and deformed nails.[1] These behaviors often occur automatically during periods of inactivity, such as while reading or using a phone, or more intentionally when focusing on perceived imperfections, like uneven skin texture or an "abnormal" hair.[16]Sensory experiences play a key role, with individuals frequently reporting mounting urges or tactile sensations—such as itchiness, tension, or a need to "smooth" or "correct" a body part—that precede the action, leading to targeted manipulation of specific areas like the scalp, face, or cuticles.[1] Emotionally, these manifestations are commonly triggered by states of boredom, stress, anxiety, or negative affect, and are often followed by immediate relief, gratification, or a reduced sense of tension, though this can reinforce the cycle; rituals may accompany the behavior, such as examining or mouthing the pulled hair or picked skin fragment.[16][17]The impacts on appearance are often visible and distressing, including thinning hairlines, missing eyelashes or eyebrows, scarring, open sores, or infections from repeated trauma, which can alter facial symmetry or overall grooming.[16] Functionally, these behaviors interfere with daily activities by consuming significant time—sometimes hours per day—and prompting avoidance of social or occupational settings due to embarrassment over visible damage or the compulsive nature of the acts.[1]
Epidemiology
Prevalence Rates
Body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs) encompass a range of clinical disorders, including trichotillomania (hair-pulling disorder) and excoriation (skin-picking disorder), with lifetime prevalence estimates for these pathological forms typically ranging from 1.5% to 4% in the general population.[9] Large-scale epidemiological studies have contributed to these figures by identifying low but consistent rates of diagnosable BFRBs, though exact community-based data remain limited due to diagnostic challenges.Prevalence varies by specific disorder, with meta-analyses providing more precise estimates. For trichotillomania, a systematic review and meta-analysis of community samples reported a pooled prevalence of 1.14% (95% CI: 0.66–1.96%), based on 17 studies involving over 100,000 participants.[18] Excoriation disorder shows somewhat higher rates, with a meta-analysis indicating an overall prevalence of 3.45% (95% CI: 2.55–4.65%) across 14 studies, highlighting its relative commonality compared to hair-pulling.[19] These figures underscore the disorders' public health impact, though they are derived primarily from Western populations and may not fully capture global variations.Subthreshold BFRBs, such as nail biting (onychophagia), are far more prevalent and affect approximately 20–30% of the general population at some point in life, often without meeting clinical impairment criteria.[20] A diverse population study of over 1,400 adults found lifetime endorsement rates exceeding 70% for habits like nail biting and lip-cheek biting, though only about 24% qualified as disorders causing significant distress.[21]Underreporting persists, particularly in non-clinical samples, due to the private nature of these behaviors and limited screening in primary care.[22]
Demographic Factors
Body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs) exhibit notable gender differences in prevalence and clinical presentation, particularly within specific manifestations. Trichotillomania, or hair-pulling disorder, shows a marked female predominance in clinical samples, with females comprising approximately 85% of diagnosed cases, corresponding to a female-to-male ratio of roughly 5.7:1.[22] Similarly, excoriation disorder (skin-picking) demonstrates a female preponderance, with meta-analytic evidence indicating an overall prevalence of 3.45% and a female-to-male odds ratio of 1.45, based on studies from the 2010s and early 2020s.[19] In contrast, nail-biting (onychophagia) appears more common among males in population surveys, with men reporting higher lifetime rates of this and other BFRBs compared to women.[21]Age patterns reveal that BFRBs typically peak in onset during childhood and adolescence, often emerging as habitual self-grooming behaviors in late childhood through the teenage years.[23] These behaviors frequently persist into adulthood, particularly among those with clinical impairment, leading to chronic patterns if untreated.[1]Cultural and socioeconomic factors influence BFRB reporting and diagnosis, with higher prevalence rates documented in Western and White populations, potentially due to greater awareness and access to mental health resources.[21] In diverse ethnic groups, such as Black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME) individuals, underdiagnosis is common, evidenced by lower treatment-seeking rates despite similar or greater symptom severity.[24]
Etiology
Biological Causes
Body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs), such as trichotillomania and excoriation disorder, exhibit significant genetic contributions, with twin studies indicating high heritability for trichotillomania (76% to 78%) and moderate heritability for excoriation disorder (approximately 40%).[25][26] For instance, a concordance study of trichotillomania in twins reported heritability of approximately 76% for hair-pulling behaviors, suggesting a strong genetic influence alongside environmental factors.[25] Candidate gene research has identified rare mutations in the SLITRK1 gene in families affected by trichotillomania, with two non-synonymous variants (R402Q and H398Y) linked to the disorder in about 5% of studied cases, implicating disruptions in neuronal growth and synapse formation.[27]Neuroimaging studies reveal structural and functional abnormalities in key brain regions associated with habit formation and impulse control in individuals with BFRBs. Reduced gray matter volume in the basal ganglia has been observed in trichotillomania, while reductions in the orbitofrontal cortex have been reported in skin-picking disorder.[28][29] Functional MRI (fMRI) research demonstrates hypoactivation in the basal ganglia and prefrontal cortex during associative learning tasks, with a 2022 analysis highlighting altered connectivity in frontostriatal circuits that may underlie reduced ability to inhibit repetitive actions.[30] Dysregulation in serotonin and dopamine pathways contributes to these findings, as evidenced by altered receptor binding and signaling in the striatum, which parallels patterns seen in obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders and supports the role of imbalanced neurotransmission in perpetuating BFRBs.[1]Physiological markers in BFRBs include heightened stress responses, which are linked to increased risk of these behaviors.[31] In skin-picking cases, repetitive trauma can trigger localized inflammation, which may exacerbate picking by heightening skin sensitivity and perpetuating the cycle of irritation and response. These biological markers underscore the interplay between stress physiology and neuroimmune mechanisms in the maintenance of BFRBs. Recent genomic studies as of 2024 have explored polygenic contributions to BFRBs, suggesting shared genetic risks with other impulsive disorders.[32]
Psychological and Environmental Factors
Body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs) are often linked to psychological factors involving stress and emotion regulation difficulties, where individuals use these behaviors as maladaptive coping mechanisms to manage negative affective states such as anxiety, tension, or boredom. According to the emotion regulation model, people with BFRBs exhibit general deficits in emotion regulation skills, including challenges in identifying emotions, controlling impulses, and accessing effective strategies, leading them to engage in BFRBs for temporary relief or sensory stimulation.[33] Self-report studies indicate that a substantial proportion of BFRB episodes are triggered by stress, with approximately 85% of individuals reporting stress release as a primary motive, alongside 52% citing boredom and 35% noting gratification or pleasure from the behavior.[34] These patterns suggest that BFRBs function through negative reinforcement, reducing emotional discomfort in the short term but perpetuating the cycle due to heightened post-behavioral guilt or shame.[33]Learning theories further explain the maintenance of BFRBs through operant conditioning principles, where the immediate sensory or emotional relief following the behavior reinforces its repetition, transforming it into a habitual response. Seminal behavioral models, originating from habit reversal training developed in the 1970s, describe BFRBs as nervous habits sustained by limited awareness of antecedents and excessive practice, with the tension reduction acting as negative reinforcement to strengthen the chain of responses.[35] In this framework, the behavior becomes automatic over time, as the relief from internal discomfort—such as anxiety or sensory urges—rewards the action, making it resistant to extinction without targeted interventions like competing response training.[35] These classical approaches emphasize how environmental cues paired with the reinforcing consequences embed BFRBs in daily routines, independent of initial triggers.Environmental factors, including family dynamics and trauma history, contribute to the development and exacerbation of BFRBs by creating contexts that amplify stress and modeling maladaptive responses. Studies show that anxiogenic parenting practices, such as over-accommodation of anxiety or inconsistent emotional warmth, predict greater BFRB severity in children and adolescents, with specific behaviors like parental rejection increasing the likelihood of skin picking by up to 1.5 times after accounting for anxiety levels.[36] Loose family bonds and histories of substance use disorders in first-degree relatives are associated with higher BFRB symptom severity and cognitive impairments, suggesting that disrupted family environments foster vulnerability through chronic stress exposure.[1] Additionally, trauma-related comorbidities, such as posttraumatic stress disorder, frequently co-occur with BFRBs like trichotillomania, where shared impulsive features heighten the risk of repetitive self-grooming in response to unresolved emotional distress.[37] Media influences on body image further compound these effects, as exposure to idealized beauty standards promotes body dissatisfaction and shame, which can intensify BFRB engagement as a form of self-soothing or perfection-seeking in affected individuals.[38]
Onset and Course
Age of Onset
Body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs) exhibit distinct patterns of onset depending on the specific manifestation, with most emerging during childhood or adolescence rather than adulthood. Nail biting (onychophagia) typically begins in early childhood, often around ages 3 to 5, and becomes more prevalent between ages 5 and 10, serving as a common self-soothing habit that may persist or intensify.[39] In contrast, hair pulling (trichotillomania) and skin picking (excoriation disorder) usually onset in pre-adolescence or early adolescence, with mean ages reported between 10 and 13 years; for trichotillomania, the average is approximately 13 years, while skin picking often aligns with ages 12 to 15.[40][41] Adult onset without any prior history of milder BFRBs is uncommon, as the majority of cases trace back to earlier developmental stages.[42]Early indicators of BFRBs can appear in toddlers through subtle, non-pathological habits that evolve over time. For instance, thumb sucking, a normative behavior in infancy that typically resolves by age 3, may transition into nail biting or other repetitive actions as a maladaptive coping mechanism during stress or boredom.[43] Longitudinal research on youth with BFRBs shows that onset often occurs well before adulthood, with self-reported means around 10.8 years in samples aged 9 to 17, highlighting the importance of early monitoring in childhood.[44]Factors such as puberty-related stress and hormonal changes frequently accelerate the emergence of BFRBs, particularly for hair pulling and skin picking, where onset commonly coincides with this transitional period; studies indicate that the majority of cases begin by age 18.[45][46] These patterns underscore the developmental vulnerability during pre-adolescence, though demographic variations exist, with mixed findings on gender differences in onset age.[47][48]
Developmental Trajectory
Body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs) typically follow a chronic course characterized by fluctuating symptom severity, often exhibiting a waxing and waning pattern influenced by environmental stressors and emotional states.[49] Exacerbations commonly occur during periods of heightened stress, leading to increased frequency and intensity of behaviors such as hair pulling or skin picking, while periods of relative calm may result in temporary reductions.[49] Longitudinal data indicate that approximately 25% of individuals with trichotillomania, a prototypical BFRB, experience spontaneous remission after an average duration of 10 years from onset, though rates may vary across specific BFRB subtypes.[50]The developmental progression of BFRBs often begins with an acute phase of rapid symptom escalation following initial onset, typically in childhood or early adolescence, where behaviors emerge as coping mechanisms and quickly become habitual. If untreated, this can transition into a chronic phase marked by ingrained patterns that persist over years, potentially leading to severe physical impairment such as scarring or infection from repeated skin picking.[50] In some cases, early-onset BFRBs in childhood show higher likelihood of resolution if symptoms do not persist beyond six months, but prolonged engagement fosters automaticity and resistance to natural extinction.[51]Life stage influences significantly shape the trajectory of BFRBs, with symptoms frequently worsening during adolescence due to intensified social pressures, self-consciousness about appearance, and peer-related anxiety that amplify urges.[52] In contrast, midlife and later adulthood are associated with greater potential for stabilization or decline, as older individuals demonstrate higher rates of natural recovery, possibly linked to reduced comorbidity burdens and life experience.[50] Cohort studies underscore this pattern, showing that while adolescent exacerbations heighten impairment, post-adolescent phases often involve less volatile symptom courses in the absence of intervention.
Diagnosis
Diagnostic Criteria
Body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs) are primarily diagnosed under the category of obsessive-compulsive and related disorders in the DSM-5, with trichotillomania (hair-pulling disorder) and excoriation (skin-picking) disorder serving as the core exemplars that have formal diagnostic criteria. For trichotillomania, the DSM-5 requires recurrent pulling out of one's hair, resulting in noticeable hair loss; repeated attempts to decrease or stop hair pulling; clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other areas of functioning; and that the behavior is not attributable to another medical condition (e.g., a dermatologic disorder) or better explained by another mental disorder (e.g., body dysmorphic disorder).[53] Similarly, excoriation disorder criteria include recurrent skin picking resulting in skin lesions; repeated attempts to decrease or stop skin picking; clinically significant distress or impairment; and exclusion of physiological effects of a substance, another medical condition, or symptoms of another mental disorder.[54] These criteria emphasize the repetitive nature of the behaviors and the resulting impairment.[55]The ICD-11 aligns closely with the DSM-5 but adopts a broader umbrella term, "body-focused repetitive behaviour disorders" (6B25), encompassing trichotillomania (6B25.0), excoriation disorder (6B25.1), and other specified variants like nail-biting or lip-biting. General criteria involve recurrent, habitual actions directed at the integument (skin, hair, or nails) leading to dermatological damage (e.g., hair loss or lesions); unsuccessful attempts to control the behavior; and significant distress or functional impairment in personal, social, educational, or occupational domains.[56] For trichotillomania specifically, it requires recurrent hair pulling causing significant hair loss, with common sites including the scalp, eyebrows, or eyelashes, and the behavior occurring in brief daily episodes or longer sessions.[56]Excoriation disorder mirrors this, focusing on recurrent skin picking leading to lesions, often on the face, arms, or hands, with exclusion of stereotyped movement disorders or medical skin conditions.[56] The ICD-11 emphasizes functional impairment over precise time metrics, allowing inclusion of behaviors not fully captured in DSM-5.[57]DSM-5 includes specifiers to refine diagnoses, such as for trichotillomania: "with trichophagia" if hairingestion occurs, which can lead to complications like trichobezoars (hair bezoars in the gastrointestinal tract). Severity for both disorders is assessed clinically based on the extent of distress and functional impairment. These criteria from the 2013 DSM-5 are carried forward in DSM-5-TR.
Assessment Methods
Assessment of body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs) relies on a combination of self-report and clinician-administered tools to evaluate symptom severity, frequency, and impact, facilitating confirmation of diagnostic criteria such as repetitive behaviors causing distress or impairment.[58] Standardized scales are widely used for this purpose, including the National Institute of Mental HealthTrichotillomania Severity Scale (NIMH-TSS), a five-item clinician-rated interview developed in the late 1980s that assesses time spent engaging in hair pulling, urge intensity, control over the behavior, associated distress, and interference with daily activities over the past week, with scores ranging from 0 to 25. The Massachusetts General Hospital Hair-Pulling Scale (MGH-HPS), a 7-item clinician-rated or self-report measure, evaluates pulling frequency, urge intensity, and resulting distress, with good reliability.[58] For skin picking, the Skin Picking Scale-Revised (SPS-R), an eight-item self-report measure introduced in the early 2010s, evaluates symptoms such as frequency of urges, time spent picking, and emotional distress on a 0-4 scale, demonstrating good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Self-monitoring diaries complement these scales by allowing individuals to track the frequency, duration, and situational contexts of BFRB episodes in real time, often as part of behavioral interventions to enhance awareness, with studies showing their utility in capturing episodic patterns not fully reflected in retrospective reports.Clinical interviews form the cornerstone of BFRB evaluation, employing structured probes to explore the intensity of premonitory urges, identifiable triggers (such as stress or boredom), and behavioral consequences like tissue damage or avoidance of social situations.[58] These interviews, often semi-structured, align with diagnostic frameworks by quantifying subjective experiences, such as rating urge resistance on a Likert scale during sessions. In cases involving children or adolescents, incorporating family reports is essential, as parents or guardians provide collateral information on observed behaviors, onset timelines, and home-based triggers, improving the accuracy of assessments where self-reports may be limited by developmental factors or shame.Objective measures enhance subjective data by providing verifiable evidence of physical impact. Photography is a common technique for documenting visible damage, such as bald patches in trichotillomania or scarring from skin picking, with standardized protocols involving consistent lighting and angles to rate severity via global impression scales or digital analysis of affected areas, offering reliable pre- and post-treatment comparisons.[59]Behavioral observation, typically conducted in clinical settings, involves direct monitoring of BFRB occurrences during structured tasks to assess automaticity and resistance, providing insights into behavioral chains. Recent advancements in the 2020s include mobile applications for real-time logging, such as those enabling users to timestamp episodes, note environmental cues, and receive prompts for awareness training via smartphone sensors or wearables, which have shown preliminary efficacy in increasing self-monitoring adherence compared to paper diaries.
Differential Diagnosis and Comorbidities
Distinguishing Features
Body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs) are primarily distinguished from obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) by the absence of intrusive obsessions that precede and motivate compulsive rituals in OCD.[1] In BFRBs, such as trichotillomania or excoriation disorder, the repetitive actions often occur automatically or with partial awareness, driven by sensory satisfaction, boredom, or tension relief rather than ego-dystonic thoughts.[60] Following the behavior, individuals with BFRBs typically experience immediate gratification or reduced tension without the subsequent guilt, doubt, or incomplete anxiety relief common in OCD.[1] The core outcome of BFRBs is tangible physical damage, like scarring or hair loss, emphasizing their self-directed, habit-like quality over OCD's psychological avoidance strategies.[60]In contrast to tic disorders, BFRBs are more suppressible through conscious effort, non-rhythmic, and inherently self-directed toward the body for emotional regulation, whereas tics manifest as sudden, involuntary, and often non-purposeful motor or vocal outbursts.[61] Electromyographic (EMG) studies during inhibition tasks reveal that patients with BFRBs demonstrate enhanced voluntary regulation of muscular tension compared to those with chronic tic disorders, supporting the greater controllability of BFRBs despite their repetitive nature.[62]BFRBs also differ from stereotypies—repetitive, seemingly purposeless movements seen in neurodevelopmental conditions—by their goal-directed intent, such as achieving tension relief or sensory pleasure, and lack of inherent rhythmicity.[34] Neurodevelopmentally, stereotypies typically emerge in early childhood (often before age 3) and are frequently associated with intellectual disabilities or autism spectrum disorders, while BFRBs onset later, around adolescence, without such pervasive developmental ties.[34] This distinction underscores BFRBs' classification within obsessive-compulsive and related disorders rather than neurodevelopmental categories.[60]
Associated Conditions
Body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs) frequently co-occur with various psychiatric conditions, with comorbidity rates highlighting their interconnected nature. A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis found that the current prevalence of any comorbid anxiety disorder among individuals with BFRBs, such as trichotillomania and skin-picking disorder, is 27.5%, while lifetime prevalence reaches 35.9%. Specific anxiety disorders show notable overlap, including generalized anxiety disorder at 19.2% current and 22.4% lifetime prevalence, and social anxiety disorder at 10.6% current and 11.0% lifetime. These rates underscore the common presentation of anxiety alongside BFRBs, though the correlation between anxiety symptom severity and BFRB severity remains modest (r = 0.29 overall).[63]Comorbidities with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are also prevalent, with current rates of 12.8% and lifetime rates of 13.8% reported in the same meta-analysis. Depression similarly co-occurs at elevated levels, with individuals exhibiting BFRBs showing significantly higher depression scores compared to those without.[63][64] In childhood cases, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) frequently co-occurs with BFRBs, potentially linked to shared impulsivity traits that exacerbate repetitive behaviors.[65][66] Autism spectrum disorder associations are noted through sensory processing sensitivities, where BFRBs may serve as maladaptive responses to tactile hypersensitivity, though exact prevalence varies and requires further study.[44]Eating disorders exhibit comorbidity with BFRBs in approximately 7-10% of cases, particularly trichotillomania, often tied to distorted body image perceptions that amplify self-directed behaviors. Recent studies, including those from 2023-2024, indicate PTSD comorbidity in up to 20% of trichotillomania cases, with co-occurrence heightening risks for impulsive actions. These overlaps imply broader implications for assessment and management, as untreated comorbidities can intensify functional impairment.[67][68]The relationship between BFRBs and associated conditions often involves bidirectional influences, such as anxiety triggering BFRB episodes while the resulting distress perpetuates anxiety cycles. Shared genetic risks further link BFRBs to obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, with family history and neurobiological factors contributing to vulnerability across these conditions.[16]
Treatment Approaches
Psychotherapy Options
Habit Reversal Training (HRT) represents the most established psychotherapy for body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs), emphasizing behavioral strategies to interrupt the cycle of urges and actions. Core components include awareness training, where individuals monitor and identify precursors to the behavior, such as tension or environmental cues; competing response training, involving the practice of an incompatible action (e.g., clenching fists for 60 seconds when an urge arises); and stimulus control, which modifies the environment to minimize triggers, like wearing gloves or altering seating arrangements. These elements are typically delivered over 8-12 sessions, often integrated with relaxation techniques for stress management.[69]Meta-analyses of HRT trials, encompassing hundreds of participants with BFRBs like trichotillomania and excoriation disorder, report large effect sizes (Cohen's d = 0.80), corresponding to substantial symptom reductions of 60-80% in many cases, with benefits maintained at follow-up. For instance, a 2025 virtual delivery trial of HRT achieved median reductions of 41% in hair-pulling severity and 45% in skin-picking, with over 75% of participants reaching clinically significant improvement thresholds. HRT's efficacy holds across age groups, though adherence challenges can influence long-term outcomes.[70][71]Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) extends HRT by targeting cognitive distortions, such as feelings of shame or perfectionism, that exacerbate BFRBs, while identifying emotional triggers like anxiety or boredom through thought records and behavioral experiments. Standard CBT protocols, often spanning 12-16 sessions, foster adaptive coping by reframing maladaptive beliefs (e.g., "I must be perfect" leading to skin picking). Evidence from randomized controlled trials supports CBT's role in reducing BFRB severity, particularly when combined with HRT, with improvements linked to enhanced self-efficacy.[2]Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), a third-wave CBT variant, promotes psychological flexibility by teaching urge tolerance via mindfulness and values clarification, allowing individuals to experience impulses without acting on them. ACT interventions, typically 10-12 sessions, include defusion exercises to detach from urge-related thoughts and committed action planning to pursue meaningful goals despite BFRBs. A 2020 randomized controlled trial of ACT for trichotillomania in adults and adolescents demonstrated significant symptom reductions (large effect size), with gains sustained at 3- and 6-month follow-ups, highlighting its utility for those with high emotional avoidance.Group and family therapies offer supportive contexts for BFRBs, especially in adolescents, by normalizing experiences and building communal coping skills. Group formats, often ACT-enhanced or CBT-based over 8-10 weekly sessions, facilitate peer encouragement and shared practice of HRT techniques, reducing isolation. A 2021 pilot randomized controlled trial of ACT-enhanced group behavior therapy for trichotillomania and skin-picking in adults showed 60% symptom reduction, with adolescent adaptations yielding similar benefits. Family therapy integrates caregivers into sessions to enhance stimulus control and provide reinforcement, with a 2011 pediatric randomized trial reporting sustained 12-month gains in hair-pulling frequency when families participated actively. These modalities improve adherence and outcomes by addressing relational dynamics.[72][73]
Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy for body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs), such as trichotillomania and excoriation (skin-picking) disorder, primarily involves off-label use of medications targeting serotonergic or glutamatergic systems, as no agents are specifically FDA-approved for these conditions.[9] Treatment selection often considers symptom severity and comorbidities like anxiety or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), with medications showing variable efficacy in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).[74]Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), such as fluoxetine at doses of 20-60 mg/day, are considered first-line pharmacotherapy for trichotillomania, particularly when comorbid anxiety or OCD is present.[75] RCTs from the 2000s to 2020s indicate modest efficacy, with response rates of 30-50% in reducing hair-pulling severity, though results are mixed compared to placebo and often inferior to behavioral therapies.[76] For excoriation disorder, SSRIs like fluoxetine or sertraline similarly demonstrate limited but supportive effects in open-label studies, with better outcomes in cases with co-occurring mood or anxiety symptoms.[77] Common side effects include nausea, sexual dysfunction, and insomnia, which may limit long-term adherence.[74]N-acetylcysteine (NAC), a glutamate modulator and antioxidantsupplement, is used off-label at doses of 1200-2400 mg/day for BFRBs, showing promise particularly for excoriation disorder.[78] A 2016 double-blind RCT in 66 adults with excoriation disorder found NAC led to a 38-50% reduction in skin-picking symptoms versus 19% with placebo, with improvements in urge resistance and global functioning.[79] For trichotillomania, smaller RCTs and case series report similar symptom reductions of around 40%, attributed to NAC's regulation of cortical excitability in the glutamate system.[80] Side effects are generally mild, including gastrointestinal upset, making it a tolerable option.[78]Other agents include clomipramine, a tricyclic antidepressant with strong serotonergic effects, reserved for severe trichotillomania cases unresponsive to SSRIs, at doses up to 250 mg/day. RCTs demonstrate clomipramine's superiority to placebo and other antidepressants like desipramine in reducing pulling severity in short-term trials, though relapse is common upon discontinuation.[74] Antipsychotics such as olanzapine are rarely used due to metabolic side effects and inconsistent evidence from small studies. Overall, pharmacotherapy is often combined with psychotherapy for enhanced outcomes, but the evidence base remains weak, as highlighted in a 2021 Cochrane review of 12 RCTs, which found low-quality data and no clear superiority of any agent over placebo for sustained remission.[81]
Emerging Interventions
Decoupling techniques represent a novel behavioral intervention for body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs), involving the substitution of habitual pulling or picking actions with incompatible motor responses, such as gentle tugs on the hair or flicks of the skin. Developed as a simplified variant of habit reversal training (HRT), decoupling aims to disrupt the automatic motor sequence while requiring minimal awareness training, making it suitable for self-administration. A 2021 randomized controlled trial demonstrated that decoupling showed a trend toward superiority over traditional HRT in reducing BFRB severity, with participants experiencing significant decreases in urge intensity and behavior frequency, achieving up to 50% symptom improvement in preliminary assessments.[82]Digital and virtual therapies have gained traction as accessible alternatives for BFRB management, leveraging technology to deliver HRT and related interventions remotely. App-based programs and online self-help platforms, such as the "Free from BFRB" resource, incorporate decoupling and HRT modules, with studies reporting completion rates of approximately 70-75% and notable symptom reductions, including 20-30% improvements in global BFRB scores among adherent users. Emerging virtual therapy approaches, including telehealth-delivered HRT, have shown clinically significant outcomes in real-world samples of youth and adults with trichotillomania and excoriation disorder, enhancing treatment reach without in-person requirements. A 2025 study on internet-based CBT for BFRBs reported significant symptom reductions and high user satisfaction, supporting its role as an accessible alternative.[83][71][84]Other innovative modalities include mindfulness-based interventions, which integrate awareness practices into comprehensive behavioral models like ComB to heighten recognition of pre-behavioral cues and reduce automaticity in BFRBs. Early pilots indicate these approaches foster better emotional regulation and urge management, complementing core therapies. For physical sequelae, particularly in excoriation disorder, regenerative laser therapies target skin damage by stimulating collagen production and tissue repair, offering adjunctive relief from scarring and itch that may perpetuate picking cycles. Additionally, preliminary research on transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), targeting prefrontal regions involved in impulse control, suggests potential as an adjunctive treatment for trichotillomania, with case series reporting reduced pulling urges following low-frequency protocols.[85][86][87]
Prognosis
Long-term Outcomes
Body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs), such as trichotillomania and excoriation disorder, often follow a chronic course, with spontaneous remission rates estimated at approximately 14% in adults without intervention.[88] Longitudinal studies indicate that untreated BFRBs tend to persist over time, with low rates of natural resolution, particularly when comorbid conditions like obsessive-compulsive disorder are present.[10] In contrast, with evidence-based interventions such as habit reversal training, remission rates improve significantly, reaching up to 50% in treated individuals at follow-up periods of 2 to 5 years.[88] For instance, a two-year follow-up of self-help behavioral techniques demonstrated sustained reductions in BFRB severity post-treatment.[89]Relapse remains a substantial challenge in BFRB management, with rates of 38-52% reported within three months following initial treatment response, escalating to 57-60% at two years.[71] Stressful lifeevents and emotional triggers are key precipitants, contributing to recurrence in 30-50% of cases, often leading to partial or full return of symptoms.[71] Severe chronic cases can result in permanent physical damage, such as scarring from skin picking or alopecia from hair pulling, underscoring the need for ongoing monitoring.[90]Long-term quality of life outcomes for those with BFRBs show notable improvements following successful intervention, though residual effects like shame and social avoidance persist in many.[9] Recent data from 2023-2024 studies indicate that around 60% of treated individuals report enhanced social adjustment and reduced impairment in daily functioning, with significant gains in overall well-being and decreased comorbid anxiety and depression symptoms.[71] These enhancements highlight the potential for interventions like psychotherapy to mitigate the psychosocial burden over extended periods, despite the risk of intermittent relapses. Prognosis may vary by BFRB type, with trichotillomania showing higher chronicity rates compared to other behaviors, and ongoing 2025 research explores prognostic biomarkers such as genetic markers.[89][1]
Factors Influencing Recovery
Several factors influence the prognosis and recovery from body-focused repetitive behaviors (BFRBs), including trichotillomania and excoriation disorder. Early intervention, particularly before age 18, is associated with more favorable outcomes, as treatment in children and adolescents yields significant symptom reductions and higher response rates compared to later-onset cases.[44] A naturalistic study of 63 youth with BFRBs found that multimodal therapy, including habit reversal training (HRT), resulted in 71% response rates at 12-month follow-up, with improvements maintained over time, underscoring the benefits of addressing symptoms during developmental years when onset typically occurs around age 10-11.[44] The presence of additional psychiatric conditions exacerbates symptom severity and functional impairment in BFRBs.[91] Strong social support further enhances prognosis by facilitating adherence to behavioral strategies and reducing isolation, with support systems such as family involvement integrated into treatments like comprehensive behavioral therapy to promote sustained change.[16]Adherence to evidence-based interventions, particularly HRT, substantially improves success rates. Studies of behavioral therapies for BFRBs, including HRT, have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing symptoms, with consistent adherence linked to greater long-term remission.[92] In clinical samples, high compliance with HRT components, such as awareness training and competing responses, correlates with up to 50-70% symptom reduction, highlighting its role as a key modifiable predictor.[71]Negative predictors include severe physical damage from repetitive behaviors, which can lead to complications like scarring, infections, and chronic tissue injury, complicating recovery and increasing treatment resistance.[93] High comorbidity with anxiety disorders worsens prognosis by amplifying BFRB severity and impairing emotional regulation, though anxiety itself shows only modest associations with symptom intensity.[94] Genetic loading elevates the risk of chronicity, with family history indicating high heritability for trichotillomania, predisposing individuals to persistent symptoms despite intervention.[95]Modifiable factors such as access to specialized therapy and effective stress management play crucial roles in recovery. Barriers to care, including limited availability in underserved areas, can be mitigated through targeted interventions like stress reduction techniques, which address emotional triggers common in BFRBs.[1] Recent advancements in telehealth have improved equity, particularly for rural populations, with virtual HRT delivery showing clinically significant improvements in large real-world samples, reducing geographic barriers and enhancing treatment retention as of 2025.[71]