Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Business object

A business object is a software construct in and enterprise application that models a real-world or concept, encapsulating both its attributes and the associated behavioral logic or rules within a single, cohesive unit. This encapsulation allows the object to represent entities such as customers, orders, or products, while hiding underlying implementation details from other parts of the system, thereby promoting modularity and reusability across applications. In multi-tiered software architectures, business objects typically operate in the layer, interacting with the to retrieve or persist information and with the to deliver processed results, ensuring through embedded validation and rules. Key components often include attributes (e.g., an employee's name or salary), methods (e.g., functions to status or calculate totals), and sometimes a defined lifecycle with states and transitions to manage complex business processes. Originating from principles in the early 1990s, the concept gained prominence with the rise of component-based development and standards like those from the (), enabling clearer and easier maintenance in large-scale enterprise systems. Business objects facilitate benefits such as improved reusability, enhanced consistency, and streamlined among teams by aligning software structures closely with domains. Common examples include an object that handles item details, logic, and fulfillment states in platforms, or an Employee object managing , calculations, and workflows in corporate systems. While implementations vary across frameworks—such as in SAP's Business Object Repository or Oracle's configuration tools—the core principle remains the abstraction of semantics into programmable entities that support scalable, rule-driven applications.

Fundamentals

Definition

A business object is a software that represents a tangible or intangible , , or within a business , encapsulating its data attributes, behavioral methods, and associated rules or constraints. These objects model real-world concepts such as customers, orders, products, or invoices, providing a structured way to capture business-specific details like names, identifiers, statuses, or validation logic. For instance, in domains like or , a business object might include attributes for transaction amounts or levels, alongside methods to payments or update quantities. Unlike general objects in programming, which often handle low-level technical concerns such as data structures or operations, business objects are distinctly oriented toward domain-specific encapsulation to align software with organizational needs. They integrate attributes (e.g., persistent properties like customer ID or order date), methods (e.g., operations such as validateOrder or calculateTax), and relationships (e.g., links to other entities like suppliers or accounts), ensuring that remains cohesive and independent of underlying implementation details. This encapsulation promotes reusability and maintainability by hiding complexities like persistence or protocols from the layer. Business objects play a crucial role in by bridging the gap between high-level requirements and technical , thereby reducing in enterprise applications. By modeling entities like "" or "," they enable developers and stakeholders to reason about software in terms familiar to the , facilitating clearer communication and more accurate translations of into code. Grounded in principles, these objects serve as reusable components that encapsulate domain logic without delving into platform-specific details.

Key Characteristics

Business objects are distinguished from generic data structures by their adherence to object-oriented principles tailored to enterprise domains, emphasizing encapsulation, , reusability, , and layer to support robust, maintainable business applications. Encapsulation in business objects involves bundling attributes and associated methods into a cohesive , ensuring by restricting direct access to internal state through private attributes and exposing controlled interfaces for business rules and operations. This approach hides implementation details, allowing external components to interact solely via public methods, such as getters and setters that enforce validation logic for attributes like account balances or order statuses. For instance, a business object representing an "" might encapsulate invoice (e.g., amount, ) with methods to calculate totals or apply discounts, preventing invalid states like negative balances without external oversight. Persistence enables business objects to maintain and retrieve their state across application sessions, typically achieved through integration with databases via object-relational mapping () techniques that bridge the impedance mismatch between object models and relational schemas. ORM frameworks map object attributes to database tables and columns, supporting (CRUD) operations while handling complexities like hierarchies or associations. This allows objects, such as a "Customer" entity, to be stored durably in a and reconstituted seamlessly, preserving behavioral logic without embedding database-specific code in the object itself. Reusability and are core to business object design, facilitating their deployment across multiple applications through support for and polymorphism that align with business hierarchies. allows subclasses to extend base classes, promoting ; for example, an "Employee" business object might inherit from a "" base class, adding specialized attributes like while reusing common methods for validation. Polymorphism enables uniform interfaces for related objects, such as treating "FullTimeEmployee" and "" interchangeably in processing, reducing redundancy and enhancing adaptability in enterprise systems. These features, combined with modular composition, enable business objects to be plugged into diverse contexts with minimal modification. Business objects achieve independence from (UI) and persistence layers by focusing exclusively on domain logic, communicating with external layers through abstract interfaces like or rather than direct dependencies. This separation, often enforced by patterns such as the Data Mapper or , shields the object from UI-specific rendering or database dialects, allowing the same "" object to integrate with forms, apps, or various storage backends without alteration. Such enhances portability, , and evolution of enterprise architectures.

Historical Development

Origins

The concept of business objects traces its roots to the emergence of (OOP) in the and , where objects were introduced as a means to model real-world entities with both state and behavior. , developed by and in , marked the first implementation of these ideas; starting with Simula I in the early and culminating in Simula 67 by 1967, it extended the language to support of complex systems, such as discrete event processes in , by representing entities like items or processes as encapsulated units with procedures and . This approach emphasized problem-oriented modeling over machine-specific code, laying the foundation for objects as abstractions of tangible or conceptual business elements. , created by at Xerox PARC in the early , further refined OOP by making it a pure paradigm where everything—from primitive to user interfaces—is treated as an object, promoting polymorphism and to simulate dynamic interactions akin to business workflows. By the , these principles began adapting to business contexts, with early object-oriented methodologies applying encapsulation and modularity to represent entities like customers or orders, bridging simulation roots to practical software for organizational modeling. A parallel influence came from entity-relationship (ER) modeling, introduced by Peter Chen in his 1976 paper, which provided a semantic framework for depicting business entities and their interconnections in databases. Chen's model used diagrammatic notation to capture entities (e.g., employees or projects), relationships (e.g., assignment links), and attributes, aiming for a unified, high-level view of data that preserved real-world semantics across abstraction levels—from conceptual structures to physical storage—while supporting relational implementations. This relational emphasis on static entity representations complemented OOP's behavioral aspects, evolving in the late 1970s and 1980s into hybrid approaches where ER diagrams informed the structural backbone of object models, facilitating the transition from data-centric to object-centric business representations. Key milestones in the early 1990s solidified the business object paradigm through standardization of distributed systems. In 1991, the (OMG) released the initial specification of the (CORBA), defining an object model and for interoperable, platform-independent communication among distributed objects via an Object Request Broker. This architecture enabled business objects to operate across heterogeneous environments, such as legacy systems integrated with new applications, marking a pivotal step toward scalable, reusable components for enterprise-wide modeling without tight coupling.

Evolution in Enterprise Software

The adoption of business objects in (ERP) systems marked a significant shift during the and , enabling standardized data exchange and across complex business processes. SAP's R/3, launched in 1992, initially focused on client-server architecture for real-time processing, but with Release 3.0 in 1995, it introduced the Business Object Repository (BOR), which encapsulated transactional logic into reusable business objects to facilitate consistent data handling and . This approach standardized interfaces like Business Application Programming Interfaces (BAPIs), allowing seamless data exchange between modules and external systems, reducing redundancy in environments. Concurrently, the rise of XML in the late and web services in the early enhanced , as business objects were increasingly exposed through XML-based protocols like , promoting cross-platform communication in distributed ERP setups. Standards development further propelled business objects into mainstream by the mid-1990s. The () initiated efforts with the 1995 OOPSLA workshop on Business Object Design and Implementation, leading to the 1996 (RFP) for a Business Object Facility (BOF), aimed at defining common facilities for reusable, interoperable business components within the CORBA framework. Although the BOF was not fully adopted as a specification, it influenced subsequent standards by emphasizing object-oriented encapsulation of business rules and data. Building on this, 's (), adopted in 2001, promoted platform-independent models (PIMs) that incorporated business objects to separate from implementation details, enabling automated transformation to platform-specific models (PSMs) for diverse enterprise technologies. These standards fostered greater reusability and reduced in enterprise applications. In the , service-oriented architecture (SOA) integrated business objects as core building blocks for loosely coupled enterprise systems, allowing them to function as composable services. SAP's Enterprise SOA, evolving from R/3 foundations, positioned business objects atop persistence layers to encapsulate application logic, with services exposed via web standards for enhanced agility in heterogeneous environments. Post-2010, cloud-native approaches extended this evolution by embedding business objects within architectures, where fine-grained services represent domain-specific objects for scalable, resilient deployments. This shift, driven by containerization and orchestration tools like , enabled dynamic scaling of business logic in distributed cloud ecosystems, aligning with principles to maintain conceptual integrity across services.

Design Principles

Modeling Approaches

Business objects are modeled using various methodologies that emphasize alignment with business domains, structural representation, and adaptability to evolving requirements. These approaches ensure that representations of business objects—such as entities encapsulating data and behavior relevant to organizational processes—facilitate effective system design and implementation in enterprise environments. Key methodologies include , UML-based modeling, and agile iterative techniques, each offering distinct strategies for capturing complexity while maintaining focus on business value. Domain-driven design (DDD), introduced by Eric Evans in , centers on modeling business objects as core elements of the to address software complexity directly tied to . In DDD, business objects are represented within bounded contexts—explicit boundaries that delineate subdomains to manage large-scale models—and aggregates, which group related objects into transactional units with a root entity enforcing consistency. This approach prioritizes ubiquitous language shared between domain experts and developers, ensuring business objects reflect real-world concepts like orders or customers without diluting focus on essential behaviors. Evans' framework has influenced by promoting strategic design patterns that evolve business objects iteratively through collaboration, as evidenced in its adoption for scalable systems where domain integrity is paramount. UML-based modeling employs standardized diagrams to visually and structurally represent objects, enabling precise depiction of their relationships and lifecycles in system architectures. Class diagrams, a primary UML artifact, illustrate objects as classes with attributes, operations, associations (e.g., or inheritance), and multiplicities to define cardinality constraints, such as one-to-many relationships between a and orders. State machine diagrams complement this by modeling the lifecycle transitions of objects, capturing states like "draft" to "approved" and triggers for events, which is crucial for in applications. Defined by the since 1997 and refined in UML 2.5, this methodology supports formal specification and validation, as applied in business object-oriented systems to bridge analysis and implementation phases. Agile and iterative modeling techniques, such as user story mapping, facilitate the evolution of business objects by prioritizing incremental refinement over comprehensive upfront specification, aligning with dynamic business needs. Introduced by Jeff Patton in 2014, user story mapping organizes requirements into visual narratives of user journeys, allowing teams to identify and prioritize business objects—like inventory items in a —as emergent entities refined through sprints. This avoids rigid designs by incorporating feedback loops, where models are updated based on validation, as outlined in iterative object-oriented practices that integrate lightweight UML elements for just-in-time detailing. Craig Larman's 2004 guidance on applying UML in iterative development further supports this by advocating evolutionary modeling of business objects to accommodate change, ensuring persistence characteristics like data durability are addressed progressively without over-engineering.

Components and Structure

A business object in typically comprises three core components: attributes, methods and behaviors, and relationships, which together encapsulate the and logic representing real-world entities. These elements enable the object to model complex business scenarios while maintaining and operational consistency. The structure adheres to object-oriented principles, such as encapsulation, where internal details are hidden from external access to promote reusability and security. Attributes form the foundational data fields of a business object, capturing the properties of the represented through typed variables that include validation rules to ensure . For instance, an object might include attributes like a for the customer name, a for the transaction , or a for the subtotal, each with constraints such as required fields or range limits to prevent invalid entries. These attributes can be scalar values, arrays, or references to other objects, supporting both simple and complex representations. Methods and behaviors define the operations that a business object can perform, embedding to manipulate attributes or interact with external systems in rule-compliant ways. Examples include a calculateTotal() on an object that computes the final amount by applying rates and discounts based on predefined rules, ensuring calculations reflect jurisdictional requirements without exposing the underlying formulas. These methods often implement lifecycle operations like creation, updating, or validation, typically through interfaces that standardize behavior across applications. Relationships establish associations between business objects, enabling and linkage to model interconnected business processes, such as one-to-many or many-to-many links. For example, a object may relate to multiple objects via a or navigation property, allowing queries to retrieve all associated orders without direct database access. These relationships support hierarchical structures, including parent-child inheritance, to represent dependencies like an order containing line items as nested objects.

Applications

In Business Process Management

In business process management (), business objects facilitate integration by acting as structured data entities within (BPMN) diagrams, where they are modeled as data objects that can be associated with activities and other flow elements via data associations. These objects encapsulate relevant process information, such as attributes defining operational states like "pending approval" in approval workflows, enabling efficient data passing and transformation across process steps without redundant modeling. For instance, in BPM implementations, a business object like a —comprising attributes for summary, status, and discount—serves as the type for process data objects and arguments in data associations, streamlining the handling of complex workflows by grouping related data and reducing diagram clutter. Event-driven processing further enhances the role of business objects in by allowing state changes within these objects to trigger automated actions, promoting responsiveness in dynamic . When a business object's state updates—such as an object shifting from "pending " to " confirmed"—it generates events via process sensors or monitors, which are then correlated and processed to initiate subsequent steps like inventory allocation or shipping notification. This mechanism, common in service-oriented architectures, integrates with (CEP) engines to detect patterns from object states and external inputs, as seen in scenarios where shipment business objects (e.g., tracking RFID-tagged items) trigger alerts for delays based on status transitions like "damage detected." Such event-driven orchestration ensures processes adapt proactively, correlating internal object changes with broader workflow execution. Business objects also embed decision logic through integration with rule engines in , enabling automated compliance checks and regulatory adherence directly within process flows. Rule engines maintain business objects in a , evaluating conditions against their states and attributes to fire rules that guide decisions, such as verifying financial transaction objects against anti-money laundering regulations before approval. For example, in a loan processing , rules might assess a business object's credit risk attributes—if exceeding 50%, the process routes to denial—ensuring decisions align with business policies without hardcoding logic into the process model. This approach, supported by BPMN's Business Rule Task, which inputs object data to external rule engines for output, allows for separable, maintainable logic that enhances process governance and auditability.

In Enterprise Resource Planning Systems

In () systems, business objects serve as foundational entities that encapsulate and manage core resources, enabling seamless integration and across organizational functions. These objects represent tangible business elements such as products, vendors, and assets, allowing for unified data handling that supports and process automation. For instance, in systems like , the Material Master business object models items, capturing attributes like stock levels, specifications, and valuation, while the Supplier object maintains vendor details including contact information, payment terms, and history. Similarly, Cloud ERP utilizes Item and Supplier business objects to track components and vendor associations, such as linking specific items to approved suppliers for sourcing. Real-time synchronization of these business objects across ERP modules ensures that resource data remains current and accessible, facilitating coordinated activities in areas like finance and . In , the in-memory database powers instantaneous updates, so changes to an InventoryItem object—such as stock adjustments from a —propagate immediately to financial ledgers for accurate costing and to modules for labor planning tied to production schedules. Oracle ERP achieves comparable synchronization through its cloud architecture, where updates to a Supplier object, like revised lead times, reflect across , , and financial modules without delays, supporting just-in-time . This minimizes silos, enhances , and reduces errors in resource tracking. To maintain data integrity during complex operations, ERP systems employ ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) transaction mechanisms that govern interactions involving multiple business objects. In SAP S/4HANA, ACID compliance via the HANA database ensures that transactions, such as updating an InventoryItem and linked Supplier records during a purchase order fulfillment, either complete fully or roll back entirely, preventing partial updates that could lead to discrepancies in resource availability. Oracle ERP similarly enforces ACID properties in its transactional framework, guaranteeing that modifications to interconnected objects—like inventory receipts affecting supplier payments—are isolated and durable, even under concurrent user access, thus propagating updates reliably across the system. Customization of standard business objects allows implementations to adapt to specific industry requirements, particularly in sectors like . In , users can extend core objects such as InventoryItem by adding custom fields—for example, incorporating batch attributes or certifications—through tools like the Business Object Extension framework, without altering the base structure. supports similar extensions via its Functional Artifacts Guide, enabling the addition of manufacturing-specific fields to Supplier or Item objects, such as or metrics, to align with unique operational workflows. These extensions preserve upgrade while tailoring to enterprise needs.

Examples

Common Business Objects

Common business objects represent fundamental entities in modeling, encapsulating data and behaviors relevant to core business operations across various domains. These objects typically include attributes for storing persistent information and methods for performing actions that maintain and support business rules. Examples such as , , , and Employee illustrate reusable patterns that facilitate data consistency and process in systems like and . The business object models an individual or engaging in transactions with the , centralizing key interaction data. Its attributes commonly include contact information such as name, , phone number, and ; purchase history detailing past orders and interactions; and financial details like limits and terms. These elements ensure accurate and compliance in and functions. Methods associated with the Customer object support CRUD operations and queries for retrieving customer instances with filtering capabilities. The Product business object defines items or services available for sale, providing a structured representation of inventory and pricing details. Core attributes encompass the stock-keeping unit (SKU) as a unique identifier, product name, description, specifications (e.g., dimensions, materials), pricing information including base price and discounts, and unit of measure for quantity tracking. These fields support catalog management and ensure consistent valuation across sales channels. Behaviors include methods for inventory updates, such as adjusting stock levels upon sales or receipts, and validations to prevent overselling based on current availability. This object integrates with broader supply chain processes while maintaining self-contained logic for pricing adjustments. The Order business object captures a customer's request for products or services, organizing transactional data hierarchically. It comprises components like header information (e.g., order date, customer reference), line items detailing specific products with quantities and unit prices, and totals aggregating subtotals, taxes, and final amounts. Relationships link the Order to the Customer object via reference IDs for billing and to Product objects for item validation and pricing retrieval. Methods facilitate calculations, such as summing line item values to generate totals and applying discounts or taxes according to business rules. This structure ensures traceability from order creation through fulfillment, with associations enabling seamless data flow between related entities. The Employee business object manages personnel essential for and operational functions, integrating personal and professional data. Key fields include roles and organizational assignment (e.g., job title, , reporting structure), payroll details such as , deductions, and information, and personal identifiers like employee ID, contact details, and dates. These attributes support with labor regulations and accurate compensation processing. Operations encompass performance evaluations, involving methods to record reviews, calculate ratings based on metrics like goals achieved and scores, and records for promotions or adjustments. This object ensures synchronized data across HR systems for reporting and decision-making.

Industry-Specific Implementations

In the healthcare sector, business objects are adapted to handle sensitive data while ensuring compliance with regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). The business object typically encapsulates attributes like , demographic details, and treatment records, with built-in methods for managing patient consent and access controls to protect (PHI). For instance, in systems like Healthcare Data Repository, the patient object serves as a unified representation across the organization, enabling secure data portability and integration with electronic health records while enforcing HIPAA's privacy and security rules. In , business objects for accounts incorporate features to mitigate risks like . The account business object often includes attributes such as history, balance details, and identification , along with methods for performing anti-money laundering (AML) checks and auditing. Financial Services Anti-Money Laundering solutions, for example, model accounts as core business objects, incorporating features for such as KYC and monitoring. Retail implementations of business objects emphasize customer-centric functionalities, particularly for dynamic interactions. The business object represents a customer's session with attributes like item lists, quantities, and user preferences, featuring methods for price adjustments and based on browsing history. In platforms, the basket serves as a business object that can be extended to handle custom data and support logic. This adaptation supports seamless integration with e-commerce personalization engines, optimizing conversion rates while maintaining data consistency across sales channels. In manufacturing, business objects facilitate complex operations through hierarchical representations. The Bill of Materials (BOM) business object links component parts, assemblies, and in a traceable structure, with attributes for material specifications and methods for propagating changes across the . SAP S/4HANA systems, for instance, define the BOM as a central business object that supports end-to-end , allowing real-time updates to part hierarchies.

Benefits and Challenges

Advantages

Business objects offer significant advantages in and systems by encapsulating business , rules, and behaviors into modular, reusable units, which streamlines the overall . One key benefit is improved , as the centralized placement of within these objects reduces code duplication across applications and simplifies updates to rules or processes without widespread system modifications. This encapsulation also enhances and testing by isolating logic from and user interfaces, allowing developers to focus on specific components without affecting others. Furthermore, the modular supports enhanced , enabling systems to handle growth—such as increased volumes or new object types—without requiring complete overhauls, as objects can be distributed across networks while maintaining seamless application performance. Another advantage lies in better alignment with business needs, where business objects abstract technical complexities using familiar business terminology and structures, making it easier for non-technical stakeholders to understand, validate, and contribute to system models. This approach ensures that systems directly reflect organizational goals and real-world entities, fostering collaboration between IT and business teams during design and evolution. Additionally, business objects facilitate integration through standardized interfaces, such as those defined in standards, which enable seamless data exchange and between disparate systems, including legacy components wrapped for modern use. Their reusability further supports this by allowing components to be shared across applications, reducing development redundancy and promoting consistent enterprise-wide .

Limitations and Considerations

In large-scale business object models, over-abstraction introduces through multiple layers of , which can result in overhead from object creation, destruction, and . This overhead is particularly pronounced in environments where extensive encapsulation and hierarchies increase costs, as seen in evaluations of object-oriented approaches where initial productivity dropped significantly due to rigid modeling rules. To mitigate these issues, developers can employ object designs that minimize unnecessary abstractions and implement caching mechanisms to store frequently accessed data closer to the application, reducing repeated computations and database queries. A key challenge in implementing business objects arises from the object-relational impedance mismatch, where the graph-like structure of objects—with features like , polymorphism, and associations—conflicts with the tabular of relational databases, leading to difficulties in mapping and persistence. This mismatch manifests in issues such as differing granularity (more object classes than database tables), identity management (object references versus primary keys), and inefficient data navigation that generates suboptimal SQL queries. Object-relational mapping () tools like Hibernate address these by providing a bridge that automates translations, handles hierarchies, and optimizes queries, thereby reducing development and project risks associated with manual mappings. Business objects often incur substantial maintenance overhead as evolving business rules necessitate frequent updates to models, components, and mappings, exacerbating costs in dynamic enterprise settings. Traditional development methods without modular reuse have historically led to high post-release maintenance demands, requiring dedicated teams to address quality issues and extensions. Best practices to manage this include adopting version control systems for tracking changes to object definitions and integrations, alongside rigorous testing frameworks to validate updates against business logic before deployment. Security risks in business object implementations stem from exposed methods that may inadvertently leak sensitive data through inadequate access restrictions, especially in distributed enterprise applications where objects interact across layers. Such vulnerabilities can enable unauthorized data exposure or manipulation if methods are callable without proper validation. Effective countermeasures involve applying (RBAC), which assigns permissions to users based on predefined roles, thereby limiting method invocations to authorized contexts and enforcing least-privilege principles.

References

  1. [1]
    What are Business Objects? Overview, Benefits & Examples | Solix
    Object-Oriented Design: Business objects follow object-oriented principles with properties representing business attributes and methods encapsulating actions.Missing: engineering | Show results with:engineering
  2. [2]
    SAP Business Objects
    SAP business objects represent real objects like employees, encapsulating SAP data and business processes, and hiding underlying implementation details.
  3. [3]
    What Is A Business Object?
    A business object (BO) is a tool that defines data, user interface behavior, and business rules, and can define a lifecycle.
  4. [4]
    Definition of Business Object - Capstera
    A Business Object is an encapsulated representation of a business concept that combines data attributes, behavior rules, and relationships into a cohesive ...
  5. [5]
    OMG Business Application Architecture
    Business object: a representation of a thing active in the business domain, including at least its business name and definition, attributes, behavior, ...
  6. [6]
    What Is a Business Object? - Programming Jakarta Struts [Book]
    A business object (BO) is simply a software abstraction of a real-world entity. It represents a person, place, thing, or concept from the business domain.<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
    Business Object Architecture
    Flexibility, reduced cycle time, and lower costs are all dependent on reusability of Business Objects. Reusability has been difficult to achieve on early object ...
  8. [8]
    SAP Business Objects
    Inheritance and Polymorphism. One objective and the main benefit of object-oriented technology is software reusability. The reuse of software code is ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Connecting Business Objects to Relational Databases
    Provide a layer for mapping your objects to the RDBMS or other database. CRUD. All persistent object need, at a minimum, create, read, update, and delete.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Object Persistence - ODBMS.org
    Object Relational Mapping. • Most business database applications use relational databases. • Need to map the objects in the application to tables in the ...
  11. [11]
    Design Patterns for Data Persistence | Microsoft Learn
    The business objects in the middle tier and the user interface or service layer are the application, and the database is a means to reliably persist the ...
  12. [12]
    The Roots of Object Orientation: The Simula Language
    The origins of object orientation lie in early programming languages and AI technologies, starting with the Simula language in 1962 (Dahl 2002 , Dahl & Nygaard ...
  13. [13]
    History of Objects: Simula and Smalltalk (Chapter 11)
    Objects were invented in the design of Simula and refined in the evolution of Smalltalk. In this chapter, we look at the origin of object-oriented programming ...Missing: roots | Show results with:roots
  14. [14]
    A brief history of objects - Naked Objects
    The first methodologies that embodied object-oriented principles and could be applied to mainstream business systems started to appear in the late 1980s. They ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] The entity-relationship model : toward a unified view of data
    A data model, called the entity-relationship model, is proposed. This model incorporates some of the important semantic information about the real world.<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Entity-Relationship versus Object-Oriented Modeling and the ... - DTIC
    Dec 1, 1992 · Moving from ER to 00 data modeling changes the traditional view of programs and programming from a collection of functions performed on data to ...
  17. [17]
    CORBA® — Common Object Request Broker Architecture
    This document specifies the CORBA Object Model and uses concepts from that model to define the operation of the Object Request Broker (ORB).
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Implementing Business Objects: CORBA interfaces for legacy systems
    In 1991, the OMG (Object Management Group) defined an architectural framework (OMA-Object. Management Architecture) as a milestone in realizing the vision of ...
  19. [19]
    SAP History | About SAP
    The SAP R/3 success story began in 1992, with the client-server software smoothing the path to a globalized economy, turning SAP into a global player with ...Sap: A 50-Year History Of... · Overview Of Our History · The Early Years
  20. [20]
    https://help.sap.com/docs/SAP_NETWEAVER_700/10992e3d6c5310149814d82d7abac0c3/4dd26f601acb2cc0e10000000a42189b.html
  21. [21]
    The Business Object Repository - BAPI - SAP Help Portal
    The BOR was originally developed for SAP Business Workflow. Today, in addition to storing SAP business object types and their BAPIs, the BOR is used for ...
  22. [22]
    Interoperability of the next generation of enterprise applications - W3C
    XML is object-oriented and was also intended to integrate the databases into the Web. But how could this be interoperable? A good description of how and why can ...<|separator|>
  23. [23]
    Business Object Design and Implementation - SpringerLink
    Oct 16, 1995 · The OMG Business Object Facility and the OMG Business Object. Oliver ... OOPSLA '95 Workshop Proceedings 16 October 1995, Austin, Texas.
  24. [24]
    https://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ormsc/2001-07-01.pdf
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Model-Driven Architecture - Object Management Group
    This paper surveys the core OMG MDA standards (i.e., UML, MOF, XMI and CWM) and discusses the current attempts at mapping these standards to J2EE, as examples ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Get ready for the next generation of SAP business applications ...
    On top of the persistence layer are business objects, which are the basic elements of an application in Enterprise SOA. A business object encapsulates.
  27. [27]
    (PDF) Migrating to Cloud-Native Architectures Using Microservices
    Aug 7, 2025 · In this paper, we intend to report our experience and lessons learned in an ongoing project on migrating a monolithic on-premise software architecture to ...
  28. [28]
    Microservices Patterns: Business Service Patterns | Cloud Native Daily
    Jun 27, 2023 · Hexagonal Architecture, Domain Model Pattern, Domain Driven Design (DDD), Strategic Pattern vs Tactical Pattern, Aggregate Pattern and more.
  29. [29]
    (PDF) Using UML for Business Object Based Systems Modeling.
    Business object s are not only well suited as modeling concepts in software engineering, they may even be used in the context of business engineering. This ...
  30. [30]
    User Story Mapping [Book] - O'Reilly
    Author Jeff Patton shows you how changeable story maps enable your team to hold better conversations about the project throughout the development process. Your ...
  31. [31]
    Business objects (BOs) - IBM
    Jan 20, 2025 · Data is exchanged between components by business objects. The underlying structure of a business object is an XML schema definition (XSD).
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Business Object Primer - Visible Systems Corporation
    Business objects reside “in the middle” below the UI that creates the visual presentation and responds to the user's actions and above the database services ...Missing: engineering | Show results with:engineering
  33. [33]
    Business Object Components - Oracle Help Center
    A business object, which a service implements, is a hierarchy of service data objects. Each service data object is a logical entity that consists of ...
  34. [34]
    13 Modeling Business Objects - Oracle Help Center
    This chapter describes how to use Business Objects in a BPM Project. Business Objects allow you to manage the data in your process efficiently and enable you to ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Business Process Model and Notation—BPMN
    Business Rule. A Business Rule Task provides a mechanism for the process to provide input to a Busi- ness Rules Engine and to get the output of calculations ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Event Driven Business Process Management taking the Example of ...
    Feb 29, 2008 · Business Process with Focus on BPEL, CEP and BAM event types reflecting the business objects. Business objects are e.g. RFID tags as well as ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Event-Driven Business Process Management and its Practical ...
    The term “Event-Driven Business Process Management” is a combination of actually two different disciplines: Business Process Management (BPM) and Complex Event.<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    [PDF] The use of Business Rules with Workflow Systems
    A business application can add/remove and change the state of business objects in the working memory, and allows the rules engine to reason about these and.
  39. [39]
    SAP S/4HANA | SAP Help Portal | SAP Help Portal
    ### Summary of Business Objects in SAP S/4HANA ERP
  40. [40]
    Item Supplier Version 2 - Oracle Help Center
    The association of an item with a supplier who provides that item, such as the association of item CAR with supplier Zoom Incorporated.Missing: ERP | Show results with:ERP
  41. [41]
    Master Data Synchronization - SAP Help Portal
    Master data synchronization can synchronize master data objects within an SAP system that are similar from a business perspective, but technically different.Missing: inventory real-
  42. [42]
    Business Object Extensions Quick Guide - SAP Help Portal
    You can customize the business objects that are provided by SAP by creating business object extensions. When you create a business object extension, you ...Missing: Oracle | Show results with:Oracle
  43. [43]
    6 Customizing and Extending Business Objects
    Business Object customization is defined as changes or extension of the base XSDs made by a customer to satisfy a customer specific business requirement. Oracle ...Missing: SAP ERP manufacturing
  44. [44]
    Business Object Modeling - SAP Help Portal
    Persistence Layer (database, search index). All business logic is implemented in business objects that model real-world objects and processes.
  45. [45]
    Customer Master Data | SAP Help Portal
    Customer master data controls how transactions are recorded, includes customer info, is used by accounting and sales, and is stored centrally.
  46. [46]
    Customer [Client] Master Data - Data Model & Process Management
    Jul 4, 2025 · Key Attributes of a Customer Master Data Model · Basic Customer Information: · Financial & Credit Data · Legal & Compliance Information · Customer ...
  47. [47]
    Building Excellence in ERP Master Data Management - Verdantis
    Jul 29, 2025 · Product Master Data typically includes attributes like product name, SKU (Stock Keeping Unit), descriptions, specifications, pricing, unit ...
  48. [48]
    What is Product Master Data? A Guide to Better Data Management
    Product master data comes from multiple sources, each contributing key details that define a product's attributes, pricing, and supply chain information.
  49. [49]
    What Is a Stock Keeping Unit (SKU) & How Does It Work? - NetSuite
    Dec 19, 2024 · SKUs are codes that businesses create out of letters and numbers that represents detailed information about a product, and they're established by each business.
  50. [50]
    Business Object - SAP Help Portal
    For example, the Sales Order object can have a method to calculate and get the line items total. Event handlers describe a specific action that can occur ...
  51. [51]
    How Sales Documents are Structured - SAP Help Portal
    An item consists of one or more schedule lines. The schedule line contains all the data that is needed for a delivery. For example, a customer orders 20 units ...
  52. [52]
    Business Object | SAP Help Portal
    Relationships define the interaction between different objects based business logic. For example, a customer can be associated to one or more sales orders.
  53. [53]
    A Playbook for Employee Master Data Management - Verdantis
    Jul 4, 2025 · Data Silos & Systemic Issues. Employee data is often fragmented across multiple systems such as HR, payroll, and IT, leading to inconsistencies.
  54. [54]
    Overview of Payroll Assignment - Oracle Help Center
    The Payroll Assignment business object contains payroll assignment details for an employee, such as time card required status and overtime period based on ...
  55. [55]
    44 Essential Data Points to Include in Your Employee Records
    Essential employee data includes contact info, emergency details, positions, salaries, bank info, leave records, and performance reviews.<|control11|><|separator|>
  56. [56]
    [PDF] Oracle® Healthcare Data Repository - Implementation Guide
    HDR provides a single definition of each business object (encounter, patients, providers, medical acts...) across the healthcare organization. This lets ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] IBM Business Process Manager V7.5
    The Healthcare Business Object Models are conceptual data models that provide the foundation for information management. You can implement a logical data model ...Missing: pattern | Show results with:pattern
  58. [58]
    Summary of the HIPAA Privacy Rule - HHS.gov
    Mar 14, 2025 · The HIPAA Privacy Rule sets national standards for protecting health information, limiting its use and disclosure by covered entities, and ...HIPAA Related Links · Guidance · Combined Text of All Rules
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Financial Crime and Compliance Management Products
    A focus type within the Oracle Financial Services Anti-Money Laundering (AML) solution set. ... A specific business object (for example, company and customer) ...
  60. [60]
    Bill of Materials | SAP Help Portal
    Additionals: Business Object Methods · Additionals: Change Analysis ... Supply Chain · Replenishment and Allocation · Merchandise Allocation Execution.
  61. [61]
    [PDF] GS1 Global Traceability Standard
    Business Object Analysis. 9.1. Business Object Life-Cycle Discussion. The purpose of this section is to identify and explain the minimum agreed data elements ...
  62. [62]
    Object-Orientation and Business-Driven Information Engineering
    Sep 1, 1998 · An object-oriented design carries the benefits of modularity and encapsulation from the analysis stage through to the completed application.<|control11|><|separator|>
  63. [63]
    Toward Intelligent Business Objects - Communications of the ACM
    Oct 1, 2000 · As an emerging technology, Business Objects (BOs) seem to be a good candidate and a promising approach [3]. BOs should be able to provide an ...
  64. [64]
    An evaluation of the business object approach to software ...
    In this paper, we report the result of an evaluation of the use of business objects and business components for developing business application software.
  65. [65]
    Caching guidance - Azure Architecture Center | Microsoft Learn
    Learn how caching can improve the performance and scalability of a system by copying frequently accessed data to fast storage close to the application.
  66. [66]
    What is object/relational mapping? - Hibernate ORM
    The object/relational impedance mismatch refers to differences in how entities are represented in the relational data model.
  67. [67]
    SAP BOBJ Performance Best Practice - IT-Conductor
    Sep 30, 2015 · 3 major areas of performance assurance: Sizing/Design, Testing/Optimization, and Monitoring/Management.
  68. [68]
    Broken access control: The leading OWASP Top 10 security risk
    Mar 27, 2025 · Learn about security vulnerabilities caused by broken access control, complete with attack techniques and best practices for prevention.Types Of Access Control In... · Types Of Attacks Exploiting... · Exploiting Access Control...Missing: oriented | Show results with:oriented
  69. [69]
    What Is Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)? - IBM
    Role-based access control (RBAC) is a model for authorizing end-user access to systems, applications and data based on a user's predefined role.<|control11|><|separator|>