Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Classical field theory

Classical field theory is a branch of theoretical physics that describes the behavior of physical fields—such as the electromagnetic field or the gravitational field—as continuous distributions over spacetime, governed by partial differential equations derived from variational principles.^[1] These fields possess infinitely many degrees of freedom, contrasting with the finite degrees of freedom in classical particle mechanics, and their dynamics are formulated using a Lagrangian density integrated over spacetime to form the action, from which equations of motion emerge via the principle of least action.^[2] The foundations of classical field theory trace back to the 19th century, with James Clerk Maxwell's unification of electricity and magnetism into a set of relativistic field equations that describe light as an electromagnetic wave propagating at a constant speed.^[3] This work laid the groundwork for special relativity, as the invariance of Maxwell's equations under Lorentz transformations highlighted the need for a unified spacetime framework, later formalized by Albert Einstein in 1905.^[1] Earlier precursors include Isaac Newton's law of universal gravitation, reformulated in field-theoretic terms via the Poisson equation \nabla^2 \phi = 4\pi G \rho for the gravitational potential, introduced by Siméon Denis Poisson in the early 19th century, marking the first field-theoretic description of long-range forces.^[2]^[4] Key aspects of classical field theory include its emphasis on locality, where interactions occur only at coincident spacetime points, and Lorentz invariance, ensuring the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames.^[1] The formalism employs the Euler-Lagrange equations for fields, such as the Klein-Gordon equation for massive scalar fields: \partial_\mu \partial^\mu \phi + m^2 \phi = 0, or Maxwell's equations for the electromagnetic field tensor F^{\mu\nu}.^[2] Symmetries play a central role, with Noether's theorem linking continuous symmetries—like spacetime translations—to conserved quantities, including the energy-momentum tensor T^{\mu\nu}, which encodes the distribution of energy and momentum in the field.^[1] Notable extensions include general relativity, where Einstein's field equations R_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2}Rg_{\mu\nu} + \Lambda g_{\mu\nu} = \frac{8\pi G}{c^4} T_{\mu\nu} couple gravity to matter via the metric tensor g_{\mu\nu}, and gauge theories, pioneered by Hermann Weyl and later Chen Ning Yang and Robert Mills in 1954, which introduce local symmetries for non-Abelian groups like SU(2).^[2] These principles underpin modern applications, from electromagnetism to the classical limits of quantum field theories, though challenges like infinities in self-energy (e.g., electromagnetic mass divergences addressed by Paul Dirac in 1938) persist.^[3]

Introduction

Definition and scope

Classical field theory provides a mathematical framework for describing physical systems where interactions are mediated by continuous distributions of quantities across space and time, rather than discrete particles. A field is defined as a function that assigns physical quantities—such as scalars, vectors, or tensors—to every point in space and time, enabling the representation of phenomena like forces and energies in a spatially extended manner.^[2]^[5] This approach treats the field itself as a dynamical entity, evolving deterministically according to partial differential equations derived from underlying principles, such as variational methods that extremize an action functional.^[6] Fields are classified by their tensorial nature, reflecting how they transform under coordinate changes. Scalar fields assign a single numerical value to each point in space and time, exemplified by the temperature distribution in thermodynamics or the gravitational potential in Newtonian gravity.^[2] Vector fields, such as the velocity field in fluid dynamics or the electric field in electromagnetism, specify both magnitude and direction at every point. Tensor fields, like the stress tensor describing material deformations or the energy-momentum tensor in relativistic contexts, generalize this to multi-component objects capturing more complex relationships. These types encompass the primary building blocks for modeling continuous media and fundamental interactions.^[2]^[5] The scope of classical field theory is limited to deterministic, non-quantum descriptions of physical phenomena, focusing on continuous theories where quantum fluctuations and probabilistic outcomes are absent. It includes gravitational fields, as in general relativity; electromagnetic fields governed by Maxwell's equations; and matter fields, such as those representing fluids or elastic media. Unlike classical particle mechanics, which deals with finite degrees of freedom corresponding to a limited number of particles, field theory accommodates infinite degrees of freedom—one for each point in space and time—allowing for wave propagation, diffusion, and long-range interactions in extended systems.^[6]^[5]^[2]

Historical significance

Classical field theory marked a pivotal shift in physics by replacing the instantaneous action-at-a-distance paradigm of Newtonian mechanics with local interactions mediated by fields that propagate through space and time. This transition resolved fundamental paradoxes in Newtonian theory, such as the violation of locality—where effects depend only on immediate surroundings—and the inconsistency with observed finite speeds of interaction, by introducing fields whose changes obey local equations of motion.^[7] However, in gravitational interactions, Newtonian field equations like Poisson's equation still implied infinite propagation speeds, an issue incompatible with causality and resolved only in relativistic theories such as general relativity.^[5] As a foundational framework, classical field theory served as a precursor to both special and general relativity, as well as quantum field theory. The study of electromagnetic wave propagation in classical electrodynamics directly inspired the development of special relativity, highlighting the invariance of the speed of light and the need for Lorentz transformations.^[3] It provided the conceptual and mathematical structure for general relativity, where gravity is described as curvature in a metric field, extending the field paradigm to spacetime geometry.^[8] Similarly, classical field theory laid the groundwork for quantum field theory by modeling fields as fundamental entities interacting with matter, enabling the quantization of fields in quantum contexts.^[9] A key impact was the formulation of Maxwell's equations within classical electromagnetism, which predicted the existence of electromagnetic waves propagating at the speed of light, unifying optics with electricity and magnetism.^[10] This not only explained light as an electromagnetic phenomenon but also established classical field theory as the basis for Einstein's general relativity, where analogous field equations describe gravitational waves and spacetime dynamics.^[8] In engineering, classical field theory underpins technologies reliant on electromagnetic propagation, such as radio waves, which emerged from Maxwell's predictions of transverse waves suitable for wireless communication.^[11] The Global Positioning System (GPS) further exemplifies this significance, using electromagnetic signals from satellites—governed by classical field equations—to enable precise timing and positioning, with relativistic corrections ensuring accuracy.^[12]

Mathematical foundations

Fields and their properties

In classical field theory, a field is mathematically represented as a mapping \phi: \mathcal{M} \to V, where \mathcal{M} denotes the spacetime manifold (typically \mathbb{R}^4 with a metric structure) and V is a vector space or other target space assigning values to physical quantities at each spacetime point x \in \mathcal{M}. This formulation captures systems with uncountably infinite degrees of freedom, contrasting with discrete particle mechanics that involve finite degrees of freedom governed by ordinary differential equations. Continuous fields arise in the continuum limit, such as when the spacing between discrete elements approaches zero, enabling the description of extended systems like fluids or elastic media through partial differential equations.^[2]^[13] Fields are classified based on their transformation properties under coordinate changes and symmetries, primarily into scalar, vector, and tensor types. A scalar field \phi(x) assigns a single real or complex value at each point and remains invariant under Lorentz or Galilean transformations, such as the mass density \rho(\vec{r}, t) or temperature field. Vector fields, like \vec{A}^\mu(x) or the velocity field \vec{v}(\vec{r}, t) in fluid dynamics, consist of components that transform as the basis vectors of the tangent space, preserving directional information under boosts or rotations. Tensor fields generalize this further, with multiple indices, exemplified by the metric tensor g_{\mu\nu}(x) or stress-energy tensor T_{\mu\nu}(x), which transform contravariantly or covariantly to maintain rank and type under group actions. This classification ensures consistency across reference frames in both non-relativistic and relativistic contexts.^[14]^[2]^[13] Key properties of fields include linearity and the principle of superposition, which hold for free or weakly interacting fields where the governing equations are linear partial differential equations, allowing solutions to be added to form new solutions. For instance, plane-wave modes of a scalar field can superpose to describe general configurations. Boundary conditions specify field behavior at spatial or temporal boundaries, often requiring fields or their derivatives to vanish at infinity to ensure well-posedness and energy finiteness. Initial value problems, central to time evolution, demand specification of the field configuration and its first time derivative on an initial hypersurface, determining the unique solution forward and backward in time for hyperbolic systems. These properties underpin the predictive power of field theories.^[2]^[13]^[14] Transformation laws dictate how fields change under spacetime symmetries, ensuring physical laws remain invariant. In non-relativistic classical field theory, Galilean invariance governs transformations, where coordinates shift as \vec{r}' = \vec{r} - \vec{v}t, t' = t, with scalar fields unchanged, vector fields like the fluid velocity transforming as \vec{v}' = \vec{v} - \vec{v}_{\text{boost}} to account for relative motion, and tensors adjusting their components accordingly. This framework applies to phenomena such as incompressible fluid flow, where the velocity field \vec{v}(\vec{r}, t) describes local motion while obeying the invariance of mass conservation. Relativistic extensions replace Galilean with Lorentz transformations, but the non-relativistic case highlights the foundational role of these laws in classical settings.^[13]^[2]

Variational principles and equations of motion

In classical field theory, the dynamics of fields are derived from variational principles, which provide a unified framework for obtaining equations of motion by extremizing an action functional. Fields can be viewed as infinite-dimensional configurations over spacetime, where the action principle generalizes Hamilton's principle from particle mechanics to continuous systems. The action S is defined as the integral of a Lagrangian density \mathcal{L} over spacetime,

S[\phi] = \int \mathcal{L}(\phi, \partial_\mu \phi) \, d^4 x,

where \phi represents the field and \partial_\mu \phi its first derivatives. The physical trajectories or field configurations are those that make the action stationary, \delta S = 0, under small variations \delta \phi that vanish at the boundaries.^[2]^[15] To derive the equations of motion, the stationarity condition is enforced using the calculus of variations. Consider a variation \phi \to \phi + \epsilon \eta, where \eta is an arbitrary test function vanishing on the boundaries. The first-order change in the action is

\delta S = \int \left[ \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \phi} \eta + \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \partial_\mu \eta \right] d^4 x = 0.

Integrating the second term by parts and using the boundary conditions yields the Euler-Lagrange equations for fields:

\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \phi} - \partial_\mu \left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \right) = 0.

These partial differential equations govern the evolution of the field \phi.^[2]^[15] A key consequence of the variational formulation is Noether's theorem, which connects continuous symmetries of the Lagrangian to conserved quantities. If the action is invariant under an infinitesimal transformation \delta \phi = \epsilon K(\phi), where \epsilon is a constant parameter, then there exists a conserved current j^\mu satisfying \partial_\mu j^\mu = 0. For spacetime symmetries, such as translations, this leads to conservation of the energy-momentum tensor T^{\mu\nu}, defined as

T^{\mu\nu} = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi)} \partial^\nu \phi - g^{\mu\nu} \mathcal{L},

with \partial_\nu T^{\mu\nu} = 0. This theorem, originally developed in the context of general relativity but applicable to classical fields, underscores the deep link between symmetry and conservation laws.^[16]^[2] The Lagrangian formalism can be transformed into the Hamiltonian formulation via a Legendre transform, introducing conjugate momentum densities \pi = \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{\phi}}, where \dot{\phi} = \partial_t \phi. The Hamiltonian density is then \mathcal{H} = \pi \dot{\phi} - \mathcal{L}, and the total Hamiltonian is H = \int \mathcal{H} \, d^3 x. Hamilton's equations follow as \dot{\phi} = \frac{\delta H}{\delta \pi} and \dot{\pi} = -\frac{\delta H}{\delta \phi}, providing a phase-space description suitable for quantization and other extensions. This transition preserves the dynamics while shifting emphasis to first-order equations in field variables and their momenta.^[2]^[15]

Historical development

Early concepts (pre-1800)

The roots of classical field theory trace back to ancient philosophical debates on the nature of matter and space. In ancient Greece, atomists such as Leucippus and Democritus proposed that the universe consists of indivisible particles (atoms) moving through a void, implying discrete rather than continuous interactions.^[17] In contrast, Aristotle advocated for a continuum model, viewing matter as a continuous substance without voids, where natural motions arise from inherent properties of this plenum rather than discrete collisions.^[17] This Aristotelian framework dominated Western thought for centuries, emphasizing filled space as the medium for physical phenomena and laying groundwork for later continuous field concepts by rejecting instantaneous action at a distance.^[17] In the 17th century, René Descartes advanced early field-like ideas through his vortex theory, positing that the universe is filled with a continuous medium of subtle matter forming rotating vortices around celestial bodies.^[18] These vortices, described in his Principia Philosophiae (1644), explained gravitational attraction not as direct action but as mechanical pressure from the surrounding ethereal fluid pushing bodies toward the center of each vortex.^[18] This mechanical continuum provided a qualitative alternative to Newton's instantaneous forces, influencing perceptions of space as a pervasive medium for transmitting influences.^[18] Contemporary thinkers like Christiaan Huygens and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz further explored propagation in continuous media. Huygens, in his Traité de la Lumière (1690), developed a wave theory of light, conceiving it as disturbances propagating through an elastic ether—a uniform, continuous medium filling space—rather than corpuscles traveling in a void.^[19] Leibniz, critiquing action at a distance in works like his correspondence with Clarke (1715–1716), favored a plenum of continuous substance where influences spread gradually through contiguous interactions, aligning with his monadic philosophy yet supporting wave-like transmission in physical media.^[20] By the 18th century, Leonhard Euler formalized continuum fields in fluid dynamics, treating fluids as continuous media governed by partial differential equations that describe density, velocity, and pressure as distributed properties throughout space.^[21] In his Principia Motus Fluidorum (1761), Euler derived equations for inviscid flow, marking a shift toward mathematical descriptions of fields as smooth variations in continuous substances, building on Newtonian mechanics but emphasizing local interactions over distant forces.^[21] Roger Joseph Boscovich proposed a hybrid approach in Theoria Philosophiae Naturalis (1758), envisioning matter as point-like centers of force embedded in a continuous field, where attractive and repulsive forces vary with distance to explain cohesion and repulsion without extended atoms.^[22] This force field concept unified diverse phenomena under a single law of alternating forces, prefiguring modern field theories by treating space as permeated by potential influences from ideal points.^[23] A pivotal experimental development came in 1785 when Charles-Augustin de Coulomb used a torsion balance to measure the force between charged objects, demonstrating that it follows an inverse-square law analogous to gravity, suggesting a possible underlying field mechanism for electrical interactions despite his action-at-a-distance interpretation.^[24]

19th-century advancements

The 19th century marked a pivotal shift in physics toward conceptualizing forces as distributed fields rather than instantaneous actions between distant particles, with foundational experiments and theoretical syntheses emerging primarily in electromagnetism and gravitation. In 1820, Danish physicist Hans Christian Ørsted discovered that an electric current in a wire produces a magnetic field capable of deflecting a nearby compass needle, establishing an intimate connection between electricity and magnetism that challenged prevailing views of their independence.^[25] This serendipitous observation during a lecture demonstration laid the groundwork for subsequent investigations into magnetic effects surrounding currents. Building on Ørsted's finding, Michael Faraday conducted extensive experiments in the 1820s and 1830s, demonstrating that currents generate circular magnetic fields around conductors and exploring rotational effects in electromagnetic setups, such as his 1821 apparatus where a current-carrying wire rotated around a fixed magnet.^[26] A key breakthrough came in 1831 when Faraday discovered electromagnetic induction, observing that a changing magnetic field induces an electric current in a nearby circuit, thus revealing the dynamic interplay between electric and magnetic phenomena and introducing the concept of time-varying fields.^[27] This law of induction demonstrated that magnetic effects could propagate and influence distant conductors without direct contact, further eroding reliance on action-at-a-distance explanations. In the 1840s, Faraday advanced his qualitative framework by introducing the concept of field lines—imaginary lines tracing the direction and intensity of magnetic forces—to visualize how fields permeate space continuously, explicitly rejecting Newtonian action at a distance in favor of a medium-filling tension and elasticity in the ether.^[28] These lines provided an intuitive model for understanding force distribution, influencing later mathematical formalizations. In gravitation, theoretical progress complemented these electromagnetic developments; Siméon Denis Poisson extended Pierre-Simon Laplace's earlier work on celestial mechanics by deriving Poisson's equation in 1813, which relates the Laplacian of the gravitational potential to the mass density, enabling solutions for potentials inside attracting bodies and solidifying the field-like treatment of gravity in Newtonian contexts.^[29] The 1860s culminated in James Clerk Maxwell's comprehensive synthesis, where he unified disparate laws of electricity, magnetism, and optics into a coherent set of field equations, portraying electromagnetic phenomena as propagating disturbances in a pervasive field and predicting electromagnetic waves traveling at the speed of light.^[30] This framework established classical field theory as a paradigm for describing continuous interactions across space.

20th-century extensions

In 1905, Albert Einstein introduced the theory of special relativity, which reconciled the classical field theory of electromagnetism—epitomized by Maxwell's equations—with the laws of mechanics by establishing the invariance of the speed of light and the principle of relativity for all inertial observers. This framework transformed electromagnetic fields from absolute entities into components of a relativistic tensor field on four-dimensional Minkowski spacetime, ensuring that field equations remain form-invariant under Lorentz transformations.^[31] Extending this relativistic foundation to include gravity, Einstein developed general relativity in 1915, conceptualizing gravitation as a classical field theory where the metric tensor of spacetime serves as the dynamical field, curved by the presence of matter and energy. This approach generalized the flat spacetime of special relativity to a pseudo-Riemannian manifold, with the geometry encoding gravitational interactions. In a seminal presentation that year, Einstein derived the complete set of field equations governing this curvature. The following year, in 1916, Einstein published a definitive exposition of general relativity, elucidating the field equations that relate spacetime curvature to the stress-energy content of matter, thereby establishing gravity as a fully relativistic classical field theory with profound implications for cosmology and astrophysics. During the 1920s, classical field theory expanded to encompass relativistic descriptions of matter fields beyond electromagnetism and gravity. The Klein–Gordon equation, formulated independently by Oskar Klein in April 1926 and Walter Gordon in September 1926, emerged as a linear relativistic wave equation for scalar fields, representing the classical dynamics of massive particles with spin zero in a Lorentz-covariant manner. In its classical interpretation, this equation governs the propagation of scalar fields with a dispersion relation that enforces the relativistic energy-momentum relation.^[32] Complementing this, Paul Dirac proposed in 1928 a first-order relativistic equation for fields describing particles with spin one-half, leading to the classical theory of spinor fields that incorporate intrinsic angular momentum within a relativistic framework. This extension enriched classical field theory by introducing fermionic fields with anticommuting properties in their classical limit, essential for modeling matter with spin.^[33] After World War II, classical field theory saw the advent of non-Abelian gauge theories, culminating in the 1954 work of Chen Ning Yang and Robert L. Mills, who constructed a classical field model invariant under local transformations in isotopic spin space. This theory generalized the U(1) gauge structure of electromagnetism to the non-Abelian SU(2) group, introducing self-interacting vector fields that mediate short-range forces, and provided a classical prototype for modern gauge field theories.^[34] These developments in the 20th century elevated classical field theory to a cornerstone of relativistic physics, influencing subsequent unification attempts across fundamental interactions.

Non-relativistic field theories

Newtonian gravitation

Newtonian gravitation represents one of the earliest examples of a classical field theory, treating gravity as a scalar field in non-relativistic physics. In this formulation, the gravitational interaction is mediated by a scalar potential \phi, which depends on the distribution of mass in space. This approach transforms Newton's original point-particle law into a continuous field description, applicable to extended bodies and continuous mass distributions. The theory assumes a flat Euclidean space and Galilean invariance, focusing on static or slowly varying configurations where velocities are much less than the speed of light. The governing equation for the gravitational potential is Poisson's equation,

\nabla^2 \phi = 4\pi G \rho,

where \rho is the mass density, G is the gravitational constant, and \nabla^2 is the Laplacian operator. This partial differential equation relates the curvature of the potential to the local mass density. It arises from applying the divergence theorem to the gravitational flux through a closed surface, yielding Gauss's law for gravity: the flux of the gravitational field through any closed surface equals -4\pi G times the enclosed mass. Taking the divergence of the field definition then leads to the source term on the right-hand side.^[35] The gravitational field \mathbf{g} is defined as the negative gradient of the potential, \mathbf{g} = -\nabla \phi. This vector field points toward regions of higher potential (more negative \phi) and encodes the direction and magnitude of gravitational acceleration. The force \mathbf{F} on a test mass m at a point is then \mathbf{F} = m \mathbf{g}, providing a local description of the interaction without direct reference to distant masses.^[35] This field-theoretic picture derives directly from Newton's law of universal gravitation, which states that the force between two point masses m_1 and m_2 separated by distance r is \mathbf{F} = -G \frac{m_1 m_2}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}. By defining the potential for a point mass M as \phi = -\frac{GM}{r}, the acceleration on m becomes -\nabla \phi, matching the force law per unit mass. For a continuous distribution, the total potential is the integral \phi(\mathbf{x}) = -G \int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{x}')}{|\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{x}'|} d^3\mathbf{x}', which satisfies Poisson's equation by the properties of the Green's function for the Laplacian. The linearity of this integral implies the superposition principle: the total field from multiple sources is the vector sum of individual fields, allowing solutions for complex distributions by adding contributions.^[36] Representative solutions illustrate the theory's utility. For a point mass M at the origin, the potential is \phi(r) = -\frac{GM}{r}, yielding a field \mathbf{g} = -\frac{GM}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}} that matches Newton's law exactly. For a uniform sphere of mass M and radius a, the shell theorem—derived by integrating over concentric shells—shows that outside the sphere (r > a), the potential and field are identical to those of a point mass at the center: \phi(r) = -\frac{GM}{r} and \mathbf{g} = -\frac{GM}{r^2} \hat{\mathbf{r}}. Inside the sphere (r < a), the potential is quadratic, \phi(r) = -\frac{GM}{2a^3} (3a^2 - r^2), producing a linear field \mathbf{g} = -\frac{GM}{a^3} r \hat{\mathbf{r}} that vanishes at the center and increases toward the surface. These solutions highlight the theory's predictive power for planetary and stellar systems modeled as spheres.^[37]^[38] Poisson's equation can also be obtained variationally from an action principle involving the integral of \phi \rho - \frac{1}{8\pi G} (\nabla \phi)^2, though the full derivation lies beyond the static scope here.^[39] A key limitation of the Newtonian formulation is its reliance on instantaneous propagation: changes in the mass distribution affect the field everywhere simultaneously, without delay or wave-like disturbances. This action-at-a-distance character precludes gravitational waves and conflicts with causality in relativistic contexts.^[40]

Classical electromagnetism

Classical electromagnetism represents a foundational example of a classical field theory that, although often approximated in non-relativistic contexts for systems where velocities are much less than the speed of light (v ≪ c), is fundamentally relativistic in its complete formulation. Maxwell's equations are Lorentz-invariant and unify electric and magnetic phenomena through continuous vector fields that propagate interactions between charges and currents at the finite speed of light c, predicting electromagnetic waves and laying the groundwork for special relativity. Developed primarily by James Clerk Maxwell in the mid-19th century, it treats the electric field \mathbf{E} and magnetic field \mathbf{B} as dynamical entities responding to charge density \rho and current density \mathbf{J}.^[30] The dynamics of these fields are encapsulated in Maxwell's four equations, expressed in differential form in free space:

\nabla \cdot \mathbf{E} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}

\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0

\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = -\frac{\partial \mathbf{B}}{\partial t}

\nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu_0 \mathbf{J} + \mu_0 \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial \mathbf{E}}{\partial t}

Here, \epsilon_0 denotes the vacuum permittivity and \mu_0 the vacuum permeability, constants that set the scale for electromagnetic interactions.^[30] These equations imply that magnetic monopoles do not exist (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0), electric charges create divergence in \mathbf{E}, time-varying \mathbf{B} induces curl in \mathbf{E}, and currents plus time-varying \mathbf{E} source curl in \mathbf{B}, enabling wave solutions for free-field propagation at speed c = 1/\sqrt{\mu_0 \epsilon_0}.^[30] To facilitate solutions, the fields are derived from potentials: a scalar potential \phi and a vector potential \mathbf{A}, defined as

\mathbf{E} = -\nabla \phi - \frac{\partial \mathbf{A}}{\partial t}, \quad \mathbf{B} = \nabla \times \mathbf{A}.

This representation automatically satisfies the two homogeneous Maxwell equations (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0 and \nabla \times \mathbf{E} + \partial \mathbf{B}/\partial t = 0), but introduces redundancy known as gauge freedom, where \phi and \mathbf{A} can be transformed by \phi' = \phi - \partial \chi / \partial t and \mathbf{A}' = \mathbf{A} + \nabla \chi for arbitrary \chi without altering the fields.^[41] A common choice is the Coulomb gauge, \nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} = 0, which simplifies the equations for \phi to resemble electrostatics and decouples the potentials in certain approximations, though it requires careful handling of boundary conditions.^[41] In static limits, where time derivatives vanish, the theory separates into electrostatics and magnetostatics. For electrostatics (\partial \mathbf{B}/\partial t = 0, \mathbf{J} = 0), \nabla \times \mathbf{E} = 0 implies \mathbf{E} = -\nabla \phi, and substituting into Gauss's law yields Poisson's equation \nabla^2 \phi = -\rho / \epsilon_0, solvable for charge distributions with boundary conditions at infinity.^[41] Magnetostatics (\partial \mathbf{E}/\partial t = 0) follows from \nabla \times \mathbf{B} = \mu_0 \mathbf{J} and \nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0, often addressed using the vector potential with the Coulomb gauge to ensure \mathbf{B} remains divergence-free.^[41] These cases highlight the field's conservative nature in the absence of time variation, analogous to gravitational potentials but extended to vector structures for magnetism. The theory also accounts for energy storage and flow: the electromagnetic energy density is \frac{1}{2} (\epsilon_0 E^2 + B^2 / \mu_0), representing electrostatic and magnetic contributions stored in the fields. The Poynting vector, \mathbf{S} = \frac{1}{\mu_0} \mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{B}, describes the directional flux of this energy, with its divergence relating to the work done on charges via \nabla \cdot \mathbf{S} + \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \left[ \frac{1}{2} (\epsilon_0 E^2 + B^2 / \mu_0) \right] = -\mathbf{J} \cdot \mathbf{E}, conserving total energy in the system. This formulation underscores the field's role as a mediator of mechanical work, distinct from direct particle interactions.

Continuum mechanics fields

Continuum mechanics describes the behavior of deformable materials, such as solids and fluids, through field theories that model local deformations and stresses as tensor fields over continuous media. The displacement field \mathbf{u}(\mathbf{r}, t) represents the vector-valued displacement of material points from their reference positions \mathbf{r} at time t, serving as a fundamental kinematic field in solid mechanics.^[42] The infinitesimal strain tensor, derived from the displacement field, quantifies small deformations and is given by \varepsilon_{ij} = \frac{1}{2} (\partial_i u_j + \partial_j u_i), where \partial_i = \frac{\partial}{\partial x_i}. This symmetric tensor, introduced by Augustin-Louis Cauchy, captures the symmetric part of the displacement gradient, neglecting higher-order terms valid for small strains. The stress tensor \sigma_{ij} describes the internal forces per unit area acting across surfaces within the material, also formalized by Cauchy as a second-order tensor. In linear elasticity for isotropic solids, Hooke's law relates stress to strain via \sigma_{ij} = \lambda \delta_{ij} \varepsilon_{kk} + 2\mu \varepsilon_{ij}, where \lambda and \mu are the Lamé constants, \delta_{ij} is the Kronecker delta, and repeated indices imply summation. This constitutive relation, generalizing Hooke's original proportionality between force and extension in springs, assumes reversible deformations under small loads.^[43] Elasticity principles often derive from variational methods, minimizing the total potential energy functional involving strain energy density.^[42] In fluid mechanics, the velocity field \mathbf{v}(\mathbf{r}, t) tracks the motion of fluid particles, with the Navier-Stokes equations governing its evolution for viscous, incompressible Newtonian fluids: \rho \left( \frac{\partial \mathbf{v}}{\partial t} + (\mathbf{v} \cdot \nabla) \mathbf{v} \right) = -\nabla p + \mu \nabla^2 \mathbf{v} + \mathbf{f}, where \rho is density, p is pressure, \mu is dynamic viscosity, and \mathbf{f} represents body forces. These equations, first derived by Claude-Louis Navier and rigorously justified by George Gabriel Stokes, balance inertial, pressure, viscous, and external forces.^[44]^[45] Representative examples illustrate field dynamics in continua: sound waves propagate as small scalar perturbations in the pressure field \delta p, satisfying the wave equation \frac{\partial^2 \delta p}{\partial t^2} = c^2 \nabla^2 \delta p with speed c = \sqrt{\frac{K}{\rho}} ( K bulk modulus), arising from linearized Navier-Stokes or elasticity equations. In fluid flows, the vorticity field \boldsymbol{\omega} = \nabla \times \mathbf{v} describes local rotation, conserved along particle paths in inviscid barotropic flows per the Crocco-Vazsonyi equation. At material interfaces, boundary conditions require continuity of the normal stress component and tangential traction, ensuring \sigma_{ij} n_j matches across the surface with normal \mathbf{n}.^[45]

Relativistic field theories

Special relativistic formulation

The special relativistic formulation of classical field theory extends the non-relativistic framework by requiring invariance under Lorentz transformations, unifying space and time into a four-dimensional continuum known as Minkowski spacetime. This adaptation ensures that the equations of motion and physical predictions remain consistent across all inertial frames moving at constant velocities relative to one another, as postulated by Einstein in 1905. Fields are now described as functions over this spacetime, with their dynamics governed by relativistic principles that preclude instantaneous action at a distance.^[46] Minkowski spacetime is a flat manifold with the pseudo-Euclidean metric tensor \eta_{\mu\nu} = \operatorname{diag}(+1, -1, -1, -1), which defines the line element ds^2 = \eta_{\mu\nu} \, dx^\mu \, dx^\nu = c^2 dt^2 - dx^2 - dy^2 - dz^2. This signature distinguishes the causal structure of events: timelike intervals (ds^2 > 0) connect cause and effect, spacelike intervals (ds^2 < 0) separate non-interacting events, and lightlike intervals (ds^2 = 0) bound the propagation of signals at the speed of light c. The metric raises and lowers indices on tensors, ensuring that the spacetime interval is a Lorentz scalar invariant under coordinate changes.^[47]^[46] Fundamental quantities in this spacetime are four-vectors, which transform linearly under the Lorentz group. The position four-vector is x^\mu = (ct, \mathbf{x}), where \mathbf{x} = (x, y, z), and the four-momentum is p^\mu = (E/c, \mathbf{p}), with E the energy and \mathbf{p} the three-momentum. A general Lorentz transformation \Lambda^\mu{}_\nu acts as x'^\mu = \Lambda^\mu{}_\nu x^\nu, preserving the metric via \Lambda^\rho{}_\sigma \eta_{\rho\tau} \Lambda^\tau{}_\lambda = \eta_{\sigma\lambda}. Boosts along the x-direction, for instance, mix time and space coordinates: ct' = \gamma (ct - \beta x), x' = \gamma (x - \beta ct), y' = y, z' = z, where \beta = v/c and \gamma = (1 - \beta^2)^{-1/2}. These transformations form the proper orthochronous Lorentz group SO(1,3), excluding parity and time reversals.^[46] Fields must transform in a manner consistent with Lorentz invariance to yield covariant equations of motion. A scalar field \phi is invariant at corresponding points: \phi'(x') = \phi(\Lambda^{-1} x), meaning its value depends only on the spacetime argument transformed inversely. For a contravariant vector field A^\mu, such as the four-potential in electromagnetism, the transformation is A'^\mu(x') = \Lambda^\mu{}_\nu A^\nu(\Lambda^{-1} x), while a covariant vector A_\mu transforms with the inverse: A'_\mu(x') = (\Lambda^{-1})^\nu{}_\mu A_\nu(\Lambda^{-1} x). Higher-rank tensors follow analogous rules, with each index transformed according to its variance. These properties ensure that the field's tensorial structure is preserved, allowing the construction of invariant Lagrangians from products like \partial_\mu \phi \partial^\mu \phi.^[46] The free dynamics of a massive scalar field are governed by the Klein-Gordon equation,

(\Box + m^2) \phi = 0,

where \Box = \partial_\mu \partial^\mu = \eta^{\mu\nu} \partial_\mu \partial_\nu is the d'Alembertian operator (with \partial_\mu = \frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu}), and m is the field's mass (in natural units where \hbar = c = 1). This second-order hyperbolic partial differential equation arises from the Lorentz-invariant action S = \int d^4x \left[ \frac{1}{2} \partial_\mu \phi \partial^\mu \phi - \frac{1}{2} m^2 \phi^2 \right] via the Euler-Lagrange equations. For m = 0, it reduces to the massless wave equation \Box \phi = 0, describing propagation at light speed. Solutions include plane waves e^{-i k_\mu x^\mu} with on-shell condition k^\mu k_\mu = m^2, ensuring positive-definite energy. Vector and higher-spin fields satisfy analogous relativistic wave equations, such as the Proca equation for massive vectors.^[46] Causality is intrinsically tied to the light-cone structure of Minkowski spacetime, where the future light cone from an event (t, \mathbf{x}) consists of all points (t', \mathbf{x}') reachable by signals traveling at or below c, satisfying (t' - t) \geq |\mathbf{x}' - \mathbf{x}|/c. Influences propagate along or inside these cones, forbidding acausal effects outside them. In field theories with sources, solutions employ retarded or advanced Green's functions to enforce this: for the Klein-Gordon equation, the retarded propagator integrates sources J(x) only from the past light cone, yielding \phi(x) = \int d^4x' G_\text{ret}(x - x') J(x'), where G_\text{ret} vanishes for spacelike separations. Advanced propagators use the future cone. This framework resolves paradoxes in non-relativistic theories, like infinite propagation speeds, by localizing interactions within causal boundaries.^[47]^[46]

Relativistic electromagnetism

Relativistic electromagnetism provides a covariant formulation of classical electromagnetism that is fully consistent with the principles of special relativity, unifying the electric and magnetic fields into a single tensor object and resolving apparent inconsistencies in the non-relativistic limit where electric and magnetic phenomena transform differently under Lorentz boosts.^[31] This framework treats the electromagnetic field as a rank-2 antisymmetric tensor in four-dimensional Minkowski spacetime, ensuring that Maxwell's equations take a compact, Lorentz-invariant form.^[48] The electromagnetic field is described by the field strength tensor F^{\mu\nu}, defined in terms of the four-potential A^\mu = (\phi/c, \mathbf{A}), where \phi is the scalar potential and \mathbf{A} is the vector potential. The tensor components are given by

F_{\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu,

with raised indices via the Minkowski metric \eta^{\mu\nu} = \operatorname{diag}(1, -1, -1, -1).^[47] In this notation, the electric field components are E_i = F_{0i} (up to a factor of c), while the magnetic field components are B_i = \frac{1}{2} \epsilon_{ijk} F^{jk}, where \epsilon_{ijk} is the Levi-Civita symbol.^[48] This tensorial representation ensures that the fields transform covariantly under Lorentz transformations, treating \mathbf{E} and \mathbf{B} on equal footing.^[49] The relativistic Maxwell equations consist of two decoupled tensor equations. The inhomogeneous equations, incorporating sources, are

\partial_\mu F^{\mu\nu} = \mu_0 J^\nu,

where J^\mu = (\rho c, \mathbf{J}) is the four-current density, \rho is the charge density, and \mathbf{J} is the current density; this encompasses Gauss's law and Ampère's law with Maxwell's correction.^[50] The homogeneous equations, reflecting the absence of magnetic monopoles and Faraday's law, are

\partial_\lambda F_{\mu\nu} + \partial_\mu F_{\nu\lambda} + \partial_\nu F_{\lambda\mu} = 0,

which can equivalently be expressed using the dual tensor \tilde{F}^{\mu\nu} = \frac{1}{2} \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} F_{\rho\sigma} as \partial_\mu \tilde{F}^{\mu\nu} = 0.^[48] These forms are manifestly Lorentz covariant and derive from the original vector equations by requiring invariance under coordinate transformations.^[49] To solve these equations, one introduces the four-potential A^\mu, which automatically satisfies the homogeneous set due to the identity \partial_\lambda F_{\mu\nu} + \partial_\mu F_{\nu\lambda} + \partial_\nu F_{\lambda\mu} = 0. The freedom in A^\mu allows a gauge choice, with the Lorentz gauge \partial_\mu A^\mu = 0 simplifying the inhomogeneous equations to the wave equation

\square A^\mu = -\mu_0 J^\mu,

where \square = \partial_\mu \partial^\mu is the d'Alembertian operator.^[50] This gauge preserves Lorentz invariance and reveals the propagation of electromagnetic disturbances at the speed of light, c.^[49] The dynamics of the electromagnetic field can be derived variationally from the action principle, using the Lagrangian density

\mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} - A_\mu J^\mu,

where the first term captures the free-field kinetics and the second couples to the sources; the Euler-Lagrange equations then yield the full set of Maxwell equations.^[50] This Lagrangian is a Lorentz scalar, ensuring the action S = \int \mathcal{L} \, d^4x is invariant under Poincaré transformations, which underpins the consistency of the theory with special relativity.^[49] For a charged particle, the relativistic interaction with the field is given by the four-force f^\mu = q F^{\mu\nu} u_\nu, where q is the charge and u^\nu = dx^\nu / d\tau is the four-velocity; in the instantaneous rest frame, this reduces to the three-dimensional Lorentz force \mathbf{f} = q (\mathbf{E} + \mathbf{v} \times \mathbf{B}).^[31] The invariance of the total action, combining the field and particle contributions, guarantees that the equations of motion respect Lorentz symmetry.^[50]

General relativistic gravitation

In classical field theory, general relativistic gravitation describes gravity as the manifestation of spacetime curvature induced by mass-energy, providing a geometric interpretation that unifies gravitation with the principles of relativity. Developed by Albert Einstein between 1915 and 1916, this theory extends the flat spacetime of special relativity to curved manifolds, where the gravitational field is not a force but an intrinsic property of geometry. The theory's core is the Einstein field equations, which couple the curvature of spacetime to the distribution of matter and energy via the stress-energy tensor.^[51] The spacetime geometry is specified by the metric tensor g_{\mu\nu}, a symmetric second-rank tensor that defines the line element ds^2 = g_{\mu\nu} \, dx^\mu \, dx^\nu, determining distances and angles in four-dimensional spacetime with coordinates x^\mu (typically ct, x, y, z). The metric encodes both the inertial and gravitational structure, with its components varying across spacetime to reflect the gravitational field. To handle differentiation compatible with this varying geometry, the Christoffel symbols of the second kind are introduced as the connection coefficients:

\Gamma^\lambda_{\mu\nu} = \frac{1}{2} g^{\lambda\sigma} \left( \partial_\mu g_{\nu\sigma} + \partial_\nu g_{\mu\sigma} - \partial_\sigma g_{\mu\nu} \right),

where g^{\lambda\sigma} is the inverse metric and \partial denotes partial derivatives. These symbols quantify how the basis vectors change under parallel transport and are essential for defining covariant derivatives in curved space.^[51] Spacetime curvature, the hallmark of gravitation in this framework, is captured by the Riemann curvature tensor R^\rho_{\ \sigma\mu\nu}, whose components arise from the non-commutativity of covariant derivatives acting on vectors:

R^\rho_{\ \sigma\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu \Gamma^\rho_{\nu\sigma} - \partial_\nu \Gamma^\rho_{\mu\sigma} + \Gamma^\rho_{\mu\lambda} \Gamma^\lambda_{\nu\sigma} - \Gamma^\rho_{\nu\lambda} \Gamma^\lambda_{\mu\sigma}.

This tensor measures the extent to which geodesics (straightest paths in curved space) fail to remain parallel, vanishing in flat spacetime. Contracting indices yields the Ricci tensor R_{\mu\nu} = R^\rho_{\ \mu\rho\nu}, a symmetric tensor summarizing curvature in the directions of interest, and the Ricci scalar R = g^{\mu\nu} R_{\mu\nu}, the trace of the Ricci tensor that provides a single measure of overall curvature. These contracted quantities form the basis for the gravitational field equations.^[51] The Einstein field equations encapsulate the dynamics:

R_{\mu\nu} - \frac{1}{2} R g_{\mu\nu} = \frac{8\pi G}{c^4} T_{\mu\nu},

where G is Newton's gravitational constant, c is the speed of light, and T_{\mu\nu} is the stress-energy-momentum tensor describing the sources of gravity, including energy density, momentum flux, and stresses. The left side represents spacetime curvature, while the right side sources it proportionally to mass-energy; the equations are nonlinear partial differential equations for the metric, making solutions challenging but revealing phenomena like gravitational waves. Einstein finalized this form in a series of papers culminating in his 1916 review.^[51] Particle trajectories in this geometry obey the geodesic equation, derived from the variational principle for the worldline length:

\frac{d^2 x^\mu}{d\tau^2} + \Gamma^\mu_{\alpha\beta} \frac{dx^\alpha}{d\tau} \frac{dx^\beta}{d\tau} = 0,

where \tau is the proper time along the path. The Christoffel terms provide the "gravitational acceleration," replacing Newtonian forces and ensuring equivalence between gravitational and inertial mass. This equation governs the motion of freely falling test particles, from planets to light rays.^[51] Prominent exact solutions include the Schwarzschild metric for the exterior field of a spherically symmetric, static mass M:

ds^2 = \left(1 - \frac{2GM}{c^2 r}\right) c^2 dt^2 - \left(1 - \frac{2GM}{c^2 r}\right)^{-1} dr^2 - r^2 d\theta^2 - r^2 \sin^2 \theta \, d\phi^2,

in Schwarzschild coordinates (t, r, \theta, \phi). Discovered by Karl Schwarzschild shortly after Einstein's equations, this vacuum solution (T_{\mu\nu} = 0) predicts an event horizon at r_s = 2GM/c^2, beyond which escape is impossible, laying the foundation for black hole physics.^[52] In the weak-field approximation, where deviations from the Minkowski metric are small (g_{\mu\nu} = \eta_{\mu\nu} + h_{\mu\nu}, |h_{\mu\nu}| \ll 1), and for non-relativistic speeds, the Einstein equations linearize to yield the Newtonian limit. Specifically, the time-time component reduces to \nabla^2 \Phi = 4\pi G \rho, where \Phi is the gravitational potential and \rho the mass density, recovering Poisson's equation and classical gravity for everyday scales. This consistency validates the theory's extension of prior frameworks.^[51]

Advanced concepts

Gauge invariance

Gauge invariance refers to a fundamental symmetry in classical field theories where the physical laws remain unchanged under local transformations of the fields, allowing for redundant descriptions that do not affect observable quantities. In the context of classical electromagnetism, this symmetry manifests as the freedom to add the gradient of an arbitrary scalar function to the vector potential without altering the electric and magnetic fields.^[53] For the Abelian U(1) gauge group, underlying electromagnetism, the gauge transformation acts on the gauge field A_\mu as A_\mu \to A_\mu + \partial_\mu \chi, where \chi(x) is an arbitrary smooth function. The electromagnetic field strength tensor F_{\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu remains invariant under this transformation, ensuring that the Maxwell equations and the associated action \int d^4x \left( -\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu} F^{\mu\nu} + \bar{\psi} (i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu - m) \psi \right) are unchanged.^[34]^[53] To incorporate charged matter fields, such as a complex scalar or Dirac field \psi, minimal coupling replaces the ordinary derivative with the covariant derivative D_\mu = \partial_\mu - i e A_\mu, where e is the coupling constant. Under the gauge transformation \psi \to e^{i e \chi} \psi, the covariant derivative transforms as D_\mu \psi \to e^{i e \chi} D_\mu \psi, preserving the invariance of the interaction term in the Lagrangian, such as \bar{\psi} i \gamma^\mu D_\mu \psi. This mechanism couples the gauge field to the conserved current via Noether's theorem, generating the interaction vertex in the theory.^[53] Non-Abelian gauge theories generalize this structure to Lie groups like SU(N), where the gauge fields A_\mu = A_\mu^a T^a transform under local group elements U(x) = e^{i g \theta^a(x) T^a} as A_\mu \to U A_\mu U^\dagger + \frac{i}{g} U \partial_\mu U^\dagger, with T^a the generators and g the coupling. The field strength tensor acquires a non-linear term: F_{\mu\nu}^a = \partial_\mu A_\nu^a - \partial_\nu A_\mu^a + g f^{abc} A_\mu^b A_\nu^c, where f^{abc} are the structure constants, reflecting self-interactions among the gauge fields. The Yang-Mills Lagrangian is \mathcal{L} = -\frac{1}{4} F_{\mu\nu}^a F^{a \mu\nu}, which is invariant under these transformations and leads to the equations of motion D_\mu F^{a \mu\nu} = 0 in the absence of sources.^[34]^[53] In curved spacetime, the covariant derivative for gauge fields combines the spin connection for gravity with the gauge connection, forming D_\mu = \nabla_\mu - i g A_\mu^a T^a, where \nabla_\mu is the spacetime covariant derivative; the field strength F_{\mu\nu} then couples to the metric via contractions in the action, maintaining local gauge invariance alongside diffeomorphism invariance. This extension is crucial for consistent formulations in general relativity. As a classical precursor to quantization, gauge invariance imposes constraints on the phase space, requiring gauge fixing to eliminate redundancies and ensure well-defined propagators, though the classical theory itself remains consistent without quantization.^[53]

Unification efforts

In the early 20th century, physicists sought to unify the fundamental classical fields of gravity and electromagnetism within a single theoretical framework, motivated by the geometric success of general relativity and the established laws of electromagnetism. These efforts primarily involved extending the spacetime manifold or modifying the metric tensor to incorporate electromagnetic potentials naturally, aiming for a purely geometric description of both forces. Hermann Weyl's 1918 proposal marked an early attempt, introducing a gauge theory based on conformal invariance where the length of vectors could vary under parallel transport, linking gravitational and electromagnetic effects through a generalized Riemannian geometry.^[54] However, this theory was later abandoned due to its prediction of non-observed length changes in spectral lines and inconsistencies with empirical data.^[55] The Kaluza-Klein theory, developed in the 1910s and 1920s, represented a more enduring classical unification approach by positing a five-dimensional spacetime, with the fifth dimension compactified to explain its unobservability. Theodor Kaluza proposed in 1919 that the Einstein field equations in five dimensions yield both the gravitational metric in four dimensions and the electromagnetic four-potential, where off-diagonal components of the five-dimensional metric g_{\mu 5} directly correspond to the electromagnetic vector potential A_\mu.^[8] Oskar Klein extended this in 1926 by incorporating quantum mechanics to justify the compactification radius, interpreting the extra dimension as a quantum degree of freedom with a size on the order of the Planck length.^[56] This framework unified gravity and electromagnetism geometrically without additional fields, influencing later multidimensional theories, though it remained classical at its core.^[57] Albert Einstein pursued unified field theories extensively from the 1920s through the 1950s, exploring nonsymmetric metrics and teleparallelism to merge gravity and electromagnetism. In works such as his 1925 paper, Einstein introduced affine connections with torsion to derive electromagnetic fields alongside curvature for gravity, aiming for a purely metric-based description.^[57] Later efforts, including collaborations with Leopold Infeld and others in the 1940s-1950s, refined these via distant parallelism, where the metric is flat but connections encode both forces; however, these theories struggled to reproduce the full nonlinearities of general relativity while accommodating Maxwell's equations.^[58] Gauge invariance, briefly referenced in these contexts as a symmetry principle for the electromagnetic potential, served as a conceptual tool but did not resolve core issues.^[54] Despite these innovations, classical unification efforts faced significant challenges. Attempts to quantize Kaluza-Klein or Einstein's theories revealed non-renormalizability, where infinities in perturbative expansions could not be systematically removed, hindering a consistent quantum extension.^[8] Moreover, these frameworks focused solely on gravity and electromagnetism, failing to anticipate the weak and strong nuclear forces discovered later, limiting their scope as complete unifications.^[57] Echoes of these classical ideas persist in modern higher-dimensional geometries, such as precursors to string theory that retain classical multidimensional unification motifs, though emphasis remains on purely classical formulations.^[56]

References

[1]
1 Classical Field Theory - DAMTP
In this first section we will discuss various aspects of classical fields. We will cover only the bare minimum ground necessary before turning to the quantum ...Missing: authoritative sources
[2]
[PDF] Introduction to Classical Field Theory - DigitalCommons@USU
Jun 6, 2022 · This is a quick and informal introduction to the basic ideas and mathematical methods of classical relativistic field theory.Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
[3]
[PDF] Lecture Notes on Classical Field Theory
The following is a short notes of lectures about classical field theory, in par- ticular classical electrodynamics for fourth or fifth year physics students ...Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
[4]
[PDF] CLASSICAL FIELD THEORY - UT Physics
Before we study quantum field theory we need to learn about the classical fields and the equations governing their dynamics. This dynamics is usually ...
[5]
[PDF] Classical Field Theory - Asaf Peer
Definition: a field is a physical quantity defined at every point in space and time: (x, t). While classical particle mechanics deals with a finite number ...
[6]
[PDF] 2 Classical Field Theory - Benjamin M Roberts
To restore locality, we must describe interactions not as direct action-at-a-distance, but as mediated by physical fields whose changes propagate through space- ...Missing: transition | Show results with:transition
[7]
On the History of Unified Field Theories - PMC - PubMed Central
This article is intended to give a review of the history of the classical aspects of unified field theories in the 20th century.<|control11|><|separator|>
[8]
Classical Field Theory | Cambridge University Press & Assessment
Classical field theory predicts how physical fields interact with matter, and is a logical precursor to quantum field theory.
[9]
18 The Maxwell Equations - Feynman Lectures - Caltech
... Maxwell's equations was also the speed of light propagation. There was just a constant in the equations. We have called it c from the beginning, because we ...
[10]
Maxwell's Equations: Electromagnetic Waves Predicted and Observed
Electromagnetic waves consist of oscillating electric and magnetic fields and propagate at the speed of light c. They were predicted by Maxwell, who also showed ...
[11]
GPS: Global Positioning System - Niels Bohr Institutet
The radio signal consists of electromagnetic waves, like light, so the speed of the signal is also constant, like light's. The GPS receiver also knows both the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[12]
[PDF] Classical Fields - UC Homepages
Sep 2, 2022 · In physics, a “theory of relativity” is an assertion that the Universe is objective. Its goal is to provide an isomorphism between sets of ...
[13]
[PDF] 2 Classical Field Theory
The first term is clearly the orbital angular momentum and the second term can be regarded as the spin. With this definition, it is straightforward to check ...
[14]
[PDF] THIRD EDITION - Variational Principles in Classical Mechanics
Aug 19, 2021 · Variational Principles in Classical Mechanics, 3rd edition by Douglas Cline is licensed under a Creative. Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- ...
[15]
[physics/0503066] Invariant Variation Problems - arXiv
Mar 8, 2005 · M. A. Tavel's English translation of Noether's Theorems (1918), reproduced by Frank Y. Wang. Thanks to Lloyd Kannenberg for corrigenda.
[16]
Ancient Atomism - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Oct 18, 2022 · A number of philosophical schools in different parts of the ancient world held that the universe is composed of some kind of 'atoms' or minimal parts.
[17]
Descartes' Physics - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jul 29, 2005 · Descartes' vortex theory attempts to explain celestial phenomena, especially the orbits of the planets or the motions of comets.
[18]
Huygens Discovers the Wave or Pulse Theory of Light
Huygens conceived of light as an irregular series of shock waves or pulses proceeding with very great but finite velocity through the ether.
[19]
Gottfried Leibniz: Metaphysics - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Leibniz argues that things seem to cause one another because God ordained a pre-established harmony among everything in the universe.Missing: propagation media
[20]
[PDF] FROM NEWTON'S MECHANICS TO EULER'S EQUATIONS
The Euler equations of hydrodynamics, which appeared in their present form in the 1750s, did not emerge in the middle of a desert.
[21]
Roger Joseph Boscovich - Linda Hall Library
May 19, 2023 · But if Boscovich was not the father of field theory in practice, he certainly deserves credit for introducing the idea of point atoms and force ...
[22]
[PDF] The Origins of the Field Concept in Physics
Much depends on whether a theory consistent with the notion of action at a distance ought qualify as a ''field'' theory. Roger Boscovich and Immanuel Kant later ...
[23]
June 1785: Coulomb Measures the Electric Force
Jun 1, 2016 · Coulomb used a torsion balance to measure electric force, finding that the force between like charges is inversely proportional to the square ...
[24]
July 1820: Oersted & Electromagnetism - American Physical Society
Jul 1, 2008 · In July 1820, Danish natural philosopher Hans Christian Oersted published a pamphlet that showed clearly that they were in fact closely related.
[25]
Michael Faraday's electric magnetic rotation apparatus (motor)
In 1820 Hans Christian Ørsted announced his discovery that the flow of an electric current through a wire produced a magnetic field around the wire.
[26]
[PDF] Michael Faraday· Discovery of Electromagnetic Induction
Scheme of Fara- day's 1831 experiment, which established electro- magnetic induction. Faraday has two units named after him, a unique honour indeed. The first ...
[27]
[PDF] Faraday, Thomson, Maxwell: Lines of Force in the Ether
In place of Newtonian “action at a distance,” Faraday aimed to explain all physical phenomena in terms of local fields, which could convey effects point-by- ...Missing: concept rejection
[28]
Siméon-Denis Poisson (1781 - 1840) - Biography - MacTutor
In 1813 Poisson studied the potential in the interior of attracting masses ... equations, Poisson's ratio in elasticity, and Poisson's constant in electricity.Missing: gravitational | Show results with:gravitational
[29]
VIII. A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field - Journals
Maxwell James Clerk. 1865VIII. A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic fieldPhil. Trans. R. Soc.155459–512http://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1865.0008. Section.Missing: 1860s | Show results with:1860s
[30]
[PDF] ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES - Fourmilab
This edition of Einstein's On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies is based on the English translation of his original 1905 German-language paper. (published as ...
[31]
Quantentheorie und fünfdimensionale Relativitätstheorie
Download PDF · Zeitschrift für Physik. Quantentheorie und fünfdimensionale Relativitätstheorie. Download PDF. Oskar Klein. 2102 Accesses. 2537 Citations. 28 ...
[32]
The quantum theory of the electron - Journals
Husain N (2025) Quantum Milestones, 1928: The Dirac Equation Unifies Quantum Mechanics and Special Relativity, Physics, 10.1103/Physics.18.20, 18. Shah R ...
[33]
Conservation of Isotopic Spin and Isotopic Gauge Invariance
The possibility is explored of having invariance under local isotopic spin rotations. This leads to formulating a principle of isotopic gauge invariance.
[34]
[PDF] Lecture 2: Potential Theory I
The scalar field, Φ is easier to visualize than a vector field. • A ... The derivation of the Poisson's equation stems from the facts that. 1. the ...
[35]
13 Work and Potential Energy (A) - Feynman Lectures
It is because gravity obeys the principle of superposition of forces that we can write the potential energy as a sum over each pair of particles. 13–4 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[36]
Potential due to uniform sphere
The gravitational potential outside a uniform sphere of mass $M$ is the same as that generated by a point mass $M$ located at the sphere's center.
[37]
[PDF] Gravitational Potentials
A uniform sphere of mass M and radius a: (r) = (. —2 G (a2 —r2=3); ... Figure 8.1: Surgery on the potential of a point mass produces the potential of a Kuzmin.
[38]
[1807.04765] An Action Principle for Newtonian Gravity - arXiv
Jul 12, 2018 · We derive an action whose equations of motion contain the Poisson equation of Newtonian gravity. The construction requires a new notion of Newton--Cartan ...Missing: scalar | Show results with:scalar
[39]
[PDF] Phys 749, Gravitational Physics Aspects of Newtonian Gravity
Sep 8, 2019 · This is an instantaneous action at a distance. Alternatively, we can ... believe that Newtonian gravity had to be changed–it predicted ...
[40]
A treatise on electricity and magnetism : Maxwell, James Clerk, 1831 ...
Mar 16, 2006 · A treatise on electricity and magnetism. by: Maxwell ... DOWNLOAD OPTIONS. download 1 file · ABBYY GZ download · download 1 file · B/W PDF ...
[41]
[PDF] sur l'équilibre et le mouvement intérieur - des corps solides ou fluides
Ces recherches ont été entreprises à l'occasion d'un Mémoire publié par M. Navier, le 14 août 1820. L'auteur, pour établir l'équation d'équilibre du plan ...
[42]
Lectures de potentia restitutiva, or of spring ... 1678 : Hooke, Robert.
Jan 30, 2024 · Lectures de potentia restitutiva, or of spring ... 1678.. Digitized from IA40313707-26. Previous issue: bim_early-english-books-1641- ...
[43]
[PDF] sur les lois du mouvement des fluides
SUR LES LOIS DU MOUVEMENT DES FLUIDES,. PAR M. NAVIER. Lu à l'Académie royale des Sciences, le 18 mars 1822.
[44]
[PDF] On the theories of the internal friction of fluids in motion
On the Theories of the Internal Friction of Fluids in Motion, and of the. Equilibrium and Motion of Elastic Solids. By G. G. STOKESs, M.A., Fel- low of Pembroke ...
[45]
[PDF] The Classical Theory of Fields
... Lorentz transformation. 9. 5 Transformation of velocities. 12. 6 Four-vectors. 14. 7 Four-dimensional velocity. 21. Chapter 2. Relativistic Mechanics. 24. 8 The ...
[46]
[PDF] Space and Time - UCSD Math
These papers have never been published together either in German or. English and The Relativity Principle has not been translated into English so far. MIP. Page ...
[47]
[PDF] arXiv:0807.4249v1 [gr-qc] 26 Jul 2008
Jul 26, 2008 · We study Minkowski's derivation and show how these equations general- ize to their modern premetric form in the framework of tensor and exterior ...
[48]
Special relativity: electromagnetism - Scholarpedia
Oct 8, 2012 · The present article describes electromagnetism in Special relativity; see the articles SR: kinematics and SR: mechanics for the prerequisites.<|control11|><|separator|>
[49]
[PDF] 5. Electromagnetism and Relativity - DAMTP
Ultimately, it was by studying the Maxwell equations that Lorentz was able to determine the form of the Lorentz transformations which subsequently laid the ...
[50]
https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/em/el4.pdf
[51]
https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0405066.pdf
[52]
[PDF] Gauge Theory - DAMTP
Gauge theory covers topics like electromagnetism, Yang-Mills theory, and anomalies, including magnetic monopoles and the theta term.Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[53]
[PDF] Early History of Gauge Theories and Weak Interactions - arXiv
It was Weyl himself who made in 1918 the first attempt to extend GR in order to describe gravitation and electromagnetism within a unifying geometrical ...
[54]
Gauge Theories in Physics - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jul 28, 2025 · The theory of the electromagnetic force is a gauge theory, as are the theories of the weak and strong nuclear forces. Philosophers disagree ...
[55]
[PDF] Kaluza-Klein Gravity - arXiv
Kaluza unified not only gravity and electromagnetism, but also matter and geometry, for the photon appeared in four dimensions as a manifestation of empty five ...
[56]
[PDF] Einstein's Unified Field Theory Program - PhilSci-Archive
Apr 11, 2007 · Einstein explicitly used the term 'unified field theory' in the title of a publication for the first time in 1925. Ten more papers appeared ...Missing: 1950s primary
[57]
On the History of Unified Field Theories. Part II. (ca. 1930–ca. 1965)
Jun 23, 2014 · Most important centers for research on unified field theory in the 1930s until the early 1950s were those around Albert Einstein in Princeton ...