Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Comment

A comment is a spoken or written expression of an , , or explanatory remark regarding a particular subject. The noun derives from commentum, denoting an interpretation or contrivance, which evolved through coment meaning commentary, entering around the late 14th century as a term for an explanatory note or . As a verb, to comment signifies the act of making such a or providing , often to annotate, criticize, or discuss. In specialized contexts, comments serve distinct functions, such as non-executable annotations in computer designed to enhance and without affecting execution. This practice underscores their utility in clarifying intent amid complex logic, though excessive or poorly placed comments can obscure rather than illuminate code structure.

Computing

Source Code Comments

Source code comments are non-executable text annotations embedded within programming source files, intended to explain the logic, algorithms, intent, or context of the code to human readers without influencing program execution. Compilers or interpreters systematically ignore these annotations during translation to , treating them as whitespace or directives for . This separation ensures comments serve purely as aids for , , and , distinct from operational instructions. The practice originated in early low-level languages of the mid-20th century, with assembly languages employing simple delimiters like semicolons (;) to denote comments from the onward, allowing programmers to annotate machine instructions directly alongside opcodes. For instance, in assemblers for systems like the , trailing text after a semicolon was disregarded, facilitating in otherwise opaque representations. This convention predates higher-level languages and reflects the need for human-readable aids in code handling punch cards or tape, where errors in interpretation could cascade into hardware faults. By the late , structured high-level languages formalized comments: introduced the "comment" keyword followed by text until a semicolon, enabling block-level explanations within algorithmic blocks. retained this syntax, embedding comments flexibly within begin-end blocks to clarify procedural intent. Syntax evolved diversely across paradigms. Early BASIC dialects from 1964 used the REM (short for "remark") statement to designate entire lines as comments, ignored by interpreters and useful for labeling program sections in educational or simple scripting contexts. Procedural languages like C (1972) adopted bounded delimiters such as /* / for multi-line comments and later // for single-line variants in C++ (1985), influencing descendants including Java, JavaScript, and C#. These C-style conventions prioritize nesting avoidance and scanner efficiency, with / */ allowing comments within strings or other comments in some implementations. Assembly variants persist heterogeneously—semicolons in x86 GAS, # in ARM—reflecting assembler-specific parsers. Modern languages extend this: Python uses # for indentation-sensitive comments, while Rust combines // with /// for documentation attributes. Comments fulfill multiple roles beyond explanation, including temporary deactivation ("commenting out") of code blocks for , where entire sections are prefixed with delimiters to isolate faults without deletion. They also enable self-documentation, embedding like authorship or revision history directly in . Empirical analyses indicate that consistent, high-quality comments enhance software and : a decade-long of studies links them to improved detection during reviews and reduced resolution times for issues, as annotative clarity aids in tracing causal paths in complex modules. However, quantitative correlations vary; one analysis of GitHub repositories found denser commenting associated with fewer reported issues, though causation remains tied to comment accuracy rather than volume. Best practices emphasize precision over proliferation, advocating comments that elucidate "why" a construct exists—such as algorithmic trade-offs or domain constraints—rather than restating evident "what" operations, which clear code should convey intrinsically. Brevity mitigates redundancy: guidelines recommend limiting to essential insights, using consistent formatting (e.g., aligned end-of-line notes), and updating alongside code changes to prevent . Over-commenting incurs costs, as outdated annotations introduce , increasing maintenance overhead by 10-20% in empirical team studies where lags. Conversely, sparse or absent comments in dense codebases correlate with higher defect densities in collaborative environments, underscoring the balance for causal efficacy in development workflows.

Markup and Documentation Comments

In markup languages such as and XML, comments are delimited by the syntax <!-- and -->, a convention inherited from the (SGML), which was formalized as ISO 8879 in 1986. These comments are stripped by parsers during document processing, preventing their display or interpretation in rendered output, which enables developers to embed explanatory notes, disable sections temporarily, or include browser-specific directives without altering the visible structure. Unlike inline code comments that aid during compilation or execution, markup comments primarily serve web development workflows, such as conditional inclusion via server-side rendering or debugging unstyled elements, as they remain accessible in the client's source view but do not influence DOM construction. Documentation comments extend this concept by integrating structured markup within source files to automate the generation of external references, such as guides, directly tied to code elements like classes and functions. , developed alongside early implementations and first available in the 1995 JDK alpha release, employs block comments prefixed with /** to parse tags (e.g., @param, @return) into hyperlinked documentation, establishing causal mappings from implementation details to intended usage. Similarly, , initially released in 1997, processes specially formatted comments across languages like C++, , and to produce outputs including class diagrams and call graphs, facilitating comprehension of by extracting relational data from code proximity and annotations. These tools underscore a direct linkage: well-formed comments reduce in understanding causal dependencies, such as method inputs yielding specific outputs, far more effectively than ad-hoc prose. Despite their utility, markup and comments introduce risks, particularly in production environments where unstripped comments can expose sensitive details like internal paths, debug flags, or version metadata visible to end-users via browser inspection, potentially aiding in assessments. Empirical analyses link inadequate or absent comments to extended , with one survey durations extending by up to 340% in teams lacking comprehensive docs, as new contributors expend disproportionate effort reverse-engineering undocumented interfaces. Best practices thus emphasize stripping comments from deployed artifacts and enforcing structured formats to mitigate these issues, prioritizing parser-agnostic clarity over voluminous notes.

Law and Regulation

Public Comments in Rulemaking

Public comments in rulemaking constitute a core procedural mechanism under the U.S. (APA) of 1946, which mandates that federal agencies provide notice of proposed rules through publication in the , afford an opportunity for interested parties to submit written comments, and incorporate relevant feedback into the final rule or explain its rejection. This notice-and-comment process, typically lasting 30 to 60 days, allows public input on substantive issues without conferring veto authority, as agencies retain discretion to adopt rules supported by a rational basis under arbitrary-and-capricious review standards. Platforms like Regulations.gov facilitate submissions, handling high volumes—such as over 22 million comments in the 2017 rulemaking alone—reflecting cumulative annual activity in the millions across dockets from nearly 300 agencies issuing thousands of proposed rules yearly. Empirical analyses indicate that comments exert influence primarily through evidence-based arguments rather than sheer volume or emotional appeals; agencies must address significant comments substantively in the record, but they may dismiss those lacking supporting data or policy rationale. Studies of Agency and other rulemakings show that substantive inputs from professional organizations, combined with scrutiny, correlate with agency responsiveness and rule modifications, whereas mass campaigns often yield minimal impact due to their templated nature. commenters, leveraging technical expertise, demonstrate higher efficacy in shaping outcomes compared to diffuse submissions, underscoring the process's toward organized, data-driven participation over unverified preferences. Criticisms highlight vulnerabilities to special-interest capture via —coordinated, artificially inflated campaigns mimicking grassroots support—which undermines the process's integrity by flooding dockets with fabricated or unattributed submissions, as seen in documented EPA rulemakings involving paid proxies. Public engagement remains low, with unique individual participation representing far less than 1% of the U.S. population annually amid perverse incentives for low-quality mass emails that prioritize signaling over deliberation, often devolving the mechanism into symbolic theater rather than robust accountability. While the framework causally enhances by requiring reasoned responses, its effectiveness hinges on diligence against manipulation, with suggesting organized interests disproportionately benefit absent reforms to prioritize verifiable, high-quality input.

Legal Commentary and Annotations

Legal commentary and annotations consist of scholarly or professional elucidations appended to statutes, constitutions, or judicial decisions, including case notes that summarize interpreting precedents and analytical treatises that dissect legal texts. , annotated statutes such as the United States Code Annotated (USCA) exemplify this form, compiling statutory provisions alongside digests of federal and state court rulings that apply or construe them, enabling precise historical and jurisprudential tracking. articles further extend this practice, offering rigorous examinations of statutory language, often prioritizing textual fidelity over extraneous materials. These annotations evolved from English traditions of judicial glosses and serjeants' reports, which annotated precedents to guide application, but achieved systematic form in 19th-century legal scholarship. Joseph Story's Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, first published in , marked a foundational milestone, providing clause-by-clause analysis grounded in ratification-era understandings and structural inferences rather than post-enactment developments. Subsequent works, such as those by and later editions of Story's treatises, embedded annotations within broader interpretive frameworks, influencing how practitioners discerned statutory purposes through direct textual and contextual reasoning. In , legal commentaries underscore causal mechanisms of enactment, critiquing reliance on legislative history as prone to selective fabrication by committee staff or lobbyists, a view advanced by Justice , who contended that such materials distort the sole verifiable expression of intent—the enacted statute itself. For instance, in , annotations have highlighted fallacies in deferring to glosses that expand statutory bounds beyond , as seen in analyses preceding the 2024 overruling of , which originalist commentaries argued undermined by substituting bureaucratic intent for congressional text. Critics observe that much academic legal commentary exhibits systemic left-leaning , with surveys revealing U.S. faculties comprising roughly 78% liberals and only 9% conservatives, fostering interpretations that normalize regulatory expansion through purposivist lenses over textual constraints. This skew, documented across elite institutions, correlates with scholarship downplaying empirical limits on interpretive evolution, such as inconsistent outcomes in living-constitution approaches that diverge from fixed meanings. Originalist annotations, by contrast, prioritize alignment with enacted provisions' public meanings, yielding more stable applications verifiable against legislative records, as evidenced in textualist shifts reducing judicial overrides of statutes post-Scalia.

Media and Publishing

Editorial and Opinion Comments

Editorial and opinion comments consist of structured, argumentative essays published in traditional print media, such as newspapers and magazines, typically commissioned by editors or submitted by external contributors in response to current events, policies, or social issues. These pieces, commonly known as op-eds—short for "opposite the editorial page"—differ from staff-written editorials by offering independent viewpoints, often constrained to 600-800 words to ensure conciseness and focus on a singular, persuasive thesis supported by evidence or logical reasoning. Originating in the early 20th century, with precursors in the New York World's 1921 commentary section opposite its editorials, the format gained prominence through the New York Times' dedicated op-ed page launched on September 21, 1970, intended to broaden discourse beyond the paper's own positions. Historically, such comments evolved from the partisan, opinion-laden broadsheets and serials of the 18th and 19th centuries, where pamphlets and satirical pieces debated political matters without bylines, to signed columns in the that emphasized individual accountability. In and early , 18th-century newspapers like those chronicling parliamentary debates or scandals often blended news with overt advocacy, fostering public argumentation amid limited press freedoms. By the , this shifted toward attributed critiques, exemplified by Walter Lippmann's columns in outlets like the , where in his 1922 book he dissected media distortions of reality through "" and pseudo-environments, undermining progressive-era faith in an informed public's capacity for without expert mediation. Lippmann's work highlighted causal mechanisms in opinion formation, prioritizing empirical scrutiny over idealized democratic assumptions. These comments serve to stimulate by articulating first-principles arguments—deriving conclusions from foundational facts and causal chains rather than appeals to or sentiment—potentially elevating public discourse on complex issues like or . Proponents argue they counteract monolithic narratives in news reporting, as seen in Lippmann's era when columns challenged wartime . However, empirical assessments reveal drawbacks, including ideological skew in selection: major U.S. newspapers' sections often exhibit a left-leaning , with studies estimating media outlets' overall ideological placements left of center based on patterns and similarity to Democratic sources, fostering echo chambers that misalign with diverse . This imbalance, documented through of thousands of articles, stems from editorial gatekeeping in elite institutions, where progressive viewpoints predominate despite broader ideological distributions in surveys like those from Pew Research showing U.S. adults roughly evenly split or center-right on key issues. Such patterns undermine causal realism by privileging narratives over verifiable data, as evidenced by disproportionate coverage favoring certain policy framings in op-eds during cycles.

Reader and Audience Responses

Reader letters to editors represent a longstanding mechanism for curated audience feedback in print and early digital publishing, distinct from unfiltered online discourse by emphasizing editorial selection for clarity, civility, and thematic relevance. Originating in early 18th-century British periodicals, such as The Spectator (1711–1712), where reader submissions were integrated into essays on politics, morals, and culture to simulate public conversation, this practice allowed limited but structured input from subscribers. By the 19th century, letters became a fixture in newspapers worldwide, often printed in dedicated sections to offer rebuttals or endorsements of reported events, with editors condensing submissions to fit space constraints while aiming for viewpoint balance. In magazines and literary journals, audience responses extended to solicited reviews and feedback on books or features, where readers' analyses—vetted for insight and constructiveness—shaped cultural reception and prompted authorial refinements. For example, 20th-century publications like incorporated subscriber critiques alongside professional assessments, providing empirical challenges to prevailing interpretations and enriching interpretive debates. This curated approach prioritized representativeness over volume, enabling feedback to influence editorial direction without overwhelming the publication's narrative coherence. Publishing selected responses yields tangible benefits, including heightened reader investment through demonstrated responsiveness; analyses of dynamics show that such features signal inclusivity, encouraging ongoing subscriptions and civic-minded by validating in content formation. Empirical studies of letter writers reveal demographics skewed toward older, educated individuals, whose inputs often introduce data-driven counterarguments that refine journalistic accuracy. Criticisms center on inherent selection biases, where editors—shaped by institutional leanings—favor letters aligning with outlet ideologies, historically sidelining nonconformist or empirically grounded that challenges dominant frames. Newsroom ethnographies document preferences for "sane" idioms over "insane" or fringe-seeming critiques, effectively muting underrepresented perspectives in an era before digital alternatives exposed such gatekeeping. In contexts prone to left-leaning slants, this has manifested as underrepresentation of conservative or contrarian views, akin to selective that prioritizes narrative consistency over comprehensive . Such practices, while curbing vitriol, undermine the format's truth-seeking potential by constraining the to editorially approved bounds.

Online and Social Media

User-Generated Comments

User-generated comments on digital platforms proliferated with the advent of in the mid-2000s, shifting from static web pages to interactive sites where users could append text-based responses to articles, videos, and posts, fostering decentralized public discourse. This evolution enabled ordinary individuals to challenge or expand upon published content in , contrasting with earlier top-down media models and amplifying voices outside elite editorial control. Platforms like Blogger (launched 1999) and early news sites introduced basic comment fields, but widespread adoption surged post-2004 as emphasized user participation, with comments serving as a core mechanism for collective input on sites hosting millions of daily interactions. Mechanically, modern comment systems incorporate features such as threaded replies, which nest responses under parent comments to simulate branching conversations and improve readability amid high volumes. , founded in 2007, popularized such threading for third-party integration on blogs and news sites, allowing users to reply directly to specific points and build extended dialogues. On video platforms like , launched in 2005, comments append to content with sorting options by relevance or recency, generating an estimated hundreds of millions daily given the site's scale of over 1 billion hours of watch time per day and typical engagement rates of about 1.2 comments per 1,000 views. These tools democratized feedback loops, enabling rapid aggregation of diverse viewpoints without institutional gatekeeping. Empirically, unfiltered comment sections have surfaced public sentiments overlooked by mainstream outlets, often accelerating the identification of factual errors or narrative inconsistencies through distributed scrutiny. For instance, crowd-sourced evaluations in online environments have demonstrated accuracy in detecting when drawing on diverse inputs, akin to applications of principle where aggregated judgments outperform individual experts under conditions of independence and variety. This has manifested in cases of swift communal debunking, where commenters cite primary evidence to counter initial reports, revealing causal discrepancies such as in footage or suppressed data in policy debates—phenomena less evident in curated channels prone to uniform biases. Anonymity in these systems, while enabling candid expression, frequently promotes terse criticism or sarcasm over substantive engagement, as the online disinhibition effect reduces perceived accountability and elevates impulsive negativity. Studies link anonymous commenting to heightened , with users more prone to attacks than reasoned rebuttals, potentially diluting discourse quality. However, empirical on suggest that excessive —by suppressing outlier views—can impair , whereas balanced, uncurtailed sections better harness aggregated insights, as seen in scalable reliant on broad participation rather than centralized filters. Thus, comment ecosystems thrive when pairs with mechanisms for or pseudonymous consistency, yielding net gains in revealing unvarnished realities over sanitized alternatives.

Moderation Systems and Practices

Moderation of online comments encompasses a spectrum of approaches, ranging from manual human review to automated algorithmic systems designed to handle high volumes of . Early implementations in internet forums relied on simple keyword blacklists to identify and block obvious , , or off-topic posts, a method that scaled poorly as platforms grew. By the , models supplanted these rudimentary filters, analyzing patterns in text, user behavior, and context to classify comments more accurately, such as distinguishing promotional from legitimate discourse. Recent advancements integrate , particularly large language models (LLMs), into hybrid systems that combine automated with human verification. Platforms like X (formerly ) have accelerated this shift, with 2024 reports documenting increased AI reliance for detecting harmful content amid staff reductions that lowered the human moderator-to-user ratio to approximately 1:297,000. This transition has diminished human labor demands while enabling real-time processing of billions of interactions, though it requires ongoing refinement to minimize false positives. In 2025, empirical studies on LLM-driven loops in hybrid moderation demonstrate accuracy gains, with initial filters expediting human review and reducing detection errors in controlled experiments. These systems emphasize causal indicators—such as repetitive posting patterns for or coordinated signals—over superficial heuristics, enabling scalable differentiation between low-value noise and substantive critique. Balancing these methods reveals inherent trade-offs backed by : over-moderation, through aggressive filtering, correlates with diminished user , , and participation levels, as moderated users report lower organizational attitudes. Under-moderation, by contrast, permits toxic behaviors to entrench, with studies showing that exposure to uncorrected negativity fosters persistence and contagion within communities, elevating risks of and disengagement. Optimal practices thus focus on verifiable harms, like direct threats or deceptive , to sustain platform viability without unduly suppressing discourse.

Controversies in Comment Moderation

A central controversy in comment moderation involves claims that aggressive removal of toxic content prevents user attrition, with some studies asserting that exposure to hostile comments contributes to platform abandonment. However, empirical analyses reveal mixed effects, as toxicity can paradoxically boost engagement by sparking curiosity, with users 18% more likely to click on toxic posts, suggesting platforms face trade-offs between curbing abuse and maintaining activity levels. Pro-moderation advocates, often from academic circles with documented left-leaning institutional biases, prioritize safety narratives, yet causal evidence indicates that overbroad definitions of "harm" frequently suppress dissenting viewpoints rather than purely toxic ones. Critics highlight asymmetries, where enforces ideological chambers by disproportionately targeting opposing political orientations. A 2024 University of Michigan study on analyzed over 100 million comments and found that moderators remove content misaligned with subreddit leanings at rates up to three times higher for cross-ideological posts, fostering homogeneity and insulating users from counterarguments. Similarly, examinations of reveal user comments under right-leaning videos face elevated scrutiny, even when not verifiably false, raising questions about whether such practices justify the or merely reflect enforcers' priors on . These patterns align with broader data showing no systematic platform-level but user-driven enforcement amplifying narratives, often at the expense of verifiable claims challenging orthodoxies. AI-driven moderation has achieved reductions in overt , such as automated filtering of slurs and on major platforms, yet false positives undermine efficacy, with systems mislabeling legitimate discourse as harmful in up to 20-30% of cases per internal reports. On X (formerly ), 2024 transparency data documented algorithmic overreach, where dissenting or lengthy replies were flagged as despite compliance, exacerbating perceptions of viewpoint . Such errors, compounded by opaque "harm" criteria biased toward suppressing realism on topics like election integrity or public health, illustrate how moderation can causally amplify one-sided discourse, prioritizing institutional consensus over open debate. analyses further contend that panic over leads to over-censorship of fact-based critiques, with surveys inflating perceived falsehoods due to flawed methodologies lacking neutral response options. While platforms tout safety gains, the net result—evident in declining trust metrics post-2020—points to free speech erosions outweighing marginal toxicity reductions.

Other Uses

Linguistic and Everyday Remarks

The English noun and verb "comment" derives from the Late Latin commentum, signifying an "invention," "fabrication," or "devised explanation," rooted in the verb comminīscī ("to contrive" or "devise"), compounded from com- (intensive prefix) and a base related to meminisse ("to remember"). This entered Middle English around 1450, initially denoting annotations or interpretive notes on texts, evolving by the 15th century into broader usage for spoken or written remarks. The term's core implication of contrivance underscores a constructed observation, yet in general linguistic application, it emphasizes factual notation over subjective invention. In everyday , a comment constitutes a concise or expressing a , , or , frequently in tone and context-dependent rather than prescriptive. Unlike opinions, which inherently convey endorsement or preference, comments prioritize descriptive neutrality, as in conversational interjections like noting an observable fact ("The traffic is heavy today") without implying judgment or . This distinction preserves disinterested presentation, avoiding with interpretive or advocacy, and aligns with first-principles where remarks ground discussion empirically rather than normatively. Linguistic corpora of spoken English highlight comments' prevalence in informal speech as parenthetical or responsive elements that facilitate without escalating to , often comprising brief, non-evaluative clauses akin to "you see" or "I mean" for clarification. Such uses underscore the word's polysemous foundation in neutral observation, informing extended senses while remaining unentangled with domain-specific connotations like legal annotations or digital replies.

Specialized Contexts

In parliamentary proceedings, "comments" denote the recorded remarks of legislators during debates, preserved in official transcripts such as the United Kingdom's , which originated in as summaries and evolved toward verbatim accounts by the early to capture nuanced positions and sentiments for . These transcripts facilitate empirical studies, including sentiment and position-taking analyses, enabling quantification of opinions on topics like , with models applied to large corpora revealing patterns in rhetorical strategies across thousands of speeches. However, non-verbatim elements, such as editorial summaries or transcriber notations for interruptions, introduce interpretive layers that can affect perceived accuracy in public records, though they enhance contextual fidelity over raw audio. Sports commentary represents a specialized form of analytical remarks, originating with radio broadcasts in the , such as the August 5, 1921, game aired by KDKA in , which marked the first live play-by-play transmission and set precedents for descriptive narration. These commentaries supplement by providing interpretive context—explaining tactics or player conditions—but do not constitute primary , as their subjective elements, like emphasis on dramatic moments, can influence audience recall without altering verifiable data like scores or timings. Empirical reviews indicate that while accurate factual recall in commentary correlates with viewer satisfaction, entertainment-driven framing often prioritizes engagement over exhaustive precision, with studies showing up to 20% variance in perceived event accuracy between commentators and official logs. Emerging applications include -generated comments in simulation environments, such as systems like SimTube, which produce synthetic audience feedback for pre-release video content by modeling inputs like visuals and text to forecast reactions with reported alignment to real comments exceeding 70% in controlled tests. In transactions, optional "comment" or fields—available in protocols like Ethereum's input or payment networks such as Stellar—allow appending human-readable notes to records, potentially enhancing auditability in niche financial or supply-chain uses; however, utilization remains below 5% of transactions, as gas fees and favor minimal , underscoring limited practical utility amid hype for decentralized . These specialized implementations bolster precision in technical documentation and predictive modeling but risk epistemic dilution if over-relied upon without validation, as outputs may amplify biases in training and notes prove vulnerable to in unverified chains.

References

  1. [1]
    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/comment
  2. [2]
    Comment - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Originating from late 14th-century Old French and Late Latin, "comment" means an explanation or remark and as a verb, to explain or discuss thoroughly.
  3. [3]
    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/comment
  4. [4]
    Comments in Programming - W3Schools
    In programming, comments are text notes in your code that are ignored by the computer. They can help you and others understand what the code does.
  5. [5]
    Concept of Comments in Computer Programming - GeeksforGeeks
    Jul 11, 2025 · Comments are text notes added to the program to provide explanatory information about the source code. They are used in a programming ...
  6. [6]
    In Search Of The First Comment - Hackaday
    Oct 23, 2021 · Comments are always 'taken seriously', back in the time of paper source code moreso than modern languages in many cases. The original ...
  7. [7]
    Algol-58 – The International Algebraic Language
    Jul 29, 2018 · Like the Algol-60 comment, it starts with the symbol comment and continues until the next semicolon (;) is encountered.Overview Of Algol-58 · Data Types And Declarations · Statements
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Report on the Algorithmic Language ALGOL 60
    It is further understood that the comment structure encountered first in the text when reading from left to right has precedence in being replaced over later ...
  9. [9]
    BASIC Commands - Dartmouth
    Jul 20, 2018 · Statements. There were fifteen statement types in the original BASIC. LET Introduces the assignment statement, and is required. PRINT Provides ...
  10. [10]
    Why does GNU AS use different characters for single-line comments ...
    Nov 22, 2017 · The GNU Assembler as uses different characters depending on the architecture to specify single-line comments, such as # on x86, ; on 29k, or @ on ARM.
  11. [11]
    A decade of code comment quality assessment - ScienceDirect.com
    Several studies have demonstrated that high quality code comments can support developers in software comprehension, bug detection, and program maintenance ...
  12. [12]
    Is there a correlation between code comments and issues?
    Mar 30, 2020 · In this paper, we set out to understand the correlation between code comments and issues in Github. We conduct an empirical study on 625 repositories hosted on ...
  13. [13]
    Best practices for writing code comments - The Stack Overflow Blog
    Dec 23, 2021 · Here are some rules to help you achieve a happy medium: Rule 1: Comments should not duplicate the code. Rule 2: Good comments do not excuse unclear code.
  14. [14]
    Best practices for writing clean code comments | TechTarget
    Mar 3, 2025 · 5 best practices for clean code comments · Comments should explain why code is written the way it is, rather than explaining what the code does.
  15. [15]
    Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML). ISO 8879:1986
    The introduction to the SGML specification highlights key components of the language, including an "abstract syntax" for descriptive markup of document elements ...
  16. [16]
    Using HTML comments <!-- … --> - HTML - MDN Web Docs
    Jul 9, 2025 · An HTML comment is used to add explanatory notes to the markup or to prevent the browser from interpreting specific parts of the document.
  17. [17]
    HTML comments - HTML Help
    HTML comments. Since HTML is officially an SGML application, the comment syntax used in HTML documents is actually the SGML comment syntax.
  18. [18]
    How to Write Doc Comments for the Javadoc Tool | Oracle Canada
    This document describes the style guide, tag and image conventions we use in documentation comments for Java programs written at Java Software, Oracle.
  19. [19]
    Overview - Doxygen
    The first version of Doxygen borrowed some code of an old version of DOC++. Although I have rewritten practically all code since then, DOC++ has still given ...Changelog · Getting started · Documenting the code · Doxygen usage
  20. [20]
    CWE-615: Inclusion of Sensitive Information in Source Code ...
    An attacker who finds these comments can map the application's structure and files, expose hidden parts of the site, and study the fragments of code.
  21. [21]
    HTML Comments - Knowledge Base - Detectify
    Mar 25, 2020 · What can happen? There are multiple legitimate uses of HTML comments, and they don't per se constitute any vulnerability. However, the reasons ...
  22. [22]
    Developer-First Documentation: Why 73% of Teams Fail and How to ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · Average onboarding time increases by 340% when documentation is inadequate ... Poor documentation doesn't just slow down individual developers – ...
  23. [23]
    What's so bad about HTML Comments as structure? - Greg Schoppe
    Sep 18, 2017 · It isn't compatible with the format necessary to bind and execute in PDO or mySQLi, so it cannot provide the actual benefits of those libraries, ...
  24. [24]
    5 U.S. Code § 553 - Rule making - Law.Cornell.Edu
    General notice of proposed rule making shall be published in the Federal Register, unless persons subject thereto are named and either personally served.
  25. [25]
    Summary of the Administrative Procedure Act | US EPA
    Jul 9, 2025 · The APA requires most rules to have a 30-day delayed effective date. In addition to setting forth rulemaking procedures, the APA addresses other ...
  26. [26]
    Regulations.gov
    Learn how to write an effective comment to make your voice heard in the regulatory process. Visit the updated Commenting Guidance page.User Notice · Commenting Guidance · Privacy Notice · Deregulation suggestions
  27. [27]
    Democracy, Rulemaking, and Outpourings of Comments
    Dec 20, 2021 · The 2017 Federal Communications Commission's net neutrality rulemaking generated over 20 million public comments, and over 4 million ...<|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Quality, not Quantity, is Key to Effective Commenting
    Feb 21, 2018 · Specifically, between 2012 and 2016, EPA acknowledged 1,244 mass mail campaigns in 32 out of 115 rules published on regulations.gov.
  29. [29]
    The Duty to Respond to Rulemaking Comments
    Mar 14, 2025 · This Essay examines the legal foundations for this duty, the policies that support it, and the circumstances in which it comes into play.
  30. [30]
    Do public comments make a difference in open rulemaking? Insights ...
    Findings show that the substantive public contributions do make a difference especially when media attention and input from professional organizations is ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] DELIBERATIVE RULEMAKING: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF ...
    Sep 14, 2021 · To that end, we examine the public deliberations occurring in 125 rules promulgated by three agencies: the Environmental Protection Agency ( ...
  32. [32]
    Understanding the factors that impact federal rulemaking: a survey ...
    Oct 3, 2024 · Studies have suggested that industry entities are highly effective in using comment letters to influence regulations, potentially due to the ...
  33. [33]
    (PDF) The Case Against Mass E-mails: Perverse Incentives and Low ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · The Case Against Mass E-mails: Perverse Incentives and Low Quality Public Participation in U.S. Federal Rulemaking. Wiley. Policy & Internet.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Public Engagement in Rulemaking Final Report
    Nov 19, 2018 · BALLA, PUBLIC COMMENTING ON FEDERAL AGENCY REGULATIONS: RESEARCH ON CURRENT PRACTICES AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE. CONFERENCE ...
  35. [35]
    LibGuides: Legal research and writing: Annotated statutes
    Oct 16, 2025 · Annotated statutes are volumes of statutes with accompanying commentary and case notes, written section by section.
  36. [36]
    Find Case Law from Statutes or Regulations - Research Guides
    Jan 24, 2025 · Annotated codes provide useful context--such as the history of the statute--and links to related law, secondary sources that will help you understand the topic.
  37. [37]
    Statutory Interpretation: Theories, Tools, and Trends - Congress.gov
    Mar 10, 2023 · As a practical matter, judicial opinions interpreting statutes necessarily shape the way those statutes are implemented. If Congress knows how ...
  38. [38]
    Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States - Google Books
    Author, Joseph Story ; Publisher, Hilliard, Gray,, 1833 ; Original from, Harvard University ; Digitized, Oct 22, 2008 ; Length, 776 pages.
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Text over Intent and the Demise of Legislative History
    The 1999 law review article noted that Justice Scalia's approach, if adopted, would represent a significant change in the way the court writes its statutory.
  40. [40]
    https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2141&context=journal_articles
  41. [41]
    Only 9 percent of law professors are conservative, study finds
    Aug 31, 2022 · Of the sample of professors, however, only 9.1 percent identified as conservative, with 77.9 percent identifying as liberal. The results of this ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] The Legal Academy's Ideological Uniformity - Chicago Unbound
    Apr 17, 2017 · Compared to the 15% of law professors that are conservative, 35% of lawyers overall are conservative. Law professors are more liberal than ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Originalism Versus Living Constitutionalism: The Conceptual ...
    Originalists believe the constitution's meaning is fixed, while living constitutionalists believe it should evolve with changing circumstances and values.
  44. [44]
    Textualism's Mistake - Harvard Law Review
    Jan 10, 2022 · Justice Scalia had a number of critiques of legislative history as it had been operationalized in statutory interpretation decisions. Most of ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] HOW TO WRITE AN OP-ED OR COLUMN - Projects at Harvard
    An op-ed piece derives its name from originally having appeared opposite the editorial page in a newspaper. Today, the term is used more widely to represent ...
  46. [46]
    Op-Ed 101 - NASSP
    The opinion editorial (op-ed) originated when responses appeared in newspapers on the page opposite from the editor's opinion. Today an op-ed is more ...
  47. [47]
    Why The New York Times Is Retiring the Term 'Op-Ed'
    Apr 26, 2021 · The first Op-Ed page in The New York Times greeted the world on Sept. 21, 1970. It was so named because it appeared opposite the editorial ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] The Creation of the New York Times Op-Ed Page
    Jul 29, 2016 · On September 21, 1970, the New York Times began publishing its op-ed page. "We hope," the editors wrote, "that a contribution may be made ...
  49. [49]
    Satire and Scandal: Media in 18th-Century England | English Heritage
    In this article author and historian Tim Clayton explores the evolution of 18th-century media in England and how it paved the way for the international media ...
  50. [50]
    Early American Newspapering - Colonial Williamsburg
    By the end of the eighteenth century, however, scores of homegrown broadsheets and tabloids satisfied the information appetites of Americans hungry for ...
  51. [51]
    Full article: Walter Lippmann and Public Opinion
    Walter Lippmann's Public Opinion was published in 1922 and has shaped much debate over the century since.Footnote It remains a classic text in communications ...
  52. [52]
    Intellectuals have said democracy is failing for a century. They ... - Vox
    Aug 9, 2018 · Walter Lippmann's Public Opinion, published in 1922, is the most persuasive critique of democracy I've ever read.
  53. [53]
    [PDF] A MEASURE OF MEDIA BIAS1 - Columbia University
    Abstract: We measure media bias by estimating ideological scores for several major media outlets. To compute this, we count the times that a particular ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] What Drives Media Slant? Evidence from U.S. Daily Newspapers
    We find that this “ideal slant”varies strongly with consumers'political beliefs, and that deviations from consumers'preferred slant involve a nontrivial ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] THE USE OF LETTERS IN THE TATLER, SPECTATOR. AND ...
    The Tatler, Spectator, and Guardian are considered the best of the many endeavors of Addison and Steele in the genre of the periodical essay.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  56. [56]
    Audience Feedback in the News Media - 1st Edition - Bill Reader
    This book provides the first definitive history of the evolution of audience feedback, from the early newsbooks of the 16th century to the rough-and-tumble ...Missing: print magazine
  57. [57]
    125 Years of Writing: The Evolution of the Book Review
    Mar 18, 2021 · How a New York Times staple began, and what shaped how the pages read today.Missing: feedback | Show results with:feedback
  58. [58]
    In the age of social media blasts, what's the point of letters ... - Poynter
    May 18, 2022 · Publishing readers' letters sends a message that they are equal participants and that reader criticism is a necessary part of how the news is made.
  59. [59]
    Age, Wealth, Education Predict Letters to Editor - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · A national survey of 1,017 U.S. adults found that most letter writers tend to be older, wealthier and better educated than average. Political ...
  60. [60]
    Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2002). The construction of the public in letters ...
    Drawing on an ethnographic study, this article describes how the editorial-page staff at one San Francisco Bay newspaper think of the letter-writing public.
  61. [61]
    Are Editors free from bias? The special case of Letters to the Editor
    Readers may occasionally wonder whether an Editor can truly be unbiased when it comes to deciding what to publish. In general the answer is “probably not”, ...Missing: examples dissenting
  62. [62]
    Understanding Web 2.0: Key Features, Impact, and Examples
    Web 2.0 represents the second stage of the internet evolution, emphasizing user-generated content, interactivity, and social networking. Unlike Web 1.0's static ...
  63. [63]
    User-Generated Content - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    1. UGC emerged as a defining feature of the Web 2.0 era, where users display their original content through Internet platforms or provide it to other users, ...
  64. [64]
    The History of UGC: How UGC Has Evolved Over The Years
    The concept of UGC truly began to take off with the rise of Web 2.0 in the early 2000s. Web 2.0 represented a shift from static websites to dynamic platforms ...
  65. [65]
    Disqus - Wikipedia
    It was founded in 2007 by Daniel Ha and Jason Yan as a Y Combinator startup. Disqus, Inc.
  66. [66]
    Disqus Officially Launches - AVC
    Oct 31, 2007 · Yesterday the comment system that I've been using since the late summer, Disqus, officially launched. They call it "public beta" but that's ...
  67. [67]
    What's the average rate of people who comment in a YouTube video?
    Nov 21, 2012 · 1.2 comment per 1000 views. There is however a great variety between videos, some more controversial ones have 1 comment.How many YouTube comments are you allowed to make per day?How many comments on YouTube can you post per day without ...More results from www.quora.com
  68. [68]
    Latest YouTube Statistics (2025) | StatsUp - Analyzify
    YouTube Comment Moderation Statistics. During Q2 2024, YouTube removed about 1.37 billion comments for violating community guidelines, a decrease from 1.44 ...
  69. [69]
    Scaling up fact-checking using the wisdom of crowds - Science
    Sep 1, 2021 · We explore a solution to these problems: using politically balanced groups of laypeople to identify misinformation at scale.
  70. [70]
    Big Data and the Wisdom of Crowds are not the same
    Mar 16, 2014 · The Wisdom of Crowds is the idea that, as collectives, groups of people can make more accurate forecasts or come up with better solutions to problems.
  71. [71]
    How Does Anonymity Affect Behavior - ExtractAlpha
    Aug 1, 2024 · Some studies suggest anonymity can increase antisocial behavior due to reduced accountability. The online disinhibition effect shows people may ...
  72. [72]
    Anonymity and its role in digital aggression: A systematic review
    The current systematic review provides clear evidence of a significant relationship between anonymity and DA while also pointing to positive cyberbullying ...
  73. [73]
    Online anonymity: study found 'stable pseudonyms' created a more ...
    Nov 17, 2021 · My research with colleagues suggests that anonymity – under certain conditions – can actually make for more civil and productive online discussion.
  74. [74]
    Algorithmic content moderation: Technical and political challenges ...
    Feb 28, 2020 · This article provides an accessible technical primer on how algorithmic moderation works; examines some of the existing automated tools used by major platforms.
  75. [75]
    On Algorithmic Content Moderation - SpringerLink
    Dec 21, 2023 · This chapter provides an overview of the challenges involved in algorithmic content moderation. Content moderation is the organized practice ...
  76. [76]
    Data Shows X Has Significantly Fewer Moderation Staff Than Other ...
    Apr 29, 2024 · X has 550 million total monthly active users, and if its entire moderation workforce is only 1,849 people, that's a ratio of 1 human moderator ...
  77. [77]
    X's Latest Content Findings Reveal Troubling Trends In AI Moderation
    Oct 18, 2024 · The report underscores a key trend in content moderation: X's increasing reliance on artificial intelligence to identify and manage harmful behavior.
  78. [78]
    The Evolution of Content Moderation Technology: Trends and ...
    Mar 14, 2024 · It went from a manual, labor-intensive process to sophisticated, automated systems that use machine learning to maintain high content quality and site ...
  79. [79]
    AI vs. Human Moderators: A Comparative Evaluation of Multimodal ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · These results suggest the potential efficacy of a hybrid human-AI review system, where AI serves as an initial filter to expedite content ...
  80. [80]
    AI Feedback Enhances Community-Based Content Moderation ...
    Jul 10, 2025 · This study explores an AI-assisted hybrid moderation framework in which participants receive AI-generated feedback —supportive, neutral, or ...
  81. [81]
    the evolution of harmful content detection: manual moderation to AI
    Jul 16, 2025 · From manual moderation to AI, the evolution of harmful content detection improves accuracy, efficiency, and safety in digital platforms and ...
  82. [82]
    The adverse effects of moderating stakeholder conversations online
    We show that increased levels of moderation negatively affect attitudes towards an organization, satisfaction with an organization's performance, and trust in ...
  83. [83]
    Why Moderators Can't Protect Online Communities on Their Own
    Nov 5, 2024 · Why Moderators Can't Protect Online Communities on Their Own · 1. Members Don't Leave After Experiencing Toxicity · 2. Online Toxic Behaviors Are ...
  84. [84]
    Finding the Balance: Manual vs. Automated Content Moderation
    This blog post explores the evolution of content moderation practices, comparing manual and automated approaches, and discussing the emergence of hybrid ...
  85. [85]
    https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4307346
  86. [86]
    Toxic Content and User Engagement on Social Media - SSRN
    Dec 29, 2022 · Taken together, our results suggest that platforms face a trade-off between curbing toxicity and increasing engagement. Keywords: toxic content, ...Missing: comment 40%
  87. [87]
    The Misleading Panic over Misinformation - Cato Institute
    Jun 26, 2025 · One study reviewed 180 surveys on misinformation and found that over 90 percent of them lacked a clear “I don't know” or “Not sure” option ...
  88. [88]
    U-M study explores how political bias in content moderation on ...
    Oct 28, 2024 · Our research documents political bias in user-driven content moderation, namely comments whose political orientation is opposite to the moderators' political ...
  89. [89]
    Politically biased moderation drives echo chamber formation
    Dec 9, 2024 · In this work, we document a novel mechanism for the formation of echo chambers on social media sites: the politically biased content removal decisions of user ...
  90. [90]
    What Does Research Tell Us About Technology Platform ...
    May 21, 2025 · The researchers found that user comments were more likely to be moderated under right-leaning videos, but this difference is “well-justified” ...
  91. [91]
    Bias Misperceived:The Role of Partisanship and Misinformation in ...
    Jul 6, 2019 · In this study, we investigate how channel partisanship and video misinformation affect the likelihood of comment moderation on YouTube.Missing: conservative | Show results with:conservative
  92. [92]
    [PDF] Bias Misperceived: The Role of Partisanship and Misinformation in ...
    However, there is, to our knowledge, no scientific evidence that social media platforms' content moderation practices exhibit systematic partisan bias. On the ...
  93. [93]
    Best 6 Social Media Comment Moderation Tools In 2025 - Statusbrew
    Sep 9, 2025 · AI-driven comment moderation that filters out spam, scams, and offensive language in real time. Automatic hiding or deletion of harmful ...
  94. [94]
    [PDF] Global Transparency Report | H1 2024
    With this transparency report, we aim to cement X as a truly safe platform for all. We achieve this through transparency about our content moderation systems, ...
  95. [95]
    AI Is Replacing Online Moderators, But It's Bad at the Job - Bloomberg
    Aug 22, 2025 · But according to 13 professional moderators, the AI now relied upon to stop the spread of dangerous content, like child sex abuse material or ...
  96. [96]
    All About Comment Clauses in English - ThoughtCo
    May 11, 2025 · A comment clause, commonly heard in everyday speech and used in dialogue to give it a natural tone, is a short word group, such as "you see" and "I think,"
  97. [97]
    COMMENT Definition & Meaning - Dictionary.com
    a remark, observation, or criticism: a comment about the weather. gossip; talk: His frequent absences gave rise to comment.
  98. [98]
    Hansard Begins Reporting Parliamentary Debates | Research Starters
    The first official accounts of parliamentary debates were published by Luke Hansard in 1774, although these initially did not provide verbatim transcripts. It ...
  99. [99]
    Sentiment and position-taking analysis of parliamentary debates
    Jan 13, 2020 · Parliamentary and legislative debate transcripts provide access to information concerning the opinions, positions, and policy preferences of ...
  100. [100]
    Hansard: Understanding Parliamentary Debate Transcripts
    Hansard is a summarized record of parliamentary debates, not a verbatim transcript. It serves as an important legal resource for understanding legislative ...
  101. [101]
    How a 1921 Baseball Radio Broadcast Marked the Dawn of ...
    Aug 4, 2021 · On August 5, 1921, Harold Arlin of KDKA in Pittsburgh voiced the first MLB game on radio. PS Phil Sheridan Pittsburgh Pirates broadcaster Bob Prince (left) and ...
  102. [102]
    Sports Commentary and the Problem of Television Knowledge - Flow
    Oct 27, 2007 · The most generous view of television sports commentary suggests that its purpose is to provide otherwise inaccessible information to viewers in ...Missing: record | Show results with:record
  103. [103]
    [PDF] Functional and Stylistic Features of Sports Announcer Talk
    With this in mind, fans expect the commentary to be accurate and insightful at all times. Regarding the setting, one has to imagine a relatively confined ...
  104. [104]
    Generating Simulated Video Comments through Multimodal AI and ...
    Nov 14, 2024 · We introduce SimTube, a generative AI system designed to simulate audience feedback in the form of video comments before a video's release.
  105. [105]
    Add AI-generated comments to Unity Catalog objects
    Sep 26, 2025 · This article introduces AI-generated Unity Catalog object and table column comments (also known as AI-generated documentation), explains how they work,<|separator|>
  106. [106]
    Using AI to Simulate Realistic Audience Feedback - Speaknow blog
    Jul 2, 2025 · AI audience simulation involves creating AI personas that mimic real people by combining data such as demographics, behavior, and culture. These ...