Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Delayed coker

A delayed coker, or delayed coking unit (DCU), is a thermal cracking process in petroleum refineries that converts heavy residual oils—such as vacuum residuum from crude oil distillation—into lighter, more valuable hydrocarbon liquids and solid petroleum coke through controlled high-temperature decomposition. The process begins with preheating the heavy feedstock, typically asphalt-like bottoms from atmospheric or vacuum distillation, in a fired heater to 485–505°C under low pressure (2–3 bar), where initial thermal cracking initiates but is delayed from completing. The hot effluent is then routed into one of two or more large, insulated vertical coke drums (typically 4–9 meters in diameter and up to 40 meters tall), where it resides for 12–24 hours, allowing further cracking, polymerization, and coke deposition on the drum walls while volatile vapors rise and exit for separation. While one drum fills and cokes, the other undergoes steam stripping to remove entrained hydrocarbons, quenching with water to cool and solidify the coke, and decoking via high-pressure hydraulic water jets to cut out the solid mass, enabling a semi-batch, continuous operation with cycles lasting about 16 hours on average. The overhead vapors from the drums are sent to a fractionator column, where they are cooled and separated into products including fuel gas, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), naphtha, light gas oil, and heavy gas oil, which can be further refined into gasoline, diesel, and other fuels. The solid byproduct, , forms in various structures depending on feedstock composition—such as sponge coke (porous, suitable for or anodes), needle coke (elongated, premium for electrodes in ), or shot coke (spherical granules from high-asphaltene feeds)—and accounts for 20–30% of the feed by weight, serving as a key for the aluminum, , and power generation industries. originated in the late , with the first commercial unit built in 1929 by of , and has since become essential for maximizing yields from heavier, sour crudes, led by regions like with over 150 million metric tons of capacity annually as of 2024. It enhances by rejecting carbon as rather than burning it, though challenges include emissions management and handling high-sulfur feeds.

Overview

Definition and purpose

A delayed coker is a type of cracking unit employed in refineries to upgrade heavy residual oils into lighter products and solid . It operates as a semi-batch continuous process, in which high molecular weight derivatives are heated in a to thermal cracking temperatures of approximately 450–500°C, with the subsequent and cracking reactions occurring in a series of insulated coke drums. The primary purpose of the delayed coker is to transform low-value heavy residues, such as vacuum residuum from crude distillation, which are unsuitable for further conventional processing, into marketable distillate fractions—including and precursors for —along with solid as a . This conversion enhances the overall yield and economic value of operations by utilizing otherwise underutilized heavy fractions of crude . At its core, the delayed coker exemplifies a , where heavy, undesirable carbon components in the feedstock are deliberately concentrated and removed as solid , avoiding their release as less desirable gaseous byproducts and thereby improving the quality and quantity of the liquid distillates produced.

Role in petroleum refining

The delayed coker unit is integrated into refineries downstream of the atmospheric and units, where it processes heavy residual fractions such as vacuum residuum that would otherwise yield low-value . This placement allows refineries to these bottoms, transforming them into more valuable streams and thereby optimizing the overall crude oil processing chain. Economically, the delayed coker enhances profitability by converting approximately 70-80% of the heavy residue feedstock into liquid distillates, including , light gas oil, and heavy gas oil, which can be further refined into transportation fuels like and . This high conversion rate minimizes the production of residual , improves refining margins through higher-value product slates, and generates as a marketable for applications in power generation, aluminum , or electrodes. The unit's role is particularly vital for heavier, sour crudes, where it boosts the of lighter products from otherwise underutilized residues by rejecting carbon as rather than requiring costly addition. Global delayed coker capacity has seen major expansions concentrated in high-capacity hubs like the US Gulf Coast and to accommodate increasing volumes of heavy imports.

Process Description

Feedstock characteristics

The delayed coker primarily processes heavy feedstocks that are unsuitable for most catalytic upgrading processes due to their high molecular weight and levels. Typical inputs include vacuum residuum, which is the heaviest fraction from crude oil , and atmospheric residuum from atmospheric units. Other common feedstocks encompass heavy oils such as bitumen derived from Canadian or Venezuelan heavy crude, as well as decant oil (clarified slurry oil) from (FCC) units. These materials are selected for their refractoriness, allowing thermal conversion without the need for or catalysts. Key characteristics of these feedstocks include a high initial boiling point exceeding 500°C, reflecting their composition of large, complex molecules that remain liquid only under vacuum conditions. They typically exhibit elevated asphaltene content, often in the range of 10-20% by weight, which consists of polar, aromatic-rich compounds that contribute to coke formation. The Conradson carbon residue (CCR), a measure of the non-volatile carbonaceous material, ranges from 15-30 wt%, indicating significant potential for solid residue production. Sulfur content can reach up to 5 wt%, primarily in organic forms, while metals such as vanadium and nickel are present at concentrations typically of 100–2000 ppm, though can exceed 3000 ppm in heavy crudes like Orinoco, posing challenges for downstream processing if not managed. These properties make the feedstocks viscous and unstable, influencing the severity of thermal cracking required. Pretreatment of delayed coker feedstocks is minimal compared to hydrotreating processes, focusing on desalting to remove inorganic salts and or to eliminate solids and water that could foul equipment. Unlike catalytic units, hydrotreating is not required, enabling the process to handle contaminated feeds economically, though occasional dewaxing or adjustment may occur for specific operations. The inherent heterogeneity of these feeds, such as varying asphaltene-to-CCR ratios, can affect cracking patterns by promoting different morphologies.

Thermal cracking mechanism

The thermal cracking mechanism in delayed coking involves free-radical reactions that decompose heavy feedstocks into lighter distillates and solid without the use of catalysts or added . At elevated temperatures of 450–500°C, carbon-carbon (C-C) bonds undergo homolytic cleavage, generating free radicals that initiate a leading to the breakdown of large molecules. This process promotes the and of asphaltenes and other heavy components into a matrix, while lighter fractions volatilize as gases and liquids. The "delayed" aspect refers to the controlled in insulated coke drums, allowing the reactions to proceed to completion over 12–24 hours, which maximizes formation and minimizes unreacted residue. The key reactions follow a classic free-radical chain mechanism. Initiation occurs through the thermal breaking of weak C-C bonds in aliphatic side chains attached to aromatic cores, producing primary . Propagation involves hydrogen abstraction from surrounding molecules to form more stable , followed by β-scission, which cleaves additional C-C bonds to yield smaller alkyl and olefins; these steps also include and reactions that contribute to molecular fragmentation. Termination happens via recombination of , forming stable, high-molecular-weight structures that aggregate into the solid phase, often through exothermic of asphaltenes. No catalytic surfaces are involved, distinguishing this from other cracking processes, and the absence of prevents side reactions. Operating conditions are precisely controlled to optimize severity. The outlet reaches 480–510°C to initiate cracking rapidly, with the process operating at low pressures of 1–3 atm to favor and reduce coke deposition in transfer lines. During filling, the coke drum maintains temperatures of 420–450°C, allowing the delayed soaking phase where propagate and terminate without further heating. Feedstock composition, such as content, influences severity by altering stability and rates.

Equipment and operation

The delayed coker unit features several major components essential for its semi-continuous operation. The fired heater, configured as a multi-tube with horizontal tubes typically 100 mm in internal and 6-12 mm wall thickness made from 9% chrome alloy, heats the residual oil feedstock to cracking temperatures of approximately 485-505°C (905-941°F) at a of about 4 (60 psig), ensuring high in-tube velocities and minimal to prevent premature coking. Multiple gas burners, each rated at around 3 million BTU, provide the necessary , limited to less than 9000 BTU/hr/ft² for optimal performance. Paired coke drums serve as the primary reaction vessels, consisting of vertical cylindrical structures typically 4-9 meters (13-30 feet) in diameter and 25 meters (82 feet) in straight-side height, with overall dimensions up to 36 meters (118 feet) including top and bottom flanges; these are constructed from 25 mm thick plates with 2.8 mm cladding for resistance and insulated with 10 cm of to retain heat. The drums operate at of 1-5.9 (typically 2-3 ) and alternate in use to enable continuous . The fractionator tower, positioned downstream, receives and separates the overhead vapors from the drums into fractions such as gases, , , heavy coker gas oil, and recycle streams, with bottom temperatures maintained at 343-382°C (650-720°F) and regulated by a . Blowdown and quench systems manage post-reaction cleanup, including venting of stripped vapors and controlled water injection for cooling. Operation of the delayed coker follows a cyclic batch in the drums combined with continuous upstream and downstream flows to achieve semi-continuous production. The preheated feedstock from the fired heater is directed via a switching —often a motorized three-way —into one of the two coke drums, where it fills over a period of 12-24 hours (typically 16 hours), allowing thermal cracking to form solid at the bottom while generating vapors that are continuously routed to the fractionator for separation and recovery. During this filling phase, the second drum is offline and undergoes decoking, ensuring uninterrupted feed processing and vapor handling. Upon completion of filling in the active drum, the switching redirects the hot feed to the empty drum, initiating a new cycle while the filled drum transitions to decoking. The decoking sequence begins with a brief steam-out period of about 0.5 hours to strip residual hydrocarbons and facilitate from the coke mass, followed by water quenching lasting 4-5 hours at controlled rates to cool the drum without causing structural damage like . Hydraulic cutting then removes the solidified using high-pressure jets at 86-275 (1250-4000 psig), starting with a pilot hole approximately 1 meter in and proceeding spirally to clear the drum in 3-4 hours, for a total decoking duration of 6-12 hours. Once decoked, the drum is pressure-tested, warmed, and prepared for the next filling cycle, maintaining the unit's overall above 95% during normal operation. control throughout relies on automated valves and monitoring to synchronize drum switching and prevent interruptions in the continuous heating and steps.

Products and Byproducts

Petroleum coke properties

, the primary solid byproduct of the delayed coking process, is a carbon-rich produced through cracking of heavy residues. It exists in green form immediately after and can be further processed into calcined coke by heating to 1200–1400°C to remove volatile matter and enhance purity. Green coke typically contains 8–14% volatile matter, while calcined coke has less than 5%, resulting in a more stable structure suitable for industrial applications. The type of petroleum coke produced depends on feedstock characteristics, such as and aromatic content. Sponge coke, the most common form, features a porous, amorphous and serves as the primary product for or anode use when impurities are low. Needle coke, formed from low-sulfur feeds like FCC decant oils, exhibits an anisotropic, needle-like crystalline with aligned carbon layers, offering superior graphitization properties. Shot coke, resulting from high-aromatic feeds, consists of small spherical particles (2–5 mm in diameter), often appearing as "beebees," and is denser but less desirable for premium applications due to its tendency to form aggregates. In terms of composition, is predominantly carbon, with green coke containing 86–92% carbon on a basis, increasing to 99.5% after . levels range from 1–6%, with anode-grade coke limited to ≤4% in green form and ≤3.5% calcined; needle coke achieves as low as 0.5%. content is 0.5–5%, higher in green coke due to volatiles. Trace metals like and are typically <100 ppm in low-metal feeds, though anode specifications allow up to 250 ppm Ni and 400 ppm V in green coke. Volatile matter is 8–14% in green coke, reduced significantly upon . The material has a high heating value of approximately 14,000 BTU/lb, making it an efficient fuel source. Key physical properties include a density of 1.2–1.4 g/cm³ for green coke, with real density reaching 2.05–2.14 g/cm³ in calcined forms; anode-grade coke requires a vibrated bulk density ≥0.87 g/cm³. Porosity is notably high in sponge coke at 20–50%, contributing to its lightweight and absorbent nature, while needle and shot cokes are less porous. Electrical resistivity is low in premium grades, such as 320 × 10⁻⁶ ohm-in for needle coke, enabling its use in conductive applications. Calcination not only lowers volatiles and density variations but also stabilizes the microstructure, reducing hydrogen and sulfur while concentrating carbon.

Distillate products

The distillate products from the delayed coking process consist of gaseous and liquid fractions generated through thermal cracking of heavy residual feedstocks, primarily comprising off-gas, coker naphtha, and coker gas oil. These products are recovered as vapors from the coke drums, which are quenched with water or steam to halt further cracking, then directed to a fractionating column for separation into distinct streams based on boiling points. Off-gas, the lightest fraction, includes C1-C4 hydrocarbons such as methane, ethane, propane, and butane, along with hydrogen sulfide and other light components, making it suitable for use as refinery fuel gas or petrochemical feedstock after sulfur removal in a gas treating unit. This stream is separated as the overhead product from the fractionator and processed in the refinery's gas plant to meet fuel specifications. Coker naphtha, boiling in the range of approximately 30-200°C, is a light liquid distillate rich in olefins, diolefins (around 5% of total olefins), and aromatics, with sulfur content 10-20 times higher than straight-run naphtha, rendering it unstable and prone to gum formation upon exposure to oxygen. Its high olefin content, indicated by a bromine number typically between 50-100, necessitates hydrotreating to stabilize it and reduce sulfur before use as a feedstock for fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) units or incorporation into gasoline blends. In FCC processing, diolefins contribute to coke formation on the catalyst, while olefins crack into lighter products like LPG. Coker gas oil, encompassing light and heavy fractions with a boiling range of 200-565°C, exhibits high sulfur (typically 2-4 wt%), nitrogen, and aromatics content, along with a Conradson carbon residue (CCR) of 5-10%, making it unsuitable for direct blending without further refining. This stream, recovered as side draws from the fractionator with pump-around cooling to enhance separation, requires hydrodesulfurization and hydrocracking to produce low-sulfur diesel or gasoline precursors, often serving as preferred feedstock for hydrotreaters or FCC units due to its cracked nature.

Yield and quality factors

In delayed coking, product yields typically range from 22-38% petroleum coke, 14-19% naphtha, 29-52% gas oil, and 7-16% gas and butanes by weight of the feedstock, with variations depending on feed composition and operating conditions. Higher Conradson carbon residue (CCR) in the feed, often exceeding 20 wt%, substantially increases coke yield, as coke production correlates approximately 1.6 times the CCR value. Process variables significantly influence product quality. Elevated temperatures, typically 480-515°C in the coke drum, promote greater unsaturation and olefin content in distillate products through enhanced thermal cracking of paraffins. Drum pressures of 0.1-0.4 MPa inversely affect yields, with lower pressures favoring higher liquid distillate production and reduced coke formation. Feed asphaltene levels, measured as heptane insolubles, determine coke porosity; higher concentrations (e.g., >15 wt%) lead to denser, less porous structures like shot coke. Recycle ratios of 5-10% optimize liquid yields by minimizing over-cracking, though higher ratios increase coke and reduce volatiles. Modern optimization employs advanced controls, including AI-driven systems, to enhance yield balance during coke drum switching. These systems use iterative learning algorithms to analyze real-time data on , , and , automating switches to minimize disturbances and stabilize product distribution. For instance, models predict and adjust parameters like heater duty and injection, extending run lengths and improving overall liquid recovery. Feeds with low content (<4 wt%) enable production of premium anode-grade .

History and Development

Invention and early adoption

The delayed coking process was developed in the late 1920s by of as an evolution of earlier cracking techniques, aimed at upgrading heavy residues into lighter distillates and solid through controlled . This innovation built on the Burton cracking process, originally patented in 1913, by introducing a "delayed" in large drums to enhance cracking while minimizing unwanted side reactions in the heating stage. The first commercial delayed coker unit was constructed and started up in 1929 at 's in , marking the practical implementation of the technology for residue conversion. Early adoption of delayed coking remained limited during , confined largely to U.S. refineries handling Midwestern heavy crudes, as the process was still refining its operational parameters and competing with simpler visbreaking methods. Initial units operated with coke yields typically ranging from 18% to 30% by weight of the feedstock, depending on residue composition, though early configurations often achieved lower efficiencies due to suboptimal and drum design. The technology saw expanded use during , when U.S. refineries increasingly relied on thermal cracking processes like delayed coking to process heavier crudes into critical fuels such as and for military needs, helping to boost overall refinery output amid wartime shortages. Significant challenges plagued early delayed cokers, particularly the labor-intensive and hazardous manual decoking procedures, which required workers to enter hot drums to break and remove solidified using tools or rudimentary mechanical aids, resulting in frequent equipment wear, high maintenance costs, and safety incidents. These issues restricted widespread implementation until hydraulic decoking innovations emerged in the late 1930s, pioneered by Shell Oil at its Wood River in through patented high-pressure water jets. Despite these hurdles, the process demonstrated economic viability for bottom-of-the-barrel upgrading, laying the foundation for its role in modern refining.

Technological advancements

Following , significant advancements in the delayed coker process focused on improving operational efficiency and safety. In the , the widespread adoption of hydraulic decoking systems, pioneered by Shell Oil Company, replaced labor-intensive manual methods, substantially reducing downtime associated with coke removal from the drums. This innovation allowed for faster turnaround times between cycles, enabling refineries to process heavier residues more reliably without the hazards of manual labor inside the vessels. During the , engineering improvements led to the of larger coke drums, with diameters expanding to up to 30 feet (approximately 9 meters), which increased unit capacity by roughly fivefold compared to earlier designs from the . These larger drums facilitated higher throughput of heavy feedstocks, supporting the growing demand for residue upgrading amid increasing production of high-sulfur crudes. By the , further refinements included the introduction of antifoam additives, such as silicone-based agents, to mitigate excessive foaming during the phase and prevent carryover into downstream equipment. Concurrently, advancements in , including structural weld overlays and corrosion-resistant alloys, enhanced the durability of coke drums when processing high-sulfur feeds, extending equipment life and reducing maintenance frequency. In the 2020s, modern innovations have integrated digital technologies and process hybrids to boost and performance. Digital twins, virtual replicas of coker units powered by algorithms, enable by simulating drum stresses and operational conditions in , minimizing unplanned outages and optimizing cycle management. Hybrid configurations combining partial hydrotreating upstream of delayed coking have emerged to produce lower- petroleum coke, with studies showing sulfur content reductions to below 3% while increasing light distillate yields by up to 29%. Capacity expansions in , exemplified by upgrades at ' Jamnagar refinery complex—which supports over 1 million barrels per day of processing through enhanced coker integration—demonstrate scalable applications of these technologies. Efficiency gains include shortened overall cycle times to 10-12 hours, achieved through advanced automated cutting tools that accelerate decoking while maintaining safety. Additionally, integration with carbon capture systems, such as post-combustion amine absorption on flue gases from the coker furnace, has been piloted to reduce CO2 emissions, aligning with broader refinery decarbonization goals.

Applications and Uses

Utilization of petroleum coke

Petroleum coke produced by delayed cokers finds primary application as a raw material in the production of carbon anodes for aluminum smelting, where low-sulfur variants are calcined to form the bulk of anode composition, comprising over 67% of the calcined petroleum coke market share. This use leverages the coke's low ash and metal content to ensure efficient electrolytic reduction in aluminum production. High-sulfur shot coke, characterized by its spherical morphology and elevated sulfur levels, serves mainly as a fuel in cement kilns and power plants, offering a high heating value ranging from 14,000 to 15,000 BTU/lb that substitutes for coal or natural gas in high-temperature processes. Additionally, specialty needle coke derived from petroleum sources is essential for manufacturing graphite electrodes used in electric arc furnaces for steel production, prized for its low coefficient of thermal expansion and high graphitizability. The global market for features substantial , with U.S. exports playing a key role and directing significant volumes to major importers like and ; for instance, in 2025, U.S. exports have remained strong to these markets. Overall trade volumes are driven by outputs exceeding domestic consumption in producing regions. Calcined , suitable for and applications, trades at a premium of $300-500 per , reflecting its purity requirements, while fuel-grade high-sulfur is valued lower at $50-100 per due to its broader availability and simpler uses. Market challenges include potential declining demand in the aluminum sector amid calls from advocacy groups for the industry's transition to renewable energy sources and carbon-neutral technologies, which seek to reduce reliance on carbon-intensive feedstocks like petroleum coke by 2035. Overproduction from expanding refinery capacities has led to substantial stockpiling, exacerbating price volatility and storage concerns, with U.S. power sector consumption of petcoke halving over the past decade to below 2 million tons annually. Regulatory scrutiny on high-sulfur petcoke imports has increased in regions like India and China as of 2025, affecting fuel-grade applications.

Integration in modern refineries

In modern refineries, delayed cokers are frequently integrated with hydrocrackers and (FCC) units to optimize the upgrading of heavy residues into higher-value products. The heavy coker gas oil (HCGO) produced by the delayed coker serves as a key feedstock for these downstream units, where it undergoes further cracking or hydrotreating to yield , , and other distillates. This synergy allows refineries to manage feedstock surpluses, improve product yields, and maintain operational flexibility; for instance, at Turkey's TUPRAS refinery, the FCC unit processes HCGO alongside hydrocracker bottoms to prevent capacity reductions in the coker and hydrocracker while enhancing overall profitability. Residue upgrade complexes represent another critical integration strategy, particularly for handling extra-heavy crudes, where delayed coking is paired with hydrotreating to achieve comprehensive . In Venezuela's , the Petrocedeño upgrader (formerly Sincor) exemplifies this approach, processing 200,000 barrels per day of extra-heavy crude oil (8.3° ) through initial hydrotreating followed by delayed coking of the vacuum residue to produce distillates and , with the distillates routed back for hydrotreating to meet specifications (32° ). This configuration enables the economic upgrading of otherwise low-value heavy oils by maximizing liquid yields and removing contaminants like metals. Contemporary adaptations of delayed cokers emphasize and efficiency, including pilot-scale co-processing of waste materials to support goals. As of 2025, Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL) has implemented the INDEcoP2F process, which integrates waste plastics into the delayed coker feedstock to produce fuel-grade liquids, reducing plastic waste while leveraging existing infrastructure. Similarly, oils can be co-processed in delayed cokers to incorporate renewable components, as demonstrated in patented methods that blend such feeds with conventional residues for thermal cracking without major unit modifications. Economically, delayed cokers are indispensable for processing heavy crudes with below 20°, as they convert high-residue feeds into marketable liquids, thereby enhancing overall margins through bottom-of-the-barrel upgrading. Delayed coking accounts for approximately 88% of global production capacity, with a substantial share dedicated to heavy oil streams that would otherwise yield low-value .

Environmental and Safety Considerations

Emissions and environmental impacts

Delayed coking operations produce several key air emissions, primarily sulfur oxides () derived from sulfur-rich feeds where sulfur content typically ranges from 1% to 5% and concentrates in the byproduct. oxides () arise from processes in the coker heaters, while volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and are released during decoking activities such as drum venting, draining, and coke cutting, with VOC emission factors estimated at 0.12–0.24 lb per ton of produced. , particularly CO2, occur at rates of approximately 0.5–1.0 lb per ton of from process vents, though total emissions including energy use can reach 0.5–1 ton CO2 equivalent per ton of . (CH4) emissions from decoking are quantified at 0.01–0.02 lb per ton of or 7.9 lb per 1,000 lb of used in stripping. These emissions contribute to environmental impacts, including from coke dust generated during handling and storage, which carries like and , leading to elevated (PM) levels in nearby communities and potential respiratory health risks. generated during quenching contains high (COD) from emulsified oils and dissolved organic matter, along with metals and heteroatom compounds (, , oxygen), complicating biological and risking contamination of surface waters if inadequately managed. for coke storage piles poses risks, as rainwater can mobilize pollutants like and hydrocarbons into and , exacerbating local ecological degradation. Mitigation strategies have advanced significantly, with wet scrubbers applied to heater flue gases achieving up to 90% reduction by capturing compounds before atmospheric release. For VOCs, enclosed decoking systems and work practice standards—such as depressurizing drums to below 2 psig before venting to or fuel gas systems—can reduce emissions by 81–92%, alongside flare gas recovery to minimize uncontrolled releases. Regulatory frameworks, including the U.S. EPA's New Source Performance Standards under 40 CFR Part Subpart and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants under Subpart CC, enforce limits on and other hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) from delayed cokers, mandating fenceline monitoring and corrective actions if concentrations exceed 9 µg/m³.

Operational safety and regulations

Delayed coker operations present several significant hazards, primarily due to the high temperatures, pressures, and thermal cycling involved in . One critical risk is coke drum bulging or cracking, which can occur during the heating phase when thermal stresses cause deformation in the drum's cylindrical shell, potentially leading to structural failure or s if not detected early. For instance, in , a major in the () region identified extensive cladding detachment in a coke drum through monitoring, averting a potential or that could have resulted from bulging-induced leaks. Another hazard arises from (H2S) release, particularly when processing sour feeds containing high content, as the thermal cracking can liberate toxic H2S gas, leading to acute respiratory irritation, poisoning, or fatalities at concentrations above 100 ppm. Additionally, decoking operations expose workers to ergonomic and physical risks, including musculoskeletal strains from handling , high-pressure injuries during coke cutting, and falls from elevated platforms over 120 feet high. To mitigate these hazards, industry standards and technologies are employed to ensure drum integrity and operational safety. API 510, the Pressure Vessel Inspection Code, mandates regular in-service inspections of coke drums, including external visual checks, ultrasonic thickness measurements, and internal assessments during shutdowns to detect bulging, cracking, or corrosion before they escalate. Acoustic emission monitoring uses sensors to detect micro-cracks and stress waves in real-time during operation, allowing for early intervention; in the 2018 GCC case, this technology reduced acoustic pulse energy by 52% through process adjustments, preventing unplanned shutdowns and potential ruptures. Automated interlocks, integrated with programmable logic controllers (PLCs), prevent erroneous valve operations that could introduce water into hot drums or release hydrocarbons, reducing human error probability from over 1 in 10,000 to less than 1 in 10,000 operations. For cutting crews, personal protective equipment (PPE) such as flame-resistant clothing, hard hats, safety harnesses, and respiratory protection is required, complemented by comprehensive training on emergency evacuation, heat stress management, and safe water jet handling to minimize injury risks. Regulatory frameworks enforce these safety practices to protect workers and prevent accidents in delayed coker units. In the United States, the (OSHA) Standard 1910.146 governs permit-required confined spaces, such as coke drums, requiring atmospheric testing for H2S and other toxics, ventilation, and rescue plans before entry during decoking or maintenance. OSHA's (PSM) standard (29 CFR 1910.119) applies to delayed cokers handling hazardous chemicals like H2S, mandating process hazard analyses, mechanical integrity programs, and operating procedures to address and release risks. Internationally, the European Union's 1999/92/EC addresses risks from flammable atmospheres in coker units by requiring risk assessments, of hazardous areas, and to safeguard against ignition sources during heating or venting. As of 2025, updates under the EU's NIS2 Directive emphasize cybersecurity for digital controls in like refineries, including delayed cokers, by imposing measures for industrial control systems to prevent cyber-induced operational failures that could exacerbate physical hazards.

Comparison with Other Processes

Fluid and flexicoking

Fluid coking represents a continuous variant of the delayed coking process, utilizing reactors to thermally crack heavy residues into lighter liquids, gases, and . Developed by Exxon in the , this technology operates at temperatures of 500–550°C, where the residuum feed is introduced into a reactor bed of hot particles that provide the necessary heat for cracking. The process features short residence times of mere minutes in the reactor, contrasting with the hours-long soaking in delayed coking drums, which promotes faster cracking and results in a finer powder product rather than the larger chunks typical of delayed coking. Like delayed coking, fluid coking yields , gas oils, and , but the continuous operation eliminates batch cycles, enabling steady throughput for processing heavier feeds. Flexicoking extends the fluid coking process by incorporating a gasification step to enhance energy efficiency and minimize coke accumulation, particularly suited for high-residue feeds. Introduced by Exxon as a modification to fluid coking, the first commercial flexicoking unit commenced operations in 1976 at the Toa Oil Company refinery in Kawasaki, Japan. In this setup, excess coke from the fluid coker reactor is transferred to a heater and then to a gasifier, where it undergoes partial combustion or steam/air gasification at around 900–1000°C to produce a low-sulfur fuel gas rich in carbon monoxide and hydrogen, which supplies process energy and can generate additional hydrogen for refinery use. This integration reduces the net coke yield by up to 80–95% compared to delayed coking, leaving only a small purge coke (typically 1–2 wt% of feed) while converting the majority into usable gas products. Compared to delayed coking, both fluid and flexicoking offer continuous processing that avoids the downtime associated with drum switching and decoking, though fluid coking requires significantly higher energy inputs (approximately 55% more total energy) due to fluidization, while flexicoking's integrated gasification results in comparable or slightly lower net energy consumption. Liquid yields are typically 5–10% higher in these processes, with lower coke production (e.g., 20–25% vs. 25–30% in delayed coking), attributed to the elevated temperatures and shorter contact times that favor vaporization over condensation. Capital costs for fluid coking units are comparable to those for delayed coking, while flexicoking units are 30–50% higher, owing to the added complexity of fluidized beds and gasification equipment, limiting their adoption to refineries handling very heavy or contaminated residues where the efficiency gains justify the investment.

Alternative residue conversion technologies

Hydrocracking represents a primary catalytic alternative to delayed coking for upgrading heavy petroleum residues, employing under elevated temperatures of 350-450°C and pressures of 100-200 bar to achieve 80-95% conversion to valuable products without generating byproducts. This process, exemplified by Chevron's LC-Fining ebullated-bed technology, produces higher-quality distillates such as with lower content compared to outputs, though it incurs a slight capital cost premium over delayed coking due to the need for high-pressure equipment and . Solvent deasphalting (), often denoted as supercritical deasphalting when using near their critical point, serves as a non-catalytic pretreatment or standalone method to separate deasphalted oil (DAO) from asphaltene-rich residues using light hydrocarbons like as . This typically yields 50-70% DAO, which can be further processed in downstream units, while the remaining is directed to or other disposal, enhancing overall flexibility when integrated before a coker. SDA's lower energy demands make it cost-effective for partial upgrading, though it does not fully eliminate the need for residue handling. Among emerging technologies as of 2025, variants and supercritical water processes offer pathways toward zero-coke residue conversion, focusing on or hydrothermal to maximize and gas yields. For instance, ebullated-bed hydrocracking like the H-Oil process achieves around 70% conversion of heavy crudes by recirculating unconverted oil, providing higher throughput for opportunity crudes while minimizing sediment formation. These innovations prioritize complete residue utilization but often require advanced catalysts or conditions to suppress . In trade-offs, alternatives like hydrocracking and reduce or eliminate production, enhancing product value and environmental compliance, yet they demand significantly more —up to 2-3 times that of —and higher inputs for compression and heating. Consequently, delayed coking remains favored for its low and straightforward carbon rejection strategy in cost-sensitive operations.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Tutorial: Delayed Coking Fundamentals
    Mar 9, 1998 · Delayed coking is a thermal cracking process used in petroleum refineries to upgrade and convert petroleum residuum (bottoms from atmospheric ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Coking 101 An Introduction to Delayed Coking
    The objective of the Coker is to process the asphalt-like material to produce higher value products, such as gasoline, diesel fuel, LPG, and petroleum coke.
  3. [3]
    Delayed Coking | FSC 432: Petroleum Refining
    All of the heat necessary for coking is provided in the heater, whereas coking takes place in the coke drum; hence, the process is called “delayed coking.”
  4. [4]
    Delayed coking - Sulzer
    The Delayed Coker Unit uses dual coke drums to which process feed is alternated, while one drum is being filled the second drum is being cooled.
  5. [5]
    Coking is a refinery process that produces 19% of finished ... - EIA
    Jan 28, 2013 · With delayed coking, two or more large reactors, called coke drums, are used to hold, or delay, the heated feedstock while the cracking takes ...
  6. [6]
    SMM: Macro Fundamentals May Drive Up the Price Center of ...
    Apr 18, 2025 · - As of 2024, China's refinery delayed coking unit capacity was approximately 151 million mt/year, up 1.28% YoY, continuing the growth trend.
  7. [7]
    Delayed Coker Unit Market Research Report 2035
    The Delayed Coker Unit Market Size was valued at 6.56 USD Billion in 2024. The Delayed Coker Unit Market is expected to grow from 6.8 USD Billion in 2025 to 9.7 ...
  8. [8]
    40 CFR 63.641 -- Definitions. - eCFR
    Delayed coking unit means a refinery process unit in which high molecular weight petroleum derivatives are thermally cracked and petroleum coke is produced in ...
  9. [9]
    Estimating delayed coker yields - DigitalRefining
    The delayed coking unit (DCU) is one of the most important carbon rejection secondary processing units for upgrading heavier fractions of crude oil residues ( ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Delayed coking as a sustainable refinery solution - DigitalRefining
    Delayed coking is a carbon rejection technology using heavy petroleum residues to produce lighter hydrocarbon distillates (inclusive of naphtha and coker gasoil) ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Tutorial: Delayed Coking Fundamentals - Colorado School of Mines
    Mar 9, 1998 · Delayed coking is a thermal cracking process used in petroleum refineries to upgrade and convert petroleum residuum (bottoms from atmospheric ...
  12. [12]
    Delayed Coking & Delayed Coker Unit Reference Guide
    Delayed coking is a refinery unit operation that upgrades the lowest value bottoms material (vacuum resid) from the atmospheric or vacuum distillation column.
  13. [13]
    Bottom of the Barrel Conversions: What Does the Future Hold?
    May 16, 2019 · Delayed coking has been popular for its relative low costs. The delayed coker will provide some with a 70-75% conversion rate.
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Delayed Coking
    Typical Delayed Coking Unit​​ Initial steam purge fed to fractionator. Further purge directed to blowdown system.
  15. [15]
    U.S. Number and Capacity of Petroleum Refineries - EIA
    Jun 20, 2025 · Data Series · Area. 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, View History. Number ... Delayed Coking. 2,882,762, 2,807,362, 2,773,432, 2,775,612 ...Missing: global | Show results with:global
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Outlook on global refining to 2028 - EIA
    Aug 3, 2024 · In January 2024, the Basrah refinery completed construction of a long-delayed crude oil distillation unit (CDU) with a capacity of 70,000 b/d.
  17. [17]
    Delayed coker design and project execution - DigitalRefining
    Delayed coking units can handle a variety of feedstocks such as petroleum-derived resids, cracked materials (pyrolysis tar and cycle oils), tar sands bitumen, ...Missing: properties | Show results with:properties
  18. [18]
    Coking | IntechOpen
    Aug 5, 2022 · Delayed coking is a severe form of thermal cracking process that operates at low pressures, without the use of hydrogen and catalysts, and falls ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Petroleum Residue Upgrading Via Delayed Coking - CORE
    Feedstock should have low metal, asphaltenes, CCR and wax content;. The aromatic content, sulphur content and CCR for three feedstocks that are known to be ...
  20. [20]
    US8147676B2 - Delayed coking process - Google Patents
    Typically, such feedstocks are high-boiling hydrocarbonaceous materials having a nominal initial boiling point of about 525° C. or higher, an API gravity of ...Missing: CCR | Show results with:CCR
  21. [21]
    (PDF) Petroleum Residue Upgrading Via Delayed Coking: A Review
    Aug 6, 2025 · Petroleum Residue Upgrading Via Delayed Coking: A Review. Wiley. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering. February 2007; 85(1):1 - 24. DOI ...
  22. [22]
    Molecular-level reaction network in delayed coking process based ...
    Dec 31, 2021 · Free radical chain reaction theory is widely used to explain the mechanism of thermal cracking reaction, includes chain initiation, chain ...
  23. [23]
    Coking Drum - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A well-designed delayed coker will have an operating efficiency of better than 95%, although delayed coking units are generally scheduled for shutdown for ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Impact of Feed Properties and Operating Parameters on Delayed ...
    Mesophase converts to coke. • Asphaltenes & very high MW aromatics rapidly convert to coke skipping mesophase. • Thermal Cracking is endothermic. • Condensation ...
  25. [25]
    Two Kinds of Coke | FSC 432: Petroleum Refining
    The major properties of the needle coke include a low coefficient of thermal expansion, a low puffing (sudden volume expansion) tendency during graphitization ...
  26. [26]
    Petroleum Coke – A Complete Guide - East Carbon
    Oct 30, 2024 · Petcoke's density typically lies within 1.4 g/cm³. This translates to a small, potent fuel source from this concentrated carbon content. Its ...
  27. [27]
    Diesel hydrotreating and Delayed coking | All Publications - FCC SA
    Oct 25, 2024 · Coker naphtha. The naphtha produced from the delayed coking process is rich in olefins, diolefins, aromatics and sulfur compounds, and can ...
  28. [28]
    Coker naphtha hydrotreating - DigitalRefining
    When olefin saturation is not properly controlled, this may lead to a premature shutdown, as excessive coke formation will take place due to gum formation/ ...
  29. [29]
    Intelligent switching expert system for delayed coking unit based on ...
    This study establishes a knowledge database of intelligent switching expert system by analyzing the on-site data and operator's experiences.
  30. [30]
    5 AI Optimization Tips to Reduce Downtime in Coker Units - Imubit
    Sep 19, 2025 · Discover proven AI strategies to prevent unplanned coker outages. Learn how refineries secure millions in savings through AI optimization.
  31. [31]
    DCU Timeline in the United States - Coking.com
    Nov 2, 2013 · 1930. The development of hydraulic decoking by Shell Oil at Wood River, Illinois. In delayed coking the use of pressure with heat for cracking ...Missing: invention Baytown 1937
  32. [32]
    August | 2014 | FSC 432: Petroleum Refining
    Aug 4, 2014 · A catalytic refinery incorporated new thermal and separation processes such as delayed coking, visbreaking, and deasphalting. The catalytic ...
  33. [33]
    Increase reliability and profitability in delayed coking units
    The coking process dates back as far as the later 1920s, around 1929 when Standard Oil in Whiting, IL started the first delayed coker unit. Delayed coking ...
  34. [34]
    Delayed Coking Unit (DCU) - WSI Specialty Welding
    The delayed coking unit (DCU) is a batch-continuous process that produces petroleum coke. It involves preheating, feeding residual oil, thermal cracking, and ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  35. [35]
    US4961840A - Antifoam process for delayed coking - Google Patents
    This invention relates to an improved delayed coking process using antifoam additives to reduce foaming in the process. ... US4961840A 1990-10-09 Antifoam process ...
  36. [36]
    Predictive Maintenance for Oil and Gas Operations - Akselos
    Operations teams can easily create a predictive maintenance strategy for oil and gas operations by leveraging structural digital twins. Find out how today!
  37. [37]
    Combination of hydrotreating and delayed coking technologies for ...
    The combination of hydrotreating and delayed coking is technically and economically better than using each process alone, with highest benefit of 57.7 USD·m −3.
  38. [38]
    Reliance's Jamnagar 'super' refinery completes 25 yrs of operations
    Dec 29, 2024 · More importantly, the 27 million tonnes a year (560,000 barrels per day) capacity unit was built at nearly 40 per cent lesser cost (per tonne) ...Missing: delayed coker 2020s
  39. [39]
    Calcined Petroleum Coke Market Size, Share & Industry Forecast ...
    Sep 18, 2025 · Anode segment is expected to account for more than 67.4% calcined petroleum coke market share by the end of 2035. Low in metals and sulfur, ...
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
    Petroleum Coke - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The products of the coking process are gas, gasoline, gas oil, and coke. In a typical delayed coking arrangement, two coke drums are used; one is being ...
  42. [42]
    Factbox: What are graphite electrodes and needle coke? - Reuters
    Sep 21, 2017 · Graphite electrodes are the main heating element used in an electric arc furnace, a steelmaking process where scrap from old cars or ...
  43. [43]
    Petroleum Coke in United States Trade
    In July 2025, United States exported Petroleum Coke mostly to India ($38.7M), Canada ($36.1M), Brazil ($34.9M), China ($25.6M), and Mexico ($24.6M). During the ...
  44. [44]
    Most U.S. petroleum coke is exported - U.S. Energy Information ... - EIA
    Nov 14, 2024 · U.S. power generators' consumption of petcoke has been in steady decline over the past 10 years, falling by more than half from 4.4 million tons ...
  45. [45]
    Petroleum Coke Prices, News, Chart, Analysis and Demand
    During the second quarter of 2025, petroleum coke prices in China reached 311 USD/MT in June. ... In India, Q2 2025 petroleum coke prices were affected by ...
  46. [46]
    Calcined Petroleum Coke Price Trends, Chart, Index And Forecast
    In Q3 2025, Petroleum Coke price in the USA dropped by 8.57%, with FOB offers ranging USD 67–77 per metric ton. The Petroleum Coke price trend in the USA ...<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Decarbonizing Aluminum Production - Mighty Earth
    1 Most petcoke is considered low grade, which contains high levels of sulphur and other contaminants like heavy metals. A lot of this petcoke is exported to ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Energy Argus Petroleum Coke
    Jul 9, 2025 · US green petroleum coke exports to China reached a six-year low in May, as sellers avoided the destination after Beijing threatened high tariffs ...
  49. [49]
    Integration of FCC Unit with Hydrocracker and Delayed Coker Units
    Jun 12, 2017 · The FCC unit can serve as a lifeline when refineries have a surplus in some half-products, thanks to its robust nature and “flexible” ...Missing: modern | Show results with:modern
  50. [50]
    FCC and HDS feed flexibility and integration with the delayed coker ...
    FCC and HDS feed flexibility and integration with the delayed coker in the Izmit refinery ... Operational flexibility is one of the key parameters that leads to ...Missing: modern configurations hydrocrackers
  51. [51]
    Venezuela's 'Black Gold': the Petrocedeño (formerly Sincor) upgrader
    Jun 12, 2025 · The distillates are sent for hydrotreating, while the short residue goes to the coking conversion process. Delayed coking unit. This unit ...
  52. [52]
    SINCOR Project Turns 200 000 b/d of Extra Heavy Oil Into High ...
    Jun 11, 2000 · ... Orinoco Belt, and to market the synthetic crude (syncrude). ... Essentially, the upgrading consists in delayed coking of the vacuum residue ...
  53. [53]
    Coprocessing & Plastic Circularity: Technology Insights (Part A)
    May 28, 2025 · IOCL R&D has created a new method to turn waste plastic into fuel using the Delayed Coker Unit (DCU). This method is called 'INDEcoP2F ...
  54. [54]
    US11597882B2 - Co-processing of biomass oil in coker
    U.S. Patent Application Publication 2010/0024283 describes co-processing of various types of raw biomass and vegetable oils in a delayed coking environment.
  55. [55]
    Enhancement of liquid/gas production during co-pyrolysis of vacuum ...
    Oct 1, 2024 · The present study shows the possibility of considerably reducing the amounts of waste plastic by exploiting delayed coker units while harvesting ...
  56. [56]
    A Model-Based Investment Assessment for Heavy Oil Processing in ...
    Dec 18, 2019 · Heavy crude oils contain high fractions of residue and are generally classified by the density measure of API gravity of less than 20. The ...
  57. [57]
    Fundamentals of Delayed Coking Joint Industry Project
    Oct 22, 2025 · These cokers produce 154,607 tons of coke per day and delayed coking accounts for 88% of the world capacity. The delayed coking charge capacity ...
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Emissions Estimation Protocol for Petroleum Refineries
    Apr 1, 2015 · ... Coking Units ... Delayed Coking Units .................................................................................................
  59. [59]
    Coking | FSC 432: Petroleum Refining
    The common objective of the three coking processes is to maximize the yield of distillate products in a refinery by rejecting large quantities of carbon in the ...
  60. [60]
    Petroleum Coke in the Urban Environment: A Review of Potential ...
    May 29, 2015 · The main threat to urban populations in the vicinity of petcoke piles is most likely fugitive dust emissions in the form of fine particulate ...
  61. [61]
    Organic matter in delayed coking wastewater - ScienceDirect.com
    Nov 1, 2020 · Delayed coking is a common resid conversion process used in refining operations. A large amount of oil-containing wastewater is produced ...Missing: emissions | Show results with:emissions
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Adopt Rule 1114 – Petroleum Refinery Coking Operations - AQMD
    May 3, 2013 · The following assumptions are used to assist in the estimation of VOC emissions from delayed coking operations. 1. The approximation of the ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] How the New Subpart Ja Regulations will Affect Your Refinery
    EPA has added three work practice standards to reduce VOC, NOX, and SO2 emissions from delayed coker units, flares, and sulfur recovery units. Note that VOCs ...
  64. [64]
    Coke Drum Monitoring Case Study: Preventing Fire and Explosion
    May 2, 2025 · Delayed coker units are the heart of heavy oil upgrading operations in refineries across the GCC. And the coke drum is the heart of coker unit.
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Hazards of Delayed Coker Unit (DCU) Operations - OSHA
    Steam is introduced to strip out any remaining oil, and the drum is cooled (quenched) with water, drained, and opened. (unheaded) in preparation for decoking.Missing: COD | Show results with:COD
  66. [66]
    New Edition of API 510 Enhances Safety of Pressure Vessel ...
    The American Petroleum Institute published a new edition of API Standard 510 specifying the in-service inspection, repair, alteration and rerating activities ...Missing: delayed coker drum<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Delayed Coker Automation & Interlocks | Refining Community
    - They are passive systems waiting for a signal prior to acting. - Delayed Coker Interlocks do NOT meet the definition of a. Safety Instrumented System (SIS), ...Missing: API 510 acoustic emission PPE training
  68. [68]
  69. [69]
    Directive 99/92/EC - risks from explosive atmospheres - EU-OSHA
    May 3, 2018 · This Directive lays down minimum requirements for improving the safety and health of workers potentially at risk from explosive atmospheres.
  70. [70]
    The NIS 2 Directive | Updates, Compliance, Training
    NIS 2 (Directive (EU) 2022/2555) is the European Union's updated framework for cybersecurity, replacing the original NIS Directive (2016).Missing: refineries | Show results with:refineries
  71. [71]
    The History of Chemical Engineering at Exxon - ACS Publications
    Jun 1, 1980 · ... fluid cat cracking, fluid coking, and the Flexicoking process. Fluid hydroforming was a disappointment. Reactor engineering and separations ...
  72. [72]
    Fluid and Flexi-Coking | FSC 432: Petroleum Refining
    Higher temperatures and short residence times in the reactor lead to higher liquid and lower coke yields compared with those of delayed coking. Coke is ...
  73. [73]
    New developments enhance attractiveness of Flexicoking technology
    May 1, 1982 · The first commercial Flexicoking unit was started up at the Toa Oil Company in Kawasaki, Japan, in September 1976.
  74. [74]
    Resid Conversion (FLEXICOKING™) - ExxonMobil Chemical
    FLEXICOKING technology produces a full range of products, from a C1+ reactor gas to C5/975°F (525°C) liquid products, the multi-purpose flexigas and a small ...
  75. [75]
    [PDF] Energy and Environmental Profile of the U.S. Petroleum Refining ...
    The Most Commonly Used Coking Processes Are Delayed Coking and Fluid Coking ... Estimated Energy Use in Fluid Coking/Flexicoking—2005. Energy Source. Specific ...
  76. [76]
    [PDF] North American Heavy Oil, Oil Sands, and Oil Shale Resources
    Nov 10, 2006 · Flexicoking units are comparable to capital expenditures for delayed coking, while other studies report capital costs for Flexicoking that ...
  77. [77]
    Hydrocracking Reaction - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Typically, hydrocrackers operate at temperatures between 290 and 425 °C (550 and 800 °F) and pressures between 8275 and 20,700 kPa (1200 and 3000 psig). High ...
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Advances in residue hydrocracking - Chevron Lummus Global
    The LC-Max process is an inte- gration of solvent deasphalt- ing with LC-Fining which can increase conversion to 90 wt%. • Replacement of the tra- ditional ...
  79. [79]
    Advances in residue hydrocracking - DigitalRefining
    Delayed coking is simple, robust, and can handle very high levels of feed contaminants. Roughly 25-30% of the residue is rejected as petroleum coke, or petcoke.
  80. [80]
    From Reaction Mechanism Over Catalysts to Kinetics and Industrial ...
    Nevertheless, the capital and operating costs of industrial hydrocrackers remain generally higher than those of thermal crackers and coking installations and, ...
  81. [81]
    Solvent Deasphalting (SDA) - Axens
    The upgrading of atmospheric residue (AR) or vacuum residues (VR) into light distillates (naphtha, diesel oil, VGO, DAO) is the solution to eliminate the ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] sulzer
    Solvent-free process. Typical yield 80-95%. Solvent process. Typical yield 50-70%. No solvent or additives. No filter or separator. Little maintenance needed.<|control11|><|separator|>
  83. [83]
    Residue upgrading - DigitalRefining
    Solvent deasphalting (SDA) is used for residue upgrading by separating valuable oils and resins from aromatic components, recovering high-quality oils.
  84. [84]
    Emerging technologies for catalytic gasification of petroleum residue ...
    This paper surveys and briefly discusses the state-of-the-art thermo- and catalytic chemical conversion technologies for petroleum residue derived fuels.
  85. [85]
    Improvements of Ebullated-Bed Technology for Upgrading Heavy Oils
    Most commercial H-Oil process applications operate in the 50-70-vol% residue conversion range with a desulfurization level of 70-85 wt%. A schematic of the ...
  86. [86]
    Commercial Ebullated Bed Vacuum Residue Hydrocracking ... - MDPI
    Mar 15, 2023 · Their achievable conversion rate reported in the literature is 60%. Intercriteria analysis was used to assess data from a commercial vacuum ...