Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Kinesthetic learning

Kinesthetic learning, also known as tactile or hands-on learning, is an educational approach and proposed learning style in which individuals best acquire and process information through physical activities, movement, touch, and direct manipulation of objects, emphasizing active engagement over passive observation or listening. This style is particularly suited to learners who thrive on experiential methods, such as building models, conducting experiments, or role-playing scenarios, as these activities leverage sensory-motor pathways to enhance and knowledge retention. The concept of kinesthetic learning forms one pillar of the Visual, Aural, Read/Write, Kinesthetic (VARK) model, a typology popularized in the late 20th century by educator Neil Fleming, though its roots trace back to early 20th-century influences including Maria Montessori's emphasis on sensory-based education, psychological studies by William James and Wilhelm Wundt on personality and perception, and Grace Fernald's kinesthetic method for remedial reading instruction. Initially developed for students with learning disabilities in the pre-1960s era, the VARK framework expanded in the 1960s and 1970s to address broader educational equity, gaining widespread adoption through learning style inventories and alignment with Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences in the 1980s. Key characteristics of kinesthetic learners include a preference for whole-body movement, tactile exploration, and practical application, often leading to fidgeting or difficulty in static lecture environments without physical involvement. In educational practice, kinesthetic learning is applied across disciplines to boost engagement and outcomes; for instance, in STEM fields through laboratory work and manipulatives, in language arts via dramatic enactments, and in anatomy education by crafting physical models like clay structures or crochet replicas to build spatial understanding. Benefits include improved memory retention, heightened focus, and stronger problem-solving skills, as physical actions reinforce neural connections and facilitate deeper comprehension. However, the validity of discrete learning styles such as kinesthetic has faced significant scrutiny in educational psychology, with research indicating limited empirical support for tailoring instruction solely to these categories, viewing them instead as a neuromyth with over 90% of teachers believing in it despite evidence favoring multimodal approaches.

Definition and Overview

Core Definition

Kinesthetic learning, also referred to as tactile or hands-on learning, is an educational approach that emphasizes acquiring knowledge and skills through physical activities, touch, and body movement, distinguishing it from more passive methods like visual observation or auditory instruction. This style involves active engagement with the environment, where learners process information most effectively by manipulating objects or performing actions that reinforce conceptual understanding. Common examples of kinesthetic activities include conducting hands-on experiments to explore scientific principles, engaging in scenarios to simulate historical events, and building physical models to grasp spatial relationships in subjects like or . These practices allow learners to internalize abstract ideas through direct sensory-motor experiences, such as molding clay to represent anatomical structures or rearranging physical cards to organize literary concepts. In multimodal learning environments, kinesthetic elements complement other sensory inputs, such as visual aids or verbal explanations, to enhance memory retention and overall by engaging multiple neural pathways simultaneously. This supports diverse learners by providing physical that deepens understanding and improves long-term . The term "kinesthetic learning" emerged in the as part of broader sensory-based learning theories, evolving from early typologies like the visual-auditory-kinesthetic (VAK) model.

Distinction from Other Learning Modalities

Kinesthetic learning, which emphasizes physical movement, touch, and hands-on manipulation to process and retain information, differs fundamentally from other primary learning modalities by prioritizing tactile and motor engagement over passive sensory input. In contrast, relies on graphical representations such as images, diagrams, and spatial layouts to facilitate comprehension, allowing learners to absorb concepts through of visual cues. Auditory learning, on the other hand, centers on sound-based inputs like lectures, discussions, and oral explanations, where information is internalized via listening and verbal interaction. Reading/writing learning involves textual engagement, where learners prefer , reading materials, and writing summaries to encode knowledge through linguistic processing. These distinctions highlight how kinesthetic learners thrive on active bodily involvement, such as building models or , whereas the others depend more on perceptual or symbolic mediation without direct physical action.
ModalityPrimary InputKey ActivitiesExample Application
Kinesthetic, touch, physical Hands-on experiments, simulations, gesturesAssembling puzzles to learn
VisualImages, diagrams, spatial visualsViewing charts, videos, mind mapsInterpreting graphs in
AuditorySounds, speech, musicListening to podcasts, group debatesMemorizing facts through rhythmic
Reading/WritingText, symbols, Reading articles, journaling, listsOutlining essays to structure arguments
The framework provides a common lens for these distinctions, categorizing learners based on preferences for Visual, Auditory, Reading/Writing, and Kinesthetic approaches. indicates that preferences for specific modalities, including kinesthetic, can enhance learner and , yet they do not consistently predict superior academic outcomes across all contexts. For instance, a of 39 studies found small effects of matching teaching methods to self-reported style preferences on achievement ( 0.13), with negligible impacts on long-term retention or performance compared to mismatched approaches. Similarly, experiments with kinesthetic activities in science education showed heightened participation among tactile learners but equivalent test scores to those using visual or auditory methods. Multimodal integration often proves more effective than isolated modality use, with kinesthetic elements serving to reinforce rather than replace other styles. Studies on environments demonstrate that combining kinesthetic tasks, such as interactive simulations, with visual aids or auditory instructions improves overall comprehension by leveraging multiple sensory pathways, particularly in complex subjects like or . This approach aligns with cognitive load theory, where kinesthetic reinforcement reduces extraneous processing and supports deeper encoding when integrated with visual or textual elements. Criticisms of rigid modality divisions underscore the flexibility of learner preferences, suggesting that individuals adapt across styles based on task demands rather than fixed traits. A comprehensive review of learning styles research concluded that strict categorizations, including kinesthetic isolation, lack robust empirical support and may oversimplify cognitive processes, as preferences vary by context and can shift with experience or instruction. Further evidence from studies reveals overlapping neural activations across , indicating that kinesthetic learning engages similar brain regions for as visual or auditory methods, challenging binary distinctions. A 2024 of 21 studies on matching found small positive effects (Hedges' g = 0.31) but noted low study quality and infrequent benefits, reinforcing the limited practical value of style-specific tailoring as of 2024.

Historical Development

Origins and Early Concepts

The concept of kinesthetic learning traces its philosophical roots to , where emphasized as a process of acquiring virtues through repeated physical actions and practice, rather than mere intellectual contemplation. In his , argued that moral character develops via habitual engagement in activities, forming dispositions through bodily repetition that align thought with action. This idea of learning through doing prefigured later educational theories by highlighting the role of motor activity in formation. In the early , these philosophical foundations evolved into practical educational approaches, notably through John Dewey's advocacy for experiential learning. Dewey, in works such as (1916), posited that education should integrate active, hands-on experiences to foster genuine understanding, critiquing passive rote methods in favor of learning derived from physical interaction with the environment. His movement influenced the shift toward incorporating movement and manipulation in classrooms to connect abstract ideas with concrete actions. Concurrently, introduced tactile and elements in the 1910s through her child-centered method, developed in Rome's district starting in 1907. In The Montessori Method (1912), she described sensory-based materials designed for hands-on manipulation, enabling children to explore concepts via touch and , which she observed enhanced concentration and skill acquisition in underprivileged youth. Montessori's emphasis on "education of the senses" through practical activities like sorting geometric forms or pouring water laid groundwork for recognizing kinesthetic modalities in . Early 20th-century experiments in sensory education further advanced these ideas, particularly in remedial and vocational contexts. Psychological studies from the onward, examining mental imagery and recall, began distinguishing visual, auditory, and kinesthetic (or tactile-motor) preferences, as traced in historical analyses of learning typologies. For instance, researchers in the explored kinesthetic aids for reading disabilities, such as Fernald's kinesthetic tracing , using manipulation to improve retention. These efforts paralleled industrial programs, such as those inspired by Taylor's principles in The Principles of Scientific Management (1911), which prioritized practical skill drills over memorization to boost worker efficiency through repetitive physical tasks. The Smith-Hughes Act of 1917 formalized this in U.S. by funding vocational programs focused on hands-on trades in agriculture, industry, and . Such precursor concepts in sensory and motor education influenced later frameworks, including Howard Gardner's bodily-kinesthetic intelligence in his multiple intelligences theory (1983), which built on these early emphases on physical dexterity as a distinct cognitive domain. The VAK model, formalized decades later, would synthesize these tactile-motor elements into a structured typology.

Evolution in Educational Theory

Following World War II, kinesthetic learning gained traction within progressive education frameworks, particularly through Jean Piaget's theories in the 1950s, which emphasized the sensorimotor stage of cognitive development where infants and young children acquire knowledge primarily through physical interactions and motor activities with their environment. This stage, spanning birth to approximately two years, highlighted the role of sensory-motor coordination in building foundational understanding, influencing educators to prioritize hands-on exploration over rote memorization in early childhood curricula. Piaget's constructivist approach, detailed in works like The Origin of Intelligence in Children (1952), aligned kinesthetic elements with active learning, promoting progressive methods that encouraged child-led physical experimentation to foster cognitive growth. In the 1970s and , kinesthetic learning concepts rose in prominence with the development of Fleming's model in 1987, which categorized learners into visual, auditory, reading/writing, and kinesthetic preferences, providing a practical tool for tailoring instruction. Fleming's framework, initially created for classrooms, quickly popularized in teacher training programs during the late and , as online inventories made it accessible for educators to assess and adapt to students' needs, including kinesthetic approaches like movement-based activities. This integration into helped embed kinesthetic strategies into mainstream , emphasizing their role in engaging diverse learners beyond traditional formats. During the 1990s and 2000s, kinesthetic learning expanded through its alignment with constructivist theories—building on Piaget's foundations—and its incorporation into education, where hands-on, experiential methods became central to interdisciplinary curricula aimed at developing problem-solving skills. For instance, with the introduction of the acronym by the U.S. in 2001, initiatives proliferated, promoting kinesthetic activities such as building models and simulations to enhance conceptual understanding in science and . However, this period also saw growing critiques from evidence-based research, which questioned the efficacy of tailoring instruction strictly to kinesthetic styles, with meta-analyses showing no significant advantages over mixed-method approaches and highlighting potential mismatches in learner outcomes. Post-2010 developments have centered on neuroeducation debates, where studies have explored kinesthetic learning's neurological basis, such as activation in motor and sensory cortices during physical tasks, to validate its contributions to skill acquisition while cautioning against over-reliance on style-specific . Concurrently, adaptive technologies like (VR) have emerged to simulate kinesthetic experiences, enabling immersive, movement-oriented learning in digital environments that address limitations of traditional methods, particularly in remote or resource-constrained settings. These tools, integrated into platforms since the mid-2010s, represent a shift toward evidence-informed enhancements rather than unsubstantiated style matching.

Theoretical Models

VARK Framework

The VARK framework, developed by educator in 1987 while at Lincoln University, provides a questionnaire-based approach to identifying individual preferences for processing information through four sensory modalities: Visual (V), Aural (A), Read/Write (R), and Kinesthetic (K). This model, first detailed in a 1992 publication co-authored with Colleen Mills, aims to promote self-awareness in learning and teaching by categorizing preferences rather than fixed styles, emphasizing that most people are . The framework has been influential in educational settings, with the free online administered to millions worldwide to guide personalized study strategies. In the VARK model, the Kinesthetic (K) modality specifically refers to a for learning through physical experiences, touch, movement, and concrete practice, often involving real or simulated actions to internalize concepts. Kinesthetic learners benefit from strategies that incorporate hands-on engagement, such as conducting simulations and role-plays to model processes, performing lab work or experiments to apply theories, and using physical note-taking methods like writing detailed summaries by hand, creating timelines with tactile elements, or practicing skills through repetition and trial-and-error. These approaches leverage personal experiences and real-world examples, such as field trips or case studies with practical demonstrations, to enhance retention and understanding over passive methods. The questionnaire consists of 16 multiple-choice items, each describing a learning or communication with four response options aligned to the V, A, R, or K modalities; respondents may select one or more options that resonate with them. Scoring is straightforward: responses are tallied for each modality, yielding four scores that reveal the dominant preference(s)—a single high score indicates a unimodal learner, while balanced scores suggest , which applies to approximately 66% of respondents according to VARK data as of 2023. This identification process encourages learners to adapt strategies contextually, such as prioritizing kinesthetic activities when scores favor K. Empirical research supports the VARK questionnaire's construct validity for measuring self-perceived preferences, with studies confirming its utility in predicting engagement and strategy use among diverse student populations. For instance, Espinoza-Poves et al. (2018) found the questionnaire useful for identifying learning preferences among business students. However, limitations include modest for actual learning outcomes, as evidence does not strongly support the "meshing hypothesis" that matching instruction to VARK preferences yields superior results; an influential 2008 review by Pashler et al. found no rigorous empirical confirmation of such benefits, attributing gains more to general instructional quality. A 2024 further confirmed no significant effects for matching instruction to modality preferences. Critics also note potential oversimplification, with classifications complicating targeted interventions.

Alternative Classifications

While the VARK model primarily categorizes into visual, auditory, reading/writing, and kinesthetic preferences, alternative frameworks integrate kinesthetic elements within broader classifications of intelligence, experiential processes, or multidimensional preferences. Howard Gardner's , introduced in 1983, posits eight distinct intelligences, one of which is bodily-kinesthetic intelligence, defined as the capacity to use one's body effectively for movement, coordination, and manipulation of objects. This intelligence manifests in activities requiring physical skill, such as , , , or craftsmanship, where learners excel through tactile and motor engagement rather than abstract verbalization. Gardner argued that bodily-kinesthetic intelligence is independent of other forms like linguistic or logical-mathematical, allowing individuals to process and retain information through physical enactment. David Kolb's experiential learning theory, outlined in 1984, describes learning as a cyclical process involving four stages: concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation. The concrete experience stage particularly aligns with kinesthetic learning, emphasizing hands-on and trial-and-error interaction with the to grasp concepts intuitively. Learners favoring this quadrant, often termed "accommodators," prefer direct physical involvement over passive theorizing, such as building models or to internalize knowledge. The Felder-Silverman learning style model, developed in 1988 for , classifies preferences along four dimensions, including active versus reflective processing, where active learners engage kinesthetically through application and discussion. In this , kinesthetic elements are subsumed under active experimentation, contrasting with reflective learners who prefer ; active styles involve physical , group problem-solving, and immediate to reinforce understanding. The Dunn and Dunn learning styles model includes five stimuli categories—environmental, emotional, sociological, physiological, and psychological—incorporating physiological factors like tactile and kinesthetic preferences alongside sensory sensitivities. These elements address perceptual modes including kinesthetic intake through varied stimuli. Additionally, non-Western classifications, such as those in indigenous traditions, highlight tactile and kinesthetic approaches; for instance, Aboriginal Australian pedagogies integrate hands-on, community-based techniques like storytelling through physical enactment and land-based exploration to foster holistic learning. Similarly, studies on Indigenous learners note a preference for kinesthetic modalities involving interactivity and group embodiment of cultural knowledge.

Cognitive Mechanisms

Kinesthetic Memory Processes

Kinesthetic learning relies heavily on , a form of implicit that enables the acquisition and execution of skills through repeated physical actions without conscious awareness. This memory system facilitates the gradual improvement of motor abilities, such as coordinating hand-eye movements, where initial deliberate efforts transition into fluid performance via consistent repetition. Through iterative practice, neural connections strengthen, leading to —the state where actions become effortless and require minimal cognitive resources, as seen in routine tasks like buttoning a shirt or shifting gears while driving. Encoding in kinesthetic memory occurs through sensory-motor loops, where tactile feedback and proprioceptive signals from movements form distinct engrams—neural traces that represent learned motor patterns—separate from the declarative memory system responsible for factual recall. These loops integrate sensory input, such as the feel of a tool or the resistance of an object, with motor output to create robust, action-specific representations that support skill refinement without verbal mediation. Unlike declarative encoding, which relies on hippocampal-mediated associations, kinesthetic engrams emerge from error-driven adjustments in sensorimotor circuits, ensuring movements are calibrated for efficiency and accuracy. Retention of kinesthetic memories is enhanced by spacing effects, where distributed physical practice over intervals allows for better and long-term accessibility compared to massed sessions. For instance, in motor skill acquisition like , practicing key sequences across multiple days rather than in a single block leads to superior performance gains and reduced errors during delayed retention tests. Similarly, in sports such as , spaced drills for serving techniques promote deeper integration of muscle patterns, resulting in more stable skill retention over weeks. Forgetting curves for kinesthetic tasks, inspired by Ebbinghaus's original work on verbal retention but adapted for procedural skills, illustrate a rapid initial decline in performance followed by stabilization, though less steep than for declarative material due to the implicit nature of motor memory. Studies on show that without , motor proficiency can decline significantly within days, but retrieval mitigates this decay, preserving in tasks like finger sequencing. This pattern underscores the importance of periodic reactivation to counteract and maintain engram stability in kinesthetic contexts.

Types of Skill Memory Involved

Kinesthetic learning relies heavily on implicit, or non-declarative, memory systems, which enable the acquisition of skills through unconscious processes such as priming and classical or via repeated physical actions. In these mechanisms, individuals perform movements without explicit awareness of the underlying rules, leading to in tasks like or , where strengthens neural connections without verbalizable knowledge. This form of is particularly suited to kinesthetic contexts, as it supports the gradual refinement of motor patterns through , minimizing during execution. Although primarily implicit, kinesthetic learning incorporates explicit, or declarative, components during early stages, involving the to foster conscious awareness and encoding of movement sequences. For instance, learners may initially verbalize or visualize steps in a new dance routine, drawing on to build a foundational understanding before transitioning to more automated recall. This hippocampal engagement facilitates strategic adjustments, such as correcting posture in , but diminishes as skills become proceduralized. Perceptual-motor memory further underpins kinesthetic learning by integrating sensory —proprioceptive, tactile, and vestibular inputs—with motor outputs to refine skills requiring and . In activities like maintaining balance during or , this type processes real-time environmental cues to adjust actions, enhancing coordination without deliberate thought after . Research in highlights its role in error correction, where sensory discrepancies drive improvements in timing and force application. These types form a in kinesthetic skill acquisition, progressing from basic reflexes and to complex, sequenced actions as described in cognitive models of . At the foundational level, simple reflexes like to repeated stimuli build into conditioned responses, such as dodging in , while higher levels involve integrated sequences, exemplified by playing a where multiple motor programs coordinate hierarchically. This progression, from cognitive awareness to autonomous execution, aligns with seminal frameworks in , emphasizing how initial explicit strategies yield to implicit hierarchies for efficient performance.

Neurological Foundations

Brain Regions and Pathways

Kinesthetic learning, which emphasizes physical movement and tactile experiences, engages specific brain regions critical for motor planning, execution, and refinement. The (M1), located in the , is responsible for planning and initiating voluntary movements by generating motor commands to muscles. The contributes to coordination and error correction during movement, using internal models to predict and adjust sensory outcomes for smooth execution. Meanwhile, the facilitate habit formation and action selection through dopamine-modulated loops that reinforce learned motor sequences over time. Sensory integration in kinesthetic learning relies on the somatosensory cortex to process tactile and proprioceptive inputs, enabling the of position and . This region, particularly Brodmann areas 2, 5, and 7, activates during kinesthetic , mirroring patterns observed in actual physical tasks. These somatosensory areas connect to the , which provides executive control by integrating sensory data with cognitive oversight to guide adaptive motor behaviors. Key neural pathways underpin these processes, including the , which transmits voluntary motor signals from the to spinal for precise muscle activation. Feedback loops involving , relayed through and spinal circuits, allow real-time adjustments by modulating afferent signals and inhibiting irrelevant inputs to refine skilled movements. These pathways enable the and to interact with cortical areas, supporting iterative learning through sensory-motor convergence. Neuroimaging studies from the 2010s provide evidence for these activations in kinesthetic contexts. Functional MRI (fMRI) research on kinesthetic illusions and motor imagery revealed heightened activity in premotor cortices, parietal lobules, and basal ganglia during self-referential movement simulation, indicating a network for sensory-motor integration without primary motor execution. Electroencephalography (EEG) studies demonstrated increased movement-related cortical potentials and beta-band event-related desynchronization in the motor cortex following short-term motor training, reflecting enhanced neural efficiency in kinesthetic skill acquisition. Such findings underscore the distributed circuitry's role, with repeated activation contributing to neuroplastic changes that strengthen these pathways over time.

Neuroplasticity in Kinesthetic Learning

Repeated kinesthetic activities, such as physical practice of motor skills, promote through synaptic strengthening via (LTP) in regions like the primary motor area (). LTP enhances synaptic efficacy between neurons, facilitating more efficient signal transmission and supporting the consolidation of learned movements. This process is evident in models where motor induces LTP-like changes, leading to expanded motor maps and improved performance on skilled tasks. Physical practice also drives structural neuroplasticity, including dendritic growth and spine formation in M1 pyramidal neurons, which increases connectivity and storage capacity for motor memories. For instance, intensive training in rats results in higher synapse density in motor areas, correlating with behavioral adaptations and long-term skill retention. Aerobic exercises, a form of kinesthetic engagement, further amplify these changes by elevating (BDNF) levels, which stimulate dendritic arborization and in cortical and hippocampal regions involved in . In childhood, heightened during sensitive periods enhances kinesthetic learning, particularly for foundational motor and . These periods, typically in the first few years, feature elevated in motor circuits, allowing gestures and physical interactions to scaffold by strengthening sensorimotor integrations. For example, early use predicts later growth, as it leverages motor pathways to reinforce linguistic neural networks during peak plasticity windows. In adults, kinesthetic interventions harness for rehabilitation, notably in where movement therapy induces cortical reorganization and synaptic remodeling. Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT), involving intensive use of the affected limb, boosts ipsilesional excitability and dendritic changes, leading to measurable functional gains in upper extremity control. Aerobic and robotic-assisted exercises similarly upregulate like BDNF, promoting recovery through enhanced in perilesional areas. As of 2025, research continues to explore advanced kinesthetic approaches for . For instance, a demonstrated that kinesthetic motor imagery-based brain-computer interface (BCI) training combined with (tDCS) improved motor recovery in patients by enhancing neuroplastic changes in motor networks.

Identification and Characteristics

Signs of Kinesthetic Learners

Kinesthetic learners often display observable behavioral traits that indicate a for physical engagement in learning. These individuals tend to fidget, tap objects, or shift positions frequently during sedentary activities such as lectures, as they process more effectively through . They may struggle with prolonged passive listening or reading, showing signs of restlessness or reduced attention, yet they excel in hands-on environments like experiments, , or group activities involving of objects. for collaborative tasks over solitary study further highlights their inclination toward interactive, physical involvement. Self-reported preferences among kinesthetic learners commonly include enjoyment of activities that incorporate building models, drawing diagrams, or pacing while reviewing material, as these methods allow for tangible interaction with concepts. They often report fatigue or disengagement from purely theoretical or abstract tasks without physical elements, favoring instead simulations, , or real-world applications to encode information. Such preferences stem from a perceptual that connects learning to concrete experiences like touching, feeling, or practicing skills. In children, signs of kinesthetic learning may manifest as excessive drawing, using manipulatives like blocks or playdough to explore ideas, or acting out stories and concepts through movement to demonstrate understanding. These behaviors help young learners build focus and cognitive connections via physical play. Among adults, indicators include gravitating toward hands-on professions such as carpentry, physical therapy, or mechanics, where practical skills and bodily coordination are central to daily tasks. Adults may also show strong muscle memory and spatial awareness, recalling procedures best through repeated physical practice. A common misconception is that all highly active or energetic individuals are kinesthetic learners; however, kinesthetic preference specifically involves learning through tactile and experiential means, not mere hyperactivity or general without purposeful . This distinction underscores that observable activity alone does not confirm the learning style, which is better identified through consistent preferences for hands-on processing across contexts.

Diagnostic and Assessment Tools

The questionnaire, developed by and Colleen Mills in 1992, serves as a foundational for identifying learning preferences across four modalities: visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic. Consisting of 16 multiple-choice items, each presenting a learning with options reflecting different sensory preferences, the allows respondents to select one or more answers per question. The kinesthetic subscale is derived by tallying responses that emphasize hands-on, experiential approaches, such as preferring to learn by doing, touching, or moving, with scores indicating the strength of this preference relative to other modalities. Validation studies have demonstrated its , with of 0.77 for the kinesthetic subscale. Beyond , the Index of Learning Styles (ILS), formulated by Richard Felder and Linda Silverman in 1988, provides another validated instrument through its 44-item assessing four of learning preferences. The active/reflective particularly relates to kinesthetic learning, where higher active scores signify a preference for physical engagement, group discussions, and practical application over solitary reflection. This subscale, comprising 11 items, helps differentiate kinesthetic-oriented learners who thrive on manipulation of materials or real-time problem-solving, with test-retest reliability reported as moderate to high across dimensions. The Productivity Environmental Preference Survey (PEPS), created by Rita and Kenneth Dunn along with Genevieve Price in 1987, offers a broader via a 100-item forced-choice format that profiles 20 learning style elements, including perceptual modalities. Within its perceptual subscale, kinesthetic preferences are measured through items gauging affinity for learning via whole-body , touch, or physical , often scored on a from strong to negligible influence. This tool's kinesthetic component has shown moderate in workplace and settings. Observational approaches provide non-self-report alternatives, relying on structured teacher checklists to evaluate behaviors indicative of kinesthetic preferences, such as frequent , preference for , or superior retention in physical simulations over verbal explanations. These checklists, often comprising 10-20 behavioral indicators rated on Likert scales, can be paired with performance assessments in tasks to gauge consistency in kinesthetic engagement. Empirical studies indicate that such methods offer a practical to questionnaires in settings when standardized. Self-report instruments like , ILS, and face limitations from response biases, including overestimation of preferred styles due to self-perception inaccuracies, as evidenced in meta-analyses showing low convergence with actual learning outcomes. Research underscores these issues, noting that cultural and motivational factors can inflate self-identifications without corresponding behavioral evidence. To address this, emerging hybrid digital assessments combine self-reports with behavioral tracking, such as analyzing interaction logs from simulations or adaptive e-learning platforms, enhancing validity through .

Educational Applications

Classroom Strategies

Although the concept of discrete learning styles such as kinesthetic has faced scrutiny for lacking strong empirical support, with research favoring multimodal and approaches, strategies incorporating and hands-on experiences can enhance and comprehension across subjects. These approaches transform passive lecture-based into dynamic, movement-oriented activities that allow students to interact physically with content, fostering deeper understanding through tactile and motor involvement. Educators can implement these strategies by incorporating manipulatives, collaborative tasks, and experiential outings, ensuring they align with goals while accommodating diverse class sizes and resources. Activity-based methods form the core of kinesthetic classroom practices, promoting active participation to reinforce abstract concepts. Group projects encourage students to build models or perform experiments collaboratively, such as constructing geometric shapes with everyday materials in mathematics to visualize spatial relationships. Manipulatives like blocks or counters enable tangible exploration of numerical operations, helping learners internalize addition and subtraction through physical arrangement and rearrangement. In history lessons, reenactments of historical events allow students to embody roles, such as simulating debates or battles, which strengthens narrative recall and empathy. Field trips to museums or natural sites provide real-world immersion, where students handle artifacts or navigate environments to connect theoretical knowledge with sensory experiences. These methods not only sustain attention but also cater to varying energy levels by distributing physical demands across the group. Effective lesson planning for kinesthetic learning involves deliberate pacing and time allocation to balance cognitive demands with physical needs. Teachers should incorporate regular movement-integrated segments and short bursts of activity, such as brain breaks with simple exercises like or object passing, to prevent and maintain . Pacing lessons with transitions to active stations—rotating between discussion, , and reflection—ensures sustained involvement without overwhelming the schedule. This structured approach, informed by on spans, supports equitable participation and aligns with broader timelines. Technology aids have expanded kinesthetic opportunities, particularly through post-2020 developments in immersive tools. (VR) simulations enable safe, repeatable hands-on experiences, such as virtual dissections in or architectural walkthroughs in , where students manipulate digital objects via gestures to simulate real-world interactions. Interactive apps for virtual labs, like those using for chemistry experiments, allow device-based tactile feedback, bridging physical constraints in traditional classrooms. These tools enhance by providing multisensory engagement, with studies indicating improved skill transfer in subjects. As individualized extensions, they can complement group management techniques for varied learner needs. Meta-analyses of strategies, which encompass kinesthetic methods, demonstrate substantial benefits for retention and achievement in K-12 settings. One comprehensive review of studies found a strong of 1.204 (Hedges' g) for learning retention, indicating significantly higher persistence compared to traditional instruction. Similarly, kinesthetic-specific implementations, such as movement-integrated math activities, have shown retention gains through improved on-task and positive perceptions of learning efficacy. These evidence-based outcomes underscore the value of kinesthetic-inclusive classrooms in improving academic performance in targeted domains, based on aggregated s from hands-on interventions.

Management Techniques for Learners

Kinesthetic learners can employ self-management techniques that integrate physical movement and tactile engagement to enhance retention and focus during independent study. For instance, walking while reviewing notes or pacing during memorization sessions allows learners to process information through motion, thereby improving comprehension and reducing restlessness. Similarly, using manipulatives such as stress balls or creating physical models of concepts provides sensory feedback that reinforces abstract ideas, as physical interaction with materials aids in cognitive development. Incorporating short active breaks, like stretching or handling objects during study intervals, further sustains engagement by aligning with the learner's need for experiential methods. Parents and mentors play a crucial role in supporting kinesthetic learners by fostering environments that encourage hands-on activities outside formal settings. Encouraging participation in hobbies such as , crafts, or outdoor helps reinforce academic concepts through physical practice, leading to improved focus and confidence. For example, parents can guide children in applying or math skills during hikes or manipulative play, which qualitative studies show enhances comprehension and retention among kinesthetic learners with ADHD. Collaboration with specialists to integrate such activities also promotes behavioral improvements and academic outcomes, as parental ensures consistent reinforcement of tactile learning preferences. To address challenges like prolonged sedentary tasks, accommodations such as movement prompts and fidget devices prove effective for kinesthetic learners. Breaking study sessions with brief physical activities, like standing to manipulate puzzles or walking to discuss aloud, mitigates and boosts participation by allowing continuous motion. Fidget tools, including stress balls or sensory boards, provide subtle tactile input that regulates without disrupting , particularly benefiting those with ADHD by stimulating regions like the for better alertness. Recent studies from the early 2020s highlight how such kinesthetic aids, including rhythmic movements or flexible seating, improve attention and social-emotional skills in ADHD contexts, filling gaps in individualized support post-pandemic. Long-term, kinesthetic learning aligns with careers that emphasize hands-on engagement, such as trades, , or , leading to higher and resilience. A 10-year found that individuals with kinesthetic preferences (comprising 25% of participants) consistently gravitated toward physically interactive professions, with stable style alignment enhancing engagement over time. This orientation supports success in fields requiring practical application, where kinesthetic approaches foster deeper retention and adaptability compared to more styles.

References

  1. [1]
    Kinesthetic Learning: Hands-On Learning and Active Engagement
    Nov 7, 2024 · Kinesthetic learning, also known as tactile or hands-on learning, is an educational approach that emphasizes active participation and ...
  2. [2]
    Where did the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning style ...
    Nov 6, 2023 · The VAK model's origins trace to educators like Montessori, studies by James and Wundt, and the kinesthetic method of Grace Fernald. It was ...
  3. [3]
    Kinesthetic Learner's Multimodal Approach to Learning Anatomy - NIH
    Kinesthetic learners gain a broader visuospatial understanding of a given organ or structure in relation to general landscape by creating crochet and clay ...Description · Fig. 2 · Discussion
  4. [4]
    Why Kinesthetic Learning? - National Math Foundation
    Kinesthetic learning refers to a learning style that involves whole-body movement and tactile engagement. Kinesthetic learners process information best when ...
  5. [5]
    Accommodating students' learning styles differences in English ...
    Learners with the kinesthetic learning style learn best by doing moving around and handling physical objects. They need to have continuous movement and may find ...2.2. Neil Fleming's Vak/vark... · 4. Results And Discussion · 4.1. Results
  6. [6]
    Learning Styles as a Myth | Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning
    They propose that we can be categorized based on our “learning style” preferences. For example, a student can identify as a “kinesthetic learner,” which means ...At A Glance · What Are Learning Styles? · Learning Styles: A Neuromyth<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    [PDF] kinesthetic learning in the english classroom - Scholars Crossing
    Kinesthetic learning involves activities for kinesthetic learners, who may feel out of place in English classes lacking kinesthetic differentiation. They ...
  9. [9]
    The long origins of the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning style ...
    Jul 20, 2023 · This study traces the long early history of the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic (VAK) learning style typology.
  10. [10]
    The Montessori Method. - UPenn Digital Library
    The Montessori programme involves much direct social experience, both in the general life of the school and in the manual work done by the pupils; the ...
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Frederick W. Taylor: The Principles of Scientific Management, 1911
    These illustrations will cover different types of work, from the most elementary to the most complicated. If the above reasoning is correct, it follows that the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Smith-Hughes Act of - ERIC
    Act of 1917. This legislation was written to provide the States with financial resources and guidelines to support thedevelopment of Vocational.Missing: kinesthetic | Show results with:kinesthetic
  14. [14]
    Piaget's Theory and Stages of Cognitive Development
    Oct 22, 2025 · Jean Piaget's theory describes cognitive development as a progression through four distinct stages, where children's thinking becomes progressively more ...Missing: kinesthetic | Show results with:kinesthetic
  15. [15]
    Piaget's theory of education - THE EDUCATION HUB
    Mar 17, 2021 · Piaget argued that humans were active meaning-makers who construct rather than receive knowledge, with much capacity to improve intelligence over a lifetime.Missing: kinesthetic | Show results with:kinesthetic
  16. [16]
    Piaget's 4 Stages of Cognitive Development Explained - Verywell Mind
    May 1, 2024 · Psychologist Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has 4 stages: sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational, ...Missing: kinesthetic progressive 1950s
  17. [17]
    Introduction to VARK®:for better learning - VARK Learn
    ... developed in 1987 by Neil Fleming, Christchurch, New Zealand, was the first to systematically present a series of questions with helpsheets for students, ...The VARK Modalities · Neil Fleming · Understanding your results
  18. [18]
    What are VARK Learning Styles? - Defined Learning | Blog
    The VARK model was designed by Neil Fleming in 1987. In this model, Fleming developed a way to help students learn more about their preferences. VARK ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] Evolution Of Constructivism - ERIC
    The purpose of this paper is to summarize the evolution of constructivism and put a focus on social constructivism from the perception of Vygotsky. This study ...
  20. [20]
    The Evolution of STEM and STEAM in the U.S. - Resilient Educator
    Nov 3, 2017 · How did STEM and STEAM come to be, why is there a divide in beliefs, and where do we go from here? Read on.
  21. [21]
    Learning Styles Debunked: There is No Evidence Supporting ...
    Dec 16, 2009 · The answer is no, according to a major report published in Psychological Science in the Public Interest, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
  22. [22]
    Evidence-Based Higher Education – Is the Learning Styles 'Myth ...
    “Individuals learn better when they receive information in their preferred Learning Style (e.g., auditory, visual, kinaesthetic),” with which 58% agreed. The ...
  23. [23]
    (PDF) Neuroscience of Kinesthetic Learning - ResearchGate
    Oct 28, 2024 · This abstract explores the neuroscience underlying kinesthetic learning, highlighting the brain's intricate systems responsible for movement and sensory ...Missing: adaptive 2010
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Transforming Interactive Educational Content into Immersive Virtual ...
    Jul 22, 2024 · The aim of this research is to evaluate the usability of the developed IVR kinesthetic- based learning system as a learning tool in the ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    (PDF) The Dynamic Impact of Neuroscience and Artificial ...
    Sep 15, 2025 · The objective of this research is to understand the various ways that artificial intelligence (AI) and neuroscience are used in education.
  26. [26]
    Biographies of the Founders of VARK®
    Neil Fleming was a learner and a teacher. His main research interest was in how people learn and how they use their modality preferences in their communication.
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    VARK Learning Styles - Helping you learn better
    VARK is a learning styles questionnaire that helps you learn better by suggesting the study strategies that are best for you.Questionnaire · The VARK Questionnaire · The VARK Modalities · Neil FlemingMissing: items scoring
  29. [29]
    The VARK Modalities: Visual, Aural, Read/write & Kinesthetic
    Fleming and Mills (1992) suggested these four modalities that seem to reflect the experiences of students and teachers.Visual (v) · Aural / Auditory (a) · Read/write (r)
  30. [30]
    Kinesthetic Learning Strategies - VARK
    ### Kinesthetic Strategies Summary
  31. [31]
    The Relationship Between the VARK Learning Styles and Academic ...
    Jan 8, 2020 · The VARK questionnaire is a standard tool, which its validity and reliability were assessed and confirmed in a study by Zhu (2018). The Persian ...
  32. [32]
    (PDF) Exploring the VARK model: a review of the validity and ...
    Jun 16, 2023 · The review found that the VARK questionnaire is generally considered a valid and reliable tool for assessing an individual's learning style preference.
  33. [33]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|separator|>
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Learning Styles: A Review of Validity and Usefulness - ERIC
    Aug 18, 2016 · Current study gives a synthetic introduction of the existing strands of learning style categorizations, and critically discusses the limitations ...
  35. [35]
    Gardner's Theory Of Multiple Intelligences - Simply Psychology
    Mar 26, 2025 · He identified eight intelligences, including linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, musical, bodily-kinesthetic, interpersonal, ...Linguistic Intelligence (word... · Bodily-Kinesthetic Intelligence...
  36. [36]
    Howard Gardner's Theory of Multiple Intelligences
    Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence (ability to control one's body movements and to handle objects skillfully); Musical intelligences (ability to produce and ...
  37. [37]
    Kolb's Learning Styles & Experiential Learning Cycle
    Mar 19, 2025 · These styles are part of his Experiential Learning Cycle, which involves four stages: concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract ...Experiential Learning Cycle · Why These Four Stages? · Learning Styles
  38. [38]
    Kolbs Four Stages of Learning | CITT - University of Florida
    In Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development (1984), Kolb defined learning as “the process whereby knowledge is created ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] LEARNING AND TEACHING STYLES IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION
    The processing compo- nents of the kinesthetic modality are included in the active/reflective learn- ing style category. Page 6. 677 this one between the ...
  40. [40]
    (PDF) Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education
    Aug 7, 2025 · We adopt the Felder and Silverman learning style model [14] , which consists of eight main learning styles: Perception (sensory vs. intuitive), ...
  41. [41]
    Learning Styles, Preferences, or Strategies? An Explanation for the ...
    Apr 1, 2025 · Fallace, T. (2023). The long origins of the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning style typology, 1921–2001. History of Psychology, 26 ...
  42. [42]
    The Learning-Style Teaching Model - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · In short, this instrument presents five categories of stimuli (Searson & Dunn, 2001) : environmental, emotional, sociological, physiological, ...
  43. [43]
    Eight Aboriginal Ways of Learning
    The framework is expressed as eight interconnected pedagogies involving narrative-driven learning, visualised learning plans, hands-on/reflective techniques.
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Indigenous Learning Preferences and Interactive Technologies
    Indigenous students have well-developed visual-spatial abilities, use holistic learning, prefer kinesthetic modality, interactivity, group work, and enjoy ...
  45. [45]
    Memory systems of the brain: a brief history and current perspective
    This article traces the development of these ideas and provides a current perspective on how these brain systems operate to support behavior.Missing: seminal procedural
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Theoretical and Computational Analysis of Skill Learning, Repetition ...
    Skill learning, repetition priming, and automaticity. In this article, we have sketched a theory of procedural memory, focusing chiefly on its implications ...
  47. [47]
    Electrifying the motor engram: effects of tDCS on motor learning and ...
    The long-lasting effect of tDCS on motor function is likely due to the after-effect of tDCS and its ability to engrave new firing patterns in memory.
  48. [48]
  49. [49]
    Effectiveness of motor sequential learning according to practice ...
    In general, motor skills are more effectively learned when there is a long resting time between training intervals, a phenomenon called the spacing effect,,,,).
  50. [50]
    Retrieval-induced forgetting in declarative and procedural memory
    Over the past decade, several experiments have demonstrated that retrieval-induced forgetting also persists for motor responses–both simple and complex, and ...
  51. [51]
    Forgetting motor programmes: Retrieval dynamics in procedural ...
    When motor sequences are stored in memory in a categorised manner, selective retrieval of some sequences can induce forgetting of the non-retrieved sequences.
  52. [52]
    Structure and function of declarative and nondeclarative memory ...
    Nondeclarative memory is more encapsulated and has less access to systems not involved in the initial learning. Perceptuomotor Skill Learning. Another important ...
  53. [53]
    Procedural and Motor Learning
    Whereas declarative memory is often described as “knowing that,” procedural memory is considered “knowing how.” For example, it may be difficult for a pianist ...
  54. [54]
    Common mechanisms of human perceptual and motor learning - PMC
    The adult mammalian brain has a remarkable capacity to learn in both the perceptual and motor domains through the formation and consolidation of memories.
  55. [55]
    Does implicit motor learning lead to greater automatization of motor ...
    Sep 5, 2018 · As skill acquisition unfolds both explicit and implicit learning will result in more and more automated motor control, and eventually converge.
  56. [56]
    Understanding implicit and explicit sensorimotor learning through ...
    The results show remarkable time course differences between implicit and explicit learning: while explicit learning was rapid and large at the beginning, ...
  57. [57]
    Motor Memory - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Motor learning is the process by which the capability for skilled motor control becomes represented in memory. Motor memory is the product of learning. In this ...
  58. [58]
    Recent insights into perceptual and motor skill learning - PMC - NIH
    Skill learning can take place both in sensory and in motor tasks. Thus, sensory skill acquisition using perceptual learning tasks is measured by improvements in ...
  59. [59]
    The role of strategies in motor learning - PMC - NIH
    (B) Fitts and Posner model of skill acquisition. Their theory posits that skill acquisition follows three sequential stages: cognitive (black), associative ( ...
  60. [60]
    Learning and Memory (Section 4, Chapter 7) Neuroscience Online
    Nondeclarative memory, also called implicit memory, includes the types of memory systems that do not have a conscious component but are nevertheless extremely ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Modeling the Distinct Phases of Skill Acquisition
    Mar 2, 2015 · Another view goes back to the early proposal by Fitts and. Posner (1967) that a skill progresses through three qualitative stages: the cognitive ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Neurotransmitters, Cell Types, and Circuit Mechanisms of Motor Skill ...
    Feb 24, 2021 · The basal ganglia, cerebellum, and motor cortex are the brain areas involved in motor learning through their circuits (5, 10–12). Motor ...
  63. [63]
    Consensus Paper: Roles of the Cerebellum in Motor Control—The ...
    The cerebellum may function similar to a forward model by using efference copies of motor commands to predict the sensory effects (corollary discharge) of ...
  64. [64]
    The contribution of the basal ganglia and cerebellum to motor learning
    Apr 3, 2023 · We designed a systems-level computational model of motor learning, including a cortex-basal ganglia motor loop and the cerebellum that both determine the ...Missing: kinesthetic | Show results with:kinesthetic
  65. [65]
    Neuropsychological Activations and Networks While Performing ...
    It would appear that kinesthetic motor imagery promotes human sensibility by activating parts of the primary somatosensory cortex, the secondary somatosensory ...
  66. [66]
    Neural Kinesthetic Contribution to Motor Imagery of Body Parts
    Jul 13, 2021 · The findings suggest evidence for motor and somesthetic neural synchronization and underline the role of the parietofrontal network for the tongue imagery task ...
  67. [67]
    Converging integration between ascending proprioceptive inputs ...
    In this review, we first highlight key connections between corticospinal tract motor circuit and spinal interneurons that receive proprioceptive inputs.Missing: loops | Show results with:loops
  68. [68]
    Modulation of Proprioceptive Integration in the Motor Cortex Shapes ...
    Jun 27, 2012 · Here, we show in humans that attention to proprioceptive input during a purely sensory task can influence subsequent learning of a novel motor task.
  69. [69]
    Brain Regions Associated to a Kinesthetic Illusion Evoked by ...
    Aug 19, 2015 · In this study we investigated the cerebral network underlying a kinesthetic illusion induced by visual stimulation by using functional magnetic resonance ...
  70. [70]
    Quantification of Movement-Related EEG Correlates Associated with ...
    The aim of this study was to investigate how the EEG correlates (MRCP and ERD/ERS) from the motor cortex are modulated by short (single session in 14 subjects) ...
  71. [71]
    Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning - PubMed Central - NIH
    Sep 12, 2011 · Here, we review findings demonstrating functional and structural plasticity across different spatial and temporal scales that mediate motor skill learning.
  72. [72]
  73. [73]
    Effects of Physical Exercise on Neuroplasticity and Brain Function
    Dec 14, 2020 · Physical exercise (PE) has been associated with increase neuroplasticity, neurotrophic factors, and improvements in brain function.
  74. [74]
    Learning, neural plasticity and sensitive periods - PubMed Central
    First, we discuss differences in the mechanism of learning and plasticity during and after a sensitive period by examining how language exposure versus training ...Missing: gestures | Show results with:gestures
  75. [75]
    Early Communicative Gestures Prospectively Predict Language ...
    These findings suggest that children's gestures may provide insight into, or bolster, the cognitive abilities needed for successful performance on EF tasks.
  76. [76]
    Exploring the transformative influence of neuroplasticity on stroke ...
    Aug 7, 2023 · These findings indicate that physical therapy induces neuroplastic changes that contribute to functional recovery in stroke patients. A recent ...
  77. [77]
    Effects of Virtual Reality Motor-Cognitive Training for Older People ...
    Sep 11, 2024 · VRMCT is effective in promoting cognitive functions and reducing physical frailty and is well tolerated and accepted by older people with cognitive frailty.
  78. [78]
    Effects of Virtual Reality Cognitive Training on Neuroplasticity - NIH
    Dec 6, 2023 · Our data suggest the potential effectiveness of a VR-based rehabilitation approach in promoting neuroplastic changes even in the chronic ...Missing: kinesthetic longitudinal
  79. [79]
    [PDF] Not Another Inventory, Rather a Catalyst for Reflection
    In this article the authors focus on the use of a modal preferences questionnaire as a catalyst to empower students to reflect on their own.
  80. [80]
    VARK Questionnaire: How do you learn best?
    Use the VARK questionnaire to find out your learning style - do you prefer to use Visual, Aural, Read/write or Kinesthetic learning strategies, or a combination ...VARK · Kinesthetic Strategies · VARK For Teachers and Trainers · Using VARK
  81. [81]
    [PDF] The VARK Questionnaire (Version 8.01)
    I want to find out more about a tour that I am going on. I would: a. look at details about the highlights and activities on the tour. b. use a map and see where ...
  82. [82]
    Assessment of learning styles of undergraduate medical students ...
    The questionnaire is designed to identify the following four sensory modalities: visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic (8) (hence the acronym VARK).
  83. [83]
    Index of Learning Styles | Resources for Teaching and Learning STEM
    ### Summary of Felder-Silverman Index of Learning Styles (ILS)
  84. [84]
    [PDF] In-Depth Analysis of the Felder-Silverman Learning Style Dimensions
    The Index of Learning Styles (ILS), developed by Felder and Soloman, is a. 44-item questionnaire for identifying the learning styles according to FSLSM. As ...
  85. [85]
    Productivity Environmental Preferences Survey (PEPS) Areas
    TruTalent Learning & Productivity (formerly called The PEPS Learning Style Inventory and Strengths for Success) analyzes 16 different preferences for adults.Missing: Perceptual | Show results with:Perceptual
  86. [86]
    Correlations between Clinical Judgement and Learning Style ...
    The Dunn and Dunn Learning Style Model, with its questionnaire, the 'Productivity Environmental Preference Survey' (PEPS) focuses on elements that are crucial ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] designing strategies that meet the variety of learning styles - ERIC
    A student survey was administered to determine a preferred learning style and the researchers used observation checklists, formal assessment, and informal ...
  88. [88]
    The Process of Creating a Learning-Teaching Style Assessment
    This paper describes the process of creating a new observational assessment that identifies learning styles of individual children and recommends appropriate ...Missing: reliability | Show results with:reliability
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Identification of Learning Styles Existent among Students Attending ...
    Individual student learning style profiles with a consistency score less than 70 were excluded from further study as were individual student learning style ...
  90. [90]
    Evidence for a Common Multi-Modal Learning Style in Young Adults ...
    The aim of the current study was to examine the psychometric properties and relationship between, two modality-specific learning style inventories.
  91. [91]
    [PDF] The effects of incorporating kinesthetic learning on learning ...
    Jun 23, 2022 · Purposeful movement that connected directly to the vocabulary and/or content, was incorporated when applicable. In instances such as vocabulary ...<|separator|>
  92. [92]
    [PDF] Impact of Kinesthetic Learning on Student Knowledge Retention and ...
    Apr 14, 2017 · This research study examines the impact of kinesthetic learning on student knowledge retention and attitudes toward mathematics. Specifically, ...Missing: meta- | Show results with:meta-
  93. [93]
    [PDF] Perspectives on Movement in the Classroom and Strategies that ...
    Apr 27, 2023 · Overall, incorporating kinesthetics into the classroom involves more than adding it as a strategy to help strengthen students' learning. This ...
  94. [94]
    [PDF] The Kinesthetic Classroom: Teaching and Learning through ...
    Dec 5, 2019 · Brain breaks are useful for giving necessary content breaks, state management, incorporating fun into a lesson, and re-focusing attention.
  95. [95]
    Virtual reality in education: global trends, challenges, and impacts ...
    Jul 3, 2025 · Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a transformative technology in education, enabling immersive simulations that foster student engagement and improve ...
  96. [96]
    (PDF) Active Learning Improves Academic Achievement and ...
    This meta-analysis examines the effects of active learning on K-12 students' academic achievement and learning retention.
  97. [97]
    Kinesthetic Learning Style | Houghton University
    A kinesthetic-tactile learning style requires that you manipulate or touch material to learn. Learn more with the Center for Student Success.
  98. [98]
    [PDF] Parents' Perceptions of Kinesthetic Learning and Academic ...
    Feb 10, 2022 · Research shows that parental perceptions of potentially effective interventions tend to impact students' academic outcomes (Dotterer & ...
  99. [99]
    Accommodating students' learning styles differences in English ...
    Jun 21, 2023 · 2.2. Neil Fleming's Vak/Vark model ... This model is one of the most common and widely used models. It follows types of learning styles as visual ...
  100. [100]
    How Does Fidgeting Enhance Focus for Individuals with ADHD?
    Research suggests that fidgeting can aid in cognitive processing. The act of fidgeting may help individuals with ADHD to concentrate better by providing a ...
  101. [101]
    [PDF] Kinesthetic Learning and Engaging Students with ADHD (in the ...
    This literature review seeks to explore how teachers engage students with. Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (hereinafter known as ADHD) or children with.
  102. [102]
    (PDF) Learning Styles and Career Choice: A Longitudinal Study
    Nov 10, 2024 · This longitudinal study investigates the relationship between individuals' learning styles and their career choices over time.