Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Microfluidics

Microfluidics is the science and technology of systems that process or manipulate small amounts of fluids (typically 10⁻⁹ to 10⁻¹² liters, or nanoliters to picoliters) using channels with dimensions of tens to hundreds of micrometers.^[1] At this microscale, fluid behavior is dominated by laminar flow and low Reynolds numbers, where viscous forces prevail over inertial ones, leading to predictable, diffusion-driven transport rather than turbulent mixing seen in macroscale systems.^[1] The high surface-to-volume ratio in microfluidic channels enhances reaction efficiency, reduces reagent consumption, and enables precise control over chemical and biological processes, making it a multidisciplinary field intersecting physics, chemistry, engineering, and biology.^[2] The field originated in the late 1970s with early efforts in miniaturized gas chromatography and capillary electrophoresis for analytical chemistry, evolving through microfabrication techniques borrowed from the semiconductor industry.^[3] A pivotal advancement came in the 1990s with the introduction of soft lithography using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), pioneered by George M. Whitesides and colleagues, which allowed rapid, low-cost prototyping of flexible microfluidic devices and spurred widespread adoption.^[3] By the early 2000s, concepts like lab-on-a-chip (LOC) and micro total analysis systems (μTAS) had formalized the integration of multiple laboratory functions onto single chips, transforming microfluidics from niche tools to versatile platforms.^[3] Key fabrication methods include photolithography for rigid materials like silicon and glass, soft lithography for polymers such as PDMS, and emerging techniques like 3D printing for complex geometries, enabling customization for diverse applications. In biomedicine, microfluidics supports point-of-care diagnostics (e.g., rapid pathogen detection via PCR chips), organ-on-a-chip models for drug testing (simulating lung, liver, or kidney functions), and targeted drug delivery systems like microneedles for insulin administration. Chemical applications encompass nanomaterial synthesis, such as uniform iron oxide nanoparticles for imaging, while environmental uses involve pollutant detection and water remediation through integrated sensors. Recent advances as of 2025 include microfluidic cooling for high-performance AI chips and enhanced droplet systems for personalized medicine.^[2]^[4]^[5] These capabilities have positioned microfluidics as a cornerstone for high-throughput, portable technologies in research and industry.^[2]

History and Development

Origins in Microfabrication

The development of microfluidics traces its technological foundations to the microfabrication techniques pioneered for integrated circuits in the mid-20th century. Photolithography emerged in the late 1950s as a method to transfer patterns onto semiconductor wafers using light-sensitive photoresists, enabling precise feature sizes down to micrometers. Concurrently, wet chemical etching processes were refined to selectively remove material and create three-dimensional structures, with early demonstrations at Fairchild Semiconductor in 1959 integrating these steps into the planar process for transistor fabrication. These innovations, initially driven by the need to miniaturize electronics, provided the core tools—patterning, masking, and etching—for subsequent adaptations in fluidic systems. In the 1980s, researchers began repurposing these semiconductor methods for handling fluids at microscales. At Ciba-Geigy, Andreas Manz and H. Michael Widmer explored photolithographic patterning and isotropic etching on silicon and glass to fabricate open-channel structures for chemical analysis, aiming to integrate sample preparation, separation, and detection in compact devices. Their work culminated in the 1990 proposal of miniaturized total chemical analysis systems (µTAS), which envisioned photolithography-derived microchannels for electrokinetic fluid propulsion and sensing, fundamentally shifting analytical chemistry from macroscopic to integrated microscale platforms. This adaptation highlighted the compatibility of IC fabrication with fluidics, though challenges like biocompatibility and sealing persisted.^[6] Early experimental demonstrations solidified these concepts in the early 1990s. In 1993, D. Jed Harrison and colleagues at the University of Alberta micromachined glass chips using photolithography and hydrofluoric acid etching to create capillary channels for electrophoresis, achieving separations of fluorescent dyes in under 30 seconds via electroosmotic flow.^[7] This work marked a key transition from conceptual designs to functional microscale fluid control, demonstrating high efficiency and minimal sample volumes compared to traditional capillaries.^[7] Parallel influences came from inkjet printing technologies; Hewlett-Packard's thermal inkjet heads, developed in the late 1970s through experiments with vapor-bubble-driven droplet ejection, provided early insights into precise microscale liquid manipulation and ejection, predating microfluidic droplet applications.^[8] Key publications in the 1990s further advanced accessible fabrication routes. George M. Whitesides and Younan Xia introduced soft lithography in the mid-1990s, using elastomeric polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) molds cast from photolithographically defined masters to replicate microchannels without cleanroom etching, enabling rapid prototyping for fluidic devices. Their comprehensive 1998 review detailed techniques like microcontact printing and replica molding, emphasizing biocompatibility and cost-effectiveness for biological interfaces. These contributions bridged rigid semiconductor methods with flexible polymer-based approaches, paving the way for lab-on-a-chip evolution.

Key Milestones and Evolution

The 1990s marked a pivotal era for microfluidics, transitioning from conceptual prototypes to practical applications in biotechnology. A key advancement was the development of soft lithography by George M. Whitesides and colleagues in 1998, which introduced polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) as a versatile material for rapid prototyping of microfluidic devices through techniques like replica molding and microcontact printing. This method democratized device fabrication by enabling low-cost, non-cleanroom alternatives to traditional silicon-based processes, fostering widespread adoption in labs worldwide. Concurrently, commercialization accelerated with the launch of Affymetrix's GeneChip in 1996, the first widely available DNA analysis microarray that integrated microfluidic principles for high-throughput gene expression profiling.^[9] These innovations laid the groundwork for lab-on-a-chip systems, emphasizing miniaturization for faster, more efficient biological assays. In the 2000s, microfluidics emerged as a distinct interdisciplinary field, driven by novel actuation methods and dedicated forums for collaboration. The introduction of electrowetting-on-dielectric (EWOD) by Michael G. Pollack and colleagues in 2000 enabled precise, programmable manipulation of discrete droplets without mechanical pumps, pioneering digital microfluidics for applications in portable diagnostics and chemical synthesis. This technique, which uses electric fields to alter surface wettability, addressed limitations of continuous-flow systems by allowing reconfigurable operations on chips. The field's maturation was further solidified by the µTAS (Micro Total Analysis Systems) conference series, which began in 1994 following Andreas Manz's 1990 proposal of integrated miniaturized analysis platforms, providing a global platform for sharing advances in microfluidics since the early 1990s. By the decade's end, these developments had spurred investments in scalable production, with microfluidics increasingly applied in drug discovery and environmental monitoring. The 2010s witnessed significant commercialization and regulatory milestones, integrating microfluidics into clinical and research ecosystems. The i-STAT blood analyzer by Abbott Point of Care, utilizing microfluidic cartridges for rapid point-of-care testing of blood gases and electrolytes, received multiple FDA clearances throughout the decade, exemplifying the shift toward approved diagnostic devices that reduced lab turnaround times from hours to minutes.^[10] This system's cartridge-based design, which employs electrochemical sensors within microchannels, highlighted microfluidics' role in bedside medicine. Parallel growth occurred in organ-on-a-chip technologies, with Emulate, Inc. launching its lung-on-a-chip platform in 2014 based on earlier academic models that simulated alveolar mechanics using flexible PDMS membranes and cyclic stretching.^[11] These models replicated tissue-level responses to drugs and toxins more accurately than 2D cultures, accelerating preclinical testing and reducing animal use. By the 2020s, open-source designs and standardization initiatives have further propelled microfluidics toward accessibility and interoperability. Platforms like OpenMFDA, introduced in 2025, automate the design, verification, and fabrication of microfluidic devices using open-source tools, enabling non-experts to create custom chips for applications in synthetic biology and diagnostics.^[12] Standardization efforts, such as those outlined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and industry consortia, focus on uniform interfaces for connectors, materials, and protocols to facilitate modular assembly and regulatory compliance, with initiatives like cloud-based digital microfluidics design tools emerging to streamline global collaboration.^[13] These advancements have lowered barriers to entry, promoting widespread innovation in personalized medicine and sustainable manufacturing.

Principles and Fundamentals

Definition and Scale

Microfluidics is defined as the science and technology of systems that process or manipulate small amounts of fluids, typically in the range of 10^{-9} to 10^{-18} liters (nanoliters to attoliters), using channels with dimensions on the order of tens of micrometers.^[14] This field focuses on generating, controlling, and detecting fluid flows within microstructures, enabling applications in analytical chemistry and biology where precise handling of minute volumes is essential. Characteristic length scales in microfluidic systems typically range from 1 to 1000 μm, with channel widths and heights often between 10 and 500 μm.^[15] These dimensions result in exceptionally high surface-to-volume ratios, reaching up to 10^4 m^{-1}, which profoundly influences fluid behavior by amplifying interfacial effects relative to bulk properties. In contrast to macroscale fluidics, microfluidic environments render inertial forces negligible due to low Reynolds numbers (typically Re << 1), allowing for highly ordered laminar flows and enabling unprecedented precision in fluid manipulation for tasks such as chemical synthesis and single-cell analysis.^[14] This shift in dominant forces—favoring viscous and surface effects—distinguishes microfluidics from conventional systems and underpins its utility in miniaturized laboratory-on-a-chip devices. Microfluidics represents a multidisciplinary domain at the intersection of fluid mechanics, materials science, and microelectronics, drawing on principles from each to design integrated systems for diverse applications ranging from diagnostics to drug discovery.^[14]

Physical Characteristics

At the microscale, surface tension emerges as a dominant force governing fluid behavior in microfluidics, enabling passive flow mechanisms such as capillary filling and meniscus formation without the need for external pumps. In typical microfluidic channels with dimensions on the order of 1–100 μm, the Bond number, defined as Bo = \frac{\rho g L^2}{\sigma}, where \rho is fluid density, g is gravitational acceleration, L is the characteristic length, and \sigma is surface tension, is much less than 1, rendering gravitational effects negligible compared to capillary forces. This allows for precise control of liquid transport through surface wettability and geometry, as demonstrated in capillary-driven systems where meniscus curvature drives spontaneous filling.^[16] Viscosity plays a preponderant role in microfluidic environments due to the confinement in narrow channels, often leading to non-Newtonian behaviors even for fluids that appear Newtonian at macroscales, such as shear-thinning or viscoelastic effects in polymer solutions or biological fluids. In charged channels, electrokinetic phenomena, including electroosmotic flow and wall slip, arise from interactions between the electric double layer and applied fields, altering velocity profiles and enhancing transport efficiency. These effects are particularly pronounced in sub-micrometer features, where viscous forces overwhelm inertial ones, promoting stable, predictable flows.^[17]^[18] Mixing in microfluidics relies heavily on diffusion across short distances, with characteristic timescales for molecular diffusion over 1–100 μm ranging from fractions of a second to tens of seconds, depending on the diffusant's properties. The Péclet number, Pe = \frac{u L}{D}, where u is flow velocity, L is channel dimension, and D is the diffusion coefficient, typically exceeds 1 in these systems, indicating that advection dominates over diffusion and necessitating passive or active mixing strategies to achieve homogeneity. For instance, small molecules with D \approx 10^{-9} m²/s require about 10 seconds to diffuse across a 100 μm channel.^[17] The high surface-to-volume ratios inherent in microfluidic channels, often exceeding 10,000 m⁻¹ due to their small dimensions and elongated geometries, facilitate rapid heat and mass transfer, enabling efficient thermal management and integrated sensing capabilities. This allows for quick equilibration of temperature gradients, with heat diffusion times on the millisecond scale over micrometer lengths, supporting applications like PCR amplification or electrochemical detection within compact devices. Electrical properties are similarly enhanced, as the confined geometry promotes uniform field distribution and low-resistance pathways for electrokinetic actuation and sensing.^[17]^[19]

Fluid Dynamics and Scaling Laws

In microfluidics, fluid dynamics is governed by the interplay of viscous, inertial, surface tension, and other forces at microscale dimensions, where scaling laws dictate behavioral predictability. The small characteristic lengths (typically 1–100 μm) lead to dominance of viscous forces over inertial ones, enabling laminar flow regimes and analytical modeling. Dimensionless numbers quantify these relative force balances, providing a framework for designing microfluidic systems without extensive empirical testing. The Reynolds number, Re = \frac{\rho u L}{\mu}, where \rho is fluid density, u is velocity, L is a characteristic length (e.g., channel width), and \mu is dynamic viscosity, characterizes the ratio of inertial to viscous forces. In microfluidic channels, typical velocities range from 1 μm/s to 1 cm/s, yielding Re values between $10^{-6} and 10 for aqueous fluids, though higher values up to 100 can occur in larger or faster systems while maintaining laminarity. At low Re, the nonlinear inertial terms in the Navier-Stokes equations become negligible, simplifying to the linear Stokes equations: -\nabla p + \mu \nabla^2 \mathbf{u} = 0 and \nabla \cdot \mathbf{u} = 0, where p is pressure and \mathbf{u} is velocity; this derivation assumes steady, incompressible flow with negligible inertia, allowing reversible and time-independent solutions. For pressure-driven flows, common in microfluidic devices, the Hagen-Poiseuille law describes the volumetric flow rate Q in a cylindrical channel of radius r and length L under pressure drop \Delta P:

Q = \frac{\pi r^4 \Delta P}{8 \mu L}.

This parabolic velocity profile arises directly from solving the Stokes equations for axial flow, highlighting the fourth-power dependence on radius that amplifies flow sensitivity to channel geometry at microscales. In rectangular channels, analogous forms apply, such as Q = \frac{w h^3 \Delta P}{12 \mu L} for width w and height h, underscoring viscous dominance. Other dimensionless numbers capture additional effects: the capillary number Ca = \frac{\mu u}{\sigma}, with \sigma as surface tension, ratios viscous to interfacial forces and governs droplet stability, where low Ca (typically $10^{-3} to $10^{-1}) favors surface tension-driven deformation over viscous shearing. In curved channels, the Dean number De = Re \sqrt{\frac{D_h}{2 R_c}}, where D_h is hydraulic diameter and R_c is curvature radius, quantifies secondary Dean vortices arising from centrifugal forces, promoting mixing at De > 10–100 without turbulence. Microscale geometry imposes profound scaling effects: fluid volume scales as L^3, while surface area scales as L^2, elevating surface-to-volume ratios (up to $10^4 m^{-1}) and enabling rapid interfacial phenomena like adsorption or evaporation with minimal sample volumes (nanoliters). Diffusion times scale as t \sim \frac{L^2}{D}, where D is the diffusion coefficient; for biomolecules in water (D \approx 10^{-10} m²/s), this yields mixing times of about 1 second over 10 μm, far faster than convective macroscale mixing. These scalings reduce reagent needs and enhance control but demand precise surface management. The absence of turbulence at low Re confers high predictability, as flows admit exact analytical solutions from the Stokes equations, such as uniform sedimentation or precise particle trajectories, facilitating design via simple computations rather than chaotic macroscale simulations. This determinism underpins microfluidic applications in precise metering and separation.

Fabrication and Materials

Common Materials

Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) is one of the most prevalent polymers in microfluidic devices due to its elastomeric properties, optical transparency in the visible spectrum (>90%), and biocompatibility, enabling applications in cell culture and organ-on-chip systems. Its flexibility (Young's modulus of 1–3 MPa) facilitates rapid prototyping through soft lithography and supports active components like pneumatic valves, while its high gas permeability allows oxygen diffusion for long-term cell viability. However, PDMS exhibits hydrophobic wettability with a water contact angle of approximately 110°, which can promote nonspecific protein adsorption and requires surface treatments like plasma oxidation to achieve hydrophilic states (contact angle <10°). Additionally, its low dielectric constant (around 2.6 at 1 kHz) limits efficiency in high-voltage electrokinetic operations, and it swells in organic solvents like toluene, restricting use with non-aqueous fluids. Despite these drawbacks, PDMS remains favored for its low cost (approximately $50/kg) and ease of bonding to glass or itself. Glass, particularly borosilicate, and silicon are foundational inorganic materials prized for their superior chemical inertness and thermal stability, often employed in early microfluidic chips for capillary electrophoresis and harsh-environment assays. Glass provides exceptional optical quality with >90% transmittance across UV-Vis-NIR ranges and low autofluorescence, making it ideal for fluorescence microscopy and detection, alongside biocompatibility that supports direct cell contact without leaching. Its hydrophilic surface (contact angle <30°) aids laminar flow control in aqueous systems, and a dielectric constant of 4–7 enables robust electroosmotic pumping. Silicon offers precise nanoscale patterning via semiconductor processes and high mechanical strength (elastic modulus ~150 GPa), suitable for integrated sensors, though it lacks optical transparency and has a higher dielectric constant (~11.7) that can introduce unwanted conductivity in some electrokinetic setups. Both materials resist degradation from acids and bases but incur higher fabrication costs and require cleanroom facilities, positioning them for specialized, high-performance devices rather than disposables. Thermoplastics such as polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) are increasingly adopted for scalable production via injection molding, offering a cost-effective alternative (around $10–20/kg) with good optical and mechanical properties for commercial diagnostics. PMMA delivers high transparency (92% transmittance) and low autofluorescence, facilitating imaging in bioanalytical chips, with biocompatibility verified for short-term cell exposure and a moderate contact angle of ~70° that balances wetting for diverse fluids. Its dielectric constant (~3.5) supports moderate electrokinetic efficiency, though it softens above 100°C, limiting high-temperature uses. COC excels in chemical resistance to polar solvents and alcohols, UV transparency (down to 220 nm), and minimal water absorption (<0.01%), enhancing stability for disposable point-of-care devices; it is highly biocompatible, achieving >80% cell viability over 72 hours in assays.^[20] With a hydrophobic contact angle of 90°–100° and low dielectric constant (~2.2 at 1 MHz), COC suits electrowetting applications requiring electrical insulation but may need surface activation for improved wettability.^[20] Material selection in microfluidics hinges on balancing biocompatibility to minimize cytotoxicity (e.g., PDMS and COC for >90% cell survival in culture), wettability via contact angle θ to control capillary filling and droplet stability (hydrophilic for aqueous flows, hydrophobic for oil-based), and dielectric properties for electrokinetics like dielectrophoresis, where higher constants (e.g., glass at 4–7) enhance field gradients but risk dielectric breakdown.^[20] Optical clarity is prioritized for visualization (e.g., >90% transmittance in glass and thermoplastics), while cost and chemical resistance guide trade-offs—polymers for prototyping, inorganics for durability—ensuring device performance aligns with application demands like bioassays or chemical synthesis.^[20]

Traditional Fabrication Techniques

Traditional fabrication techniques for microfluidic devices primarily rely on cleanroom-based processes adapted from microelectronics and MEMS technologies, enabling the precise patterning and etching of channels with dimensions typically ranging from micrometers to sub-micrometers. These methods emphasize subtractive manufacturing and replication, providing high resolution and reproducibility essential for early microfluidic development. Photolithography serves as the foundational step, often followed by etching and replication processes like soft lithography or embossing to create functional devices from materials such as silicon, glass, or polymers.^[21] Photolithography involves coating a substrate, such as a silicon wafer, with a photosensitive polymer called photoresist, which is then exposed to ultraviolet (UV) light through a patterned mask to selectively define channel geometries. The exposed (or unexposed, depending on the resist type) regions are developed to reveal the pattern, achieving resolutions below 1 µm for fine features critical in microfluidics. This is followed by etching to transfer the pattern into the substrate: wet etching uses chemical solutions like hydrofluoric acid (HF) for isotropic removal in glass or silicon, producing smooth but rounded channels, while dry etching, such as reactive ion etching (RIE), employs plasma to achieve anisotropic profiles with vertical sidewalls and higher aspect ratios up to 10:1. These techniques, originating from semiconductor fabrication, enabled the first integrated microfluidic systems in the 1990s, though they require specialized cleanroom facilities and are best suited for prototyping masters rather than mass production.^[21]^[22]^[23] Soft lithography, introduced in 1998, extends photolithography by using elastomeric replication to produce low-cost, flexible devices outside full cleanroom environments. A master mold patterned via photolithography and SU-8 photoresist (with features down to 1 µm) is created, onto which polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) prepolymer is poured, cured, and peeled to form a negative replica containing open channels. This replica molding process allows rapid prototyping of biocompatible, optically transparent devices with resolutions from nanometers to hundreds of micrometers, and PDMS's elastomeric properties facilitate conformal contact for applications like cell culture. Widely adopted for its simplicity and accessibility, soft lithography has been pivotal in biological microfluidics, enabling over 10,000 citations of the foundational work by 2025.^[24] For scalable production, hot embossing and injection molding utilize thermoplastics like polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) or cyclic olefin copolymer (COC), offering high-throughput alternatives to silicon-based methods. Hot embossing heats a thermoplastic sheet above its glass transition temperature (e.g., 130–180°C for PMMA) and presses it against a rigid master mold under vacuum or pressure (typically 10–100 bar), replicating channels with aspect ratios up to 10:1 and surface roughness below 50 nm. This technique supports commercial devices, such as diagnostic cartridges, with cycle times of minutes per part once molds are prepared via lithography or machining. Injection molding, similarly, melts the thermoplastic (200–300°C) and injects it at high pressure (500–2000 bar) into a precision mold, cooling it to form closed or open channels with sub-micron resolution, ideal for volumes exceeding 10,000 units due to its automation and minimal material waste. Both methods excel in reproducibility for thermoplastic microfluidics, with hot embossing favored for smaller batches and injection for mass production.^[24]^[25] Sealing microfluidic channels requires bonding techniques to create leak-proof enclosures, with plasma activation being the standard for PDMS-glass interfaces. Oxygen plasma treatment (at 20–100 W for 30–60 seconds) oxidizes the surfaces, generating silanol (-SiOH) groups that form irreversible covalent siloxane (Si-O-Si) bonds upon contact, yielding burst pressures exceeding 500 kPa and compatibility with biological assays. This method, often performed in a reactive ion etcher, ensures strong adhesion without adhesives, though bonding must occur within 30 minutes of activation to maximize hydrophilicity and seal integrity. For thermoplastics, thermal bonding under pressure (e.g., 80–120°C for PMMA) or adhesive interlayers complement these processes, but plasma remains dominant for hybrid PDMS devices due to its precision and reversibility options via uncured PDMS layers.^[26]^[27]^[28]

Emerging Fabrication Methods

Emerging fabrication methods in microfluidics have shifted toward scalable, cost-effective, and environmentally conscious approaches that enable rapid prototyping of complex structures beyond the limitations of traditional cleanroom processes. These innovations leverage additive manufacturing, biocompatible substrates, and hybrid integrations to facilitate intricate designs, such as non-planar channels and multifunctional components, supporting diverse applications in diagnostics and analysis.^[29] Additive manufacturing techniques, particularly 3D printing variants like stereolithography (SLA) and two-photon polymerization (TPP), have revolutionized the creation of complex three-dimensional microfluidic channels with sub-micrometer precision. SLA employs ultraviolet light to cure photosensitive resins layer by layer, achieving resolutions down to approximately 25 µm for microfluidic features, while TPP utilizes femtosecond lasers to initiate polymerization at focal points, enabling intricate structures with resolutions as fine as 1 µm. These methods allow for the direct fabrication of enclosed channels and multilayer devices without assembly, significantly reducing production time compared to conventional lithography. For instance, in the 2020s, SLA-based projection micro-stereolithography has been used to print modular droplet generators capable of producing uniform droplets at rates exceeding 1 kHz, demonstrating enhanced reproducibility for high-throughput applications. Similarly, TPP has facilitated the printing of neuronal network culturing devices with precise microscale features for biological interfacing.^[29]^[30]^[31]^[32]^[33] Hydrogel and paper-based microfluidics represent biocompatible, disposable alternatives fabricated through accessible techniques like laser cutting and wax printing, prioritizing ease of use and low-cost production. Laser cutting employs CO2 or femtosecond lasers to pattern hydrogels or paper substrates, creating hydrophilic channels with widths as small as 30 µm while preserving material integrity for fluid transport via capillary action. Wax printing, meanwhile, involves inkjet printing hydrophobic wax patterns onto paper followed by thermal reflow, forming defined barriers for colorimetric assays and suitable for resource-limited settings. These methods yield flexible, biodegradable devices ideal for point-of-care testing, with hydrogel variants offering tunable mechanical properties for cell encapsulation and paper ones enabling solvent-free assembly. For example, laser-ablated nanoparticle-encased hydrogels have produced open, breathable microfluidic chips that mimic tissue environments without additional sealing.^[34]^[35]^[36]^[37] Nanofabrication hybrids integrate microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) with nanomaterials to produce multifunctional chips that combine structural precision with enhanced sensing capabilities. This approach typically involves depositing nanomaterials onto MEMS-fabricated substrates using chemical vapor deposition or solution gating, yielding devices with integrated electrodes for electrochemical detection. Graphene, valued for its high conductivity and large surface area, serves as a prominent example, where CVD-grown graphene electrodes are patterned onto silicon-based MEMS platforms to enable sensitive biomolecule detection with limits down to femtomolar concentrations. Such hybrids expand microfluidic functionality by incorporating real-time monitoring without compromising channel integrity, as demonstrated in multi-compartment platforms for multimodal biosensing.^[38]^[39]^[40]^[41] Sustainability trends in microfluidic fabrication emphasize recyclable polymers and solvent-free processes to minimize environmental impact, aligning with post-2020 efforts to address waste from disposable devices. Recyclable thermoplastics, such as polyethylene terephthalate derived from post-consumer sources, are increasingly used in extrusion-based printing to create reusable channels, reducing material consumption by up to 50% compared to virgin polymers. Solvent-free techniques, including hot embossing and mechanical punching on biodegradable substrates, eliminate toxic organic solvents, lowering the carbon footprint while maintaining feature resolutions above 50 µm. These advancements promote circular economies in microfluidics, with life-cycle assessments showing reduced energy use in production by 30-40% for green additive methods. Polymer challenges, such as swelling in aqueous environments, are mitigated through surface treatments in these sustainable frameworks.^[42]^[43]^[44]^[45]

Flow Regimes and Types

Laminar Flow and Reynolds Number

In microfluidics, laminar flow is characterized by parallel streamlines where fluid layers slide past each other with minimal disruption, resulting in no convective mixing beyond molecular diffusion. This regime is prevalent due to the small channel dimensions, typically on the order of micrometers, which ensure smooth and predictable fluid motion without the onset of turbulence. The stability of laminar flow in these systems is quantified by the Reynolds number (Re), a dimensionless parameter that compares inertial forces to viscous forces, defined as

Re = \frac{\rho u D}{\mu},

where \rho is the fluid density, u is the characteristic velocity, D is the hydraulic diameter of the channel, and \mu is the dynamic viscosity. Laminar flow is generally stable for Re < 2000, but in microfluidic devices, Re is typically much less than 1 (often ranging from $10^{-6} to 10), as the small D and low velocities make viscous forces overwhelmingly dominant. This low Re regime prevents turbulence and supports the formation of parallel flows, which is advantageous for applications like particle separations where distinct fluid streams must remain isolated.^[14] The dominance of viscous forces at low Re implies that chaotic mixing is absent, limiting homogenization to slow diffusion processes that can take minutes over typical channel widths of 100 \mum. To achieve effective mixing, passive methods such as herringbone-patterned grooves in channel walls induce chaotic advection by generating transverse circulations that stretch and fold fluid interfaces exponentially. Active techniques, including acoustic streaming, introduce perturbations via ultrasonic waves to disrupt laminar profiles and enhance dispersion at these low Re conditions.^[46] Experimental verification of laminar flow often involves dye injection tests in Y-shaped channels, where colored streams from separate inlets maintain sharp, parallel interfaces without intermixing, confirming the absence of convective blending and the reliance on diffusion. Such visualizations, typically captured via microscopy, underscore the precision of flow control in microfluidic environments.

Continuous Flow Systems

Continuous flow systems in microfluidics involve the steady-state transport of fluids through interconnected channels, typically driven by external forces to enable precise control over fluid handling in closed microscale environments. These systems operate predominantly under laminar conditions due to the low Reynolds numbers inherent to microfluidic scales, where viscous forces dominate over inertial effects. Pressure-driven and electrokinetic mechanisms serve as the primary actuation methods, facilitating applications such as separations and reactions without the need for discrete fluid segmentation. Pressure-driven flow, the most common approach, utilizes syringe pumps, pneumatic actuation, or hydrostatic gradients to propel fluids through channels. This method generates a parabolic velocity profile characteristic of Poiseuille flow, described by the equation u(r) = \frac{\Delta P}{4 \mu L} (R^2 - r^2), where u(r) is the axial velocity at radial position r, \Delta P is the pressure difference across channel length L, \mu is the fluid viscosity, and R is the channel radius. This profile arises from the balance between pressure gradients and viscous drag in cylindrical channels, leading to plug-like flow approximations in shallow rectangular geometries common in planar microfluidic devices. Syringe pumps provide precise volumetric control, while pneumatic systems offer scalability for integrated arrays, though they require off-chip pressure sources. Electrokinetic flow provides an alternative buffer-free pumping strategy, leveraging electric fields to induce motion without mechanical components. It encompasses electroosmosis, where charged channel walls interact with the electric double layer to drive bulk fluid, and electrophoresis, which mobilizes charged analytes relative to the fluid. The velocity for electrophoretic motion is given by u = \mu_{EP} E, where \mu_{EP} is the electrophoretic mobility and E is the applied electric field strength. In electroosmotic flow, a near-plug velocity profile results from the thin double layer (Debye length ~10-100 nm), minimizing dispersion compared to pressure-driven parabolic flows. This approach enables high-speed separations in capillary electrophoresis by combining analyte migration with counter-flow control, often at voltages below 1 kV for microchannels. Pioneering implementations integrated these flows into silicon-based chips for miniaturized analysis.^[47] To manage flow direction and enhance blending in these steady-state systems, pneumatic valves and specialized mixers are essential. Pneumatic valves, developed in the late 1990s by the Quake group, employ multilayer soft lithography with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) to create flexible membranes that deflect under air pressure, enabling on-off switching and peristaltic pumping without direct fluid contact. These monolithic valves support complex routing in integrated devices, closing channels as small as 10 μm wide with response times under 1 ms. For mixing under low Reynolds numbers, where diffusion alone is slow, chaotic advection mixers exploit channel geometry to stretch and fold fluid interfaces exponentially. Seminal designs feature staggered herringbone patterns etched into channel floors, inducing transverse circulations that generate chaotic streamlines and reduce mixing lengths to millimeters at flow rates of 1-100 μL/min. The advantages of continuous flow systems include straightforward integration with separation techniques like chromatography, where steady flows enable efficient analyte partitioning with minimal sample volumes (nanoliters). Microfluidic adaptations of capillary electrophoresis achieve plate heights below 10 μm and analysis times under 1 minute, outperforming macroscale systems in speed and reagent efficiency due to reduced dispersion and Joule heating. These features support high-throughput screening in chemical analysis, with pneumatic control allowing automation of multi-step processes on a single chip.^[48]

Droplet-Based Systems

Droplet-based systems in microfluidics involve the generation and manipulation of discrete volumes of fluid, typically in the picoliter to nanoliter range, encapsulated within an immiscible carrier phase, enabling high-throughput processing as isolated reactors. These systems leverage the low Reynolds number flows inherent to microfluidics to produce highly monodisperse droplets, contrasting with bulk emulsification methods that yield polydisperse populations. By compartmentalizing reactions, droplet-based approaches enhance mixing efficiency through internal circulation and reduce cross-contamination, making them ideal for parallel assays.^[49] Generation of droplets primarily occurs through passive hydrodynamic methods, such as T-junction and flow-focusing geometries, where the dispersed phase is sheared or focused by the continuous phase to form discrete droplets. In T-junction setups, the dispersed fluid enters perpendicular to the continuous flow, leading to droplet breakup via squeezing and shear forces when the growing droplet obstructs the channel. Flow-focusing geometries, in contrast, surround the dispersed phase with converging streams of the continuous phase through a narrow orifice, promoting rapid pinching and more uniform size control. Droplet size d in these systems scales approximately as d \sim \mathrm{Ca}^{-1/2} \times channel width, where Ca is the capillary number (\mathrm{Ca} = \mu U / \gamma, with \mu as viscosity, U as velocity, and \gamma as interfacial tension), reflecting the balance between viscous shear and interfacial forces in the dripping regime.^[50] Manipulation of droplets post-generation includes techniques for coalescence and sorting to enable sequential reactions or selection. Coalescence can be induced via dielectrophoresis (DEP), where an inhomogeneous electric field polarizes droplets, drawing them together to merge upon contact, facilitating content mixing without mechanical disruption.^[51] For sorting, optical tweezers employ focused laser beams to exert gradient forces on droplets based on their refractive index or fluorescence, allowing precise deflection and isolation of target droplets at rates up to hundreds per second.^[52] These methods operate effectively in the low Reynolds number environment, where inertial effects are negligible. In screening applications, droplet-based systems enable enzymatic assays at ultra-high throughput, generating and analyzing millions of droplets per hour for directed evolution or activity profiling, as demonstrated in early work by the Weitz group using fluorescence-activated sorting for enzyme variants.^[53] Stability is maintained through surfactants, such as fluorinated polyethers, which adsorb at the interface to lower interfacial tension and prevent unwanted coalescence during transport. High monodispersity, typically with a coefficient of variation less than 5%, ensures consistent reaction volumes and reliable quantification across the droplet population.

Digital and Electrowetting Systems

Digital and electrowetting systems in microfluidics enable precise, programmable manipulation of discrete droplets through the application of electric fields, facilitating reconfigurable lab-on-a-chip platforms for automated fluid handling.^[54] The core principle underlying this technology is electrowetting, which alters the wetting properties of a liquid on a hydrophobic surface by inducing an electric field across a dielectric layer. This effect reduces the contact angle of the droplet, allowing it to spread and move along electrode surfaces. The relationship is quantitatively described by the Lippmann-Young equation:

\cos \theta = \cos \theta_0 + \frac{\varepsilon V^2}{2 \gamma d}

where \theta is the apparent contact angle, \theta_0 is the intrinsic contact angle without voltage, \varepsilon is the permittivity of the dielectric, V is the applied voltage, \gamma is the liquid-vapor surface tension, and d is the dielectric thickness.^[54] Electrowetting-on-dielectric (EWOD) devices typically consist of an array of coplanar electrodes coated with a hydrophobic dielectric layer, enabling addressable control of droplets without mechanical components. By selectively activating electrodes, droplets can be routed, merged, split, or dispensed for operations such as mixing or dilution, mimicking digital logic in fluidic systems. Pioneering work in the 2000s by Advanced Liquid Logic demonstrated scalable EWOD arrays for biochemical assays, where droplets as small as 1 nL were manipulated at speeds up to 1 cm/s under voltages of 50-200 V.^[55] These systems support complex protocols by integrating droplet transport with on-chip heating or sensing elements. Key advantages of EWOD-based digital microfluidics include the absence of a carrier fluid, which minimizes dilution and reagent waste while reducing cross-contamination between operations, as droplets remain isolated until intentionally combined.^[56] Furthermore, the seamless integration with microelectronics allows for automated, software-controlled workflows, enhancing portability and scalability for point-of-care applications. Commercial implementations, such as custom EWOD chips fabricated by uFluidix for diagnostic platforms in the 2020s, exemplify this by enabling rapid biomarker detection in portable devices.^[57] Similarly, legacy systems from Advanced Liquid Logic, now part of Illumina, have been adapted for DNA sample preparation and sequencing workflows.^[55]

Paper-Based and Open Microchannels

Paper-based microfluidics leverage porous substrates, such as cellulose filter paper, to enable capillary-driven flow in low-cost, disposable devices suitable for point-of-care diagnostics. The foundational approach, introduced by Martinez et al., involved patterning paper using photolithography to create hydrophilic channels surrounded by hydrophobic barriers, allowing fluids to wick through defined paths without external actuation. A widely adopted evolution of this method employs wax printing, where hydrophobic wax patterns are inkjet-printed onto the paper surface and heated to penetrate the substrate, forming impermeable barriers that delineate hydrophilic flow channels with resolutions down to 500 μm. These techniques facilitate the fabrication of multilayered structures by stacking patterned sheets, enabling complex assays in volumes as low as microliters.^[58]^[59] A representative application is the colorimetric detection of glucose through enzymatic reactions, where glucose oxidase oxidizes glucose to gluconic acid and hydrogen peroxide, which horseradish peroxidase then uses to convert iodide to iodine, producing a visible brown color change proportional to glucose concentration (detectable from 2.5 to 50 mM). This assay, demonstrated in early prototypes, requires only spotting reagents and sample onto the paper, with color development occurring in 10-11 minutes without specialized equipment. Such simplicity has extended paper-based devices to multiplexed tests for analytes like proteins and heavy metals, relying on the paper's natural filtration and high surface area for reagent immobilization.^[58]^[60] Open microchannels represent another capillary-driven paradigm, utilizing surface tension on non-enclosed planar substrates—often glass or PDMS with patterned wettability—to guide droplets or streams along predefined paths, providing unobstructed access for pipetting or imaging. Fluid motion is directed by gradients in hydrophilicity or topography, with channel widths typically ranging from 100 μm to millimeters. A key challenge is evaporation, which can alter concentrations and disrupt flow; this is commonly addressed by operating the channels under an immiscible oil layer, such as fluorinated oil, that suppresses vapor loss while permitting precise droplet manipulation via pressure or electrowetting. These systems draw on capillary forces to transport fluids, akin to those in closed channels but adapted for open environments.^[61]^[60] The primary advantages of both paper-based and open microchannel systems lie in their pump-free operation, driven solely by capillary action, which ensures portability and minimal infrastructure needs—ideal for resource-limited settings, as seen in lateral flow pregnancy tests that detect human chorionic gonadotropin via antibody capture in under 5 minutes. Fabrication costs can be under $0.01 per device, and their disposability reduces biohazard risks. However, limitations include inherently slower flow rates, described by the Lucas-Washburn law where penetration distance L scales as L^2 \propto t due to viscous resistance in narrow pores, often limiting assay times to minutes rather than seconds. Additionally, porous media like paper are susceptible to clogging from particulates in complex samples such as blood, necessitating pre-filtration or coarser substrates to maintain reliability.^[60]

Specialized Manipulation Techniques

Specialized manipulation techniques in microfluidics leverage external fields to enable precise, non-contact control of particles and fluids, extending the capabilities of laminar base flows by introducing tunable forces for separation, sorting, and assembly. These methods are particularly valuable in low-Reynolds-number environments where diffusion-limited mixing necessitates active intervention. By applying magnetic, acoustic, or optical fields, researchers can achieve high-resolution manipulation of superparamagnetic particles, cells, or droplets without disrupting overall flow continuity. Magnetophoresis employs magnetic field gradients to generate forces on diamagnetic or paramagnetic entities, facilitating their deflection or capture within microfluidic channels. The magnetic force acting on a particle with magnetic moment μ in a field B is described by \mathbf{F} = \nabla (\mu \cdot \mathbf{B}), which drives motion proportional to the field gradient and particle susceptibility. This technique is widely used for separating superparamagnetic beads, often coated with antibodies, in immunoassays, where beads bind to target analytes and are isolated from unbound components at flow rates up to 1 μL/min, achieving purities exceeding 95%. For instance, in continuous-flow devices, magnetophoretic separation of 10-μm beads from non-magnetic particles has demonstrated separation efficiencies over 90% using neodymium magnets with gradients on the order of 100 T/m.^[62]^[63] Acoustofluidics utilizes acoustic waves, particularly surface acoustic waves (SAWs), to induce streaming or radiation forces for particle translation and sorting in microfluidic systems. SAWs, generated by interdigital transducers on piezoelectric substrates at frequencies of 10-100 MHz, propagate along the device surface and couple into the fluid, creating localized vortices or pressure nodes. Droplet ejection occurs when SAW amplitude exceeds a threshold, propelling microliter volumes at speeds up to 1 m/s, while cell sorting leverages acoustic radiation forces to deflect cells based on size and compressibility, with separation velocities scaling approximately as velocity ≈ frequency × amplitude². In a representative setup, 10-μm polystyrene particles have been sorted from blood samples at throughputs of 10^3 cells/s with viabilities above 98%, avoiding labels and shear damage common in centrifugal methods.^[64]^[65]^[66] Optofluidics integrates photonic elements to manipulate fluids or detect particles through light-matter interactions, often via photothermal effects that generate localized heating and thermocapillary flows. Illuminating absorbing nanoparticles or dyes with a focused laser (e.g., 532 nm, 10 mW) induces temperature gradients up to 10 K/μm, driving fluid motion at velocities of 1-10 μm/s without mechanical pumps. For particle detection, optofluidic devices incorporate resistive pulse sensing based on the Coulter principle, where a transiting particle modulates channel resistance by ΔR ≈ (r_p² / L) × (ρ_p - ρ_f)/ρ_f, with r_p as particle radius and L as channel length, enabling single-particle sizing with resolutions down to 50 nm. This has been applied to count and characterize exosomes in serum, achieving detection limits of 10^6 particles/mL.^[67]^[68] Integration of these techniques with continuous flow systems forms hybrid platforms that combine multiple fields for enhanced functionality, such as sequential magnetic capture followed by acoustic sorting or optical trapping. In opto-electric hybrids, light-patterned electrodes induce electrothermal flows alongside photothermal effects, manipulating 1-μm particles in Poiseuille flows at Reynolds numbers below 1, with aggregation times under 1 s. Similarly, acoustic-optical systems map force fields in real-time, enabling precise cell positioning in laminar streams for high-throughput analysis, as demonstrated in devices handling 10^4 cells/min with sub-micron accuracy. These hybrids expand manipulation versatility while maintaining biocompatibility and scalability.^[69]^[70]

Applications

Biological and Medical Applications

Microfluidics has revolutionized biological and medical applications by enabling precise manipulation of fluids at the microscale, facilitating studies of cellular and molecular processes that mimic physiological conditions more accurately than traditional methods. These systems allow for high-throughput analysis of biomolecules, single-cell behaviors, and tissue-level interactions, reducing sample volumes and improving sensitivity in diagnostics and therapeutics. Key advancements include integrated platforms for nucleic acid analysis, cell mechanics, organ simulation, and personalized medicine, which address limitations in conventional assays such as low resolution and poor recapitulation of in vivo environments.^[71] In molecular biology, microfluidic DNA microarrays have enabled high-density gene expression profiling by immobilizing thousands of DNA probes on chips for simultaneous hybridization with target sequences. Pioneered in the 1990s with platforms like the Affymetrix GeneChip, these systems use photolithographic synthesis to create arrays that detect mRNA levels across genomes, providing insights into cellular responses to stimuli. Microfluidic integration enhances this by automating sample delivery and reducing hybridization times to minutes, as seen in continuous-flow designs that improve diffusion-limited reactions.^[72] Additionally, microfluidic PCR amplification has miniaturized polymerase chain reaction processes, achieving rapid thermal cycling in sub-microliter volumes for applications like pathogen detection and genetic screening; devices with integrated heaters and valves can complete 30 cycles in under 10 minutes, outperforming benchtop systems in speed and portability.^[73] For studying cell behavior and biophysics, microfluidics excels in single-cell trapping and migration assays, where hydrodynamic traps capture individual cells in arrays for real-time observation without physical contact. These platforms, based on principles like least resistance paths, achieve trapping efficiencies over 90% and enable tracking of chemotactic responses in controlled gradients, revealing heterogeneous migration patterns in cancer cells.^[74] Mechanical assays, such as microfluidic analogs of micropipette aspiration, apply controlled suction via deformable channels to quantify cell deformability and cortical tension; for instance, parallel arrays can test hundreds of cells simultaneously, identifying stiffness variations linked to disease states like leukemia.^[75] Such techniques provide quantitative metrics, like Young's modulus in the kPa range, to correlate biophysical properties with cellular function.^[71] Organ-on-chip (OoC) devices represent a major advance in modeling tissue interfaces, with multi-compartment microfluidics simulating organ-level physiology through co-cultures of epithelial and endothelial cells under fluid shear. The seminal lung-on-a-chip by Huh et al. (2010) recapitulates alveolar mechanics by cyclically stretching a porous membrane, inducing inflammatory responses to pathogens akin to human lung injury. Recent multi-organ systems extend this by interconnecting chips for liver, heart, and kidney modules via vascular channels, enabling pharmacokinetic studies of drug distribution across organs; these platforms have entered 2020s clinical trials for toxicity prediction, correlating in vitro responses with patient outcomes in phase I studies.^[76] In personalized cancer treatment, microfluidic tumor microenvironment chips recreate patient-specific niches by culturing primary tumor cells with stromal elements in 3D matrices under perfusion, allowing high-throughput drug screening. These devices assess drug penetration and efficacy in spheroids that mimic tumor heterogeneity, with assays showing concordance with clinical responses for chemotherapeutics.^[77] Patient-derived models integrate biopsy samples into chips for real-time viability monitoring, guiding tailored therapies by identifying resistance mechanisms, as demonstrated in platforms that screen multiple agents simultaneously to optimize regimens for individual tumors.

Chemical and Analytical Applications

Microfluidics has revolutionized chemical and analytical applications by enabling precise control over reaction conditions, sample volumes, and separation processes at the microscale, leading to enhanced efficiency, reduced reagent consumption, and faster analysis times. In chemical synthesis, microfluidic reactors facilitate uniform mixing and heat transfer, allowing for the production of materials with tailored properties. Analytically, integrated separation techniques such as miniaturized chromatography and electrophoresis provide high-resolution separations in compact devices, while innovative sample preparation methods like acoustic ejection streamline interfacing with detection systems such as mass spectrometry. Miniaturized high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) leverages microfluidic columns to achieve faster separations with improved efficiency, where the theoretical plate number N scales approximately with column length L divided by particle diameter d_p (N \sim L / d_p), enabling high-resolution analysis of complex mixtures using minimal sample volumes on the order of nanoliters. These systems reduce analysis times from hours to minutes while consuming less solvent, making them ideal for applications requiring high throughput and sensitivity, such as proteomic profiling.^[78] Capillary electrophoresis in microfluidics employs electric field-driven separations within fused-silica channels, which provide excellent electroosmotic flow and low dispersion for high-efficiency analyte migration. A key milestone was achieved in 1994 when Manz and colleagues demonstrated the separation of antisense oligonucleotides on a micromachined fused-silica device, completing the analysis in under 45 seconds at an electric field of 2300 V/cm over a 3.8 cm path, marking the advent of integrated microchip-based electrophoresis for rapid biomolecular analysis. This technique excels in separating charged species like ions and small molecules with plate counts exceeding 10^5, offering superior speed and resolution compared to conventional slab gel methods. Acoustic droplet ejection utilizes piezoelectric transducers to generate focused ultrasonic waves that non-contactingly eject nanoliter droplets from source wells, facilitating precise sample preparation for mass spectrometry without tips or contamination. Developed by Labcyte (now part of Beckman Coulter Life Sciences), systems like the Echo platform enable high-throughput transfer at rates up to 200 Hz, directly interfacing with electrospray ionization for real-time analysis of chemical reactions or metabolites.^[79] This method supports automated scouting of reaction conditions, achieving over 80% success rates in synthesizing diverse small molecules while minimizing waste. Microreactors in microfluidics promote uniform chemical reactions through controlled residence times and rapid mixing, particularly for molecular synthesis where precise stoichiometry ensures reproducible product yields. For nanoparticle production, these devices allow stoichiometric control of precursors, yielding monodisperse particles with sizes tunable from 5 to 100 nm; for instance, gold nanoparticles synthesized via continuous flow exhibit narrow polydispersity indices below 0.1 due to diffusion-limited mixing. Such systems outperform batch reactors by mitigating hot spots and enabling safe handling of hazardous reagents at microscale volumes.

Engineering and Industrial Applications

Microfluidics has found significant applications in engineering and industrial contexts, leveraging precise control over fluid flow at microscales to enhance efficiency, reduce material consumption, and enable compact device designs. In energy systems, chemical processing, and manufacturing, microfluidic technologies facilitate improved heat and mass transfer, rapid mixing, and scalable production methods that outperform traditional macroscale approaches. These applications capitalize on the laminar flow regimes inherent to microfluidics, allowing for deterministic manipulation of fluids without the turbulence that complicates larger systems. In fuel cell technology, microfluidic channels integrated into proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells enhance mass transport of reactants and products, mitigating limitations such as flooding and concentration polarization. For instance, designs employing long, narrow microchannels in mixed multichannel flow fields have demonstrated superior performance compared to serpentine or parallel configurations, with improved resistance to flooding at varying flow rates and achieving higher overall power output. Computational modeling of gradient three-dimensional flow fields in microfluidic PEM fuel cells has shown power density improvements of up to 21.54% at current densities of 1.9 A/cm², enabling operation closer to or exceeding 1 W/cm² in optimized setups by enhancing reactant distribution. Active water management techniques using electroosmotic pumping in microfluidic PEM fuel cells have further boosted power densities to 0.42 W/cm² at air stoichiometries as low as 1.3, representing a 60% increase over passive systems.^[80]^[81]^[82] Precision droplet generation via inkjet and acoustic ejection principles has revolutionized engineering applications such as additive manufacturing and material deposition. Inkjet microfluidics enables the controlled ejection of picoliter to nanoliter droplets for high-resolution printing, where piezoelectric or thermal actuators drive fluid through nozzles to form uniform patterns in inks, resins, or even high-viscosity materials. Acoustophoretic printing, a nozzle-free variant, uses focused acoustic waves in microfluidic resonators to propel droplets from substrates, accommodating viscosities from 0.5 to 25,000 mPa·s and yield stresses exceeding 50 Pa, thus supporting applications in patterning liquid metals, optical components, and 3D structures at ejection rates up to 10³ Hz. These methods improve precision over conventional spraying by minimizing satellite droplets and enabling drop-on-demand operation, which is critical for scalable fabrication in electronics and photonics.^[83]^[83] In food science, microfluidics supports emulsion formation for encapsulating sensitive compounds like flavors, enhancing stability and controlled release in products. Droplet-based microfluidic platforms generate monodisperse food-grade emulsions with tunable droplet sizes (typically 1–100 µm), using flow-focusing or T-junction geometries to encapsulate hydrophobic flavors within oil-in-water droplets stabilized by natural emulsifiers such as lecithin or proteins. This approach prevents flavor degradation during processing and storage, improving sensory profiles in beverages and dairy while reducing the need for synthetic stabilizers. Additionally, microfluidic lab-on-chip devices enable rapid pathogen detection in food processing lines by integrating sample preconcentration, amplification, and optical or electrochemical readout for bacteria like Salmonella and E. coli, achieving detection limits below 10 CFU/mL within minutes to hours, which supports real-time quality control and minimizes contamination risks.^[84]^[84]^[85] Industrial processes benefit from microfluidics in heat exchangers and mixing operations within chemical plants, where microscale designs promote efficient thermal management and reaction control. Microfluidic heat exchangers utilizing gas-liquid slug flows in channels of 1 mm dimensions achieve Nusselt numbers up to 1.54 times higher than single-phase flows at equivalent pressure drops, reducing thermal resistance by 1.67 times and enabling heat fluxes over 1000 W/cm² for cooling high-power electronics or reactors. In mixing for chemical synthesis, passive microfluidic mixers like vortex or serpentine channels facilitate rapid homogenization of reagents at low Reynolds numbers, cutting synthesis times from hours to seconds and enabling reagent consumption reductions of up to 90% through precise nanoliter-scale dosing, as seen in nanoparticle production scaled to 122 g/day. These systems often build on continuous flow reactors for safe handling of exothermic reactions, further minimizing waste in plant-scale operations.^[86]^[86]^[87]

Emerging and Interdisciplinary Applications

Microfluidics has expanded into optics and photonics through the integration of optical waveguides and fiber-optic sensors within microfluidic chips, enabling compact, sensitive detection systems. Optical waveguides fabricated in microfluidic devices, such as those using femtosecond laser irradiation to combine waveguides with channels, facilitate label-free sensing of biomolecules by guiding light through fluid-filled structures for refractive index changes or fluorescence excitation. For instance, hollow-core photonic crystal fiber sensors integrated with microfluidics achieve label-free protein detection with limits of detection down to picomolar levels, leveraging evanescent wave interactions. Lab-on-fiber technology further advances remote sensing by functionalizing optical fibers with microfluidic elements, allowing distributed platforms for in situ analysis at inaccessible locations, such as environmental monitoring or biomedical diagnostics, where fiber tips serve as both waveguides and sensing probes.^[88] These systems, like all-fiber optofluidic setups, support simultaneous multi-analyte detection via surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) with sensitivities reaching 10^{-11} mol/L. In astrobiology, microfluidic devices simulate extreme habitats to study extremophiles, providing analogs for extraterrestrial environments like Mars. NASA-developed microfluidic bioanalytical systems for CubeSats, such as those in the 2010s missions (e.g., GeneSat and EcAMSat), enable autonomous growth and monitoring of microbial cultures under microgravity and radiation, mimicking Mars-like conditions to assess extremophile viability and metabolic responses.^[89] These platforms integrate fluid handling, filtration, and luminescent imaging to detect biomarkers in simulated Martian regolith, supporting life detection by analyzing cellular structures and redox potentials in harsh analogs.^[90] For example, microfluidic fluorescence microscopes at technology readiness level 6 have demonstrated detection of extant life signatures in solid, liquid, and gas samples from Mars-analog sites, informing missions like ExoMars.^[90] Droplet-based microfluidics has revolutionized evolutionary biology by enabling directed evolution of proteins at ultrahigh throughput, far surpassing traditional methods. In these systems, picoliter-volume droplets encapsulate individual variants from gene libraries, allowing parallel screening of enzymatic activity through fluorescence-activated sorting.^[91] A seminal application screened over 10^8 enzyme reactions in hours, identifying horseradish peroxidase mutants with catalytic efficiencies up to 10-fold higher than wild-type, achieving near diffusion-limited rates (k_cat/K_M ≈ 2.5 × 10^7 M^{-1} s^{-1}).^[91] This approach, extended to double-emulsion droplets for in vivo evolution, has accelerated protein engineering for industrial biocatalysts by reducing costs a million-fold compared to robotic assays. Microfluidics intersects cell biophysics and behavior through micropatterning techniques that control cell adhesion and morphology, revealing mechanotransduction mechanisms. By patterning adhesive proteins like fibronectin on substrates within microfluidic channels, researchers impose defined geometries on cells, influencing cytoskeleton organization and focal adhesion dynamics.^[92] For example, circular or linear micropatterns demonstrate how adhesion area modulates cell spreading and migration speed, with cells on 1000 μm² patterns exhibiting 2-3 times higher motility than on smaller ones, linking substrate rigidity to biophysical responses.^[93] In evolutionary biology tie-ins, evolutionary algorithms optimize microfluidic chip designs by iteratively refining channel geometries for efficient cell trapping and flow, generating validated single-cell analysis devices through polygon coordinate optimization.^[94]

Challenges and Future Directions

Current Limitations

One of the primary challenges in microfluidics is scalability, particularly in mass-producing complex three-dimensional devices. Traditional fabrication methods, such as soft lithography, often struggle to create intricate 3D architectures due to limitations in layering and alignment precision, leading to high production costs and low throughput for commercial volumes.^[95] Additionally, bonding processes for multilayer devices frequently result in yield losses, with irreversible adhesion techniques causing defects like misalignment or delamination, which can reduce overall device reliability by up to 20-30% in thermoplastic assemblies.^[96] Clogging and fouling remain persistent issues in microfluidic channels, primarily due to particle aggregation and bioadhesion under laminar flow conditions. Suspended microparticles, such as cells or colloids, tend to form clusters near channel walls, obstructing flow and reducing device lifespan, as observed in simulations of Newtonian fluids where aggregation thresholds occur at particle concentrations above 1-5 vol%.^[97] While anti-fouling coatings, like perfluorocarbon layers, can mitigate these effects by repelling hydrophobic interactions, their application often requires additional processing steps that compromise long-term stability in dynamic environments.^[98] High costs and limited accessibility further hinder widespread adoption of microfluidics. Establishing cleanroom facilities for photolithography and etching demands investments exceeding $100,000 in equipment alone, restricting development to well-funded institutions and excluding low-resource settings.^[99] Moreover, the lack of standardized fabrication protocols and testing metrics across devices leads to variability in performance, with no universal benchmarks for metrics like channel resolution or flow uniformity, complicating reproducibility and regulatory approval.^[100] Interoperability poses significant integration challenges when connecting microfluidic systems to macroscale components or electronics. Fluid delivery from macro-pumps to microchannels often suffers from leaks or pressure mismatches due to scale disparities, with interface designs failing to maintain seal integrity above 100-500 mbar without custom adapters.^[101] Similarly, embedding sensors or actuators requires precise alignment to avoid electrical shorts or thermal mismatches, yet current methods lack modularity, resulting in integration yields below 80% for hybrid lab-on-chip systems.^[102]

Recent Advances and Trends

Recent advances in microfluidics have increasingly integrated artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to enhance design efficiency and operational precision. Neural networks have been employed for automated optimization of channel geometries, enabling rapid iteration in microfluidic device development since 2023. For instance, Bayesian optimization techniques have improved mixing performance in micromixers by predicting and refining structural parameters, reducing design cycles from weeks to hours.^[103] In real-time applications, ML-driven image analysis has revolutionized cell sorting within microfluidic systems, allowing high-throughput classification and separation based on morphological features without labels. Deep learning models, such as YOLOv5, facilitate on-the-fly detection and sorting of cells or organoids in bright-field imaging, achieving speeds up to thousands of events per second while maintaining accuracy above 95%.^[104] These integrations extend to combinatorial platforms, where ML algorithms analyze vast datasets from parallel microfluidic experiments to predict outcomes in nanoparticle synthesis and drug screening.^[105] Organ-on-chip (OoC) technologies have progressed toward more physiologically relevant human-on-chip platforms, particularly through the incorporation of vascularization to mimic blood-tissue interfaces. Vascularized OoC models now support endothelial-lined channels that enable perfusion and nutrient delivery, improving the fidelity of multi-organ systems for disease modeling and toxicity assessment. A 2024 microfluidic platform integrates functional vascularized organoids, allowing co-culture of tissues like liver and kidney with perfusable vasculature, which has demonstrated enhanced barrier function and metabolic activity compared to avascular counterparts.^[106] These advancements have advanced to clinical translation, with OoC devices entering preclinical trials for evaluating drug-induced toxicity; for example, heart-on-chip platforms assessed cardiotoxicity in oncology drugs, correlating in vitro results with human outcomes and reducing animal testing needs.^[107] By 2025, interconnected human-on-chip systems with vascularization have been validated for multi-organ toxicity screening, providing quantitative metrics on drug metabolism and biodistribution that align closely with clinical data.^[108] Wearable and flexible microfluidics have emerged as key trends for continuous, non-invasive health monitoring, with skin-patch devices leading innovations in sweat analysis. These patches employ soft, stretchable materials to conform to the skin, collecting and analyzing sweat biomarkers like electrolytes, glucose, and lactate in real time. Laser-cut microfluidic sweat-sensing patches, developed in 2025, feature hydrogel interfaces for efficient sweat wicking and electrochemical detection, enabling multiplexed monitoring with wireless data transmission.^[109] Integration with Internet of Things (IoT) platforms allows seamless connectivity to smartphones or cloud systems, facilitating remote health tracking and personalized alerts for conditions such as dehydration or metabolic disorders. Recent devices combine colorimetric or fluorescence-based readouts with IoT for on-demand sweat analysis during exercise, achieving detection limits in the micromolar range for multiple analytes.^[110] This trend supports broader adoption in point-of-care diagnostics, with flexible microfluidics expanding to interstitial fluid and tear analysis for comprehensive physiological profiling.^[111] Sustainability efforts in microfluidics emphasize biodegradable materials and open-source designs to address environmental concerns and accessibility in low-resource settings. Biodegradable polymers such as cellulose and polylactic acid (PLA) have replaced traditional polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), reducing plastic waste while maintaining device functionality; paper-based microfluidics, for example, enable low-cost diagnostics that degrade naturally post-use.^[112] These materials support eco-friendly fabrication via 3D printing or laser cutting, with life-cycle assessments showing up to 80% lower environmental impact compared to conventional chips.^[113] Open-source platforms further democratize access, providing blueprints for syringe pumps and assay kits adaptable to resource-limited environments like remote clinics. A 2024 open-source 3D-printed syringe pump, for instance, delivers precise flow rates at costs under $50, enabling microfluidic experiments in settings without specialized equipment.^[114] By 2025, hybrid paper-polymer systems have been deployed for immunoassays in low-resource areas, offering user-friendly, training-minimal tools for pathogen detection and health screening.^[115]

References

[1]
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.77.977
[2]
Bio-Microfluidics: Overview: Coupling Biology and Fluid Physics at ...
Introduction. Microfluidics deals with the transport of minute volumes of fluid (typically, sub-nanoliter) through channels having at least one of three ...
[3]
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05058
[4]
µ-TAS: Miniaturized Total Chemical Analysis Systems - SpringerLink
The miniaturized total chemical analysis system is a concept for on-line monitoring combining classical analytical techniques and photolithographically ...
[5]
Micromachining a Miniaturized Capillary Electrophoresis-Based ...
Micromachining technology was used to prepare chemical analysis systems on glass chips (1 centimeter by 2 centimeters or larger) that utilize electroosmotic ...
[6]
Inkjets Are for More Than Just Printing - IEEE Spectrum
Mar 25, 2024 · Hewlett-Packard's HP ThinkJet was its first desktop inkjet printer based on its thermal technology, and it was designed to connect to a personal ...
[7]
DNA Chips - MIT Technology Review
Jan 1, 2001 · DNA chips made their big splash in 1996 when Santa Clara, Calif.-based Affymetrix introduced the first commercial version, which the company dubbed GeneChip.
[8]
Microfluidic Point-of-Care Testing: Commercial Landscape ... - NIH
Jan 15, 2021 · It has combined machine learning and lateral flow technology to develop a FDA approved at-home hematology analyzer and generates about 376K USD ...
[9]
Human Organs-on-Chips - Wyss Institute
Just four years after the publication of their first paper describing living Organ Chips, a group of Wyss Institute researchers launched Emulate, Inc. in 2014 ...
[10]
An open source platform to automate the design, verification, and ...
Sep 26, 2025 · This paper presents OpenMFDA, an open-source platform for MFDA, and a design automation tool to generate microfluidic physical designs, ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[11]
Democratizing digital microfluidics by a cloud-based design and ...
We introduce a proof-of-concept cloud platform that empowers any user to design, obtain, and operate DMF chips.
[12]
The origins and the future of microfluidics - Nature
Jul 26, 2006 · The origins and the future of microfluidics. George M. Whitesides. Nature volume 442, pages 368–373 (2006)Cite this article. 130k Accesses.
[13]
Microfluidic Channel - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
A microfluidic channel typically presents hydraulic diameters ranging from 1 to 100 μm [25], and a microfluidic device is nowadays defined to have one or more ...
[14]
Capillary flow of liquids in open microchannels: overview and recent ...
Dec 9, 2021 · In general, the relative importance of gravitational forces to surface-tension forces is given by the Bond number, , where \hat{\rho } is the ...
[15]
Microfluidics: Fluid physics at the nanoliter scale | Rev. Mod. Phys.
Oct 6, 2005 · Specifically, we consider fluid physics that occurs within channels with typically ∼ 100 μ m transverse dimension—for reference, 1 nl = ( 100 μ ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[16]
Electrokinetics of non-Newtonian fluids: a review - PubMed
This work presents a comprehensive review of electrokinetics pertaining to non-Newtonian fluids. The topic covers a broad range of non-Newtonian effects in ...Missing: dominance wall slip<|control11|><|separator|>
[17]
Controlling Mass Transport in Microfluidic Devices - PMC - NIH
In this review, we focus on recent developments in manipulating chemical concentrations at the microscale. Some techniques prevent or accelerate mixing.Missing: thermal | Show results with:thermal<|control11|><|separator|>
[18]
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24148843/
[19]
Fabrication Methods for Microfluidic Devices: An Overview - PMC - NIH
Lithographic methods utilise techniques frequently used in microfabrication with photolithography, wet (KOH, TMAH, etc.), and dry (RIE and DRIE) etching, as ...
[20]
Development of glass-based microfluidic devices: A review on its ...
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polystyrene (PS), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) are commonly used in microfluidic device fabrication ...
[21]
Fabrication and Applications of Microfluidic Devices: A Review - PMC
Microfluidics is a relatively newly emerged field based on the combined principles of physics, chemistry, biology, fluid dynamics, microelectronics, and ...
[22]
A Review of Current Methods in Microfluidic Device Fabrication and ...
Much of the work in the field of microfluidics was performed using soft lithography as introduced by Whitesides [8] in 1998. The methods for soft lithography, ...3. Molding · 4. 3d Printing · 5. Nanofabrication<|separator|>
[23]
The Fabrication and Bonding of Thermoplastic Microfluidics: A Review
Sep 18, 2022 · Hot embossing, in comparison, has an average production rate, but it requires less expensive tools and infrastructure. The primary disadvantage ...
[24]
PDMS Bonding Technologies for Microfluidic Applications: A Review
Silicon-based materials (e.g., glass or silicon) can be relatively easily bonded to PDMS. The process only requires surface activation (Figure 2a), which can be ...
[25]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9503322/
[26]
https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6374/11/8/292
[27]
From Soft Lithography to 3D Printing: Current Status and Future of ...
Feb 9, 2025 · This review explores the potential of 3D printing, particularly photopolymerization techniques, fused deposition modeling, and material jetting, in advancing ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[28]
Two‐photon stereolithography for realizing ultraprecise three ...
May 15, 2025 · In this review, we report the progress of two-photon polymerization based on 3D microfabrication, including the results obtained from the ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[29]
Two-Photon Polymerization 3D-Printing of Micro-scale Neuronal ...
Jun 7, 2024 · This protocol illustrates the design and fabrication of PDMS-based microfluidic devices aimed at culturing modular neuronal networks.
[30]
A 3D-Printed Standardized Modular Microfluidic System for Droplet ...
In this paper, we propose a modular microfluidic system using projection micro-stereolithography three-dimensional (3D) printing technology for droplet ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[31]
(PDF) A 3D printed microfluidic device for centrifugal droplet ...
Jul 25, 2025 · This study aims to use an additive process for the first time to develop a microfluidic device that uses centrifugal technique for precise and repeatable ...
[32]
Machining water through laser cutting of nanoparticle-encased ...
Jun 29, 2023 · We demonstrate that laser-fabricated water patterns can form diverse self-supporting chips (SSCs) with openness, transparency, breathability, ...
[33]
Fabrication of Perfluoropolyether Microfluidic Devices Using Laser ...
Apr 29, 2024 · The lower power and faster speed of the laser engraving resulted in the development of microchannels with smaller dimensions, less than 30 μm in ...
[34]
A review on wax printed microfluidic paper-based devices for ... - NIH
This review paper is focused on the applications of paper-based microfluidic devices fabricated by the wax printing technique and used for international health.
[35]
Fabrication of laser printed microfluidic paper-based analytical ...
May 27, 2019 · We report for the first time, a facile method to fabricate μPADs using a commonly available laser printer which drastically reduces the cost and complexity of ...Missing: hydrogel | Show results with:hydrogel
[36]
A Multifunctional Hybrid Graphene and Microfluidic Platform to ...
Oct 4, 2022 · In this study, solution-gated graphene field effect transistors (GFETs) are combined with multi-compartment microfluidic platform for multimodal ...
[37]
Microfluidic sensors based on two-dimensional materials for ...
Jan 12, 2022 · These two-dimensional material-based microfluidic devices can provide a well-controlled microenvironment for both low-cost point-of-care analytics and advanced ...
[38]
Recent Advances in the Fabrication and Application of Graphene ...
This article reviews the latest research progress of graphene microfluidic sensors in the fields of electrochemistry, optics, and biology.
[39]
Characterisation of graphene electrodes for microsystems ... - Nature
Apr 8, 2019 · Conclusions. A graphene fabrication process was characterised for use in microsystems and microfluidic devices. The graphene fabrication process ...Missing: review | Show results with:review
[40]
Engineering a sustainable future for point-of-care diagnostics and ...
Jun 23, 2022 · More research into the use of recycled plastics in microfluidic production is needed and manufacturers could help by supplying in-depth material ...
[41]
A Comprehensive Review of Sustainable and Green Additive ... - MDPI
This study focuses on the utilization of recyclable thermoplastics combined with biodegradable polymers, exploring sustainable source materials, cold ...
[42]
[PDF] Microfluidics for Polymer Microparticles: Opinion on Sustainability ...
Feb 6, 2024 · Microfluidics is a fast, efficient process for polymer microparticles, but its sustainability and scalability are unclear, and more awareness ...
[43]
Recent Advances in Polymer Science and Fabrication Processes for ...
This review explores significant advancements in polymer science and fabrication processes that have enhanced the performance and broadened the application ...
[44]
Acoustic mixing at low Reynold's numbers - AIP Publishing
Feb 2, 2006 · In microfluidic devices, hydrodynamic flow is usually governed by very low Reynold's numbers. Under these conditions, only laminar flow is ...
[45]
ELECTROKINETIC FLOW AND DISPERSION IN CAPILLARY ...
Jan 21, 2006 · This paper reviews the subject of fluid flow in such capillary microchannels and examines the various causes of enhanced dispersion that limit the efficiency ...
[46]
Recent Advances in Microfluidics-Based Chromatography—A Mini ...
Microfluidics-based chromatography has good reproducibility and small sample consumption. However, the on-chip chromatography fabrication techniques are often ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[47]
Droplet-based microfluidics and enzyme evolution - ScienceDirect
Droplet-based microfluidic systems can produce, process, and sort picoliter droplets at kilohertz rates and have emerged as powerful tools for library screening ...
[48]
Experimental studies on droplet characteristics in a microfluidic flow ...
Aug 28, 2021 · This work reports rigorous analysis and optimization of the behavior of droplets with change in flow rate ratio and viscosity ratio in a flow-focusing device.
[49]
Manipulation and control of droplets on surfaces in a homogeneous ...
Jan 12, 2022 · Deflection of sliding droplets by dielectrophoresis ... The control of droplet coalescence is a major challenge of droplet microfluidics.
[50]
Microfluidic sorting of arbitrary cells with dynamic optical tweezers
May 30, 2012 · Optical gradient forces generated by fast steerable optical tweezers are highly effective for sorting small populations of cells in a lab-on-a- ...
[51]
[PDF] Single-cell analysis and sorting using droplet-based microfluidics
Apr 4, 2013 · In contrast, droplet-based microfluidic systems enable the handling of millions of droplets (and cells) in a single experiment, including ...
[52]
Electrowetting: from basics to applications - IOPscience
Electrowetting: from basics to applications. Frieder Mugele and Jean-Christophe Baret. Published 1 July 2005 • IOP Publishing Ltd
[53]
Current commercialization status of electrowetting-on-dielectric ...
This review presents the history around major EWOD products that hit the market to show their winding paths to commercialization and summarizes the current ...
[54]
Applications of electrowetting-on-dielectric (EWOD) technology for ...
EWOD digital microfluidics reduces reagent and energy consumption, accelerates analysis, enables point-of-care diagnostic, simplifies integration with sensors, ...
[55]
A Brief Introduction to Digital Microfluidics
Jan 30, 2019 · Advanced Liquid Logic (acquired by Illumina Inc. in 2013) used EWOD digital microfluidic devices to provide an automated solution to complex ...
[56]
Patterned Paper as a Platform for Inexpensive, Low‐Volume ...
Feb 5, 2007 · This type of patterned paper is a prototype of a class of low-cost, portable, and technically simple platforms for running multiplexed bioassays.
[57]
Understanding Wax Printing: A Simple Micropatterning Process for ...
Jul 15, 2009 · This technical note describes a detailed study on wax printing, a simple and inexpensive method for fabricating microfluidic devices in paper
[58]
Paper-based microfluidics: Simplified fabrication and assay methods
Jun 1, 2021 · This review provides an overview of current methods of fabricating paper-based microfluidic devices, examples of applications of these devices,
[59]
Under oil open-channel microfluidics empowered by exclusive liquid ...
Apr 17, 2020 · In single liquid–phase open microfluidics, fluid is directly exposed to air, which makes the systems susceptible to evaporation and airborne ...
[60]
Microfluidics Based Magnetophoresis: A Review - Alnaimat - 2018
Jun 11, 2018 · In this article, we will review the fundamental principles of magnetophoresis and its recent applications in microfluidics based ...
[61]
Recent advances and current challenges in magnetophoresis based ...
The present review paper highlights the recent advancements of magnetophoresis based mixing, separation, and trapping of biological cells, magnetic beads ...
[62]
Microscale acoustofluidics: Microfluidics driven via acoustics and ...
Jun 20, 2011 · This article reviews acoustic microfluidics: the use of acoustic fields, principally ultrasonics, for application in microfluidics.
[63]
Surface acoustic wave microfluidics - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
In this review article, we discuss the theory underpinning SAWs and their interactions with particles and the contacting fluids in which they are suspended.
[64]
Long-range optofluidic control with plasmon heating - Nature
Mar 31, 2021 · Our optofluidic platform not only induces localized temperature gradients but also measures them in situ, thus enabling us to correlate measured ...<|separator|>
[65]
Fiber Optofluidic Technology Based on Optical Force and ...
Photothermal effects can be used for optical manipulation and sensing in optofluidics. The photothermal effect is usually weak and needs to be enhanced by ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[66]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7345500/
[67]
Acoustic force mapping in a hybrid acoustic-optical ... - ResearchGate
The dual acoustic/optical nature of the system lends itself to optically measure the exact acoustic force map, by means of direct force measurements on an ...
[68]
Microfluidics as a functional tool for cell mechanics - PMC - NIH
Microfluidics is an excellent means to deliver physical cues that affect cell mechanics, such as cell shape, fluid flow, substrate topography, and stiffness.Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[69]
Microfluidic DNA microarray analysis: A review - ScienceDirect.com
Feb 14, 2011 · The recent microfluidic hybridization method shows the advantages of less sample usage and reduced incubation time. Here, sample solutions are ...
[70]
Polymerase chain reaction in microfluidic devices - RSC Publishing
In this review, we introduce recent developments in microfluidic-based space and time domain devices as well as discuss various designs integrated with multiple ...
[71]
A microfluidic device enabling high-efficiency single cell trapping - NIH
This paper reports on a passive hydrodynamic microfluidic device based on the “least flow resistance path” principle with geometry optimized in line with ...
[72]
High-throughput microfluidic micropipette aspiration device to probe ...
We present an easy-to-use microfluidic device that applies the well-established approach of micropipette aspiration, adapted to measure many cells in parallel.
[73]
State-of-the-Art Organ-on-Chip Models and Designs for Medical ...
Aug 11, 2025 · Organ-on-a-chip (OoC) devices simulate human organs within a microenvironment, potentially surpassing traditional preclinical methods and paving ...
[74]
Microfluidics: Emerging prospects for anti-cancer drug screening - NIH
The microfluidic environment closely mimics the physiological microenvironment, including gas and drug diffusion rates, shear stress and cell confinement. In ...
[75]
https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2019/lc/c9lc00444k
[76]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12383757/
[77]
Performance of micro-PEM fuel cells with different flow fields
The results in this study suggested that the μ-PEMFC with a mixed multichannel design flow field and long micro-channels yielded the best performance.
[78]
Computational modeling studies on microfluidic fuel cell
Compared to traditional parallel straight flow field PEMFC, the power density of the gradient 3D flow field PEMFC could increase by 21.54% at 1.9 A·cm−2.<|separator|>
[79]
[PDF] Active Water Management for PEM Fuel Cells - Stanford University
With EO pumping we were able to operate the 25 cm2 fuel cell at an air stoichiometry of 1.3 while maintaining a power density of 0.42 W/cm2. This is 60% greater ...<|separator|>
[80]
Acoustophoretic printing | Science Advances
Aug 31, 2018 · Droplet-based printing methods are widely used in applications ranging from biological microarrays to additive manufacturing.
[81]
Droplet-Based Microfluidics as a Platform to Design Food-Grade ...
This review points out the most current advances in droplet-based microfluidic processes, which successfully use food-grade emulsions to develop simple and ...
[82]
Detection of pathogens in foods using microfluidic “lab-on-chip”
This mini-review discusses several fabrication materials to produce microfluidic chips as well as compares their advantages and disadvantages. Different methods ...
[83]
Gas–liquid slug flow in microfluidic heat exchanger
The paper presents an experimental study of the gas-liquid segmented flow as a method of intensifying microfluidic heat exchangers (MFHE)
[84]
Microfluidic Mixing - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
The most prominent application of microfluidic mixing is the chemical reaction between reactants. A rapidly and controllably created homogeneous reactant ...Missing: plants | Show results with:plants
[85]
Optical Biomedical Diagnostics Using Lab-on-Fiber Technology
Cutting-edge fiber optic technology enables the interaction of light with functionalized fiber surfaces at remote locations to develop a novel, miniaturized and ...
[86]
Integrated Microfluidic Bioanalytical Systems for CubeSats - NASA
NASA Ames Research Center has developed a series of miniaturized bioanalytical cubesat payloads that integrate microfluidics and sensors to conduct autonomous ...
[87]
[PDF] Microfluidic Approaches to Searching for Extant Life on Mars. R.C. ...
Key to enabling this approach are ARC advances in the development of automated microfluidic handling and manipulation technologies for use in microgravity.Missing: analog chips<|control11|><|separator|>
[88]
Ultrahigh-throughput screening in drop-based microfluidics ... - PNAS
A particularly powerful tool for these technologies is directed evolution (2–4), which is a means of producing proteins and nucleic acids with tailor-made ...
[89]
Advances in Regulating Cellular Behavior Using Micropatterns - PMC
Dec 29, 2023 · Micropatterned material can mimic physical and chemical signals of in situ cells, providing inspiration for using micropatterning to modulate ...
[90]
Biology on a Chip: Microfabrication for Studying the Behavior of ...
The applications of microfabrication in fibroblast biology presently encompass basic studies of cell adhesion, spreading, motility, proliferation, and ...
[91]
Generative design of microfluidic channel geometry using ...
The evolutionary approach uses continuous optimization of polygon coordinates to generate microfluidic channel geometry for single cell analysis devices.
[92]
3D Printed Microfluidics - PMC - NIH
Traditional microfabrication techniques suffer from several disadvantages including inability to create truly three-dimensional architectures, expensive and ...
[93]
Recent Advances in Thermoplastic Microfluidic Bonding - PMC
Mar 20, 2022 · This review paper summarizes the current bonding processes being practiced for the fabrication of thermoplastic microfluidic devices.
[94]
Aggregation and clogging phenomena of rigid microparticles in ...
We developed a numerical tool to investigate the phenomena of aggregation and clogging of rigid microparticles suspended in a Newtonian fluid transported ...Missing: coatings | Show results with:coatings
[95]
Effective Anti-Fouling Surface Coating of Microfluidic Mixing Devices ...
Jul 15, 2024 · Employment of omniphobic, thin-layer perfluorocarbon (TLP) coating to prevent fouling and clogging in microfluidic mixing devices during mRNA LNP formulations.Missing: particle | Show results with:particle
[96]
Low-Cost, Accessible Fabrication Methods for Microfluidics ... - NIH
Sep 12, 2018 · Importantly, we demonstrated that high-quality patterns could be generated without specialized cleanroom equipment such as mask exposers (~$15 k) ...Missing: standardization | Show results with:standardization
[97]
[PDF] Trends and Challenges in the Microfluidic Industry - SEMI
Nov 11, 2022 · Testing of microfluidic devices is lacking standard test protocols and accepted standards. • Interest in standards and protocols for: • Testing, ...
[98]
TapeTech microfluidic connectors: adhesive tape-enabled solution ...
Feb 5, 2025 · A longstanding challenge in microfluidics has been the efficient delivery of fluids from macro-scale pumping systems into microfluidic devices, ...
[99]
Sensor integration into microfluidic systems: trends and challenges
This review article highlights several successfully integrated microfluidic sensor systems, with a focus on work that has been published within the last two ...
[100]
Advancing microfluidic design with machine learning: a Bayesian ...
Jan 31, 2025 · We compare the proposed BO approach with several evolutionary algorithms commonly used in microfluidic device and sensor design, including ...
[101]
Versatile Image-Assisted Cell Sorting by Selective Trapping with ...
Sep 17, 2025 · We integrated YOLOv5, a deep learning model for sorting in both microfluidic channels and well plates, utilizing bright-field and fluorescence ...Figure 2 · Sorting With Deep Learning... · Sorting Organoids To...
[102]
Machine Learning-Driven Innovations in Microfluidics - MDPI
A 2023 study exemplifies the potential of ML in optimizing channel design and device parameters, improving nanoparticle synthesis within microfluidic platforms ...
[103]
A microfluidic platform integrating functional vascularized organoids ...
Feb 16, 2024 · We report a platform to vascularize various biological tissues on-chip, using an original and user-friendly microfluidic device and chip loading process.
[104]
10 Organ-Chip Publications That Defined 2024 | Emulate
Jan 16, 2025 · The Heart-Chip provides a scalable, precise platform for evaluating cardiotoxicity in drug candidates, enabling safer cancer treatments without ...
[105]
Organoids and organs-on-chips: Recent advances, applications in ...
Apr 11, 2025 · This perspective explores the concept, advancements, pros and cons, and applications of organoids and OoCs, particularly in drug research and development.
[106]
Sweat-Sensing Patches with Integrated Hydrogel Interface for ...
May 29, 2025 · The microfluidic sweat-sensing patch, fabricated with laser-cut technology, features a sandwich structure that enables the measurement of sweat ...
[107]
An IoT-integrated cellulose-based microfluidic wearable patch for ...
Aug 10, 2025 · Herein, we have fabricated a cellulose-based wearable patch, which further paired with a smartphone-based fluorescence imaging module and a self ...
[108]
Wearable microfluidic devices for multiplex body fluid monitoring
Sep 12, 2025 · Wearable microfluidic devices enable multiplexed, continuous monitoring of analytes in body fluids such as sweat, interstitial fluid, tears, and ...
[109]
Sustainable Sensing with Paper Microfluidics: Applications in Health ...
Paper microfluidics are used for healthcare, environmental monitoring, and food safety, detecting pathogens, pollutants, and contaminants.
[110]
Assessing the Environmental Impacts of Microfluidic Devices for ...
Jun 18, 2025 · This study highlights the importance of considering environmental impacts at multiple scales and shows the added value of using LCA to guide design and ...
[111]
Open-source spring-driven syringe pump with 3D-printed ...
Jul 12, 2024 · We expect that the proposed syringe pump will enable the utilization of microfluidic technologies in resource-limited settings, promoting the ...
[112]
Design, fabrication, and decontamination of low-cost microfluidics ...
We describe bubble reduction, fabrication, decontamination, and material selection methods to increase the success of microfluidic devices for nucleic acid ...2. Experimental · 2.2. Microfluidic Chip... · 3. Results And DiscussionMissing: standardization | Show results with:standardization