A spherulite is a spherical aggregate of radiating needle-like or fibrous crystals that forms through crystallization processes, appearing in both geological contexts such as volcanic rocks and in materials science applications like polymers.[1][2][3]In geology, spherulites primarily develop in felsic volcanic rocks, such as rhyolites and obsidian, via devitrification—the transformation of glassy, amorphous lava into crystalline structures during cooling.[1] These structures nucleate around points like pre-existing crystals or gas bubbles and grow outward in radial patterns, often composed of minerals including quartz, feldspar, or cristobalite, with sizes ranging from microscopic to tens of centimeters.[1][2] Their presence indicates rapid cooling rates in lava flows, providing insights into the thermal and geochemical history of volcanic environments, as seen in formations like the Hot Creek rhyolite in California's Long Valley Caldera.[1] Under polarized light microscopy, spherulites exhibit characteristic extinction patterns, such as the Maltese cross, due to their radial symmetry.[2]In polymer science, spherulites represent the dominant morphology of crystallization in semi-crystalline thermoplastics, emerging from a melt or solution as polycrystalline regions with lamellar crystals branching from a central nucleus.[3][4] These structures, often visible as spheres up to several micrometers in diameter, influence mechanical properties like tensile strength and opacity; for instance, in polyethylene, lamellae are approximately 500 Å thick and grow at temperatures around 130°C.[3][5] Formation involves splaying and infilling of chain-folded lamellae, with growth rates affected by factors such as molecular weight, cooling speed, and additives, leading to banded or unbanded textures based on lamellar twisting.[3][6] Spherulites in polymers, much like their geological counterparts, display birefringence under crossed polarizers, highlighting their ordered radial architecture.[3]
Definition and Structure
Definition
A spherulite is a small, rounded aggregate composed of radially arranged needle-like or fibrous crystals that radiate outward from a central nucleation point, forming nearly spherical or hemispherical shapes. These structures typically range in diameter from about 0.1 mm to several centimeters, though sizes can vary depending on the material and formation conditions.[1][7][8]Spherulites primarily form in glassy or devitrified igneous rocks, such as obsidian or rhyolite, where they arise during the crystallization of supercooled melts. They also occur in a variety of other materials, including polymers during melt crystallization, metals in rapidly solidified alloys, and certain organic compounds.[1][9][10]In contrast to single crystals, which exhibit uniform crystallographic orientation throughout without radial divergence, spherulites display a polycrystalline nature with fibers fanning out in all directions from the center. They differ from dendrites, which grow as branched, tree-like extensions rather than compact, spherical clusters.[7][11][9]The term "spherulite" originated in the 1830s, with early observations of these radial mineral structures described by David Brewster, who referred to them as "circular crystals" in his optical studies.[8]
Internal Structure
Spherulites exhibit a distinctive microscopic architecture characterized by a radial arrangement of acicular or fibrous crystals that diverge outward from a central nucleation point, often forming fan-like or sheaf-like patterns within the aggregate.[2][12] These crystals are typically separate individuals rather than branched structures, with adjacent fibers sharing a common crystallographic axis parallel to their length, though slight misorientations occur between neighbors.[12]In geological contexts, particularly within silica-rich volcanic rocks, spherulites commonly consist of minerals such as quartz, feldspar, cristobalite, and tridymite, often forming as two-mineral intergrowths where one mineral initiates the spherulitic growth followed by infilling by the other.[12][13] For instance, in rhyolitic obsidians, cristobalite or tridymite may dominate the fibrous cores, with later quartz or alkali feldspar crystallization completing the structure.[14][15]Under polarized light microscopy, the internal symmetry of spherulites produces characteristic birefringence patterns, including a Maltese cross extinction figure when viewed between crossed polars, resulting from the radial alignment of optic axes that causes uniform extinction in four perpendicular directions.[2][12] This optical feature highlights the coherent yet divergent crystal orientations emanating from the center.Spherulites display variations in their architecture, such as axial versus non-axial forms; axial spherulites, also known as axiolites, feature growth predominantly along a central axis of faster elongation, resulting in linear or elliptical aggregates rather than fully spherical ones.[2] Non-axial spherulites, in contrast, exhibit isotropic radial expansion in all directions from the nucleation site.[2]
Formation and Growth
Mechanisms
Spherulite formation initiates through nucleation processes in supercooled melts or supersaturated solutions, where the melt or solution is cooled below its equilibrium crystallization temperature, creating a thermodynamic driving force for phase separation. This nucleation is predominantly heterogeneous, occurring on pre-existing impurities, inclusions, or substrate surfaces that lower the energy barrier for crystal embryo formation, rather than homogeneous nucleation in the bulk fluid.[16][17]In glassy rocks such as obsidian, spherulites often develop via devitrification, a transformation from an amorphous to a crystalline state driven by the polymerization of silica tetrahedra into ordered networks, typically involving the formation of minerals like cristobalite or alkali feldspar. This process begins at random nuclei within the glass matrix and propagates outward, accelerated by elevated temperatures (above 650 °C) and the presence of alkali-rich fluids that enhance silica network reorganization.[18][17]Undercooling, denoted as ΔT (the difference between the liquidus temperature and the actual temperature), plays a critical role in driving rapid crystallization by reducing the free energy barrier for nucleation, thereby increasing the nucleation rate. The classical nucleation theory describes this rate I asI = I_0 \exp\left(-\frac{\Delta G^*}{kT}\right),where I_0 is a pre-exponential factor, \Delta G^* is the free energy barrier for forming a critical nucleus (which decreases with increasing ΔT), k is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the absolute temperature. In rhyolitic systems, nucleation rates peak at ΔT values of approximately 100–277 °C, corresponding to temperatures around 500–600 °C.[19][16]The composition of the parent material significantly influences spherulite formation, with silica-rich (rhyolitic) magmas favoring spherulites due to their high viscosity, which inhibits diffusion and promotes substantial undercooling during cooling. In contrast, mafic magmas exhibit lower viscosity, enabling faster heat dissipation and crystallization without the conditions necessary for spherulite nucleation.[20][17]
Growth Patterns
Spherulites expand radially outward from a central nucleation site, with crystalline fibers growing at a constant velocity in all directions to produce their spherical geometry. This radial symmetry arises from isotropic growth conditions in the absence of external perturbations, allowing the aggregate to fill space efficiently until interactions with neighboring structures occur.[11]In geological systems, spherulite growth rates are typically low (e.g., 0.1–10 μm/h) and controlled by diffusion of melt components such as water and silica, increasing with undercooling but often leveling off at high ΔT due to reduced diffusivity in viscous melts.[21][20]As multiple spherulites develop simultaneously within a material, their expanding fronts eventually impinge upon one another, leading to the formation of boundaries or grain-like interfaces that delineate individual domains and halt further radial extension in those directions. These impingement zones often exhibit irregular or polycrystalline textures due to the misalignment of adjacent fibrous crystals.[11]Various environmental factors can modify spherulite growth patterns beyond ideal sphericity; for instance, temperature gradients during cooling may induce directional preferences, resulting in elongated or asymmetric forms where growth accelerates along the gradient. Impurities or solute rejections at the growth front can also promote branching and splaying of fibers, increasing the complexity of the radial architecture by creating diffusion-limited boundary layers that influence local crystallizationkinetics.[22][23]Theoretical models, such as the Keith and Padden framework originally developed for polymer systems, describe spherulitic expansion through diffusion-controlled branching of fibrous crystals, where rejected impurities form unstable channels that drive non-crystallographic divergences; this approach extends to geological settings involving silicate melts under similar nonequilibrium conditions.[23]
Geological Occurrences
In Igneous Rocks
Spherulites commonly occur in silica-rich igneous rocks such as rhyolites and obsidians, where rapid cooling rates during extrusion or subvolcanic emplacement preserve a glassy matrix while promoting localized devitrification and crystallization.[1] These structures form under conditions of strong supercooling in felsic magmas, typically achieving sizes on the millimeter scale, with diameters ranging from 1 to 10 mm in most volcanic glasses.[24] The process is diffusion-controlled, involving the nucleation and radial growth of fine-grained minerals like alkali feldspar and quartz within the amorphous host.[24]In hand specimens, spherulites are diagnostic features, appearing as distinct white or gray spherical aggregates contrasting against the dark, vitreous groundmass of the rock.[1] Their radial internal structure, composed of needle-like or fibrous crystals radiating from a central nucleus, becomes evident under microscopic examination but is often recognizable macroscopically due to the spherical morphology.[25] This texture signals post-eruptive thermal histories, with denser spherulite populations indicating faster cooling, such as at the distal margins of lava flows.[26][1]Notable examples include spherulites within pitchstone, a devitrified variety of obsidian characterized by its resinous luster, and perlitic obsidian, where concentric cracking accompanies the crystallization.[1] These occurrences, such as in the Hot Creek rhyolite flow of the Long Valley Caldera, highlight spherulites as indicators of devitrification in rapidly quenched rhyolitic lavas.[1]
Megaspherulites
Megaspherulites represent exceptionally large variants of spherulites, defined as radial crystalline aggregates exceeding 10 cm in diameter and extending up to several meters in scale. These structures form primarily in slowly cooled intrusive or dome-like extrusive settings, where viscous, silica-rich rhyolitic magmas provide extended crystallization periods that favor sparse nucleation and radial expansion under conditions of significant undercooling. Such environments, often above the glass transition temperature, allow for diffusion-controlled growth in phenocryst-poor melts, distinguishing megaspherulites from smaller spherulites commonly observed in more rapidly cooled igneous rocks.[27]Prominent geological examples of megaspherulites occur in rhyolitic lavas, including those at Glass Mountain in California, where quartz-dominated megaspherulites reach diameters up to 2 m within Paleogene flows. Similarly, Miocene rhyolitic lavas in the San Luis Potosí region of Mexico host megaspherulites composed mainly of K-feldspar (sanidine) and SiO₂ phases, highlighting their prevalence in high-silica volcanic provinces. These occurrences underscore the role of prolonged cooling in thick, viscous flows or domes, enabling the development of these oversized crystalline domains.Internally, megaspherulites display distinct zoning patterns reflective of evolving crystallization conditions, with coarser-grained cores featuring dendritic intergrowths of quartz and sanidine giving way to finer, fibrous rims of radiating sanidine and quartz bands. This transition from coarser central domains to finer marginal zones arises from progressive changes in temperature, melt composition, and diffusion rates during cooling, often culminating in sector-sphere textures at the periphery.[27] Such zoning provides insights into the nonequilibrium dynamics of silica-rich magma solidification.
Lithophysae
Lithophysae represent a specialized variant of spherulites characterized by hollow, bubble-like structures featuring concentric shells of crystalline material surrounding central vapor pockets or cavities. These cavities often exhibit irregular, star-shaped forms resulting from tensional stress or vapor-phase corrosion at the crystallization front. The shells typically consist of fine-grained quartz, sanidine, cristobalite, or tridymite, forming radial or fibrous patterns that line the cavity walls, sometimes with secondary infills like chalcedony.[14][28]The formation of lithophysae occurs during the cooling of viscous, silica-rich lavas or welded ignimbrites, where gas expansion—driven by volatiles released during devitrification—creates internal voids above the glass transition temperature (approximately 535°C). This process involves ductile expansion of the host material due to vapor pressure and exothermic heat from crystallization, which can raise local temperatures by up to 16°C and promote cavity growth through mechanical opening rather than solely vapor-phase pressure. In some cases, the cavities develop post-emplacement in compacted tuffs, with boundaries deflecting surrounding foliation to indicate formation while the material remains sufficiently ductile.[28][14][29]Lithophysae commonly occur in rhyolitic ignimbrites and domes, where they form in permeable, lower-density zones of welded tuffs, often 2–12 meters above the base in thick sections exceeding 40 meters. Typical sizes range from 1 to 30 centimeters in diameter, though larger examples up to 50 centimeters have been documented in certain formations. Prominent occurrences include the Bishop Tuff in California's Long Valley Caldera, where they appear in devitrified, densely welded zones with concentric mineral linings, and the Lava Creek Tuff in Yellowstone National Park, featuring cavities up to 15 centimeters amid vapor-phase crystallization. Additional examples are found in the Rattlesnake Tuff (Oregon) and Peach Springs Tuff (Arizona), highlighting their association with large-volume silicic eruptions.[29][28][14]
Variolites
Variolites represent a distinctive spherulitic texture observed in basaltic rocks, characterized by fine-grained, micrometer-scale spherulites known as varioles that impart a spotted or ophitic appearance to the rock surface. These varioles consist of radiating fibrous aggregates primarily of plagioclase microlites, often intergrown with pyroxene, embedded within a fine-grained groundmass. The pock-marked weathering pattern arises from the differential erosion of these denser spherulitic clusters against the surrounding matrix.[30][31][32]This texture forms in mafic lavas subjected to rapid cooling, such as at the margins of flows or in pillow lavas, where high undercooling promotes nucleation and radial growth of mineral fibers from a glassy precursor. Plagioclase spherulites dominate in tholeiitic basalts, while pyroxene varieties occur in more magnesian compositions like komatiites, reflecting local compositional variations during crystallization. The process involves devitrification of basaltic glass, leading to impingement of fibrous crystals that fill space radially outward from nucleation sites.[31][33][34]Prominent examples include variolitic basalts within the Columbia River Basalt Group, where sheaves of feldspar needles develop in the glassy rims of flows, and in Archean greenstone belts like the Abitibi region of Canada, featuring plagioclase-rich varioles in aphyric tholeiites. The term "variolite" originated from 17th- and 18th-century European observations of these spotted basalts, drawing from the Latin "variola" to describe their pustule-like spots, with early descriptions from Italian and German geologists.[35][31]The textural evolution in variolites progresses from an initial vitreous state to a fully crystalline fabric through progressive heating or hydration, which facilitates spherulite coalescence and enhances rock coherence. This evolution is particularly useful for identifying paleo-flow structures in ancient mafic volcanics, as varioles preferentially form at interfaces of rapid quenching, delineating original lava boundaries and aiding reconstruction of eruptive dynamics.[36][34]
Spherulites in Materials
In Polymers
In semi-crystalline polymers, spherulites form as radial arrays of lamellar crystals during melt crystallization, where thin, folded-chain lamellae (typically 10-20 nm thick) branch and twist outward from a central nucleus, creating a spheroidal morphology. This structure is prominent in polymers such as polyethylene (PE) and isotactic polypropylene (iPP), where the lamellae organize into fibrillar bundles that splay apart to fill space impingement-free until contacting neighboring spherulites. The overall spherulite imparts a hierarchical organization to the material, with the radial symmetry arising from the continuous branching and divergence of lamellae during growth.[37][38]Nucleation of polymer spherulites typically occurs heterogeneously on impurities, fillers, or nucleating agents, which lower the energy barrier for crystal initiation compared to homogeneous nucleation in the pure melt. For instance, in iPP, sodium benzoate or talc fillers serve as effective heterogeneous sites, promoting higher nucleation densities and finer microstructures. Growth proceeds radially at rates of 1-10 μm/min for iPP and linear PE when crystallized isothermally at 100-130°C, influenced by undercooling, molecular weight, and chain mobility; higher temperatures near the melting point slow growth due to reduced driving force, while lower temperatures enhance it until kinetic limitations dominate. These rates reflect regime II crystallizationkinetics, where secondary nucleation on lamellar surfaces controls propagation.[39][40][41]Under polarized light microscopy, polymer spherulites exhibit characteristic birefringence due to the oriented lamellae, producing a bright Maltese cross extinction pattern when viewed between crossed polars, with the cross arms aligning radially and tangentially to the propagation direction. Spherulite diameters typically range from 10 to 1000 μm, depending on nucleation density and cooling rate; larger sizes (>100 μm) increase light scattering at boundaries, reducing optical transparency and haze in films, whereas sub-10 μm spherulites enhance clarity in applications like packaging. This size-dependent opacity arises from refractive index mismatches between crystalline and amorphous regions.[42][43][44]Recent advances since 2020 have leveraged 3D electron diffraction (3D ED) techniques to resolve atomic-scale structures within polymer spherulites, overcoming limitations of traditional 2D methods by reconstructing three-dimensional crystal orientations from nano-sized volumes. For example, 3D ED has enabled direct determination of polymorphic structures in compact spherulites of semi-crystalline organics akin to polymers, revealing subtle lamellar twisting and branching not visible in bulk samples, which informs models of growth mechanisms and material design. This method, combined with cryo-electron tomography, provides unprecedented insight into the internal architecture of spherulites in polymers like iPP, facilitating precise control over mechanical properties. Post-2022 developments as of 2025 include studies on mesoscopic damage mechanisms linked to spherulitic microstructures, lamellar branching orientations, and solvent-enabled hierarchical nested spherulites, enhancing understanding of toughness and photonic properties in semi-crystalline polymers.[45][46][47][48]
In Glass
Spherulites in glass primarily form through devitrification, the crystallization of amorphous silicate structures under thermal or chemical influences. In soda-lime-silica glasses, devitrification often produces devitrite (Na₂Ca₃Si₆O₁₆) as needle-like aggregates radiating from nucleation sites, while cristobalite may appear as a primary phase in surface crystallization before secondary devitrite growth.[49][50] In borosilicate glasses, such as those used in laboratory ware, spherulitic cristobalite dominates, nucleating heterogeneously in the presence of agents like chromium oxides and growing as fibrous aggregates that scatter light, leading to hazy appearances.[51][52]Quartz forms less commonly, typically under prolonged high-temperature exposure in pure silica variants. These inorganic transitions differ from organic polymer growth, occurring via diffusion-limited attachment in viscous melts above the glass transition temperature.Controlled devitrification in laboratory settings enables the production of glass-ceramics, where heat treatments between 500°C and 800°C dictate spherulite size and distribution for tailored microstructures. At lower temperatures (around 500–600°C), finer spherulites (micrometers in scale) form via volume nucleation, while higher temperatures (700–800°C) promote larger, surface-nucleated growth up to millimeters, often transforming initial phases like cristobalite into more stable silicates.[53][54] This process is exploited in ceramic manufacturing to achieve uniform crystallization, avoiding uncontrolled devitrification that could compromise integrity.Historical examples include spherulite-like devitrification structures observed in ancient Egyptian glasses, where surface cracks facilitate nucleation of crystalline aggregates, often wollastonite or devitrite, due to long-term exposure to environmental conditions. In modern applications, such as silica-based optical fibers, devitrification yields cristobalite spherulites during high-temperature processing or impurity-induced reactions, potentially affecting signal transmission if not minimized.[55][56]Devitrification-induced spherulites generally increase glass opacity through lightscattering by radiating crystals, reducing transparency from near 90% in amorphous states to under 50% in heavily crystallized regions. In controlled glass-ceramic contexts, this crystallization enhances mechanical strength, with biaxial flexural values rising from ~70 MPa in base glass to over 150 MPa due to compressive stresses around crystal aggregates, improving fracture toughness without excessive brittleness.[57][58][59]
In Metals
Spherulites in metals primarily form in metallic glasses and alloys during rapid solidification processes, such as casting or drop-tube experiments, where undercooled melts lead to crystalline growth patterns. These structures arise from the nucleation and radial expansion of intermetallic or eutectic phases within an amorphous matrix, often during devitrification or partial crystallization. In supercooled metallic melts, nucleation initiates the spherulitic growth, as referenced in broader mechanisms of polycrystalline formation.[8]A prominent example is observed in Ni₃Ge alloys processed via rapid solidification in droplet form, where spherulites develop through disorder trapping followed by solid-state ordering of the β-Ni₃Ge phase. These spherulites exhibit lamellar morphologies with diameters typically ranging from 10 to 20 μm at cooling rates of 700–4600 K/s, consisting of ordered lamellae separated by disordered material, and show non-crystallographic branching similar to category 1 spherulites. Such structures are relevant for high-temperature applications in advanced alloys, including those used in aerospace components due to their chemical stability and hardness.[8]In Fe-based metallic glasses, such as Fe₅₀Ni₁₆Mo₆B₁₈Zr₁₀, spherulites form during solidification of the melt, featuring eutectic phases like (Fe, Ni)₃B and intermetallic compounds such as Fe₂Zr. The morphology includes flower-like arrangements of needles and lamellae with wavelengths of 1–3 μm and overall sizes up to several tens of micrometers, often 1–50 μm in representative cases. These crystalline defects can influence mechanical properties, such as reducing fracture toughness in bulk metallic glasses by inducing stress concentrations, though their volume fraction is typically low in optimized casting.[60][61]Studies on rapidly solidified droplets, including Ni-based systems like Ni₃Ge, highlight spherulitic morphologies in undercooled conditions, with mixed dendritic-spherulitic patterns at higher cooling rates, underscoring their role in tailoring microstructures for aerospace alloys. Overall, spherulite sizes in these metallic systems generally span 1–50 μm, depending on cooling rate and composition, providing insights into phase transformations in amorphous metals.[8]
Significance
Geological Indicators
Spherulites serve as key indicators of cooling rates in igneous rocks, providing insights into the thermal history of volcanic and subvolcanic environments. The size of spherulites is inversely related to the cooling rate during crystallization; small spherulites, often micrometers to millimeters in diameter, form under rapid quenching conditions typical of extrusive lavas or shallow intrusions, where high undercooling promotes numerous nucleation sites and limited growth time.[62] In contrast, larger spherulites, ranging from centimeters to decimeters, develop in slower-cooling settings, such as thick lava flows or hypabyssal bodies, allowing for fewer nuclei and extended radial growth.[63] This relationship has been quantified through diffusion modeling around spherulites in obsidian, revealing cooling rates from 10^{-2.2} to 10^{-1.2} °C/h in natural rhyolitic lavas.[64]The presence of spherulites in obsidian flows aids in paleovolcanic reconstruction, particularly signaling the dynamics of explosive or effusive eruptions in silicic systems. Obsidians hosting spherulites, such as those from the Aeolian Islands, indicate initial rapid quenching followed by devitrification during post-eruptive cooling, often associated with dome-building or explosive events that produce glassy ejecta.[65] For instance, spherulite development in these contexts reflects volatile loss and fracturing in rhyolitic magmas, helping to differentiate between sustained effusive phases and potential precursors to Plinian eruptions.[66]Mineralogical analysis of spherulites offers compositional insights into the parent magma, especially silica content in felsic rocks. Spherulites in rhyolitic settings predominantly consist of intergrown quartz and alkali feldspar (e.g., sanidine), with high silica phases indicating magmas exceeding 70 wt% SiO₂, as seen in Yellowstone obsidians where quartz-rich spherulites confirm rhyolitic affinities.[64] Trace elements and oxides within these structures further reveal oxidation states and volatile histories, linking spherulite textures to specific magmatic compositions.[67]Spherulites also hold potential for geochronology through associated minerals or direct application of fission-track methods on the host glass. Zircon or other uranium-bearing phases enclosed in or near spherulites can be dated via fission tracks, providing eruption ages for volcanic sequences, as demonstrated in rhyolitic flows where tracks in accessory minerals align with broader stratigraphic timelines.[67] Additionally, fission-track dating of obsidian matrices containing spherulites enables precise timing of lava flows and associated devitrification events.[68]
Materials Properties
In polymers, the presence of spherulites generally reduces ductility by restricting chain mobility within the rigid, crystalline fibrillar networks, while simultaneously increasing stiffness due to the enhanced packing density and ordered lamellar structures.[37] This trade-off arises from the spherulitic morphology, where crystalline regions contribute to higher modulus but limit plastic deformation under stress.[69] Additionally, the radial orientation of lamellae in spherulites introduces mechanical anisotropy, with tensile properties differing significantly between radial (stiffer) and tangential (more compliant) directions in materials like isotactic polypropylene.[70][71]In glasses and metals, particularly bulk metallic glasses, controlled spherulitic crystallization plays a pivotal role in balancing toughness and brittleness. Partial crystallization, such as forming nanoscale TiCu₂ spherulites in an amorphous matrix, enhances toughness by creating ductile composite-like structures that absorb energy during fracture, improving overall ductility without fully sacrificing strength.[72] Conversely, uncontrolled or excessive spherulite formation in alloys leads to brittleness, as interconnected crystalline phases propagate cracks more readily and reduce fracture toughness with increasing crystallinity.[73] This control is achieved through techniques like high-current density pulsing or additive manufacturing, preventing detrimental phase transformations in high-strength applications.[61]Tailoring spherulite size has emerged as a key strategy in applications involving synthetic materials. In biodegradable plastics such as polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB), copolymerization reduces spherulite dimensions from micrometers to sub-micrometer scales, enhancing toughness by minimizing stress concentrations at grain boundaries and improving ductility for biomedical uses.[74] For high-strength metallic glasses, optimizing spherulite size and distribution during casting or processing maintains exceptional toughness (e.g., K_IC > 50 MPa·m^{1/2}) while preserving yield strengths above 1 GPa, critical for aerospace components.[61]Recent 2025 research highlights the optimization of spherulite density in 3D-printed polymers to boost impact resistance. Post-processing annealing refines spherulite formation in Onyx prints, increasing nucleation density and yielding finer crystals that improve mechanical performance through better energy dissipation at interspherulitic boundaries.[75] This approach addresses anisotropy in extrusion-based printing, enabling tailored microstructures for load-bearing parts with enhanced durability.[76]