Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Token Ring

Token Ring is a (LAN) technology developed by in the 1980s that employs a token-passing protocol to control access to the shared medium, ensuring orderly data transmission without collisions. Standardized as IEEE 802.5, it defines the physical and layers for interconnecting equipment in commercial and light industrial environments using a token-passing ring access method. In Token Ring networks, devices are physically connected in a star topology via Multistation Access Units (), which logically form a unidirectional ring where circulates in one direction. A special three-byte frame known as a —consisting of a start , access control byte, and end —travels around the ring; only the station possessing the token can transmit frames, which include and destination addresses, user , and a frame check sequence for error detection. Operating at speeds of 4 Mbps or 16 Mbps initially (with later extensions to 100 Mbps), these networks support up to 250 stations using shielded twisted-pair cabling and incorporate features like priority mechanisms for high-priority traffic and automatic fault recovery through token stripping and ring reconfiguration. The technology's deterministic nature provides several advantages, including guaranteed access times suitable for applications, efficient utilization under heavy loads, and built-in error correction without requiring a central for connectivity. However, disadvantages include higher costs due to specialized hardware like , potential single points of failure if a malfunctions (disrupting the entire ), and slower performance in as frames must traverse all stations. By the late , Token Ring had largely declined in , overshadowed by the faster, cheaper, and more scalable Ethernet (), rendering it obsolete for most modern networking needs despite its historical role in enterprise environments.

Overview

Definition and Principles

Token Ring is a (LAN) technology that operates at the physical and data link layers of the , utilizing a token-passing to control access to the shared communication medium among multiple stations. This approach enables reliable data transmission in a multi-access environment by ensuring that only one station can send data at a time, thereby maintaining orderly network operation. At its core, Token Ring functions through a logical ring structure where a single special frame, known as the , circulates unidirectionally among the connected . The that possesses the is granted exclusive rights to transmit data frames onto ; once is complete or a is reached, the releases the for the next in the sequence. This token-passing mechanism, as defined in the IEEE 802.5 standard, establishes a structured flow of data that regenerates and forwards signals at each , forming a closed for continuous circulation. The token-passing protocol inherently provides deterministic access to , guaranteeing each a finite and predictable waiting time before it can transmit, which eliminates the risk of collisions that can occur in contention-based systems. By restricting to the token holder, the system avoids simultaneous data injections, ensuring conflict-free operation even under high load conditions. Although logically organized as a ring, Token Ring is physically implemented using a star topology, where stations connect to a central wiring concentrator, such as a multistation access unit, to form the pathway. This design offers key benefits, including fair access opportunities for all stations regardless of position and predictable performance that supports consistent throughput in environments with multiple active users.

Key Characteristics

Token Ring networks operate at standardized data transmission speeds of 4 Mbps in their original implementation and 16 Mbps in the more commonly deployed version, with a later extension supporting 100 Mbps under the IEEE 802.5t . These speeds enable reliable connectivity, particularly in environments requiring consistent performance without the variability of contention-based access. A defining feature of Token Ring is its deterministic , arising from the token rotation time, which can be approximated as roughly N \times \frac{\text{frame size}}{\text{[bandwidth](/page/Bandwidth)}}, where N is the number of ; this calculation reflects the worst-case scenario where each holds the to transmit a maximum-sized frame before it reaches a given station. This predictability ensures bounded access delays, making it suitable for applications sensitive to timing variations, unlike probabilistic methods in other networks. Token Ring supports up to 250 stations per ring in IEEE 802.5 configurations, with physical constraints limiting the total ring circumference by propagation delays and station insertion delays to maintain within tolerable limits. The protocol's high reliability stems from built-in mechanisms, including automatic reconfiguration to isolate and bypass faulty stations or links via beaconing and temporary removal from the ring, as well as procedures to restore connectivity without manual intervention. In high-load scenarios, Token Ring's token-passing media access method achieves near-peak efficiency, often outperforming contention-based systems by avoiding collisions and ensuring fair bandwidth allocation among stations.

History

Development and Standardization

The concept of ring topologies for computer networks emerged in the late 1960s and early through academic aimed at efficient local . In 1969, John Newhall and colleagues proposed an early design, initially known as the Newhall ring, which connected stations in a closed loop for sequential data transmission, laying foundational ideas for token-based access in shared media environments. At , researchers in the explored variations, including star-shaped configurations to enhance maintainability while preserving logical ring signaling, addressing challenges like fault isolation in pure ring setups. Concurrently, the project at the began in 1974, developing a slotted for high-speed local area networking at 10 Mbit/s, which demonstrated practical implementation of distributed control and influenced subsequent commercial designs. IBM's development of Token Ring technology commenced in 1977 at its Laboratory, drawing inspiration from these academic efforts, including consultations with MIT's Jerry Saltzer and the Ring's slotted approach. By fall 1980, formed an internal led by engineers Warmenhoven and Murray Bolt to create a proprietary , selecting over alternatives like Ethernet to ensure deterministic performance and compatibility with 's ecosystem. Prototypes were operational by 1981, incorporating key innovations such as a logical overlaid on a physical star —using a central multistation access unit (MAU) for wiring concentration and —and dual monitors (active and standby) to maintain ring stability by detecting and resolving issues like lost tokens without disrupting the network. These features prioritized reliability for enterprise environments, with the physical star enabling easier cabling and isolation of failures compared to pure s. The standardization process began in 1982 when IBM submitted its Token Ring proposal to the committee, integrating it as the token ring access method alongside other LAN proposals like token bus (802.4) and CSMA/CD (802.3). After iterative working group reviews and balloting, IEEE 802.5 was ratified in 1985, defining the (MAC) and specifications for 4 Mbit/s operation over shielded twisted-pair cabling, with provisions for communication and . The standard emphasized and extensibility, establishing Token Ring as a viable alternative to Ethernet for controlled-access networks. Subsequent evolution of IEEE 802.5 included amendments to support advanced media and speeds. In 1997, IEEE 802.5j introduced fiber optic station attachments, enabling longer distances (up to 2 km) and higher bandwidth for dedicated Token Ring links while maintaining compatibility with the base standard. By 2000, IEEE 802.5t extended the protocol to 100 Mbit/s over unshielded and , incorporating dedicated full-duplex modes and enhanced error handling to meet growing enterprise demands without altering core mechanics. These updates reflected ongoing refinements to adapt Token Ring for diverse physical environments and performance needs.

Launch, Adoption, and Decline

IBM officially launched its Token Ring network on October 15, 1985, following an initial announcement of development efforts in 1984, with the product featuring 4 Mbps adapters compatible with PCs and midrange systems. The technology quickly gained traction in settings, particularly those reliant on mainframes, where its deterministic access and reliability suited mission-critical applications during the late 1980s and 1990s. Adoption peaked in this period, driven by IBM's ecosystem dominance and support from third-party vendors such as Ungermann-Bass, which provided compatible components for broader integration. By , Token Ring held a substantial in local area networks, capturing over 57% of the 4 Mbps adapter segment and significant portions of enterprise deployments worldwide. Its use extended to large organizations valuing predictable performance over Ethernet's contention-based approach, though growth was somewhat limited by IBM's influences on the ecosystem. The decline of Token Ring began in the mid-1990s as Ethernet evolved with lower costs, simpler twisted-pair cabling, and higher speeds, exemplified by the introduction of at 100 Mbps in 1995, which outpaced Token Ring's then-common speeds of up to 16 Mbps. Token Ring's higher hardware complexity, installation challenges, and overall expense further eroded its competitiveness against Ethernet's scalability and vendor openness. ceased active development of Token Ring around 1998, shifting focus to Ethernet-compatible solutions. The IEEE 802.5 , responsible for Token Ring standardization, was disbanded in 2008 following the withdrawal of the standard in 2008, though some legacy networks continue to operate in niche industrial and mainframe environments.

Architecture

Network Topology

Token Ring networks employ a logical ring topology, where stations are logically arranged in a closed loop to facilitate unidirectional circulation of a control token, ensuring orderly access to the shared medium. In this configuration, data flows sequentially from one station to the next around the ring, with each station receiving and relaying frames until they return to the originating station. Physically, Token Ring implements a star topology, with all stations connected to a central multistation access unit (MAU) that internally wires the connections to form the logical ring. This uses twisted-pair cabling from each station (known as a lobe) to the MAU, which provides the illusion of a ring without direct station-to-station wiring, enhancing manageability and isolation of faults. Key ring parameters include a maximum of 250 stations for 16 Mbps operation using shielded twisted-pair cabling, balancing performance and reliability. Each lobe segment is limited to approximately 100 meters in passive MAU configurations at 16 Mbps to minimize signal attenuation and maintain timing integrity. For fault tolerance, IEEE 802.5c introduces dual ring capability, allowing a counter-rotating backup path that can automatically reconfigure upon primary ring failure, supporting high-availability applications by wrapping around damaged segments. In terms of ring closure, the logical loop is formed by connecting the head-end output of the first station to the tail-end input of the last station via the MAU's internal bypassing mechanism; inactive stations are optically or electronically bypassed, ensuring continuous circulation without interruption.

Components and Interfaces

The Multistation Access Unit (MAU) serves as the central wiring concentrator in Token Ring networks, enabling multiple stations to connect in a star topology while logically forming a ring. It features ports for station attachments via lobe cables and includes ring-in (RI) and ring-out (RO) ports to daisy-chain multiple units, supporting up to 260 devices with shielded twisted pair cabling or 72 devices with unshielded twisted pair. The IBM 8228 MAU, for example, provides 8 ports for stations plus RI/RO ports, operates at 4 Mbps or 16 Mbps, and uses internal relays to insert or bypass stations without active power management. The Controlled Access Unit (CAU) extends the MAU's functionality with active management capabilities, acting as a powered concentrator that monitors and controls access to the ring. It includes features like soft error reporting, automatic station bypass for faults, and integration with protocols such as SNMP. The 8230 CAU supports up to 92 ports through lobe attachment modules (LAMs) and lobe insertion units (LIUs), with dual ring redundancy via primary and secondary ports, and can handle lobe lengths over 100 meters at 4 Mbps or 16 Mbps. Network Interface Cards (NICs), also known as Token Ring adapters, provide the physical and connectivity for end stations to the network. These cards, such as IBM's 16/4 Token Ring Adapter, include a unique 48-bit IEEE-assigned address in for identification and support auto-sensing of ring speeds (4 Mbps or 16 Mbps). They handle frame processing and management, often featuring AUI-like ports for media attachment and compatibility with various cabling types. Token Ring networks primarily use shielded twisted pair (STP) cabling, such as IBM Type 1 (two pairs, 150-ohm impedance, supporting up to 350 meters at 4 Mbps), Type 2 (six pairs for combined voice/data), Type 6 (jumper cables up to 100 meters), and Type 9 (plenum-rated). Unshielded twisted pair (UTP) options include Type 3 (four pairs, Category 3 or 5, limited to 72 stations per segment due to interference susceptibility). Fiber optic cabling, like Type 5 (two 100/140-micron fibers), enables high-speed backbones up to 2 km, offering immunity to electromagnetic interference. Interfaces in Token Ring adhere to the IEEE 802.5 specifications, which define signaling and connectivity for 4 Mbps and 16 Mbps operations using . Common connectors include RJ-45 for UTP lobe cables (e.g., on CAU LAMs) and DB-9 (IEEE "ugly plug") for attachments. Lobe cables, serving as short point-to-point links from NICs to or CAUs, typically measure up to 100 meters and use hermaphroditic data connectors for STP, ensuring reliable ring insertion.

Operation

Token Passing Mechanism

In Token Ring networks, the serves as a special three-byte control that circulates continuously around the logical ring, granting transmission rights to the that possesses it. This consists of a starting byte, an byte, and an ending byte, ensuring synchronization and indicating the 's availability for use. The is passed sequentially from one to the next in a unidirectional manner, forming the core of the medium protocol defined in IEEE 802.5. When a station receives the token, it examines its own queue to determine if data transmission is required. If no data is pending, the station simply regenerates and forwards the token to its downstream neighbor without modification, allowing the token to continue circulating promptly. However, if the station has data to send, it seizes the token by altering the access control byte and converts it into a data frame by appending the necessary header, payload, and trailer information. The station then transmits this frame onto the ring, where it circulates until it returns to the originating station, which verifies successful delivery (via acknowledgment bits set by the destination) and removes the frame before regenerating and releasing a new free token. To prevent any single from monopolizing the network, the token holding time (THT) limits the duration a can retain and use the , typically set to 10 milliseconds for 4 Mbps rings or scaled proportionally for higher speeds like 16 Mbps. During this interval, the may transmit multiple frames if available, but upon THT expiration, it must release the regardless of remaining data. This mechanism ensures fair access and bounded latency for all on the ring. In the event of token loss—due to corruption, frame errors, or other transient faults—stations detect the absence through a configured timeout period, after which the network reinitializes the token circulation process to restore operation. This basic recovery approach maintains network availability without requiring complex reconfiguration in most cases.

Access Control and Monitors

In Token Ring networks, access to the medium is regulated through the (AC) field within frames, which is a single-byte field containing specific bits for managing transmission rights and ring operations. This field includes a 1-bit field that distinguishes tokens from data or command frames (set to 0 for tokens and 1 for frames), a 1-bit field used by the active monitor to track frame circulation and prevent indefinite looping, a 3-bit field that indicates the frame's priority level, and a 3-bit reservation field allowing stations to reserve the token for future use based on their priority needs. The active monitor (AM) is a designated station responsible for maintaining ring stability and coordinating key operations, including generating free tokens, timing token rotations to enforce the ring's latency limits, and purging any frames that circulate endlessly by stripping their trailing delimiters. The AM is elected through the claim token process, in which stations detect the absence of an active monitor (such as after a timeout or ring initialization) and transmit special claim token frames containing their ; the station with the highest MAC address wins the contention after up to seven rounds of circulation, assuming the role and notifying others via an active monitor present frame. Standby monitors (SMs) serve as backups to the AM, with all non-AM stations configured in this role; they periodically transmit standby monitor present to report their status and monitor for AM , such as by detecting missing active monitor present or excessive token rotation times, at which point any SM can initiate a new claim process to assume the AM role. Neighbor notification enhances fault isolation by enabling each to identify and communicate with its nearest active upstream (NAUN), the immediately preceding it in the ; during insertion or , stations exchange neighbor information to confirm and report any anomalies, allowing localized diagnostics without disrupting the entire . Ring maintenance relies on beaconing and autoreconfiguration to handle faults like cable breaks or station failures. When a station detects a signal loss or duplicate address, it transmits frames repeatedly; stations within the failure domain (the beaconing station, its NAUN, and the segment between them) then perform autoreconfiguration by activating internal relays in the multistation access unit (MAU) or using mechanisms to electrically bypass the faulty component, restoring ring operation without manual intervention. After approximately 26 seconds without resolution, the initiating station performs auto-removal by temporarily removing itself from the ring to test if it is the fault source.

Frame Formats

Token and Control Frames

In Token Ring networks, token and control frames serve essential roles in managing access to the shared medium and maintaining ring integrity without carrying user data. The token frame acts as a permission signal that circulates continuously around the logical , allowing a station to seize it for transmission when it arrives. Control frames, including the abort frame and various (Media Access Control) control frames, facilitate error recovery, network diagnostics, and coordination among stations. These frames are defined in the IEEE 802.5 standard and implemented in hardware to ensure deterministic access and . The is a compact 3-byte structure designed for rapid circulation. It consists of a starting (SD), an (AC) byte, and an ending (ED). The SD is a 1-byte field encoded with J-K symbols (specifically J:K:0:J:K:0:0:0 in ) to signal the beginning of the frame and violate the standard bit encoding for unambiguous detection. The AC byte includes 3 bits (P), 3 bits (R), a bit (T set to 0 to indicate a token rather than a frame), and a bit (M set to 0). The ED is another 1-byte field (J:K:1:J:K:1:0:0) that marks the end and includes an intermediate frame indicator (I) and error bit (E), both set to 0 for tokens. This minimal format ensures low overhead, enabling the token to traverse the ring at speeds of 4 or 16 Mbps without impeding performance. The abort frame, also 3 bytes long, is used by a station to prematurely terminate a , such as when an occurs or a frame exceeds the token holding time. It mirrors the token frame's structure: an SD (J:K:0:J:K:0:0:0), an AC byte (with T=1 to distinguish it from a token, and other bits configured for abort signaling), and an ED (J:K:1:J:K:1:1:0, where I=1 indicates an abort). Stations detect and remove the abort frame to clear the ring, preventing indefinite circulation of damaged frames. MAC control frames are specialized non-data frames that support ring management functions, following a structure similar to data frames but with a frame control (FC) byte indicating control type (e.g., FC=40h for MAC frames) and a variable information field for parameters. Key examples include the Duplicate Address Test (DAT) frame, which a station transmits upon joining the ring to check for address conflicts; it includes the source address in the information field and uses counters to track responses, with no replies expected if the address is unique. The Active Monitor Present (AMP) frame, sent periodically by the active monitor every 7 seconds, broadcasts the monitor's address and its nearest active upstream neighbor (NAUN) to synchronize stations and initiate neighbor notification processes. Neighbor notification frames, triggered by AMP, allow stations to update their NAUN by copying addresses from passing frames and responding if needed, ensuring each station knows its immediate predecessor for diagnostics. Other control frames, such as beacon and ring purge, handle fault isolation and token regeneration but follow analogous formats. These frames typically include SD, AC (with M=0 for initial circulation), FC, destination/source addresses (often broadcast), a 1- to 6-byte information field, a 4-byte frame check sequence (FCS) for CRC-32 error detection, and ED. At the physical layer, Token Ring employs for data bits, but delimiters use special J and K symbols to create code violations that reliably boundaries amid potential . The J symbol lacks a transition at the bit start, while K lacks it at the midpoint, forming non-standard 5-bit patterns (e.g., J=00 or 11, K=01 or 10 in NRZ representation) that stations detect as violations to synchronize without ambiguity. Code violations outside delimiters signal errors, incrementing station counters for line errors and triggering recovery. Control frames circulate the ring like tokens, with stations examining the AC and FC fields to determine actions: they may copy information, set status bits, or strip the frame if designated (e.g., the active purges duplicates). The monitor bit prevents endless looping by flipping after one rotation, prompting removal and token reinsertion. This process integrates with the overall to maintain orderly ring operation.
Frame TypeLength (bytes)Key FieldsPrimary Purpose
Token3SD (1), AC (1), ED (1)Circulate access permission
Abort3SD (1), AC (1), ED (1)Halt faulty transmission
MAC Control (e.g., AMP, DAT)Variable (min. 21)SD (1), AC (1), FC (1), Addresses (12), Info (var.), FCS (4), ED (1), FS (1)Ring diagnostics and coordination

Data and Management Frames

In Token Ring networks, data frames are used to transmit user data across the ring and follow a specific structure defined by the IEEE 802.5 standard. The frame consists of a 1-byte starting (SD) to signal the beginning, a 1-byte (AC) field for token handling and priority, a 1-byte frame control (FC) field, 6-byte destination address (DA) and source address (SA) fields, an optional routing information field, the variable-length information field carrying the (up to 4464 bytes at 16 Mbps), a 4-byte (FCS) for integrity, a 1-byte ending (ED), and a 1-byte frame (FS) field indicating receipt and processing by the destination. This results in a minimum frame size of 21 bytes for empty frames (no routing information or ). The field in data frames employs its leading to differentiate between frames (FC=40h), which include information or low-level control data, and LLC frames (FC=50h), which encapsulate user data for delivery to the sublayer. This distinction ensures appropriate handling at the receiving station, with frames supporting internal ring operations and LLC frames enabling interoperability with upper-layer protocols. Management frames operate at the level to maintain ring functionality and include types such as the ring parameters request frame, sent by inserting stations to query operational settings like holding time, and the corresponding response frame from the ring parameter server providing those details. These MAC management functions integrate with the LLC layer through service access points (SAPs), allowing coordinated handling of both local ring maintenance and higher-layer service requests. Error detection in and frames relies on the FCS, a 4-byte field computing a over the header and information fields to identify transmission errors; receiving set error indicators in the and report detected line errors (physical signaling issues) or soft errors ( corruption) to the active monitor for network diagnostics. stripping ensures efficient ring usage, with the originating recognizing its own transmitted or frame upon return—via the match and bits—and removing it from circulation before reinserting the , thus preventing congestion from lingering frames.

Advanced Features

Priority and Reservation Scheme

The priority and reservation scheme in Token Ring networks, as defined in IEEE 802.5, provides an optional mechanism to support differentiated access for traffic with varying urgency levels, allowing higher-priority stations to seize the token more frequently than lower-priority ones. This feature enhances the network's ability to handle time-sensitive applications by modifying the token's (AC) field during circulation, without disrupting the basic token-passing protocol. The AC field in tokens and frames includes a 3-bit priority field (PPP) and a 3-bit reservation field (RRR), enabling eight discrete priority levels from 0 (lowest, default for new tokens) to 7 (highest). A station wishing to transmit at a specific level monitors passing tokens or frames; if the current token is lower than the station's assigned , the station sets the RRR bits in the field to its desired level (up to its own maximum) as the frame circulates back to the originator. This signals a request for the next token to be issued at the elevated , ensuring that only stations with equal or higher can access it. When a station captures the token, it promotes the token's priority to match or exceed the highest reservation seen during the previous rotation if its own priority allows; otherwise, it passes the token unchanged, allowing subsequent stations to evaluate the reservation until a qualified station elevates it. After transmitting at the elevated priority, the holding station releases a new token at that level, which circulates the ring up to seven times (or until no higher reservations are made) before the priority is automatically downgraded to the previous level by the same station that promoted it, preventing indefinite high-priority locking. This promotion and restoration process maintains fairness within priority classes while favoring urgent traffic. The scheme is particularly suited for environments requiring predictable latency, such as voice transmission or IBM's () traffic, where higher priorities (e.g., levels 6 or 7) ensure low-delay paths for real-time data amid bulk transfers. In IBM deployments, SNA sessions often utilized elevated priorities to prioritize interactive terminal responses over file transfers. As an optional extension to the core IEEE 802.5 specification, the priority and reservation mechanism is not universally implemented in all Token Ring hardware, leading to issues in mixed environments. Its added logic also increases complexity, potentially raising the risk of errors like persistent high-priority tokens if a station fails to restore the original level.

Source Routing and Bridging

In Token Ring networks, enables communication between stations across multiple interconnected rings by embedding the complete information directly into the 's Routing Information Field (). This field, indicated by the Routing Information Indicator (RII) bit set to 1 in the source address, consists of a Routing Control subfield specifying the route type, length, direction (D-bit for directional or non-directional), and the largest allowable size, followed by up to 14 Routing Designator subfields, each containing a 12-bit ring number and a 4-bit bridge number. The source station specifies the route, allowing to traverse up to 13 bridges (14 rings total) in IEEE 802.5 implementations, though IBM's original design limited it to 7 bridges (8 rings). This approach contrasts with hop-by-hop , as the entire is predetermined to avoid loops and ensure efficient delivery. Source-routing bridges operate by examining and modifying the RIF to forward frames between Token Ring LANs, adding their own ring and bridge identifiers to explorer frames during route discovery while stripping them from the response frames upon return to the source. There are two primary types: source-routing bridges, which strictly follow the RIF for forwarding and support single-route, all-routes, and specific-route frames; and transparent bridges, which learn MAC addresses without relying on RIF but are compatible via hybrid source-route transparent (SRT) modes defined in IEEE 802.5m. Route discovery begins with the source station broadcasting explorer frames—either all-routes explorers, which propagate along all possible paths and generate multiple copies to collect diverse routes, or spanning tree explorers, which follow a loop-free spanning tree topology similar to IEEE 802.1d to limit flooding. Upon reaching the destination, a response frame is sent back using the accumulated route, which the source then caches for future data frames. Bridges also adjust the largest frame size in the RIF to the minimum supported along the path, ensuring compatibility; for instance, a fully routed frame can reach up to 4472 bytes including the RIF, accommodating the overhead from up to 14 designators. These mechanisms support interconnections primarily between multiple Token Ring LANs via source-routing bridges, but also extend to other media types through translational bridges that convert between Token Ring frames and formats like , handling RIF insertion or removal as needed. The IEEE 802.5 standard incorporates as a core extension for bridging, with full compatibility to spanning tree protocols for transparent operations and loop prevention in mixed environments. This standardization, proposed by and adopted by the IEEE 802.5 committee, ensures scalable Token Ring deployments across enterprise networks while maintaining deterministic .

Comparisons and Interconnections

Differences from Ethernet

Token Ring and Ethernet represent two fundamentally different approaches to local area networking, with Token Ring employing a deterministic token-passing access method as defined in IEEE 802.5, while Ethernet relies on the contention-based mechanism specified in IEEE 802.3. In Token Ring, a special token frame circulates the logical ring, granting exclusive transmission rights to the station that possesses it, ensuring predictable access times and eliminating collisions entirely. This contrasts with Ethernet, where stations listen for a before transmitting but risk collisions under contention, leading to retransmissions and variable delays. Consequently, Token Ring maintains superior performance under high network loads, where Ethernet's throughput can degrade significantly due to increased collision probabilities— for instance, simulations show token-passing protocols outperforming CSMA/CD for loads between 40% and 70% in time-critical applications. In terms of , Token Ring implements a logical ring over a physical using Multistation Units (), which connect stations via shielded twisted-pair cabling to a central . This design facilitates easier fault , as a failure in one station's connection (a "lobe") can be automatically bypassed by the MAU without disrupting the entire ring, unlike Ethernet's original coaxial bus where a single cable break could segment the network and affect multiple stations. Ethernet later evolved to topologies with hubs and switches, but Token Ring's active MAUs inherently provide this isolation from inception. Token Ring's incurs higher and compared to Ethernet, primarily due to the need for active components like intelligent and more sophisticated cards that handle management and ring maintenance. In the 1980s, Token Ring nodes around $2,000, roughly 70% more than equivalent Ethernet setups, which benefited from simpler passive cabling and broader vendor competition driving prices down to $600 per node by 1985. Installation further favored Ethernet, as its or unshielded twisted-pair wiring required less specialized equipment than Token Ring's shielded pairs and active hubs. Performance-wise, Token Ring guarantees fair bandwidth allocation per station through timed token holding, allowing each node a predictable share of the total capacity—typically 4 or 16 Mbps—without the variability inherent in Ethernet's contention model. For example, in the 1990s, a 16 Mbps Token Ring provided more consistent throughput for multiple stations under load than a 10 Mbps Ethernet, where effective bandwidth per station could drop below 1 Mbps due to collisions. This determinism made Token Ring preferable for environments requiring low latency, though Ethernet's simplicity allowed it to scale better overall. The evolutionary paths of the two technologies diverged sharply, with Token Ring's upgrades progressing slowly from 4 Mbps in 1985 to 16 Mbps by 1989, and limited further to 100 Mbps in niche implementations, constrained by its architecture and IBM-centric development. In contrast, Ethernet rapidly scaled from 10 Mbps to 100 Mbps in 1995, 1 Gbps in 1998, and beyond to 10 Gbps and higher by the , fueled by open standards, switching innovations, and widespread adoption that reduced costs and improved performance. By 1995, Ethernet adapter sales reached 23.7 million units annually, overshadowing Token Ring's 3.8 million and leading to its decline.

Integration with Other Networks

Token Ring networks were integrated with other network types, particularly Ethernet, through routers and gateways that facilitated protocol translation for IP traffic. These devices enabled seamless communication between IP over Token Ring (using IEEE 802.5) and IP over Ethernet () by handling address resolution and routing at the network layer, allowing enterprises to interconnect disparate LANs without immediate full replacement. Bridging techniques, such as translational bridges, converted frame formats between Token Ring and Ethernet, mapping Token Ring's information to Ethernet's addressing. This approach supported non-routable protocols like but required careful handling of frame headers to avoid compatibility issues, often implemented in routers via source-route translational bridging (SR/TLB). Direct compatibility challenges arose due to differences in frame structures; for instance, Token Ring include route information absent in Ethernet, necessitating translation to prevent . Encapsulation methods standardized IP transmission over IEEE 802 networks, including Token Ring, via RFC 1042, which wraps IP datagrams in LLC/SNAP headers for interoperability with Ethernet's IP encapsulation under RFC 894. However, direct 802.3 compatibility was limited without this encapsulation, as Token Ring's physical layer differed significantly from Ethernet's CSMA/CD mechanism. Migration strategies in the 1990s focused on gradual replacement of Token Ring with Ethernet in enterprises, often using dual-NIC configurations on servers to support both technologies during transition phases. This allowed phased rollouts, such as upgrading workstations every 3 years or targeting specific departments, minimizing disruption while shifting to IP-centric infrastructures. IBM's AnyNet provided a legacy tool for running SNA protocols over Ethernet via TCP/IP, enabling mainframe integration without retaining Token Ring hardware.

Implementations and Legacy

Hardware and Software Support

was the primary developer of Token Ring hardware, offering Network Interface Cards (s) in both and bus formats to connect computers to the network. The IBM 16/4 Token-Ring PCI Adapter II, for instance, supported speeds of 4 Mbps and 16 Mbps, featured RJ-45 and DB-9 connectors, and was designed for integration with IBM's cabling system. Third-party vendors expanded compatibility; produced Token Ring adapters like the 3C619 for compatible systems. Similarly, Madge Networks offered high-performance options, such as the Smart 16/4 PCI Ringnode adapter, which achieved near-wire-speed throughput in benchmarks with compatible drivers. For network concentration, provided Multistation Access Units (MAUs) and Controlled Access Units (CAUs). The 8228 MAU supported up to eight lobe attachments in a passive star topology, suitable for small workgroups at 4 Mbps or 16 Mbps. Larger installations used the 8230 CAU, which offered 24 RJ-45 ports with active management features like port switching and diagnostics to maintain ring integrity. In vendor ecosystems, integrated Token Ring support into routers such as the 2500 and 4000 series via modular ports, enabling interconnection with other protocols until hardware and software maintenance ended in 2012. Software support included drivers from for Windows operating systems up to XP, where the NDIS 5.x-compatible IBM Token-Ring driver enabled connectivity for legacy applications. kernels incorporated modules like ibmtr and tokenring for IBM and compatible adapters using the Tropic , allowing operation on distributions from kernel 2.2 onward. macOS provided limited legacy support through third-party drivers in versions up to 9.x, primarily for over Token Ring. Native integration was strong in IBM's , with built-in support via the Communications Manager for LAN Server environments, and in AIX, where the tr0 handled Token-Ring interfaces natively. For modern systems lacking physical Token Ring hardware, emulation occurs through virtualization platforms like , which bridge virtual machines to the host's Token Ring adapter using host-only or custom networking configurations. Network management relied on tools like IBM's NetView, which offered comprehensive monitoring for Token Ring LANs, including topology mapping, fault detection via agents, and configuration of gateways in and AIX environments.

Current Status and Modern Uses

Token Ring technology has become largely obsolete in contemporary networking environments, with no new hardware developments since the early as organizations transitioned to Ethernet-based solutions for their scalability and cost-effectiveness. The IEEE 802.5 , responsible for standardizing Token Ring, was disbanded, and the is now maintained as an archived document without active maintenance or updates. This shift reflects the dominance of faster, more flexible alternatives, rendering Token Ring unsuitable for modern high-speed data centers and general-purpose LANs. Despite its , Token Ring persists in niche applications where deterministic and reliability are critical. In industrial systems, of token-passing mechanisms—such as those in Modbus+ or networks—continue to support operations with low under 10 milliseconds, ensuring predictable performance in and environments. Mainframe setups, particularly IBM z/OS systems, retain Token Ring adapters for with SNA protocols, allowing secure integration of older applications in back-ends. and networks occasionally employ it for its fault-tolerant design, providing survivable communications in high-reliability scenarios like secure data distribution over dedicated links. Modern uses of Token Ring are primarily through software emulations and virtualizations, facilitating , testing, and maintenance of systems without physical . Tools like support simulation of Token Ring topologies, enabling network engineers to model token-passing behaviors, frame formats, and metrics in distributed environments for training purposes. Virtual Token Ring interfaces, often implemented in hypervisors such as or environments, allow testing of legacy software on emulated rings, preserving compatibility for applications reliant on IEEE 802.5 protocols while avoiding the costs of obsolete hardware. These emulations highlight performance challenges in virtual setups, such as increased latency from software overhead compared to native implementations, though they remain effective for non-production validation. Security aspects of Token Ring, including potential vulnerabilities like token frame interception or , receive limited contemporary analysis due to its rarity, with most discussions focusing on historical risks rather than modern exploits in emulated environments. While not a primary revival candidate for due to power and scalability constraints, Token Ring's deterministic principles have indirectly influenced protocols like , which adopts ring-like arbitration for storage networks, and (TSN), an Ethernet extension enhancing predictability for industrial applications. A widespread revival is unlikely given Ethernet's entrenched position, but these conceptual legacies underscore Token Ring's role in shaping reliable, collision-free networking paradigms.

References

  1. [1]
    What is token ring and how does it work? - TechTarget
    Jul 8, 2021 · A token ring is a data link for a local area network (LAN) in which all devices are connected in a ring or star topology and pass one or more tokens from host ...
  2. [2]
    ANSI/IEEE 802.5-1998
    May 26, 1998 · Its purpose is to provide compatible interconnection of data processing equipment by means of a LAN using the token-passing ring access method.
  3. [3]
    What is the Token ring IEEE 802.5? - IONOS
    Feb 23, 2023 · The token ring topology uses Multistation Access Units (MAUs), which allow a star-shaped connection of the connections involved. The distributor ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Networking Fundamentals - University of Delaware
    IEEE 802.5 Token Ring. The IEEE 802.5 standard defines token ring, which derives from IBM's lo- cal area network design in which a token travels continually ...
  5. [5]
    Token Ring - Bitsavers.org
    The development of Token Ring networks by IBM and TI dates back to the early eighties. IEEE 802 work on this topic began around 1982. In. 1985, the main ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Token Ring Solutions - ibmfiles.com
    The IBM Token Ring network is a general purpose Local Area Network (LAN) with a star-wired ring topology, using baseband signalling and token-passing protocols ...
  7. [7]
    Token Ring Network - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The IEEE 802.5 standards specify layers 1 and 2 of a family of token ring networks. These networks transmit at 4 Mbps or 16 Mbps. (Standards are being developed ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Token Ring Solutions - ibmfiles.com
    How and why IBM pioneered the development of token ring in the early 1980s as a highly robust and efficient network protocol for mission-critical business.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] token-ring performance: mean-delay approximation
    In designing and configuring ring networks with token access, there is a practical need for an accurate delay formula which can be easily computed for an ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Token Ring
    Maximum number of stations is 250. • 4Mbps 802.5 token ring uses single frame operation. • 4 Mbps IBM token ring uses single token operation.
  11. [11]
    Troubleshooting Token Ring   [Support]
    ### Summary of Token Ring Access Control and Fault Management Mechanisms (IEEE 802.5)
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Token Ring
    FDDI uses TTRT (Target Token Rotation Time) to ensure that token rotation time is less than some value. Cannot use differential Manchester because 100 Mbps ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    A Star-Shaped Ring Network with High Maintainability - MIT
    Ring networks exhibit a number of desirable properties: they are simple in concept and in implementation; one-way point-to-point signal transmission minimizes ...Missing: 1960s | Show results with:1960s
  15. [15]
    [PDF] The Cambridge Fast Ring Networking System - Andrew Hopper
    "HE CAMBRIDGE Ring is a local network that was de- signed in the mid 1970's for linking digital devices [1].Missing: history | Show results with:history
  16. [16]
    The IBM PC and IBM's Token Ring LAN 1981-1982
    On September 16, 1982, IBM and TI made known their intentions to develop integrated-circuit chips for an IBM “local area network.”6 The article further ...
  17. [17]
    A token-ring network for local data communications - IEEE Xplore
    The first idea concerns the physical topology of the wiring network and its star-ring organization. Next, the logical data flows are overlaid on the physical ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
  18. [18]
    Token Ring Networks
    Maximum length for a segment varies from 45 to 200 meters; Minimum segment length is 2.5 meters; Maximum length for type 6 patch cable is 46 meters; Maximum ...<|separator|>
  19. [19]
    IEEE Committee 802: 1981 - 1982
    In December, at the meeting held at DEC, Committee 802 forwarded its CSMA/CD recommendation, standard 802.3, to the IEEE TCCC for approval. Both token bus ...
  20. [20]
    IEEE 802.5 Activities
    Jul 5, 2001 · The PAR change, from an errata supplement to a Corrigenda, was approved by the standards board on September 16th, 1999. This document has ...
  21. [21]
    IEEE 802.5j-1997 - IEEE Standards Association
    The standard which adds to the token ring standard the means for fiber optic media station attachment to the token ring network.
  22. [22]
    IEEE 802.5t-2000 - IEEE SA
    This supplement specifies the changes required to ANSI/IEEE Std 802.5, 1998 Edition, (Base standard) and ANSI/IEEE 802.5r, 1998 Edition, and ANSI/IEEE Std 802.5 ...
  23. [23]
    AT LAST, THE DEBUT OF I.B.M.'S NETWORK - The New York Times
    Oct 16, 1985 · For its network, I.B.M. chose a ''token ring'' design, a specific approach to linking computers that is basically incompatible with Ethernet ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] IBM Token-Ring Product Guide - Bitsavers.org
    In 1984, IBM began to announce products designed to provide the user with ... (See IBM Product Announcement 185-127, dated October 15, 1985.) Pricing ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] IBM's Token-Ring Networking Handbook
    Jul 16, 1992 · In this implementation token-ring can be used by the business groups, and Ethernet by the research and development areas of a corporation ...
  26. [26]
    Ungermann-Bass | History of Computer Communications
    Token Ring investment was an enormous investment, and broadband technology was a big investment, but they're do-able. They're engineering feats that, if you've ...Missing: 1990 | Show results with:1990
  27. [27]
    [PDF] ethernet vs. token ring in the local area network - Martin Kenney
    This paper draws upon the work by von Burg (2001) to explain the outcome of the local area networking (LAN) adoption contest that began in the early 1980s and ...Missing: stations latency
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
    CISSP Networking Essentials: In-Depth Guide to Token Ring and ...
    This process involves identifying and bypassing faulty stations, often orchestrated by monitors, to reestablish a functional ring.
  30. [30]
    Ethernet Through the Years: Celebrating the Technology's 50th Year ...
    With 100 Mbps Ethernet, two network devices can now communicate and establish the best speed and duplex modes of operation with auto-negotiation.
  31. [31]
    Milestones:Origin of the IEEE 802 Family of Networking Standards ...
    The 802.5 standard lasted somewhat longer: it was withdrawn on Sept. 26, 2008, and the vote to disband the WG became effective on Oct. 27, 2008. Thus, ...
  32. [32]
    [802SEC] +++30 day EC Email Ballot+++ to disband the IEEE 802.5 ...
    If the EC electronic ballot on disbanding the group passes, the WG is disbanded. If the ballot fails, then the EC Chair shall determine a future date when the ...
  33. [33]
    Troubleshooting Token Ring [Support] - Cisco Systems
    Token Ring networks use a sophisticated priority system that permits certain user-designated, high-priority stations to use the network more frequently.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Cabletron Systems TOKEN RING TECHNOLOGY OVERVIEW
    Maximum Stations. 250. Maximum Lobe Length. 150 m. Passive Device, 16 Mbps. Maximum Stations. 250. Maximum Lobe Length. 100 m. Active Device, 4 Mbps. Maximum ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    IEEE 802.5c-1991 - IEEE SA
    IEEE Standards for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Supplement to Token Ring Access Method and Physical Layer Specifications
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Token Ring/IEEE 802.5
    The related IEEE 802.5 specification is almost identical to and completely compatible with IBM's Token Ring network. In fact, the IEEE 802.5 specification was.Missing: MAU CAU
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Token Ring - Network Protocols Lab
    • Ring Latency: time it takes a bit to go around. = total propagation delay + ... • Token Rotation Time (TRT): time it take for a token to go around. TRT ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
  38. [38]
    IEEE 802.5 Token Ring in Detail - Dr. Balvinder Taneja
    IEEE 802.5 Token Ring is a network protocol standard that defines a LAN topology and a media access method using token passing. Developed by IBM in the 1980s ...
  39. [39]
    First Hop Redundancy Protocols Configuration Guide, Cisco IOS ...
    Oct 19, 2012 · The standby use-bia command was implemented to overcome the limitations of using a functional address for the HSRP MAC address on Token Ring ...
  40. [40]
    Token Ring/IEEE 802.5
    The length of this field is limited by the ring token holding time, which defines the maximum time a station may hold the token. Following the data field is ...
  41. [41]
    Token Ring - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The main advantage of a token ring over the Ethernet is that there are no collisions and no bandwidth wasted as a result. A disadvantage is that a token ring ...Missing: decline | Show results with:decline<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of the Token-Ring Network Architecture Reference (SC30-3374-02) based on all provided segments. To retain all information in a dense and organized manner, I will use a combination of narrative text and tables in CSV format where applicable. The response consolidates details on Token Frame, Abort Frame, MAC Control Frames, Physical Layer Signaling, and Control Frame Circulation, ensuring no information is lost.
  43. [43]
    The default MTU sizes for different network topologies
    Each media type has a maximum frame size. The link layer is responsible ... 4 Mbps Token Ring 4464. FDDI 4352. Ethernet 1500. IEEE 802.3/802.2 1492 PPPoE ...
  44. [44]
    Token Ring IEEE 802.5 - IBM
    The token-ring architecture specifies the maximum value of the I-field in the data frame, which corresponds to the maximum size of the L-PDU.
  45. [45]
    Understanding Token Ring - Ardent Tool of Capitalism
    When many nodes contend for use of the network, a 4-Mbps Token Ring can perform nearly as well as a 10-Mbps Ethernet, while a 16-Mbps Token Ring can provide ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] SNA Network Implementation Guide - IBM
    Oct 24, 2022 · This document provides an understanding of the major concepts involved in implementing a VTAM® network and describes how to: • Install VTAM.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Source-Route Bridging
    The source-route bridging (SRB) algorithm was developed by IBM and was proposed to the IEEE 802.5 committee as the means to bridge between all LANs.
  48. [48]
    Chapter: Configuring Source-Route Bridging - Cisco
    Sep 9, 2007 · Changes the Ethernet/Token Ring translation behavior to translate Token Ring LLC2 frames into Ethernet 0x80d5 format frames. Enable Standard ...
  49. [49]
    IEEE 802.5m-1993 - IEEE SA
    IEEE 802.5m-1993. IEEE Standard Token Ring LAN Access Method: Specification and PICS Proforma for Source Routing Transparent Bridge Operation (SRT).
  50. [50]
    The IBM 8209 LAN bridge | IEEE Journals & Magazine
    The IBM 8209 LAN bridge, a two-port MAC bridge, supports source routing on the token ring/802.5 side and transparent bridging on the Ethernet/802.3 side.
  51. [51]
    Ethernet Tutorial - Part I: Networking Basics - Lantronix
    Token Ring is another form of network configuration. It differs from Ethernet in that all messages are transferred in one direction along the ring at all times.
  52. [52]
    Prediction of transport protocol performance through simulation
    For loads between 40% and 70%, a token passing access method provides better performance for time-critical applications. Formats available. You can view the ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Overview of LANs Ethernet Token Ring
    Token Ring – Advantages. • fairness and stability. Token Ring – Disadvantages. • entire network fails if any link, station or mechanism for token passing fails.
  54. [54]
    Configuring Transparent Bridging - Cisco
    Mar 15, 2005 · Translational bridging without routing indicators between Token Ring and Ethernet is also called SR/TLB.
  55. [55]
    Translational Bridging - InetDaemon.Com
    Jul 15, 2018 · A translational bridge can be used to connect such as Ethernet to FDDI, or Ethernet to Token Ring, or Ethernet on unshileded twisted pair (UTP) to coax.
  56. [56]
    RFC 1042 - Standard for the transmission of IP datagrams over IEEE ...
    This RFC specifies a standard method of encapsulating the Internet Protocol (IP) [1] datagrams and Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) [2] requests and replies ...
  57. [57]
    None
    ### Summary of Token Ring to Ethernet Migration Strategies (Redpaper, IBM, February 2002)
  58. [58]
    IBM 16/4 Token-Ring PCI Adapter II Package - Servers
    This document contains the IBM 16/4 Token Ring PCI Adapter II for Device Drivers for DOS and Windows 3.1x (NDIS2) and OS/2.Missing: AIX | Show results with:AIX
  59. [59]
    Network Adapters - Ardent Tool of Capitalism
    Benchmarks of MCA Token Ring Adapters (by Wolfgang Gehl) RPL - Remote ... 3Com 3C629 TokenLink III MCA. Cabletron Cabletron T3015. DCA IRMAtrac MCA/ISA.
  60. [60]
    Madge Networks Blue+16/4 ISA Token Ring Adapter Performance ...
    May 1, 1995 · Madge Networks commissioned The Tolly Group to conduct a performance evaluation of its Blue+ 16/4 ISA Token Ring adapter and Fast Blue driver ...
  61. [61]
  62. [62]
    Cisco IOS Release 15.x SY System Message Guide
    Sep 28, 2011 · The token ring device driver requires capabilities of a NPE150 revision 2 and later CPU. Recommended Action Upgrade the 7200 router processor to ...
  63. [63]
    Which driver should I use? - The Linux Documentation Project
    This is the original token ring driver in the kernel and supports almost all adapters that use the IBM Tropic chipset, including the IBM ISA, ISA/Pnp, and a ...<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    [PDF] AIX Version 7.2: Communications Programming Concepts - IBM
    Token-Ring Data Link Control Overview ... The AIX operating system is designed to support The Open Group's Single UNIX Specification Version 3.Missing: OS/ | Show results with:OS/
  65. [65]
    IBM TCP/IP Version 1.2 for OS/2 - OS2World.Com Wiki
    May 5, 2024 · COMPATIBILITY: TCP/IP Version 1.2 includes NDIS MAC drivers for IBM Token-Ring, IBM Ethernet and IBM PC Network adapters that do not come with ...
  66. [66]
    Configuring Host-Only Networking - TechDocs
    Oct 8, 2025 · With this configuration, you can connect the virtual machine to a Token Ring or other non-Ethernet network. On Windows host systems, you can ...
  67. [67]
    Token-Ring LAN-Attached NetView Management Console Servers
    In the NCP generation, where the token ring is attached, define two GROUP sets. The first GROUP set defines the physical NTRI connection. The second GROUP ...
  68. [68]
    IEEE 802 - Wikipedia
    Working groups ; IEEE 802.5 · Token Ring MAC layer, Disbanded ; IEEE 802.6 · MANs (DQDB), Disbanded ; IEEE 802.7, Broadband LAN using Coaxial Cable, Disbanded.IEEE 802.3 · IEEE 802.15 · IEEE 802.11 · IEEE 802.15.4Missing: 2007 | Show results with:2007
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Local and Metropolitan Area Networks + Drafts (LAN/MAN 802s ...
    Jun 19, 2003 · IEEE 802.5r and IEEE 802.5j, 1998 Edition (ISO/IEC 8802-5:1998/Amd.1), IEEE. Standard for Information technology--Telecommunications and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  70. [70]
    What environment is still using the Token Ring network?
    May 19, 2020 · Some older industrial network protocols do use this. For example Modbus + or for multiple masters in a Profibus ring can use this, ...
  71. [71]
    Understanding Ring Topology in Networking - SynchroNet
    Mar 8, 2025 · Ring topology is a network layout where every device connects to two others, forming a loop. Data travels sequentially, reducing collisions.Missing: decline | Show results with:decline
  72. [72]
    Legacy-data Strategies - GovTech
    Aug 12, 2010 · Because IBM ruled the back-end big iron, it often ran on the LAN in the form of IBM's Token Ring network protocol. ... the SNA and Token Ring ...Missing: z/ military
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Introduction to the New Mainframe: z/OS Basics
    uses the services of a token-ring adapter. The service access point, in this case, is the name by which IP knows the adapter that is the token-ring address.<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    Implementation Considerations to Connect an IBM Token Ring LAN ...
    The Administrative Sciences department is expanding it LAN-to-DDN connectivity so as to offer services common to most LANs as well as direct access to the DDN.Missing: legacy industrial z/
  75. [75]
    [PDF] Implementation considerations to connect an IBM Token Ring LAN ...
    Another elective protocol specific to the TR-LAN is the Internet Protocol on IEEE 802 (RFC. 1042). This protocol specifies a standard method to encapsulate IP ...
  76. [76]
    A Comparative Analysis of Ethernet, Token Ring and FDDI Protocols ...
    This paper compares and analyses the network performance of the three LAN protocols; Ethernet, Token Ring, and FDDI in a distributed system through simulation
  77. [77]
    5. VMWare and Token Ring
    One of the bummers about VMWare is if you are on a Token-Ring adapter, your VMWare system can't have a real TCP/IP address. Turns out this isn't the case.Missing: emulation | Show results with:emulation
  78. [78]
    Virtual Token Ring Interfaces - Cisco Community
    Nov 14, 2007 · Virtual tokenring interfaces are typically used in an environment where snasw is used. Historically this was/is the entry point when you have physical ...Cisco Packet Tracer vs EmulatorsHow to Create a Local Virtual Lab for Networking Practice and projectMore results from community.cisco.comMissing: software emulation Packet Tracer hypervisors
  79. [79]
  80. [80]
    Fibre Channel over Token Ring: In-Depth Analysis
    Jul 16, 2010 · Token Ring's 20% payload size advantage makes the network more efficient than Ethernet. Although a typical Fibre Channel frame of over 2 KB ...
  81. [81]
    CISSP Focus: Tokens and Token Ring Protocols Explained
    The IEEE 802.5 standard defines the technical specifications for token ring networks. It specifies the frame format, token passing rules, and physical and ...