Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Backup software

Backup software consists of applications and tools designed to automate the creation of duplicate copies of , files, applications, and entire systems on secondary devices, facilitating from incidents such as failures, cyberattacks, or errors. These programs enable organizations and individuals to protect critical information by scheduling regular backups and providing mechanisms for , often integrating with various media like hard drives, tapes, or services. Key types of backup strategies implemented by backup software include full backups, which create a complete copy of all selected ; incremental backups, which capture only changes since the last backup of any type to minimize and time; and backups, which record all modifications since the most recent full backup for simpler restoration processes. Additional variants, such as (CDP), provide real-time replication of every change, while bare-metal backups allow for the recovery of an entire operating system and . Modern backup software often supports hybrid approaches, combining local and for enhanced redundancy and accessibility. The importance of backup software lies in its role in ensuring business continuity and minimizing through defined recovery time objectives (RTO) and recovery point objectives (RPO), which measure the acceptable duration and during . By safeguarding against from events like infections or natural disasters, it supports compliance with regulatory standards and reduces financial risks associated with information unavailability. Historically, backup practices originated with tape media as the primary method for archiving data, evolving into sophisticated software solutions that leverage and for scalable, automated protection.

Introduction

Definition and Purpose

Backup software refers to applications and systems designed to automate the creation, management, and storage of duplicate copies of data from primary source systems to secondary storage locations, enabling the preservation and retrieval of information as needed. This automation distinguishes backup software from manual data copying processes, streamlining operations to ensure consistent and reliable data duplication across various IT environments. The primary purpose of backup software is to protect against data loss caused by hardware failures, human errors, ransomware attacks, or natural disasters, while facilitating rapid recovery to minimize operational downtime. By maintaining accessible copies of critical data, it supports business continuity and reduces the financial and productivity impacts of disruptions. A key distinction exists between backup and archiving: backup involves creating copies of active data for short-term recovery in case of loss or corruption, whereas archiving focuses on long-term of inactive, historical for or purposes. Backup software serves as a foundational component of broader planning, providing the copies essential for restoring systems and applications after incidents. Historically, backup practices evolved from manual copying in the mid-20th century to automated processes enabled by modern software, transforming protection from labor-intensive tasks to efficient, scheduled operations.

Importance in Modern Computing

In modern computing, backup software plays a pivotal role in safeguarding against a range of threats that can lead to significant losses. Hardware failures, such as (HDD) crashes, affect approximately 1-1.5% of drives annually based on large-scale analyses of operational systems. Cyberattacks have surged, with global incidents increasing by 30% in the second quarter of 2024. Accidental deletions by users and like floods or fires further exacerbate risks, potentially wiping out irreplaceable information in personal, business, and environments. The benefits of backup software extend to ensuring business continuity and , minimizing disruptions across diverse ecosystems. By enabling rapid recovery—often reducing from days to mere hours—it allows organizations to resume operations swiftly after incidents, thereby averting revenue losses and reputational damage. Compliance with standards such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which mandates appropriate technical measures for data availability and resilience including regular backups, and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), requiring contingency plans with data backup procedures to protect electronic , is directly supported. Amid explosive data growth, where the global volume is projected to reach 182 zettabytes by 2025, backup software addresses escalating concerns over data loss. Surveys indicate that 85% of organizations experienced at least one data loss incident in 2024. The economic toll is stark, with the average cost of a data breach hitting $4.88 million in 2024, driven by detection, response, and lost business opportunities. In hybrid work setups, IoT deployments generating vast streams of data, and big data analytics pipelines, backup solutions prevent irrecoverable losses by integrating with cloud and on-premises systems, ensuring seamless protection and restoration.

History and Evolution

Early Developments (Pre-1980s)

In the pre-software era of the and , data backups for mainframe computers relied on manual methods using punched cards and magnetic tapes. Punched cards, originally invented in the late for automated looms and later adapted for , were physically punched by operators to record and duplicate information, with stacks of cards serving as portable backup media for systems like early tabulators. This process was labor-intensive, error-prone, and limited by the cards' capacity of about 80 characters each, often requiring thousands for significant datasets. Magnetic tape emerged as a transformative backup medium in the early 1950s, with IBM's 726 —introduced in 1952 for the —enabling sequential data recording at 7,500 characters per second on 1,200-foot reels. These tapes allowed for inexpensive, high-capacity off-line of entire datasets, reducing reliance on punch cards and facilitating by storing copies in secure locations. By the , magnetic tapes had largely supplanted punched cards as the dominant technology for mainframes, offering densities up to 800 bits per inch by the late and supporting automated reading/writing via s integrated with systems like the IBM System/360. The 1970s saw the rise of initial software utilities that automated backup processes on minicomputers and systems, shifting from hardware-dependent manual operations. The Unix operating system's 'dump' utility, developed at , first appeared in the Sixth Edition Unix release in 1975 for PDP-11 minicomputers, providing block-level backups of file systems to . This command-line tool supported multi-volume dumps and incremental backups based on modification times, addressing the need for efficient archiving in multi-user environments without graphical interfaces. Similarly, Digital Equipment Corporation's operating system, announced in 1977 for VAX minicomputers, incorporated the utility to streamline tape-based archiving. The command created "savesets"—self-contained, compressed volumes of files and directories—that could be written to tape drives like the TU45, supporting full, incremental, and differential modes while handling access controls and volume labeling. Key milestones in this period included the conceptual foundations of hierarchical storage management (HSM), which originated in the late 1960s with IBM's Information Management System (IMS) database software released in 1968 for System/360 mainframes. IMS introduced tree-structured data organization to optimize access across storage levels, laying groundwork for automated data placement between fast-access disks and slower tapes, though full HSM automation emerged later. Early ARPANET projects from 1969 onward explored networked resource sharing among heterogeneous systems, indirectly influencing storage concepts by highlighting the need for distributed backup strategies across varying media. These pioneering tools were constrained by their command-line interfaces, dependence on physical , and lack of user-friendly features, requiring operators for scheduling and handling.

Modern Advancements (1980s to Present)

The 1980s and 1990s witnessed the transition from rudimentary tape-based backups to more sophisticated commercial software tailored for personal computers and early networks, emphasizing user interfaces and efficiency improvements. Commercial tools, such as early versions of , emerged in the 1980s, providing accessible programs for PC data protection via floppy disks and tapes. By the 1990s, graphical user interfaces became prevalent, with Microsoft's NTBackup introduced in 1995 as part of , offering integrated backup capabilities for enterprise environments including support for incremental methods that captured only modified files since the last backup, significantly reducing storage needs and backup times compared to full backups. This shift to incremental backups addressed the growing data volumes in client-server architectures, enabling more frequent and manageable data protection routines. In the 2000s, open-source solutions gained traction, democratizing advanced backup features for diverse operating systems. , the Advanced Maryland Automatic Network Disk Archiver, originally developed in 1991 at the University of , saw widespread adoption during this decade for its ability to centrally manage backups across multiple Unix, , and Windows hosts to or disk media. Concurrently, technology advanced to optimize storage, with Permabit Technology Corporation founding in 2005 and pioneering inline deduplication software like , which eliminated redundant data blocks during backup processes, influencing subsequent products by reducing backup sizes by up to 95% in variable-block scenarios. The 2010s and 2020s brought cloud-native and intelligent features, driven by scalability demands and cyber threats. launched S3 Glacier in 2012, introducing low-cost, durable cloud archiving for long-term backups with retrieval times measured in minutes to hours, spurring the adoption of hybrid cloud strategies for offsite data protection. , founded in 2014, integrated automation and for in backups, enabling real-time identification of unusual patterns like mass deletions or encryptions indicative of threats. The 2017 , affecting over 200,000 systems worldwide, accelerated the development of immutable backups, where data is stored in write-once-read-many (WORM) formats to prevent alteration or deletion by , becoming a standard resilience measure in tools from vendors like and . As of 2025, backup software incorporates zero-trust security models, verifying every access request to backups regardless of origin, enhancing protection against insider threats and lateral movement in breaches. Support for has also expanded, with solutions like providing lightweight agents for remote devices and distributed sites, ensuring low-latency backups without central dependency. The global data backup and recovery market reached approximately $16.5 billion in 2025, reflecting robust growth fueled by these innovations and rising data proliferation.

Types and Categories

Personal and Desktop Solutions

Personal and desktop backup software is designed for individual users and small-scale environments, prioritizing simplicity, affordability, and integration with everyday computing tasks. These solutions typically feature lightweight architectures that minimize system resource usage, allowing seamless operation on standard consumer hardware without requiring dedicated servers or complex configurations. User-friendly interfaces, such as drag-and-drop file selection and wizard-based setup processes, enable non-technical users to initiate backups with minimal training, often through graphical dashboards that provide visual progress indicators and one-click restore options. A key focus of personal backup tools is compatibility with local storage destinations, including internal hard drives, external USB devices, and portable media, which facilitates quick setup using readily available consumer-grade hardware like flash drives or external HDDs. This emphasis on local backups contrasts with enterprise solutions that prioritize networked or scalability for larger deployments. and open-source options further enhance ; for instance, , an open-source tool first released in 2008, supports encrypted backups to local or targets via a straightforward web-based . Prominent examples include Apple's , introduced in 2007 with macOS Leopard, which performs continuous, incremental backups to external drives or devices, automatically versioning files for easy recovery of previous states. Similarly, Microsoft's File History, launched in 2012 with , offers simple file versioning by periodically scanning and copying changes from user libraries to connected , emphasizing protection against accidental deletions or overwrites. These built-in operating system tools exemplify the sector's trend toward automated, low-intervention backups tailored for personal workflows. Common use cases for and solutions revolve around safeguarding irreplaceable home data, such as family photos, documents, and media libraries, where users seek to protect against or without professional IT support. For example, a typical might use these tools to photo collections or important financial records to an external USB , ensuring quick during device upgrades or events. These solutions are generally limited to smaller data scales, with typical personal datasets under 10 TB, as most consumer backups involve 1-4 TB of active files like documents and media, aligning with standard external drive capacities. Exceeding this range often requires transitioning to more robust tools for handling petabyte-level volumes. In the consumer market, built-in OS features dominate, with a 2024 survey of 1,000 U.S. users showing 41% of users regularly backing up via tools like and 31% of Windows users doing so, highlighting reliance on native solutions over third-party software.

Enterprise and Server-Based Tools

Enterprise and server-based backup tools are engineered for large-scale organizational environments, emphasizing to handle petabyte-scale volumes across distributed systems. These solutions typically clustering for and , ensuring uninterrupted operations during failures, while integrating seamlessly with Storage Area Networks () and Network Attached Storage () infrastructures to optimize access and transfer efficiency. Architectures often employ agent-based models, where software agents are installed on individual servers or virtual machines for granular control and application-aware backups, or agentless approaches that leverage to minimize overhead and deployment complexity. Prominent examples include , launched in 2006, which specializes in virtualization environments by providing instant recovery for virtual machines (VMs) and workloads, and Commvault Complete Data Protection, originating from a 1988 Bell Labs development group, offering unified management across multi-platform ecosystems including physical, virtual, and assets. These tools facilitate policy-driven automation for consistent backups in heterogeneous IT landscapes, contrasting with the simpler, user-centric interfaces of personal desktop solutions. In practice, enterprise tools address critical use cases such as protecting databases (e.g., , SQL Server), VMs, and email systems (e.g., ) in round-the-clock operations, where downtime can incur significant financial losses. Features like geo-redundancy replicate data across multiple geographic locations to mitigate regional disasters, enabling rapid and within defined recovery time objectives (RTOs). Such capabilities support 24/7 business continuity, with tools often incorporating immutable storage to counter threats. Compliance with standards like for business continuity management systems is a key attribute, as these tools provide auditable recovery processes and risk assessments to align with regulatory requirements such as GDPR and HIPAA. In the segment, valued at approximately $10 billion by 2025, market leaders like command around 20% share, underscoring their dominance in scalable, resilient data protection.

Core Features

Data Selection and Volumes

In backup software, data selection involves identifying and organizing volumes, which serve as logical storage units that abstract underlying physical media. These units include disk partitions, which divide a single physical drive into multiple independent sections, and Logical Unit Numbers (LUNs), which represent logical partitions carved from redundant arrays of independent disks (RAID) in storage area networks (SANs). LUNs appear to host systems as individual disk drives, enabling targeted access to portions of large-scale storage arrays spanning hundreds of physical disks. This abstraction allows backup tools to operate at a logical level, selecting specific volumes without needing to interact directly with hardware configurations. Selection methods typically employ graphical user interfaces (GUIs) for intuitive navigation, such as tree-based browsing that displays structures, or rule-based include/exclude filters that use wildcards (e.g., *.tmp) and path specifications to define what to capture or omit. For instance, in Acronis True Image, users access a "Disks and partitions" option to view a full list of volumes, including hidden system partitions, and check specific ones for inclusion, while the "Files and folders" mode enables browsing and selecting items via a folder tree. Exclude filters can automatically skip temporary files (e.g., pagefile. or Temp folders) or user-specified paths, streamlining the process by defaulting to common non-essential items. Backup techniques distinguish between file-level and block-level approaches to capturing selected volumes. File-level backups traverse the to identify and copy entire files or directories, preserving like permissions and timestamps, which suits granular control in environments with diverse file types. Block-level backups, however, read and replicate fixed-size blocks (typically 4 ) directly from the , bypassing file system structures to update only modified blocks within volumes. This method offers advantages in efficiency for large volumes where only portions change. Handling mounted volumes in multi-operating system (multi-OS) environments requires careful consideration of file system compatibility, such as on Windows or on . Backing up mounted volumes can yield unpredictable results due to ongoing writes, potentially leading to inconsistent or corrupted ; unmounting the volume or scheduling during low-activity periods is recommended to ensure . Cross-OS scenarios exacerbate issues, as volumes mounted read-only on (e.g., after unclean Windows shutdowns) may limit access, necessitating tools that support native file system drivers for seamless selection across environments. GUI selectors in tools like Acronis True Image facilitate volume handling by supporting Master Boot Record (MBR) and GUID Partition Table (GPT) disks, allowing users to preview and select partitions in a visual interface. However, dynamic volumes—configurable storage units that support features like spanning or mirroring—pose challenges, as resizing or modifying them during backup can cause data loss or corruption, especially in mixed SAN-local configurations. Dynamic disks are legacy features that have been deprecated in modern Windows Server versions (such as Windows Server 2022); Microsoft recommends using basic disks or alternatives like Storage Spaces for current deployments to avoid issues with logical disk manager (LDM) databases and ensure compatibility with backups. Best practices for data selection prioritize critical volumes to shorten backup windows and optimize resources. Conducting a data audit to classify volumes by business impact—such as financial records on high-priority partitions—enables focused selections, ensuring essential receives frequent protection while deferring less urgent items. This approach aligns scopes with recovery time objectives, reducing overall processing time by limiting the volume of scanned and transferred.

Compression and Deduplication

Backup software employs to reduce the footprint of backed-up by encoding it more efficiently without loss of . Common algorithms include LZ77, a dictionary-based method that replaces repeated sequences with references to prior occurrences, forming the basis for tools like . , which combines LZ77 with for further entropy reduction, is widely used in backup utilities such as those implementing the format. These techniques achieve ratios typically ranging from 2:1 to 10:1, with higher ratios (e.g., 3:1 to 4:1) for redundant like text files and lower ratios (e.g., closer to 1.5:1) for already-compressed media such as video. Deduplication further optimizes storage by eliminating redundant data blocks across files or backups, storing only unique instances. It operates at the block level, dividing data into fixed-size chunks (e.g., 4KB) and using cryptographic hashes to detect duplicates. Backup software implements deduplication either inline, where duplicates are identified and discarded before writing to storage, or post-process, where data is first stored and then scanned for redundancies. In virtual environments, where identical operating systems and applications across multiple machines create high redundancy, deduplication can yield savings up to 95%, significantly reducing overall storage requirements. A key implementation is single-instance storage, which maintains one copy of each unique data chunk in the backup repository, as seen in tools like that apply chunk-based deduplication across archives. However, these methods introduce trade-offs, including increased CPU overhead for hashing and comparison operations, often resulting in 10-20% higher resource utilization during backups. The effectiveness of deduplication is quantified using the deduplication ratio, calculated as \frac{\text{total data}}{\text{total unique data}}, which indicates the factor of reduction (e.g., 5:1). Space savings can then be derived as \left(1 - \frac{\text{total unique data}}{\text{total data}}\right) \times 100\%, helping assess efficiency.

Backup Types: Full, Incremental, and

Backup software employs several methodologies to capture , with full, incremental, and differential backups representing the primary types for balancing completeness, efficiency, and resource utilization. A full backup creates an exact, complete copy of all selected at a specific point in time, serving as the foundational for subsequent operations. This approach ensures that every , , and is included without reliance on prior , making it ideal for initial setups or standalone scenarios. However, full backups demand substantial space equivalent to the entire and require considerable time to complete; for example, transferring 1 TB of over a typical network link might take 3 hours or more, depending on throughput rates like 100 per second. The simplicity of restores is a key advantage, as involves only a single without needing to reconstruct from multiple components, though the high resource overhead limits its frequency in large-scale environments. Incremental backups optimize efficiency by capturing only the data that has changed since the most recent backup, whether that was a full or another incremental operation. This method relies on a backup chain, where each incremental file depends on the previous one to maintain data integrity, necessitating the full backup plus all subsequent incrementals for a complete restore. Storage savings arise from the reduced size of each file, limited to modified blocks; over n backup cycles, the total storage approximates the initial full backup size plus the cumulative sum of changes across those cycles, often resulting in significantly less space than repeated full backups. While this minimizes bandwidth and time per session—potentially completing in minutes for modest changes—the chain dependency introduces complexity, as corruption or loss of an intermediate file can complicate recovery. Differential backups address some incremental limitations by recording all changes since the last full backup, ignoring any prior differentials. This produces a growing set of files where each subsequent differential incorporates the accumulating modifications, simplifying restores to just the full backup plus the most recent differential. For instance, a Week 1 full backup of 100 GB might be followed by a Week 2 differential of 10 GB and a Week 3 differential of 15 GB, reflecting the expanding scope of changes without chain dependencies beyond the full. Restores are thus faster and less error-prone than incrementals, though storage and backup times increase over time as differentials enlarge, trading some efficiency for reliability. Selection of these types depends on priorities such as recovery speed, storage constraints, and operational overhead; full backups suit infrequent, comprehensive needs, while incrementals maximize savings for daily use, and differentials offer a middle ground for quicker point-in-time recoveries. Modern tools often implement hybrids like forever-forward incremental backups, as in , where a single full backup is followed by an ongoing sequence of forward incrementals without periodic fulls, periodically merging data to manage retention and chain length. This approach enhances long-term efficiency while preserving restore simplicity, adapting to environments with limited windows for full operations.

Operational Mechanisms

Scheduling and Automation

Backup software incorporates scheduling and to ensure consistent, hands-off execution of backup operations, minimizing human intervention and reducing the risk of due to oversight. These features allow administrators to define when and under what conditions backups occur, integrating seamlessly with operating system tools or providing standalone interfaces. Automation extends to policy enforcement, where rules dictate the timing, scope, and resource usage of tasks, often aligning with needs such as off-peak hours to avoid impacts. Scheduling mechanisms in backup software typically include time-based approaches like cron-like schedulers on systems, which use configuration files to specify recurring intervals such as hourly, daily, or weekly executions, or graphical user interfaces (GUIs) with calendar views for visual setup on Windows or cross-platform tools. Event-triggered scheduling complements this by initiating backups in response to specific conditions, such as USB device insertion for portable media backups or system idle states to optimize resource usage without disrupting active workloads. For instance, tools like Handy Backup support both preset time slots and event-based triggers to automate tasks dynamically. Backup policies govern the operational details of scheduled runs, including —such as daily for high-change environments or weekly for stable sets—and retention periods that specify how long copies are kept before purging, for example, retaining seven daily backups and four weekly ones to balance storage needs with recovery windows. is a common policy feature, limiting transfer rates during backups to prevent during peak hours; NetBackup, for example, allows configurable read and write limits in kilobytes per second to prioritize critical traffic. These policies ensure efficient while maintaining compliance with requirements. Advanced scheduling supports dependency chains, where backup types like full backups run weekly and incremental backups follow daily, creating a hierarchical sequence that builds on prior sessions for efficient . Integration with scripting languages enhances flexibility; on Windows, scripts can automate complex backup logic, such as conditional executions based on system state, and schedule them via Task Scheduler for seamless operation. Backup leverages cmdlets to orchestrate server backups, enabling custom workflows tied to enterprise automation pipelines. Many backup tools embed scheduling capabilities natively, such as Bacula's built-in , which handles time-based and dependency-driven executions for full, incremental, and differential backups across distributed environments. , a widely used open-source utility, relies on external jobs for scheduling but supports automation through scripted invocations for remote synchronization tasks. Failure handling in these systems includes automatic retries for transient errors, like network interruptions— NetBackup, for instance, retries only the affected data streams upon partial failures—and configurable alerts via or dashboards to notify administrators of issues, as implemented in Datto SIRIS for monitoring and troubleshooting.

Open File Access and Locking

Backing up files that are currently in use by applications presents significant challenges in , as these files are often locked to prevent corruption or inconsistent reads. In Windows, for example, applications such as or document editors hold exclusive locks on active files, making direct access impossible during backup operations and resulting in incomplete data captures or outright failures. To address this, introduced the Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) in , which enables the creation of consistent point-in-time snapshots of volumes even when files are open or locked. Shadow copying, a core method facilitated by VSS, works by coordinating between backup applications (requesters), storage providers, and application-specific writers to briefly freeze write operations—typically for less than 60 seconds—flush buffers, and generate a stable snapshot without interrupting ongoing processes. For databases like SQL , VSS writers play a crucial role; the SQL Writer service, installed with SQL , prepares database files by freezing I/O, ensuring transactional consistency during snapshot creation, and supports full or differential backups of open instances without downtime. This approach allows backup software to read from the shadow copy rather than the live files, maintaining for critical applications. Alternative techniques include hot backups, which perform continuous data capture without halting the system, as seen in where binary logs record all changes for incremental while the server remains operational. Another method involves temporarily quiescing applications, a process that flushes buffers and pauses transactions to achieve a consistent state suitable for snapshots, often used in virtualized environments like to ensure application-aware backups. These quiescing steps, integrated with tools like Tools, prioritize data consistency for transactional workloads by executing pre-freeze and post-thaw scripts. Despite these advancements, open file access methods have limitations, as not all operating systems or platforms support them fully; for instance, resource-constrained systems often lack services like VSS, relying instead on simpler, potentially disruptive approaches. Additionally, VSS operations can fail if applications do not implement compatible writers or if system resources are insufficient, though proper configuration significantly enhances reliability for supported environments.

Transaction Logging and Consistency

Transaction logging is a fundamental mechanism in backup software for maintaining in transactional systems, such as , by recording all changes to data before they are applied to the primary storage. These logs, often implemented as write-ahead logs (WAL), capture the sequence of operations, including inserts, updates, and deletes, allowing for precise or replay during processes. In , for instance, WAL ensures that every change is logged durably before being written to data files, enabling the database to reconstruct its state after a by reapplying committed transactions and rolling back uncommitted ones. Backup software integrates transaction logging through techniques like log shipping, where logs are continuously transmitted to secondary sites for and rapid . This facilitates (PITR), which restores a database to a specific moment by replaying archived logs from a base backup onward; the recovery duration depends on the volume of transactions to replay and the efficiency of the log application process. In , PITR relies on a continuous sequence of archived WAL files shipped via an archive command, allowing restoration to any timestamp, transaction ID, or named restore point since the base backup. Oracle Recovery Manager (RMAN), introduced in Oracle 8.0 in 1997, exemplifies this integration by automating the backup and restoration of archived redo logs—Oracle's equivalent of transaction logs—for complete or point-in-time recoveries without manual intervention. A key distinction in backup mechanisms is between crash-consistent and application-consistent approaches, where transaction logging plays a pivotal role in the latter to ensure reliable recovery. Crash-consistent backups capture data at the storage level, potentially leaving uncommitted transactions incomplete, much like a system crash, and rely on logs for post-restore verification. Application-consistent backups, however, coordinate with the application—using frameworks like Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) in Windows—to operations and flush pending I/O, incorporating transaction logs to guarantee that all changes are committed or rolled back properly before the snapshot. By preserving the exact sequence of operations, transaction logging upholds ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) properties during recovery, ensuring that restored databases maintain transactional integrity without partial commits or data anomalies. This is essential for enterprise environments aiming for , as it minimizes recovery time objectives (RTO) and enables near-continuous operations, supporting service level agreements for minimal downtime in critical systems.

Security and Protection

Encryption Methods

Backup software employs to protect during and , safeguarding against unauthorized access in case of breaches or . methods are broadly categorized into symmetric and asymmetric types, with the former using a single shared key for both and decryption, and the latter utilizing a public-private key pair for secure . Symmetric encryption, such as the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) with a 256-bit key length, is preferred for backup operations due to its efficiency in handling large volumes of data, enabling rapid processing on standard hardware. AES-256 provides robust security through an enormous key space of $2^{256} possible combinations, rendering brute-force attacks computationally infeasible with current technology. In contrast, asymmetric encryption like RSA is typically used for initial key exchange in hybrid systems, where it secures the symmetric keys before the bulk data encryption proceeds symmetrically, balancing speed and security. For , encryption is applied at the or level using symmetric algorithms like AES-256 to protect stored backups on local drives or cloud repositories. Tools such as Duplicacy implement , where data is encrypted on the before transmission, ensuring that even the storage provider cannot access content. is secured via protocols like (TLS) 1.3, which provides and efficient handshakes to encrypt backup streams between endpoints. Key management in backup software often involves passphrase-derived keys for symmetric or integration with Modules (HSMs) for generating and storing keys in tamper-resistant environments. Passphrases are hashed to derive encryption keys, while HSMs ensure keys never leave secure hardware, supporting in settings. Many solutions adhere to standards, which validate cryptographic modules for federal use, covering aspects like key generation and module integrity, though transition to the updated standard is ongoing as of 2025, with 140-2 validations retiring in September 2026. Encryption introduces a overhead, typically a 5-15% slowdown in backup speeds due to computational demands on CPU resources, though hardware acceleration can mitigate this in modern systems. This impact is often applied after to optimize overall without compromising .

Access Controls and Auditing

Access controls in backup software enforce granular permissions to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data, distinguishing between administrative and user roles through (RBAC). In RBAC implementations, administrators typically have full privileges for configuring backups, scheduling operations, and initiating restores, while standard users are limited to viewing or restoring their own data sets, reducing the risk of broad exposure. For instance, Veritas NetBackup employs RBAC to assign permissions based on organizational roles, ensuring least-privilege access. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) adds an additional layer of verification, particularly for high-risk actions like restore operations, requiring users to provide a or biometric confirmation beyond standard credentials. integrates MFA using time-based one-time passwords (TOTP) for login and critical tasks, including restores, to thwart credential-based attacks. Similarly, Security Cloud mandates MFA for administrative access, enhancing protection during recovery processes. Auditing features in backup software maintain detailed event logs that record user identities, timestamps, and actions such as backup initiation, access, or restore attempts, providing a verifiable trail for incident response. These logs are often designed to be tamper-evident or immutable, preventing alterations that could obscure accountability. Integration with (SIEM) tools allows real-time correlation of backup events with broader security ; for example, supports forwarding audit logs to SIEM platforms like Microsoft Sentinel for automated threat detection and forensic analysis. To meet regulatory requirements, backup software's auditing capabilities support compliance with standards like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act () and Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI-DSS) through immutable logs that ensure non-repudiable records of data handling. Veritas NetBackup, for instance, provides immutable storage options and audit trails that align with SOX financial reporting mandates and PCI-DSS requirements for protecting cardholder data during backups. These features mitigate insider threats, which contributed to approximately 8% of breaches according to the 2024 Data Breach Investigations Report.

Strategies and Best Practices

Backup Planning and the 3-2-1 Rule

Backup involves designing a robust to ensure , , and recoverability in the face of disruptions such as failures, cyberattacks, or . Effective requires assessing organizational needs, defining objectives, and selecting appropriate and rotation methods to balance cost, performance, and risk. This process typically begins with identifying critical assets and establishing metrics like Recovery Point Objective (RPO) and Recovery Time Objective (RTO) to guide implementation. The foundational 3-2-1 rule is a widely recommended for protection, stipulating that organizations maintain three copies of critical : the original plus two backups, stored on two different types of media, with at least one copy kept offsite to mitigate risks from localized incidents like fires or . This rule enhances by distributing across diverse storage formats—such as hard drives, s, or repositories—and geographic locations, reducing the likelihood of total . For example, a primary copy on local disk, a secondary on , and a in a remote align with this principle. Extensions to the 3-2-1 rule address evolving threats like , with the -1-0 variant adding a fourth copy that is air-gapped or immutable to prevent tampering, and emphasizing zero errors through regular testing of all backups. The air-gapped copy, often stored on disconnected or in isolated environments, ensures recoverability even if backups are encrypted by , while immutability features lock data against modifications for a defined . Testing verifies that recoveries can occur without , achieving the "zero errors" goal. Key planning steps include evaluating RPO and RTO to prioritize assets based on business impact. RPO defines the maximum tolerable , measured as the time between backups—for instance, an RPO of less than one hour for data requires near-continuous replication to minimize gaps. RTO specifies the acceptable for restoration, such as four hours for systems, influencing choices in backup frequency and storage speed. Organizations first data by criticality, then map these objectives to technologies that meet them without excessive cost. Common strategies include the grandfather-father-son (GFS) rotation for tape-based backups, which creates a hierarchy of daily (son), weekly (father), and monthly (grandfather) full backups to support long-term retention while optimizing media reuse. In this scheme, incremental daily backups occur Monday through Friday, with full weekly backups on Fridays rotating tapes weekly, and monthly fulls retained for a year or more. Hybrid local-cloud models complement this by combining on-premises storage for fast access with cloud offsite copies for scalability and disaster isolation, following best practices like segmenting hot data locally and archiving colder data to the cloud. This approach supports the 3-2-1 rule by leveraging local disks for the primary and secondary copies and cloud object storage for the offsite one, ensuring compliance with RPO/RTO through automated tiering. Tools such as policy engines in backup software automate adherence to these strategies by enabling configuration of retention rules, immutability, and multi-tier storage to enforce 3-2-1-1-0 compliance across hybrid environments, including automated discovery and reporting for regulatory alignment. These engines simplify planning by integrating RPO/RTO targets into workflows, reducing manual oversight and enhancing overall resilience.

Recovery Processes and Testing

Recovery processes in backup software encompass a range of techniques to restore data and systems from stored backups, ensuring minimal disruption to operations. Granular recovery, also known as file-level or item-level restoration, enables the selective retrieval of individual files, folders, emails, or database objects without restoring the entire dataset, which is particularly useful for targeted data loss incidents and reduces recovery time for specific needs. In contrast, bare-metal recovery involves a complete system rebuild from "bare metal"—starting with no operating system or data—by deploying the full backup image, including the OS, applications, configurations, and data, onto new or dissimilar hardware; this approach is critical for total system failures but requires more resources and time. For disaster scenarios where the primary system is non-bootable, backup software often integrates bootable media, such as USB drives or ISO files created from recovery environments, allowing administrators to initiate restores from an independent platform and access backups stored on networks or external storage. Testing processes is vital to verify backup usability and identify flaws before real incidents occur, as unvalidated backups can exacerbate . Dry runs, or non-disruptive simulations, test the by mounting backups or performing read-only verifications without overwriting , helping detect errors or issues early. Chaos testing extends this by intentionally injecting failures, such as network outages or hardware simulations, to evaluate under adverse conditions and refine procedures for . Industry best practices recommend conducting full tests at least quarterly, alongside more frequent spot checks, to align with organizational risk levels and ensure compliance with standards like those from NIST, which emphasize periodic validation of plans. Challenges in recovery often arise with incremental backups, where version conflicts can occur if a chain of dependent increments is broken—such as a intermediate backup—leading to incomplete or failed restores that require reconstruction from full baselines. Moreover, recent studies indicate significant risks with untested backups, with approximately 39% of restore attempts failing due to undetected , compatibility issues, or procedural gaps, underscoring the need for rigorous validation to avoid operational . A primary metric for evaluating recovery effectiveness is Mean Time to Restore (MTTR), defined as the average duration required to return systems to full functionality post-failure. The is: \text{MTTR} = \frac{\text{Total Restore Time Across Incidents}}{\text{Number of Incidents}} This measure helps quantify , with lower values indicating robust processes; for instance, enterprise backups aim for MTTR under several hours through optimized tools and testing.

Challenges and Future Trends

Common Limitations and Solutions

Backup software frequently faces bottlenecks, especially in networked environments where transfer rates are capped at 10 Gbps or lower, resulting in extended backup durations and potential disruptions to primary operations. Compatibility challenges across operating systems, such as discrepancies between Linux's and Windows' file systems, often lead to restoration failures or during cross-platform backups. errors in configuration, including misconfigured schedules or overlooked data selections, account for a significant portion of backup failures, exacerbating risks. To mitigate bandwidth limitations, many backup solutions incorporate throttling algorithms that dynamically adjust data transfer speeds to avoid overwhelming resources; for instance, Avamar's burst-based queues data after short sends to optimize flow without saturation. software similarly enables configurable throttling to balance performance with production needs. For OS compatibility issues, platforms like employ universal data adapters that support heterogeneous environments, including and Windows, facilitating seamless agent-based protection across mixed infrastructures. in backup workflows addresses human errors by enforcing consistent policies and verification, potentially reducing configuration mistakes by up to 80% in IT processes. Emerging challenges include ransomware campaigns explicitly targeting backups, with 94% of 2024 attacks attempting to compromise these systems to hinder recovery, as seen in exploits against popular tools like . Solutions involve implementing immutable storage and air-gapped replicas to evade tampering. Additionally, cloud storage for backups often incurs cost overruns due to inefficient data retention and unexpected egress fees, with 25% of organizations reporting significant budget excesses in 2024. Optimization strategies, such as automated tiering to cheaper storage classes, help control these expenses. The 2023 MOVEit breach exemplifies vulnerabilities from unpatched software, where a zero-day SQL injection flaw (CVE-2023-34362) in Progress Software's file transfer tool enabled the Cl0p ransomware group to exfiltrate data from thousands of organizations, highlighting the critical need for prompt patching in backup-adjacent applications to prevent cascading failures. These limitations echo historical challenges from the 1980s, when tape-based systems struggled with media degradation and manual handling errors.

Emerging Technologies and Directions

The integration of (AI) and (ML) into backup software represents a pivotal advancement, enabling predictive backups that anticipate data risks and automate optimization processes. AI algorithms analyze historical backup patterns, usage trends, and system metrics to forecast potential failures or events, allowing software to initiate preemptive backups and allocate resources dynamically. For example, leverages ML for proactive threat detection by identifying anomalies in data patterns, which enhances times and minimizes disruptions in environments. Similarly, in tools like those from Druva focus on of backup activities to detect irregularities, such as unusual deletions indicative of , thereby improving overall data resiliency. A key benefit of AI-driven anomaly detection is the substantial reduction in false positives, which traditionally overwhelm security teams. Advanced ML models, when applied to backup data streams, can achieve up to 93% fewer false alerts by incorporating contextual behavioral analysis, as demonstrated in cloud security frameworks. This automation extends to optimization, where AI adjusts compression ratios, deduplication strategies, and scheduling based on learned efficiencies, potentially cutting storage costs by 20-30% in large-scale deployments. Backup vendors like Computer Weekly-highlighted solutions use these techniques to make processes more reliable, shifting from reactive to proactive paradigms. Emerging trends in backup software emphasize immutable storage through Write Once, Read Many (WORM) policies, driven by post-2020 regulatory mandates for tamper-proof amid rising cyber threats. Platforms such as Blob Storage implement WORM to lock for specified periods, preventing modifications or deletions that could compromise compliance with standards like SEC Rule 17a-4(f), which requires immutable records for electronic communications. This approach has become standard in enterprise backups to counter , ensuring recovery from unaltered copies. Complementing this, edge backups for (IoT) ecosystems are gaining traction with 5G-enabled networks, which provide low-latency connectivity for distributed protection. Solutions integrated with platforms process and back up IoT-generated locally, reducing central server loads and enabling real-time resilience in sectors like manufacturing and smart cities. Looking ahead, quantum-resistant encryption is emerging as a critical direction for backup software to safeguard against future attacks that could break current cryptographic standards. Vendors like have introduced capabilities supporting algorithms such as HQC, selected by NIST as a post-quantum backup defense, allowing seamless upgrades to crypto-agile frameworks without disrupting existing backups. In parallel, serverless backups tailored for cloud-native applications facilitate event-triggered, scalable data protection without infrastructure management, aligning with Kubernetes-based environments for automated . The broader market is shifting toward backup-as-a-service (BaaS) models, projected to expand from USD 8.34 billion in 2025 to USD 33.18 billion by 2030 at a 31.8% CAGR, reflecting accelerated adoption driven by cloud migration. Despite these innovations, challenges persist, particularly privacy risks in AI-driven backup tools where processing sensitive data for or can lead to unauthorized exposure or compliance violations under regulations like GDPR. AI models trained on datasets may inadvertently retain personal information, raising concerns about and in threat assessments. Additionally, remains a hurdle, addressed by standards such as the X/Open Backup Services (XBSA), which defines a platform-independent for applications to interact with storage services, promoting vendor-agnostic data exchange and recovery across heterogeneous systems. Efforts to standardize protocols like XBSA are essential for seamless integration in multi-cloud and hybrid environments.

References

  1. [1]
    What Is Backup and Restore? | IBM
    Backup and restore refers to technologies and practices for making periodic copies of data and applications to a separate, secondary device.
  2. [2]
    What is Azure Backup? - Azure Backup
    ### Summary of Azure Backup Service
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Data Backup Options - CISA
    3 – Keep 3 copies of any important file: 1 primary and 2 backups. 2 – Keep the files on 2 different media types to protect against different types of hazards.<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
    Backup software product specifications - TechTarget
    Nov 8, 2007 · Backup software and replication software are powerful tools used to protect data against loss due to hardware failure, natural disasters, ...
  5. [5]
    Data Backup Explained: A Comprehensive Enterprise Guide
    Aug 25, 2025 · Data backup is the process of copying data in an IT system to another location so it can be recovered if the original data is lost.
  6. [6]
    What is Backup and Recovery? | Learn Data Backup Solutions
    Backup and recovery is the process of duplicating data and storing it in a secure place in case of loss or damage, and then restoring that data to a location.What is backup and recovery? · Why do you need a data...
  7. [7]
    What Is Backup and Disaster Recovery? - IBM
    Backup is the process of making the file copies. Disaster recovery is the plan and processes for using the copies to quickly reestablish access to applications, ...
  8. [8]
    Archive vs. backup and why you need to know the differences
    Oct 31, 2019 · Data backup is generally for short-term storage and recovery, while archives are for long-term storage and regulatory retention. Backups and ...
  9. [9]
    The evolution of backing up to tape and where it stands | TechTarget
    May 24, 2018 · In the second half of the 20th century, most servers and other critical PC-based systems were backing up to tape, and most experienced system ...
  10. [10]
    Backblaze Drive Stats for Q2 2025 | Hard Drive Failure Rates
    Aug 5, 2025 · The quarterly failure rate went up from 1.35% to 1.42%. As with the zero-failure club, our higher-end outlier AFRs show some of the usual ...
  11. [11]
    Key Cyber Security Statistics for 2025 - SentinelOne
    Jul 30, 2025 · According to CheckPoint research, global cyber attacks increased by 30% in Q2 2024, reaching 1,636 weekly attacks per organization. The ...
  12. [12]
    Cost of a Data Breach Report 2025 - IBM
    The global average cost of a data breach, in USD, a 9% decrease over last year—driven by faster identification and containment. 0%. Share of organizations ...
  13. [13]
    Ensuring GDPR Compliant Backups. GDPR Backup Requirements
    Dec 18, 2024 · Data must be accurate and up-to-date;; Data protection must be assured using appropriate security measures;; Personal information must be ...
  14. [14]
    What are the HIPAA Requirements for Data Backup?
    Oct 6, 2022 · Your data must be backed up daily and maintained weekly. There must also be monthly and annual backup procedures. A good data backup solution ...Missing: GDPR | Show results with:GDPR
  15. [15]
    https://www.statista.com/topics/1464/big-data/
  16. [16]
    85% of Organizations Experienced Data Loss in 2024
    May 29, 2025 · According to the report, an overwhelming 85% of organizations experienced one or more data loss incidents over the past year.
  17. [17]
    The Best Cloud Backup Services for Business for 2025 - PCMag
    Cloud backup makes it easier than ever to secure and access off-site data. We test and rank the top cloud backup services for businesses to help you decide ...
  18. [18]
    The IBM punched card
    Punched cards, also known as punch cards, dated to the late 18th and early 19th centuries when they were used to “program” cloth-making machinery and looms. In ...
  19. [19]
    How Data Backup Started with Punch Cards & Became Digital
    Sep 13, 2016 · Did you know data backup can first be traced to manually punching cards? Or that the first hard drive needed a dolly to move?
  20. [20]
    Memory & Storage | Timeline of Computer History
    Magnetic tape allows for inexpensive mass storage of information and is a key part of the computer revolution. The IBM 726 was an early and important practical ...
  21. [21]
    Magnetic tape | IBM
    Beginning in the early 1950s, magnetic tape greatly increased the speed of data processing and eliminated the need for massive stacks of punched cards as a data ...
  22. [22]
    A Brief History of Data Storage - Dataversity
    Nov 1, 2017 · In the 1960s, “magnetic storage” gradually replaced punch cards as the primary means for data storage. Magnetic tape was first patented in 1928, ...
  23. [23]
    Chris's Wiki :: blog/unix/DumpHistory
    Nov 9, 2008 · The idea of a dump program itself goes back to V6 (Research) Unix, which introduced the first, rather basic dump program. At the time, Unix had ...Missing: backup 1970s
  24. [24]
    [PDF] The Restoration of Early UNIX Artifacts - USENIX
    3rd Edition. UNIX was the last version written in PDP-11 assembly language. During 1973, while the assembly version was still being developed, the system was ...
  25. [25]
    Digital Equipment Corporation records - 102733963 - CHM
    This tape contains a full backup of a Cluster File System (CFS), disk name VENEG1, by Jpm. The tape density (BPI) is 6250.Missing: utilities | Show results with:utilities
  26. [26]
    [PDF] Nothing Stops It! - Computer History Museum - Archive Server
    The DEC-10 was used to compile the VMS modules written in Bliss because at ... “The VMS Documentation Group grew from five people in 1977 to 45 in. 1987 ...
  27. [27]
    What is a Hierarchical Database? | MongoDB
    The concept of hierarchical data models dates back to the early 1960s, when data management needs were rapidly growing alongside advancements in computing.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] A History of the ARPANET: The First Decade - DTIC
    Apr 1, 1981 · In sum, at the time of the initiation of the ARPANET program in fiscal year 1969 many of the requisite ideas had been considered and many of the ...
  29. [29]
    The Evolution of Backup - NovaBACKUP
    Sep 28, 2023 · The first commercial backup software was probably a program called "DISC" (Disk Copy), developed by Digital Communications Associates (DCA).
  30. [30]
    NTBackup - BetaWiki
    Jul 1, 2024 · NTBackup, internally known as Windows Backup Utility and also referred to as Backup Utility or simply Backup, is a backup tool in Microsoft ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  31. [31]
    Special Edition Using Windows NT Server 4.0 -- Chapter 8 - rigacci.org
    An incremental backup copies to the backup media all selected files that have their archive bit turned on, and then turns the archive bit off for the files that ...
  32. [32]
    Amanda Network Backup: Open Source Backup for Linux, Windows ...
    AMANDA, the Advanced Maryland Automatic Network Disk Archiver, is a backup solution that allows the IT administrator to set up a single master backup server.
  33. [33]
    Red Hat Acquires Permabit Assets, Eases Barriers to Cloud ...
    Jul 31, 2017 · It has acquired the assets and technology of Permabit Technology Corporation, a provider of software for data deduplication, compression and thin provisioning.Missing: 2005 | Show results with:2005
  34. [34]
    Announcing Amazon Glacier - AWS
    Aug 20, 2012 · We are excited to announce Amazon Glacier, a secure, reliable and extremely low cost storage service designed for data archiving and backup.Missing: advancements 2010s
  35. [35]
    Using Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection and Ransomware ...
    Aug 16, 2021 · The DNN analyses data via a machine learning pipeline for Rubrik Polaris Radar that consists of two models: an anomaly detection model and an ...
  36. [36]
    Ransomware-Proofing Your Business With Immutable Cloud Backups
    Nov 4, 2021 · Best Practices for Implementing Immutable Backup​​ Automate Response: Ransomware attacks mostly happen months after a system is infected. ...
  37. [37]
    How Backup Integrates into Zero-Trust Architectures - Bacula Systems
    Sep 28, 2025 · Organizations that implement zero-trust backup see measurable improvements in multiple areas. Ransomware resilience improves because attackers ...
  38. [38]
    Veeam Managed Backup Solutions for Edge Computing - Otava
    OTAVA's Veeam solution offers next-gen edge backup, comprehensive protection, ransomware protection, and is designed for edge environments with small ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  39. [39]
    Data Backup And Recovery Market 2025 Growth, Analysis By 2034
    In stockThe data backup and recovery market size has grown rapidly in recent years. It will grow from $14.95 billion in 2024 to $16.48 billion in 2025 at a compound ...Missing: exact | Show results with:exact<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    4 Features to Look for in Personal Backup - CrashPlan
    May 16, 2024 · 1. Secure, Cloud-Based Backup. The first quality to look for in a cloud-based personal backup solution is its security features. · 2. Automatic ...
  41. [41]
    https://www.techradar.com/best/best-free-backup-software
  42. [42]
    Duplicati: Zero trust, fully encrypted backup | Open Core Ventures
    May 13, 2024 · Duplicati's been focused on providing a zero-trust, open source backup solution that's easy to use as well as platform and storage destination independent.Missing: software | Show results with:software
  43. [43]
    A brief history of Time Machine - The Eclectic Light Company
    Sep 7, 2024 · Released in Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard on 26 October 2007, it supported Time Capsules launched in January 2008, and in Big Sur could back up to ...
  44. [44]
    How to use File History in Windows 10 and 11 - Computerworld
    May 12, 2022 · When Windows 8 made its public debut in October 2012, one of the new features it introduced to users was called File History. Still ...
  45. [45]
    Easy & Reliable personal backup software for home and office
    Rating 4.4 (62) Choose the best personal backup software. Store your files easily and securely in Acronis personal cloud backup and enjoy our award winning backup solution.
  46. [46]
    https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/knowledgebase/best-hard-drive-for-backup-a-comprehensive-guide/
  47. [47]
    The Backup Survey: Only 33% of Users Regularly Back Up Their Data
    Rating 5.0 (6) Jun 19, 2025 · Discover 15 fresh data backup statistics from Handy Recovery Advisor, based on a survey of 1000 US citizens and illustrated by charts.
  48. [48]
    Enterprise Backup Software - NovaStor
    NovaStor DataCenter Enterprise was built on a distributed architecture with the ability to handle petabytes of data with high fault tolerances, and built-in ...
  49. [49]
    Agent-based vs Agentless Backup - Trilio
    Nov 3, 2025 · Ensuring the security and integrity of agent-based backup solutions requires diligent patching, configuration management, and monitoring ...Missing: characteristics petabyte SAN NAS
  50. [50]
    How to Choose the Best Enterprise Backup Software in 2025? Best ...
    Aug 3, 2025 · Rubrik is a reasonably versatile enterprise backup solution that includes many features one expects from a modern backup solution of this scale.
  51. [51]
    Commvault - Crunchbase Company Profile & Funding
    Commvault is a cyber resilience platform built for recovery and protection against threats.
  52. [52]
    The 12 Best Enterprise Data Backup & Recovery Solutions Right Now
    Nov 8, 2023 · An enterprise backup solution protects critical data and applications. Top solutions include HYCU, Veeam, Rubrik, and others.Missing: IoT | Show results with:IoT
  53. [53]
    Cloud Disaster Recovery: Ensuring Resilience & Business Continuity
    Sep 16, 2025 · Explore cloud disaster recovery strategies that minimize downtime, meet RTO/RPO goals, and ensure business continuity.
  54. [54]
    What is ISO 22301 Business Continuity Management Framework?
    Oct 17, 2024 · Compliance with ISO 22301 would indicate that a backup and recovery solution supports a structured approach to risk management, recovery ...
  55. [55]
    Best Backup And Recovery Software in 2025 | 6sense
    Over 122,907 companies are using Backup And Recovery tools. Veeam with 20.22% market share (24,857 customers), VMware Disaster Recovery with 12.97% market share ...
  56. [56]
    Backup Software for Enterprise Businesses 2025 Trends and ...
    Rating 4.8 (1,980) Mar 9, 2025 · The market, currently valued at approximately $15 billion in 2025, is projected to exhibit a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12% from 2025 ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] A Survey of Contemporary Enterprise Storage Technologies from a ...
    LUNs are logical partitions of redundant array of independent disks (RAID) groups from the storage system (EMC Corporation, 2006).
  58. [58]
    [PDF] Acronis True Image 2021
    Acronis True Image 2021 is a complete data protection solution that ensures the security of all of the information on your PC. It can back up your documents ...Missing: GUI | Show results with:GUI
  59. [59]
    Block Level Backups Vs File-Level Backups - NetApp
    Nov 10, 2022 · Block-level backups are much more efficient than file-level backups. What Makes File-Level Backups Inefficient? What's the reason behind file- ...File-Level vs. Block-Level... · Problem #1: File-Level... · Problem #3: File-Level...
  60. [60]
    5.4. Backing up ext2, ext3, or ext4 File Systems
    Although it is possible to back up a data partition while it is mounted, the results of backing up a mounted data partition can be unpredictable. If you need to ...
  61. [61]
    https://www.2brightsparks.com/resources/articles/file-systems.html
  62. [62]
    Best practices for using dynamic disks - Windows Server
    Jan 15, 2025 · Describes the best practices for using dynamic disks on Windows Server 2003-based computers.
  63. [63]
    Enterprise Backup Strategy: Steps & Best Practices - Veeam
    Sep 27, 2024 · The key is to find a balance that ensures your critical data is always safe without overloading your storage or bandwidth. 3. Choose the Right ...
  64. [64]
    ZFS Compression and Deduplication | vStor 4.12 Documentation
    Mar 13, 2025 · Typical compression ratios range from 1.5:1 to 3:1, reducing data size by 50% to 67%. Expected compression ratios: Text Files and Logs: Up to 3 ...
  65. [65]
    What Is Data Deduplication? Methods and Benefits - Oracle
    Feb 14, 2024 · Data deduplication is the process of removing identical files or blocks from databases and data storage.
  66. [66]
    What Is Data Deduplication? - Pure Storage
    Inline deduplication occurs in real time as data is being written to storage. It provides immediate storage savings but may affect system performance due to the ...
  67. [67]
    The effectiveness of deduplication on virtual machine disk images
    Instead, we propose the use of deduplication to both reduce the total storage required for VM disk images and increase the ability of VMs to share disk blocks.
  68. [68]
    Single-Instance Store and SIS Backup - Win32 apps | Microsoft Learn
    Aug 23, 2019 · Single-instance store, or SIS, is an architecture designed to maintain duplicate files with a minimum of disk, cache, and backup media overhead.Missing: software | Show results with:software
  69. [69]
    Frequently asked questions — Borg - Deduplicating Archiver 1.4.2 ...
    Also, in order for the deduplication used by Borg to work, it needs to keep a local cache containing checksums of all file chunks already stored in the ...
  70. [70]
    Types of Deduplication: Inline vs. Post-Process - DataCore Software
    Mar 8, 2021 · This blog will explore and compare the two implementations while also highlighting uses cases for when to use data deduplication solution.
  71. [71]
    Understanding Deduplication Ratios - Pure Storage Blog
    Sep 18, 2024 · It's super important to understand where deduplication ratios, in relation to backup applications and data storage, come from.
  72. [72]
    Architecture Overview - Azure Backup | Microsoft Learn
    Jul 17, 2025 · A differential backup is based on the most recent, previous full-data backup. It captures only the data that's changed since the full backup. At ...Missing: software | Show results with:software
  73. [73]
    Tuning database backups to cloud object storage - IBM
    For example, a 1 Gb network link might process only 100 MB per second of throughput. A 1 TB database backup operation might take 3 or more hours to complete.
  74. [74]
    404 - Content Not Found
    No readable text found in the HTML.<|separator|>
  75. [75]
    Backup Types Explained: Full, Incremental, and Differential - NAKIVO
    Jun 8, 2023 · Incremental backup is a backup type that involves copying only data changes since the latest backup (which can be a full, incremental, or differential backup).Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
  76. [76]
    Backup Chain - Veeam Backup & Replication User Guide
    Jul 19, 2024 · A backup chain is a sequence of backup files created by jobs. · The backup chain consists of the first full backup file, incremental backup files ...
  77. [77]
    Types of backup explained: Incremental vs. differential vs. full, etc.
    Jul 7, 2025 · The most common backup types are a full backup, an incremental backup and a differential backup. A full backup takes a complete copy of the source data.Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
  78. [78]
    Differential Backups (SQL Server) - Microsoft Learn
    Jul 15, 2025 · A differential backup is based on the most recent, previous full data backup. A differential backup captures only the data that has changed since that full ...
  79. [79]
    Restoring Incremental and Differential Backups - Win32 apps
    Jan 7, 2021 · In this article​​ Restoring an incremental or differential backup under VSS is not significantly different from any other VSS restore operation. ...Missing: example | Show results with:example
  80. [80]
    Forever Forward Incremental Backup - Veeam Help Center
    Aug 13, 2025 · The forever forward incremental backup method produces a backup chain that consists of the first full backup file (VBK) and a set of forward ...
  81. [81]
    Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) - Microsoft Learn
    Jul 7, 2025 · Learn how to use Volume Shadow Copy Service to coordinate the actions that are required to create a consistent shadow copy for backup and ...
  82. [82]
    Volume Shadow Copy Service (VSS) and SQL Writer - Microsoft Learn
    Apr 3, 2025 · This paper describes the SQL writer component and its role in the VSS snapshot creation and restores process for SQL Server databases.
  83. [83]
    MySQL :: MySQL 8.4 Reference Manual :: 9.2 Database Backup Methods
    ### Summary of Hot Backup Methods for MySQL with Binary Logs
  84. [84]
    VMware Tools Quiescence - Veeam Backup & Replication User Guide for VMware vSphere
    ### Summary: What Quiescing Applications Means in the Context of Backups
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Challenges in Embedded Database System Administration - USENIX
    These tasks are log archival and reclamation, backup, data compaction/reorganization, automatic and rapid recovery, and reinitialization from an initial state.
  86. [86]
    Documentation: 18: 28.3. Write-Ahead Logging (WAL) - PostgreSQL
    Write-Ahead Logging (WAL) is a standard method for ensuring data integrity. A detailed description can be found in most (if not all) books about transaction ...
  87. [87]
    18: 25.3. Continuous Archiving and Point-in-Time Recovery (PITR)
    To recover successfully using continuous archiving (also called “online backup” by many database vendors), you need a continuous sequence of archived WAL files.Missing: shipping | Show results with:shipping
  88. [88]
    What is Oracle RMAN (Oracle Recovery Manager)? - TechTarget
    Apr 17, 2017 · RMAN was introduced in Oracle release 8.0. Database administrators (DBAs) can use RMAN to protect data on Oracle databases rather than ...
  89. [89]
    6.4 RMAN RESTORE: Restoring Lost Database Files from Backup
    By default, RMAN restores archived redo logs with names constructed using the LOG_ARCHIVE_FORMAT and the LOG_ARCHIVE_DEST_1 parameters of the target database.Missing: transaction | Show results with:transaction
  90. [90]
    About Azure VM backup - Azure Backup
    ### Crash-Consistent vs Application-Consistent Backups
  91. [91]
    Database Transaction Logging: Implementation For Enterprise ...
    Rating 4.8 (30,500) · Free · Business/ProductivityIn the context of scheduling software, transaction logging ensures data integrity, enables audit trails, and facilitates disaster recovery—creating a robust ...
  92. [92]
    Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Encryption: Top Use Cases in 2025
    Jul 18, 2025 · While symmetric encryption requires a single key, asymmetric encryption requires a pair of public and private keys to ensure the separation of ...
  93. [93]
    AES vs. RSA: What's the Difference? - Rublon
    Sep 9, 2025 · AES is symmetric, using one key for both encryption and decryption, while RSA is asymmetric, using public and private keys.<|separator|>
  94. [94]
    Advanced Encryption Standard: Understanding AES 256 - N-able
    Jul 29, 2019 · With a 256-bit key, a hacker would need to try 2256 different combinations to ensure the right one is included. This number is astronomically ...
  95. [95]
    Backup Encryption Best Practices - OneNine
    Feb 20, 2025 · Use AES-256 for encrypting large datasets quickly, while RSA secures key exchanges. Both methods support compliance with regulations like HIPAA, ...
  96. [96]
    Duplicacy
    Duplicacy backs up your files to many cloud storages with client-side encryption and the highest level of deduplication. Download. Lock-Free Deduplication.Buy · Web GUI Guide · Duplicacy Forum · Download<|separator|>
  97. [97]
    Data Security and Compliance Powered by Comet Backup
    Comet keeps your data safe with end-to-end encryption during backup, transit and at rest for both local and cloud storage. ... TLS 1.3 "A" grade level security ...
  98. [98]
    Key Management - HSMs - Encryption Consulting
    Apr 22, 2020 · Once the keys are created and stored in the HSM, authorization will only be allowed through a series of key cards and passphrases to gain access ...
  99. [99]
    Key Management - Thales Docs
    The recommended procedure for key backup is to use the CKA_EXPORT and CKA_EXPORTABLE attributes for the KEK and working keys, respectively. These are preferable ...
  100. [100]
    FIPS 140-2, Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules | CSRC
    FIPS 140-2 specifies security requirements for cryptographic modules, with four levels, covering areas like specification, ports, and key management.Missing: backup | Show results with:backup
  101. [101]
    What is FDE security? - Huntress
    Sep 19, 2025 · Software-based FDE typically introduces 5-15% performance overhead, while hardware-based solutions often operate with minimal impact. Modern ...
  102. [102]
    Acronis delivers FIPS 140-2-compliant encryption to strengthen your ...
    Feb 6, 2025 · FIPS 140-2 compliance enables you to meet strict internal and external mandates, confidently engage with regulated entities and reduce potential ...
  103. [103]
    [PDF] Guidelines to Secure Backup Data | Veritas
    Oct 23, 2024 · Enable RBAC for Least Privileged User Access: Apply role-based access control to provide secure, limited access and permissions for the users ...<|separator|>
  104. [104]
    Multi-Factor Authentication - Veeam Backup & Replication User ...
    Jul 11, 2025 · Veeam MFA uses a one-time password (OTP) from a mobile app for user verification, requiring a 6-digit code after login, for additional security.
  105. [105]
    MFA: Enhancing Security for Rubrik Security Cloud & CDM
    Aug 2, 2022 · MFA uses two or more factors, like biometrics, a PIN, and a security token, to protect against attacks. Rubrik uses TOTP and enables MFA by ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  106. [106]
    Expand Security with SIEM Integration and Backup - Veeam
    Jan 10, 2024 · Forensic Audit: In the event of a security incident, SIEM integration provides a valuable forensic audit trail related to backup activities.
  107. [107]
    Keepit integration with Microsoft Sentinel: Export backup insights to ...
    Sep 24, 2025 · Keepit's integration with Microsoft Sentinel lets you export relevant backup and audit activity into your SIEM, so detection, investigation, and ...Missing: software | Show results with:software
  108. [108]
    About NetBackup, PureDisk and PCI DSS - Veritas
    This statement presents the NetBackup product team's interpretation of the PCI DSS and PA-DSS requirements as they apply to data protection in general.Missing: SOX immutable logs
  109. [109]
    PCI Compliance | Veritas
    We have years of experience helping organizations comply with PCI as data is backed up and protected with all our available features including encryption and ...
  110. [110]
    [PDF] 2024 Data Breach Investigations Report | Verizon
    May 5, 2024 · This 180% increase in the exploitation of vulnerabilities as the critical path action to initiate a breach will be of no surprise to anyone who ...
  111. [111]
    Plan | Office of Technology and Digital Innovation
    The RPO is defined by NIST's CSRC as the point in time to which data must be recovered after an outage. For the DR Program, the RPO is the amount of time since ...
  112. [112]
    YALE-MSS-1.5.1: Determine the maximum amount of data that can ...
    Recovery Point Objective (RPO) is how frequently backups of data are created. For example, if you have an RPO of 24 hours, then a backup is generated once every ...
  113. [113]
    [PDF] PROTECTING DATA FROM RANSOMWARE AND OTHER DATA ...
    ○ To increase the chances of recovering lost or corrupted data, follow the 3-2-1 rule: 3 – Keep three copies of any important file: one primary and two backups.Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  114. [114]
    Are You Confident in Your Backups? - Communications of the ACM
    Jan 8, 2024 · The rule is simple yet effective: maintain at least three copies of your data, keep two copies on different types of media, and keep one backup ...
  115. [115]
    Cyber Hygiene - UW-IT - University of Washington
    Feb 5, 2025 · ... 3-2-1 rule for effective backups: 3 copies or versions of data; Stored on 2 different pieces of media; 1 backup off-site and in an immutable ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin<|separator|>
  116. [116]
    3-2-1 Backup Rule Explained: Do I Need One? - Veeam
    Veeam's 3-2-1-1-0 rule adds one immutable copy and verifies zero recovery errors, delivering stronger ransomware resilience. Cloud backups, DRaaS, and ...
  117. [117]
    3-2-1-1-0 Backup Rule: Extend Your Backup Security - MSP360
    Jan 25, 2022 · The 3-2-1-1-0 rule significantly increases your chances of getting your data back, no matter what happens to your main dataset: malware, physical damage, or ...
  118. [118]
    3-2-1 vs 3-2-1-1 vs 3-2-1-1-0 Backup Rules. What is the Difference ...
    Jul 21, 2024 · 3-2-1-1-0 rule – an extension of the 3-2-1-1 rule that introduces the concept of frequent backup testing to the mix.
  119. [119]
    The 3-2-1 Backup Rule and Beyond: 3-2-1 vs. 3-2-1-1-0 vs. 4-3-2
    Jul 21, 2021 · A strategy like 3-2-1-1-0 offers the protection of air gapped backups with the added fidelity of more rigorous monitoring and testing.
  120. [120]
    Disaster Recovery and Backup Guidance | UC Santa Barbara ...
    The second consideration is Recovery Point Objective (RPO.) Simply put, this is answering the question about how much data you're willing to lose if a disaster ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  121. [121]
    Backup and Recovery - UF Policy Hub - University of Florida
    Information Security Administrators (ISAs) are responsible for establishing Recovery Time Objectives (RTO) and Recovery Point Objectives (RPO), in conjunction ...
  122. [122]
    Grandfather Father Son Backup (GFS) for Tape Rotation with Amanda
    Jun 6, 2025 · Grandfather Father Son backup is the most widely used scheme for tape backup rotation. Learn how to use Amanda to implement this schdule.
  123. [123]
    Grandfather-Father-Son (GFS) Data Retention
    Sep 26, 2025 · The weekly or Son backups are rotated on a weekly basis with one graduating to Father status each month. · Perform incremental backups daily and ...<|separator|>
  124. [124]
    Grandfather-Father-Son (GFS) backup strategy: A reliable and ...
    Apr 8, 2025 · The Grandfather-Father-Son (GFS) strategy is a hierarchical backup rotation system designed to balance long-term data retention with efficient storage usage.
  125. [125]
    Six Strategic Hybrid Cloud Backup Best Practices - TierPoint
    Jul 23, 2024 · Six Hybrid Cloud Backup Best Practices · 1.) Establish RTOs and RPOs · 2.) Develop Backup and Recovery Policies · 3.) Determine Your Data Security ...
  126. [126]
    Hybrid Cloud Backups | Explore - Commvault
    Best Practices to Maximize Value of Hybrid Cloud​​ Segment by use case: Keep frequently accessed data on-prem and move older or less critical data to cloud ...
  127. [127]
    Rubrik Solutions Overview | Rubrik a Multi-Cloud Data Control ...
    Rubrik simplifies provides radically simplified, policy-driven backup, archival, and cloud migration for enterprises running on VMware's Software-Defined Data ...Database Backup · Instant Ransomware Recovery... · VMware Cloud
  128. [128]
    Compliance & Risk Mitigation - Rubrik
    Rubrik automatically discovers, classifies, and reports on where certain types of sensitive data reside to help comply with regulations.
  129. [129]
    Rubrik DataGuardian: Security at the Point of Data
    Oct 4, 2021 · Rubrik DataGuardian keeps backup data immutable. Simply put, once data has been written it cannot be modified or encrypted.
  130. [130]
    Full System Backup and Restore Guide for Windows - MSP360
    Granular recovery. Recovery of the selected files or folders from the image. This saves time when you need to restore a folder, instead of a whole machine.
  131. [131]
    Bare Metal Backup and Recovery: Definition and Types
    Oct 2, 2024 · Bare metal backup and recovery is a solution type that allows backing up and restoring the entire system data from one system to another, ...
  132. [132]
    Disaster Recovery - BackupAssist
    The Bootable Backup Media allows for stress-free recovery to a bare-metal machine with the same hardware, and the RecoverAssist media allows for bare-metal ...
  133. [133]
    Disaster recovery testing: Master 4 Uninterrupted Steps
    Conduct dry runs to catch issues before the main event. Then, execute the test according to the plan. Meticulous monitoring and issue logging are critical ...
  134. [134]
    Testing disaster recovery with Chaos Engineering - Gremlin
    Dec 11, 2020 · Use Chaos Engineering to recreate or simulate a black swan event. This gives us the opportunity to test our DRP and our response procedures ...Missing: dry | Show results with:dry
  135. [135]
    IT Disaster Recovery Testing Best Practices - SBS CyberSecurity
    Apr 29, 2025 · Minimum: Retain backups for at least 14 days. · Best practice: Maintain a 30-day retention schedule, supplemented with quarterly and yearly ...
  136. [136]
    [PDF] Can We Really Recover Data If Storage Subsystem Fails?
    This paper presents a theoretical and experimental study on the limitations of copy-on-write snapshots and incremental backups in terms of data recoverability.Missing: conflicts | Show results with:conflicts
  137. [137]
    CXO Research: 58% of Data Backups are Failing, Creating ... - Veeam
    Mar 18, 2021 · Despite the integral role backup plays in modern data protection, 14% of all data is not backed up at all and 58% of recoveries fail, leaving ...
  138. [138]
    Mean Time to Restore (MTTR) Explained: How to Measure and ...
    Jan 13, 2023 · Mean Time to Restore (MTTR) Explained: MTTR refers to the average time it takes to restore a service following a downtime incident, focusing on ...Mean Time to Restore vs... · The Importance of Measuring...
  139. [139]
    Top 9 Causes Of Slow Data Backups And How To Fix Them - Zmanda
    May 23, 2025 · Why is my backup taking so long? Your backup may be delayed by network congestion, slow disk speeds, or misconfigured backup software settings.
  140. [140]
    Windows and Linux NAS file system compatibility - BackupAssist
    Compatibility issue · The backup is running a system protection job to the Linux based NAS. · The Linux NAS has sparse file allocation turned on.
  141. [141]
    https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000170398/avamar-how-to-throttle-an-avamar-client-s-consumption-of-system-resources-cpu-network-i-o-and-memory
  142. [142]
    Avamar: How to throttle a backup client's CPU, network, IO and ... - Dell
    The Avamar network throttling algorithm works in such a way that it transmits data in short bursts. After each burst, the algorithm queues data for an ...
  143. [143]
    Throttling Backup Activities - Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows ...
    Feb 4, 2025 · You can instruct Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows to throttle its activities during backup. The throttling option can help you avoid situations when backup ...
  144. [144]
    Cohesity Pegasus 6.6 Release: A New Dawn in Simplified Data ...
    Mar 19, 2021 · Cohesity's latest innovation, the Universal Data Adapter (UDA) simplifies and automates protection for a wide range of databases (RDBMS, open- ...
  145. [145]
    7 Human Error Statistics For 2025 - DocuClipper
    Mar 17, 2025 · Automating regular tasks can drastically reduce human errors. For instance, automation in data entry can lower error rates by up to 80%.Missing: backup | Show results with:backup
  146. [146]
    Critical Data Recovery from Ransomware Attacks - Index Engines
    May 8, 2025 · More alarmingly, 94% of ransomware attacks specifically target backup systems, with 57% successfully compromising these critical safety nets.
  147. [147]
    #StopRansomware: Akira Ransomware - CISA
    After tunneling through a targeted router, Akira threat actors exploit publicly available vulnerabilities, such as those found in the Veeam Backup and ...
  148. [148]
    Ransomware backup strategy & best practices. How to protect ...
    Oct 13, 2025 · Financial services organizations saw 65% targeted by ransomware in 2024, with attackers attempting to compromise backups in 90% of these attacks ...
  149. [149]
    Cloud data storage woes drive cost overruns, business delays
    Feb 26, 2025 · One-quarter of respondents reported massive budget overruns in 2024. Data egress and usage fees took a toll on broader enterprise plans.
  150. [150]
    Causes of Cloud Waste: 8 Cloud Cost Savings Strategies for 2025
    Jan 3, 2025 · Inefficient storage usage in cloud environments can quickly drive up costs. This inefficiency stems from retaining unnecessary data, using ...Inefficient Storage Usage · Strategies For Cloud Cost... · Reducing Cloud Costs With...
  151. [151]
    #StopRansomware: CL0P Ransomware Gang Exploits CVE-2023 ...
    Jun 7, 2023 · CL0P ransomware group exploited the zero-day vulnerability CVE-2023-34362 affecting MOVEit Transfer software; begins with a SQL injection to ...
  152. [152]
    Backup failure: Four key areas where backups go wrong
    Apr 28, 2021 · We look at the key ways that backups can fail – via software issues, hardware problems, trouble in the infrastructure and good old human error – ...
  153. [153]
    AI and ML to Enhance Data Backup and Recovery - Veeam
    Jul 5, 2024 · AI and ML transform data backup and recovery by analyzing vast amounts of data to identify patterns and anomalies, enabling proactive threat ...
  154. [154]
    [PDF] Data Anomaly Detection | Druva
    Sep 5, 2025 · By analyzing backup data in real time, Druva provides early warning of ransomware through detection of unusual deletions, modifications, or ...Missing: false positives 70%
  155. [155]
    Reducing False Positives with Active Behavioral Analysis for Cloud ...
    Aug 18, 2025 · Our findings indicate an average reduction of 93\% in false positives. Furthermore, the framework demonstrates low latency performance. These ...
  156. [156]
    AI and backup: How backup products leverage AI | Computer Weekly
    Aug 28, 2025 · Backup providers use machine learning and predictive analytics, in particular, to make backups more reliable and efficient. This includes use of ...
  157. [157]
    Overview of immutable storage for blob data - Azure - Microsoft Learn
    May 1, 2024 · Immutable storage for Azure Blob Storage enables users to store business-critical data in a WORM (Write Once, Read Many) state.Missing: 2020 | Show results with:2020
  158. [158]
    Top Edge Computing Platforms for 2025 | OTAVA
    Discover top edge computing platforms for 2025. Learn how edge solutions enhance speed, security, and real-time processing for AI, IoT, and business ...
  159. [159]
    Commvault Unveils New Post-Quantum Cryptography Capabilities ...
    Jun 9, 2025 · Commvault's new post-quantum cryptography includes expanded encryption standards, the HQC algorithm, and a crypto-agility framework to protect ...
  160. [160]
    Backup-as-a-Service (BaaS) Market Size & Share Analysis
    Jul 3, 2025 · The Backup-as-a-Service market stands at USD 8.34 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 33.18 billion by 2030, advancing at a 31.8% CAGR.
  161. [161]
    7 Challenges with Applying AI to Data Security - Pure Storage Blog
    Oct 12, 2025 · AI's Data Hunger Raises Privacy and Compliance Risk. Generative AI systems often need access to sensitive data to deliver relevant outcomes.
  162. [162]
    Backup Services API (XBSA) - Introduction
    XBSA is an interface between applications needing backup data storage and the services providing it, standardizing the API for various platforms.