Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Binding of Isaac

The Binding of Isaac, termed the Akedah (Hebrew for "binding") in Jewish tradition, is a pivotal narrative in Genesis 22 of the , wherein God tests Abraham's fidelity by instructing him to sacrifice his beloved son as a burnt offering upon Mount Moriah, an act halted by angelic intervention that substitutes a ram for the boy. This episode, dated compositionally to ancient Israelite sources reflecting oral traditions potentially from the second millennium BCE, exemplifies absolute obedience to divine will amid apparent ethical extremity. Thematically, the account emphasizes unwavering as the cornerstone of the Abrahamic , with Abraham's compliance—departing at dawn with wood, fire, and knife—demonstrating prioritization of God's command over paternal instinct or rational scruple. In , it holds liturgical primacy, chanted on to invoke ancestral merit for communal , underscoring causal linkage between individual submission and collective . Christian interprets Isaac's near-sacrifice as typological foreshadowing of Christ's atoning death, where divine provision replaces human offering, reinforcing soteriological continuity from patriarch to . Historically, the site's identification with suggests etiological function legitimating Jerusalem's cult, contrasting Israelite against contemporaneous Near Eastern practices by affirming . The narrative's stark causality—divine imperative yielding providential resolution—has elicited enduring scrutiny over faith's tension with moral intuition, with rabbinic and patristic commentaries debating Abraham's taciturnity and Isaac's consent, yet affirming the episode's role in validating prophecy's authority through empirical fulfillment of God's to multiply Abraham's seed. Scholarly analyses, drawing from textual and archaeological contexts, highlight its rejection of human immolation in favor of animal proxy, marking a realist pivot toward amid regional pagan norms.

Biblical Account

Narrative Details

God tests Abraham by commanding him to offer his son as a burnt offering on a mountain in the land of . Abraham obeys without delay, departing early the next morning with , two young men servants, a , and the wood for the offering, traveling for three days until he discerns the designated site from afar. He instructs the servants to wait while he and proceed to worship and return, then places the wood on , carries the fire and himself, and responds to Isaac's inquiry about the by stating that will provide it. Upon reaching the place, Abraham builds an altar, arranges the wood, binds Isaac, and lays him on the wood atop the altar, raising the knife to slaughter his son. At that moment, the angel of the Lord calls from heaven, halting Abraham and affirming that he has proven his fear of God by not withholding his only son. Abraham then notices a ram caught by its horns in a thicket nearby, which he sacrifices in Isaac's place, naming the site Jehovah-jireh, meaning "The Lord will provide." The angel calls a second time, swearing by himself to bless Abraham with innumerable descendants like the stars and sand, granting them possession of their enemies' gates, and extending blessings to all nations through his offspring because of his obedience. Abraham returns to his servants, and they journey together to Beersheba.

Theological Elements

The narrative in Genesis 22 introduces the theological concept of divine testing as a means to reveal and affirm human faithfulness, beginning with the declaration that "God tested Abraham" by commanding the sacrifice of his son Isaac, the heir central to prior covenant promises of progeny and land (Genesis 22:1-2). This trial probes the depth of Abraham's devotion, requiring him to confront the apparent contradiction between God's earlier assurances of blessing through Isaac (Genesis 21:12) and the sacrificial directive, thereby elevating obedience to divine authority above rational human expectations or emotional ties. Abraham's compliance—rising early, journeying to , binding , and raising the knife—exemplifies radical submission, culminating in the angel's validation: "Now I know that you fear , seeing you have not withheld your son, your only son, from me" ( 22:12). This exchange establishes yir'at Hashem (fear of the Lord) as the litmus of authentic piety, not mere ritual or profession, but costly action that acknowledges God's over life and . The , providing a caught in a as substitute ( 22:13), manifests God's providential mercy and initiative in atonement, prompting Abraham's proclamation that "the Lord will provide" (, 22:14). The episode resolves with God's self-oath to multiply Abraham's offspring and bless all nations through him, explicitly tying these expansions to observed obedience ( 22:16-18), thus portraying reciprocity between human and divine reliability without implying earned merit.

Ancient Near Eastern Context

Prevalence of Child Sacrifice

Child sacrifice appears in textual records from Ugaritic and Phoenician sources as a ritual known as mlk, often involving the offering of children to deities such as Baal in fulfillment of vows or during crises. Phoenician inscriptions from Carthage, such as KAI 63 and KAI 99, describe mlk sacrifices of infants (mlkt for females) to Baal-Hammon or Tanit, sometimes substituted with lambs (mlk-ʾmr), spanning from the 8th century BCE onward. Ugaritic traditions, preserved in later accounts like Sanchuniathon via Eusebius, recount myths of Kronos (equated with Baal) sacrificing his only son, paralleling Canaanite motifs of firstborn offerings. These texts suggest mlk denoted a specific rite of human dedication, distinct from animal sacrifice, practiced among Phoenician-related groups. Archaeological evidence is most robust at Punic tophets, sacred precincts in and colonies like , , and , where over 20,000 urns containing remains—primarily perinatal, a few weeks old, and of both sexes—date from approximately 800 BCE to 146 BCE. Accompanying stelae invoke and as recipients of vows "heard" and "blessed," implying premeditated offerings rather than post-mortem burials of natural deaths. A 2014 multidisciplinary study, incorporating dental topology and , confirmed the remains represent ritually killed healthy infants, not discards, as the age profile (concentrated at birth) mismatches natural mortality patterns and includes co-buried sacrificial animals treated identically. While earlier debates posited tophets as infant graveyards for stillborns, isotopic and analyses refute this, aligning with Greco-Roman accounts of live . Beyond Phoenician spheres, isolated instances occur in other Near Eastern contexts, indicating sporadic prevalence tied to royal or wartime desperation rather than routine cultic norms. The Moabite king , circa 840 BCE, sacrificed his firstborn son as a burnt offering on Kir-hareseth's wall amid siege, per 2 Kings 3:27, a practice corroborated by the Mesha Stele's authentication of the conflict though not detailing the rite. In Mesopotamia, at Başur Höyük (3100–2800 BCE), at least two children aged 11 and younger showed sharp-force trauma in elite tombs, positioned as retainers with goods, akin to Ur's royal graves where victims evidenced violent dispatch. sites yield scant direct remains, but biblical prohibitions against passing children through fire (e.g., Leviticus 18:21) and continuity to Phoenician practices imply familiarity among neighbors, though systematic evidence remains textual and inferential. Overall, while not ubiquitous, child sacrifice manifested across regions as a high-stakes , often of firstborns, with Punic data showing the most sustained scale.

Archaeological Corroboration

No direct archaeological evidence confirms the specific events of the Binding of Isaac as recounted in Genesis 22, given the narrative's description of a transient constructed on a mountaintop and a ultimately averted, which would leave minimal physical traces. The site's identification with Mount Moriah—traditionally the Jerusalem —aligns with excavations revealing early cultic activity in the area, including settlement evidence and later religious artifacts from sifting projects, such as and indicative of Judahite worship continuity. Excavations near the , including in the , have uncovered structures and artifacts supporting regional practices of high-place rituals, such as a 2,800-year-old II installation with cultic stands, figurines, and possible remains, consistent with the biblical depiction of altar-building and offerings on elevated terrain. These findings, dated to the First Temple period (ca. 1000–586 BCE), reflect and early Israelite traditions of mountain sanctuaries, providing contextual plausibility for the Akedah's setting during the Middle patriarchal era. In the broader , sites like the Late temple at (13th century BCE) yield bone fragments—over 90% human, including from immature individuals—associated with burnt offerings and pyres, evidencing practices of youthful to deities like Milkom, against which the narrative positions Yahweh's intervention as a rejection. Such discoveries, including jewelry and sherds from the same , corroborate the cultural milieu of rituals prevalent among Ammonites and Canaanites, framing the Akedah as a theological pivot from human to animal substitution.

Traditional Religious Interpretations

Jewish Exegesis and Observance

In , the Akedah exemplifies Abraham's absolute obedience to divine command, serving as the paradigm of tested through . The and portray Isaac not as a passive child but as a mature adult of 37 years, willingly consenting to the , thereby emphasizing mutual devotion to over paternal-filial bonds. interprets the command's timing as a response to potential lapses in Abraham's righteousness, such as his evasion of military service or leniency toward , underscoring the narrative's role in rectifying moral ambiguities. (Ramban) views the Akedah as a demonstration of Abraham's trust in , reconciling the apparent contradiction between 's promise of progeny through and the sacrificial demand by positing in or substitution. Medieval commentators further elaborate on thematic depths, with the Akedah symbolizing ultimate and serving as an eternal merit for Jewish martyrdom and endurance. Midrashic expansions highlight Isaac's and the binding's purpose to atone for generational sins, framing as a voluntary act that elevates human submission to divine will. These interpretations prioritize causal fidelity to the text's portrayal of unwavering , rejecting modern ethical qualms by affirming the narrative's intent to affirm covenantal loyalty over autonomous moral judgment. In Jewish observance, the Akedah holds central liturgical prominence during , the New Year festival marking divine . Genesis 22 is recited as the portion on the second day, evoking themes of and through Abraham and Isaac's merits. The blasts, mandated on , commemorate the ram substituted for , symbolizing provision in crisis and invoking ancestral to mitigate . The narrative permeates the Mussaf prayer, where pleas for forgiveness reference the "binding of Isaac" as a paradigm of sacrifice, reinforcing communal reliance on historical piety for contemporary redemption. This observance, rooted in Talmudic tradition, underscores the Akedah's enduring role in fostering resilience and covenantal continuity.

Christian Typology

In Christian theology, the Binding of Isaac, or Akedah, is interpreted typologically as a prefiguration of Jesus Christ's sacrificial death, with Isaac serving as a type of the obedient Son offered by the Father. This reading draws parallels between Abraham's willingness to sacrifice his only-begotten son and God's provision of Jesus as an atoning substitute, emphasizing themes of obedience, substitutionary sacrifice, and resurrection. The narrative's location on Mount Moriah, later associated with the Temple in Jerusalem, reinforces its foreshadowing of the crucifixion site, linking the Akedah to the ultimate redemptive act in salvation history. Key typological correspondences include Isaac carrying the wood for his own sacrifice, mirroring Jesus bearing the to Golgotha; the three-day journey paralleling the time between and ; and the ram caught in the thicket provided as a substitute, symbolizing Christ's role as the who takes away sin. Early like viewed Abraham as a type of , as the suffering Christ, and the ram as another figure of the Savior, interpreting the event spiritually to reveal deeper mysteries of redemption. Similarly, in his homily on highlighted Abraham's faith in offering , seeing it as a testament to belief in , thus prefiguring Christian hope in Christ's victory over death. New Testament texts support this typology, particularly Hebrews 11:17-19, which recounts Abraham's expectation of receiving Isaac back "as from the dead," evoking Christ's and underscoring the Akedah's role in demonstrating amid apparent finality. Allusions appear in the Gospels, such as Luke's narrative evoking Genesis 22 to portray Isaac as a model for Christ's . Patristic exegesis consistently affirmed these connections without altering the literal Jewish sense, integrating the Akedah into liturgical readings for to illuminate the . This interpretive tradition persists in Christian doctrine, viewing the Akedah not as completed but as divine provision averting it, fulfilled perfectly in Christ's voluntary .

Islamic Narrative

In Islamic scripture, the account of Abraham's (Ibrahim's) test of faith through the intended sacrifice of his son appears in the Quran's Surah As-Saffat (37:99–113), where Abraham prays for righteous offspring after leaving his homeland in obedience to God, and is granted "the good news of a forbearing son." When the son reaches the age of maturity and companionship in work, Abraham confides the content of a prophetic dream commanding the sacrifice, to which the son responds submissively: "O my father, do as you are commanded. You will find me, if Allah wills, of the steadfast." Father and son then prostrate in submission, with Abraham positioning the son for the act on his forehead, at which point divine intervention occurs: God affirms fulfillment of the vision, ransoms the son with "a great sacrifice," and blesses Abraham's legacy. This narrative emphasizes mutual obedience and divine mercy, contrasting with any implication of coercion by portraying the son's willing participation as a mark of righteousness. The Quranic text does not explicitly name the son involved in the , placing the episode prior to the announcement of (Ishaq) as a prophet from righteous (37:112–113), which classical exegetes interpret as evidence that the intended victim was (Isma'il), Abraham's firstborn from . This identification prevails in traditional tafsirs, such as those by and , who argue the chronological sequence and the son's described maturity ("forbearing" or "of sound judgment") align with rather than the younger promised afterward. Some early opinions, including certain Shi'a and Mu'tazili scholars, occasionally favored to harmonize with texts, but the Ishmaelite view dominates Sunni orthodoxy and links the event to Mecca's sacred history, where and Abraham are said to have built the . Theologically, the narrative underscores (monotheistic submission) and serves as a prototype for ritual sacrifice, commemorated in during pilgrimage, where Muslims slaughter animals (typically sheep or camels) in emulation of the ransomed ram, distributing meat to the needy as an act of piety rather than . collections, such as , reinforce this by narrating Abraham's dream as a true divine command tested thrice against Satanic interference, culminating in the substitution, with the site's veneration at near tying it to prophetic lineage and covenantal promises to Ishmael's descendants. Unlike biblical emphases on covenantal progeny through , the Islamic version prioritizes exemplar faith across Abraham's lines, rejecting any completed as antithetical to God's mercy.

Scholarly Examinations

Textual Composition and Sources

The narrative of the Binding of Isaac, known as the Akedah, comprises 22:1-19 in the Hebrew Bible's . This passage recounts God's command to Abraham to sacrifice his son on Mount Moriah, Abraham's obedience, via an angel, and the provision of a ram as substitute. The text employs the divine name throughout, except in verses where an angel speaks on Yahweh's behalf, a pattern consistent with northern Israelite traditions. In terms of manuscript sources, the primary textual witness is the (MT), a standardized Hebrew version vocalized and pointed by Jewish scribes () between the 7th and 10th centuries CE, based on earlier consonantal traditions dating to at least the BCE. The (LXX), a Greek translation produced in between the 3rd and 2nd centuries BCE, renders 22 with minor variations from the MT, such as expanded phrasing in verse 2 to emphasize Isaac's beloved status, but preserves the core narrative without substantive alterations affecting the plot or . Fragments from the Dead Sea Scrolls, including 4QGenb (ca. 1st century BCE), align closely with the MT in 22, showing no significant deviations in the Akedah and confirming textual stability over centuries. These ancient witnesses—MT, LXX, and fragments—demonstrate high fidelity across traditions, with variants limited to orthographic or minor idiomatic differences rather than doctrinal shifts. Scholarly analysis of textual composition often invokes the Documentary Hypothesis (DH), which posits that Genesis derives from multiple independent sources woven together by redactors: Yahwist (J), Elohist (E), Deuteronomist (D), and Priestly (P). Under DH, Genesis 22 is predominantly attributed to the E source, dated to the 9th-8th centuries BCE in northern Israel (Ephraim), due to its use of Elohim as the divine name, focus on fear of God (v. 12), and narrative emphasis on prophetic mediation via angels—hallmarks distinguishing E from the anthropomorphic, Yahweh-centric J source. Proponents like Gerhard von Rad argue this attribution fits E's theological profile, portraying divine testing through indirect revelation, though they acknowledge redactional seams, such as the shift to Yahweh in the angel's speech (vv. 11-12, 14-15). Critics of DH, however, contend it over-relies on speculative source divisions and underestimates the text's literary unity, proposing instead a more cohesive composition from a single authorial tradition or post-exilic editing. Empirical support for DH draws from patterns like divine name usage and narrative doublets elsewhere in Genesis, but lacks direct manuscript evidence for pre-redacted sources, rendering it a reconstructive model rather than empirically verifiable.

Proposed Original Forms

Scholars employing , particularly within the framework of the Documentary Hypothesis, attribute the core of Genesis 22—the command to Abraham, the journey, and the near-sacrifice—to the (E) source, a northern Israelite tradition dating to the 9th–8th centuries BCE that predominantly uses the divine name . This assignment stems from linguistic features, such as the consistent use of Elohim until the intervention (vv. 11–12), and thematic emphases on testing divine fear (yir'at Elohim, v. 12), which align with E's portrayal of prophetic encounters and moral discernment. Later Judean redactors, associated with the Yahwist (J) source (ca. 10th–9th centuries BCE), are posited to have inserted elements like the angel of YHWH (v. 11) and the ram substitution (vv. 13–14) to harmonize the narrative with emerging prohibitions against , reflecting a shift toward centralized in . One prominent reconstruction posits that the original E form concluded with the actual sacrifice of , portraying Abraham's compliance as a demonstration of unwavering obedience amid doubts over Isaac's legitimacy (linked to Genesis 20's episode). In this view, articulated by Tzemah Yoreh, the proto-narrative ended after v. 10 ("he bound Isaac his son and laid him on upon ... and took to slay his son"), implying completion without the interpolated halt (v. 12a) or animal proxy, which were added to avert ethical dissonance in post-exilic . This hypothesis draws on the abruptness of v. 19 (Abraham returning alone, with Isaac's reunion unmentioned) and parallels in E's terse style elsewhere, suggesting the substitution served to retrofit the story for rituals emphasizing animal offerings at (later ). Alternative proposals emphasize an etiological function in the earliest recoverable form: viewed it as a pre-monarchic saga explaining the transition from human to at a northern , while John Skinner saw it as a deliberate protest against persistent practices among Canaanites and early . Verses 15–18, containing the of progeny and land promises, are widely regarded as a Deuteronomistic or Priestly (P) expansion (ca. 7th–5th centuries BCE), absent from the core E narrative, as they disrupt the story's climax and echo broader covenantal motifs in . These layers reflect incremental redaction rather than a unified composition, though critics of the Documentary Hypothesis, such as Richard Elliott Friedman, note ongoing debates over precise demarcations due to textual fluidity. Such reconstructions remain hypothetical, reliant on comparative analysis with Near Eastern motifs (e.g., divine tests in ) and internal inconsistencies, like the shift from Elohim to YHWH. Empirical support is indirect, drawn from archaeological evidence of decline post-8th century BCE, but no variants confirm a "completed" version, underscoring the narrative's evolution through oral and scribal transmission.

Causal Explanations for the Narrative

One prominent scholarly theory posits that the Binding of Isaac narrative functioned as an etiological explanation for the prohibition of human sacrifice in Israelite religion, distinguishing it from practices in neighboring cultures such as Canaanite devotion to deities like Molech, where archaeological evidence from sites like Gezer and Punic Carthage indicates occasional child immolation as offerings for fertility or divine favor. The story's substitution of a ram for Isaac underscores a causal shift toward animal sacrifice, reflecting an evolving theological norm that rejected human offerings while affirming divine provision, as evidenced by the textual emphasis on God's intervention in Genesis 22:13. This interpretation aligns with biblical condemnations of child sacrifice in Leviticus 18:21 and Deuteronomy 12:31, suggesting the Akedah served to codify a cultural rupture from Bronze Age rituals documented in Ugaritic texts and Mesopotamian records. Textual criticism further proposes that the narrative's composition arose from source integration during the monarchic period (ca. 8th–7th centuries BCE), where a Judahite (Jahwistic) redactor modified an earlier Elohistic () tradition—potentially depicting Isaac's actual sacrifice as for Abraham's prior lapses, such as in 20—to insert the angelic halt and ram substitution, driven by discomfort with amid religious reforms. This redaction causally addressed narrative s, including Isaac's disputed paternity linked to Sarah's Abimelech episode, by reiterating Abraham's fatherhood six times in 21–22 and resolving the conflict between divine promises of progeny ( 12:2, 15:5) and the sacrificial command. The result reinforced monotheistic fidelity without endorsing violence, adapting older lore to post-exilic ethical standards while preserving the motif's dramatic . A related hypothesis views the Akedah as a sacred legend (hieros ) crafted to legitimize the Jerusalem 's sanctity, identifying Mount Moriah (Genesis 22:2) with the temple to counter northern Israelite shrines like after the conquest of 722 BCE. In this context, the story's placement etiological explains pilgrimage traditions via Genesis 22:14's parenthetical note on perpetual worship, competing with Jacob's theophany (Genesis 28:10–22) and linking patriarchal origins to Judahite cultic centrality, as later echoed in 2 Chronicles 3:1. Scholars like Rami Arav attribute this to Judah's ideological response to northern textual dominance, using Abraham's obedience to elevate amid inter-regional rivalry documented in . These causal layers—ritual repudiation, source harmonization, and site validation—illustrate how the narrative coalesced to sustain Israelite identity amid empirical pressures from imperial threats and internal schisms.

Key Debates and Controversies

Ethical Implications of Divine Command

The narrative of the , or Akedah, in 22 presents a stark ethical : a divine mandate to perform an act—sacrificing one's son—that contravenes fundamental human moral prohibitions against and parental duty. This command tests the primacy of obedience to over autonomous ethical reasoning, raising questions about whether morality is inherently derived from or independent of divine will. In philosophical terms, it exemplifies , wherein moral obligations arise exclusively from God's directives; thus, the imperative to slay , if authentically divine, would constitute an ethical duty despite its apparent horror. Proponents of this view, drawing on theistic frameworks, argue that God's precludes capricious cruelty, rendering the command a provisional trial rather than an endorsement of sacrifice. Søren Kierkegaard, pseudonymously authoring Fear and Trembling in 1843, frames Abraham's acquiescence as the "teleological suspension of the ethical," where the universal moral order—governed by Hegelian rational norms—is momentarily eclipsed by the singular, incommensurable relation between the individual and the divine. For Kierkegaard, Abraham embodies the "," who embraces the absurd: proceeding with the sacrifice while inwardly trusting God's promise of posterity through , thereby transcending ethical universality in favor of absolute . This interpretation posits that true religiosity demands a leap beyond ethical deliberation, as divine commands may demand actions unintelligible or repugnant within human moral paradigms. Jewish philosopher echoes this by emphasizing the Akedah's core as pure obedience to divine fiat, deliberately antagonistic to ethical sensibilities, underscoring religion's over humanistic . The Akedah also engages the Euthyphro dilemma, articulated by Plato around 399–395 BCE: does the command's moral status derive from God's decree (implying potential arbitrariness, as even abhorrent acts could be deemed good), or does God endorse it because it aligns with an extrinsic good (undermining divine sovereignty over ethics)? Theistic responses often modify the horns, asserting that God's commands reflect His unchanging, essentially good nature, avoiding both voluntarism and external standards; yet the narrative's intensity—requiring Abraham's three-day journey and binding of Isaac—intensifies scrutiny, as the provisional halt via angelic intervention reaffirms ethical norms only after near-violation. Critics, including some modern ethicists, argue this dynamic risks subordinating human rights to unverifiable divine claims, potentially justifying fanaticism if interpreted literally, though traditional exegeses mitigate by viewing the event as abrogating child sacrifice practices prevalent in ancient Near Eastern cults, such as those to Canaanite deities like Moloch circa 2000–1000 BCE. In this causal light, the command's ethical resolution lies not in blind adherence but in its ultimate subversion of human sacrifice, aligning divine intent with long-term covenantal ethics over immediate horror.

Completion of the Sacrifice

In the canonical biblical account of 22:9-13, Abraham binds upon the altar but is halted by the before drawing the knife across his son's throat, with the text explicitly stating, "Do not lay your hand on the boy or do anything to him." Abraham then lifts his eyes to discover a caught in a , which he offers as a burnt offering "instead of his son," affirming that the was averted and substituted. This plain reading, known as in Jewish , emphasizes preventing completion, underscoring themes of obedience tested but not culminating in . Certain midrashic traditions, however, interpret the episode as entailing actual completion followed by Isaac's miraculous , a view articulated to amplify Isaac's merit as a willing participant and to provide theological basis for atonement. For instance, 56:8 and later sources like Pseudo-Jonathan Targum suggest Abraham slew Isaac, whose blood and ashes ascended to heaven as an atoning offering, only for Isaac to revive upon divine command, paralleling motifs of in Abraham's faith (Hebrews 11:19). This interpretation reconciles textual ambiguities, such as Sarah's death upon hearing of the near-sacrifice ( 58) or references to Isaac's "blood" sprinkled on the altar, positing full sacrificial efficacy to merit Israel's future redemption. Scholar Shalom Spiegel, in his 1967 analysis, traces this motif to tannaitic and amoraic rabbis like R. ben Pedat, who argued explained Isaac's post-Akedah and progeny, though he notes it as a homiletical expansion rather than historical claim. Scholars debate the origins of this resurrection tradition, attributing it to post-Temple Judaism's need for symbolic substitutes for sacrificial , especially after 70 , when the Akedah's merit was invoked in like the New Year to supplant animal offerings. R. Yochanan in Babylonian Ta'anit 16a exemplifies this by linking Isaac's "ashes" before to perpetual efficacy, a derash level reading that contrasts with the narrative's explicit incompletion but served pastoral purposes amid Roman persecutions. Critics like J. Richard Middleton argue such views risk retrojecting later onto the text, potentially endorsing symbolically, though proponents like those in Spiegel's study see it as enhancing Abrahamic fidelity without literal endorsement. Empirical analysis of and variants shows no textual support for completion, reinforcing the Masoretic base's aversion. In Christian , the incompletion foreshadows Christ's completed sacrifice, with Hebrews 11:17-19 interpreting Abraham's readiness as faith in , but without claiming Isaac's death occurred. Islamic narratives in 37:99-113 similarly avert the act via substitution, identifying as the intended son, though without motifs. These variances highlight interpretive pluralism, where completion debates pivot on reconciling with obedience's extremity, yet the source text prioritizes non-completion as the resolution.

Psychological and Modern Critiques

Psychoanalytic interpretations of the Binding of Isaac have often drawn parallels to the Oedipus complex, viewing Abraham's readiness to sacrifice his son as manifesting latent paternal murderous impulses toward the male heir, akin to mythic father-son conflicts in Greek narratives. Sigmund Freud's framework, applied retrospectively, posits the Akedah as evidence of universal Oedipal tensions embedded in Hebrew mythology, where divine command serves as a cultural alibi for repressed patricidal or filicidal drives. These readings emphasize the narrative's psychological undercurrents, interpreting Isaac's binding not merely as obedience but as a symbolic resolution of generational rivalry through symbolic death and substitution. Some modern psychological analyses frame Abraham's compliance with the divine command as indicative of , where auditory hallucinations or delusional obedience overrides rational paternal instincts, contrasting with historical theological endorsements by figures like Augustine and that praised his faith. This perspective critiques the story's portrayal of unhesitating action—Abraham's three-day journey without protest or consultation—as symptomatic of a break, potentially rationalized by religious rather than genuine divine encounter. The narrative's impact on Isaac has elicited trauma-focused critiques, positing the near-sacrifice as a profound childhood inducing (PTSD), evidenced by his textual silence thereafter and diminished agency in subsequent biblical accounts. Midrashic traditions noting 's absence post-Akedah align with psychological models of and avoidance, where the event's terror manifests in later physical ailments like blindness, interpreted as hysterical conversion symptoms stemming from unresolved fear of abandonment by both father and . Empirical analogies to survivor suggest intergenerational transmission of emotional bruising, as seen in later behaviors mirroring Akedah-induced relational patterns. Modern ethical critiques decry the Akedah as endorsing moral inversion, where fidelity to authority supersedes child welfare, rendering Abraham's willingness ethically indefensible by contemporary standards that prioritize autonomy and harm prevention over teleological suspension of ethics. Richard Dawkins, in The God Delusion, highlights the command as emblematic of an "unpleasant" deity demanding filicide, arguing it exemplifies religion's capacity to override innate moral revulsion toward infanticide. Such views, echoed in secular ethics, contend the story's resolution via ram substitution fails to mitigate the psychological coercion, potentially normalizing obedience to perceived higher powers at the expense of rational dissent. Critics like Burton Visotzky portray Abraham as a tyrannical abuser exploiting divine rhetoric, underscoring how the narrative's ambiguity invites projections of parental pathology absent empirical safeguards against abuse.

Comparative and Cultural Dimensions

Mythological Parallels

The narrative of the Binding of Isaac, or Akedah, exhibits structural parallels with certain ancient mythological accounts of divine commands for parental sacrifice of children, particularly in motifs of obedience, near-victimization, and providential substitution. In the Greek tradition, the story of —daughter of —bears notable similarities: is compelled by the goddess to sacrifice at Aulis to secure winds for the expedition, mirroring Abraham's to under divine mandate; both children are portrayed as innocent and bound for the altar, with fathers exhibiting resolute compliance despite the absence of explicit child consent; and in each case, a intervenes at the climactic moment, substituting with a deer and providing a for , averting the bloodshed. These correspondences extend to thematic ambivalence toward human sacrifice in both corpora: Euripides' Iphigenia at Aulis (circa 405 BCE) depicts familial grief and ethical tension among participants, akin to later rabbinic expansions on Isaac's unknowing role and Sarah's distress in midrashic interpretations, though the biblical text itself maintains a terse focus on Abraham's fidelity. Scholars observe that while direct literary dependence remains unproven—given the Genesis composition likely postdating Homeric antecedents (, circa 8th century BCE)—the shared Indo-European and Near Eastern cultural milieu may account for convergent motifs of divine testing through filial offering, contrasting with completed sacrifices in Phoenician or Carthaginian rites documented archaeologically at sites like (8th–2nd centuries BCE). Fewer direct analogs appear in core Ancient Near Eastern mythologies, such as or Mesopotamian texts, where motifs (e.g., potential firstborn dedications in covenantal contexts) lack the Akedah's redemptive , emphasizing instead completion or via without narrative intervention. This divergence underscores the Akedah's potential innovation: transforming a widespread sacrificial paradigm into an for monotheistic aversion to human offerings, as evidenced by Deuteronomy 12:31's explicit rejection of practices (circa 7th century BCE redaction).

Influence on Art, Literature, and Music

The Binding of Isaac, known in Hebrew as the Akedah, has profoundly influenced visual art across cultures and eras, serving as a motif for themes of faith, obedience, and divine intervention. Early depictions appear in Jewish contexts, such as the 6th-century mosaic in the Beit Alpha synagogue in Israel, which illustrates the narrative as part of synagogue floor art reflecting communal interpretation of scripture. In Christian art, the scene often prefigures Christ's sacrifice, with prominent Renaissance examples including Caravaggio's Sacrifice of Isaac (c. 1603), emphasizing dramatic tension and chiaroscuro to highlight Abraham's anguish and the angel's intervention. Rembrandt van Rijn produced multiple versions, such as his etching and painting from the 1630s and 1650s, portraying evolving psychological depth in Abraham's faith. In literature, the Akedah has inspired philosophical and theological reflections, most notably Søren Kierkegaard's (1843), which examines Abraham's "teleological suspension of the ethical" as a of faith's , influencing existentialist thought by contrasting universal with individual divine command. The narrative recurs in Jewish midrashic expansions and modern works, but Kierkegaard's pseudonymous treatise remains a cornerstone, framing the story as an "absolute relation to the absolute" beyond rational comprehension. Musical compositions drawing on the Akedah span liturgical traditions and works, with Ashkenazi featuring the Niggun Akedah, a penitential melody linked to piyyutim (liturgical poems) evoking the binding during . In Western classical , at least 50 oratorios and pieces address the sacrifice of , often tying it to themes. Twentieth-century examples include David Diamond's The Binding (1940s), symbolizing collective Jewish suffering, and Steve Reich's The Cave (1990), which incorporates interviews and electronic elements to explore the story's contemporary resonance.

References

  1. [1]
    Genesis, CHAPTER 22 | USCCB - Daily Readings
    * [22:9] Bound: the Hebrew verb is 'aqad, from which is derived the noun Akedah, “the binding (of Isaac),” the traditional Jewish name for this incident.Missing: primary source
  2. [2]
    Genesis 22 - After these things God tested Abraham and said to him ...
    After these things God tested Abraham and said to him, “Abraham!” And he said, “Here I am.” He said, “Take your son, your only son Isaac, whom you love, ...Missing: primary source
  3. [3]
    The Binding or Sacrifice of Isaac - Biblical Archaeology Society
    Sep 11, 2025 · According to the narrative in Genesis 22:2–18, God, without any warning, commands Abraham to sacrifice his beloved son as a burnt offering.Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  4. [4]
    Judaism: Akedah - Jewish Virtual Library
    The Akedah became in Jewish thought the supreme example of self-sacrifice in obedience to God's will and the symbol of Jewish martyrdom throughout the ages.Missing: scholarly reliable
  5. [5]
    The Real Sacrifice of Isaac | Catholic Answers Magazine
    Feb 25, 2024 · Isaac's sacrifice could not take away sin; it could not do anything new and different from the blood sacrifices already offered on the altars ...
  6. [6]
    The Binding of Isaac, a Sacred Legend for the Jerusalem Temple
    Sep 25, 2020 · One of the most famous, and disturbing, stories in the Bible is the binding of Isaac, in which Abraham is commanded by God to sacrifice his son, ...
  7. [7]
    Thoughts on the Akedah | jewishideas.org
    Finally, Rambam (and other Rishonim) viewed the Akedah as the prooftext for the reliability of prophecy on the same level as a logical deduction. It teaches ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Echoes of Redemption - Scholars Crossing
    Jul 30, 2025 · The Early Church Fathers sought to find allegorical meaning in the. Aqedah by viewing Isaac as a type of Christ, while later scholars were ...Missing: reliable | Show results with:reliable
  9. [9]
    The Binding Of Isaac (Genesis 22:1–19): Historical Settings, Textual ...
    Within the book of Genesis, the binding of Isaac serves to display the tested and proven faith of Abraham and to transition the narrative from promises to their ...
  10. [10]
    Molekh: The Sacrifice of Babies - TheTorah.com
    May 13, 2024 · Archaeological excavations throughout Carthage uncovered the remains of thousands of babies offered to Baʿal and his consort Tanit, together ...
  11. [11]
    Ancient Carthaginians really did sacrifice their children
    Jan 23, 2014 · Children – both male and female, and mostly a few weeks old – were sacrificed by the Carthaginians at locations known as tophets. The practice ...
  12. [12]
    Did the Moabite king sacrifice his son? - Bible Hub
    Yes. The Moabite king, Mesha, sacrificed his firstborn son, the designated successor, as a burnt offering. 2 Kings 3:26-27 explicitly describes this event.
  13. [13]
    New evidence of ancient child sacrifice found in Turkey
    Jun 28, 2018 · Remains of young people who were ritually sacrificed have been found from Bronze Age Mesopotamia. Led by Museum scientific associate Dr Brenna ...
  14. [14]
    Where is the historical or archaeological evidence for these events ...
    While no single altar trace exists, archaeological evidence shows religious use of the Temple Mount area, and similar practices in the ancient Near East, and ...Missing: binding | Show results with:binding
  15. [15]
    Ancient Jerusalem—Not Where We Thought?
    Jun 23, 2023 · Scholar argues Bronze Age Jerusalem was centered on Temple Mount ... Mount Zion was not north of Jerusalem but was south of Mount Moriah.
  16. [16]
    The History of the Temple Mount in 12 Objects: #2 The Early First ...
    Dec 2, 2018 · The Temple Mount Sifting Project has uncovered several artifacts that help paint an archaeological picture of the Temple Mount in the early days of the Kingdom ...
  17. [17]
    2,800-year-old structure unearthed in Israel was likely used for cultic ...
    Jan 16, 2025 · Archaeologists have unearthed a unique stone structure in East Jerusalem, providing evidence of cultic activity and possibly animal sacrifice in the Kingdom of ...
  18. [18]
    Ritual Structure Used by Canaanites and Jews Revealed in Jerusalem
    Jan 14, 2025 · In another room, the archaeologists uncovered a wealth of cultic items that seem to have been ritually buried. These include scarabs ...
  19. [19]
    Top Ten Discoveries Related to Abraham - Bible Archaeology Report
    Jul 16, 2021 · Mt Moriah/Temple Mount​​ One of the most defining moments in Abraham's life was when the Lord called him to sacrifice his only Son Isaac. In Gen.
  20. [20]
    First Person: Human Sacrifice to an Ammonite God?
    Were sons and daughters—as opposed to infants—sacrificed in ancient times? Is there any archaeological evidence?
  21. [21]
    The Binding of Isaac and Child Sacrifice in the Ancient Near East
    Sep 10, 2025 · This paper argues that the story's literary form and theological message must be understood both in dialogue with and in opposition to its ANE ...
  22. [22]
    Akedah: How Jews and Christians Explained Abraham's Faith
    Oct 30, 2017 · God promised Abraham that Isaac would be his heir, yet God asked Abraham to offer Isaac as a sacrifice. What did Abraham believe that allowed him to reconcile ...
  23. [23]
    Isaac's Age at the Binding (Akeidah) - Aish.com
    Some of the commentators believe he was 37. The basis for this is that the binding seems to have occurred immediately prior to Sarah's death.
  24. [24]
    https://www.sefaria.org/Rashi_on_Genesis.22.1
  25. [25]
    https://www.sefaria.org/Ramban_on_Genesis.22.1.1
  26. [26]
    Ultimate Values and the Akedah Story - Jewish Theological Seminary
    Oct 30, 2015 · The Akedah story demands we grapple with the question: What values do we hold dear enough that we would be willing to sacrifice?Missing: exegesis | Show results with:exegesis
  27. [27]
    The Binding of Isaac - Chassidic Masters - Parshah - Chabad.org
    And on Rosh Hashanah, when the world trembles in judgment before G‑d, we evoke the binding of Isaac by sounding the horn of a ram (reminiscent of the ram which ...
  28. [28]
    The Binding of Isaac | My Jewish Learning
    In it, God orders Abraham to sacrifice his son, Isaac, on Mount Moriah. Abraham agrees, but then is stopped at the last minute when God sends an angel who tells ...
  29. [29]
    Akeda and Rosh Hashanah: Invoking the Original Oath God was ...
    Sep 14, 2014 · Rosh Hashana, the Day of Judgment, is connected to the story of the binding of Isaac (Akedat Yitzchak) both in ritual (the shofar) and in ...
  30. [30]
    Parshat Rosh Hashanah In-Depth - Chabad.org
    Parshat Rosh Hashanah covers the birth of Isaac, the banishment of Hagar and Ishmael, the covenant with Abimelech, and the binding of Isaac.
  31. [31]
    Akedah & Resilience - Reconstructing Judaism
    Sep 15, 2025 · There are many explanations why on Rosh Hashanah, we read the story of the Akedah, wherein Abraham is tested by binding his son, Isaac, ...Missing: exegesis interpretations
  32. [32]
    Canonical understanding of the sacrifice of Isaac
    He claimed that Isaac was 'a type of Christ who was going to suffer'. ... Akedah' (1969:25). However, Dahl's conclusion lacks clear evidence. The atoning ...
  33. [33]
    Abraham's Sacrifice of Isaac - Origen - Crossroads Initiative
    Mar 7, 2017 · This spiritual exegesis sees the ram and Isaac as figures or types of Jesus Christ. Abraham is seen as a type of God the Father.Missing: typology | Show results with:typology
  34. [34]
    The Sacrifice of Isaac with Origen - The Lutheran Witness
    Dec 14, 2020 · Isaac is a type in the way that he carries his own wood (just as Jesus to Golgotha), as he walks alongside of Abraham (demonstrating Jesus' ...Missing: typology | Show results with:typology
  35. [35]
    Homily 25 on Hebrews - CHURCH FATHERS - New Advent
    Hebrews 11:17-19. By faith [Abraham], when he was tried, offered up Isaac; and he that had received the promises offered up his only-begotten son, of whom it ...Missing: interpretation typology
  36. [36]
    Topical Bible: Resurrection: Typified: Isaac
    Isaac's life is marked by a significant event that prefigures the resurrection: the binding of Isaac, also known as the Akedah, in Genesis 22. God commands ...
  37. [37]
    The Akedah and the Crucifixion: Luke and Isaac Typology
    Significant allusions to the narrative of Genesis 22 in the Gospel of Luke show that Isaac is considered a model or type of Christ.
  38. [38]
    Joseph as a Type of Christ in Syriac Literature - BYU Studies
    Prominently featured among the Old Testament readings prescribed for Easter are the account of the binding of Isaac and excerpts from the story of Joseph.
  39. [39]
    The Binding of Isaac (Akedah) and Christ - Explaining The Book
    Dec 6, 2024 · The Binding of Isaac (Akedah) and Christ ... The Akedah serves as a glorious type of Christ, prefiguring His substitutionary atonement, obedient ...
  40. [40]
    Surah As-Saffat - 99-113 - Quran.com
    (99) He later said, “I am leaving ˹in obedience˺ to my Lord. He will guide me. (100) My Lord! Bless me with righteous offspring.” (101) So We gave him...
  41. [41]
    Surah 37. As-Saffat, Ayat 99-113 - Islamicstudies.info
    The Prophet Abraham (peace be upon him) had prayed for a righteous son and in answer to it, Allah had given him the good news of a clement boy.
  42. [42]
    Ishmael as Abraham's Sacrifice: Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Kathīr on the ...
    This article examines how Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Kathīr shift the Islamic exegetical tradition towards accepting Ishmael as Abraham's intended sacrifice.
  43. [43]
    The Sacrifice Of Abraham: Isaac or Ishmael? - Islamic Awareness
    In the tale of binding (surah 37:99-110) Muhammad identified the son who was to be sacrificed as Ishmael and, indeed, the opinion of the traditionalists were ...
  44. [44]
    https://islamicstudies.info/tafheem.php?sura=37&verse=75&to=113
  45. [45]
    Abraham's Sacrifice According to Christianity and Islam
    Jul 9, 2022 · Analysing the sacrifices made by Abraham and his family according to the accounts given by the sacred texts of Christianity and Islam.
  46. [46]
    “Take Your Only Son Isaac” – What Happened to Ishmael?
    Nov 12, 2019 · In the introductory verses of the Akedah (Binding of Isaac), God refers to Isaac as Abraham's only son, ignoring the existence of Ishmael.
  47. [47]
    The “Original” Bible and the Dead Sea Scrolls
    Jun 27, 2014 · Bible scholars examined two ancient texts to elucidate the original language of the Bible: the Masoretic Text and the Septuagint.
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Tracing the Linkage of Genesis 22 and Isaiah 53 in Ancient Jewish ...
    sources relevant for text criticism include the Masoretic Text (MT), the Septuagint (LXX), the. Samaritan Pentateuch (SP), and fragments of Dead Sea Scrolls ( ...
  49. [49]
    Abraham's sacrifice: Gerhard von Rad's interpretation of Genesis 22.
    " (7) In his Genesis commentary, von Rad generally follows the documentary hypothesis. Therefore, Gen 22 is an E-text (although he has to struggle with fact ...
  50. [50]
    Briefly stated, the JEDP Source Theory states that the Hebrew Bible ...
    The J source is responsible for most of Genesis. E (the Elohist or Ephraimitic source) uses Elohim ("God") for the divine name until Exodus 3-6, where YHWH is ...
  51. [51]
    Documentary Hypothesis
    E (the Elohist or Ephraimitic source) uses Elohim ("God") for the divine name until Exodus 3-6, where the Tetragrammaton is revealed to Moses and to Israel.
  52. [52]
    The Sacrifice of Isaac in Context: Recovering a Lost Ending of the ...
    Sep 24, 2014 · The original story is largely identical to what other scholars call “E” or the Elohistic source, since it uses the name “Elohim” (almost) ...
  53. [53]
    Understanding Genesis 22: God and Child Sacrifice
    Sep 11, 2013 · Then one day, God commanded Abraham to sacrifice Isaac, the beloved son of his old age. Abraham set out to do it, and was about to, when God ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  54. [54]
    Obligation, Divine Commands and Abraham's Dilemma - jstor
    a theory according to which moral obligation is constituted by divine commands remains tenable, and is the best theory on the subject for theists,.
  55. [55]
    Is The Akedah Ethical? - Torah Musings
    Sep 21, 2020 · Therefore, when Avraham was commanded by God to slaughter his son, he knew that the most ethical thing to do, the most logical course of action, ...
  56. [56]
    Man's Morals and God's Will: The Meaning of Abraham's Sacrifice
    Kierkegaard relentlessly stresses that the divine command, “Sacrifice thy son,” enjoins the gravest immorality. Here the divine command means the command to ...<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    God, Obligation, and the Euthyphro Dilemma | Strange Notions
    Apr 16, 2013 · The Euthyphro dilemma goes like this: God commands us to do what is good. But is something good simply because God commands it, or does He command it because ...
  58. [58]
    Isaac's Death and Resurrection | Sefaria
    Interestingly, a later midrashic tradition developed this notion, that Isaac actually had been sacrificed. This tradition is discussed in S. Spiegel's The ...
  59. [59]
    381) Midrashic sources referring to the actual sacrifice of Isaac?
    May 8, 2022 · It could only have been that Abraham actually sacrificed Isaac but that he was subsequently resurrected. R. Eleazar ben Pedat. Here is ...
  60. [60]
    Are there any Midrashim where Yitzchak was actually sacrificed by ...
    Apr 5, 2020 · A later midrashic tradition developed this notion, that Isaac actually had been sacrificed. This tradition is discussed in S. Spiegel's The Last Trial.
  61. [61]
    [PDF] The Ashes of Isaac and the Nature of Jewish Philosophy
    Rabbinic reading of the binding of Isaac stands as a subtle critique of the story of the. Passion of Jesus, as many Christians understand that story. Hazony ...
  62. [62]
    Was Abraham's Attempt to Sacrifice Isaac a Faithful Response to God?
    May 29, 2014 · I argued that Abraham's response of blind obedience to the command to sacrifice his son was sub-par. It was better than outright disobedience.
  63. [63]
    Discover Jesus in the Binding of Isaac - Genesis 22 and the Akedah
    Both Jews and Christians agree that Genesis 22 is a magnificent example of a father/son relationship of love, obedience, sacrifice, and faith. In fact, Jewish ...<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    [PDF] BETWEEN ULTIMATE SACRIFICE AND YEARNING FOR DEATH:
    Classical psychoanalytic interpretations of this narrative focused on its resemblance to the Oedipus myth, demonstrating the murderous drives operating in ...
  65. [65]
    Freud, Greek Narratives, and Biblical Counter ... - Clio's Psyche
    Freud would see the Akedah as further evidence of the universality of the Oedipus complex. He would say that the Oedipus complex underlay Hebrew myth, just as ...
  66. [66]
    (PDF) Paternal Function and Thirdness in Psychoanalysis and Legend
    Aug 6, 2025 · This paper examines the Akedah, the biblical narrative of the Binding of Isaac, and suggests that this story may be interpreted as inaugurating paternal ...
  67. [67]
    Abraham: A Case of Psychosis in the Akedah? - ResearchGate
    Mar 8, 2020 · This paper examines the story of the binding of Isaac in Genesis 22, looking at the views of Augustine, Luther, Calvin and enlightened humanists ...
  68. [68]
    Biblical PTSD - Jewish Theological Seminary
    Nov 1, 2010 · ... Isaac's psyche in the aftermath of the Akedah, the binding of Isaac. Today, one finds myriad psychological interpretations of his near-death ...
  69. [69]
    Isaac, Trauma, and Healing - CBSRZ
    Sep 12, 2018 · Most rabbis of long ago agreed that it was significant that Isaac was missing immediately following the events of the Akedah, though the ...
  70. [70]
    Psychological Forces and Spiritual Encounters: The Bruising and ...
    Dec 1, 2022 · On the impact of the Akedah on Jacob, it has been shown that emotional reactions [to previous family events] are transmitted from older to ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  71. [71]
    Should We Admire Abraham's Willingness to Sacrifice His Son?
    My answers to the questions "Was Abraham ethical?" and "Should we admire his willingness to sacrifice his son?" are a resounding "No."
  72. [72]
    Quote by Richard Dawkins: “God ordered Abraham to make a burnt ...
    God ordered Abraham to make a burnt offering of his longed-for son. Abraham built an altar, put firewood upon it, and trussed Isaac up on top of the wood.
  73. [73]
    The day Abraham yielded on the basis of his faith. A psychological ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · A psychological and anthropological reading of Genesis 22 | The biblical story of the binding of Isaac raises a question about the meaning ...
  74. [74]
    Rereading the Akeidah: Three Perspectives - Reform Judaism
    Nov 7, 1998 · ... Rashi on Genesis 22:1)―or because only Abraham's actual compliance can justify the future blessings that God promises to shower upon Abraham ...
  75. [75]
    Iphigenia & Isaac - The BAS Library - Biblical Archaeology Society
    Yet both were almost sacrificed—one to a Greek goddess and the other to the universal Israelite God. Both Iphigenia and Isaac were innocent of any wrongdoing.
  76. [76]
    Biblical and Greek Ambivalence Towards Child Sacrifice
    Nov 15, 2016 · Iphigenia and Isaac raise questions as well. The ambivalence of the supporting characters parallels that of their fathers. The ambivalence ...
  77. [77]
    “But I Grieve for My Mother”: The Betrayal of Iphigenia and Isaac
    Iphigenia's tragedy mirrors, in revealing ways, the biblical Binding of Isaac—one of the most climactic moments in Jewish and Christian imagination ...
  78. [78]
    Portrayals of Child Sacrifice in Israelite and Greek Literature
    This paper explores the manner in which narratives of child sacrifice were received in Israelite and Greek literature through an examination of the binding of ...
  79. [79]
    Mosaics of the Abraham & Isaac story show how Jews in late ...
    Feb 26, 2021 · Each depiction of the Akedah stands by itself as a nuanced form of biblical and social commentary, a record of how its commissioning community ( ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
  80. [80]
    The Binding of Isaac in art | Sefaria
    Rembrandt treated many Jewish and biblical themes, including repeatedly the akedah. Here we will examine three of these treatments, spanning 30 years of the ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
  81. [81]
    Fear and Trembling by Søren Kierkegaard - EDSITEment
    Kierkegaard centers his existential exploration of Christianity on the figure of Abraham, who is called by God in Genesis 22 to sacrifice his son, Isaac.
  82. [82]
    Akedat Yitzchak ~ exploring the Binding of Isaac ~ session 8/10
    Fear and Trembling (original Danish title: Frygt og Bæven) is an influential philosophical work by Søren Kierkegaard, published in 1843 under the pseudonym ...
  83. [83]
    Niggun 'Akedah: A Traditional Melody Concerning the Binding of Isaac
    Jan 19, 2020 · Niggun ʽAkedah is an Ashkenazi liturgical melody set to penitential poems referring to the Biblical episode of the binding of Isaac.
  84. [84]
    The Binding - Milken Archive of Jewish Music
    In the oratorio's libretto, there was an emphasis on Isaac as a symbol or metaphor for the entire people of Israel being persecuted as an “innocent sacrifice.” ...
  85. [85]
    [PDF] musical perspectives on the binding of isaac story - IDEALS
    This dissertation will examine three compositions from the twentieth century that engage the story of. Genesis 22: Aharon Harlap and Menachem Zur's ​Akedat ...