Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Biofertilizer

A biofertilizer is a substance containing living or dormant microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi, that enhance plant growth by improving the availability of essential nutrients in the soil through processes like nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization, and production of phytohormones.^[1] These microbial inoculants colonize the rhizosphere or interior of plants, acting as natural alternatives to synthetic fertilizers by mobilizing nutrients that are otherwise inaccessible to crops.^[2] Unlike chemical fertilizers, which provide immediate but often excessive nutrient supplies, biofertilizers promote sustainable nutrient cycling and long-term soil health without contributing to environmental degradation.^[3] Biofertilizers are categorized based on their primary functions and microbial components, with key types including nitrogen-fixing biofertilizers (e.g., Rhizobium for legumes and Azotobacter for non-legumes), phosphorus-solubilizing biofertilizers (e.g., Bacillus and Pseudomonas species), and potassium-mobilizing biofertilizers (e.g., Bacillus mucilaginosus).^[1] Other notable types encompass plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) like Pseudomonas fluorescens, which produce siderophores and antibiotics to suppress pathogens, and mycorrhizal fungi that extend root systems for better nutrient and water uptake.^[3] These formulations are typically applied as seed coatings, soil amendments, or foliar sprays, with effectiveness depending on factors such as soil pH, temperature, and microbial viability.^[2] The benefits of biofertilizers are multifaceted, including yield increases of 10–40% in various crops through improved nutrient efficiency and stress tolerance to conditions like drought and salinity.^[2] They reduce the required input of chemical nitrogen by up to 50% and phosphorus by 25%, lowering production costs and minimizing risks of nutrient runoff that leads to eutrophication.^[2] Environmentally, biofertilizers support biodiversity by fostering beneficial microbial communities, decreasing greenhouse gas emissions from fertilizer manufacturing, and enhancing soil organic matter over time.^[1] Economically, their low-cost production and growing market—valued at approximately USD 2.8 billion as of 2025—position them as vital tools for sustainable agriculture and food security amid rising global population demands.^[4] In regions like the United States, biofertilizers face regulatory challenges due to the lack of a uniform federal definition, often falling under state fertilizer laws or as unregulated biostimulants, which can hinder widespread adoption despite their proven efficacy in field trials.^[2] Ongoing research emphasizes integrating biofertilizers with precision agriculture to optimize their performance, ensuring they contribute to resilient farming systems worldwide.^[1]

Definition and History

Definition and Scope

Biofertilizers are defined as preparations containing living or latent cells of efficient strains of microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, and algae, which, when applied to seeds, plant surfaces, or soil, colonize the rhizosphere or plant interior to enhance nutrient availability and uptake by plants through natural biological processes such as nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization, and organic matter decomposition.^[1]^[5] These microbial inoculants differ from chemical fertilizers by providing a renewable, eco-friendly alternative that promotes long-term soil health rather than immediate nutrient release, thereby supporting sustainable agricultural practices that reduce environmental pollution and dependency on synthetic inputs.^[2]^[6] The scope of biofertilizers encompasses a broad range of applications in modern agriculture, focusing on improving crop productivity while addressing nutrient deficiencies in soils worldwide. They include both symbiotic and free-living microorganisms: symbiotic types establish mutualistic relationships with host plants, such as those forming root nodules to facilitate nutrient exchange, whereas free-living types operate independently in the soil to mobilize nutrients without direct plant association.^[1]^[5] This distinction allows biofertilizers to target diverse cropping systems, from legumes to cereals, integrating seamlessly with organic and integrated pest management approaches to foster resilient agroecosystems.^[2] A key aspect of biofertilizers is their emphasis on rhizosphere colonization, where microorganisms interact with root exudates to establish beneficial communities that enhance nutrient cycling and plant vigor, distinguishing them from biostimulants that primarily stimulate growth through hormonal or metabolic pathways without directly supplying nutrients.^[1]^[6] Representative categories within this scope include nitrogen-fixing biofertilizers, which convert atmospheric nitrogen into plant-usable forms; phosphate-solubilizing types, which unlock bound phosphorus in soil; and potash-mobilizing variants, which improve potassium availability, all contributing to balanced nutrition in nutrient-poor environments.^[5]^[2]

Historical Development

The discovery of biological nitrogen fixation in the late 19th century marked the foundational milestone in biofertilizer development. In 1888, German scientists Hermann Hellriegel and Hermann Wilfarth demonstrated that legumes could acquire atmospheric nitrogen through symbiotic relationships with root nodule bacteria, attributing this process to microbial activity in sterilized soil experiments.^[7] This revelation, building on earlier observations, led to the isolation of Rhizobium by Martinus Beijerinck in the same year, enabling the first practical applications of microbial inoculation for legume crops to enhance soil fertility without synthetic inputs.^[8] These early findings shifted agricultural practices toward leveraging natural microbial processes, particularly in Europe, where inoculation techniques began to be tested on a small scale for improving yields in nitrogen-poor soils. Commercial production of biofertilizers emerged in the early 20th century, transitioning from laboratory experiments to widespread agricultural use. In the 1920s, systematic efforts in India initiated by N.V. Joshi introduced Rhizobium-based inoculants for legume cultivation, laying the groundwork for organized biofertilizer application in the region.^[9] Concurrently, in Europe, products like Nitragin—first commercialized in 1895 but expanded in the interwar period—facilitated broader adoption of bacterial inoculants for crops beyond legumes. In the Soviet Union, Azotobacter species were extensively utilized starting in the 1930s, with large-scale field trials in 1958 covering over 35 million hectares to boost non-legume crop productivity under intensive farming systems.^[10] By the mid-20th century, dedicated biofertilizer programs were established in India during the 1950s, including the launch of the first commercial production unit in 1956, which focused on scaling up Rhizobium and Azotobacter cultures for national agricultural needs.^[11] Post-2000 developments reflected a global pivot toward biofertilizers driven by mounting environmental concerns over chemical fertilizer overuse, such as soil degradation and water pollution. Key advancements included the widespread adoption of Azospirillum biofertilizers in the 1970s and 1980s, followed by research into multi-strain consortia for enhanced efficacy.^[12] This era saw increased research and policy support for microbial alternatives to promote sustainable agriculture, aligning with international frameworks like the United Nations' 2015 Sustainable Development Goals, particularly SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) and SDG 13 (Climate Action), which emphasize eco-friendly nutrient management.^[13] Consequently, the global biofertilizer market evolved from a niche sector to a significant industry, valued at USD 2.53 billion in 2024 and projected to reach USD 2.81 billion in 2025, fueled by demand in organic farming and regulatory incentives in regions like Europe and Asia.^[4]

Types and Composition

Bacterial Biofertilizers

Bacterial biofertilizers consist of living bacterial strains that enhance plant nutrient uptake and growth by facilitating biological nitrogen fixation and phosphate solubilization in soil. These bacteria are primarily categorized into symbiotic and free-living groups, with key representatives including Rhizobium for symbiotic nitrogen fixation in legumes, and Azotobacter and Azospirillum as free-living nitrogen fixers that associate with plant roots without forming specialized structures. Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria such as Bacillus and Pseudomonas play a complementary role by converting insoluble soil phosphates into plant-available forms through organic acid production and enzymatic activity.^[14]^[15]^[12] Potassium-solubilizing bacteria (KSB), such as Bacillus mucilaginosus and Frateuria aurantia, mobilize fixed potassium from soil minerals like feldspars and micas into forms accessible to plants via production of organic acids, enzymes, and chelating agents.^[16] Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), encompassing genera like Pseudomonas fluorescens and Bacillus subtilis, provide multifaceted benefits including nutrient solubilization, phytohormone production, siderophore-mediated iron acquisition, and biocontrol against pathogens, often applied in formulations targeting non-legume crops.^[17] Characteristics of these bacteria vary by group, influencing their efficacy in biofertilizer formulations. Rhizobium species are Gram-negative, rod-shaped alpha-proteobacteria that establish symbiotic relationships with legume roots, inducing nodule formation via specific signaling pathways. In contrast, Azotobacter and Azospirillum are also Gram-negative but function in associative or free-living modes, colonizing the rhizosphere to fix atmospheric nitrogen independently. Phosphate-solubilizing genera like Bacillus (Gram-positive, spore-forming rods) and Pseudomonas (Gram-negative, motile rods) exhibit robust environmental tolerance, including resistance to desiccation and pH fluctuations, which supports their survival in carrier materials. Strain selection for biofertilizers prioritizes traits such as high nitrogen fixation rates, compatibility with host plants, and possession of nodulation genes (e.g., nod, nol, and noe clusters in Rhizobium), ensuring effective symbiosis and minimal competition with native soil microbes.^[18]^[19]^[12] Specific examples highlight their agricultural impact; for instance, inoculation with efficient Rhizobium strains can increase nodule formation and biomass in legumes, with studies showing enhanced nodulation under controlled conditions that supports greater nitrogen provision to crops. Bacillus subtilis strains, valued for their dual nutrient and biocontrol roles, produce antibiotics such as surfactin and iturin, which suppress soil-borne pathogens like Fusarium and Rhizoctonia, thereby reducing disease incidence in treated plants. Commercially, Bradyrhizobium japonicum (formerly classified as Rhizobium japonicum) serves as a key strain for soybean biofertilizers, promoting nodulation and yield improvements in nitrogen-limited soils when applied as seed inoculants.^[20]^[21]^[22]

Fungal and Other Microbial Biofertilizers

Fungal biofertilizers primarily encompass mycorrhizal fungi and certain saprophytic or antagonistic species like Trichoderma, which enhance plant nutrient acquisition and provide indirect benefits through symbiosis or pathogen suppression. Mycorrhizal fungi form mutualistic associations with plant roots, extending the root system's reach via extensive hyphal networks that improve the uptake of immobile nutrients such as phosphorus and zinc from the soil.^[23] These networks can explore volumes of soil far beyond root hairs, facilitating nutrient mobilization over distances up to several centimeters.^[24] Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), belonging to the phylum Glomeromycota, are particularly vital for phosphorus uptake in herbaceous plants and crops, forming intracellular arbuscules within root cortical cells to exchange nutrients for plant-derived carbohydrates. Genera such as Glomus, including species like Glomus intraradices and Glomus mosseae, establish symbiosis with over 80% of vascular land plants, promoting improved drought tolerance and overall vigor in diverse ecosystems.^[25] In contrast, ectomycorrhizal fungi, primarily from Basidiomycota and Ascomycota, sheath the roots of trees like pines and oaks with a fungal mantle and Hartig net, enhancing nitrogen and phosphorus acquisition in forest soils and aiding reforestation efforts.^[26] These fungi are especially effective in nutrient-poor, acidic soils common to forestry, where they contribute to tree establishment and growth.^[27] Trichoderma species, such as Trichoderma harzianum and Trichoderma viride, serve as biofertilizers with dual roles in nutrient cycling and biocontrol, colonizing the rhizosphere to solubilize phosphates and suppress soil-borne pathogens through mycoparasitism and antibiotic production.^[28] Unlike bacterial biofertilizers focused on direct nitrogen fixation, Trichoderma emphasizes indirect plant health benefits via competition for resources and induction of systemic resistance.^[29] Among other microbial biofertilizers, Cyanobacteria, or blue-green algae, offer a more established alternative, particularly in wetland agriculture; heterocystous species like Anabaena fix atmospheric nitrogen in symbiotic or free-living states, contributing 20-30 kg N per hectare annually in rice paddies while adding organic matter to enhance soil structure.^[30] These algal biofertilizers combine nitrogen fixation with photosynthesis-derived biomass, supporting sustainable rice cultivation in flooded systems.^[31]

Mechanisms of Action

Nitrogen Fixation

Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) is a microbial process that converts atmospheric dinitrogen (N₂) into ammonia (NH₃), a bioavailable form that plants can assimilate for growth, primarily catalyzed by the metalloenzyme nitrogenase. This enzyme complex, consisting of the iron (Fe) protein and molybdenum-iron (MoFe) protein (or variants), facilitates the reduction of the stable N≡N triple bond through a series of electron transfers and protonations, requiring substantial energy input.^[32]^[33] The core reaction of BNF is:

\ce{N2 + 8H+ + 8e- -> 2NH3 + H2}

This stoichiometry accounts for the production of one molecule of hydrogen gas as a byproduct, with the overall process consuming 16 ATP molecules to drive the endergonic reduction, highlighting the high energy cost of breaking the N₂ bond.^[34] BNF occurs in two primary modes: symbiotic and asymbiotic. Symbiotic fixation involves mutualistic associations between diazotrophic bacteria, such as Rhizobium species, and host plants like legumes, where the bacteria reside in specialized root nodules that provide a low-oxygen microenvironment conducive to nitrogenase activity.^[35] In contrast, asymbiotic (free-living) fixation is carried out by aerobic soil bacteria such as Azotobacter, which independently reduce N₂ in the rhizosphere without forming structures with plants.^[13] Nitrogenase is highly sensitive to oxygen, which irreversibly inactivates the enzyme by damaging its metalloclusters, necessitating protective mechanisms like leghemoglobin in nodules or rapid respiration in free-living diazotrophs. Optimal activity also depends on pH, with peak performance typically in the range of 6.0 to 8.0, beyond which proton availability and enzyme stability decline. In biofertilizer applications, particularly those using Rhizobium inoculants, BNF contributes an estimated 50-100 kg N/ha/year to crop nitrogen supply, reducing reliance on synthetic fertilizers.^[36]^[37]^[9]

Nutrient Solubilization and Mobilization

Biofertilizers play a crucial role in nutrient solubilization and mobilization by employing microbial processes to convert insoluble forms of essential minerals, particularly phosphorus (P) and potassium (K), into plant-available forms. Phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms (PSMs) and potassium-solubilizing bacteria (KSB) achieve this through biochemical mechanisms that enhance nutrient bioavailability in the soil rhizosphere, thereby reducing the need for chemical fertilizers.^[1] The primary mechanisms for phosphorus solubilization include the production of organic acids, secretion of enzymes, and chelation of metal ions. Microbes such as Pseudomonas and Bacillus species generate organic acids like gluconic acid via glucose dehydrogenase activity, which lowers the rhizosphere pH and solubilizes insoluble inorganic phosphates, such as tricalcium phosphate (TCP). This acidification process can be represented by the simplified reaction:

\ce{Ca3(PO4)2 + 2H+ -> 3Ca^2+ + 2HPO4^2-}

Additionally, phosphatases secreted by these microbes hydrolyze organic phosphorus compounds into inorganic forms accessible to plants, while organic acids chelate cations like Ca²⁺, further releasing bound phosphorus.^[38]^[39] In terms of efficiency, Pseudomonas strains can solubilize fixed phosphorus, significantly increasing available P levels for crop uptake. However, this efficiency varies by soil type; it is higher in acidic soils where low pH naturally aids organic acid activity, compared to alkaline soils where calcium precipitation limits solubilization unless microbial acidification is robust.^[40]^[41] For potassium mobilization, biofertilizers target insoluble minerals like mica through weathering facilitated by organic acid production and chelation. Bacteria such as Bacillus mucilaginosus and Bacillus edaphicus, along with fungi like Aspergillus niger, excrete acids (e.g., citric and oxalic) that protonate and dissolve mica structures, releasing K⁺ ions via acidolysis and exchange reactions. This process involves biofilm formation on mineral surfaces, enhancing weathering rates and making fixed potassium available to plants.^[42]^[43]

Plant Growth Promotion

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and other microbes in biofertilizers enhance plant health through indirect mechanisms that improve physiological processes and defense responses, distinct from direct nutrient supplementation. These include the synthesis of phytohormones, production of siderophores for better iron acquisition, antagonistic interactions against pathogens, and elicitation of plant immune responses. Such activities collectively boost root development, stress tolerance, and overall vigor, enabling plants to thrive in challenging soil environments.^[44] A primary mechanism involves phytohormone production, particularly indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and gibberellins, which modulate plant architecture and growth. IAA, secreted by many PGPR such as Pseudomonas and Bacillus species, promotes cell division and elongation in roots, often increasing root surface area by 20-50% to facilitate greater absorption of water and nutrients. For instance, Azospirillum brasilense induces prolific root branching and proliferation via IAA signaling, leading to enhanced plant establishment in low-fertility soils. Gibberellins, produced by strains like Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, stimulate shoot elongation and counteract growth inhibition under abiotic stresses, contributing to taller stems and higher biomass yields.^[44]^[45]^[46] Siderophore production by PGPR addresses iron limitation in alkaline or high-pH soils, where iron is poorly soluble. These low-molecular-weight compounds chelate ferric iron (Fe³⁺), converting it to plant-usable forms while starving pathogenic microbes of this essential nutrient, thereby exerting a biocontrol effect. Fungal biofertilizers like Trichoderma species further support growth promotion through direct antagonism, including mycoparasitism, where they parasitize and degrade hyphae of pathogens such as Fusarium culmorum, inhibiting their growth by up to 66%. Additionally, certain PGPR release volatile organic compounds (VOCs), such as N,N-dimethyl-hexadecylamine, which inhibit weed seed germination and seedling growth, indirectly benefiting crop competitiveness.^[47]^[48]^[49] Biofertilizers also trigger induced systemic resistance (ISR), a primed state of enhanced defense without direct pathogen contact. PGPR like Bacillus amyloliquefaciens activate ISR through jasmonic acid and ethylene signaling pathways, upregulating genes for antimicrobial compounds and strengthening cell walls against necrotrophic pathogens and insects. This jasmonic acid-mediated response improves long-term plant resilience, with studies showing reduced disease severity in crops like tomato and Arabidopsis. Overall, these mechanisms underscore the multifaceted role of biofertilizers in fostering sustainable plant health.^[50]^[51]

Production and Quality Control

Manufacturing Processes

The manufacturing of biofertilizers commences with the isolation of microbial strains from natural environments to ensure efficacy and specificity. For Rhizobium, effective strains are obtained from legume root nodules by surface sterilization with 70% ethanol for 30 seconds followed by 3% sodium hypochlorite for 3 minutes, then crushing and streaking the contents onto yeast extract mannitol agar (YEMA) plates, which are incubated at 28°C for 2-14 days to select pure colonies.^[52] Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria are isolated similarly using Pikovskaya's medium supplemented with tricalcium phosphate, where clear zones around colonies indicate solubilization activity after incubation.^[52] Strain selection prioritizes those with high nitrogen fixation or nutrient mobilization potential, confirmed through greenhouse trials before proceeding to production.^[53] Inoculum preparation follows isolation, involving the growth of pure cultures in nutrient media to generate starter populations for scaling. Rhizobium inoculum is typically cultured in yeast extract mannitol (YM) broth, containing 10 g/L mannitol and 0.5 g/L yeast extract adjusted to pH 7.0, in shake flasks or small fermenters with aeration of 5-10 L air per L medium per hour.^[52] Incubation occurs at 28-30°C for 3-5 days to reach an optical density suitable for transfer, ensuring logarithmic growth phase for optimal viability.^[54] This step uses autoclaved media to minimize contaminants, with volumes progressively increased from 100 ml to 20 L vessels.^[53] Mass culturing employs liquid or solid-state fermentation to amplify microbial biomass industrially. Liquid fermentation utilizes submerged bioreactors with modified YM or nitrogen-free media, aerated and agitated at 28-30°C for 3-7 days, targeting yields of 10^9 colony-forming units (CFU) per ml through fed-batch strategies that supply carbon sources like glycerol.^[52]^[53] Solid-state fermentation inoculates sterile carriers such as peat or lignite (sterilized by autoclaving or gamma irradiation at 50 kGy) with 5-10% inoculum volume, maintaining 45-50% moisture and incubating at 30°C for 2 weeks to achieve comparable CFU densities per gram.^[52] Scaling to industrial levels involves multi-stage fermenters with pH control (6.5-7.0) and sterile air filtration to support continuous production. Recent advances as of 2025 include the development of microbial consortia in co-culture systems, enhancing compatibility and multifunctionality during mass production.^[55] Harvesting separates viable cells from the culture medium, primarily via centrifugation for liquid fermentations at 4000-5000 rpm for 10 minutes, followed by resuspension in distilled water or buffer to remove spent media.^[52] Solid fermentations require no such separation, as the carrier integrates the biomass directly, though grinding and sieving (to 0.18 mm particles) may follow for uniformity.^[52] These techniques ensure high recovery rates while preserving cell integrity for downstream processing.^[53] Quality metrics during manufacturing focus on contamination control and purity to guarantee product reliability. Contamination is limited to less than 5% in liquid cultures and 15% in solid ones, assessed via plating on non-selective media like nutrient agar and incubation at 30°C for 3-5 days.^[56] Viable counts must exceed 10^9 CFU/ml for liquids or 10^9 CFU/g for solids, verified by spread-plate methods on selective media, aligning with international guidelines such as those from the Forum for Nuclear Cooperation in Asia (FNCA).^[56] Purity is confirmed through Gram staining (e.g., Gram-negative rods for Rhizobium) and absence of off-target growth, with laboratory testing adhering to ISO/IEC 17025 standards for microbial analysis.^[57]^[58]

Formulation and Viability Assessment

Biofertilizers are formulated to ensure the survival and efficacy of microbial inoculants during storage and transport, primarily through carrier-based, liquid, or encapsulated approaches. Carrier-based formulations, which are the most traditional, utilize solid substrates such as peat or lignite to adsorb microbial cells, providing a protective matrix that maintains viability by retaining moisture and shielding against environmental stressors.^[59] These carriers allow for easy handling and application but can be bulky and prone to contamination if not properly sterilized. In contrast, liquid formulations suspend microbes in oil-based emulsions, broth media, or aqueous solutions, offering advantages like uniform distribution and reduced dust, though they require stabilizers to prevent sedimentation.^[60] Encapsulation techniques, involving natural polymers like alginate or chitosan, further enhance protection by creating microcapsules that shield cells from desiccation, oxygen exposure, and mechanical damage, thereby extending usability in diverse agricultural settings. As of 2025, innovations such as nano-encapsulation using nanomaterials have improved shelf life and stability, allowing viability retention for over 18 months in challenging conditions.^[61] Viability assessment is crucial to verify the metabolic activity and population density of microbes in formulations, employing methods such as colony-forming unit (CFU) counting and the tetrazolium chloride (TTC) assay. CFU counting involves serial dilution and plating on selective media to enumerate viable cells, providing a direct measure of propagule density essential for quality assurance.^[62] The TTC assay, which uses 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride to detect dehydrogenase activity, offers a rapid, colorimetric indication of respiratory viability in non-culturable cells, complementing CFU by assessing metabolic health without lengthy incubation.^[63] Emerging molecular techniques, such as quantitative PCR (qPCR), provide more precise detection of viable cells by targeting genetic markers, improving accuracy in quality control as of 2024-2025. To extend shelf life, protectants like glycerol are incorporated, acting as cryoprotectants and humectants that mitigate desiccation and temperature fluctuations, often preserving cell populations for extended periods.^[64] Peat-based carriers typically sustain microbial viability for 6-12 months under ambient storage conditions (around 25-30°C), with lignite offering similar durability due to its adsorptive properties and low water activity that inhibits contaminants.^[65] Commercial approval often mandates stress testing for viability under UV radiation and pH variations (e.g., 4.5-8.5), simulating field exposure to ensure formulation robustness and prevent premature cell death.^[66] Regulatory standards emphasize a minimum of 10^8 viable cells per gram of carrier material for solid formulations, ensuring sufficient inoculant density for agronomic impact, while liquid forms require at least 10^8-10^9 cells per milliliter.^[67] The EU Fertilizing Products Regulation (2019/1009) incorporates microbial fertilizers under harmonized categories, mandating conformity assessments for viability, purity, and absence of pathogens to facilitate market access across member states.^[2]

Application and Efficacy

Methods of Application

Biofertilizers are delivered to crops and soils through targeted techniques that promote microbial colonization and activity. Primary methods include seed coating or dipping, soil drenching, foliar spraying, and integration with irrigation via fertigation, each suited to specific crop needs and environmental conditions.^[68] Seed coating and dipping treat seeds with a biofertilizer suspension, enabling early root establishment by the microbes. In this process, the inoculant is mixed into a slurry with water or a sticker like gum arabic, applied to seeds, and then shade-dried before planting to maintain viability. This approach is especially common for legume crops, where Rhizobium is applied as a slurry to soybean or pea seeds to facilitate symbiotic nitrogen fixation.^[68]^[69] Application rates for seed treatments generally range from 10 to 20 g of biofertilizer per kg of seed, balancing efficacy with seed handling. Timing at planting maximizes colonization, as microbes align with root emergence for optimal interaction.^[68] Soil drenching involves diluting biofertilizers in water and applying them to the soil surface or root zone, either pre-sowing or around established plants, to enhance soil microbial populations. For cereals like wheat and maize, free-living bacteria such as Azotobacter are broadcast across fields at 5 to 7 kg/ha, often incorporated with organic matter like farmyard manure for better distribution and survival.^[68]^[70] Foliar spraying applies liquid biofertilizer directly to leaves, aiding absorption of growth-promoting compounds from strains like Azospirillum brasilense, often in combination with seed treatments for synergistic effects. Fertigation delivers biofertilizers through irrigation systems, such as drip or sprinkler setups, ensuring precise root-zone placement and uniform coverage in high-value or row crops.^[68]^[71] Large-scale operations utilize inoculation machines and rotary drum coaters for efficient seed treatment, achieving consistent coverage. Mixing protocols emphasize compatible microbial strains to prevent antagonism, with guidelines recommending separate applications or pre-tested consortia to maintain viability and performance.^[72]^[73]

Factors Influencing Performance

The performance of biofertilizers in agricultural systems is profoundly affected by environmental and management factors, which can either enhance or limit their ability to colonize roots, mobilize nutrients, and promote plant growth. Soil properties play a pivotal role, with optimal pH levels typically ranging from 6 to 7.5 supporting the metabolic activity and survival of most microbial inoculants, such as rhizobia and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria.^[74] Outside this range, acidic or alkaline conditions can inhibit enzyme activity and reduce efficacy.^[75] Soil moisture is equally critical, as biofertilizers require adequate water availability to establish populations and function effectively; drought stress diminishes microbial viability and limits nutrient release, while excessive moisture may promote antagonistic interactions.^[15] Temperature influences microbial metabolism, with optimal ranges of 20–35°C favoring proliferation and activity for many strains, including Azotobacter and Bacillus species, whereas extremes below 10°C or above 40°C can halt processes like nitrogen fixation.^[76] Competition from native soil microbes further complicates establishment, as indigenous populations often outcompete introduced biofertilizer strains for resources and space in the rhizosphere, potentially reducing colonization success by favoring adapted local communities.^[77] Management practices significantly modulate these environmental effects. Crop rotation enhances biofertilizer performance by diversifying soil microbial communities, improving nutrient cycling, and reducing buildup of crop-specific pathogens that could suppress inoculant activity.^[78] Compatibility with chemical fertilizers is another key consideration; high doses of nitrogen-based chemicals can repress nitrogen-fixing biofertilizers by feedback inhibition of symbiotic processes, so integrated use often involves reducing synthetic inputs to 50–75% of recommended rates to maintain microbial function.^[74] Specific edaphic stresses highlight performance variability. In saline soils, biofertilizer efficacy declines due to osmotic stress on microbes, with studies on rice showing technical efficiency dropping to approximately 73% compared to 80% in non-saline conditions, underscoring the need for salt-tolerant strains.^[79] For foliar applications, ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure reduces microbial viability by damaging cellular components, thereby shortening the longevity of surface-applied inoculants and necessitating protective formulations.^[77] To evaluate and optimize performance, monitoring techniques such as rhizosphere sampling are essential, allowing quantification of inoculant colonization rates through techniques like plate counting or qPCR to confirm establishment levels above 10^5–10^6 cells per gram of root tissue.^[80] These factors collectively determine field success, emphasizing the importance of site-specific adaptations for reliable outcomes.

Benefits and Impacts

Agronomic and Economic Advantages

Biofertilizers offer significant agronomic benefits by enhancing crop yields through biological processes such as nitrogen fixation and nutrient mobilization. In legume crops, Rhizobium-based biofertilizers can increase yields by 10-30% by forming symbiotic relationships that fix atmospheric nitrogen, reducing the need for synthetic inputs. When integrated with reduced chemical fertilizer applications, biofertilizers have been shown to maintain productivity levels comparable to full chemical applications even at 50% lower chemical fertilizer rates.^[81] For instance, in soybean cultivation in Brazil, biofertilizer use has resulted in yield gains of 15-20%, as demonstrated by research from the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa), supporting high-output farming without excessive nitrogen reliance.^[82] Economically, biofertilizers contribute to cost reductions for farmers by minimizing reliance on expensive chemical fertilizers. Applications can lead to savings of $50-100 per hectare through lower input costs and improved nutrient efficiency.^[83] In India, biofertilizers enable a 25% reduction in nitrogen inputs while sustaining yields, particularly in cereal and pulse crops, thereby lowering overall production expenses.^[12] The global market for biofertilizers reflects their growing economic viability. As of 2025, the market is estimated at approximately USD 2.7 billion, with projections to reach USD 5.6 billion by 2034, fueled by demand for sustainable alternatives in major agricultural regions. Recent market analyses indicate Asia-Pacific as the fastest-growing region at over 13% CAGR, driven by adoption in sustainable farming.^[84]^[85] These advantages position biofertilizers as a strategic tool for optimizing farm-level productivity and profitability.

Environmental and Sustainability Benefits

Biofertilizers play a crucial role in mitigating environmental pollution associated with conventional agriculture by reducing nutrient runoff and greenhouse gas emissions. Compared to chemical fertilizers, organic inputs including biofertilizers can reduce nitrate leaching by approximately 15-30% when integrated into farming practices, thereby minimizing groundwater contamination and eutrophication in water bodies.^[86] Additionally, they lower emissions of nitrous oxide (N₂O), a potent greenhouse gas, through enhanced nitrogen use efficiency by soil microbes, which optimize nutrient cycling and reduce excess fertilizer application.^[87] In terms of soil health, biofertilizers promote enhanced microbial diversity by introducing beneficial microorganisms such as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and mycorrhizal fungi, which foster symbiotic relationships that improve nutrient availability and soil structure.^[88] This leads to organic carbon buildup in the soil, with meta-analyses indicating an average increase of 0.44 g C kg⁻¹ soil, contributing to long-term carbon sequestration and resilience against degradation.^[89] Furthermore, by stimulating robust root growth, biofertilizers aid in erosion control, as deeper and denser root systems anchor soil particles, reducing surface runoff and soil loss on sloped or vulnerable lands.^[90] Long-term application of biofertilizers contributes to increased soil organic matter, enhancing soil fertility and water-holding capacity while supporting sustainable land management.^[79] These benefits align with the European Union's Green Deal (2020), which promotes bio-based fertilizers as part of its strategy to achieve climate neutrality and reduce reliance on synthetic inputs through policies like the Fertilising Products Regulation.^[91] Overall, biofertilizers advance sustainability by underpinning regenerative agriculture practices that restore ecosystems and diminish dependency on finite resources like phosphate rocks. Phosphate-solubilizing microbes in biofertilizers, especially in co-inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, enhance phosphorus availability from insoluble sources, reducing reliance on rock phosphate mining.^[92] This shift not only conserves non-renewable reserves but also minimizes mining-related habitat destruction and pollution.

Challenges and Limitations

Biological and Technical Constraints

Biofertilizers encounter substantial biological constraints related to microbial viability, primarily due to their limited shelf life, which typically ranges from 3 to 6 months under ambient storage conditions of 20-25°C, beyond which significant loss of microbial populations occurs.^[14] This short viability is exacerbated by sensitivity to environmental stressors such as high temperatures and drought, where exposure to heat above 30°C can rapidly diminish bacterial activity and survival rates during storage or application.^[66] In field settings, these factors contribute to inconsistent performance, with efficacy varying by 20-50% across trials, often attributable to edaphic conditions like soil moisture and nutrient levels that influence microbial establishment and function.^[93]^[94] Technical limitations further complicate biofertilizer deployment, particularly the high strain specificity required for effective symbiosis. For instance, Rhizobium strains must be matched to specific legume hosts to promote nodulation and nitrogen fixation, as mismatched inoculants result in poor root colonization and reduced nutrient uptake.^[95] Colonization efficiency is notably low in sterile or microbially depleted soils, where the absence of a supportive native microbiome hinders introduced strains from competing for niches and establishing stable populations.^[96] Additionally, key enzymes like nitrogenase, essential for nitrogen fixation in many biofertilizer microbes, undergo inactivation at temperatures above 35°C, limiting applicability in warmer climates or during heat stress events.^[97] Commercial scaling poses another critical technical barrier, with many microbial strains failing to retain sufficient viability through large-scale production processes due to challenges in maintaining physiological integrity during fermentation, formulation, and distribution.^[94] This low survival rate underscores the need for strain selection and protective carriers to preserve functionality. Furthermore, the incorporation of archaeal microbes remains limited in biofertilizers, as many archaea require strictly anaerobic conditions that are incompatible with the aerobic environments of most agricultural soils, restricting their practical utility despite potential nitrogen-fixing capabilities.^[98]^[99]

Socioeconomic and Regulatory Barriers

The adoption of biofertilizers faces significant socioeconomic hurdles, particularly in developing regions where low awareness among farmers limits uptake. For instance, over 56% of farmers in rural areas remain unaware of microbial fertilizers or their benefits, often due to inadequate extension services and publicity efforts. This knowledge gap is compounded by high initial costs, as biofertilizers can be more expensive to produce and purchase than conventional chemical alternatives, deterring smallholder farmers who operate on tight margins. In many cases, these economic pressures result in persistent reliance on cheaper synthetic inputs, despite long-term soil health benefits from biofertilizers.^[100]^[101]^[102] Regulatory barriers further impede widespread use, with inconsistent standards across major markets creating uncertainty for producers and distributors. In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Department of Agriculture (USDA) lack specific definitions or streamlined registration processes for biofertilizers, leading to regulatory ambiguity that slows market entry. By contrast, the European Union has pursued greater harmonization through Regulation (EU) 2019/1009, which categorizes biofertilizers under fertilizing products but still imposes rigorous efficacy and safety testing requirements. Approval for new microbial strains is particularly protracted, often taking years due to fragmented guidelines and the need for extensive validation, which discourages innovation in strain development.^[2]^[103]^[104] In specific contexts like China, the entrenched overuse of chemical fertilizers—driven by historical subsidies and yield-focused policies—continues to hinder the transition to biofertilizers, as evidenced by 2025 assessments highlighting environmental risks such as soil degradation and water pollution from excess nitrogen. Similarly, in Africa, farmer training needs remain a critical bottleneck, with programs in countries like Nigeria and Ethiopia emphasizing capacity building to address gaps in application knowledge and production techniques. Socioeconomic challenges extend to supply chain inefficiencies in rural areas, where limited cold storage and transportation infrastructure exacerbate biofertilizer shelf-life issues, raising distribution costs. Gender disparities also play a role, as women farmers, who comprise a significant portion of the agricultural workforce in developing regions, face restricted access to inputs like biofertilizers due to unequal land ownership, credit, and extension services.^[105]^[106]^[107]^[108]^[109]

Future Directions

Emerging Research Areas

Recent advances in genetic engineering have focused on CRISPR/Cas9-edited microbial strains to enhance biofertilizer performance under abiotic stresses. For instance, researchers have explored modifications to improve symbiotic efficiency and stress tolerance in nitrogen-fixing bacteria like Rhizobium, addressing limitations in native strains for better performance in arid soils.^[110]^[111] Metagenomic approaches are uncovering novel biofertilizer strains from extreme environments, particularly saline habitats, to expand applications in salt-affected farmlands. Halotolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) have been identified through 16S rRNA sequencing, exhibiting phosphate solubilization and IAA production that mitigate salinity stress in crops.^[112] Multi-omics integration, combining metagenomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics, is guiding the design of synthetic microbial consortia by predicting synergistic interactions, such as nitrogen-fixing bacteria paired with solubilizers for balanced nutrient release.^[113] This has led to consortia that enhance soil microbial diversity and plant resilience, with field validations showing yield improvements in saline conditions.^[114] Microalgae-based biofertilizers are emerging for integrated nutrient delivery, leveraging their ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen and release bioavailable phosphorus and potassium. Recent 2024 studies on microalgae applied as soil amendments have demonstrated improved soil fertility and microbial community structure under continuous cropping, increasing soil organic matter and reducing fertilizer needs.^[115] Omics-driven research post-2023 has further enhanced induced systemic resistance (ISR) in plants via biofertilizers, identifying key pathways like jasmonic acid signaling upregulated by PGPR consortia, which boost defense against pathogens while maintaining growth.^[116] These efforts address critical gaps, such as the disparity between laboratory efficacy (often 70-80% success in controlled settings) and field trials (typically 30-50% due to soil heterogeneity and environmental variability).^[14]

Innovations and Market Trends

Recent innovations in biofertilizer technology focus on enhancing the stability and efficacy of microbial agents through nano-encapsulation techniques, which protect beneficial organisms from environmental stressors and extend their shelf life. Patents and research from 2024 highlight nano-encapsulation methods using biopolymers to encapsulate nitrogen-fixing bacteria and phosphate-solubilizing microbes, improving nutrient release and reducing application frequency in field trials.^[117]^[118] Another key advancement involves consortia products that combine multiple microbial strains for synergistic effects, such as blends of Bacillus species with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), which enhance nutrient uptake and plant resilience in diverse soils. These consortia have demonstrated yield improvements in crops like wheat and maize compared to single-strain biofertilizers.^[119]^[120] The global biofertilizer market is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach approximately USD 5.02 billion by 2030, driven by increasing demand for sustainable alternatives to synthetic inputs.^[121] A notable collaboration in 2024 involved Fresh Del Monte Produce partnering with local entities in Kenya to convert pineapple residues into biofertilizers, establishing a facility that processes fruit waste into microbial-rich products for on-farm use, thereby promoting circular economy principles.^[122] In China, a 2025 policy shift emphasizes reducing chemical fertilizer overuse through incentives for biofertilizer adoption, including subsidies and streamlined approvals, as part of broader efforts to cut nitrogen inputs by 20% while maintaining yields.^[105] Adoption of Bacillus-based biofertilizers has surged, with studies reporting increases in crop yields and corresponding reductions in chemical fertilizer needs, particularly in cereal production.^[123] Emerging trends include the integration of biofertilizers with biostimulants, such as seaweed extracts combined with microbial inoculants, to amplify plant stress tolerance and nutrient efficiency amid climate variability.^[64] Regulatory frameworks are evolving to support these products, with initiatives like the U.S. Plant Biostimulant Act of 2025 aiming to standardize approvals and encourage replacement of synthetic fertilizers, targeting reductions of up to 25% in key crop applications by 2030.^[124]^[125]

References

[1]
Overview of biofertilizers in crop production and stress management ...
So biofertilizers are properly defined as “the preparations containing live microbes that help in enhancing soil fertility by fixing atmospheric nitrogen, ...
[2]
Biofertilizer use in the United States: definition, regulation, and ...
Nov 12, 2024 · Biofertilizers can boost plant growth and yield by 10–40% (Stewart and Roberts 2012), and they can be a low-cost source to improve nutrient use ...
[3]
Biofertilizer: The Future of Food Security and Food Safety - PMC - NIH
Jun 14, 2022 · Biofertilizers provide a number of advantages, including being a low-cost source of nutrients, excellent suppliers of micro-compounds and ...
[4]
[PDF] Biofertilizers - Development of e-Course for B.Sc (Agriculture)
Biofertilizers are defined as preparations containing living cells or latent cells of efficient strains of microorganisms that help crop plants uptake of ...
[5]
[PDF] Biofertilizer - Government Arts College, Ariyalur
A biofertilizer (also bio-fertilizer) is a substance which contains living microorganisms which, when applied to seed, plant surfaces, or soil, colonizes the ...
[6]
History of Research on Nitrogen Fixation in Soybeans (1887-2018)
Nov 20, 2018 · 1888 Nov. – Hermann Hellriegel and Hermann Wilfarth, German scientists, publish the key, classical paper on the acquisition of atmospheric ...
[7]
Rhizobium - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Hellriegel and Wilfarth (1888) exhibited the capability of legumes to fix atmospheric nitrogen. Beijerinck (1888) isolated the microorganism through root ...Bradyrhizobium · Mesorhizobium · Sinorhizobium · AzorhizobiumMissing: key milestones<|control11|><|separator|>
[8]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/agricultural-and-biological-sciences/rhizobium
[9]
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial biofertilizers for crop production
Sep 16, 2022 · Large-scale field trials were performed using Azotobacter and Bacillus spp. on more than 35 million ha of land in the former Soviet Union in ...
[10]
[PDF] Bio-Fertilizer use in Indian Agriculture - Worldwidejournals.com
In India the first commercial production of bio-fertilizer started in 1956 under the supervision of N.V Joshi. India's Ninth Five. Year plan document talked of ...Missing: 1950s | Show results with:1950s
[11]
Nitrogen Fixing Azotobacter Species as Potential Soil Biological ...
We pointed out Azotobacter based-biofertilizers, which possess unique characteristics such as cyst formation conferring resistance to environmental stresses.Missing: Union | Show results with:Union<|control11|><|separator|>
[12]
Biofertilizers Market Size, Share & Trends | Growth Report [2032]
Oct 31, 2025 · The global biofertilizers market size was valued at USD 2.53 billion in 2024. The market is projected to grow from USD 2.81 billion in 2025 ...
[13]
A Comprehensive Review on Biofertilizers - Crimson Publishers
Apr 24, 2025 · Among nitrogen-fixing bacteria, Rhizobium, Azotobacter, and Azospirillum play a crucial role in making atmospheric nitrogen available for plant ...
[14]
Biofertilizers: A Nexus between soil fertility and crop productivity ...
Nitrogen-Fixing biofertilizers raise the nitrogen level of soil by fixing atmospheric nitrogen and making it available to the plants. Examples: Azotobacter, ...
[15]
Development of biofertilizers for sustainable agriculture over four ...
In the 1950s, phosphorus-dissolving bacteria began to be used as biofertilizers to convert phosphorus in the soil into a form that can be used by plants (Wang ...Missing: programs | Show results with:programs
[16]
Plant Growth-Promoting Soil Bacteria: Nitrogen Fixation, Phosphate ...
Dec 5, 2023 · This review covers the literature data on plant growth-promoting bacteria in soil, which can fix atmospheric nitrogen, solubilize phosphates, produce and ...Missing: major | Show results with:major
[17]
[PDF] Rhizobium as a potential biofertilizer and its quality control analysis ...
Mar 25, 2025 · Each Rhizobium strain has specific nodulation- affecting genes (nod, nol, and noe) which decide the specific plant root to form nodules.
[18]
Legume-rhizobium specificity effect on nodulation, biomass ... - NIH
Feb 11, 2021 · Efficient rhizobium strains stimulate the formation of more nodules which provides legumes with more fixed nitrogen resulting in greater biomass ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[19]
Bacillus subtilis: A plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium that also ...
May 20, 2019 · In summary, many strains of Bacillus subtilis exhibit the ability to act as biocontrol agents against pathogenic fungi and thus can be used to ...
[20]
Bio-Priming of Soybean with Bradyrhizobium japonicum and ...
Jul 25, 2022 · The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Bradyrhizobium japonicum (commercial strains) and Bacillus megaterium (newly ...
[21]
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi as Natural Biofertilizers: Let's Benefit ...
In this review, it has been pointed out that AMF inoculation overall produces positive outcomes on plant production in both controlled and open-field conditions ...
[22]
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi as Natural Biofertilizers - PubMed
Jan 19, 2016 · They are considered natural biofertilizers, since they provide the host with water, nutrients, and pathogen protection, in exchange for photosynthetic products.
[23]
The Most Widespread Symbiosis on Earth - PMC - NIH
Jul 11, 2006 · More than 80% of all higher land plant species are able to benefit ... rosea, Glomus intraradices, and Gl. claroideum, thus providing ...
[24]
Ectomycorrhizal fungi as biofertilizers in forestry restoration in Africa
Ectomycorrhiza, is an input of natural origin, a biofertilizer, supplying nutrients, increasing root biomass, root surface area, and controlling pests and ...
[25]
Relation between forest nutrient status and local mineral sources
Ectomycorrhizal (EcM) fungi are important for the acquisition of potassium and phosphorus by trees. ... Ectomycorrhizal Fungi: Role as Biofertilizers in Forestry.
[26]
Trichoderma and its role in biological control of plant fungal and ...
May 3, 2023 · Trichoderma is mainly used to control soil-borne diseases as well as some leaf and panicle diseases of various plants.
[27]
Trichoderma: The “Secrets” of a Multitalented Biocontrol Agent - PMC
It has been well established that Trichoderma species compete for nutrients, biological niches or infection spots with pathogens in plant rhizosphere [60].
[28]
Archaea: current and potential biotechnological applications
7.1. Biofertilizers. The treatment of organic waste with methanogenic archaea is not only beneficial in terms of biogas production, but also the post-digestion ...
[29]
Cyanobacteria: A Precious Bio-resource in Agriculture, Ecosystem ...
Apr 21, 2016 · Cyanobacteria can contribute to about 20–30 kg N ha-1 as well as the organic matter to the soil, quite significant for the economically weak ...
[30]
Combined application of nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria enhances ...
Nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria are a promising, green, and sustainable method for improving rice growth and quality in saline soils.
[31]
Biological nitrogen fixation in theory, practice, and reality
Biological nitrogen fixation is catalysed by the enzyme nitrogenase that naturally exists as three isozymes: Mo‐nitrogenase, V‐nitrogenase, and Fe‐nitrogenase, ...
[32]
Nitrogenase and biological nitrogen fixation - PubMed - NIH
Biological nitrogen fixation is catalyzed by the nitrogenase enzyme system which consists of two metalloproteins, the iron (Fe-) protein and the molybdenum ...
[33]
Define biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) and explain its importance.
This reaction is conducted by an enzyme known as nitrogenase. The 16 molecules of ATP (ATP = Adenosine Triphosphate, an energy storing compound) represent ...
[34]
Biological Nitrogen Fixation | Learn Science at Scitable - Nature
Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation Many microorganisms fix nitrogen symbiotically by partnering with a host plant. The plant provides sugars from photosynthesis that ...
[35]
Nitrogenase structural evolution across Earth's history - eLife
Apr 9, 2025 · Notably, nitrogenases are extremely sensitive to oxygen, which degrades the bound metalloclusters required for their enzymatic activity and ...
[36]
Purification and properties of the nitrogenase of Azospirillum ...
As reported for other nitrogenases, the optimal pH range was from pH 6.0 to 7.5. After short exposures of isolated nitrogenase to pH 5.0, about 50% activity was ...
[37]
Prospects for Using Phosphate-Solubilizing Microorganisms ... - NIH
Aug 15, 2022 · Here, we review the availability of soil phosphate, the diversity of phosphate-solubilizing soil microorganisms, the mechanisms and induction of ...
[38]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9414882/
[39]
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11162119
[40]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.11.005
[41]
The use of soil microbial potassium solubilizers in potassium ...
Nov 30, 2022 · This review discusses the various types of potassium solubilizing microorganisms in soil, their mechanism of action, and their importance in sustainable crop ...
[42]
https://annalsmicrobiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13213-022-01701-8
[43]
Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria: Context, Mechanisms of ...
Next, mechanisms of plant growth promotion by PGPR are discussed, including signal exchange between plant roots and PGPR and how these relationships modulate ...
[44]
Rhizobacteria modify root architecture and improve nutrient uptake ...
The inoculation positively influenced the root volume with an average increase of 46.7%, 28.4% total root length, 42.5% total surface area, 43.7% average ...
[45]
Azospirillum: benefits that go far beyond biological nitrogen fixation
May 4, 2018 · In the co-inoculation with rhizobia, Azospirillum usually contributes with root-growth promotion (Cassán et al. 2009; Juge et al. 2012) ...
[46]
A Potential Biofertilizer—Siderophilic Bacteria Isolated From the ...
May 8, 2022 · Siderophilic bacteria, as an important type of PGPR, can secrete siderophores to chelate unusable Fe3+ in the soil for plant growth.
[47]
Trichoderma versus Fusarium—Inhibition of Pathogen Growth ... - NIH
Nov 23, 2022 · Trichoderma fungi are among the most aggressive competitors of Fusarium, and mycoparasitism is their key biocontrol mechanism [29,30]. In our ...2. Results · Table 3 · 4.2. Fungal Isolates
[48]
Revisiting bacterial volatile-mediated plant growth promotion
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) volatiles, dimethylhexadecylamine (DMHDA) and indole, increase primary root length, lateral root length and number, ...
[49]
Development of plant systemic resistance by beneficial rhizobacteria
Beneficial rhizobacteria are generally called as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) that induce systemic resistance (ISR) against pathogen infection.
[50]
Induced Systemic Resistance and Promotion of Plant Growth by ...
Elicitation of ISR by Bacillus spp. is associated with ultrastructural changes in plants during pathogen attack and with cytochemical alterations.
[51]
[PDF] Biofertilizer Manual - FNCA
Biofertilizers from microorganisms can replace chemical fertilizers to increase crop production. In principle, biofertilizers are less expensive and are more.<|control11|><|separator|>
[52]
Fermentation Strategies to Improve Soil Bio-Inoculant Production ...
Jun 9, 2021 · In this short review, we will present a comprehensive analysis of the microbial mass-production processes, and the strategies for their ...
[53]
Culture Optimization for Mass Production of Rhizobium Using ...
Growth of bacteria on Yeast Extract Mannitol Agar (YEMA) medium indicates their ability to fix atmospheric Nitrogen to the plants (Figure 1). The use of Yeast ...
[54]
[PDF] 112 V. Quality Control of Biofertilizers 1. General Concept of ... - FNCA
Such contaminants will usually be detectable on these indicator media and their number should be reported together with their number of viable cells as ...
[55]
[PDF] Quality Control Protocols For Biofertilizers And Biopesticides
Sep 2, 2025 · Meanwhile, ISO/IEC 17025 sets the standards for testing laboratories, guaranteeing that microbial analyses are accurate, reliable, and.
[56]
A contribution to set a legal framework for biofertilisers - PMC - NIH
... 1950s, has opened a worldwide market of a new kind of fertilisers: the biofertilisers. The different kinds of microorganisms utilised to improve plant ...
[57]
Formulation of Microbial Inoculants by Encapsulation in Natural ...
Mar 10, 2020 · The most important solid formulations are based on carriers such as peat, compost, agro-industrial wastes, vermiculite, perlite, rock phosphate, ...
[58]
Microbial bioformulation - PubMed Central - NIH
Diversity among nitrogen fixing bacteria (NFB) in symbiotic and non-symbiotic associations has revolutionized the crop yield and progress of sustainable ...
[59]
Maintenance and assessment of cell viability in formulation of non ...
Dec 4, 2017 · Moreover, we discuss methods for the assessment of cell viability and storage stability, including standard colony counting, spectrophotometry, ...
[60]
[PDF] Optimization of Biofertilizer Production and its Application in Plants ...
Dec 14, 2019 · Viable count of the biofertilizer was measured in every 15 days ... 2.5 ml of sterile water and 1 ml of. 3% aqueous Triphenyl Tetrazolium Chloride ...
[61]
US Biofertilizer Market: new report - World Fertilizer
Nov 22, 2018 · The shelf-life of such biofertilizers is limited to 6 – 12 months in powder form. Companies mentioned: - Abhinav Biotech - Agrinos AS - Agro ...
[62]
4 Roadblocks to Biofertilizer Adoption - Lux Research
Oct 2, 2025 · Formulation stability, pH shifts, and exposure to UV or temperature extremes further reduce microbial viability before application. Unlike ...Missing: approval | Show results with:approval
[63]
A contribution to set a legal framework for biofertilisers
Jun 6, 2014 · In case of bacteria, the minimum count of viable cells is 5 × 107 cells per gram of solid carrier, or 1 × 108 cells per ml of liquid carrier.
[64]
Biofertilizers: An ecofriendly technology for nutrient recycling and ...
However, only methanogens are able to fix nitrogen among archaea. Different bacterial strains are able to carry out nitrogen fixation with different ...
[65]
Legume Seed Inoculants - CSU Extension - Colorado State University
Sep 1, 2014 · This is usually done by applying inoculum directly to the seed prior to planting, or by metering the inoculum into the seed furrow during ...
[66]
(PDF) Azotobacter: Nitrogen fixing Bio-fertilizer for Sustainable ...
Jan 14, 2021 · 1 kg of Azotobactor in 50-100 liters of water is good for seedling growth. It improves seedling growth, development and accelerates the growth.
[67]
Bio fertilizer Application in a Fertigation System - INIS-IAEA
Bio fertilizers contain live beneficial microorganisms that provide nutrients and other benefits to crops. At present, bio fertilizers can be found in solid ...
[68]
Effects of Seed-Applied Biofertilizers on Rhizosphere Biodiversity ...
Feb 25, 2020 · This study investigated the effects of three commercial biofertilizers on rhizosphere bacterial biomass, biodiversity and enzymatic activity, and on plant ...
[69]
A study of microbial diversity in a biofertilizer consortium | PLOS One
Aug 24, 2023 · This study examines the microbiome composition of a commercial biofertilizer known for its plant growth-promoting activity.
[70]
A Beginner's Guide to Using Biofertilizers Effectively | ROI Biologicals
Jan 2, 2025 · pH levels: Ensure the soil pH is within a range that supports microbial activity (usually 6-7.5). Organic matter content: Determine how much ...
[71]
The dual nature of plant growth-promoting bacteria: Benefits, risks ...
Environmental conditions, including soil pH, moisture levels, temperature, and oxygen availability, also affect bacterial activity. Additionally, plant species ...
[72]
[PDF] Effect of Storage Temperature, Duration and Types of Biofertilizer ...
Aug 22, 2016 · Moreover, it is note that the optimum temperature to maintain the vitality of the bacterial inoculum was 30oC. ... and/or biofertilizer for crop ...
[73]
Formulation challenges associated with microbial biofertilizers in ...
Sep 18, 2024 · Lack of effective formulation technologies that keep microbial inoculants viable during storage, transport and field application is considered ...
[74]
Diversifying crop rotation increases food production, reduces net ...
Jan 3, 2024 · Diversified crop rotations reduce net GHG emissions. The amounts of supplementary irrigation and fertilizers applied to each rotation varied ...
[75]
Bioorganic fertilizers from agricultural waste enhance rice growth ...
Mar 15, 2025 · Rice cultivation with saline soil has an average technical efficiency of just 73%, whereas with non-saline soil that figure might approach 80% ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[76]
The Colonization of Synthetic Microbial Communities Carried by Bio ...
... colonization into the rhizosphere soil (0.49% to 0.21%). Meanwhile, the colonization of bacterial strains into the bulk soil did not seem to be affected by ...
[77]
Biofertilizers Improve the Plant Growth, Yield, and Mineral ... - MDPI
Jul 31, 2023 · The CF (1/2) + BF treatment can yield as much as CF with 50% less usage of CF. These results are important due to the increase in chemical ...
[78]
Role of Microbial Biofertilizers in Boosting Crop Production
Mar 5, 2025 · Research by Embrapa (Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation) found: 15-30% yield increase in soybean and corn fields.
[79]
[PDF] Microbial Phosphatases in Sustainable Agriculture - RSIS International
Jul 16, 2025 · in recent years, can achieve significant cost reductions of $50-100 per hectare by incorporating microbial biofertilizers into their nutrient ...
[80]
[PDF] The Use of Biofertilizer by Smallholder Farmers and its Impact on ...
The results revealed that smallholder farmers who planted rhizobium-inoculated faba bean seed gained additional yield benefits of 79%, 66%, and 42% for faba ...
[81]
Biofertilizers Market Size, Share & Forecast Report, 2025-2034
The global biofertilizers market was estimated at USD 2.5 billion in 2024. The market is expected to grow from USD 2.7 billion in 2025 to USD 5.6 billion in ...
[82]
Organic inputs to reduce nitrogen export via leaching and runoff
Sep 18, 2025 · The replacement of mineral fertilizers with full organic fertilizer could decrease the nitrate leaching by more than 30% (Wei et al. 2021) . Xia ...
[83]
New method could significantly reduce agricultural greenhouse gas ...
May 30, 2024 · New research by the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU) and IIASA proposes using soil bacteria to cut greenhouse gas emissions from food production.
[84]
Enhancing Soil Health and Plant Growth through Microbial Fertilizers
Mar 18, 2024 · Studies have shown that the application of microbial fertilizers significantly increases the diversity of soil microbial communities and ...
[85]
Biofertilization increases soil organic carbon concentrations: results ...
Based on 59 studies and 267 observations, was found that biofertilizers significantly increased SOC concentration by an average of 0.44 g C kg −1 soil.
[86]
Biofertilizers: A sustainable strategy for enhancing physical ...
Oct 23, 2024 · Moreover, biofertilizers help to enhance soil physical properties (soil bulk density, soil moisture, soil temperature, and soil color), chemical ...
[87]
New EU rules prepare the ground for more use of organic and waste ...
Jul 15, 2022 · New EU rules will soon make it possible to market more organic and waste-based fertilisers in the EU.
[88]
Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by ...
May 8, 2014 · When biofertilizers are applied as seed or soil inoculants, they multiply and participate in nutrient cycling and benefit crop productivity [8].
[89]
Up to 52 % N fertilizer replaced by biofertilizer in lowland rice via ...
Feb 23, 2014 · In addition, we found that up to 45 % of the variability in biofertilizer performance is related to the amount and timing of N, P, and K ...
[90]
Rethinking Crop Nutrition in Times of Modern Microbiology - Frontiers
Feb 18, 2021 · The commercial history of biofertilizers dates back to 1895 using “Nitragin” by Nobbe and Hiltner with a laboratory culture of Rhizobium sp. ( ...
[91]
Legume-Rhizobium Strain Specificity Enhances Nutrition and ...
Rhizobium strains significantly enhanced nodulation, nitrogen fixation, nutrient uptake and soil nitrogen balance. Inoculation with NSFBR-12 and NSFBR-15 ...
[92]
Impact of sterilization and chemical fertilizer on the microbiota of oil ...
Apr 27, 2023 · Sterilized soil with a depleted microbial population adversely affected crop growth, which was exacerbated by fertilizer use. In the rhizosphere ...
[93]
The effect of oxygen concentration and temperature on nitrogenase ...
Jul 14, 2017 · The optimum temperature for nitrogenase activity in Fischerella was approximately 40 °C (Fig. 2). This was the case for N m and N d and ...
[94]
Archaea, bacteria and termite, nitrogen fixation and sustainable ...
May 5, 2021 · Certain bacteria and archaea are responsible for biological nitrogen fixation. Metabolic pathways usually are common between archaea and bacteria.
[95]
Advantages and Limitations of Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment ...
For hydrolyzing and acidogenic bacteria, the optimal pH ranges from 4.5 to 6.3 [113], whereas methane-producing Archaea prefer neutral conditions between 6.8 ...3.4. Organic Load Rate (olr) · 3.5. Microbial Community · 5. Reactors For Anaerobic...<|control11|><|separator|>
[96]
Microbial Fertilizer Market Size & Forecast [2033]
Sep 1, 2025 · "Lack of farmer awareness and technical know-how." In rural areas, over 56% of farmers remain unaware of microbial fertilizers or their benefits ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[97]
[PDF] Challenges and Opportunities in Biofertilizer Commercialization
Jan 2, 2024 · The commercialization of efficient microbial strains in biofertilizers play a pivotal role in commercial success, as they significantly enhance ...
[98]
Review Limitations of biofertilizers and their revitalization through ...
Sep 15, 2023 · Such as, majority of the farmers in developing country are of lower middle class cannot support the high cost of biofertilizers, so ...
[99]
The U.S. and EU Biostimulant Market: Progress, Challenges, and ...
“At the federal level, neither the EPA nor the USDA specifically define plant biostimulants nor have established regulations for their registration and ...Missing: barriers | Show results with:barriers
[100]
Biologicals Regulation: The Right Way - 3BarBio
Jul 10, 2023 · The Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 on fertilizing products defines biostimulants on a functional basis with four functional claims: “nutrient use ...
[101]
Biofertilizer Industry and Research Developments in China - NIH
May 24, 2025 · This review discusses the transition from chemical fertilizers to biofertilizers in China, highlighting the risks of chemical overuse, the booming ...
[102]
Training on Production of Biofertilizer in Nigeria - EBAFOSA
The objective of the training was to equip youth with skills in producing bio-fertilizer as a climate action solution to bring Ecosystems-based Adaptation (EBA) ...
[103]
[PDF] Future of Bio-fertilizers in Ethiopian agriculture
The 15 months Promoting Soil. Fertility Technologies through capacity building of Farmer. Training Centers in PASIDP target regions project aimed to enhance.
[104]
Opportunities and challenges of bio-based fertilizers utilization for ...
May 4, 2023 · The challenge of cost is not only in transportation but also in production. BBF production on a large scale will face high production costs, ...
[105]
Mind the Gap! The Urgent Need for Gender Equality in Agriculture
Mar 5, 2020 · Compared to men, however, women have access to only a fraction of the land, labour, credit, inputs such as fertilizers, agricultural training, ...
[106]
Genomic mechanisms of plant growth-promoting bacteria in the ...
CRISPR/Cas9 tools have been employed in crop plantation that requires water for their growth and cognition of significant genes to control drought stress ( ...
[107]
[PDF] Plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus megaterium ...
Aug 21, 2024 · Many plants achieve stress resistance through PGPR-mediated activation of various stress- responsive genes. Plants inoculated with PGPR under ...<|separator|>
[108]
Functional characterization of a novel plant growth-promoting ...
Aug 19, 2025 · Auxin-producing PGPR (e.g., Bacillus and Azotobacter) have been shown to significantly enhance crop yields and growth traits such as root and ...
[109]
Multi-Omics Approaches in Plant–Microbe Interactions Hold ... - MDPI
The rise of Omics approaches enables the investigation of microbial diversity and plant–microbe interactions across diverse ecological communities (Figure 3).
[110]
Omics-driven insights into plant growth-promoting microorganisms ...
Jul 18, 2025 · Omics-guided design of these consortia allows for functional complementarity, ecological robustness, and improved consistency across variable ...
[111]
Microalgae-based biofertilizers improve fertility and microbial ...
Dec 22, 2024 · Combining microalgae with agroforestry wastes as a biofertilizer is promising to improve the microbial community structure of the soil with continuous cropping.
[112]
Omics approaches in understanding the benefits of plant-microbe ...
This review synthesizes diverse microbial-plant interactions, showcasing the application of omics in understanding mechanisms.
[113]
Potential application of nanotechnology in formulating biofertilizers ...
Aug 24, 2025 · ... 2024 ... As sustainable agriculture gains momentum, nano-biofertilizers have emerged as a promising alternative to chemical fertilizers.
[114]
Next generation nanobioformulation: A fascinating field for smart ...
They are designed to encapsulate and protect active ingredients, including biological components, plant compounds, and plant growth regulators, to enhance their ...
[115]
Bacillus sp. and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi consortia enhance ...
Nov 20, 2021 · Consortia based on native plant growth–promoting bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi significantly improved the postharvest soil health ...Missing: blends | Show results with:blends
[116]
Integrating microbial consortia into biofertilizers for sustainable ...
Mar 10, 2025 · Benefits of microbial consortia include enhanced plant productivity, reduced environmental impact, soil health restoration and resilience to ...
[117]
Biofertilizers Market to Reach USD 5.02 Billion by 2030
Nov 1, 2023 · Biofertilizers Market to Reach USD 5.02 Billion by 2030 | Excusive Report by Fortune Business Insights™ ... Pune, India, Nov. 01, 2023 (GLOBE ...<|separator|>
[118]
Fresh Del Monte Announces Partnership to Produce Biofertilizers ...
Fresh Del Monte Announces Partnership to Produce Biofertilizers from Fruit Residues, Launching Innovative Plant in Kenya. May 14, 2024.Missing: waste | Show results with:waste
[119]
Microbial Biofertilizers to Bolster Food Security | ASM.org
Microbial biofertilizers improve agricultural yield, promote soil health and protect against plant pathogens.
[120]
Advances in the Development of Biofertilizers and Biostimulants ...
Mar 21, 2024 · These powders are easily miscible with water and can be suspended in a liquid carrier; their shelf life can exceed 18 months. [33,37,38]. Water- ...
[121]
Padilla, Marshall Introduce Bipartisan, Bicameral Legislation to Spur ...
May 30, 2025 · Oversight and regulatory standards for plant biostimulants, which could replace or reduce the use of synthetic pesticides and fertilizers ...
[122]
https://freshdelmonte.com/news/fresh-del-monte-produce-biofertilizers-fruit-residues/