Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Direct air capture

Direct air capture (DAC) is a technology that uses processes to extract CO₂ directly from ambient atmospheric air, separating it for permanent geological or into fuels and materials. Unlike point-source carbon capture, DAC targets the dilute CO₂ concentration in air—around 420 parts per million—requiring large volumes of air processing and for sorbent regeneration, typically via solid adsorbents or liquid solvents like . This flexibility allows siting near storage reservoirs, but thermodynamic constraints from the low of CO₂ impose minimum needs exceeding 1.5 GJ per ton of CO₂ captured, often met by heat or electricity. Pioneering facilities, including ' Orca plant in operational since 2021, have demonstrated commercial viability by capturing 4,000 tons of CO₂ annually through modular air contactors. Yet, current costs range from $400 to $1,000 per ton of CO₂, far above targets for widespread adoption, while scaling to gigaton levels faces material and demands that challenge optimistic climate models reliant on rapid deployment. Critics highlight that unproven assumptions about cost reductions and low-carbon availability risk overestimating DAC's role in offsetting emissions, potentially delaying emission cuts.

Fundamentals

Definition and Operating Principles

Direct air capture (DAC) refers to chemical and physical processes that extract carbon dioxide (CO₂) directly from ambient atmospheric air, independent of emission sources, for subsequent purification, compression, and either permanent geological storage or utilization in products. Unlike point-source capture, DAC operates on dilute CO₂ concentrations of approximately 420 parts per million (ppm) as of 2023, necessitating large-scale air processing to achieve meaningful removal volumes. The captured CO₂ can contribute to negative emissions when stored durably, though the technology's scalability depends on energy inputs, sorbent efficiency, and infrastructure costs. The core operating principle of DAC involves selective of CO₂ from air using engineered materials, followed by sorbent regeneration to yield a concentrated CO₂ stream. Ambient air is drawn into contactors—via fans or blowers—where it interacts with that exploit CO₂'s chemical reactivity, such as its acidity relative to and oxygen. is typically exothermic and driven by (chemical bonding) or (physical adsorption), binding CO₂ while allowing other gases to pass. Regeneration then desorbs the CO₂ through energy application, often (heating to 80–120°C), pressure swing, or moisture swing, producing a high-purity CO₂ output (90–99%) for and . This cyclic process requires renewable or low-carbon energy to minimize net emissions, with total energy demands ranging from 5–10 gigajoules per of CO₂ captured, primarily for air movement and regeneration due to the thermodynamic penalty of diluting CO₂ separation. DAC systems predominantly employ two sorbent classes: liquid solvents and solid materials. Liquid solvent systems, such as those using aqueous (KOH), contact air with an alkaline solution in large open ponds or packed towers, where CO₂ reacts to form or ions (e.g., 2KOH + CO₂ → K₂CO₃ + H₂O). Regeneration calcines the slurry at 900°C to release pure CO₂, recycling the solvent after pelletization and causticization steps; this approach, demonstrated by since 2015, leverages established industrial chemistry but incurs high thermal energy costs. Solid sorbent systems, conversely, pass air through modular filter beds coated with amine-functionalized materials (e.g., on silica supports), enabling adsorption at ambient conditions followed by lower-temperature regeneration (around 100°C) via steam or hot air; ' deployments since 2017 exemplify this, offering potential for distributed, lower-pressure operations but facing challenges in sorbent durability and scaling airflow. Both methods prioritize modular designs for deployment near storage sites, though solid systems often achieve higher selectivity and reduced compared to liquids.

Distinctions from Other Carbon Removal Approaches

Direct air capture (DAC) differs fundamentally from point-source (CCS) in that it extracts CO₂ from ambient atmospheric air at concentrations of approximately 420 parts per million, rather than from concentrated industrial flue gases containing 4-15% CO₂. This necessitates processing vastly larger volumes of air—up to 1,000 times more than point-source methods—resulting in higher energy demands primarily for air movement and sorbent regeneration, often estimated at 5-10 gigajoules per ton of CO₂ captured depending on the technology. Consequently, DAC enables deployment independent of emission hotspots, allowing facilities to be sited near renewable energy sources or storage sites, whereas point-source CCS is geographically constrained to large emitters like power plants or factories. In contrast to nature-based carbon removal methods such as or with (BECCS), DAC does not compete for land or rely on biological productivity, avoiding risks like land-use conflicts, , or variable sequestration rates influenced by climate and management practices. sequesters CO₂ through tree growth at rates typically below 5 tons per hectare annually but faces permanence challenges from fires, pests, or harvesting, with global potential limited by available estimated at 0.5-3 gigatons of CO₂ per year. BECCS, which combines with , similarly depends on sustainable biomass supply chains, projecting deployment limits of 3-5 gigatons annually due to feedstock constraints and indirect land-use emissions, whereas DAC's scalability hinges on and availability without such biophysical limits. Compared to mineral-based approaches like , which accelerates natural rock dissolution to form stable carbonates, DAC offers faster capture kinetics and direct atmospheric drawdown without dispersing materials across ecosystems, potentially reducing ecological side effects such as ocean alkalinity shifts or soil pH alterations. deploys crushed silicates like at rates of 10-50 tons per to achieve 1-4 tons of CO₂ removal annually per site, but verification of net removal is complicated by variable rates and co-emissions from and grinding, contrasting with DAC's modular, controllable yielding pure CO₂ streams amenable to precise and permanent . Overall, while DAC's higher upfront technological barriers enable negative emissions agnostic to emission timing—capturing legacy CO₂ accumulated over decades—these distinctions underscore its role as a complementary rather than substitutive technology in diversified removal portfolios.

Historical Development

Conceptual Origins and Early Research

The concept of direct air capture (DAC) originated in 1999 when Klaus Lackner, then at , proposed extracting directly from ambient air as a strategy for carbon management, arguing that the uniform mixing of CO2 in the atmosphere enables capture at optimal sites rather than being constrained to emission point sources. This approach addressed limitations in traditional carbon capture and sequestration, which requires proximity to large emitters, by leveraging air's accessibility for scalable removal independent of industrial infrastructure. Lackner's thermodynamic analysis highlighted the feasibility despite CO2's low ambient concentration (around 400 ppm), estimating that engineered sorbents could overcome dilution challenges through selective binding and regeneration cycles, though at higher energy costs than concentrated capture. Early research in the focused on proving technical viability through lab-scale experiments with chemical s. Lackner and collaborators explored anion-exchange resins and other materials capable of reversibly binding CO2 at dilute levels, demonstrating initial capture efficiencies in controlled setups. By 2007, Lackner, now at , partnered with Technologies to achieve the first successful demonstration of air-based CO2 capture, using plastic membranes coated with sorbents to extract and release pure CO2 streams in a benchtop prototype. These efforts validated the core principle but underscored engineering hurdles, such as minimizing energy for air movement and sorbent regeneration, with preliminary costs projected far exceeding point-source methods due to the need to process vast air volumes. Subsequent theoretical advancements refined DAC's role in climate mitigation, with Lackner emphasizing in 2011 that air capture could serve as an "" against storage leaks or legacy emissions from mobile sources, prioritizing development to enable negative emissions at scales. Peer-reviewed reviews by the mid-2010s cataloged progress in chemistries, including amine-functionalized solids and liquid solvents like hydroxides, confirming that while conceptually sound, early systems required innovations in materials and process integration to approach economic viability. This foundational phase established DAC as a complementary tool to emission reductions, grounded in first-principles assessments of and rather than optimistic projections.

Commercialization and Initial Deployments

commissioned the world's first commercial direct air capture (DAC) plant in , , in May 2017, capturing approximately 900 metric tons of CO₂ annually using modular solid sorbent technology powered by from a nearby facility. This deployment marked the initial shift from laboratory prototypes to revenue-generating operations, with CO₂ sold for use in greenhouses and beverages, though at high costs exceeding $600 per ton. In September 2021, Climeworks launched the Orca plant in Hellisheidi, Iceland, the first large-scale DAC facility, designed to remove 4,000 metric tons of CO₂ per year through 72 modular collectors utilizing renewable geothermal energy for capture and mineralization via injection into basaltic rock formations. Orca's operations demonstrated feasibility for permanent storage but highlighted scalability limits, with actual removal rates initially below targets due to optimization challenges and energy demands. By 2024, Climeworks had expanded to additional small-scale sites, contributing to a global total of 27 commissioned DAC plants capturing under 0.01 million tons of CO₂ annually. Carbon Engineering, acquired by Occidental Petroleum in 2023, advanced commercialization through pilot demonstrations starting in 2015 at its Squamish, facility, which processed air using liquid solvent contactors to yield pipeline-grade CO₂. This led to plans for the Stratos facility in , under subsidiary 1PointFive, with initiated in 2022 and commercial operations slated for late 2025 at a capacity of 500,000 metric tons per year, leveraging and saline storage. Stratos represents the largest initial deployment to date, financed partly through carbon credit sales and tax incentives, though economic viability depends on costs dropping below $100 per ton amid volatile policy support. Other early efforts include a zeolite-based DAC plant commissioned in in 2022 by Verdian, aiming for 2,000 tons per year by 2025, and Mission Zero Technologies' integrated DAC-to-materials facility opened in , , in May 2025, processing hundreds of tons annually into building products. These deployments underscore DAC's progression from niche pilots to semi-commercial scales, constrained by high capital expenditures—often $500–1,000 per ton of capacity—and reliance on subsidies, with total global capacity remaining below 0.02 million tons per year as of mid-2025.

Expansion and Key Milestones Post-2020

In 2021, commissioned the direct air capture (DAC) facility in , marking the largest operational DAC plant at the time with a nominal capacity of 4,000 metric tons of CO₂ removed annually using solid sorbent technology powered by . This deployment represented a scale-up from prior pilot efforts, utilizing modular collector units to achieve commercial viability, though total global DAC capacity remained under 0.01 million metric tons per year. The sector expanded through corporate acquisitions and large-scale project announcements in 2023. agreed in August 2023 to acquire for $1.1 billion, finalizing the deal in November, integrating liquid solvent-based DAC technology into its low-carbon ventures subsidiary, 1PointFive. This move supported plans for facilities like STRATOS in , designed for 500,000 metric tons of annual CO₂ capture—the largest planned DAC project globally— with construction advancing toward operations by late 2025 and Class VI injection permits secured in April 2025. Policy-driven funding accelerated deployments, with the U.S. Department of Energy selecting two regional DAC hubs in August 2023 for up to $1.2 billion under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, targeting hubs in and to demonstrate integrated capture, storage, and utilization at megaton scales. Additional phases announced up to $1.8 billion in December 2024 to support ecosystem , though implementation faced uncertainties including potential funding reviews in 2025. Further milestones included ' Mammoth plant in reaching initial operations in May 2024 with a 36,000 metric tons per year capacity—nine times Orca's scale—expanding to full modular deployment by year-end. By late 2024, the DAC industry encompassed over 180 companies, five operational commercial plants, and 27 in development, with pipeline capacity projected to reach 15 million metric tons annually, though operational removals stayed below 0.06 million metric tons in 2024 amid high energy demands and costs exceeding $600 per ton. Global capacity grew from negligible levels in 2020 to approximately 59,000 metric tons in 2024, with projections for 569,000 metric tons in 2025 driven by these initiatives.

Technological Approaches

Solid Sorbent-Based Systems

Solid sorbent-based systems utilize modular contactors containing solid materials, such as amine-impregnated polymers or , to selectively adsorb CO2 from atmospheric air at ambient conditions. Large fans draw air across the sorbent beds, where CO2 binds chemically or physically, achieving capture rates influenced by factors like airflow velocity and sorbent selectivity. Regeneration occurs via temperature-vacuum swing adsorption, applying heat of 80-120°C—often from renewable sources—and reduced pressure to desorb concentrated CO2 streams (typically 95-99% purity), which are then compressed for storage or use. These systems offer advantages over liquid solvent alternatives, including lower regeneration energy demands due to milder desorption conditions (versus 900°C for solutions), reduced risks, and compatibility with low-temperature renewables like geothermal or , potentially lowering operational emissions and costs in suitable locations. Solid also enable compact, scalable designs via standardized containers, facilitating rapid deployment and maintenance. However, they face drawbacks such as slower adsorption compared to liquids, necessitating oversized air handlers to process dilute CO2 (around 420 ppm), and sorbent from , , or oxidative impurities, which can reduce over thousands of cycles. Climeworks, a leading developer, employs proprietary amine-based solid sorbents in its DAC plants, with facilities like (, operational since 2021) capturing up to 4,000 tonnes of CO2 annually via geothermal-powered regeneration. The company's plant, commissioned in 2024 with a of 36,000 tonnes per year, achieved only 105 tonnes captured in its first year, highlighting challenges in scaling efficiency and operational reliability amid variable environmental conditions. Recent advancements include Gen 3 sorbents tested with Svante's structured adsorbents from May 2024 to January 2025, aiming for higher throughput and halved costs per tonne through improved . Performance metrics vary by design, with optimized systems achieving use of 1.5-2.5 per CO2 captured, dominated by regeneration (60-80% of total) and air handling. Lifecycle assessments indicate net-negative emissions when powered renewably, though upfront manufacturing emissions from production (e.g., amines derived from ) require offsets. Cost estimates for current deployments range $600-1,000 per CO2, driven by capital for contactors (40-50%) and (20-30%), with projections falling to $200-400 per at gigatonne-scale via economies of learning and innovations like durable zeolites. Ongoing research emphasizes enhancements for selectivity and , with DOE-supported studies exploring temperature-pressure swings to minimize penalties. Despite promise, empirical from pilots underscore that deployment lags behind theoretical potentials, constrained by and site-specific factors like impacting adsorption .

Liquid Solvent-Based Systems

Liquid solvent-based direct air capture (L-DAC) systems utilize aqueous alkaline solutions, such as (KOH) or (NaOH), to chemically absorb CO2 from ambient air through contactors that facilitate large volumes over the liquid. The absorption reaction forms or ions, binding CO2 at dilute atmospheric concentrations of approximately 420 ppm. Regeneration involves heating the solution to release CO2, often via pelletization of the carbonate salt followed by high-temperature above 900°C to produce pure CO2 and regenerate the hydroxide solvent in a closed-loop process. This approach enables continuous operation and scalability for industrial deployment, distinguishing it from batch-oriented solid sorbent methods. Carbon Engineering's technology, employing aqueous KOH, demonstrated feasibility in a operational since 2015, capturing up to 1 of CO2 per day through air-sorbent contact towers and subsequent electrochemical or thermal regeneration steps. The process requires significant energy input, with thermal demands for regeneration comprising over 80% of total needs, primarily low-grade heat for initial separation and high-grade heat for , alongside electricity for fans and pumps. Performance metrics vary with site-specific conditions; modeling shows energy consumption ranging from 6-10 per tonne of CO2 captured, influenced by ambient and , which affect and regeneration . Aqueous KOH systems achieve CO2 purity exceeding 99% post-capture, suitable for or utilization, but face challenges including solvent degradation, of equipment, and losses necessitating replenishment. Optimization studies indicate potential energy reductions through integration and advanced , targeting costs below $100 per tonne CO2 as scale increases to megatonne capacities. Alternative liquid solvents, such as amines or , have been explored in research but remain less mature for DAC compared to hydroxides due to lower selectivity in dilute air and higher volatility losses. Hydroxide-based L-DAC benefits from thermodynamic favorability in alkaline conditions but incurs dominated by large structures and high-temperature reactors, with operational expenses tied to sourcing. Deployment examples include Carbon Engineering's planned facilities in , aiming for 1 million tonnes CO2 removal annually by integrating with low-cost for regeneration.

Alternative and Experimental Techniques

Electrochemical direct air capture (EDAC) employs electrical potential to facilitate CO2 adsorption and desorption, often through pH modulation or reactions, offering potential advantages in and integration with intermittent renewables compared to thermal regeneration methods. In one approach, neutral red as a redox mediator in with enables capture at low voltages, achieving up to 80% CO2 recovery in lab-scale tests conducted in 2023. Another variant uses bipolar membrane electrodialysis for regenerating sorbents like L-arginine, demonstrated in 2025 experiments to operate at energy inputs below 2 /tonne CO2 under optimized conditions. Hybrid flow cells combining air exposure with electrochemical stripping have shown capture rates of 0.1-1 mmol CO2/m²/hour in 2025 prototypes, though scalability remains limited by electrode durability and overpotentials exceeding 1 V. These methods address thermodynamic barriers via non-thermal driving forces but face challenges from side reactions like oxygen reduction, which can reduce Faradaic efficiency to under 90% in ambient conditions. Membrane-based DAC leverages selective to concentrate CO2 from dilute air streams, potentially simplifying processes by avoiding bulk liquid or solid handling. Polymeric or facilitated transport , such as those with carriers, have demonstrated CO2 of 100-500 GPU and selectivities over N2 of 20-50 in 2023-2024 studies, though air's low CO2 (400 ) necessitates multi-stage cascades with , elevating use to 1-2 /. A two-stage configuration modeled in 2025 integrated high-flux with sweep gases, achieving 90% recovery at pressures below 2 bar, but from and aerosols poses operational hurdles. Economic analyses indicate costs must drop below $50/ for viability, contrasting with current prototypes exceeding $200/ due to material over 10,000 hours. While promising for decentralized deployment, empirical highlight inferior versus systems, with pilot-scale fluxes rarely surpassing 10^{-6} //s. Emerging techniques integrate mineralization or humidity swings for capture and storage. Heirloom's process accelerates natural limestone carbonation by cycling CO2-laden air through reactive beds, mineralizing up to 1000 tonnes CO2/year per module as of 2023 deployments, with binding energies derived from exothermic reactions exceeding 100 kJ/mol. A 2023 Princeton prototype uses humidity-responsive sorbents like PEI on silica, capturing CO2 during dry adsorption and releasing via moisture-induced swings, achieving 85% efficiency at ambient temperatures without external heat. Biotech enhancements, such as carbonic anhydrase enzymes in DAC contactors, catalyze hydration to boost kinetics by factors of 10^6, tested in 2025 lab setups to lower energy penalties by 20-30% over uncatalyzed baselines. These approaches prioritize permanence—mineral products stable for millennia—but empirical scaling reveals dependency on abundant reactants, with costs projected at $200-600/tonne absent subsidies. Mobile DAC variants, conceptualized in 2024 reviews, adapt electrochemical or membrane units for vehicle integration, capturing 1-10 kg CO2/day per unit, though fleet-wide viability hinges on battery synergies unproven beyond simulations. Overall, these techniques remain pre-commercial, constrained by material longevity and process yields below 1 tonne CO2/m³ reactor volume annually.

Economic Dimensions

Current Cost Structures and Drivers

Current operational costs for direct air capture (DAC) facilities range from $500 to $1,200 per metric ton of CO2 removed, reflecting variations in technology type, plant scale, and energy sourcing. ' solid sorbent systems, as deployed in its plant in (operational since 2021 with a of 4 ktCO2/year), incur costs around $600 per ton for bulk operations, though end-user pricing reaches $1,200 per ton. Liquid solvent-based approaches, exemplified by Carbon Engineering's processes, estimate at approximately $341 per ton (with a 90% of $226–$544). These figures represent levelized costs, incorporating both capital and operational expenses, and remain significantly higher than point-source carbon capture due to the dilute atmospheric CO2 concentration of about ppm. Cost structures break down into capital expenditures (CAPEX), which comprise 60-80% of total costs and include air contactors, or materials, and regeneration units, and operational expenditures (OPEX), dominated by for fanning air volumes and /electrochemical desorption. demands typically require 5-10 per ton CO2 for solid systems and 6-9 for liquid systems, with for fans adding 1-2 /ton; this can constitute up to 50% of long-term OPEX, exacerbated by the thermodynamic penalty of extracting CO2 from ultra-dilute sources. or degradation necessitates periodic replacement, contributing 10-20% to OPEX, while and labor add further burdens in remote or early-stage deployments. Primary cost drivers include the engineering challenges of processing vast air flows—requiring energy-intensive fans and large surface areas for contact—and limited from current small-to-medium facilities (under 10 ktCO2/year). High CAPEX per ton captured stems from custom modular designs not yet mass-produced, while OPEX sensitivity to energy prices underscores the need for with cheap renewables or heat; for example, geothermal integration at ' sites reduces effective energy costs but does not eliminate the baseline intensity. Material costs for durable sorbents or alkaline solvents, such as amines or hydroxides, remain elevated without maturation, and regulatory incentives like the U.S. 45Q of $180 per ton for DAC provide partial offsets but do not address underlying technical hurdles. As of 2025, absent breakthroughs in efficiency or scaling to levels, costs persist above $300-500 per ton for optimized systems.

Pathways to Cost Reduction

Cost reductions in direct air capture (DAC) are essential to make the technology economically viable for large-scale deployment, with current levelized costs ranging from $250 to $600 per tonne of CO2 captured, targeting sub-$150 per tonne through multifaceted strategies. Key pathways include technological innovations that enhance process efficiency, particularly in sorbent and solvent performance to minimize requirements, which constitute 20-50% of operational costs. Advances in solid and liquid , such as temperature or vacuum swing adsorption, aim to lower regeneration from current levels of 5-10 per tonne CO2 to under 2 through optimized cycle designs and novel materials. Economies of scale and learning effects from increased deployment are projected to drive reductions, with modular plant designs enabling serial manufacturing and site-agnostic replication to achieve 20-50% cost declines as cumulative capacity exceeds gigatonne scales. Historical analogies to solar photovoltaics suggest learning rates of 10-20% per doubling of capacity, potentially halving DAC costs by 2030-2040 if deployment accelerates via policy incentives like the U.S. 45Q . Integration with low-cost sources represents another critical lever, as DAC's thermochemical processes demand heat and electricity; co-location with renewables or heat could reduce expenses by 30-50%, with electricity costs targeted below $20/MWh through oversupply periods or dedicated farms. Public-private R&D investments, such as those outlined in the U.S. Department of 's Multi-Year Program Plan, prioritize hybrid systems combining DAC with geothermal or baseload to stabilize and cheapen inputs, fostering a virtuous cycle of deployment and refinement. Despite these pathways, uncertainties persist in durability and supply chains, necessitating sustained to avoid plateaus above $100 per .

Financing Models and Market Dynamics

Public funding has been instrumental in advancing direct air capture (DAC) technologies, with the allocating $3.5 billion through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law of 2021 to establish four regional DAC hubs aimed at capturing and storing millions of tons of CO2 annually. This includes grants for demonstration projects, such as those under the Department of Energy's Regional DAC Hubs Program, which prioritize integration with carbon storage infrastructure. Tax incentives like the 45Q credit, expanded under the of 2022, provide up to $180 per ton of CO2 captured and stored, subsidizing operational costs for qualifying facilities. Internationally, policies such as Japan's 2023 CCUS roadmap target 6-12 million tons of annual capture by 2030, incorporating DAC with public investments. Private investment complements government support, with over $2.3 billion in equity funding directed to DAC companies from 2021 through mid-2025, excluding grants and mergers. has fueled early-stage scaling, exemplified by Aircapture's $50 million in June 2025 for modular DAC systems and CarbonCapture's $80 million infusion in 2024 to refine its hardware. However, investor enthusiasm has waned amid high capital requirements and unproven , with U.S. DAC startups raising only $58 million in venture funding during the first quarter of 2025, a decline signaling caution over long payback periods. Carbon markets provide a revenue mechanism, enabling DAC operators to sell removal to corporations pursuing net-zero commitments; between 2022 and mid-2025, 2.47 million of such were contracted, doubling in volume during the first half of 2025 alone. These voluntary purchases, often at premiums exceeding $600 per , bridge the gap between high capture costs (currently $250-600 per ) and economic viability, though reliance on emerging standards raises risks of . Market dynamics reflect a shift from hype to pragmatic deployment by 2025, with the global DAC sector valued at $97.56 million in 2024 and projected to grow to $1.7 billion by 2030 at a of over 60%, driven by policy mandates and corporate demand for verifiable removals. Supply remains constrained by energy-intensive processes and site-specific needs for renewables and storage, fostering competition among leaders like and Occidental Petroleum's acquisitions. Challenges include regulatory uncertainty and the need for blended financing—combining grants, credits, and offtake agreements—to de-risk large-scale projects, as pure private capital alone struggles with upfront costs exceeding billions for gigaton-scale ambitions.
Major DAC Funding Examples (2024-2025)AmountSourcePurpose
Regional DAC Hubs Program$3.5BU.S. DOE (2021 allocation, ongoing)Hub development and integration
Aircapture Series A$50M VC (June 2025)Modular system scaling
CarbonCapture investment$80M (2024) refinement
DAC credit contracts2.47M tCO2Voluntary markets (2022-H1 2025) for operations

Deployments and Industry Landscape

Prominent Companies and Their Innovations

, a firm founded in 2009, has pioneered modular direct air capture units using solid sorbent filters coated with amines that adsorb CO₂ at ambient conditions and release it via temperature-vacuum swing adsorption powered by low-grade heat and electricity. Their third-generation technology, demonstrated in 2025, achieves a 50% reduction in energy use compared to prior versions, targeting costs below $100 per ton of CO₂ removed through optimized sorbent regeneration and integration. operates facilities like the 4,000-tonne-per-year plant in (commissioned 2021) and the larger plant (2024), emphasizing permanent storage via mineralization in formations. Occidental Petroleum's subsidiary 1PointFive, incorporating Carbon Engineering's technology acquired in 2023 for $1.1 billion, employs a liquid solvent process where large fans draw air over a solution of (KOH) to form pellets, followed by thermal regeneration via at 900°C to yield pure CO₂. This air-liquid design scales to gigatonne levels by leveraging heat and for energy, with innovations including pellet handling to minimize and energy losses. The Stratos in , under construction since 2022, aims for 500,000 tonnes annually by 2025, integrating CO₂ for or storage. In 2025, Occidental acquired to blend electrochemical regeneration innovations, potentially reducing energy needs further. Heirloom Carbon Technologies utilizes a low-temperature, moisture-swing process with crushed (Ca(OH)₂) that passively captures CO₂ to form , regenerated via mild heating (around 900°C) in a cyclic system mimicking accelerated mineral weathering. This approach claims energy use as low as 1.5 GJ per tonne of CO₂ due to reliance on abundant, cheap and integration with renewable electricity, with pilot tests in 2023 capturing over 1,000 tonnes. Heirloom's first commercial plant in , planned for 2025, targets 30,000 tonnes yearly, emphasizing cost reductions to $100-200 per tonne through material abundance and minimal water use. Global Thermostat, rebranded under Zero Carbon Systems following a acquisition, deploys solid sorbent monoliths impregnated with proprietary amines for continuous adsorption under vacuum swing, using low-temperature (80-100°C) regeneration to achieve claimed efficiencies of 5-8 GJ per . Their containerized T-Series units, commissioned in , enable modular deployment capturing up to 1,000 annually per unit, with innovations in low-pressure drop airflow and rapid cycling to suit off-grid renewables. A 2023 demonstration in highlighted scalability for industrial co-location, though commercial volumes remain pilot-scale as of 2025.

Operational and Planned Facilities

As of late 2025, operational direct air capture (DAC) facilities remain limited in scale and number, with global capacity totaling approximately 0.01 million tonnes of CO₂ removed per year across 27 commissioned plants, most of which are small-scale pilots or demonstrations. The largest operational facility is ' plant in , which began operations in May 2024 and captures up to 36,000 tonnes of CO₂ annually using solid sorbent technology powered by , with captured CO₂ stored geologically via . ' earlier plant, also in and operational since September 2021, removes 4,000 tonnes per year under similar conditions, marking the first industrial-scale DAC deployment. These Icelandic facilities leverage abundant and suitable for storage, but their combined output represents a fraction of the gigatonne-scale removals needed for climate mitigation. In , Deep Sky's Alpha facility in , , launched operations in October 2025 as the region's first integrated DAC and storage site, in partnership with Skyrenu for subsurface injection, though specific capacity details remain modest compared to ' projects. Other operational pilots include early systems by companies like and Verdox, but these are pre-commercial and contribute minimally to total capacity, often focused on technology validation rather than scaled removal.
FacilityOperatorLocationCapacity (tonnes CO₂/year)Operational Since
Mammoth36,000May 2024
Orca4,000September 2021
AlphaDeep Sky, Undisclosed (pilot-scale)October 2025
Planned facilities emphasize larger-scale deployments, with over 130 projects in various stages of development worldwide, though only about 15 are advanced or under construction. Occidental Petroleum's STRATOS project in —developed via its 1PointFive subsidiary using Carbon Engineering's liquid solvent technology—represents the most ambitious near-term effort, targeting 500,000 tonnes per year and advancing toward commercial operations by late 2025, supported by a $550 million investment from and Class VI injection permits for permanent storage. This facility integrates with regional oil infrastructure for potential CO₂ utilization or , highlighting DAC's prospective role in despite debates over net emissions benefits. Further plans include ' Cypress facility in , aimed at U.S. expansion with modular solid sorbent modules, and Occidental's South Texas DAC Hub on the King Ranch, envisioning up to 30 million tonnes annually across multiple plants, with initial phases potentially funded by partnerships like ADNOC's up to $500 million commitment. A proposed wind-powered DAC site in , the first to rely primarily on on-site renewables, is in planning to address energy intensity concerns. These projects face hurdles in securing low-cost energy, regulatory approvals, and verifiable permanence of storage, with scalability dependent on policy incentives like U.S. 45Q tax credits.

Global Distribution and Regional Initiatives

Direct air capture (DAC) facilities are concentrated in and , where policy support, , and for CO2 storage enable early deployments. As of 2025, global operational capacity stands at approximately 0.01 million tonnes of CO2 per year across 27 commissioned plants, with the majority being small-scale pilots or demonstrations. Planned expansions include over 130 facilities, potentially increasing capacity significantly, though most remain in development phases. hosts 36 operational plants, while has 37, underscoring regional leadership driven by government incentives and private investment. In the United States, the Department of Energy's Regional DAC Hubs program coordinates multi-project clusters to scale deployment, targeting four hubs each removing at least 1 million metric tons of CO2 annually through integration with permanent storage or utilization pathways. Federal funding exceeding $3 billion supports these efforts, including feasibility studies and awards for 16 projects under Funding Opportunity Announcement 2735. Key hubs include the California DAC Hub, focusing on statewide networks of DAC facilities with storage, and the Colorado DAC Hub, emphasizing partnerships among technology providers, energy sources, and CO2 transport. The Stratos facility in Texas, developed by 1PointFive (a subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum), represents a milestone with planned operations starting in late 2025 at 500,000 tonnes per year. These initiatives leverage state-specific advantages like renewable energy access and geological formations suitable for sequestration. Canada advances DAC through fiscal incentives, including an investment tax credit and a $10 million government purchasing program for credits. The country benefits from abundant hydroelectric power and sedimentary basins for storage, hosting operational plants and supporting companies like , acquired by in 2023 for large-scale peltas. Initiatives focus on integrating DAC with existing oil and gas infrastructure for , positioning Canada as a North American leader with multiple facilities in provinces like and . European efforts emphasize modular, low-energy DAC suited to diverse climates, with operational examples including ' plant in (4,000 tonnes per year since 2021) and the under-construction facility there (36,000 tonnes per year expected online in 2024). Poland launched its first DAC pilot in in September 2025, testing carbon removal amid broader innovation funding tied to net-zero goals. Projects in the and explore co-location with renewables and offshore storage, though commercial scaling trails due to higher energy costs and regulatory hurdles. The 's research programs, such as those analyzed in parliamentary studies, prioritize DAC's role in residual emissions abatement. Outside these core regions, initiatives are nascent. is testing DAC pilots adapted to high-humidity environments, leveraging geothermal resources and positioning the country for equatorial-scale potential. supports exploratory projects with A$65 million in funding for capture technologies, though DAC-specific deployments remain limited. These emerging efforts highlight site-specific adaptations but lack the policy and investment density of leading regions.

Resource and Environmental Footprint

Energy Demands and Integration with Renewables

Direct air capture (DAC) technologies demand substantial energy, dominated by thermal inputs for sorbent or solvent regeneration and electrical power for air movement and CO2 compression. Solid sorbent systems, such as those employing amine-functionalized materials, typically require low- to medium-temperature (80–120°C) for regeneration, while liquid solvent approaches using or similar bases necessitate higher temperatures (up to 900°C for in carbonate-based cycles). Electrical energy for fans to process dilute atmospheric CO2 (around 420 ppm) constitutes a significant , with estimates ranging from 300 to 900 kWh per of CO2 captured, reflecting the need to handle vast air volumes—up to 2,500 cubic meters per . Total practical in operational systems reaches 2–3 MWh per , including compression to supercritical states for transport and storage, far exceeding the thermodynamic minimum of 0.5–0.76 (140–210 kWh) per dictated by the of CO2 separation from air. These demands pose challenges for net CO2 removal, as sourcing energy from fossil fuels could negate captured amounts through associated emissions; thus, low-carbon integration is imperative for environmental viability. DAC's flexibility in siting enables pairing with renewables, particularly where baseload or dispatchable options align with process requirements. ' facility in , operational since May 2024 and targeting 36,000 tonnes of annual capture, relies on geothermal heat from the adjacent Hellisheidi plant for regeneration, supplemented by renewable , achieving near-zero operational emissions in a region with abundant subsurface resources. Similar geothermal co-location has been modeled for sites like California's Brawley field, leveraging existing infrastructure to minimize grid strain. Variable renewables like solar photovoltaics offer scalability in arid, high-insolation areas but require or designs to match with continuous DAC operations. Techno-economic analyses indicate solar-integrated DAC could reduce costs in sun-rich locales while absorbing excess to mitigate curtailment, potentially deploying at gigatonne scales if electrolyzers provide heat via . Wind integration faces similar variability hurdles, though offshore or wind-DAC concepts are under exploration. Geothermal remains optimal for thermal needs due to its reliability, with studies showing up to 50% higher abatement rates when paired with DAC compared to standalone deployment. Overall, renewable hybridization could lower lifecycle emissions to under 0.1 tonnes CO2 equivalent per captured, contingent on site-specific matching and gains.

Water, Materials, and Land Requirements

Direct air capture (DAC) technologies exhibit varying water requirements depending on the capture medium employed. Liquid-solvent systems, such as those utilizing hydroxide-based sorbents like or , demand for processes including solvent regeneration, pellet formation in steps, and cooling, with operational water consumption typically ranging from 1 to 10 cubic meters per metric ton of CO₂ captured, influenced by local and rates. Solid sorbent approaches, which rely on amine-functionalized materials or metal-organic frameworks, generally incur lower direct use—often limited to air preprocessing for control or equipment cleaning—but may still require indirect for generation if not fully powered by renewables. Emerging moisture-swing adsorption variants leverage ambient to regenerate , potentially minimizing or eliminating net consumption in humid environments. While absolute demands appear modest relative to biomass-based removal methods (e.g., 30–100 times lower than per ton CO₂), local scarcity could amplify impacts at scale, particularly for evaporative cooling in arid regions. Material inputs for DAC primarily involve sorbents and auxiliary chemicals, which degrade over repeated cycles due to , impurities, or chemical reactions, necessitating replacement and contributing to operational costs. In liquid-solvent configurations, alkaline sorbents react with CO₂ to form carbonates, requiring or (CaCO₃) for regeneration via , with material consumption estimated at 1–2 metric tons of limestone equivalent per metric ton of CO₂ captured, alongside production of and potential waste streams. Solid sorbents, such as supported amines or ion-exchange resins, exhibit cycle lives of hundreds to thousands but still demand periodic replenishment, with degradation rates varying by design—e.g., quaternary ammonium-based materials showing promise for under ambient conditions. into durable alternatives like electrochemical or charged sorbents aims to reduce these inputs, though current systems from companies like and highlight ongoing challenges in sorbent stability and supply chain demands for rare earths or specialty polymers in advanced prototypes. Land requirements for DAC remain among the lowest of carbon dioxide removal technologies, enabling deployment in industrial or remote areas without competing heavily for arable space. Modular solid-sorbent facilities, such as those operational by , occupy footprints of approximately 0.2 square kilometers to capture 1 million metric tons of CO₂ annually when paired with thermal regeneration sources. Scaling to gigatonne levels could require 300–3,300 square kilometers globally—equivalent to 0.02–0.2% of U.S. land area—far less than the thousands of square kilometers needed for equivalent with or . Liquid-solvent plants may demand slightly more space for larger contactors and regeneration units, but overall, DAC's compact design mitigates land-use pressures, though siting near geological storage or utilization hubs adds logistical considerations. Environmental critiques note potential indirect land impacts from sorbent precursors, but empirical data underscores DAC's in this domain compared to diffuse biological alternatives.

Full Lifecycle Emissions and Net Benefits

Full lifecycle emissions of direct air capture (DAC) systems encompass from or , plant construction and decommissioning, inputs for air contact and CO2 regeneration, and downstream transport and storage of captured CO2. These assessments, conducted via life cycle analysis (LCA), reveal that operational use dominates emissions, typically accounting for 70-90% of the total footprint, while upfront manufacturing contributes 5-20% depending on material choices like amine-based liquids or solid sorbents. Peer-reviewed LCAs indicate that DAC achieves net negative emissions only when powered by low-carbon sources such as renewables or ; for instance, a solid sorbent system like ' temperature-vacuum swing adsorption process yields a net CO2 removal efficiency exceeding 90% when using geothermal and , emitting less than 0.1 s CO2 equivalent per captured after accounting for all stages. In contrast, reliance on fossil-heavy grids can result in gross emissions offsetting 20-50% or more of captured CO2, potentially rendering the process carbon neutral or positive. Liquid solvent systems, such as those developed by using , show baseline emissions of 0.51 g CO2 equivalent per g CO2 captured when integrated with for regeneration (with capture), though this drops below 0.1 g/g with full from renewables. Net benefits hinge on energy sourcing and system efficiency, with studies estimating 0.8-0.95 s net CO2 removed per tonne captured under optimal low-carbon conditions, enabling durable atmospheric drawdown when paired with geological . However, material-intensive components like modular contactors and high-temperature calciners introduce from and (e.g., 1-5% of lifecycle total from and ), which scale with deployment volume and may amplify if supply chains remain fossil-dependent. Sensitivity analyses underscore that inefficiencies in regeneration—often 10-20% losses—erode net removal, emphasizing the need for site-specific renewable integration to maximize causal impact on atmospheric CO2 levels.

Limitations and Critiques

Technical Scalability Constraints

The principal technical constraint on direct air capture (DAC) scalability stems from the dilute concentration of CO2 in ambient air, approximately 420 parts per million by volume as of 2023, necessitating the processing of vast air volumes to isolate meaningful quantities of CO2. To capture one of CO2, a DAC system must contact roughly 200,000 to 500,000 cubic meters of air, depending on process efficiency and local conditions, far exceeding the air throughput required for point-source capture where CO2 concentrations reach 10-15% in gases. This dilution imposes thermodynamic limits, with the minimum work of separation estimated at 0.5 gigajoules per of CO2 under ideal conditions, though real processes consume 5-10 times more due to irreversibilities in and regeneration steps. Actual energy demands include substantial for fans—up to 0.3-0.5 GJ/ for air movement alone—and for sorbent or regeneration, often 1.5-2.5 GJ/ in liquid systems like those using . Engineering bottlenecks further hinder large-scale deployment. Air contactors, essential for maximizing CO2-sorbent interaction, must span hundreds of meters in dimension to achieve , subjecting structures to high wind loads and requiring robust materials like corrosion-resistant steels or advanced composites. Solid sorbent systems, such as those deployed by , cycle materials through adsorption-desorption loops where degradation rates of 1-5% per cycle necessitate frequent replacements, amplifying material throughput at gigatonne scales—potentially millions of tonnes annually for global deployment. Heat and mass transfer inefficiencies compound this, as low partial pressures limit adsorption kinetics, demanding oversized equipment and precise temperature control, which current prototypes like (4,000 tonnes CO2/year capacity) demonstrate only at modest outputs. Deployment modeling reveals systemic limits on ramp-up rates. Integrated assessment models constrain DAC growth to 20% annually without breakthroughs in modularization or supply chains, as fabricating millions of units would strain global for specialized components like large-scale fans and pelletized sorbents. At projected scales of 1-10 gigatonnes per year by , DAC could demand 10-60% of non-electric global energy, primarily low-temperature , exposing vulnerabilities to intermittent renewables and grid stability. Empirical data from operational facilities underscore these hurdles: no DAC plant exceeds 10,000 tonnes/year as of 2024, with scaling beyond this requiring unproven innovations in continuous-flow reactors and automated to mitigate from or inefficiencies. While modular designs offer pathways to parallelism, causal analysis indicates that parallel deployment multiplies land and demands without proportionally reducing per-unit technical risks, such as uneven airflow distribution in open-air systems.

Economic Viability Challenges

Direct air capture (DAC) technologies currently incur costs estimated at $500–$1,000 per metric ton of CO₂ captured, significantly higher than point-source carbon capture methods, which range from $50–$100 per ton. These elevated expenses stem primarily from the dilute concentration of atmospheric CO₂ (approximately 420 parts per million), necessitating the processing of vast air volumes—up to 10,000 times more than streams—to extract equivalent CO₂ quantities, alongside high capital expenditures for specialized sorbents, fans, and regeneration systems. Operational energy demands further exacerbate costs, requiring 5–10 gigajoules per ton of CO₂ in and , often sourced from renewables to minimize emissions, which adds to infrastructure needs. Cost reduction projections, such as those from the (IEA), anticipate declines to under $100 per ton with scaled deployment and innovation, potentially reaching $194–$230 per ton for nth-of-a-kind plants capturing 1 million tons annually. However, independent analyses critique these targets as overly optimistic, citing a 2024 study estimating $230–$540 per ton by 2050 under realistic scaling assumptions, far exceeding the $100 benchmark often invoked but derived from idealized, low-energy scenarios that overlook thermodynamic limits and supply chain constraints for materials like specialized amines or modular units. Peer-reviewed assessments of solid DAC variants report levelized costs of $1,200–$40,400 per ton of sorbent lifetime, underscoring dependency on unproven learning curves and that have not materialized in early deployments. Economic viability hinges on external supports like the U.S. 45Q , offering up to $180 per ton for DAC with , yet even subsidized projects struggle with profitability absent carbon prices exceeding $300–$600 per ton, rendering large-scale adoption (e.g., gigatons annually) improbable without mandates or breakthroughs in low-cost renewables and durability. The global DAC market remains nascent, valued at $0.07 billion in 2024 and projected to reach $0.11 billion in 2025, reflecting limited commercial traction despite investments, as high upfront capital—often exceeding $500 million for megaton-scale facilities—deters widespread financing amid uncertain revenue from voluntary credits or utilization pathways like synthetic fuels. Critics argue that diverting funds to DAC risks opportunity costs, as cheaper alternatives like or achieve removal at $10–$100 per ton, though DAC's appeal lies in its site flexibility and verifiability, qualities unproven at teraton scales required for net-zero scenarios.

Ideological and Practical Objections

Critics argue that direct air capture (DAC) introduces a by potentially delaying or reducing incentives for immediate emissions cuts, as the promise of future carbon removal could justify continued reliance on . This concern, articulated by climate scientists in 2016, posits that betting on large-scale negative emissions technologies like DAC risks a "fool's game" where efforts weaken under the illusion of technological salvation. A 2023 analysis in WIREs Climate Change similarly warns of "mitigation deterrence," where over-reliance on removal offsets undermines aggressive decarbonization policies, with from policy modeling showing reduced support for when removal options are emphasized. Such hazards are exacerbated by industry involvement, which some researchers link to prolonged high-emission pathways. DAC has also faced accusations of enabling greenwashing, particularly when funded or promoted by oil companies seeking to extend the viability of their assets without fundamental changes. For instance, partnerships between DAC startups and firms are critiqued for providing "political cover" to emitters, allowing them to claim environmental progress while offsetting rather than eliminating , as noted in a 2023 Scientific American article highlighting deceptive carbon capture narratives. Environmental advocates, including Stanford's Mark Jacobson, describe DAC as a "greenwashing technology" that diverts attention from proven mitigation strategies like and renewables, with limited evidence of net atmospheric benefits when lifecycle emissions are accounted for. These claims are substantiated by observations of industry , where DAC is positioned as a complement to rather than a replacement, potentially locking in emissions-intensive infrastructure. On ethical grounds, DAC deployment raises concerns about and , as large-scale facilities could impose localized burdens on communities near sites, including air and water pollution risks from chemical processes or waste byproducts. A 2024 Nature Communications Earth & Environment study found conditional community support for DAC hinges on addressing health implications, with strong opposition emerging where perceived risks outweigh benefits, such as in regions already facing industrial externalities. International law analyses further highlight potential violations of rights to a healthy if DAC scales without equitable siting, disproportionately affecting marginalized groups through unmitigated trade-offs like resource extraction for sorbents. Practically, achieving social license requires transparent governance to avoid "problem-shifting," where global CO2 benefits come at the expense of local ecosystems or lands, as evidenced by contested permitting processes in early projects. Beyond ideology, practical objections center on DAC's vulnerability to misuse in frameworks that prioritize offsets over absolute reductions, potentially entrenching inefficient systems. Critics note that without stringent safeguards, DAC credits could subsidize high-emission sectors like or , delaying transitions to zero-carbon alternatives, per a 2023 economic assessment quoted in industry commentary. Deployment demand rigorous assessment of full-system impacts, including dependencies on rare materials, which could amplify geopolitical tensions or if not managed, underscoring the need for first-mover projects to demonstrate verifiable net negatives amid from peer-reviewed projections questioning optimistic scaling assumptions.

Policy Framework and Strategic Role

Incentives and Regulatory Support

The has implemented key financial incentives for direct air capture (DAC) through the Section 45Q tax credit, originally established in 2008 and significantly expanded under the of 2022, which increased the credit to up to $180 per metric ton of CO₂ captured and permanently stored via DAC facilities meeting prevailing wage and requirements, or $130 per metric ton for utilization in qualified products. This credit applies to CO₂ captured from ambient air using equipment placed in service after 2022, aiming to offset the high capital costs of DAC deployment estimated at over $500 per ton without subsidies. The U.S. Department of Energy further supports DAC through the Regional Direct Air Capture Hubs program, announcing up to $1.8 billion in funding in October 2024 for mid- and large-scale commercial facilities to accelerate technology maturation and infrastructure development. In the European Union, regulatory frameworks emphasize industrial carbon management, with the outlining actions in 2023 to assess cross-border CO₂ transport and storage needs, facilitating DAC integration into net-zero strategies. Financial support includes approximately €657 million allocated through programs like for (CDR) technologies, including DAC, though much of this funding targets research and demonstration rather than full-scale commercialization. EU policies, such as the 2023 Carbon Removal Certification Framework, provide guidelines for verifying DAC permanence and additionality but lack dedicated large-scale tax credits comparable to the U.S. 45Q, leading analysts to note insufficient incentives for rapid deployment absent further fiscal measures. Internationally, offers up to 60% investment tax credits for DAC projects under its Strategic Innovation Fund, leveraging abundant hydroelectric power and geological storage sites to attract facilities like those developed by . The highlights the need for targeted government grants and public procurement to bridge DAC's cost gap, with early policies in regions like California's providing additional revenue streams for captured CO₂. Regulatory support varies, with U.S. and EU efforts addressing permitting for CO₂ injection and transport, though challenges persist in harmonizing standards for DAC-sourced CO₂ quality and long-term storage verification. These incentives reflect a policy consensus on DAC's potential role in residual emissions abatement, yet their effectiveness depends on sustained funding amid fiscal pressures, as evidenced by the U.S. 45Q's preservation in 2025 budget proposals despite broader scrutiny.

Integration into Broader Emission Strategies

Direct air capture (DAC) serves as a component of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) portfolios within comprehensive emission reduction frameworks, addressing residual atmospheric CO₂ after primary mitigation measures in hard-to-decarbonize sectors such as cement production, aviation, and agriculture. In modeled net-zero pathways, DAC contributes to balancing unavoidable emissions, with the International Energy Agency's Net Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario projecting its annual removal capacity to reach 980 million metric tons of CO₂ by mid-century, integrated alongside bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and other CDR approaches. This deployment assumes coupling with low-carbon energy sources to minimize DAC's own emissions footprint, emphasizing its role as a supplement to aggressive sector-specific reductions rather than a standalone solution. Integration occurs through policy mechanisms that embed DAC in national and international carbon management plans, such as the U.S. Department of Energy's strategies, which position technologies including DAC as complements to emissions cuts via incentives like s and regional hubs. Carbon markets further enable by assigning value to verified removals, though high costs—currently exceeding $600 per ton of CO₂—constrain widespread adoption without sustained subsidies or pricing signals exceeding $100 per ton. For instance, frameworks like the U.S. 45Q and emerging voluntary removal purchasing challenges incentivize DAC alongside , prioritizing lifecycle-verified net removals to avoid over-reliance on any single technology. Critically, DAC's strategic viability hinges on its deployment being subordinated to emissions abatement hierarchies, as unchecked expansion could divert resources from cheaper mitigation options like and efficiency gains. International assessments underscore that while DAC enhances flexibility in achieving Paris Agreement-aligned pathways, its limited current scale—under 0.01 million tons annually as of 2023—necessitates parallel advancements in , storage, and utilization to realize net benefits. Effective integration thus requires robust accounting standards to distinguish removals from avoidance, preventing where DAC offsets delay urgent cuts.

Prospects for Large-Scale Deployment

![Cost of CO2 capture using direct air capture][float-right] As of 2025, direct air capture (DAC) remains at early commercial stages, with operational facilities capturing less than 0.01 Mt CO₂ annually globally, far below the gigaton-scale removals projected for net-zero pathways by 2050. ' plant in , operational since May 2024 and designed for up to 36 kt CO₂ per year, captured only 105 tonnes in its first year, highlighting initial ramp-up challenges despite modular scaling from prior facility. Companies like target megaton-scale capacity by 2030 through iterative plant expansions, aiming for gigaton levels by 2050 via standardized modules and supply chain maturation. In ambitious scenarios aligned with 1.5°C goals, DAC could remove 85 Mt CO₂ by 2030 and up to 980 Mt by 2050, representing 5-10% of required to offset residual emissions, contingent on accelerated deployment from current near-zero levels. The U.S. Department of Energy's 2024 Notice of Intent for $1.8 billion in funding supports mid- and large-scale commercial demonstrations, potentially enabling hub-based deployments integrating DAC with geologic storage and low-carbon energy. Proponents argue that pairing DAC with or renewables addresses energy demands, with studies suggesting nuclear co-location could enable terawatt-scale removals economically. Cost reductions are pivotal, with current DAC expenses at $600-1,000 per tonne CO₂, projected to fall below $1,000/t by 2030, under $500/t by 2040, and approaching $100-200/t by 2050 through learning curves, , and process optimizations like advanced sorbents. Carbon markets and removal credits could drive demand, with voluntary purchases already funding early projects, though sustained policy incentives are needed for viability below $100/t to compete with alternatives like . Scaling to gigatons will necessitate robust CO₂ / infrastructure and workforce development, as emphasized in U.S. analyses, amid risks of over-reliance if technological hurdles persist.

References

  1. [1]
    DOE Explains...Direct Air Capture - Department of Energy
    Direct air capture technology is a form of carbon dioxide (CO2) removal that takes CO2 from ambient, or still, air. The separated CO2 can then be permanently ...
  2. [2]
    Direct Air Capture - Energy System - IEA
    Direct air capture (DAC) technologies extract CO2 directly from the atmosphere at any location, unlike carbon capture which is generally carried out at the ...
  3. [3]
    Current status and pillars of direct air capture technologies - PMC
    In this review, we present the current status of commercial DAC technologies and elucidate the five pillars of technology including capture technologies.
  4. [4]
    Overcoming the Entropy Penalty of Direct Air Capture for Efficient ...
    Jan 23, 2023 · In this work, the challenge of removing gigatonnes of CO 2 is described via the scale of effort and the thermodynamics of collecting and reducing this diffuse ...Introduction · Results and Discussion · Conclusions · Supporting InformationMissing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  5. [5]
    Unrealistic energy and materials requirement for direct air capture in ...
    Jul 3, 2020 · Our analysis further showed that the energy and materials requirements for DACC are unrealistic even when the most promising technologies are employed.<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    World's first commercial direct air capture plant - Climeworks
    Direct air capture plant near Zurich filters 900 tonnes of CO₂ from atmosphere to supply to greenhouse, replacing fossil industrial CO₂.Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  7. [7]
    Global Assessment of Direct Air Capture Costs - IEAGHG
    Dec 1, 2021 · This study aims to improve the current DACCS cost-performance evidence base by synthesising data from the recent literature and technology developers.
  8. [8]
    Direct air capture capacity configuration and cost allocation based ...
    Nov 15, 2024 · Currently, the total cost of DAC is estimated to range from $400–1000 per ton of CO2 captured [22]. Assuming adsorbents are regenerated using ...
  9. [9]
    Reality check on technologies to remove carbon dioxide from the air
    Nov 20, 2024 · Study finds many climate-stabilization plans are based on questionable assumptions about the future cost and deployment of “direct air capture.”
  10. [10]
    Direct Capture of CO2 from Ambient Air | Chemical Reviews
    Aug 25, 2016 · JournalsPeer-reviewed chemistry research; SubjectsSpecific research ... Because CO2 mixes rapidly in the atm., air capture could operate anywhere ...
  11. [11]
    Direct Air Capture - Negative Emissions Technologies ... - NCBI - NIH
    Process Description​​ Like liquid solvent systems, solid sorbent direct air capture systems have two main processes: adsorption and desorption that operate ...
  12. [12]
    A review of direct air capture (DAC): scaling up commercial ...
    Apr 16, 2021 · This review article focuses on two distinctive, commercial DAC processes to bind with CO 2 : solid sorbents and liquid solvents.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  13. [13]
    Direct Air Capture Technology - Carbon Engineering
    Our Direct Air Capture (DAC) technology does this by pulling in atmospheric air, then through a series of chemical reactions, extracts the carbon dioxide (CO2) ...Missing: principles Climeworks
  14. [14]
    Direct air capture technology: innovations in CO₂ removal
    Climeworks is the global leader in carbon removal solutions ... High-quality is in our DNA. 1st commercial Direct Air Capture (DAC) and storage facilities and ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  15. [15]
    Point-source carbon capture and direct air capture – A technology ...
    Sep 1, 2025 · This review provides an overview of today's two most studied CO 2 capture and removal technologies: point-source CO 2 capture and direct air capture.
  16. [16]
    Comparing approaches for carbon dioxide removal - ScienceDirect
    Oct 19, 2022 · Direct air capture (DAC) was proposed from the late 1990s. The ... Permanent sinks might include geological sequestration (e.g., BECCS or DACCS) ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Carbon Dioxide Removal
    CDR methods differ in terms of removal process, timescale of carbon storage, technological maturity, mitigation potential, cost, co-benefits, adverse side- ...Missing: distinctions | Show results with:distinctions
  18. [18]
    Carbon Dioxide Extraction from Air: Is It An Option? - OSTI.gov
    Carbon dioxide extraction directly from atmosphere would allow carbon management without the need for a completely changed infrastructure.
  19. [19]
    Direct air capture: A little history - Advanced Science News
    Sep 7, 2022 · In 1999, Klaus Lackner, a chemical engineer at Arizona State University, was recognized as the first to suggest that capturing carbon ...
  20. [20]
    The thermodynamics of direct air capture of carbon dioxide
    Feb 1, 2013 · Lackner et al. in 1999 [1], [2] already proposed an analysis that considers a single sorbent-based system as more adequate for comparing CO2 ...
  21. [21]
    First Successful Demonstration of Carbon Dioxide Air Capture ...
    Apr 24, 2007 · ... Klaus Lackner from Columbia University have achieved the successful demonstration of a bold new technology to capture carbon from the air. The “ ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    The urgency of the development of CO2 capture from ambient air
    Air capture of CO 2 could act as insurance against CO 2 leaking from storage and furthermore may provide an option for dealing with emissions from mobile ...
  23. [23]
    The reality of deploying direct air capture in the field - Climeworks
    Climeworks' Orca plant has long been the world's only active commercial carbon removal project based on direct air capture with permanent geological storage.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Direct Air Capture: The Rapidly Expanding Landscape
    Nov 1, 2024 · 1 Climeworks, “Climeworks makes history with world's first commercial direct air capture plant,” May 31, 2017, https://climeworks.com/press ...
  25. [25]
    Climeworks launches Orca: the world's largest DAC+S plant
    Orca is a first-of-its-kind plant that translates the vision of industrial-scale direct air capture and storage into reality.
  26. [26]
    Orca is Climeworks' large-scale carbon dioxide removal plant
    We launched Orca, the world's first and largest direct air capture and storage plant, making carbon dioxide removal on large-scale a reality.
  27. [27]
    Ector County DAC - STRATOS - 1PointFive
    It is designed to capture up to 500,000 tonnes of CO2 per year and is expected to be commercially operational in 2025.
  28. [28]
    Occidental, 1PointFive to Begin Construction of World's Largest ...
    Aug 25, 2022 · The world's largest Direct Air Capture plant will be built in Texas, capturing up to 500,000 metric tons of CO2 per year, with a start-up ...
  29. [29]
    Direct Air Capture: 6 Things To Know | World Resources Institute
    Sep 2, 2025 · DAC is theoretically highly scalable and can be coupled with permanent CO2 storage. It's also relatively easy to quantify the amount of CO2 ...Missing: controversies thermodynamics
  30. [30]
    Mission Zero Technologies opens new direct air capture plant in ...
    May 2, 2025 · Today we opened our direct air capture plant in Norfolk, the world's first fully integrated DAC-to-building materials production demonstration.
  31. [31]
    Navigating the Stages of Commercialization to Deploy Direct Air ...
    Jun 16, 2023 · The latest report from the Bipartisan Policy Center's DAC Advisory Council provides a comprehensive overview of the commercial landscape for DAC startups.
  32. [32]
    Construction of Climeworks' DAC+S Orca plant
    Orca, once complete, will have a nominal capture capacity of 4'000 tons of CO₂ per year, making it the largest direct air capture and storage plant to date.
  33. [33]
    Occidental Enters into Agreement to Acquire Direct Air Capture ... - Oxy
    Aug 15, 2023 · This transaction is expected to close before the end of 2023, subject to Canadian court reviews, Canadian and U.S. regulatory approvals and ...
  34. [34]
    Occidental buys carbon air capture tech firm for $1.1 billion - Reuters
    Aug 15, 2023 · U.S. oil and gas producer Occidental Petroleum on Tuesday agreed to pay $1.1 billion for technology supplier Carbon Engineering Ltd to help ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  35. [35]
    Occidental and 1PointFive Secure Class VI Permits for STRATOS ...
    Apr 7, 2025 · “The permits are a catalyst to unlock value from carbon dioxide and advance Direct Air Capture technology as a solution to help organizations ...
  36. [36]
    DAC Hubs announcement - Carbon Capture Coalition
    Aug 11, 2023 · Through this announcement, DOE designates the recipients up to $1.2 billion of the $3.5 billion made available by the BIL to develop the process ...
  37. [37]
    OCED Announces up to $1.8 Billion in New Funding for ...
    Dec 19, 2024 · As part of the Regional DAC Hubs program, this funding will help support an ecosystem of projects designed to provide DAC technology and project ...
  38. [38]
    Climeworks opens world's largest plant to extract CO2 from air in ...
    May 8, 2024 · The Mammoth DAC plant has a capacity to capture 36,000 metric tons of CO2 a year and will be fully complete by the end of 2024. It is ...
  39. [39]
    The Current State of Direct Air Capture - AlliedOffsets
    Mar 21, 2025 · Global DAC capacity is projected to rise by 873%, from 59 ktCO2/yr in 2024 to 569 ktCO2/yr in 2025, driven by the anticipated launch of 1 ...
  40. [40]
    Optimal Design and Operation of Solid Sorbent Direct Air Capture ...
    Aug 9, 2022 · We found that DAC performance is optimal when the process can adjust the operating variables according to the weather profile and when CO 2 can be produced ...
  41. [41]
    Carbon Removal & Storage - Project Drawdown®
    Sep 18, 2025 · Liquid-DAC requires temperatures up to about 900 °C (1,652 °F), while solid-DAC requires temperatures of only about 100 °C (212 °F). Because the ...
  42. [42]
    Recent advances and challenges in solid sorbents for CO2 capture
    This review offers an extensive assessment of recent progress in solid sorbent technology, outlining the enhancement of material characteristics, ...
  43. [43]
    The Mammoth Failure of Direct Air Capture | The Future is Electric
    Sep 17, 2025 · In 2024, Climeworks' direct air capture (DAC) Mammoth plant in Iceland captured just 105 tonnes of carbon dioxide. That's not per day, not per ...
  44. [44]
    Real-world testing proves Climeworks' Gen 3 efficiency
    Running from May 2024 to January 2025, Climeworks has completed the first test phase of Svante's structured adsorbent technology at its large-scale test ...Missing: solid process
  45. [45]
    NETL Explores Sorbent-Based Direct Air Capture Systems for the ...
    Aug 3, 2022 · A case study conducted by the US Department of Energy's (DOE) NETL examined the performance and cost of different sorbent-based direct air capture (DAC) system ...
  46. [46]
    Technical, economic and lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions ...
    This study presents a comprehensive assessment of five solid sorbents under different technology scenarios to determine the design, operations, cost and ...
  47. [47]
    Considering technology characteristics to project future costs of ...
    Mar 1, 2024 · At 1 Gt-CO2/year cumulative capacity, we project DACCS costs at $341/tCO2 ($226–$544 at 90% confidence) for liquid solvent DACCS, $374/tCO2 ($ ...Estimating Three Dac... · Probabilistic Daccs Cost... · Experimental Procedures
  48. [48]
    Liquid solvent direct air capture's cost and carbon dioxide removal ...
    Oct 19, 2024 · We build an open-source model of a liquid solvent direct air capture technology and analyze its capture performance as a function of hourly varying ambient ...
  49. [49]
    NETL Case Study Explores Solvent-Based Direct Air Capture ...
    Nov 3, 2022 · One DAC tool in our box is solvent-based carbon capture, which uses liquid solvents to capture atmospheric CO2 through chemical reaction ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] 1 Direct Air Capture of CO2 Using Solvents Radu Custelcean ...
    Jun 12, 2023 · Carbon Engineering developed a pilot DAC plant based on aqueous KOH solvent that has been operated at a scale of 1 ton CO2 captured per day ...
  51. [51]
    The impact of climate on solvent-based direct air capture systems
    Nov 1, 2022 · Liquid DAC systems require both high-temperature heat and electricity, with heat accounting for over 80 % of the energy demand. In systems ...
  52. [52]
    The performance of solvent-based direct air capture across ...
    Apr 28, 2024 · This study develops a process-level model of a liquid-solvent DAC system and couples it to a 20-year dataset of temperature and humidity conditions.Abstract · Introduction · Methods and materials · Discussion of results
  53. [53]
    Simulation of carbon dioxide direct air capture plant using potassium ...
    This plant can capture approximately 1.1 Mt-CO 2 annually with a purity of 99 mol%. Optimization of the system can reduce energy use and raise energy recovery.
  54. [54]
    Direct Air Capture of CO 2 Using Solvents - PubMed
    Feb 18, 2022 · This review highlights one of the two main approaches to DAC based on aqueous solvents. The discussion focuses on different aspects of DAC with solvents.<|separator|>
  55. [55]
    Direct Air capture (DAC) deployment: A review of the industrial ...
    Jan 5, 2024 · DAC deployment faces challenges including small-scale pilots, a large TRL jump, material supply issues, and limited facility capacity compared ...
  56. [56]
    Direct Air Capture and Storage of CO2 - Carbon Engineering
    Carbon Engineering's liquid-based approach to Direct Air Capture uses closed-loop chemistry in a continuous operation–meaning we can reuse materials in the ...Missing: principles Climeworks
  57. [57]
    Electrochemical direct air capture of CO2 using neutral red as ...
    Jan 19, 2023 · We demonstrate electrochemical direct air capture using neutral red as a redox-active material in an aqueous solution enabled by the inclusion of nicotinamide ...
  58. [58]
    A Novel Approach to Electrochemical Direct Air Capture Using ...
    Jul 21, 2025 · CO 2 capture using an l-arginine solution as the sorbent, combined with its regeneration via bipolar membrane electrodialysis (BPMED), is adapted to direct air ...
  59. [59]
    Direct air capture of CO2 in an electrochemical hybrid flow cell with ...
    Aug 22, 2025 · Direct air capture (DAC), the process of capturing CO2 directly from the atmosphere, is an area of rapidly growing activity for mitigating ...
  60. [60]
    Assessment of the Potential of Electrochemical Steps in Direct Air ...
    Aug 5, 2024 · Direct air capture (DAC) technologies are proposed to reduce the atmospheric CO2 concentration to mitigate climate change and simultaneously ...Introduction · Methods · Results · Supporting Information
  61. [61]
    A new strategy for membrane-based direct air capture - Nature
    Oct 15, 2020 · The main purpose of DAC is to reduce the CO2 concentration in the air by removing historical emissions and to offset the emissions that are ...
  62. [62]
    Membrane Separation Technology in Direct Air Capture - MDPI
    Membrane technology can be considered a promising DAC approach since it provides several advantages, eg, lower energy and operational costs, less environmental ...
  63. [63]
    Connecting Material Characteristics with System Properties for ... - NIH
    Apr 10, 2025 · This paper presents a process modeling approach for a two-staged membrane-based direct air capture (m-DAC) process, considering material characteristics, ...<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    Process Operability Analysis of Membrane-Based Direct Air Capture ...
    This study investigates the feasibility of using membranes as direct air capture (DAC) technology to extract CO 2 from atmospheric air to produce low-purity CO ...Introduction · Methods · Results and Discussions · Supporting Information
  65. [65]
    Direct air capture by membranes | MRS Bulletin
    May 5, 2022 · In this article, the potential of membrane technologies as DAC is discussed and future technology target is proposed.
  66. [66]
    Heirloom
    Heirloom uses limestone to permanently remove CO2 from the air, accelerating natural carbon mineralization, and is a leading Direct Air Capture company.
  67. [67]
    Engineers use moisture to pull carbon dioxide out of the air
    Mar 14, 2024 · A way to capture and release carbon dioxide from the atmosphere by simply changing the surrounding humidity.
  68. [68]
    Biotechnology in direct air capture, enhanced weathering, and ...
    Feb 2, 2025 · The GHGR technologies of focus are (1) the potential for the enzyme carbonic anhydrase to catalyze CO2 exchange in direct air capture; (2) the ...
  69. [69]
    What is Carbon Mineralization? | World Resources Institute
    Jun 22, 2023 · Carbon mineralization is a process that naturally occurs over hundreds or thousands of years in which certain minerals inside rocks react with atmospheric CO2 ...
  70. [70]
    Critical review on mobile direct air capture: Concept expansion ...
    Mar 6, 2024 · This review introduces the innovative concept of mobile DAC, expanding DAC's scope and addressing development challenges.
  71. [71]
    A comprehensive review on direct air carbon capture (DAC ...
    Dec 15, 2024 · DAC technology is one of the most important technologies to achieve negative CO2 emissions, essentially reducing CO2 concentration in the air.
  72. [72]
    Prospects for Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage: Costs, Scale ...
    Nov 30, 2023 · Project developer Carbon Capture has said it expects to hit $250 per ton by 2030 and $150/ton within a decade. The evidence supporting such ...
  73. [73]
    Co-assessment of costs and environmental impacts for off-grid direct ...
    Jan 16, 2024 · Costs are $755 and $877 for gross and net removal of 1tCO2. The cost difference is explained by a carbon removal efficiency (CRE) of 88%. Of 16 ...
  74. [74]
    The Real Cost of Big DAC - by Susan Su - Climate Money - Substack
    Mar 13, 2024 · $341 per ton for liquid solvent DAC systems like Carbon Engineering's approach, with a range of $226–$544/tCO2 at 90% confidence ; $374 per ton ...
  75. [75]
    Out of Thin Air: The Cost of Scaling Direct Air Capture | BloombergNEF
    Aug 6, 2025 · Direct air capture is costly. Modular plants, optimized processes and improved efficiency may cut costs.
  76. [76]
    Direct air capture price explained: Breaking down the cost of ...
    Mar 12, 2025 · Direct air capture price is defined by a huge range of variables. Take a closer look at the economics behind each tonne of atmospheric CO2.
  77. [77]
    [PDF] The One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 - Carbon Capture Coalition
    Jul 3, 2025 · and power facilities ($85 per metric ton) and one value for direct air capture (DAC) projects ($180 per metric ton), regardless of the end ...
  78. [78]
    Direct Air Capture 2022 – Analysis - IEA
    Apr 1, 2022 · Direct air capture plays an important and growing role in net zero pathways. Capturing CO2 directly from the air and permanently storing it ...
  79. [79]
    A policy roadmap for negative emissions using direct air capture
    Apr 6, 2021 · First, DAC is currently very expensive, with cost estimates ranging from between $100 and $600 to potentially as high as $1000/ton of carbon ...Policies For Climate Leaders · Renewables And Cost Leverage · Direct Air Capture And...
  80. [80]
    The cost of direct air capture and storage can be reduced via ...
    Jul 21, 2023 · Currently, the only commercial plants in the world are operated by Climeworks. They have quoted costs or prices of $500–600 t-CO2−1 in 2019 and ...
  81. [81]
    Characterizing the Effects of Policy Instruments on Cost and ...
    Jun 19, 2025 · This study evaluates how different policy approaches impact the costs and deployment of Direct Air Capture (DAC) technology. By combining energy ...
  82. [82]
    How to get direct air capture costs to under $150 per ton
    Aug 9, 2023 · We believe that reducing DAC costs to $150 per ton of CO2 or below is achievable, but getting there will be a stretch.
  83. [83]
    An inter-model assessment of the role of direct air capture in deep ...
    Jul 22, 2019 · This allows a reduction of the overall cost of capture, as energy needs appear to be one of the main cost components for DACCS plants. The main ...
  84. [84]
    Executive summary – Direct Air Capture 2022 – Analysis - IEA
    Six priorities for direct air capture deployment​​ This will require increased public and private support to reduce costs, improve technologies and build the ...
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Carbon Dioxide Removal Multi-Year Program Plan
    2.1 Direct Air Capture (DAC) ... cost reduction as technologies mature.24. To support continued innovation and cost reduction, FECM and NETL are ...
  86. [86]
    Regional Direct Air Capture Hubs - Department of Energy
    OCED's DAC Hubs Program will develop four domestic direct air capture hubs. Each will demonstrate a DAC technology or suite of technologies at a commercial ...Missing: 2023 | Show results with:2023
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Direct Air Capture: Investment Snapshot - Bipartisan Policy Center
    Ways to advance direct air capture: Implementation and potential expansion of 45Q tax credits for carbon capture; Greater federal research and development (via ...
  88. [88]
    Direct Air Capture Market Snapshot | 2025 - CDR.fyi
    Oct 16, 2025 · A total of 2.47 million tonnes of DAC credits have been contracted between 2022 and 2025-H1, with the first two quarters of 2025 having doubled ...
  89. [89]
    DAC Technology Sees $80 Million Investment in US-Based ...
    Mar 13, 2024 · US-based CarbonCapture has received an $80 million investment to further develop its direct air capture carbon (DAC) technology.Missing: dynamics | Show results with:dynamics
  90. [90]
    Why Investors are Souring on Direct Air Capture - Bloomberg.com
    May 1, 2025 · US-based startups developing direct air capture (DAC) received about $58 million from venture capitalists in the first three months of 2025, a ...Missing: grants | Show results with:grants
  91. [91]
    Direct Air Capture in 2025: The End of Hype, the Start of Realism
    Jun 30, 2025 · Pilot plants deployed in 2025 are typically small (hundreds to low thousands of tonnes), but average project sizes are expected to increase ...
  92. [92]
    Direct Air Capture Market Size, Trends | Industry Report 2030
    The global direct air capture market size was estimated at USD 97.56 million in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 1,699.33 million by 2030, growing at a CAGR ...Missing: dynamics | Show results with:dynamics
  93. [93]
    (new) Direct Air Capture Market 2023–2025 - EnkiAI
    Aug 25, 2025 · (new) Direct Air Capture Market 2023–2025: From Hype to ... cost reduction, suggesting that DAC might remain more expensive than hoped.
  94. [94]
    Climeworks Achieves 50% Energy Reduction With Its Gen 3 DAC Tech
    May 15, 2025 · Leading direct air capture (DAC) developer Climeworks has achieved a major breakthrough with its Gen 3 technology, reducing the energy use by 50% in large- ...
  95. [95]
    Climeworks direct air capture plant Capricorn
    The facility consists of 18 CO₂ collectors that together capture several hundred tons of carbon dioxide from the air every year. We applied a modular design to ...
  96. [96]
    Occidental Buys Holocene, Marking Its Second DAC Technology ...
    Apr 17, 2025 · The purchase of Holocene and its innovative DAC technology will enable Occidental to combine this solution with the one created by Carbon ...
  97. [97]
    The Companies Leading the Charge in Direct Air Capture
    Mar 3, 2025 · 1. Climeworks: Pioneering Large-Scale Carbon Removal · 2. Carbon Engineering: Scaling Up Direct Air Capture · 3. Heirloom: Using Natural Processes ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  98. [98]
    News — Zero Carbon Systems
    May 22, 2024 · Global Thermostat's Direct Air Capture technology uses a proprietary solid sorbent embedded on a monolith, coupled with a low temperature vacuum ...
  99. [99]
    Global Thermostat commissions first containerized T-Series system ...
    Feb 6, 2024 · DAC is highly scalable and has many advantages as a Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) solution: it enables permanent sequestration, is directly ...
  100. [100]
    Global Thermostat Launches One of the World's Largest DAC Units
    Apr 6, 2023 · Global Thermostat's DAC unit is eligible for the tax credits by meeting its minimum requirements with a removal capacity of one thousand tons ...
  101. [101]
    Top 20 Direct Air Capture Companies In 2025 - Carbon Herald
    May 5, 2023 · Our list of 20 direct air capture companies represents the top players in the sector with many more expected to enter the space.
  102. [102]
    Occidental and BlackRock Form Joint Venture to Develop Stratos ...
    Nov 7, 2023 · BlackRock (NYSE: BLK) will invest $550 million on behalf of clients in the development of STRATOS, the world's largest Direct Air Capture (DAC) facility, in ...
  103. [103]
    Oxy's $1.3B Texas carbon capture facility on track to​ launch this year
    Sep 12, 2025 · Oxy says Stratos is the world's largest DAC facility. It's designed to pull 500,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide from the air and either store ...
  104. [104]
    Why Swiss carbon-removal start-up Climeworks faces serious ...
    May 22, 2025 · Why is Climeworks downsizing? ... The start-up operates two DAC plants in Iceland (Orca and Mammoth) and plans a third (Cypress) in Louisiana, US.
  105. [105]
    Oxy, ADNOC Explore $500 Million DAC Carbon Removal Project in ...
    May 19, 2025 · According to Oxy, the South Texas DAC Hub, located on the King Ranch in Kleberg County, Texas, comprises approximately 165 square miles of ...
  106. [106]
    World's First Carbon Capture Plant Powered Directly by Wind Planned
    Mar 17, 2025 · A planned project in Texas could be the world's first direct air capture development to rely primarily on electricity produced on site by wind power.
  107. [107]
    NETL Awards 16 BIL-Funded Regional Direct Air Capture Hub ...
    Oct 2, 2024 · NETL has awarded and is currently managing 16 regional direct air capture (DAC) Hub projects throughout the country, putting into use the technologies ...
  108. [108]
    Project Selections for FOA 2735: Regional Direct Air Capture Hubs
    The goal of this program is to establish a regional DAC hub that can remove one million metric tonnes of CO2 per year from the air and either permanently store ...
  109. [109]
    California DAC Hub
    Through the California DAC Hub, the consortium will pursue funding to develop a network of DAC+S hubs across the state under the DOE's Regional DAC Hubs ...
  110. [110]
    Colorado DAC Hub - Carbon America
    The project aims to develop cooperative relationships among DAC technology providers, green energy providers, CO2 transportation networks, and companies.
  111. [111]
    First direct air capture plant opens in Kielce as Europe tests carbon ...
    Sep 17, 2025 · Across Europe, DAC facilities are slowly proliferating, from Climeworks' plant in Iceland to projects under development in the UK and Norway.
  112. [112]
    [PDF] The role of Direct Air Capture technologies in the EU's ...
    Abstract. This study analyses the development, costs, future potential, and role of Direct Air Capture (DAC) and subsequent storage.<|separator|>
  113. [113]
    Understanding CCS in Australia - Norton Rose Fulbright
    Carbon Capture Technologies Program: This program allocated c.A$65 million in funding in 2024 to support seven projects developing CO2 capture and utilisation ...
  114. [114]
    The energy and cost dynamics of direct air carbon capture
    Jul 9, 2024 · The energy consumption of fans in DAC plants can range from 300 to 900 kWh per ton of CO2 captured.
  115. [115]
    Carbon capture is an energy problem - by Sean Fleming
    Sep 26, 2024 · Current leaders like Climeworks and Heirloom estimate they need ~2-3 megawatt-hours of energy to remove and compress a single tonne of CO 2 for storage.<|separator|>
  116. [116]
    Energy Consumption of Direct Air Capture - Stanford University
    Nov 17, 2024 · The theoretical minimum energy consumption for DAC is 0.5-0.76GJ per ton of CO 2 (or approximately 140-210kWh per ton of CO 2 ).
  117. [117]
    Climeworks switches on world's largest direct air capture plant
    May 8, 2024 · The geothermal energy partner ON Power in Iceland provides the energy necessary for this process. Once the CO₂ is released from the filters ...
  118. [118]
    Geothermal-powered Mammoth direct air capture facility in Iceland ...
    May 9, 2024 · Climeworks has started operations of Mammoth, the largest direct air capture and storage facility in the world, powered by geothermal energy in Iceland.
  119. [119]
    Solar-Powered Direct Air Capture: Techno-Economic and ...
    Jan 25, 2024 · Capturing atmospheric CO2 with solar energy could be a more efficient, scalable, and cost-effective solution to mitigate climate change.
  120. [120]
    Addressing solar power curtailment by integrating flexible direct air ...
    This study aims to explore the feasibility of integrating DAC systems into renewable energy systems, specifically using PV to power DAC systems to capture ...
  121. [121]
    Renewable Energy is Not Just for the Grid: Supercharging Carbon ...
    Jul 15, 2025 · New research from the Clean Energy Conversions Lab shows that pairing geothermal with direct air capture (DAC) can boost CO₂ abatement by up to ...
  122. [122]
    [PDF] The water footprint of carbon capture and storage - ScienceDirect.com
    DACCS uses blue water during the energy-intensive capture process. 8. Small-scale of direct air capture technologies have found niche markets for greenhouses ...
  123. [123]
    [PDF] The impact of climate on solvent-based direct air capture systems
    Sep 6, 2022 · capture rates and overall energy demand on the process. None of the peer-reviewed studies published to date explicitly address the impact of.
  124. [124]
    Distributed direct air capture of carbon dioxide by synergistic water ...
    Nov 11, 2024 · Direct air capture of CO2 suffers from high energy consumption. Here, the authors use co-harvested water as in situ vapor purge to regenerate ...
  125. [125]
    Direct Air Capture: Costs, Benefits, and the Future - Wharton Impact
    Aug 6, 2021 · DAC uses machines to suck CO2 out of the atmosphere. If the captured CO2 is buried underground, the process is referred to as direct air capture ...
  126. [126]
    Capturing carbon dioxide from air with charged-sorbents - Nature
    Jun 5, 2024 · Hydroxide-based scrubbers are among the most promising for direct air capture (DAC) of carbon dioxide. Industrially mature approaches use ...
  127. [127]
    Chapter: 5 Direct Air Capture - The National Academies Press
    This chapter evaluates two types of direct air capture CO 2 separation processes: one employing liquid solvents and one utilizing solid sorbents.
  128. [128]
    Understandings on design and application for direct air capture
    Direct air capture (DAC) plays a crucial role in the carbon removal portfolio and is expected to capture over 980 MtCO2 to reach the net zero target.
  129. [129]
    How Would Ideal Sorbents Improve the Technical and Economic ...
    Sep 12, 2024 · This study evaluates DAC performance when replacing existing sorbents with theoretical ones designed to optimize the process.
  130. [130]
    NETL Research Targets Degradation of Sorbents Used in Direct Air ...
    May 22, 2024 · DAC technologies use sorbents to pull CO2 directly out of the air in contrast to point source capture processes that captures the greenhouse gas ...Missing: consumption | Show results with:consumption
  131. [131]
    Materials for Direct Air Capture and Integrated CO2 Conversion
    Numerous sorbents, such as zeolite, MOF, and alkali oxides, have been extensively studied. Sorbents are generally categorized into physical and chemical types ...
  132. [132]
    [PDF] Direct Air Capture - Center for International Environmental Law
    Nov 10, 2023 · Implementing DAC on climate-relevant scales would require such vast amounts of toxic chemicals and water, on top of its energy use, that it ...
  133. [133]
    Life Cycle Assessment of Direct Air Carbon Capture and Storage ...
    Aug 5, 2021 · We present a comprehensive life cycle assessment of different DACCS systems with low-carbon electricity and heat sources required for the CO 2 capture process.
  134. [134]
    Life-cycle assessment of an industrial direct air capture process ...
    Feb 4, 2021 · Our LCA results show that the first industrial DAC plants can already provide CO2 with a negative carbon footprint from cradle-to-gate today: if ...
  135. [135]
    A life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from direct air ...
    Apr 15, 2020 · We conduct a life cycle assessment (LCA) of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of a DAC system paired with Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) to produce ...
  136. [136]
    A comprehensive review of life cycle assessments of direct air ...
    This review critically assesses Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) of Direct Air Capture and Carbon Storage (DACCS) technologies, emphasizing environmental ...<|separator|>
  137. [137]
    [PDF] Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Analysis of Direct Air Capture Systems
    Mar 5, 2021 · Y-axis values below zero indicate life cycle carbon negative emissions. Results that are greater than zero indicate life cycle carbon positive ...Missing: peer | Show results with:peer
  138. [138]
    Environmental trade-offs of direct air capture technologies in climate ...
    Jun 25, 2022 · Previous studies have shown that DACCS can achieve negative emissions, but capture efficiencies are sensitive to the operational efficiency and ...
  139. [139]
    [PDF] Process-informed adsorbent design guidelines for direct air capture
    direct air capture process to show that the dry CO2 adsorption capacity does ... the thermodynamic minimum work of ~0.5 MJ kg-1 for this purity constraint.
  140. [140]
    sorbent direct air carbon capture plant - Cell Press
    Mar 2, 2022 · 3 relies on natural gas as an energy source and requires 13 times the thermodynamic minimum energy supply. In other words, only 8% of the energy ...
  141. [141]
    Unlocking the potential of direct air capture: Is scaling up through ...
    May 11, 2023 · DACS applications are currently hindered by very high costs, ranging from USD 600 to USD 1 000 per tonne of CO2 captured from the atmosphere.Missing: constraints | Show results with:constraints
  142. [142]
    Emergency deployment of direct air capture as a response ... - Nature
    Jan 14, 2021 · As expected, relaxing the scalability constraint beyond our central estimate of 20% yr–1 allows substantially more net CO2 removal over 2030 ...
  143. [143]
    Perspective on distributed direct air capture: what, why, and how ...
    May 17, 2025 · DAC is broadly defined as the direct extraction of CO2 from ambient air. It generally involves two steps: capture and regeneration. In the ...
  144. [144]
    Will Direct Air Capture Ever Cost Less Than $100 Per Ton Of CO₂?
    Nov 29, 2024 · Using the social cost of carbon as a benchmark, even DAC systems operating at $300–$500 per ton could deliver substantial net benefits by ...
  145. [145]
    Carbon Capture Costs Needs Reassessment, Engineers Say - ASME
    Apr 8, 2025 · The company said it was aiming to reach a $400-$600 a ton cost range. If that Climeworks or other DAC companies can reach that level without ...
  146. [146]
    Debunking the $100 fallacy: What does direct air capture CO2 ...
    The $100/tonne target is unrealistic; a 2024 study estimates $230-$540/tonne by 2050. The $100 target was based on ideal conditions.
  147. [147]
    Deploying direct air capture at scale: How close to reality?
    Our results show that the deployment of DAC is driven by its cost and is dominated by DACCS, with little deployment of DACCU. We analyze the technical and ...
  148. [148]
    Direct Air Capture Global Market Report 2025
    The direct air capture market size has grown exponentially in recent years. It will grow from $0.07 billion in 2024 to $0.11 billion in 2025 at a compound ...
  149. [149]
    Direct air capture climate solution faces harsh criticism, steep ...
    Dec 13, 2024 · This would-be heavy-industry geoengineering solution remains mired in controversy as it faces real-world questions of cost, scale and viability.Missing: thermodynamics | Show results with:thermodynamics
  150. [150]
    Credit for Carbon Oxide Sequestration | Internal Revenue Service
    The Credit for Carbon Oxide Sequestration is a credit for qualified carbon oxide captured at a qualified facility using certain carbon capture equipment.
  151. [151]
    The Section 45Q Tax Credit for Carbon Sequestration | Congress.gov
    Aug 25, 2023 · The amount that a taxpayer may claim as a Section 45Q tax credit is computed per metric ton of qualified carbon oxide captured and sequestered.
  152. [152]
    DOE Announces up to $1.8 Billion in Funding in Next Phase of ...
    Oct 15, 2024 · In August 2023, OCED announced the selection of two Regional DAC Hubs, to be located in Louisiana and Texas, respectively, as recipients of the ...
  153. [153]
    Industrial carbon management - Energy - European Commission
    It lists key actions to support industrial capture, use and storage of CO2, including the assessment of cross-border CO2 infrastructure deployment needs at EU, ...
  154. [154]
    EU carbon removal funding
    The EU has allocated approximately EUR 657 million to directly support CDR methods through existing programmes such as Horizon Europe.Introduction · EU funding mechanisms: a... · How can the EU build on its...
  155. [155]
    [PDF] TECHNOLOGY PRIMERS FOR POLICYMAKERS - Direct Air Capture
    Oct 17, 2024 · Along with providing significant funding support, U.S. and EU policymakers have begun tackling regulatory issues such as carbon quality ...
  156. [156]
    45Q Carbon Management Incentive Preserved In Latest Budget ...
    May 13, 2025 · Carbon management's crucial 45Q tax credit remains intact and is not part of broader cuts to the Inflation Reduction Act.
  157. [157]
    [PDF] Direct Air Capture: A key technology for net zero
    In the IEA Net Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario, DAC technologies capture more than 85 Mt of CO2 in 2030 and around 980 MtCO2 in 2050, requiring a large and ...
  158. [158]
    [PDF] Carbon Management Strategy - Department of Energy
    ... direct air capture, biomass with carbon dioxide removal and storage, and enhanced mineralization, as a complement to broader emissions reduction efforts.<|separator|>
  159. [159]
    [PDF] Direct Air Capture | OECD
    In the IEA Net Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario (Net Zero Scenario),1 DAC deployment rapidly scales up to reach around 85 MtCO2 in 2030 and 980 MtCO2 in 2050.
  160. [160]
    [PDF] Direct Air Capture: Definition and Company Analysis
    Direct air capture is a technology that regenerates a capture medium in a closed loop and/or uses a mechanical air contactor to chemically or physically ...
  161. [161]
    IEA holds expert workshop on scaling up direct air capture and ...
    Jun 5, 2023 · IEA holds expert workshop on scaling up direct air capture and storage through carbon markets - News from the International Energy Agency.
  162. [162]
    Direct air capture is growing around the world, but more policy ...
    Jul 14, 2022 · DAC is similar to capturing carbon from a point source, such as a factory or power plant, but works to remove carbon dioxide directly from the ...
  163. [163]
    OCED Issues Notice of Intent for up to $1.8 Billion to Fund ...
    Sep 20, 2024 · OCED issued a Notice of Intent (NOI) to fund up to $1.8 billion for the design, construction, and operation of mid- and large-scale commercial direct air ...
  164. [164]
    The prospects of massively scalable nuclear-powered direct air ...
    Direct air capture (DAC) has recently emerged as a promising and scalable solution for removing accumulated CO 2 in the atmosphere to mitigate global warming.