Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Pelletizing

Pelletizing is an agglomeration process that converts fine particulate materials, such as powders, dusts, or fumes, into small, uniform spherical pellets to enhance handling, storage, transportation, and processing characteristics.^[1]^[2] The technique typically involves mixing the fines with a binder and moisture, followed by mechanical action in devices like disc pelletizers or rotary drums to form green pellets, which are then dried and indurated through heating to achieve strength.^[1] This method improves material bulk density, reduces dust loss, and ensures consistent size distribution for optimal performance in end-use applications.^[1]^[2] Widely applied in industries including metallurgy, where it processes iron ore concentrates into pellets for efficient blast furnace feed, pelletizing supports steel production by providing high-reducibility agglomerates that minimize energy consumption and emissions compared to alternatives like sintering.^[3] In plastics manufacturing, it transforms molten polymers into uniform nurdles serving as standardized raw material for extrusion and molding.^[4] Additional sectors encompass animal feed production for improved digestibility and nutrient uniformity, biofuel pelletization from biomass for dense energy carriers, and fertilizer formulation for controlled-release properties.^[1]^[5] The process's versatility stems from its ability to handle diverse feedstocks while yielding pellets with tailored physical properties, such as porosity and abrasion resistance, critical for industrial efficiency.^[1]^[6]

History

Origins and Early Developments

The process of pelletizing iron ore fines into spherical agglomerates originated with the patent granted to A. G. Andersson in Sweden in 1912 (Patent No. 35124), which described rolling moist fine ore in a rotating drum to form green balls, followed by drying and thermal firing to harden them.^[7]^[8] A similar patent was issued to C. A. Brackelsberg in Germany in 1913, focusing on analogous agglomeration techniques for powdered ores using binders like tar, which had been explored experimentally since the late 19th century.^[7] Early pilot-scale testing occurred in 1926 at Krupp's Rheinhausen Steel plant in Germany, where a facility with a capacity of 120 tons per day demonstrated the feasibility of drum pelletizing followed by induration, though it was dismantled in 1937 due to limited demand for low-grade ore processing.^[7] In the United States, systematic research advanced in the 1940s at the University of Minnesota's Mines Experiment Station under Dr. E. W. Davis, targeting taconite ores; initial experiments successfully fired experimental pellets in a shaft furnace by 1943, establishing key parameters for binder use and heat treatment.^[7]^[8] Commercial adoption began in the early 1950s, with the first full-scale iron ore pellet plant operational in Babbitt, Minnesota, in 1952, processing taconite concentrates into blast furnace feed.^[7] Sweden saw parallel commercialization starting in the 1950s using vertical-shaft kilns for induration, with initial plants producing 10,000 to 60,000 tons annually.^[8] By 1954, the Reserve Mining Company in Minnesota commissioned an experimental pelletizing machine with 1,000 tons per day capacity, scaling to larger operations, while the Erie Mining Company's Hoyt Lakes plant, equipped with 24 vertical shaft furnaces, began production in 1957, marking a shift toward handling vast low-grade ore reserves depleted of high-grade natural ores.^[7]

Expansion and Industrial Adoption

The expansion of iron ore pelletizing gained momentum in the mid-20th century, driven by the depletion of high-grade natural ores and the post-World War II surge in global steel demand, which necessitated efficient processing of fine concentrates from low-grade deposits like taconite.^[9] In the United States, Minnesota's Iron Range pioneered large-scale adoption to sustain the domestic iron mining industry; the Reserve Mining Company's plant in Silver Bay commenced commercial taconite pellet production in 1955, marking a pivotal shift toward beneficiation and agglomeration of previously uneconomic ores.^[10] This was followed by Erie Mining Company's facility in Hoyt Lakes starting operations in 1957, enabling the utilization of vast taconite reserves estimated at billions of tons.^[9] Industrial adoption accelerated through the 1950s and 1960s as pelletizing addressed key limitations of fine ores, such as poor permeability in blast furnaces and handling difficulties, by producing uniform, high-strength agglomerates with iron contents typically exceeding 65%.^[8] U.S. pellet output rose from about 5 million short tons in 1955, representing roughly 5% of usable iron ore production, to approximately 17 million short tons by the late 1960s, accounting for over 23% of total input to steelmaking.^[11] Concurrently, Sweden scaled up commercial plants in the 1950s using vertical-shaft kilns with capacities of 10,000 to 60,000 tons per year, while innovations like the straight-grate and grate-kiln induration processes—first commercialized around 1960—facilitated larger facilities and higher throughputs, boosting efficiency and reducing energy use.^[8]^[12] By the 1970s, pelletizing had become integral to the steel industry worldwide, with adoption in Europe, Japan, and emerging producers like Brazil, as pellets offered superior reducibility and decreased coke consumption compared to sinter or lump ore.^[13] Global capacity expanded dramatically, from modest beginnings to supporting over 300 million tons annually by the 1980s, reflecting pelletizing's role in extending ore reserves and optimizing blast furnace performance.^[14] Further growth in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, with world pelletizing capacity increasing from 350 million tons per year in 2000 to more than 600 million tons per year in 2020, was propelled by rising steel demands in Asia and the shift toward direct reduction processes requiring high-quality feeds.^[15] This evolution underscored pelletizing's causal importance in sustaining ironmaking amid resource constraints, though early environmental concerns, such as tailings disposal from taconite processing, prompted regulatory adaptations without halting expansion.^[16]

Key Technological Milestones

The concept of pelletizing iron ore fines into spherical agglomerates was first patented in 1912 by A.G. Andersson in Sweden, who described a process of rolling moist ore into balls followed by drying and firing.^[8] A similar patent was granted in 1913 to C.A. Brackelsberg in Germany.^[7] These early inventions laid the groundwork for transforming fine iron ore concentrates into handleable forms suitable for blast furnaces, addressing issues with dust loss and inefficient charging. Industrial experimentation advanced in 1926 when Krupp constructed a pilot pellet plant at its Rheinhausen Steel works in Germany, capable of producing 120 tons per day using shaft furnace induration; the facility operated until its dismantling in 1937.^[7] Significant progress for low-grade taconite ores occurred in the United States during the 1940s, with E.W. Davis at the University of Minnesota demonstrating viability in 1943 via an experimental shaft furnace.^[8] Commercialization accelerated in the 1950s in Sweden, where the first full-scale plants employed vertical shaft kilns for induration, achieving annual capacities of 10,000 to 60,000 tons.^[8] Key process innovations emerged in the mid-1950s, including the introduction of grate machines for preliminary drying and preheating. In 1956, Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company commissioned a grate-based operation at Eagle Mills, Michigan.^[7] The grate-kiln system, developed by Allis-Chalmers, marked a major advancement by combining traveling grate preheating with rotary kiln firing for uniform induration; its first commercial plant started at Humboldt Mine, Michigan, in 1960, enabling higher throughput and better control over pellet quality.^[7] Parallel developments included multi-shaft furnace setups, such as the 1957 Erie Mining Company plant at Hoyt Lakes with 24 vertical shafts.^[7] These milestones shifted pelletizing from experimental to industrial scale, with straight-grate variants later optimizing for diverse ore feeds and larger capacities.^[8]

Fundamental Principles

Feedstock Preparation

Feedstock preparation in pelletizing encompasses the pretreatment of raw materials to achieve uniform particle size distribution (PSD), optimal moisture content, and incorporation of binders or additives, ensuring effective agglomeration during subsequent stages. This step is critical for producing pellets with sufficient green strength and uniformity, as inconsistencies can lead to poor pellet quality or process inefficiencies. Key objectives include reducing particle size to enhance interparticle bonding, controlling moisture to promote plasticity without causing excessive adhesion or dusting, and blending additives to improve mechanical properties.^[17]^[8] Size reduction via crushing or grinding is typically the first subprocess, targeting a fine PSD—often with 80% of particles below 150 microns for mineral feedstocks like iron ore concentrates—to maximize surface area for binding while avoiding excessive fines that could hinder flowability. For biomass or organic materials, grinding to 1-3 mm particles balances durability and mill operability, as overly fine particles increase energy demands and risk equipment jamming. Uniformity in PSD, achieved through screening or classification, is essential across feedstocks, though slight variance aids in forming robust pellets by facilitating interlocking during compression.^[18]^[8]^[19] Moisture adjustment follows, often via drying to 8-12% for cellulosic biomass or pre-moistening dry powders, as levels outside the material-specific optimum (determined empirically) impair green pellet formation—excess moisture yields sticky masses, while deficiency causes brittleness. In mineral applications, water addition during mixing targets 9-10% to enable balling without disintegration. Drying methods, such as rotary dryers, prevent mud-like behavior in wet feedstocks, while conditioning with steam softens lignins in biomass for natural binding under heat and pressure.^[17]^[19]^[8] Binders and additives are dosed and mixed homogeneously, typically at 0.5-1% by weight, to enhance adhesion; bentonite is standard for iron ores due to its swelling properties that confer green strength, though it introduces silica impurities, prompting exploration of organic alternatives like starch or lignosulfonates for lower contamination. Mixing in pugmills or pin mixers ensures even distribution, preventing localized weaknesses. Impurities are removed via magnetic separation or screening, particularly in ores, to maintain chemical purity. These preparations are tailored by material—e.g., higher moisture tolerance in starch-rich feeds versus minerals—but universally prioritize empirical testing for PSD and moisture optima to optimize downstream pellet integrity.^[8]^[18]^[19]

Agglomeration Mechanisms

In wet pelletizing processes, agglomeration begins with nucleation, where fine particles are wetted by a liquid binder, typically water or a solution, forming initial small aggregates through the creation of pendular liquid bridges between particles; these bridges are stabilized primarily by capillary forces arising from surface tension.^[8]^[20] As agitation continues in equipment such as balling drums or discs, these nuclei grow via coalescence, in which colliding granules deform viscously or plastically upon impact, merging into larger entities if the kinetic energy overcomes inter-granule repulsion and insufficient liquid leads to successful bonding without rebound.^[8]^[21] Layering, or snowballing, represents another dominant growth mechanism, particularly in continuous operations, wherein moist fines adhere to the surface of existing pellets during tumbling, incrementally increasing size through successive deposition driven by capillary adhesion and mechanical interlocking.^[8]^[21] Concurrently, consolidation occurs as granules densify under compressive forces from agitation, expelling excess liquid and enhancing structural integrity via viscous flow and particle rearrangement.^[22] Opposing these growth processes are breakage and abrasion, where excessive mechanical energy fragments oversized pellets or erodes surfaces, redistributing material and influencing the final size distribution; optimal conditions balance growth and disruption to achieve uniform green pellets typically 8-16 mm in diameter.^[8]^[20] At the microscopic level, bonding transitions from pendular (isolated bridges with high negative capillary pressure) to capillary (interconnected liquid filling voids, maximizing attractive forces) states as moisture content rises to 8-10% by weight, with viscous forces from binders like bentonite contributing to deformation resistance.^[23]^[22] In dry or compaction-based pelletizing, such as for biomass or feeds, mechanisms shift toward solid-state adhesion via van der Waals forces, electrostatic interactions, and plastic deformation under high pressure, without relying on liquid phases.^[24] These mechanisms are modulated by factors including particle size (finer particles favor nucleation), binder viscosity (higher viscosity promotes coalescence over layering), and agitation intensity, with empirical models confirming predominance of layering and coalescence in industrial iron ore balling drums operating at 20-30 rpm.^[8]^[21]

Binding and Induration Processes

Binding processes in pelletizing primarily occur during the formation of green pellets, where fine particles are agglomerated using moisture and binders to achieve initial cohesion through capillary forces, viscous bonding, and adhesive interactions.^[8] Common binders include bentonite clay, added at approximately 0.5 wt%, which swells upon wetting to form viscous bonds and solid bridges upon drying, though it introduces silica and alumina impurities that can lower ore grade by 0.6 wt% per 1% bentonite.^[8] ^[25] Organic polymers such as sodium lignosulfonate, starch, or sodium carboxymethyl cellulose provide alternative binding via hydrogen bonding, electrostatic adhesion to particle surfaces, and polymer chain entanglement, enhancing green pellet drop resistance (4–6 drops per pellet) without residual impurities after burnout.^[25] These green binding mechanisms rely on interfacial forces like liquid bridges from controlled moisture (typically 8–10 wt%) and molecular attractions such as van der Waals forces, ensuring pellets of 8–16 mm diameter withstand handling before induration.^[8] Combined binder systems, pairing organics with inorganic salts, further optimize wet, dry, and preheated strengths by promoting even dispersion and reducing sticking during thermal treatment.^[8] Induration follows to impart permanent strength, involving thermal processing that hardens pellets through sintering, partial melting, and solid-state diffusion, converting temporary bonds into robust solid bridges.^[8] The process comprises drying up to 300°C to evaporate moisture, preheating to 1000–1100°C for initial oxidation, firing at 1200–1350°C to achieve metallurgical bonding, and cooling with ambient air for heat recovery, resulting in compressive strengths exceeding 2500 N per pellet.^[8] ^[25] Straight-grate furnaces, accounting for about 60% of production, process pellets continuously across zones of drying, firing, and cooling, while grate-kiln systems separate preheating on a grate from rotary kiln firing, offering flexibility for varied feeds.^[8] Organic binders may lower bursting temperatures during induration due to combustion gases but improve overall porosity and reducibility when supplemented with additives like borates to form supportive liquid phases.^[25] These steps ensure pellets suitable for blast furnaces or direct reduction, with principles adaptable to non-ore materials requiring enhanced durability.^[8]

Metallurgical Applications

Iron Ore Pelletizing

Iron ore pelletizing agglomerates fine iron ore concentrates, typically below 150 micrometers from beneficiation processes, into strong, uniform spheres of 8 to 16 millimeters in diameter for efficient metallurgical reduction.^[8] This method addresses the challenges posed by the high proportion of fines in modern low-grade ores, which would otherwise cause poor gas permeability and reduced productivity in blast furnaces if charged directly.^[26] Pellets typically contain 62 to 66 percent iron, with binders such as bentonite added at 0.5 to 1 percent to enhance green pellet strength during formation.^[27] The process begins with feedstock preparation, involving grinding iron ore to fine particles, often mixed with fluxes like limestone for slag control and binders for adhesion. Green pellets are formed via tumbling in rotating drums or discs, where rolling motion and moisture (around 9 percent) promote spherical agglomeration through plastic deformation and capillary forces.^[8] Induration follows, hardening the green pellets through thermal treatment: drying at 100 to 200°C removes moisture, preheating to 900 to 1100°C initiates oxidation for hematite ores, and firing at 1200 to 1350°C in straight-grate or grate-kiln systems sinters the particles, achieving compressive strengths exceeding 200 kg per pellet.^[28] Straight-grate processes suit magnetite ores, enabling in-situ magnetization, while grate-kiln systems offer flexibility for various ore types and higher throughputs up to 10 million tons annually per plant.^[8] In blast furnace operations, pellets enhance burden permeability due to their uniform porosity (25 to 30 percent) and size consistency, facilitating better reducing gas distribution and faster iron reduction compared to sinter or lump ore.^[26] This results in higher furnace productivity, reduced coke consumption by 10 to 20 kilograms per ton of hot metal, and lower dust generation during handling and charging.^[29] Pellets also support direct reduced iron production in shaft furnaces, where their mechanical strength withstands high temperatures without excessive degradation. Global pellet production reached approximately 400 million tons in 2023, with major capacity in Brazil, Sweden, and India, driven by demand for high-quality inputs amid depleting lump ore reserves.^[30]^[31]

Other Ore and Mineral Pelletizing

Pelletizing of non-ferrous ores and other minerals involves agglomerating fine particles into uniform pellets to facilitate handling, reduce dust loss, and enhance metallurgical efficiency, similar to iron ore processes but adapted to specific mineralogies such as varying silica content or refractory behavior.^[32] For chromite ore, fines are mixed with binders like bentonite or organic alternatives, formed into green pellets via disc pelletization, and indurated through sintering or pellet-sintering to achieve compressive strengths suitable for ferrochrome smelting in submerged arc furnaces.^[33] ^[34] This approach addresses the frail nature of chromite concentrates, enabling pre-oxidative sintering that liberates iron from chromite spinel at elevated temperatures, with pellet quality influenced by ore grind size and flux additions for slag control.^[35] Manganese ore fines, often containing high levels of gangue, are pelletized using bentonite binders at 1-1.2 wt% addition and 15% moisture in disc pelletizers, followed by firing in grate-kiln systems to produce high-strength pellets for electric arc furnace (EAF) feed in ferromanganese production.^[36] ^[37] The process yields uniform pellets with stable compositions, outperforming sintering in energy efficiency and productivity, though challenges include controlling cracking from carbonate decomposition during induration.^[38] For low-grade powdery zinc oxide ores, pelletizing precedes alkaline leaching, where green pellets are formed and sintered to improve zinc dissolution rates by reducing solidification time and enhancing reactivity.^[39] Phosphate rock fines, particularly low-grade powders, undergo pelletization to boost utilization in fertilizer production, involving grinding to fine sizes, binder addition (e.g., sulfuric acid or organics), and nodulation or pan pelletizing followed by roasting to form durable pellets with controlled particle density and release properties.^[40] ^[41] This agglomeration eliminates dust issues and improves storage flowability, with processes like rotary kiln defluorination sometimes integrated post-pelletizing for ore upgrading.^[42] Nickel concentrates and copper-nickel tailings have been granulated or pelletized similarly, using sulfuric acid for tailings to recover metals while forming stable aggregates for further hydrometallurgical treatment.^[43] Across these applications, pelletizing enhances dust control and transport economics compared to fines handling, but requires tailored induration—often at 1200-1400°C—to account for mineral-specific thermal behaviors, with binders selected to minimize gangue introduction.^[32] ^[44] Industry adoption remains less widespread than for iron ore due to ore variability and process economics, though advancements in organic binders aim to replace bentonite for purity in non-ferrous applications.^[45]

Agricultural and Feed Applications

Animal Feed Pelletizing

Animal feed pelletizing involves compressing ground feed ingredients, such as grains, proteins, and vitamins, into durable cylindrical pellets using mechanical pressure and heat, primarily to enhance nutritional delivery and handling efficiency in livestock, poultry, and aquaculture operations.^[46] This process originated in the early 20th century with the development of pellet mills, including the Schüler press in the 1920s, which used interlocking rollers to form feed mash into pellets, marking a shift from loose foraging or mash feeds to structured rations.^[47] By the mid-20th century, pelleting became widespread in commercial feed production due to its ability to reduce ingredient segregation and improve bulk density for storage and transport.^[48] The core process begins with feedstock preparation, grinding ingredients to uniform particle size (typically 0.5-2 mm) to ensure even mixing and extrusion, followed by blending with binders like lignin or steam-conditioned molasses.^[5] Conditioning involves adding steam at 70-90°C to gelatinize starches and soften fibers, increasing pellet durability; the conditioned mash then passes through a ring-die or flat-die pellet mill where two rollers force it against a perforated die, extruding pellets at pressures of 20-100 MPa and temperatures up to 90°C.^[46] Post-pelletization, pellets are cooled to ambient temperature in counterflow coolers to harden them and reduce moisture to 10-12%, followed by screening to remove fines and crumbling for smaller animals like poultry chicks.^[49] Pelleted feeds offer empirical advantages over mash forms, including 5-10% improvements in feed conversion ratios (FCR) for broilers and swine due to enhanced digestibility from starch gelatinization and reduced selective feeding, leading to more uniform nutrient intake.^[50] ^[51] Studies confirm that high-quality pellets minimize dust and waste, lowering feed costs by up to 7% through better flowability and reduced spoilage, while promoting gut health via slower ingestion rates that stimulate gizzard development in birds.^[52] ^[53] Globally, a significant portion of the 1.396 billion metric tons of compound feed produced in 2024 is pelleted, particularly for poultry and pigs, where pelleting rates exceed 80% in intensive systems to optimize growth performance.^[54] ^[55] Equipment advancements, such as variable-speed conditioners and dies with optimized hole patterns, have improved pellet quality metrics like the Pellet Durability Index (PDI), targeting >90% to prevent breakage during handling.^[49] For ruminants, larger pellets (8-12 mm) reduce sorting behavior, while aquaculture uses floating or sinking variants tailored to species like salmon, where pelleting enhances water stability and minimizes leaching.^[56] Challenges include energy-intensive operations (up to 20-30 kWh/ton) and potential nutrient degradation from overheating, necessitating precise control to preserve vitamins and enzymes.^[57] Overall, pelleting's causal benefits stem from physical agglomeration that enforces consistent consumption, supported by decades of production data showing superior animal outcomes when PDI and conditioning are optimized.^[58]

Fertilizer and Soil Amendment Pellets

Pelletizing fertilizers and soil amendments entails the mechanical agglomeration of powdered or slurry-based feedstocks into compact, uniform granules or cylinders, typically 3-6 mm in diameter, to enhance manageability and agronomic efficacy. The process often employs extrusion for moist organic materials (up to 20% moisture content), where forced feeding through a die forms dense pellets, or rotary drum/disc methods for inorganic formulations, involving tumbling of reactive slurries that solidify into spherical shapes during chemical reactions.^[59]^[60] These techniques incorporate binders like water or biochar to optimize pellet durability, with production stages including crushing, mixing, pelleting, drying, and cooling to achieve densities exceeding 900 kg/m³ and abrasion resistance above 95%.^[61] Feedstocks commonly pelletized encompass organic sources such as animal manures, compost, and co-mixtures with biochar or sewage sludge ash (SSA), yielding nutrient-rich products with controlled heavy metal levels below regulatory thresholds. Inorganic amendments, including lime-based fertilizers and gypsum, undergo disc pelletizing to form stable aggregates suitable for acid soil neutralization. Waste-derived materials, like wood pellet ash rich in potassium and micronutrients or coal tailings, are processed into conditioner pellets that repurpose byproducts while providing alkalinity and mineral supplementation.^[62]^[63]^[64] Pelletization confers operational advantages by minimizing dust generation, enabling bulk storage without settling or salting out, and facilitating precise broadcasting application that reduces uneven nutrient distribution. Agronomically, pellets promote slow-release dynamics, particularly for nitrogen, where processing parameters like compression and binder ratios extend soil residence time, curbing leaching losses by up to 30-50% compared to uncoated powders and boosting crop uptake efficiency. Soil amendments in pellet form enhance physical properties, including water-holding capacity, texture, and microbial biomass, as evidenced by compost-biochar mixtures that increased nutrient bioavailability and suppressed erosion in field trials.^[65]^[66]^[67] This technology supports waste recycling, converting manure or industrial residues into marketable fertilizers that maintain soil fertility with lower environmental footprints than synthetic alternatives, including reduced runoff and greenhouse gas emissions from handling. However, pellet quality hinges on feedstock homogeneity and induration conditions, with suboptimal drying potentially leading to friability under field moisture exposure.^[61]^[68]

Pharmaceutical Applications

Techniques for Drug Delivery Systems

Pelletization techniques in pharmaceutical drug delivery systems produce multiparticulate dosage forms, typically spherical units ranging from 0.5 to 2 mm in diameter, which enhance bioavailability, enable controlled release, and reduce variability in gastrointestinal transit compared to single-unit forms.^[69] These methods facilitate site-specific delivery, such as enteric or colonic targeting, by allowing subsequent coating of uniform pellets, thereby minimizing risks like dose dumping observed in matrix tablets.^[70] Pellet-based systems are particularly advantageous for drugs with narrow therapeutic indices, as their dispersion in the gut promotes more predictable absorption profiles.^[71] The predominant technique, extrusion-spheronization, involves preparing a wet mass of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), excipients like microcrystalline cellulose, and a granulating liquid, followed by extrusion through a die to form cylindrical rods that are cut into short segments and rounded in a spheronizer via centrifugal force.^[72] Developed in the early 1970s, this process yields high sphericity and reproducibility, making it suitable for sustained-release formulations where pellet integrity during coating and compression into capsules is critical.^[73] Key parameters include liquid-to-solid ratio (typically 0.3–0.5), extrusion screen size (0.5–1.5 mm), and spheronizer speed (500–2000 rpm), which influence pellet density and friability; deviations can lead to irregular shapes or breakage, compromising release kinetics.^[74] This method accommodates both hydrophilic and lipophilic APIs but requires optimization to avoid overheating sensitive compounds.^[75] Layering techniques, including powder layering and solution/suspension layering, deposit API onto starter cores such as nonpareil sugar spheres or microcrystalline cellulose beads in a centrifugal pan coater or fluidized bed apparatus.^[76] Powder layering sprays binder solutions alternately with drug-excipient powders, achieving high drug loads (up to 90% w/w) for potent APIs, while solution layering dissolves the drug for uniform deposition, ideal for poorly soluble compounds to enhance dissolution rates.^[77] These methods support multiparticulate systems for pulsatile release, with process controls like atomization pressure and bed temperature ensuring layer adhesion and preventing agglomeration; for instance, layering has been used in formulations like enteric-coated omeprazole pellets to protect against gastric acid.^[70] Drawbacks include potential core erosion during GI transit if not properly sealed, necessitating robust subcoating.^[69] Alternative approaches include hot-melt extrusion, where API and polymers are melted and extruded into strands that are spheronized or pelletized post-cooling, enabling lipid-based matrices for gastroretentive floating systems.^[78] This technique, applied since the 1990s for sustained-release profiles, avoids solvents but demands thermal stability from the API, with screw speed and temperature (typically 80–150°C) dictating melt viscosity and pellet uniformity.^[70] Cryopelletization and spray congealing, involving freezing or rapid solidification of emulsions, produce porous pellets for immediate-release or taste-masked applications, though scalability remains limited compared to extrusion methods.^[79] Across techniques, pellet quality is assessed via parameters like aspect ratio (<1.2 for sphericity), Hausner ratio (<1.25 for flowability), and in vitro dissolution matching pharmacokinetic targets, ensuring efficacy in delivery systems.^[71]

Biomass and Fuel Applications

Wood and Biomass Pellet Production

Wood and biomass pellets are produced by compressing lignocellulosic materials into dense, cylindrical forms typically 6-8 mm in diameter, primarily for use as renewable fuel in heating, power generation, and co-firing applications. The process relies on the natural binding properties of lignin, which softens under heat and pressure during extrusion, eliminating the need for added binders in most cases. Raw materials consist mainly of wood residues such as sawdust, shavings, and chips from sawmills and plywood mills, which account for the majority of production; non-wood biomass includes agricultural residues like straw, rice husks, and energy crops such as switchgrass or miscanthus.^[80]^[81]^[82] The production process begins with feedstock preparation, involving debarking and chipping of logs or slabs to uniform sizes under 50 mm, followed by grinding in hammer mills to particles of 2-5 mm for optimal density and flow. Moisture content is then adjusted to 10-15% through drying, often using rotary drum or flash dryers fueled by biomass waste, as higher moisture impedes pellet formation and leads to energy inefficiency. Pelletizing occurs in mills where conditioned biomass is forced through a heated die under pressures of 30-100 MPa and temperatures of 80-100°C, forming soft strands that are cut to length; ring-die mills predominate in commercial operations for capacities exceeding 1 ton per hour, while flat-die types suit smaller scales. Post-extrusion, pellets are cooled to ambient temperature in counterflow coolers to solidify structure and reduce moisture below 10%, then screened for fines and packaged.^[83]^[80]^[84] Equipment demands significant energy, with pellet mills requiring 50-100 kW per metric ton of hourly output, and total plant efficiency influenced by integrated drying systems that recover heat from exhaust gases. Quality standards, such as ENplus established by the European Pellet Council in 2010, classify pellets into grades A1 (premium residential, ash <0.7%, nitrogen <0.3%) and A2 (higher ash tolerance), prohibiting chemically treated or demolition wood to ensure low emissions and consistent combustion; compliance involves third-party certification for traceability from source to delivery. In the United States, the Pellet Fuels Institute (PFI) standards similarly emphasize mechanical durability above 96.5% and bulk density over 600 kg/m³.^[80]^[85]^[86] Global production reached approximately 48 million metric tons in 2024, with the European Union-27 as the leading region at over 20 million tons, driven by policy support for biomass co-firing; the United States exported 10 million tons that year, primarily from southern pine residues. Growth averaged 8-10% annually pre-2023, stabilizing amid supply chain constraints, though demand for certified pellets persists due to their higher energy density (17-19 MJ/kg) compared to loose biomass.^[87]^[88]^[89]

Efficiency and Combustion Characteristics

Biomass pellets, particularly wood pellets, exhibit combustion efficiencies typically ranging from 70% to 83% in certified pellet stoves, surpassing traditional wood-burning stoves which often achieve only 50-70% efficiency due to inconsistent fuel size and higher moisture content.^[90]^[91] Modern pellet boilers and stoves can reach up to 95% thermal efficiency through automated air-fuel mixing and controlled combustion, minimizing heat loss compared to open-fire wood systems.^[92] This efficiency stems from the pellets' uniform density (approximately 40 lb/ft³ versus 10-25 lb/ft³ for raw biomass) and low moisture content (under 10%), enabling consistent ignition and sustained burning.^[93] Combustion characteristics of biomass pellets include rapid ignition (often within seconds in optimized burners) and steady flame propagation due to their high volatile content (70-80%), which releases gases that burn more completely than in loose biomass.^[94] Pellet orientation and composition influence burn profiles; for instance, additives like rice husk can extend combustion duration by up to 16% while reducing peak temperatures.^[95] Torrefied pellets, processed at 225-300°C, demonstrate higher energy density (up to 29.9 MJ/kg versus 18.9 MJ/kg for untreated wood) and more even combustion, with slower ignition but lower burnout temperatures, contributing to reduced slagging.^[96] Emissions during pellet combustion are characterized by low particulate matter (often below EPA limits for certified appliances) and efficient conversion averaging 80-93% across various pellet types, though non-biomass baselines show biomass facilities emitting up to 2.8 times more CO₂ per unit energy due to lower inherent energy density.^[97]^[98]^[99] Higher torrefaction temperatures further mitigate CO, CO₂, and NOₓ outputs, but untreated pellets can produce elevated volatiles leading to incomplete combustion if moisture exceeds optimal levels.^[96] Ash content, typically 0.5-3% for quality wood pellets, fuses at higher temperatures than raw wood residues, reducing operational disruptions in automated systems.^[100]

Polymer and Materials Processing

Plastics and Polymer Pelletizing

Polymer pelletizing involves extruding molten thermoplastic polymers through a die to form continuous strands or directly cut shapes, followed by cooling and sizing into uniform pellets typically 1-5 mm in diameter, serving as standardized feedstock for processes like injection molding and extrusion.^[101] This method enhances material handling, metering accuracy, and uniformity in downstream manufacturing, applicable to both virgin resins and recycled plastics.^[102] Pelletizing originated with strand-cutting techniques in the mid-20th century, evolving to underwater systems invented in the 1950s by Automatik, which improved efficiency for heat-sensitive or sticky polymers by enabling immediate cooling and cutting in water.^[103] Key techniques include strand pelletizing, where extruded strands are cooled in water baths or air and then chopped into pellets, suitable for stable, non-sticky materials like polyethylene; underwater pelletizing, which cuts pellets directly in a water stream for rapid quenching, ideal for viscous or hydrolyzable polymers such as PVC or nylon; and die-face or hot-face pelletizing, involving cutting at the die exit followed by air or water cooling, often used for compounding with additives.^[104] ^[105] ^[106] Water-ring pelletizing, a variant, employs rotating blades against a die face submerged in a water ring for cooling, balancing cost and performance for standard thermoplastics.^[107] Selection depends on polymer properties, throughput rates—often exceeding 10 tons per hour in industrial systems—and desired pellet quality, with underwater methods reducing defects like fines or tails in challenging formulations.^[108] In recycling, pelletizing converts post-consumer or industrial plastic waste into reusable granules after sorting, shredding, washing, and melting, enabling closed-loop material flows and reducing reliance on virgin production.^[109] Life-cycle assessments indicate that pellets from recycled plastics emit 22.6% less carbon and 11-40% lower impacts in other categories compared to virgin equivalents, though process energy for melting and extrusion contributes to overall footprint.^[110] However, handling risks exist, as spills of pre-production pellets—known as nurdles—release an estimated 445,000 tonnes annually into global environments, exacerbating microplastic pollution despite regulatory efforts like the EU's 2023 measures to curb losses.^[111] Modern systems incorporate automation and filtration to minimize such losses, prioritizing safety and yield in operations processing biopolymers, adhesives, and engineering plastics.^[102]

Impacts and Controversies

Economic and Operational Benefits

Pelletizing enhances operational efficiency by increasing material bulk density, which reduces storage volume requirements and facilitates automated handling systems in industries such as mining and animal feed production. For instance, in iron ore processing, pellets exhibit superior resistance to degradation during transport and storage compared to fines, minimizing clogging in hoppers and enabling consistent feeding into furnaces.^[32] In animal feed manufacturing, pelleted forms improve flowability through bins and reduce dust generation, lowering equipment maintenance needs and enhancing safety in processing facilities.^[52]^[5] Economically, pelletizing supports cost reductions in logistics and waste management by converting fines or by-products into value-added products, extending resource lifecycles. Iron ore pellet plants have demonstrated after-tax internal rates of return up to 25% and annual EBITDA of US$173 million at US$70/t pellet prices, driven by efficient utilization of low-grade ores otherwise unsuitable for direct reduction.^[112] Biomass pellet production from agricultural residues, such as corn straw, can cut heating fuel costs by approximately USD 254.26 per hectare while diverting waste from landfills, promoting circular economies.^[113] In polymer recycling, pelletizing recycled plastics yields uniform feedstocks that lower downstream processing expenses and reduce landfill fees associated with waste disposal.^[114]^[115] Operationally, the process improves downstream performance metrics, such as combustion uniformity in biomass fuels and digestibility in feeds, leading to indirect economic gains through higher yields. Wood pellets achieve energy densities that halve fuel costs relative to fossil alternatives like oil or gas, with burning times comparable to coal despite lower dosage volumes.^[116] In feed applications, pelleting boosts animal growth rates and feed conversion ratios by up to 10-15% via reduced selective feeding and nutrient loss, optimizing farm-level productivity.^[58]^[46] These benefits collectively lower capital and operational expenditures, with pelletizing enabling scalable production from marginal feedstocks in mining and biofuels.^[117]

Environmental Effects and Criticisms

Biomass pellet production generates significant air pollution, including particulate matter (PM2.5), volatile organic compounds, nitrogen oxides, and hazardous pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and dioxins during grinding, drying, and pelletizing stages. These emissions have been linked to respiratory issues and cancer risks in communities near facilities, particularly in the U.S. South, where production has expanded rapidly. Lifecycle analyses indicate that harvesting, processing, and transporting wood for pellets can result in net greenhouse gas emissions exceeding those of coal when accounting for carbon debt from forest regrowth delays, challenging claims of carbon neutrality. Critics, including environmental groups and scientists, argue that sustainability certifications like the Sustainable Biomass Program fail to ensure residue-only sourcing, often relying on whole trees and contributing to deforestation and biodiversity loss.^[118]^[119]^[120]^[121] Iron ore pelletizing is energy-intensive, relying on fossil fuels for drying and induration, which drives 86% of fossil resource depletion and 95% of ozone layer depletion impacts in assessed plants. Open-pit mining for pellet feedstock emits particulate matter that affects human health through inhalation, while tailings and water use exacerbate local ecosystem disruption. Although pellets improve blast furnace efficiency and reduce coking coal needs in steelmaking—potentially lowering CO2 emissions per ton of steel—unmitigated dust and emissions from pellet plants have prompted calls for stricter pollution controls. Studies emphasize that without cleaner energy integration, such as hydrogen-based processes, pelletizing perpetuates high environmental footprints tied to global steel demand.^[122]^[123]^[124] Plastic pelletizing contributes to microplastic pollution via nurdle spills during manufacturing, transport, and handling, with an estimated 445,970 tonnes entering global environments annually. These pre-production pellets, often 2-5 mm in size, are ingested by marine life, mimicking food and carrying adsorbed toxins like PCBs and additives that bioaccumulate up food chains, threatening fisheries and biodiversity. High-profile incidents, such as the 2021 X-Press Pearl spill off Sri Lanka releasing 1,410 tonnes, demonstrated agglomeration, fragmentation, and chemical alteration under environmental exposure, amplifying ecological harm. Regulatory efforts, including IMO guidelines, highlight ongoing challenges in preventing leaks despite industry protocols.^[125]^[126]^[127] Fertilizer pelletizing aims to control nutrient release, potentially reducing leaching and eutrophication compared to uncoated forms, but production emissions and overapplication still drive environmental degradation. Ammonia-based synthesis emits NOx and contributes to soil acidification, while excess phosphorus and nitrogen from fields cause algal blooms depleting oxygen in waterways, as seen in U.S. dead zones. Pelletized compost variants show promise in enhancing nutrient efficiency and minimizing runoff, yet lifecycle assessments reveal persistent GHG emissions from energy use in granulation. Criticisms focus on insufficient adoption of slow-release technologies to counter systemic overuse in intensive agriculture.^[128]^[129]^[130]

Recent Developments

Technological Innovations

In biomass pellet production, torrefaction pretreatment has emerged as a key innovation, enhancing pellet density, hydrophobicity, and energy content by thermally treating raw biomass at 200–300°C in low-oxygen conditions, reducing moisture and volatiles while improving grindability for co-firing with coal.^[131] This process, scaled commercially since 2020, allows pellets to achieve higher calorific values comparable to fossil fuels, with pilot plants reporting up to 20–30% improvements in combustion efficiency.^[132] Co-pelletization of diverse feedstocks, such as agricultural residues with wood, further optimizes resource use, yielding uniform pellets with stable mechanical properties through optimized binderless extrusion under high-pressure dies.^[133] For iron ore pelletizing, developments in organic binders derived from biomass, including starch-based and lignosulfonate alternatives to bentonite, have reduced silica impurities and improved green pellet strength by 15–25% in laboratory tests conducted from 2020 onward, minimizing sintering energy requirements.^[134] Automation via process control systems and AI-driven sensors now enables real-time adjustments to moisture, binder dosage, and disc speed, cutting energy consumption by up to 10% in industrial plants, as evidenced by advancements in grate-kiln induration technologies.^[135] Prereduction during pelletizing, integrating hydrogen-based reduction in pilot continuous processes, produces direct reduced iron pellets with metallization degrees exceeding 90%, supporting lower-carbon steelmaking pathways tested since 2021.^[136] In polymer pelletizing for recycling, underwater strand and die-face cut systems incorporating IoT monitoring have advanced since 2022, allowing precise control of cooling and cutting parameters to produce uniform nurdles from mixed post-consumer plastics, reducing defects by 20% and enabling higher throughput in advanced mechanical recycling lines.^[137] These innovations facilitate depolymerization-compatible feedstocks, where pellets from sorted PET and HDPE achieve purity levels suitable for food-grade re-extrusion, with energy-efficient extruders minimizing thermal degradation.^[138] Across sectors, Industry 4.0 integration, including predictive maintenance via machine learning on vibration and temperature data, has boosted overall pelletizing reliability, with reported downtime reductions of 15–30% in biomass and mineral operations by 2025.^[139]

Market and Industry Trends

The global market for pelletized products, encompassing biomass, iron ore, and plastics, continues to expand amid rising demand for efficient material handling and energy alternatives. In the biomass sector, which dominates fuel applications, the market is projected to reach USD 10.17 billion in 2025, growing to USD 16.27 billion by 2033 at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.04%, fueled by policies promoting renewable heating and industrial co-firing in Europe and Asia.^[140] Wood pellets specifically are expected to see production in the European Union rise to 20.5 million metric tons in 2025, up from 19.9 million in 2024, though industrial consumption may recover only marginally due to economic pressures on energy prices.^[141]^[88] In metallurgy, iron ore pellet production supports high-grade steelmaking, with the market valued at USD 61.64 billion in 2025 and forecasted to reach USD 94.51 billion by 2032 at a CAGR of 6.3%, driven by global infrastructure demands and the shift toward direct reduced iron processes for lower emissions.^[142] Alternative estimates project growth to USD 67.5 billion in 2025, reflecting replenished stockpiles and production increases in major exporters like Brazil.^[143]^[144] However, oversupply concerns have prompted adjustments, such as Vale S.A. revising its 2025 pellet output forecast downward to 31-35 million metric tons from prior expectations.^[145] The plastics pelletizing segment, essential for polymer processing, is anticipated to grow from USD 8.45 billion in 2024 to USD 12.68 billion by 2032 at a CAGR of 5.2%, propelled by lightweight material needs in packaging and automotive industries despite environmental scrutiny over microplastic pollution from nurdles.^[146] Equipment markets for pelletizing machines across sectors, valued at USD 2.9 billion in 2023, are set to expand at a 3.8% CAGR through 2032, indicating sustained investment in automation and efficiency upgrades.^[147] Overall, industry trends emphasize technological integration for higher throughput and sustainability compliance, though volatility in raw material supplies and regulatory shifts pose risks to projected trajectories.^[148]

References

[1]
What is Pelletizing? - FEECO International
Pelletizing is a method of agglomeration, or particle size enlargement, in which material fines are processed into pellets or granules.
[2]
Why Pelletize - Mars Mineral
Pelletizing is defined as an agglomeration process whereby an amorphous mass of finely divided particulates, such as dust, powder, fume, is formed into a pellet ...
[3]
Iron Ore Pelletization - FEECO International
Pelletizing, or balling, carried out through either a disc pelletizer or rotary drum, is a key part of efficiently and sustainably producing steel from iron ...Missing: metallurgy | Show results with:metallurgy
[4]
What Is Pelletizing? - Hyde Industrial Blade Solutions
Aug 28, 2023 · Pelletization converts original and recycled polymers into small, uniform pellets that serve as the raw material for manufacturing new plastic products.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[5]
Your guide to pelleting - Borregaard
Pelleting is the process of converting finely ground mash feed into dense, free flowing pellets or capsules. In this section we delve into the art and science ...Table Of Contents · Take A Look At Our Pelleting... · More Resources About...
[6]
Pelletizing - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Pelletizing is defined as a process that follows dry blending in the pre-compounding of rigid and semi-rigid PVC materials, aimed at improving results and ...
[7]
Iron Ore Agglomeration Processes and their Historical Development
Dec 28, 2015 · The first patent on pelletizing was granted to AG Andersson of Sweden in 1912 (Patent number 35124) and in 1913 to CA Brackelsberg in Germany. A ...
[8]
Iron Ore Pelletizing Process: An Overview - IntechOpen
The idea of rolling moist fine ore in a drum to form balls and then drying and firing it was first patented by A. G. Andersson in Sweden in 1912. Further ...
[9]
How innovation saved the Iron Range
Jun 3, 2018 · In 1960, Reserve Mining expanded the Silver Bay plant, increasing annual capacity by 50 percent, to 9 million tons.
[10]
Taconite Mining in Silver Bay: A Tale of Extraction and Accumulation
In 1955, the Reserve Mining Company began operating in Silver Bay, Minnesota. The processing plant for Reserve's taconite mine was situated right off the shore ...
[11]
[PDF] UNITED STATES TARIFF COMMISSION
U.S. production of pellets rose from about 5 million tons or 5 percent of the total usable iron ore produced in 1950 to about 17 million tons or 23.5 percent ...Missing: 1950s | Show results with:1950s
[12]
The grate-kiln induration machine - history, advantages, and ...
Iron ore pellets are a preferred feedstock for ironmaking. One method used for pelletizing is the grate-kiln process, first established in 1960. During the past ...
[13]
NEW ORES FOR OLD FURNACES: PELLETIZED IRON 1
Increased demands of the steel industry for iron ore pellets have helped stimulate the development of large and expensive concentrating and pelletizing ...
[14]
[PDF] conceptual aspects concerning the pelletizing of iron ores
The history of the pelletizing of iron ores started in 1912, in Sweden, with A.G. Andersson, who invented this process of agglomeration. The first industrial ...
[15]
EVOLUTION AND GROWTH OF IRON ORE PELLETIZING
In this scenario, the world pelletizing capacity grew from 350 Mt/year in 2000 to more than 600 Mt/year in 2020. Invented in 1912 by the Swedish A.G. Andersson, ...
[16]
The origins of public concern with taconite and human health
By 1979, taconite mining in Minnesota reached its peak, with eight companies producing approximately 55 million tons of pellets (Skillings, 2002).
[17]
Material Pretreatment Requirements for Pelletizing
Feedstock uniformity is especially important when combining multiple components in the pelletizing process, as a lack of uniformity can otherwise yield ...
[18]
How to Pelletize a Fine Powder - FEECO International
Feedstock should be processed to be as uniform as possible (though a slight variance in PSD is encouraged to produce a strong pellet product).
[19]
Preparation prior to making pellets - Wood Pellet
Jul 12, 2015 · Feedstock preparation. The standard pelleting process. This guide will follow the process to produce quality fuel pellets, and will state the ...<|separator|>
[20]
Mechanisms of agglomerate growth in green pelletization
The mechanisms responsible for the formation and growth of agglomerates in balling or granulation can be described as nucleation, coalescence, ...
[21]
Investigation of the layering mechanism of agglomerate growth ...
Of the several mechanisms identified, nucleation, coalescence, and layering are considered to be predominant in a continuously operated pelletizing system.
[22]
Upgrading wet granulation monitoring from hand squeeze test ... - NIH
These mechanisms are wetting and nucleation, coalescence or growth, consolidation, and attrition or breakage. Granulation can retain a memory about the nuclei ...6. Solid Excipient... · 6.2. Solubility Of Solid... · 7. Mixing Torque Rheometer...
[23]
The Mechanism Of Granulation - Formation And Methods
Nucleation of granules in wet granulation starts with a number of particles joining together in the pendular state. Agitation of the mixture causes the ...Missing: agglomeration | Show results with:agglomeration
[24]
The study of granular agglomeration mechanism - ScienceDirect.com
Dry particle agglomeration mainly occurs due to adhesive forces (e.g., van der Waals force, electrostatic force and magnetic force) between particles.
[25]
A Review on the Effect of the Mechanism of Organic Polymers on ...
Nov 12, 2022 · Low viscosity leads to faster moisture agglomeration on the pellet surface, which may result in the uncontrolled and rapid growth of green ...
[26]
Use of Iron Ore Pellets in Blast Furnace Burden - IspatGuru
Jun 13, 2014 · North American fluxed pellets are now equivalent to the best sinter in terms of reducibility and softening meltdown properties and are superior ...
[27]
[PDF] Effectiveness of Organic Binders for Iron Ore Pelletization
Since iron ore concentrates consist of finely divided particles, they must be pelletized (with a binder) for use as blast furnace feed material. Approximately ...Missing: binding agents techniques
[28]
[PDF] UNDERSTANDING STRENGTH OF DRIED IRON ORE PELLETS
Jan 18, 2023 · Figure 2.3 Coordination number extracted from Halt and Kawatra's (2017) data making fine hematite pellets with a starch binder and variety ...
[29]
Iron ore pellets for blast furnace - a technical guide - MAXTON
Jan 28, 2023 · Iron ore pellets are a man-made iron-riched ore. The pellet production method was invented in Sweden in 1912, and then began to be used in the United States in ...What is iron ore pellet · How iron ore pellet is made... · Iron ore pellets quality and...
[30]
[PDF] iron ore - Mineral Commodity Summaries 2024 - USGS.gov
Oct 17, 2025 · Domestic iron ore production was estimated to be 44 million tons in 2023, a 13% increase from 39 million tons in 2022. Pig iron production ...
[31]
Iron Ore Pellets Market Size & Top Players Analysis, 2032
Jul 17, 2025 · India raised its pellet production from 59.6 million tonnes in 2018–19 to 94 million tonnes in 2023–24. In FY2024–25, the country reached 105 ...Market Dynamics · Regional Insights · East Asia Ironore Pellets...
[32]
Pelletizing Minerals for Improved Handling and Use
Production processes can be greatly improved by pelletizing in many cases. This occurs through enhanced process flow, increased efficiency, and the elimination ...Missing: excluding | Show results with:excluding
[33]
[PDF] A Preliminary Study on Pellet-Sintering of Chromite Fines - Pyro.co.za
The process is characterized by low cost, good strength and uniform size of pellets. The pellet-sintered ores produced can be used in the smelting of high- ...
[34]
Study the effect of chromite ore properties on pelletisation process
Chromite ore pellets are used for ferrochrome production by the smelting reduction process. The strength and porosity of the sintered pellets play a significant ...
[35]
Influence of Chromite Ore Selection on the Pelletized Oxidative ...
Considering the general frail nature of chromite ore [18], a pelletization step is required prior to smelting [19].
[36]
A Study of Pelletization of Manganese Ore Fines - Wiley Online Library
In this paper, high quality fired pellets were produced by simulating grate-kiln process to supply the feed for EAF from some imported manganese ore fines ...
[37]
Strengthening pelletization of manganese ore fines containing high ...
Compared with sintering, pelletizing is an ideal process for manganese ore fines. Pellets have even size and stable chemical compositions, high productivity and ...
[38]
Strengthening pelletization of manganese ore fines containing high ...
Pelletization is one of useful processes for the agglomeration of iron ore or concentrates. However, manganese ore fines are mainly agglomerated by sintering ...
[39]
Pelletizing and alkaline leaching of powdery low grade zinc oxide ores
Aug 6, 2025 · Decreasing the solidification time can reduce reaction time, increase dissolution of zinc in pellets and lower the effect of initial zinc ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[40]
phosphate ore pelletization production process
Phosphate ore powder and phosphate concentrate powder are made into pellets to improve the comprehensive utilization rate of phosphate rock. 1. The pellet ...
[41]
US3032408A - Process of pelletizing phosphate rock - Google Patents
The pan pelletizer is an inclined rotating disc or pan. Phosphate rock fines with or without phosphate dust are introduced at a point preferably below the ...
[42]
Upgrading Phosphate Ores with Rotary Kilns - FEECO International
Pelletizing. It is sometimes desirable or necessary to agglomerate or pelletize the material prior to processing in the kiln, such as in the defluorination ...
[43]
Sulfuric Acid Granulation of Copper—Nickel Ore Tailings - MDPI
Jan 23, 2022 · A potential method was proposed of processing the concentration tailings of copper-nickel ores providing further recovery of non-ferrous metals.
[44]
Effect of manganese ore and basicity on the consolidation ...
Feb 15, 2024 · Compared with sintering and briquetting, pelletizing characterized by compact process flow route, high productivity, low energy consumption, ...<|separator|>
[45]
Novel Additives to Improve Sintering Characteristics of Indian ...
Dec 27, 2023 · This study is conducted to find suitable additives to improve chrome ore pelletization and pellet properties. Two types of additives ...
[46]
Pelleting of broiler diets: An overview with emphasis on pellet quality ...
Pelleting is the most common thermal processing method in the production of poultry feed. The main aim of pelleting is to agglomerate smaller feed particles.<|separator|>
[47]
The history and future of feed processing - Phileo by Lesaffre
Jun 8, 2020 · The most revolutionary innovation was the introduction of the pelleting process in the 1920's-1930's (Behnke, 1996; Castaldo, n.d.). Pelleting ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
[48]
[PDF] History of pelleting - Feed Strategy
In the early days of pelleting, feed manufacturers and livestock producers were concerned about the impact of the heat and pressure used in the pelleting.
[49]
Innovations in pelleting technology for improved quality control in ...
Aug 6, 2024 · The integration of smart sensors in pelleting technology represents a significant advancement in optimizing pellet quality and production ...
[50]
Effect of pelleting and different feeding programs on growth ...
Nov 1, 2019 · Some pelleting benefits include reduction of ingredients segregation, ease of handling, better feed flow in the equipment, and makes it possible ...
[51]
Effect of the Pellet and Mash Feed Forms on the Productive ... - NIH
Mar 5, 2021 · The present study indicated that pellet diets improved the production performance and nutrition metabolism through positive changes in the laying rate, feed ...
[52]
Pelleted feeds: Understanding nutritional benefits, issues
Nov 21, 2017 · Reduced volume for transportation; Reduced dust generation; Less feed separation; Better flowing characteristics compared to meal diets. When it ...
[53]
[PDF] FEED PELLET AND CORN DURABILITY AND BREAKAGE DURING ...
Research has shown that animals fed with good quality pellets have better growth perfor‐ mance and feed conversion than those fed with mash, re‐ ground pellets ...
[54]
Global feed production rises in 2024, led by growth in poultry and dairy
May 14, 2025 · Global feed production increased to 1.396 billion metric tons in 2024, up 1.2% from the previous year, according to the 2025 Alltech Agri-Food Outlook.
[55]
Identifying feed characteristics that affect the pellet manufacturing of ...
The global production of compound livestock feed was estimated at 1.266 billion tonnes in 2022 (Alltech, 2023). A large fraction of this feed is pelleted ...
[56]
Discover The Benefits of Pellet Feed & Related Diet Effects
Pelleting can improve production performance, although research has found that this can depend on the quality of the pellet. Positive production effects can be ...
[57]
[PDF] Improvement of the physical and nutritional quality of pelleted feed
Dec 6, 2007 · Several studies have revealed that pelleted diets improve broiler and swine performance over mash diets (Hussar and Robblee, 1962; Baird, 1973; ...
[58]
Animal nutrition with high-quality pellets - All About Feed
Research consistently shows that animals fed high-quality physical pellets experience improved growth, better feed conversion and enhanced overall health.<|control11|><|separator|>
[59]
Pelleting process of the fertilizer - La Meccanica B2blog
Jun 10, 2021 · The fertilizer pelleting process uses a heavy-duty machine with material up to 20% moisture, producing 3.5-6mm pellets. Forced feeding is used ...
[60]
Systems for Granular Fertilizer and Soil Amendment Production
The slurry is then tumbled in a granulation drum where the reaction completes and the tumbling action rolls the material into pellets as it solidifies.
[61]
Forest Industrial Waste Materials Upgraded to Fertilizer Pellets for ...
Mar 29, 2024 · The pellets met a high-quality result according to durability and density, which were above 95% and 900 kg/m3. However, pellets exposed to wet ...
[62]
Production and Quality Assessment of Fertilizer Pellets from ... - NIH
Mar 4, 2025 · Co-pelleting of compost and SSA produces high-density, high-quality fertilizer pellets with favorable nutrient profiles and heavy metal contents ...<|separator|>
[63]
[PDF] Wood Pellet Ash as an Agricultural Soil Amendment in the ...
Wood pellet ash is rich in potassium and micronutrients, alkaline, and has high acid neutralizing values. Some bottom ash samples meet standards, but some fly ...
[64]
Producing soil conditioner pellets from waste coal tailings for ...
This study proposed a novel approach to produce CT-based soil conditioner (CTSC) pellets for plants using a pelletiser.
[65]
Effect of Pellet Processing of Fertilizer on Slow-Release Nitrogen in ...
Aug 7, 2025 · Pellet processing can be used as a method for slow-release of nitrogen fertilizer that reduces leaching losses and enhanced nitrogen uptake.
[66]
Optimizing the production and quality of soil amendment pellets from ...
Compost-biochar pellets enhanced soil properties, improving nutrients availability, microbial activity, WHC, and soil texture.
[67]
[PDF] Pelleting Animal Manures
Pelleting is a mechanical process that forms uniform-sized pellets from solid material, making them easier to handle, store, and transport.
[68]
Pellet fertilizer as a tool for agricultural sustainability. - Agricotec
Pellet fertilizer improves soil fertility, water retention, and reduces erosion. It also has a lower environmental impact and slow nutrient release.Improving Soil Fertility · Increased Microbial Activity · Lower Environmental Impact
[69]
Quality aspects in the development of pelletized dosage forms - NIH
Feb 15, 2022 · The various pelletization techniques are extrusion-spheronization, Hot-melt extrusion, Layering techniques, Balling (Spherical agglomeration), ...
[70]
Recent advances in pelletization technique for oral drug delivery
The present review outlines the recent findings on the manufacturing and evaluation of spherical pellets published over the past decade. The techniques namely ...<|separator|>
[71]
A Comprehensive Review on Pellets as a Dosage Form in ... - PubMed
The current paper focuses on pellets, the merits and demerits associated, various pelletization techniques, and their characterization.
[72]
Extrusion–spheronization a promising pelletization technique
In extrusion–spheronization, first the dry powder mix is agglomerated with the help of a binding liquid. Then it is processed in the extruder to produce high- ...
[73]
[PDF] Extrusion Spheronization and the Recent Advancements in Pellets
Apr 30, 2022 · The extrusion spheronization was introduced by Reynolds (1970) and by Conine & Hadley (1970) and these will be helpful to produce uniform size ...
[74]
New Insights into the Pelletization Mechanism by Extrusion ... - NIH
This study proves that mass transfer between particles must be considered in addition to plastic deformation in order to capture the spheronization mechanism.
[75]
(PDF) Pelletization by Extrusion-Spheronization: A detailed review
Jul 29, 2025 · This review outlines the various steps involved in the extrusion spheronization process, the excipients used in such formulations along with some modifications.
[76]
Pharmaceutical approaches to preparing pelletized dosage forms ...
Pelletized dosage forms can be prepared by a number of techniques, including drug layering on nonpareil sugar or microcrystalline cellulose beads, spray drying ...
[77]
Review on Starter Pellets: Inert and Functional Cores - PMC
There are several methods for the production of pellets, of which mainly extrusion/spheronization, direct pelletizing, powder layering, and solution or ...
[78]
A Novel Floating Controlled Release Drug Delivery System ... - NIH
Novel floating pellets were prepared using the hot-melt extrusion (HME) technology. Uniformly foamed strands were created by liquid injection pumping and screw ...
[79]
Porous pellets as drug delivery system - PubMed
The technique described in this research work is suitable for the production of porous pellets. Drug loading via immersion the pellets in a drug solution ...
[80]
Manufacturing Fuel Pellets from Biomass - Penn State Extension
Jan 27, 2023 · These steps involve feedstock grinding, moisture control, extrusion, cooling, and packaging. Each step must be carried out with care if the ...
[81]
Raw materials for pelletization - gemco pellet mill
The most common sources of material for the manufacture of wood pellets are the by-products of primary wood processing at sawmills and plywood plants.
[82]
Pellet production from agricultural raw materials – A systems study
Such raw materials include cultivated energy crops (e.g. short rotation coppice, reed canary grass, hemp) and agricultural wastes and by-products (straw, cereal ...
[83]
Wood Pellet Plant Process: Mastery Of Pelletizing Technology
First, the feedstock is usually wood waste, such as wood shavings, sawdust and chips, which must be cleaned and sorted to remove impurities. Next, the feedstock ...
[84]
[PDF] Wood Pellets - An introduction to their production and use
Once the feedstock has been dried, it is fed into a hammer mill to produce wood particles that are a consistent size. This process helps make the pellets a ...Missing: steps | Show results with:steps
[85]
[PDF] ENplus® wood pellets – Requirements for companies
ENplus® ST 1001:2022, the first edition, is the standard for wood pellets, approved by the European Pellet Council, and valid globally.
[86]
Enplus: Home
We are a world-leading, transparent and independent certification scheme for wood pellets. From production to delivery, we guarantee quality and combat fraud.A Quality Scheme · Technical documentation · Home - UK · Producer
[87]
Bioenergy Europe released today its Pellets Statistical Report 2025
Jun 25, 2025 · Global pellet production remained broadly stable in 2024 at 48,3 million tonnes, while global consumption exceeded 45 million tonnes for the ...
[88]
[PDF] Report Name: Wood Pellets Annual
Jul 14, 2025 · In 2024, the number of wood pellet- based heating system units in Germany is estimated at 738,000 (722,000 in 2023).
[89]
USDA: US wood pellet exports top 10 million metric tons in 2024
Feb 5, 2025 · Total U.S. wood pellet exports for 2024 reached 10 million metric tons at a value of $1.86 billion, compared to 9.6 million metric tons exported ...
[90]
Wood and Pellet Heating | Department of Energy
Pellet stoves that are certified by the EPA are likely to be in the 70% to 83% efficiency range. Pellet stoves have heating capacities that range between 8,000 ...
[91]
https://www.comfortbilt.net/blogs/stoves/pellet-stoves-vs-wood-stoves-which-is-better-for-my-home
[92]
ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND WOOD PELLETS: THE PERFECT ...
Jul 29, 2024 · Modern wood pellet stoves and boilers can achieve combustion efficiencies of up to 95%, while firewood typically burns at 70-80% efficiency.
[93]
What are pellets?
Second, the density of pellet fuel is substantially higher than raw biomass (40 lbs. per cubic foot versus 10-25 lbs. per cubic foot in raw material form).<|control11|><|separator|>
[94]
Combustion Characteristics and Visualization Analysis of a Biomass ...
Mar 3, 2023 · The pellet orientation angle of 30° has a shorter ignition time, a lower surface temperature, and a lower burnout temperature.
[95]
Combustion and mechanical properties of pellets from biomass and ...
The additives in the pellet composition increased the combustion time. For instance, rice husk and straw increased the combustion duration by up to 16 %, peat ...
[96]
Emissions and combustion characteristics of torrefied wood pellets
The higher ignition temperature of torrefied pellets means that torrefied pellets burn more slowly and evenly than raw pellets, which can lead to a more ...
[97]
Monthly Densified Biomass Fuel Report - EIA
Wood pellet combustion has a high efficiency level, averaging about 80%, and extremely low particulate emissions. Additionally, wood pellets are a renewable ...
[98]
Comparison of Emissions and Efficiency of Two Types of Burners ...
Feb 8, 2023 · The combustion efficiencies Ƞc for the reference burner were as follows: 93.1% for pellets A, 93.7% for pellets B and 93.6% for pellets C.
[99]
Emissions of wood pelletization and bioenergy use in the United ...
Emissions from biomass-based facilities are on average up to 2.8 times higher than their non-biomass counterparts per unit energy. We estimate that 2.3 million ...
[100]
Characteristics of Biomass as a Heating Fuel - Penn State Extension
Jul 8, 2024 · Key characteristics of biomass include heat value, moisture content, chemical composition (ash, slagging, volatiles), and size/density, which ...
[101]
Solving Common Polymer Pelletizing Issue – Appearance of Fines!
Sep 18, 2018 · Pelletizing of plastics is an operation that involves the processing and cutting of a melted polymer to cylindrical, dry, and easy-to-handle ...<|separator|>
[102]
Pelletizing systems for polymer production - MAAG Group
Jun 3, 2024 · Modular pelletizing systems are suitable for numerous applications such as compounding and masterbatches, production of raw materials, polymers ...
[103]
The History Of Underwater Pelletizers And Their Evolution Over Time
Apr 26, 2023 · The first underwater pelletizer was invented by a German company called Automatik in the 1950s. This machine used a submerged cutting system ...
[104]
Plastic pelletizing | Blog - PURE LOOP
Plastic pelletizing plays a crucial role in the recycling process. In this step, the melt is converted into pellets. There are three different types of ...
[105]
Plastic Pellet Recycling Process - Scrap Management
Rating 4.8 (32) Plastic pelletizing is a crucial process in the recycling industry that involves converting plastic waste into small, cylindrical pellets.
[106]
Common Methods of Pelletization - NYCOA
May 7, 2021 · In this post we want to share some introductory information about the world of pelletization, and how the process method for making resin pellets is an ...
[107]
Follow These Guidelines to Select the Right Pelletizing System
Feb 1, 2019 · Three major types of pelletizing system are available, each with a distinctly different range of strengths and weaknesses.
[108]
Pelletizing: Established solutions and challenging trends
Plastic pellets facilitate handling and enhance processibility, thus pelletizing companies-raw material producers, compounders, and recyclers-offer a real ...
[109]
What Is Plastic Pelletizing? - Accel Polymers llc.
Feb 2, 2021 · Plastic pelletizing is the process of converting scrap plastic back into a usable clean raw material. Plastic manufacturing companies can then ...
[110]
Assessing the environmental footprint of recycled plastic pellets
Additionally, carbon emissions during pellet production from plastic waste are 22.6%, and other impacts are in the range of 11%–40% lower compared to virgin ...
[111]
[PDF] A global opportunity to end Plastic Pellet Pollution
Pellets are the third largest source of microplastic pollution globally with over 445,000 tonnes leaking out of the global plastic supply chain directly into ...
[112]
Strategic Resources Announces Robust Economic Results from its ...
Mar 12, 2024 · Highlights: A robust economic project with an after-tax IRR of 25%. Ability to generate US$173 million of annual EBITDA assuming a US$70/t ...
[113]
Emergy, Environmental and Economic (3E) Assessment of Biomass ...
The production of biomass pellets from corn straw for heating can reduce heating fuel costs by approximately USD 254.26/hm2. Additionally, air pollutant ...
[114]
Cost-Benefit Analysis of Investing in PE PP Film Pelletizing Machines
May 30, 2024 · ... Cost Reduction: Diverting plastic waste from landfills and incineration reduces waste management costs. This includes savings on landfill fees ...
[115]
Plastic Pelletizer: Everything You Need to Know
Cost Savings: Using recycled pellets often reduces production costs in the plastics industry. Uniformity: Ensures pellet size uniformity, essential for ...
[116]
What Are The Investment Benefits Of Making Wood Pellets For Fuel?
The economic advantages of wood pellets are significant: you can save about half of the fuel costs compared to fossil oil or natural gas.
[117]
Iron & Other Ore Pelletizing Plants: Boosting Sustainability
These plants enable the reuse of mining by-products, reduce waste generation, and extend the lifecycle of industrial raw materials.
[118]
Study: Burning wood pellets for energy endangers local ... - Mongabay
Jan 18, 2024 · A wide range of hazardous air pollutants are emitted from burning wood pellets for energy, including particulate matter and dioxins, that are harmful to human ...
[119]
Wood Pellet Manufacturing in the South Harms Communities and ...
May 29, 2025 · Wood pellet manufacturing plants release harmful air pollution, like nitrogen oxides and fine particulate matter (PM 2.5).
[120]
Biomass and the environment - U.S. Energy Information ... - EIA
Apr 17, 2024 · Biomass and biofuels are alternative energy sources to fossil fuels. Burning fossil fuels and biomass releases carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), a greenhouse gas.
[121]
Sustainable biomass certification scheme is flawed, degrades ...
Aug 21, 2025 · The NGO report alleges that not all SBP-certified biomass has been harvested sustainability, and points out that certification methodologies are ...
[122]
Environmental impacts for iron ore pellet production: A study of an ...
The pelletizing process is relevant for Ozone Layer Depletion (95 %), Fossil Depletion (86 %) due to the energy sources, like carbon, electricity, fuel oil, and ...
[123]
Environmental impacts for iron ore pellet production: A study of an ...
Jul 5, 2025 · The study showed that the main environmental impact in the Human Health category was particulate matter emissions during the open mining ...Missing: effects | Show results with:effects
[124]
Iron ore pellets and sustainable steel | Malvern Panalytical
Nov 2, 2022 · Pellets reduce the amount of coking coal required and improve furnace productivity, reducing CO 2 emissions in the process.
[125]
The Problem - The Great Nurdle Hunt
Nurdles, small plastic pellets, are the second largest source of microplastic pollution, with 445,970 tonnes entering the environment yearly, and are difficult ...
[126]
The M/V X-Press Pearl Nurdle Spill: Contamination of Burnt Plastic ...
Exposure to combustion, heat, and chemicals led to agglomeration, fragmentation, charring, and chemical modification of the plastic, creating an unprecedented ...<|separator|>
[127]
FAQ - Plastic pellets
When plastic pellets are released into the marine environment, they can cause environmental damage, including impacts on fishing, aquaculture and tourism.What Are Plastic... · What Has Imo Done To... · Who Is Liable For Clean-Up...
[128]
Improving sustainability and mitigating environmental impacts of ...
Sep 15, 2021 · However, compost fertilizer is prone to decomposition by bacteria or fungi when left in the field in wet conditions for long periods, resulting ...
[129]
Basic Information on Nutrient Pollution | US EPA
Apr 22, 2025 · Too much nitrogen and phosphorus in the water causes algae and algae-like bacteria to grow faster than ecosystems can handle, forming algal ...
[130]
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-20818-9
[131]
2025 Pellet Mill Magazine Issue 1
Feb 20, 2025 · “The torrefaction process increases the calorific value and grindability of the biomass, which make it suitable for use in pulverized coal ...
[132]
Riding the Wave of Innovation | Biomass Magazine
Aug 13, 2025 · Learn more about innovations at CPM and Biomass Engineering ... biomass production, new technology, and near-term research and development.
[133]
Better use of bioenergy: A critical review of co-pelletizing for biofuel ...
This paper provides an innovative overview of co-pelletization technology for biomass pellet fuels. The chemical composition of various types of biomass is ...
[134]
Development and Application Prospects of Biomass-Based Organic ...
Pelletization typically involves mixing iron ore with binders and then adding water as a wetting agent to adjust the moisture content, promoting particle ...
[135]
[PDF] 6th North American Iron Ore Symposium: Agglomeration & Pelletizing
Iron ore beneficiation needs advances in process control, automation, more efficient burners and furnace designs, new silica-free binders, and even al-.Missing: innovations | Show results with:innovations
[136]
[PDF] PREREDUCED IRON ORE PELLETS - CDC Stacks
Part 1 reviews pelletizing technology and presents the case for prereduced pellets. Part 2 reveals the laboratory technique for making prereduced pellets from a.Missing: binding | Show results with:binding<|separator|>
[137]
Under Water Str Pelletizing System Market Outlook 2025-2032
The integration of IoT-enabled monitoring systems allows real-time adjustment of cutting parameters, optimizing pellet quality while minimizing material waste.
[138]
Advanced Mechanical Recycling - TOMRA
Advanced mechanical recycling is a revolutionary new technique that transforms household plastic waste into high-quality recycled plastic content.
[139]
Exploring Cutting-Edge Innovations and Sustainable Practices in ...
Discover emerging trends such as smart automation, digitalization, and Industry 4.0 integration, and their potential to revolutionize biomass pellet ...
[140]
Biomass Pellets Market Size & Outlook, 2025-2033 - Straits Research
The global biomass pellets market size is projected to grow from USD 10.17 billion in 2025 to USD 16.27 billion by 2033, exhibiting a CAGR of 6.04%.
[141]
Report: EU wood pellets consumption expected to expand in 2025
Sep 11, 2025 · The EU is expected to produce 20.5 million metric tons of wood pellets in 2025, up from 19.9 million in 2024 and 19.97 million in 2023. Imports ...Missing: forecast | Show results with:forecast
[142]
Iron Ore Pellets Market Size, Share | Industry Report [2025-2032]
Oct 6, 2025 · June 2023: Samarco achieved a significant milestone by producing 20 million tons of iron ore pellets since resuming operations in December 2020 ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[143]
Iron Ore Pellet Market Size, Trends & Forecast 2025-2035
Sep 24, 2025 · The global iron ore pellet market is projected to reach US$ 67,503.9 million in 2025, with expectations to surpass US$ 142,988.8 million by 2035 ...
[144]
[PDF] IRON ORE1 - USGS Publications Warehouse
Events, Trends, and Issues: Iron ore production in 2024 was estimated to have increased likely owing to replenishing stocks. Domestic iron ore production ...
[145]
Vale (VALE) Cuts 2025 Iron Ore Pellet Forecast Amid Market ...
Jul 8, 2025 · Vale (VALE) Cuts 2025 Iron Ore Pellet Forecast Amid Market Oversupply. The new forecast range is 31 million to 35 million metric tons (Mt).<|separator|>
[146]
Plastic Pellets Market Size, Share, Growth Trends & Forecast 2032
Plastic Pellets Market was valued at US$ 8.45 Bn. in 2024 and is expected to reach US$ 12.68 Bn. by 2032, at a CAGR of 5.20% during the forecast period.
[147]
Pelletizing Machine Market Size & Share, Statistics Report-2032
The global pelletizing machine market was valued at around USD 2.9 billion in 2023 and is estimated to grow at a CAGR of around 3.8% from 2024 to 2032.Missing: timeline milestones
[148]
Pelletizing Machine 2025-2033 Trends: Unveiling Growth ...
Rating 4.8 (1,980) Jul 8, 2025 · The global pelletizing machine market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand across diverse industries.