Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Indexicality

Indexicality is a central concept in the philosophy of language and linguistics denoting the context-dependent interpretation of certain expressions, whose reference shifts according to features of the utterance situation such as the speaker, time, or location.^[1] Typical examples include pure indexicals like the first-person pronoun I, which refers to the speaker; spatial deictics such as here and there; temporal terms like now and today; and demonstratives such as this or that, often accompanied by gestures.^[2] Unlike names or definite descriptions, which have stable references across contexts, indexicals derive their semantic content directly from contextual parameters, enabling efficient communication of egocentric or proximal information.^[1] The modern semantic framework for indexicals was established by philosopher David Kaplan in his 1977 essay "Demonstratives," which posits that indexicals possess a stable character—a function mapping contexts to contents—and a context-sensitive content that determines truth-conditions without intermediary senses or modes of presentation.^[3] Kaplan's two-dimensional logic distinguishes the stable rules governing indexical use from their variable extensions, influencing subsequent debates on direct reference, belief ascription (e.g., de se attitudes), and the scope of context-sensitivity in natural language.^[4] This approach underscores indexicals' role in resolving puzzles like the failure of substitutivity in propositional attitude reports, where "I am a fool" expressed by the speaker differs essentially from third-person variants.^[5] Key distinctions within indexicality include pure indexicals, which rely solely on utterance coordinates without further demonstration (e.g., today), versus true demonstratives requiring accompanying indications (e.g., pointing with that).^[2] While Kaplan's theory emphasizes rigid, direct reference, ongoing controversies involve whether all apparent indexicals reduce to such mechanisms or if some involve pragmatic enrichment, as in debates over quasi-indexicals like actual or relational anaphors.^[1] Empirically, cross-linguistic studies confirm indexicality's universality, though variations in form (e.g., honorifics indexing social stance) highlight its interplay with pragmatics and cognitive anchoring to the self.^[6] These elements collectively reveal indexicality's foundational status in understanding how language interfaces with subjective experience and causal context.^[7]

Semiotic Foundations

Peirce's Trichotomy of Signs

Charles Sanders Peirce classified signs according to a trichotomy that differentiates their mode of reference to an object: icons, indices, and symbols. An icon denotes its object through intrinsic qualities of resemblance or similarity, such that the sign would convey the same relation even if the object did not exist, as in a portrait replicating the features of its subject.^[8] An index denotes through a real, existential connection or causal influence from the object, such as smoke serving as an index of fire due to the physical process of combustion linking the two.^[8] A symbol denotes through a general rule or habitual association established by convention, independent of resemblance or direct causation, like algebraic notations representing mathematical operations.^[8] This trichotomy emerges from Peirce's broader categories of Firstness, Secondness, and Thirdness, outlined in his 1867 paper "On a New List of Categories," where Firstness captures pure qualities or possibilities, Secondness brute reactions or actualities, and Thirdness mediating laws or habits.^[9] Icons align with Firstness by relying on shared qualitative properties; indices with Secondness through factual contiguity, correlation, or compulsion rather than interpretive mediation alone; and symbols with Thirdness via representational habits that govern interpretation across instances.^[9] Peirce emphasized that indices presuppose an actual dyadic relation—such as pointing or effect—grounded in Secondness, distinguishing them from icons' monadic qualities or symbols' triadic conventions.^[8] Peirce first articulated elements of this sign classification in section 14 of the 1867 paper, initially framing signs as likenesses (icons), indications (indices), and general symbols, and refined it across subsequent works up to his 1903 Harvard Lectures on Pragmatism.^[9]^[10] In these lectures, delivered between March 26 and May 17, 1903, Peirce integrated the trichotomy into his pragmaticist philosophy, underscoring indices' role in causal realism by highlighting their dependence on verifiable existential links over arbitrary or mimetic signification.^[10] This framework positions indexicality as a mode privileging empirical connection, foundational to Peirce's semiotic typology developed amid his lifelong logical inquiries from 1867 onward.

Index as Context-Dependent Signification

In Charles Sanders Peirce's semiotic framework, an index functions as a sign that denotes its object through a direct, non-arbitrary connection, such as a physical, causal, or existential relation, which inherently embeds and reveals contextual dependencies for its interpretation.^[11] Unlike symbols, whose meanings derive from habitual conventions independent of immediate circumstances, indices presuppose the actual presence or influence of their referents, making their signification contingent on verifiable real-world linkages rather than abstracted rules.^[12] This context-dependence ensures that indices "point to" objects via brute factual associations, as seen in a weather vane, which aligns with wind direction solely because the wind exerts mechanical force upon it, rendering the sign interpretable only amid ongoing atmospheric conditions.^[11] Similarly, a footprint in soil indices the recent passage of a foot-bearing entity through the compressive effect of weight on the medium, a causal trace that dissipates without sustained context.^[12] This distinguishes indices from icons, which signify via qualitative resemblance interpretable through subjective analogy, and from symbols, which maintain stable denotation across variable settings via learned association.^[13] Indices, by contrast, demand empirical corroboration of their linkage—such as aligning the vane's orientation with anemometer readings or matching footprint contours to a suspect's shoe—to affirm signification, thereby facilitating truth-seeking through testable correlations over perceptual or conventional proxies.^[11] Peirce classified such signs as "dicisigns" when asserting facts, emphasizing their role in grounding inference against reality rather than interpretive latitude.^[12] Peirce further highlighted the inferential dimension of indices via abduction, a hypothetical reasoning process where an observed sign prompts positing an explanatory cause that resolves the anomaly.^[14] For instance, detecting smoke as an index abductively hypothesizes fire as the generative source, with subsequent deduction and induction verifying the causal chain through contextual evidence like heat or fuel remnants, privileging realist validation over unfettered hypothesis.^[14] This abductive reliance underscores indices' orientation toward causal mechanisms, countering relativist views by tethering meaning to observable contingencies and experimental falsification.^[13]

Historical Development and Influences

Charles Sanders Peirce formulated the concept of the index as a distinct category within his triadic classification of signs—alongside icons and symbols—beginning in his 1867 essay "On a New List of Categories" and elaborating it through subsequent writings up to the early 1900s, positing indices as signs connected to their objects through existential or causal relations rather than resemblance or convention.^[15] Peirce drew from Aristotelian logic, particularly the categories of substance and relation, as well as empirical traditions emphasizing direct observation and abduction, adapting these to argue that indices, like a weathercock indicating wind direction, rely on brute force or adjacency for signification.^[16] In 1938, Charles Morris advanced Peirce's framework in Foundations of the Theory of Signs, recasting the semiotic process in behaviorist terms as a relation among a sign vehicle (the perceptible form), its designatum (the object referenced), and the interpretant (the effect on the interpreter), thereby emphasizing pragmatic dimensions over Peirce's more metaphysical infinitude of interpretants.^[17] This refinement facilitated applications beyond pure logic, integrating semiotics with empirical psychology by focusing on dispositional responses to signs. Early linguistic incorporation appeared in Karl Bühler's 1934 Sprachtheorie, where his organon model portrayed language as a multifunctional tool encompassing expressive, representational, and appellative (deictic or indexical) roles, with the latter anchoring utterances to speaker position and context via demonstrative fields.^[18] Philosophically, Hans Reichenbach's 1947 Elements of Symbolic Logic analyzed indexical terms through token-reflexive rules, treating expressions like "I" or "now" as self-referential to their utterance tokens, thus providing a formal mechanism for context-dependent reference in logical systems.^[19] By the 1970s, these semiotic foundations underpinned a shift toward interdisciplinary extensions, particularly in pragmatic linguistics and cultural analysis, where indexicality's causal grounding in context enabled rigorous examination of sign-object links without reliance on arbitrary conventions.^[20] This evolution preserved Peirce's emphasis on real connections, influencing subsequent work while resisting dilutions from structuralist abstractions.

Linguistic Pragmatics

Referential Indexicality and Deixis

Referential indexicality encompasses linguistic expressions whose semantic reference is determined by utterance-specific contextual parameters, such as the speaker's identity, the time and location of speaking, and environmental saliences. Deixis operationalizes this through pragmatic categories that anchor reference to the speech act: person deixis via pronouns like "I" (speaker) and "you" (addressee); spatial deixis via adverbs like "here" (proximate to utterance site) and "there" (distal); temporal deixis via "now" (simultaneous with utterance) and "then" (non-simultaneous); and demonstrative deixis via "this" (near speaker) and "that" (remote). These expressions yield variable referents across contexts—for instance, sequential uses of "I" by different speakers designate distinct individuals—yet ensure precise, context-bound identification essential for communication.^[21] Frege's sense-reference distinction laid groundwork for understanding indexical context-sensitivity, positing that expressions like "today" convey a sense incorporating the utterance date, such that its reference (a specific day) shifts while the associated thought remains objectively graspable; he noted that to preserve equivalence in indirect discourse, "today" must become "yesterday" to retain the original sense. Russell extended this by characterizing indexicals as non-descriptive yet unambiguous designators, dependent on perceptual or situational facts rather than propositional content, as in "I," which rigidly picks out the utterer without equivocation. These analyses highlight how indexicals avoid the reference failures of definite descriptions by leveraging causal ties to context.^[22]^[23] Cross-linguistic surveys reveal deictic primitives as near-universal, with first- and second-person pronouns present in all documented languages to encode speaker-hearer distinctions, reflecting evolved cognitive mechanisms for egocentric and allocentric referencing. Empirical data from acquisition studies confirm early mastery of deictic shifts, with children around age 3 reliably adjusting temporal terms like "yesterday" relative to shifting perspectives, indicating innate processing of contextual anchors. In truth-conditional semantics, indexicals supply a fixed character—a contextual function yielding content (the proposition's truth-value bearer)—enabling sentences to express context-relative truths; for example, "I am here now" is tautologically true due to its character mandating alignment with speaker, place, and time coordinates.^[24]^[25]^[3]

Non-Referential Indexicality in Utterance Meaning

Non-referential indexicality refers to linguistic elements that signal contextual parameters of an utterance—such as temporal alignment, interpersonal calibration, or epistemic sourcing—without denoting specific entities or events, thereby contributing to the overall pragmatic interpretation of speaker meaning.^[26] These features function as procedural cues, establishing the interactional frame for inference rather than providing direct referential content, as distinguished from deictic shifters like pronouns.^[27] In utterance production and comprehension, they encode aspects of the speech event itself, influencing how hearers reconstruct the intended message based on observable contextual dependencies.^[28] Tense marking exemplifies non-referential indexicality by anchoring the utterance to the temporal context of speaking, signaling the speaker's stance toward event location relative to the deictic center without referencing a particular time entity. For instance, simple present tense in English often indexes a stance of immediacy or genericity, as in weather reports ("It rains"), presupposing shared temporal orientation at the moment of utterance.^[26] Politeness forms, such as indirect requests ("Could you possibly pass the salt?"), index social distance by calibrating the utterance to perceived relational hierarchies, evoking inferences of deference or imposition avoidance per the weight of the request. Intonation patterns further illustrate this, where rising terminal contours in declarative statements can index evidential indirectness or uncertainty, as evidenced in experimental data from Majorcan Catalan, where such prosody marks reliance on hearsay or inference over direct observation, affecting comprehension accuracy.^[29] Within Gricean pragmatics, these non-referential indices act as inference triggers, prompting hearers to apply cooperative principles to derive implicatures from contextual signals; for example, excessive politeness may implicate heightened awareness of face-threat under the quantity maxim, revealing speaker intent tied to situational facts.^[30] Empirical psycholinguistic evidence supports their causal role in processing, with self-paced reading and reaction time studies showing delayed responses to utterances where contextual shifts mismatch indexed features, such as question-under-discussion incongruence, indicating incremental pragmatic computation integrates these cues into utterance meaning.^[31]^[32] This distinguishes non-referential indexicality from semantic referentiality, as these elements do not alter truth-conditional content but modulate utterance interpretation via hearer-inferred situational or attitudinal facts, with data from inference timing experiments confirming their pragmatic, rather than compositional, contribution—prioritizing verifiable processing effects over unsubstantiated interpretive expansions.^[33]^[31]

Empirical Evidence from Language Use

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies provide evidence of context-dependent neural activation during deictic resolution, a core aspect of referential indexicality. In one experiment, processing sentences with high deictic content (e.g., involving multiple spatial or temporal indexicals) relative to low-deictic counterparts elicited increased activation in the bilateral middle temporal gyri, extending to superior temporal sulci, suggesting specialized circuitry for integrating utterance context with indexical reference.^[34] This activation pattern correlates causally with successful resolution of indexicals like demonstratives, as disruptions in schizophrenia impair deictic comprehension without equivalent deficits in non-indexical syntax, underscoring pragmatic reliance on real-time environmental cues.^[34] Cross-linguistic corpora confirm near-universal patterns in deictic systems, supporting empirical universality in indexical structures. The World Atlas of Language Structures (WALS) database, covering over 2,600 languages, documents that 64% exhibit a binary distance contrast in demonstratives (e.g., proximal vs. distal forms), with only 3% lacking any contrast, indicating robust causal links between spatial pragmatics and grammatical encoding across diverse typologies.^[35] These distributions arise from adaptive pressures for efficient reference resolution in communicative contexts, as evidenced by consistent proximal-distal oppositions in unrelated language families. Corpus linguistics quantifies indexical usage variations tied to pragmatic contexts, revealing causal correlations with speaker proficiency and discourse demands. In a corpus-driven analysis of ESL learners' writing (n=200 texts), first-year students used deictics like this and here at rates 25% lower than fourth-year peers, with higher proficiency predicting shifts toward temporally nuanced indexicals (e.g., then over now), attributable to improved context sensitivity rather than lexical expansion alone.^[36] Variationist sociolinguistics extends this through real-time speech tracking; Labov's foundational metrics from 1966 onward show style-shifting in phonetic variables (e.g., postvocalic /r/ realization varying 40-60% by attention to speech), mirroring indexical adjustments to interpersonal factors like formality, with quantitative models linking such shifts to observable environmental triggers. Empirical critiques highlight limits to indexical overgeneralization, where pragmatic models fail without clear causation. Neuroimaging data reveal that deictic impairments in clinical populations persist despite intact semantic processing, implying not all context-dependence qualifies as indexical; parsimonious accounts prioritize verifiable neural correlates over expansive theoretical extensions.^[34] Similarly, corpus patterns show deictic underuse in constrained registers (e.g., academic prose reducing spatial indexicals by 15-20% for abstraction), cautioning against assuming universal causal efficacy without disambiguating discourse-specific constraints.^[36]

Anthropological Extensions

Adaptation of Semiotics in Linguistic Anthropology

Linguistic anthropologists in the late 20th century extended Peircean semiotics by reframing indexicality as a mechanism through which linguistic forms presuppose and entangle contextual social facts, shifting focus from isolated signs to their embedding in cultural practices. Michael Silverstein, a pivotal figure, developed this adaptation in works from the 1970s onward, arguing that indices operate via metapragmatic functions—linguistic cues that model the pragmatic context of utterance events themselves, thereby revealing presupposed participant roles, interactional stances, and underlying ideologies.^[37]^[38] This approach posits indexicality as inherently dialectical, where signs not only point to co-occurring social realities but also transform them through higher-order presuppositions, forming stratified "indexical orders" that accumulate cultural entailments over time.^[39] In Silverstein's analysis of linguistic contact, detailed in his manuscript circulated since the early 1970s and published as "Dynamics of Linguistic Contact" in 1996, indices emerge from historical interactions between speech communities, functioning metapragmatically to index differential access to communicative resources and social hierarchies.^[40] For instance, in scenarios of language shift or pidginization among North American Indigenous groups, lexical or grammatical borrowings index presupposed asymmetries in power and cultural continuity, constraining participant interpretations without explicit reference. This extends Peirce's contiguity-based signification to performative dimensions, where linguistic choices enact stances—such as deference or authority—rather than merely denoting objects, as evidenced in ritual speech genres that presuppose shared ideological frameworks for efficacy.^[41] Fieldwork among Australian Aboriginal communities further grounded this framework empirically, demonstrating how phonological or morphological variants index social relationality, such as moiety affiliations in kinship systems, where linguistic features presuppose dyadic distinctions like "+/- different moiety" that causally link environmental adaptations and biological inheritance to emergent cultural ideologies.^[42] Dialectal variations in these languages, for example, index speaker alignment with totemic clans or ritual statuses, revealing causal chains from ecological pressures on subsistence to formalized linguistic presuppositions that sustain group cohesion. Silverstein's observations underscore that such indices are not arbitrary but rooted in verifiable patterns of usage, where repeated co-occurrences between forms and social contexts yield predictable entailments, testable against ethnographic data rather than abstract theory alone.^[43] This adaptation thus prioritizes the causal realism of language as a socially embedded system, where indexical presuppositions mediate between individual agency and collective norms without reducing to referential denotation. In linguistic anthropology, social indices refer to non-referential linguistic features that signal group affiliations, stances, or social categories through observable correlations rather than direct semantic content. These indices often arise from causal biological or environmental factors, such as vocal pitch variations that empirically correlate with biological sex due to differences in laryngeal anatomy; adult males typically exhibit fundamental frequencies around 85-180 Hz, while females average 165-255 Hz, stemming from longer, thicker vocal folds in males that produce lower resonance.^[44]^[45] Similarly, prosodic elements like intonation contours index affective stances, with rising pitch patterns in declarative utterances signaling uncertainty or deference in conversational dynamics, as evidenced by acoustic analyses of natural speech corpora showing systematic pitch height correlations with interpersonal alignment.^[46] Social class indices manifest in patterns of linguistic variation, notably through hypercorrection, where speakers from lower socioeconomic strata overapply prestige forms in monitored speech to signal upward mobility. William Labov's 1972 study of postvocalic /r/ pronunciation in New York City department stores demonstrated this: clerks at higher-end Saks Fifth Avenue maintained consistent r-fullness (18% r-less in casual style), while those at mid-tier Macy's showed hypercorrection (hyper-rhoticity exceeding 60% in careful style among lower-middle-class speakers), indexing class aspiration amid stratified urban environments.^[47] Such patterns reflect empirical regularities in variationist sociolinguistics, where phonetic shifts correlate with socioeconomic metrics like education and occupation, rather than arbitrary conventions. Identity construction involves enregisterment, the process by which clusters of linguistic forms become linked to recognizable social personas or styles, enabling speakers to index multifaceted affiliations. Asif Agha's framework describes enregisterment as discursive processes that trope diverse signs into coherent registers associated with demographic groups, such as features of African American Vernacular English (AAVE)—including zero copula (e.g., "she Ø tall") and habitual aspect (e.g., "she be working")—which variationist studies link to urban youth identities in neighborhoods with high African American populations, where usage rates exceed 70% for phonological markers like monophthongal /ay/ among adolescents signaling local solidarity.^[48]^[49] These indices operate hierarchically, as in specialized jargons termed oinoglossia by Michael Silverstein, where wine connoisseur discourse deploys terms like "terroir" and sensory metaphors to index expertise, empirically functioning as gatekeeping in prestige economies by excluding non-initiates through opaque, indexically layered evaluations tied to market hierarchies.^[50] Observable data from ethnographic corpora confirm such jargons reinforce professional stratification, with mastery correlating to access in fields like oenology.

Biological and Causal Critiques of Indexical Models

Critiques of indexical models in anthropological linguistics emphasize biological constraints and causal mechanisms underlying linguistic signs, arguing that such models often overemphasize social construction at the expense of innate adaptations and genetic influences. Deictic systems, central to referential indexicality, exhibit features consistent with evolutionary adaptations for social coordination rather than arbitrary cultural inventions. For instance, deictic gestures and terms facilitate joint attention and cooperative action, emerging from embodied cognitive capacities that predate complex language and align with primate pointing behaviors for shared intentionality.^[51] These systems are near-universal across languages, suggesting selection pressures for efficient reference in dynamic environments, where indexical meanings track causal relations like spatial proximity or temporal immediacy rather than deriving solely from higher-order social ideologies.^[52] Empirical data on sex differences in language use further challenge purely constructivist views of indices, revealing patterns linked to hormonal and genetic factors that persist independently of socialization. Meta-analyses indicate men employ more assertive speech forms, such as direct imperatives and interruptions, with small but consistent effect sizes (d ≈ 0.16), contrasting women's greater use of affiliative and tentative styles.^[53] These differences correlate with testosterone levels, which influence vocal production—higher concentrations predict lower pitch and more dominant prosody in men—implying prenatal and pubertal hormonal organization shapes indexical signaling of status or intent, rather than indices being fluidly enacted through performance alone.^[54] ^[55] Such findings underscore causal realism: biological dimorphisms drive baseline linguistic behaviors, with social contexts modulating but not originating them, contra models positing indices as detachable from embodied substrates. Silverstein's framework of indexical orders, which layers presupposed and creative social meanings, invites critique for potential circularity in attributing macro-social ideologies to micro-linguistic forms without sufficient recourse to underlying causations.^[39] By treating indices as dialectically emergent from entextualization processes, it risks conflating correlation with determination, overlooking how genetic and environmental factors—such as heritability in speech production (h² ≈ 27–52% for language-related traits)—constrain possible indexical associations.^[56] Cognitive science alternatives, drawing on modular theories of mind, posit language faculties as domain-specific computational systems evolved for parsing causal structures in signals, prioritizing innate parsing over performative enactment.^[57] This modularity resists full social fluidity, as linguistic indices must interface with biologically fixed perceptual modules for phonetics and syntax, rendering anthropological extensions vulnerable to overattribution of agency to cultural dialectics absent empirical dissection of causal priors. Data on linguistic persistence refute normalized constructivism by demonstrating resilience of indices against deliberate resocialization, highlighting critical periods and biological inertia. In migrant populations, foreign accents diminish but rarely vanish in second-generation speakers if acquisition begins post-critical period (around age 12–15), with residual phonetic traits enduring due to entrenched neural commitments in vocal tract control and auditory mapping.^[58] Twin studies affirm moderate-to-high heritability for speech sound patterns, implying genetic variances in articulation and prosody underlie dialectal stability, even as environmental pressures toward assimilation operate.^[59] These patterns persist despite interventions, as seen in incomplete accent reduction programs, evidencing that indices encode causally potent biological histories rather than being infinitely malleable through indexical orders or performative ideologies.

Philosophical Analyses

Indexicals in Semantics and Context

Indexicals in semantics are linguistic expressions whose semantic reference varies systematically with features of the utterance context, such as the speaker, time, or location, rather than being fixed solely by descriptive content or logical form. Gottlob Frege's distinction between Sinn (sense) and Bedeutung (reference), introduced in his 1892 essay "Über Sinn und Bedeutung," provides a foundational framework, where sense determines reference but must incorporate contextual parameters for indexicals to avoid reference failure in varying circumstances.^[60] This extension addresses how expressions like "today" or "this" yield different referents across uses, with sense serving as a rule that maps contextual elements—such as the utterance's temporal coordinate—to a specific referent, ensuring stable truth-conditional evaluation.^[61] Bertrand Russell's analysis of definite descriptions in "On Denoting" (1905) contrasts with indexical reference by treating phrases like "the present king of France" as incomplete symbols equivalent to existential quantifiers asserting uniqueness and existence, rather than direct referring terms with inherent rigidity.^[62] Unlike descriptions, which allow scope ambiguities and fail to refer when presuppositions are unmet without collapsing truth values, indexicals exhibit context-bound rigidity: their reference remains constant across counterfactual evaluations compatible with the utterance's contextual parameters, prioritizing direct denotation over descriptive mediation.^[23] This distinction underscores indexicals' causal tie to utterance circumstances, where reference determination follows from the expression's rule-like sensitivity to proximal factors like speaker identity, bypassing the quantificational unpacking Russell applies to non-indexical descriptions. Two-dimensional semantics formalizes this context-dependence by evaluating expressions relative to paired coordinates: a primary dimension fixing the context of utterance (e.g., actual world and speaker) and a secondary dimension assessing content across possible worlds consistent with that context.^[63] Indexicals thus receive a character—a function from contexts to contents—resolving reference via logical form that integrates both dimensions, allowing truth-conditional stability despite shifting referents; for instance, "I" denotes the speaker in the primary context, yielding propositions true or false in secondary worlds based on that fixed agent.^[64] This approach reveals tautological structures in coordinated indexical sentences, such as "I am here now," which holds true at every utterance context due to the necessary alignment of speaker, location, and time indices, independent of further worldly verification.^[65]

Kaplan's Character and Content Framework

David Kaplan's framework, articulated in his 1977 paper "Demonstratives," posits that the semantics of indexicals and demonstratives operates through two distinct levels: character, the stable linguistic rule governing an expression's interpretation, and content, the context-specific semantic value or proposition expressed.^[3] The character functions as a mapping from possible contexts of utterance—defined by parameters such as speaker, time, and location—to the corresponding content.^[3] This distinction enables a precise account of how expressions like pure indexicals yield varying referents without altering their underlying meaning.^[3] For pure indexicals, such as "I" or "now," the character rigidly specifies the referent relative to the context: "I" denotes the agent of the context, ensuring its content is the actual speaker in any utterance scenario, while remaining directly referential and rigid across possible circumstances of evaluation.^[3] Demonstratives, including "that" or "he," extend this by incorporating a demonstration—a gesture, mental image, or directing intention—into the character, which then determines the content as the demonstrated entity, bypassing descriptive mediation.^[3] Kaplan formalized these mechanics in the language LD, an extension of first-order predicate logic with identity and descriptions, where demonstrations serve as primitive elements to model context-sensitive truth conditions, as in the logical necessity of "I am here now" within any context despite its contingency.^[3] This approach diverges from treatments of definite descriptions, which resolve reference via property satisfaction and uniqueness conditions rather than contextual functions or demonstrations, highlighting demonstratives' immunity to descriptive ambiguity.^[3] Empirical challenges in contexts like indirect discourse or cross-linguistic translation—where indexical content resists substitution without altering propositional attitudes—further validate the framework's emphasis on direct reference over descriptive proxies.^[3] In "Afterthoughts" (1989), Kaplan refined the theory by examining "monsters," operators purportedly shifting the context of evaluation (e.g., "actually" evaluating a subordinate clause at the utterance context rather than its local one).^[66] He contended that natural languages admit few such shifters, restricting them to preserve the two-dimensional structure of character and content, thereby upholding formal semantic precision against expansions that might introduce pragmatic instability.^[66] This prioritization ensures expressions maintain stable rules for content determination, aligning with Kaplan's broader commitment to direct reference theories.^[66]

Challenges to Rule-Based Theories

Rule-based theories of indexicals, such as David Kaplan's framework positing fixed characters as semantic rules mapping contexts to contents, encounter difficulties in accounting for deferred or descriptive uses where reference shifts beyond speaker-centered rigidity. Geoffrey Nunberg argued in 1993 that expressions like "I" or "here" can defer to non-prototypical referents, as in a surgeon announcing "I have the tumor" to indicate the patient rather than themselves, which violates strict egocentric rules by relying on secondary descriptions or pragmatic deferral rather than direct contextual stipulation. This flexibility suggests that semantic rules alone underdetermine reference, necessitating supplementary pragmatic mechanisms to capture observed variations in natural language corpora.^[67] François Recanati further critiques Kaplanian rigidity by introducing pragmatic modulation, where contextual factors adjust the interpreted meaning of indexicals prior to truth-evaluation, as opposed to mere saturation of fixed parameters. In cases like "you" referring descriptively to "the one who just left" in narrative contexts, modulation allows primary pragmatic processes to alter the effective character, challenging the strict semantics-pragmatics divide and the invariance of rules across utterances.^[68] Recanati's approach, detailed in works emphasizing truth-conditional pragmatics, posits that such adjustments are mandatory and content-altering, supported by linguistic examples where rule-bound predictions fail to align with intuitive speaker interpretations.^[69] Empirical evidence from large language models reinforces these logical challenges, as AI systems trained on vast corpora often misinterpret or produce indexicals due to shallow pattern-matching without causal context grounding, such as failing to resolve "this" in hypothetical scenarios absent embodied perspective. Studies on models like ChatGPT demonstrate systematic errors in indexical production and comprehension, where context-adaptive rules break down under shifted viewpoints, highlighting how pure rule application lacks the hybrid robustness seen in human use.^[70] While rule theories provide explanatory parsimony, their inability to fully predict such variations—evident in verifiable datasets—supports hybrid accounts integrating rules with usage patterns, avoiding relativism through corpus-grounded constraints.^[71]

Cognitive and Metaphysical Dimensions

Indexicality in Self-Reference and Belief

John Perry's 1979 analysis of the "essential indexical" demonstrates that self-referential beliefs possess a subjective component irreducible to non-indexical propositions, as their causal efficacy in guiding action depends on the agent's egocentric perspective. In a key example, a shopper unaware of trailing sugar believes propositions about spills occurring but fails to stop until forming the belief "I am making a mess," where the indexical "I" anchors the content to the self, enabling behavioral response..pdf) This illustrates that beliefs lacking such anchoring, even if descriptively equivalent, do not motivate the same actions, highlighting indexicality's role in the practical rationality of mental states.^[72] De se beliefs—attitudes toward oneself under the first-person mode of presentation—exemplify this necessity, resisting translation into de re or de dicto forms without forfeiting their explanatory power for intentional behavior. Perry contends that such beliefs fail to be captured by Russellian propositions, as the indexical element integrates context-dependent self-identification essential for causal chains leading to action, such as in cases where third-personal knowledge (e.g., "Perry is spilling sugar") does not prompt intervention..pdf) Subsequent critiques and extensions affirm that de se content preserves the belief's role in decision-making, where impersonal equivalents lack the subjective immediacy required for efficacy.^[73] Linking to action theory, indexicals facilitate the specification of Davidsonian events in belief structures, where self-referential content identifies the agent as participant in causal sequences, transforming static propositions into dynamic, egocentrically oriented guides for behavior. This integration ensures that beliefs not only represent states but trigger events involving the self, as seen in intentional explanations requiring first-person anchoring to account for observed actions.^[74] Empirically, egocentric cognition underpins this, with self-referential processing yielding superior memory and motivational effects, as meta-analyses of encoding tasks show enhanced recall for self-linked information, reflecting the primitive embedding of indexicality in mental representation.^[75] Introspective thought experiments verify self-reference's foundational status, as subjects report distinct phenomenal and causal profiles when indexicals are replaced, confirming their irreducibility: paraphrases like "the agent here now believes P" alter the belief's introspectively accessible force, underscoring indexicality's primitive anchoring in belief formation..pdf) Tyler Burge's framework further posits egocentric indexes as core to psychological content, enabling singular self-thoughts without identificatory mediation, thus grounding causal realism in mental states' subjective orientation.^[76]

Essential Indexical and First-Person Perspectives

Héctor-Neri Castañeda introduced the distinction between third-person pronouns like "he" and quasi-indicators such as "he himself" in his analysis of self-conscious belief reports, arguing that the latter uniquely capture the first-person perspective irreducible to objective descriptions.^[77] In this framework, "he himself" serves as a device to ascribe de se beliefs—beliefs about oneself as oneself—that Fregean hierarchies of sense and reference fail to accommodate, as they overlook the causal immediacy of self-location from the agent's embodied viewpoint.^[78] This essential indexicality implies that self-reference involves a primitive, perspectival element grounded in the thinker's causal relation to their own mental states, challenging reductions to non-indexical propositions.^[79] The metaphysical upshot is that indexicality anchors subjective realism, positing irreducibly first-personal facts about the self that resist eliminativist denial or materialist assimilation into third-person science.^[80] John Perry's extension of Castañeda's ideas, through cases where agents possess all relevant descriptive knowledge yet fail to act without indexical realization (e.g., believing "the messy shopper is me" versus objective facts alone), demonstrates that de se attitudes possess unique causal efficacy tied to self-location, undermining attempts to eliminate the subjective via functional or propositional equivalents.^[80] For qualia—the introspectively accessible, phenomenal properties of experience—indexicals like "my sensation" index these private, intrinsic features, which empirical reports of consciousness confirm as non-reducible to behavioral or neural correlates alone, countering materialist claims that qualia are illusory or exhaustively describable objectively.^[81] Empirical evidence from split-brain studies, involving patients with severed corpus callosum, reveals disruptions in unified indexical self-reference, where hemispheres exhibit independent streams of agency and confabulation, as the left (verbal) hemisphere denies awareness of right-hemisphere actions despite their occurrence.^[82] Such dissociations empirically affirm indexicality's role in binding subjective perspectives, prioritizing causal disruptions in self-location over functionalist dismissals that attribute them to mere informational gaps without ontological commitment to multiple first-person viewpoints.^[83] While functionalists like Daniel Dennett argue qualia and indexical selves dissolve into dispositional roles without residue, the persistence of perspectival variance in these cases—unexplained by eliminativism—supports the causal reality of essential indexicals as markers of irreducible subjectivity.^[84]^[82]

Implications for Mind and Reality

Indexicality posits that certain facts about reality are inherently perspectival, yet objectively grounded in the ontology of context-dependent relations rather than subjective illusion. Temporal indexicals like "now" engage the debate between A-series (tensed) and B-series (tenseless) theories of time, where the former treats the present as a mind-independent boundary distinguishing past from future. Arthur Prior's 1967 analysis in tense logic formalized "now" as an operator capturing objective temporal becoming, enabling propositions such as "it is now the case that P" to express irreducible tensed truths that evolve with time's passage, thus supporting an ontology of dynamic, A-theoretic reality over static B-series eternalism. This framework reveals perspectival facts—e.g., the objective status of an event as presently occurring—as real constituents of the temporal structure, not mere epistemic artifacts. Spatial indexicals such as "here" similarly ground relational metaphysics, positing space as a network of objective relations among entities rather than an independent container. In this view, "here" references the utterer's position within a relational web, aligning with Leibnizian relationalism where spatial properties emerge from inter-object distances and orientations, devoid of absolute locations. Empirical support derives from classical physics critiques of substantivalism, where relational structures suffice to explain motion and geometry without invoking unoccupied spatial points, as relationalism accounts for all observable spatial phenomena via body-body relations. Such indexicals thus affirm realism about perspectival spatial facts, embedding the observer's standpoint in an objective relational ontology. From a causal realist standpoint, indexicals track genuine objective correlations between contexts and worldly entities, mitigating solipsistic misreadings that conflate perspectival reference with ontological subjectivity. For example, an indexical like "this" establishes a causal chain from the utterance event to its referent via perceptual or demonstrative links, ensuring references align with external causal powers rather than isolated mental states. This debunks overinterpretations of indexicality as yielding solipsism, as the mechanisms of reference—grounded in reliable causal processes—preserve intersubjective consistency across perspectives.^[85] Interdisciplinary connections to physics further illuminate this without endorsing relativism: observer-dependent frames in special relativity, such as varying simultaneity across inertial observers, mirror indexical context-sensitivity in describing measurements (e.g., length contraction at relative velocities), yet preserve objective invariants like the spacetime interval. These frames do not relativize truth but encode perspectival aspects of a unified Minkowski ontology, where indexical-like coordinates (e.g., proper time) reveal real, frame-covariant facts about events. This parallels metaphysical realism, affirming that indexical variations reflect structural objectivity in reality's causal fabric, not arbitrary subjectivity.

Debates, Criticisms, and Recent Developments

Major Controversies in Application

One major controversy concerns the referential versus non-referential roles of indexicals in applied semantics. Traditional pragmatic approaches, following Kaplan's framework, treat indexicals like "I" or "now" as contributing directly to truth-conditional content through context-dependent reference.^[5] In contrast, linguistic anthropology highlights non-referential indexical functions, where linguistic forms signal social stances, identities, or cultural presuppositions without altering propositional truth-values, as in Silverstein's analysis of shifters indexing interpersonal dynamics beyond denotation.^[27] Empirical evidence from discourse studies supports a hybrid model, showing that utterances often combine referential precision with non-denotational cues—such as accent variations indexing speaker affiliation—that modulate interpretation without pragmatic intrusion into semantics.^[28] This synthesis resolves under-determination issues in pure referentialism but faces criticism for diluting Kaplanian rigor, with anthropological applications risking overemphasis on subjective stance at the expense of verifiable reference.^[86] A second debate arises in extending indexicality to social constructs, particularly sex and gender categories, where constructivist models in anthropology posit contextually variable indexing detached from fixed priors. These approaches analyze gender as emergent from discursive practices, akin to non-referential signaling of cultural norms.^[87] Critics contend this ignores causal biological foundations, such as sex dimorphism rooted in anisogamy—males producing small motile gametes and females large immotile ones—a mechanism conserved across sexually reproducing species and constraining indexical flexibility to rare intersex exceptions (0.018% of births per chromosomal criteria).^[88] Biosocial syntheses argue for integrating evolved priors with social modulation, rejecting pure constructivism as empirically ungrounded, since reproductive outcomes empirically adjudicate sex over arbitrary indexing.^[89] Anthropological overreliance on indexical variability here reflects disciplinary bias toward cultural relativism, undervaluing cross-cultural biological universals evident in genetic and physiological data.^[90] Philosophical applications further spotlight tensions between rule-governed (Kaplanian) and use-based (contextualist) theories, tested via experimental semantics. Kaplan's character-content distinction enforces stable rules for indexical resolution, precluding ad hoc variability.^[5] Contextualists counter that interpretations, including for temporal indexicals like "today," incorporate speaker intentions or salience beyond fixed contexts, as challenged by under-determination arguments where multiple resolutions fit data.^[86] Surveys in experimental philosophy from the 2010s reveal mixed intuitions: participants often favor flexible readings aligned with contextualism for ambiguous scenarios, yet adhere to Kaplanian defaults in straightforward cases, suggesting hybrid mechanisms but methodological disputes over vignette realism.^[91] These tests underscore application pitfalls, including failure to distinguish semantic indexicals from pragmatic enrichment, potentially rendering theories explanatorily vacant without independent criteria for unobvious cases.^[86]

Empirical and Theoretical Advances Post-2020

In de se semantics, post-2020 theoretical refinements have emphasized the exclusion of certain entailments in distinguishing de se from de re attitudes, allowing utterances to convey self-referential content even when presupposed implications are contextually ignored. This challenges earlier assumptions that all entailments must factor into attitude ascriptions, with implications for how indexical expressions like "I" anchor beliefs to doxastic centers without rigid propositional commitment.^[92] Empirical investigations into sociolinguistic indexicality have leveraged experimental paradigms to trace the emergence of social meanings in controlled linguistic environments. A 2023 study on artificial languages found that variants rapidly acquire indexical associations with speaker groups, forming register-like gradients akin to natural sociolinguistic variation, as participants inferred nonlinguistic social features from form distributions.^[93] This aligns with variationist approaches influenced by Eckert, where indexicality functions as a cline rather than discrete categories, supported by behavioral data showing rapid conventionalization of such links.^[94] In semiotics, a revival of Peircean indexicality post-2020 has prioritized causal grounds over interpretive mediation, positioning indices as direct effects of their objects. A 2022 analysis in religious semiotics highlighted how indexical signs materially embody causality, pointing to absent causes like divine agency through tangible traces, thus enabling non-arbitrary reference in multimodal contexts.^[95] This causal emphasis has extended to multimodal discourse, where 2024-2025 studies apply indexical analysis to visual-linguistic hybrids, demonstrating how co-present signs yield empirical gradients of reference resolution via causal adjacency rather than symbolic convention alone.^[96] Such advances facilitate data-driven modeling in AI systems for resolving indexical ambiguity in mixed-media inputs.^[97]

Interdisciplinary Impacts and Future Directions

In cognitive science, indexicality intersects with embodied cognition by emphasizing how semantic content relies on the agent's physical and situational embedding, such as spatial or temporal references grounded in bodily orientation.^[98] This framework reveals limitations in disembodied models of mind, where failures to account for indexical dependencies lead to incomplete explanations of perception and action coordination, as sensory-motor systems constitutively shape referential success.^[99] Empirical studies in grounded cognition further support this, showing that conceptual representations reactivate modality-specific experiences tied to indexical contexts, enhancing predictive models of behavior over abstract symbol manipulation alone.^[100] In artificial intelligence, particularly natural language processing, indexicality poses persistent challenges for context-aware systems, often resulting in failures to resolve speaker-relative references like "this" or "now" without explicit disambiguation.^[101] Large language models, despite advances, struggle with dynamic indexical shifts in dialogue, leading to misinterpretations in real-time applications such as conversational agents, where inadequate context modeling amplifies errors in referential grounding.^[102] These shortcomings underscore the need for hybrid architectures integrating sensory inputs to mimic human-like deictic processing, as pure statistical patterns fail to capture causal dependencies on utterance circumstances. Biological investigations extend indexicality to nonhuman primates, where deictic signals—such as referential pointing or distal gestures—function to index specific environmental referents, facilitating coordinated attention without full symbolic semantics.^[103] In chimpanzees, for instance, these signals demonstrate audience-directed intentionality, adjusting based on visual access to shared referents, suggesting evolutionary precursors to human indexical systems rooted in ecological pressures for efficient signaling.^[104] Comparative analyses across great apes reveal that such indexicals prioritize causal immediacy over arbitrary conventions, informing debates on the biological fixity of deictic mechanisms against cultural overlays. Indexicality's broader impacts foster truth-seeking in interdisciplinary communication by exposing unarticulated contextual assumptions that underpin interpretive disputes, thereby prioritizing verifiable referential anchors over fluid subjective construals. This counters relativistic tendencies in social frameworks, where denial of stable indexical cores—such as first-person biological self-reference—undermines causal accountability in identity-based claims. Future directions emphasize empirical rigor, including post-2020 advances in indexical shift theories that enable cross-linguistic testing of grammatical constraints on context-dependence.^[105] Longitudinal studies tracking indexical stability amid sociocultural shifts could disentangle invariant semantic rules from variable pragmatics, using multimodal data from AI simulations and primate observations to validate causal models over normative interpretations.^[106] Such hypotheses prioritize falsifiable predictions, advancing unified theories of reference across domains.

References

[1]
Indexicals - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jan 16, 2015 · An indexical is, roughly speaking, a linguistic expression whose reference can shift from context to context.
[2]
Demonstratives and Indexicals | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
In the philosophy of language, an indexical is any expression whose content varies from one context of use to another.Kaplan's Semantic Theory of... · True Demonstratives · Kaplan's Logic of Indexicals
[3]
[PDF] Kaplan.demonstratives.pdf
The demonstratives 'that' and 'he' can be correctly used to refer to any one of a wide variety of objects simply by adjusting the accompanying demonstration. ...
[4]
[PDF] 17 Demonstratives An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics ...
The indexical 'I' can be represented by an operator 0. 1 f o r equivalent to replacing the neutral a by the indexical T. Page 17. 512 David Kaplan. We could ...
[5]
[PDF] Indexicality: de se semantics and pragmatics - OSU Linguistics
Since 1977, the standard theory of the semantics of indexicals has been that of Kaplan (1977): an indexical is directly referential, with no Fregean sense.
[6]
https://benjamins.com/online/hop/articles/ind4
[7]
The Semantics and Pragmatics of Indexicals - Wiley Online Library
Feb 18, 2017 · Indexicals include pronouns such as 'I' and 'you', as well as words like 'here', 'now', 'today', 'tomorrow', and 'yesterday' that occur as both nouns and
[8]
Three trichotomies of Signs by Charles Sander
According to the second trichotomy, a Sign may be termed an Icon, an Index, or a Symbol. An Icon is a sign which refers to the Object that it denotes merely ...
[9]
On a New List of Categories - Wikisource, the free online library
Apr 15, 2025 · Published 1868 in Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 7. 2404On a New List of Categories1867Charles Sanders Peirce ... Signs.
[10]
Pragmatism as a principle and method of right thinking : the 1903 ...
Jan 12, 2022 · Pragmatism as a principle and method of right thinking : the 1903 Harvard lectures on pragmatism. xi, 305 p. : 24 cm. Includes bibliographical references and ...
[11]
[PDF] Peirce on the Index and Indexical Reference - CORE
Examples of this type of indexical sign are natural signs or simple causal indices like the barometer or weathervane. Second, the sub-index, which displays ...
[12]
[PDF] The Object of Signs in Charles S. Peirce's Semiotic Theory
This thesis attempts an explanation of the object of signs in Charles s. Peirce's semiotic theory. In this r~gard it tries to defend Peirce's ~iew that ...
[13]
[PDF] ICON, INDEX, AND SYMBOL - PhilArchive
Feb 25, 2010 · Again, there are numerous and wide-ranging examples, includ- ing demonstratives and indexical expressions, weather vanes, barometers, fever ...
[14]
Indexicality and the Abductive Link - jstor
the indexical function of signs and the mode of inference that Peirce calls abduction. We will see that abduction, taken in its broadest sense, is ...
[15]
Charles Peirce's Sign Categories - Icon, Index, Symbol
Charles Peirce's Sign Categories. Find out the difference between icons, indexes and symbols in our guide to Peirce's sign categories.Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
[16]
[PDF] A Critical Examination of the Philosophy of Charles S. Peirce
The influence of both Aristotle and Kant on Peirce is undeniable, and it has ... developed before Peirce's discovery of the logic of relations, but also that the.
[17]
Foundations of the Theory of Signs (1938) - ResearchGate
Jul 24, 2020 · “Foundations of the theory of signs,” published by Charles W. Morris in 1938, deals with the relations between semiotics and science.Missing: refinements | Show results with:refinements
[18]
Language as a Tool | SpringerLink
First we will follow Karl Bühler, who proposed in 1934 in his epoch-making book Language Theory an organon model of language or, more specifically, of the sign.
[19]
[PDF] Indexicals as Token-Reflexives - UB
Reichenbachian approaches to indexicality contend that indexicals are "to- ken-reflexives": semantic rules associated with any given indexical-type de- termine ...
[20]
[PDF] Semiotic Anthropology - University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jun 18, 2007 · Abstract. From the 1970s through the present, semiotic anthropology has grown in importance but also has shifted its emphasis, in the pro-.
[21]
(PDF) Indexicality and Deixis - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · Because each indexical reference can have multiple meanings-for instance, "that's he" can refer to several different people-the indexical ...
[22]
[PDF] 6 Frege on Sense and Linguistic Meaning (1990) - UCLA Philosophy
Conversely,. Frege sometimes counts the sense associated with two applications of two different indexical expressions ('yesterday' and 'today') the same ...
[23]
[PDF] Russell on Indexicals and Scientific Knowledge
According to Russell, no other linguistic expression is context dependent in this manner and at the same time unambiguous in its designation. (ii) Indexicals ...
[24]
(PDF) Deixis in Modern Linguistics and Outside - ResearchGate
Aug 10, 2025 · Examples of person deixis may consist of: • Personal pronouns. In every language there is a first-person pronoun and a second-person pronoun.
[25]
Today is tomorrow's yesterday: Children's acquisition of deictic time ...
Deictic time words like “yesterday” and “tomorrow” pose a challenge to children not only because they are abstract, and label periods in time.
[26]
[PDF] Shifters and Verbal Categories - Spencer Kaplan
In fact, shifters are distinguished from all other constituents of the linguistic code solely by their compulsory reference to the given message. The indexical ...
[27]
[PDF] Shifters, Linguistic Categories, and Cultural Description
Finally, nonreferential, relatively per- formative indexes serve as independent speech signals establishing the parameters of the interaction themselves, as in ...
[28]
Registers, Styles, Indexicality (Chapter 1) - The Cambridge ...
Referential and non-referential indexicality. Jakobson's essay was concerned with shifters (indexical symbols), that is, forms that contribute to the ...
[29]
Experimental Evidence for the Role of Intonation in Evidential Marking
This paper investigates the role of intonation in the marking of directly-perceived information in Majorcan Catalan polar questions.Missing: indexing | Show results with:indexing
[30]
Implicature - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
May 6, 2005 · “Implicature” denotes either (i) the act of meaning or implying one thing by saying something else, or (ii) the object of that act.
[31]
Pragmatic inferences are QUD-sensitive: an experimental study
Nov 24, 2020 · When a target inference is congruent with the QUD, an increased rate of inference generation is predicted, as well as decreased reaction times.
[32]
Pragmatic Felicity Facilitates the Production and Comprehension of ...
Jan 26, 2023 · We predicted a corresponding shift in reaction time for listeners, with listeners responding fastest to the sentences that were informative in ...
[33]
Some inferences still take time: Prosody, predictability, and the ...
Psycholinguistic studies of scalar implicature have focused on how these two meanings emerge during comprehension. The earliest studies measured response times ...
[34]
Processing of linguistic deixis in people with schizophrenia, with and ...
Results showed that high-deixis relative to low-deixis was associated with clusters of increased activation in the bilateral middle temporal gyri extending into ...
[35]
Chapter Distance Contrasts in Demonstratives - WALS Online
Demonstratives are deictic expressions such as English this and that. They indicate the relative distance of a referent in the speech situation vis-à-vis the ...
[36]
The Effect of Academic Level on the Use of Deictic Expressions in ...
Aug 9, 2025 · This book marks a new development in the field of second language acquisition research. It explores the way in which language processing ...
[37]
Indexicality's Ambivalent Ground | Signs and Society
Jan 1, 2025 · Indexicality has served as a foundational analytic category for linguistic anthropology, both in its ethnographic analyses as well as in its theoretical ...Missing: overgeneralization | Show results with:overgeneralization
[38]
[PDF] Indexicality's Ambivalent Ground - Cloudfront.net
Jan 26, 2018 · Through its theorization and elaboration in the path-breaking work of Michael Silverstein, indexicality has served as a foundational analytic ...
[39]
[PDF] Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life
Abstract. The concept of indexical order is introduced, necessary to any empirical investigation of the inherently dialectical facts of indexicality.Missing: Peircean | Show results with:Peircean
[40]
CSCS Library of Michael Silverstein's Works
1997 Dynamics of linguistic contact. In I. Goddard, ed., Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 17, Languages, 117–36 (Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian ...
[41]
Michael Silverstein (1945–2020) | Language in Society
Aug 12, 2021 · Silverstein, Michael (1997b). Dynamics of linguistic contact. In Goddard, Ives (ed.), Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 17: Languages ...
[42]
https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110726626-010/html
[43]
Preliminary Inventory to the Michael Silverstein Papers 1901-2019
Silverstein researched Native language speakers in the Pacific Northwest and Aboriginal Australia, as well as globalization and nationalism. Information on Use.<|control11|><|separator|>
[44]
Individual differences in human voice pitch are preserved from ...
Feb 26, 2020 · Indexical cues to a vocalizer's identity, sex and age are readily transmitted by the non-linguistic properties of modal speech, particularly ...
[45]
Human voice pitch measures are robust across a variety of speech ...
Sep 29, 2021 · In this study, for example, men's average fo ranged from 78 to 182 Hz and women's from 126 to 307 Hz. Thus, the magnitude of pitch differences ...Missing: indexicality | Show results with:indexicality
[46]
Prosodic features of stances in conversation - Laboratory Phonology
Nov 13, 2019 · This study presents some of the first work to find automatically-extractable acoustically-measurable correlates of stance-taking in natural speech.
[47]
[PDF] Labov (1972)
We will now examine a second dimension of linguistic variation: the differentia- tion of speakers by their social status.¹ Our debt to sociology and survey ...Missing: indexicality | Show results with:indexicality
[48]
[PDF] “Cultural” Concepts and the Language
We have already been using the Peircean notion of “indexical” semiosis in the sense of a “pointing-to” relationship between a sign and some co-occurrent thing ...
[49]
Neighborhood effects on use of African-American Vernacular English
Audio recordings of the youth were transcribed and coded for the use of five grammatical and five phonological AAVE features to construct a measure of the ...Missing: indexing variationist
[50]
Old Wine, New Ethnographic Lexicography - Annual Reviews
Jun 21, 2006 · How did oinoglossia become, in fact, generative as a model of what a prestige comestible ought to be, that is, a model of how one should ...
[51]
Embodied, Embedded Language Use - PMC - NIH
Humans' ability to use spoken language is an evolutionary adaptation of their species. ... Language use, coordination and the emergence of cooperative action.
[52]
https://oxfordre.com/literature/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-9780190201098-e-1055
[53]
A meta-analytic review of gender variations in adults' language use
Three separate sets of meta-analyses were conducted of studies testing for gender differences in adults' talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech ...Missing: testosterone | Show results with:testosterone
[54]
High testosterone levels predict low voice pitchamong men
Higher levels of testosterone were significantlyassociated with lower pitched voices among males but not among females.
[55]
Why Men and Women Communicate Differently: Psychological and ...
Feb 18, 2024 · Estrogen has been linked to enhanced verbal fluency and social bonding behaviors, while testosterone correlates with more competitive and direct ...
[56]
Prevalence and heritability of parental‐reported speech and/or ...
Jan 31, 2024 · Research on genetic and environmental influences on speech and language difficulties is sparse, with inconsistent heritability estimates.INTRODUCTION · MATERIALS AND METHODS · RESULTS · DISCUSSION
[57]
Modularity of Mind - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Apr 1, 2009 · The mind is modular through and through, up to and including the high-level systems responsible for reasoning, planning, decision making, and the like.
[58]
Speaking Accent-Free in L2 Beyond the Critical Period
Jul 10, 2019 · Given that age at immigration has a non-linear effect on the persistence of a foreign accent—it increases after the CP—we use dummy variables ...
[59]
Heritability of Specific Language Impairment and Nonspecific ...
The available behavioral genetics studies of twins over the past 30 years provide valuable estimates of the heritability of language, speech, and cognitive ...Missing: dialects | Show results with:dialects
[60]
Frege on Indexicals: Sense and Context Sensitivity. - PhilPapers
Abstract. Indexical expressions--e.g., 'I', 'here', 'yesterday', 'this', etc.--pose a serious challenge for a Fregean theory of meaning.Missing: Russell | Show results with:Russell
[61]
[PDF] Fregean Senses and the Semantics of Singular Terms
Apr 29, 2021 · Ad (i): Frege says that the thought is expressed not only by the mere wording but by an indexical sentence in combination with the circumstances ...
[62]
(PDF) Russell's Descriptivism about Proper Names and Indexicals
Russell's descriptivism suggests that names function as abbreviations for definite descriptions, indicating meanings like 'the philosopher who drank the hemlock ...Cite This Paper · Abstract · References (7)
[63]
[PDF] Two-Dimensional Semantics - David Chalmers
More commonly, two-dimensional approaches are understood more narrowly to be a species of possible-worlds semantics, on which each dimension is understood in ...
[64]
[PDF] Two-Dimensional Semantics – the Basics - Uni Bielefeld
An assignment of extensions to all possible worlds – that is, a function f: W → E from possible worlds to extensions – is called an intension. Hence, the ...
[65]
[PDF] Indexicality and De Se Reports* P. Schlenker - Free
I am here now. b. I exist. Without knowing anything about the world, we can determine that these sentences must be true; they are in that sense a priori ...
[66]
[PDF] Afterthoughts - Andrew M. Bailey
1 © 1989 by David Kaplan. I am deeply grateful to John Perry, Howard ... To complete my afterthoughts regarding the semantics of direct refer- ence ...
[67]
Indexicality and deixis | Linguistics and Philosophy
Indexicality and deixis. Published ... Wettstein, Howard: 1981, 'Demonstrative Reference and Definite Descriptions',Philosophical Studies 40, 241–257.
[68]
[PDF] Recanati on the Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction - UB
Famously, for the case of indexicals Kaplan (1989) distinguished two levels of meaning, character and content. Given that there are sour debates among ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
[69]
Truth-Conditional Pragmatics - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews
Aug 31, 2011 · Recanati is concerned with things speakers mean that are more closely connected to the semantic contents of the sentences they utter than are Grice's ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
[70]
An Investigation of LLMs' Limitations in Interpreting and Producing ...
... model's performance (GPT-4 vs. GPT-3.5), ChatGPT often fails to correctly understand the indexicals used in prompts and even makes some occasional mistakes ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[71]
Insights into LLM Long-Context Failures: When Transformers Know ...
Jun 20, 2024 · We find that while LLMs encode the position of target information, they often fail to leverage this in generating accurate responses. This ...
[72]
[PDF] The Problem Of The Essential Indexical - Semantic Scholar
The Problem Of The Essential Indexical. @inproceedings{Perry1979ThePO, title={The Problem Of The Essential Indexical}, author={John Perry}, year={1979}, url ...
[73]
(PDF) Demystifying the myth. Perry: Revisiting the essential indexical
Aug 9, 2025 · Demystifying the myth. Perry: Revisiting the essential indexical ; a great job at clarifying Perry's claims in his classic 1977 and 1979 papers,.
[74]
Robert Francescotti, Intention, Action, and De Se Indexicality
Mar 16, 2024 · The view that first-person (de se) mental content is essential to the explanation of action in general is a strong essential indexicality ...
[75]
The Self-Reference Effect in Memory: A Meta-Analysis - ResearchGate
Oct 9, 2025 · A meta-analysis confirms the expected self-reference effect (SRE) in memory, with self-referent encoding strategies yielding superior memory.Missing: introspection primitive
[76]
[PDF] 3 Psychological Content and Egocentric Indexes - UCLA Philosophy
Representing particulars via egocentric indexes is not perceiving them and is not an identificatory event. Such con- textual repre sen ta tion of particulars ...
[77]
Castañeda'S Philosophy of Language - SpringerLink
CastaŇeda, Hecter-Neri: 1966, '“He”: A Study in the Logic of Self-Consciousness', Ratio 8, 130–157. Google Scholar. CastaŇeda, Hector-Neri: 1967a ...
[78]
'He': A study in the logic of self-consciousness - ResearchGate
'He': A study in the logic of self-consciousness · Abstract · No full-text available · Citations (16) · References (0) · Recommended publications.
[79]
[PDF] WHY ARE INDEXICALS ESSENTIAL? - PhilPapers
Lewis (1979) argued that essential indexical content was de se content, which he argued could be characterised in terms of sets of centred worlds, or in ...Missing: necessity | Show results with:necessity
[80]
[PDF] The Problem of the Essential Indexical
John Perry is making a mess". ... Kaplan's treatment of indexicality was by and large shaped by considerations other than the problem of the essential indexical.
[81]
[PDF] The Qualities of Qualia - University of Southampton Web Archive
Abstract: This essay is a defence of the traditional notion of qualia – as properties of consciousness that are ineffable, intrin- sic, private and ...
[82]
Brain connectivity and the self: the case of cerebral disconnection
In this review we will summarize what is known with regard to self-representation and self-related cognition in split-brain patients and other patients with ...Missing: indexical reference
[83]
[PDF] Self-Consciousness and “Split” Brains - CORE
Sep 4, 2018 · A seizure is a sudden excess of electrical activity, like a short circuit in the brain. When the disruption is confined to a localized area, it ...
[84]
[PDF] Quining Qualia
Descartes claimed to doubt everything that could be doubted, but he never doubted that his conscious experiences had qualia, the properties by which he knew or.
[85]
[PDF] Indexical Realism by Inter-Agentic Reference - PhilArchive
There are two routes leading to causality in the context of an utterance of “this.” The linguistic route is a causal chain which starts from an utterance of “ ...
[86]
None
Summary of each segment:
[87]
https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-052721-092531
[88]
On the Critiques of the Concept of Sex - Duke University Press
May 1, 2016 · For example, if speaking about reproductive sex in the biological world more generally, sex is neither a continuum nor is it strictly dimorphic.
[89]
[PDF] Biosocial Construction of Sex Differences and Similarities in Behavior
Following our biosocial constructionist model, biological as well as social processes produce these performance decrements and gains in men and women. Other ...
[90]
A critique and synthesis of biological essentialism and social ...
The essay is critical of both biological essentialist and social constructionist views. Biological essentialism depicts a process in which biological influences ...
[91]
Rollercoasters are not Fun for Mary: Against Indexical Contextualism
Jun 25, 2020 · Indexical contextualism (IC) is an account of predicates of personal taste (PPTs) which views the semantic content of PPTs as sensitive to the context in which ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[92]
Full article: Excluded entailments and the de se/de re partition
In this paper, we argue that the latter assumption is false. In certain contexts, certain entailments can be ignored for the purpose of assessing an utterance ...
[93]
The Emergence of Indexicality in an Artificial Language - PubMed
Sociolinguistic indexicality involves the association of linguistic variants with nonlinguistic social or contextual features.Missing: big data 2021-2023
[94]
The emergence of indexicality in an artificial language
We investigated the emergence of register-like indexical associations, whereby linguistic forms that are associated with groups of speakers acquire novel ...
[95]
(PDF) Semiotics of imagination in religion (2022) - Academia.edu
... causality of God.” Indexical signs can materially represent a causality of which they are a result and direct our attention to it even if the cause is not ...<|separator|>
[96]
[PDF] A brief survey of the journals Sign Systems Studies and Semiotica in ...
Feb 17, 2025 · A multimodal discourse analysis is proposed in the study based on semiotics, clearly demonstrating how fruitful the application of semiotic ...
[97]
An AI-powered approach to the semiotic reconstruction of narratives
This article presents a novel and highly interactive process to generate natural language narratives based on our ongoing work on semiotic relations.
[98]
Embodied cognition. - Fred Adams - PhilArchive
Embodied cognition views the relation to the sensori-motor system as constitutive of cognition, not just causal, unlike non-embodied approaches.
[99]
Embodied Cognition - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jun 25, 2021 · Embodied cognition is a wide-ranging research program drawing from and inspiring work in psychology, neuroscience, ethology, philosophy, linguistics, robotics, ...The Foils and Inspirations for... · Embodied Cognition: Themes... · Constitution
[100]
Situating Language in the Real-World: The Role of Multimodal ...
Indexicality, in contrast, is largely ignored by the language as a system approach. At the lexical level, demonstrative pronouns have been considered indexical, ...
[101]
The intersection of philosophy of language and artificial intelligence
... fail when the conversation involves nuanced or context-dependent language. ... In addition, it is criticized that AI fails at understanding indexical ...
[102]
The Context Problem in Artificial Intelligence
Dec 1, 2022 · The idea of pairing machines with people to amplify human capabilities is not new. Could the algorithm be designed to avoid this kind of failure ...
[103]
Distal Communication by Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
Aug 21, 2015 · van der Goot et al. (2014) proposed that distal, deictic communication indexed the appreciation of the psychological state of a common ground ...
[104]
The higher the farther: distance-specific referential gestures in ...
Nov 15, 2017 · Referential signals, such as manual pointing or deictic words, allow individuals to efficiently locate a specific entity in the environment, ...Missing: indexicality | Show results with:indexicality
[105]
[PDF] A Theory of Indexical Shift - Linguistics
Jun 24, 2020 · Names: Deal, Amy Rose, author. Title: A theory of indexical shift : meaning, grammar, and crosslinguistic variation / Amy Rose Deal.
[106]
Longitudinal Conversation Analysis - Introduction to the Special Issue
May 10, 2021 · The longitudinal perspective on interactional histories is important for understanding the formation and change of human culture.