Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Itanium

The Itanium is a family of 64-bit microprocessors implementing the IA-64 instruction set architecture (ISA), jointly developed by Hewlett-Packard (HP) and Intel using the Explicitly Parallel Instruction Computing (EPIC) paradigm to enable high instruction-level parallelism (ILP) through compiler-driven optimizations. Designed primarily for high-end servers and workstations, it emphasizes advanced features such as explicit instruction bundling (three instructions per 128-bit bundle), predication to minimize branch penalties, data and control speculation to hide memory latencies, and a large register file including 128 general-purpose registers and 128 floating-point registers. Launched on May 29, 2001, with the initial Merced processor, Itanium aimed to address limitations of existing architectures like x86 by providing superior scalability for enterprise and technical computing workloads. The architecture's origins trace back to a 1994 partnership between and , following HP's initial research into VLIW-based designs in the late 1980s, with the goal of creating a next-generation 64-bit platform for mission-critical applications. Subsequent generations, including Itanium 2 (introduced in 2002) and later models like Tukwila (2008) and Poulson (2012), incorporated multi-core designs, , larger caches, and process shrinks down to 32 nm, achieving up to 2x performance gains per generation while maintaining backward compatibility with software. Despite early promise—such as powering supercomputers and accumulating over $8.7 billion in revenue by 2007—Itanium faced challenges from entrenched x86 ecosystems, limited software adoption, and competition from AMD's , leading to niche market positioning in areas like HP's servers. Intel announced the discontinuation of Itanium in January 2019 via Product Change Notification 116733-00, citing shifts in market demand toward x86-based products, with final orders accepted until January 30, 2020, and last shipments on July 29, 2021, for the Kittson series (Itanium 9700). Although support for existing systems continued through partners like HPE until December 31, 2025, the architecture's end marked the conclusion of a bold but ultimately unsuccessful attempt to redefine , influencing later designs in parallelism and technologies.

Architecture

EPIC paradigm

The Explicitly Parallel Instruction Computing (EPIC) paradigm, foundational to the Itanium architecture, shifts the responsibility of identifying (ILP) from hardware to the , allowing software to explicitly annotate independent instructions for concurrent execution and thereby minimizing runtime dependency resolution overhead. This design philosophy contrasts with conventional RISC and CISC approaches, which rely on complex hardware schedulers to detect parallelism dynamically, often at the cost of increased power consumption and design complexity. EPIC's origins trace back to advancements in VLIW research, notably the Multiflow TRACE project led by Josh Fisher in the 1980s, which pioneered trace scheduling—a compiler technique for grouping instructions along likely execution paths to exploit ILP statically. This work influenced Hewlett-Packard's subsequent efforts, culminating in a 1993 collaboration with Intel to develop the IA-64 architecture, publicly announced in 1994 as a new computing paradigm to address limitations in scaling ILP for future processors. Central to EPIC are instruction bundles, fixed 128-bit units comprising three 41-bit instructions and a 5-bit template; the template encodes instruction types (e.g., integer, memory, or branch) and stop bits to delineate dependency boundaries, enabling the hardware to fetch and issue bundles atomically for parallel execution across multiple functional units. Complementing this, predicate execution employs 64 dedicated predicate registers to guard instructions conditionally, transforming branches into predicated operations that execute both paths simultaneously and nullify the incorrect one, thus reducing control hazards and enabling over 50% branch elimination in typical code. Proponents of asserted it could achieve superior instruction throughput by harnessing compiler sophistication for parallelism exposure, while permitting simpler hardware devoid of advanced decoders or reorder buffers, potentially supporting wider issue widths and larger files for sustained performance in parallel workloads. For instance, by explicitly marking independent operations within bundles, avoids the latency of hardware ILP extraction, claiming up to 40% fewer branch mispredictions through predication alone. Unlike pure VLIW architectures, where the bears full responsibility for scheduling—including handling variable latencies via no-ops or delay slots— introduces hardware-assisted mechanisms for greater robustness, such as dynamic branch hints via manipulation and to enforce dependencies without stalling the . These features enhance binary portability across processor generations and mitigate VLIW's sensitivity to inaccuracies, though they still demand high-quality optimization tools for optimal efficacy.

Instruction set and registers

The IA-64 (ISA), which underpins the Itanium processor family, is a 64-bit load-store that separates memory operations from computation, enabling efficient pipelining and parallelism. It features a large to minimize memory accesses, including 128 general-purpose integer registers (GR0 through GR127), each 64 bits wide, used for addressing, arithmetic, and ; 128 floating-point registers (FR0 through FR127), each 82 bits to accommodate with status bits; 64 one-bit registers (PR0 through PR63) for conditional execution; and 8 registers (BR0 through BR7), each 64 bits, dedicated to holding target addresses for branches and calls. Instructions in employ a three-operand format, where most operations specify two source operands and one destination, promoting explicit data flow without implicit reuse common in two-operand ISAs. To indicate parallelism, instructions are grouped into 128-bit bundles consisting of three 41-bit instructions and a 5-bit that encodes dependencies and assignments, ensuring alignment on 16-byte boundaries for atomic fetch. Addressing modes include PC-relative for , such as in targets calculated as instruction pointer plus , and indirect addressing via registers plus or for flexible memory access patterns. The mandates little-endian byte order exclusively, with natural alignment required for loads and stores to avoid exceptions. Key instruction categories encompass integer operations like (add) for basic arithmetic and shifts (shl, shr) for ; floating-point instructions including fused multiply-add (fma), which computes a \times b + c in a single rounded operation to enhance precision and performance in numerical computations; memory instructions such as speculative loads (ld.s) that defer exceptions until use, paired with checks (chk.s) for control data speculation; and control-flow instructions like predicated es (br) that execute conditionally based on predicate registers, reducing branch misprediction penalties, alongside call instructions (call) that link to branch registers for subroutine invocation. These categories support a wide range of computations while integrating predication across nearly all instructions to enable if-conversion during compilation. Distinctive features of the include register rotation, facilitated by a 7-bit register rename base (RRB) in the processor status register, which cyclically renames registers within the set to facilitate software and iteration without stack spills or explicit counter maintenance, ideal for vectorizable loops. Additionally, Not-a-Thing () values—special 65th-bit indicators on general registers—allow deferred in ; a load that faults sets a bit instead of trapping immediately, enabling the computation to proceed until a consuming like an add triggers resolution via a check. These mechanisms, combined with bundle-based explicit parallelism, form the core of IA-64's for .
Register TypeDesignationCountWidthPrimary Use
General-PurposeGR0–GR12712864 bitsInteger arithmetic, addressing
Floating-PointFR0–FR12712882 bitsFloating-point operations
PredicatePR0–PR63641 bitConditional execution
BR0–BR7864 bitsBranch targets and calls

Microarchitecture features

The Itanium processors employ a deep optimized for the set, with early designs featuring a 10-stage to accommodate wide issue and high clock frequencies. Subsequent generations refined this to an 8-stage , the front-end fetch and back-end execution stages with an buffer to sustain throughput of up to six instructions per cycle. These pipelines support for loads and hardware mechanisms for , including an Advanced Load Address Table (ALAT) to track speculative memory accesses and resolve dependencies dynamically. Execution units are designed for parallel operation, with configurations including multiple integer arithmetic logic units (ALUs), floating-point multipliers/accumulators (FMACs), and dedicated units per core. Baseline implementations provide four integer ALUs, two floating-point units, and three units, enabling peak rates of several gigaflops in floating-point operations; later evolutions expand to six ALUs, four FP units, and additional units for enhanced vector processing. handling emphasizes compiler-provided static hints over dynamic hardware to reduce complexity and power overhead, though limited hardware support for IP-relative branches achieves zero-cycle penalties on correct predictions. The memory subsystem features a split on-chip L1 cache with separate 16 KB instruction and 16 KB data caches, both four-way set-associative and write-through for low access. A unified on-chip cache follows, typically 256 KB and eight-way associative, followed by an off-chip L3 cache of several megabytes that operates at core speed for high . This hierarchy incorporates non-blocking designs and dynamic prefetching to tolerate in speculative workloads, with monitoring for misses and references to aid . Interconnects evolve from a shared in initial models to point-to-point links in later generations, such as the QuickPath Interconnect (QPI), providing scalable bandwidth up to 6.4 /s per link for multi-socket systems. These support (NUMA) configurations, allowing up to four processors in glueless setups with coherent caching and up to 16 outstanding requests to maintain scalability in enterprise environments. Power and thermal efficiency improvements include extensive error-correcting code (ECC) coverage across caches and buses, along with voltage scaling introduced in later designs to reduce consumption—such as low-voltage variants operating at half the power of standard models while preserving performance. These features enable reliable operation in high-density servers, with mechanisms like phase shedding in voltage regulators to optimize idle power.

Development history

Inception and partnerships (1989–1994)

In the late 1980s, () initiated internal research to develop a successor to its architecture, driven by the need for a more scalable 64-bit design to address limitations in handling increasingly complex enterprise workloads. This effort, which began as a secret project in December 1988 under director Dick Lampman, focused on exploring advanced to boost performance in high-end computing. Meanwhile, , having learned from the commercial failure of its complex iAPX 432 microprocessor in the early 1980s—which aimed for high-level language support but suffered from performance issues and high costs—was seeking opportunities to evolve beyond incremental x86 improvements toward a revolutionary enterprise-focused architecture. By late 1993, , facing the economic challenges of developing and manufacturing advanced processors independently, approached to propose a collaboration on a 64-bit VLIW-based design, marking the start of formal joint efforts. This led to the official announcement on June 8, 1994, of a 50-50 between and to co-develop a new processor family codenamed Merced, intended to power future workstations and servers with superior and . Key figures included HP's technical lead Jerry Huck, who advocated for the alliance, and Intel's senior vice president Albert Yu, who emphasized merging the companies' expertise to advance . Intel's John Crawford was appointed to lead the joint design team, drawing on HP's research into explicit parallelism concepts. The partnership's primary goals were to create a clean-slate 64-bit for that would supplant both x86 and existing RISC designs, targeting high-performance servers capable of explicit to exploit parallelism without relying on hardware speculation. Initial visions outlined a aiming for clock speeds around 800 MHz and a 6-wide issue capability, though emphasis was placed on long-term innovation over precise near-term metrics, with production slated for the . To ensure market adoption, the design incorporated plans for with x86 software through , addressing early debates about forgoing native support in favor of a forward-looking . This anticipated challenge highlighted tensions between innovation and legacy preservation, as and sought to protect customer investments while pushing for a .

Design phase and delays (1994–2001)

The design of the Itanium processor, codenamed Merced during its development, evolved through a collaboration between () and , shifting from HP's initial vision of a radically wide () architecture toward a more practical () approach. Early HP concepts explored issue widths as wide as 64 instructions to maximize (), but the joint effort scaled this down to a 6-wide execution that dispatched bundles of three 41-bit instructions within 128-bit words, balancing complexity with compiler-driven scheduling. This paradigm incorporated semantics from HP's architecture, such as rotating register files for loop unrolling and predication to reduce branch penalties, enabling compilers to explicitly mark parallel operations without speculation overhead. Development encountered substantial delays from 1994 to 2001, primarily due to process technology transitions from an initial 0.25 μm node to the more advanced 0.18 μm process to fit the chip's growing transistor count and performance needs, as well as the inherent complexity of verifying a design with over 25 million transistors. Verification efforts were hampered by the architecture's novelty, requiring extensive simulation to ensure EPIC bundle execution and branch prediction accuracy across billions of potential state combinations. Compiler development further contributed to lags, as optimizing for EPIC's reliance on static scheduling demanded new tools to identify ILP in legacy codebases, with early versions struggling to achieve expected parallelism without manual intervention. Key milestones highlighted these challenges: design verification issues delayed tape-out until July 1999, with first produced in August 1999 but containing bugs in the execution pipeline and , necessitating additional revisions. To accelerate tool development, and partnered with universities, including efforts at institutions like the University of Illinois for optimization research and simulation frameworks. Internal conflicts arose over resource allocation, as Intel increasingly prioritized enhancements to its dominant x86 architecture amid rising demand for Pentium processors, diverting engineering talent from the Itanium project. Debates intensified regarding x86 compatibility, culminating in the addition of a hardware emulation unit in 2000 to decode and execute legacy x86 instructions via a dedicated in-order pipeline, addressing concerns about software ecosystem migration without fully integrating x86 semantics into the core EPIC design. By 2001, the Merced design was frozen for production on the 0.18 μm process at 800 MHz, but initial performance fell short of expectations, with SPECint_base2000 score of around 314 compared to approximately 480-550 for HP's PA-8700 and 400-550 for 21264 at comparable clock speeds, placing Itanium behind in integer workloads while matching or slightly trailing in floating-point tasks like SPECfp_base2000. This gap stemmed partly from immature compilers unable to fully exploit the architecture's potential, underscoring the risks of the bet during the design phase.

Launch and initial expectations (2001)

The Itanium processor, codenamed Merced, officially launched on May 29, 2001, following years of development collaboration between and . Initial shipments began in June 2001 to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) such as and , with the first systems including HP's rx7620 server and Dell's Precision Workstation 730. These entry-level configurations, equipped with 733 MHz or 800 MHz Itanium processors, 1 GB of , and basic storage, started at prices around $7,000 to $8,000, positioning Itanium as a premium option for high-end computing. Intel and its partners marketed Itanium as a revolutionary shift in computing architecture, leveraging the (EPIC) paradigm to unlock massive parallelism and deliver up to 10 times the performance of contemporary processors like the through better exploitation of . Intel CEO Craig Barrett emphasized the processor's potential to power enterprise workloads, including web servers and , heralding it as the foundation for a new generation of scalable systems. Expectations were high, with projections that Itanium would dominate high-end servers and workstations, supported by endorsements from major vendors including , , and Silicon Graphics Inc. (SGI), who announced their own Itanium-based platforms. However, early performance benchmarks revealed significant shortfalls, primarily due to immature compilers that struggled to generate optimized code, limiting the architecture's promised parallelism. On the SPEC CPU2000 suite, the 800 MHz Itanium in the Dell Precision Workstation 730 achieved a SPECint_base2000 score of 314, lagging behind competitors like the 1.5 GHz 4's score of 526 and even some RISC processors such as the UltraSPARC III. Floating-point performance fared better at around 645 on SPECfp_base2000, but overall integer workloads underperformed expectations, with analysts noting Itanium's effective throughput as roughly equivalent to or below mid-range x86 systems despite its higher price point. These results stemmed from the need for specialized software tuning, as legacy x86 emulation added overhead for non-native applications. Initial adoption was confined to niche high-end markets, with limited deployments in environments for tasks like database processing and scientific computing. Partnerships with SGI and expanded system offerings, but volume sales remained low as customers awaited software ecosystem maturity; HP positioned early systems more as development platforms than production-ready hardware. By late 2001, fewer than a dozen Itanium-based models were available from major vendors, reflecting cautious uptake amid economic uncertainty following the dot-com bust. Media coverage and opinions lauded Itanium's architectural innovation as a bold departure from x86 dominance, praising its 64-bit addressing and potential for future scalability in mission-critical applications. However, criticism quickly mounted over the immature technology and , with outlets describing the launch as overhyped and as "disappointing" relative to established RISC alternatives. Illuminata Jonathan Eunice called it a "development environment" rather than a mature product, highlighting the risks of betting on unproven paradigms in a rapidly evolving .

Processor generations

Merced generation (2001)

The Merced generation marked the debut of the Itanium processor family in 2001, featuring a single-core design targeted at high-end servers and workstations. Fabricated using a 0.18 μm process technology, the processor contained approximately 25 million transistors. It operated at a base clock speed of 800 MHz for standard models, with a low-voltage variant clocked at 733 MHz to support power-sensitive applications. These processors integrated with the 460GX chipset, enabling connectivity for memory and I/O in early Itanium-based systems. Merced's emphasized the paradigm through a 10-stage capable of issuing up to 6 in bundles of three, supported by 2 arithmetic logic units (ALUs) and 2 floating-point units. While the theoretical peak performance promised high throughput for explicitly parallel code, real-world (IPC) typically ranged from 1 to 2, limited by the rigidity of instruction bundling and early inefficiencies in exploiting parallelism. The design supported 4-way (SMP), allowing configurations of up to four processors without additional for basic . Key limitations included the absence of dedicated hardware for x86 translation, relying instead on software that resulted in significantly reduced for legacy applications—often 50% or slower compared to native x86 of the era. Additionally, the processor exhibited high power consumption with a (TDP) of 130 W, contributing to thermal management challenges in densely packed systems. Deployment was limited, appearing in initial products such as the Compaq servers, but overall volumes remained low at around 10,000 units shipped in 2001 due to software ecosystem immaturity and shortfalls relative to expectations.

McKinley and Madison generations (2002–2006)

The McKinley processor, introduced in 2002 as the inaugural member of the Itanium 2 family, marked a substantial from the initial Merced generation by enhancing execution efficiency and resource utilization within the architecture. Fabricated using a 0.18 μm process, it operated at clock speeds of 900 MHz to 1 GHz and incorporated up to 3 MB of integrated L3 cache, enabling up to twice the overall system performance compared to Merced-based platforms. Floating-point capabilities saw particularly strong gains, with SPECfp_base2000 scores reaching approximately 1,356 at 1 GHz—roughly four times higher than Merced's typical results—due to doubled execution resources and refined pipeline design that better exploited parallelism. Key architectural advancements in McKinley included improved branch prediction mechanisms, which reduced misprediction penalties through advanced prediction tables and recovery paths, and an enhanced hardware x86 assist unit for seamless execution. These features doubled the number of integer and load/store units relative to Merced, allowing for greater while maintaining with the evolving Itanium instruction set. The processor powered early enterprise systems, demonstrating viability in high-end computing environments despite ongoing reliance on sophisticated compilers for optimal EPIC bundle scheduling. The series, debuting in 2003, refined McKinley's design through a 0.13 μm process shrink, enabling higher clock speeds up to 1.6 GHz and larger configurations of 6 MB or 9 MB L3. With around 410 million transistors, Madison variants delivered up to 50% greater frequency and doubled L3 bandwidth over McKinley, yielding SPECfp_base2000 rates exceeding 2,100 in single-processor configurations. These improvements extended to multi-processor scalability, where SPECfp_rate2000 scores surpassed 40 in small cluster setups, underscoring enhanced floating-point throughput for scientific and database workloads. Madison processors integrated into platforms like Integrity servers and SGI Altix systems, supporting demanding applications in enterprise and . In 2006, the Madison lineage culminated with the Montecito variant, Intel's first dual-core Itanium 2 processor fabricated at 90 nm, featuring two Madison-derived cores sharing up to 12 MB L3 per at 1.6 GHz. Operating at a of up to 104 W per , Montecito emphasized reliability with advanced error correction and aimed to double per- performance through core replication, though power scaling remained challenging in multi-socket configurations exceeding four sockets due to interconnect bottlenecks and elevated thermal demands. Despite these hurdles, the generation's dependency persisted, requiring optimized to fully leverage its parallel execution potential.

High-end evolutions (2006–2017)

The high-end evolutions of the Itanium architecture from 2006 to 2017 built upon the dual-core generation by introducing enhanced multi-core designs, process node shrinks, and advanced interconnects tailored for (HPC) and mission-critical enterprise applications. These developments emphasized scalability, (RAS) features, such as improved error correction and support, to address demanding workloads in sectors like , , and scientific . The Itanium 2 9100 series, codenamed Montvale and released in 2007, marked the transition to dual-core configurations on a , operating at up to 1.66 GHz with speeds reaching 667 MT/s. It featured up to 24 MB of shared L3 cache and split L2 caches per core (1 MB instruction and 256 KB data), enabling better thread handling through demand-based switching and whole-core lockstep for . These processors supported up to four sockets in NUMA configurations, delivering approximately 19% performance uplift over prior models while maintaining compatibility with existing Itanium platforms for enterprise servers. In 2010, the Itanium 9300 series, known as Tukwila, advanced to a quad-core on a with frequencies up to 1.86 GHz and a (TDP) of 130 W. It introduced the first integrated on-die L3 cache of 30 MB shared across cores, along with Technology for eight threads per processor, resulting in more than double the performance of Montvale in memory-intensive tasks. A key innovation was the adoption of the QuickPath Interconnect (QPI) at 4.8 GT/s, replacing the to boost inter-processor by up to 800% and support up to four sockets with enhanced DDR3 memory capacity reaching 2 TB per processor. These features significantly improved through advanced and second-generation virtualization, targeting scalable mission-critical systems. The Itanium 9500 series, codenamed Poulson and launched in 2012, represented a major leap with an eight-core architecture on a 32 nm process, clock speeds up to 2.53 GHz, and a TDP of up to 170 W. It integrated 54 MB of on-die cache (including 32 MB L3 and approximately 6 MB total L2 across cores, with 512 KB instruction and 256 KB data per core), enabling up to 16 threads and 12 instructions retired per cycle for superior multi-threaded efficiency. Architectural enhancements included optimized integer multiply units and a wider execution pipeline, providing up to 1.9x the performance of Tukwila in HPC benchmarks while supporting up to eight sockets via QPI at 6.4 GT/s. With 3.1 billion transistors, Poulson focused on power efficiency and scalability for large-scale enterprise and technical computing environments. The final evolution, the Itanium 9700 series codenamed Kittson in 2017, retained the eight-core layout on 32 nm but refined frequencies to up to 2.66 GHz with a TDP of 130-170 W and 32 MB L3 . It incorporated dual on-die controllers supporting scalable interfaces for up to 2 TB DDR4 per , supporting up to eight- configurations via QPI for HPC clusters. Kittson emphasized with prior generations and enhanced , delivering incremental performance gains in mission-critical applications while prioritizing reliability features like advanced extensions. Overall, these evolutions sustained Itanium's niche in high-end servers, with annual system shipments stabilizing around 26,000 units through 2016 amid a focus on specialized, resilient computing.

End of production and support (post-2017)

Intel ceased development of new Itanium designs after 2017, citing the dominance of the x86 architecture in markets as the primary reason for shifting resources away from the IA-64 platform. The final processor, codenamed Kittson (Itanium 9700 series), saw its last shipments in July 2021, marking the end of hardware production. A significant legal challenge arose from the 2010 HP-Oracle lawsuit, stemming from 's decision to withdraw support for its software on Itanium-based HP servers, despite a prior agreement. The dispute originated in a September 2010 settlement of an unrelated case involving former HP CEO , which obligated to maintain compatibility with HP's Itanium systems. 's subsequent announcement to end support in 2011 prompted HP to sue for , leading to a 2012 ruling in HP's favor that enforced continued support and awarded damages, though the ecosystem suffered from reduced vendor confidence. Software support has progressively wound down, reflecting the hardware's obsolescence. The Linux kernel removed IA-64 architecture support in version 6.7, released in late 2023, after it had been marked as orphaned earlier that year due to lack of maintainers and minimal usage. HP-UX 11i v3, the primary operating system for Itanium servers, reached end of standard support on December 31, 2025, with Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) ceasing all maintenance thereafter. However, the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) temporarily reversed its deprecation of Itanium support in version 15, released in 2025, to aid legacy code maintenance amid ongoing discussions for full removal in future releases. As of November 2025, support remains in GCC 15 but is planned for removal in GCC 16. HPE has accelerated its transition to x86 and architectures for enterprise servers, fully phasing out Itanium-based systems by the end of 2025 to align with broader industry trends toward more efficient, scalable platforms. Despite this, a small number of legacy Itanium installations persist in specialized sectors like and , where custom applications and high-reliability requirements delay full migrations. As of 2025, no active Itanium production or new hardware shipments occur, but emulation tools such as continue to enable software testing and gradual transitions to modern architectures for remaining users.

Hardware support

Server systems and platforms

The initial Itanium server platforms emerged in 2001 with Hewlett-Packard's Integrity series, designed as rackmount systems for workloads. The rx4610 model supported 2 to 4 first-generation Merced Itanium processors operating at 733 MHz or 800 MHz with 2 MB or 4 MB L3 , respectively, in a 7U chassis weighing up to 68 kg. It featured up to 64 of PC100 SDRAM across 64 slots, 10 slots (including 8 hot-plug 64-bit/66 MHz slots), and high-availability elements such as N+1 redundant 800W hot-swap power supplies and 6 hot-swap fans for cooling. Storage options included 2 hot-plug 36 drives, with system bandwidth reaching 4.2 /s for and 2.1 /s for I/O. These systems targeted mission-critical applications under 11i v1.5, , or . Mid-era platforms expanded scalability and density, exemplified by the Integrity rx7640 introduced around 2005 with Itanium 2 processors, such as the single-core generation at up to 1.6 GHz or later dual-core models. This 7U rackmount server accommodated up to 8 processors (up to 16 cores with dual-core configurations), 256 GB of DDR2 memory, and configurations with 2 cell boards, 10 GB base memory, and 5 cards for enhanced I/O. It included 2 internal hard drives, a DVD drive, and redundant bulk power supplies, emphasizing reliability for database and tasks. Blade-based designs also proliferated, with the Integrity BL60p as an early Itanium 2 blade for the BladeSystem p-Class enclosure, supporting 2 processors, 2 hot-swappable U320 SCSI drives, and integration with up to 256 virtual machines under for low . The HPE Integrity Superdome 2, launched later in the decade, introduced modular blade architecture using 8-core Itanium 9700 series processors (Poulson generation) in CB900s blades, scaling to 16 blades per enclosure for up to 32 sockets and 8 TB memory in a unified . Later platforms focused on and extreme scalability, particularly through SGI's offerings. The SGI Altix 4700 series utilized McKinley and subsequent Itanium 2 processors in NUMA configurations, supporting up to cores in bandwidth-optimized systems for scientific simulations, as evidenced by its ranking on supercomputing lists with Itanium cores. The HPE Superdome 2 evolved to support Kittson-generation Itanium processors (planned for mid-2017 refresh), maintaining up to 8 sockets in compact configurations while preserving compatibility with Poulson-era systems; following the Kittson refresh, no further Itanium platforms were developed due to the architecture's discontinuation. Form factors spanned rackmount (e.g., rx series), blades (e.g., Superdome 2 CB900s), and specialized systems for . Hewlett-Packard (later HPE) dominated the Itanium server market, capturing approximately 90% share by 2009, with SGI, (via PrimeQuest series), and each holding around 1%. 's PrimeQuest servers supported up to 32 Itanium sockets for mission-critical Unix environments. Scalability relied on NUMA architectures, enabling single systems up to 64 processors in earlier Superdome configurations or 32 sockets in Superdome 2, with larger clusters possible for over 1000 processors in SGI Altix for HPC, with dense configurations featuring redundant power (e.g., 4x 800W supplies) and hot-swap cooling (e.g., multiple fans per enclosure) to manage thermal loads in multi-socket setups exceeding 100 kW.

Chipset integrations

The Itanium family relied on a variety of s from and key partners to handle system connectivity, , and I/O expansion, evolving from early designs supporting basic interfaces to more advanced configurations enabling large-scale multiprocessor systems. 's initial 460GX , introduced alongside the Merced-generation Itanium in 2001, served as the primary northbridge solution, supporting up to four with standard 100 MHz SDRAM , slots for expansion, and 4x for graphics in configurations. This isolated and I/O subsystems from the bus, allowing customization for servers or while providing bi-directional 1.3 GB/s to . For the McKinley and subsequent Itanium 2 generations starting in 2002, Intel developed the E8870 chipset, which enhanced scalability for up to 16 processors in shared-memory modules and supported 128 GB of DDR SDRAM at 6.4 GB/s bandwidth. The E8870 included scalable node controllers for multiprocessor interconnects, though early implementations used front-side bus architectures rather than later serial links. Later iterations, particularly for the Tukwila-generation Itanium 9300 in 2010, integrated Intel's QuickPath Interconnect (QPI) with up to six links per processor for cache-coherent multiprocessing, enabling bandwidths of 96 GB/s for interprocessor communication and improved I/O handling shared with Xeon platforms. Hewlett-Packard (later HPE) contributed significantly to Itanium chipset designs, particularly for its server line. The sx2000 chipset, launched in 2005 for Madison-generation Itanium 2 systems like the Superdome, supported up to 64 processors in NUMA configurations with redundant cell boards and double-chip-spare memory for . HP also integrated TACHYON-based controllers, such as the A6795A adapter, providing 2 Gbps connectivity for storage area networks in Itanium environments running . For NUMA scaling, HP systems incorporated PCI bridges to manage I/O expansion across nodes, ensuring low-latency access in multi-socket setups. Other vendors developed specialized s for Itanium-based platforms. (SGI) utilized the SN1 router ASIC in its Altix series, connecting up to 512 Itanium 2 processors via the proprietary NUMAlink interconnect, which provided directory-based similar to for clusters with 2.4 GB/s per port bandwidth. Fujitsu's PRIMEQUEST servers employed a custom-developed with proprietary , optimized for mission-critical mainframe workloads on Itanium 2 processors, supporting up to 32 sockets, 512 GB of memory, and enhanced reliability features like error-correcting code extensions. Over time, Itanium chipsets evolved from support in early generations (offering up to 1 GB/s per slot) to PCIe 3.0 in the Poulson-generation Itanium 9500 by , delivering 8 GT/s per for high-bandwidth I/O. Memory support progressed to DDR3-1600 in later designs, achieving up to 51.2 GB/s bandwidth per , while QPI facilitated cache-coherent NUMA across scales from 2 to 8 sockets. Itanium chipsets lacked integrated graphics processing, focusing exclusively on applications and requiring external host bus adapters (HBAs) for storage and networking tasks like or Ethernet.

Software support

Operating systems

The Itanium architecture received native support from several Unix variants, reflecting its initial positioning in enterprise computing. 11i provided full support starting in 2001, enabling deployment on HP Integrity servers, with ongoing updates through version 11i v3 until its scheduled end-of-support in December 2025, with Mature Support available until December 31, 2028. IBM ported AIX 5L to Itanium as part of Project Monterey, with initial availability in 2003, though adoption remained limited and support was discontinued in 2016. 10 offered native Itanium support from 2005, targeting high-end servers, but this was terminated in 2012 following Oracle's broader withdrawal from the platform. Linux kernel support for Itanium (ia64) began with version 2.4 in 2001, allowing early adoption in research and enterprise environments. Major distributions followed suit, including 5, which maintained support through extended lifecycle phases until November 2020 for legacy users. also provided ia64 packages, though with decreasing maintenance; kernel-level deprecation occurred in version 6.7 in 2023, while user-space compatibility persists for existing installations. Microsoft offered native Itanium support in and 2008, optimized for and database workloads, with mainstream support ending in 2010 and extended support concluding in 2018 for the 2008 edition. No subsequent versions, including or later, supported Itanium natively, marking the end of 's investment in the architecture. Proprietary operating systems further extended Itanium's ecosystem in specialized markets. , ported by in 2003, ran on servers for mission-critical applications, with providing support until 2020, after which VSI OpenVMS continued maintenance, with VSI providing support until December 31, 2035. NonStop OS, originally from , utilized Itanium for fault-tolerant in financial and telecommunications sectors, with support ending December 31, 2025. Tru64 Unix, inherited from DEC, received limited Itanium support starting around 2001 but saw minimal adoption and was phased out by the mid-2000s in favor of other platforms. Porting operating systems to Itanium presented significant challenges due to the architecture's lack of binary compatibility with x86, necessitating full recompilation of applications and libraries rather than direct migration of existing binaries. This required substantial developer effort to optimize for Itanium's (EPIC) model, often leading to specific to the hardware.

Compilers and development tools

Intel developed the primary compilers for the Itanium , starting with the ECC (Itanium C Compiler) released in 2001 for early development and testing on platforms like and UNIX. The (Intel C++ Compiler) for IA-64 followed, incorporating advanced features such as bundle scheduling to group instructions into fixed 128-bit bundles for explicit parallel execution and predication to enable conditional execution without branches using 64 predicate registers. These compilers targeted C, C++, and , emphasizing the (EPIC) model to exploit . Hewlett-Packard provided the aC++ compiler optimized for HP-UX on Itanium, focusing on EPIC-specific enhancements like and speculation to execute instructions ahead of dependency resolution, using speculative loads and (Not a Thing) tokens for . It also supported register rotation through software pipelining, which overlaps iterations using rotating registers and predicates to minimize code expansion and improve loop performance. Open-source support emerged with (GCC) version 3.0 in 2002, introducing an backend for C and C++ compilation. The Open64 compiler, derived from SGI's tools and released as open-source, further advanced optimization research. In 2024, the GCC backend was undeprecated in GCC 15, maintaining limited compatibility despite broader platform decline. Key optimization techniques in these toolchains included software via modulo scheduling to overlap loop operations and if-conversion to transform branches into predicated code, reducing misprediction penalties on Itanium's deep . Tools like Intel VTune Profiler aided development by analyzing parallelism, cache misses, and branch behavior on systems, enabling targeted tuning of code. Developing for Itanium posed challenges due to the paradigm's reliance on intelligence, often resulting in optimization times of hours for large applications because of complex global scheduling and profile-guided passes. To bridge legacy software, Intel's Execution Layer (IA-32 EL) served as a dynamic binary translator, converting x86 instructions to native at for without full recompilation. Today, active development of Itanium compilers is limited, with and focusing on maintenance rather than new features; archived versions remain available through developer portals for . Migration guides from vendors like HPE recommend porting code to architectures, leveraging automated tools for syntax and optimization adjustments to ease transition from environments.

Virtualization and emulation

Hewlett-Packard Enterprise (HPE) developed nPars, a hardware partitioning technology for servers based on Itanium processors, enabling the division of a single physical system into multiple independent partitions for improved resource isolation and management. Complementing this, Virtual Machines ( VM), introduced in 2005, provided soft partitioning and support for environments on Itanium hardware, allowing multiple virtual machines to run concurrently on a single physical host while leveraging Intel's Technology for Itanium (VT-i). These solutions facilitated efficient workload consolidation and resource allocation in enterprise settings, with VM requiring 11i v2 (May 2005 update) or later as the host and guest operating system. For development purposes, created the simulator, an open-source instruction set emulator designed to execute and debug Itanium code on non- platforms such as x86 systems running . simulates the Itanium architecture as specified in Intel's Itanium 2 manuals, supporting user-level and basic operating system development without full platform emulation, and it includes features like a for loading executables and inspecting machine state. This tool proved valuable for early software porting and testing before native hardware availability, though it lacks networking or peripheral simulation. To address compatibility with existing software ecosystems, implemented the Execution Layer ( EL), a dynamic system that enabled 32-bit x86 applications to run on Itanium processors with minimal overhead. EL employed a two-phase approach—initial template-based translation followed by runtime optimization—bypassing the slower hardware x86 mode in early Itanium models and achieving performance comparable to equivalently clocked x86 processors like , typically incurring 10-20% overhead on Itanium 2 systems. This layer was integrated into operating systems such as Windows and for Itanium, supporting seamless execution of legacy x86 binaries in enterprise applications. During the early 2000s transition from 's Alpha architecture to Itanium following 's acquisition of Compaq, efforts focused on source-level migration rather than direct binary emulation, as no widespread runtime emulator like FX!32 (originally for x86 on Alpha) was developed specifically for Alpha binaries on Itanium; instead, provided porting guides and recompilation frameworks for and Tru64 UNIX applications to ensure compatibility. For reverse emulation, running Itanium (IA-64) code on non-Itanium architectures, QEMU offers partial support through its IA-64 target, enabling emulation of Itanium binaries and basic system images primarily for legacy application testing and preservation. However, QEMU's Tiny Code Generator (TCG) interpreter for IA-64 results in significantly reduced performance, often comparable to a 1990s-era Pentium 100 MHz processor, making it unsuitable for production workloads but useful for development or archival purposes. Microsoft did not provide native emulation for IA-64 binaries on x86-64 Windows via WOW64 or Application Virtualization (App-V), limiting support to source recompilation or containerized migration paths, as IA-64 was discontinued after Windows Server 2012. Migration from Itanium systems often involved HP's Systems Insight Manager (SIM), a centralized that monitored and facilitated inventory, , and phased transitions to x86 platforms, including automated for decommissioning planning. also offered recompilation suites and porting kits, such as those for , to automate source code adaptation from Itanium to x86 equivalents, reducing manual effort in enterprise migrations. In the 2020s, financial institutions decommissioned Itanium-based infrastructure as part of broader modernization efforts, with case studies highlighting migrations to x86 cloud environments to cut costs and extend support lifecycles, though specific banking examples emphasize general shifts rather than Itanium-exclusive tools. Emulation generally imposed substantial performance penalties, with dynamic binary translation on Itanium for x86 code showing around 50% instructions-per-cycle (IPC) loss in unoptimized scenarios compared to native execution, though optimized layers like IA-32 EL mitigated this to near-parity. In hybrid environments, such as HPE's Superdome series, transitions from Itanium-based models (e.g., Superdome 2) to x86 variants (e.g., Superdome X and Flex) relied on for interim compatibility, allowing gradual workload shifts without full overhead. For source-based migrations, compilers from prior toolchains could be referenced briefly to enable recompilation for x86 targets, streamlining the process alongside where binaries remained irreplaceable.

Market and reception

Adoption in high-end servers

Itanium's adoption in high-end servers reached its zenith between 2003 and 2008, a period marked by growing deployment in enterprise environments seeking robust 64-bit processing for demanding workloads. During this time, (HP), later (HPE), dominated the market, accounting for approximately 80% of Itanium system sales in 2007 and rising to 95% by 2008. This dominance was driven by HP's server line, which integrated Itanium processors with and NonStop operating systems tailored for high-reliability computing. The architecture's focus on explicit parallelism appealed to sectors requiring fault-tolerant operations, contributing to Intel's server revenue growth amid the broader shift to 64-bit systems. Key markets for Itanium included mission-critical applications in , , and , where downtime costs were prohibitive. In and telecom, HP NonStop systems powered and , leveraging Itanium's scalability for real-time operations. Government agencies adopted Itanium for high-performance simulations; notably, NASA's , equipped with 10,240 Itanium 2 processors, achieved 51.87 teraflops in 2004, enabling advanced modeling and earning recognition as the world's fastest at the time. These deployments underscored Itanium's role in environments prioritizing availability over raw speed. Market metrics highlight Itanium's niche but influential presence. In the third quarter of 2005 alone, Gartner reported 7,845 Itanium servers sold, contributing to growing cumulative shipments worldwide by mid-year according to IDC. The RISC/Itanium Unix server segment, where Itanium played a prominent role, generated $15.4 billion in revenue for 2005, representing a stable portion of the overall $51.7 billion global server market. Over its lifetime, Itanium shipments totaled hundreds of thousands of processors, with annual production estimates reaching 200,000 units by 2007. Success factors centered on reliability and scalability suited to enterprise databases and clustered systems. HP NonStop platforms delivered 99.9999% uptime (six nines), categorized as Availability Level 4 (AL4) by , enabling continuous operation for transaction-heavy applications without single points of failure. For database workloads, scaled effectively on Itanium systems, supporting multi-terabyte environments in clustered configurations up to 64 processors per node, as certified by for versions through 12c. Signs of decline emerged by 2010, as Itanium's dwindled below 1% of overall revenues amid the rise of cost-efficient x86 multicore processors from Intel's line. The RISC/Itanium segment's revenue, for example, reached $2.4 billion in Q3 2011 with a 3.5% year-over-year increase but with shipments dropping sharply. Despite this, legacy installations persisted; HPE reported supporting around 50,000 active Itanium systems as of , primarily in entrenched mission-critical sites reluctant to migrate due to and reliability concerns.

Competition and decline

The Itanium architecture faced significant competition from x86 processors, particularly Intel's own Xeon line and AMD's Opteron multicore chips introduced in 2003, which provided 64-bit extensions while maintaining backward compatibility with existing x86 software ecosystems. Unlike Itanium, which required recompilation for its Explicitly Parallel Instruction Computing (EPIC) model and lacked native support for legacy x86 binaries, Opteron enabled seamless execution of 32-bit x86 applications at high speeds, eroding Itanium's appeal in enterprise servers. RISC-based architectures also posed rivals, including IBM's Power series, Sun Microsystems' SPARC, and Hewlett-Packard's PA-RISC processors, which dominated high-end computing through the early 2000s before many transitioned or declined. Emerging 64-bit ARM processors from 2012 further intensified pressure by offering power-efficient alternatives for servers, though Itanium's decline predated widespread ARM adoption in that segment. Itanium's market contraction accelerated due to x86 achieving performance parity by around 2005, driven by advancements like and multicore designs that boosted throughput without the architectural overhaul required for Itanium. The ecosystem for Itanium lagged behind, as optimizing for its paradigm proved complex and time-intensive compared to the mature x86 toolchain, limiting software availability and developer adoption. Intel's strategic pivot toward enhancing x86 post-2006, including aggressive process shrinks and feature additions, further marginalized Itanium by prioritizing the higher-volume architecture. Economic pressures exacerbated the decline, with Itanium's development incurring costs exceeding $1 billion due to its novel design and limited production scale, contrasting sharply with x86's billions of units shipped annually for . Low sales volumes hindered cost recovery, while the 2008 financial recession prompted vendors to consolidate around commoditized x86 platforms, accelerating exits from proprietary RISC and Itanium investments. Key events underscored the contraction: , following its 2010 acquisition of , announced in 2011 the cessation of software development for Itanium, citing Intel's waning commitment and low market traction as factors propping up its SPARC-based alternatives. formally cut funding and production in 2019, accepting last orders until January 2020 and ceasing shipments by July 2021. HPE announced that standard support for Itanium-based systems will end on December 31, 2025. By 2025, Itanium persists in niche legacy roles within specialized high-end servers, but holds less than 0.1% of the overall server market share, serving as a cautionary example of lock-in challenges in a x86- and ARM-dominated landscape.

Legacy in computing

Despite its commercial challenges, the Itanium left a lasting mark on through its (EPIC) paradigm, which emphasized compiler-driven parallelism and features like predication to reduce mispredictions. Predication, where instructions are conditionally executed based on predicates rather than branches, influenced subsequent hardware-software co-designs by enabling more efficient exploitation of (ILP) in superscalar processors. Similarly, Itanium's advanced mechanisms, including advanced load speculation and checkpointing, informed models in modern engines, allowing compilers to safely reorder loads ahead of dependent operations. In , Itanium spurred innovations in technology that extended beyond its . Its reliance on sophisticated optimization for ILP extraction advanced techniques now integral to open-source compilers like and , particularly in , , and ABI design. The Itanium C++ ABI, for instance, became the standard for non-Windows platforms in and Clang/, facilitating consistent binary interfaces across diverse architectures. These advancements highlighted the potential of compiler-hardware synergy, influencing how modern toolchains handle vectorization and auto-parallelization in environments. Itanium played a pivotal role in high-performance computing (HPC) during the early 2000s, powering scalable shared-memory systems that advanced supercomputing capabilities. SGI's Altix series, built on Itanium 2 processors, enabled massive single-system image configurations, with NASA's Columbia supercomputer—comprising 10,240 Itanium 2 cores—achieving 51.87 teraflops and ranking among the world's fastest systems in 2004. At its peak, Itanium-based systems accounted for over 80 entries on the TOP500 list in late 2004, representing about 16% of the total and demonstrating viability for large-scale scientific simulations in fields like astrophysics and climate modeling. This era underscored Itanium's strength in NUMA-aware environments, where its 64-bit addressing and cache coherence supported unprecedented memory scalability up to terabytes. Beyond HPC, Itanium found niche applications in mission-critical domains requiring high reliability and scalability. In , deployed Itanium-based NonStop platforms for its systems, leveraging the architecture's fault-tolerant features for processing and archiving large volumes of diagnostic from . In defense simulations, Itanium powered high-end workstations and clusters for complex modeling, though specific deployments like those at national labs emphasized its role in secure, high-throughput computations. The development of migration tools and utilities during Itanium's lifecycle has since become standard practice for transitioning legacy workloads to x86 or , incorporating lessons in and recompilation. From a 2025 vantage, Itanium serves as a for emerging open ISAs like , illustrating the perils of betting on novel paradigms without broad ecosystem buy-in, much as navigates fragmentation risks in extensions and commercialization. Academically, it remains a key in ILP and optimization, with principles referenced in research on parallelism extraction for multicore and GPU architectures. Its intellectual legacy endures through over 200 patents related to EPIC innovations, many still cited in ongoing work on hardware-software partitioning.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Intel® Itanium® Architecture Software Developer's Manual, Volume 1
    May 3, 2010 · Intel® processors based on the Itanium architecture may contain design defects or errors known as errata which may cause the product to deviate ...
  2. [2]
    Intel officially launches 64-bit Itanium chip - Computerworld
    May 29, 2001 · It also detailed a workstation that's aimed at compute-intensive applications and scheduled for release on June 29 at a starting price of ...
  3. [3]
    Intel, HP Reveal IA-64 Instruction Set Architecture
    The release of today's IA-64 architecture information is the result of the research and development effort between Intel and HP announced in 1994. The alliance ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Fact Sheet - Intel
    Based on a standards-based model of open computing, the Itanium architecture brought a new level of flexibility and OS choice to the mission-critical ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Product Change Notification
    Feb 1, 2019 · Select Intel® Itanium® Processors and Intel®. Scalable Memory Buffer,. PCN 116733-00, Product Discontinuance,. End of Life. Date of Publication ...
  6. [6]
    EPIC: Explicitly Parallel Instruction Computing - IEEE Xplore
    The authors developed the Explicitly Parallel Instruction Computing (EPIC) style of architecture to enable higher levels of instruction-level-parallelism.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Understanding EPIC Architectures and Implementations
    This paper seeks to illustrate the differences between EPIC architectures and former styles of instruction set architectures such as superscalar and VLIW.
  8. [8]
    Historical background for HP/Intel EPIC and IA-64 -- Mark Smotherman
    Instead, EPIC is a compendium of ideas that have been percolating in computer architecture for years.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Chapter 29 - Itanium Architecture - HPE Community
    Intel and HP jointly defined a new architecture technology called EPIC (Explicitly. Parallel Instruction Computing) named for the ability of the software to ...
  10. [10]
    Itanium — A System Implementor's Tale - USENIX
    Mar 2, 2005 · Itanium is a fairly new and rather unusual architecture. Its defining feature is explicitly-parallel instruction-set computing (EPIC).Missing: paradigm history
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Intel® IA-64 Architecture Software Developer's Manual
    A key feature of the IA-64 architecture is IA-32 instruction set compatibility. The Intel® IA-64 Architecture Software Developer's Manual provides a ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Itanium processor microarchitecture
    The pipeline design employs robust, scalable circuit design techniques. We consciously attempted to manage interconnect lengths and pipeline away secondary ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Intel Itanium 2 Processor Reference Manual
    Instruction cache lines are delivered to the execution core and dispersed to the Itanium 2 processor functional units. The Itanium 2 processor can issue, or ...
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Intel® QuickPath Architecture
    It features new system architecture that: 1) integrates a memory controller into each microprocessor, and 2) connects processors and other components with a new ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] New 130nm Itanium® 2 Processors for 2003 - Hot Chips
    • Low Voltage Itanium® 2 processor to deliver performance similar to Itanium® 2 processor 1.0GHz at about half the power. • Itanium roadmap committed to ...
  16. [16]
    Itanium: A cautionary tale - CNET
    Dec 7, 2005 · On June 8, 1994, Hewlett-Packard and Intel announced a bold collaboration to build a next-generation processor called Itanium, ...
  17. [17]
    Intel's IAPX 432: Gordon Moore's Gamble And Intel's Failed 32-bit ...
    Apr 9, 2023 · Intel's IAPX 432: Gordon Moore's Gamble And Intel's Failed 32-bit CISC ... My plan is to develop own board with iAPX 432 CPU (43201 and ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] The Itanium (I64) family
    In 12/1993 HP approaches Intel to jointly develop a 64-bit VLIW based architecture. • Intel agreed to work jointly with HP on a new VLIW-based 64-bit design. • ...
  19. [19]
    COMPANY NEWS; Intel Forms Chip Pact With Hewlett-Packard
    Jun 9, 1994 · The Intel Corporation and the Hewlett-Packard Company announced an alliance today to develop computer processor technologies that could be ...Missing: Itanium press
  20. [20]
    The birth of a new processor - EDN Network
    Jan 1, 2000 · ... Intel pushed back Itanium's release date from 1999 to mid-2000. Gwennap says HP had promised at one point not to continue building PA-RISC ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] THE IA-64 ARCHITECTURE - GW Engineering
    IA-64 is an actual instruction set architecture that is intended for implementation using the EPIC technology. The first Intel prod- uct based on this ...Missing: specification | Show results with:specification<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    PA-RISC Processors History and Performance - OpenPA
    The first Itanium Merced (2001) from HP and Intel was notably much slower than PA-8700 in integer but on par in floating point, while the second generation ...Missing: freeze | Show results with:freeze
  23. [23]
    USENIX '05 — Technical Paper, General Track
    ### Summary of EPIC in Itanium from https://www.usenix.org/event/usenix05/tech/general/gray/gray_html/
  24. [24]
    Why was the Itanium processor difficult to write a compiler for?
    Apr 16, 2015 · It's commonly stated that Intel's Itanium 64-bit processor architecture failed because the revolutionary EPIC instruction set was very difficult to write a ...Missing: shifts verification lags
  25. [25]
    NCSA ITANIUM-BASED LINUX CLUSTER TO AID SCIENTIFIC ...
    Jun 1, 2001 · The National Computational Science Alliance is a partnership to prototype an advanced computational infrastructure for the 21st century and ...
  26. [26]
    Intel software to boost Itanium's x86 processing speed - EE Times
    Apr 25, 2003 · The new software will emulate the x86 32-bit code to be executed as part of Itanium's 64-bit operation, she said. The spokeswoman denied that ...
  27. [27]
    Advanced Micro to Describe a Chip That Will Take On Intel
    Aug 10, 2000 · Michael Sullivan, an Intel spokesman, said the Itanium chip would be compatible, even though it was not an extension of the x86 design.
  28. [28]
    INTEL, HP LAUNCH NEW PROCESSOR - HPCwire
    Jun 1, 2001 · The Itanium processor, developed by both companies, is designed for workstations and servers _ machines that power Web sites, sift through data ...
  29. [29]
    Intel Launches Itanium: OEMs Unveil Systems
    May 29, 2001 · The first group of Itanium processors come at clock speeds of 733 MHz and 800 MHz. They feature 2 MB or 4 MB of L3 cache. Prices range from ...Missing: expectations 10x
  30. [30]
    Intel to aim Itanium at tough IT crowd - CNET
    Jun 21, 2001 · ... 2001. Intel CEO Craig Barrett said Wednesday that the company needs to see a recovery in the chip market within six months or it will ...
  31. [31]
    ITANIUM SCORES HIGH IN PERFORMANCE TESTS - HPCwire
    Jun 1, 2001 · “We feel (integer performance) is competitive today with UltraSparc III, and we expect it to get better with McKinley,” the second-generation ...Missing: 10x | Show results with:10x
  32. [32]
    Upgrading your server: A look at the Itanium | ZDNET
    Sep 10, 2001 · Waiting for Merced, as Intel's next-generation Itanium processor was code-named, was like waiting for Godot. First it was going to ship in 1998, ...
  33. [33]
    HP i2000 Itanium Workstation - OpenPA
    Itanium had been long in development as joint HP-Intel project that promised a better CPU future based on a new VLIW/EPIC processor architecture for HP-UX, ...
  34. [34]
    Intel names Merced chip Itanium - CNET
    Oct 4, 1999 · Itanium will be the official name of Intel's Merced processor, and the company will provide more details on the microarchitecture of the chip tomorrow.
  35. [35]
    Merced - Microarchitectures - Intel - WikiChip
    Jan 20, 2021 · Merced was the first Itanium microarchitecture designed by Intel. The architecture avoids expensive out-of-order execution hardware by moving scheduling ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] In-System FPGA Prototyping of an Itanium Microarchitecture
    The first generation Intel Itanium processors (code named Merced) ran at 733 and 800 MHz and use an 8-stage core pipeline [16].
  37. [37]
    Itanium 2 on the way, but will it sell? - CNET
    Jul 8, 2002 · Performance was relatively anemic, and sales were even worse. In the third quarter of 2001, less than 500 Itanium servers were shipped, ...
  38. [38]
    Intel Begins Shipping Itanium® 2 Processors
    SANTA CLARA, Calif., July 8, 2002 - Intel Corporation today announced that it has begun initial commercial shipment of Itanium® 2 processors ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] HotChips 2002 - Intel® Itanium® 2 Processor
    Itanium/Alpha ISAs: • Itanium® arch has 40% fewer memory operations and 30% fewer branches than Alpha (some impact from no-pgo on Alpha).Missing: McKinley transistor count
  40. [40]
    Benchmarks in, McKinley girds for marathon - EE Times
    May 31, 2002 · Indeed, next year Intel will apply its 0.13-micron technology to the 0.18-micron Itanium 2 core to deliver Madison, a version with a ...
  41. [41]
    New Intel Server Processors Strengthen High-End Line-Up
    Jun 30, 2003 · The 32-bit Intel Xeon processor MP 2.80 GHz is compatible with existing Intel Xeon processor MP-based platforms and delivers up to 10 percent or ...
  42. [42]
    Products formerly Montecito - Intel
    TDP. Intel® Itanium® Processor 9015 (12M Cache, 1.40 GHz, 400 MHz FSB). Q1'07, 2, 1.40 GHz, 12 MB L2 Cache, 104 W. Intel® Itanium® Processor 9010 (6M Cache, ...
  43. [43]
    Montecito: a dual-core, dual-thread Itanium processor - IEEE Xplore
    Apr 30, 2005 · Intel's Montecito is the first Itanium processor to feature duplicate, dual-thread cores and cache hierarchies on a single die.
  44. [44]
    Intel® Itanium® 9300 Processor Raises Bar for Scalable, Resilient ...
    Feb 8, 2010 · The Itanium 9300 processor employs the second generation of Intel® Virtualization Technology to improve performance and robustness. Its Intel® ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Dual-Core Intel Itanium Processor 9100 Series
    This processor will be equipped with more than two billion transistors and can be expected to deliver more than double the performance of today's Intel Itanium ...
  46. [46]
    Montvale - Microarchitectures - Intel - WikiChip
    Nov 30, 2017 · Process, 90 nm. Core Configs, 1, 2. Instructions ... Montvale was an Itanium microarchitecture designed by Intel as a successor to Montecito.Missing: node | Show results with:node
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Intel Itanium Processor 9300 Series and 9500 Series
    2-18 FMB Voltage Specifications for the Intel® Itanium® Processor 9500 Series ................43. 2-19 FMB 170W and 130W Current Specifications for the. Intel ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] A 65 nm 2-Billion Transistor Quad-Core Itanium Processor
    The 21.5 mm by 32.5 mm die has 2.05B transistors. The processor has four dual-threaded cores, 30 MB of cache, and a system interface that operates at 2.4 GHz ...Missing: count | Show results with:count
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Intel Itanium Processor 9500 Series Product Brief
    The Intel Itanium 9500 has up to 8 cores, 54MB cache, 2TB memory, 2.4x performance scaling, and 16 threads, with 3.1B transistors.
  50. [50]
    Intel outs 'Poulson' speeds and feeds - The Register
    Mar 3, 2011 · Each core has 16 KB of L1 instruction and 16 KB of L1 data cache, with 512 KB of L2 instruction cache and 256 KB of L2 data cache. Then there is ...Missing: 32nm 20MB 50MB multiply
  51. [51]
    [PDF] Intel® Itanium® Processor 9300/9500/9700 Series: Datasheet
    The Intel® Itanium® Processor 9300 Series delivers new levels of flexibility, reliability, ... pipeline for pipeline management and core RAS. ▫ Intel ...Missing: Merced | Show results with:Merced
  52. [52]
    Intel® Itanium® Processor 9760
    Intel® Itanium® Processor 9760 ; Processor Base Frequency. 2.66 GHz ; Cache. 32 MB ; Bus Speed. 6.4 GT/s ; TDP. 170 W ; Launch Date. Q2'17.
  53. [53]
    Itanium - Wikipedia
    The Itanium architecture originated at Hewlett-Packard (HP), and was later jointly developed by HP and Intel. Launching in June 2001, Intel initially marketed ...
  54. [54]
    Intel to finally scatter remaining ashes of Itanium to the wind in 2021
    Feb 1, 2019 · Intel said that the Itanium 9700 series would take its final order on January 30 of 2020 with the final shipment date to take place on July 29, 2021.
  55. [55]
    Intel to discontinue Itanium 9700 'Kittson' processor, the last of the ...
    Feb 1, 2019 · Under their product discontinuance plan, Intel will cease shipments of Itanium CPUs in mid-2021, or a bit over two years from now. The impact to ...
  56. [56]
    HP Wins Court Ruling in Itanium Litigation - HP - Investor Relations
    Aug 1, 2012 · The Settlement and Release Agreement entered into by HP, Oracle and Hurd on September 20, 2010, requires Oracle to continue to offer its ...
  57. [57]
    HP Wins Itanium Court Case Against Oracle | CRN
    HP filed a breach-of-contract suit arguing that Oracle had committed to continue supporting Itanium as part of a Sept. 20, 2010, settlement of an earlier ...
  58. [58]
    Oracle loses bid to upend HP's $3 billion win - Reuters
    Jun 15, 2021 · The California Court of Appeal ruled on Monday that Oracle is on the hook for a $3 billion verdict for violating a settlement agreement with Hewlett-Packard Co.
  59. [59]
    Hewlett-Packard Co. v. Oracle Corp. - Justia Law
    Jun 14, 2021 · A jury subsequently found that Oracle had breached both the express terms of the settlement agreement and the implied covenant of good faith and ...
  60. [60]
    Intel Itanium IA-64 Support Removed With The Linux 6.7 Kernel
    Nov 2, 2023 · Overnight the mainline Linux kernel has retired support for Intel Itanium (IA-64) processors.
  61. [61]
    [PDF] HP-UX 11i v3 2025 Operating Environment Update Release (OEUR)
    ... Itanium ... HP-UX will end standard support on December 31,. 2025. The HP-UX 11i v3 2025 OEUR is available to customers with a valid support agreement.
  62. [62]
    GCC 15 to 'undeprecate' Itanium support - for now - The Register
    Nov 1, 2024 · GCC 15 will de-deprecate Linux support for Intel's original 64-bit chip. The development team of the GNU Compiler Collection has accepted a code patch.
  63. [63]
    GCC 15 Un-Deprecates Itanium IA-64 Linux Support - Phoronix
    Oct 9, 2024 · The GCC 14 compiler marked Itanium IA-64 support as obsolete with plans to remove that Intel architecture in GCC 15.Missing: undeprecate | Show results with:undeprecate
  64. [64]
    Intel's Itanium, once destined to replace x86 in PCs, hits end of line
    May 11, 2017 · HPE has said it will keep support for Itanium servers up and running until 2025 ... HPE from trying to get customers to move to x86. HPE ...<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    Industry Update: HPE to End Itanium Support by December 31, 2025
    Aug 21, 2025 · Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) will officially cease support for Intel's Itanium processor series by December 31, 2025. ... x86 and ARM ...Missing: shift | Show results with:shift
  66. [66]
    Save the date: Itanium will finally die at the end of 2025
    Feb 1, 2019 · Intel announced shipments of Itanium 9700-series CPUs will end on July 29, 2021, though HP Enterprise, the last remaining vendor, will continue ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Itanium-based solutions by hp - HPE Community
    This white paper discusses the advantages of the Itanium architecture, and gives details about the rx4610,. Hewlett-Packard's first server to use the 64-bit ...Missing: ProLiant | Show results with:ProLiant
  68. [68]
    [PDF] HP Integrity rx7640 Server - Spectra
    Four 1.6 GHz Intel Itanium 2 processors. 10 GB of memory. 5 PCI cards. 2 cell boards. 2 internal hard drives. 1 DVD drive. 1 core I/O board set. 2 bulk power ...Missing: Altix 3000 McKinley Dell 6650
  69. [69]
    [PDF] HPE Integrity Superdome 2 Server Digital data sheet - Mojo Systems
    The HPE Integrity Superdome 2 Server delivers a unified blade architecture, from. HPE X86 to HPE Superdome 2, using 8 core Intel Itanium 9700 series processors.
  70. [70]
    [PDF] The power of invention: a history of ProLiant servers from HP
    HP systems provide features differentiating them from the competition. The number and variety of options and features available for HP industry standard ...Missing: early rx Merced
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Update On SGI Technology - ECMWF
    #1: SGI Altix UV 1000 1024c Intel Xeon 7560. 16000. #2 SGI Altix 4700 Bandwidth System 1024c Itanium. 10600. #3: SGI Altix UV 1000 512c Xeon X7560. 6840. #4: ...
  72. [72]
    Server vendors optimistic about Itanium 2 - InfoWorld
    Jul 17, 2006 · Fujitsu Siemens will upgrade from single to dual-core Itanium chips in its 8, 16, and 32-socket PrimeQuest servers by late this quarter. The ...
  73. [73]
    Next Superdome CPU chips amble into HPE - The Register
    Feb 15, 2017 · There have been reports that Intel has already started shipping its latest, Kittson version, Itanium processor chip.<|separator|>
  74. [74]
    Ten Years After First Delay, Intel's Itanium Is Still Late - Bits
    Feb 9, 2009 · NEC shipped 3 percent of the systems, and Hitachi, SGI and Fujitsu shipped 1 percent each.
  75. [75]
    The Math On Big NUMA Versus Clusters - AIwire
    Feb 14, 2014 · The chipsets it created for its Itanium-based Superdome 2 machines span up to 32 sockets, and HP has engineered 64 socket machines in the past, ...
  76. [76]
    [PDF] The Itanium™ Processor Cartridge - Hot Chips
    • Up to four Itanium™ Processor cartridges with Intel's 460GX chipset. • Chipset isolates the memory and I/O subsystems from the system bus. • Bi-directional ...Missing: GX northbridge Merced
  77. [77]
    Intel Itanium and Itanium 2 Chipsets - Flylib.com
    The 460GX chipset included 10 components, enabling developers to customize Itanium systems for use as workstations with AGP4x graphics or as servers with up to ...Missing: GX northbridge Merced
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Intel® E8870 Chipset
    The Intel E8870 chipset, optimized for the Intel® Itanium® 2 processor, provides new levels of performance, scalability, and enhanced error detection, ...Missing: McKinley QPI
  79. [79]
    [PDF] HP Integrity Superdome Servers 16- processor, 32 - Spectra
    The Integrity Superdome with the sx2000 chipset supports the Mad9M Itanium 2 processor at initial release. ... processor Superdome (16 core Itanium 2. Madison or ...
  80. [80]
    [PDF] A6795A Fibre Channel Mass Storage Adapter Installation Guide
    If the td driver for an installed Tachyon adapter (A6795A) does not display, verify that the adapter is securely seated before taking additional action.
  81. [81]
    HP upgrades chip set for entry-level Itanium servers - EDN Network
    Sep 7, 2006 · The chip set now supports 10Gbytes/s maximum I/O throughput, up from 4 Gbytes/s in the ZX-1. Latency for DMA reads has declined from 700 to 400 ...
  82. [82]
    The SGI Altix 3000 series. - The Netlib
    Like the Origin systems the Altix has so-called C-bricks that contains boards with four Itanium 2 processors, 2 memory modules, two I/O ports, and two ASICs ...Missing: SN1 | Show results with:SN1
  83. [83]
    Fujitsu Adds Attractively-Priced PRIMEQUEST 420 Midrange Model ...
    Feb 17, 2006 · The PRIMEQUEST server line uses high-performance 64-bit Intel® Itanium® 2 processors with a Fujitsu-developed chipset that maximizes reliability ...
  84. [84]
    [PDF] The Making of a Compiler for the Intel Itanium Processor
    The Intel Itanium compilers were tested in two different environments to cover the C/C++ and Fortran compiler language functionality and to test optimizations ...Missing: ECC ICC<|control11|><|separator|>
  85. [85]
    [PDF] An Overview of the Intel® IA-64 Compiler
    In this paper, we provide an overview of the Intel IA-64 compiler, discuss and illustrate several optimization techniques, and explain how these optimizations ...Missing: Itanium history ECC
  86. [86]
    Developing High-Performance Applications for HP-UX on IA-64
    Like PA-RISC, the IA-64 architecture provides full support for both 32-bit and 64-bit addressing and arithmetic. In addition, the HP-UX operating system ...
  87. [87]
    IA-64 Options - Using the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC)
    3.17.14 IA-64 Options. These are the ` -m ' options defined for the Intel IA-64 architecture. -mbig-endian: Generate code for a big endian target.
  88. [88]
    Open Research Compiler (ORC) - SourceForge
    The objective of the Open Research Compiler (ORC) project is to provide a leading open source ItaniumTM Processor Family (IA-64) compiler infrastructure to ...Missing: ICCE | Show results with:ICCE
  89. [89]
    Intel® VTune™ Performance Analyzer 9.1 Update 8 for Linux ...
    It enables you to collect, analyze, and display performance data for Linux* applications running on IA-32, Intel® 64 or Itanium®-based systems. The VTune ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  90. [90]
    [PDF] Intel® Itanium® Processor Family Reference Guide: IA-32 Execution ...
    The Intel® Itanium® processor family has been architected to provide industry-leading perform- ance and capabilities on high-end applications.
  91. [91]
    Itanium IA-64 Support May Revert Back To Being ... - Phoronix
    Aug 12, 2025 · But then last year the Itanium port was un-deprecated with plans to "support this for some years to come." Now one year later it's back to ...
  92. [92]
    NonStop Migration: Should you stay or should you go?
    The good news is that the migration from Itanium to x86 on NonStop is a simpler migration than platform moves for NonStop have been in the past.
  93. [93]
    [PDF] HP Integrity Virtual Machines A.03.00 Installation, Configuration, and ...
    HP-UX 11i V2 May 2005 or later. •. HP-UX 11i V3. To ... (nPars) or HP Integrity servers. Note that Integrity VM does not run on soft partitions (vPars).
  94. [94]
    [PDF] New OpenVMS Virtualization Technologies
    Apr 10, 2005 · 10/4/2005. European Technical Update Days. 35. HP Integrity Virtual Machines (HPVM). • VT-i = Intel's Virtualization Technology for Itanium.
  95. [95]
    ski
    Aug 12, 2007 · It simulates the IA-64 architecture as defined by the Intel Itanium 2 architecture manuals. This is not a full platform simulator; i.e., no ...
  96. [96]
    ski, xski, bskinc - An IA-64 Instruction Set Simulator - Linux
    The simulator must be run with root privilege to get the networking emulation to work. You can specify other options on the command line, just like you would do ...
  97. [97]
    IA-32 Execution Layer | Proceedings of the 36th annual IEEE/ACM ...
    IA-32 Execution Layer: a two-phase dynamic translator designed to support IA-32 applications on Itanium®-based systems · Abstract · Formats available · References.
  98. [98]
    [PDF] Intel Itanium - Computer Science and Engineering
    Nov 27, 2012 · ▫ Based on Pentium 4 Netburst architecture. ▫ Hyperthreading ... ▫ http://www.ideasinternational.com/benchmark/spec/specfp_s2000.html.
  99. [99]
    [PDF] Intel® Itanium® Processor Family Reference Guide: IA-32 Execution ...
    IA-32 EL is a software binary that will be part of leading operating systems that support Itanium architecture, including. Windows* and Linux *. Execution of ...Missing: x86 emulation overhead
  100. [100]
    [PDF] Porting Applications from HP OpenVMS Alpha to HP ... - Digiater.nl
    This manual provides a framework for application developers who are migrating applications from HP OpenVMS Alpha to HP OpenVMS. Industry Standard 64 for ...
  101. [101]
    IBM AIX for IA64 (Itanium) aka Project Monterey Runs Again!
    Oct 3, 2022 · The OS will not boot on modern Itanium 2 (McKinley) CPUs, only the early “pre-release” Itanium 1 aka Merced. Allegedly the only emulator ...
  102. [102]
    WOW64 Implementation Details - Win32 apps | Microsoft Learn
    Aug 19, 2020 · (x64 only) Wow64Cpu.dll provides support for running x86 programs on x64. (Intel Itanium only) IA32Exec.bin contains the x86 software emulator.
  103. [103]
    [PDF] Transitioning from Insight Manager™ 7 to HP ... - HPE Community
    HP provides a migration from Insight. Manager 7 to HP Systems Insight Manager through a configuration data migration tool - the DMT. The DMT operates ...Missing: Itanium | Show results with:Itanium
  104. [104]
    [PDF] HP OpenVMS Migrating an Application from OpenVMS VAX to ...
    This manual describes how to create an HP OpenVMS Industry. Standard 64 for Integrity Servers (I64) version of an OpenVMS VAX application. Revision/Update ...
  105. [105]
    [PDF] A Better Choice for Migration from Intel Itanium - Cisco
    Cisco® RISC/UNIX Migration Services provides a proven migration process to help IT departments move from Intel. Itanium processor–based environments to Cisco ...Missing: bank case 2020s<|separator|>
  106. [106]
    Using the Intel Itanium2 processor performance monitoring unit to ...
    In this paper, we cover three broad topics: the Itanium® 2 processor performance monitoring u nit (PMU), our tools and methodology to gather and process cache, ...
  107. [107]
    HPE Integrity Superdome 2 QuickSpecs
    HPE Superdome 2 (SD2) is an HPE Integrity server that represents a new category of modular, mission-critical systems that scale up, out, and within to ...
  108. [108]
    AMD steps into the 64-Bit ring with Opteron - Tech Monitor
    Apr 22, 2003 · It's taken a few years, but Advanced Micro Devices will today finally launch a 64-bit alternative to Intel's Itanium processors with its ...Missing: competition multicore
  109. [109]
    Intel's 64-bit Xeon may steal thunder from Itanium CPU - EE Times
    The widely expected Xeon repositioning is likely to marginalize, but not kill, the Itanium, co-developed with Hewlett-Packard Co. as a successor to the X86. The ...
  110. [110]
    [PDF] Opteron: Pushing x86 to the Limit - AcesHardware.com
    May 21, 2018 · The key selling point of the Opteron is that it also runs all 32-bit x86 applications at high speed, in contrast with Intel's Itanium that only ...
  111. [111]
    Big Blue's Power Systems Get Some Itanium Competition - IT Jungle
    Nov 12, 2012 · Here we are in November, and the new Poulson Itanium 9500 processors are out, and HP is getting ready to ship entry Integrity blade and rack ...
  112. [112]
    The history of chip architecture-Electronics Headlines-EEWORLD
    It's worth noting that its competitor, ARM, didn't widely promote 64-bit processor design until 2012. ... RISC ... 64-bit Itanium processor, the Itanium ...
  113. [113]
    SRWare IT-News - Why Intel can be glad Itanium failed
    Jan 9, 2025 · This article explores why Itanium would have been completely unsuitable for the modern world of technology and why its failure ultimately proved to be a ...Missing: delays 1994-2001 verification
  114. [114]
    Intel made a huge mistake 10 years ago - Hacker News
    Apr 20, 2016 · Itanium was a RISC-y endeavour by Intel and it had it's problems but ... high internal costs. That's fine in their main business ...
  115. [115]
    [PDF] IBM System z10™ Mainframe, HP Integrity, No Contest!
    Itanium® supporter HP in 2004, and SGI in 2007. In 2005, Microsoft even cancelled its Itanium® workstation Windows OS, a final death-knell. Itanium®.
  116. [116]
    Oracle Drops Itanium Support, Intel Soldiers On - CRN
    Mar 23, 2011 · Oracle says it chose to discontinue its support for Intel's Itanium server processors because Intel isn't commited to Itanium, ...<|separator|>
  117. [117]
    Death of HP-UX and Itanium - LinkedIn
    Jul 22, 2020 · Then in 1994, HP and Intel formed the Itanium chip partnership, and a year later the RISC/Unix crowd were all starting to commit to porting ...
  118. [118]
    Intel stops production Itanium-cpus - Techzine Global
    Feb 4, 2019 · Mid 2021, the last Itanium 9700 Kitson CPU will roll off the belt, after which Intel will close the fabs. Itanium, based on the promising ...Missing: Kittson | Show results with:Kittson
  119. [119]
    Why did Intel's Itanium processors fail to replace x86 in workstations ...
    Aug 17, 2025 · I spent a lot of time studying “next generation” processors years ago. The problem that Itanium had was that it was an intel product.Was the Intel Itanium architecture better and more efficient than its ...Is it true that the Itanium failed in the market against even ... - QuoraMore results from www.quora.comMissing: origins | Show results with:origins<|control11|><|separator|>
  120. [120]
    [PDF] Itanium — A System Implementor's Tale - USENIX
    Itanium is a fairly new and rather unusual architecture. Its defining feature is explicitly-parallel instruction-set computing (EPIC), which moves the onus ...
  121. [121]
    Itanium C++ ABI
    In this document, we specify the Application Binary Interface (ABI) for C++ programs: that is, the object code interfaces between different user-provided C++ ...
  122. [122]
    Architecture & Platform Information for Compiler Writers - LLVM
    GCC reading list. ABI¶. System V Application Binary Interface · Itanium C++ ABI (This is used for all non-Windows targets.) Linux¶. Linux extensions to gabi.
  123. [123]
    NASA's SGI Altix Supercomputer Ranked Among the Best on Official ...
    Nov 8, 2004 · Fully Operational 10,240-Processor Columbia System Rated at 51.87 Teraflops, Returning World-Class Supercomputing to U.S. Scientists.<|separator|>
  124. [124]
    Intel Enterprise Platforms Take Lion's Share Of 'Top500' Ranking
    Nov 8, 2004 · Intel Itanium 2 processors power 83 systems on the list, up from 61 previously, representing a 36 percent increase since June and up 160 percent ...
  125. [125]
    TOP500 List - November 2004
    ASCI Q - AlphaServer SC45, 1.25 GHz, HPE Los Alamos National Laboratory ... SGI Altix 1.3 GHz, HPE SGI United States, 512, 2,338.00, 2,662.40. 82, pSeries ...
  126. [126]
    GE rolls out new Centricity Enterprise - AuntMinnie
    In addition, the new version of Centricity Enterprise is supported by the NonStop Itanium platform from computer developer HP of Palo Alto, CA. The platform is ...
  127. [127]
    [PDF] Transforming Business-Critical Infrastructure through Migration to ...
    Itanium®-based servers are changing the face of business-critical computing by delivering enterprise-class scalability and availability.
  128. [128]
    Arm vs. RISC-V in 2025: Which Architecture Will Lead the Way?
    Dec 24, 2024 · With an open-standard architecture like RISC-V, they can mitigate the risks of trade restrictions on advanced semiconductor technologies. Modern ...Risc-V Is Poised To Reshape... · Arm Vs. Risc-V: Advantages... · How Arm Vs. Risc-V Will Play...Missing: Itanium legacy parallelism patents
  129. [129]
    Intel Patents – Key Insights and Stats
    Intel has a total of 214150 patents globally, out of which 123905 has been granted and more than 48% of these worldwide patents are active.Missing: Itanium | Show results with:Itanium