Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Like button

The Like button is a feature designed to allow users to express quick approval or affinity for —such as posts, , or —via a simple thumbs-up icon, thereby streamlining social feedback and enhancing platform interactivity. It was first implemented on in November 2005, followed by FriendFeed's "Like" function launched on October 30, 2007, though 's introduction on February 9, 2009, brought it to mainstream adoption across platforms. Rapidly adopted across ecosystems, including Instagram's heart icon, YouTube's thumbs-up, and Twitter's (now X's) heart, the Like button transformed online engagement by quantifying social validation, with empirical analyses revealing it boosts content dissemination as each endorsement signals to peers and algorithms alike. Studies indicate that likes function as social rewards, activating neural pathways associated with release and , akin to tangible incentives, which heightens user retention but fosters habitual checking for affirmation. Despite its ubiquity, the feature has drawn scrutiny for psychological tolls, including correlations between low like counts and heightened depressive symptoms or emotional distress, as fewer endorsements relative to peers elicit and self-comparisons that undermine . Research further links pervasive like-seeking to broader declines, such as anxiety and distorted self-perception, with surveys identifying it as among the most detrimental elements due to its role in gamifying approval. Critics argue it incentivizes superficial metrics over substantive interaction, exacerbating echo chambers and polarizing content prioritization, though underscores its dual capacity for connection alongside risks of addictive loops and diminished critical .

History

Early origins and precursors

Early precursors to the like button included rating and endorsement mechanisms in online forums and content aggregation sites. These mechanisms, rooted in advertising research on "likability" as a for —such as the Advertising Research Foundation's 1990 study linking ad appeal to sales outcomes—evolved into lightweight endorsement buttons, enabling scalable feedback without verbose input. Prior to Facebook's rollout, they demonstrated causal between positive signals and content amplification, though often paired with negative options to balance curation. Earlier systems provided conceptual groundwork. , operational since 1997, employed a queue where logged-in users rated comments as "insightful," "funny," or otherwise, with scores affecting display thresholds to filter noise in discussions. Terms like "upvote" and "downvote" emerged around 2000 on predecessor sites such as , reflecting evolving norms for collective validation in user-generated threads. Sites like , launched in October 2000, pioneered simple user-driven rating mechanisms by allowing visitors to score uploaded photos on a 1-10 attractiveness scale, with aggregated scores determining overall rankings and visibility. This binary-to-scaled endorsement model emphasized quick judgments to surface popular content, influencing later social feedback interfaces. News aggregation platforms built on these foundations with explicit promotion tools. , debuting in November 2004, introduced "Digg" buttons for users to upvote stories, elevating them on the front page, alongside "Bury" options to demote low-quality submissions, fostering community-curated feeds. followed in June 2005, implementing upvote and downvote arrows from launch to algorithmically sort posts and comments by net positive votes, prioritizing high-engagement content while suppressing others. Video-sharing platform introduced the first dedicated "like" button in November 2005, enabling users to provide simple positive endorsements for videos without a corresponding downvote mechanism.

Facebook's development and launch

The development of the Like button at began in , amid the platform's rapid expansion beyond students to the general public. A small team, including product manager Leah Pearlman, engineering managers Akhil Wable and , designer , and internal communications lead Maggie Richardson, sought to enable quick on posts without requiring full comments, aiming to foster while avoiding negative reactions like a dislike option. The concept, initially codenamed "props," drew from ideas like stars or thumbs-up symbols discussed as early as July 2007, and was prototyped to post updates such as "[User] thinks this is awesome" to friends' feeds. Pearlman proposed the feature on Facebook's internal ideas board under the name "awesome button," which generated interest but faced debate over its implications for user interaction. Founder reportedly vetoed "awesome" due to concerns it might reduce commenting by oversimplifying feedback, ultimately approving "like" after testing alternatives to ensure it encouraged rather than supplanted deeper . The button's emphasized simplicity and positivity, with Rosenstein focusing on increasing "positivity in the system" by streamlining affirmation without algorithmic disruption at launch. Facebook enabled the Like button for all users on February 9, 2009, marking a pivotal update that integrated it across profiles, pages, and later external websites via an embeddable . This rollout followed internal testing and efforts, transforming passive consumption into interactive signaling, though early marketing analyses worried it might diminish detailed interactions—contrary to observed increases in overall . By , the feature aggregated likes into news feed stories, amplifying and virality without immediate reliance on recommendation algorithms.

Widespread adoption across platforms

The dedicated like button, first implemented by in 2005, saw widespread adoption across platforms following Facebook's prominent 2009 introduction, with other major platforms rapidly integrating similar positive endorsement features to boost user interaction and content visibility. implemented its thumbs-up like button in , enabling viewers to signal approval for videos alongside a dislike option, which contributed to algorithmic recommendations favoring highly liked content. Instagram, launched on October 6, 2010, integrated a heart icon for liking posts from its , allowing users to double-tap images for quick endorsement and fostering rapid growth through visual affirmation mechanics. maintained its star-based "favorites" system initially but transitioned to a heart "like" button on , , to streamline and align with broader conventions, reportedly increasing by making the action more intuitive. Google introduced the +1 button on March 30, 2011, as a direct analog to the Like, initially appearing in search results to recommend pages and later embeddable on websites, influencing personalized search outcomes based on user endorsements. Platforms like LinkedIn followed suit by adding native like functionality to posts around 2013, extending the model's reach into professional networking. Reddit's upvote system, present since the site's 2005 launch, operated on a comparable principle of elevating content via positive votes, though distinguished by its bidirectional voting that included downvotes for demotion. This proliferation reflected a industry-wide recognition of lightweight positive feedback as a driver for retention and virality, with variations tailored to platform-specific user behaviors.

Technical Design and Functionality

Core mechanics and implementation

The core mechanics of a like button revolve around a toggle mechanism that records a user's endorsement of content, such as a post or video, without requiring page reloads for seamless interaction. When clicked, the button's frontend implementation—typically using JavaScript event listeners—captures the action and dispatches an asynchronous HTTP request (e.g., POST via Fetch API or XMLHttpRequest) to a dedicated backend endpoint, passing parameters like the content ID, user ID (often from session tokens or cookies), and the intended action (like or unlike). This enables optimistic updates: the client-side UI immediately reflects the change, such as incrementing a visible counter or altering the button's state (e.g., filling a thumbs-up icon), while awaiting server confirmation to handle potential failures like network issues or duplicates. Backend processing authenticates the request, queries the user's prior interaction to enforce a single like per user-content pair (via unique constraints or checks against a ), and executes the toggle: inserting a record with user ID, content ID, and for likes, or deleting it for unlikes, often within a to maintain atomicity. Like counts are updated either by querying the 's row count or maintaining a separate counter field with atomic increments/decrements, with high-traffic systems using in-memory caches like for sub-millisecond reads and writes, syncing periodically to persistent stores such as relational databases (e.g., with junction tables for many-to-many relations) or solutions optimized for high write throughput. Concurrency is managed through locking or optimistic locking to prevent race conditions from simultaneous clicks. Scalable implementations, as in major platforms, incorporate sharding by for load distribution across servers, edge caching to reduce for global users, and asynchronous queues (e.g., Kafka or ) for side effects like notifying content owners or feeding into recommendation algorithms. For instance, systems handling extreme volumes employ models, where count discrepancies are reconciled via background jobs rather than blocking operations. Security measures include to curb and CSRF tokens to validate requests, ensuring the mechanic supports both feedback and robust .

Variations and platform-specific features

The Facebook Like button employs a thumbs-up and supports expanded introduced on February 24, 2016, including , , , Sad, and Angry emojis, allowing users to express nuanced beyond simple approval. These reactions appear alongside the primary Like option, with data indicating they increased engagement by providing alternatives to the thumbs-up for non-positive sentiments. Twitter, now X, transitioned from a star-shaped "favorite" button to a heart icon for "likes" on November 3, 2015, aiming to simplify interactions and boost user retention by aligning with more intuitive mechanisms observed on other platforms. This unidirectional like lacks a downvote equivalent, focusing solely on endorsement, which aggregates to display popularity metrics on tweets. YouTube utilizes thumbs-up and thumbs-down buttons for bidirectional voting on videos, where likes contribute positively to algorithmic recommendations while dislikes signal lower quality, though public dislike counts were hidden starting March 2021 to curb targeted campaigns. Recent updates in October 2025 redesigned the thumbs icons to be bolder and more rounded for improved mobile visibility. Reddit's system features upvote and downvote arrows, enabling users to elevate or suppress based on perceived value to the , with net votes determining and comment visibility in subreddit feeds. Upvotes promote deemed contributory, while downvotes hide off-topic or rule-violating material, influencing karma scores that gate further participation for new accounts. Instagram employs a heart icon for likes, introduced in 2010, where users can also double-tap posts to activate it, emphasizing quick, affectionate endorsement without reaction variants or downvotes to maintain a positive feed experience. This design prioritizes visual simplicity, integrating likes into metrics like engagement rates for content creators.

Social and Behavioral Impacts

Positive contributions to engagement

The like button lowers the threshold for interaction by enabling rapid, minimal-effort endorsement of , which empirical tests show amplifies overall platform activity. Internal evaluations at prior to the 2009 launch confirmed that incorporating the feature elevated levels, as it streamlined compared to more demanding actions like commenting or . This mechanism fosters habitual checking and responding, contributing to sustained session times and daily active growth, with likes forming a core component of metrics tracked by platforms. Likes function as , where visible counts of prior endorsements signal content quality and popularity, prompting additional interactions. A on advertisements revealed that posts displaying higher like volumes generated proportionally more subsequent likes and clicks, demonstrating a causal boost in user responsiveness through perceived consensus. This feedback loop extends to organic content, as algorithmic prioritization favors highly liked posts, exposing them to broader audiences and spurring chain reactions of views, reactions, and shares that enhance network effects. For content creators and brands, likes provide quantifiable validation that incentivizes production and refinement of material. Research indicates that positive social feedback via likes correlates with increased sharing and commenting behaviors, as users interpret endorsements as affirmations worth propagating. When paired with targeted promotion, accumulated likes translate to heightened awareness and loyalty, yielding measurable returns in user acquisition and retention for entities leveraging the feature.

Psychological and addictive effects

The like button elicits psychological responses primarily through social validation, activating brain reward centers akin to other reinforcers. Receiving likes triggers release in the ventral striatum and related pathways, mirroring the neural response to monetary or food rewards, as evidenced by (fMRI) studies on social feedback. This process fosters a sense of approval and belonging, but repeated exposure can condition users to prioritize external affirmation over intrinsic motivation. Addictiveness arises from intermittent , where likes occur unpredictably, similar to variable-ratio schedules in that heighten through anticipation. Platforms exploit this by algorithmically varying frequency, promoting habitual checking behaviors that correlate with altered sensitivity in adolescents' brains. reveals heightened striatal activity during like receipt, contributing to compulsive patterns that parallel behavioral addictions, with users exhibiting tolerance-like escalation in usage to maintain reward levels. Longitudinal data indicate that frequent interactions, driven by like-seeking, inversely associate with baseline synthesis capacity in reward regions like the , suggesting neuroadaptation akin to substance use disorders. Empirical studies link these effects to broader psychological outcomes, including dependency where individuals experience withdrawal-like distress from notification absence, exacerbating cycles of overuse. For instance, habitual checking for likes in early alters sensitivity to social rewards and punishments, potentially priming vulnerability to addiction-like use (ASMU). While some reward variability enhances , excessive reliance on likes distorts self-perception, as the quantized of —lacking nuanced —amplifies validation-seeking at the expense of authentic interactions. These underscore causal pathways from engineered rewards to sustained , independent of content quality.

Criticisms and Controversies

Mental health and validation-seeking concerns

Receiving likes on platforms triggers release in the brain's reward pathways, fostering habitual checking and posting behaviors akin to those observed in substance use disorders. This neurochemical response conditions users to seek external validation through quantifiable approval metrics, often prioritizing content creation for affirmation over genuine expression. Empirical research demonstrates that lower-than-expected like counts compared to peers provoke acute emotional distress, including and reduced mood, with effects persisting beyond immediate exposure. In experimental settings, adolescents exhibit heightened state fluctuations from social feedback loops, where positive likes temporarily boost confidence but negative discrepancies amplify vulnerability to depressive ideation. Such patterns contribute to broader validation-seeking cycles, where users escalate posting frequency to mitigate perceived social deficits, correlating with elevated anxiety and erosion over time. Longitudinal associations link intensive like-oriented engagement to worsened outcomes, including increased risk among youth, mediated by upward comparisons and dependency. Interventions like temporary abstinence from platforms have shown restorative effects on , underscoring how like-driven validation disrupts intrinsic self-worth calibration. These concerns are amplified in adolescents, whose developing brains exhibit greater susceptibility to reward intermittency, potentially entrenching maladaptive habits.

Algorithmic biases and content distortion

Social media platforms employ recommendation algorithms that prioritize based on engagement metrics, including likes, to determine and ranking in users' feeds. On , for instance, likes contribute to scores that influence post distribution, with higher signaling predicted user interest and prompting broader dissemination. Similarly, Twitter's (now X) algorithms historically amplified through like-based signals, favoring posts that elicited rapid . This mechanic creates a self-reinforcing cycle: initial likes boost algorithmic promotion, attracting more likes and , independent of veracity or depth. Such systems introduce popularity biases, where algorithmic weighting of likes disadvantages niche or substantive material lacking immediate appeal, distorting feeds toward mainstream or optimized . Empirical of Twitter's engagement-driven ranking, for example, revealed of emotionally charged and divisive posts—those generating outsized likes from out-group —over or informative ones, with users reporting diminished from exposure. On , a 2023 of feed variations showed algorithmic curation, incorporating likes, increased exposure to like-minded by 6.7% on average compared to chronological views, fostering echo chambers that reinforce preexisting beliefs rather than diverse perspectives. These prioritize virality over accuracy, as likes often correlate with superficial emotional triggers rather than evidentiary merit. Content distortion manifests causally through optimization incentives: producers craft posts for like maximization, yielding , exaggeration, or to exploit human biases toward novelty and outrage, sidelining rigorous analysis. A study demonstrated how engagement algorithms hijack social learning processes, warping collective inference by overexposing users to high-like content that skews perceptions of consensus, such as inflating minority views into perceived majorities. Peer-reviewed examinations confirm this favors low-credibility material; Twitter audits found algorithmic boosts for unverified accounts via engagement loops, with likes serving as primary propagators absent counterbalancing signals like downvotes. While platforms claim neutrality, the like's unidimensional positivity—lacking nuance for critique—exacerbates these effects, as evidenced by reduced spread in simulations adding "distrust" options alongside likes. This structure, rooted in profit-driven retention, empirically correlates with societal fragmentation, though direct causation requires disentangling user behaviors from algorithmic mediation.

Privacy tracking and surveillance issues

The embedding of like buttons, particularly Facebook's, on third-party websites facilitates cross-site tracking by loading platform-specific scripts upon page load, transmitting user data such as addresses, browser identifiers, and referrer URLs to the platform's servers regardless of whether the is logged in, clicks the , or has an account. This mechanism enables the construction of behavioral profiles for purposes, including for non-users, through techniques like cookie setting and device fingerprinting, which aggregate browsing histories across unrelated sites. In a landmark 2019 ruling by the Court of Justice of the (CJEU) in the Fashion ID case, websites integrating 's Like button were deemed joint data controllers with for the collected from all visitors, including non-users, necessitating prior under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) before the plugin loads to avoid unlawful processing. The decision highlighted that such embeddings transmit identifiable data to for interest-based profiling, imposing liability on site operators for failing to inform or obtain from individuals whose data is harvested passively. Similar tracking occurs with like buttons from platforms like and (now X), where embedded iframes or APIs report user interactions and page views to parent companies, amplifying through network effects across the web. These practices contribute to broader concerns by enabling platforms to infer sensitive attributes—such as political leanings or interests—from mere site visits, without explicit user interaction, fostering an ecosystem of opaque that circumvents traditional opt-in mechanisms. Empirical analyses of have documented billions of daily tracking requests from like-button embeds, underscoring their role in pervasive monitoring that persists despite privacy features like Intelligent Tracking Prevention in . Critics, including privacy advocates, argue this model prioritizes ad revenue over user , with limited on or sharing with third parties, though platforms maintain it enhances via personalized content.

Legal and Regulatory Dimensions

Patent infringement claims

In February 2013, Social Media, a holding patents originally developed by Joannes Jozef Everardus van der Meer, filed a against and social service in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of . The complaint alleged willful infringement of two —U.S. Nos. 6,772,212 and 7,689,516—issued in the late and early , which described systems for users to select, store, and share across networks, predating 's . claimed these covered core functionalities of 's "Like" and "Share" buttons, introduced in 2009 and 2011 respectively, arguing that the features enabled users to endorse and propagate content in ways directly replicating the patented methods. Van der Meer, who died in 2004, had prototyped an early social site called Surfbook in the late , which Rembrandt asserted anticipated modern social endorsement tools; the suit sought damages potentially exceeding hundreds of millions, citing 's widespread implementation of the buttons on its site and via plugins on third-party websites. denied infringement, contending the patents were either invalid due to or not applicable to its proprietary algorithms for content interaction and distribution. The case proceeded to a in June 2014, where after approximately three hours of deliberation, the jury unanimously ruled in 's favor, determining that the company did not infringe the patents and that the claims were anticipated by earlier technologies. No appeals were pursued, effectively resolving the matter without liability for ; the outcome highlighted challenges in enforcing broad software patents against evolved platform innovations, though Rembrandt's assertions drew criticism as typical of patent assertion entities targeting high-value tech features without practicing the inventions themselves.

Data privacy litigation

In 2015, the Brussels Court of First Instance ruled that Facebook violated Belgian privacy laws by using tracking cookies associated with the Like button on third-party websites to monitor non-users' browsing activity without explicit consent, ordering the company to cease such practices within 48 hours or face a daily fine of €250,000. The court determined that loading the Like button plugin transmitted personal data, including IP addresses, to Facebook's U.S. servers even without user interaction, contravening the EU e-Privacy Directive's requirements for cookie consent. Facebook appealed the decision, arguing jurisdictional issues and implied consent through browser use, but the initial ruling highlighted the plugin's role in unauthorized cross-site surveillance. In 2016, Belgium's Court of Appeals partially reversed the order, exempting non-users from the tracking ban but upholding restrictions on registered users. In the United States, the multidistrict litigation In re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation (Case No. 5:12-md-02314-EJD, N.D. ), initiated in 2012, alleged that employed via the Like button on non-Facebook websites to track users' internet activity across the web, including after logout, without adequate disclosure or consent, in violation of federal and state privacy laws such as the Wiretap Act and . Plaintiffs claimed the mechanism collected identifiers like browser types and timestamps, enabling persistent profiling beyond platform boundaries. denied wrongdoing but agreed in February 2022 to a $90 million covering affected U.S. users who visited sites embedding the Like button between April 22, 2010, and September 26, 2011, with payments to claimants beginning in April 2025 after final approval. The Ninth Circuit's 2020 ruling in Davis v. Facebook (part of the litigation) had earlier limited some claims by finding no "" under the Wiretap Act for post-logout tracking, influencing the scope. In Europe, the Court of Justice of the (CJEU) in Fashion ID GmbH & Co. KG v. Verbraucherzentrale NRW e.V. (Case C-40/17, decided July 29, 2019) held that website operators embedding the Facebook Like button act as joint controllers with Facebook for the resulting data processing, including the transfer of visitors' (such as addresses) to Facebook's Irish subsidiary and onward to U.S. servers without user consent. The ruling arose from a German consumer protection group's complaint against Fashion ID for breaching the GDPR's predecessor directive by facilitating tracking via the to optimize , without informing or obtaining consent from site visitors. Consequently, embedding operators bear co-responsibility for compliance, including obligations for prior consent before data transmission outside the EU, prompting many sites to remove or modify social s to mitigate liability. This decision reinforced causal links between plugin integration and unauthorized data flows, influencing subsequent regulatory scrutiny of Meta's tracking practices under GDPR.

Free speech and liability protections

In Bland v. Roberts (2013), the of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled that clicking the "Like" button on constitutes protected speech under the First , reversing a lower court's dismissal of a public employee's claim that he was retaliated against for liking a political rival's campaign page. The court reasoned that such actions convey a message of support or endorsement, akin to traditional expressive conduct, and merit constitutional safeguards against government adverse actions. This precedent has implications for users engaging with like buttons across platforms, establishing that mere interaction via likes qualifies as symbolic speech deserving First Amendment protection in contexts involving state actors. Platforms hosting like buttons benefit from broad liability immunities under of the of 1996, which shields interactive computer services from civil liability for , including endorsements or interactions like likes. Courts have consistently interpreted this provision to cover not only posted content but also user engagements that facilitate or amplify it, allowing platforms to host likes without treating them as their own publications. For instance, algorithmic recommendations driven by like metrics—such as promoting content with high engagement—remain protected, as affirmed in Gonzalez v. Google (2023), where the declined to impose liability on platforms for neutral tools facilitating user interactions, even if indirectly aiding harmful speech. These protections intersect with free speech concerns when platforms moderate likes, such as hiding them from public view (as did in 2022) or restricting them based on content policies, without triggering publisher liability under , which permits editorial discretion. Critics, including legal scholars, argue this framework enables platforms to curate feeds via like-driven algorithms while evading accountability for downstream effects like echo chambers or amplification, though courts have upheld the immunity to avoid chilling innovation. No federal appellate decisions as of 2025 have eroded specifically for like functionalities, preserving platforms' ability to operate without for users' expressive choices.

References

  1. [1]
    How Facebook designed the like button—and made social media ...
    Nov 15, 2022 · A button that became an iconic symbol of Facebook, reshaped the internet, reconfigured the media, and altered the course of world politics.
  2. [2]
    The Origin of the Like Button | 01 - Vocal Media
    On February 10, 2009, Facebook launched its Like button. The Facebook employee that created the Like button is former Facebook engineer Justin Rosenstein.
  3. [3]
    “A cursed project”: a short history of the Facebook “like” button
    Oct 9, 2015 · The idea of a star, plus sign or thumbs up for posts first came up in July 2007, three years after “TheFacebook” launched in 2004.
  4. [4]
    View of The social significance of the Facebook Like button
    In this paper we study social aspects of using the Like button for purposes of impression management, identity construction, and maintenance of social ties ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Why Buttons Matter - International Journal of Communication
    Gerlitz & Helmond (2013) claim that social buttons both prestructure feelings and enable possibilities of expressing affective engagement with Web content, ...
  6. [6]
    The Effects of Social Feedback Through the “Like” Feature on Brain ...
    Jan 6, 2025 · In the context of SM, the “like” button acts as a reward mechanism, providing quick and simple feedback on users' social media activity [17]. ...
  7. [7]
    The Scroll of Approval: Receiving More Likes on Social Media ...
    Feb 3, 2025 · Likes also have an impact on the user who receives them and have been shown to serve as positive feedback, which can increase the user's self- ...
  8. [8]
    Getting Fewer “Likes” Than Others on Social Media Elicits Emotional ...
    Sep 6, 2020 · In Study 2 (N=145), negative responses to receiving fewer likes were associated with greater depressive symptoms reported day-to-day and at the ...
  9. [9]
    Study Finds 'Like' Buttons Are the Most Harmful Social Media Feature
    Aug 31, 2019 · The RSHP polled over 2,000 people, including adults and teens, and found the like button is considered more harmful than push notifications, ...
  10. [10]
    Examining the links between active Facebook use, received likes ...
    For social media users, profile updating and receiving Likes may feel like a reward, and elicit positive emotions, reinforcing use of the platform.<|separator|>
  11. [11]
    Discerning Audiences Through Like Buttons · Issue 6.1, Winter 2024
    Jan 31, 2024 · In particular, the belief that it is possible to get audiences to indicate what they like with the click of a button emerged long before social ...
  12. [12]
    How 'Hot or Not' Created the Internet We Know Today
    Jun 18, 2014 · “Hot or Not,” the site that lets you rate other people's attractiveness, relaunched in the US Tuesday as an app 14 years after it tapped into our baser selves.Missing: early | Show results with:early
  13. [13]
    HOTorNOT: The forgotten website that shaped the internet | Mashable
    Sep 27, 2020 · HOTorNOT was such a captivatingly viral concept that it inspired dozens of copycats, including GothorNot, RateMyPoo, Monkey Hot or Not(opens in ...
  14. [14]
    How Digg helped invent the social internet - The Verge
    Oct 15, 2024 · Digg founder Kevin Rose on the creation of the like button, the decline of the homepage, and how we can bring fun back to the web.
  15. [15]
    Reddit v. Digg: A Difference in Approach - The History of the Web
    Jun 25, 2018 · Digg actually got its start first, launched at the end of 2004. It had a similar vibe to Reddit, a list of links that could either be “dugg” or ...
  16. [16]
    Slashdot Moderation
    Sep 9, 1999 · This document will attempt to explain the moderation system that lies underneath Slashdot's vast comment section.Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  17. [17]
    Did we invent the words 'downvote' and 'upvote'? : r/TheoryOfReddit
    May 15, 2012 · It appears to have first developed on Everything2 (Wikipedia's spiritual ancestor): July 13, 2000 is the earliest hit for "downvote" while ...
  18. [18]
    A History of Like - The New Inquiry
    Mar 27, 2013 · The Like button is a logical extension of the studies and practices developed by marketing since the 1990 ARF study and the USA Today Ad Meter ...
  19. [19]
    https://thehistoryoftheweb.com/reddit-digg/
  20. [20]
    The Unintended Consequences of the Facebook Like Button
    Mar 26, 2021 · During the lead-up to the 2016 presidential election, millions of users were exposed to thousands of ads that were purchased by a Russian agency ...
  21. [21]
    Facebook Innovations: The Idea Behind the Facebook Like Button
    Dec 14, 2022 · Facebook innovation is a story of how a group of college students at Harvard University embarked on a journey.<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Facebook's "Like" Button Used To Be The "Awesome" Button
    Oct 5, 2010 · Facebook Engineer Andrew Bosworth delineates the history of the “Awesome”/”Like” button, what eventually turned out to be a way to connect Facebook users with ...
  23. [23]
    The Rise of the Like Economy - The Ringer
    Feb 15, 2017 · Launched in 2009, the Like button has become the low-hanging digital fruit for human connection, not only on Facebook but across the social web.
  24. [24]
    On February 9, 2009, the internet social networking site Facebook ...
    Feb 9, 2025 · On February 9, 2009, the internet social networking site Facebook introduced its “like button” feature for the first time.
  25. [25]
    The History of Facebook (2003-2025) - Influize
    Aug 6, 2025 · In 2009, Facebook introduced two small features that had massive impact. First came the Like button, launched in February 2009. It was a quick ...
  26. [26]
    A Brief History of the Facebook “Like” Button and its Effect on ...
    Aug 29, 2023 · For the first few years, Facebook didn't have a “Like” button. It finally appeared in 2009 and marketing types worried it would kill off engagement.Missing: development | Show results with:development
  27. [27]
    How Likes Went Bad. Facebook didn't invent the feature, but…
    Apr 25, 2018 · Facebook's introduction of the like button on February 10, 2009, was a historic day in the history of attention metrics. Not because Facebook ...
  28. [28]
    How did the Dislike Button affect Social Media? - TagMango
    Jun 13, 2022 · ... first social media platform to introduce the 'like' button in November 2005. YouTube introduced the 'like' button in 2010. The Evolution of ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  29. [29]
    Twitter officially kills off favorites and replaces them with likes
    Nov 3, 2015 · The company said today that it is replacing favorites with "likes," to be represented in its apps and on the web by red heart icons.
  30. [30]
    Introducing the +1 button | Google Search Central Blog
    We're introducing the +1 button, an easy way for Google users to recommend your content right from the search results pages (and, soon, from your site).
  31. [31]
    Why is Karma? Or, how the internet learned to love the upvote : r/reddit
    Mar 16, 2022 · If you felt something was worth seeing, you upvote. If not, you downvote. Content that had a lot of upvotes floated to the top of the feed and ...
  32. [32]
    How does the Facebook Like button work? - Stack Overflow
    Nov 24, 2011 · The Like button is using cookies to obtain your FB user information, that with additional attributes are then sent to a service endpoint.implement facebook like button - android - Stack OverflowImplement a facebook type simpler 'like' feature in backendMore results from stackoverflow.com
  33. [33]
    How does a “like” button works? : r/webdev - Reddit
    Sep 19, 2024 · Open your browser's dev tools and watch the network traffic next time you click a like button. Then press the button a few extra times. What happens?Looking for some advice on implementing likes/dislikes per postHow I implemented a like button without Authentication - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
  34. [34]
    The Data Modeling Behind Social Media “Likes” - ScyllaDB
    Jun 6, 2023 · Likes, views, comments, follows, etc. could be queried as counters. Here's what I learned about how do proper data modeling for these using ScyllaDB.
  35. [35]
    Designing a Scalable “Likes” Counting System for Social Media
    Apr 16, 2025 · Users can like and unlike a post by toggling the like button. A user can like a post only once. If they press “like” again, it should be treated ...
  36. [36]
    Implement a facebook type simpler 'like' feature in backend
    Jun 4, 2018 · I am working on a website made in Django and i want to implement a facebook type (or any social media type) like button. I have a user table ...What's the most efficient way to add social media "like" and "+1 ...How to trigger Facebook like button from custom button?More results from stackoverflow.com
  37. [37]
    Design a system to count likes, dislikes and comments on YouTube ...
    Jul 23, 2025 · The success of a YouTube video can be measured in various ways, including the number of likes, dislikes, and comments it receives.High-Level Design · Database Design · Microservices Used
  38. [38]
    Facebook Reactions, the Totally Redesigned Like Button, Is Here
    Feb 24, 2016 · Users can now access five additional animated emoji with which to express themselves. Each emotive icon is named for the reaction it's meant to convey.Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
  39. [39]
    With Reactions, Facebook Supercharges The Like Button With 6 ...
    Oct 8, 2015 · A new set of six emoji that will sit alongside the original thumbs-up to let users quickly respond with love, laughter, happiness, shock, sadness and anger.Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
  40. [40]
    Facebook Wrestles With the Features It Used to Define Social ...
    Oct 29, 2021 · Some people began using Likes to compare themselves to others. Others exploited the share button to spread information quickly, so false or ...
  41. [41]
    Twitter's 'favourite' stars change into 'like' hearts - BBC News
    Nov 3, 2015 · Hitting the heart button will now be classed as a "like" in the style of Facebook. The changes are being rolled out today for most users online ...
  42. [42]
    Twitter's 'Favorite' Star Button Becomes a Heart-Shaped 'Like' | Fortune
    Nov 3, 2015 · Starting on Tuesday, the new heart-shaped “like” button will roll out for users on Twitter's iOS and Android apps, Twitter.com, TweetDeck, ...Missing: evolution | Show results with:evolution
  43. [43]
    YouTube's 'Dislike' Button Doesn't Do What You Think - WIRED
    Sep 20, 2022 · Users try to control the video platform's algorithm by giving content a thumbs-down, but Mozilla researchers say it's not so simple.Missing: variations | Show results with:variations
  44. [44]
    https://www.wired.com/story/youtube-dislike-button-mozilla-research/
  45. [45]
    https://9to5google.com/2025/10/23/youtube-video-player-icon-redesign-rollout/
  46. [46]
    Upvotes, Downvotes, and the Science of the Reddit Hivemind
    Aug 8, 2013 · Like Yelp, IMDb, or Amazon.com, the site runs on the principle of voting aggregation. Each user can give a post or comment an upvote of approval ...<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    The Evolution of Instagram Likes: From Double Taps to Emojis
    Jul 4, 2023 · Back in 2010, Instagram introduced the “Like” button, represented by a humble heart icon. Users could express their appreciation for a post ...
  48. [48]
    The “Like” button: when perfect design causes catastrophic outcomes
    Sep 12, 2025 · Political violence is the unintended yet predictable consequence of UX theory applied to the Attention Economy.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  49. [49]
    Facebook Engagement: What It Is & How To Increase It | Klipfolio
    Facebook engagement is a way to track how your audience is interacting with the content you share. Facebook engagement metrics include likes, comments, shares,
  50. [50]
    Do More Likes Lead to More Clicks? Evidence from a Field ...
    Dec 11, 2024 · The authors explore whether and how displaying more likes in an ad can effectively lead to more ad likes and clicks.
  51. [51]
    Comments, Shares, or Likes: What Makes News Posts Engaging in ...
    Yet, exposure to uncivil comments may have negative effects, such as an increase in readers' perception that the commented-on content is biased (Anderson et al.Engagement And Its... · Commenting, Sharing, And... · Findings
  52. [52]
    What Facebook Likes Really Mean for Your Brand
    Jan 26, 2021 · They conclude Facebook likes can have positive value for brands if they are augmented with paid advertising and used to drive brand awareness.
  53. [53]
    Social Media Algorithms and Teen Addiction - NIH
    Jan 8, 2025 · Frequent engagement with social media platforms alters dopamine pathways, a critical component in reward processing, fostering dependency ...
  54. [54]
    Association of Habitual Checking Behaviors on Social Media With ...
    Jan 3, 2023 · Social media checking behaviors in early adolescence may be associated with changes in the brain's sensitivity to social rewards and punishments.
  55. [55]
    The Emotional Reinforcement Mechanism of and Phased ...
    May 13, 2025 · Neuroimaging studies have shown that social media interaction, especially liking behavior, can significantly activate the striatum (the core ...
  56. [56]
    Striatal dopamine synthesis capacity reflects smartphone social activity
    May 21, 2021 · We find that a higher proportion of social app interactions correlates with lower dopamine synthesis capacity in the bilateral putamen.
  57. [57]
    Developmental changes in brain function linked with addiction-like ...
    Feb 9, 2024 · Abstract. Addiction-like social media use (ASMU) is widely reported among adolescents and is associated with depression and other negative ...
  58. [58]
    Engineered highs: Reward variability and frequency as potential ...
    The evidence illustrates how qualitative and quantitative variability of reward can confer addictive potential to non-drug reinforcers.
  59. [59]
    Addictive potential of social media, explained - Stanford Medicine
    Oct 29, 2021 · These apps can cause the release of large amounts of dopamine into our brains' reward pathway all at once, just like heroin, or meth, or alcohol ...Missing: fMRI | Show results with:fMRI
  60. [60]
    The Power of Social Validation: A Literature Review on How Likes ...
    Sep 5, 2023 · This literature review examines the impact of social validation on user behavior on social media platforms, focusing on self-presentation, emotional responses, ...
  61. [61]
    A comparative study of state self-esteem responses to social media ...
    Sep 22, 2025 · How do social media feedback loops differentially affect self-esteem in adolescents compared to adults? In this study, we examine the ...Introduction · Methods · Results · Discussion
  62. [62]
    Social comparisons: A potential mechanism linking problematic ...
    Jun 2, 2022 · Upward social media comparisons have been linked to negative psychological outcomes such as low self-esteem and depression (Andreasson et al., ...
  63. [63]
    The Impact of Social Media on the Mental Health of Adolescents and ...
    Aug 5, 2023 · Smartphone and social media use among teenagers relates to an increase in mental distress, self-harming behaviors, and suicidality.
  64. [64]
    Out of the loop: Taking a one-week break from social media leads to ...
    This study experimentally tested the effects of taking a one-week break from social media (SM) on body image and self-esteem among young women.
  65. [65]
    How social media usage affects psychological and subjective well ...
    Sep 22, 2023 · Social media usage by university students was positively associated with their PWB and SWB through self-esteem and online social support.
  66. [66]
    Inside the Facebook Algorithm in 2025: All the Updates You Need to ...
    Apr 8, 2025 · The Facebook algorithm was created so that the Meta-owned platform shows users more interesting, relevant content that's tailored to them and keeps them ...
  67. [67]
    Engagement, User Satisfaction, and the Amplification of Divisive ...
    Jan 3, 2024 · Twitter's engagement-based ranking algorithm amplifies emotionally charged, out-group hostile content that users say makes them feel worse about their ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence<|separator|>
  68. [68]
    Social Media Algorithms: Why You See What You See
    The more frequent the engagement, the stronger the association the algorithm will make between the user and that content.6 ...
  69. [69]
    How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in ...
    Jul 27, 2023 · On Facebook, users in the Algorithmic Feed group liked an average of 6.7% of the content to which they were exposed, whereas those in the ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Echo Chambers and Algorithmic Bias: The Homogenization of ...
    For example, algorithms that prioritize user engagement might favor sensationalist content over factual reporting, regardless of the underlying truth.<|control11|><|separator|>
  71. [71]
    Social-Media Algorithms Have Hijacked “Social Learning”
    Aug 16, 2023 · The researchers argue that the way platform algorithms filter content interferes with the strategies people typically use for social learning.
  72. [72]
    Evaluating Twitter's algorithmic amplification of low-credibility content
    Mar 7, 2024 · This study presents a measurement approach that uses observed digital traces to infer the status of algorithmic amplification of low-credibility content on ...Missing: sensational | Show results with:sensational
  73. [73]
    Social media 'trust' or 'distrust' buttons could reduce spread of ...
    Jun 6, 2023 · The addition of "trust" and "distrust" buttons on social media, alongside standard "like" buttons, could help to reduce the spread of misinformation.Missing: studies distortion
  74. [74]
    Social Drivers and Algorithmic Mechanisms on Digital Media - PMC
    Algorithmic mechanisms on digital media are powered by social drivers, creating a feedback loop that complicates research to disentangle the role of algorithms.
  75. [75]
    Facebook's Hotel California: Cross-Site Tracking and the Potential ...
    Oct 10, 2011 · If you are uneasy with Facebook's cross-domain tracking, you aren't alone. This has led to a call from lawmakers as well as privacy advocates ...
  76. [76]
    Does FB share button contain trackers?
    Apr 30, 2020 · Yes. For years, Facebook has been using its 'like' and 'share' buttons to collect data on users that visit sites where these buttons are installed.How can I protect my privacy against Facebook tracking my web ...How does Facebook track your browsing without third party cookies?More results from security.stackexchange.com
  77. [77]
    How Facebook Cookies Work and Impact Privacy
    Aug 7, 2025 · Third-party cookies set by Facebook on non-Facebook pages enable cross-site tracking. When users visit third-party services or websites that ...
  78. [78]
    Facebook Data Tracking: What Gets Tracked... and how to stop it
    Jan 21, 2025 · "Facebook privacy" is an oxymoron. Discover not only what kind of data Facebook tracks, but also how they gather it and how you can stop it.<|separator|>
  79. [79]
    CJEU rules that Facebook and website operators are joint ...
    Jul 31, 2019 · The CJEU found that when a website operator embeds Facebook's “Like” button on its website, Facebook and the website operator become joint controllers.Missing: violations | Show results with:violations
  80. [80]
    Guest Post: Using Facebook's “Like” Button May Violate the GDPR
    Aug 8, 2019 · The ECJ determined that Fashion ID controlled how Facebook collects data because it utilizes “Like” buttons. Ultimately, the court determined ...
  81. [81]
    CJEU Ruling on Websites Using Facebook 'Like' Buttons
    Aug 2, 2019 · The CJEU ruled that Fashion ID should be considered a joint controller with Facebook regarding the collection and disclosure of website visitors ...Missing: users violations
  82. [82]
    Responsibilities for 'Like' button data protection clarified
    Aug 15, 2019 · The Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) clarified website operators' obligations under data protection law when personal data is collected ...Missing: non- violations
  83. [83]
    How to stop Facebook and tracking you around the web - Privacy.net
    Apr 9, 2022 · In this post, I reveal more about how and why Facebook tracks you around the web. I also show you how to stop Facebook and other sites tracking you.
  84. [84]
    Facebook sued over 'like' button - BBC News
    Feb 11, 2013 · Facebook is facing legal action over its use of the "like" button and other features of the social network. It is being sued by a patent-holding company.Missing: infringement | Show results with:infringement
  85. [85]
    Facebook Sued Over "Like" Button and Other Features
    Feb 20, 2013 · Well, last week, Facebook and social bookmarking service, AddThis, were sued in the Eastern District of Virginia for willful infringement of two ...
  86. [86]
    Facebook Accused of Infringing Patents with “Like” Button
    In addition to the “Like” button, the complaint claims that nearly all aspects of the Facebook website were taken from van der Meer's patents, including using ...
  87. [87]
    Facebook Sued for "Like" Button Patent Infringement
    Feb 19, 2013 · Plaintiffs are claiming this either reinforced Facebook's prior knowledge of the existing patents or at least made the company aware they were ...
  88. [88]
    Facebook Sued Over 'Like' Button Patent | Science, Climate & Tech ...
    Feb 11, 2013 · Facebook is being sued over claims its 'like' button infringes technology patented by a Dutch computer programmer 15 years ago.
  89. [89]
    Facebook is being sued over patents for its 'Like' button - Innovation
    Feb 11, 2013 · Social networking giant Facebook is being sued by Rembrant IP Management for allegedly infringing patents related to its 'Like' button, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  90. [90]
    Facebook Beats Surfbook in Patent-Infringement Trial - NBC News
    Jun 13, 2014 · A Dutch programmer who launched a website called "Surfbook" more than a decade ago claimed Facebook infringed on his patents.
  91. [91]
    Jury verdict favors Facebook in patent infringement case
    Jun 26, 2014 · Rembrandt Social Media claimed that Van Der Meer's patents covered such Facebook features as the “share” and the “like” buttons. Rembrandt ...
  92. [92]
    Facebook fends off patent case over 'like' button | SBS News
    Jun 14, 2014 · Facebook has successfully defended itself against a lawsuit that claimed the social media company infringed on patents held by a Dutch ...Missing: Leader | Show results with:Leader
  93. [93]
    Belgian court orders Facebook to stop tracking non-members ...
    Nov 23, 2015 · On November 9, 2015, the President of the Brussels Court of First Instance ordered Facebook to stop tracking non-members in Belgium without their consent.
  94. [94]
    Belgian Court tells Facebook to stop tracking non-members
    Nov 13, 2015 · The Court rejects Facebook's argument that non-members have given their consent for placing the cookie, as required by the e-Privacy Directive.
  95. [95]
    Facebook to Appeal a Belgian Court's Ruling on Data Privacy
    Nov 10, 2015 · In Monday's ruling, a court in Brussels said that Facebook could no longer collect and store online information from people in Belgium who do ...
  96. [96]
    Facebook Belgium v. Belgian Privacy Commission: Belgian Court of ...
    Jul 12, 2016 · The Belgian Court of Appeals reversed a Belgian Court of First Instance's order from summary proceedings that Facebook cease tracking Belgian non-users.Missing: ruling | Show results with:ruling
  97. [97]
    In re: Facebook, Inc. Internet Tracking Litigation - Epic.org
    A privacy suit brought against Facebook to challenge the company's use of cookies to track Facebook users even after they have logged out of the platform.
  98. [98]
    In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation: Home
    The lawsuit is known as In Re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation, Case No. 5:12-MD-02314-EJD (N.D. California). Defendant denies that it violated any law but ...Submit your Claim Form online · Submit Claim · Submit an Exclusion Request
  99. [99]
    Meta agrees to pay $90 million to settle lawsuit over Facebook ...
    Feb 15, 2022 · Meta has agreed to pay $90 million to settle a decade-old class action lawsuit over a practice that allowed the social network to track users' activity across ...
  100. [100]
    [PDF] Facebook's "Like" Button Plugin and User Tracking
    Aug 30, 2022 · Abstract. With its 2020 decision in Davis v. Facebook, Inc. (In re Internet Tracking. Litigation),1 the Federal Court of Appeals for the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  101. [101]
    Fashion ID - CURIA - Documents
    Jul 29, 2019 · Thus, for example, photos, videos, news and the Facebook 'Like' button at issue in the present case can be linked to a website and appear there.<|control11|><|separator|>
  102. [102]
    Companies using Facebook 'Like' button liable for data: EU court
    Jul 29, 2019 · Companies that embed Facebook's "Like" button on their websites must seek users' consent to transfer their personal data to the U.S. social ...Missing: tracking lawsuits
  103. [103]
    Court Rules That Facebook 'Likes' Are Free Speech - ACLU
    Sep 18, 2013 · The district court judge ruled last year that pressing a button does not involve "enough speech" and that "liking" something is not a ...Missing: implications | Show results with:implications
  104. [104]
    A Facebook Like Is Now Covered by the First Amendment
    Sep 19, 2013 · A federal appeals court ruled that a Facebook Like is, indeed, a form of expression that is covered by the First Amendment. Clicking a button ...
  105. [105]
    4th Cir: Liking on Facebook Is Protected First Amendment Activity
    Yesterday, the Fourth Circuit made the world right again by finding that liking a candidate's campaign page on Facebook was in fact protected First Amendment ...
  106. [106]
    Section 230: An Overview | Congress.gov
    Jan 4, 2024 · Courts have interpreted Section 230 as creating broad immunity that allows the early dismissal of many legal claims against interactive ...
  107. [107]
    What Is Section 230 and Why Should I Care? - Freedom Forum
    Section 230 is most often invoked by websites and social media platforms who are sued for defamation, but it also protects them from lawsuits about invasion of ...How Does Section 230 Relate... · Why Was Section 230 Created? · Common Misconceptions About...
  108. [108]
    Courts Should Hold Social Media Accountable - Harvard Law Review
    Sep 10, 2024 · 47 US Code § 230 is a federal law that immunizes platforms like TikTok, YouTube, or Facebook for the content people post there.
  109. [109]
    The Future of Section 230 | What Does It Mean For Consumers?
    Jul 21, 2023 · ... liability on social media companies could lead to increased censorship of online content. Those in favor of keeping Section 230 intact ...
  110. [110]
    The Hidden History of the Like Button: From Decentralized Data to Semantic Enclosure
    Peer-reviewed article in Social Media + Society confirming Vimeo's launch of a "Like" button in 2005 as an early example in video-hosting platforms.
  111. [111]
    The Origin of the Like Button
    Article attributing the origin of the like button to Vimeo in 2005.
  112. [112]
    Facebook's "Like" Button Used To Be The "Awesome" Button
    TechCrunch article confirming FriendFeed's official launch of the "Like" button on October 30, 2007