Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Mount Merapi

Mount Merapi is an active situated on the border between province and the , , with a summit elevation of 2,911 meters. Positioned approximately 30 kilometers north of , a densely populated city, the poses significant hazards to surrounding communities due to its proximity and frequent eruptive activity. Merapi is characterized by the growth and collapse of summit lava domes, which generate pyroclastic flows, incandescent avalanches, and ash plumes during eruptions. The volcano has recorded at least 68 historical eruptions since 1548, occurring on average every 5 to 10 years, making it Indonesia's most consistently active . Eruptive styles range from low explosivity (VEI) 1-2 events roughly every six years to rarer VEI 3 blasts every few decades, with major historical outbursts like the 2010 eruption causing hundreds of fatalities through pyroclastic surges and infrastructure destruction. An ongoing eruption phase that began in late December 2020 continues to produce intermittent ash emissions and lava avalanches as of 2025. Intensive monitoring efforts, including seismic networks and observations, track Merapi's activity to mitigate risks, given its amid agricultural lands and urban peripheries supporting millions. The 's andesitic composition and zone setting drive its persistent dome-building behavior, underscoring the causal link between tectonic plate convergence and recurrent magmatic unrest.

Geography and Physical Features

Location and Regional Context

Mount Merapi is an active stratovolcano located on the border between Central Java province and the Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia, approximately 28 kilometers north of Yogyakarta city. Its summit lies at coordinates 7°32′S 110°27′E, rising to an elevation of about 2,910 meters above sea level. The volcano occupies a position in the densely populated central Java region, where fertile volcanic soils support agriculture and human settlements extending onto its lower flanks. Geologically, Merapi forms part of the Sunda volcanic arc, situated along the where the subducts beneath the at a rate of approximately 7 centimeters per year. This tectonic setting contributes to its frequent activity within Indonesia's broader , a zone encompassing over 150 active volcanoes across the archipelago. The surrounding landscape includes river valleys and plateaus that channel pyroclastic flows toward nearby regencies such as Sleman, , and Boyolali during eruptions. Yogyakarta, with its population exceeding one million residents, lies in the volcano's potential hazard zone, underscoring the interplay between Merapi's location and regional human geography. This proximity has historically influenced settlement patterns, with communities adapting to periodic volcanic threats through traditional monitoring practices alongside modern geophysical networks.

Topography and Morphology


Mount Merapi exhibits the classic conical form of a stratovolcano, rising steeply to a summit elevation of 2,910 meters above sea level at coordinates 7.54°S, 110.446°E. Its topography is defined by alternating layers of andesitic lavas and pyroclastic deposits, producing rugged slopes that average 25-35 degrees in inclination on the upper flanks, facilitating frequent pyroclastic flows and lahars. The volcano's base spans approximately 10-15 kilometers in diameter, anchoring it within the volcanic arc of central Java, with radial drainage patterns carving deep valleys such as the Bebeng and Krasak that channel eruptive products downslope.
The summit morphology centers on a breached , roughly 500 meters in , which frequently hosts an active , particularly in its southwestern sector. This dome undergoes episodic growth via viscous lava extrusion, reaching volumes of up to several million cubic meters before partial collapses reshape the rim and deposit talus aprons. Such dynamic features contribute to Merapi's asymmetric profile, with the southwestern flank showing more pronounced scarring from historical dome failures compared to the eastern side. The 2010 eruption notably modified the summit, excavating a significant depression and reducing the peak height by about 38 meters through explosive removal of the pre-eruption dome and wall material. Overall, Merapi's morphology reflects ongoing constructional and destructural processes, with the stratovolcanic edifice built atop older fans dating to the , resulting in a composite structure prone to sector collapses and flank instabilities. Steep topographic gradients from the to elevations as low as 2,000 meters amplify hazard potential by directing hot into adjacent river systems.

Surrounding Human Settlements

Mount Merapi's flanks, particularly the southern and southwestern slopes, feature dense human settlements in , Special Region, with villages such as Cangkringan, Kepuharjo, Kaliurang, Pakem, and Turgo situated at elevations ranging from 400 to 1,700 meters above . These communities, numbering in the tens of thousands, rely heavily on —cultivating , , and cash crops on fertile volcanic soils enriched by past eruptions—and increasingly on volcano tourism, including attractions like river trekking and cultural performances. The volcano lies about 28 kilometers north of Yogyakarta city, home to over 3 million residents in the metropolitan area, exposing a vast population to secondary hazards like lahars channeled through river valleys toward the urban center. On the flanks themselves, population estimates indicate over 50,000 inhabitants across multiple villages within 20 kilometers of the summit, spanning regencies including Sleman, Magelang, and Boyolali. Agricultural dependence persists despite risks, as volcanic ash deposits enhance soil productivity, supporting livelihoods in an otherwise densely populated Java island region. Indonesian hazard mapping designates Kawasan Rawan Bencana (KRB) zones around Merapi, with KRB III (highest risk) prohibiting permanent structures within roughly 10 kilometers of the crater, though informal farming and occasional habitation occur; KRB II and I encompass most slope villages, mandating evacuations during alerts. The 2010 eruption destroyed over 2,000 homes in Cangkringan and nearby areas, displacing around 350,000 people temporarily and leading to government-built relocation settlements, such as those occupied since 2012, though many residents have resettled closer to the volcano for economic reasons. Monitoring by the enables preemptive evacuations, reducing fatalities in recent events compared to historical eruptions.

Geological Formation

Stratigraphic History

Mount Merapi's stratigraphic record reveals a complex buildup through multiple volcanic edifices, primarily composed of lavas and deposits, with evidence of sector collapses shaping its . The volcano's history is divided into three main evolutionary stages: Proto-Merapi, Old Merapi, and New Merapi, distinguished by stratigraphic units, , and geochemical shifts from medium-K to high-K magmas in later phases. Proto-Merapi represents the earliest stage, dating back to less than 170 ka, with basaltic lavas forming peripheral cones such as Gunung Bibi (109 ± 60 ka), Gunung Turgo, Gunung Plawangan (138 ± 3 ka and 135 ± 3 ka), and Gunung Medjing. These units (stratigraphic Units 1 and 2) consist of older basaltic flows, potentially disrupted by early sector collapses around 115 ka. Overlying these are the deposits of Old Merapi, which began growing more than 30.3 ± 1.0 ka and persisted until less than 4.8 ± 1.5 ka , building a through intercalated lavas (Unit 3, Somma-Merapi flows) and pyroclastic rocks. This edifice experienced multiple sector collapses, including one exceeding 31,430 ± 2,070 14C y , culminating in a major and caldera-forming collapse around 2 ka that removed much of the upper structure. The modern New Merapi stage initiated approximately 1,900 14C y BP (~1.7 ka cal BP) within the collapse scar, marked by younger lava flows (Unit 6, <4.8 ka) and pyroclastic series (Units 4/5, <11,792 ± 90 14C y BP), transitioning to high-K basaltic andesites with subordinate basalts and andesites. Recent units (7 and 8) include historical pyroclastic deposits and lava domes emplaced since AD 1786, reflecting ongoing dome-building activity interspersed with flows from fountain , a recurrent process evident throughout the record. A minor sector affected New Merapi around 1,130 ± 50 14C y BP, further modifying the edifice. Overall, the underscores Merapi's persistent activity, with an average eruption recurrence of about 15.9 years over the last 2,000 years, driven by subduction-related .

Magma Composition and Volcanic Type

Mount Merapi is a , featuring a steep-sided constructed from alternating layers of viscous lava flows, deposits, and , which contribute to its propensity for eruptions interspersed with dome-building events. This aligns with subduction-related , where ascent is hindered by high , leading to pressure buildup and frequent flows. The volcano's magma is predominantly , classified within the calc-alkaline series with medium- to high-K affinities, reflecting derivation from wedge partial melting modified by fluids and crustal interactions. Whole-rock geochemical analyses of eruptive products indicate SiO₂ contents ranging from 51.5 to 56.1 wt% (volatile-free), with systematic variations observed in prehistoric flows that suggest cyclic processes including fractional and of carbonate-rich crust. These compositions yield viscous, crystal-rich magmas prone to stalling as lava domes at the summit, as evidenced by persistent dome extrusion throughout the 20th and 21st centuries. Mineral assemblages in Merapi lavas typically include , , and phenocrysts set in a groundmass dominated by microlites, supporting a petrogenesis involving recharge, mixing, and in shallow reservoirs at depths of 2–8 km. Oxygen isotope data from inclusions further indicate contamination by local , enhancing and explosivity through calc-silicate reactions. Such geochemical traits distinguish Merapi from more Hawaiian-style volcanoes, underscoring its role as a type example of andesitic arc volcanism driven by .

Tectonic Setting

Mount Merapi occupies a position within the , a volcanic chain extending along the southern margin of the , resulting from the oblique subduction of the beneath the . This subduction zone, part of the broader circum-Pacific , drives the region's intense volcanic activity through the descent of oceanic lithosphere into the mantle, where dehydration and of the subducting slab generate magmas that ascend to form stratovolcanoes like Merapi. The subduction along the Java segment occurs at a convergence rate of approximately 6 cm per year in the north-northeast direction, with the Indo-Australian Plate descending beneath the Sunda margin at angles typically ranging from 30° to 45° in the upper 100-200 km. Merapi's location in central Java places it above a relatively steep Benioff zone, contributing to frequent magma replenishment and explosive eruptions characteristic of calc-alkaline andesitic systems in this tectonic regime. Seismic evidence from local earthquake tomography reveals a pronounced low-velocity zone beneath the volcano, indicative of fluid-rich mantle wedge altered by slab-derived volatiles. Regional tectonics also involve back-arc thrusting and extensional features in the depression, where Merapi is situated between the Southern Mountains Zone to the south and the Kendeng-Rembang fold-thrust belt to the north, influencing the volcano's edifice stability and eruption dynamics through inherited crustal weaknesses. This setting underscores Merapi's vulnerability to tectonic triggering of eruptions, as observed in correlations between regional earthquakes and increased volcanic unrest.

Etymology

Origin and Linguistic Roots

The name Merapi derives from Old Javanese, combining the prefix mer-, which denotes agency or the possession of a quality (as in "one that performs" or "giver of"), with api (also spelled apuy or apwi), meaning "fire." This etymological structure yields a literal translation of "the one that makes/gives fire" or "fiery one," directly alluding to the volcano's frequent eruptive activity and luminous lava flows. An alternative interpretation incorporates influence, prevalent in ancient Javanese due to historical Hindu-Buddhist kingdoms, positing mer- from Meru, the mythical cosmic mountain symbolizing centrality and stability in , paired with Javanese api for "." This yields "mountain of fire," emphasizing both and , though linguistic analyses prioritize the indigenous Javanese construction over pure borrowing. The term's application extends beyond this specific volcano; Merapi is a descriptive archetype for fire-associated features in Austronesian languages of the region, appearing in names like the Merapi in East Java's Ijen complex, underscoring a cultural recognition of pyroclastic and magmatic phenomena predating modern geology. Local Javanese oral traditions further embed the name in animistic views of the mountain as a living entity capable of "breathing" fire, influencing hazard perception and ritual practices around eruptions.

Eruptive History

Prehistoric and Holocene Activity

Mount Merapi's Holocene volcanic activity commenced with explosive eruptions dating back to at least 11,792 ± 90 radiocarbon years (14C y BP), as evidenced by the base of the Series overlain by a palaeosol in proximal sections. The volcano's evolution during this period includes the terminal phase of Old Merapi, which built up through lava extrusion and explosive events from approximately 30 to around 4.8 ± 1.5 BP, culminating in a major sector that transitioned to the New Merapi phase. Stratigraphic deposits from this early interval, such as those dated to 9,630 ± 60 14C y BP, consist primarily of flows, surges, and fallback breccias resulting from Vulcanian to subplinian explosions and dome collapses. Mid-Holocene activity featured recurrent moderate eruptions, with density currents generated via collapse mechanisms extending several kilometers downflank, as preserved in widespread block-and-ash flow deposits and associated beds. Pumiceous fallout layers indicate subplinian events of (VEI) 3–4, which produced volumes exceeding those of most historical eruptions except the 1872 CE and 2010 CE events. These prehistoric eruptions, predating written records around the CE, demonstrate Merapi's capacity for significant plinian-scale explosivity, contrasting with the more frequent but smaller effusive dome-building phases observed later. A compositional shift to high-potassium (high-K) calc-alkaline magmas occurred approximately 1,900 14C y (~100–200 CE), coinciding with the post-collapse growth of New Merapi's modern cone following a debris that removed much of Old Merapi's southeastern flank. Deposits from this late phase, such as those in the Kali Batang at 2,260 ± 30 14C y BP, reflect continued dome extrusion interrupted by partial collapses yielding hot and fine ash, with persistent activity averaging one eruption every 15.9 years over the subsequent two millennia. Overall, stratigraphy underscores Merapi's andesitic nature, with prehistoric output dominated by explosive products rather than extensive lava flows.

Pre-20th Century Eruptions

Historical records of Mount Merapi's pre-20th century eruptions derive primarily from colonial observations starting in the late , documenting frequent cycles of extrusion followed by collapses that generated pyroclastic flows (nuées ardentes), surges, and associated lahars. These events typically affected drainages on the volcano's southwestern and western flanks, with impacts including village destruction, agricultural losses, and fatalities from hot flows and secondary flooding. (VEI) estimates for larger events range from 3 to 4, indicating sub-Plinian to Plinian scales with broad dispersal. Earlier activity, prior to systematic recording, includes sparse Javanese chronicles attributing a major eruption in 1006 to Merapi, which deposited ash across and coincided with the collapse of the Medang Kingdom (Mataram). Stratigraphic evidence supports recurrent explosive eruptions throughout the , with deposits indicating VEI 4-5 events that buried or damaged ancient temples like and influenced regional settlement patterns, though precise dating for pre-1768 historical events remains uncertain due to reliance on oral traditions and limited instrumentation. From 1768 to 1898, over 20 eruptive episodes occurred, many minor (VEI 1-2) involving steam explosions, rockfalls, and dome growth with negligible distant impacts, but punctuated by several hazardous events:
  • 1822–1823: Explosive eruption with fountain-collapse pyroclastic flows directed into multiple sectors (including Blongkeng, Krasak, and Bebeng), forming a 600 m wide crater; destroyed 8 villages and caused ~50 deaths from flows and hot lahars; VEI 3 (possibly 4).
  • 1846–1848: Dome collapse triggered VEI 3 explosion, generating pyroclastic flows into Woro and Gendol drainages up to several kilometers, with hot lahars; produced a 200 m crater but limited reported fatalities.
  • 1849: Strong VEI 3 explosion formed a 400 × 250 m crater, with pyroclastic flows down Blongkeng reaching ~7 km; ashfall extended 25 km, destroying 800 houses and 500,000 coffee trees; no direct fatalities noted.
  • 1872–1873: The period's most intense VEI 4 event, involving massive dome destruction and fountain-collapse flows that devastated villages above 1,000 m elevation across broad sectors; formed a 600 × 480 m crater with widespread tephra.
These eruptions underscore Merapi's causal mechanism of viscous andesitic stalling at shallow depths, leading to buildup and directed blasts upon dome failure, a pattern consistent with its morphology and subduction-zone setting. Smaller events, such as dome growth in , , and explosions in 1888, caused localized rockfalls and minor burns but rarely exceeded a few kilometers in hazard reach.

20th Century Eruptions

Mount Merapi's activity in the was dominated by effusive eruptions involving the extrusion of viscous andesitic lava domes, often followed by gravitational collapses that generated flows known as nuées ardentes. This style contrasted with the more explosive events (up to VEI 4) of the , with production occurring at a relatively constant rate of approximately 0.4–0.6 million cubic meters per month since 1890. Systematic monitoring commenced in under the East Indian Volcanological Survey, later continued by Indonesia's Volcanological Survey. While many eruptions involved lava flows and minor explosions with limited impacts, several produced significant flows, leading to fatalities in at least a dozen instances. The most devastating event was the 1930 eruption, classified as VEI 3, which featured explosive activity, lava extrusion, and extensive flows that destroyed villages and killed approximately 1,300 people. Earlier minor activity included lava flows in 1902, accompanied by flows, and subsequent flows in 1906 and 1910 with no reported major impacts.
YearKey ActivityImpacts and Casualties
1969Nuées ardentes in January traveling 11–12 km down SW flank; lava avalanches in February; explosion ejecting eruption cloud and avalanches.60 homes destroyed, 3 missing; 2,000 homeless; upper lava dome partially destroyed, no direct fatalities reported.
1972Summit explosion on 6 producing ash cloud rising 3 km and sand showers.No casualties reported.
1976Dome growth with nuées ardentes (up to 6 km in March, 2.5 km in November); ash clouds to 3 km; avalanches and incandescent material.Dome collapse of 400,000 m³; ash deposits to 37.5 km; forest fires; no fatalities per primary records, though some accounts report 28 deaths.
1994Lava dome growth followed by explosive eruption on 22 November generating flows.At least 64 fatalities from flows; evacuations prevented higher toll.
Other eruptions, such as those in 1935, 1942, 1948, 1954, 1961, 1984, 1992, and minor dome-building phases in 1977, primarily involved lava flows and with negligible human impacts due to their localized nature. Increased around the heightened vulnerability, underscoring the need for improved hazard assessment by century's end.

2006 Eruption

The 2006 eruption of Mount Merapi began with increased and fumarolic activity in late , when rockslides from the were recorded and emissions rose 400 meters above the . initiated around early May, accompanied by incandescent avalanches extending up to 100 meters down the flanks, prompting the Indonesian Center for and Geological Hazard Mitigation (CVGHM) to raise the alert level to 3 on May 11. By mid-May, a hot gas-and-ash plume was observed on , marking the onset of more intense activity, though plume heights remained modest compared to later phases. Activity escalated in late May, with the level elevated to 4—the maximum—due to persistent dome growth, multiphase earthquakes, and plumes detected daily via satellite. flows generated by dome collapse traveled up to 6 kilometers southeast toward the Kaliadem area, with notable events on producing ashfall 5 kilometers away. The eruption, classified as (VEI) 2–3, involved predominantly effusive dome-building with intermittent surges and avalanches rather than highly explosive blasts, continuing intermittently through July and August with plumes reaching 6.1 kilometers altitude. Impacts were limited relative to Merapi's historical events, with pyroclastic flows destroying vegetation and infrastructure within the 7-kilometer but causing only two fatalities: two men who perished in a near Kaliadem after aiding evacuations. Lahars triggered by heavy rains mobilized deposits, affecting rivers and farmlands, though no widespread agricultural devastation was reported beyond the immediate flanks. Evacuations displaced thousands from southern villages, supported by monitoring data that allowed timely warnings despite challenges from a concurrent M6.4 earthquake on May 27, which complicated regional response efforts. Monitoring relied on seismic networks established since the , visual observations from observatories, and gas flux measurements, which detected elevated emissions correlating with dome instability. CVGHM's real-time data on frequency and plume dynamics informed , emphasizing risks in predefined danger zones. The eruption subsided by late 2006, with dome remnants stabilizing, though minor activity persisted into , underscoring Merapi's pattern of frequent, moderate-effusion cycles.

2010 Eruption

The commenced with heightened and gas emissions in late , culminating in the first events on , marking the onset of a major eruptive phase that persisted until early December. This activity involved rapid growth of a followed by repeated collapses, generating density currents (PDCs) that extended up to 16 kilometers down the southern and southeastern flanks, devastating agricultural lands and villages. The eruption's (VEI) reached 4, classifying it as moderately large, with ash plumes rising to altitudes exceeding 15 kilometers, leading to widespread fallout and disruptions across . A chronology of key events included initial explosions on October 25–26 that prompted evacuations within a 10-kilometer radius, expanding to 20 kilometers by late October as PDCs intensified. The most vigorous phase occurred from October 26 to November 7, with dome extrusion rates peaking at over 100 cubic meters per second, fueling multiple PDC events; a particularly destructive surge on November 5 traveled 15 kilometers, incinerating structures in areas like Kinahrejo. Cumulative impacts encompassed the destruction of over 2,000 homes and burial of approximately 22 square kilometers under PDC deposits, with lahar activity triggered by heavy rains mobilizing volcanic debris and causing additional flooding downstream. Official tallies reported 386 fatalities, predominantly from burns and of hot ash during PDC incursions into populated zones, alongside 577 injuries, though some residents defied evacuation orders, contributing to higher losses in proximal villages. Evacuation efforts displaced more than 300,000 individuals, with timely warnings from the Center for and Geological Hazard Mitigation (CVGHM) and international collaborators credited for averting 10,000 to 20,000 additional deaths by enforcing buffer zones based on seismic, deformation, and . Post-eruption assessments highlighted the role of accurate forecasting in mitigating human toll, despite challenges from rapid event progression and community reluctance in high-risk areas.

2018 Eruption

The 2018 activity at Mount Merapi began with a on May 11 at approximately 19:40 local time, producing a seismic signal lasting about 5 minutes and an ash plume rising 5.5 km above the summit. The event prompted the temporary closure of , canceling eight flights, and was accompanied by elevated levels measured at 2.0 Dobson Units. Ashfall affected areas up to 15 km downwind, though no immediate casualties or significant structural damage were reported. Subsequent phreatic explosions occurred on May 21, with three events: the first at 01:25 lasting 19 minutes and generating a plume to 700 m that drifted west; the second at 09:38 producing a plume to 1.2 km; and the third at 17:50 of unknown plume height. Additional explosions followed on May 23 at 03:31 (lasting 4 minutes, plume to 2 km), May 24 (two events with plumes to 6 km and 1.5 km), and (three events with plumes reaching 6 km, 2.5 km, and 1 km). included volcano-tectonic earthquakes at depths around 3 km below the and continuous tremors, prompting the Balai Penyelidikan dan Pengembangan Teknologi Kebencanaan Geologi (BPPTKG) to raise the alert level to II (Siaga, or "wary") on May 21 and recommend a 3 km by May 24. The phase, characterized by steam-driven explosions without new involvement, reflected interaction between and hot volcanic gases or rocks, following a period of quiescence since 2016. BPPTKG's monitoring via seismometers and visual observations detected no deep magmatic signals initially, classifying the activity as minor. By , however, the status shifted to indicate a major eruption phase with the formation of a , marking the onset of effusive activity that continued into 2019, though this dome growth was distinct from the earlier explosive events. No fatalities occurred during the 2018 sequence, underscoring its relatively low hazard compared to Merapi's historical magmatic eruptions.

2020–Ongoing Eruption Cycle

The 2020–ongoing eruption cycle at Mount Merapi initiated on 31 December 2020, following precursory activity noted from October 2019, and has persisted through October 2025 with continuous extrusion of lava at the summit and southwestern (SW) lava domes. This phase features episodic dome growth, frequent incandescent lava avalanches extending up to 2-5 km in drainages such as Bebeng, Krasak, Sat, and Putih, pyroclastic density currents reaching 2-5 km southeastward, and intermittent ash emissions rising 1-6 km above the summit. The Pusat Vulkanologi dan Mitigasi Bencana Geologi (PVMBG) and Balai Penyelidikan dan Pengembangan Teknologi Kegiatan Gunungapi (BPPTKG) elevated the alert level to 3 (Siaga, or standby) on 5 November 2020, maintaining a prohibited zone of 3-7 km from the crater rim due to hazards from collapses and flows. Early activity in 2020-2021 included explosive events, such as a large blast on 27 January 2021 generating 71 flows and ashfall, alongside dome volumes expanding to approximately 1.88 million cubic meters at the SW rim and 2.817 million cubic meters at the by 2021. Ash plumes reached notable heights, including 3 km on 10 2020 and 6 km on 21 2020, prompting evacuations of 537 residents on 3 February 2021. By August 2021, ashfall affected 19 villages, while monitoring via seismometers, electronic distance measurement () instruments, and drones revealed and morphological changes in the SW dome. Subsequent years saw recurrent dome collapses and flows, including a major event on 9 March 2022 with currents traveling 5 km southeast, leading to the evacuation of 50 people and deposits in and Selo areas. In 2023, activity intensified with 68 flows during 10-16 March (extending up to 4 km), major surges on 11-12 March impacting multiple districts with , and 254 lava during 21-27 July; the SW dome volume measured 3.348 million cubic meters by 16 November 2023. A 2.5 km occurred on 17 2023, and plumes reached 3.7 km on 19 July 2023. The cycle continued into 2024 with a 1 km plume on 21 January, and in 2025, features included a 2 km on 17 September, 88 lava during 24-30 September (up to 2 km in multiple drainages), and minor in villages like Tunggularum and Ngori on 9 July. Monitoring by BPPTKG has documented persistent , including volcanic earthquakes and continuous tremors, alongside minor dome and collapses as of 23 October 2025, with no large-scale evacuations reported recently but ongoing risks from sudden surges confined within the . This cycle aligns with Merapi's historical pattern of andesitic dome-building eruptions every 5-10 years, driven by ascent in a subduction-related tectonic setting, though prolonged activity has heightened local vigilance without major fatalities since 2010.

Volcanic Hazards

Pyroclastic Flows and Surges

at Mount Merapi, often termed nuée ardentes, consist of dense avalanches of hot volcanic fragments, ash, and gases generated primarily by the of growing lava domes or explosive disruptions during eruptions. These block-and-ash flows, characteristic of Merapi's andesitic composition, travel along steep ravines on the volcano's flanks, incorporating entrained material and maintaining high momentum. Accompanying surges form as dilute, turbulent ash-clouds detached from the denser base, capable of overriding topographic barriers due to their lower and greater mobility. Flows and surges at Merapi typically reach velocities exceeding 50 meters per second, with temperatures ranging from 200°C to 700°C, enabling rapid and burial of structures and . Emplacement temperatures of deposits, as measured in the nuée ardente, varied from under 200°C near Kaliurang to around 300°C in Turgo areas, reflecting partial cooling during transit. Historical records indicate flows extending 7-16 kilometers from the summit, confined largely to southern and western drainages like the Boyong, Bebeng, and Krasak rivers. The 2010 eruption exemplified these hazards, with pyroclastic flows traveling up to 16 kilometers southward, destroying over 2,000 homes and contributing to 341 fatalities through direct thermal and mechanical impacts. Surges during this event extended beyond flow channels, exacerbating damage in peripheral villages. Earlier activity reveals recurrent fountain-collapse flows, underscoring Merapi's predisposition to such phenomena over millennia. These currents pose immediate threats due to their speed and heat, rendering evasion difficult even within established danger zones.

Lahars and Flooding

Lahars, rapidly flowing mixtures of volcanic debris, water, and mud, pose a significant secondary hazard at Mount Merapi, exacerbated by the volcano's steep slopes, frequent eruptive deposits of loose material, and intense rainfall. These events typically originate from remobilization of fresh eruption deposits or saturated older materials in drainages such as the Bebeng, Krasak, Putih, and Boyong rivers, traveling distances up to 30-40 km downstream. Since the mid-1500s, at least 23 of Merapi's 61 documented eruptions have generated source deposits leading to lahars, with cumulative deposits spanning approximately 286 km² across the southern and eastern flanks. Lahars are predominantly rain-triggered, requiring intensities of around 40 mm per 2 hours to initiate significant flows, with peak activity during the November-to-April . Historical records indicate at least 35 events since the early , resulting in 76 fatalities, destruction of thousands of houses, and damage to tens of bridges and kilometers of roads. While primary eruption fatalities at Merapi are often attributed to flows, lahars have amplified long-term risks by altering river morphologies and burying agricultural lands under meters-thick layers, reducing and necessitating repeated evacuations. Following smaller eruptions like that in , which deposited limited volumes, lahars still threatened downstream floodplains during heavy rains, impacting infrastructure and farmland through infilling and channel avulsions. The 2010 VEI 4 eruption markedly intensified activity, depositing roughly ten times more material than the 1994 or 2006 events, which fueled an unprecedented 240 rain-triggered s during the 2010-2011 rainy season (October 2010 to May 2011). By June 2011, at least 15 major s had occurred since November 2010, with the most severe on , 2011, along the Putih , where flows eroded banks and inundated distal areas previously unaffected for decades. These events reached speeds up to 60 mph (100 km/h), displacing thousands, destroying homes and bridges in districts like , and burying villages under hot mudflows that continued into subsequent seasons due to persistent loose deposits. No direct fatalities were reported from these post-2010 s, reflecting improved warnings, but economic losses from agricultural disruption and repair exceeded millions of dollars. hazards have since recurred in cycles tied to rainfall and residual 2010 sediments, underscoring Merapi's capacity for prolonged fluvial threats beyond immediate eruptive phases.

Ashfall and Gas Emissions

Ashfall from arises during explosive eruptions and lava dome collapses, generating plumes that deposit fine over distances of 10–60 km depending on wind direction and plume height. In the 2010 eruption, plumes reached 18.3 km altitude, producing 4 thick ash layers west-southwest toward (30 km SSW) and west-northwest, causing roof damage, agricultural losses, and airport closures at Adisucipto International Airport. Accumulations of 1–5 , common in proximal villages like Selo (6 km NNW) and Cangkringan, have led to structural failures and contamination of water sources, while finer distal deposits disrupt aviation and farming. In the 2020–ongoing cycle, ashfall has affected areas up to 40 km southeast, as seen on January 21, 2024, in Jelok Village, with plumes to 1 km drifting southeast. Inhalation of respirable ash fractions (PM₂.₅ and PM₁₀) from Merapi poses respiratory hazards due to high content, a bio-reactive crystalline silica inducing and symptoms like , , and chest tightness. Post-2010 assessments link exposure to exacerbated and , with particle bioreactivity exceeding typical urban despite coarser grain sizes (PM₂.₅:PM₁₀ ratio ~0.23). Chronic effects may include silicosis-like lung damage, though acute morbidity dominates in densely populated flanks. Volcanic gases, primarily SO₂, CO₂, H₂S, and H₂O, emanate from fumaroles and plumes, with fluxes spiking pre- and during eruptions signaling ascent. SO₂ emissions measured 95 tons/day in January 2001 and 80 tons/day in October 2001; a 2006 pulse reached 175 metric tons on April 22. The 2010 event released 0.44 SO₂ total, peaking November 4 with injections to 17 , detected via (AIRS) and enabling long-range transport to the by February 2011. These gases irritate mucous membranes, causing and , while SO₂ forms aerosols exacerbating ash-related respiratory distress and contributing to that corrodes infrastructure and harms vegetation. Elevated CO₂/SO₂ ratios, as observed in fumaroles, correlate with unrest but pose asphyxiation risks in confined summit areas.

Long-Term Risks and Probabilistic Modeling

Mount Merapi's long-term risks stem from its persistent magmatic activity, driven by subduction-related volcanism in the , resulting in recurrent dome-building episodes prone to and explosive events. Historical records indicate hazardous eruptions—characterized by flows—occur approximately every 5-10 years, with smaller effusive phases more frequent but major explosive eruptions ( [VEI] 3 or higher) recurring every few decades to a century. For instance, VEI 3 events occurred in 1822 and 1849, while a VEI 4 eruption took place in 1872, highlighting the potential for escalating intensity beyond typical dome- hazards. Over centuries, these patterns suggest a of significant density current (PDC) incursions into proximal drainages, with ashfall and lahars extending impacts regionally, compounded by Java's dense near the . Probabilistic modeling employs statistical frameworks to quantify these risks, often using Bayesian Event Trees (BET) that integrate historical eruption catalogs, monitoring precursors, and geophysical data to estimate conditional probabilities of unrest and escalation. In a 2018 BET application to Merapi, the probability of volcanic unrest was calculated at 0.822, with a 0.549 likelihood of progression to a VEI 2 eruption given unrest, based on volcano-tectonic signals and extrusion rates. These models assume Poisson-like processes for eruption timing but condition on observables like seismicity and deformation, enabling forecasts over 1-50 year horizons; for PDCs specifically, multivolcano assessments project a non-negligible probability of invasion in southern Java drainages within 50 years, informed by Merapi's empirical runout distributions. Further statistical analyses of VEI sequences reveal characteristic patterns, where most events cluster at VEI 2 but exhibit fat-tailed distributions for higher magnitudes, implying underestimation risks in models without tail adjustments. Recurrence intervals for VEI 4+ events remain uncertain due to sparse —potentially 100-200 years—but simulations incorporating historical and dome volumes support hazard maps delineating 20-30 km PDC zones with annual exceedance probabilities around 0.1-0.2 for moderate flows. Long-term modeling thus emphasizes scenario-based event trees, prioritizing empirical validation against pre-2010 records to mitigate biases from recent activity, while acknowledging epistemic uncertainties in supply rates that could amplify risks under sustained unrest.

Monitoring and Scientific Assessment

Observatories and Instrumentation

Mount Merapi's monitoring is primarily conducted by the Balai Penyelidikan dan Pengembangan Teknologi Kebencanaan Geologi (BPPTKG), Indonesia's dedicated research and technology development center for the , established to provide on activity. BPPTKG operates a network of five observation posts situated on the 's slopes: Selo to the north, Jrakah to the northwest, Babadan to the west, and additional posts at Ngepos and other strategic locations for comprehensive coverage. These posts house personnel and equipment, enabling both and on-site visual observations, with data transmitted to the central BPPTKG facility in . The instrumentation network includes a dense of seismometers deployed across the to detect microearthquakes, volcanic tremors, and signals, with monitoring originating from seismic stations installed as early as during the Dutch colonial era. Geodetic instruments comprise multiple GPS stations—up to eight in some configurations—positioned around the flanks and a reference station at the Observatory to measure ground deformation and baseline lengthening indicative of intrusion. Tiltmeters, such as AGI-722 models installed at depths of 3-4 meters in concrete casings, monitor subtle changes in ground slope at summit-area stations, often paired with GPS and weather sensors for correlated analysis. Gas emissions are tracked using correlation spectrometers (COSPEC) for remote measurement of SO2 flux via ultraviolet spectroscopy from fixed distances, supplemented by multi-gas sensors for real-time plume composition. Additional tools include infrasound sensors for detecting low-frequency pressure waves from eruptions, webcams for visual dome growth observation, rain gauges and for lahar risk assessment, and integration of satellite data like interferometry for cloud-penetrating deformation mapping. This multi-parameter system, enhanced by international collaborations such as USGS Assistance inputs, supports continuous 24/7 and rapid response to precursory signals.

Seismicity and Deformation Tracking

![A selection of instruments used for monitoring volcanoes.jpg][float-right] Seismicity at Mount Merapi is monitored through a dense network of seismic stations operated by the Center for Research and Development of Geological Disaster Technology (BPPTKG), in collaboration with the Geological Agency of Indonesia (PVMBG). This network includes broadband and short-period seismometers deployed across the volcano's flanks, enabling real-time detection of volcanic earthquakes classified as deep Type-A (VT-A) events associated with brittle failure at depth, shallow Type-B (VT-B) events linked to fluid movement, hybrid earthquakes, and low-frequency tremors indicative of magma dynamics. The DOMERAPI array, comprising 46 broadband seismometers, facilitates precise hypocenter location and supports advanced analysis such as probabilistic correlation of seismic patterns with lava extrusion phases. Real-time seismic amplitude measurement (RSAM) tracks energy release trends, with notable peaks such as 407 hybrid earthquakes recorded on September 2, 2023, signaling heightened unrest. Ground deformation is tracked using continuous GPS stations and satellite-based (InSAR) techniques to quantify , , and lateral displacements driven by intrusion or dome . BPPTKG maintains multiple GPS receivers around Merapi, providing millimeter-precision data on vertical and horizontal movements; for instance, low-cost kinematic GPS has been validated for detecting pre-eruptive swelling. InSAR processing of data generates displacement maps and digital elevation models (DEMs), revealing deformation during dome , as applied in post-2010 monitoring to map rates up to several cubic meters per second. Persistent Scatterer InSAR (PSInSAR) cross-validated against GPS measurements enhances detection of subtle pre-eruptive signals, such as those preceding the 2020-ongoing cycle. Integration of seismic and deformation data allows of subsurface processes; for example, correlated increases in VT-B events and GPS-detected often precede dome or flows, as observed in the lead-up to elevated activity in September 2025, when seismic surges prompted maintenance of Alert Level III. These metrics feed into probabilistic models for unrest progression, prioritizing empirical patterns over speculative interpretations.

Eruption Forecasting Methods

Eruption for Mount Merapi integrates of precursory geophysical and geochemical signals with probabilistic models to estimate eruption likelihood, timing, location, and magnitude. Key precursors include elevated seismic energy from earthquakes and tremor, rapid summit deformation, increased extrusion rates, and heightened emissions of (SO2) and (CO2), which indicate ascent of gas-rich . These signals, observed through networks maintained by Indonesia's Center for and Mitigation (CVGHM), enabled accurate predictions during the 2010 eruption, where alerts were raised on October 25 based on intensifying activity, leading to evacuations that saved thousands of lives. Seismic plays a central role, utilizing techniques such as seismic (RSAM) to track increasing energy and Bayesian Online Changepoint Detection (BOCPD) on magnitude to identify abrupt shifts signaling unrest. BOCPD, optimized with parameters like hazard rate and hyperparameters tuned to data from 2012–2018, detected changepoints preceding eruptions, such as those in 2013 and 2018, with lags of up to 235 days in testing scenarios, aligning with ascent timescales. Additionally, the Materials Failure Forecast Method () applies to accelerating seismic energy release, modeling it as material failure to forecast eruption times deterministically, as tested on Merapi's multiphase and s from 1993 onward. Geodetic and methods complement by measuring ground deformation via tiltmeters, electronic distance meters (), and GPS, revealing or patterns, while satellite radar tracks summit morphology changes even under cloud cover, as during the event. Geochemical analysis of gas plumes quantifies flux via , with surges preceding explosive phases. Probabilistic frameworks like the Bayesian Event Tree for Eruption Forecasting (BET_EF) synthesize these inputs— including swarm rates, deformation, gas content, and historical data from 1961–—yielding unrest probabilities (e.g., 0.822), likely eruption sites at the main (0.938 probability), and sizes (VEI 2 at 0.549 probability). This event-tree approach propagates uncertainties through nodes representing sequential volcanic processes, aiding zoning for districts like Cangkringan.

Historical Accuracy of Predictions

Forecasting eruptions at Mount Merapi has relied on integrated of seismic activity, deformation, gas emissions, and since the establishment of dedicated observatories in the mid-20th century. Methods such as the Material Failure Forecast Method (MFFM), which analyzes accelerating patterns in seismic or deformation rates assuming material failure, have been applied retrospectively and in real-time to predict eruption onsets. Probabilistic approaches like the Bayesian Event Tree () incorporate historical unrest from 1961 to 2010, where 146 unrest episodes included 55 magmatic unrests and 46 eruptions, to estimate probabilities such as 0.822 for unrest and 0.549 for VEI 2 events. The MFFM demonstrated 36% success in forecasting across 64 pre-eruptive sequences at Merapi and other volcanoes, rising to 83% when strict reliability criteria—such as clear power-law acceleration—were satisfied, with 62% of sequences deemed suitable for the method. This Bayesian-enhanced MFFM highlights the method's utility for effusive and explosive events but notes limitations in physical justification for certain long-period seismic signals and dependency on data quality. BET models align forecasts with Merapi's eruptive cycles of 3-5 years for minor events and 30-40 years for larger ones, though they provide probabilities rather than deterministic timings, reflecting inherent uncertainties in volcanic processes. In the 2010 eruption, forecasts proved effective despite challenges in magnitude prediction; the alert level was elevated to the highest ("Awas") on October 25, 2010, based on precursors like increased , deformation, and gas emissions, preceding the onset on October 26 by hours. This prompted evacuation of approximately 40,000 people initially within 10 km, expanding to 20 km and displacing over 350,000, averting 10,000 to 20,000 potential deaths amid 341 fatalities, primarily from flows. Retrospective analyses confirm that while onsets were anticipated accurately, distinguishing between effusive dome-building and highly phases remains difficult without advanced composition insights. Overall, historical forecasting accuracy at Merapi has improved with enhanced and , reducing relative casualties compared to pre-1980 eruptions like 1930 (68 deaths) versus modern events, though probabilistic nature limits pinpoint precision and underscores the value of conservative alert thresholds.

Mitigation Strategies

Alert Levels and Evacuation Protocols

The Indonesian alert system for Mount Merapi, managed by the Center for Volcanology and Geological Hazard Mitigation (PVMBG) through its dedicated Merapi Volcano Research and Development Center (BPPTKG), utilizes a four-tier to signal escalating unrest and guide risk mitigation. Level I (Normal) reflects routine volcanic activity with stable parameters, permitting unrestricted access beyond basic monitoring zones while maintaining continuous seismic and visual surveillance. Level II (Waspada, or Vigilance) denotes moderate increases in earthquakes, gas flux, or deformation, typically restricting public approach to within 3 kilometers of the to avert direct exposure to potential ejections. Level III (Siaga, or Standby), Merapi's status since November 2020 as of September 2025, indicates pronounced activity such as accelerating or avalanches, enforcing dynamic exclusion radii of 3-7 kilometers tailored to topographic flow paths and mandating community readiness for displacement. Level IV (Awas, or Warning), the apex, signifies eruption onset or imminence with vigorous and surface manifestations, triggering compulsory clearance of expanded zones up to 20 kilometers. Evacuation protocols integrate real-time geophysical data with predefined hazard simulations, prioritizing zones vulnerable to nuée ardente surges along southern and western flanks, corridors in drainages like the Bebeng and Krasak Rivers, and dispersion patterns. Activation escalates with alert thresholds: at Level III, high-risk settlements receive pre-evacuation notices via radio broadcasts, alerts, and village assemblies, enabling self-directed relocation to designated bunkers or assembly halls; Level IV enforces mandatory exodus using coordinated transport from local disaster agencies (BPBD) and assets, with sirens and megaphones signaling immediacy. The 2010 VEI-4 eruption exemplified protocol efficacy when BPPTKG extended the from 15 to 20 kilometers on October 25 amid surging , displacing over 400,000 individuals to 31 camps and averting 10,000-20,000 fatalities from incursions that reached 17 kilometers. Subsequent refinements, informed by 2010 post-event analyses, incorporate community-driven mutual aid (gotong royong) for asset evacuation—such as livestock herding and crop safeguarding—and compulsory drills under the Wajib Latih framework, fostering 80-90% compliance rates in simulations. During the 2020-2023 dome-building phase at persistent Level III, protocols shifted toward proactive thinning of at-risk populations, evacuating 500-2,000 from proximal hamlets like Kinahrejo during avalanche spikes, with shelters stocked for 7-14 days based on supply chain models. Coordination via BNPB's national command ensures logistical support, including medical triage and psychological debriefing, though bottlenecks in rural access and farmer reluctance—rooted in economic dependence on fertile slopes—necessitate ongoing behavioral interventions. Empirical outcomes affirm causal linkages: timely zoning expansions correlate directly with minimized casualties, as 2010's death toll of 353 contrasted sharply with negligible losses in analogous 2021 surges despite similar plume heights exceeding 15 kilometers.

Engineering Controls (Check Dams and Barriers)

Engineering controls for lahar mitigation at Mount Merapi primarily consist of sabo dams, known internationally as check dams, which are low transverse structures built across river channels to intercept volcanic , dissipate flow energy, and prevent downstream or . These permeable or semi-permeable barriers, often constructed from , gabions, or cribs with spillways, trap coarse while allowing finer material and water to pass, thereby reducing lahar peak discharge and velocity. Sabo dams have been deployed in key drainage systems such as the Putih, Gendol, Opak, and Krasak rivers, which channel deposits from the volcano's flanks during heavy rainfall. Construction of these structures intensified after significant eruptions, with sediment control facilities initiated following the event to address post-eruptive . In the Putih River watershed alone, 20 sabo dams were documented as of surveys around 2020, alongside other infrastructure like ground sills. Post-2010 eruption rehabilitation efforts included the installation of six additional sabo dams—three each in the Gendol and Opak rivers—through international aid projects focused on urgent debris flow countermeasures. However, these dams proved vulnerable; lahars in the Putih River following the 2010 eruption damaged 19 sabo dams and destroyed 14 others across affected channels, highlighting the need for reinforced designs and periodic reconstruction. Effectiveness of sabo dams depends on proper spacing, , and relative to lahar volume; they successfully filter contaminants and stabilize channels during moderate events by reducing , but large-volume flows can overtop or breach them, leading to avulsion where divert from confined paths. models assess structural integrity, rates, and hydraulic , with indices indicating variable success in containing material post-eruption. Simulations of flows in the demonstrate that arrays of sabo dams can attenuate impacts by distributing loads, though full efficacy requires integration with upstream controls. Complementary barriers include reinforced s and dikes along channels like the Krasak River, featuring facings (30-40 cm thick) and walls to resist overtopping, alongside baffles— velocity reducers—and diversion channels to redirect flows away from populated areas. widening and gradient flattening further support these measures by lowering inherent flow energies, with ongoing essential to prevent clogging and repurpose trapped debris for levee augmentation. Despite these interventions, structural failures during intense rainy seasons underscore that engineering alone cannot fully eliminate risks without coupled land-use restrictions and early warning systems.

Sterile Zones and Land-Use Restrictions

Following the major 2010 eruption of Mount Merapi, which killed 353 people and displaced over 350,000, the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, along with the National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB) and local governments, designated a prohibited or "sterile" zone within approximately 8-10 km of the summit where permanent is banned to mitigate risks from flows, surges, and dome collapses. This zone aligns with the highest-risk Kawasan Rawan Bencana (KRB III), typically extending 3-7 km from the crater in vulnerable directions like the south and southeast flanks, where land-use regulations strictly limit new residential construction and encourage relocation of existing communities to safer areas outside the 10 km radius. Agricultural activities are permitted in limited forms within buffer areas (5-7 km), but settlement is prohibited, with concepts designating inner zones as national park-like forbidden areas for occupancy to preserve natural barriers against hazards. The KRB system, mapped by the Center for Volcanology and Geological Hazard Mitigation (PVMBG), divides the volcano's surroundings into three tiers: KRB III for direct eruption threats (prohibiting dwellings and prioritizing evacuation routes), KRB II for medium risks like ashfall and secondary lahars (allowing restricted farming but no expansion), and KRB I for lahar-prone riverine areas (permitting elevated structures with precautions). Post-2010 mapping efforts reassigned land use in southern regions, converting high-risk farmlands to non-residential buffers and designating relocation sites, though over 1 million people remain within the 10 km high-risk perimeter due to historical habitation. Enforcement of these restrictions has been inconsistent, with lax oversight allowing informal returns and new builds in prohibited zones, exacerbating as seen in subsequent alerts where temporary no-go radii (3-7 km at Level III) overlap with permanent KRB III areas. PVMBG and BPPTKG maintain ongoing prohibitions on climbing and non-essential access within these zones during normal operations, restricting entry to authorized personnel only, while provincial plans aim to integrate KRB maps into spatial development to prevent settlement creep. Despite these measures, from local communities, who rely on volcanic soils for , has hindered full compliance, leading to land uses that balance risk reduction with economic needs.

Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit Analysis

The alert level system and evacuation protocols implemented by Indonesia's Center for Volcanology and Geological Hazard Mitigation (CVGHM) have demonstrated high effectiveness in reducing fatalities during major eruptions, as evidenced by the event where extending the evacuation radius from 15 km to 20 km averted an estimated 10,000 to 20,000 deaths from flows. In that eruption, over 350,000 people were evacuated, with only 353 confirmed fatalities, primarily among those who ignored orders or returned prematurely to retrieve assets, underscoring the protocols' success in prioritizing human life despite logistical strains from the eruption's rapid escalation. Cost-benefit analyses of such evacuations frame decisions around break-even probabilities, where the economic costs of temporary displacement (e.g., , , and lost livelihoods) are weighed against expected mortality and property losses; for Merapi, these favor proactive evacuation given historical speeds exceeding 100 km/h and lethal radii up to 17 km. Engineering controls, including check dams (sabo structures) and barriers, have moderately mitigated and risks by redirecting s and reducing downstream inundation, with 272 sabo dam units operational around Merapi by recent assessments, capturing volcanic material post-eruption. Since the , investments in over 50 check dams, 101 consolidation dams, and 12 km of dikes have curtailed lahar-induced disasters, though effectiveness is limited by high volumes—lahars at Merapi often triggered by 40 mm/h rainfall carry millions of cubic meters of material, overwhelming structures during peak rainy seasons. These measures' cost-benefit ratio remains positive for infrastructure protection, as they avert annual damages estimated in billions of rupiah while costs per unit (typically under $1 million for mid-scale sabo dams) yield returns through preserved agricultural lands and reduced relocation expenses, though burdens and partial failures during extreme events (e.g., post-2010 lahars breaching some dams) necessitate ongoing reinforcements. Sterile zones and land-use restrictions, enforcing no-build buffers within 5-10 km radii, have constrained in high-hazard areas, minimizing baseline exposure to surges and ashfalls, but enforcement challenges persist due to fertile volcanic soils incentivizing informal farming and habitation encroachments. Their effectiveness is evident in lower casualty rates in zoned versus peripheral areas during eruptions like and , yet incomplete compliance erodes benefits, with post-event resettlements often reverting to risk zones for economic reasons. From a cost-benefit , these restrictions impose costs on (Merapi's slopes support high-value crops yielding up to 50 million/ annually) but deliver net savings by avoiding reconstruction expenses, which exceeded 7.1 trillion ($781 million) in total eruption damages including non-mitigated assets. Overall, Merapi's integrated mitigation portfolio yields a favorable long-term cost-benefit by prioritizing lives over —evacuations alone prevented catastrophe-scale losses in 2010—but gaps in controls and adherence highlight needs for adaptive investments, such as probabilistic modeling to refine break-even thresholds amid frequent activity (eruptions every 4-6 years). Empirical from 1994-2010 events affirm that early warning and structural interventions reduce expected losses by 70-90% in compliant scenarios, though socioeconomic factors like poverty-driven risk tolerance demand hybrid approaches blending enforcement with incentives.

Human Impacts and Responses

Casualties and Demographic Effects

![Destroyed house in Cangkringan Village after the 2010 eruptions][float-right] Mount Merapi's eruptions have caused significant loss of life historically, with fatalities primarily resulting from flows, lahars, and ash falls. Of its 67 documented historic eruptions, 11 involved deadly nuée ardentes, leading to deaths concentrated in densely populated slopes. The eruption stands as one of the deadliest in recent decades, claiming approximately 353 lives through pyroclastic surges that extended up to 15 km from the summit, alongside over 500 injuries. Earlier events, such as the eruption, resulted in 28 fatalities and displaced 1,176 individuals due to similar hazards. Demographic effects include massive temporary displacements, with the event forcing nearly 400,000 residents—predominantly from rural farming communities within 20 km of the —into evacuation for over a month, straining local resources and capacities. Permanent impacts affected around 2,200 families whose homes were destroyed, prompting resettlement programs that altered local population distributions and agricultural livelihoods. Vulnerable groups, including children, experienced reduced enrollment rates post-eruption, exacerbating long-term educational disparities in affected areas. Recent eruptions, bolstered by improved , have minimized ; for instance, the activity reported no deaths despite evacuations of nearly 2,000 people from high-risk zones. Overall, while acute mortality has declined, recurrent threats contribute to ongoing patterns and stresses, interacting with high population densities to amplify scale.

Economic and Agricultural Consequences

The 2010 eruption of Mount Merapi caused extensive damage to agricultural infrastructure and production in surrounding regions of and , with over 1,000 homes destroyed alongside farmland, leading to immediate paralysis of farming activities and losses exceeding 2,500 and tens of thousands of . and pyroclastic flows buried crops such as , fruits, and across thousands of hectares, resulting in estimated agricultural economic losses of approximately £13 million from destroyed harvests and reduced yields. Overall damages to the agricultural sector exceeded $100 million, exacerbating food insecurity for subsistence farmers reliant on rain-fed paddies and smallholder plots. Rice production in affected districts like Klaten and Sleman declined by 32,941 tons in 2011 due to ash-induced and burial of fields, which prevented planting and caused puddling that hindered root penetration and water infiltration. Lahars—volcanic mudflows—further eroded channels and farmlands, disrupting perennial crops like and , while deaths compounded income losses for dairy and beef producers in the fertile volcanic slopes. These impacts disproportionately affected small-scale farmers, whose economic activities are tightly linked to annual cycles, leading to heightened vulnerability from combined risks of fallout, input price volatility, and post-eruption market disruptions. In the medium term, while volcanic ash deposits enrich soils with minerals such as and magnesium, enabling fertility recovery and supporting Java's high productivity, initial consequences include multi-year yield reductions and relocation costs for farmers in hazard-prone areas. Eruptions like those in thus impose recurrent economic burdens on densely populated volcanic regions, where contributes significantly to local GDP, though adaptive practices such as have mitigated some long-term risks by diversifying income sources.

Recovery Efforts and Resilience Factors

Following the major eruptions of October-November 2010, which displaced over 350,000 people and caused 353 confirmed deaths, recovery efforts prioritized relocation from high-risk zones to reduce future exposure to flows and s. By March 2013, authorities had resettled 2,500 families into purpose-built housing in safer upland areas across and provinces, with additional plans to relocate 668 families amid ongoing threats from rain-remobilized ash deposits. These initiatives were complemented by cash grant distributions managed through state entities like PT Pos , alongside community mobilization programs to facilitate rapid aid delivery to affected households. International aid supported immediate post-eruption , including the International Organization for Migration's provision of for non-food items to approximately 290,000 evacuees in regencies such as Sleman, , and Klaten. Reconstruction strategies incorporated structural lessons from the 2006 earthquake, emphasizing durable housing and infrastructure upgrades to withstand seismic and volcanic stresses, though evaluations highlight mixed outcomes in achieving "build back better" due to persistent socioeconomic disruptions like livelihood losses in agriculture-dependent villages. Community resilience around Merapi stems from adaptive social structures and empirical , with studies identifying 13 out of 16 key indicators—such as robust local networks, resource access, and collective response capacities—in villages like Kaliadem, , and Petung, enabling quicker recovery through self-organized rebuilding post-2010. Farmers exhibit particular tenacity, leveraging the volcano's nutrient-rich andesitic ash for high-yield crops like and , which replenishes via periodic eruptions, though this necessitates ongoing hazard monitoring to balance economic gains against relapse risks. Resistance to full relocation in some areas, driven by cultural ties to ancestral lands and proven short-term via temporary shelters, underscores a causal : while reducing mortality, enforced moves can erode informal built from generations of eruption cycles, as seen in initial pushback from communities like Pelemsari before partial compliance. Enhanced preparedness through local training and stakeholder coordination has bolstered capacities, with factors like risk knowledge, socioeconomic buffers, and community cohesion directly correlating to lower in empirical assessments of Merapi's flanks. These elements, rooted in observable patterns of survival rather than external impositions, have contributed to declining per-eruption fatalities over decades, from thousands in pre-20th-century events to hundreds in modern ones, reflecting iterative learning from causal eruption dynamics like dome collapse and flank instability.

Controversies in Crisis Management

During the , faced significant challenges due to villagers' reluctance to evacuate, often prioritizing and agricultural assets over official warnings. Approximately 10,000 individuals initially ignored evacuation orders, citing the need to tend to and crops, which constituted their primary economic resources; this defiance contributed to at least some of the 353 confirmed fatalities, as returning were caught in pyroclastic flows. The Indonesian Center for and Geological Hazard Mitigation (CVGHM), led by chief Surono, had escalated alerts to the highest level on , 2010, and extended the danger zone to 20 km from the summit by November 4, yet enforcement relied heavily on voluntary compliance, with military and assisting but not compelling departures in all cases. A prominent controversy arose from the influence of traditional spiritual practices, particularly the actions of Mbah Maridjan, the appointed spiritual guardian (abdi dalem) of Merapi by the Sultan of . Maridjan refused to evacuate despite repeated scientific advisories, asserting his duty to perform rituals appeasing the volcano's spirits (roh-roh gunung); he perished on October 26, 2010, in his home near Kinahrejo village, found in a prostrating position amid deposits. His stance, echoed in prior events like the 2006 unrest, reportedly encouraged followers to delay departures, exacerbating risks in a region where cultural beliefs in oversight coexist with modern monitoring; critics argued this undermined CVGHM's data-driven forecasts, which accurately predicted escalating activity based on seismic and gas emission data. While government protocols integrated traditional consultations—such as pre-eruption selamatan ceremonies—the episode highlighted causal tensions: empirical evidence from and ashfall patterns favored prompt relocation, yet unverified spiritual claims delayed for dozens of households. Livestock management emerged as another focal point of debate, with inadequate provisions for animal evacuation leading to high losses—around 2,800 perished in 2010, representing 12.4% of regional herds—and indirectly endangering human lives as owners returned to feed or retrieve . Post-event analyses criticized the absence of dedicated shelters or subsidies for relocating herds, noting that cultural attachments to as status symbols and income sources (e.g., and for farming) outweighed perceived risks, despite historical precedents like the 1930 eruption killing thousands. Authorities' reliance on ad-hoc transport for proved insufficient during the rapid escalation, prompting calls for integrated agro-volcanic protocols; however, economic data indicated that full compliance could have averted most livestock deaths without human casualties, underscoring individual risk calculus over systemic failure. Local government coordination drew scrutiny for delayed information dissemination and resource constraints, with some reports noting sluggish activation of shelters relative to the eruption's pace—peaking at nearly 400,000 evacuees by mid-November. While national agencies like the National Disaster Management Agency (BNPB) facilitated aid, polycentric overlaps between Yogyakarta's special administrative status and Central Java's complicated unified command, leading to uneven enforcement; nonetheless, retrospective assessments affirmed that timely zoning expansions averted 10,000–20,000 potential deaths, attributing residual controversies to behavioral factors rather than predictive errors. These events informed subsequent refinements, such as enhanced livestock evacuation drills, but persistent cultural-economic barriers reveal ongoing causal disconnects in balancing empirical hazard modeling with community incentives.

Cultural and Traditional Perspectives

Mythological Narratives

In Javanese folklore, the origin of Mount Merapi is attributed to the defiance of two master blacksmiths, Empu and Empu Pamadi, whose forges occupied the site selected by the gods to place a mountain for balancing the island of , which was tilting due to an existing peak called Jamurdipa on its western end. When commanded to relocate, the smiths refused, prompting the gods to bury them alive beneath ; their unquenched forge transformed into the volcano's fiery crater, with their restless spirits fueling its eruptions as a perpetual reminder of mortal against divine order. Merapi occupies a pivotal role in Javanese cosmology as part of a sacred north-south axis linking the volcano's spirits to the Kraton palace and the southern domain of , the Queen of the , forming a spiritual equilibrium that locals interpret as influencing seismic and eruptive events through interactions between mountain-dwelling entities and oceanic forces. Central to these narratives is Mbah Petruk, a guardian or spirit king residing in the crater, often visualized as a shadow puppet appearing in clouds prior to eruptions, believed to mediate volcanic fury and deliver omens to human caretakers. Additional figures include Nyi Gadung Melati, a nurturing associated with Merapi's fertile slopes, embodying themes of destruction and renewal in the volcano's cycle. These oral traditions, preserved through local rituals and , underscore a where volcanic activity reflects agency rather than solely geological processes.

Role of Spiritual Guardians

The spiritual guardians of Mount Merapi, referred to as juru kunci (key holders) or abdi dalem (royal servants), are traditional custodians appointed by the Sultan of to maintain spiritual harmony between the volcano, the Kraton palace, and local communities. These figures, often selected from local families with hereditary ties to the mountain, interpret omens such as animal behaviors or dreams as signs from ancestral spirits believed to reside within Merapi, advising on rituals to placate potentially disruptive forces. Their authority derives from Javanese cosmological traditions linking the volcano to protective entities, including spirits (danyang) that demand respect to avert . Central to their duties are periodic labuhan offerings, ceremonial presentations of , flowers, fruits, and symbolic items like or effigies, transported to Merapi's slopes or crater edges by processions from the Kraton. These rituals, conducted annually or in response to seismic activity—such as on May 14, , when villagers offered a mound shaped like a —aim to "feed" or honor the mountain's spiritual inhabitants, drawing from pre-Islamic Javanese animist practices blended with Islamic elements. Guardians lead selamatan feasts involving communal prayers and sometimes ascetic displays, like processions of unclothed men in , to beseech calm during heightened unrest. The Labuhan Merapi specifically prohibits resource extraction during ceremonies, reinforcing taboos against to preserve the as a conduit for spiritual exchange. Notable guardians include Mbah Maridjan, appointed in 1982 by Sultan , who conducted crater-side dispersals of offerings and communicated warnings via dreams, refusing evacuation during the October 2010 eruption and perishing in a prayer posture amid pyroclastic flows that killed 353 people. His successor, Mbah Asih (appointed post-2010), continues these traditions, emphasizing ancestral mediation to foster amid scientific monitoring. While empirical evidence attributes Merapi's activity to tectonic processes rather than appeasement failures, these roles persist as cultural mechanisms for interpreting uncertainty, with guardians collaborating selectively with volcanologists during crises like the 2010 events.

Tensions Between Tradition and Science

In Javanese cosmology, Mount Merapi is regarded as a sacred entity animated by spirits, including the Spirit King and other supernatural forces, whose unrest manifests as eruptions; traditional guardians, or abdi dalem, appointed by the of , perform rituals such as offerings of rice, flowers, and livestock at sites like the crater rim to mediate and placate these entities, believing such acts can avert or mitigate disasters. These practices, rooted in centuries-old oral traditions, frame volcanic activity as interpersonal spiritual dynamics rather than geophysical processes driven by magma dynamics and tectonic pressures. Modern volcanology, advanced by Indonesia's Center for Volcanology and Geological Hazard Mitigation (PVMBG), employs seismic sensors, tiltmeters, and SO2 gas flux measurements to detect precursors like increased seismicity and deformation, enabling alerts and evacuations based on quantitative thresholds, as during the 2010 eruption when pre-eruptive signals prompted zoning up to 20 km. Tensions arise when traditional interpretations conflict with these empirical methods; for instance, locals may prioritize omens like unusual animal behavior or dreams—deemed spiritual warnings—over instrumental data, leading to delayed responses, as evidenced by villagers' "domestication" of hazards through habitual risk acceptance rather than relocation. The 2010 eruption highlighted acute friction: spiritual guardian Mbah Maridjan, custodian since 1982, rejected full evacuation despite PVMBG alerts, insisting on ritual mediation to "cool" the volcano's anger, resulting in his death from pyroclastic flows on October 25 and 35 initial fatalities among followers who heeded his stance over scientific orders. This episode pitted geologists' causal models—linking eruptions to pressure buildup in the conduit—against guardians' , with Maridjan's circle criticizing scientific predictions as incomplete without spiritual insight, while authorities viewed ritual adherence as endangering lives. Post-2010, successors like Mbah Sri Marijan have attempted hybrid approaches, incorporating PVMBG seismic bulletins into rituals while upholding traditions, yet resistance persists; surveys indicate some communities discount alerts if traditional signs (e.g., spirit "events" like tremors interpreted cosmologically) contradict them, complicating enforcement of sterile zones and amplifying in densely populated slopes. Empirical analyses of evacuation efficacy underscore that cultural entwinement with Merapi—viewing eruptions as regenerative for fertile soils—fosters non-compliance, though scientific forecasting has reduced overall mortality by enabling preemptive actions when heeded.

Conservation and Ecology

Merapi National Park

![The peak of Mount Merapi seen from Klangon][float-right] Gunung Merapi National Park (Taman Nasional Gunung Merapi, TNGM), established in 2004, encompasses approximately 6,410 hectares of forested slopes surrounding the volcano, spanning the Special Region and provinces across Sleman, , Boyolali, and Klaten districts. The park's creation aimed to conserve the unique volcanic ecosystem, protect water sources, and preserve biodiversity despite frequent eruptions, with a later ministerial decree in 2014 adjusting the area to 6,607.52 hectares. The park is divided into core, wilderness, and utilization zones to balance protection and sustainable use, including areas for ecotourism and environmental services like water provision. Elevations range from 600 to 2,968 meters above sea level, featuring tropical montane forests that support diverse vegetation, from pioneer species on lava flows to mature woodlands. Biodiversity includes lichens serving as air quality bioindicators in sanctuary zones like Gunung Bibi Forest, various terrestrial mammals affected by disturbances, and plant species adapted to periodic volcanic resets. Conservation efforts face challenges from Merapi's activity, such as the 2010 eruption that destroyed up to 2,800 hectares of , necessitating and invasive species control like . Local communities depend on the park for resources, leading to conflicts over , grass harvesting, and land access, compounded by historical resistance to park designation that restricted traditional farming. Despite these, the park's fertile volcanic soils enhance regional and support through natural recolonization post-eruption.

Biodiversity and Soil Fertility Benefits

The volcanic eruptions of Mount Merapi periodically deposit ash layers rich in essential minerals such as , , and trace elements, which enhance in surrounding areas. This acts as a natural by replenishing nutrient-depleted soils, improving , and promoting microbial activity that aids nutrient cycling. Studies on post-eruption landscapes indicate that Merapi's increases buffering and water retention, leading to higher crop yields in regrowth phases; for instance, applications of Merapi combined with have been shown to boost plant height and biomass in experimental plots. In the context of Mount Merapi National Park, these fertile volcanic soils support a diverse array of , including that rapidly colonize ash-covered terrains and mature forests on older deposits. Vegetation surveys within the park reveal high plant diversity, with 45 species recorded in the Cangkringan Resort area alone, encompassing plants from 13 families that thrive due to the nutrient influx. This enhanced primary productivity sustains habitats for fauna, including bird species such as the (Todiramphus chloris) and (Oriolus chinensis), as well as endemic mountainous flora adapted to periodic disturbances. The ecological benefits extend to , as volcanic ash's high surface area absorbs atmospheric CO₂, contributing to buildup over time and fostering resilient ecosystems. However, these advantages manifest primarily in the medium to long term following eruptions, after initial disruptions subside, underscoring the volcano's role in maintaining dynamic, nutrient-driven hotspots despite short-term hazards.

Conflicts Over Resource Use

Local communities in the regions surrounding Mount Merapi have engaged in protracted disputes with authorities over access to forest and volcanic resources, primarily stemming from the 2004 establishment of (MMNP). The park, decreed on May 4, 2004, and spanning 8,655 hectares across (DIY) and , aimed to conserve and watersheds but restricted traditional uses such as for food, medicines, and timber, affecting approximately one million residents reliant on these resources for livelihoods. Opposition intensified from the planning phase in 2001, with locals decrying exclusion from decision-making and violations of Indonesia's 1999 regional autonomy law, which prioritizes community rights over centralized control. These tensions escalated during the November 2010 eruption, when villagers resisted mandatory evacuations, suspecting them as pretexts for land seizure to enforce park boundaries—a distrust rooted in historical precedents of resource confiscation under the regime (1967–1998). Slogans like "I prefer to die on the mountain" encapsulated local defiance against zoning regulations that curtailed small-scale collection of non-timber forest products while permitting large-scale concessions granted to local governments, which extracted up to 3.5 million cubic meters annually and degraded springs, forests, and soil fertility. Such disparities highlighted causal inequities: conservation policies imposed ecological limits on subsistence users but overlooked industrial exploitation's environmental toll, including and habitat loss. Inter-provincial frictions compound these issues, particularly between DIY and communities asserting generational customary rights to Merapi's forests, often clashing over overlapping claims amid ambiguous regulations that frame locals as encroachers rather than stewards. Post-eruption has fueled further disputes, with governors and regents in adjacent jurisdictions circumventing national licensing to capture revenues from Merapi's volcanic deposits, undermining coordinated and exacerbating downstream in rivers used for and . Resolution efforts, including mediated partnerships and consensus-building, seek to reconcile with access but frequently falter due to power imbalances favoring state and business interests over practices.

Educational and Commemorative Institutions

Volcano Museum and Exhibits

The , located at Jl. Kaliurang Km. 22 in , Hargobinangun, Pakem, , Daerah Istimewa , , serves as a primary educational institution dedicated to the study and public understanding of Mount Merapi's volcanic history and hazards. Established following the destructive eruption, which caused over 350 fatalities and widespread damage, the museum aims to commemorate the event while promoting scientific awareness of volcanic risks among local communities and visitors. Housed in a modern angular building approximately 5 kilometers from Kaliurang village, it operates under the 's cultural department and features exhibits emphasizing empirical geological data and eruption monitoring. Exhibits focus on Mount Merapi's eruptive chronology, including a detailed scale model illustrating major events from the onward, such as the 1930 and eruptions, and their morphological impacts on the volcano's cone. Interactive displays cover volcanic , lava flow dynamics, and ash dispersal patterns, drawing from seismographic and satellite data to demonstrate causal mechanisms of eruptions. Comparative sections highlight other active volcanoes like Mount Sinabung and international examples, underscoring Merapi's status as one of the world's most frequently erupting stratovolcanoes, with over 100 documented events since 1548. The second floor hosts multimedia presentations, including the documentary Mahaguru Merapi, which analyzes the eruption's socioeconomic effects based on eyewitness accounts and geophysical records, alongside films depicting historical visits by national figures. Artifact collections preserve items damaged in recent eruptions (e.g., , 2018, 2021), such as vehicles and household goods, to illustrate velocities exceeding 100 km/h and deposition thicknesses up to several meters. These elements prioritize mitigation education, with guided tours explaining early warning systems reliant on seismic, , and gas emission sensors deployed by Indonesia's Center for Volcanology and Geological Mitigation. Admission costs Rp 5,000 for nationals and Rp 10,000 for foreigners, with operating hours from 08:00 to 15:30 Tuesday through Sunday (closing at 14:30 on Fridays and fully closed Mondays), facilitating accessibility for school groups and researchers. The museum's design integrates site-specific data to foster resilience, though some critiques note limited updates on post-2021 activity despite ongoing monitoring.

References

  1. [1]
    Merapi Volcano, Java, Indonesia | John Seach
    Merapi Volcano | John Seach. john. Central Java, Indonesia. 7.54 S, 110.44 E summit elevation 2911 m. Stratovolcano. Note: a volcano with a similar name ...
  2. [2]
    Merapi - Global Volcanism Program
    The current eruption period began in late December 2020 and has more recently consisted of ash plumes, intermittent incandescent avalanches of material, and ...
  3. [3]
    Merapi | Volcano World | Oregon State University
    Merapi has had 68 historic eruption since 1548. The current eruption began in 1987. Because of Merapi's violent past and its close proximity to Yogyakarta it ...
  4. [4]
    Merapi Volcano (Central Java, Indonesia) Information
    Merapi, a steep stratovolcano north of Central Java's capital Yogyakarta, is Indonesia's most active volcano. It erupts on average every 5-10 years.
  5. [5]
    Seismic imaging and petrology explain highly explosive eruptions of ...
    Sep 12, 2018 · Merapi experiences Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) 1–2 eruptions roughly once every 6 years, a VEI 3 eruption once every few decades, and a ...Missing: facts elevation
  6. [6]
    Volcano Watch — Indonesia pays heavy price for proximity to plate ...
    Merapi has frequent eruptions that can last for several years. These are characterized both by lava domes—mounds of viscous lava that pile up over the vent in ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  7. [7]
    Merapi - Volcano Disaster Assistance Program
    Over the following 10 days, VDAP and its Indonesian partners used satellite radar data to track the rapid extrusion of lava at the summit, and forecast the ...
  8. [8]
    Mount Merapi, Selo, Boyolali Regency, Central Java, Indonesia
    The latitude of Mount Merapi, Selo, Boyolali Regency, Central Java, Indonesia is -7.540718, and the longitude is 110.445724. Mount Merapi, Selo, Boyolali ...
  9. [9]
    Merapi Volcano, Indonesia - Mindat
    Aug 3, 2025 · Merapi is an active stratovolcano at 2,910 meters, part of the Ijen complex, located in Central Java and Yogyakarta, with a tropical rainforest ...
  10. [10]
    FAQ: A Look Inside Mount Merapi | Live Science
    Nov 8, 2010 · Tectonically, Merapi is situated at the subduction zone where the Indo-Australian Plate is sliding beneath the Eurasian Plate.
  11. [11]
    Mount Merapi - Vulkane Net
    Mount Merapi is a high-risk subduction zone volcano in Central Java, known for pyroclastic flows, and is a stratovolcano with a height of 2911m.
  12. [12]
    Mt. Merapi, Indonesia. Located in Central Java province and the ...
    The Merapi eruptions struck five Regencies around the mountain: Boyolali, Klaten, Magelang, and Muntilan located within Central Java Province and Sleman Regency ...
  13. [13]
    Merapi (Central Java, Indonesia): An outline of the structural and ...
    Merapi summit is located about 30 km north of Yogyakarta city (Fig. 1), which has more than one million inhabitants. Merapi is regarded as perhaps the most ...Missing: context | Show results with:context
  14. [14]
    The geological evolution of Merapi volcano, Central Java, Indonesia
    Aug 5, 2025 · Old Merapi started to grow at ~30 ka, building a stratovolcano of basaltic andesite lavas and intercalated pyroclastic rocks. This older Merapi ...
  15. [15]
    Morphological and structural changes at the Merapi lava dome ...
    Merapi is characterized by lava dome extrusions at its summit, which can collapse to produce major hazards or pyroclastic flows (Newhall et al., 2000). During ...
  16. [16]
    Merapi 2010 eruption—Chronology and extrusion rates monitored ...
    The summit's geometry and the terrain morphology formed by a major transversal ridge and a funneling deep canyon strongly focused PDC mass towards a major ...
  17. [17]
    Social vulnerability at a local level around the Merapi volcano
    It is very close to the city of Yogyakarta, and thousands of people live on the flanks of the volcano, with villages as high as 1700 m above sea level. Merapi ...Missing: settlements surrounding
  18. [18]
    Kaliurang: Sacred Slopes of Mount Merapi - Indonesia Travel
    Located on 400-900 meters above sea level, the village also houses popular tourist attractions such as Adat Pager Bumi, KubroSiswo, river trekking, jathilan and ...
  19. [19]
    How People Survive Life Near Indonesia's Most Active Volcano
    Feb 26, 2021 · The slopes of Merapi are densely populated with more than 50,000 people, and many Indonesians still migrate towards this red zone because of ...Missing: population | Show results with:population<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Disaster preparedness behaviour of tourist village managers in ...
    Currently, around the Mount Merapi area in Sleman Regency Yogyakarta, there are 32 tourist villages in different stages of development. The development of the ...Missing: surrounding | Show results with:surrounding
  21. [21]
    Hazards of Merapi, Java, Indonesia - Volcano World
    Yogyakarta city, with a population of 3 million, is 15 miles (25 km) south of Merapi. About 70,000 people live in the immediate vicinity of the volcano.
  22. [22]
    Mount Merapi, Indonesia - NASA Earth Observatory
    May 3, 2006 · The slopes of the volcano are densely populated, with four districts clustered on its flanks. As many as 80,000 people may be displaced if ...
  23. [23]
    Mt. MERAPI - Population Breakdown by Village within 20 Km From ...
    Nov 8, 2010 · Mt. MERAPI - Population Breakdown by Village within 20 Km From the Crater - 08 November 2010. Format: Map; Source. OCHA.
  24. [24]
    Indonesia: the reality of life next to active volcanos - Geographical
    Jul 25, 2022 · In Indonesia, more than five million people live close to active volcanos. Photographer Putu Sayoga set out to document the lives of those who live so near to ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Updating Risk Level on Housing Resettlements of Mount Merapi ...
    Dec 31, 2024 · KRB Merapi divides three level zones, from higher to lower threats, namely KRB III, II, I, and an unsafe area inside a radius 10 km from the ...
  26. [26]
    Toward a revised hazard assessment at Merapi volcano, Central Java
    The current hazard-zone map of Merapi (Pardyanto et al., 1978) portrays three areas, termed 'forbidden zone', 'first danger zone' and 'second danger zone ...Missing: settlements | Show results with:settlements
  27. [27]
    Thousands saved by accurate eruption forecasts of Mount Merapi ...
    The difference between a small-to-moderate and a large eruption can mean the difference between life and death for tens of thousands of people living on the ...Missing: population | Show results with:population
  28. [28]
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    The Geological Evolution of Merapi Volcano, Central Java, Indonesia
    Old Merapi started to grow at ~30 ka, building a stratovolcano of basaltic andesite lavas and intercalated pyroclastic rocks. This older Merapi edifice was ...
  31. [31]
    Temporal variations in magma composition at Merapi Volcano ...
    Magmas of intermediate composition erupted during these stages provide evidence for periodic withdrawal of magma from a steadily fractionating magma chamber.<|control11|><|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Structure of magma reservoirs beneath Merapi and surrounding ...
    Oct 4, 2016 · The deeper anomaly at depths of ∼4–8 km may represent a magma reservoir with partially molten rock that feeds several volcanoes in Central Java.
  33. [33]
    Magmatic differentiation processes at Merapi Volcano: inclusion ...
    ▻ Crustal and magmatic inclusions constrain sub-volcanic processes at Merapi. ▻ Oxygen isotopes support contamination of magma by limestone and calc-silicates.
  34. [34]
    Detailed seismic imaging of Merapi volcano, Indonesia, from local ...
    Jun 15, 2019 · Merapi, located in the central part of Java in the eastern Sunda arc of Indonesia, can be traced back to the subduction of the Indo-Australian ...
  35. [35]
    Volcanic activity influenced by tectonic earthquakes: Static and ...
    Mar 7, 2007 · Mt. Merapi is one of the most dangerous volcanoes in Indonesia, located within the tectonically active region of south-central Java.<|control11|><|separator|>
  36. [36]
    The geodynamic setting and geological context of Merapi volcano in ...
    Merapi is a stratovolcano on the active volcanic front of Java, part of the Sunda-Banda subduction, with frequent eruptions and a NW-SE trend.Missing: stratigraphic | Show results with:stratigraphic
  37. [37]
    Gunung Merapi
    Gunung Merapi = Firey Mountain. From the Old Javanese apuy or api or apwi (“fire”) with the prefix mer- meaning “possessing the quality expressed in the base ...
  38. [38]
    MERAPI VOLCANO - Facts and Details
    ... language and means "the one making fire". It is a popular name for volcanoes: another volcano with the same name Merapi is in the Ijen Massif in East Java ...Missing: etymology linguistic roots
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Geological History, Chronology and Magmatic Evolution of Merapi
    This chapter provides a synthesis of the geological history, chronology and magmatic evolution of Merapi. Stratigraphic field and.
  40. [40]
    10000 Years of explosive eruptions of Merapi Volcano, Central Java
    Old Merapi grew by lava extrusion and explosive eruptions from at least 8600 B.C. until ∼100 A.D., when it collapsed in a debris avalanche. Eruptions of New ...Missing: prehistoric | Show results with:prehistoric
  41. [41]
    Historical eruptions of Merapi Volcano, Central Java, Indonesia ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · The Volcanic Explosivity Index (VEI) 4 eruption occurred in 1872 with a recorded death toll of 200 and in 2010 recorded 367 fatalities. (Voight ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  42. [42]
    10000 Years of explosive eruptions of Merapi Volcano, Central Java
    Stratigraphy and radiocarbon dating of pyroclastic deposits at Merapi Volcano, Central Java, reveals ~10,000 years of explosive eruptions.Missing: chronology | Show results with:chronology
  43. [43]
    Historical eruptions of Merapi Volcano, Central Java, Indonesia ...
    During the twentieth century, activity has comprised mainly the effusive growth of viscous lava domes and lava tongues, with occasional gravitational collapses ...Missing: 20th | Show results with:20th
  44. [44]
    Volcano Watch — Mount Merapi has lessons for Kīlauea - USGS
    Nov 25, 1994 · Mount Merapi, a 2,911-meter-tall volcano on the island of Java in Indonesia, erupted on November 22 at about 10:15 a.m. local time.Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  45. [45]
    Report on Merapi (Indonesia) — May 2006
    On 7 May, 26 incandescent avalanches that extended ~ 100 m were seen during the morning. On 6 and 7 May, the lava dome continued to grow and seismicity was ...Missing: impacts | Show results with:impacts
  46. [46]
    Report on Merapi (Indonesia) — 17 May-23 May 2006
    May 17, 2006 · According to news reports, an eruption producing a cloud of hot gas and ash was witnessed on 17 May. Witnesses said the size of the plume ...
  47. [47]
    Report on Merapi (Indonesia) — 31 May-6 June 2006
    May 31, 2006 · The Alert Level at Merapi remained at 4, the highest level, during 31 May to 6 June. Sulfur-dioxide plumes were observed daily during this period.Missing: VEI timeline
  48. [48]
    Image GVP-11969 - Global Volcanism Program
    A pyroclastic flow travels down the SE flank of Merapi on 7 June 2006. Renewed lava dome growth had begun at Merapi in April 2006. Ashfall was reported 5 km ...
  49. [49]
    Overview of the 2006 eruption of Mt. Merapi - ScienceDirect.com
    Merapi in Central-Java Indonesia erupted about every 2–5 years. Most of the eruptions were low in explosivity, with VEI-3 or less. Eruptions usually involve the ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  50. [50]
    Report on Merapi (Indonesia) — 2 August-8 August 2006
    Aug 2, 2006 · Based on pilot reports, the Darwin VAAC reported that eruption plumes from Merapi on 2 and 3 August reached altitudes of ~6.1 km (~20,000 ft) ...
  51. [51]
    The 2006 pyroclastic deposits of Merapi Volcano, Java, Indonesia
    ... fatalities were reported, although lahars reached densely populated areas. To summarize, this study provides an update of lahar risk issues at Merapi, with ...Missing: casualties | Show results with:casualties
  52. [52]
    The 26 May 2006 magnitude 6.4 Yogyakarta earthquake south of Mt ...
    May 15, 2008 · Although the magnitude reached only Mw = 6.4, it left more than 6,000 fatalities and up to 1,000,000 homeless. The main disaster area was south ...Missing: casualties impacts
  53. [53]
    The 2010 eruption of Mount Merapi - Internet Geography
    The danger area was extended to 20km from the mountain and 278,000 people living in the area had to flee their homes. Evacuation centres were overcrowded ...Missing: flanks | Show results with:flanks
  54. [54]
    AHA Centre Flash Update #2: Merapi Volcano Phreatic Eruption ...
    May 12, 2018 · Mount Merapi phreatic eruption occurred on May 11, 2018 at 7:40 pm with 5 minutes of seismic duration. · Satellite observations revealed that the ...
  55. [55]
    Report on Merapi (Indonesia) — July 2018
    Merapi, one of Indonesia's most active volcanoes, lies in one of the world's most densely populated areas and dominates the landscape immediately north of the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  56. [56]
    Merapi phreatic eruptions continue on Wednesday - The Jakarta Post
    May 23, 2018 · At 3:31 a.m. on Wednesday, a phreatic eruption occurred lasting four minutes, spewing 2,000-meters of volcanic ash into the sky. The eruption ...<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Disaster Information Management on the Phreatic Eruption of Mount ...
    May 21, 2018 · As the most active volcano in Indonesia, Mount Merapi has erupted 27 times since 1990s with more than 1500 dead casualties (Sulistiyorini, 2001).Missing: facts elevation
  58. [58]
    Mount Merapi | Active, Eruptions, Pyroclastic, & Map | Britannica
    Mount Merapi, volcanic mountain peak located near the center of the island of Java, Indonesia. The volcano is about 20 miles (32 km) north of Yogyakarta.
  59. [59]
    Simulation of block‐and‐ash flows and ash‐cloud surges of the ...
    May 12, 2017 · ... reach a velocity of 50 m/s. ... Voight, B., and M. J. Davis (2000), Emplacement temperatures of the November 22, 1994 nuée ardente deposits, ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Pyroclastic Flows and Surges
    Pyroclastic flows are hot mixtures of ash, pumice, and gases, traveling at 20-70 mph. Flows are dense and follow paths, while surges are less dense and move ...
  61. [61]
    The Hazards of Pyroclastic Flows - National Geographic Education
    Apr 30, 2024 · Reaching speeds greater than 100 kilometers (60 miles) per hour and temperatures between 200° and 700° Celsius (392°and 1292° Fahrenheit) ...
  62. [62]
    Emplacement temperatures of the November 22, 1994 nuee ardente ...
    Nov 22, 1994 · The experimental evidence suggests that deposits in the Turgo area briefly achieved a maximum temperature near 300°C, whereas those near ...Missing: velocity | Show results with:velocity
  63. [63]
    Report on Merapi (Indonesia) — May 2011
    The eruption and secondary events affected areas in all directions around the volcano; pyroclastic flows reached 4 km to the N, 11.5 km to the W, 7 km to the E, ...
  64. [64]
    [PDF] Insights from the 2010 mount Merapi eruption in Indonesia - Hal Inrae
    Jun 6, 2020 · Merapi in Indonesia which lasted from late October until early December 2010 generated many casualties and a large amount of losses.Missing: timeline details
  65. [65]
    Lahars at Merapi volcano, Central Java: an overview - ScienceDirect
    At least 23 of the 61 reported eruptions since the mid-1500s have produced source deposits for lahars. The combined lahar deposits cover about 286 km2 on the ...Missing: credible | Show results with:credible
  66. [66]
    Lahar-related disasters at Merapi volcano. At least 35 lahar events...
    At least 35 lahar events caused damage on the slopes of Merapi since the early 1900's. 76 people died and thousand of houses were destroyed, as well as tens of ...Missing: numbers | Show results with:numbers
  67. [67]
    (PDF) Impacts of the 2006 eruption of Merapi volcano, Indonesia, on ...
    Dormant and understudied ice-covered stratovolcanoes present one of the greatest threats to the global economy due to their extensive impact when they erupt.
  68. [68]
    Rain-triggered lahars following the 2010 eruption of Merapi volcano ...
    This study provides an update of lahar risk issues at Merapi, with emphasis on the distal slope of the volcano where lahars had not occurred for 40 years.
  69. [69]
    Mount Merapi Mudflows Chase Indonesian Villagers Away
    Dec 3, 2010 · Lahar is an Indonesian word for a rapidly flowing mixture of rock debris and water that originates on the slopes of a volcano. Lahars are also ...Missing: credible | Show results with:credible
  70. [70]
    Health Impact Assessment of Volcanic Ash Inhalation
    Jul 3, 2020 · The respiratory health hazard of tephra from the 2010 centennial eruption of Merapi with implications for occupational mining of deposits.
  71. [71]
    [PDF] The 2010 explosive eruption of Java's Merapi volcano – a '100
    Merapi volcano (Indonesia) is one of the most active and hazardous volcanoes in the world. It is known for frequent small to moderate eruptions, ...<|separator|>
  72. [72]
    Probabilistic and Statistical Analysis of Historical Activity of Merapi ...
    By this construction, the formation of the Old Merapi was ~30 ka with formation of large central volcano by emplacement of lava flows and collapses and the ...Missing: stages | Show results with:stages
  73. [73]
    Velocity variations associated with the large 2010 eruption of Merapi ...
    Merapi is one of the most active and dangerous volcanoes of Java Island. Common eruptions have typical recurrence of 4–6 yr and are characterized by effusive ...4 Results · 5 Interpretation And... · Stage 6: Eruption Onset...
  74. [74]
    Probabilistic Hazard From Pyroclastic Density Currents in the ...
    Apr 6, 2018 · Here we compute a novel multivolcano Probabilistic Volcanic Hazard Assessment of PDCs, in the next 50 years, by combining the probability of PDC invasion from ...<|separator|>
  75. [75]
    [PDF] Predicting the probability of Mount Merapi eruption using Bayesian ...
    The probability of Merapi unrest is 0.822, with a 0.549 chance of a VEI 2 eruption. Bayesian Event Tree (BET) is used to predict this.
  76. [76]
    (PDF) Predicting the probability of Mount Merapi eruption using ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · This paper focus on how to predict the probability of Merapi unrest based on volcano-logical information by using Bayesian Event Tree. Bayesian ...
  77. [77]
    Probabilistic analysis to correlate seismic data with lava extrusion ...
    Here we explore how to correlate a given eruption phase with changes in the monitoring data using statistical analysis and conditional probabilities.
  78. [78]
    Probabilistic and statistical analysis of historical activity of Merapi ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · Merapi volcano produces hazardous eruptions on average every 5-10 years and is feared for its deadly pyroclastic flow avalanches of rocks and ...
  79. [79]
  80. [80]
    The Merapi Volcano Monitoring System | Request PDF
    Merapi volcano has the most advanced and comprehensive monitoring system in Indonesia. Monitoring at the volcano started in 1920, when the Dutch East Indies ...
  81. [81]
    [PDF] The Depth of Pressure Source and Magma Supply Volume for ...
    There are eight GPS stations installed around merapi volcano. During the eruption in October 2010, GPS data have shown lengthening of the baselines between ...
  82. [82]
    Merapi Volcano Monitoring
    The classification of Merapi seismic events has been improved since the 1984 eruption. Merapi seismic signals are distinguished into six (6) types: VA event. It ...
  83. [83]
    Monitoring of Merapi volcano, Indonesia based on Sentinel-1 data
    We here describe the effort in progress to integrate in near real time the information derived from Sentinel-1 satellites into the monitoring devices at BBPTKG ...
  84. [84]
    Revolutionizing Volcano Monitoring in Indonesia - USGS.gov
    The alert level was raised to four. Flows of hot rocks, ash, and volcanic gasses moved toward communities as the largest eruption of Mount Merapi in over a ...Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Classification of Types A and B Volcanic Earthquakes using Neural ...
    Monitoring of the seismicity of Mount Merapi is carried out by BPPTKG through seismic data obtained in the field [4]. Figure 1. Monitoring the seismicity of ...
  86. [86]
    Earthquake Location Determination Using Data from DOMERAPI ...
    DOMERAPI earthquake monitoring network consists of 46 broad-band seismometers installed around the Merapi volcano. Earthquake hypocenter determination is a very ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] Instrumentation Recommendations for Volcano Monitoring at US ...
    Tracking long-term seismicity rates and energy release through such techniques as real-time seismic-amplitude measurement (RSAM; Endo and Murray,. 1991) at ...
  88. [88]
    The seismicity at Mount Merapi is reaching new peak values.
    Sep 5, 2023 · The seismic activity at Mount Merapi in Indonesia has reached new peak levels. On September 2nd, there were 407 hybrid earthquakes recorded, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  89. [89]
    Low-cost GPS-based volcano deformation monitoring at Mt ...
    The global positioning system (GPS) can be utilised to detect ground deformations of the surface of a volcano. Ground deformation monitoring is considered ...
  90. [90]
    [PDF] Monitoring of Merapi Volcano Deformation Using Interferometry ...
    In this study monitoring by analyzing the Digital Elevation Model. (DEM) and displacement map from result processing using InSAR technique. The accuracy of DEM ...Missing: tracking | Show results with:tracking
  91. [91]
    Synthesis of global satellite observations of magmatic and volcanic ...
    Feb 6, 2018 · PSInSAR as a new tool to monitor pre-eruptive volcano ground deformation: Validation using GPS measurements on Piton de la Fournaise.
  92. [92]
    Indonesia's Mt. Merapi shows rising activity, BNPB issues warning
    Sep 27, 2025 · Increased seismic activity has been detected at Mount Merapi, which remains at Level III (Alert), according to Indonesia's National Disaster ...Missing: stations tiltmeters
  93. [93]
    detecting early warning of mount Merapi eruptions - PMC
    In this paper, an online early warning system is constructed based on the changepoints detection on earthquake magnitude time series.
  94. [94]
    Seismic energy data analysis of Merapi volcano to test the eruption ...
    One of methods that can be used to predict the time of eruption is Materials Failure Forecast Method (FFM). Materials Failure Forecast Method (FFM) is a ...
  95. [95]
    Performance of the 'material Failure Forecast Method' in real-time ...
    Most attempts of deterministic eruption forecasting are based on the material Failure Forecast Method (FFM). This method assumes that a precursory ...
  96. [96]
    MAGMA Indonesia - Kementerian ESDM
    No information is available for this page. · Learn why
  97. [97]
    Lessons learned from the 2010 evacuations at Merapi volcano
    Aug 7, 2025 · During the 2010 Merapi eruption, 400,000 internally displaced individuals were evacuated to refugee camps [2] . Settlements located in Disaster ...
  98. [98]
    Lessons learned from the 2010 evacuations at Merapi volcano
    The 2010 Merapi evacuation led to displacement of almost 400,000 people living within 20 km from the summit for one and a half months. This evacuation was much ...
  99. [99]
    Implication of Mutual Assistance Evacuation Model to Reduce the ...
    Mount Merapi Evacuation. Several lessons were learned during the 2010 Merapi eruption that could be used in future Merapi mass evacuations. The evacuation ...<|separator|>
  100. [100]
    Indonesia, Volcanic Eruption Mount Merapi in Yogyakarta and ...
    Mar 9, 2022 · Merapi has been on ALERT Level III since 05 November 2020 ... - Residents in the danger zone evacuate independently to the Rante Village hall. - ...
  101. [101]
    [PDF] The case of the Mt. Merapi eruption emergency response
    Dec 29, 2022 · volcano alert level status as issued by the BPPTKG. The alert level for Mount Merapi consists of 4 levels, namely: Level I. (Normal), Level ...
  102. [102]
    Reducing risk from lahar hazards: concepts, case studies, and roles ...
    Nov 6, 2014 · Check dams to control lahar discharge and erosion. Some structures are built to slow down or weaken lahars as they flow down a channel. Check ...
  103. [103]
    The occurrence and mitigation of volcanic hazards in Indonesia as ...
    The Volcanic Debris Control Projects involve the construction of large numbers of engineering works such as check dams, sabo works, levees, dykes and lahar ...Missing: barriers | Show results with:barriers
  104. [104]
    Sediment Disaster and Resource Management in the Mount Merapi ...
    After the large eruption in 1969, sediment control facilities were constructed to prevent sediment flooding and sediment problems such as blockage of irrigation ...
  105. [105]
    Evaluation of infrastructures and riparian area toward the potency of ...
    From the field survey result, it shows that there are 35 buildings/infrastructures in Putih River, consisting of 2 dams, 11 bridges, 1 ground sill, 20 sabo dams ...
  106. [106]
    Ex-Post Project Evaluation 2016 Package IV-3 (Indonesia)
    <Disaster Countermeasures for Mt. Merapi Eruption>) in which three units of sabo dams each were installed at the Gendol and Opak rivers by urgent works ...
  107. [107]
    Post-eruptive lahars at Kali Putih following the 2010 ... - Academia.edu
    The 2010 Merapi eruption triggered over 250 lahars, with 62 affecting the Kali Putih watershed. Lahars caused extensive damage to 307 homes, 19 sabo dams, and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  108. [108]
    (PDF) Sabo Dam Infrastructure System Performance Index Model in ...
    Mar 30, 2021 · Sabo Dam Infrastructure System Performance Index Model in Mount Merapi ... The Sabo Dam is only effective as contaminants filter from ...
  109. [109]
    Simulation of debris flows in the watershed of the Putih River ...
    This simulation aims to determine the effectiveness of the sabo dams in reducing the impact of debris flows. The data used are rainfall data, DEM and sediment ...
  110. [110]
    [PDF] Mitigation of h'azards from future lahars from Mount Merapi in the ...
    Procedures for reducing hazards from future lahars and debris flows in the Krasak River channel near Yogyakarta, Central Java, Indonesia, include (1).Missing: check dams
  111. [111]
    [PDF] Damages and Problems to Land Use Plans Caused by the Merapi ...
    2. A buffer zone area, especially for 5-7 (km) from the Merapi crater area, is prohibited for settlement area, however, it still allows for limited activities, ...Missing: sterile restrictions
  112. [112]
    Updating Risk Level on Housing Resettlements of Mount Merapi ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · ... Mount Merapi Using a Visual Chart. Examination. ICONARP ... eruptions. KRB I, or low-hazard zone, is sideways along the. main ...
  113. [113]
    Reducing the volcano risk in Indonesia - PreventionWeb
    May 1, 2014 · More than one million people live within a 10km radius of the summit, putting them at constant risk. Hundreds of lives have been lost due to its ...Missing: permanent zone
  114. [114]
    Local Resistance to National Park Development on Mount Merapi
    Despite the implementation of a zoning system that permits the villagers regulated access to some parts of the park, local residents have continued to protest, ...Missing: sterile restrictions
  115. [115]
    Cost-benefit analysis for evacuation decision-support: challenges ...
    Aug 18, 2023 · This approach compares the cost of evacuating versus the expected loss from not evacuating, expressed as a 'break-even' probability of fatality.
  116. [116]
    [PDF] Lessons learnt from community preparedness for Mount Merapi and ...
    Recommendations include more intensive cooperation, educational initiatives, and strategic relocation from high-risk zones to effectively protect vulnerable ...
  117. [117]
    Suitability analysis of the distribution final evacuation sites for Mount ...
    The objectives of this research are 1) GIS-based disaster vulnerability class modeling in Mount Merapi area. 2) Analyzing the distribution of FES (Final ...Missing: exclusion restrictions
  118. [118]
    Case Study of the 1994 and 2006 Eruptions of the Merapi Volcano ...
    Aug 5, 2025 · Although the eruption killed 350 people and injured 277, and led to the evacuation of a further 410,388 [41] , no deaths in Pentingsari were ...
  119. [119]
    Merapi eruptions cost Indonesia Rp 7.1t - ReliefWeb
    Jan 24, 2011 · Indonesia suffered Rp 7.1 trillion (approximately US$781 million) in financial losses caused by the Mount Merapi eruptions last year affecting Central Java and ...Missing: benefit analysis
  120. [120]
    Probabilistic volcanic impact assessment and cost-benefit analysis ...
    This paper provides a framework using geospatial data, probabilistic modelling and cost-benefit analysis to produce a geospatial evacuation decision support ...
  121. [121]
    Update 04
    Merapi, is one of 65 Indonesian volcanoes listed as dangerous. Its last major eruption was in 1976, when it killed 28 people and rendered 1,176 people homeless.Missing: historical | Show results with:historical
  122. [122]
    Resettlement Following the 2010 Merapi Volcano Eruption
    Jul 14, 2016 · The 2010 Merapi eruption resulted in almost 400,000 internally displaced persons and around 2,200 families lost their houses.Missing: deaths | Show results with:deaths
  123. [123]
    Evidence from the Mt. Merapi volcano eruption on Java Island ...
    We found that the volcanic eruption reduced the likelihood of children being enrolled in school, and the negative impact worsened over time.Missing: prehistoric | Show results with:prehistoric
  124. [124]
    Mount Merapi Eruption 2021: Indonesia's Most Active Volcano Erupts
    Jan 27, 2021 · No residents were evacuated as of 5:30 a.m. EST, but Indonesian authorities are closely monitoring the volcano's activity. People were told to ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  125. [125]
    Migration and Mental Health in the Aftermath of Disaster
    The Merapi eruptions struck five Regencies around the mountain: Boyolali, Klaten, Magelang, and Muntilan located within Central Java Province and Sleman Regency ...
  126. [126]
    Land Management for Agriculture After The 2010 Merapi Eruption
    Aug 8, 2025 · The month-long eruptions killed more than 200 people, displaced over 100,000 residents, killed over 1,000 livestock and destroyed over 1,000 ...
  127. [127]
    FAO gives cows, goats to Merapi farmers - Indonesia - ReliefWeb
    May 1, 2013 · Purnomo said that the eruption killed 2,233 dairy cows, 235 beef cattle and tens of thousands of chickens and quails and destroyed livestock ...Missing: economic | Show results with:economic
  128. [128]
    Mount Merapi Eruption 2010: Case Study, Causes & Facts - Vaia
    Jan 17, 2022 · There was significant damage to rice, fruits, and vegetables, and as a result, the economic loss from agriculture was estimated at £13 million.<|separator|>
  129. [129]
    Mt Merapi eruptions damage farmland - ABC News
    Nov 19, 2010 · The month-long eruptions have killed 273 people and caused over $100 million in damage to agriculture. Some farmers have lost everything.
  130. [130]
    The Impact of Merapi Mountain Eruption on the Community Economy
    The Mount Merapi eruption caused a 32,941 ton decline in rice production in 2011. · Agricultural productivity increased significantly in 2012, with Klaten ...
  131. [131]
    [PDF] AGRIVITA - CABI Digital Library
    A significant change was also found on the soil surface as the precipitated volcanic ash made the soil surface denser and formed puddles when penetrated by ...
  132. [132]
    Sustainability of Post-Eruption Socio Economic Recovery for the ...
    Merapi eruption occurred in 2010 resulted in damage to a variety of community-owned assets on the Mount Merapi slope. Paralysis of profitable activity, ...
  133. [133]
  134. [134]
    [PDF] A case study of agroforestry practices and challenges in Mt. Merapi ...
    Mt. Merapi eruptions affect people socio-economically. (Maharani et al. 2016). As such, utilizing local potency for economic relief of Mt. Merapi risk and ...
  135. [135]
    How volcanoes shape daily life in rural Indonesia - Adventure.com
    Oct 16, 2023 · Many live near volcanoes due to fertile soil, spiritual connection, and some believe volcanoes give them everything, despite the risk.
  136. [136]
    [PDF] Exploring Agricultural Resilience in Volcano-Prone Regions
    Jun 22, 2023 · As a result, the economic activities of farmers in the Mount Merapi area are closely tied to their livelihoods, making the economic activities.<|separator|>
  137. [137]
    Indonesian volcano survivors relocated, better prepared - Indonesia
    Mar 8, 2013 · Two thousand five hundred families have moved to government-built houses in relocation sites and the authorities want to relocate another 668 families.
  138. [138]
    [PDF] Mount Merapi Recovery Program in Indonesia - Final Report as at ...
    Jul 14, 2011 · This objective aimed to support the volcanic eruption-affected families by providing them with economic asset development assistance to improve ...
  139. [139]
    IOM Supports Government Response to Merapi Eruption
    IOM is providing transport for the government, international and local NGOs to distribute non-food relief items for some 290,000<|separator|>
  140. [140]
    First Step Towards Post Merapi Reconstruction - World Bank
    Dec 29, 2010 · Yogyakarta reconstruction experiences post 2006 earthquake will become the main asset in rebuilding the areas affected by the Merapi disaster.
  141. [141]
    Indonesia: recovery lessons after volcanic eruptions - PreventionWeb
    May 25, 2022 · This research considered if, and how, impacted communities have managed to build back better from the 2010 Merapi eruption, with implications ...
  142. [142]
    (PDF) Community Resilience: Learning from Mt Merapi Eruption 2010
    Aug 8, 2025 · Based on research findings, the community have 13 of the 16 indicators of resilience. As the result, community from Kaliadem, Jambu and Petung ...
  143. [143]
    (PDF) Developing Farmers' Community Resilience in the Volcanic ...
    Jun 30, 2024 · Despite the inherent risks, many farmers continue to cultivate the region's land. This study examines the resilience of farmers in the Mount ...
  144. [144]
    “Moving or not?”: Factors affecting community responses to ...
    This article attempts to explain why the Pelemsari community differed from neighboring communities by abandoning its previous resistance to relocation.
  145. [145]
    The Resilient Community: Strengthening People-Centered Disaster ...
    However, since the perceived risk of the Merapi community is said to be influenced by the three factors of risk knowledge and information, socio-economic, and ...
  146. [146]
    [PDF] strengthening community resilience at balerante village, klaten ...
    DRR strategies at Balerante can be improved through capacity building in each resilience objects and coordination within parties, stakeholders, and community ...
  147. [147]
    Evaluating hazard, vulnerability, and capacity through local ...
    Sep 30, 2025 · Primary hazards include lava melt, pyroclastic flows and toxic gases that appear immediately during an eruption (Farquharson & Amelung 2022).
  148. [148]
    Indonesia volcano eruption death toll hits 25 - BBC News
    Oct 27, 2010 · In 1930 another powerful eruption wiped out 13 villages, killing more than 1,000 people.Missing: details | Show results with:details
  149. [149]
    Livestock Evacuation Saves Humans from the Impacts of Volcanic ...
    Apr 26, 2022 · BNPB recorded that there were 2800 cattle deaths during the 2010 eruption of Mount Merapi, with 332 human fatalities. Around 12.4% of the total ...
  150. [150]
    Spiritual guardian of Indonesian volcano dies - BBC News
    Oct 27, 2010 · The BBC's Olivia Lang reports on Mbah Maridjan, the spiritual guardian of Indonesia's Mount Merapi volcano, who died trying to tame nature's ...
  151. [151]
    Merapi volcano's 'spirit keeper' walks line between tradition and ...
    Nov 15, 2012 · Many villagers still wonder if Maridjan's death was a result of his refusal to evacuate during another volcanic scare in 2006, despite warnings ...Missing: controversy | Show results with:controversy
  152. [152]
    Indonesia Fuses Myth and Science for Volcano Disaster Management
    Jan 5, 2018 · Still, when it erupted in 2010, 353 people died in the disaster, even though 350,000 people were evacuated. Since that tragedy, Yogyakarta has ...Missing: failures | Show results with:failures
  153. [153]
    Cultural factors in livestock emergency management | AJEM Research
    Jul 3, 2021 · Most commonly mentioned evacuation reluctance reasons in media articles were animals and religious beliefs. Analysis showed that livestock ...
  154. [154]
    Short- and long-term evacuation of people and livestock during a ...
    Jan 25, 2012 · Some evacuated livestock died during or immediately following evacuation due to gastro-intestinal complications, usually starvation related.
  155. [155]
    A Lesson from the 2010 Eruption of Mount Merapi | Unisia
    Local governments were slow in responding and distributing information, with limited resources. However, NGOs/volunteers were crucial in emergency response.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
  156. [156]
    Collaborating network in managing post the Mount Merapi's ...
    This study examines the successfulness of the handling of disasters in Indonesia, with particular focus on eruptions of Mount Merapi. Disasters foster a close ...Missing: controversies crisis
  157. [157]
    The Legend of Merapi Mountain
    Empu Rama and Empu Pamadi were the chosen ones. They mastered supernatural powers! >> [Read More]. Legenda Gunung Merapi | Edisi Indonesia · Indonesian ...
  158. [158]
    The Origin of Mount Merapi - Folklore for Kids
    Apr 17, 2021 · In ancient times, the Gods in heaven placed a mountain in the middle of Java Island. The mountain is named Jamurdipa.
  159. [159]
    The Legend of Mount Merapi | PDF - Scribd
    The Legend of Mount Merapi narrates the tale of two powerful smiths, Empu Rama and Empu Pamadi, who refuse to move a mountain as requested by the gods to ...
  160. [160]
    legend : Asal Mula Gunung Merapi - Steemit
    Empu Rama da Empu Pamadi was killed by the mountain. The fireplace where the two masters were then turned into a crater. Finally, the mountain is called Mount ...
  161. [161]
    Mount Merapi And Its Mythology - VOI
    Merapi is a mountain that is the center of Javanese mythology, along with the South Sea. The two of them then formed a cosmological unit.
  162. [162]
    [PDF] Ancient oral tradition describes volcano–earthquake interaction at ...
    Nov 15, 2016 · The Merapi–Kraton–South Sea oral tradition. Natural disasters such as violent volcanic eruptions often become the core of legends (e.g. Duffield.<|control11|><|separator|>
  163. [163]
    The myth surrounding Mt Merapi eruptions - ANTARA News
    Feb 15, 2011 · The believe in is in essence a myth about the volcano`s periodic eruptions some of which took place on October 26-November, 2010 with catastrophic consequences ...
  164. [164]
    Myths and Mysticism Surrounding Merapi: Central Java, Indonesia
    Dec 21, 2010 · Merapi at Kaliurang, Sleman regency. During the ritual, participants worship Mbah Petruk, a divine spirit believed to be a guardian of Merapi.
  165. [165]
    Queen of Earth, Giver of Fruits: from Middle-earth to Merapi
    Dec 31, 2023 · Nyi Gadung Melati, one of Merapi's supernatural guardians, has a striking similarity to Yavanna, to the point that I had to write a specific post for them.
  166. [166]
    [PDF] between the king and the scientist: mount merapi eruption, early ...
    Mbah Maridjan was assigned by the Sultan Hamengkubuwono IX to take the role as the guardian of Mt Merapi, a crucial symbolic post to watch over and restore the ...
  167. [167]
  168. [168]
    [PDF] Community Rituals in Facing Volcanic Eruption Threat in Java - Neliti
    Labuhan ceremony procession begins at 06.00 WIB Merapi Juru Kunci and abdi dalem walk together towards the one post led by the caretaker of Merapi, upon arri-.
  169. [169]
    Indonesians make offerings to keep volcano from erupting
    May 15, 2006 · Indonesian men carry a mound of rice formed into the shape of a volcano made as an offering to appease Indonesia's Mount Merapi volcano. Despite ...
  170. [170]
    Naked men try to calm a volcano's rumbling
    May 19, 2006 · A drama of modern science versus an ancient culture is playing out on the verdant slopes of one of the world's most active volcanoes.
  171. [171]
    How Indonesia's Labuhan Merapi Tradition Helps Preserve Forest ...
    Oct 14, 2025 · The Labuhan Merapi ritual plays a role in preserving the forest. This is evident through rules such as prohibiting tree felling and taking ...
  172. [172]
    This Volcano is a Spiritual Creature - Eastern Standard Times
    May 23, 2023 · Mbah Asih is the Spiritual Guardian of Mount Merapi. The role of the spiritual guardian is to carry forth the traditions of ancestors ...Missing: abdi dalem
  173. [173]
    Perception of volcanic eruption as agent of change on Merapi ...
    Villagers living on Merapi have developed a system of religious belief, and a system of agro-ecological practices, that 'domesticates' the volcanic hazard.
  174. [174]
    Science, Mysticism Meld in Predicting Mount Merapi's Deadly ... - PBS
    Dec 2, 2010 · It began on October 26, when Merapi blew its top, shooting lava, hot gas, boulders and ash down the mountainside at the speed of a jet airplane, ...Missing: prehistoric evidence
  175. [175]
    [PDF] self-surveillance on Merapi volcano, Central Java - Yale University
    Feb 13, 2010 · The disproportionate response of the Vulcanology Service reflects the earlier-discussed traditional beliefs that natural perturbations like.
  176. [176]
    [PDF] There She Blows: Public Perceptions of Mt. Merapi and Mt. Agung
    In contrast to shield volcanoes, like Kilauea in Hawaii, the lava of Merapi is high in viscosity and often leaves the mountain during violent explosions.
  177. [177]
    The practical application of social volcanology at Mt Merapi, Indonesia
    Aug 6, 2025 · A simple explanation would be that we have witnessed a large cultural shift provoked by a loss of faith in 'traditional religious beliefs' and ...Missing: tensions | Show results with:tensions
  178. [178]
    Gallery - Ditjen Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam dan Ekosistem - ksdae
    Kawasan tersebut ditetapkan sebagai kawasan Taman Nasional Gunung Merapi Sesuai SK Nomor : SK.3627/Menhut-VII/2014 tanggal 6 Mei 2014, dengan luas 6.607,52 ha.
  179. [179]
    (PDF) Assessing Indigenous Forest Management in Mount Merapi ...
    Oct 29, 2023 · Zoning Details of Mount Merapi National Park (Atmojo et al., 2018). Zone. Size (Ha). Areas. Services. Core ...<|separator|>
  180. [180]
    Taman Nasional Gunung Merapi (TNGM) - Geopark Jogja
    Kawasan TNGM berada pada ketinggian antara 600 - 2.968 m di atas permukaan laut dengan topografi wilayah lereng yang landai hingga berbukit dan bergunung-gunung ...
  181. [181]
    LICHEN SPECIES DIVERSITY AS BIOINDICATOR OF AIR QUALITY ...
    Aug 28, 2025 · As an area included in the core zone, Gunung Bibi Forest has a high biodiversity value which is typical of the Mount Merapi ecosystem(Wijayati & ...
  182. [182]
    The Effects of Anthropogenic Disturbances on the Spatiotemporal ...
    Oct 14, 2023 · The Gunung Merapi National Park (GMNP), a tropical mountain forest, is a habitat for species of mammals that are threatened by human ...
  183. [183]
    Response of terrestrial mammals to various types of disturbance in ...
    Biodiversitas 23: 1635-1647. Human disturbance in the form of sand mining and grass harvesting activities in the area of Mount Merapi is an important component ...
  184. [184]
    Direct economic benefits and human dependence toward Gunung ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · Biodiversitas 21: 982-993. Merapi (Java, Indonesia) is recognized as the most active volcano in Indonesia. This area has also gazetted as a ...
  185. [185]
    Volcanic Ash, Insecurity for the People but Securing Fertile Soil for ...
    Ashes ejected from the volcano can cause much nuisance to farmers, burying agricultural lands, and destroying crops. The ashes can also present harmful impacts ...
  186. [186]
    The effect of organic fertilizer and mount Merapi volcanic ash to land ...
    Oct 30, 2022 · The findings indicated that chicken manure increased plant height from 1 to 5 weeks after planting. The application of 30 tons/ha of chicken ...
  187. [187]
    Applying volcanic ash to croplands – The untapped natural solution
    Volcanic ashes do not need to be ground, can soak up significant amounts of carbon from the atmosphere, and build fertile soils that supply an abundance of ...
  188. [188]
    Analysis of Diversity Level and Vegetation Structural Composition ...
    This study found 45 plant species in Klangon and 34 plant species in Kali Kuning. The results show that the total level of diversity in Cangkringan Resort MMNP ...
  189. [189]
    Study Area Mount Merapi National Park - ResearchGate
    There were 33 understory species of 13 families observed in all locations. The highest number of understory species was observed in Kaligendol (20 species), ...
  190. [190]
    WILDLIFE XPDC 2025: The Hidden Treasures of Mount Merapi
    Jul 2, 2025 · Several bird species were observed, including the collared kingfisher (Todiramphus chloris), black-naped oriole (Oriolus chinensis), and common ...
  191. [191]
    Risk of biodiversity extinction in Gunung Merapi National Park ...
    The Mount Merapi (MM) has a unique landscape and becomes the habitat for mountainous species in the central Java, Indonesia.
  192. [192]
    Indonesia: A national park, its failure and impact on livelihoods
    Oct 12, 2005 · Mount Merapi forest ecosystem is located at 600 to 2968 meter above sea level, in Yogyakarta Province, Republic of Indonesia. With an area of ...Missing: date size
  193. [193]
    [PDF] CONFLICT MANAGEMENT OF UTILIZING FOREST RESOURCES ...
    • Conflicts between DIY and Central Java communities around Mount Merapi National Park, where the community has been passed down from generation to ...
  194. [194]
    A Transboundary Political Ecology of Volcanic Sand Mining
    Mount Merapi's mining operations incubate upstream environmental problems that flow downstream to penetrate the heart of urban settlements. Although hot and ...
  195. [195]
    Mount Merapi Museum (2025) - All You Need to Know ... - Tripadvisor
    Rating 3.9 (213) This museum is built to commemorate mount Merapi eruption in 2010. Mount Merapi is one of most active volcano in the world.Missing: exhibits | Show results with:exhibits
  196. [196]
    Merapi - the guide to dark travel destinations around the world
    The name simply translates from Javanese roughly as 'fire mountain' (an almost depressingly common unimaginative name for volcanoes; cf. e.g. Eldfell near ...
  197. [197]
    Merapi Volcano Museum, Sleman, Indonesia - Wanderlog
    It features exhibits dedicated to the Mt. Merapi volcano as well as other Indonesian and international volcanoes. Housed in a striking angular structure ...
  198. [198]
    MUSEUM GUNUNG MERAPI SALAH SATU DAYA TARIK WISATA ...
    Salah satu Daya Tarik Wisata tersebut adalah keberadaan Museum Gunung Merapi, yang pengelolaannya menjadi tugas pokok dan fungsi dari Dinas Kebudayaan Sleman, ...<|separator|>
  199. [199]
    Merapi Volcano Museum | Attractions - Lonely Planet
    Exhibits dedicated to Merapi include a scale model, which demonstrates eruptions from the 18th century until today and how they altered the mountain's shape.
  200. [200]
    Merapi Volcano Museum | Entrance Fee, Opening Hours & More
    It includes exhibits on volcanic activity, the geology of Mount Merapi, and the impact of eruptions on the surrounding area.
  201. [201]
    Merapi Volcano Museum in Banteng - Ask AI | mindtrip
    Inside, exhibits include a scale model of Mount Merapi that simulates eruptions, artifacts from past eruptions, and interactive displays on volcanic activity, ...<|separator|>
  202. [202]
    Climb Majestic Mt. Merapi Volcano at the Center of Java
    Scientists surmise that a violent eruption of Merapi in 1006 AD was the ruin of the empire. This massive eruption also buried the nearby Borobudur temple in ...
  203. [203]
    MUSEUM GUNUNG API MERAPI - Jam Buka dan Harga Tiket 2022
    Jun 19, 2022 · Harga tiket masuk Museum Gunungapi Merapi sangat terjangkau, yaitu Rp5.000 untuk wisatawan Nusantara dan Rp10.000 untuk wisatawan mancanegara.
  204. [204]
    Museum Gunungapi Merapi: Front Page
    Lokasi Museum Gunung Api Merapi di Jl. Kaliurang Km. 22, Banteng, Hargobinangun, Pakem, Sleman, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta 55582. MORE DETAILS. Jam Buka MGM.