Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Rocket launcher

A rocket launcher is a device, most often employed as a , that launches unguided, rocket-propelled projectiles containing warheads to engage targets such as armored vehicles, fortifications, personnel, or . These projectiles are powered by rocket engines that provide self-propulsion, distinguishing them from gun-launched munitions, and are typically fired from shoulder-held s, vehicle-mounted racks, or fixed platforms for anti-tank, anti-personnel, or area suppression roles. Rocket launchers vary in scale, from portable infantry weapons like the —a reusable, shoulder-fired tube effective up to 1,600 feet against stationary targets—to multiple-launch systems capable of delivering saturating barrages over broader areas. The origins of rocket launchers date to the 13th century, when forces deployed "arrows of flying fire"—early solid-propellant launched from tubes—during the 1232 Siege of to repel Mongol invaders, marking the first recorded military use of such weapons. By the , European innovators like in refined tube-launched for improved accuracy, laying groundwork for modern designs. Significant military advancements emerged in the 20th century, particularly during ; the U.S. M1 , developed in 1941 by Leslie Skinner at and first deployed by British forces in , was a portable shoulder-fired launcher using shaped-charge to penetrate armor. Concurrently, the Soviet BM-13 , pioneered in the late by engineers including Yu. A. Pobedonostsev and first used in ground combat on July 14, 1941, near , revolutionized area fire with its truck-mounted array of 16 electrically fired 132 mm , capable of a full salvo in 8-10 seconds and ranges up to 11 km. These WWII innovations influenced post-war designs, such as the introduced by the in 1961, which has seen over 9 million units produced globally and remains a staple in asymmetric conflicts due to its low cost, ease of use, and versatility against vehicles, bunkers, and low-flying . Today, rocket launchers encompass both unguided legacy systems and advanced guided variants integrated into precision strike capabilities, underscoring their enduring tactical importance in conventional and .

Overview

Definition and Principles

A rocket launcher is a or system designed to launch unguided rockets, which are self-propelled munitions that utilize to deliver payloads at short ranges with high velocity. These systems can be man-portable, vehicle-mounted, or fixed, and the rockets themselves consist of a motor, , and , with propulsion achieved through the combustion of that expels gases rearward. The core operating principle of rocket in these systems is Newton's third law of motion, which states that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. In a rocket launcher, the action is the high-pressure expulsion of hot gases from the rocket motor's nozzle, generated by burning solid or liquid ; this creates that propels the rocket forward in the opposite direction. The burns independently of external atmosphere, allowing operation in various environments. Once the is fully consumed—typically within seconds—the rocket coasts along a ballistic , an arc-shaped path determined by its initial , launch , and , with no further or course correction. The trajectory of an unguided rocket follows the physics of after . Assuming level ground, negligible air resistance, and g \approx 9.8 \, \mathrm{m/s^2}, the R is approximated by the : R = \frac{v^2 \sin(2\theta)}{g} where v is the initial (muzzle or ), and \theta is the launch angle relative to the . This derives from the components of motion: the v_x = v \cos \theta remains , while the vertical starts at v_y = v \sin \theta and decreases due to . The T to return to the launch height is T = \frac{2 v \sin \theta}{g}, obtained by solving y(t) = (v \sin \theta) t - \frac{1}{2} g t^2 = 0 for t > 0. Substituting into the horizontal displacement gives R = v_x T = v \cos \theta \cdot \frac{2 v \sin \theta}{g} = \frac{v^2 (2 \sin \theta \cos \theta)}{g}. Using the double-angle identity \sin(2\theta) = 2 \sin \theta \cos \theta, the simplifies to the form above. Maximum occurs at \theta = 45^\circ, where \sin(2\theta) = 1. For typical velocities of 100–300 m/s in unguided rocket systems (e.g., initial booster velocities in man-portable launchers), this yields ranges from approximately 1 km at 100 m/s to 9 km at 300 m/s under ideal conditions; however, practical limitations like accuracy and design reduce effective ranges. Due to their unguided nature, rocket launchers are primarily used for area saturation tactics, delivering multiple projectiles to blanket a target zone rather than achieving precision strikes on single points. Typical operational ranges span 200–500 meters for man-portable systems like the against armored targets, extending to 5,000 meters or more for multiple systems like the (BM-13), where salvos maximize coverage over larger areas. Rocket launchers are distinct from recoilless rifles primarily in their propulsion mechanisms. Recoilless rifles, such as the M40 106-mm, use an initial propellant charge within the barrel to accelerate the to high muzzle velocities (e.g., 1200 ft/s), after which the coasts unpowered along a ballistic , with managed by venting gases rearward through a . In contrast, rocket launchers employ a self-contained motor that ignites after the clears the launch tube, providing sustained during flight and enabling greater and post-launch, as seen in systems like the RPG-29. Missile launchers differ from launchers in guidance capabilities. launchers fire unguided projectiles that rely on initial aim and follow a fixed ballistic arc after the rocket motor burns out, lacking in-flight correction. systems, however, incorporate guidance such as wire command, inertial navigation, or GPS, along with control surfaces for trajectory adjustments, allowing precision targeting even against moving objects. The following table summarizes key operational differences:
AspectRocket LauncherRecoilless RifleMissile Launcher
GuidanceNone (ballistic post-burn)None (ballistic throughout)Active (wire, inertial, GPS)
Propulsion DurationShort initial burn, then coastInitial barrel acceleration onlySustained or multi-stage with guidance
Reload TimeManual (man-portable: seconds to minutes)Manual (breech-loaded: similar)Often automated (vehicle-mounted: rapid)
Data derived from comparative analyses of systems like the RPG series, Carl Gustaf, and Javelin. The Bazooka (M1/M9), introduced in 1942, exemplifies an early true rocket launcher, using a shoulder-fired tube to launch a rocket-propelled shaped-charge warhead with stabilizing fins, achieving penetration of up to 100 mm of armor at ranges beyond hand-throwing capability—unlike earlier hand-thrown grenades, which lacked propulsion and were limited to short distances. Modern multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS), such as the M270, emphasize saturation fire over precision, delivering clusters of unguided rockets to blanket large areas and suppress enemy positions, whereas conventional artillery (e.g., 155-mm howitzers) prioritizes accurate, point-target strikes with adjustable shells. Under regimes, unguided rocket launchers are often classified as conventional munitions distinct from ballistic missiles. The (MTCR) regulates systems capable of delivering payloads over 300 km with precision guidance, excluding short-range unguided rockets like the Frog-7 (70 km range), which lack the trajectory and control features of treaty-covered ballistic missiles. The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty similarly focused on guided systems with ranges of 500–5,500 km, treating unguided rockets as non-prohibited equivalents.

History

Early Development

The earliest precursors to modern rocket launchers emerged in ancient , where —invented around the —was initially used for and pyrotechnic displays before being adapted for purposes. By the , Chinese engineers developed "fire arrows," unguided rockets attached to arrows or launched from tubes, which served as propulsion-enhanced projectiles in warfare. These systems marked the transition from recreational to solid-fuel rockets, providing incendiary or effects against enemies, as documented in historical accounts of battles against Mongol invaders in 1232. In the early , British inventor advanced rocket technology by designing more sophisticated unguided systems inspired by captured Indian rockets. Congreve's work began in 1804 at the Royal Arsenal in , where he experimented with metal-cased, solid-propellant rockets equipped with long wooden stabilizing sticks to address flight instability and improve range, achieving distances up to 3,000 yards in tests by 1806. These designs were intended for both naval and land applications, launched from frames or troughs, and represented a key evolution in addressing the inherent inaccuracy of early rockets through rudimentary stabilization. Congreve's rockets saw limited adoption during the , primarily by British forces in operations like the 1807 bombardment of and the 1814 siege of , where their psychological impact was notable despite poor accuracy compared to conventional . The weapons' unreliability—due to variable trajectories and wind sensitivity—restricted widespread use, though Congreve later patented a tail-mounted revolving fin design around 1823 to replace the cumbersome sticks and enhance . Pre-World War II advancements in the built on these foundations, with American physicist conducting pioneering experiments in the 1910s that shifted toward liquid propellants for greater control. Goddard received U.S. patents in 1914 for a liquid-fueled and a multi-stage rocket design, conducting static tests and the first liquid-propellant flight in 1926, though his work focused more on scientific rocketry than immediate military launchers. In the , development of solid-fuel rockets began in the under the Gas Dynamics Laboratory, leading to prototypes that informed the system; early efforts by inventors like Nikolai Tikhomirov emphasized unguided artillery rockets with stabilizing fins to mitigate instability, setting the stage for multiple-launch configurations by the 1930s.

World War II

During , the introduced the M1 Bazooka in 1942, a man-portable anti-tank rocket launcher developed by Edward Uhl and Leslie Skinner as part of the Army's rocket research program. The weapon consisted of a 5-foot steel tube weighing 13 pounds, designed to fire 2.36-inch rockets with shaped-charge warheads that could penetrate up to 4 inches of armor, revolutionizing anti-tank capabilities by allowing soldiers to engage armored vehicles at ranges of about 300 yards. The Bazooka first saw combat during in in November 1942, where it proved effective against early-war German Panzers by targeting vulnerable spots like tracks and sides, though initial results were mixed due to untrained crews and unreliable rockets in humid conditions. By 1945, the U.S. Army had produced nearly 500,000 M1 and improved M9 variants, alongside millions of rockets, enabling widespread deployment across theaters like and the Pacific, where it excelled against lighter armor. On the Eastern Front, the fielded the BM-13 system in 1941, mounted on trucks with 16 rails for 132mm M-13 fin-stabilized rockets, providing rapid area saturation fire over distances up to 8,500 meters. These unguided rockets, stabilized by folding fins for improved accuracy compared to earlier spin-stabilized designs, delivered high-explosive payloads in salvos lasting 7-10 seconds, creating devastating psychological and material effects on German forces. The 's impact was particularly notable at the in 1942-1943, where batteries of truck-launched 130mm rockets, nicknamed "Stalin's organs" by the Germans for their eerie whistling sound, inflicted heavy casualties and disrupted positions with near-point-blank barrages during urban fighting. Over 10,000 BM-13 systems were produced by war's end, supporting Soviet counteroffensives through massed fire that could cover 400,000 square meters with 4.35 tons of explosives per battery salvo. Both systems highlighted wartime innovations in rocket technology but also revealed limitations. The Bazooka's shaped-charge warheads marked a shift toward focused armor penetration via the Munroe effect, concentrating explosive energy into a jet, yet its backblast posed hazards, requiring a clear 10-20 meter rear area to avoid injuring the two-man crew or nearby allies. Similarly, the Katyusha's fin stabilization enhanced trajectory reliability, but its inaccuracy against pinpoint targets and vulnerability to after launches due to the telltale smoke trails limited its role to preparatory barrages rather than direct support. These weapons collectively transformed battlefield dynamics, empowering against armor and enabling area denial, though their effectiveness waned against late-war upgrades like sloped Panzer plating and improved German countermeasures.

Postwar Advancements

Following , rocket launcher technology advanced significantly during the era, with the developing the M20 Super in the early 1950s as an improved anti-tank weapon to counter evolving armored threats. This 3.5-inch (89 mm) recoilless launcher, which entered full-scale production in August 1950, featured enhanced shaped-charge warheads capable of penetrating up to 11 inches (280 mm) of armor, a substantial upgrade from its WWII predecessor, the M9 . Its design emphasized greater range and reliability, achieving effective distances of up to 1,100 yards (1,000 m), and it saw its first combat deployment during the in 1950. In parallel, the introduced the in 1961, a reusable shoulder-fired launcher that fired 40 mm PG-7V rockets with shaped-charge warheads capable of penetrating up to 260 mm of armor at effective ranges of 200–300 meters. With over 9 million units produced worldwide, the became a staple in squads for its simplicity, low cost, and versatility against armored vehicles, fortifications, and low-flying , influencing tactics. In parallel, the introduced the multiple rocket launcher system in the early , marking a leap in area capabilities with its truck-mounted 122 mm rockets. The standard configuration featured a 40-tube launcher pod on a Ural-375D 6x6 , capable of delivering a full salvo of high-explosive fragmentation rockets over an area of 40,000 square meters in seconds, with an initial effective range of 20 km. This system addressed postwar demands for mobile, high-volume fire support, evolving from WWII-era designs to provide more precise barrage patterns and rapid reload times of under 10 minutes. The in the 1960s further drove innovations in man-portable systems, exemplified by the U.S. adoption of the M72 Light Anti-tank Weapon () in early 1963 as the primary anti-armor tool. This disposable, 66 mm rocket launcher weighed just 5.5 pounds (2.5 kg) when loaded, offering a lightweight alternative to recoilless rifles with an effective range of 200 meters against armored vehicles and up to 1,000 meters against soft targets. Its one-shot design and construction improved portability and reliability in , where it was issued to riflemen for engaging North tanks and bunkers. By the , advancements in propellants and fire control systems extended operational ranges and accuracy for multiple rocket launchers, tackling challenges like limited standoff distances and imprecise targeting. Improved solid propellants, such as composite formulations, enabled systems like the to achieve ranges of 10-20 km with standard rockets, while upgrades like base-bleed units later pushed this to 30-40 km by reducing drag and enhancing stability. Simultaneously, the U.S. (MLRS), introduced in , incorporated electronic fire control systems with automated command, control, and communications () integration, allowing for rapid targeting data input and salvo coordination across dispersed batteries. These developments prioritized reliability in contested environments, with the M270's fire control enabling "" tactics to evade . The 1991 demonstrated the impact of these evolutions, as U.S. M270 MLRS units conducted deep strikes against Iraqi positions, firing over 17,000 rockets in coordinated barrages that extended up to 30 km and demoralized enemy forces through overwhelming "" saturation. This operational success validated postwar emphases on range and mobility, with MLRS batteries achieving response times under 30 seconds from to launch. In the post-2000, rocket launchers have integrated precision guidance and lightweight materials to enhance versatility and reduce logistical burdens. The (APKWS) , a laser-guided kit developed by , converts legacy unguided rockets into precision munitions with under 1 meter, deployable from and ground launchers for low-collateral engagements. Complementing this, advancements in composite materials like carbon fiber have lightened launcher designs by 40-50%, as seen in updated man-portable systems, improving soldier mobility without sacrificing structural integrity or range. These innovations reflect a shift toward networked, guided while building on foundations for greater reliability in asymmetric conflicts.

Design and Components

Propulsion Systems

Rocket launchers predominantly employ solid propellants due to their simplicity, reliability, and ease of storage compared to more complex alternatives. These solid fuels, such as double-base formulations consisting of and , allow for compact, ready-to-fire systems without the need for separate fuel and oxidizer handling. propellants, while offering potential advantages in performance, are rarely used in rocket launchers because of their inherent complexity, including requirements for pumps, tanks, and precise flow control, which complicate and increase vulnerability in tactical environments. A critical aspect of solid propellant engineering is controlling the , which dictates the profile over time, achieved primarily through the geometry of the grain. Grain shapes, such as cylindrical, star, or finocyl configurations, determine the burning surface area as the propellant regresses, enabling tailored acceleration curves for specific mission needs. The generated by the motor is governed by the equation T = \dot{m} v_e + (p_e - p_a) A_e where T is thrust, \dot{m} is the mass flow rate of exhaust gases, v_e is the exhaust velocity (typically 1500–2500 m/s for solid propellants in military applications), p_e and p_a are the exhaust and ambient pressures, respectively, and A_e is the nozzle exit area. This formulation highlights how efficient exhaust expulsion and pressure differentials contribute to overall propulsion efficiency. Modern military rocket motors often incorporate smokeless powders to minimize visible exhaust signatures, enhancing operational by reducing the detectability of launch positions. In the 2020s, propulsion systems—combining with liquid oxidizers—have emerged as a promising development for launchers, offering improved safety, throttleability, and potential reusability through easier component replacement and reduced ignition risks. For example, in August 2025, Firehawk Aerospace demonstrated a tactical-ready 3D-printed for the U.S. Army, achieving a vertical ascent of over 18,000 feet with and . in these systems is commonly measured by (I_{sp}), which for solid-propellant military rockets ranges from 200 to 250 seconds, balancing with practical constraints like grain integrity and design.

Launch Mechanisms

Rocket launchers employ specialized hardware to initiate and direct the firing of rockets, distinct from the internal of the projectiles themselves. The primary components include launch tubes, which are typically to accommodate the unguided or fin-stabilized flight of rockets, in contrast to the rifled barrels used in conventional firearms to impart spin for stability. Firing mechanisms generally consist of firing pins or electrical igniters that strike a primer to activate the rocket's motor, ensuring reliable ignition upon trigger activation. Launch tubes vary by design to support different operational needs. Reloadable systems, such as the Soviet , feature an open-breech configuration that allows muzzle-loading of individual rockets, enabling rapid reloading in under 14 seconds for sustained fire. In contrast, disposable tubes like those in the U.S. integrate the launcher as a single-use outer and inner tube assembly, which extends for firing and is discarded after one shot, prioritizing portability and simplicity for use. These mechanisms often incorporate percussion-type strikers, where a hammer-driven impacts the rocket's primer to initiate propulsion. A critical consideration in launch operations is the backblast zone, created by the expulsion of high-pressure gases rearward from recoilless designs, posing a danger radius of approximately 10-20 meters to personnel and equipment. For instance, U.S. Army standards specify a 40-meter danger cone and 25-30 meter caution area for systems like the M72 series, requiring clear rear space before firing to prevent injury from blast and . Stabilization during launch is achieved through rails or pod assemblies; in multiple rocket systems like the M270 MLRS, spin rails within launch pods impart rotational stability to rockets via their fins, while pod containers securely hold and align six rockets for salvo fire. Safety features are integral to mitigate risks from and environmental factors. Recoilless venting systems direct exhaust gases rearward through the open breech, balancing forces to reduce operator , though this necessitates the aforementioned backblast clearance. In vehicle-mounted configurations, such as the MLRS, modern systems incorporate servo-assisted aiming via hydraulic turrets and electronic fire control for precise elevation and adjustments, along with voltage testers to prevent accidental ignition from static or electrical faults. These elements ensure operational reliability across man-portable and mounted platforms.

Types

Man-Portable Launchers

Man-portable rocket launchers are shoulder-fired or handheld systems designed for individual use, prioritizing lightweight construction and ease of deployment in dynamic combat environments. These weapons typically weigh under 10 kg to ensure mobility, allowing a single soldier to carry and operate them without assistance. For instance, the Soviet , introduced in 1961, has an unloaded weight of approximately 7 kg, while the Swedish , developed in the 1980s and entering service in 1987, weighs about 6.7 kg. Both exemplify the emphasis on portability, with the AT4's disposable design further reducing logistical burdens by eliminating the need for reloading equipment. Design features of these launchers include simple launch tubes paired with sighting systems for accurate targeting. The employs as standard but can be fitted with optical sights like the PGO-7, which provides 2.7x magnification for improved aiming at ranges up to 500 m. Reloadable systems such as the allow for rapid follow-up shots, with trained operators achieving reload times of 5-10 seconds by inserting a new grenade into the front-loading tube. In contrast, disposable launchers like the require no reloading, enabling immediate use but limiting the operator to a single shot per tube; its effective range reaches 300 m against point targets. These elements make man-portable launchers suitable for close-quarters engagements, where quick setup and firing are critical. Primarily employed in anti-tank roles, these systems deliver (HEAT) warheads to penetrate armored vehicles. The RPG-7's PG-7V series, for example, achieves effective ranges of up to 500 m against tanks. Adaptations for emerged in the post-1990s era, including tandem warheads like the RPG-7's PG-7VR, which uses a precursor charge to defeat explosive reactive armor before the main charge penetrates, enhancing lethality against modern protections in confined city environments. Despite their advantages, man-portable launchers have notable limitations that affect operational safety and effectiveness. The backblast from rocket ignition creates a hazardous behind the , spanning up to 30 m in a 90-degree sector and capable of causing severe or to nearby personnel. Additionally, unguided projectiles lead to reduced accuracy beyond 300 m due to ballistic drop and lack of stabilization, making them less reliable against distant or fast-moving targets.

Vehicle-Mounted Launchers

Vehicle-mounted rocket launchers are integrated systems designed to provide mobile from ground , , or helicopters, enhancing tactical flexibility in combat scenarios. These launchers allow for the deployment of rockets or missiles from stabilized platforms, enabling precise engagement of targets while the vehicle maintains . Unlike man-portable systems, they leverage the host vehicle's power, sensors, and armor for improved operational effectiveness. A prominent example from the is the system mounted on Humvees (HMMWVs), which entered service in 1970 and was adapted for vehicular use to deliver wire-guided missiles against armored threats. The Improved Target Acquisition System (ITAS) variant, integrated on HMMWVs, features a single- or multi-tube pedestal mount for rapid targeting. This configuration supports engagements from ground vehicles, providing anti-armor capability with a reusable launcher and guidance set. In aerial applications, the Hydra 70 rocket system exemplifies vehicle-mounted launchers on helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft, with pods such as the LAU-61 and M261 accommodating 19 tubes, while the LAU-68 and LAU-131/A hold 7 tubes. These 2.75-inch unguided rockets are employed for close air support, as seen on the AH-64 Apache attack helicopter, which integrates Hydra 70 pods alongside advanced fire control systems for coordinated strikes. The Apache's setup allows for the launch of up to 76 rockets across four pods in support roles, with effective ranges reaching up to 8 kilometers depending on the motor variant. Design features of these emphasize integration with systems, including fire control computers that incorporate imagers, rangefinders, and trackers for enhanced accuracy. Reloading often involves hydraulic-assisted mechanisms on ground or pod replacement on , allowing crews to sustain fire without dismounting. For instance, the TOW ITAS on Humvees uses digital fire control for day/night operations, while pods on helicopters like the enable seamless integration with the 's for real-time targeting. Key advantages include the capacity for rapid salvo fire, with rates of 10 to 20 rockets per minute, delivering concentrated effects on enemy positions. Additionally, mounting on provides through armored cabs and , reducing compared to exposed positions and allowing sustained operations in hostile environments.

Multiple Rocket Systems

Multiple rocket systems represent a class of heavy artillery platforms designed for delivering high-volume, saturating fire over large areas, typically employing salvos of unguided or guided rockets from multi-tube arrays to suppress enemy positions, fortifications, or troop concentrations. These systems evolved from earlier barrage launchers to incorporate modular pod designs that allow rapid reloading and enhanced mobility, often mounted on armored tracked chassis or heavy trucks for deployment in divisional artillery roles. Unlike single-launcher configurations, multiple rocket systems emphasize indirect fire capabilities, with launchers capable of firing dozens of rockets in seconds to achieve overwhelming effects across extended battlefields. A prominent example is the ' M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS), developed in the 1980s and entering service with the U.S. Army in 1983, which features two six-tube pods for a total of 12 rockets in 227mm caliber. The M270, built on a tracked derived from the fighting vehicle, provides armored protection and high cross-country mobility, with a fire rate of 12 rockets in under 40 seconds. Its ammunition includes the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS) variants, which integrate GPS-aided inertial navigation for precision strikes up to 70 kilometers, enabling pod-based loading where entire assemblies are ejected and replaced for quick turnaround. The lighter M142 HIMARS (High Mobility Artillery Rocket System), introduced in 2005, offers a wheeled alternative with a single six-tube pod on a 6x6 FMTV , providing similar GMLRS capabilities up to 150 km with extended-range variants while emphasizing rapid deployment and lower logistical footprint for lighter forces. The Russian , introduced in the late 1980s, exemplifies a truck-mounted counterpart with 12 launch tubes for 300mm rockets, achieving ranges of up to 90 kilometers and a full salvo in 38 seconds. Mounted on a MAZ-543 heavy , the Smerch prioritizes road mobility and logistical simplicity, with its rockets often employing or high-explosive fragmentation warheads for area denial. Design features include automated fire control systems and optional inertial guidance for improved accuracy, though early variants relied primarily on ballistic trajectories for massed fire. In operational terms, these systems deliver immense salvo volumes; for instance, a single M270 firing dual-purpose improved conventional munitions (DPICM) rockets can disperse approximately 8,000 submunitions across an area of approximately 0.03 square kilometers, providing suppressive effects against armored and targets. During the , U.S. M270 units employed such barrages to neutralize Iraqi and command posts, contributing to rapid coalition advances by disrupting enemy counterfire capabilities. Post-2010 developments in multiple rocket systems have been influenced by international efforts to restrict cluster munitions, notably the 2008 , which prompted many operators to phase out submunition-dispersing warheads in favor of unitary high-explosive types for reduced . This shift, seen in upgrades like the M270A1's integration of GMLRS-ER (extended range) unitary warheads reaching 150 kilometers, emphasizes precision over area saturation while maintaining the core multi-tube architecture for sustained . has similarly pursued guided unitary options for the Smerch successor, the 9A52-4 Tornado-S, aligning with global trends toward compliant, lethal effects.

Ammunition and Warheads

Rocket Propellants

Rocket propellants for launchers have evolved from simple formulations in early designs to advanced composites in modern systems. Early rocket launchers, such as the M1 Bazooka developed during World War II, primarily utilized double-base propellants consisting of nitrocellulose and nitroglycerin, which provided improved propulsion over earlier black powder formulations but still had limitations in range and velocity due to energy density. In contrast, contemporary rocket propellants are typically solid composite types, incorporating high-energy materials like HMX (cyclotetramethylene-tetranitramine) embedded in polymer matrices such as hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB), enabling higher specific impulse and thrust for improved performance in anti-tank and other applications. These generally have a of 5 to 10 years under optimal conditions, after which degradation can compromise reliability. Storage requirements emphasize , typically between 10°C and 25°C, to minimize chemical breakdown and maintain structural integrity, as elevated temperatures accelerate aging and reduce ballistic consistency. A representative example is the PG-7VL for the launcher, which employs a composite propellant charge weighing approximately 0.39 within a total mass of 2.6 , delivering a of about 112 m/s. Safety concerns with propellants include the of spontaneous ignition if exposed to temperatures exceeding the auto-ignition threshold, often around 200–250°C depending on the , potentially leading to uncontrolled . Internationally, such is classified as explosives of 1.1D or 1.2D, indicating a projection or mass , which dictates strict packaging, labeling, and transport protocols to mitigate handling dangers.

Warhead Types

Rocket launcher warheads are the payloads designed to deliver destructive effects upon , varying by type and operational . High- (HE) warheads primarily function through and fragmentation to engage personnel and light , dispersing metal fragments over a wide area to maximize casualties against soft . These warheads typically contain 0.5 to several kilograms of high , equivalent to comparable yields, producing lethal radii of 10-20 meters depending on the charge size. Shaped-charge high-explosive anti-tank (HEAT) warheads employ the Munroe effect to focus explosive energy into a high-velocity metal jet, enabling penetration of armored vehicles. For instance, common man-portable rocket warheads achieve penetration equivalents of up to 500 mm of rolled homogeneous armor (RHA), sufficient against most light and medium tanks. Tandem warheads address countermeasures like explosive reactive armor (ERA) by incorporating two charges: a precursor to detonate the ERA and a follow-through charge for main armor defeat, restoring penetration effectiveness to 600-800 mm RHA in modern designs. Cluster submunitions, used in some pre-2008 rocket designs, disperse multiple bomblets to cover area targets with anti-personnel or anti-armor effects, though their use has declined following the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions. Thermobaric warheads, optimized for urban and confined spaces, generate a prolonged pressure wave by dispersing and igniting fuel-air mixtures, causing overpressure damage inside structures with yields equivalent to 1-5 kg TNT in portable variants like the Russian TBG-7V developed in the late 1980s. The TBG-7V, for example, is tailored for anti-personnel roles in buildings and bunkers, with a blast radius extending to 10 meters in enclosed environments. Larger rocket systems employ warheads up to 50 kg for broader area effects, but post-2010 developments in precision have integrated electronic timing and proximity sensors to minimize unintended detonations and in populated areas. These allow airburst or delayed modes, reducing fragmentation scatter by up to 50% compared to contact in urban scenarios.

Operational Use

Tactical Employment

Rocket launchers play essential roles in contemporary warfare, primarily serving as anti-armor weapons for forces and as substitutes for conventional in delivering . Man-portable systems enable dismounted troops to target armored vehicles, fortifications, and low-flying , allowing maneuver elements to exploit disruptions in enemy formations by suppressing or destroying threats at extended ranges. Multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS), such as the M270, provide support akin to , emphasizing area saturation to neutralize enemy positions, command nodes, and air defenses through high-volume barrages. Tactical employment of man-portable rocket launchers often involves configurations, where small teams position along anticipated enemy avenues of approach to launch surprise attacks on vehicles from concealed sites, maximizing the element of surprise and minimizing exposure. In contrast, MLRS tactics focus on coordinated salvos from dispersed launchers to overwhelm defenses, delivering dozens of rockets in seconds to saturate target areas and degrade enemy response capabilities before repositioning to avoid . U.S. for MLRS operations, as detailed in FM 3-09.60 from the early , marked a shift toward integrating these systems into broader plans, prioritizing mobility, rapid execution, and synchronization with joint assets for deep effects. Following 2015, tactical doctrines have increasingly incorporated unmanned aerial vehicles for targeting, enabling real-time reconnaissance and fire adjustment to counter dynamic threats in contested environments. As of 2025, advanced variants like the GMLRS-ER extend ranges to 150 km, improving precision in contested environments, particularly in support of operations against forces. The effectiveness of rocket launchers is constrained by inherent inaccuracies, for example, tests have shown hit probabilities around 30-40% against area targets under optimal conditions, rendering them more suitable for suppressive roles than precision strikes. Countermeasures like explosive reactive armor () on armored vehicles mitigate threats from shaped-charge warheads by explosively disrupting the penetrating jet upon impact, often reducing lethality against protected targets.

Safety and Logistics

Safety protocols for rocket launchers prioritize operator training to mitigate hazards such as backblast, which generates high and debris in a rearward cone-shaped area. For systems like the M136 , training requires clearing a 100-meter backblast danger zone in a 90-degree fan behind the launcher during live-fire exercises, with the zone doubling in size below 0°C to account for increased gas expansion. Similarly, for the M72-series antiarmor weapons, operators must ensure a 40-meter backblast danger area is free of personnel and equipment. (PPE) is mandatory, including single hearing protection for noise levels exceeding 140 dB; the M72 rocket launcher produces approximately 180 dB at the operator's position, necessitating attenuating earplugs like the V51-R model, which provide 25-29 dB reduction. Additional PPE, such as helmets, , and , is required within 20 meters of firing positions for antitank rockets. Logistics for rocket launchers involve specialized transport and maintenance to ensure operational readiness. Ammunition resupply for multiple launch rocket systems (MLRS) relies on vehicles like the M985 Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck (HEMTT), which can carry four launch pods containing 48 unguided rockets or eight missiles, with trailers adding capacity for rapid reloading at forward points 800 meters from firing positions. Costs per round vary widely by type and guidance; basic unguided rockets for man-portable systems like the RPG-7 range from $100 to $500, while advanced guided MLRS rounds like the GMLRS cost approximately $168,000 each (as of 2020). Maintenance cycles follow Army standards under AR 750-1, including daily operator preventive maintenance checks and services (PMCS) for cleaning and inspection, quarterly unit-level repairs, and annual depot-level overhauls to verify structural integrity and propulsion systems. Demilitarization processes render rocket launchers and munitions unusable for combat, adhering to U.S. Department of guidelines that employ methods such as cutting, crushing, , , or burning components to prevent restoration. For cluster munition-equipped rockets, compliance with international agreements like the 2008 requires destruction of stockpiles by signatory states. In prolonged conflicts, supply vulnerabilities exacerbate logistical challenges; during the 2022 , Ukrainian forces nearly exhausted Soviet-era rocket ammunition stocks, becoming reliant on Western-supplied systems like HIMARS to sustain operations.

References

  1. [1]
    Firearms Guide - Identification of Firearms - Section 11 - ATF
    U.S. Rocket Launcher (Bazooka)​​ Classification. Destructive Device. Distinctive Characteristics. Designed to fire a self-propelled rocket. Rate of Transfer Tax.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  2. [2]
    Rocket-Propelled Grenades: Old Threat, New Danger
    ... (rocket-propelled grenade) is a shoulder-fired, reusable tube that launches an unguided, rocket-propelled grenade. The RPG-7 is inexpensive, easy to use and ...
  3. [3]
    Brief History of Rockets - NASA Glenn Research Center
    Today's rockets are remarkable collections of human ingenuity that have their roots in the science and technology of the past. They are natural outgrowths ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] A Brief History of Shaped Charges - DTIC
    The bazooka was first used by the U.K. in North Africa in 1941. Incidentally, Leslie Skinner, formerly of APG, has been called the father of the bazooka.
  5. [5]
    [PDF] SOVIET ROCKET FORCES - DTIC
    with the charged Katyusha rocket launcher. We took a fragment, and a missile of the Katyusha rocket launcher will destroy it and us. One short round! One ...
  6. [6]
    Rocket and Mortar Basics - Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance
    A rocket is an unguided self-propelled munition. Rockets are propelled by the rearward expulsion of expanding gases from the nozzle of the motor.Missing: principles | Show results with:principles
  7. [7]
    Artillery Rockets - GlobalSecurity.org
    Jul 7, 2011 · Used as area saturation weapons, these rockets caused large numbers of psychiatric as well as physical casualties. Corporal was America's ...
  8. [8]
    Rocket Principles
    A rocket in its simplest form is a chamber enclosing a gas under pressure. A small opening at one end of the chamber allows the gas to escape, and in doing so ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] 1 Range of Projectile Motion - UF Physics Department
    the displacement equation and using 2 sin θ cos θ = sin(2θ), we have. R = ∆x(t = 2v0 sin θ/g) = v2. 0 g sin(2θ). Example. A baseball player can throw a ball at ...
  10. [10]
    RPG-7 / RPG-7V / Antitank Grenade Launcher
    Nov 7, 2011 · The maximum effective range is 500 meters for stationary targets and 300 meters for moving targets. Maximum range is 920 meters at which ...
  11. [11]
    BM-13 Katysha Multiple Rocket Launcher - GlobalSecurity.org
    Mar 27, 2023 · The BM-13 fighting vehicle had 16 tracks for launching of M-13 missiles each of them weighting 42 kg and flying as far as 8 470 m. On December ...
  12. [12]
    Recoilless Weapons for Modern Warfare - GlobalSecurity.org
    Apr 9, 2019 · Recoilless guns incorporated a nozzle in the breech to eject propellant gases out of the rear of the gun, permitting part of the propellant gas ...
  13. [13]
    Know the difference – rockets versus missiles - Forces News
    Aug 5, 2022 · Although they look like missiles, rockets are technologically simpler and were therefore developed far earlier than missiles.Missing: unguided | Show results with:unguided
  14. [14]
    Worldwide Ballistic Missile Inventories | Arms Control Association
    Ballistic missiles are powered by rockets initially but then they follow an unpowered, free-falling trajectory toward their targets. They are classified by the ...
  15. [15]
    Bazooka Anti-Tank Rocket Launcher - GlobalSecurity.org
    Jul 7, 2011 · The M20 3.5-Inch Rocket Launder (Bazooka) is a recoilless anti-tank weapon firing a 9 pound projectile. It can be used against a wide ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Marine Corps Artillery Rockets: Back Through The Future
    The Katyusha The history of rocket ... FARS was a lightweight, helicopter transportable, mutiple rocket launcher with a range of 14 - 18 kilometers.<|control11|><|separator|>
  17. [17]
    The History of Early Fireworks and Fire Arrows - ThoughtCo
    Feb 17, 2019 · The first use of true rockets as weapons is reported as occurring in 1232. The Chinese and the Mongols were at war with each other, and the ...
  18. [18]
    The Congreve War Rockets, 1800-1825 - U.S. Naval Institute
    The use of rockets on fire ships was another tactic proposed by Congreve. He suggested placing about 1,000 rockets in various positions, aimed at random, to be ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  19. [19]
    Congreve Rocket - Age of Revolution
    The first successful tests took place in 1804. By 1806 Congreve had developed 32-pounders that would travel 3000 yards. The Navy was the first to take up the ...Missing: designs adoption
  20. [20]
    Congreve Rockets - The Waterloo Association
    May 27, 2018 · Rockets were thereafter used as a weapon, but their unreliability made them a poor choice compared with guns that were capable of being aimed ...Missing: limited adoption
  21. [21]
    The Congreve missiles - RussianSpaceWeb.com
    Oct 6, 2024 · Around 1823, Congreve patented a design involving small revolving fins on the rocket's tail, again trying to do away with a stabilizing stick.
  22. [22]
    95 Years Ago: Goddard's First Liquid-Fueled Rocket - NASA
    Mar 17, 2021 · In 1914, he registered his first two patents, describing a multi-stage rocket and a rocket fueled by solid or liquid propellants, respectively, ...Missing: military 1910s
  23. [23]
    BM-13 Katyusha (1940) - Truck Encyclopedia
    Initial development started with the solid propellant, with Nikolai Tikhomirov in charge of the Soviet Gas Dynamics Laboratory. The first test was performed by ...
  24. [24]
    Edward Uhl, the Man Behind the Bazooka - HistoryNet
    Sep 30, 2010 · Edward Uhl was barely out of college and barely into uniform when he found himself constituting 50 percent of the U.S. Army's rocket ...
  25. [25]
    The Bazooka | Newsletter Archive - Beaches of Normandy Tours
    In the United States, this technology was first applied to hand grenades, but these prototypes were too heavy to be thrown or shot as a rifle grenade, or had a ...
  26. [26]
    RocketPower - Key Military
    Dec 20, 2018 · The famous Russian BM-13 'Katyusha' multiple rocket launcher system (MRS), was introduced into service in 1941 on the eve of war with Germany.Missing: Battle | Show results with:Battle
  27. [27]
    The Katyusha multiple-launch rocket system - War History
    Dec 13, 2024 · The development of these weapons began well before the war, in 1938, with a small trial run of 40 systems built by the time of the German ...
  28. [28]
    Stalingrad: Apocalypse on the Volga - Warfare History Network
    ... Katyusha rockets. Dubbed “Stalin's organs,” the truck-launched, 130mm rockets fired 16 at a time. Nearly five feet in length, the missiles were deadly accurate ...
  29. [29]
    Super Bazooka: Improved Antitank Fist - Tank Archives
    Dec 9, 2017 · Small scale production of the Super Bazooka began in 1948, and full mass production began only in August of 1950. The M20 rocket launcher was ...
  30. [30]
    M20A1B1 Super Bazooka – It's a Super Bazooka. Need I Say More?
    Oct 28, 2017 · The 3.5” M20 Super Bazooka was adopted in late 1945 and put into production in 1948, with it s first combat use coming in the Korean War.Missing: 1950s | Show results with:1950s
  31. [31]
    BM-21 Grad Russian 122mm Multiple Rocket Launcher (MRL) - ODIN
    Dec 19, 2024 · The BM-21 Grad is a Soviet truck-mounted 122 mm multiple rocket launcher. The weapons system and the M-21OF rocket that it fires evolved in the early 1960s.
  32. [32]
    The Grad system: A hot hail of cluster-fired rockets - Russia Beyond
    Aug 26, 2014 · The Grad BM-21 multiple launch rocket system has a history that goes back all the way to the early 1960s, when it succeeded the legendary Katyusha rocket ...
  33. [33]
    M72 LAW Is the Old School 'Bazooka' Built to Destroy Tanks
    Jun 27, 2025 · In the early 1960s, the M72 LAW was adopted by the US Army and Marine Corps as the primary individual infantry anti-tank weapon.
  34. [34]
    Indian Army Set To Induct Enhanced Range Rockets For Pinaka ...
    Sep 7, 2022 · DRDO reverse engineered the original Soviet BM-21 rockets. The range was then doubled to 40km in 122mm ERR using composite propellant packed ...Missing: improved | Show results with:improved
  35. [35]
    MLRS - Redstone Arsenal Historical Information
    MLRS is a free-flight artillery rocket system that greatly improves the conventional, indirect fire capability of the field Army.
  36. [36]
    MLRS: Thunder in the Desert | Lockheed Martin
    Oct 1, 2020 · In the coming days, relentless attacks from MLRS vehicles would demoralize Iraqi soldiers on the ground, ushering in a quick and decisive ...
  37. [37]
    Advanced Precision Kill Weapon System (APKWS) II
    The APKWS rocket, a mid-body guidance kit that transforms a standard unguided munition into a precision laser-guided rocket, has proven highly successful for ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  38. [38]
    How Advanced Composites Are Reshaping Modern Missile Design
    Jun 25, 2025 · Carbon fiber composites have emerged as the game-changing material in modern missile and munition design. From enabling hypersonic flight to making drone ...Missing: advancements | Show results with:advancements
  39. [39]
    Basics of Space Flight: Rocket Propellants
    Double base propellants usually consist of nitrocellulose and nitroglycerine, to which a plasticiser is added. Homogeneous propellants do not usually have ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] SOLID PROPELLANT GRAIN STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ANALYSIS
    Ballistic performance is dependent on grain geometry, and excessive dimensional changes (especially changes in the burning surface area) usually mean that.
  41. [41]
    Rocket Thrust Equations
    ... rocket thrust equation is given by: F = m dot * Ve + (pe - p0) * Ae. You can explore the design and operation of a rocket nozzle with our interactive nozzle ...Missing: A_e
  42. [42]
    O-100 Reduced Vulnerability Minimum Smoke Propellants for ...
    The principal benefit of these types of propellants is their lack of visible signature. This enables the firing position to remain concealed and thus less ...
  43. [43]
    A Review of Recent Developments in Hybrid Rocket Propulsion and ...
    This paper extensively reviews hybrid rocket propulsion-related activities from combustion engine designs to launch tests.
  44. [44]
    Solid Propellant - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The specific impulse of high-performance rockets ranges from 2455 to 2700 N/kg · sec (250–270 lbf/lbm · sec). TABLE VI. Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Motorsa ...
  45. [45]
    M-72 Light Anti-tank Weapon (LAW)
    Sep 12, 1998 · Like the RPG-7, the M72 is capable of penetrating a foot of armor, but its ... -Firing Mechanism ......... Percussion. -Front Sight ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Range Safety - Army Garrisons
    Apr 16, 2014 · Antitank rocket launcher surface danger zone criteria, in meters. Area F3. Weapon. Area A. Area B. Minimum range to impact1. Distance. X2.
  47. [47]
    FM 6-60 Chptr 1 System Description - GlobalSecurity.org
    The four stabilizer fins at the aft end of the rocket provide in-flight stability by maintaining a constant counterclockwise spin. The initial spin is imparted ...
  48. [48]
    RPG-7 - Weaponsystems.net
    The RPG-7 is a Soviet-origin, reloadable rocket launcher, developed in the 1950s, with a 40mm tube, and is the most widely used reusable rocket launcher.<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    AT4 - NamuWiki
    Aug 5, 2025 · AT4 ; ammunition. 84mm projectile ; coal feeding. disposable built-in launcher ; Battlefield. 1,020mm ; weight. 6.7kg 8kg (AT4 CS) 1.8kg (projectile ...
  50. [50]
    AT4 - Weaponsystems.net
    400+ mm RHA. Velocity. 285 m/s. Range. 300 m effective. 500 m maximum. Accessories. Sights. Mechanical, flip up sights. Optional detachable optical or night ...
  51. [51]
    PGO-7 RPG Optic - RussianOptics.net
    Originally designed for the infamous RPG-7 rocket launcher, the PGO-7 is a 2.8x optic with PSO style illuminated reticule for low light shooting.
  52. [52]
    The Science Behind the World's Most Ubiquitous Anti-Tank Weapon
    “The system's 6-second redeployment time lets fighters exploit fleeting opportunities that heavier weapons miss.” Modern planners study these engagements to ...
  53. [53]
    RPG-7 - Gun Wiki - Fandom
    Weight. 15.4 pounds (7 kilograms). Feed system. Single-shot. Effective range. 200-500 meters (656.2-1640.4 feet) depending on type of grenade. Maximum effective ...
  54. [54]
    Phase Four Operations in Iraq and the RPG-7 by George J. Mordica
    With the invention of the tandem warhead for the RPG-7, this technique was thought to be obsolete. However that specific warhead, developed as an answer to ...
  55. [55]
    IN0546 Lesson 2 - GlobalSecurity.org
    Apr 27, 2005 · The maximum effective range is 500 meters for stationary targets and 300 meters for moving targets. ... All RPG-7 models have optical ...
  56. [56]
    This Is How an RPG Works | Military.com
    Jun 7, 2019 · The Soviet tactical doctrine regarding the RPG-7 states that it is most effective at 300 meters or at a point blank target with a height of two ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  57. [57]
    TOW 2 Wire-Guided Anti-Tank Missile - Army Technology
    Mar 15, 2022 · The TOW EagleFire launcher is lithium-ion powered, allowing silent watch for nine hours. Other structural and technological improvements include ...
  58. [58]
    Hydra-70 Rocket System - Army Technology
    Sep 18, 2020 · The rocket system can fire at a speed of 2,425ft/s (739m/s). Maximum range of the system is 11,500 yards (10,500m). The Hydra-70 rocket ...
  59. [59]
    Apache Attack Helicopter (AH-64A/D), United States of America
    Apr 28, 2023 · In the close support role, the helicopter carries 16 Hellfire missiles on four four-rail launchers and four air-to-air missiles. The AH-64E ...
  60. [60]
    Hydra 70 multi-platform rocket - Militarnyi
    Aug 2, 2023 · Rocket weighs 6 kg and has a diameter of 70 mm. Its effective range is 8 kilometers, but the distance may vary due to different rocket motors.
  61. [61]
    FM3-09.21 Chptr 7 Combat Service Support - GlobalSecurity.org
    It includes all the requirements related to manning, arming, fueling, fixing, moving, and sustaining the force during military operations.Missing: launcher | Show results with:launcher
  62. [62]
    Customized Artillery Launcher Truck Cab Underscores Crew ...
    Jan 1, 2001 · “As long as sufficient air pressure is kept inside the cab, the crew can fire rockets without having to wear gas masks.” The Army uses similar ...
  63. [63]
    M270 MLRS (Multiple Launch Rocket System), US - Army Technology
    Mar 15, 2023 · An MLRS was deployed in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom in 2003. The US Army fielded the upgraded M270A1 launchers and new army tactical ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  64. [64]
    Multiple Launch Rocket System (M270) - Lockheed Martin
    The MLRS is a highly mobile automatic system that fires surface-to-surface rockets from the M270 family of launcher weapons platforms.Missing: mechanism | Show results with:mechanism
  65. [65]
    BM-30 Smerch 9K58 MLRS - Army Recognition
    Jul 27, 2025 · 300mm Multiple Launch Rocket System - Russia ; NBC protection system, 850 km ; Dimensions. 3, Length:12.37 m; Width: 3.1 m; Height: 3.1 m ; 3 ...
  66. [66]
    9A52-2 BM-30 300-mm Multiple Rocket Launcher - GlobalSecurity.org
    Feb 14, 2018 · 9A52-2 BM-30 Smerch 300-mm Multiple Rocket Launcher ; Warhead Weight (kg), 258 ; Rocket Length (m), 7.6 ; Maximum Velocity, INA ; Fuze Type ...
  67. [67]
    Cluster Munitions: Background and Issues for Congress
    Dec 16, 2024 · Cluster munitions are air-dropped or ground-launched weapons that release a number of smaller submunitions intended to kill enemy personnel or destroy vehicles.Missing: Evolution | Show results with:Evolution
  68. [68]
    Convention on Cluster Munitions. Dublin, 30 May 2008 - UNTC
    The Convention was concluded by the Dublin Diplomatic Conference on Cluster Munitions at Dublin on 30 May 2008. In accordance with its article 15, ...Missing: Evolution multiple rocket systems phase unitary
  69. [69]
    [2.0] Solid-Propellant Rockets - Vectors
    Jun 1, 2024 · The lack of burn control for solid-fuel rockets has led to the development of hybrid rockets that use a solid-fuel core along with a liquid oxidizer.
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Solid Propellants: Composition, Fabrication, Burning
    • used in early modern solid rockets. – in US, initial work done by Navy and part of JPL. – replaced gun/black powder, ... • add HMX, RDX to casting powder in CDB.
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Factors Governing the Storage Life of Solid Propellant Rocket Motors
    The figure required is generally at least 7 to 10 years for rocket charges and 20 to 30 years or longer for gun propellants (see Table 7).Missing: military | Show results with:military
  72. [72]
    Service life prediction of AP/Al/HTPB solid rocket propellant with ...
    The shelf life of this propellant formulation at 25 °C is predicted to be 13 years using the modulus as failure criteria and control parameter.
  73. [73]
    40 mm PG-7VL Round with High-Explosive Anti-tank Grenade PG ...
    Propellant charge type: PG-7PL Length of propellant charge, (mm): 285 ÷ 290.5. Weight of propellant charge, (kg): 0.39. Stabilizer fins span in flight, (mm) ...Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
  74. [74]
    [PDF] Chemical Rocket/Propellant Hazards. Volume 2. Solid ... - DTIC
    auto-ignition temperature, the;best procedure to follow when a fire occurs ... Safety in propellant man- some metallic powders and pyrotechnic ...Missing: 0436 | Show results with:0436
  75. [75]
    [PDF] PART 2 Classification - UNECE
    Class 1. Explosive substances and articles. Class 2. Gases. Class 3. Flammable liquids. Class 4.1 Flammable solids, self-reactive substances and solid ...
  76. [76]
    [PDF] EXPLOSIVE WEAPON EFFECTS - GICHD
    Jul 20, 2006 · These are the high explosive (HE) and high explosive fragmentation (HE-FRAG) types. Other warhead types which rely primarily on high explosive ...
  77. [77]
    [PDF] TB 9-1340-201 - Bulletpicker
    Ammunition for rocket launchers consists ofthe following types, which are classified according to their warhead types. a. High-explosive (HE) (fig. 1 and 2),.
  78. [78]
    [PDF] Discussions to Shaped Charge Jet Tests after MIL-STD-2105B - DTIC
    After the perforation of 100 mm RHA or less the residual jet tip velocities are over 8 mm/µs with large jet diameters. Further missile WH are nearly 100 % using ...
  79. [79]
    The most misunderstood weapon in the world: Mythbusting HEAT ...
    Jun 20, 2024 · According to Dr Held's data, the 150 mm warhead used by HOT 2 reached its peak penetration of 1,150 mm of RHAe at around 1,200 mm of standoff (8 ...
  80. [80]
    RPG-29 Vampir Russian Anti-Tank Rocket Launcher - ODIN
    Aug 7, 2024 · * The PG-29V anti-tank/anti-bunker round has a tandem-charge HEAT warhead for defeating explosive reactive armor (ERA). This warhead is ...
  81. [81]
    [PDF] A GUIDE TO CLUSTER MUNITIONS
    Ground- based cluster munitions include mortar bombs, artillery projectiles and rockets, while air-delivered ordnance includes bombs, rockets and ...
  82. [82]
    TBG-7V
    TBG-7V is a Thermobaric Rocket designed to inflict heavy casualties on the enemy manpower in the open and inside fortifications, but vehicles are also at risk.
  83. [83]
    105mm tbg 7 rocket - CAT-UXO
    It is designed to disable enemy personnel in urban or mountainous terrain (including entrenched enemy combatants in bunkers and buildings) through a combination ...
  84. [84]
    [PDF] XM1156 Precision Guidance Kit (PGK) Overview 2010 Fuze ...
    May 13, 2010 · – Increased Number of Stowed Kills (Reduces Logistics Burden). – Greatly Reduces Possibility of Collateral Damage. • PGK Increment 1 Fielding ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
  85. [85]
    FM3-21.91 Chapter 1 The Role of Antiarmor Organizations
    During tactical operations, antiarmor units suppress, fix, or destroy enemy at long ranges, allowing infantry forces to maneuver. Commanders should task ...
  86. [86]
  87. [87]
    Drones to take Network Integration Evaluation by swarm - Army.mil
    Oct 1, 2015 · Coordinated units of remotely-operated and automated aircraft will be used to represent a possible threat on tomorrow's battlefields.Missing: rocket post-
  88. [88]
    [PDF] aspects regarding the unguided rocket effectiveness
    The hit probability is about 34. The additional data of this simulation is the destruction percentage which is about 41%. In that case the target has a ...
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Explosive Reactive Armour (ERA) Evolution and Impact on Tank ...
    HEAT warheads are neutralized by the ERA's explosion, detonating in the direction of the incoming missile, nullifying its explosive penetration, which would ...
  90. [90]
    FM 23-25: Light Antiarmor Weapons - APPENDIX A (SAFETY)
    This backblast can damage equipment or seriously injure personnel who are too close to the rear of the launcher. When operating temperatures fall below freezing ...Missing: rocket avoidance
  91. [91]
    [PDF] Small-Rocket Noise: Hazards to Hearing (Advanced LAW Program)
    M72 rocket firers face 179 dB without protection, exceeding the damage-risk limit. Standard earplugs allow safe exposure up to 184 dB.
  92. [92]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of the MLRS Ammunition Resupply and Transport Logistics, consolidating all information from the provided segments into a dense and comprehensive response. Where applicable, detailed data is presented in CSV table format for clarity and efficiency. The response retains all key details while avoiding redundancy and adhering to the constraint of no thinking tokens.
  93. [93]
    RPG-7D3 Russia Rocket-Propelled Grenade Launcher - ODIN
    Aug 7, 2024 · Ammunition ... Perhaps the primary reason RPG-7s are so popular is the low cost—anywhere from $500-2 000 for a launcher and $100-500 per rocket.
  94. [94]
    M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System - Wikipedia
    The M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (M270 MLRS) is an American armored self-propelled multiple launch rocket system.
  95. [95]
    [PDF] Army Regulation 750–1 - AVIATION ASSETS
    Feb 2, 2023 · This regulation also applies to the maintenance of all materiel owned or supported by the Army; except materiel purchased with non-appropriated ...
  96. [96]
    [PDF] Defense Demilitarization Procedural Guidance
    Dec 9, 2022 · Demilitarization (DEMIL) of DoD property requires methods like cutting, crushing, shredding, melting, or burning to prevent restoration. For ...
  97. [97]
    [PDF] Improved Conventional Munitions Policy - CSBA
    Mar 7, 2017 · The 2008 Convention on Cluster. Munitions (CCM), also referred to as the Oslo Treaty, calls for the elimination of cluster munitions stockpiles.Missing: pre- | Show results with:pre-
  98. [98]
    Treaties & Agreements - Arms Control Association
    This code is an agreement between states on how they should conduct their missile trade and bolsters efforts to curb ballistic missile proliferation. Latin ...
  99. [99]
    [PDF] Ukrainian Military Performance and Outlook - Congress.gov
    Jun 13, 2025 · Ukraine has nearly exhausted its supplies of Soviet and. Russian artillery and rocket ammunition, making the UAF almost entirely reliant on ...