Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Animal Locomotion

Animal locomotion refers to the diverse mechanisms by which animals propel themselves through their environments, encompassing gaits such as walking, running, swimming, and flying, driven by the coordinated action of muscular contractions, skeletal structures, and neural control systems.^[1] This process enables displacement across varied terrains, including land, water, and air, and is shaped by evolutionary adaptations to optimize speed, efficiency, and stability against physical constraints like gravity, friction, and fluid resistance.^[2] At its core, animal locomotion integrates sensory feedback, motor commands, and biomechanical dynamics to achieve purposeful movement, with muscles serving roles as motors, springs, struts, and brakes to store and release energy effectively.^[1] The study of animal locomotion provides insights into integrative physiology, revealing how metabolic energy input translates into mechanical output through interactions between the motor (muscular) and transmission (skeletal lever) systems.^[3] Key metrics include overall efficiency, defined as the ratio of mechanical work to metabolic cost, and economy, measured as energy expended per unit distance, which vary with factors like speed, body mass, and environmental medium.^[3] For instance, terrestrial locomotion in mammals and birds minimizes nonpropulsive forces for stability, while aquatic and aerial forms emphasize propulsion against drag and lift generation, respectively.^[1] These principles not only explain ecological behaviors like foraging and predator evasion but also inform applications in biomechanics, robotics, and rehabilitation by modeling how animals achieve agile, robust navigation.^[2]

Forms of Locomotion

Terrestrial Movement

Terrestrial locomotion refers to the movement of animals across solid substrates, primarily achieved through the coordinated use of appendages such as legs or, in some cases, body undulation for propulsion.^[4] This form of locomotion contrasts with aquatic or aerial modes by relying on direct interactions with the ground, where gravitational forces and substrate properties dictate the mechanics of support and progression. Animals employ a variety of gaits to navigate land environments, balancing stability, speed, and energetic efficiency. Key gaits in terrestrial locomotion include the walk, trot, and gallop, each characterized by distinct patterns of limb coordination and support. The walk is a symmetrical gait where limbs move in lateral pairs, maintaining at least three feet on the ground for stability at low speeds, with a duty factor (the proportion of stance phase to the full stride cycle) typically exceeding 0.5 to ensure continuous support.^[5] In contrast, the trot involves diagonal limb pairs lifting and placing simultaneously, allowing moderate speeds while reducing vertical oscillations of the body center of mass, though it sacrifices some stability compared to the walk.^[6] The gallop is an asymmetrical gait featuring extended suspension phases and bounding motions, enabling high speeds but with trade-offs in stability due to periods of single-limb or no-limb support; for instance, horses transition to a gallop when musculoskeletal forces exceed critical thresholds during trotting, prioritizing velocity over steady support.^[6] These gaits optimize trade-offs between stability and speed, with slower gaits favoring broader support bases and faster ones emphasizing stride length and frequency.^[5] Limb mechanics vary significantly between quadrupedal and bipedal patterns, influencing overall locomotor efficiency. Quadrupedal animals sequence limbs in patterns that distribute ground reaction forces across multiple supports, often using a hindlimb-lead coordination to propel the body forward while forelimbs provide braking and steering.^[7] The duty factor in quadrupeds typically ranges from 0.4 to 0.6 during walking and trotting, allowing for efficient force production without excessive limb stress.^[8] Bipedal locomotion, as seen in humans and birds, relies on a narrower base of support, requiring upright posture and pendulum-like swinging of the limbs to minimize energy costs, with duty factors around 0.4-0.5 to balance forward momentum and stability.^[9] Limb sequencing in both forms ensures phased overlaps in stance to counteract torque and maintain balance, with evolutionary adaptations refining these patterns for specific body plans.^[10] Representative examples illustrate the diversity of terrestrial movement. In mammalian quadrupeds like horses, gaits progress from a four-beat walk to a two-beat trot and a four-beat gallop, with limb sequencing optimizing speed up to 18 m/s in the latter.^[6]^[11] Reptiles often employ sprawling gaits, where limbs extend laterally from the body, generating propulsion through lateral undulation and low duty factors (around 0.3-0.5) that facilitate quick maneuvers on uneven terrain but limit sustained speed.^[12] Arthropods, such as insects, utilize multi-legged arrays with alternating tripods of support—three legs in stance at a time—for inherent stability, employing metachronal waves of leg motion to achieve efficient progression across complex substrates.^[13] Terrain profoundly influences terrestrial locomotion through variations in friction, substrate compliance, and slip resistance. On frictional surfaces like soil or rock, animals generate propulsive forces via tangential ground reactions, but compliant substrates such as sand reduce effective friction, necessitating wider stance angles or slower speeds to prevent sinking.^[14] Anti-slip mechanisms, including claws in mammals and adhesive pads in lizards and insects, enhance grip by increasing contact area or interlocking with rough textures, allowing animals to maintain traction on low-friction inclines or wet surfaces without altering gait fundamentally. These adaptations enable animals to modulate limb forces dynamically, ensuring progression across diverse land environments.

Aquatic Propulsion

Aquatic locomotion in animals is governed by hydrodynamic principles that differ markedly from those in terrestrial or aerial environments, primarily due to the density and viscosity of water. Drag reduction is achieved through streamlined body shapes that minimize frictional and pressure drag, allowing animals to move efficiently through fluid media. Buoyancy compensation plays a crucial role, as water's near-neutral density relative to many aquatic organisms reduces the energy needed to maintain position, though active adjustments are required to counter variations in depth and pressure.^[15] The Reynolds number (Re), defined as the ratio of inertial to viscous forces (Re = ρUL/μ, where ρ is fluid density, U is velocity, L is characteristic length, and μ is viscosity), determines the flow regime: low Re favors viscous-dominated flows in small organisms, while high Re leads to inertial-dominated turbulence in larger swimmers. Propulsion in aquatic animals employs diverse strategies tailored to body morphology and habitat. Undulatory propulsion involves propagating wave-like motions along the body, as seen in eel-like swimmers where lateral undulations generate thrust via reactive forces from the surrounding water.^[16] Oscillatory propulsion relies on rhythmic oscillations of appendages, such as tail beats in fish, producing thrust through vortex shedding and momentum transfer to the fluid.^[17] Jet propulsion, utilized by cephalopods like squid, involves rapid contraction of a muscular mantle to expel water through a siphon, creating reactive thrust for bursts of speed.^[18] Fins and appendages are specialized for distinct roles in aquatic propulsion, enhancing maneuverability and efficiency. Pectoral fins primarily facilitate turning and stability by generating lift and torque, while caudal fins provide the majority of forward thrust through oscillatory motions.^[18] Optimal efficiency in oscillatory propulsion is characterized by the Strouhal number (St = fA/U, where f is oscillation frequency, A is amplitude, and U is forward speed), with values typically between 0.2 and 0.4 across diverse swimmers, ensuring effective vortex formation for thrust without excessive energy loss.^[19] Representative examples illustrate these principles in action. In teleost fish, carangiform swimming features significant body undulation with tail beats concentrated posteriorly, balancing speed and maneuverability, whereas thunniform mode in tunas restricts motion to the caudal fin for high-speed, efficient cruising with minimal drag.^[20] Cetaceans employ fluking, where broad, flexible tail flukes oscillate vertically to generate lift-based thrust, optimized for sustained travel in open water.^[21] Crustaceans, such as shrimp, use metachronal paddling of pleopods—coordinated, wave-like appendage strokes—to produce both lift and thrust, enabling agile escape responses in viscous flows.^[22] Adaptations to depth and pressure further refine aquatic propulsion. Many fish achieve neutral buoyancy via swim bladders, gas-filled organs that adjust volume to match ambient pressure, minimizing vertical movement costs and allowing energy allocation to horizontal propulsion.

Aerial Flight

Aerial flight in animals depends on aerodynamic principles to produce lift that counters gravitational force while managing drag to enable efficient propulsion through the low-density medium of air. The primary equation governing lift generation is L = \frac{1}{2} \rho v^2 S C_L, where L represents lift, \rho is air density, v is the relative airflow velocity, S is the wing area, and C_L is the dimensionless lift coefficient influenced by wing geometry and motion.^[23] This coefficient peaks at optimal angles but declines sharply beyond a critical threshold due to airflow separation. Drag, comprising induced components from vortex shedding and profile components from surface friction, acts opposite to motion and scales similarly with dynamic pressure (\frac{1}{2} \rho v^2).^[23] The angle of attack—the angle between the wing's chord line and incoming airflow—typically ranges from 5° to 15° in steady flight for birds and bats to maximize C_L without inducing stall, where lift drops and drag surges as the boundary layer detaches from the wing surface.^[24] Flying animals utilize distinct flight modes tailored to energy demands and environmental conditions: flapping, gliding, and soaring. Flapping flight, the most versatile and powered form, involves cyclical wing oscillations driven by thoracic muscles, generating lift and thrust on both downstrokes and upstrokes in taxa like birds and insects for hovering, climbing, or forward travel.^[25] Gliding represents a passive mode where extended wings produce lift to sustain forward glide at a steady descent angle, balancing weight against aerodynamic forces without active muscle input, as seen in squirrels or flying lizards during short leaps. Soaring, an advanced passive strategy, leverages atmospheric updrafts—such as thermals or slope winds—to circle and gain altitude, minimizing energy use for long-distance travel in large raptors and vultures.^[26] Wing morphologies have evolved convergently to optimize aerodynamics across taxa, reflecting trade-offs in rigidity, flexibility, and control. Bird wings feature a bony framework supporting asymmetrical feathers that form a cambered airfoil, enabling high lift-to-drag ratios during gliding and precise adjustments via feather vanes for turbulence resistance.^[27] In contrast, bat wings comprise a patagium—a thin, elastic membrane spanning elongated digits and body—allowing dynamic camber changes and superior maneuverability at low speeds, though this coupled evolution with hindlimbs constrains niche diversification relative to birds.^[27] Insects employ paired, vein-reinforced chitinous wings, with the fore- and hindwings often coupled via mechanisms like hamuli (hooks) in bees or jugal lobes in flies to synchronize motion and amplify force as a unified aerofoil, enhancing stability in unsteady flows.^[28] Diverse examples highlight adaptations in aerial locomotion. During migration, many avian species like white storks rely on soaring along thermal corridors to traverse continents, covering thousands of kilometers with intermittent flapping to exploit uplift and reduce metabolic costs.^[26] Extinct pterosaurs achieved unparalleled scale, with species such as Quetzalcoatlus boasting wingspans of 10–11 meters supported by an elongated fourth finger and membrane, facilitating sustained soaring over Mesozoic skies using lightweight, pneumatized bones.^[29] Hummingbirds exemplify agile hovering, flapping their wings at frequencies up to 80 Hz in smaller species through a horizontal stroke plane and supinated upstrokes that generate 25–75% of weight support, powered by enlarged pectoral muscles occupying 30% of body mass.^[30] Initiating and terminating flight demand specialized maneuvers to manage transitions from stationary states. Takeoff often incorporates jump-assisted launches, where hindlimb extension provides initial momentum—contributing 25% of acceleration in pigeons—followed by downward-tilted wingbeats (stroke plane angles of -47° to -60°) at high angles of attack (up to 60° in parrotlets) to redirect drag into thrust and lift.^[31]^[32] Landing emphasizes stall prevention through gradual angle-of-attack reduction and drag augmentation; birds like pigeons reorient the stroke plane upward (to +17°) and flare the tail vertically, dissipating kinetic energy while maintaining lift to avoid uncontrolled descent, with wings supplying over 33% of braking force in final beats.^[31] In bats, membrane flexibility further aids controlled flaring, while insects use rapid deceleration flaps to align with perches.^[32]

Specialized Modes

Burrowing represents a specialized form of locomotion adapted for subterranean environments, where animals navigate through soil or sediment using body morphologies that minimize resistance and maximize propulsion without relying on appendages for primary movement. Earthworms, for instance, employ peristaltic body waves, alternately contracting circular and longitudinal muscles to generate waves of expansion and contraction along their segmented bodies, allowing them to push through soil by anchoring rear segments while advancing the anterior.^[33] Moles facilitate burrowing with wedge-shaped heads that reduce soil entry resistance and powerful, spade-like foreclaws that excavate and displace material laterally, enabling rapid tunnel construction in compact soils.^[34] These mechanisms address key mechanical challenges, such as overcoming soil compaction through localized pressure application and minimizing friction via streamlined body shapes or mucus secretion, which prevents appendage-independent animals from becoming immobilized in granular media.^[33] Sliding and inching modes enable slow, controlled progression across irregular or low-friction surfaces, often in moist or viscous conditions. Snails achieve this through pedal waves in their muscular foot, gliding over a self-produced mucus trail that acts as both lubricant and adhesive, reducing energy expenditure by up to 30% when following existing trails laid by conspecifics.^[35] On sandy substrates, snakes employ lateral undulation, propagating sinusoidal body waves that contact sand grains at multiple points to generate thrust, with body curvature optimized to balance propulsion efficiency against frictional drag in loose, cohesionless environments.^[36] These techniques are particularly suited to desert surface travel, where animals like sand snakes exploit granular flow to minimize sinking and maintain forward momentum without limbs.^[37] Other specialized modes include saltation in sandfish lizards (Scincus scincus), which alternate between rapid limb-driven surface dashes and subsurface undulation to traverse desert dunes, using explosive jumps to clear obstacles or initiate dives into sand for evasion.^[38] Spiderlings, in contrast, utilize ballooning for passive dispersal, releasing silk threads that create aerodynamic drag in low-altitude winds or electrostatic fields, allowing lift-off and controlled descent over distances up to several kilometers without active propulsion.^[39] Such adaptations fill unique environmental niches, including subterranean navigation where blind mole rats integrate magnetic compass cues with path integration during locomotion to orient in featureless tunnels.^[40] In arid landscapes, these modes support survival by facilitating access to hidden prey or escape routes amid extreme temperatures and shifting substrates.^[37]

Biomechanical Principles

Kinematics

Kinematics in animal locomotion encompasses the descriptive study of motion, focusing on spatial and temporal patterns such as position, velocity, and acceleration, independent of the forces involved. This branch of biomechanics provides a geometric framework for understanding how animals traverse environments, from terrestrial strides to aerial flaps, by analyzing trajectories and cycle timings. Seminal work in this field integrates observations across taxa to reveal common principles in motion descriptors.^[41] Core kinematic variables include displacement, defined as the vector change in an animal's position over time; linear velocity, the first derivative representing speed and direction of translation; angular velocity, quantifying rotational rates at joints or appendages; and acceleration profiles, which capture velocity changes within locomotion cycles like strides or wingbeats. These variables are periodic in cyclic gaits, allowing decomposition into stance and swing phases for terrestrial animals or upstroke and downstroke for flyers. For example, acceleration often peaks during propulsion phases, enabling bursts of speed.^[41] A key metric for analyzing terrestrial motion is the relationship between speed, stride length (SL, the distance covered per full cycle), and stride frequency (SF, cycles per unit time), given by the equation v = \text{SL} \times \text{SF}. This formula scales predictably with body size across mammals, from mice to horses, where larger animals achieve higher speeds through proportionally longer strides despite lower frequencies—e.g., mice trot at frequencies up to 10 Hz with SL around 0.05 m, while horses gallop at 2-3 Hz with SL exceeding 7 m. Such scaling underscores how kinematics adapt to morphological constraints for efficient progression.^[42] Quantitative assessment relies on coordinate systems to track joint angles and center-of-mass (CoM) trajectories during gaits. Joint angles are measured relative to anatomical planes, such as flexion-extension in the sagittal plane for limb protraction and retraction. In symmetrical gaits like walking or trotting in quadrupeds, the CoM follows a laterally undulating or fore-aft sinusoidal trajectory, with vertical excursions minimized to conserve energy through vaulting over stance limbs; for instance, in small mammals, this path exhibits pronounced lateral sway to maintain stability.^[41] Measurement techniques have evolved from historical chronophotography to advanced digital systems. In the late 19th century, Eadweard Muybridge's Animal Locomotion (1887) employed arrays of up to 36 cameras triggered by tripwires to sequentially capture phases of horse gallops and other motions, revealing previously invisible gait details like mid-air limb suspension. Contemporary methods use optical motion capture with infrared cameras and markers for precise 3D reconstruction of external kinematics, while X-ray-based techniques like XROMM enable visualization of internal bone movements in vivo, achieving sub-millimeter accuracy at high frame rates.^[43] Illustrative examples highlight kinematic diversity. In cheetahs, acceleration curves during sprints show rapid velocity increases from 0 to 25 m/s within seconds, driven by stride frequencies rising to 3.4 Hz and lengths extending to 7.6 m, with forelimb protraction angles optimizing ground contact. In birds, wing kinematics during steady flight involve angular excursions of 90-120° in the downstroke for thrust generation, as seen in pigeons where stroke plane angles adjust from 0° (horizontal) at low speeds to 45° at cruising velocities around 10 m/s, facilitating aerodynamic efficiency.^[44]

Kinetics

Kinetics in animal locomotion examines the forces and torques that produce motion, governed by fundamental physical principles. Newton's laws of motion form the basis for understanding these dynamics: the first law describes inertial tendencies in steady gaits where net forces balance to maintain constant velocity; the second law quantifies acceleration as proportional to net force and inversely to mass, explaining how animals accelerate or decelerate during bursts of speed; and the third law accounts for action-reaction pairs, such as limb-ground interactions that propel the body forward.^[45] These laws apply across taxa, from insects to mammals, revealing how external forces like gravity and internal muscle forces interact to drive movement.^[46] The impulse-momentum theorem further elucidates how animals initiate and sustain locomotion, stating that the impulse (force integrated over time) equals the change in linear momentum (mass times velocity change). In jumping or starting from rest, animals generate impulses through rapid force application, as seen in the hindlimbs storing elastic energy before release to achieve takeoff velocities. This theorem predicts that longer contact times with lower peak forces or shorter times with higher peaks can yield equivalent momentum changes, optimizing for different locomotor demands like endurance versus explosive power.^[46] Ground reaction forces (GRFs) are the primary external forces in terrestrial locomotion, arising from Newton's third law as the ground pushes back against the limb. Vertical GRFs support body weight and typically peak early in stance phase, often exceeding body weight by 1.5–2 times in walking gaits to counteract gravitational loading. Horizontal GRFs include braking components at initial contact to decelerate forward momentum and propulsive components late in stance to accelerate the body, with net horizontal impulse determining stride-to-stride velocity changes in symmetrical gaits like trots. In asymmetrical gaits such as gallops, forelimb braking impulses are larger, while hindlimbs provide greater propulsion.^[47]^[48] Torques, or rotational forces, arise at joints from GRFs and limb inertia, quantified as joint moments (force times perpendicular distance from joint center). These moments must be counteracted by muscle forces to control limb posture; for instance, hip extensor moments peak during early stance to support weight transfer, scaling with body size such that larger animals experience higher absolute torques but similar relative safety factors due to proportional muscle cross-sections. Limb effective mass, the apparent mass influencing acceleration, increases with distal segment loading, raising energetic demands as it amplifies inertial torques during swing phase. Leverage effects from joint geometry modulate these moments, with longer moment arms enhancing torque output but requiring precise control to avoid instability.^[49]^[46] In elephants, foot pressure distribution exemplifies kinetic adaptations for large-scale stability, with peak pressures reaching up to approximately 950 kPa, primarily on the lateral digits, to distribute GRFs evenly and minimize tissue stress on soft substrates.^[50] Conversely, fleas achieve extraordinary jumps via high impulses: hindleg GRFs generate forces up to 200 times body weight over milliseconds, transmitting stored elastic energy through lever-like tibiae to propel the 0.7 mg body to heights of 20 cm.^[51] Dynamic stability during locomotion balances these forces to prevent falls, particularly in turns where centrifugal forces act outward, requiring inward GRFs to provide centripetal acceleration (v²/r, where v is tangential speed and r is turn radius). Animals maintain balance by adjusting limb placement and modulating GRF vectors; for example, dogs in sharp turns generate lateral GRFs up to 0.8 times body weight on inner limbs to counteract centrifugal tendencies, with medium-sized animals achieving higher centripetal forces relative to friction limits than smaller or larger counterparts. This interplay ensures momentum conservation while negotiating curved paths without loss of control.^[52]^[53]

Structural Adaptations

Animal locomotion relies on diverse skeletal designs that provide structural support and enable movement. Arthropods, such as insects and crustaceans, possess exoskeletons composed of chitinous cuticles that offer external protection and leverage points for muscle attachment, facilitating rapid, segmented locomotion like walking or flying.^[54] In contrast, vertebrates feature endoskeletons made of bone and cartilage, which allow internal muscle attachment and growth without molting, supporting complex gaits in tetrapods.^[54] Soft-bodied animals, including annelids and cnidarians, utilize hydrostatic skeletons—fluid-filled compartments surrounded by muscular walls—that generate peristaltic waves for crawling or burrowing.^[55] Muscle architectures further adapt to locomotion demands by optimizing force generation and velocity. Fusiform muscles, with parallel fiber arrangements, enable fast shortening for activities like swimming in fish or sprinting in cheetahs, prioritizing speed over force.^[56] Pennate muscles, featuring oblique fiber insertions, produce greater force through shorter fibers, as seen in the powerful hindlimb muscles of birds for takeoff.^[56] Antagonist muscle pairs, such as flexors and extensors around joints, provide bidirectional control essential for precise movements, counteracting each other to stabilize limbs during locomotion in mammals.^[57] Material properties of locomotor structures enhance efficiency by storing and releasing energy. Bones exhibit viscoelastic elasticity, with Young's modulus around 10-20 GPa, allowing deformation under load without fracture during impacts in running animals.^[4] Tendons, particularly the Achilles in kangaroos, act as springs with high elastic modulus (up to 1.5 GPa), storing and returning elastic strain energy that can account for up to 78% of the mechanical work of locomotion during hopping, reducing metabolic costs.^[58] Recent computational models, including finite element analyses, have further elucidated stress distributions in scaled skeletal structures across taxa.^[59] Scaling laws govern how structural adaptations vary with body size, following geometric allometry where limb length L scales proportionally to body mass M as L \propto M^{1/3} under isometric growth, maintaining similar stress levels across sizes.^[60] Deviations occur in specialized forms; for instance, giraffe necks leverage elongated cervical vertebrae for counterbalancing long strides, enhancing stability in walking despite low mechanical advantage.^[61] Similarly, octopus arms employ hydrostatic flexibility with longitudinal, transverse, and oblique muscles for multi-directional propulsion, enabling crawling or jet-assisted swimming without rigid joints.^[62]

Physiological Mechanisms

Energy Utilization

Animal locomotion relies on a combination of aerobic and anaerobic metabolic pathways to supply energy for muscle contraction. Aerobic metabolism, which utilizes oxygen to oxidize fuels like carbohydrates and fats, supports sustained locomotion by producing ATP through oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria, enabling prolonged activity without rapid fatigue.^[63] In contrast, anaerobic metabolism, including glycolysis and phosphagen breakdown, provides rapid ATP for short bursts of high-intensity movement, such as sprinting or escaping predators, but leads to lactate accumulation and fatigue after brief durations.^[63] The fundamental energy currency for these processes is ATP hydrolysis by myosin ATPase in muscle fibers, with rates varying by muscle type and activity intensity; for instance, fast-twitch fibers exhibit higher hydrolysis rates during explosive locomotion to match elevated power demands.^[64] The cost of transport (COT), defined as the energy expended per unit distance traveled per unit body mass, serves as a key metric for assessing locomotor efficiency across species and environments. In most terrestrial and aquatic animals, COT exhibits a characteristic U-shaped curve as a function of speed, with the minimum value occurring at an optimal speed where energy use per distance is lowest, typically balancing the trade-off between high metabolic rates at low speeds (due to static posture costs) and increased drag or inertial losses at high speeds.^[65] This minimum COT scales negatively with body size, allowing larger animals like elephants to transport themselves more economically over long distances compared to smaller ones like mice.^[65] Locomotor efficiency is quantified as the ratio of mechanical work output (e.g., positive work against gravity or drag) to metabolic energy input, revealing how effectively animals convert chemical energy into movement. Across taxa, efficiencies range from 20-50%, with human walking achieving up to 40% efficiency through inverted pendulum mechanics that minimize active muscle work by leveraging gravitational potential energy exchanges.^[66] In flying and swimming, efficiencies are generally lower (10-30%) due to continuous propulsion against fluid resistance, though specialized adaptations can enhance them.^[63] Several factors modulate energy utilization during locomotion, including speed, load, and movement pattern. Animals typically select speeds near the COT minimum to optimize energy economy, as deviations increase metabolic demands exponentially; for example, doubling speed from the optimum can raise COT by 50-100% in running mammals.^[67] Load carrying elevates COT proportionally to the added mass, as seen in ants transporting fragments where metabolic rates rise linearly with payload relative to body weight, reflecting increased force requirements per stride.^[68] Intermittent locomotion, involving pauses or gliding phases, yields energy savings by reducing continuous muscle activation; studies on lizards and birds show up to 20-30% lower costs compared to steady movement, as pauses allow recovery and minimize drag during inactive periods.^[69] Notable examples illustrate these principles across taxa. Wandering albatrosses achieve exceptional efficiency in soaring flight through dynamic soaring, extracting kinetic energy from wind shear gradients to maintain speeds of 15-20 m/s with minimal metabolic input—estimated at less than 10% of flapping costs—enabling transoceanic migrations covering thousands of kilometers.^[70] In contrast, ants like Camponotus demonstrate high relative energy demands in terrestrial locomotion, with oxygen consumption rates increasing 4.3-fold above resting levels during level walking at 5 mm/s and up to 6.9-fold on steep inclines, underscoring the metabolic intensity of small-bodied, load-bearing movement despite their efficiency in minimizing COT through rapid strides.^[71]

Neural Coordination

Neural coordination in animal locomotion involves intricate interactions between central and peripheral nervous system components that generate, modulate, and adapt rhythmic motor patterns essential for movement. Central pattern generators (CPGs) are key spinal circuits in vertebrates that produce rhythmic outputs for locomotion without requiring continuous supraspinal input, enabling activities such as walking, swimming, and flying. These networks consist of interconnected interneurons and motoneurons that self-sustain oscillatory activity, as demonstrated in decerebrate cat preparations where fictive locomotion persists after sensory disconnection.^[72]^[73] Reflexes provide rapid peripheral modulation to these central rhythms, ensuring stability and responsiveness during locomotion. The stretch reflex, mediated by muscle spindles and Ia afferents, contributes to stance phase support by automatically adjusting muscle tension in response to lengthening, as observed in cat hindlimb muscles during treadmill walking where reflex gain increases with load compliance.^[74] In contrast, the withdrawal reflex, a polysynaptic response to noxious stimuli, interrupts ongoing locomotor patterns to protect the limb, such as by resetting the swimming rhythm in amphibian spinal cords via flexor activation.^[75] These reflexes integrate briefly with sensory inputs to fine-tune CPG outputs, enhancing adaptability without overriding the core rhythm. Supraspinal structures exert higher-level control over locomotor initiation, maintenance, and modulation. The brainstem, particularly the mesencephalic locomotor region and reticular formation, initiates locomotion by descending commands that activate spinal CPGs, as shown in decerebrate cats where electrical stimulation evokes rhythmic activity.^[76] The cerebral cortex provides voluntary modulation, enabling gait adjustments like speed changes or turning through direct and indirect pathways, with neurons in the motor cortex encoding directional preferences during cat locomotion.^[77] Neural plasticity allows locomotor circuits to adapt to learning and injury, reshaping patterns for improved performance. In vertebrates, repeated training induces use-dependent changes in spinal interneurons, facilitating new gait acquisition, such as transitioning from walking to trotting in rats via strengthened synaptic connections.^[78] Following spinal cord injury, plasticity promotes recovery by reorganizing CPG networks, as evidenced by locomotor retraining in spinalized cats that restores hindlimb coordination through enhanced interneuron excitability.^[79] A classic example of CPG function is the lamprey's swimming circuit, where segmental oscillators in the spinal cord generate undulatory waves, modeled as coupled phase oscillators that propagate caudal-rostrally for propulsion.^[80] In insects, walking algorithms rely on thoracic CPGs that coordinate leg motoneurons for alternating gaits, with networks in stick insects producing tripod patterns modifiable by neuromodulators like octopamine.^[81] These examples illustrate the conserved yet adaptable nature of neural coordination across taxa.

Sensory Integration

Sensory integration in animal locomotion involves the processing and combination of inputs from multiple sensory modalities to ensure stability, adaptability, and precise movement control. These sensory systems provide both feedforward predictions of body motion and feedback corrections based on real-time environmental interactions, enabling animals to navigate diverse terrains and maintain equilibrium during various gaits.^[82] Proprioception, the sense of body position and movement, relies on specialized receptors in muscles, tendons, and joints to monitor limb configuration and force during locomotion. Muscle spindles detect changes in muscle length and velocity, while Golgi tendon organs sense tension to prevent overload, and joint receptors provide information on angular positions. These signals allow for continuous adjustment of stride length and posture, as seen in the coordinated limb movements of walking mammals where proprioceptive feedback refines motor patterns to match intended trajectories.^[83]^[84] The vestibular system, located in the inner ear, detects head orientation and acceleration to maintain balance during locomotion. Semicircular canals respond to rotational movements, signaling angular acceleration, while otolith organs sense linear acceleration and gravitational tilt. In vertebrates, this input stabilizes the head against body perturbations, such as those occurring during trotting or galloping, by integrating with postural reflexes to counteract destabilizing forces.^[85]^[86] Visual and exteroceptive cues contribute to locomotion by providing anticipatory information about the environment. Optic flow—the apparent motion of visual features across the retina—enables speed estimation and terrain preview, allowing animals to adjust gait in response to obstacles or slopes. For instance, in flying insects and running mammals, optic flow patterns inform distance to barriers and self-motion velocity, facilitating collision avoidance and path correction without direct contact. Tactile exteroception, such as antennal sensing in arthropods, supplements this by detecting immediate surface textures during ground traversal.^[87]^[88] Multisensory fusion combines these inputs in the central nervous system to produce a unified percept of body-environment interactions, enhancing locomotor robustness. The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), for example, integrates vestibular signals with visual feedback to stabilize gaze during head movements in locomotion, countering retinal slip from optic flow. In insects, tactile cues from legs or antennae fuse with visual flow to refine steering, as in cockroaches navigating cluttered environments. This integration follows principles where congruent signals amplify responses, improving accuracy in dynamic conditions.^[89]^[90]^[82] A classic example is the cat's righting reflex, where vestibular detection of angular displacement during free fall triggers rapid body reorientation to land on all fours, integrating otolith and canal inputs for precise gravitational alignment. In bees, polarization vision detects the skylight's e-vector pattern to maintain navigational heading during flight, fusing with optic flow for stable path integration over long distances. These mechanisms highlight how sensory integration supports adaptive locomotion across taxa.^[91]^[92]

Evolutionary and Ecological Contexts

Historical Development

The earliest forms of animal locomotion trace back to the Precambrian era, particularly the Ediacaran period (approximately 635–541 million years ago), where soft-bodied metazoans exhibited rudimentary mobility. Cnidarian-grade organisms, such as medusa-like forms, relied on passive drifting facilitated by water currents and simple pulsatile contractions for limited propulsion in marine environments.^[93] In contrast, emerging bilaterians demonstrated active crawling behaviors, as evidenced by trace fossils like simple trackways and burrows from late Ediacaran deposits, indicating the evolution of muscular coordination for substrate interaction.^[94] These early bilaterians, including fossils like Ikaria wariootia, represent a pivotal shift toward directed locomotion, likely driven by the need for foraging and evasion in benthic habitats.^[95] The Cambrian explosion, beginning around 541 million years ago, marked a profound diversification of locomotor strategies with the emergence of complex appendages. Arthropods, such as trilobites and early euarthropods, evolved jointed legs (endopodites and exopodites) for efficient walking and swimming on the seafloor, enabling rapid colonization of diverse niches.^[96] Concurrently, early chordates developed finned structures supported by a notochord, facilitating undulatory swimming; fossils from the Chengjiang biota illustrate these primitive fins as precursors to more advanced vertebrate appendages.^[97] This burst of innovation, documented in lagerstätten like the Burgess Shale, underscores how segmented limbs and fins provided selective advantages for predation and escape during the period's ecological upheaval.^[98] A key evolutionary transition occurred in the Devonian period (419–359 million years ago), as lobe-finned fishes (sarcopterygians) adapted robust, fleshy fins for weight-bearing in shallow waters, paving the way for tetrapod limbs. The fossil Tiktaalik roseae, dated to about 375 million years ago, exemplifies this shift with its pectoral fins featuring robust bones, wrist-like elements, and mobile neck, allowing push-up motions and rudimentary terrestrial excursion.^[99] These adaptations bridged aquatic undulation to terrestrial walking, with subsequent tetrapods like Acanthostega refining limb structure for land navigation.^[100] Later transitions from reptilian ancestors further refined locomotion. Synapsids, the precursors to mammals, evolved from basal amniotes in the Permian (299–252 million years ago), gradually acquiring more efficient sprawling gaits and, by the late Triassic, erect postures for enhanced speed and endurance; forelimb diversity in early synapsids already rivaled that of modern mammals.^[101] In parallel, archosaurian reptiles gave rise to birds through theropod dinosaurs, with Archaeopteryx lithographica (circa 150 million years ago) displaying feathered wings and skeletal features indicative of active flapping flight, including an enlarged brain for aerial coordination.^[102] These developments highlight convergent evolution toward specialized terrestrial and aerial locomotion. Underpinning these milestones are genetic mechanisms, particularly Hox genes, which pattern appendage development along the body axis in a conserved manner across phyla. In arthropods and vertebrates, Hox clusters regulate segment identity and limb positioning, with variations in expression driving diversification from simple fins to complex limbs; for instance, nested Hox patterns in lobe-finned fish foreshadow tetrapod digit formation.^[103] Fossil and molecular evidence confirms that these genes originated in early bilaterians, providing a developmental toolkit for locomotor innovation throughout metazoan history.^[97]

Environmental Influences

Environmental influences profoundly shape animal locomotion by imposing selective pressures on movement strategies, where physical surroundings, temperature regimes, and biotic interactions dictate performance optima. Habitats impose structural constraints that favor specialized locomotor modes: in dense forest canopies, arboreal animals prioritize agility and precision to traverse discontinuous supports, while open plains enable cursorial species to evolve for explosive linear acceleration. Climatic factors modulate locomotor physiology, with extreme temperatures altering muscle function and heat management during activity. Ecological demands, including predation risks and resource pursuit, further refine speed profiles and efficiency, often intersecting with behavioral adjustments that allow real-time adaptations to substrate variability. Habitat structure directly influences locomotor evolution and execution. Arboreal environments, characterized by narrow branches and gaps, select for leaping and clinging abilities; for example, squirrels in forest canopies perform targeted leaps with rapid mid-air adjustments to land successfully on slender perches, optimizing energy use in fragmented three-dimensional spaces.^[104] Conversely, expansive open plains facilitate sustained sprinting in pursuit predators, where cheetahs attain peak velocities of up to approximately 19 m/s during hunting via a galloping gait that minimizes vertical center-of-mass displacement and body pitching, enabling efficient chases over long distances.^[105] These contrasts highlight how terrain openness reduces maneuver demands but amplifies the need for raw speed, while canopy complexity emphasizes stability and quick directional changes. Climatic extremes impose thermal constraints on locomotor performance, prompting adaptations that balance heat retention or loss with mobility. In frigid polar regions, low temperatures induce muscle stiffness in species like polar bears, restricting endurance running but allowing brief sprints without overheating due to dense fur insulation that traps body heat.^[106] In scorching deserts, heat dissipation becomes critical during locomotion; camels mitigate hyperthermia through nasal countercurrent water evaporation and selective panting, sustaining travel across hot sands without excessive water loss.^[107] Desert antelopes similarly exhibit convergent physiological tweaks, such as enhanced sweat glands and reflective pelage, to maintain sprint capacity under high ambient heat loads.^[108] These mechanisms ensure locomotor viability within narrow thermal windows, where deviations can impair speed or provoke fatigue. Ecological roles amplify environmental pressures on locomotion, particularly through predator-prey dynamics and foraging imperatives. Evasion tactics prioritize burst acceleration and erratic trajectories; prey in open habitats, such as gazelles, achieve escape success by unpredictable turns that outmaneuver pursuing carnivores, reducing capture risk in exposed settings.^[109] Foraging efficiency, meanwhile, demands locomotion that minimizes energy expenditure per resource gained; mesopredators in varied terrains balance search speeds with vigilance, using moderate gaits to scan for prey while evading larger threats, thereby optimizing net energy intake.^[110] Such strategies underscore how biotic interactions calibrate locomotor traits to survival trade-offs in specific ecosystems. Behavioral plasticity enables animals to fine-tune gaits across heterogeneous substrates, enhancing adaptability without fixed morphological overhauls. Primates like cotton-top tamarins adjust stride parameters on sloped surfaces, decreasing hindlimb protraction and increasing gait diagonality on declines to preserve balance and reduce slip risk during arboreal traversal.^[111] This flexibility manifests in gait transitions— from trots to bounds—on uneven or compliant grounds, allowing seamless shifts that maintain propulsion efficiency amid environmental variability. Illustrative examples reveal these influences in aquatic and aerial realms. In coral reef habitats, fish such as wrasses employ labriform swimming, powered by pectoral fins, for intricate maneuvering around coral protrusions, favoring high turning radii over straight-line velocity to exploit refuges and pursue elusive prey.^[112] Among migratory birds, wind utilization boosts locomotor economy; greenfinches, for instance, attain maximal energy conversion efficiency at mid-range flight speeds by leveraging tailwinds, which reduce mechanical power demands during long-distance sojourns.^[113] These cases exemplify how fluid media amplify environmental modulation of movement, integrating hydrodynamic or aerodynamic aids into core locomotor repertoires.

Diversity Across Taxa

Animal locomotion exhibits profound diversity across major phyla, reflecting adaptations to varied ecological niches and body plans. Invertebrates often rely on simple, fluid-mediated or ciliary mechanisms for movement, while arthropods leverage segmented appendages for stability and speed on land. Vertebrates, in contrast, employ more complex musculoskeletal systems enabling specialized gaits like hopping or flight, with outliers in other groups showcasing unique hydraulic or propulsive strategies. This variation underscores the evolutionary convergence and divergence in locomotor solutions.^[114] Among invertebrates, platyhelminthes, such as free-living flatworms (triclads), utilize ciliary gliding for slow, steady locomotion over surfaces, particularly in aquatic environments. The ventral epidermis is densely ciliated, with rhythmic beating of cilia generating propulsive forces, often aided by mucus secretion for reduced friction; some species switch to muscular peristalsis for rapid escape responses. This mechanism enables speeds of approximately 1-2 mm/s, comparable to other small ciliary movers, and facilitates efficient foraging and navigation in microhabitats.^[114]^[115]^[116] Cnidarians, including jellyfish medusae, employ jet propulsion for swimming, contracting subumbrellar muscles to expel water downward through the bell, with elastic mesoglea storing and recovering strain energy to enhance efficiency. This pulsatile mechanism generates pressures of 20-30 Pa and achieves speeds from 0.02 m/s in species like Carybdea to 0.15 m/s in Stomolophus meleagris, saving up to 37% of muscular energy and serving both escape and feeding functions. Long-duration action potentials in the bell muscles, akin to cardiac potentials, support this energy-efficient recoil.^[114]^[117] Arthropods demonstrate advanced legged locomotion, with hexapods like insects achieving stability through an alternating tripod gait, where at least three legs maintain ground contact to prevent tipping during rapid movement. In cockroaches, for instance, hind and middle legs generate propulsive power while front legs absorb impact, enabling dynamic stability at high speeds and transitions from trot to gallop gaits; this coordination, studied via energy transfer models, inspires hexapedal robot designs. Myriapods, such as centipedes and millipedes, exploit body segmentation for wave-like progression, with metachronal leg waves and repetitive muscular contractions allowing flexible, endurance-based travel. Scolopendromorph centipedes use a "top gear" gait with rigid exoskeletons for speeds up to 480 mm/s (20 body lengths/s), while millipedes push at lower velocities of 6.4 mm/s with high duty factors; oxygen consumption scales linearly with speed, though aerobic capacity limits endurance compared to insects.^[114]^[118] In vertebrates, amphibians like frogs employ hopping as an energy-efficient terrestrial strategy, using elongated hind limbs (up to 14% body mass) and elastic tendons to store kinetic energy during ground contact, recoiling it for takeoff at angles near 45° for optimal distance. Species such as Osteopilus achieve standing long jumps of 1.44 m with accelerations over ~0.06 s, minimizing friction work through series of discrete hops. Mammals feature cursorial limbs adapted for sustained running, with elongated bones and tendons in species like horses and cheetahs enabling stride lengths that scale with speed and reduce stress proportional to body mass^{0.10}. Elastic energy in tendons, as in kangaroos, lowers the cost of transport, supporting sprint speeds of up to approximately 19 m/s in wild cheetahs over short bursts.^[119]^[105] Avian locomotion often involves asymmetry due to pronograde trunk orientation, causing differential leg function during bipedal running; in small birds like guineafowl, this leads to kinematic disparities between limbs, with one leg braking more and the other propelling, enhancing stability but requiring compensatory neural control.^[120] Notable exceptions include echinoderms, where tube feet facilitate slow crawling via a hydraulic water vascular system and duo-gland adhesion, with contact times of 3-20 s inversely related to speed and increasing under load (e.g., 4.3 s unloaded vs. 8.4 s at +50% mass in Asterias rubens). This decentralized feedback allows adaptive locomotion without central coordination, supporting inverted or burdened movement. Tunicates, such as salps, use pulsatile jet propulsion similar to cnidarians, expelling water through siphons for efficient swimming, with kinematics optimized via fluid dynamics as revealed by particle image velocimetry.^[121]^[117] Comparative metrics highlight locomotor extremes: the sailfish achieves aquatic speeds estimated at up to 8.3 m/s via tail-fin propulsion, while wild cheetahs reach terrestrial speeds of up to approximately 19 m/s during pursuits. These records underscore phylum-specific optimizations, with vertebrate speeds scaling as ~6.0(mass, kg)^{0.23} m/s for sprints.^[122]^[105]^[119]

Modern Research and Applications

Bioengineering Insights

Bioengineering has drawn extensively from animal locomotion to advance robotics, prosthetics, and materials science, leveraging biological principles for enhanced efficiency, adaptability, and performance in engineered systems. Seminal work in this field emphasizes replicating musculoskeletal dynamics and neural control to overcome limitations in rigid mechanical designs, enabling machines to navigate complex environments with greater agility.^[123] In robotics, biomimicry of quadrupedal locomotion has inspired high-speed legged platforms, such as Boston Dynamics' Cheetah robot, which emulates the cheetah's sprinting gait through compliant leg mechanisms and dynamic stabilization to achieve speeds up to 28.3 mph on treadmills. This design incorporates flexible spine articulation and paw compliance to mimic the animal's energy-efficient bounding, improving terrain adaptability in unstructured settings. Similarly, gecko-inspired adhesives replicate the nanoscale setae on gecko foot pads, enabling reversible dry adhesion for wall-climbing robots; synthetic microfiber arrays generate shear forces exceeding 100 N/cm², allowing secure attachment to diverse surfaces without residue.^[124]^[125]^[126] Prosthetic advancements incorporate human gait patterns into powered exoskeletons, such as the Berkeley Lower Extremity Exoskeleton (BLEEX), which uses biomechanical data to synchronize torque assistance with natural stride cycles, reducing metabolic cost by approximately 10% during load-carrying tasks. These systems employ series elastic actuators to buffer impacts and store energy akin to human tendons, enhancing user comfort and endurance in rehabilitation and augmentation applications.^[127]^[128] Materials science benefits from tendon-like springs in robotic joints, where series elastic elements mimic the elastic storage and release in animal tendons, boosting power output by optimizing actuator operating ranges and shock absorption. Flapping-wing drones, inspired by avian and insect flight, utilize lightweight, flexible membranes to generate lift through oscillatory motions, achieving efficiencies comparable to biological counterparts in micro-aerial vehicles for surveillance and pollination tasks.^[128]^[129] Key challenges include scaling biological efficiency to mechanical systems, where energy conversion losses in motors hinder the 20-40% muscle efficiency seen in animals, with overall locomotor efficiencies up to ~60% in some species via elastic energy storage. CPG models, derived from spinal neural circuits in vertebrates, enable rhythmic locomotion in robots but require hybrid integration with machine learning to handle variability in real-world dynamics. Recent advances as of 2025 include AI-enhanced CPGs for adaptive robotic gaits in dynamic environments.^[123]^[130]^[131] Post-2020 advances in soft robotics highlight octopus arm inspiration, with pneumatic actuators replicating hydrostatic muscle arrangements for continuum manipulation; these designs achieve multi-directional grasping forces up to 10 N while conforming to irregular objects, advancing applications in minimally invasive surgery and disaster response.^[132]^[133]

Conservation Implications

Understanding animal locomotion provides critical insights for conservation, enabling strategies to address human-mediated threats like habitat loss and climate impacts that disrupt movement essential for survival, foraging, and reproduction. By analyzing how fragmentation and environmental changes alter mobility, wildlife managers can prioritize habitat connectivity and restoration to sustain populations. Habitat fragmentation from infrastructure such as roads and fences reduces migration speeds by increasing energetic barriers, forcing animals to expend more effort on detours or hesitate at obstacles, which can delay access to breeding or feeding grounds. For example, road networks elevate resistance to dispersal, slowing overall migration rates in terrestrial species and heightening vulnerability to predation during prolonged exposure. Barrier navigation failures are common, as linear structures like fences block traditional paths, leading to habitat avoidance and isolated subpopulations with reduced genetic diversity. In arboreal rodents, fragmentation causes limited habitat use and obstructed movement corridors, exacerbating local extinctions. Migratory connectivity is further imperiled, with proposed developments potentially severing key routes for long-distance travelers. Climate change influences locomotion by inducing gait alterations through temperature shifts, where warmer conditions prompt adjustments in stride or stroke efficiency to maintain performance, particularly in ectothermic species like fish. Ocean warming disrupts biomechanics, reducing locomotor capacity and forcing compensatory changes that may increase fatigue during essential activities. For swimmers, rising sea levels erode coastal habitats, compelling marine mammals such as pinnipeds to undertake longer, more strenuous swims between diminished haul-out sites and foraging areas, thereby elevating energy demands and collision risks with vessels. Locomotor impairments from injuries or poaching necessitate targeted rehabilitation in zoos, where exercise protocols restore gait symmetry and mobility to prepare animals for potential release. In Asian elephants with forelimb injuries, structured rehabilitation enhances route selection and action precision, improving overall locomotion for reintegration into wild or semi-captive environments. Rescued wildlife from illegal trade often exhibit declined locomotor abilities due to confinement, but tailored programs mitigate this by rebuilding muscle strength and coordination. Gait analysis through collar-based tracking detects poaching effects by identifying irregular movement signatures in survivors, such as limping or reduced ranging, which informs anti-poaching patrols and health interventions in free-ranging populations. Advanced monitoring tools leverage locomotion data for proactive conservation. Camera traps document movement patterns, capturing variations in speed, direction, and frequency to assess threat responses, such as increased nocturnal activity in fragmented areas. GPS telemetry quantifies ranging extents and migration fidelity, revealing how barriers or climate stressors compress home ranges and guide habitat restoration priorities. Integrating these technologies allows real-time tracking of locomotor behaviors, supporting wildlife management by quantifying connectivity needs. As of 2025, drone-based and AI-analyzed movement tracking has enhanced monitoring of elusive species in fragmented habitats.^[134] Notable case studies illustrate these dynamics. In giant pandas, habitat fragmentation and degradation limit access to bamboo resources, increasing energy costs for foraging including climbing in altered forests. Conservation initiatives emphasize corridor creation to sustain locomotion vital for this species' diet. Similarly, birds experience flight path shifts from climate change, with warming prompting detours or extended routes to track shifting resources, which strains endurance and elevates collision risks; protected flyways are thus prioritized to accommodate these changes and prevent population declines.

References

[1]
How Animals Move: An Integrative View
### Summary of Animal Locomotion from Abstract
[2]
[PDF] The Physiology and Mechanics of Animal Locomotion
Mar 24, 2023 · Animal locomotion involves the physiology of muscular, skeletal, and nervous systems, and the mechanics of physical principles like laws of ...
[3]
Locomotion as a Powerful Model to Study Integrative Physiology
Locomotion is the most common form of movement in nature. Its study allows analysis of interactions between muscle functions (motor) and lever system ...
[4]
Biomechanics of Mammalian Terrestrial Locomotion - Science
Mammalian skeletons experience peak locomotor stresses (force per area) that are 25 to 50% of their failure strength, indicating a safety factor of between ...
[5]
Biomechanical and energetic determinants of the walk–trot transition ...
Nov 15, 2004 · Each gait is used only over a limited range of speeds. For example, horses walk at slow speeds, trot at moderate speeds and gallop at fast ...
[6]
A Mechanical Trigger for the Trot-Gallop Transition in Horses | Science
These findings suggest that the trot-gallop transition is triggered when musculoskeletal forces reach a critical level.
[7]
A kinematic synergy for terrestrial locomotion shared by mammals ...
Oct 30, 2018 · We report that a kinematic synergy involving the planar covariation of limb segment motion holds in 54 different animal species (10 birds and 44 mammals)
[8]
Work minimization accounts for footfall phasing in slow quadrupedal ...
Sep 14, 2017 · At low duty factors (0.5 < DF < 0.75), the vertical forces produced by the legs relate closely to the vertical forces experienced by the center ...
[9]
Scaling of avian bipedal locomotion reveals independent effects of ...
May 22, 2018 · Duty factor is considered a functionally important feature of gait because it can accurately predict peak and average vertical ground reaction ...
[10]
Evolutionary history of quadrupedal walking gaits shows ...
Considering the evolutionary history of quadrupedal gait sequences has provided a new framework for investigating patterns of quadrupedal locomotor strategies ...
[11]
Biomechanics and kinematics of limb-based locomotion in lizards
The sprawling pattern of locomotion in lizards is kinematically intriguing and is underpinned by a distinctive pattern of appendicular morphology.
[12]
Six-legged walking in insects: how CPGs, peripheral feedback, and ...
Feb 1, 2018 · Walking is a rhythmic locomotor behavior of legged animals, and its underlying mechanisms have been the subject of neurobiological research ...
[13]
the role of substrate roughness on animal walking and a proposed ...
Apr 21, 2023 · For an animal walking on non-flat terrain, the impact of substrate roughness depends at least on the body size, morphology, physiology, and ...
[14]
Aquatic Animals Operating at High Reynolds Numbers (Chapter 10)
The hydrodynamic forces determine the pattern of fluid movement around a swimming animal. Depending on the size of the animal and its swimming speed, the ...
[15]
Undulatory and oscillatory swimming | Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Jul 4, 2019 · For such organisms, we can identify four major types of swimmers: undulatory, oscillatory, pulsatile and drag-based, as illustrated in figure 1.
[16]
Hydrodynamics of Undulatory Propulsion - ScienceDirect.com
The chapter focuses on recent experimental hydrodynamic data on undulatory locomotion in fishes, and provides a general description of the major theoretical ...
[17]
HYDROMECHANICS OF AQUATIC ANIMAL PROPULSION 1 1),
SCOPE OF THE SURVEY. This is a survey of the hydromechanics of aquatic animal propulsion. It includes no discussion of the aquatic movements of animals that ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[18]
Efficient cruising for swimming and flying animals is dictated by fluid ...
We argue that the Strouhal number for peak efficiency is largely determined by fluid drag on the fins and wings.
[19]
Fish functional design and swimming performance - Blake - 2004
Nov 3, 2004 · Axial undulatory propulsors in steady (periodic) continuous swimming fall into four groups: anguilliform, sub-carangiform, carangiform and ...
[20]
Passive cambering and flexible propulsors: cetacean flukes
The flukes are the primary locomotor structure in cetaceans, which produce hydrodynamic thrust as the caudal vertebrae are oscillated dorso-ventrally.Missing: fluking | Show results with:fluking
[21]
The role of suction thrust in the metachronal paddles of swimming ...
Oct 20, 2020 · We show that, like other swimming animals, the propulsors of these metachronal swimmers rely on generating negative pressure along their surfaces to generate ...
[22]
Birds repurpose the role of drag and lift to take off and land - NIH
Nov 25, 2019 · The lift CL and drag CD coefficients of the wings were calculated as C L = L 1 2 ρ S v 2 2 and C D = D 1 2 ρ S v 2 2 , where L is the total ...
[23]
Animal Flight Dynamics I. Stability in Gliding Flight - ScienceDirect
Abstract. Stability is as essential to flying as lift itself, but previous discussions of how flying animals maintain stability have been limited in both number ...Missing: citation | Show results with:citation
[24]
A method for continuous study of soaring and windhovering birds
Apr 29, 2022 · This work describes the development of a wind tunnel configuration that facilitates the study of flapless windhovering (hanging) and soaring bird flight in ...
[25]
Overland and oversea migration of white storks through the water ...
Dec 1, 2020 · Soaring landbirds typically exploit atmospheric uplift as they fly overland, displaying a highly effective energy-saving locomotion.
[26]
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-77273-x
[27]
Wing Coupling in Bees and Wasps: From the Underlying Science to ...
Jun 3, 2021 · Wing‐to‐wing coupling mechanisms synchronize motions of insect wings and minimize their aerodynamic interference.
[28]
Pterosaurs Article, Pterosaurs Information, Facts - National Geographic
Paleontologists estimate that this pterosaur and a related form had wingspans of at least 36 feet (11 meters), making them the largest flying animals known.
[29]
Biomechanics of hover performance in Neotropical hummingbirds ...
Sep 26, 2018 · To hover, hummingbirds consistently generate about a quarter of the vertical aerodynamic force required to support their body weight during the upstroke.
[30]
Wing and body kinematics of takeoff and landing flight in the pigeon ...
Pigeons used multiple mechanisms to adjust thrust and drag to accelerate during takeoff and decelerate during landing. Body angle, tail angle and wing plane ...
[31]
Birds repurpose the role of drag and lift to take off and land - Nature
Nov 25, 2019 · We can then calculate the total aerodynamic power as Paero = 2(Fwing • v3), where v3 is the wing's velocity at r3.Drag Increases Total... · Methods · Aerodynamic Forces From...
[32]
Fundamentals of burrowing in soft animals and robots - PMC - NIH
Jan 30, 2023 · Here we propose four challenges for burrowers to solve. First, the burrower has to create space in a solid substrate, overcoming resistance.
[33]
The biomechanics of burrowing and boring
Jan 15, 2015 · Mechanical boring relies on abrasion, and most boring bivalves have ridges and rasping structures on their shells for this purpose.
[34]
Energy saving through trail following in a marine snail - PMC - NIH
Most snails and slugs locomote over a layer of mucus and although the resultant mucus trail is expensive to produce, we show that this expense can be reduced by ...Missing: inching | Show results with:inching
[35]
On the snake-like lateral un-dulatory locomotion in terrestrial ...
We note that as the snake-like undulation in Chen's model is essentially close to both natural snakes and sandfishes, the basic analysis and principles of the ...
[36]
Mechanical models of sandfish locomotion reveal principles of high ...
Mar 4, 2011 · Like the sandfish lizard and the RFT and numerical simulation models ... locomotion in lizards, Journal of Experimental Biology, 10.1242/jeb.Missing: saltation | Show results with:saltation
[37]
Investigating the Locomotion of the Sandfish in Desert Sand Using ...
Oct 1, 2008 · The sandfish (Scincus scincus) is a lizard having the remarkable ability to move through desert sand for significant distances.Missing: saltation | Show results with:saltation
[38]
Electric Fields Elicit Ballooning in Spiders - ScienceDirect.com
Jul 23, 2018 · To disperse, spiders “balloon,” whereby they climb to the top of a prominence, let out silk, and float away. The prevailing view is that drag ...Missing: locomotion | Show results with:locomotion
[39]
A subterranean mammal uses the magnetic compass for path ...
Path integration allows animals to navigate without landmarks by continuously processing signals generated through locomotion. Insects such as bees and ants ...
[40]
Animal Locomotion - Hardcover - Andrew Biewener; Sheila Patek
Free delivery 25-day returnsThis book integrates the biomechanics of animal movement with the physiology of animal energetics and the neural control of locomotion.Missing: PDF | Show results with:PDF
[41]
Scaling Stride Frequency and Gait to Animal Size: Mice to Horses
### Key Findings on Stride Length, Frequency, and Speed in Animal Locomotion (Mice to Horses)
[42]
Muybridge's 'Animal Locomotion': Photography & Science
Feb 17, 2020 · Muybridge's “Animal Locomotion” opened up an entirely new way of thinking about photography, human and animal movement, and even the concept of time.Missing: chronophotography | Show results with:chronophotography
[43]
https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/new-way-thinking-about-motion-movement-eadweard-muybridge
[44]
A moving topic: control and dynamics of animal locomotion - PMC
Apr 21, 2010 · Animal locomotion involves sensory systems, motor output, musculo-skeletal dynamics, and environment interaction. How movement is controlled is ...
[45]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2880073/
[46]
Biomechanics of Mammalian Terrestrial Locomotion - ResearchGate
Aug 10, 2025 · For example, terrestrial locomotion enhances bone formation due to greater muscle loads (Biewener 1990) . Meanwhile, aquatic movement is less ...
[47]
Biomechanical consequences of scaling
May 1, 2005 · This decreases the magnitude of joint moments produced by the ground reaction force (=R× G), which are the principal moments that the muscles ...
[48]
Torque patterns of the limbs of small therian mammals during ...
May 1, 2002 · The general time course of joint torques is comparable for all species in all joints of the forelimb and in the ankle joint.
[49]
Foot pressure distributions during walking in African elephants ...
Oct 5, 2016 · This study tests how foot pressures vary among African and Asian elephants from habitats where natural substrates predominate but where foot care protocols ...Missing: kinetics | Show results with:kinetics
[50]
Quantifying Dynamic Stability and Maneuverability in Legged ...
We argue that to ultimately reveal function, an animal performing steady-state locomotion must be subjected to perturbations (Full and Koditschek, 1999).
[51]
Exploring the limits to turning performance with size and shape ...
Nov 1, 2022 · Variation in turning ability with size was complex: medium sized dogs produced greater centripetal forces, had relatively higher friction ...
[52]
38.1: Types of Skeletal Systems - Biology LibreTexts
Apr 9, 2022 · The three types of skeleton designs are hydrostatic skeletons, exoskeletons, and endoskeletons. A hydrostatic skeleton is formed by a fluid ...
[53]
Why animals developed four types of skeletons | National Geographic
Oct 19, 2021 · Hydrostatic skeletons are fluid-filled columns, or cavities, inside invertebrates, including jellyfish, flatworms, nematodes, and annelids such ...
[54]
Muscle architecture in relation to function - PubMed
Animal muscles generate forces and induce movements at desirable rates. These roles are interactive and must be considered together.<|control11|><|separator|>
[55]
Muscle agonist–antagonist interactions in an experimental joint model
Contractions of agonist and antagonist muscle groups generate movement around a limb joint, and during any movement, the muscle antagonists change their lengths ...
[56]
Scaling of elastic strain energy in kangaroos and the benefits of ...
During the first half of the ground-contact phase, kinetic energy lost from the body is stored as elastic strain energy, predominantly in the hind limbs.
[57]
The Role of Cross‐Sectional Geometry, Curvature, and Limb ...
Feb 5, 2013 · If animals scaled their support structures isometrically, stress would increase in proportion to body mass1/3. However, scaling exponents ...
[58]
Low effective mechanical advantage of giraffes' limbs during walking ...
Jul 7, 2022 · Our previous study of giraffe neck kinematics during walking showed that the cyclical motion of the neck is decoupled from oscillations of the ...
[59]
Octopus arm flexibility facilitates complex behaviors in diverse ...
Sep 11, 2025 · Octopus arms (and suckers) constitute most of their body mass, playing a crucial role in nearly all of their behaviors such as locomotion, prey ...
[60]
Energetics of Locomotion - Oxford Academic
In this chapter, we focus on how energy metabolism and the cost of locomotion vary in terms of speed and body size; these two variables exert the strongest ...
[61]
Energetics of Contraction - Barclay - 2015 - Wiley Online Library
Apr 1, 2015 · Muscles convert energy from ATP into useful work, which can be used to move limbs and to transport ions across membranes.<|separator|>
[62]
Locomotion: energy cost of swimming, flying, and running - PubMed
Locomotion: energy cost of swimming, flying, and running. Science. 1972 Jul 21;177(4045):222-8. doi: 10.1126/science.177.4045.222. Author. K Schmidt-Nielsen.Missing: transport | Show results with:transport
[63]
Reappraisal of the comparative cost of human locomotion using gait ...
Oct 15, 2007 · This study re-explores how the net metabolic energy cost of running and walking (J kg–1m–1) in humans compares to that of animals of similar ...<|separator|>
[64]
Models and the scaling of energy costs for locomotion
May 1, 2005 · In this paper I look at the scaling of the energy costs of locomotion, and ask whether we can explain what we observe.
[65]
Energetics of Locomotion and Load Carriage and a Model of the ...
Standard rates of O₂ consumption (V̇o2) and net, gross, and minimum costs of transport (NCOT, GCOT, and Mrun) were measured in the leaf-cutting ant Atta ...
[66]
Behavioral Ecology of Intermittent Locomotion1 - Oxford Academic
However, intermittent locomotion can also reduce energy costs when forward movement continues during the pauses or when muscles function more efficiently at ...
[67]
Flight speed and performance of the wandering albatross with ...
Mar 7, 2018 · Albatrosses and other large seabirds use dynamic soaring to gain sufficient energy from the wind to travel large distances rapidly and with ...
[68]
Walking on inclines: energetics of locomotion in the ant Camponotus
Feb 15, 2005 · During walking, the ants breathed continuously and metabolic rate increased between 4.3 times(level walking at 0-5 mm s-1) and 6.9 times (30° ...
[69]
Central Pattern Generator for Locomotion: Anatomical ... - Frontiers
Walking, flying, and swimming are largely controlled by a network of spinal neurons generally referred to as the central pattern generator (CPG) for locomotion.Missing: papers | Show results with:papers
[70]
Central Pattern Generation of Locomotion: A Review of the Evidence
This article reviews the evidence for CPGs governing locomotion and addresses other factors, including supraspinal, sensory, and neuromodulatory influences.Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[71]
Modulation of stretch reflexes during locomotion in the ...
1. A cat preparation was used to study the modulation of stretch reflexes during locomotion. The brain stem was transected and locomotion was induced by ...Missing: animal | Show results with:animal
[72]
Flexion Reflex Can Interrupt and Reset the Swimming Rhythm
Mar 2, 2016 · SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The spinal cord can generate leg withdrawal (flexion reflex), locomotion, and scratching in limbed vertebrates.
[73]
Brainstem Circuits for Locomotion - Annual Reviews
Jul 8, 2022 · Here we review recent advances on brainstem circuits involved in controlling locomotion. We describe how delineated command circuits govern the ...
[74]
Review Connecting Circuits for Supraspinal Control of Locomotion
Oct 24, 2018 · This Review discusses recent work unraveling the cellular identity, connectivity, and function of supraspinal circuits.
[75]
Neural Plasticity after Human Spinal Cord Injury - Sage Journals
Locomotor training, a new rehabilitative approach, is based on principles that promote the movement of limbs and trunk to generate sensory information ...
[76]
Neural plasticity and locomotor recovery after spinal cord injury
This article discusses the importance of studying neural plasticity to better understand the effects of current rehabilitation interventions.
[77]
Models of central pattern generators as oscillators - ScienceDirect.com
This paper describes modeling of the lamprey's CPG, using network models and mathematical analysis of the spinal cord as coupled oscillators.
[78]
Central pattern generating networks in insect locomotion - Mantziaris
Mar 3, 2020 · Central neural networks capable of generating rhythmic motor activity are common neural elements and essentially contribute to locomotion in insects.Missing: algorithms | Show results with:algorithms
[79]
Mechanosensory Control of Locomotion in Animals and Robots
In this review, we draw attention to mechanosensation—the sensing of mechanical forces generated within and outside the body—as a key sense that enables robust ...Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
[80]
Proprioception, the regulator of motor function - PMC
Proprioception is the internal sense of body position, sensing movement of limbs or muscles, and is essential for precise movement patterns.
[81]
Proprioception revisited: where do we stand? - PMC - PubMed Central
Proprioception, originally 'muscle sense', involves sensory neurons in muscles, tendons, and joints, playing a critical role in movement control and motor ...
[82]
Vestibular animal models: contributions to understanding physiology ...
Apr 15, 2016 · This review summarizes the attempts to establish the roles of semicircular canal and otolith endorgans in these functions followed by an overview of the most ...
[83]
The vestibular system: multimodal integration and encoding of self ...
This review highlights progress that has recently been made towards understanding how the brain encodes and processes self-motion to ensure accurate motor ...
[84]
Integration of visual motion and locomotion in mouse visual cortex
To derive this estimate, animals integrate visual speed gauged from optic flow and run speed gauged from proprioceptive and locomotor systems. The primary ...
[85]
Retinal optic flow during natural locomotion - PMC - PubMed Central
We examine the structure of the visual motion projected on the retina during natural locomotion in real world environments.
[86]
The human vestibulo-ocular reflex during linear locomotion - PubMed
During locomotion, there is a translation and compensatory rotation of the head in both the vertical and horizontal planes. During moderate to fast walking ...
[87]
Multisensory integration in the mammalian brain - PubMed Central
Aug 7, 2023 · This review discusses the diversity and flexibility of MSI in mammals, including humans, primates and rodents, as well as the brain areas involved.
[88]
The development of vestibular system and related functions in ...
The present review showed accumulating evidence on the sensitivity of the organisms to the alteration of gravity during their development. The peripheral ...
[89]
Honeybee navigation: following routes using polarized-light cues
We have examined whether bees can be trained to find their way through a maze composed of four interconnected tunnels, by using directional information ...
[90]
The advent of animals: The view from the Ediacaran | PNAS
Apr 20, 2015 · Patterns of evolution, origination, and extinction of early animal life on this planet are largely interpreted from fossils of the soft-bodied Ediacara Biota.
[91]
Late Ediacaran trackways produced by bilaterian animals ... - Science
Jun 6, 2018 · These trace fossils represent the earliest known trackways. They consist of two rows of imprints arranged in poorly organized series or repeated ...
[92]
Discovery of the oldest bilaterian from the Ediacaran of South Australia
Mar 23, 2020 · Complex body and trace fossils from older Ediacaran deposits were probably produced by muscular eumetazoans interpreted to be cnidarians (34).
[93]
Exites in Cambrian arthropods and homology of arthropod limb ...
Jul 30, 2021 · The last common ancestor of all living arthropods had biramous postantennal appendages, with an endopodite and exopodite branching off the ...
[94]
Fossils, genes and the evolution of animal limbs
Aug 14, 1997 · It is clear from the fossil record that chordates and arthropods diverged at least by the Cambrian. The appendages of these two groups are ...
[95]
The lower Cambrian lobopodian Cardiodictyon resolves the origin of ...
Nov 24, 2022 · Arthropods trace their evolutionary origins back to the Cambrian Period, and there has been continued debate about the origin of the brain ...
[96]
A Devonian tetrapod-like fish and the evolution of the ... - Nature
Apr 6, 2006 · The geological setting in which Tiktaalik was found supports the view that shallow water habitats on Late Devonian floodplains of the ...Missing: fossil discovery
[97]
Evolution of forelimb musculoskeletal function across the fish-to ...
Jan 22, 2021 · The evolution of terrestrially capable tetrapod limbs from aquatically adapted fins has inspired decades of scientific investigation.
[98]
Antiquity of forelimb ecomorphological diversity in the mammalian ...
Mar 18, 2019 · We found that forelimb shape diversity in the early mammalian lineage (Synapsida) began to increase about 270 million years ago, with the emergence of a group ...
[99]
Wing bone geometry reveals active flight in Archaeopteryx - Nature
Mar 13, 2018 · We therefore interpret that Archaeopteryx actively employed wing flapping to take to the air through a more anterodorsally posteroventrally ...
[100]
The origin and evolution of animal appendages - PNAS
Animals have evolved diverse appendages adapted for locomotion, feeding and other functions. The genetics underlying appendage formation are best understood ...
[101]
Acrobatic squirrels learn to leap and land on tree branches without ...
Aug 6, 2021 · Arboreal animals often leap through complex canopies to travel and avoid predators. Their success at making split-second, potentially life ...
[102]
Three Characteristics of Cheetah Galloping Improve Running ... - NIH
Apr 14, 2022 · Their galloping shows three characteristics: small vertical movement of their center of mass, small whole-body pitching movement, and large ...Missing: sprinting plains
[103]
Adaptations & Characteristics | Polar Bears International
Polar bears have 2 layers of fur that prevent almost all heat loss. In fact, the fur keeps them so warm that adult males can quickly overheat when they run.
[104]
How do camels survive in deserts? | Natural History Museum
Camels are well suited to their desert habitats, with numerous clever adaptations that help them to tolerate extreme hot and cold environments.Missing: runners locomotion antelopes
[105]
Genomic insights into the convergent evolution of desert adaptation ...
Camels, long recognized for their ability to endure extreme heat and aridity, have become an emblem of desert endurance. Similarly, several African antelope ...Missing: runners | Show results with:runners
[106]
Unpredictability of escape trajectory explains predator evasion ...
Sep 5, 2017 · Enhanced evasion ability decreases the risk of predation in exposed microhabitats, resulting in an inverse relationship between predator evasion ...
[107]
https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/how-do-camels-survive-in-deserts.html
[108]
Gait parameter adjustments of cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus ...
Cotton-top tamarins utilize lower diagonality values the more the substrate declines. This tendency leads to a greater use of lateral sequence gaits on steeply ...
[109]
Maneuverability of four species of coral-reef fish that differ in body ...
Pectoral-fin morphology also determined the use of maneuvering behaviours within gaits that are used by fish to fractionate their locomotor-performance range.
[110]
Energy conversion efficiency peaks at intermediate flight speed in a ...
Jun 23, 2025 · Birds rely on flight—an energy-demanding yet efficient way of locomotion—to travel across the globe. Understanding how they use energy during ...
[111]
[PDF] Invertebrate Locomotor Systems. In - Poly-PEDAL Lab
Invertebrate locomotion involves musculo-skeletal, nervous, and endocrine systems. It's studied for diversity, as most animals are invertebrates, and for the ...
[112]
Superphylum Lophotrochozoa: Flatworms, Rotifers, and Nemerteans
The ventral epidermis of free-living flatworms is ciliated, which facilitates their locomotion. Some free-living flatworms are capable of remarkable feats ...
[113]
AnimalPhylogeny2
(Note that flatworms and other small multicellular animals using cilia can achieve speeds of 1-2 mm/sec that are comparable to speeds of small animals using ...
[114]
Cool your jets: biological jet propulsion in marine invertebrates
Jun 15, 2021 · Pulsatile jet propulsion is a common swimming mode used by a diverse array of aquatic taxa from chordates to cnidarians.Missing: echinoderm tube feet, tunicate
[115]
[PDF] Chapter 12 Invertebrate 'LocOlympics': Investigation and Inquiry into ...
'Invertebrate LocOlympics' is an interdisciplinary lab investigation of animal locomotion, using video analysis to study biomechanics and various types of ...
[116]
[PDF] Principles of Animal Locomotion - Original Wisdom
THIS BOOK is about the mechanics and energetics of animal movement on land, in water, and through the air. Its emphasis is on understanding rather than ...
[117]
Trunk orientation causes asymmetries in leg function in small bird ...
Here, we analyse for the first time the effects of a pronograde trunk orientation on leg function and stability during bipedal locomotion.Missing: amphibian | Show results with:amphibian
[118]
[PDF] Tube feet dynamics drive adaptation in sea star locomotion - bioRxiv
Apr 24, 2025 · Our FTIR platform offers a promising avenue for investigating locomotion dynamics in echinoderms and other soft-bodied aquatic animals.Missing: tunicate jet
[119]
Animal Olympians
### Speed Records Summary
[120]
The neuromechanics of animal locomotion: From biology to robotics ...
May 31, 2023 · Locomotion encompasses the variety of ways in which animals and robots propel themselves through their environments: underwater, on the ground, ...
[121]
Cheetah Robot runs 28.3 mph; a bit faster than Usain Bolt - YouTube
Sep 5, 2012 · Cheetah Robot is a fast-running quadruped developed by Boston Dynamics with funding from DARPA. It just blazed past its previous speed ...Missing: biomimicry locomotion
[122]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5087677/
[123]
Gecko-Inspired Adhesive Mechanisms and Adhesives for Robots ...
This review summarizes different adhesion mechanisms involving gecko-inspired adhesives and attempts to explain the parameters and limitations which have ...Missing: biomimicry | Show results with:biomimicry
[124]
[PDF] On the Biomimetic Design of the Berkeley Lower Extremity ...
This paper outlines the use of Clinical Gait Analysis data as the framework for the design of such a system at UC Berkeley. Index Terms—BLEEX, Legged Locomotion ...
[125]
[PDF] The effect of series elasticity on actuator power and work output
Evidence from biomechanics research suggests that tendon series elasticity allows muscle to act in an optimal range of its force–length and.
[126]
Flapping-wing robot achieves bird-style self-takeoff by adopting ...
Sep 3, 2025 · This work advances avian-inspired robotics through vertebrate-like actuation principles, enabling more biomimetic flapping-wing designs.Missing: biomimicry | Show results with:biomimicry
[127]
[PDF] Central pattern generators for locomotion control in animals and robots
CPG-based approaches also present disadvantages/challenges. I see two main challenges to be overcome: First a sound design methodology is yet missing for ...
[128]
An Octopus-Inspired Soft Pneumatic Robotic Arm - PMC
This paper addresses the design, development, control, and experimental evaluation of a soft robot arm whose actuation is inspired by the muscular structure ...Missing: biomimicry | Show results with:biomimicry
[129]
Embodying soft robots with octopus-inspired hierarchical suction ...
May 14, 2025 · This development provides insights into octopus-inspired machine intelligence through low-cost, simple, and easy-to-integrate methods.Missing: biomimicry | Show results with:biomimicry