Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Combine harvester

A combine harvester, also known simply as a combine, is a versatile agricultural machine designed to harvest grain crops such as wheat, rice, barley, oats, and maize by simultaneously performing the key operations of reaping (cutting the crop), threshing (separating the grain from the stalks), and winnowing (cleaning the grain from chaff and debris) in a single pass through the field.^[1] This integration of multiple functions into one self-propelled unit allows for efficient large-scale harvesting, significantly reducing manual labor requirements compared to traditional methods that involved separate reaping, binding, shocking, threshing, and winnowing steps.^[2] Modern combines typically feature a header or platform at the front for cutting and gathering the crop, a threshing mechanism (often a rotating cylinder and concave), separation systems (such as straw walkers or rotary units), cleaning sieves with fans for air separation, and onboard grain storage bins, enabling operators to cover hundreds of acres per day while minimizing grain loss and damage.^[3] The invention of the combine harvester revolutionized agriculture, particularly in grain-producing regions, by boosting productivity and enabling the expansion of commercial farming during the 19th and 20th centuries. The first practical combine was developed and patented in 1836 by Hiram Moore and John Hascall in the United States, who built a horse-drawn machine capable of harvesting, threshing, and cleaning grain.^[4] Early designs faced challenges like uneven terrain and frequent breakdowns, limiting adoption until improvements in the late 19th century, including the introduction of the Holt Manufacturing Company's combined harvester-thresher, which incorporated a sickle bar, reel, apron, sieve, and elevator for more reliable operation in California's wheat fields. By the 1920s, manufacturers like John Deere began producing pulled combines that united harvesting and threshing, retailing for about $2,000 and marking a shift toward mechanization that reduced the agricultural workforce needed for harvest from dozens to a single operator.^[5] Over the decades, combines evolved from horse-drawn and tractor-pulled models to fully self-propelled machines, with pivotal advancements including the first self-propelled combine introduced by Holt in 1911 and John Deere's Model 55 in the 1940s, which incorporated diesel engines and improved mobility for diverse field conditions.^[3] Post-World War II innovations focused on capacity and efficiency, such as axial-flow threshing systems introduced by Case IH in the 1970s, which enhanced grain separation with gentler handling to reduce damage, and the integration of GPS-guided precision agriculture technologies in the 2000s for optimized path planning and yield mapping.^[6] Today, high-capacity models from leading manufacturers can harvest hundreds of acres daily, process multiple crop types with interchangeable headers, and incorporate automation for ground speed adjustment based on grain loss, engine load, and terrain, including AI-assisted and semi-autonomous operations as of 2025, supporting sustainable practices by minimizing fuel use and residue waste.^[7] These developments have made the combine harvester indispensable to global food production, particularly in mechanized regions like North America, Europe, and Australia, where it accounts for the majority of grain harvests.^[8]

History

Early inventions and development

The combine harvester's origins trace back to the mid-19th century, when the need for more efficient grain harvesting in expansive American prairies drove innovation beyond separate reaping and threshing processes. In 1834, inventor Hiram Moore constructed the first practical machine that integrated reaping and threshing, demonstrating it near Climax, Michigan, on wheat fields.^[4] This horse-drawn device, approximately 17 feet long with a 15-foot cutting width, used a vibrating sieve and beaters to separate grain from straw, reducing the labor required for what had previously been a multi-step, manual operation involving dozens of workers.^[9] Moore, in collaboration with John Hascall, secured U.S. Patent No. 9,793 on June 28, 1836, for this combined harvester-thresher, marking the foundational patent in the field's mechanical development.^[10] Despite its promise, Moore's machine faced limited adoption due to high construction costs and the dominance of established reaper manufacturers, though it laid the groundwork for future designs suited to staple crops like wheat.^[11] By the 1870s, ongoing refinements addressed the inefficiencies of early prototypes, with manufacturers transitioning from stationary threshers to more mobile, integrated units that could handle field operations directly. Companies such as Warder, Mitchell & Co., based in Springfield, Ohio, contributed through patents and designs that enhanced threshing mechanisms, incorporating vibrating screens and fan systems to better separate grain in real-time during harvest.^[12] These improvements built on Moore's concepts, focusing on durability for larger-scale farming in the Midwest and California, where stationary threshers had previously required crops to be hauled post-reaping.^[13] Key patents from this era, including those refining cylinder threshing and straw handling, enabled prototypes that were pulled by teams of horses or mules, evolving toward practical field mobility while still relying on animal power.^[14] Pull-type combines of the 1880s exemplified both progress and persistent hurdles, as machines like the Holt Manufacturing Company's 1886 model—a 14-foot ground-drive unit—required teams of 20 to 30 mules for propulsion across vast wheat fields.^[15] These devices intensified labor demands, necessitating skilled operators to manage animal teams and manual adjustments amid breakdowns, while dust from dry prairies often clogged mechanisms, leading to unreliability and frequent downtime in arid conditions.^[16] Despite such challenges, which limited widespread use to regions with flat terrain and large operations, these pull-types could harvest up to 40 acres per day, a vast improvement over hand labor.^[17] Around 1900 to 1910, the integration of mechanical power marked a pivotal shift, with steam engines first powering combines to overcome animal limitations in expansive harvests. In 1886, California farmer George Stockton Berry adapted a combine with a straw-burning steam engine, enabling independent operation without draft animals and boosting capacity in dusty Central Valley fields.^[17] By the early 1900s, models like the J.I. Case steam-powered pull-type, circa 1900, used boiler-heated traction to pull harvesting units, though they demanded constant fuel management and water supplies.^[16] Transitioning into the 1910s, early gasoline engines emerged, with International Harvester introducing tractor-pulled combines featuring onboard gasoline-powered threshing by 1915, offering quicker starts and reduced reliance on bulky steam systems for more versatile field use.^[18]

Transition to self-propelled models

The transition from pulled to self-propelled combine harvesters marked a pivotal engineering advancement in agricultural machinery, enabling greater mobility and efficiency in the field. Although the Holt Manufacturing Company developed one of the first internal combustion-powered self-propelled combines in 1911, featuring an integrated gasoline engine for independent operation, these early models saw limited use due to high costs and reliability issues.^[16] Widespread adoption occurred after World War II, as manufacturers addressed wartime labor shortages and postwar demands for faster harvesting. For instance, Allis-Chalmers introduced self-propelled versions of its All-Crop series in the late 1940s, allowing operators to harvest without a separate tractor and improving maneuverability across uneven terrain.^[19] Key to this shift was the integration of internal combustion engines, typically in the 45-100 horsepower range, which provided the power needed for both propulsion and threshing operations. These gasoline or diesel engines, often sourced from suppliers like Hercules, replaced horse-drawn or tractor-pulled systems that had evolved from 19th-century precursors. By the 1950s, hydrostatic drives began appearing in models like International Harvester's No. 91, offering smoother speed control and better traction in varied field conditions compared to mechanical transmissions. This combination enhanced field maneuverability, reducing soil compaction and allowing operators to navigate crops more precisely.^[20]^[21]^[22] World War II significantly influenced production, as U.S. manufacturers faced material shortages but innovated to meet urgent food production goals, exemplified by the Massey-Harris Harvest Brigade program that deployed over 100 self-propelled combines to critical wheat regions in 1943. Postwar, the agriculture boom fueled scaled-up manufacturing, with models like the 1950 Massey-Harris Super 26 self-propelled unit becoming staples for larger farms, boosting output amid expanding mechanized operations.^[23]^[24]^[25] Early ergonomic improvements further supported operator adoption, with enclosed cabs introduced in the 1960s to shield users from dust, noise, and weather. These cabs, first offered as options on models from manufacturers like John Deere and International Harvester, improved visibility and comfort during long harvest days, marking a step toward modern human-machine interfaces.^[26]^[27]

Modern innovations and market evolution

In the late 20th century, the introduction of axial-flow threshing technology marked a significant advancement in combine harvester design. International Harvester launched the Model 1460 Axial-Flow combine in 1977, featuring a single large-diameter rotor for longitudinal crop processing that minimized grain damage through gentler threshing action compared to conventional cylinder systems.^[28]^[29] This innovation boosted harvesting capacity, with early models achieving throughput rates exceeding 200 bushels per hour under optimal conditions, enabling faster field coverage and higher productivity.^[30]^[31] The integration of precision agriculture technologies further transformed the industry in the 2000s, with GPS guidance and telematics becoming standard features for optimizing harvest paths and monitoring performance in real time. These systems allowed for variable-rate applications and yield mapping, reducing overlap and fuel use while improving overall efficiency.^[32]^[33] As of 2025 estimates, the global combine harvester market is valued at approximately USD 12-16 billion, exhibiting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of around 5%, driven by automation advancements and demand for connected machinery in large-scale operations.^[34] Recent innovations as of 2025 emphasize AI-driven automation and sustainability, including advanced auto-steering systems that use machine learning for precise navigation and obstacle avoidance, minimizing operator input and enhancing safety. Hybrid engine technologies have also emerged, combining diesel with electric components to improve fuel efficiency by up to 15-20% and reduce emissions during low-load operations. For instance, New Holland's CR11 series, with over 700 horsepower from its FPT Cursor 16 engine, incorporates redesigned twin rotors and automated cleaning systems that achieve up to 20% better grain retention rates, resulting in near-zero losses even at high capacities of 6 bushels per second unloading.^[35]^[36]^[37] Environmental considerations have driven adaptations like low-emission engines compliant with EU Stage V standards, which impose stringent limits on particulate matter and NOx for non-road machinery, effective since 2019 and promoting cleaner operation across Europe. Simultaneously, market evolution reflects expansion into emerging regions, particularly Asia, where rising mechanization in countries like India and China—supported by government subsidies—has increased demand for affordable, high-capacity models tailored to diverse crops and terrains.^[38]^[39]

Design and Components

Header and intake system

The header, also known as the front-end attachment, is the initial component of a combine harvester that cuts standing crops and gathers them for feeding into the machine's main body. It is designed to match specific crop types and field conditions, ensuring efficient crop intake while minimizing losses. The intake system, integrated with the header, transports the cut material rearward via mechanical conveyors to the threshing area. Common header types include platforms for small grains such as wheat and barley, which feature a wide cutting bar and auger system to collect and center the crop. These platforms typically range in width from 20 to 40 feet (6 to 12 meters) to optimize harvest speed across large fields. Corn heads, specialized for maize, incorporate snapping rolls that strip ears from stalks while guiding the plants through row units, available in configurations from 5 to 18 rows depending on combine size. Draper headers use endless belts to convey crop material, providing superior performance on uneven or hilly terrain by reducing spillage and maintaining a steady flow.^[40] The intake mechanism begins with a rotating reel mounted above the cutting area, which sweeps crops onto the platform; its speed is adjustable, typically set to 1.25 to 1.5 times the ground speed to ensure smooth gathering without excessive agitation.^[41] Cut material is then drawn rearward by a center auger or draper belt and fed into the feeder house, a hinged assembly equipped with a chain-and-slat conveyor that elevates and propels the crop toward the threshing drum at a controlled rate.^[42] Cutting systems in headers primarily employ reciprocating sickle bars, consisting of a series of triangular knives driven back and forth against stationary ledger plates to shear stalks cleanly. Some modern designs incorporate rotary knives for higher-speed operations in tough conditions. Height control is achieved through hydraulic sensors or mechanical floats that maintain a consistent cutting height, often set to leave stubble at 4 to 6 inches (10 to 15 cm) for soil protection and residue management.^[43] For crops like soybeans grown close to the ground, flex headers are adapted with articulated frames and floating cutterbars that conform to soil contours, allowing the header to pivot independently across its width for uniform cutting over uneven surfaces. These adaptations reduce pod shatter and dirt inclusion, enhancing grain quality in low-stature crops.^[44]

Threshing and separation mechanisms

The threshing and separation mechanisms in a combine harvester are responsible for detaching grain kernels from the ears or heads and separating them from the surrounding chaff, straw, and other material other than grain (MOG). These systems must balance efficiency, grain quality, and minimal damage while handling variable crop conditions such as moisture content and yield density. Traditional designs rely on mechanical impact and agitation, whereas modern variants emphasize gentler processing to reduce losses and kernel damage.^[45] Conventional tangential flow systems initiate threshing with a rotating cylinder, typically 20 to 24 inches in diameter operating at 1000 to 1200 RPM for crops like wheat and rye, which beats the crop material against a stationary concave to detach grain through impact and rubbing action. The concave, often adjustable for clearance (e.g., 0.5 to 1 inch), features bars or wires that enhance grain release while allowing detached kernels to fall through gaps. Following initial threshing, the partially processed material moves onto straw walkers—vibrating, rack-like platforms usually consisting of 4 to 6 banks or steps—that agitate the straw mat to liberate remaining free grain via gravity and shaking, conveying residue rearward for discharge. This setup achieves effective separation in dry, brittle crops but can increase kernel damage in tougher conditions due to higher impact forces.^[46]^[47]^[45] In contrast, axial flow designs employ a single, elongated rotor—often up to 100 inches long and 20 to 30 inches in diameter—housed in a cylindrical chamber, where crop material flows longitudinally from front to rear. Helical guide vanes along the rotor accelerate and direct the material in a spiral path, promoting gradual threshing and separation through continuous rubbing against fixed grates and concaves without abrupt direction changes. This gentler, grain-on-grain action reduces mechanical damage and achieves separation losses below 1% in high-yield crops when properly adjusted, outperforming conventional systems in capacity and quality for diverse conditions like corn or soybeans. Adjustable vane angles (e.g., smaller for increased residence time) further optimize flow and efficiency.^[30]^[48]^[49]^[50] Throughout both designs, separation aids such as beater bars on the cylinder or rotor enhance initial detachment by providing additional impact, while return pans collect and redirect tailings—unthreshed or partially separated material—for recleaning through the system, minimizing overall losses to under 1.5% under optimal conditions. Material typically sees 70-90% grain separation during the primary threshing phase, with 10-30% occurring in the subsequent separation stage, ensuring high recovery rates.^[51]^[52]^[53] The header feeds crop directly into these mechanisms for seamless processing.^[45]

Cleaning and grain handling systems

The cleaning and grain handling systems of a combine harvester refine the grain separated from the crop residue, ensuring minimal impurities reach the storage bin while managing the dispersal of leftover material to support field operations. Following the initial separation, the mixture of clean grain, chaff, and light debris is directed to the cleaning shoe for final purification. This process relies on a combination of mechanical agitation, sieving, and pneumatic separation to achieve high grain purity levels, typically exceeding 99% for small grains like wheat under optimal conditions.^[53] The core of the cleaning system is the cleaning shoe, which features reciprocating sieves that oscillate to stratify materials by size and weight. The upper sieve, or chaffer, has larger adjustable openings (typically 0.5-0.75 inches or 12-19 mm for small grains) to allow grain and chaff to pass while retaining larger MOG, while the lower sieve has finer adjustable openings (typically 0.25-0.375 inches or 6-10 mm) to allow clean grain to pass through to the bin, with remaining chaff and light debris removed by the fan airflow. Sieve openings are adjustable to suit specific crop conditions, ensuring optimal separation. These sieves reciprocate at 300-400 oscillations per minute, driven by an eccentric shaft or similar mechanism, promoting even material flow and separation efficiency. Complementing the sieves is a centrifugal fan that generates upward airflow at speeds of 1,000-1,400 RPM, directed at an angle of 20-30 degrees to the horizontal to lift and remove light impurities without displacing the denser grain. This airflow, combined with the shoe's 5-7 degree rearward tilt, ensures thorough cleaning while minimizing grain loss, which can be kept below 1% in well-adjusted systems.^[54]^[55]^[56] Clean grain exiting the shoe is then conveyed to the onboard storage bin via a grain elevator, typically an auger or belt conveyor system designed for gentle handling to preserve quality. Auger elevators, common in modern combines, feature enclosed helical screws rotating at 200-300 RPM to lift grain 10-15 feet vertically into bins with capacities of 200-300 bushels for mid-sized models, allowing extended field operation without frequent unloading. Belt elevators, used in some high-capacity designs, reduce damage to fragile grains like corn by minimizing compression, achieving similar lift rates of up to 10 bushels per second. These systems include cleanout augers at the base to facilitate crop switching and prevent residue buildup.^[57]^[58] For unloading, an extendable auger tube, usually 20-30 feet long, transfers grain from the bin to transport vehicles at rates of 5-10 bushels per second, enabling rapid offloading while the harvester remains in motion. The auger features variable-speed drives and adjustable angles up to 45 degrees for precise filling of trucks or trailers, with safety interlocks to prevent operation during extension or retraction. This design supports high-throughput harvesting, with unloading times as short as 30-60 seconds for a full 300-bushel bin.^[57]^[59] Residue management integrates with grain handling by processing the chaff and straw not captured in cleaning, using integrated choppers and spreaders to promote even field distribution and soil health benefits. Straw choppers employ high-speed rotating knives (1,500-3,000 RPM) to shred long straw into 1-2 inch pieces, reducing tillage needs and enhancing decomposition for nutrient return. Spreader mechanisms, often dual rotating discs or impellers, then disperse the chopped residue 20-40 feet wide behind the machine, adjustable for wind conditions to avoid clumping and ensure uniform coverage over a 30-40 foot swath. This approach aids no-till farming by incorporating residue into the soil surface, potentially increasing organic matter by 0.5-1% annually when managed properly.^[60]^[61]

Operating Principles

Core threshing process

The core threshing process in a combine harvester initiates with the crop material, already cut by the header, being fed into the machine via the intake system and conveyed to the threshing unit. Here, the material encounters a rapidly rotating cylinder or rotor fitted with threshing elements such as rasp bars, which apply mechanical impact and rubbing forces to break the grain kernels free from the seed heads, stalks, and husks. This stage relies on the kinetic energy from the rotor's motion to disrupt the attachment points of the kernels without causing undue damage to the grain.^[62] Following threshing, the partially processed material advances to the separation phase, where straw walkers or an axial flow rotor further disentangle the grain from the remaining straw and chaff. In conventional systems, reciprocating straw walkers shake the material to allow grains to fall through perforated surfaces under gravity, while axial flow designs use extended rotor rotation to propel the mixture along a concave path, promoting additional dislodgement. The freed grains then drop onto sieves for initial cleaning, where airflow and vibration remove lighter chaff and short straw, directing clean grain toward storage while returning unthreshed material for reprocessing.^[50]^[62] Central to the effectiveness of threshing and separation are physical principles like centrifugal force generated by the rotor's high rotational speeds, producing accelerations up to 350 g (approximately 3,500 m/s²), which hurl kernels outward through concaves while retaining larger straw. Optimal crop moisture levels of 14-18% during harvest minimize kernel cracking and ensure clean separation, as drier grain risks shattering and wetter material clings more stubbornly to plant parts.^[63]^[64] In terms of performance, modern combine harvesters achieve throughputs of 10-50 tons of grain per hour across various models and crop conditions, with grain recovery efficiencies surpassing 98% under ideal settings, reflecting the process's ability to extract nearly all viable kernels in a single pass. The overall crop flow forms a linear progression—from feeder intake through the rotor-concave interaction, walker or axial separation, and into the cleaning cascade—optimizing material residence time and force application for consistent output.^[65]^[66]^[62]

Speed and efficiency maintenance

Maintaining optimal speed and efficiency in combine harvesters involves dynamic adjustments to ground speed, ensuring it aligns with crop conditions to prevent overload or underutilization of the machine's capacity. Optimal ground speeds typically range from 3 to 6 mph, depending on crop type, yield, and field conditions, as higher speeds can increase grain loss while lower speeds reduce throughput.^[67] These speeds are controlled through hydrostatic transmissions, which allow seamless variation in forward velocity to match crop density, enabling operators to slow down in dense stands to avoid plugging the threshing system or speed up in lighter areas for better productivity.^[57] Hydrostatic systems provide precise, infinite speed adjustments without gears, responding to real-time crop flow to sustain consistent harvesting rates across variable fields.^[22] Threshing speed is critical for efficient grain separation. Cylinder speeds are typically set between 800 and 1200 RPM depending on the crop and conditions to ensure optimal threshing without excessive damage.^[68] This adjustment ensures the cylinder processes material at a rate proportional to intake, preventing unthreshed grain or cracking. Auto-adjust systems enhance this by using load sensors to monitor torque and feed rate, automatically varying concave clearance—typically between 0.1 and 0.5 inches—to prevent plugging and optimize separation as crop density fluctuates.^[69] These systems, common in modern models, respond in real-time to maintain efficiency during the core threshing process without manual intervention.^[70] Fuel efficiency in contemporary combine harvesters averages 0.5 to 1 gallon per acre, achieved through advanced engine management and streamlined crop flow that minimizes energy waste.^[71] Variable rate technology further reduces consumption by modulating engine load, transmission output, and threshing parameters based on crop variability, potentially lowering fuel use by up to 20% in heterogeneous fields compared to fixed settings.^[72] This integration supports sustainable operations while maximizing acres covered per tank, with models like the Fendt IDEAL series exemplifying approximately 1 gallon per acre under typical conditions.^[73]

Terrain adaptation features

Combine harvesters incorporate hydraulic suspension systems for hillside leveling, which tilt both the operator's cab and the separator unit to maintain a level orientation on slopes up to 27 percent. This adjustment ensures that the grain flow remains perpendicular to the cleaning shoe and threshing components, preventing uneven distribution and reducing grain losses, which can increase substantially on slopes (e.g., several bushels per acre depending on conditions and prices).^[74] For sidehill operations, specialized configurations feature independent wheel tracks combined with four-wheel drive capabilities, enabling stable performance on grades up to 18 percent (10.2 degrees) while preventing rollover through enhanced traction and a center-pivot design that reuses existing drivetrain elements. These systems include hydraulic lateral tilt controls for the header to follow ground contours, with automatic or manual activation via the operator's console, thereby distributing crop material evenly across the cleaning system.^[75]^[76]^[77] Header flotation mechanisms rely on nitrogen-charged hydraulic accumulators integrated into the lift circuit, which act as shock absorbers to handle impacts from uneven or rocky terrain, allowing the header to maintain consistent ground contact without excessive bouncing or damage. These accumulators, typically ranging from 30 cubic inches to 2 gallons in size, use a floating piston to separate oil and nitrogen gas, providing responsive damping during field operations.^[78]^[79]^[80] Operational limitations generally cap combine harvester use at maximum slopes of 20 to 27 percent, depending on the model and configuration, beyond which stability risks increase; additional counterweights can be installed to lower the center of gravity and enhance balance, particularly for rice or hillside variants on steeper grades.^[74]^[81]^[82]

Instrumentation and Technology

Basic monitoring tools

Basic monitoring tools in combine harvesters provide essential real-time feedback on mechanical performance, enabling operators to detect issues like blockages, excessive losses, or engine anomalies during harvesting operations. These tools typically include sensors and gauges integrated into the machine's core systems, focusing on rotational speeds, grain separation efficiency, and powertrain health without relying on advanced digital integrations. Shaft monitors utilize RPM sensors to track the rotational speeds of key components such as the threshing cylinder and cleaning fan, ensuring optimal operation and early detection of potential blockages. The cylinder typically operates at 1000-1200 RPM for most grain crops, while the fan maintains around 1200 RPM to generate sufficient airflow for residue removal; deviations can indicate overloads or mechanical faults.^[83]^[84] These sensors often incorporate vibration detection to signal blockages in the threshing drum or fan assembly, preventing damage and downtime. Loss monitors employ impact-based sensors, such as piezoelectric plates positioned under the straw walkers or sieves, to quantify unthreshed grain escaping the separation process. These devices count grain impacts, with alerts triggered at losses greater than 2% of total throughput, helping maintain harvest efficiency.^[85] For wheat, calibration typically equates to about 1 kernel per square foot as an acceptable loss threshold, adjusted via manual or semi-automatic settings to account for crop type and moisture.^[86] Fuel and engine gauges offer straightforward diagnostics for powertrain integrity, monitoring hydraulic pressure in the 2000-3000 psi range for auxiliary systems and coolant temperature between 180-200°F to prevent overheating. Low hydraulic pressure may indicate leaks or pump wear, while elevated coolant temperatures signal cooling system issues, both displayed via analog dials for immediate operator awareness.^[87]^[88] Operator displays, often analog panels in older models or basic digital interfaces in modern ones, consolidate this data into a central view, including real-time throughput estimates in tons per hour to guide forward speed adjustments. These displays prioritize mechanical oversight, with throughput readings derived from feedrate sensors to ensure the machine operates within capacity limits of 50-70 tons per hour at 1% loss.^[89] Such tools can integrate briefly with advanced yield technologies for enhanced diagnostics, but remain focused on core mechanical indicators.^[90]

Advanced automation and precision systems

Advanced automation and precision systems in combine harvesters integrate sophisticated electronics, sensors, and artificial intelligence to enable autonomous navigation, real-time adjustments, and optimized operations, enhancing efficiency and reducing operator intervention as of 2025.^[91] GPS and GNSS systems, particularly those employing Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) technology, provide sub-inch accuracy of less than 2 cm for auto-guidance, allowing combines to follow precise paths and minimize field overlaps by 10-15%.^[92]^[93] This precision is achieved through satellite corrections that enhance standard GNSS signals, integrating with basic shaft and loss sensors as inputs for path correction during harvesting.^[94] Machine vision systems utilize high-resolution cameras, such as stereo setups processing at 30 frames per second, to detect weeds and automatically adjust header height for optimal crop intake.^[95] For instance, forward-mounted stereo cameras scan ahead to measure crop height and density, enabling dynamic header control that maintains ground clearance while avoiding excessive stubble loss.^[91] In advanced configurations, these cameras identify weedy patches and modulate machine speed accordingly, supporting site-specific management without halting operations.^[96] Automation features in 2025 models, exemplified by the John Deere X9 series, incorporate AI-driven path planning for semi-autonomous or unmanned operation, where the system predicts terrain changes and optimizes harvest routes using pre-loaded field maps and real-time sensor data.^[91] These capabilities allow the combine to execute turns, adjust speeds proactively, and maintain productivity across varied field conditions, reducing the need for constant human oversight.^[97] Telematics platforms facilitate cloud-based uploads of operational data for fleet management, enabling predictive maintenance through analysis of over 100 data points per hour, including engine performance, fuel usage, and vibration metrics.^[98] Systems like John Deere's JDLink transmit this information wirelessly to central dashboards, allowing remote monitoring and forecasting of potential failures to minimize downtime.^[99]

Data mapping and yield analysis

Yield monitoring systems in combine harvesters employ mass flow sensors, such as impact or optical types, to estimate crop productivity in bushels per acre by applying a formula that incorporates grain weight, harvest speed, and header width.^[100] Impact sensors detect the force of grain striking a plate to gauge mass flow, while optical sensors measure grain passage through light interruptions in the elevator.^[100] These sensors, integrated with GPS for georeferencing, enable real-time data collection during harvesting to support post-harvest analysis.^[101] Field mapping utilizes Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to layer harvest data, revealing spatial variations such as moisture content with 10-20% variability across fields, yield zones ranging from 150 to 250 bushels per acre in typical corn production, and areas affected by soil compaction.^[102]^[103] Moisture mapping identifies wetter zones prone to disease or drier areas needing irrigation adjustments, while yield zones highlight high-productivity regions versus those limited by compaction, informing targeted soil management.^[102] Soil compaction data, derived from yield correlations, pinpoints traffic-induced restrictions that reduce root growth and water infiltration.^[104] Software integration allows yield and mapping data to be exported directly to platforms like the John Deere Operations Center, where it generates prescriptions for variable rate seeding in subsequent seasons to optimize plant populations based on historical performance.^[105] This process involves uploading georeferenced yield maps to create zoning for seed rates, reducing overplanting in low-yield areas and enhancing efficiency.^[105] Advancements in 2025 incorporate artificial intelligence for anomaly detection, automatically flagging low-yield zones below 100 bushels per acre potentially caused by pests, enabling proactive interventions like targeted pesticide application. AI algorithms analyze combined sensor and mapping data to identify deviations from expected patterns, such as pest-induced stress, minimizing broader yield losses.

Types and Classifications

Size and capacity categories

Combine harvesters are classified into size and capacity categories primarily based on engine horsepower, following industry standards that divide modern machines into classes 5 through 10, where class 5 typically ranges from under 290 horsepower, class 6 from 290 to 325, class 7 from 325 to 375, class 8 from 375 to 500, class 9 from 500 to 570, and class 10 over 570 horsepower. This correlates with grain tank size, throughput rates, and suitability for different farm scales. These categories help farmers select machines that match operational needs, balancing power, efficiency, and cost for small, medium, or large agricultural operations.^[106]^[107] Small combines, typically under 200 horsepower (often class 4 or 5), feature grain tanks with capacities of 100 to 200 bushels and are designed for farms under 500 acres, where maneuverability in compact fields is essential. These models, such as certain compact rice harvesters from manufacturers like Kubota, offer efficient performance for specialty crops like rice while keeping acquisition costs lower for limited-scale producers.^[108]^[109] Medium combines, ranging from 200 to 400 horsepower (classes 5 to 7), provide grain bins of 300 to 400 bushels and serve as standard equipment for farms between 500 and 2,000 acres, offering a cost-effective balance at prices typically between $300,000 and $500,000. Examples include the Claas Lexion 570 with 373 horsepower and a 280-bushel tank, which supports versatile harvesting without excessive operating expenses.^[110]^[111] Large combines exceed 400 horsepower (classes 8 and above), with grain tanks over 400 bushels and throughput capacities surpassing 50 tons per hour, making them ideal for industrial-scale operations on farms larger than 2,000 acres. The Case IH 8250, for instance, delivers 480 horsepower and a 410-bushel tank, enabling high-volume processing in demanding conditions.^[112] Capacity in these models often aligns with header widths, such as 40 feet, which can achieve around 20 tons per hour in wheat harvesting to optimize field coverage and efficiency.^[113]^[114]

Specialized designs for crops and terrain

Combine harvesters have evolved into specialized variants tailored to specific grain crops, diverging from standard wheat or maize models that emphasize threshing and separation. For rice, compact models incorporate elevated designs and moisture-resistant components to handle flooded fields, as seen in Kubota's DC series with adjustable ground clearance.^[108] Terrain challenges necessitate further adaptations in undercarriage and overall design to maintain mobility and minimize soil compaction. Tracked configurations, as seen in models like the Case IH AF Series with optional tracks, distribute weight over a larger footprint to reduce ground pressure to approximately 4-7 psi in wet or soft soils, enabling operation where wheeled combines would cause rutting or get mired.^[115]^[116] This flotation benefit is particularly valuable in regions with high moisture, where tracks provide superior traction and limit compaction to levels below those of tires inflated over 20 psi.^[116] For orchard environments, low-profile designs lower the machine's center of gravity and height, allowing navigation between tree rows without branch interference; compact models like the Massey Ferguson 205 series exemplify this by offering reduced clearance for specialty grain or forage harvesting under canopies.^[117] Hybrid designs enhance versatility through interchangeable headers that accommodate multiple crops on a single platform. Multi-crop headers, such as the CLAAS MAXFLEX, feature flexible cutters and adjustable reels compatible with corn, soybeans, and wheat, enabling quick swaps to handle varying row spacings and plant heights without major reconfiguration.^[43] Recent advancements include modular kits introduced in 2025, like John Deere's hinged draper systems and adapters from Capello's Quick Up series, which allow seamless attachment of corn, flex, or grain headers to standardize harvesting across diverse fields and reduce downtime between crop rotations.^[118]^[119] Global adaptations reflect regional topography and field layouts, optimizing combines for local constraints. In Europe, narrow-body models like the CLAAS Elios series, with widths under 3.5 meters and tight turning radii, navigate hedgerows and fragmented fields common in traditional landscapes, preserving boundaries while maintaining efficiency.^[120] For Australia's hilly terrains, high-clearance variants such as the CLAAS LEXION 7700 MONTANA incorporate elevated axles and four-wheel drive to handle slopes up to 20% gradient, ensuring stability and crop flow on undulating ground without excessive soil disturbance.^[121]

Safety and Modifications

Fire risks and prevention

Combine harvesters face significant fire risks due to the accumulation of flammable crop residues in proximity to high-heat components during operation. A comprehensive study of approximately 9,000 grain combine fires in the United States identified crop residue as the primary fuel source in 41% of cases, often igniting when it contacts hot engine parts, bearings, or exhaust systems.^[122] Faulty electrical wiring and overheated bearings are also frequent ignition sources, accounting for a substantial portion of incidents alongside fuel or hydraulic leaks that provide additional combustibles.^[123] Chaff buildup near the exhaust manifold poses a particular hazard, as exhaust gas temperatures routinely surpass 1,000°F (538°C), with surface temperatures reaching around 900°F (482°C), sufficient to ignite dry plant material rapidly.^[124] In the United States, combine harvesters are involved in over 600 fire incidents annually, leading to more than $20 million in property damage and injuring over 50 individuals each year, with many events occurring during peak harvest conditions of low humidity and high temperatures.^[125] ^[126] These figures, drawn from pre-2020 data, highlight the persistent threat, and recent droughts as of 2024-2025 have increased fire risks in regions like the Midwest.^[127] Newer equipment designs, such as relocated air intakes, aim to reduce fire starts, though overall incidents remain a concern. Basic monitoring tools, such as infrared thermometers, aid in identifying hotspots exceeding 200°C (392°F) before ignition occurs.^[128] Prevention strategies emphasize proactive maintenance and engineered safeguards to mitigate these risks. Daily cleaning of chaff and debris from the engine compartment, exhaust areas, and wiring harnesses is essential to prevent buildup, while spark arrestors installed on exhaust stacks capture embers and reduce field fire spread.^[122] Fire suppression systems, including automatic CO2 or foam discharge units triggered by heat sensors, provide rapid response in enclosed areas like the engine bay, significantly limiting fire escalation.^[129] Operators should also conduct regular inspections of bearings for overheating and electrical systems for shorts, parking machines away from flammable materials after use. Emergency protocols are critical for minimizing harm during an incident. Immediate actions include activating emergency shutdown switches to halt fuel flow and engine operation, then positioning the machine in an open area away from crops before evacuating all personnel.^[124] Onboard ABC-rated fire extinguishers and pre-planned field evacuation routes enable quick response, underscoring the need for operator training in these procedures to protect lives and limit crop losses.^[130]

Conversions and retrofitting

Conversions and retrofitting allow owners of older combine harvesters to upgrade machinery for compliance with modern regulations, improved performance, and extended operational lifespan without purchasing new equipment. These modifications typically involve replacing key components or integrating aftermarket systems to enhance efficiency, data collection, and residue handling. Such upgrades are particularly valuable for small to medium-sized farms facing high costs for new combines, enabling customized improvements based on specific operational needs. One common conversion is upgrading engines to meet Tier 4 emissions standards, which reduces pollutants while often improving fuel efficiency. For instance, retrofit kits from manufacturers like John Deere enable Interim Tier 4 compliance on existing equipment by integrating aftertreatment systems such as diesel oxidation catalysts and particulate filters. Cummins Tier 4 Final engines, when retrofitted, achieve up to 5% better fuel efficiency compared to prior generations through optimized combustion and aftertreatment technologies.^[131] These swaps, while requiring professional installation, help avoid fines for non-compliant operation in regulated areas and lower long-term fuel costs. Retrofitting technology for precision agriculture is another popular option, particularly adding GPS guidance and yield monitoring to models from the 1990s onward. Kits like the FarmTRX PLUS+ system, which includes GPS receivers, yield sensors, and moisture detectors, can be installed on nearly any combine with access to 12-volt power and a clean grain elevator, typically in a few hours. Ag Leader yield monitors fit combines made in the last 30 years, providing accurate data with minimal calibration—often just two loads—and cost around $3,000 to $4,000 including installation components. These additions enable variable-rate applications and yield mapping, upgrading older machines to support data-driven farming decisions. Installing straw choppers on conventional walker combines represents a key retrofit for better residue management. Conversion kits, such as those for Case IH models like the 1480, 1680, and 2388, replace rigid knives with flail-style systems, including rotors, bearings, and drive components, to finely chop and spread straw evenly. Aftermarket options from suppliers like Shoup Manufacturing or Redekop cost approximately $5,000 and improve residue distribution, facilitating reduced tillage practices and enhancing soil health by minimizing erosion and incorporating organic matter more effectively. The cost-benefit of these retrofits often justifies investment for small farms, extending machine life by several years through enhanced reliability and compliance while delivering returns via operational savings. For example, yield monitoring kits pay for themselves in one to two seasons through optimized inputs and reduced losses, with overall upgrades like choppers and GPS improving efficiency by 5-10% in fuel and labor. Some retrofits also incorporate safety enhancements, such as integrated monitoring for operator alerts during upgrades.

References

[1]
Grain harvesting, threshing and cleaning - Technical alternatives
Combine-harvesters, as the name implies, combine the actions of reaping and threshing. Either the 'through-flow' or the 'hold-on' principle of threshing may be ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[2]
Industrialization of Agriculture - Food System Primer
The combine harvester performs two processes at once: cutting grain (reaping) and removing it from the inedible part (threshing). Mechanization in agriculture ...
[3]
Harvester Works - Deere & Company
Combines got their name because they combine the 6 functions of harvesting: Cutting & feeding, Threshing, Separating, Cleaning, Grain handling, and Residue ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[4]
Hiram Moore Collection | NMAH.AC.1429
Biographical / Historical In 1834, Hiram Moore built and put into practical use the first successful grain combined harvester named Thresher which was patented ...
[5]
Holt Combined Harvester-Thresher | Smithsonian Institution
The Holt combine was the first to combine harvesting, threshing, cleaning, and bagging grain, using a sickle bar, reel, apron, sieve, and elevator. It was ...
[6]
[PDF] THE PLOWSHARE - John Deere
1927 Deere introduces its first combine, uniting the harvesting and threshing methods into a single operation. They retail for approximately $2,000. 1934 ...
[7]
[PDF] Axial Flow Combine History - PPC Dev News
Q: What is the origin of the axial flow combine harvester design? A: The axial flow combine harvester design originated in the 1970s, developed by Case IH,.
[8]
T6 800 Combine | Grain Harvesting | John Deere US
Ground Speed Automation dynamically adjusts combine ground speed during harvest based on various operator inputs and internal sensors around the machine. These ...
[9]
Agricultural engineering in development - The harvest
Another machine that is capable of simultaneously harvesting, shucking, shelling, and cleaning maize is the combine-harvester.
[10]
Moore Hascall Combine | Invention & Technology Magazine
Hiram Moore and John Hascall built and put into practical use the first successful grain combined harvester - thresher which was patented June 28, 1836.
[11]
What Does a “Combine” Combine? - Blog - The Henry Ford
Jun 30, 2023 · The first successful combine was demonstrated by Hiram Moore and John Hascall in Climax, Michigan, in 1834. Horse-drawn and tractor-drawn ...
[12]
Case Study: The Evolution and Impact of the Combine Harvester
Jul 16, 2024 · 1834: The first patent for a grain-cutting machine was issued to Hiram Moore in the United States. This machine could reap and thresh grain ...
[13]
[PDF] Agricultural Implements and Machines in the Collection of the ...
The Deerfoot Farm at South- borough, Massachusetts, used this machine, patented by D. M. Weston of Boston. Gift of Deerfoot Farm Company, Southborough,.
[14]
[PDF] lisenssillä - Doria
Warder, Mitchell & Co. 1873. Mss 4z, box 24; Vienna awards 1873. C.H. & L.J. ... of the Combine Harvester in Australia, Canada and U.S.A. (Tools and Tillage.
[15]
Gordon v. Warder | 150 U.S. 47 (1893)
The bills of complaint, as originally filed, averred infringements by the defendants of three different patents ... harvester. Such devices were well known ...
[16]
The era of pull-type combines: Part 1 - Grainews
Feb 1, 2018 · The Holt Company of Stockton, California, sold the first commercial combine in North America in 1886. It was a 14-foot cut, ground drive machine pulled by up ...Missing: challenges 1880s
[17]
Harvest Equipment: A Brief History of the Combine - Iron Solutions
May 24, 2020 · The combine harvester got its start in Scotland in 1826 when Reverend Patrick Bell designed a reaper—a large machine pushed by horses that used ...Missing: reliable | Show results with:reliable
[18]
What You Should Know about Combine History: Full Guide
The combine harvester inventor is considered to be Hiram Moore. In the 1830s, he and John Hascall built and tested the first combine, patenting it in 1836. To ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
[19]
Combine Harvester: Innovating Modern Wheat Farming by History ...
Sep 15, 2010 · The source seems reliable considering it gives credit to every picture and the owners. It also knows dates, companies, and northwest areas ...
[20]
Self-Propelled Combines - Wessels Living History Farm
During the war, short supplies of farm machines and the raw materials to make them, combined with increased demand for food, produced some amazing advances ...Missing: widespread adoption
[21]
A Brief History of Deere's Self Propelled Combines - Green Magazine
Oct 1, 2019 · A six cylinder Hercules QXD-3 engine producing 45 horsepower supplied the power. Early machines did not have individual wheel brakes, but only a ...
[22]
The Birth of the Hydrostatic Transmission - Successful Farming
Jun 18, 2025 · IHC engineers had been laboring to create a dependable hydraulic hydrostatic (hydrostat) transmission since the mid-1950s.
[23]
The Hydrostatic Combine Harvester Page - Hydraulic Pump Repair
151 combine weighed in with 75 hp IH engine, big 37 inch separator and was available with 12ft, 14ft and 16ft grain headers as well as 2 and 4 row corn heads.Missing: combustion | Show results with:combustion
[24]
'Harvest Brigade' important to American WWII efforts
Jul 18, 2021 · Because the combines could be driven faster and were more efficient resulting in a cleaner, more complete harvest, it was calculated that 365, ...
[25]
Postwar Technology - Wessels Living History Farm
The end of World War II produced a technological boom in agricultural machinery and research. Ironically, this boom in research spending and emphasis did ...
[26]
Beating Wartime Restrictions: Massey-Harris' Harvest Brigade
Sep 1, 2002 · The U.S. War Food Administration set a 1944 goal of 1 billion bushels of wheat; even though thousands of farmers were serving in the Armed ...
[27]
Harvesting Wheat - Wessels Living History Farm
This era also saw the introduction of factory-installed cabs on combines. By the mid-60s, manufacturers were offering optional cabs to keep the operator out of ...
[28]
What Is a Combine in Farming: Essential Machinery Explained
Jul 24, 2024 · By the 1960s, more sophisticated models included advanced features such as enclosed cabs for increased operator comfort. Innovation did not ...
[29]
Case IH celebrating 30th anniversary of Axial-Flow combine ...
When International Harvester Co. introduced the Model 1460 Axial-Flow Combine in 1977, it was not without some sense of fear and trepidation.
[30]
The Strength of the Axial-Flow Legacy - Case IH
May 30, 2025 · From feeding to cleaning, the entire system is designed to minimize grain damage. GRAIN SAVINGS. Thorough threshing and efficient separation put ...
[31]
[PDF] Axial-Flow® Enhancements Spanning the Years 1977-2013
Nov 1, 2013 · When the Axial-Flow combine was introduced to the world in the fall of 1977, it was the culmination of many man-hours of hard work, testing, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[32]
3 IHC Innovations That Changed Farming - Successful Farming
Aug 21, 2024 · The Axial-Flow combine established the concept of rotary threshing and separation that dominates combine design today.
[33]
The crop of the 21st century | National Museum of American History
Jul 16, 2018 · Linking the yield monitor data to GPS-plotted locations, farmers created yield maps, making the new technology even more powerful. Yield mapping ...
[34]
7 facts about HVO - CLAAS
Oct 9, 2024 · HVO (hydrotreated vegetable oil) has been approved for use in CLAAS harvesters and tractors that meet the latest Stage V emissions standard ...
[35]
Combine Harvesters Market Size, Share & Report to 2033
The global combine harvesters market size reached USD 11.1 Billion in 2024. Looking forward, IMARC Group expects the market to reach USD 15.8 Billion by 2033.
[36]
Deere unveils new combine harvester with 'expanded advanced ...
Apr 25, 2025 · A part of the ultimate technology package, predictive ground speed automation was introduced with the model year 2025 ... AI-powered harvesters.<|control11|><|separator|>
[37]
Best Combine Harvester Machine: 2026 Innovations - Farmonaut
Oct 19, 2025 · Recent innovations include fuel-efficient powertrains, hybrid/electric engines, and smart residue management systems, all designed to reduce ...Missing: steering | Show results with:steering
[38]
New Holland Reveals Next-gen CR11 Combine - Successful Farming
Nov 13, 2023 · The CR11 is built with a C16 engine capable of up to 775 hp. The grain tank has a 567 bushel capacity, can be unloaded in under 100 seconds with ...Missing: harvester retention
[39]
EU: Nonroad engines - Emission Standards - DieselNet
Summary of European emission standards for engines used in non-road mobile machinery (NRMM) covering EU Stage I through Stage V regulations.Missing: combine harvesters
[40]
Asia Pacific Combine Harvester Market Size & Share, 2033
Jul 30, 2025 · Asia Pacific Combine Harvester Market size will reach USD 19.40 Bn by 2033. Countries such as India and China have experienced rapid growth ...Missing: expansion emerging markets
[41]
Draper Platforms | Harvesting | John Deere US
Choose one of our rigid or hinged frame drapers. Choose from a variety of widths, ranging from 30-ft to 50-ft (9.14-15.24 meters) models.RDF35 HydraFlex™ Draper · RDF45 HydraFlex™ Draper · HDF50 Hinged Frame...Missing: types: | Show results with:types:
[42]
Setting Feeder House Chain for a Successful Soybean Harvest
Synchronizing Reel Speed. To synchronize reel speed to ground speed, reel RPM should be 10 times ground speed. Example: 4 MPH ground speed = 40 RPM on reel.Missing: conveyor | Show results with:conveyor
[43]
How Does Your Combine Harvester Work? - FridayParts
Oct 10, 2025 · The Feederhouse acts as an elevator. A chain-and-slat conveyor moves the cut crop upward and back into the machine for threshing. A consistent, ...
[44]
Combine headers - CLAAS
The MAXFLEX features a flexible header and unique multicrop capability, they offer maximum flexibility and convenience for harvesting a range of different crops ...
[45]
FD2 Series FlexDraper® | MacDon
The FD261 FlexDraper® is a fully flexing 61-foot draper header. The FD261 provides you with 61 feet of true ground following flex, and our close reel-to- ...
[46]
CIGR Handbook of Agricultural Engineering, Volume III Plant Production Engineering, Chapter 1 Machines for Crop Production, 1.6 Harvesters and Threshers, Part 1.6.1-1.6.7 Harvesters and Threshers: Grain
### Summary of Conventional and Axial Flow Threshing and Separation
[47]
[PDF] Evaluation Report 312 - Open Government program
Suitable cylinder speeds for threshing were 1000 to 1300 rpm in wheat, 1000 to 1200 rpm in rye, 1000 to 1100 rpm in barley and 800 to 900 rpm in rapeseed. Shoe ...<|separator|>
[48]
[PDF] REPORT RESUMES - ERIC
up straw. Maximum Separation. Cylinder and Concave Setting Speed a. 8. 1200. 1450 ... per minute and the diameter of the cylinder is 24 inches, at what r. p. m. ...
[49]
[PDF] Axial-Flow 50 Series Combines - Central Illinois Ag
From header to spreader, Axial-Flow series combines are designed to be reliable and preserve the quality of more than 134 grain types, so you can simply harvest ...Missing: internal combustion hydrostatic
[50]
[PDF] Practical Farmers Clinic Legacy and Flagship combine settings for ...
University research indicates total machine loss for head and combine should be 1.8% of total Yield. • Properly set axial flows can get total loss below 1%. • ...
[51]
Crop Flow Control in a Longitudinal Axial Threshing Unit Using Fully ...
Larger angles accelerate crop flow, reducing damage but raising the risk of unseparated grain loss. Several studies have confirmed the importance of guide ...
[52]
Determination of Grain Losses on Combine Harvester - ResearchGate
Feb 14, 2021 · Under good harvesting conditions, the total loss should not be more than 1.5% [10]. 1. Cutter bar loss - 0.5 to 2%. 2. Cylinder loss - 0.5 to 1% ...
[53]
Modeling and simulation of grain threshing and separation in axial ...
In fact, only at the end of the axial feeding zone, 100% of the material enters into the threshing and separating zone. This paper expands the grain threshing ...
[54]
Chapter 12 Grain Harvesting - ASABE Technical Library
The threshing cylinders in conventional combines vary from 38 to 56 cm in diameter and rotate between 150 to 1500 rev/min. The cylinder speed is determined by ...
[55]
Impeller for rotary cleaning mechanism in combines - Sperry ...
... a speed of 120 RPM, each cleaning shoe 60 would receive 405 shakes per minute. As one skilled in the art will further realize, the spider assembly 125 seen ...
[56]
Explore the Structure of Combine Harvesters Cleaning Unit
Apr 1, 2020 · The airflow direction should be around 30° to the horizontal. If on sieve, such direction should be ranging between 20°–30°. A fan, or a series ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[57]
Mathematical modeling and research of the work of the grain ...
Experimental measurements of the airflow distribution over the working part of the sieve shoe for the existing cleaning system and modern combine harvesters ...
[58]
X9 | X-Series | Combine Harvesters | John Deere US
Combine harvester harvesting corn in a field, with corn stalks visible at ... Headers and Platforms. X9 Combines are engineered to create a perfect ...
[59]
Crop Residue Management: Make The Right Decisions - Case IH
Dec 21, 2017 · Effective residue management involves decisions at harvest, such as header height and chopping, and spreading finely to promote even ...
[60]
Biggest Case Combine - Wickham Tractor Co.
Case AF10 is a class 10+ combine with a 567 or 455-bushel (optional) grain tank with a 6.0 or 4.5 (optional) bushel-per-second unload rate. Case AF11 is also a ...
[61]
Crop Residue Management - Bayer Crop Science
Jul 16, 2025 · For proper residue distribution, harvesters should be equipped with straw spreaders capable of uniformly distributing residue over the working ...
[62]
Residue Management Starts With the Combine - Beck's Hybrids
Aug 29, 2023 · The chopper sizes soybean residue and helps promote an even spread pattern. If the knives/blades are dull, clumps of residue will be spread out ...
[63]
https://agronomyjournal.usamv.ro/pdf/2023/issue_2/Art60.pdf
[64]
[PDF] STUDIES ON THE DYNAMICS OF THRESHING APPLIANCES OF ...
Dec 19, 2023 · The present paper presents a comparative study of the threshers that equip different types of self-propelled combines for cereal harvesting.
[65]
Drying wheat and barley - University of Minnesota Extension
If you harvest grain at high moisture content, you need to artificially dry it to 13 to 14 percent moisture for safe storage.Missing: optimal combine
[66]
(PDF) Development tendencies and potential of the market for ...
Aug 5, 2025 · Combine harvesters used today can achieve throughput rates of over 70 tons of grain per hour; however, their technical performance potential ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[67]
Optimization of Conventional Combine Harvester to Reduce ...
The threshing efficiency remained above 99.31% ± 0.47%, for both years. Thus, optimization of combine harvester was able to save the visible grain damage by 60% ...
[68]
Speeding up soybean harvest operations
Oct 19, 2023 · Effect of combine ground speed on soybean harvest capacity. Header width (feet). 3 mph. 4 mph. 5 mph. Acres harvested per hour at 75% efficiency.Missing: typical | Show results with:typical
[69]
The Effect of Combine Harvester Speed, Threshing Cylinder Speed ...
Aug 6, 2025 · There is evidence to suggest that the grain loss during harvesting increases in direct correlation with the speed at which the combine ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
[70]
Automatic Control System for Maize Threshing Concave Clearance ...
An electric-driven automatic control system for maize threshing concave clearance based on real-time entrainment loss monitoring was developed.
[71]
Auto-adjust combines need monitoring - Top Crop Manager
Jul 3, 2025 · Auto-adjust combines typically use sensors to monitor many parts of the grain threshing process. An operator sets the parameters for grain loss, foreign ...
[72]
[PDF] Self-Propelled Harvesting and Spraying - Iowa State Extension
Table 2. Diesel fuel consumption estimates for harvesting and spraying. Operation. Gallons per acre. Combine soybeans or small grain. 1.00.Missing: modern | Show results with:modern
[73]
Make your Harvest Legendary with the Fendt IDEAL Combine
The threshing system is also distinguished by its simple configuration. The operator only needs to change the rotor speed range and the concave clearance.
[74]
Power Meets Precision with the Fendt IDEAL 9T Combine | Farms.com
Oct 6, 2025 · Combined with direct drive technology, it delivers industry-leading fuel efficiency, consuming approximately one gallon per acre. Along with ...Missing: harvester variable
[75]
John Deere Combine Leveling Systems | Hillside & Sidehill
Hillco offers Hillside (27%) and Sidehill (18%) leveling systems for John Deere combines, with automatic leveling, increased capacity, and reduced grain loss.
[76]
[PDF] comBine leveling SySTemS - Hillco Technologies
Hillco's combine leveling systems eliminate hillside grain loss, increase harvesting speeds, and evenly distribute material for maximum cleaning capacity.
[77]
John Deere Sidehill Leveling System - Hillco Technologies
Hillco Technologies offers a broad range of leveling systems specifically designed to maximize STS & S Series combine's performance in all terrain.
[78]
[PDF] GRAIN HARVESTING - John Deere
Two-speed 4-wheel-drive lets you switch between torque ranges. In slow-speed ... Improve combine performance on sidehill slopes up to 8° (14%) by ...<|separator|>
[79]
Accumulators help keep heads on straight | Power & Motion Tech
reaping, threshing, and winnowing — into a ...
[80]
Dual accumulator hydraulic flotation system for crop harvester
The hydraulic flotation circuit for the header of a windrower or other harvester utilizes a pair of precharged gas accumulators that are always in ...
[81]
[PDF] Flotation Systems on.tif
As changes in the terrain oc- cur the header can easily float up or down to maintain close contact with the ground and harvest the entire soy- bean crop.Missing: nitrogen | Show results with:nitrogen
[82]
Harvesting campaign: how to obtain a better bonus load?
May 31, 2021 · The slope must not exceed 20% (11 degrees). At maximum capacity, the tyre must not travel more than 1.5 km. Bigger bonus load for ...Missing: counterweights | Show results with:counterweights
[83]
Counterweight block for driving stability of the rice combine harvester.
The maximum bending moment was 2298.08 N/m, and it was located at the cross section of the left end of the bearing beam at 1.61 m.Missing: rating | Show results with:rating
[84]
Parameter optimisation of a centrifugal fan for rice combine ...
The main operational parameters of the combine harvester are fan speed ... Test No. Fan Speed (rpm), Guide plate angle I (°), Guide plate angle II (°), Sieve
[85]
[PDF] YOUR HARVEST GAME CHANGER - Massey Ferguson
Hydraulic fan drive removes the need for belts and a belt variator, and allows simple and stepless fan speed control between 150 – 1,350 rpm to suit a wide ...
[86]
Development of single measuring point overall balancing method ...
Using sensors to monitor the vibration state of the threshing drum can ensure the safe and reliable operation of the combine harvester. It can also improve the ...
[87]
Grain separation loss monitoring system in combine harvester
Aug 5, 2025 · Grain sieve loss-monitoring sensors represent an important accessory in combine harvesters, as they can not only provide current grain loss ...
[88]
Study on the Technologies of Loss Reduction in Wheat ... - MDPI
Nov 17, 2022 · This research first points out the main losses in the operation of a wheat combine harvester, then introduces sensor monitoring technology for grain harvesting ...
[89]
Temperature measurements in hydraulics - HAWE Hydraulik
The temperature of the hydraulic fluid in hydraulic systems can be measured either with simple measurement devices (thermometer) or with a measuring device.
[90]
[PDF] Operation and Maintenance Manual - Aurora Generators
Coolant temperature – The coolant temperature sensor indicates high ... (30 psi to 60 psi) at rated rpm. A lower oil pressure is normal at low idle ...
[91]
Throughput control on a combine harvester using Model-based ...
Jun 20, 2010 · The capacity of a combine harvester is generally defined as the tons of pure grain a combine can process in one hour at a 1% loss level.
[92]
Development and testing of a grain combine harvester throughput ...
Aug 5, 2025 · Throughput is a key performance indicator of combine harvesters and an important basis for the control of its operating speed and loss rate.
[93]
X9 Technology Packages | John Deere US
In addition to the integrated technology, X9 Combines offer three technology packages stuffed with precision ag advances.Bring Precision Technology... · More Automation. More... · Harvest Settings AutomationMissing: AI path
[94]
What Is RTK and Why Use It in Agriculture? - FieldBee
May 13, 2022 · RTK (Real-Time Kinematic) is a satellite correction technology that boosts GNSS accuracy from a few metres down to just a few centimetres.Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[95]
Who will benefit from GPS Auto Guidance in the Corn Belt
The estimates assume that with lightbar controlled traffic this can be cut to 30%, with DGPS auto guidance to 20% and with RTK GPS to 15%. The estimates are ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[96]
Implement lateral position accuracy under RTK-GPS tractor guidance
... With precision steering with an accuracy of about +/-1 to 2 cm (e.g. "RTK-GPS"), overlaps can be reduced to about 3- ...
[97]
[PDF] Video-based Prediction for Header-height Control of a Combine ...
This paper introduces a video-based prediction system for header-height control of a combine harvester. To achieve this goal, we propose a lighting-invariant ...Missing: weed 4K stereo
[98]
John Deere Unveils 2026 Combine Automation and Header Upgrades
Jun 6, 2025 · Cameras on the front of the combine will now detect weedy areas in the field and adjust the machine's speed accordingly. This new system also ...
[99]
John Deere Combine: Features, Models, and Prices Farmers Should ...
Sep 2, 2025 · John Deere's research and development pipeline indicates continued focus on autonomous operations and artificial intelligence integration.Precision Harvesting... · 2025 Pricing Structure... · Future Technology Trajectory
[100]
Data Management | JDLink™ | John Deere US
JDLink™ Connect allows you to view critical and timely information about your machines, and to move data wirelessly and effortlessly.
[101]
[PDF] A STUDY OF COMBINE DATA COMPARING OPERATORS ... - K-REx
harvesting is a service that relieves the farmer of having to invest in machinery and labor that both can be costly and hire a harvester to harvest the crops in ...
[102]
[PDF] Crop Yield Monitors - LSU AgCenter
Yield monitors make use of electronic sensors to calculate crop productivity, usually in pounds (or bushels) per acre. Sensors used are: Mass flow sensors – A ...
[103]
[PDF] Yield Monitor - VTechWorks
A yield monitor, com- bined with Global Positioning System (GPS) tech- nology, is an electronic tool that collects data on crop performance for a given year.
[104]
Yield Monitoring And Mapping Systems For Data-Driven Farming
May 29, 2025 · Yield monitoring and mapping help detect field variability and understand where input use is efficient or wasteful. Learn how to adopt it in ...
[105]
Technology To Maintain Optimal Soil Moisture: Top 7 Ways
Satellite/drone imagery detects soil, crop moisture variability, 15-25%, 10-20%, Wide coverage, identifies problem areas rapidly. Automated Irrigation Systems ...1. Soil Moisture Sensors... · 2. Remote Sensing... · 6. Soil Moisture Retention...<|separator|>
[106]
GIS Applications in Precision Agriculture, Including Soil and Crop ...
Sep 23, 2024 · GIS enables farmers to gather detailed information about soil conditions, crop health, and weather patterns.
[107]
Precision Ag Technology | Variable Rate Application - John Deere
Vary your seed and fertilizer rates automatically based on field types and conditions, minimizing overlap and reducing input costs.
[108]
Combine Harvesters: Specs, Price, Models | AllMachines
With prices ranging from $102,200 to $1,133,625, AllMachines helps you find the right combine harvester that fits your budget and operational needs.<|control11|><|separator|>
[109]
Combine Harvester & Rice Transplanter | Products & Solutions
Light-Weight and Compact Design (Combine Harvester). Even in the small Asian farm fields, our combine harvesters have excellent maneuverability and high fuel ...Missing: 100-200 | Show results with:100-200<|separator|>
[110]
Mini Combine Harvester Price & Specifications - TractorKarvan
The mini combine harvester price in India starts at Rs. 18,50,000*. The mini combine harvesters are available in the 76 to 101 HP range.
[111]
Claas Hybrid Combine Harvesters: Specs, Price, Models - AllMachines
Claas LEXION 570 · 280 bu Grain Tank Size · 373 hp Max Power · 210 gal Fuel Capacity · C-9 Make and Model · 2.8 bu/s Unloading Rate.Missing: bin | Show results with:bin
[112]
How Much Does a Combine Harvester Cost? Harvester Financing
Feb 6, 2024 · Here are the pricing ranges of the leading combine harvester brands: · Claas: $100,000 to $250,000 · John Deere: $200,000 to $400,000 · New Holland ...
[113]
Axial-Flow 8250 - Combine Harvester - Case IH
The Axial-Flow 8250 combine, with 480 hp at 2100 engine RPMs and a 410-bushel tank, provides unmatched horsepower and the performance you've come to expect ...
[114]
Choosing the Right Combine Header - Successful Farming
May 4, 2011 · No matter what type of header you're looking for, you want one that handles a wide range of field conditions, maximizes field time, and improves productivity.
[115]
[PDF] Benchmark Testing in Wheat using a John Deere X9 1100 ... - PAMI
The results from the loss curve testing showed that the John Deere X9 reached a throughput of. 115 tonnes/h (254,000 lb/h) at a 1% total loss threshold; the ...
[116]
CH570 Sugar Cane Harvester - John Deere
The CH570's reliable cleaning system yields the cleanest cane in the industry. Cleaner cane, less billet loss, and less downtime will bring more profit.
[117]
Harvesting Equipment | John Deere US
John Deere offers combines, drapers, corn heads, cotton harvesters, and sugar cane harvesters for various crops and operations.Combine Harvesters | S-Series · CS770 Cotton Stripper · S7 900 · Corn HeadsMissing: specialized | Show results with:specialized<|separator|>
[118]
Our Largest Combine Harvesters: AF Series - Case IH
Discover the Case IH AF Series combines, featuring dual-rotor and single-rotor options for unmatched speed, capacity, and subscription-free technology.
[119]
'Combine Chasing' Has Compaction Drawbacks - Successful Farming
Sep 9, 2020 · Tracks exert a ground pressure of approximately 4 to 7 pounds per square inch (psi) depending on track width, length, and tractor weight, says ...
[120]
The best combine for small scale farmer | Yesterday's Tractors Forums
Feb 18, 2021 · I want to buy a combine but what is the best small scale combine for a small farmer with less than 50 acres i pefer a gear trans gas or ...
[121]
Deere Unveils Next-Gen Combine Front-End Equipment, Expanded ...
Feb 28, 2025 · John Deere has released new combine headers, including a three-piece hinge draper reel system and an 18-row corn head with 30-inch spacing.
[122]
Quick Up, the modular adapter - Capello World
Quick Up is our modular adapter designed to meet every maize header connection need, allowing you to hook it up to any machine, whether it be a self-propelled ...Missing: kits | Show results with:kits
[123]
Combine harvesters CLAAS, online shop agrodoctor.eu
Elios with a capacity of 72-88 hp has a small turning radius and the low center of gravity. Axos, whose power reaches 100 hp, suitable for work in the field and ...<|separator|>
[124]
LEXION 8000 / 7000 - CLAAS
The LEXION 7700 MONTANA is the ideal combine harvester if your farm is located in a hilly region. With 4-wheel drive and differential lock, it is perfectly at ...
[125]
Preventing and Responding to Combine Fires
In a study of 9,000 grain combine fires in the U.S., 41% were caused by crop residue. It is easy for crop residue to accumulate on the engine, wiring harnesses, ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[126]
Combine Fire Prevention - Agronomic Crops Network
The primary heat sources causing fires include faulty wiring and over-heated bearings. Fuel sources for the fires can vary between leaking fuel or hydraulic oil ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
[127]
Preventing and Responding to Combine Fires | CropWatch | Nebraska
Sep 21, 2022 · A study out of Spain conducted in 2018 and 2019 found that bearings and belts caused 18% of combine fires. One way to ensure bearings are ...
[128]
Prevent the tragedy of combine fire - Farm Progress
Aug 30, 2023 · With more than 600 combine fires reported annually across the country, combines should always have regularly updated fire extinguishers on board ...Missing: incidents | Show results with:incidents
[129]
Combine Fires: a $20 Million Avoidable Problem - Successful Farming
Sep 20, 2024 · The $20 million in property losses each year from combine and tractor fires doesn't include the cost of lost time and downed crops during the ...Missing: incidents | Show results with:incidents
[130]
Fire Safety During Harvest Season: Essential Tips for Farmers
Oct 2, 2024 · Recent studies have shown that most combine fires begin in the engine area, with 76.7% of incidents stemming from contact between crop ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[131]
How to Prevent, Fight Combine Fires During Harvest Time
Oct 2, 2024 · Warm weather, drought, windy days and low relative humidity can all contribute to higher fire risks for machinery on farms, especially at ...
[132]
Prevent Combine Fires During Fall Harvest
Prevent combine fires with daily maintenance, cleaning spills, removing chaff, and eliminating static electricity. Have two ABC fire extinguishers and a water ...Missing: causes | Show results with:causes