Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Composition studies

Composition studies is an centered on the theory, research, and of writing processes, particularly in postsecondary , where it examines how individuals compose texts and how writing instruction can be optimized. Emerging as a scholarly field in the , it leveraged empirical methods to explore in writing, drawing from , , , and to challenge earlier current-traditional approaches that emphasized formal correctness over invention and revision. The field has advanced writing through developments like , which prioritizes and over product alone, and initiatives such as writing-across-the-curriculum programs that integrate composition into diverse disciplines. However, composition studies has encountered significant controversy for shifting focus from measurable writing proficiency—rooted in grammar, logic, and evidence-based argumentation—to ideologically driven paradigms like , , and , often at the expense of foundational skills and amid critiques of academic bias toward progressive politics. This evolution reflects broader tensions in academia, where empirical rigor in assessing writing outcomes competes with interpretive frameworks that prioritize and dynamics over causal mechanisms of effective communication.

History

Origins in Classical Rhetoric and 19th-Century Education

The foundations of composition studies lie in classical , an ancient discipline concerned with the effective composition of persuasive , both oral and written. Emerging in fifth-century BCE among the Sophists, rhetoric was systematized by in his around 350 BCE, which emphasized —the discovery of arguments—alongside , , , and as the five canons guiding creation. These canons provided a framework for composing texts that prioritized logical structure, stylistic clarity, and audience adaptation, influencing subsequent Roman theorists. Roman educators adapted Greek rhetoric for comprehensive training in eloquence, integrating composition exercises into liberal arts curricula. Cicero's De Inventione (circa 84 BCE) detailed invention and arrangement for argumentative texts, while Quintilian's Institutio Oratoria (circa 95 CE) outlined a progressive educational program for orators, including imitation of models, declamation practice, and original writing to develop fluency and precision. Rhetoric's role in education persisted through medieval and Renaissance periods as a core component of the trivium, fostering skills in textual production essential for civic and scholarly discourse. In nineteenth-century American education, classical rhetorical traditions converged with demands for mass literacy and standardized instruction amid university expansion. Harvard University introduced English composition requirements in its 1870 entrance examinations, prompting the establishment of remedial writing courses to address deficiencies in grammar and expression among incoming students. Adams Sherman Hill, appointed Boylston Professor of Rhetoric and Oratory at Harvard in 1876, advanced a product-oriented approach in his Principles of Rhetoric (1878), stressing correctness, unity, and mechanical accuracy in prose composition over inventive processes. This shift marked composition's emergence as a distinct pedagogical field, detached from oratorical emphasis, to serve growing enrollments in public schools and colleges, where writing instruction emphasized formal modes and error elimination. By the late 1800s, such practices influenced national curricula, embedding composition in secondary and higher education as a tool for moral and intellectual discipline.

Emergence as a Modern Discipline (1910s-1960s)

The National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE) was founded on November 30, 1911, in by approximately fifty educators seeking to improve English language arts instruction, including , amid growing standardization in American schooling. This organization quickly addressed college-level concerns, with its 1913 convention passing resolutions endorsing rigorous entrance examinations in and literature to ensure student preparedness, reflecting early efforts to professionalize teaching practices. By the 1920s, had solidified as a required course in most U.S. colleges, often taught via the current-traditional paradigm, which prioritized product-oriented instruction focusing on formal correctness, (e.g., narration, exposition, argumentation), and mechanical exercises derived from 19th-century grammar texts and elocutionary traditions. This paradigm, critiqued retrospectively for its emphasis on surface features over or audience, dominated through the mid-20th century, supported by prolific production—over 100 composition texts appeared between 1910 and 1930 alone—and institutional mandates amid expanding enrollments. Post-World War II, the spurred a surge in undergraduate numbers, from about 1.5 million in 1940 to over 2.6 million by 1950, necessitating expanded composition staffing often filled by undertrained graduate students, which highlighted pedagogical inconsistencies but also prompted calls for better preparation. A pivotal development occurred in 1949 when NCTE sponsored a conference on college composition in , leading to the formation of the as a dedicated , officially recognized in 1950 with around 1,000 initial members. CCCC's annual meetings and the launch of its journal, College Composition and Communication, in 1950 provided platforms for sharing empirical insights into teaching efficacy, such as and objective grading, amid influences from and in the 1950s. These efforts marked composition's transition from peripheral service work to a semi-autonomous sphere, though scholarly research remained limited, with focus on practical rather than theoretical innovation until the late 1960s.

Professionalization and Expansion (1970s-1990s)

During the 1970s, composition studies transitioned from a primarily pedagogical service area within English departments to a recognized scholarly discipline, driven by into writing processes and the adoption of scientific methods to study as a cognitive activity. This shift was precipitated by a perceived crisis and growing student enrollments in required writing courses, prompting calls for specialized training among instructors. A pivotal moment came at the 1974 Wyoming Conference on English, sponsored by the Conference on College Composition and Communication (CCCC), where participants issued the Wyoming Resolution asserting that "all administrators and teachers of writing must be prepared to teach writing" and advocating for dedicated preparation in theory and over general literary training. The late 1970s saw institutional consolidation through the founding of the Council of Writing Program Administrators (CWPA) in 1977, which provided a forum for directors of college writing programs to address administrative, curricular, and research challenges in scaling instruction amid rising undergraduate numbers. Concurrently, graduate programs proliferated to meet demands for qualified faculty; the number of programs in and grew from 7 in 1969 to 20 by 1979, reflecting English departments' investment in field-specific expertise. By the 1980s, this expansion accelerated, with new refereed journals such as Rhetoric Review (1981), Journal of Advanced Composition (1980, later JAC), and Written Communication (1984) establishing outlets for peer-reviewed scholarship on writing , assessment, and . Into the 1990s, the field's professionalization deepened as programs reached 72 by 1993, enabling the hiring of tenure-track specialists rather than relying on graduate students or literature faculty for composition courses. Organizations like CCCC, with its longstanding journal College Composition and Communication, expanded annual conventions and position statements on ethical research and curriculum standards, fostering a self-sustaining academic community. This era also witnessed the maturation of writing program administration as a subfield, with CWPA developing guidelines for program assessment and faculty development, amid debates over balancing service teaching loads with research productivity. Overall, these developments elevated composition studies from marginal status to a core area of , though tensions persisted over resource allocation and interdisciplinary boundaries.

21st-Century Evolution

In the early , composition studies exhibited increased fragmentation and contention compared to prior decades, with a proliferation of approaches including the rise of that emphasized ideological critique and social contexts over traditional skills-focused pedagogies, alongside the persistence of expressivist and argument-based methods. Richard Fulkerson documented this shift in 2005, noting the field's departure from unified paradigms toward diverse, often competing emphases on themed courses and , though for the efficacy of these newer orientations remained limited relative to process-oriented research. This evolution reflected broader academic trends but also highlighted ongoing debates about whether such expansions enhanced writing proficiency or diluted core instructional goals. From the mid-2000s onward, research on gained prominence, investigating how knowledge and practices from courses apply across disciplines and contexts, with studies revealing low baseline transfer rates—often below 10% without explicit instruction—prompting pedagogies like genre awareness and reflective strategies to foster adaptability. Concurrently, the digital turn reshaped toward composing, incorporating visuals, audio, and interactive elements in environments, as writing increasingly occurred beyond alphabetic text in platforms like and websites; by 2011, scholars advocated for curricula integrating these modes to align with 21st-century communication demands. The Statement on Writing Transfer in 2015 synthesized findings from seminars, emphasizing metacognitive practices to improve long-term skill application amid these technological shifts. Since the release of generative AI tools like in November 2022, composition has grappled with their integration, using AI for tasks such as brainstorming, , and to enhance efficiency, yet studies indicate reduced student brain activity during AI-assisted writing and diminished recall of produced content, raising concerns about and authorship. By 2024, position papers and empirical analyses urged balanced policies, treating AI as a tool for rather than substitution, while highlighting risks of overreliance that could undermine and transferrable skills in an era of automated text generation.

Theoretical Foundations

Current-Traditional Paradigm

The current-traditional paradigm, also known as current-traditional rhetoric, dominated composition instruction in U.S. higher education from the late 19th century through the mid-20th century, emphasizing the final written product over the composing process. It emerged alongside the institutionalization of required freshman English courses, such as Harvard's model established in 1874 by Adams Sherman Hill, which adapted classical rhetorical modes—narration, description, exposition, and argumentation—into a structured curriculum focused on clarity, correctness, and logical arrangement. By the 1890s, many institutions mandated sequences covering grammar, rhetorical modes (with heavy emphasis on exposition), and theme writing, reflecting influences from Scottish Common Sense philosophy and 18th-century elocutionists who prioritized observable, rule-based discourse. The term "current-traditional" was coined by Daniel Fogarty in 1959 to describe this approach, highlighting its persistence as the "current" standard despite roots in pre-modern traditions. Epistemologically, the paradigm rested on a positivist assumption that reality is objective, rational, and knowable through empirical , with serving as a neutral, transparent medium for transmitting pre-existing ideas. Writers were positioned as technicians arranging content logically via prescribed forms, such as outlines and modes of development, rather than as inventors grappling with uncertainty or . Pedagogically, instruction centered on product-oriented tasks: drills, usage correction, imitation from models (e.g., informal essays and papers), and through error marking, often delivered by literature-trained faculty using textbooks like Sheridan Baker's The Practical Stylist (1962) or and Robert Penn Warren's Modern Rhetoric (1949). This —, writing, —treated as a skill of mechanical refinement, neglecting , adaptation, or recursive revision. Though critiqued in the 1970s for failing to address persistent student errors amid expanding enrollments (e.g., policies revealing limitations in diverse populations), the paradigm's legacy endures in residual emphases on formal correctness and conventions within contemporary writing curricula. Analyses by James A. Berlin and Robert P. Inkster () identified its paradigmatic coherence in assuming neutral communicators exchanging verifiable truths in a harmonious , a view substantiated through examinations of period textbooks that reinforced arrangement and over dialectical . This framework's rule-bound focus yielded measurable outcomes in standardized prose but overlooked writing's social-constructive dimensions, contributing to its displacement by process models.

Expressivist Approaches

Expressivist approaches in composition studies emphasize the writer's personal voice, , and inner discovery as central to the , viewing writing as an artistic act of self-expression rather than a skill or social transaction. This emerged in the and as a reaction against the current-traditional model's focus on formal correctness and product-oriented instruction, drawing from romantic notions of individual genius and existential emphasis on subjective . Proponents argued that genuine writing originates from the writer's felt sense and private meanings, prioritizing and over revision for external audiences. Key figures include Peter Elbow, whose 1973 book Writing Without Teachers advocated "freewriting"—uninterrupted, nonjudgmental writing to bypass inner critics and access authentic voice—and peer response groups to foster supportive communities without hierarchical evaluation. Donald Murray, in works like A Writer Teaches Writing (1968), portrayed writing as a recursive process of , urging teachers to model and treat students as apprentices to their own emerging texts. Other contributors, such as Ken Macrorie and Toby Fulwiler, promoted s and "honest" writing to combat "Engfish"—stilted prose disconnected from —emphasizing s as tools for ongoing self-exploration. These methods aimed to build and motivation, positing that expressive fluency precedes effective communication. In practice, expressivist pedagogy often structures courses around low-stakes personal narratives, reflective essays, and workshop feedback that validates individual perspectives over standardized criteria. Advocates like contended that such approaches cultivate "believing" games, where writers suspend doubt to generate ideas, contrasting with critical "doubting" modes applied later. However, empirical studies on its efficacy in improving compositional proficiency remain sparse and inconclusive; while therapeutic expressive writing paradigms, such as James Pennebaker's of 15-20 minute sessions over days, demonstrate benefits for emotional processing and health outcomes like reduced physician visits in survivors (e.g., a 1986 study with 43 participants showing sustained effects at 6-month follow-up), direct evidence linking expressivist techniques to measurable gains in skills, such as or argumentation, is limited and often anecdotal. Classroom implementations report increased student engagement but variable to formal genres. Critics, particularly from social-epistemic perspectives, argue that fosters by neglecting audience, power dynamics, and cultural contexts, potentially reinforcing individualistic ideologies amid systemic inequalities. , for instance, characterized it as ideologically conservative for prioritizing private experience over public . himself problematized the label "expressivism," noting its conflation with unchecked subjectivity and defending hybrid forms that integrate personal and critical elements. Despite critiques, variants like "critical expressivism" persist, blending self-expression with social awareness to address detractors' concerns. This approach's enduring appeal lies in its accessibility for novice writers, though its theoretical dominance waned by the 1990s amid shifts toward and sociocultural models.

Cognitivist Models

Cognitivist models in composition studies emerged in the late and early as a response to both current-traditional paradigms, which prioritized product over process, and early expressivist approaches, which emphasized personal discovery without sufficient attention to structured mental operations. These models, rooted in , conceptualize writing as a set of goal-directed thinking processes embedded in problem-solving hierarchies, where writers actively manage cognitive resources to produce text. Unlike linear stage theories, cognitivism highlights recursive interactions among subprocesses, informed by empirical methods such as think-aloud protocols to map mental activities. The foundational cognitivist framework is Linda Flower and John R. Hayes' "A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing," published in 1981. This model posits writing as hierarchically organized cognitive procedures operating within , influenced by components including the rhetorical task environment (e.g., , ), topic , and stored writing schemas or . Key subprocesses include (subdivided into generating content or goals and organizing them), (rendering ideas into linguistic strings constrained by mechanics and form), and reviewing (encompassing of text against goals and revision execution). A central allocates limited attentional capacity among these elements, enabling and adaptation based on loops. Flower and Hayes derived this structure from protocol analyses of experienced and novice writers, demonstrating that skilled composers engage more in goal-setting and strategic monitoring, achieving greater textual coherence through deliberate problem representation. Empirical validation of the model has come from subsequent studies confirming its core insight that writing entails dynamic cognitive orchestration rather than sequential stages; for instance, data show writers cycling between and revising up to 40% of composing time, with expertise linked to efficient subgoal . Pedagogically, cognitivist models advocate explicit instruction in heuristics for (e.g., problem-definition prompts) and metacognitive strategies to enhance , such as self-questioning during revision to align text with rhetorical goals. These approaches have influenced composition curricula by promoting process-oriented workshops that teach writers to externalize and refine cognitive routines, improving outcomes in tasks requiring complex argumentation. Refinements to the original model, such as John R. Hayes' later integrations of and as modulators of , underscore writing's vulnerability to interference from task-specific knowledge deficits or divided attention, with data indicating that high demands can reduce idea generation by up to 25% in novices. While critiqued for underemphasizing social contexts—evident in studies showing cultural variations in norms—the model's emphasis on verifiable mental mechanisms has endured, informing diagnostic tools like timed writing simulations to assess cognitive bottlenecks in .

Social-Epistemic and Process-Oriented Theories

Process-oriented theories in composition studies emerged in the as a from the current-traditional emphasis on the written product to the dynamic, recursive nature of composing. Emig's 1971 empirical study of eight twelfth-grade students demonstrated that writing involves nonlinear, processes such as planning, translating ideas into text, and revising, often looping back iteratively rather than proceeding sequentially. This work challenged linear models by using think-aloud protocols to reveal composing as a problem-solving activity influenced by individual strategies and external factors like audience awareness. Donald M. Murray's 1972 essay further popularized the approach, arguing that teachers should facilitate students' discovery through , , and rewriting stages, treating writing as an exploratory akin to rather than a polished artifact. Cognitivist variants within , notably Linda Flower and John R. Hayes's 1981 model, formalized writing as a goal-directed cognitive operation. Their framework posits a central monitor coordinating sub-processes—planning (generating and organizing goals), translation (executing text production), and reviewing (evaluating and revising)—drawing from task environment cues, knowledge, and constraints. Empirical protocol analyses supported this, showing skilled writers engage in recursive monitoring to manage , though novices often struggle with integration. pedagogy thus informed classroom practices like freewriting, peer feedback loops, and multi-draft assignments, aiming to build metacognitive awareness over rote form adherence. Social-epistemic theories, developed by in the 1980s, extended process views by embedding writing in ideological and discursive contexts, rejecting neutral individualism for a view of as socially constructed through . 's 1987 historical analysis categorized rhetorics into objective (reality as fixed), subjective (reality as personal intuition), and transactional (reality as mediated by language and ), positioning social-epistemic as the latter's critical form where composing negotiates material conditions, social practices, and symbolic interpretations. This paradigm holds that all writing instruction implicitly advances , urging explicit interrogation of power in communities to reveal how texts reproduce or challenge . In his 1988 article, advocated placing centrally in , fostering dialectical engagement to empower students as agents in reshaping epistemic realities rather than passive reproducers. While process-oriented theories prioritize procedural mechanics—whether expressive or cognitive—social-epistemic ones them for insufficiently addressing how processes are shaped by cultural ideologies, advocating integration of to analyze writing's role in . Berlin's influenced composition by promoting assignments that examine rhetorical situations' ideological underpinnings, such as analyzing texts' embedded assumptions about class or , though it has faced pushback for potentially subordinating technical proficiency to political .

Post-Process Paradigms

Post-process paradigms emerged in the late 1990s as a critique of the dominant process-oriented theories in composition studies, which had emphasized writing as a recursive, individualized sequence of stages such as prewriting, drafting, and revising. Thomas Kent, in his edited collection Post-Process Theory: Beyond the Writing-Process Paradigm (1999), articulated the core tenet that no universal, codifiable writing process exists, rejecting the notion that writing can be reduced to a generalized model applicable across contexts. Instead, post-process theorists posited writing as a public, interpretive act inherently situated in specific rhetorical and social contexts, where meaning arises through intersubjective negotiation rather than private cognition. Central to this is the view that writing defies capture by any "big" , emphasizing its contingency on , , and power dynamics over internal psychological stages. outlined three foundational assumptions: writing is public (involving external dialogues), interpretive (relying on hermeneutic understanding rather than objective rules), and situated (embedded in particular scenes that preclude generalizability). This shift drew from earlier social-epistemic influences but extended them by dismantling process 's administrative utility in , arguing that attempts to teach writing as a transferable overlook its event-like nature. Proponents like contended that such paradigms better align with rhetorical traditions, where writing functions as response to exigencies rather than a skill-building exercise. Critics within composition studies have questioned post-process's implications for , noting its to the field's "pedagogical imperative"—the to develop teachable methods—which some view as preserving institutional roles over practical efficacy. Sidney Dobrin, for instance, extended post-process critiques to argue against over-reliance on disciplinary boundaries, yet others observed limited uptake, with few articles engaging it deeply post-2000s due to its abstractness. Despite this, post-process influenced subsequent discussions on writing's social construction, informing views of composition as dialogic practice rather than mechanistic process, though it faced pushback for potentially undermining evidence-based teaching strategies rooted in empirical studies of writer behaviors.

Pedagogical Approaches

Core Composition Courses

Core composition courses, commonly designated as first-year composition (FYC), form a cornerstone of undergraduate general education in U.S. , requiring nearly all incoming students to demonstrate proficiency in . These courses prioritize rhetorical knowledge, including audience awareness and purpose-driven composition; through and of sources; flexible writing processes involving , , revision, and ; and adherence to conventions of standard edited English. The mandate for such courses traces to 1875, when implemented required freshman English to address perceived declines in student preparedness amid expanding college access, a policy that influenced national adoption by the early 1900s. By 1925, over 80% of American colleges enforced similar requirements, solidifying FYC as a universal entry-level expectation amid debates over standards and curricular uniformity. Enrollment data from the period reveal that these courses served millions annually, with placement exams emerging by the 1930s to exempt advanced students, though exemption rates hovered below 20% in most institutions. Contemporary curricula typically span one or two semesters, with the first emphasizing expository and persuasive modes—such as personal narratives, analytical essays, and arguments—while the second incorporates methods, source integration, and longer documented papers. Instruction integrates reading across genres, , and multimodal elements like , aligning with outcomes that stress joining disciplinary conversations and reflecting on writing habits. Class sizes average 20-25 students, with assignments totaling 20-30 pages of revised prose per term, fostering iterative practice over rote product delivery. Effectiveness metrics from longitudinal studies show FYC participation correlates with higher retention rates (up to 5-10% gains) and GPA improvements in subsequent coursework, particularly when emphasizing explicit and awareness. However, on remains contested: while within-course gains in syntax complexity and argumentation depth are robust (e.g., 15-20% increases in holistic scores), cross-disciplinary application lags, with only 40-50% of reporting sustained use of FYC strategies in major-specific writing. Critics like Downs and Wardle contend this stems from FYC's decontextualized focus, advocating integration with discipline-specific instruction over standalone generalism. Proponents counter that foundational competencies—such as source evaluation and ethical citation—provide causal scaffolding for advanced literacies, evidenced by meta-analyses confirming modest but positive effects on (effect size d=0.3-0.5). Placement reforms since 2010, including directed self-placement, have boosted equity, reducing underplacement by 25% in diverse cohorts without compromising outcomes. Despite ideological pressures in —often tilting toward expressivist or critical paradigms in academic sources—these courses endure due to institutional mandates and data linking them to broader academic persistence.

Writing Process Instruction

Writing process instruction represents a pedagogical shift in composition studies toward viewing writing as a dynamic, recursive activity rather than a linear production of a polished artifact. Emerging prominently in the , this approach instructs students to engage iteratively with stages such as or (generating ideas through brainstorming or freewriting), (initial composition), (restructuring content for clarity and purpose), and (refining surface features like and ). Unlike product-oriented methods that prioritize error-free final texts, process instruction emphasizes the writer's internal cognitive and experiential engagement, fostering habits of reflection and adaptation. Key influences include Donald Murray's advocacy in his 1972 essay "Teach Writing as a Process—Not Product," which argued that effective teaching must replicate professional writers' practices of discovery and reformation, rather than imposing external standards prematurely. Murray promoted techniques like maintaining writerly journals and conducting "internal revision" to clarify personal meaning before external critique. Complementing this, Linda Flower and John R. Hayes's 1981 cognitive modeled writing as a hierarchical, goal-directed system comprising a task environment, , and subprocesses of (setting goals and organizing), translating (producing text), and reviewing (evaluating and revising), with loops enabling . This framework informed instruction by highlighting writing's problem-solving nature, encouraging activities like think-aloud protocols to make cognitive strategies explicit. In classroom practice, writing process instruction typically structures assignments around multiple drafts submitted for staged , often incorporating peer response groups to simulate collaborative revision and audience awareness. Techniques such as timed freewriting, pioneered by Peter Elbow, aim to overcome initial blocks by prioritizing fluency over correctness, while revision workshops focus on global changes informed by rubrics tied to rhetorical goals. supports its benefits; a 2011 meta-analysis of 22 studies involving over 4,000 students found process-oriented instruction produced a moderate (d = 0.48) on writing quality, outperforming traditional methods, particularly when emphasizing revision. However, outcomes vary by implementation: isolated process emphasis without explicit skill-building in areas like conventions or shows limited gains in standardized assessments. Critics within composition studies note that early process pedagogies sometimes undervalued social contexts, such as demands or cultural constraints on , leading to later integrations with rhetorical and social-epistemic elements. Nonetheless, process instruction remains foundational in core composition courses, with evidence indicating it enhances student and persistence in writing tasks when combined with targeted mechanisms.

Genre and Rhetorical Awareness

Genre and rhetorical awareness in pedagogy refers to the instructional emphasis on equipping students with meta-cognitive tools to analyze writing contexts and adapt discourse accordingly. Rhetorical awareness centers on Bitzer's 1968 conceptualization of the as a complex involving an exigence—an imperfection or obstacle that prompts discourse—an audience capable of being constrained or moved, and contextual constraints or affordances shaping the response. This framework, revived in modern to counter overly formalist views, teaches students to dissect purpose, audience expectations, and situational demands before composing, fostering strategic choices in tone, structure, and evidence. Genre awareness complements this by treating genres not as rigid templates but as "typified rhetorical actions" recurring in response to social situations, per Carolyn R. Miller's 1984 analysis. Instructors guide students to examine genre conventions—such as argumentative essays' claim-evidence-rebuttal patterns or lab reports' methodological objectivity—through of exemplars, revealing how genres mediate social actions like or information dissemination. Pedagogical methods integrate these with process instruction: students map rhetorical situations, analyze genre samples for moves (e.g., Swales' genre analysis for research articles), and revise drafts to align with situational exigencies, often in first-year courses. Empirical evidence supports efficacy, particularly in building transferable skills. A of 30 Japanese EFL undergraduates found genre-based training, emphasizing rhetorical elements like field, tenor, and mode, yielded holistic score gains (e.g., tasks: 1.53 to 4.73 for higher-proficiency group), increased (words from 85.8 to 286.9), syntactic complexity (e.g., clauses per T-unit), and use of devices like for . Process-genre hybrids similarly boosted expository performance in EAP contexts, with students reporting heightened awareness of rhetorical adaptation. In L1/L2 first-year , curricula fostering this awareness improved genre recognition and text appropriateness over traditional drills. Gains are proficiency-dependent, however, with lower-skilled writers limited by foundational deficits despite conceptual advances.

Explicit Skills and Grammar Focus

Explicit skills and grammar focus in composition involves direct, structured instruction in discrete elements of writing, such as , , usage, , construction, and organization, often through drills, rule memorization, and error-focused feedback. This approach prioritizes the formal accuracy of the written product, viewing writing proficiency as built from mastery of these foundational components before emphasizing higher-order concerns like content or . Historically rooted in current-traditional , which dominated U.S. college composition from the late through the mid-20th, it treated writing as a mechanical assembly of modes (, , exposition, argumentation) with heavy emphasis on grammatical correctness to prepare students for professional and academic . Pedagogical methods include explicit modeling of rules, practice exercises like sentence diagramming or combining, drills, and teacher-led correction of surface errors in drafts, aiming to instill in form to free cognitive resources for rhetorical choices. In settings, this manifests in first-year courses assigning handbooks, quizzes on usage (e.g., splices, subject-verb ), and revision tasks targeting mechanical issues, sometimes integrated with rhetorical analysis to link form to effect. Proponents argue it addresses empirical deficits in writing, where surveys from 2016 to 2023 indicate 40-60% of incoming freshmen lack basic command of Written English, correlating with lower overall proficiency scores on assessments like the or SAT. Empirical studies yield mixed results on effectiveness, with isolated grammar drills showing limited transfer to holistic writing quality (effect size d ≈ 0.10-0.20 in meta-analyses of decontextualized instruction), but explicit teaching of sentence-level skills like combining fragments into complex structures demonstrates stronger impacts (d = 0.62 for writing quality in adolescent samples). A 2007 meta-analysis of 123 studies on adolescent writing interventions found explicit and sentence instruction improved mechanics (d = 0.48) and overall (d = 0.34) when embedded in authentic writing tasks, outperforming incidental approaches, though effects diminish without sustained practice. More recent reviews, including a 2023 analysis of explicit vs. implicit methods, confirm enhances editing skills and syntactic maturity in EFL and native contexts, particularly for novice writers, with gains in and reader impact. Critics within composition studies, influenced by process paradigms since the 1970s, contend explicit focus overemphasizes form at the expense of invention and voice, citing early reviews like Braddock et al. (1963) that found no broad improvements from teaching—though subsequent critiques note those studies often examined poorly designed, isolated drills rather than integrated methods. Field-wide resistance may reflect ideological preferences for constructivist models over skills hierarchies, as evidenced by curriculum shifts away from in mainstream programs despite persistent student error rates. Nonetheless, hybrid applications persist in remedial and multilingual courses, where explicit skills correlate with measurable gains in placement exam passage rates (e.g., 15-25% improvement in targeted interventions from 2018-2022). This approach's causal value lies in building syntactic fluency as a prerequisite for complex argumentation, aligning with cognitive load theory where mastery of basics reduces interference in composition.

Specialized Contexts

Basic and Remedial Writing

Basic and remedial writing encompasses pedagogical efforts to develop foundational skills in postsecondary students identified as underprepared for standard courses, typically through placement assessments evaluating , , , and rudimentary argumentation. These programs target deficits often stemming from inadequate K-12 preparation, with approximately one-third of first-year students in U.S. public institutions requiring remediation in reading, writing, or as of 2001. Instruction emphasizes explicit drills in sentence-level accuracy, paragraph unity, and basic essay structure to enable progression to credit-bearing and . Historically, basic writing arose in the late and alongside expansions at urban institutions, which enrolled greater numbers of socioeconomically diverse students lacking college-ready proficiencies. Early models, influenced by scholars like Mina Shaughnessy, analyzed "errors" as systematic approximations of rather than mere deficiencies, advocating contextualized teaching over rote correction. Traditional sequences featured non-credit prerequisites, but completion rates remained low, with on-time remediation passage under 10% in many cases, correlating with delayed degree attainment and higher attrition. Contemporary approaches increasingly replace isolated remedial tracks with mainstreaming—integrating underprepared learners into first-year via corequisite support labs or accelerated "stretch" courses—and directed self-placement, which mitigates and placement test inaccuracies. Empirical evaluations of such reforms, including Accelerated Learning Programs implemented since 2013 at institutions like , report first-year pass rates of 62.8% to 67.1%, outperforming traditional cohorts by 5-8 s. Completing remedial writing specifically has been linked to 17.7 gains in subsequent writing course success, though overall benefits vary by delivery mode, with condensed or paired formats yielding superior outcomes over multi-semester prerequisites. Challenges persist in measuring long-term efficacy, as traditional remediation often incurs high opportunity costs—delaying credit accumulation and inflating tuition exposure—without proportionally addressing root causes like uneven secondary schooling. Critics argue that deficit-focused discourses in early programs reinforced exclusionary gatekeeping, while reforms risk diluting rigor if support supplants skill mandates; nonetheless, data favor hybrid models balancing acceleration with targeted mechanics review to boost throughput without compromising proficiency benchmarks. Placement reforms incorporating high school GPA alongside tests have further reduced misassignments, enhancing equity for underrepresented groups.

Second-Language and Multilingual Writing

Second-language writing within composition studies examines the processes, challenges, and for non-native English speakers, particularly in postsecondary contexts where multilingual students comprise a significant portion of first-year composition enrollees. indicates that writers often face distinct hurdles compared to native speakers, including interference from first-language structures and limited proficiency in conventions, which can impede of writing skills across genres. Theoretical frameworks have evolved from early contrastive models, which attributed errors to cultural differences in text organization, to cognitive-process approaches emphasizing planning, drafting, and revision adapted for contexts, and more recently to social-contextual models incorporating translingual practices. Empirical studies spanning two decades demonstrate that explicit , such as genre awareness and peer feedback tailored to needs, yields measurable improvements in writing proficiency, with meta-analyses confirming positive effect sizes from in EFL/ESL settings. In U.S. universities, composition programs increasingly mainstream multilingual writers into standard first-year courses rather than segregating them into ESL tracks, driven by access equity goals outlined in professional guidelines, though this raises concerns about diluted instruction for linguistic deficits. Content-based ESL instruction has shown long-term benefits, with students in integrated programs achieving higher pass rates and grades compared to traditional grammar-focused ESL, as evidenced by longitudinal data from postsecondary cohorts. Pedagogical innovations include approaches that encourage L2 students to interrogate sources and rhetorical conventions, fostering engagement in freshman while addressing intercultural gaps in argumentation. However, faculty often lack specialized , leading to inconsistent correction and underestimation of L2-specific needs like syntactic , which research links to persistent proficiency gaps. Assessment and transfer remain contentious, with studies highlighting that L2 writers struggle with genre adaptability in disciplinary writing due to hidden curricula in academic expectations, necessitating explicit rhetorical instruction for better outcomes. While translingualism promotes valuing multilingual repertoires over error eradication, empirical evidence prioritizes balanced approaches combining form-focused feedback with meaning-making to enhance overall writing development, avoiding overemphasis on ideology at the expense of verifiable skill gains. Ongoing research underscores the need for interdisciplinary collaboration between composition and second-language specialists to address these dynamics effectively.

Writing Across the Curriculum and Disciplines

Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) refers to pedagogical initiatives that integrate writing instruction into courses across academic disciplines, aiming to enhance learning through frequent writing practice rather than confining it to standalone classes. Originating in the early amid concerns over declining undergraduate writing proficiency, WAC drew from earlier British educational experiments, such as James Britton's 1960s studies linking writing to , and gained traction in U.S. universities by the through programs emphasizing writing as a tool for thinking and knowledge construction. Key early implementations included faculty development workshops and writing-intensive course designations, with milestones like the 1981 publication of Writing in the Arts and Sciences by Elaine Maimon and colleagues formalizing WAC as an institutional strategy at institutions such as Beaver College (now ). By 1985, over 100 U.S. colleges had adopted WAC elements, often requiring writing requirements in general or major courses. Distinct from WAC's broader focus on writing-to-learn activities—such as low-stakes journaling or reflective summaries to process content—Writing in the Disciplines (WID) targets genre-specific conventions, like lab reports in sciences or policy analyses in social sciences, to acculturate students into disciplinary communities. WAC programs typically involve cross-disciplinary , with English departments providing to non-specialist faculty, while WID embeds writing within major programs, such as requiring annotated bibliographies in history or empirical abstracts in . Proponents argue this dual approach fosters transferable skills, with surveys from over 200 WAC sites in the 1990s indicating increased student writing frequency, from an average of 5.2 assignments per semester pre-WAC to 8.7 post-. However, implementation varies, with some universities mandating writing-enriched curricula () that certify courses meeting minimum writing thresholds, as seen in programs at institutions like Penn State, where designated courses must include at least 4,000 words of student writing per term. Empirical evidence on WAC effectiveness remains mixed and predominantly perceptual rather than causal. A study of 142 baccalaureate students across two years found 78% reported improved discipline-specific writing and content retention from WAC strategies, attributing gains to iterative feedback loops. Similarly, self-assessment protocols in WAC contexts outperformed peer or no-assessment controls in improving writing for 85% of participants in a of K-12 extensions, though effects diminished for advanced writers. Longitudinal data is scarcer; a 2008 review of writing interventions noted modest gains in informational writing across curricula for struggling students, with effect sizes of 0.4-0.6 standard deviations, but cautioned that benefits accrue more from explicit instruction than incidental practice. Critics highlight methodological flaws, such as self-reported outcomes prone to and lack of randomized controls, with resistance—cited by 62% of WAC directors as a barrier— from unpreparedness to evaluate writing amid heavy loads. Challenges include uneven adoption, where STEM disciplines lag due to perceived incompatibility with quantitative foci, and assessment difficulties, as rubrics often prioritize process over measurable proficiency gains. Despite these, WAC persists in over 300 U.S. programs as of 2020, underscoring its role in addressing persistent gaps in student writing, where only 27% of graduates met proficiency benchmarks in assessments like the 2015 NAEP.

Writing Centers and Tutoring

Writing centers emerged in U.S. primarily as supplementary support for students struggling with writing, often originating as "writing clinics" or "laboratories" targeted at remedial or developmental writers in the early . The first documented university writing center was established at the State University of Iowa in 1934, initiated by English Professor Carrie Ellen Stanley to provide individualized assistance beyond classroom instruction. By the mid-, such centers proliferated amid growing emphasis on as a required undergraduate , evolving from deficit-focused remediation to collaborative spaces integrated with , as seen in Purdue University's center which shifted from skills drills in the 1970s to process-oriented support by the 1990s. In composition studies, writing centers emphasize peer or professional tutoring that aligns with process-oriented pedagogies, prioritizing collaborative dialogue over directive editing to foster student ownership of writing. Tutors typically employ non-hierarchical practices, such as and higher-order concern analysis (e.g., development, organization, and audience awareness), drawing from theories like where the tutor acts as a scaffold rather than an authority figure. Sessions often last 30-60 minutes and focus on iterative feedback during drafting, reflecting composition's shift from product to in the 1970s-1980s, though this approach has been critiqued for underemphasizing explicit or instruction in favor of rhetorical exploration. Empirical studies indicate modest but positive outcomes from writing center , particularly for and skill . A 2021 analysis of assessment from multiple centers found that students attending sessions regularly (e.g., 3+ visits per term) showed statistically significant gains in revision depth and final grade improvements averaging 0.5 points on a 4.0 scale, attributed to reinforced metacognitive strategies. For multilingual writers, has demonstrated effectiveness in source and accuracy, with one tracking three sequential courses revealing of skills to subsequent assignments. However, remains limited by reliance on self-reported and small samples, with some research noting no broad impact on overall proficiency without mandatory participation or with courses. Criticisms of writing centers highlight their variable efficacy and potential misalignment with practical skill-building needs in composition. Detractors argue that the predominant non-directive model, which avoids line-by-line , can perpetuate errors in basic for underprepared students, echoing broader debates in composition studies about theory's insufficient attention to explicit . Institutional underfunding and tutor training inconsistencies further undermine outcomes, as centers often serve as catch-alls for diverse needs without standardized metrics, leading to perceptions of them as optional rather than essential supports. Despite these issues, centers contribute to composition's emphasis on individualized learning, though empirical rigor in assessing long-term causal impacts lags behind claims of transformative effects.

Research and Assessment

Methods in Composition Research

Composition research employs a range of methodologies, including qualitative, quantitative, and historical approaches, with qualitative methods historically predominant due to the field's focus on contextual, interpretive analysis of writing processes and . This emphasis stems from influences like and , which prioritize subjective experiences over generalizable data, though critics argue it has sidelined rigorous empirical testing. Qualitative methods dominate, encompassing ethnographic studies that involve prolonged observation of writing classrooms to capture and instructional practices; case studies examining individual trajectories or program implementations; and or dissecting textual artifacts and interpersonal interactions for rhetorical patterns. These approaches, as detailed in foundational texts, allow researchers to explore feminist, cultural, and theoretical dimensions of but often rely on small, non-representative samples, raising concerns about subjectivity and replicability. Quantitative and empirical methods, though underrepresented, include experimental designs to assess pedagogical interventions—such as pre- and post-test comparisons of writing proficiency following specific strategies—and surveys tracking self-reported behaviors or outcomes across larger cohorts. of corpora, statistical modeling of error rates, and observational coding schemes provide measurable data on writing development, with advocates like Davida Charney emphasizing their value for despite resistance in a field wary of "positivist" paradigms. Mixed-methods designs integrate these strands, combining qualitative insights with quantitative validation to address limitations in either alone, as seen in studies evaluating writing program efficacy through both accounts and standardized assessments. Historical research complements these by analyzing archival documents, textbooks, and institutional records to trace methodological evolution, revealing shifts from skills-based in the early to process-oriented post-1960s. Despite diversity, methodological debates persist, with rigor often critiqued as reductive in humanities-dominated scholarship, potentially undermining causal claims about effective instruction.

Empirical Studies on Pedagogical Outcomes

A of 123 true and quasi-experimental studies on writing instruction for adolescents in grades 4–12 identified 11 effective practices, including explicit strategy instruction ( d = 1.02), adding self-regulation to strategy instruction (d = 0.87), and peer assistance (d = 0.87), which collectively improved writing quality with an overall of d = 0.34. These findings indicate that structured, explicit interventions yield measurable gains in compositional elements like and , though the primarily addressed secondary rather than postsecondary contexts. Extrapolation to college-level suggests potential benefits for targeted skill-building, but adaptation to diverse adult learners remains underexplored in rigorous trials. In contrast, process-oriented approaches, emphasizing freewriting and revision cycles without explicit skill drills, show limited empirical support for broad efficacy. A of process writing interventions reported no statistically significant improvements in writing quality or , particularly for struggling writers, with sizes near zero across included studies. This aligns with broader reviews finding process methods ineffective for at-risk populations, as they often fail to address foundational deficits in or . Such outcomes challenge the dominance of process in composition curricula, where causal links to proficiency gains appear weaker than in explicit alternatives. Evidence on transfer of learning from first-year composition (FYC) to disciplinary writing is sparse and predominantly indicative of barriers rather than robust positive effects. Pilot studies reveal perceived roadblocks, including mismatched genre expectations and lack of metacognitive prompting, hindering application of FYC skills in major courses, with qualitative data showing students rarely invoke composition concepts unprompted. Experimental investigations into transfer-focused pedagogies report modest gains in self-reported transfer awareness, but objective measures of writing proficiency across contexts remain inconclusive, with general educational psychology underscoring difficulties in far transfer beyond near-similar tasks. Overall, empirical data suggest FYC contributes minimally to sustained, domain-general writing improvements, prompting calls for pedagogy emphasizing adaptable heuristics over context-bound practices.

Challenges in Measuring Writing Proficiency

Assessing writing proficiency in composition studies encounters significant obstacles due to the inherently subjective of evaluating complex cognitive and rhetorical processes. Unlike objective measures in or , writing scores rely on human raters' judgments of traits such as , argumentation, and , which introduce variability from inter-rater differences. Empirical analyses indicate that rater effects, though minimal in some controlled settings, contribute to measurement error, with true score variance often comprising only 50-54% of total variance in holistic scoring across tasks like and expository writing. In contexts, inconsistent rater training and diverse interpretive frameworks exacerbate this, as humanities-oriented educators may prioritize contextual nuance over psychometric standardization. A core tension arises between reliability—achieving consistent scores—and validity—ensuring assessments capture authentic writing proficiency. Efforts to enhance reliability, such as analytic rubrics or multiple raters, can narrow the construct to quantifiable elements like and structure, potentially overlooking creativity, audience adaptation, or rhetorical depth essential to real-world writing. This risks assessments that serve administrative over diagnostic value for writers, as rigid protocols may distort the multifaceted nature of proficiency implied in state and national high school evaluations, where constructs vary widely across prompts and genres. is further compromised when assessments fail to align with broader proficiency definitions, such as transferability to disciplinary or professional contexts, leading to inferences that do not generalize beyond conditions. Empirical studies underscore the resource intensity required for adequate reliability; for instance, achieving a generalizability coefficient of 0.80 in holistic scoring typically demands at least one rater and three to four tasks, while 0.90 reliability necessitates two raters and six to seven tasks, posing practical barriers for or large-scale evaluations. Historical developments since the holistic scoring era highlight persistent methodological inconsistencies, with over eight statistical approaches to inter-rater agreement yielding variable results that obscure true proficiency levels. Task-prompt interactions amplify these issues, as writers' performances fluctuate across genres, accounting for up to 30% of variance and challenging the assumption of stable skill measurement. In composition research, these limitations hinder causal attributions of pedagogical efficacy, as low to moderate reliability coefficients (often 0.5-0.7 without ) undermine claims of skill improvement without extensive controls. Additional challenges stem from contextual and demographic factors, including rater biases toward familiar cultural or ideological norms, though empirical quantification remains sparse. For multilingual or underprepared writers, assessments may undervalue L1 or oral proficiency influences on written output, further eroding validity in diverse populations. Portfolios and process-oriented methods aim to address these by incorporating multiple artifacts, yet they amplify reliability concerns due to subjective weighting of drafts versus finals, requiring hermeneutic approaches that prioritize interpretive dialogue over numerical agreement. Overall, these hurdles necessitate context-specific validation frameworks to balance empirical rigor with the discipline's emphasis on writer development.

Controversies and Criticisms

Ideological Influences and

Composition studies has exhibited a pronounced influence from progressive ideologies, particularly and , which frame writing instruction as a means to interrogate power dynamics, promote , and challenge dominant cultural narratives rather than prioritize mechanical skills like or argumentation. This orientation stems from the field's adoption of postmodern and poststructuralist frameworks in the late , where texts are analyzed primarily for ideological content over formal structure, leading to pedagogies that encourage students to "write back" against perceived . Critics contend that such approaches embed left-leaning assumptions about and into curricula, often at the expense of neutral skill-building, as evidenced by the discipline's explicit self-description as "blatantly political" in departmental, institutional, and national contexts. Faculty political leanings in rhetoric and mirror the broader trend, with over 60% identifying as liberal or far-left in recent surveys of U.S. , contributing to limited ideological . This skew is amplified in by the field's emphasis on cultural critique, where conservative or traditionalist perspectives on —such as those rooted in Aristotelian principles of and —are frequently dismissed as tools of "white, male, Western dominance." Lazere, in his 2015 analysis, highlights how this manifests in "unqualified celebrations of , , and ," which prioritize subjective narratives over objective standards, potentially biasing student evaluations toward alignment with progressive viewpoints. Conservative scholars have leveled pointed critiques, arguing that ideological dominance undermines the field's core mission of literacy instruction. Jeffrey Zorn, writing in 2003, described compositionism as a "fraud and failure" for problematizing clarity, organization, , and expository writing in favor of relativistic deconstructions that leave students ill-equipped for professional or academic demands. Empirical studies on secondary in composition further indicate risks of instructors imposing personal political biases onto students through topic selection and critical framing, as teachers' ideologies shape what constitutes "plausible" arguments in assignments. These concerns are compounded by the rarity of conservative voices in peer-reviewed composition journals, fostering what detractors term an that resists empirical scrutiny of pedagogical outcomes in favor of activist-oriented research. Despite defenses framing such biases as inherent to reflective pedagogy, the lack of viewpoint balance raises questions about causal impacts on student , with calls for greater to mitigate risks of over education.

Debates on Standards, Remediation, and Inclusivity

In composition studies, debates on standards, remediation, and inclusivity highlight tensions between upholding rigorous expectations—such as command of Standard Written English (), coherent argumentation, and grammatical precision—and efforts to accommodate diverse student literacies, including non-standard dialects, multilingual backgrounds, and cultural rhetorical traditions. Advocates for high standards, drawing from first-principles reasoning that clear, conventional prose facilitates effective communication and , argue that deviations undermine evaluative fairness and long-term student success; for instance, a 2012 analysis using instrumental variables found that required remedial writing courses improved subsequent graded writing performance by addressing foundational deficits. Conversely, much scholarship in the field, influenced by a prevailing emphasis on equity, posits that enforcing SAE marginalizes underrepresented groups and perpetuates linguistic hierarchies, favoring "all-inclusive linguistic diversity" as articulated in programmatic statements from organizations like the Conference on College Composition and Communication (CCCC). This perspective, while sourced from peer-reviewed composition journals, often prioritizes social inclusion over empirical validation of skill transfer, reflecting broader ideological tendencies in humanities academia toward de-emphasizing traditional metrics of proficiency. Remediation, typically involving separate pre-college-level courses for students failing placement exams, has been a since the 1970s emergence of basic writing programs. Proponents view it as causally necessary for building mechanical skills like syntax and organization, with heterogeneous supporting benefits: a 2012 study of students showed positive effects for those in lower-level remedial writing relative to higher developmental tracks, particularly in boosting pass rates for credit-bearing courses. A 2025 analysis further indicated that remediation raised graduation rates by 22.5 percentage points for low-skilled students in math-intensive majors, suggesting analogous potential in writing-heavy disciplines when targeted. Critics, however, decry remediation as stigmatizing and inefficient, citing high —national from 2003–2004 revealed that only about 50–60% of remedial writing enrollees advanced to college-level English within three years—and arguing it delays degree progress without proportional gains. These critiques, prominent in , have fueled movements to abolish standalone remedial tracks, as in discursive analyses portraying remediation as a of exclusion rather than uplift. Such positions, while aiming for inclusivity, risk conflating access with readiness, as evidenced by persistent gaps in writing proficiency among mainstreamed students lacking targeted . Inclusivity initiatives, including mainstreaming basic writers into credit-bearing first-year composition (FYC) and corequisite support models, seek to dismantle perceived barriers but intensify debates over diluted standards. Empirical outcomes remain mixed; while some quasi-experimental studies report no negative grade impacts from accelerated placement, broader reviews underscore that unremedied skill gaps correlate with higher failure rates in subsequent coursework, challenging claims of seamless integration. Composition's advocacy for validating "students' own voices" and diverse genres, as in hyperlocal surveys of FYC instructors, aligns with inclusivity but often sidesteps causal evidence linking SAE mastery to measurable outcomes like GPA or job market advantages. Traditionalists counter that this approach, dominant in field publications, erodes accountability, potentially attributing deficiencies to systemic inequities rather than instructional needs—a pattern critiqued in policy syntheses urging composition research to better inform remediation efficacy amid rising college enrollment of underprepared students. Ultimately, these debates underscore unresolved causal questions: whether inclusivity-driven reforms enhance equity without compromising proficiency, or if empirical underperformance necessitates reinstated standards-focused remediation.

Critiques of Theoretical Overemphasis vs. Practical Skills

Critics of composition studies contend that the field has prioritized abstract theoretical paradigms—such as process-oriented pedagogies, , and —over the direct instruction of practical writing competencies, including , , logical argumentation, and conventions essential for academic and professional success. This shift, which gained prominence in the late following the dominance of expressivist and post-structuralist approaches in the 1970s and 1980s, is argued to undermine students' ability to produce clear, coherent prose in . For instance, Jeffrey Zorn, in a 2003 analysis published by the , describes this as "compositionism as fraud," asserting that the field's romantic emphasis on personal expression and subjective "voice" neglects error-free writing and rhetorical precision, leaving graduates ill-equipped for real-world demands despite fulfilling composition requirements. Zorn attributes this to an ideological commitment within the discipline that favors theoretical innovation over empirical outcomes, evidenced by persistent low proficiency rates in national assessments like the , where in 2011 only 24% of 12th graders scored at or above proficient in writing. Proponents of practical skills instruction, often aligned with current-traditional , argue that causal links exist between reduced emphasis on explicit and teaching—exemplified by Patrick Hartwell's influential 1985 minimizing 's role—and measurable declines in student writing quality. Empirical studies, such as a 2005 review by the National Council of Teachers of English, have shown that targeted instruction improves sentence-level accuracy without stifling , yet composition curricula increasingly sidelined such methods in favor of workshop-style processes that prioritize ideation over revision for correctness. Critics like Martha J. Kolln, in her 1980s-1990s scholarship, highlighted how this theoretical tilt fosters a between unedited personal narratives and disciplined exposition, correlating with employer surveys (e.g., a 2004 report) indicating that 70% of business leaders viewed recent college graduates' writing as deficient in clarity and structure. This critique extends to ESL contexts, where scholars like Hinkal (2004) fault over-reliance on for sidelining product-oriented skills, such as controlled exercises that build syntactic control, resulting in non-native speakers struggling with genres. The debate underscores tensions between composition's academic institutionalization, which rewards theoretical publications in journals like College Composition and Communication, and the pragmatic needs of writing transfer to disciplines. Conservative commentators, including those in the , link this overemphasis to broader ideological biases in scholarship, where post-1960s paradigms—often critiqued for relativizing standards—displace first-principles focus on verifiable proficiency metrics, such as rubric-scored coherence in argumentative essays. Empirical pushback includes calls for hybrid models, as in a 2016 study by Graham et al., which meta-analyzed 100+ experiments demonstrating that explicit strategy instruction (e.g., outlining and editing drills) yields effect sizes of 0.5-1.0 on writing quality, far outperforming theory-heavy interventions. Despite these findings, field-wide adoption remains limited, perpetuating critiques that composition's theoretical insularity hampers causal for pedagogical .

Conservative and Traditionalist Perspectives

Conservative and traditionalist scholars in composition studies advocate for centered on explicit instruction in grammatical accuracy, rhetorical structures, and shared cultural knowledge, viewing these as essential for producing coherent, persuasive that aligns with conventional expectations in academic and public . Jr., a prominent figure in this tradition, argued in his 1977 book that effective writing requires adherence to verifiable conventions of style and , derived from empirical studies of across historical periods, rather than subjective interpretation or divorced from communal norms. posited that without a common stock of knowledge—encompassing facts, allusions, and linguistic norms—communication fails due to mismatched author-reader assumptions, a principle he extended to critique relativistic in literary and composition theory. This emphasis on content-rich instruction manifests in Hirsch's Core Knowledge Foundation, established in , which promotes sequenced curricula prioritizing domain-specific vocabulary and factual literacy to underpin writing proficiency. A 2023 longitudinal study by researchers, tracking over 2,000 students from kindergarten through eighth grade, demonstrated that Core Knowledge implementation yielded effect sizes of 0.25 to 0.40 standard deviations in reading and writing outcomes, outperforming approaches that de-emphasize explicit knowledge transmission. Traditionalists contrast this with the post-1960s shift toward process and expressivist pedagogies, which they contend foster undisciplined at the expense of formal rigor; current-traditional , by comparison, treats writing as a rule-governed skill amenable to drill in modes like exposition and argumentation, independent of . Critics from this perspective further contend that composition's integration of postmodern and critical theories since the has subordinated skill-building to ideological aims, such as deconstructing "dominant" discourses, thereby eroding objective standards and rendering the field vulnerable to external conservative backlash. For example, assertions within and composition that formal argumentation perpetuates hegemony are seen as undermining the discipline's core function of equipping students for reasoned civic participation. Empirical indicators, including stagnant National Assessment of Educational Progress writing scores since 1998—hovering around 50% proficiency for eighth graders—bolster claims that relativist emphases correlate with skill deficits, particularly among underprepared cohorts neglected by reduced remediation.

Recent Developments

Digital Multimodal and Technology Integration

composing in composition studies refers to the integration of multiple semiotic modes—such as text, images, audio, video, and interactive elements—into rhetorical artifacts using tools, expanding beyond alphabetic writing to reflect contemporary communication practices. This approach gained traction in the early with the proliferation of accessible software like Adobe Suite and web platforms, enabling students to produce essays, websites, or videos that leverage visual and auditory for and meaning-making. By 2010, multimodal assignments appeared in over 20% of surveyed first-year curricula, driven by recognition that environments demand hybrid literacies. Technology integration in this domain emphasizes tools that facilitate creation and , including video editors (e.g., or ), graphic design software (e.g., or Photoshop), and platforms for interactive like Twine for nonlinear narratives. In , instructors incorporate these into first-year writing courses to teach , where students remix modes to address audience and context, as seen in assignments blending argumentative text with embedded . Empirical studies from 2010 to 2020, reviewing 26 projects, indicate that such practices enhance student engagement and rhetorical flexibility, with participants reporting greater awareness of mode-specific affordances, such as video's emotive impact over static text. However, outcomes vary; a qualitative of first-year students found multimodal projects improved but did not consistently to enhanced alphabetic argumentation without explicit bridging instruction. Recent developments, post-2020, highlight collaborative and AI-assisted work, though cautions against overreliance on generative tools without rhetorical oversight. A of 35 undergraduates in literary courses showed collaborative fostered peer and , yielding artifacts with 15-20% more rhetorical layers than print equivalents, per instructor . Challenges persist in , as rubrics must adapt to non-linear modes, and empirical reveal uneven proficiency gains: while 70% of students in one self-reported improved adaptation, only 40% demonstrated measurable improvements in writing conventions. Critics within the field argue that risks diluting foundational skills if not grounded in print-based principles, advocating models where tools supplement rather than supplant textual rigor.

Transfer-Focused and Corequisite Models

Transfer-focused models in composition pedagogy prioritize developing students' ability to apply writing knowledge and rhetorical strategies across varied contexts, addressing longstanding empirical observations that writing skills often fail to transfer without explicit instruction. This shift, formalized in frameworks like Teaching for Transfer (TFT), emerged prominently in the 2010s through longitudinal studies at institutions such as Elon University, where researchers identified low-level transfer (routine reuse) versus high-road transfer (adaptive application) as critical distinctions. Empirical evidence from qualitative and quantitative analyses indicates that TFT curricula, incorporating reflective practices and meta-awareness, enhance students' recognition of transferable elements like genre awareness and rhetorical situation analysis, with one 2023 study showing improved writing development when students actively contextualize prior knowledge in new tasks. However, transfer remains challenging, as second-language writing research highlights that adaptation requires overcoming context-bound habits, with success rates varying by students' prior experiences and instructional scaffolding. Recent advancements in transfer-focused approaches integrate transformative experiences, extending beyond cognitive reuse to foster deeper where students reconceptualize writing as a dynamic process. A 2019 study introduced this construct, finding that prompting students to view writing problems as personally meaningful increased adaptive in tasks compared to standard . In contexts, transfer-focused modules for lab report writing yielded measurable gains in undergraduates' adaptation, per NSF-funded evaluating pre- and post-instruction . Critics note limitations in , as first-generation students may require additional dispositions for problem-solving to achieve , with pedagogical interventions like ePortfolios showing promise in promoting forward-looking . Overall, bibliographies of underscore its into broader disciplinary dialogues, emphasizing evidence that deliberate TFT outperforms incidental learning in sustaining writing proficiency post-. Corequisite models represent a remedial in instruction, placing underprepared students—typically those scoring below college-ready benchmarks on placement exams—directly into credit-bearing first-year writing courses with concurrent, just-in-time support rather than sequential prerequisite remediation. Adopted widely since the mid-2010s in states like and , these models have demonstrated superior outcomes in randomized trials; for example, a 2021 experiment found corequisite English instruction boosted passage rates and credit accumulation for reading- and writing-deficient students by integrating support within the gateway course. In 's statewide starting 2015, corequisite remediation increased completion of initial college-level math and English courses by up to 20 percentage points over traditional models, while reducing per-student costs due to accelerated progression. Effectiveness stems from structural advantages, such as fewer exit points from remediation sequences and aligned content between support and corequisite elements, fostering responsibility and contextual skill-building. A 2025 confirmed corequisites accelerate gateway course success without inflating failure rates, attributing gains to embedded instruction over isolated developmental silos. Student experience surveys from RAND's evaluation revealed corequisites provide early credit-earning opportunities and reduced frustration compared to standalone courses, though long-term retention impacts vary by institution. In CUNY's model, updated in 2019, corequisites emphasize transferable outcomes to minimize credit loss upon transfer, with pass rates doubling in some English implementations relative to prior remediation. Despite robust evidence from multiple states, adoption lags in some regions due to faculty training needs, though IES-funded studies affirm short-term metrics like first-course passage as reliable indicators of broader efficacy.

Responses to AI and Automated Writing Tools

The release of OpenAI's in November 2022 prompted widespread discussion within composition studies about the implications of generative for writing pedagogy, with scholars debating whether such tools undermine core skills like and originality or offer opportunities for augmentation. Early responses highlighted risks of , as AI-generated text could mimic student work, complicating assessment of authentic composition processes. Surveys and analyses in composition journals noted that undetected AI use could erode the emphasis on rhetorical and revision central to first-year writing courses. Empirical studies on 's pedagogical effects remain preliminary but reveal mixed outcomes. A of EFL students found that integrating tools improved organization and overall writing quality, suggesting potential benefits for weaker writers, though gains were attributed to prompted refinements rather than skill-building. Conversely, research from 2025 indicated reduced brain activity in prefrontal and temporal regions among -assisted writers compared to those composing without tools, correlating with poorer of produced and implying diminished cognitive in the . A of 2024 empirical work across university contexts identified patterns of short-term efficiency gains in drafting but warned of over-reliance fostering dependency, with factors like hallucinations—fabricated facts in outputs—and algorithmic biases potentially misleading learners on . Pedagogical adaptations in composition classrooms have shifted from outright bans toward "critical integration," framing AI as a rhetorical tool requiring meta-awareness. Scholars advocate teaching as a form of , where students refine AI outputs to align with audience and purpose, akin to traditional but with ethical caveats on . In first-year writing programs, experiments reported in 2023–2024 emphasized AI literacies, including detection of biases in training data and of outputs against primary sources, to preserve transferrable skills like argumentation. However, student surveys indicate resistance, with many expressing concerns over loss of personal voice and , underscoring tensions between technological convenience and the discipline's focus on human agency in . Ongoing debates center on long-term proficiency, as composition theorists question whether AI offloads cognitive labor essential for mastery, potentially exacerbating gaps in basic mechanics for underprepared students. Professional organizations like the Conference on College Composition and Communication have issued guidelines promoting "dialectical" approaches—using AI alongside human critique—while calling for more longitudinal data on skill retention post-intervention. These responses reflect composition studies' historical adaptability to technologies like spell-checkers, yet highlight unique challenges from AI's capacity for coherent, context-mimicking prose, necessitating updated rubrics that prioritize process artifacts over polished products.

References

  1. [1]
    Composition Studies - Writing Commons
    Composition Studies is. an academic discipline chiefly concerned with the study of composing; a subdiscipline of Writing Studies.<|separator|>
  2. [2]
    Where did Composition Studies Come from?: An Intellectual History
    Composition Studies emerged as a scholarly research discipline during the 1970s as (a) empirical methods became available to investigate the problem of meaning ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Where Did Comp Studies Come From
    {. Composition Studies emerged as a scholarly research discipline during the 1970s as (a) ... approaches to writing, text, and sources of meaning. Not all social.
  4. [4]
    Definition and Examples of Composition-Rhetoric - ThoughtCo
    Jul 3, 2019 · Composition-rhetoric is the theory and practice of teaching writing, especially as it's carried out in composition courses in the U.S..
  5. [5]
    English Compositionism as Fraud and Failure by Jeffrey Zorn | NAS
    Compositionism is seen as a redefinition of straightforward work with heavy ideological loading, and its theory is called "garbage" and "a mess of one- ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] The Five Canons of Rhetoric
    In De Inventione, he Roman philosopher Cicero explains that there are five canons, or tenets, of rhetoric: invention, arrangement, style, memory, and delivery.
  7. [7]
    https://www.memoriapress.com/articles/5-canons-of-rhetoric/
  8. [8]
    The Origins of Composition Studies in the American College, 1875 ...
    $$70.00This volume describes the formative years of English composition courses in college through a study of the most prominent documents of the time.<|separator|>
  9. [9]
    [PDF] brereton.pdf - joyce rain anderson
    THE ORIGINS OF COMPOSITION STUDIES assistants. Finally, the German model did not include rhetoric; Ameri- cans interested in English studies came home with ...
  10. [10]
    Composition's Beginnings in Nineteenth-Century Schools. Studies ...
    This book, the first full-length history of school-based writing instruction, demonstrates that writing instruction in 19th-century American schools was ...
  11. [11]
    The Reform Tradition in Nineteenth-Century Composition Teaching
    The composition teaching we tend to associate with nineteenth-century schools was exemplified by A. S. Hill's courses at Harvard, which emphasized ...
  12. [12]
    About - National Council of Teachers of English - NCTE
    In 2011 the National Council of Teachers of English, founded in Chicago in December 1911, marked its Centennial, 100 years of leadership in literacy education.
  13. [13]
    A Short History of the NCTE College Section - jstor
    of composition teaching, and less than a year later at its 1913 convention the. NCTE passed a resolution which began by commending the North Central As ...
  14. [14]
    Rhetoric and Reality: Writing Instruction in American Colleges, 1900 ...
    This history of major and minor developments in the teaching of writing in twentieth-century American colleges employs a taxonomy of theories.Missing: dominance | Show results with:dominance
  15. [15]
    What Can We Learn from Composition Instruction in the 1960s?
    Steve Lamos's and David Fleming's new books work to locate college composition during the turbulent years of the 1960s, when open admissions, racial protest, ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    [PDF] The Founding of the Conference on College Composition and ...
    The CCCC was founded after a successful 1949 NCTE conference in Chicago. It was recognized by NCTE and became a permanent organization in May 1950.
  17. [17]
    College Composition and Communication , v17 n3 p175-200 Oct 1966
    Workshop Reports of the Annual Conference [On College Composition and Communication] (Denver, March 24-26, 1966). College Composition and Communication , v17 n3 ...
  18. [18]
    Where Did Composition Studies Come From? An Intellectual History
    Aug 7, 2025 · Composition Studies emerged as a scholarly research discipline during the 1970s as (a) empirical methods became available to investigate the problem of meaning ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] A Contextualist Paradigm for Rhetoric and Composition
    composition studies emerged in the 1970s during the “literacy crisis” suggest that the field possibly emerged because of that paradigm shift, suggesting ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] The Wyoming Conference Resolution: A Beginning
    Mar 17, 1988 · composition studies and writing programs. The resolution was drafted at the Wyoming Conference in the summer of 1986, following a remarkable ...
  21. [21]
    Council of Writing Program Administrators
    The Council of Writing Program Administrators is a national association of college and university faculty with professional interests in directing writing ...WPA Journal · About CWPA · CWPA Conference · WPA Position Statements and...
  22. [22]
    Increases in Number of PhD Programs in Composition & Rhetoric ...
    Between 1969 and, programs increased from 7 to 20; by 1993 there were 72, a ten- fold increase (Fig. 3). Inasmuch as the new researchers directed the new sites ...Missing: 1990s | Show results with:1990s
  23. [23]
    [PDF] A History of Writing Program Administration
    tion became Composition (15). As doctoral programs in composition and rhetoric developed in the late 1970s and 1980s, English depart- ments began to hire ...
  24. [24]
    Composition at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century - ncte.org
    Jun 1, 2005 · I argue that composition studies has become a less unified and more contentious discipline early in the twenty-first century than it had appeared to be around ...
  25. [25]
    Composition at the turn of the twenty-first century - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · Our field has experienced a shift from writing about literature, to process as content, to argument writing, to themed courses (Fulkerson 2005) ...Missing: 21st | Show results with:21st
  26. [26]
    [PDF] The Rise of Writing Transfer Research Across Contexts
    The works covered in this bibliography situate transfer within relevant, ongoing scholarly conversations in the discipline, including topics of composition ...
  27. [27]
    A New Composition, a 21st Century Pedagogy, and the Rhetoric of ...
    Writing in the 21st century is no longer only performed with paper and pencil or word processing programs, but often takes place in diverse online environments.
  28. [28]
    Multimodal Composing - University Press of Colorado
    Multimodal Composing explores the relationship between rhetorical choices, design thinking, accessibility, and technological awareness in the writing center.
  29. [29]
    Elon Statement on Writing Transfer - Center for Engaged Learning
    This statement summarizes and synthesizes the seminar's meta-level discussions about writing and transfer, not as an end-point, but in an effort to provide a ...
  30. [30]
    Brain Activity Is Lower for Writers Who Use AI. What That Means for ...
    Jun 26, 2025 · Many writers who had AI help with an essay couldn't recall what they wrote, a study finds. It could have implications for the classroom.
  31. [31]
    AI has rendered traditional writing skills obsolete. Education needs ...
    May 30, 2025 · And it means helping students become proficient at using AI as a force multiplier to improve the depth, versatility, and speed of their writing.<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    What Students Can Do with AI in the Writing Classroom
    Dec 13, 2023 · Students can use AI for multimodal writing, generating visuals, creating text and images, and analyzing AI-generated content, including ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Embracing AI in English Composition: Insights and Innovations in ...
    Jan 22, 2024 · The current state of scholarship on the impact of AI on writing pedagogy highlights the growing influence of digital technologies on educational ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Thomas Kuhn and the Revolution in the Teaching of Writing Author ...
    writing, indicates that our profession is probably in the first stages of a paradigm shift. The Current-Traditional Paradigm and Its Proponents. In order to ...
  35. [35]
    The paradox within: Origins of the current‐traditional paradigm
    By 1890 many schools had a required two or three course freshman sequence in which students studied grammar, the rhetorical modes—especially exposition—and ...
  36. [36]
    Current-Traditional Rhetoric - ThoughtCo
    Jan 8, 2020 · Current-traditional rhetoric is a disparaging term for the textbook-based methods of composition instruction popular in the US during the first two-thirds of ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] 1980 8.3 - Composition Studies
    For current-traditional rhetoric, reality is rational, regular and certain -a realm which when it is not static is at least in a predictable, harmonious, ...
  38. [38]
    Current-Traditional Rhetoric: Paradigm and Practice - jstor
    In George Campbell, the progenitors of current-traditional. rhetoric discovered not only their epistemological position, but their general conception of ...
  39. [39]
    Know Your Theory! – Expressivist Composition Pedagogy Edition
    May 19, 2016 · Expressivism began in the anti-textbooks of Donald Murray, Ken Macrorie, Peter Elbow, and William Coles. Each author offered counter-approaches ...
  40. [40]
    History of Composition Studies Theory - Sutori
    A history of composition studies theory. An overview of the development of key theories underpinning the field of composition studies from the 1940s to today.Missing: 1910s | Show results with:1910s
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Expressive Pedagogy: Practice/Theory, Theory/Practice - UNCW
    Expressivism places the writer in the center, articulates its theory, and develops its peda gogical system by assigning highest value to the writer and her ...
  42. [42]
    Peter Elbow: A Tribute - NCTE
    Mar 11, 2025 · Peter burst into composition with his 1973 book Writing without Teachers. ... Peter was cast, not of his choosing, as the avatar of expressivism ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] A course in Advanced Writing employing expressivist theory and ...
    Gordon Rohman, Ken Macrorie, Donald Murray, Peter. Elbow, Toby Fulwiler, and Ann Berthoff are hard not to recognize in the history of Composition Studies. Both.
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Expressivist Pedagogy in the High School English Classroom
    This is a technique presented once again by expressivist leader Peter Elbow. (1981). The process begins as a generative writing activity, but slowly ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] “PERSONAL WRITING” AND “EXPRESSIVISM” AS PROBLEM TERMS
    Here's another marginal case: a writer takes a seemingly personal topic—say his or her own alcohol use—and make it nonpersonal by taking a wholly detached, ...
  46. [46]
    Effects of Expressive Writing on Psychological and Physical Health
    Other researchers have found the opposite pattern of results – that writing is more effective for those who have difficulty identifying or expressing emotion.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Expressivism and its (Dis)Contents: Tracing Theory and Practice ...
    ... expressivism and, furthermore, composition studies, may address one of the main critiques it is faced with—the overreliance on the student as subject.
  48. [48]
    Critical Expressivism: Theory and Practice in the Composition ...
    Nov 28, 2014 · Critical Expressivism is an ambitious attempt to re-appropriate intellectual territory that has more often been charted by its detractors than by its ...
  49. [49]
    A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing | ncte.org
    Dec 1, 1981 · A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. Author(s): Linda Flower and John R. Hayes; Source: College Composition & Communication, Volume 32 ...
  50. [50]
    A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing - jstor
    John R. Hayes and Linda Flower, "Uncovering Cognitive Processes in Writing: An Intro- duction to Protocol Analysis," in Methodological Approaches to Writing ...
  51. [51]
    (PDF) A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing - Academia.edu
    This paper presents a Cognitive Process Theory of Writing, which argues that writing should be understood as a set of distinctive thinking processes rather ...
  52. [52]
    The Cognitive Process Model of the Composing Process
    The basic insight of the Flower and Hayes model has been confirmed by countless later studies. They set out to map the actual mental behaviors of ...
  53. [53]
    https://wac.colostate.edu/books/horning_revision/chapter3.pdf
  54. [54]
    Flower & Hayes Cognitive Process Theory of Writing - Yomu AI
    Sep 7, 2024 · The Flower & Hayes Cognitive Process Theory of Writing is a model that explains how writers think and work.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] How Can the Hayes and Flower's (1980) Model of the Composition ...
    Jun 16, 2023 · This study aims to investigate the attributes of Flower and Hayes' cognitive model of composition and its influence on the writing of second ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] A-new-framework-for-understanding-cognition-and-affect-in-writing.pdf
    This research produced cognitive process models of two aspects of written text comprehension. The first, called UNDERSTAND, described the processes by which ...
  57. [57]
    Remodeling writers' composing processes: Implications for writing ...
    The author argues for remodeling writers' cognitive processes through reviewing the changing conceptualizations in six notable global writing process models ( ...
  58. [58]
    ED058205 - The Composing Processes of Twelfth Graders., 1971
    The Composing Processes of Twelfth Graders. Emig, Janet. This inquiry examines the composing process of twelfth-grade writers, using a case study method.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Teach Writing as a Process Not Product
    Teach Writing as a Process. Not Product. DONALD M. MURRAY. Most of us are trained as English teachers by studying a product: writing. Our critical skills are ...
  60. [60]
    Rhetoric and Reality - Southern Illinois University Press
    Berlin introduces a taxonomy made up of three categories: objective rhetorics, subjective rhetorics, and transactional rhetorics.
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Rhetoric and Ideology in the Writing Class James Berlin College ...
    Oct 2, 2007 · Social-epistemic rhetoric is an alternative that is self-consciously aware of its ideological stand, making the very question of ideology the ...
  62. [62]
    Post-Process Theory: Beyond the Writing-Process Paradigm
    Aug 20, 1999 · Post-Process Theory: Beyond the Writing-Process Paradigm · Thomas Kent · Published 20 August 1999 · Linguistics.<|separator|>
  63. [63]
    Thomas Kent, Post-Process Theory | Exam. Play.
    POST-PROCESS THEORY: BEYOND THE WRITING PROCESS PARADIGM (1999) Ed. Thomas ... Composition Studies Notes · Themes · Practice Questions · Other Resources ...
  64. [64]
    Beyond Postprocess on JSTOR
    In Thomas Kent's introduction toPost-Process Theory, he argues that the three main assumptions behind the emerging postprocess movement are writing is public, ...
  65. [65]
    https://books.google.com/books?id=vyNOZdWqY_wC
  66. [66]
    [PDF] POSTCOMPOSITION: BEFORE AND AFTER POSTPROCESS
    Apr 14, 2021 · In contrast, his. Post-Process Theory chapter seems to me to be invested in maintaining the dis- cipline's institutional or administrative ...
  67. [67]
    What Should We Do with Postprocess Theory? - Project MUSE
    ... post-process theory.” We seem to have heeded Dobrin's warning well since, in the ten years that have passed, only a handful of articles have been written ...
  68. [68]
    What Should We Do with Postprocess Theory? | Pedagogy
    Apr 1, 2008 · ———, ed. 1999 . Post-process Theory: Beyond the Writing-Process Paradigm ... Worsham, Lynn. 1991 . “Ecriture Féminine in Composition Studies.<|separator|>
  69. [69]
    WPA Outcomes Statement for First-Year Composition (3.0 ...
    Jul 18, 2019 · This Statement identifies outcomes for first-year composition programs in US postsecondary education. It describes the writing knowledge, practices, and ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] U.S. First-year Composition and Writing in the Disciplines
    Since the requirement was first instituted at Harvard in 1875, most composition courses were called “Freshman English” or “English Composition,” but now, the ...
  71. [71]
    The Origins of Composition Studies in the American College, 1875 ...
    This volume describes the formative years of English composition courses in college through a study of the most prominent documents of the time: magazine ...Missing: 19th | Show results with:19th
  72. [72]
    First-year composition in the 20th century U.S. higher education
    U.S. college composition needs to recognize the diversity of student population. The college student population today is not what it used to be in the late 19th ...
  73. [73]
    First-Year Composition Courses - ASU Department of English
    First-year courses focus on foundational writing skills, critical thinking, and literacy. ENG 101 focuses on expository/persuasive writing, and ENG 102 on ...
  74. [74]
    Teaching Introductory Composition: CO130 Academic Writing
    This guide provides an overview of an introductory composition course offered at Colorado State University for first-year students.
  75. [75]
    (PDF) How Student Performance in First-Year Composition Predicts ...
    Feb 27, 2017 · The formal use of cooperative learning techniques developed originally in primary and secondary education proved effective in improving student ...
  76. [76]
    [PDF] From First-Year Composition to Writing in the Disciplines
    The study found that most students improved writing from FYC to WID, with some struggling. Writing curricula and good practices impacted student writing ...
  77. [77]
    Bad Idea About Writing: “First-Year Composition Prepares Students ...
    Tyler S. Branson's essay from the book Bad Ideas About Writing refutes the idea that “First-Year Composition Prepares Students for Academic Writing.”
  78. [78]
    [PDF] We Know What Works in Teaching Composition
    Jan 3, 2017 · Effective composition teaching includes ample writing opportunities, frequent and extensive writing, serious effort, careful sequencing, ...
  79. [79]
    A Writer Reforms (the Teaching of) Writing: Donald Murray and the ...
    Aug 22, 2023 · A Writer Reforms (the Teaching of) Writing: Donald Murray and the Writing Process Movement, 1963–1987. By Michael J. Michaud Copy edited by Don ...
  80. [80]
    https://www.compositionforum.com/issue/50/teach-writing-as-process.php
  81. [81]
    [PDF] Writing with Elbow - DigitalCommons@USU
    composition studies, in Bartholomae's view, from more productive attention to ... writing: process pedagogy. Freewriting, multiple drafts, collab- orative ...
  82. [82]
    [PDF] A Review of Writing Model Research Based on Cognitive Processes
    In 1980 Linda Flower and John Hayes proposed a shift from the traditional linear sequence models being used to describe various steps taken during writing to ...
  83. [83]
    Flower, Linda, and John R. Hayes. “A Cognitive Process Theory of ...
    Flower and Hayes attempt to show a (formal) model of the composing process. Their theory is guided by four hypotheses.
  84. [84]
    The Process Writing Approach: A Meta-analysis
    Oct 17, 2011 · The process approach to writing instruction is one of the most popular methods for teaching writing. The authors conducted meta-analysis of ...
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Evidence-Based Practices for Writing Instruction - CEEDAR Center
    A comprehensive writing program uses the backbone of the process approach in tandem with explicit instruction in strategies to support the writing process as ...
  86. [86]
    [PDF] Evidence-based writing pedagogy - ScholarWorks@GVSU
    Aug 7, 2023 · 5. Pedagogy- The strategies used to teach. 6. Process writing approach- A writing pedagogy that focuses on teaching students writing.
  87. [87]
    [PDF] A WRITER REFORMS (THE TEACHING OF) WRITING
    The primary fodder for Berlin's critique of expressionistic rhetoric in “Rhetoric and Ideology” comes from the work of Donald Murray and Elbow, with Berlin.
  88. [88]
    [PDF] WID course enhancements in STEM: The impact of adding â
    Dec 28, 2019 · These findings offer quantitative evidence that adding writing-process pedagogy and iterated peer review improves student outcomes in both ...
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Cultivating a Process Approach to Writing: Student Experiences in a ...
    Their findings suggested that a writing process pedagogy, as opposed to a “remedial pedagogy” approach, is more effective in helping students to develop the ...
  90. [90]
    [PDF] The Rhetorical Situation Lloyd F. Bitzer - CUNY
    This essay, therefore, should be understood as an attempt to revive the notion of rhetorical situation, to provide at least the out- line of an adequate ...Missing: composition pedagogy
  91. [91]
    The Rhetorical Situation Lloyd F. Bitzer - jstor
    If someone says, That is a dangerous situation, his words suggest the présence of events, persons, or objects which threaten him,.Missing: composition pedagogy
  92. [92]
    [PDF] Genre in Rhetorical and Sociological Traditions
    In her groundbreaking and influential 1984 article “Genre as Social Action,” Carolyn Miller drew on and built connections between new rhetorical ...
  93. [93]
    Comparing L1 and L2 Texts and Writers in First‐Year Composition
    May 24, 2017 · The curriculum, focused on building genre and rhetorical awareness, is inspired by the FYC models writing about writing (Downs & Wardle, 2007) ...
  94. [94]
    [PDF] A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF WRITERS' RHETORICAL
    It is also important to note that the enhanced genre and rhetorical awareness affected two other important factors that possibly influenced the quality of ...
  95. [95]
    [PDF] Research Article Examining the effectiveness of the process-genre ...
    The process-genre framework significantly improved students' expository essay writing skills, and students perceived it as useful.
  96. [96]
    [PDF] Comparing L1 and L2 Texts and Writers in First-Year Composition
    The cur- riculum, focused on building genre and rhetorical awareness, is inspired by the FYC models writing about writing (Downs & Wardle,. 2007) and ...
  97. [97]
    Current-Traditional Rhetoric: Thirty Years of Writing with a Purpose
    the nature of current-traditional rhetoric seemed to be defined by. "traditional" rather than by "current." But at the same time this new conservatism was ...
  98. [98]
    [PDF] Teaching Grammar-in-Context in College Writing Instruction - ThinkIR
    Does grammar instruction help to improve students' writing? Should writing instructors focus on grammar in first-year composition or other university-level ...
  99. [99]
    [PDF] why can't they write right? teaching grammar in the composition ...
    If the goals of the composition class are to engage students as writers, encourage their critical thinking abilities, and enable them to produce coherent,.
  100. [100]
    [PDF] Improving Writing Skills in Academic English Through Explicit ...
    Apr 23, 2025 · The explicit instruction emphasizes direct and structured teaching (Goeke, 2009), whereas the process writing guides learners through the stages ...
  101. [101]
    [PDF] A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Adolescent Students
    In this article, we report a comprehensive meta-analysis, funded by the Carnegie. Corporation of New York, of experimental and quasi-experimental studies that ...
  102. [102]
    A meta-analysis of almost 40 Years of research - ScienceDirect.com
    (2012), and Graham and Perin (2007a) revealed that grammar instruction exhibited ineffectiveness in bolstering writing expression across various grade levels.
  103. [103]
    [PDF] Reviewing the Effects of Explicit and Implicit Grammar Instruction in ...
    The results showed that explicit grammar instruction was more effective than implicit grammar instruction, although in some cases relating to the complexity of ...
  104. [104]
    (PDF) Explicit Grammar Instruction for EFL Writing and Editing
    The purpose of this study is to explore the effect of explicit grammar instruction on Korean students' perceptions of their writing and editing skills at the ...
  105. [105]
    Grammar for Writing - National Council of Teachers of English - NCTE
    Jun 23, 2022 · Myhill et al. found that explicit teaching of grammar does improve student writing, especially when teachers employ a playful approach that ...
  106. [106]
    [PDF] Grammar Instruction Embedded Within Writing Instruction in the ...
    Aug 8, 2023 · Grammar, when seen as a tool for thoughtful composition, allows writers the ability to effectively impact readers the way the author wishes; it ...
  107. [107]
    [PDF] Remedial and Developmental Courses in Higher Education
    While this chapter reviews information on remediation nationwide, the empirical analysis focuses on students attending public colleges and universities in Ohio.
  108. [108]
    [PDF] Remedial, Basic, Advanced: Evolving Frameworks for First-Year ...
    Through a Critical Discourse Analysis, I contrast the remediation and basic skills discourse of Early Start—what I refer to as the Remedial Writing. Framework— ...
  109. [109]
    [PDF] Basic Writing - The WAC Clearinghouse
    Framed by historic developments—from the open admissions movement of the. 1960s and 1970s to the attacks on remediation that intensified in the. 1990s and ...
  110. [110]
    Remedial Education - Center for American Progress
    Sep 28, 2016 · While rates vary depending on the source, on-time completion rates of students who take remedial classes are consistently less than 10 percent.Missing: writing empirical
  111. [111]
    Evidence-based reforms in college remediation are gaining steam
    Mar 29, 2018 · Remedial courses for under-prepared college students have historically backfired, and studies over the last decade showing these harmful ...
  112. [112]
    [PDF] Basic Writing Reform as an Opportunity to Rethink First-Year ... - ERIC
    Jul 18, 2019 · ABSTRACT: This article argues that the national trend to replace developmental writing programs with mainstreaming and corequisite courses ...
  113. [113]
    Assessing the Heterogeneous Effects of Remedial Education
    Jun 1, 2025 · For example, Boatman and Long (2018) found that completing remedial courses in reading or writing was associated with a 6.5 and 17.7 percentage ...
  114. [114]
    [PDF] THE ROLE OF REMEDIAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL COURSES IN ...
    Research suggests that students enrolled in condensed courses, self-paced courses, and/or mainstreamed developmental courses show higher rates of persistence.<|separator|>
  115. [115]
    Second language composition instruction: developments, issues ...
    This chapter discusses ESL writing instruction, its developments, models, and future directions, and how it differs from native English writing.
  116. [116]
    Students are encountering linguistic and cultural obstacles to writing
    Students face obstacles like language skills, unfamiliar writing types, cultural differences in expressing opinions, and different rhetorical styles and ...
  117. [117]
    [PDF] Second language writing theory
    There is no single theory of second language writing. It has shifted from structural language to cognitive processes and then to social context.
  118. [118]
    View of Translingualism in Composition Studies and Second ...
    Translingualism in Composition Studies and Second Language Writing: An Uneasy Alliance ...
  119. [119]
    [PDF] Learning to Write in a Second Language: Two Decades of Research
    The empirical studies reviewed in this article show that over the past two decades research on learning to write in second languages has expanded and ...
  120. [120]
    Project-based Learning in EFL educational settings: A meta-analysis ...
    Mar 21, 2024 · The result reveals that PjBL had a significant positive effect size in EFL/ESL writing. Moreover, the effect sizes of some moderating variables ...
  121. [121]
    [PDF] The Effects of Writing Strategy Instruction on EFL Learners ... - ERIC
    The study found significantly positive differences in learners' using writing strategies and in writing proficiency.
  122. [122]
    CCCC Statement on Second Language Writing and Multilingual ...
    The aim of this document is to provide broad research-based guidelines for teachers and administrators to advocate for multilingual writers.
  123. [123]
    [PDF] The “Problem” of L2 Writers in College Composition Placement
    The problem is how to measure L2 students' suitability for writing classes, the role of identity labeling, and the suitability of DSP for L2 writers.
  124. [124]
    Content-based ESL instruction: Long-term effects and outcomes
    The study found that students enrolled in the content-linked ESL program not only achieved higher pass rates and better grades in the ESL course, but also ...
  125. [125]
    [PDF] Engaging Second Language Writers in Freshman Composition - ERIC
    Abstract: This article presents the case for using a critical literacy approach to enhance the freshman composition experience for second language writers.
  126. [126]
    [PDF] NEGOTIATING “ERRORS” IN L2 WRITING: FACULTY ...
    This chapter reports on a study of faculty dispositions towards language difference, including the ways they talk about second language writers.
  127. [127]
    [PDF] Mapping the Gaps in Services for L2 Writers
    Meanwhile, most U.S. college writing teachers tended to be radically under-informed about the needs of L2 students. Exacerbating this professional ...
  128. [128]
    View of Teaching for Transfer to First-Year L2 Writers
    Most studies have focused on writing knowledge being transferred from first-year composition ... multilingual writers are used to refer to students whose first ...
  129. [129]
    Facilitating Genre Transferability for Multilingual Writers in First-Year ...
    In this project, I set out to investigate how Writing Program Administrators (WPA) can draw on theories, research findings, and best practices of transfer ...
  130. [130]
    [PDF] Developments in classroom-based research on L2 writing - ERIC
    This paper reviews L2 writing research from 2001-2020, covering 75 studies on students, teachers, and assessment, and major research themes.
  131. [131]
    Composition Studies and ESL Writing: A Disciplinary Division of Labor
    Rather, second-language writing should be seen as an integral part of both composition studies and second-language studies, and specialists in both ...
  132. [132]
    [PDF] WRITING ACROSS THE CURRICULUM - The WAC Clearinghouse
    The renewed interest in communication, rhetoric, and writing in the U.S. in the 1960s manifested itself in the rise of composition stud- ies as an academic ...
  133. [133]
    About Writing Across the Curriculum - Eastern Michigan University
    As an institutional program, Writing Across the Curriculum came of age with the publication of Writing in the Arts and Sciences (Maimon et al., 1981) and with ...
  134. [134]
    [PDF] American Origins of the Writing- across-the-Curriculum Movement
    The WAC movement launched by 1985, has roots in debates over writing and pedagogy, especially in progressive education, and the conflict between specialization ...
  135. [135]
    What is Writing in the Disciplines? - The WAC Clearinghouse
    Writing in the Disciplines (WID) introduces students to a discipline's writing conventions, typically formal documents, and helps them learn the discipline's ...
  136. [136]
    Writing Across the Curriculum: An Introduction - Purdue OWL
    Finally, writing across the curriculum acknowledges the differences in writing conventions across the disciplines, and believes that students can best learn ...
  137. [137]
    [PDF] Evaluating Writing Across the Curriculum Programs
    (ED 232 523). A survey of twelve interdisciplinary writing programs revealing their features but not assessing their effectiveness. Thomas, S., and Keech, C.
  138. [138]
    What is Writing Across the Curriculum? - Penn State Berks
    Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) is a nationwide movement designed to ensure that students have frequent and significant opportunities to write, revise, and ...<|separator|>
  139. [139]
    [PDF] The Effectiveness of Writing Across the Curriculum in a ...
    Students reported that WAC strategies substantially improved their abilities to write in the discipline and learn course content. Based on our findings, it is ...
  140. [140]
    Peer and self-assessment practices for writing across the curriculum
    Dec 20, 2019 · Self-assessment was found more effective than the control for all writer levels and more effective than peer assessment for most writers.
  141. [141]
    Informational writing across the curriculum. - APA PsycNet
    This chapter focuses on writing across the curriculum, with a specific focus on struggling writers. In the empirical literature, this work is described in ...Citation · Abstract · Affiliation<|separator|>
  142. [142]
    Not It! Resistance to Teaching Writing Across the Curriculum
    Feb 28, 2017 · Writing can be an integral part of deepening student learning. In writing assignments, students grapple with both content and disciplinary conventions.
  143. [143]
    (PDF) Critiques of Writing across the Curriculum - Academia.edu
    Sep 17, 2025 · This paper critiques current ideologies surrounding Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) pedagogy, specifically focusing on the inclusivity ...
  144. [144]
    writing centers | Composition Studies
    Nov 1, 2021 · Writing centers started as writing clinics or writing laboratories where “remedial” students were sent to meet the standardized writing levels ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  145. [145]
    History of the Writing Center
    The idea of a writing center at the State University of Iowa was born in 1934 when English Professor Carrie Ellen Stanley (photo courtesy of the Fredrick W.
  146. [146]
    [PDF] The Evolution of a Writing Center: 1972-1990 - Purdue e-Pubs
    Jan 1, 1991 · The call for accountability would lead many schools away from the insights of people like Vivian Patraka, who looked for the basics of writing ...
  147. [147]
    Basic Theories for Tutoring - Highline College Writing Center
    Oct 28, 2020 · Like any field, Writing Centers have pedagogies, or a set of teaching theories we often use as a basis for our work. These are just theories, ...
  148. [148]
    Toward a Cohesive Tutoring Pedagogy in a Writing and Speaking ...
    Much of the discussion focused on how tutors welcome students into a session and thus emphasized best practices in starting both oral communication and writing ...
  149. [149]
    Adapting Writing Center Pedagogy for Composition Classrooms
    May 4, 2012 · While a writing center tutor may view her role as a coach, a commentator, and a counselor, the tutor actually serves as scaffolding, ...
  150. [150]
    20.3 Grendell et al - Praxis: A Writing Center Journal
    Ultimately, the conclusions drawn from our study imply that tutoring generally has a positive effect on stress levels.
  151. [151]
    [PDF] Learning from Writing Center Assessment: Regular Use Can ... - ERIC
    Jan 21, 2021 · Abstract. To demonstrate effectiveness, writing centers collect quantitative and/or qualitative information about and from the students who ...
  152. [152]
    [PDF] Exploring the Efficacy of a Source-Based Writing Tutoring ...
    Oct 15, 2025 · Our study examined whether or not writing centers can help MLWs develop—and transfer—source- based writing skills in a sequence of three ...
  153. [153]
    [PDF] The Role of Writing Center Tutorials of ESL Students
    The findings of this study revealed that the writing center is effective in improving ESL tutees' writing skills that may also be transferable to their future ...
  154. [154]
    [PDF] A mixed-methods study measuring writing center students ...
    However, writing center scholars rely primarily on anecdotal evidence or empirical evidence from other fields that explore tutoring, supplemental instruction, ...<|separator|>
  155. [155]
    Against the Writing Center - The Chronicle of Higher Education
    Jan 3, 2023 · Many of the colleges and universities where we work have writing centers with staff dedicated to building writing skills among incoming students.
  156. [156]
    [PDF] Notions of Writing Center Community and Some Challenges to Them
    Nov 17, 2023 · And considering the cutthroat nature of much of 21st- century higher education, maintaining a writing center that follows the grand narra-.
  157. [157]
    Writing Center Theory and Research: A Review - The Peer Review
    This study reviews the current underlying theories relevant to writing centers as well as the research methods being used in the early 21st century.
  158. [158]
    Reviews 555 - jstor
    Methods and Methodology in Composition Research, ed. Gesa Kirsch and. Patricia A Sullivan (Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 1992,354 pages). Reviewed by ...<|separator|>
  159. [159]
    [PDF] Empiricism Is Not a Four-Letter Word Davida Charney College ...
    Feb 4, 2004 · qualitative and quantitative empirical methods. Surely we only ... Location in Composition Research. •. CCC (1995): 7-29. Kitcher ...
  160. [160]
    Amazon.com: Methods and Methodology in Composition Research
    Included are discussions of historical, theoretical, and feminist scholarship; case-study and ethnographic research; text and conversation analysis; and ...
  161. [161]
    Methods and Methodology in Composition Research - BiblioVault
    Included are discussions of historical, theoretical, and feminist scholarship; case-study and ethnographic research; text and conversation analysis; and ...
  162. [162]
    [PDF] Strategies For Empirical Research In Writing
    Common empirical methods include surveys, experiments, observations, and content analysis. ... Composition Research Empirical Designs. New York Oxford ...
  163. [163]
    [PDF] Researching Style: Methods in Rhetoric, Composition, and Related ...
    Methodology in Composition Research. Research on style within the field ... Knowledge of dialectology and its empirical methods can push teachers and ...
  164. [164]
    2. Research in Composition: Current Issues and a Brief History
    Current debates about research methods have often focused on where and how researchers view reality and evidence. Because we debate the value of evidence—rather ...
  165. [165]
    A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Adolescent Students - ERIC
    The authors conducted a meta-analysis of the writing intervention literature (Grades 4-12), focusing their efforts on experimental and quasi-experimental ...
  166. [166]
    The Process Writing Approach: A Meta-analysis - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · The process writing approach neither resulted in a statistically significant improvement in students' motivation nor enhanced the quality of ...
  167. [167]
    The Process Writing Approach: A Meta-Analysis - ASHA
    Overall, the findings from these studies found that the process approach to writing instruction was not effective for at risk or struggling writers. The ...
  168. [168]
    (PDF) Perceived roadblocks to transferring knowledge from first-year ...
    Jul 29, 2019 · Nelms and Dively's (2007) study explores variables that may affect transfer of knowledge between general composition and discipline-specific ...
  169. [169]
    [PDF] Effectiveness of Transfer Focused Writing Pedagogy on ...
    This paper presents the study results of the past three years to investigate the effectiveness of learning transfer-focused or transfer-focused writing pedagogy ...
  170. [170]
    [PDF] A Review of Transfer Theories and Effective Instructional Practices
    A large body of research indicates that students often find transferring knowledge to situations other than the one in which it was learned highly challenging ( ...
  171. [171]
    Writing Evaluation: Rater and Task Effects on the Reliability of ... - NIH
    Feb 6, 2017 · We examined how raters and tasks influence measurement error in writing evaluation and how many raters and tasks are needed to reach a desirable level of .90 ...
  172. [172]
    [PDF] REFRAMING RELIABILITY FOR WRITING ASSESSMENT
    This essay provides an overview of the research and scholarship on re- liability in college writing assessment from the author's perspective as.
  173. [173]
    The constant danger of sacrificing validity to reliability
    The danger is that writing assessment often prioritizes reliability, which can be achieved at the expense of construct validity.
  174. [174]
    Constructs of writing proficiency in US state and national writing ...
    The present study investigated constructs of writing proficiency implicated in 41 US state and national high school direct writing assessments.
  175. [175]
    Critical Theory Pedagogies Guide - Research Guides - UNC Charlotte
    Sep 22, 2023 · Critical pedagogy connects critical theory with education, viewing it as political, challenging power structures, and seeking social justice.
  176. [176]
    Know Your Theory! – Critical Pedagogy and Composition Edition
    May 12, 2016 · Critical pedagogy is a practice, the routine contestations of power, value, and authority. The critical writing classroom asks students to ...
  177. [177]
    Political Literacy in Composition and Rhetoric - SIU Press
    Jul 20, 2015 · “The view that reasoned argument is an instrument of white, male, Western dominance still haunts the field of rhetoric and composition like a ...
  178. [178]
    Are They Empowered Yet? - Composition Forum
    Beth Daniell goes so far as to say that “few disciplines are as blatantly political as composition is—departmentally, institutionally, nationally” (128).<|separator|>
  179. [179]
    The Hyperpoliticization of Higher Ed: Trends in Faculty Political ...
    Higher education has recently made a hard left turn—sixty percent of faculty now identify as “liberal” or “far left.” This left-leaning supermajority is ...
  180. [180]
    Stop Using Rhetoric to Teach Writing - Inside Higher Ed
    Dec 22, 2008 · It is a serious mistake to ground undergraduate instruction in writing in the basics of Aristotelian rhetoric.
  181. [181]
    Donald Lazere's Political Literacy in Composition and Rhetoric
    Political literacy is rife with critiques of scholars who advocate for pluralism through the outlets of diversity, multiculturalism, and personal discourse ...
  182. [182]
    Donald Lazere. Political Literacy in Composition and Rhetoric - jstor
    Lazere critiques what he sees as rhetoric and composition's "unqualified celebrations of identity politics, diversity, and difference" (152), which he ...
  183. [183]
    [PDF] Critical thinking and ideology: A study of composition's secondary ...
    composition teachers, because of their own political biases, may inevitably force those biases onto students as the correct or plausible answer to the topic ...
  184. [184]
    The Bias Fallacy - AAUP
    Students and faculty alike must learn to understand where to expect disagreement on a topic and how then to engage in a civil discussion.
  185. [185]
    [PDF] The Value of Ideological Diversity among University Faculty
    This essay argues that the lack of political diversity among American university faculty hampers the ability of universities to fulfill their core mission of ...
  186. [186]
    [PDF] Remedial Writing and Collegiate Performance: Using Grader Failing ...
    Aug 2, 2012 · Remedial writing most directly affects performance in the required college writing classes. Unfortunately, one sixth of the students were ...
  187. [187]
    Composition Program Position Statement on All-Inclusive Linguistic ...
    We strive to build a community and a culture that values all-inclusive linguistic diversity and upholds linguistic justice as a core tenet of our programmatic ...
  188. [188]
    [PDF] Does Remediation Work for All Students? How the Effects of ... - ERIC
    In writing, we find positive effects for those placed in the lower-level remedial course relative to those placed in the higher-level developmental course. For ...
  189. [189]
    Assessing the Heterogeneous Effects of Remedial Education
    Jun 1, 2025 · Our study finds that remediation increases graduation rates by 22.5 percentage points for students with lower math skills in math-intensive majors.
  190. [190]
    [PDF] Remedial Coursetaking at U.S. Public 2- and 4-Year Institutions
    This Statistical Analysis Report attempts to contribute to the literature with a descriptive analysis of beginning postsecondary students' coursetaking ...
  191. [191]
    [PDF] DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTIONS OF REMEDIATION BEYOND THE ...
    It is no secret that remediation has historically been disparaged in both public and academic discourses (and as Mara Lee Grayson notes in her chapter in this.
  192. [192]
    How does course recommendation impact student outcomes ... - arXiv
    Oct 2, 2025 · The results of our regression discontinuity design show that directed self-placement does not negatively impact student grades or pass rate.
  193. [193]
    [PDF] Diversity and Inclusivity in the First-Year Composition Classroom
    May 7, 2024 · In sum, for first-year composition courses to be more diverse and inclusive, students should be able to write in their own voice so that they ...
  194. [194]
    The Challenge of Writing Remediation: Can Composition Research ...
    Bridging composition studies for a higher education policy audience, this is a critical synthesis of prior conceptual and empirical work.
  195. [195]
    On E. D. Hirsch's "The Philosophy of Composition" - jstor
    Hirsch always has his eye on practical solutions and stra- tegies for teaching composition. I confess that I found this rather disappointing at first. Having ...
  196. [196]
    Meet Founder E. D. Hirsch, Jr. - Core Knowledge Foundation
    Hirsch was a highly regarded literary critic and professor of English. His transition to education reform began when, while researching written compositions ...
  197. [197]
    At long last, E.D. Hirsch, Jr. gets his due: New research shows big ...
    Apr 13, 2023 · A remarkable long-term study by University of Virginia researchers led by David Grissmer demonstrates unusually robust and beneficial effects on reading ...
  198. [198]
    chapter two: pedagogical philosophies
    Current-traditionalists. Page 4. 9 embraced this idea that knowledge existed outside of human experience which allowed them to approach writing as an isolated ...
  199. [199]
    Reaffirming Critical Composition Studies as an Antidote to Trumpian ...
    Dec 1, 2019 · This article traces the rise of that concept and broader study of mass society in American social science, with adaptations into composition ...
  200. [200]
    [PDF] The Rhetorical Value of Multimodal Composition - ERIC
    Jun 1, 2022 · Multimodal composition goes beyond printed words, using visual and technological literacy, and digital projects, to enhance communication and  ...
  201. [201]
    [PDF] INTEGRATING MULTIMODALITY INTO COMPOSITION CURRICULA
    As we have noted, the goal for the survey project was to get a contemporary snapshot of how multimodal composition was being taught in collegiate environments ...<|separator|>
  202. [202]
    Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy: Issue ...
    Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy is the premier online, peer-reviewed journal in computers and writing.Missing: integration | Show results with:integration
  203. [203]
    Review of the Empirical Research on Digital Multimodal Composing ...
    Abstract: Driven by advances in multimedia technologies, digital multimodal composing (DMC) has gained growing scholarly interests.<|separator|>
  204. [204]
    Rethinking the essay: student perceptions of collaborative digital ...
    May 24, 2023 · This study focuses on 35 students in two advanced undergraduate literary studies courses who were assigned a collaborative digital multimodal composition ...
  205. [205]
    Emotional Responses Towards Multimodal Composing
    Further empirical studies found that composing a web-based multimodal text increases students' perceived awareness of audience due to understanding how ...
  206. [206]
    Multimodal Composing and Writing Transfer on JSTOR
    ¹ The emerging body of research explores students' transfer of knowledge between print-based composition and multimodal composition (DePalma 2015; DePalma and ...
  207. [207]
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373121161_The_Teaching_for_Transfer_Curriculum_The_Role_of_Concurrent_Transfer_and_Inside-and_Outside-School_Contexts_in_Supporting_Students%27_Writing_Development
  208. [208]
    Expanding disciplinary discussions of “transfer” in second-language ...
    In this paper, we argue that discussions of transfer in L2 writing and composition studies have focused primarily on the reuse of past learning and thus ...
  209. [209]
    [PDF] Extending the “Warming Trend” to Writing Transfer Research - ERIC
    Abstract: In this article, we investigate a new construct for conceptualizing learning transfer with writing knowledge: Transformative Experience (TE).
  210. [210]
    Developing Dispositions for Transfer | Pedagogy
    Apr 1, 2024 · This article suggests pedagogical practices to help first-generation students gain effective problem-solving strategies for the future ...
  211. [211]
    Assessing the Effect of Corequisite English Instruction Using a ...
    This is the first study to provide experimental evidence of the impact of corequisite remediation for students underprepared in reading and writing.
  212. [212]
    [PDF] Is Corequisite Remediation Cost-Effective? Early Findings From ...
    Under corequisite remediation it costs less to get a remedial student through his or her initial college-level courses in math and writing. College ...Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
  213. [213]
    A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Corequisite English Developmental ...
    Sep 30, 2025 · A growing body of evidence demonstrates that corequisite remediation helps students progress more quickly through college-level courses. For ...
  214. [214]
    How Does Corequisite Remediation Change Student Experiences?
    Mar 24, 2021 · The findings in this study suggest that corequisite remediation improved student experiences in a variety of ways; it provided early opportunities to earn ...Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes
  215. [215]
    [PDF] Guidance for the Corequisite Model at CUNY
    To minimize problems with transfer, we strongly recommend that the faculty maintain identical learning outcomes when adapting an existing fully transferable.<|separator|>
  216. [216]
    Exploring Co-Requisite Developmental Education Models | IES
    Key measures for this portion of the analysis will include short-term outcomes such as completing developmental courses, passing first college-level courses, ...
  217. [217]
    artificial-intelligence | Composition Studies
    Sep 16, 2024 · Some students assumed AI would generate truthful and unbiased texts because AI language models train on huge data sets and vetted scholarship.
  218. [218]
    Generative AI in first-year writing: An early analysis of affordances ...
    Using the generative AI features in writing to learn contexts may be one of the most powerful and impactful use cases for the technology within education.
  219. [219]
    [PDF] Meta-Writing: AI and Writing - Composition Studies 51.1 (Spring 2023)
    AI helps with grammar, content creation, translation, text analysis, and writing suggestions, but it is not a substitute for human creativity.
  220. [220]
    The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of ...
    These AI tools served as supplementary teaching resources, aiding in grammar checking, paraphrasing, plagiarism detection, generating content, and offering ...
  221. [221]
    a systematic review of empirical studies on the impact of artificial ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · This systematic review of literature aims at synthesizing empirical studies to highlight the patterns of the impact of AI on the students' ...
  222. [222]
    [PDF] a systematic review of empirical studies on the impact of artificial ...
    Dec 21, 2024 · The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students' writing: EFL teachers' perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 1 ...
  223. [223]
    Playing the digital dialectic game: Writing pedagogy with generative AI
    This article explores teaching writing with generative AI as critical play where students and teachers engage in an ethically dialectical and aleatory game ...
  224. [224]
    [PDF] Fostering AI Literacies in the Composition Classroom: A Mixed
    May 23, 2025 · These deliverables aim to model the application of AI literacies across composition studies, demonstrating what effective engagement with AI.<|separator|>
  225. [225]
    The Influence of AI Tools on the Student Writing Process and ...
    Jun 10, 2025 · This study investigates the multifaceted influence of artificial intelligence (AI) tools on the student writing process and compositional fluency.
  226. [226]
    The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students ...
    Jun 18, 2024 · The study specifically examines the contributing factors of over-reliance, such as AI hallucination, algorithmic bias, plagiarism, privacy ...Missing: composition | Show results with:composition
  227. [227]
    Working Alongside, Not Against, AI Writing Tools in the Composition ...
    Abstract. This article presents a dialectical retrospective on thoughtfully integrating Generate AI tools such as ChatGPT into composition classrooms.
  228. [228]
    [PDF] (Re)considering Writing Pedagogy in the Wake of AI
    ChatGPT is best thought of as a language “synthesizer,” a way to explore the different ways one might think through their own ideas, research, and rhetorical ...