Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

DICOM

DICOM, an acronym for and Communications in , is the international standard for handling, storing, printing, and transmitting information in . It enables the secure exchange of medical images and related data across devices, networks, and systems from different manufacturers, supporting a wide range of modalities such as , , MRI, , and . Developed through collaboration between the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the (NEMA), DICOM originated in the early 1980s to address challenges in decoding and MRI images from various vendors. The first version, known as ACR-NEMA 300, was released in 1985 for point-to-point image communication, evolving through subsequent updates in 1988 and 1990 before being formalized as the DICOM standard in 1993, incorporating TCP/IP networking and published as NEMA PS3. At its core, DICOM organizes into structured sets containing attributes like patient identifiers, study details, and pixel for images, which can be compressed using methods such as , , or RLE to optimize and transmission. It defines key services including for sending images to picture archiving and communication systems (PACS), Query/Retrieve for searching and fetching , Modality Worklist for integrating exam scheduling, and for outputting to DICOM-compatible printers, ensuring consistent workflows in healthcare environments. Since its inception, DICOM has revolutionized by replacing film-based workflows with fully digital processes, expanding to include support for , , structured reporting, and web-based services like introduced in 2013 for RESTful access to imaging data. Managed by the DICOM Standards Committee—a global body of professional societies, manufacturers, and organizations—the standard is continuously updated, with multiple editions released annually to incorporate advancements in technology.

Introduction

Definition and Purpose

DICOM, which stands for and Communications in , is the for handling images and related information. It establishes protocols for the communication, storage, retrieval, printing, processing, and display of data, ensuring that these operations maintain the quality and integrity required for clinical use. Developed and maintained by the DICOM Standards Committee under the (NEMA), the standard addresses the need for consistent data exchange in the field of medical informatics. The primary purpose of DICOM is to promote vendor-neutral among healthcare imaging systems, allowing devices and software from different manufacturers to communicate seamlessly without proprietary barriers. By defining standardized formats, syntax, and semantics for network and media-based exchanges, DICOM facilitates the integration of diverse equipment, such as scanners, workstations, and picture archiving and communication systems (PACS), across various medical specialties including , , and radiotherapy. This is critical in multi-vendor environments, where it supports the efficient sharing of data to improve diagnostic accuracy and workflow efficiency in healthcare settings worldwide.

Scope and Adoption

The DICOM standard encompasses a broad scope beyond mere image storage, facilitating the communication, management, and interchange of diverse medical data types including images, reports, measurements, waveforms, and structured reporting documents. These elements are encoded as composite service-object pair (SOP) instances, enabling precise linkage of textual annotations, quantitative measurements, and multimodal data to specific images or waveforms for enhanced clinical documentation and analysis. Additionally, DICOM supports both network-based communication through defined protocols for device interoperability and media storage via standardized file formats and application profiles for removable media interchange. DICOM has achieved extensive global adoption as the international standard for , utilized in the vast majority of modern healthcare facilities and devices worldwide to ensure seamless data exchange across heterogeneous systems. The standard is recognized by regulatory bodies, including the U.S. (FDA) as a standard for communication and management, which streamlines premarket reviews for compliant devices. Over its evolution, DICOM has expanded from an imaging-centric to support multimodal , incorporating advancements such as and annotations in recent editions through dedicated working groups and supplements. For instance, -generated outputs are handled as secondary capture objects with specific DICOM tags (e.g., Image Type indicating derived ) and unique identifiers, allowing integration of algorithmic annotations without overwriting original data, as outlined by DICOM Working Group 23 on . This progression facilitates the inclusion of non-image data like predictive models and structured reports alongside traditional modalities, promoting comprehensive enterprise imaging ecosystems, with the 2025 edition continuing to incorporate such advancements. DICOM profoundly influences key healthcare information systems, serving as the foundational protocol for in Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS), Radiology Information Systems (RIS), and Vendor Neutral Archives (VNAs). In PACS, it enables secure storage, retrieval, and distribution of imaging , reducing and supporting clinical workflows; RIS integration via DICOM modalities worklist streamlines patient scheduling and reporting; while VNAs leverage DICOM for vendor-agnostic long-term archiving of both DICOM and non-DICOM content, yielding benefits such as 10-30% cost reductions in storage and improved .

Historical Development

Origins and Early Standards

In the late 1970s and early , the field underwent a significant transition from traditional film-based systems to digital technologies, including the advent of computed tomography (CT) in 1971 and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 1977, which generated vast amounts of digital data but relied on proprietary formats and interfaces from various equipment manufacturers. This proliferation of vendor-specific systems hindered interoperability, making it challenging for hospitals to integrate devices from different suppliers into cohesive workflows, such as picture archiving and communication systems (PACS). To address these issues, the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the (NEMA) formed a joint committee in 1983, tasked with developing a standard to promote device-independent communication of digital image information, facilitate PACS expansion, and enable the creation of enterprise-wide diagnostic databases. The committee's first effort resulted in ACR-NEMA Standards Publication No. 300-1985, designated as version 1.0 and released in 1985, which defined a hardware interface for point-to-point connections between devices, specifying formats for basic transfer but limited to simple, direct cabling without network support. This version included revisions in 1986 and 1988 to refine command structures and elements. In 1988, (ACR-NEMA Standards Publication No. 300-1988) was published, incorporating version 1.0 with enhancements such as support for display functions, a more flexible , and an object-oriented hierarchy for grouping related images, while still focusing on point-to-point rather than networked communication. These early standards laid the groundwork for but faced adoption challenges due to their complexity and the absence of mandatory , leading to inconsistent implementations across vendors that often failed to achieve seamless . By the early 1990s, the limitations of ACR-NEMA versions 1.0 and 2.0—particularly their lack of support for modern networking protocols like TCP/IP and broader service classes—prompted a major overhaul. In 1993, the committee introduced the and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard as version 3.0, rebranding the effort to reflect its expanded scope beyond ACR-NEMA's origins while maintaining where possible. This version shifted toward a , enabling network-based exchanges and offline media storage, which addressed early gaps by defining stricter conformance requirements, though initial vendor adoption remained uneven due to the standard's increased sophistication.

Key Milestones and Versions

The DICOM standard was formally introduced in 1993 as version 3.0, marking a significant from its ACR-NEMA predecessors by adopting an object-oriented model for representation, defining standardized service classes for operations like and query/retrieve, and requiring conformance statements to ensure among implementations. This version also shifted to a multi-part structure (PS3 parts), encompassing specifications for information objects, protocols, and media , which facilitated broader adoption in networked and offline environments using TCP/IP and formats like . Subsequent supplements expanded the standard's scope in the late and , with the PS3 parts providing a modular framework for ongoing enhancements. Key additions included support for through Supplement 50 in 2001, which introduced structured reporting for computer-aided detection results in mammograms. Structured reporting was initially defined in Supplement 23 in 1999, enabling the encoding of clinical observations and measurements in a hierarchical, machine-readable format to improve report precision and integration with images. Further refinements to structured reporting templates occurred in the early , such as those in Supplement 53 for content mapping resources. Building on Supplement 148's 2011 SOAP-based services, 2013 supplements including 161 (WADO-RS) and 163 (STOW-RS) introduced DICOMweb's RESTful services for web-based access to data, enabling retrieval and storage via . Recent milestones include the 2025 editions (2025a through 2025d), which incorporate new information object definitions (IODs) and templates to address emerging clinical needs. These updates feature enhanced segmentation IODs for AI-generated outputs, such as label maps for entity classification in medical images. Specific additions cover through structured reporting templates for surveys and biometry, dermoscopy with a dedicated IOD and storage SOP class for skin lesion imaging, and inventory management via Supplement 223's repository query and Inventory IOD for tracking DICOM instances in archives. Internationally, the DICOM standard achieved harmonization as ISO 12052 in 2006, adopting the full specification including workflow and data management to promote global interoperability in . Maintenance remains under the ongoing responsibility of the NEMA DICOM Standards Committee, which issues annual editions and supplements through a continuous development process.

Core Technical Framework

Information Object Definitions

In the DICOM standard, an Information Object Definition (IOD) provides an abstract specification of the structure and semantics of a set of attributes that collectively describe a real-world relevant to and related workflows, such as a , , or . These IODs form the foundation of the DICOM , enabling the consistent representation and exchange of medical data across systems by defining what information must or may be included for each . DICOM distinguishes between two types of IODs: composite and normalized. A composite IOD includes attributes drawn from one or more related Service-Object Pair (SOP) Instances, representing a complete set of information about interconnected real-world objects, such as a full imaging study that links patient details with multiple images. In contrast, a normalized IOD contains only attributes inherent to a single SOP Instance, focusing on a discrete entity without referencing external related objects, such as a standalone key object selection. This distinction supports different use cases, with composite IODs typically used for storage and retrieval of persistent data, while normalized IODs facilitate query and management operations on individual entities. The structure of an IOD is organized hierarchically through modules and attributes, mirroring the DICOM information model that progresses from the patient level to study, series, and instance. At the highest level, the entity encompasses attributes like patient identification and demographics; a groups related examinations under that patient; a Series organizes images or reports from a specific procedure within the study; and an Instance represents the atomic unit, such as a single image or report document. Modules are logical groupings of related attributes within an IOD—for instance, the includes mandatory attributes like Patient Name and Patient ID—allowing for modular extension and reuse across different IODs while ensuring semantic consistency. Attributes are the basic building blocks, each defined with a tag, value representation, and multiplicity to specify their role in describing entity properties. SOP Classes extend IODs by pairing them with specific operations from DICOM service classes, creating Service-Object Pairs that define the allowable actions on an object, such as storing or querying. For example, the CT Image Storage SOP Class combines the CT Image IOD with the Storage Service Class to enable the transfer and persistence of computed images. This pairing ensures that implementations negotiate supported SOP Classes during , guaranteeing for targeted workflows. Representative examples illustrate the application of IODs. The Image IOD, a composite type, structures data through modules like the Image Pixel Module, which defines attributes for samples per pixel, photometric interpretation, and rows/columns, alongside the General Image Module for instance numbering and orientation. This allows representation of entities like or MRI images as self-contained instances within a series. In comparison, the Structured Report (SR) IOD, also composite, organizes text and measurements hierarchically using a content tree with modules such as the SR Document General Module and Content Sequence, where value types like TEXT for narrative descriptions and CODE for quantitative measurements (e.g., size) are employed to encode clinical findings without data. These examples highlight how IODs adapt to diverse data types while maintaining the hierarchical model for comprehensive entity description.

Value Representations and Data Types

In DICOM, the (VR) defines the and format for the field of each within a . Each consists of four components: a (a unique identifier formed by a 16-bit Group Number followed by a 16-bit Number), the VR (two single-byte characters in explicit VR encoding, or implicit based on the Tag), a field (specifying the byte length of the , encoded as 16-bit or 32-bit unsigned depending on the VR and encoding type), and the field itself (an even number of bytes, padded as necessary to achieve even length). The VR ensures consistent interpretation of attribute values across systems, supporting the modular structure of Information Object Definitions (IODs) where attributes are grouped into modules. DICOM employs specific encoding rules to maintain interoperability, particularly for length, padding, and character sets. Data Elements may have fixed or variable lengths depending on the VR: fixed-length VRs (e.g., US, SS, FL, FD) require exact byte counts without padding beyond the specified size, while variable-length VRs (e.g., AE, CS, LO) allow up to a maximum byte count and are padded only if needed for even length. Padding uses the SPACE character (20H, or 02/00 in ISO 646) for most character string VRs, a single NULL byte (00H) for UI and OB VRs, and is prohibited for certain binary VRs like OW unless specified by the Transfer Syntax. Character sets follow ISO/IEC 2022 standards, with the default being ISO-IR 6 (ISO 646 Basic G0 Set); extended sets (e.g., ISO/IEC 8859, UTF-8, GB 18030) are invoked via the Specific Character Set attribute (0008,0005) for applicable VRs like SH, LO, PN, ST, LT, UC, UT, enabling multi-byte support while preserving backward compatibility. Multi-valued strings use the backslash (, 05/12) as a delimiter, and control characters like CR (00/13) and LF (00/10) represent line breaks in text VRs. DICOM defines 34 primary Value Representations, categorized into strings, numerics, binary data, and composites, each with precise rules for format, multiplicity (single or multiple values), and maximum length. The following table summarizes these VRs, their descriptions, and key constraints:
VRNameDescriptionMax LengthPadding/Notes
AEApplication EntityTitle of an application entity; no leading/trailing spaces significant16 bytesSPACE; even length
ASAge StringAge in format nnnD/W/M/Y (e.g., 018M for 18 months)4 bytes fixedSPACE; fixed length
ATAttribute TagTag value as two 16-bit unsigned integers (e.g., (0018,00FF))4 bytes fixedNo padding; fixed length
CSCode StringCoded term from controlled terminology; leading spaces insignificant16 bytesSPACE; even length
DADateDate in YYYYMMDD format (e.g., 19930822)8 bytes fixedSPACE; fixed length
DSDecimal StringDecimal number as string; fixed- or floating-point16 bytesSPACE; even length
DTDate TimeDate/time in YYYYMMDDHHMMSS.FFFFFF&ZZXX format26 bytesSPACE; even length
FLFloating Point SingleIEEE 754 single-precision floating point4 bytes fixedNo padding; fixed length
FDFloating Point DoubleIEEE 754 double-precision floating point8 bytes fixedNo padding; fixed length
ISInteger StringInteger as string12 bytesSPACE; even length
LOLong StringLong string of characters64 bytesSPACE; even length
LTLong TextLong unstructured text10240 bytesSPACE; even length
OBOther Byte StringOctet-stream (e.g., pixel data); length per Transfer SyntaxUndefined/2^32-1NULL (00H); even length
ODOther DoubleStream of IEEE 754 double-precision values2^32-8 bytesNo padding; even length
OFOther FloatStream of IEEE 754 single-precision values2^32-4 bytesNo padding; even length
OLOther LongStream of 32-bit wordsUndefinedNo padding; even length
OVOther 64-bit Very LongStream of 64-bit wordsUndefinedNo padding; even length
OWOther Word StringStream of 16-bit words (e.g., audio data)UndefinedNo padding; even length
PNPerson NameStructured name with up to 5 components (e.g., family^given)64 bytes/componentSPACE; even length
SHShort StringShort string of characters16 bytesSPACE; even length
SLSigned Long32-bit signed integer4 bytes fixedNo padding; fixed length, little-endian
SQSequence of ItemsNested sequence of Data Elements; delimited if undefined lengthUndefinedNo padding; uses SQ Delimitation Item
SSSigned Short16-bit signed integer2 bytes fixedNo padding; fixed length, little-endian
STShort TextShort unstructured text1024 bytesSPACE; even length
SVSigned 64-bit Very Long64-bit signed integer8 bytes fixedNo padding; fixed length, little-endian
TMTimeTime in HHMMSS.FFFFFF format (e.g., 070907.0705)14 bytesSPACE; even length
UCUnlimited CharactersUnlimited-length character string2^32-2 bytesSPACE; even length
UIUnique IdentifierGlobally unique ID as dotted numeric string (e.g., 1.2.840.10008.1.2)64 bytesNULL (00H); even length
ULUnsigned Long32-bit unsigned integer4 bytes fixedNo padding; fixed length, little-endian
UNUnknownUnspecified octet-stream; used for unknown VR or long valuesUndefinedNo padding; even length
URUniversal Resource IdentifierURI or URL string2^32-2 bytesSPACE; even length
USUnsigned Short16-bit unsigned integer2 bytes fixedNo padding; fixed length, little-endian
UTUnlimited TextUnlimited-length text2^32-2 bytesSPACE; even length
UVUnsigned 64-bit Very Long64-bit unsigned integer8 bytes fixedNo padding; fixed length, little-endian
Note: Binary VRs (e.g., OB, OW, OF, OD) use little-endian byte order by default, while sequences () allow nested Data Sets. Representative examples illustrate VR application: the (UI) VR ensures global referencing for objects like SOP Instances, formatted as a string of numeric components separated by periods (e.g., 1.2.840.10008.5.1.4.1.1.2 for a Image), padded with a trailing if odd-length to maintain even bytes. data, typically encoded as Other Byte String (OB) or Other Word String (OW), represents uncompressed or compressed image samples as an octet-stream, with length determined by the Transfer Syntax and padded with bytes; for instance, 8-bit pixels use OB for direct byte storage. These VRs facilitate precise handling in clinical imaging workflows.

Communication and Services

Network Protocol and Transport

The DICOM network protocol operates as an upper-layer protocol over , providing the foundation for reliable, connection-oriented communication between DICOM Application Entities (AEs). It leverages the for end-to-end data delivery, ensuring ordered and error-checked transmission of DICOM messages, while the handles addressing and routing. This stack supports both IPv4 and , aligning with established standards for interoperability in networks. At the application layer, DICOM employs the DICOM Message Service Element (DIMSE) to manage the exchange of commands and data, layered atop the Association Control Service Element (ACSE) from the . The ACSE facilitates the establishment, maintenance, and release of associations between AEs, using protocol data units (PDUs) such as A-ASSOCIATE-RQ for initiation and P-DATA-TF for data transfer. DIMSE, in turn, defines the structure and encoding of DICOM-specific messages, enabling operations like store or query over these associations. This layered approach ensures that DICOM communications adhere to a subset of OSI presentation and session services while simplifying implementation over TCP/IP. Association negotiation begins with the A-ASSOCIATE service, where the requesting (typically the Service Class User) initiates a connection by sending an A-ASSOCIATE-RQ PDU to the accepting (Service Class Provider). This PDU includes critical parameters such as Application Entity Titles (AETs) for identification, the Application Context (e.g., DICOM Application Context 1.2.840.10008.1.1), and one or more Presentation Contexts. Each Presentation Context proposes an Abstract Syntax—defined by a Service-Object Pair () Class specifying the service and object type—and a list of supported Syntaxes, which dictate the encoding rules for data (e.g., Little Endian Explicit VR for uncompressed images). The accepting responds with an A-ASSOCIATE-AC PDU, accepting or rejecting contexts and selecting a Syntax per context, ensuring mutual agreement on data handling before any DIMSE operations proceed. DICOM communications typically use port 104 as the well-known port for unsecure connections, assigned by IANA for DICOM Upper Layer entities when privileged access is available; alternatively, port 11112 serves as a registered fallback for non-privileged environments. For secure transmission, DICOM supports (TLS) via profiles defined in PS3.15, such as the BCP 195 TLS Profile, which mandates TLS 1.2 or higher with strong cipher suites to protect against and tampering. Implementations using TLS are recommended to employ port 2762, the IANA-registered port for DICOM-TLS, facilitating encrypted associations without altering the upper-layer . Conformance to the DICOM protocol is ensured through of implementation-specific details during setup, including the Implementation Class —a globally (per PS3.7) that declares the vendor and version of the implementation—and supported Classes via Abstract Syntax in Presentation Contexts. The Implementation Class appears in the A-ASSOCIATE-RQ to allow the acceptor to compatibility, while Class confirms shared support for specific services (e.g., Class 1.2.840.10008.1.1). These elements, detailed in conformance statements per PS3.2, prevent mismatches and promote by mandating disclosure of capabilities upfront.

Core Service Classes

The core service classes in DICOM provide the foundational operations for handling data, enabling basic interactions such as , retrieval, commitment to , and between application entities (). These classes define standardized Service-Object Pair () combinations that support across devices like modalities, archives, and workstations, using DIMSE (DICOM Message Service Element) operations over the network protocol. The Storage Service Class facilitates the transfer of Composite Instances, such as images, waveforms, or reports, from a Service Class User (SCU) to a Service Class Provider () for persistent . It employs the C-STORE DIMSE-C operation, where the SCU initiates the transfer by sending the instance data, and the responds with a success or failure status, ensuring the data is stored in a compatible format adhering to the Patient, , and Series Information Object Definitions (IODs). Successful implies the will maintain the instance for an implementation-specific duration and provide some retrieval method, though details like access protocols are outlined in the 's Conformance Statement. This class supports a wide range of Classes, including those for various modalities, and allows for partial in cases like JPIP-referenced data. The Query/Retrieve Service Class enables the search and transfer of stored Composite SOP Instances using hierarchical query models based on key attributes. It supports three primary DIMSE-C operations: C-FIND for querying matches against an Identifier containing keys like Patient ID (a Unique Key for entity identification), which returns pending responses for each match and a final status; C-MOVE for retrieving instances by initiating sub-operations on another Association to move data to a specified AE; and C-GET, which performs retrieval on the same Association by reversing SCU/SCP roles. Standard query models include Patient Root (querying from patient level downward), Study Root (starting at study level), and others like Image Set, with keys classified as Unique (U), Required (R), or Optional (O) to define matching behavior. Conformance levels allow negotiation of baseline or extended functionality, supporting views such as Classic single-frame or Enhanced multi-frame conversions for compatibility. The Storage Commitment Service Class provides a mechanism for an SCU to request and receive confirmation from an that transferred Instances have been committed to long-term storage and are retrievable. It operates via the N-ACTION DIMSE-N in a Model, where the SCU sends a request referencing one or more Instance s (previously transferred, e.g., via the Storage Class), and the responds with a notification indicating success, failure, or warning status for each referenced instance, including details like storage duration. Unlike basic storage, this class ensures the retains full pixel data (not just references) for an implementation-defined period, such as permanent archiving, with the Class 1.2.840.10008.1.20.1. The complements image transfer by reducing the risk of data loss after sending. The Print Management Service Class standardizes the creation and management of print jobs for medical images and related data on hardcopy output devices. It includes two Meta SOP Classes: Basic Print Management (for monochrome images) and Basic Color Print Management (for color images), each encompassing multiple Classes for film sessions, image boxes, and printer management. Key operations involve N-CREATE to establish film sessions or boxes (defining layout attributes like number of images or annotations) and N-SET to modify them, allowing the SCU to specify transformations such as or spatial adjustments for output. The SCP handles rendering to or paper, supporting standardized layouts while excluding flexible page description languages like , which fall outside DICOM's scope. Conformance requires support for these basic Meta SOP Classes to ensure consistent hardcopy output across systems.

Workflow and Management Services

The and Services in DICOM provide mechanisms for coordinating clinical imaging procedures, ensuring accurate data integration, and tracking resource utilization across healthcare systems. These services facilitate dynamic interactions between modalities, information systems, and archives, reducing manual errors and enhancing in workflows. Unlike static data exchange protocols, they emphasize real-time updates and notifications to support procedure scheduling, execution, and post-processing stages. The (MWL) service enables imaging modalities to query a central , such as a Information System (RIS), for scheduled procedure details, thereby automating patient demographics and study parameters to prevent entry errors. Using the Basic Worklist Management Service Class with C-FIND operations, a modality retrieves worklist items linked to Scheduled Procedure Steps, Requested Procedures, and entities, ensuring that captured images are correctly associated with clinical records from the outset. This SOP Class, identified by 1.2.840.10008.5.1.4.31, supports two organizational approaches: modality-initiated queries or system-managed lists, and mandates attributes like ID and for DICOM object creation. Complementing MWL, the service allows modalities to report the status and outcomes of executed procedures back to the RIS or (PACS), updating workflow states such as "in progress," "completed," or "discontinued." Defined as an Information Object Definition (IOD) in DICOM Part 3, the MPPS IOD includes modules for general procedure details, image acquisition results, billing, and material management, capturing data like procedure duration, dose, and contrast usage without encompassing image storage itself. Modalities notify via N-CREATE and N-SET DIMSE services, linking the performed step to the original scheduled procedure for seamless integration into enterprise systems and supporting accurate resource tracking. Instance Availability Notification (IAN) extends workflow management by allowing a DICOM Application Entity (AE) to inform another AE about the readiness of SOP Instances for retrieval, aiding in timely access during clinical processes. Operating within its dedicated Class, the IAN uses N-NOTIFY operations where the Service Class User (SCU) specifies notification triggers, such as instance completion or retrieve latency, while the Service Class Provider (SCP) processes these for automation, like updating worklists or initiating further . This does not guarantee data completeness but focuses on status, often integrating with storage services to signal when instances from prior steps are queryable. Key attributes in the Module describe instance relationships and access parameters, as outlined in DICOM Part 4. A recent enhancement to these services is the IOD introduced via Supplement 223, finalized in the 2022c edition and incorporated into the current standard, which standardizes the creation and exchange of comprehensive inventories for PACS repositories to track DICOM content at scale. This composite IOD, comprising modules like (C.38.1), General Equipment (C.7.5.1), and SOP Common (C.12.1), encodes hierarchical attributes from entities such as Studies, Series, and Instances, enabling efficient querying, migration, and auditing of archive holdings without full data transfer. Supporting SOP Classes for Inventory creation and transfer, it addresses enterprise-level management needs, such as verifying during consolidations, and promotes in large-scale imaging ecosystems.

Data Format and Storage

File Structure and Encoding

DICOM files encapsulate a dataset representing a Service-Object Pair (SOP) Instance related to a DICOM Information Object Definition (IOD), enabling offline and interchange of data. The file structure begins with a 128-byte , which is typically filled with zeros (00H) if unused, followed by a 4-byte containing the characters "DICM" in uppercase ISO 8859 G0 encoding to identify the file as DICOM-compliant. Immediately after the prefix comes the File Meta Information Header, a in group 0002 that includes mandatory elements such as the File Meta Information Group Length (0002,0000), File-set ID (0002,0012), File-set Creator (0002,0014), and Transfer Syntax (0002,0010), all encoded using the Explicit VR Little Endian Transfer Syntax ( 1.2.840.10008.1.2.1). This header precedes the main , which contains the actual SOP Instance data encoded according to the specified Transfer Syntax . The main dataset consists of data elements ordered by their tags (group and element numbers), with encoding determined by the Transfer Syntax. Datasets use either Explicit VR, where each data element includes a 2-byte Value Representation (VR) field specifying the data type (e.g., AE for Application Entity, PN for Person Name), or Implicit VR, where the VR is inferred from the tag per the DICOM standard without an explicit field; these modes cannot coexist within a dataset. Byte order is typically Little Endian for both the header and dataset, though Big Endian is supported for legacy compatibility in certain transfer syntaxes. Transfer syntaxes dictate the precise encoding, including pixel data compression and encapsulation. For uncompressed , common syntaxes include Explicit VR Little Endian (1.2.840.10008.1.2.1) and Implicit VR Little Endian (1.2.840.10008.1.2); compressed formats encapsulate in items, such as JPEG Lossy Process 1 (1.2.840.10008.1.2.4.50) or Lossless (1.2.840.10008.1.2.4.90), allowing efficient storage while preserving interoperability. The Transfer Syntax in the meta header ensures the reader decodes the dataset correctly, supporting encapsulation of as sequences of items for compressed or multi-frame images. DICOM files commonly use the ".dcm" extension for identification on storage , as recommended in the standard and associated RFC 3240 for extracted files. A complete study or series is typically organized as a multi-file set within a file-set structure, where each holds one SOP Instance (e.g., one image), and a mandatory DICOMDIR serves as the referencing all files by their File IDs and providing hierarchical navigation via the DICOM Application Context. This file-set approach, identified by a unique File-set , facilitates interchange without requiring network access.

Media Interchange and Transfer Syntaxes

DICOM's Media Storage Classes enable the storage and interchange of data on physical media such as and USB drives, utilizing the Media Storage Service Class to identify supported Composite and Normalized Information Object Definitions (IODs). These classes include all IODs defined for the DIMSE C-STORE Storage Service Class and the Non-Patient Object Storage Service Class, along with the Media Storage Directory Class (UID: 1.2.840.10008.1.3.10), which employs the Basic Directory IOD to organize file sets. In this framework, applications act as File-set Readers () to read files from the media or File-set Updaters (FSU) to modify them, ensuring standardized access without requiring network connectivity. Media Storage Application Profiles specify subsets of the DICOM standard tailored for offline interchange, defining supported SOP Classes, media formats, transfer syntaxes, and security options to promote interoperability across devices. These profiles outline rules for physical media like , including file system mappings (e.g., ) and constraints such as maximum file sizes, with the General Purpose profile serving as a baseline for broad image and directory storage without modality-specific restrictions. For instance, implementations must parse the DICOMDIR file to locate and read SOP Instances, while FSU roles allow additions or deletions with corresponding directory updates, adhering to profile-defined optionalities. Transfer syntaxes in DICOM media storage dictate how sets are encoded for interchange, with the Implicit VR Little Endian (UID: 1.2.840.10008.1.2) serving as the default uncompressed format required for all conformant systems unless pixel exceeds practical limits. Compressed syntaxes support lossless methods (e.g., Lossless) when uncompressed is too large, preserving full fidelity, while lossy options (e.g., Baseline) are allowed only if source is already lossy-compressed, with applications negotiating via presentation contexts. Multi-frame images, common in modalities like , are accommodated through these syntaxes, enabling efficient storage of sequences on media without altering the underlying IOD structure. To maintain with existing systems, DICOM incorporates in media formats, allowing legacy files—such as those in older ACR-NEMA structures or proprietary conversions—to be read as valid DICOM instances via dual-personality encodings like DICOM-TIFF hybrids. Profiles ensure that new media, such as DVD extensions, align with prior standards by retaining core directory and file-set mechanisms, preventing obsolescence of archived data. This approach facilitates migration of legacy archives into modern DICOM workflows without data loss.

Applications and Implementation

Imaging Modalities and Equipment

DICOM supports a wide range of modalities, each defined by specific Object Definitions (IODs) that standardize the and of images generated by corresponding . These IODs ensure by specifying attributes such as pixel data, patient information, and acquisition parameters tailored to the modality's characteristics. For computed tomography (CT), the CT Image IOD captures cross-sectional images from X-ray transmission data, including details like slice thickness and reconstruction algorithms, enabling storage and transmission from CT scanners. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) utilizes the MR Image IOD to represent multi-planar images based on responses, incorporating attributes for echo time and repetition time to support analysis in MRI systems. X-ray imaging employs the Digital X-Ray Image IOD for radiographic projections, accommodating both grayscale and enhanced images from equipment. Ultrasound devices rely on the Image IOD and Ultrasound Multi-frame Image IOD to store single-frame or cine-loop data, including Doppler information and probe parameters for real-time visualization. Mammography systems use the Digital X-Ray Image IOD to handle high-resolution breast images, with attributes for compression and detector specifics to facilitate screening workflows. (PET) leverages the Positron Emission Tomography Image IOD for functional images depicting radiotracer uptake, supporting attenuation correction and multi-frame datasets from PET scanners. Beyond modalities, DICOM encompasses various equipment types essential for image handling. Acquisition devices, such as and probes, generate and initially encode images according to modality-specific IODs before transmission. Workstations serve as viewing and processing nodes, supporting query/retrieve services to display and manipulate DICOM objects for diagnostic . Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) act as centralized archives, storing vast collections of DICOM files using storage commitment protocols to ensure and long-term retrieval. Printers integrate via print management services, converting DICOM images to hardcopy outputs with standardized formatting for film or . To ensure compatibility, vendors must produce DICOM Conformance Statements detailing supported IODs, service classes, and transfer syntaxes for their equipment, allowing users to verify before integration. These statements specify mandatory and optional features, such as protocols and profiles, as required by the DICOM standard. DICOM extends to specialized applications, including integration with robotic surgery systems that export intraoperative images using enhanced IODs for real-time guidance, and endoscopy equipment that stores video frames as multi-frame Video Endoscopic Image IODs for procedural documentation.

Clinical Fields and Integration

DICOM plays a pivotal role in , where it standardizes the transmission, storage, and display of medical images from modalities such as , computed tomography (), magnetic resonance imaging (), and , enabling seamless integration across diagnostic workflows. This foundational application supports the management of vast imaging datasets in picture archiving and communication systems (PACS), facilitating efficient retrieval and analysis for clinical decision-making. In , DICOM accommodates specialized data like waveforms through the Basic Cardiac Electrophysiology Waveform Information Object Definition (IOD), which captures digitized electrical signals from the during procedures such as studies. Additionally, Supplement 72 of the DICOM standard introduces structured reporting for procedures, allowing the transfer of measurement data, images, and textual descriptions to enhance diagnostic accuracy in assessing cardiac function. This supports the exchange of hemodynamic and data, promoting interoperability in PACS environments. For , particularly in , DICOM-RT extensions enable treatment planning by defining RT Structure Sets for tumor and organ delineations, RT Plans for beam geometries and dose distributions, and integration with images for . These objects allow treatment planning systems to calculate and store radiation dose details, ensuring precise delivery while minimizing exposure to healthy tissues. In , DICOM supports whole slide (WSI) for digital slides, with 2025 advancements including native DICOM output in scanners like the Philips Pathology Scanner SGi, which uses for high-resolution images to streamline workflows. The 2025 DICOM Connectathon demonstrated for WSI, enabling seamless AI-driven analysis. As of 2025, certain WSI systems using DICOM have been FDA-cleared for primary , with comparable to . DICOM integrates with electronic health records (EHRs) through HL7/FHIR gateways, where pipelines transform imaging metadata into FHIR resources, such as converting DICOM Structured Reporting (SR) to FHIR Observations for unified access. Tools like DICOM Gear further enable this by DICOM elements to HL7 messages, reducing manual entry and supporting bidirectional in clinical systems. For applications, the Segmentation IOD (DICOM SEG) stores results from automated segmentation algorithms, representing pixel classifications in referenced images to aid in tumor delineation or organ-at-risk identification. frameworks generate these SEG objects for into workflows, enhancing precision in analysis without proprietary formats. In workflows, DICOM facilitates the end-to-end process from image acquisition—where modalities capture and transmit studies via DICOM networks—to storage in PACS, remote interpretation, and structured reporting using DICOM SR for measurements and findings. This enables radiologists to prioritize cases, annotate images, and generate reports compliant with standards like the IHE Technical Framework, minimizing delays in off-site diagnostics. Secure transmission protocols ensure compliance during transfer, supporting 24/7 coverage in distributed healthcare settings. Case studies highlight DICOM's utility in global health initiatives for . The (IAEA) has promoted DICOM-based digital imaging in resource-limited settings, including post-disaster scenarios in developing regions, to standardize practices and enable across aid networks. For example, using PACS and DICOM has supported on-site image acquisition and remote reporting during such as hurricanes and earthquakes, improving outcomes in mass casualty incidents.

Derivations and Adaptations

DICONDE, or and Communications in , represents a key adaptation of the DICOM standard tailored for industrial applications beyond . Developed by and first published as standard E2339 in 2004, DICONDE extends DICOM's framework to handle image and signal data from (NDT) methods, such as ultrasonic, radiographic, and inspections. This adaptation maintains DICOM's core elements like information object definitions (IODs) and service-object pair () classes while introducing specialized modules for NDT-specific attributes, enabling vendor-neutral data exchange in sectors like and where structural integrity assessments are critical. For instance, DICONDE supports the storage and communication of radiographic images from industrial systems, facilitating standardized archiving and analysis in processes. Another derivation is DICOS, or Digital Imaging and Communications in Security, established in 2009 as an extension of DICOM for non-medical in security contexts. Managed by the (NEMA), DICOS adapts DICOM's protocols to manage and exchange digital images from security screening devices, such as those used in or cargo inspection. It includes specific SOP classes like DICOS Digital X-Ray Image Storage for Presentation and Processing, allowing seamless integration with DICOM-compliant systems while addressing -specific requirements like threat detection reports. Although primarily for security applications, DICOS principles have influenced specialized implementations in fields requiring high-resolution , though direct ties to ophthalmic devices are not established in core documentation. In the medical domain, adaptations for leverage DICOM's extensibility through dedicated working groups and supplements, focusing on devices like (OCT) scanners and fundus cameras. DICOM Working Group 09 (WG-09), active since the early 2000s, has developed targeted IODs and classes, such as those in Supplement 91 (2004) for Ophthalmic Photography 8-bit and 16-bit Image , which accommodate and slit-lamp imaging. Further, Supplement 110 (2007) introduced the Ophthalmic Tomography Image Class to support OCT volumetric , enabling standardized server-based and retrieval for these devices in clinical workflows. These adaptations ensure for ophthalmic servers, allowing of multi-modal from various vendors without proprietary formats. DICOMweb, introduced around 2011 and formalized in subsequent supplements like 161, 162, and 163 (2011) for core RESTful services, provides a modern RESTful adaptation of DICOM for web-based interactions. It enables HTTP-based services such as Query/Retrieve (Q/R) via WADO-RS and storage via STOW-RS, using JSON and XML projections of DICOM metadata to facilitate API integrations in cloud environments. This derivation supports lightweight access to DICOM objects without full DICOM network protocols, promoting broader adoption in web-enabled applications. These derivations extend DICOM's utility to diverse fields, including where Working Group 25 (WG-25) modifies attributes for animal patient identification and species-specific imaging, such as in equine or companion animal . In , DICONDE standardizes NDT data for inspections, while employs it for automated defect detection in lines. Overall, such adaptations preserve DICOM's foundational structure for interoperability while addressing domain-specific needs.

Interoperability with Other Standards

DICOM facilitates with complementary healthcare standards by serving as a foundational for within broader frameworks. The Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) initiative leverages DICOM in various to address clinical workflows, particularly for cross-enterprise . For instance, the Cross-Enterprise for Imaging (XDS-I.b) enables the registration, , and of clinical documents, including DICOM images and diagnostic reports, across health enterprises by using DICOM Object Selection documents as manifests to studies. This supports scenarios such as sharing images in regional cardiac networks, where DICOM objects are stored in repositories and metadata is registered in a central registry for retrieval. DICOM also interfaces with Health Level Seven (HL7) standards to exchange orders, results, and administrative data between imaging and information systems. HL7 Version 2 messages, such as ADT for admissions and for orders, are commonly mapped to DICOM Worklist attributes to automate scheduling and identification in workflows. For results, DICOM Structured Reporting (SR) documents can be transformed into HL7 (CDA) reports, allowing imaging observations to be incorporated into electronic health records (EHRs). This bidirectional mapping ensures that information systems (RIS) and hospital information systems (HIS) communicate seamlessly, reducing manual data entry and errors. As a core component of informatics efforts, DICOM serves as the base standard within the (ISO) Technical Committee 215 (TC 215) for biomedical imaging and communication. ISO TC 215 maintains a Type A liaison with the DICOM Committee, adopting DICOM (as ISO 12052) for standards related to the capture, interchange, and use of health-related imaging data. Similarly, DICOM integrates with the ISO/IEEE 11073 series for communication, particularly in point-of-care environments where imaging devices require with personal health devices and aggregators. The IEEE 11073 Service-oriented Device Connectivity (SDC) standard complements DICOM by enabling dynamic discovery and control of networked devices, with mappings that align device data models for combined use in clinical settings. Recent advancements emphasize DICOM's role in web-based standards through mappings to HL7 (FHIR). The HL7 DICOM SR to FHIR Resource Mapping Implementation Guide defines how measurements and qualitative evaluations from DICOM Structured Reports are conveyed using FHIR and DiagnosticReport resources, facilitating the inclusion of imaging results in FHIR-based EHRs and AI applications. This mapping uses standardized vocabularies like and LOINC to ensure , independent of specific transport mechanisms. The DICOM Working Group 20 (WG-20) actively develops these linkages, including profiles for ImagingStudy and ImagingSelection resources, to support integration with FHIR for modern healthcare ecosystems. DICOM's development involves collaboration with key standards development organizations (SDOs). The (NEMA) administers the DICOM Standards Committee, ensuring industry alignment. The American College of Radiology (ACR) contributes through initiatives like the (BI-RADS), whose terminology is embedded in DICOM SR templates for standardized reporting. In Europe, the (CEN) normatively references DICOM as EN 12052, harmonizing it with regional standards. Within DICOM, interoperability extends to compression standards like for efficient image encoding. DICOM supports Baseline and Extended processes via transfer syntaxes that encapsulate compressed pixel data while preserving diagnostic integrity, as defined in Part 5 of the standard. This allows DICOM images to be stored and transmitted compatibly with web and archival systems using as a content type. A notable challenge in DICOM interoperability arises from mapping Unique Identifiers (UIDs) to identifiers in other standards, such as HL7 or FHIR. DICOM UIDs, which uniquely identify studies, series, and instances, often require transformation to align with FHIR's URLs or HL7 message IDs, leading to compatibility issues in implementation guides where DICOM's UID registry lacks direct FHIR references. This mapping complexity can complicate data across systems, necessitating careful and reconciliation to maintain without introducing duplicates or privacy risks.

Security and Privacy

Security Profiles and Mechanisms

DICOM incorporates security profiles and mechanisms primarily defined in Part 15 of the standard, which specify technological approaches to implement security policies such as , data , and across network communications and media storage. These profiles enable Application Entities () to negotiate and enforce security during interactions, assuming a trusted local environment and appropriate user identification. The Integrated Secure Communication Layer (ISCL) profile provides secure transport connections using (TLS), ensuring entity authentication, , and data integrity for communications between . ISCL requires a system, such as smartcards or certificates, to handle authentication and , with TLS protocols negotiating suites like for during establishment. Complementing this, User Identity Negotiation profiles— including Basic User Identity, User Identity with Passcode, Server, and SAML Assertion—support by authenticating users at the level, allowing to verify identities and apply role-based permissions before granting access to services. These profiles operate within the DICOM negotiation phase, where exchange parameters to establish protected sessions. For auditing and accountability, the Message Format Profile defines a standardized XML-based for logging security-relevant events, such as user authentications, data accesses, and modifications, aligned with 3881. This profile captures essential attributes like Event Identification, Active Participants (e.g., user IDs and roles), and Participant Object details (e.g., Class UIDs for accessed instances), enabling systems to generate audit messages for storage in logs or transmission via protocols like . Implementations claiming conformance must include a minimum set of these attributes to support forensic analysis and compliance reporting. Encryption mechanisms address both in-transit and at-rest protection. In-transit relies on TLS within ISCL or alternative tunnels, with certificate-based using standards to verify AE identities via (PKI). For at-rest data, Media Storage Security Profiles, such as the Basic DICOM Media Security Profile, apply file-level to DICOM datasets on storage media, encapsulating files with cryptographic headers and supporting algorithms like for confidentiality. These features collectively align with regulatory requirements, including HIPAA in the United States and GDPR in Europe, by facilitating safeguards through , access controls, and audit logging.

De-identification Processes

De-identification in DICOM involves the systematic removal or alteration of personally identifiable information (PII) from sets to protect patient privacy while preserving the utility of the data for secondary purposes. This process is governed by the DICOM Standard's Attribute Confidentiality Profiles, outlined in Part 15 (PS3.15), which define an Application Level Profile to support the of sets and prevent leakage of individually identifiable information. The Information Object Definition (IOD) facilitates this by specifying how attributes are handled during the transformation from an original set to a de-identified version, using a de-identifier application entity that applies predefined rules to attributes. The Basic Application Level Confidentiality Profile provides the foundational method for de-identification, requiring the removal or replacement of identifiable attributes as specified in Table E.1-1a of PS3.15. For instance, attributes such as Patient Name (0010,0010) and Patient ID (0010,0020) are typically removed entirely using the "X" (remove) action code to eliminate direct identifiers. Dates like Study Date (0008,0020) may be retained but anonymized through shifting or replacement to preserve longitudinal temporal relationships without revealing specific timelines, as detailed in the Retain Longitudinal Temporal Information Modified Option. The Clean Graphics Option extends the Basic Profile by addressing potential identifiers embedded in image pixel data, such as graphic annotations or overlays that might contain text like patient names; it requires removing these elements to ensure no identifying information remains in the visual content. DICOM PS3.15 guidelines outline a set of action codes for attribute handling, including "D" for replacement with a non-zero length dummy value, "Z" for replacement with a specified cleaning descriptor, "U" for replacement with a , and "C" for cleaning (replacing with context-group values). Unique Identifiers (UIDs), such as Study Instance UID (0020,000D), are replaced with newly generated values to break links to original data while maintaining within the de-identified set, per the Retain UIDs Option. Tools implementing these rules, such as de-identifier software, must also handle private tags—vendor-specific attributes that may contain hidden PII—by either removing unsafe ones or retaining those deemed safe from identity leakage, as specified in the Safe Private Option. Challenges in DICOM de-identification include minimizing re-identification risk, which can arise from residual non-required attributes (e.g., device models or referring names) or unique clinical features in images that indirectly identify patients, even after header cleaning. Embedded PII in pixel data, such as text overlays in or screen captures, poses additional risks, often requiring manual intervention like obscuring or image deletion since automated tools may overlook nonstandard elements. Ensuring compliance with regulations like HIPAA or GDPR further complicates the process, as variability in tag modification (e.g., altering thousands of tags in some pipelines) must balance privacy with data utility. In applications, enables the creation of research datasets by transforming clinical DICOM files into anonymized collections suitable for sharing across institutions, supporting studies in and other fields. For AI training, it is critical for building large-scale imaging repositories, such as those used in models for cancer detection or skin disease classification, where privacy-protected data maintains and enhances model generalizability without risking patient exposure.

Challenges and Future Directions

Limitations and Disadvantages

The DICOM standard's complexity arises from its comprehensive structure, divided into 18 parts, encompassing specifications for information objects, service classes, protocols, and conformance requirements, which demands significant expertise to implement fully. This intricate design, including numerous modules and configurable options to accommodate diverse clinical contexts, results in a steep for developers and users, often requiring specialized to navigate effectively. Furthermore, the standard's evolution through frequent supplements and correction proposals—over 200 supplements issued since its inception—adds to the challenge, as ongoing updates can introduce new attributes and extensions that complicate maintenance and adoption. Backward compatibility, while a core principle of DICOM to ensure longevity, presents practical issues for legacy systems integrating new features, such as advanced compression algorithms like or HEVC. Older equipment, common in many healthcare settings, may lack support for these enhancements, leading to failures, data transfer errors, or the need for costly to bridge gaps between outdated and modern implementations. Vendor-specific interpretations of the standard exacerbate this, as conformance statements alone cannot guarantee seamless operation across devices from different manufacturers. Performance limitations in DICOM stem from the overhead associated with its network protocol, particularly the association phase, where application entities exchange detailed parameters for SOP classes, transfer syntaxes, and extended negotiations before data transfer can begin. This process, essential for establishing secure and tailored connections, introduces latency that hinders real-time applications like or intraoperative , making DICOM more suited to store-and-forward workflows than low-latency scenarios. Comparative studies show that traditional DICOM C-STORE operations can take up to 50 times as long as HTTP-based alternatives for metadata-heavy transfers, underscoring the protocol's efficiency trade-offs in bandwidth-constrained environments. Despite its standardization intent to promote , DICOM implementations carry risks of through proprietary extensions or preferences in archive systems, where equipment from one manufacturer may not fully integrate with others without additional customization. This can trap healthcare providers in ecosystems tied to specific vendors, increasing long-term costs for upgrades or migrations, even as vendor-neutral archives aim to mitigate such dependencies. Additionally, DICOM files often include extensive embedded , such as demographics, acquisition parameters, and attributes, which contributes to overall file size beyond the pixel data alone. For high-resolution modalities like or whole-slide imaging, this metadata overhead compounds storage and transmission burdens, with studies exceeding 500 MB per series requiring strategies to manage efficiently, though lossless options preserve the bloat while reducing pixel data.

Ongoing Developments and Updates

Recent advancements in the DICOM standard, including those in the 2025 editions, feature new Information Object Definitions (IODs) and templates tailored for applications, , and specialized imaging. Building on prior updates like Supplement 243 (2024), which added a Label Map Segmentation IOD enabling the encoding of pixel- or voxel-level classifications for 2D, , or tiled images to support -driven analysis and entity labeling in medical datasets, the standard continues to evolve. Supplement 249 introduced Structured Reporting () template extensions for fetal anatomy surveys, standardizing the documentation of fetal structural assessments in the first, second, and third trimesters to align with clinical guidelines and improve in obstetric reporting. These updates build on prior frameworks to facilitate rendered outputs, such as volumetric rendering protocols in Supplement 228, allowing models to generate and store visualized reconstructions directly in DICOM format. Digital pathology whole-slide imaging (WSI) received focused attention in 2025, with standardization efforts emphasizing seamless integration into clinical workflows. The DICOM Working Group 26 (WG-26) advanced WSI support through iterative supplements and testing, incorporating multi-frame image handling for large tiled slides to enable efficient storage and retrieval in pathology information systems. Emerging features in the 2025 releases enhance DICOM's adaptability to modern infrastructures. Supplement 246 introduced DICOMweb services for modality procedure steps, improving cloud-based Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) by enabling RESTful access to workflow data and real-time synchronization across distributed environments. Support for augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) visualization has expanded via volumetric rendering web services and 3D model encapsulation, as in Supplements 228 and 205, allowing DICOM datasets to drive immersive 3D rendering for surgical planning and training without proprietary formats. New Service-Object Pair (SOP) classes for inventory management, introduced in Supplement 223, enable the creation and querying of inventories of DICOM studies, series, and instances in repositories, aiding data migration and oversight in enterprise settings. Looking ahead, future directions emphasize secure and comprehensive data ecosystems. Emerging research explores integration with technology for audit trails in healthcare , potentially leveraging immutable ledgers to verify and in multi-site collaborations. Support for data continues to develop, aiming to better link imaging with other types for precision applications. Community-driven initiatives remain pivotal, with the DICOM Connectathon achieving a milestone through the largest-ever participation, validating WSI across vendors and accelerating clinical adoption of digital slides. Open-source tools like DCMTK, a comprehensive DICOM toolkit, received updates in to incorporate recent supplements, fix vulnerabilities such as CVE--2357, and add features for handling new IODs, fostering broader developer engagement and testing.

References

  1. [1]
    About DICOM: Overview
    Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine — is the international standard for medical images and related information.Translation Policy · Related Standards and SDOs · Governance
  2. [2]
    DICOM Standard
    DICOM is the international standard to transmit, store, retrieve, print, process, and display medical imaging information.About DICOM: Overview · Current Edition · DICOM Standard Committee · HistoryMissing: definition | Show results with:definition
  3. [3]
    History - DICOM
    DICOM is a Standard for communication of medical imaging information. Selected highlights of its history are shown below.
  4. [4]
    Key Concepts - DICOM
    DICOM consists of services, most of which involve transmission of data over a network. The file format for offline media is a later addition to the standard.
  5. [5]
    1 Introduction & Overview - DICOM Standard
    The DICOM Standards Committee is an independent, international standards development organization comprising biomedical professional societies.
  6. [6]
    Current Edition - DICOM
    The DICOM Standard is managed by the Medical Imaging & Technology Alliance - a division of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association. DICOM® ...
  7. [7]
    Overview - DICOM
    DICOM is used in virtually all hospitals worldwide. It ensures the interoperability of systems used to medical images and derived structured documents.
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    Thirty Years of the DICOM Standard - PMC - NIH
    Oct 6, 2023 · DICOM is an international standard that defines a format for storing medical images and a protocol to enable and facilitate data communication among medical ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  10. [10]
    Recognized Consensus Standards: Medical Devices - FDA
    Dec 23, 2024 · The DICOM Standard facilitates interoperability of medical imaging equipment by specifying: For network communications, a set of protocols to be ...Missing: mandatory EU MDR
  11. [11]
    Why Secure DICOM is Poorly Accepted: Understanding ... - Medcrypt
    Sep 3, 2024 · Medical Device Regulations: Medical imaging systems must comply with specific regulations set out by the FDA (in the U.S.) and MDR/IVDR in ...
  12. [12]
    AI And DICOM
    AI in medical imaging interacts with DICOM, creating secondary objects. AI-generated objects should have specific DICOM tags and unique identifiers, and should ...
  13. [13]
    Implementation and Benefits of a Vendor-Neutral Archive and ...
    Oct 18, 2018 · This process was associated with more than 10% cost savings, 30% reduction in storage costs, superior support for disaster recovery, and 80% decrease in ...Enterprise Imaging · Phase Ii--Dicom Images... · Results
  14. [14]
    Vendor neutral archive in PACS - PMC - NIH
    The new concept of vendor neutral archive (VNA) has emerged. A VNA simply decouples the PACS and workstations at the archival layer.
  15. [15]
    Medical Imaging: From Roentgen to the Digital Revolution, and ...
    Oct 4, 2018 · Digital images on workstations now replace films, permitting multiplanar image reconstruction. Modern radiology is actually “filmless” but image ...
  16. [16]
    1.3 History - DICOM Standard - NEMA
    ACR-NEMA Standards Publication No. 300-1988, published in 1988 was designated version 2.0. It included version 1.0, the published revisions, and additional ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Digital Mammography
    The class is described in DICOM supplement 50, finalized in. May 2001, and now incorporated into the full. DICOM Standard (PS 3.3, 3.4, and 3.6). The supplement ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] The DICOM standard: a brief overview - HAL Inserm
    Aug 31, 2009 · Abstract: The DICOM standard has now become the uncontested standard for the exchange and management of biomedical images.
  19. [19]
    DICOM Standard Status
    DICOM Standard Status · Table Of Contents · Final Text Supplements additional to 2025d Base Standard · Supplements additional to 2025d Base ...
  20. [20]
    Leveraging Internet Technologies with DICOM WADO - PMC - NIH
    The standard was further advanced in 2011 with the final text addition of DICOM Part 18, Supplement 148 WADO by means of web services [2]. These DICOM standards ...
  21. [21]
    Approved Supplements - DICOM
    This supplement adds the Modality Scheduled Procedure Step Service and the Modality Performed Procedure Step Service to DICOMweb to mirror the Modality Worklist ...
  22. [22]
    DICOM News
    This supplement to the DICOM Standard introduces new SR template content to address fetal anatomy survey assessments in ultrasound reports.Missing: 223 segmentation dermoscopy inventory
  23. [23]
    DICOM - Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine
    Sup223 adds a new set of features and services to the DICOM Standard to create and manage a complete inventory of the PACS archive that is application ...Missing: NEMA segmentation fetal ultrasound dermoscopy
  24. [24]
    ISO 12052:2006 - Health informatics — Digital imaging and ...
    ISO 12052:2006 is intended to facilitate interoperability of medical imaging equipment and information systems by specifying: a set of protocols to be followed ...Missing: NEMA | Show results with:NEMA
  25. [25]
    PS3.1 - DICOM - NEMA
    The American College of Radiology (ACR) and the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) formed a joint committee in 1983 to develop a standard to:.Missing: motivations | Show results with:motivations
  26. [26]
    PS3.3
    ### Summary of Introduction to Information Object Definitions in DICOM Part 3
  27. [27]
    6 DICOM Information Model
    6 DICOM Information Model. The DICOM ... An IOD that includes information about related Real-World Objects is called a Composite Information Object.
  28. [28]
    6.3 PS3.3: Information Object Definitions - DICOM
    PS3.3 of the DICOM Standard specifies a number of Information Object Classes that provide an abstract definition of real-world entities applicable to ...
  29. [29]
    C.3 Standard Query/Retrieve Information Models - DICOM Standard
    The patient level is the top level and contains Attributes associated with the Patient Information Entity (IE) of the Composite IODs as defined in PS3.3.
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
    C.7.6 Common Image IE Modules
    ### Summary of Image IOD Example (C.7.6 Common Image IE Modules)
  32. [32]
    A.35 Structured Report Document IODs
    ### Summary of Structured Report IOD Example (Basic Text SR IOD)
  33. [33]
    6.2 Value Representation (VR) - DICOM - NEMA
    Value Representation (VR) describes the data type and format of a Data Element's Value(s). VRs are listed by Data Element Tag.
  34. [34]
    7 The Data Set
    ### Summary of DICOM Data Element Structure (Section 7.1.2)
  35. [35]
    6 Value Encoding
    ### Summary of DICOM Value Encoding Rules (Chapter 6, DICOM PS3.5 2025d)
  36. [36]
    PS3.8
    ### Summary of TCP/IP Ports for DICOM (Section 9.1)
  37. [37]
  38. [38]
  39. [39]
  40. [40]
  41. [41]
  42. [42]
  43. [43]
  44. [44]
  45. [45]
    B Storage Service Class
    The Storage Service Class defines an application-level class-of-service that facilitates the simple transfer of information Instances (objects).
  46. [46]
    C Query/Retrieve Service Class
    ### Summary of DICOM Query/Retrieve Service Class
  47. [47]
    J Storage Commitment Service Class
    ### Summary of DICOM Storage Commitment Service Class
  48. [48]
    H Print Management Service Class - DICOM
    The Print Management Service Class defines an application-level class-of-service that facilitates the printing of images and image related data on a hard copy ...
  49. [49]
    R Instance Availability Notification Service Class - DICOM
    The Instance Availability Notification Service Class defines an application-level class-of-service that allows one DICOM AE to notify another DICOM AE of the ...
  50. [50]
    K.6 SOP Class Definitions - DICOM
    The Modality Worklist SOP Class supports two alternatives for the realization of this requirement, supporting different organization methods of the department:.
  51. [51]
    B.17 Modality Performed Procedure Step IOD - DICOM
    The Modality Performed Procedure Step IOD includes general PPS Modules and image acquisition specific ones, such as Image Acquisition Results, and Billing and ...
  52. [52]
    A.88.3 Inventory IOD Module Table
    ### Summary of Inventory IOD from DICOM PS3.3 2025d
  53. [53]
    7 DICOM File Format
    The DICOM File Format provides a means to encapsulate in a file the Data Set representing a SOP Instance related to a DICOM IOD.
  54. [54]
    8.2 File IDs - DICOM
    DICOM files stored on interchange media may have an alternate file name or link that uses less restricted file names, such as a filename extension (e.g., ".dcm" ...
  55. [55]
    8 DICOM File Service
    ### Summary of DICOM File Sets and Multi-File Structures
  56. [56]
    I.4 Media Storage SOP Classes
    ### Summary of Media Storage SOP Classes
  57. [57]
    8.3 File Management Roles and Services - DICOM
    Although a File-set Updater (FSU) may include the functions corresponding to a File-set Creator (FSC) and a File-set Reader (FSR), it is not required that ...
  58. [58]
    6.2.4 DICOM Media Storage Application Profiles
    A Media Storage Application Profile defines a selection of choices at the various layers of the DICOM Media Storage Model that are applicable to a specific ...
  59. [59]
    10 Transfer Syntax
    ### Summary of Transfer Syntax Specifics for DICOM Media Storage
  60. [60]
    [PDF] DICOM Format and Protocol Standardization—A Core Requirement ...
    The DICOM files can be dual personality Tagged Image File. Format (TIFF) for legacy support. ... A core principle of DICOM is backward compatibility, such that ...
  61. [61]
    PS3.3 - DICOM - NEMA
    PS3.3 is a DICOM publication defining Information Object Definitions, including composite and normalized IODs, and attributes.
  62. [62]
  63. [63]
  64. [64]
  65. [65]
    Understanding and Using DICOM, the Data Interchange Standard ...
    DICOM addresses five general application areas: (1) network image management, (2) network image interpretation management, (3) network print management, (4) ...
  66. [66]
    View - DICOM Standard
    The scope of this DICOM Conformance Statement is to facilitate integration between < Product> and other DICOM products. The Conformance Statement should be ...
  67. [67]
    6 Purpose of a Conformance Statement - DICOM Standard
    A Conformance Statement helps users determine which optional DICOM components are supported and what extensions are added by an implementation.
  68. [68]
    What is DICOM and Why It Matters in Modern Endoscopy?
    Jul 15, 2025 · In the complex world of medical diagnostics, DICOM acts as a powerful workflow optimization tool for endoscopy clinics. By standardizing image ...
  69. [69]
    TeleRay Record DICOM Surgery and Endoscope Recorder
    TeleRay Record DICOM Surgery and Endoscope Recorder integrates with major EMRs such as Epic, Cerner, and Meditech. o. Some other resource(s) that may be helpful ...
  70. [70]
    Informatics in Radiology: An Information Model of the DICOM ...
    The Series serves as a container that aggregates zero or more objects such as Waveforms, Images, Raw Data, and Presentation States.
  71. [71]
    Basic Cardiac Electrophysiology Waveform CIOD
    The Basic Cardiac Electrophysiology Waveform IOD is the specification of digitized electrical signals from the patient cardiac conduction system collected ...
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Supplement 72: Echocardiography Procedure Reports - DICOM
    Sep 18, 2003 · This supplement introduces the structure and codes used to transfer echocardiography reporting information. The goal of the supplement is ...
  73. [73]
    Working with DICOM Waveforms - LEADTOOLS
    The DICOM standard supports waveform storage and communication: this includes hemodynamic curve data, cardiac electrophysiology, electrocardiography (
  74. [74]
    DICOM IN RADIOTHERAPY
    A treatment planning system (TPS) then reads the CT Images, RT Structure Set, and RT Plan. It adds beam modifiers, modifies the beam geometries where necessary, ...
  75. [75]
    DICOM-RT and Its Utilization in Radiation Therapy1 - RSNA Journals
    May 1, 2009 · The Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard is now widely implemented in radiology as the standard for diagnostic imaging.<|separator|>
  76. [76]
    Philips announces digital pathology scanner with native ...
    Philips Pathology Scanner SGi [1] offers powerful extension of native DICOM support designed for high-resolution whole slide images. Sep 08, 2025 | 2 minute ...Missing: advancements | Show results with:advancements
  77. [77]
    Part 5 – Infrastructure & Standards: DICOM Interoperability
    Oct 27, 2025 · The digital pathology community achieved a significant milestone in 2025, with the largest DICOM Connectathon to date demonstrating that ...
  78. [78]
    Large-Scale Integration of DICOM Metadata into HL7-FHIR for ... - NIH
    Apr 15, 2025 · A large-scale end-to-end data processing pipeline that transforms DICOM imaging metadata directly from clinical routine into the Health Level 7-FHIR format.
  79. [79]
    DICOM information made interoperable with Corepoint Integration ...
    DICOM Gear makes DICOM data interoperable by converting it to HL7 messages, eliminating manual entry, improving accuracy, and reducing processing time.
  80. [80]
    A.51 Segmentation IOD
    The Segmentation Information Object Definition (IOD) specifies a multi-frame image representing a classification of pixels in one or more referenced images.Missing: AI tools
  81. [81]
    DICOM SEG :: Weasis Documentation
    DICOM SEG can be generated by AI frameworks to represent the results of segmentation algorithms applied to medical images.Missing: IOD | Show results with:IOD
  82. [82]
    [PDF] Reporting Workflow in Radiology using DICOM SR integration
    DICOM SR Use. • DICOM SR is used in key subspecialty areas that produce structured data in the course of image acquisition or post-processing, where: – ...
  83. [83]
    Teleradiology Workflow: Steps, Benefits, And Challenges
    Oct 12, 2025 · Teleradiology workflows are at the core of performing diagnostic imaging remotely. They make it easy for healthcare facilities and radiologists to communicate.
  84. [84]
    Teleradiology and Telehealth in 2025 - Dicom Systems
    Image Acquisition and Transmission: The workflow begins with acquiring medical images, such as X-rays, CT scans, MRIs, or ultrasound scans, at the healthcare ...
  85. [85]
    Teleradiology in Disaster: Essential Tool for Emergency Response
    Nov 11, 2024 · Teleradiology serves as a critical lifeline during disasters by enabling remote radiological diagnosis and interpretation of medical images.Missing: initiatives studies
  86. [86]
    [PDF] Worldwide implementation of digital imaging in radiology
    These publications include reports of technical meetings, the results of IAEA coordinated research projects, interim reports on IAEA projects, and educational ...
  87. [87]
    The Role of Imaging Informatics in Disaster Preparedness During ...
    Many radiology practices have previously prepared for disasters such as mass casualty incidents [3], terrorist attacks [4], or natural disasters [5]. In ...Missing: DICOM initiatives
  88. [88]
    DICONDE in Digital NDT Taking Hold | 2018-07-08 - Quality Magazine
    Jul 8, 2018 · In 2004, the ASTM E07.11 subcommittee made DICONDE the standard (E2339-11) for NDT (Non-Destructive Testing) with the goal of standardizing an ...
  89. [89]
    DICOS, the Standard for Security Image Exchange - NEMA
    DICOS is an adaption of Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). DICOM is the international standard for medical images and related information.Missing: server | Show results with:server
  90. [90]
    A Registry of DICOM Unique Identifiers (UIDs) (Normative)
    Ophthalmic Tomography Image Storage. Ophthalmic​Tomography​Image​Storage. SOP ... DICOS​Digital​X​Ray​Image​​StorageFor​Presentation. SOP Class. DICOS. 1.2 ...
  91. [91]
    WG-09: Ophthalmology - DICOM
    WG-09: Ophthalmology Scope: To address all issues relating to imaging and reporting of image-based studies in ophthalmic applications.
  92. [92]
    [PDF] Supplement 110: Ophthalmic Tomography Image Storage SOP Class
    The ophthalmic tomographic imaging devices typically produce non-tomographic (fundus) reference images that may be represented using either the 8-bit or 16 ...Missing: DICOS | Show results with:DICOS
  93. [93]
    DICOMweb™: Background and Application of the Web Standard for ...
    May 10, 2018 · This paper describes DICOMweb, how it extended the DICOM standard, and how DICOMweb can be applied to problems facing healthcare applications.
  94. [94]
    WG-25: Veterinary Medicine - DICOM Standard
    To develop DICOM attributes and workflow-related modifications to support identifying and describing veterinary patients.
  95. [95]
    10 Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing (XDS.b) - IHE ITI TF Vol1
    The Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing (XDS.b) IHE Integration Profile facilitates the registration, distribution and access across health enterprises of ...XDS.b Actors/Transactions · XDS.b Actor Options · Integration Profile Process Flow
  96. [96]
    [PDF] DICOM & HL7: Integration of Imaging and Information Systems
    • Allows for creating Diagnostic Imaging Reports in HL7-based information systems and integrating DICOM SR based imaging results. • Created and published in ...
  97. [97]
    HL7 and DICOM based integration of radiology ... - PubMed
    The aim was to explore the ability to integrate and exchange RIS originated data with Hospital Information Systems based on HL7's CDA (Clinical Document ...
  98. [98]
    Related Standards and Standards Development Organizations
    DICOM addresses multiple levels of ISO's OSI network model. It uses both TCP/IP and HTTP as transport mechanisms, while JPEG and MPEG are recognized as content ...
  99. [99]
    Comparison and Analysis of ISO/IEEE 11073, IHE PCD-01, and HL7 ...
    To this end, standards have been developed and used to provide interoperability between personal health devices (PHDs) and external systems. ISO/IEEE 11073 ...Missing: DICOM TC215 NEMA ACR CEN JPEG compression challenges UID
  100. [100]
    [PDF] Technical report „Medical device approval based on the SDC ...
    The IEEE 11073 SDC standards integrate well with Health Level Seven (HL7) and DICOM: Whereas SDC provides unique capabilities such as bidirectional device ...
  101. [101]
    Home - DICOM® SR to FHIR Resource Mapping IG v1.0.0
    This Implementation Guide defines the use of FHIR resources to convey measurements, derived measurements and Qualitative Evaluations extracted from a DICOM SR ...
  102. [102]
    Mapping of DICOM SR to FHIR - HL7 Confluence
    Sep 22, 2020 · Goals: Extract key content from DICOM SR (AI result, measurement report, etc.) into FHIR resources, Observation; Make mapping independent of ...Missing: interoperability ISO TC215 IEEE 11073 ACR CEN compression challenges
  103. [103]
    WG-20: Integration of Imaging and Information Systems
    Potential additional topics include: DICOMweb and FHIR integration; Additional DICOM SR template mapping (e.g. cardiac / echo reports); Imaging AI results, ...
  104. [104]
    8.2.3 JPEG-LS Image Compression - DICOM
    DICOM provides a mechanism for supporting the use of JPEG-LS Image Compression through the Encapsulated Format.
  105. [105]
    [PDF] Add FHIR canonical for DICOM UID Registry
    Sep 16, 2024 · PS3.16 currently lacks a FHIR canonical reference for DICOM UIDs, resulting in compatibility issues with. FHIR Implementation Guides (IG) and ...
  106. [106]
  107. [107]
    PS3.15
    ### Summary of DICOM Secure Transport, TLS, and Ports from PS3.15 (2025d)
  108. [108]
  109. [109]
  110. [110]
  111. [111]
  112. [112]
  113. [113]
  114. [114]
  115. [115]
    8.11 Security and Privacy - DICOM
    It is very likely that DICOM objects contain Protected Health Information. Privacy regulations in the United States (HIPAA), Europe (GDPR), and elsewhere, ...Missing: compliance | Show results with:compliance
  116. [116]
  117. [117]
  118. [118]
  119. [119]
  120. [120]
  121. [121]
  122. [122]
  123. [123]
    Beyond the DICOM Header: Additional Issues in Deidentification | AJR
    This article summarizes the issues, technology, and pitfalls involved in the deidentification of DICOM medical images.<|control11|><|separator|>
  124. [124]
    Documenting the de-identification process of clinical and imaging ...
    May 31, 2024 · This paper provides de-identification guidelines from the AI for health imaging (AI4HI) projects. Keywords: Data anonymization, Radiology, ...
  125. [125]
    The Role of DICOM in Artificial Intelligence for Skin Disease - Frontiers
    Feb 9, 2021 · DICOM is a universally recognized standard for medical imaging and would be ideal as a standardized image encoding to address this challenge.
  126. [126]
    DICOM Strategy
    Jul 6, 2001 · The goals of DICOM are to achieve compatibility and to improve workflow efficiency between imaging systems and other information systems in ...Working Group 4... · Wg 12 (ultrasound) · Wg 15 (mammography And Cad)
  127. [127]
    Exploring the Different Components of a DICOM Imaging Network
    Sep 14, 2025 · Many healthcare institutions operate with legacy systems that may not fully support modern DICOM standards, leading to compatibility challenges ...
  128. [128]
    pynetdicom 1.2 very low with MR or CT studies · Issue #317 - GitHub
    Mar 13, 2019 · There more datasets you can transfer over one association the better since this minimises the overhead due to the association negotiations.
  129. [129]
    Comparative performance investigation of DICOM C-STORE and ...
    We compare the performances of C-STORE transactions with the STOW HTTP-based protocol, and show that the STOW protocol can divide the transfer time by about 50.
  130. [130]
    Breaking the Chains: Is Vendor Lock-In Holding Back Your Imaging ...
    As imaging volumes grow and legacy systems show their age, many healthcare organizations are finding that vendor lock-in is quietly draining budgets and slowing ...
  131. [131]
    Successes and challenges in extracting information from DICOM ...
    Sep 12, 2023 · Anecdotal evidence from imaging centres suggests information that is often not readily available to staff even to undertake simple audits.
  132. [132]
    Are there any ideas to reduce the vast size of DICOM files before ...
    Jan 5, 2022 · The usual recommendation for this is compression of the images. Lossless compression would gain you about 2–3:1 compression so reducing your CT study size to ...
  133. [133]
    [PDF] Sup 243 - Label Map Segmentation - DICOM Standard - NEMA
    Sep 14, 2024 · This Supplement describes addition of a Label Map Segmentation IOD to DICOM to encode classification of entities.​ ... Segmentation IOD with an ...Missing: 2025 | Show results with:2025
  134. [134]
    [PDF] Web Services and Protocol IOD for Volumetric Rendering - DICOM
    Jun 28, 2023 · This supplement establishes separate services for 3D and MPR study, series, instances ... This supplement introduces web services and a Volumetric ...
  135. [135]
    DICOM Whole Slide Imaging (WSI) - NEMA
    May 7, 2025 · The DICOM Standard now provides support for WSI digital slides, by incorporating a way to handle tiled large images as multi-frame images and multiple images ...
  136. [136]
  137. [137]
    [PDF] Supplement 205: DICOM Encapsulation of STL Models for 3D ...
    Apr 3, 2018 · The new IOD allows 3D manufacturing models to be exchanged between various types of equipment using. DICOM. This adds the ability to store, ...
  138. [138]
    Recent advances and future prospects for blockchain in biomedicine
    This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of how blockchain technology can transform the biomedical sector, potentially making healthcare data ...Missing: DICOM | Show results with:DICOM
  139. [139]
    The future of multimodal artificial intelligence models for integrating ...
    Multimodal AI combines imaging and clinical data, using frameworks like transformers and GNNs, and fusion techniques to improve diagnostic accuracy.Missing: DICOM blockchain audit
  140. [140]
    Part 5 – Infrastructure & Standards: DICOM Interoperability
    Oct 27, 2025 · The digital pathology community achieved a significant milestone in 2025, with the largest DICOM Connectathon to date demonstrating that ...
  141. [141]
    Issues - DCMTK - OFFIS DCMTK and DICOM Projects
    2025-10-23 11:37, Actions. 1163, Feature, New, Normal, Add "dcmtk" command line tool and man page, 2025-10-02 14:26, Actions. 1162, Feature, New, Normal, Enable ...Missing: source | Show results with:source
  142. [142]
    CVE-2025-2357: Memory Corruption in DCMTK
    Mar 16, 2025 · DCMTK is an open-source library widely used for handling DICOM medical imaging files. The vulnerability arises from improper handling of ...<|control11|><|separator|>