Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Fish locomotion

Fish locomotion encompasses the diverse biomechanical strategies employed by fishes to generate propulsive forces and navigate aquatic environments, primarily through coordinated undulations of the body and appendages that interact with surrounding water to produce thrust and control.^[1] This form of movement has evolved over millions of years to optimize energy efficiency, maneuverability, and survival in varied habitats, from slow cruising in reefs to high-speed pursuits in open water.^[2] The primary modes of fish locomotion are broadly classified into two categories: body and/or caudal fin (BCF) propulsion, which accounts for approximately 85% of fish species and involves wave-like undulations propagating from head to tail, and median and/or paired fin (MPF) propulsion, used by the remainder for more precise, low-speed maneuvers such as hovering.^[2] Within BCF propulsion, distinct patterns include anguilliform swimming, characterized by full-body waves in eel-like species for sinusoidal motion; carangiform swimming, where thrust is generated mainly by the posterior body and tail in many bony fishes; and thunniform swimming, featuring stiff bodies with rapid tail oscillations for high-speed, efficient travel in tunas and lamnid sharks.^[1] MPF propulsion, in contrast, relies on oscillatory or undulatory motions of pectoral, pelvic, dorsal, or anal fins, as seen in rays and some coral reef fishes, enabling lift-based propulsion akin to flapping wings.^[2] Key biomechanical principles underlying fish locomotion involve the transfer of momentum to the fluid medium via vortex shedding and reactive forces, governed by factors such as the Strouhal number (typically 0.2–0.4 for optimal efficiency) and body flexibility, which allows fins to deform and enhance hydrodynamic performance.^[2] Surface structures like shark skin denticles can increase swimming speed by up to 12.3% by reducing drag and promoting favorable flow patterns, while unsteady behaviors—such as the C-start escape response or burst-and-coast swimming—demonstrate adaptive strategies for predation and energy conservation.^[1] Recent advances in three-dimensional imaging and computational fluid dynamics have revealed complex wake structures and inter-fin interactions that boost propulsive efficiency, informing bio-inspired designs for underwater robotics.^[1]

Fundamentals of Aquatic Locomotion

Hydrodynamic Forces

Hydrodynamic forces in fish locomotion arise from the interaction between the fish's body and the surrounding water, primarily encompassing drag, lift, and thrust. These forces govern the efficiency and sustainability of swimming, with drag acting as the primary resistive force that must be overcome for forward motion.^[3] Drag forces on a swimming fish consist of two main components: pressure drag, also known as form drag, which results from differences in fluid pressure between the front and rear of the body due to flow separation, and frictional drag, or skin drag, which stems from viscous shear stresses along the body's surface. In streamlined fish like mackerel, frictional drag dominates at typical swimming speeds because the body shape minimizes flow separation, whereas pressure drag becomes more significant in less streamlined forms or at higher speeds where separation occurs. The total drag force F_d is given by

F_d = \frac{1}{2} \rho v^2 C_d A,

where \rho is the density of water, v is the swimming velocity, C_d is the drag coefficient (typically 0.01–0.1 for fish, depending on shape and speed), and A is the cross-sectional area perpendicular to the flow. This equation, derived from momentum considerations in fluid dynamics, quantifies the resistive load that propulsion must counter. Early studies, such as those by Gray (1936), applied similar hydrodynamic principles to rigid-body models of fish and dolphins, revealing that streamlined shapes minimize drag by promoting attached flow and laminar boundary layers, though actual swimming drag often exceeds rigid-body predictions due to body undulations.^[3]^[4] Lift forces enable fish to maintain buoyancy and maneuver, generated primarily through the asymmetric flow over fins or the body when oriented at an angle to the oncoming water. According to Bernoulli's principle, faster fluid velocity over the upper surface of a fin or foil creates lower pressure compared to the slower flow underneath, producing an upward force perpendicular to the flow direction. The angle of attack—the angle between the fin's chord line and the relative water velocity—further modulates this by increasing circulation around the foil, with lift rising linearly at small angles (up to about 15°) before stalling. The lift force F_l is expressed as

F_l = \frac{1}{2} \rho v^2 [C_l](/page/Coefficient) A,

where [C_l](/page/Coefficient) is the lift coefficient (approximately $2\pi \alpha in radians for thin foils, with \alpha the angle of attack, and maximum values around 1.5). In fish, pectoral and caudal fins exploit this mechanism for stability and turning, distinct from thrust production.^[3] For steady swimming, thrust must balance drag to achieve constant velocity, with excess thrust enabling acceleration. Thrust is actively generated by oscillatory motions of the body or fins, which shed vortices to propel water rearward, but its magnitude is tied to overcoming the quadratic velocity dependence of drag. The Reynolds number [Re](/page/Re) = \frac{\rho v L}{\mu}, where L is a characteristic length (e.g., body length), and \mu is water's dynamic viscosity, characterizes the flow regime: low [Re](/page/Re) (<1000) yields viscous-dominated laminar flows, while high [Re](/page/Re) (>10^5, typical for adult fish like mackerel at [Re](/page/Re) \approx 10^6) promotes inertial-dominated turbulent flows with vortex shedding. This distinction is crucial, as most fish operate in high-[Re](/page/Re) regimes where pressure and inertial effects prevail over viscosity.^[3]^[5] Water's high density (\rho \approx [1000](/page/1000) kg/m³) and relatively low viscosity (\mu \approx 10^{-3} Pa·s at 20°C) compared to air (\rho \approx 1.2 kg/m³, \mu \approx 1.8 \times 10^{-5} Pa·s) amplify hydrodynamic challenges in aquatic locomotion, making drag roughly 800 times greater than in air for similar shapes and speeds due to the density term in force equations. This contrast necessitates specialized adaptations in fish, such as streamlined forms, to manage the elevated inertial forces absent in lower-density aerial media.^[6]^[3]

Propulsive Mechanisms

Fish locomotion relies on two primary classifications of propulsive mechanisms: undulatory propulsion, which involves wave-like motions propagating along the body or fins, and oscillatory propulsion, characterized by back-and-forth movements of appendages such as fins.^[7] Undulatory motions generate thrust by deforming the body in a sinusoidal pattern, while oscillatory motions produce force through rhythmic flapping or heaving of structures like the caudal or pectoral fins.^[8] These mechanisms counteract hydrodynamic forces such as drag, enabling sustained forward motion in water.^[9] Thrust in these systems arises from reactive forces, primarily through momentum transfer to the surrounding water via jet propulsion in some species or vortex shedding from oscillating surfaces.^[10] In undulatory and oscillatory propulsion, efficiency is optimized when the Strouhal number, defined as St = \frac{f A}{v} where f is the frequency of oscillation, A is the amplitude, and v is the swimming speed, falls within the range of approximately 0.2 to 0.4.^[11] This dimensionless parameter indicates the balance between inertial and viscous forces, with values in this range associated with peak propulsive efficiency across various aquatic animals.^[12] Maneuverability is enhanced by the pectoral fins, which serve as control surfaces for adjusting stability and direction, including yaw (lateral turning), pitch (vertical tilting), and roll (rotational stabilization).^[13] Asynchronous or differential motion of these paired fins generates corrective torques, allowing precise adjustments during turns without relying solely on body undulations.^[14] Most fish achieve neutral buoyancy through adaptations like swim bladders, which minimizes the energy required for vertical propulsion and focuses propulsive efforts on horizontal movement.^[15] Examples of these mechanisms include steady swimming, where continuous undulations maintain constant speed, and burst-and-glide patterns, which alternate high-intensity tail beats with passive gliding phases to conserve energy.^[16] In steady swimming, speed v approximates the product of tail beat frequency f and wavelength \lambda of the undulatory wave, v \approx \lambda f, linking kinematic parameters directly to propulsion output.^[17]

Swimming Modes

Body-Caudal Fin Propulsion

Body-caudal fin (BCF) propulsion represents a dominant swimming mechanism in many fish species, where undulatory waves propagate posteriorly from the head to the tail, generating lateral body movements that produce reactive forces converted into forward thrust through hydrodynamic interactions with the surrounding water.^[18] This mode relies on myotomal muscle contractions to initiate the waves, with the amplitude and frequency tailored to the fish's morphology and environmental demands. In the anguilliform mode, characteristic of elongate species like eels (Anguilla spp.), the undulatory wave encompasses the entire body length, producing high-amplitude lateral excursions and a wavelength roughly equal to the body length. This configuration enables effective low-speed locomotion, typically below 1 body length per second, prioritizing maneuverability in complex habitats such as reefs or burrows over sustained speed.^[19] The subcarangiform mode, observed in salmonids like trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), confines the propulsive wave primarily to the posterior third of the body, resulting in moderate wave amplitudes and frequencies that balance speed and efficiency for steady cruising.^[18] This mode supports velocities around 2-4 body lengths per second, making it suitable for migratory behaviors in open water.^[20] Carangiform locomotion, typical of mackerels (Scomber scombrus), features reduced body undulation with strong, high-frequency tail beats and a stiff caudal fin that acts as a lunate propulsor to generate thrust.^[21] The minimal anterior body amplitude enhances streamlining, allowing higher speeds up to 10 body lengths per second while maintaining moderate efficiency for predatory pursuits.^[18] The thunniform mode, employed by tunas (Thunnus spp.), minimizes body oscillations to the anterior region while relying on powerful, rapid caudal fin oscillations for propulsion, achieving high speeds up to 20 m/s in species like the bluefin tuna.^[22] This adaptation, supported by specialized red muscle and a thunniform body shape, optimizes long-distance migration.^[23] In the ostraciiform mode, exemplified by boxfishes (Ostracion cubicus), the rigid carapace prevents body flexure, with propulsion derived solely from pendulum-like tail oscillations, promoting exceptional stability in turbulent reef environments.^[24] The boxfish's keeled morphology generates hydrodynamic damping forces that counteract perturbations, enabling straight-line swimming amid high flow variability.^[25] Across BCF modes, propulsive efficiency is quantified as \eta = \frac{\text{thrust power}}{\text{total power input}}, where thrust power is the useful work advancing the fish and total power includes lateral energy losses.^[20] Thunniform swimming achieves peak efficiencies of 0.7-0.9, attributed to reduced slip and optimized vortex shedding, surpassing other modes like anguilliform at around 0.5-0.7.^[20] Recent post-2020 computational fluid dynamics studies have revealed that thunniform propulsion forms coherent vortex rings in the wake, which enhance thrust while minimizing drag through axisymmetric structures that align with forward motion.^[26] These models underscore how tail kinematics in tunas generate linked vortex loops, improving overall hydrodynamic performance during steady swimming.^[27]

Median and Paired Fin Propulsion

Median and paired fin (MPF) propulsion refers to a form of fish locomotion where thrust is generated through independent oscillations of the median (dorsal and anal) and paired (pectoral and pelvic) fins, without involving propagating waves along the body axis. This mode is typically employed at low speeds for precise control, maneuvering, and station-holding in complex aquatic environments, contrasting with faster body-involved swimming. MPF propulsion allows fishes to achieve high maneuverability and stability by modulating fin movements independently, often functioning as hydrofoils to produce lift and thrust. Several distinct MPF modes exist, classified based on the primary fins used and their motion patterns. In the rajiform mode, large pectoral fins undulate in a wave-like manner resembling flapping wings, as seen in batoid fishes such as rays and skates; this enables hovering, tight turns, and forward propulsion with high efficiency. The diodontiform mode involves a rowing action of the pectoral fins, utilized by porcupinefishes (Diodon spp.) for slow-speed movement over short distances. The amiiform mode features a continuous undulatory wave along the elongated dorsal fin, employed by bowfins (Amia calva) for steady, slow cruising. Additional modes include the gymnotiform mode, where a long anal fin undulates to generate thrust, allowing knifefishes (Gymnotiformes) to swim forward or backward with exceptional precision. In the balistiform mode, paired pectoral fins oscillate to provide thrust and lift, as in triggerfishes (Balistidae), facilitating precise station-holding against currents. Oscillatory subtypes within MPF propulsion encompass the tetraodontiform mode, characterized by high-frequency beats of the pectoral fins in pufferfishes (Tetraodontidae) for agile, low-speed navigation, and the labriform mode, where labrid wrasses (Labridae) flap pectoral fins rapidly to achieve quick accelerations and maneuvers. Thrust in MPF propulsion arises from the fins acting as hydrofoils, generating lift through vortex dynamics. The circulation around the fin, which determines the lift force, follows the relation

\Gamma = \oint \mathbf{v} \cdot d\mathbf{l}

where \Gamma is the circulation, \mathbf{v} is the velocity vector, and the integral is taken around a closed path enclosing the fin; this circulation produces thrust via the Kutta-Joukowski theorem adapted to unsteady flows in swimming.^[4] Recent bio-robotic studies from 2022 to 2024 have highlighted the advantages of labriform propulsion in simulating reef environments, demonstrating significantly enhanced maneuverability compared to carangiform modes due to independent fin control in cluttered settings.

Dynamic Lift

Dynamic lift in fish locomotion refers to a propulsion mode where the body and fins function as hydrofoils to generate upward force, enabling sustained gliding or planing with minimal oscillatory movements. In this mechanism, the flattened or streamlined body profile acts as a primary hydrofoil, producing lift through its angle of attack relative to the water flow, while pectoral fins contribute additional lift by orienting to capture oncoming currents effectively. Tail use is minimized, as propulsion relies primarily on forward momentum and hydrodynamic forces rather than active caudal beats, allowing for energy-efficient travel once initial speed is achieved. This approach draws from basic principles of hydrofoil theory, where fluid pressure differences over the body surface create net upward force.^[28]^[4] Representative examples include batoid fishes like electric rays (Narcine brasiliensis), which employ dynamic lift during gliding descents to control sink rate despite negative buoyancy. In these species, the disc-shaped body serves as a lifting body, with pitch adjustments modulating lift to achieve glide angles as shallow as 10–20 degrees, facilitating controlled descent without powered swimming. Similarly, ocean sunfish (Mola mola) utilize their large, symmetrical dorsal and anal fins for lift-based cruising, oscillating these fins laterally at low frequencies (0.3–0.6 Hz) to generate thrust and maintain neutral buoyancy over long distances. This fin-driven lift enables steady speeds of 0.4–0.7 m/s, emphasizing the role of non-homologous fins acting as a coordinated pair. Dynamic lift typically operates at intermediate speeds of 1–5 m/s, where streamlined body shapes reduce drag and enhance efficiency by minimizing induced drag from vortex formation.^[29]^[30]^[28] Optimization of lift-to-drag ratios in dynamic lift relies on cambered body profiles, which increase lift coefficients while controlling drag through smooth curvature that delays flow separation. The resulting glide angle \theta is given by \theta = \arctan\left(\frac{D}{L}\right), where D is drag and L is lift, allowing fishes to achieve shallow descent paths with high endurance. In fast-cruising sharks, such as leopard sharks (Triakis semifasciata), there is a transition from oscillatory body-caudal fin (BCF) propulsion at low speeds to integrated lift-based mechanisms at higher velocities, where pectoral fins held at negative dihedral angles provide stabilizing lift to complement BCF thrust. However, this mode offers poor maneuverability due to reliance on rigid hydrodynamic stability, making it best suited for open-water travel where straight-line efficiency outweighs the need for rapid turns.^[4]^[31]^[32] Recent research utilizing high-speed imaging has revealed vortex shedding patterns around shark pectoral fins during dynamic lift phases, demonstrating how leading-edge vortices enhance lift and reduce drag to support prolonged endurance swims in species like the bonnethead shark (Sphyrna tiburo). These vortices form ring structures that align with body motion, contributing to up to 20% greater lift efficiency compared to non-vortex-assisted gliding.^[31]

Advanced Hydrodynamics and Adaptations

Fluid Dynamics in Swimming

Fish locomotion involves complex unsteady flow patterns generated by propulsive mechanisms such as tail oscillations, which produce a reverse Kármán vortex street in the wake. This vortex arrangement, characterized by alternating vortices of opposite sign shed from the tail, contrasts with the von Kármán street observed in stationary bluff bodies and enables net positive thrust. Wake visualization techniques, including particle image velocimetry (PIV), have been used to quantify vortex spacing and strength, allowing estimation of thrust through momentum flux in the wake; for instance, in steadily swimming mackerel, PIV reveals clear reverse Kármán street configurations that correlate with forward propulsion efficiency.^[33]^[34] During acceleration phases, added mass effects significantly influence the dynamics, as the accelerating body must impart momentum to the surrounding fluid. The virtual mass, m_a = \rho V_{\text{displaced}}, where \rho is fluid density and V_{\text{displaced}} is the volume of fluid displaced by the body, effectively increases the inertial costs of motion, requiring greater energy input to achieve rapid starts. In self-propelled aquatic locomotion, this added mass contributes to initial bursts by accelerating fluid for vortex generation, but it elevates the overall cost of transport, particularly at high deformation amplitudes.^[35]^[36] Boundary layer control is critical for minimizing frictional drag in swimming, achieved through mucus secretion and scale microstructures that promote laminar flow and delay separation. Fish slime forms a low-viscosity coating that reduces skin friction by up to 66% compared to smooth controls in species like bluegill sunfish, while scales create riblet-like surfaces that align with flow to suppress turbulence and shift laminar separation points downstream. These adaptations maintain attached flow over the body, lowering total drag and enhancing hydrodynamic efficiency during steady cruising.^[37]^[38]^[39] Unsteady flow aspects, such as leading-edge vortices (LEVs) on fins, further augment lift and thrust, analogous to mechanisms in insect flight. In fish tail motion, an attached LEV forms during the power stroke, stabilizing the flow and increasing the lift coefficient C_l up to approximately 1.5 by enhancing circulation without full stall. This vortical lift contributes to maneuverability and efficiency in oscillatory propulsion.^[40]^[41] Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations have elucidated these phenomena in thunniform swimming, where tuna-like undulations generate reverse Kármán streets in the wake for sustained thrust. Three-dimensional FSI models show that increasing tail amplitude strengthens wake vortices and orients thrust forward, with efficiency peaking at moderate fin oscillation angles around 35°, yielding up to 66% propulsive efficiency. These simulations confirm positive net thrust from the reverse vortex arrangement, validating experimental observations.^[42]^[43] Environmental factors, including swimming in currents or near substrates, modulate these flows; for example, ground effect proximity to the bottom can alter vortex interactions, though for undulatory swimmers it often reduces speed and efficiency, with studies showing minor velocity gains up to 18% at low frequencies and close proximity. This effect varies by conditions and is particularly relevant for benthic species in shallow waters. Recent research in 2025 has used machine learning-based optimization, such as Bayesian optimization, for anguilliform flow models, achieving propulsive efficiencies up to 82.4% through tuned body profiles that minimize wake energy loss.^[44]^[45]

Evolutionary and Morphological Adaptations

Fish locomotion has been shaped by evolutionary pressures to optimize hydrodynamic efficiency across diverse aquatic environments, with morphological adaptations emerging over millions of years in response to habitat demands and predatory pressures. Early chordates exhibited rudimentary myomeric structures, but the diversification of ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii) during the Mesozoic era led to specialized body forms that minimize drag and enhance propulsion. For instance, fusiform (torpedo-like) bodies evolved in open-water pelagic species like tunas (Thunnus spp.) to facilitate sustained high-speed cruising, while depressed body plans developed in bottom-dwelling elasmobranchs such as rays (Rajiformes) for undulatory motion over substrates. These shapes reflect convergent evolution, where slender profiles reduce form drag, and fin aspect ratios—defined as AR = \frac{\text{span}^2}{\text{area}}—enhance lift-to-drag efficiency in high-aspect-ratio pectoral fins of gliding species.^[46] Myomeres, the segmental muscle blocks along the fish trunk, are arranged in a characteristic W- or zigzag-shaped pattern that enables lateral undulation by allowing sequential contraction to propagate waves along the body. This architecture, conserved across teleosts, positions muscle fibers at oblique angles to the body axis, optimizing force transmission for bending without requiring axial rotation. Within myomeres, slow-twitch red fibers, rich in mitochondria and myoglobin, predominate in superficial layers for sustained cruising, comprising 10-20% of total muscle mass, while deep white fast-twitch fibers enable burst swimming through anaerobic glycolysis. This fiber segregation evolved in early sarcopterygians and persists in modern fishes, balancing endurance and power for varied locomotor demands.^[47]^[48] Fin rays in ray-finned fishes, composed of segmented lepidotrichia formed by paired hemitrichia, provide adjustable stiffness through a lever-like mechanism at their bases, allowing dynamic reshaping during median and paired fin (MPF) propulsion. Hemitrichia enable rays to splay or stiffen via intrinsic muscles and tendons, modulating camber and area to generate thrust with minimal energy loss, an adaptation refined over 400 million years since the Devonian. This flexibility contrasts with rigid fins in other vertebrates, permitting precise control in maneuvering species.^[49]^[50] Cycloid or ctenoid scales, overlapping in a diamond pattern, and the overlying mucus layer further reduce skin friction drag by up to 37.5% through boundary layer stabilization and polymer-like viscoelastic effects. Mucus, secreted by epidermal goblet cells, originates from glandular precursors in early chordates like amphioxus, evolving into a protective slime coat in jawed vertebrates by the Silurian period to lower hydrodynamic resistance during gliding. In combination, these features can decrease total drag coefficient (C_d) by 20-40% in streamlined species.^[51]^[37] Habitat specialization drives fin morphology: reef-associated labrids and pomacentrids possess enlarged, fan-like pectoral fins for precise MPF maneuvering among corals, whereas pelagic scombrids like tunas feature thunniform tails with high-aspect-ratio caudal fins for efficient cruising. These adaptations correlate with ecological niches, with pectoral-dominant propulsion suiting complex environments and caudal thrust favoring open-water endurance.^[1] The cost of transport (COT), calculated as \text{COT} = \frac{\text{power}}{\text{mass} \times v}, is minimized in cruising modes of endothermic tunas at approximately 0.1 J/kg/m, reflecting evolutionary tuning of muscle and body form for low-energy long-distance migration. This efficiency surpasses that of ectothermic relatives by 20-30%, underscoring the selective advantage of regional endothermy in myotomal muscles.^[52] Recent genomic studies (2021-2024) have linked Hox gene clusters to fin evolution, revealing that teleost-specific duplications of hox13 paralogs (e.g., hoxb13a and hoxc13a) facilitated the transition from heterocercal to homocercal caudal fins by regulating posterior ray identity and vertebral extension. In zebrafish, hoxc11 mutants disrupt anal fin formation, while Hoxa/Hoxd genes specify dorsal fin regions, highlighting evolutionary shifts in gene deployment across species like medaka.^[53]^[54] Emerging research as of 2025 indicates that warmer waters drive tissue-wide metabolic reprogramming, increasing metabolic costs and potentially constraining burst swimming and dispersal in tropical species like clownfish under +3°C scenarios.^[55] These adaptations continue to inspire bio-inspired designs, including 2025 advances in soft robotics that leverage fluid-structure interactions for enhanced underwater maneuverability.^[45]

Aerial Locomotion

Tradeoffs in Flying Fishes

Flying fishes in the family Exocoetidae face significant physiological and morphological tradeoffs to achieve dual aquatic and aerial locomotion, balancing the demands of high-speed underwater propulsion with efficient gliding in air. The enlarged pectoral fins, crucial for generating lift during glides of 10–50 m, must be folded tightly against the streamlined body during swimming to reduce hydrodynamic drag; however, their overall size and structure may compromise steady-state swimming efficiency. This adaptation prioritizes burst performance for predator evasion over sustained cruising, as the fins' extension in air enhances aerodynamic lift but hinders maneuverability in water when not retracted.^[56] Muscle composition further underscores these compromises, with flying fishes relying heavily on white anaerobic muscle fibers for explosive launches reaching speeds of 10–20 m/s, enabling takeoff from the water surface. These fast-twitch fibers provide the high power output necessary for rapid tail beats (up to 70 per second) during the initial propulsion phase but fatigue quickly, sacrificing the endurance offered by red aerobic muscles used in prolonged swims by other pelagic species. As a result, flying fishes expend more energy on intermittent bursts rather than efficient, long-distance travel, limiting their metabolic scope for extended foraging or migration. Evolutionary pressures in the open ocean, primarily the need to escape fast predators such as tunas, billfishes, and dolphins, have shaped these adaptations, with aerial gliding serving as a key anti-predator strategy. Fossil evidence indicates the persistence of such dual-locomotion capabilities since the Eocene. Performance limits of these glides include a maximum lift-to-drag ratio of approximately 4-5:1, durations typically ranging from 10–30 s, and maximum altitudes up to 6 m above the water surface, beyond which drag and gravitational forces curtail efficiency. Recent aerodynamic research, including wind tunnel tests on Exocoetidae models, has demonstrated that optimal launch angles of 20–35° maximize lift coefficients during water exit, enhancing glide initiation while highlighting the sensitivity of performance to precise body orientation.^[57]

Body Plan Variations

Flying fishes exhibit distinct body plan variations adapted for aerial gliding, primarily classified into biplane and monoplane configurations based on fin usage for lift generation.^[56] In the biplane plan, paired pectoral and pelvic fins function as upper and lower wings, respectively, as seen in species like Exocoetus volitans. This setup leverages a slot effect, where airflow between the fins creates a high-pressure jet that boosts lift and delays stall at higher angles of attack, enhancing stability during short glides.^[57] The biplane design prioritizes maneuverability over speed, with pectoral fin aspect ratios (AR, span squared over area) overall ranging from 3 to 17 across species.^[56] In contrast, the monoplane plan relies on enlarged pectoral fins alone for primary lift, exemplified by Cypselurus californicus, where pelvic fins remain smaller and serve auxiliary roles. This configuration enables higher gliding speeds due to reduced form drag but offers less inherent stability, often compensated by the caudal fin acting as a trailing edge flap to adjust pitch and yaw.^[57] These variations reflect adaptations balancing lift, drag, and control, with over 70 species in the Exocoetidae family displaying such fin morphologies across tropical and subtropical oceans.^[58] Wing loading, defined as body mass divided by total wing area, scales with body size in flying fishes, facilitating sustained short-distance glides without powered flight. Launch into gliding occurs via porpoising, where rapid tail thrusts propel the fish out of the water at speeds exceeding 10 m/s, transitioning seamlessly from aquatic propulsion to aerial phase.^[57] These structural designs underscore the evolutionary fine-tuning of fin morphology for escape behaviors, with biplanes favoring stability in turbulent air and monoplanes emphasizing velocity for extended range.^[56]

Substrate Locomotion

Walking in Fishes

Walking in fishes primarily involves the use of pectoral fins to propel the body across substrates in intertidal or amphibious environments, enabling survival during low tides or habitat transitions. In mudskippers (family Oxudercidae, within Percomorpha), pectoral fins function as crutches, with a pair of joints analogous to tetrapod elbows allowing synchronous strides where both fins move in phase to lift and advance the body forward with minimal axial bending.^[59]^[60] In contrast, lungfishes (order Dipnoi) employ pelvic fins in a more tetrapod-like manner, utilizing alternating strides driven by protractor and retractor muscles to produce walking and bounding gaits, supported by a subdivided musculature that facilitates limb-like propulsion.^[61]^[62] These mechanisms rely on axial muscles for overall propulsion, adapting swimming patterns to generate force against solid substrates rather than fluid media. Speeds during land walking typically range from 0.1 to 0.5 m/s, though lungfishes often move more slowly at 0.01–0.02 m/s, reflecting the energy-intensive nature of terrestrial movement compared to aquatic swimming.^[63]^[64] Adaptations supporting this locomotion include amphibious respiration via skin and buccopharyngeal linings in mudskippers, which maintain oxygen uptake out of water, and mucus secretions that preserve skin moisture for cutaneous breathing while potentially aiding substrate grip through fin placement.^[65]^[66] Evolutionarily, these traits echo the transition to tetrapods, as seen in fossils like Eusthenopteron, a Devonian lobe-finned fish with robust pectoral fins that prefigure limb-based support and movement on land.^[67] Representative examples include the Senegal bichir Polypterus senegalus, which uses pectoral fins for burst locomotion on land, covering distances of 1–2 m in short, coordinated pushes before returning to water.^[68] Another example is the walking catfish Clarias batrachus, which employs pectoral fins and axial body undulations to move across land, often traveling several meters to reach new water bodies. Energy costs are notably higher than for swimming, limiting sustained activity to 1–2 minutes due to risks of desiccation and muscle fatigue. Recent electromyography (EMG) studies from 2022 on mudskippers and related species reveal shifts in muscle activation patterns to coordinate terrestrial gaits, forming a continuum with aquatic undulation while showing gradual adaptations in spinal circuits.^[68]^[69]

Burrowing Behaviors

Burrowing behaviors in fishes involve specialized subsurface locomotion to penetrate and navigate through sediment, primarily for concealment, foraging, or refuge. These movements adapt aquatic propulsion strategies to granular media, where fish employ body undulations or fin-based excavation to displace particles and create tunnels. Such behaviors are prevalent in soft-bottom habitats like sandy or muddy substrates, enabling fishes to exploit three-dimensional space below the surface for survival advantages.^[70] Mechanisms of burrowing typically rely on anguilliform thrashing in elongate species, where the entire body undulates to generate thrust against sediment resistance, allowing head-first or tail-first penetration. For instance, the burrowing eel Pisodonophis boro uses sinusoidal waves propagating from head to tail to burrow subsurface, with kinematic patterns showing reduced amplitude compared to aquatic swimming to minimize energy expenditure in dense media. In contrast, some benthic fishes employ pectoral fin scooping to excavate and propel through sand, as seen in stargazers (Uranoscopus spp.), where enlarged pectoral fins function like shovels to rapidly displace sediment and achieve burial depths of up to body length in soft substrates. These mechanisms can extend to depths of up to 20-60 cm in loose sediments for species like eels, though performance varies with grain size and cohesion.^[70]^[71]^[72]^[73] Adaptations supporting burrowing include highly streamlined body forms that reduce frictional drag in granular environments, often with reduced or modified fins to prevent snagging on particles. Anguilliform fishes, such as eels, exhibit elongated, cylindrical bodies with minimal dorsal and anal fins, facilitating smooth passage through sediment without creating voids that could collapse. Sensory adaptations, particularly the lateral line system, aid navigation in low-visibility subsurface conditions by detecting pressure gradients and vibrations from nearby prey or obstacles, even when partially embedded. These neuromasts remain functional in turbid or sediment-laden water, allowing burrowing fishes to orient and avoid entrapment during locomotion.^[73]^[74] Burrowing often occurs nocturnally to evade diurnal predators, with fishes emerging at night to forage and retreating into sediments during daylight for protection. In intertidal zones, species like gobies and eels use burrows as tidal refuges, timing excursions with low tides to access resources while minimizing exposure to avian or piscine threats. This behavior enhances survival by leveraging sediment as a physical barrier, with burrow construction typically completed in minutes to hours depending on substrate softness.^[72]^[75] Representative examples include stargazers (Uranoscopus spp.), which "swim" through sand using pectoral fin undulations at speeds around 0.2-0.4 m/s, ejecting particles rearward to maintain forward momentum and ambush prey from below. Similarly, European eels (Anguilla anguilla) exhibit stage-specific burrowing, with elvers preferring fine gravel for rapid head-first dives to escape currents or predators. These cases illustrate how burrowing integrates with predatory lifestyles, balancing energy costs against concealment benefits.^[71]^[72] In granular media, burrowing dynamics parallel fluid hydrodynamics but with higher resistance due to particle interlocking; thrust generation resembles viscous drag models, approximated by F_b \approx \mu_g v A, where \mu_g is the effective granular viscosity, v is velocity, and A is the cross-sectional area. This resistive force theory effectively predicts propulsion efficiency in sediments, showing that undulatory motions reduce drag by localizing fluidization around the body. Unlike water, granular drag scales nonlinearly with speed, necessitating slower, more deliberate movements to avoid compaction.^[76] Research on burrowing mechanics, such as a 2012 study on amblyopine gobies like Odontamblyopus lacepedii, has examined localized fluidization via body motions to minimize energy use, with implications for biomimetic robotics in soft soils.^[77]

Larval Locomotion

Swimming in Early Stages

Fish larvae initiate swimming shortly after hatching, during the yolk-sac stage when they measure 1-5 mm in length and rely on weak, low-amplitude body undulations for limited propulsion.^[78] These undulations are primarily driven by axial musculature, enabling basic orientation but not sustained locomotion, as the larvae depend on yolk reserves for energy.^[79] In the subsequent preflexion stage, as the notochord remains straight and the caudal fin begins to form, larvae incorporate initial caudal fin beats, marking a transition toward more effective oscillatory movements.^[80] Swimming modes in early stages resemble anguilliform patterns, characterized by propagating body waves from head to tail that generate thrust through whole-body undulations.^[81] These larvae operate at low Reynolds numbers (Re < 100), where viscous forces dominate over inertial ones, resulting in swimming that prioritizes drag reduction in highly resistive fluid environments.^[82] Typical cruising speeds range from 1-10 body lengths per second (BL/s), progressively increasing with developmental age as musculature strengthens and fin structures mature.^[83] For burst swimming, larvae employ C-start escapes, achieving velocities up to approximately 20 BL/s through rapid tail curvature and recoil. Pectoral fins emerge shortly post-hatch and function primarily for steering and maneuvering during slow swims, with rhythmic adduction-abduction aiding subtle turns rather than generating significant thrust.^[83] Their contribution to propulsion remains limited until the flexion stage, when caudal and median fins develop further to support integrated body-caudal-fin locomotion.^[84] In representative examples, such as zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae, phototactic swimming emerges around day 3 post-fertilization, with individuals directing undulatory bursts toward light sources to navigate their environment.^[85] Recent research utilizing optogenetics in larval zebrafish has elucidated neural circuits governing tail beats, demonstrating how targeted stimulation of brainstem regions initiates and modulates undulations in viscous-dominated flows. These findings highlight the role of reticulospinal neurons in coordinating early swimming rhythms, approximating primitive versions of adult anguilliform propulsion.^[86]

Hydrodynamics of Larvae

Fish larvae navigate fluid environments characterized by low to intermediate Reynolds numbers (Re ≈ 10–1000), where viscous forces predominate over inertial ones, resulting in nearly inertialess motion. In this regime, drag is primarily viscous, approximated for simple geometries by Stokes' law as F_d \approx 6 \pi \eta r v, with \eta denoting dynamic viscosity, r the characteristic radius, and v the velocity. Although larval bodies are elongated rather than spherical, this formulation underscores the dominance of skin friction over form drag, with viscous effects permeating the entire flow field around the larva.^[87] The prevalence of viscous forces leads to thick boundary layers relative to larval body size, with thickness scaling as \delta \approx \sqrt{\nu t} (\nu kinematic viscosity, t time scale), which envelops the swimmer and elevates drag coefficients above unity (C_d > 1). This contrasts sharply with adult fish, where thinner boundary layers and inertial dominance yield lower C_d (typically < 0.1). High viscous drag necessitates energy-intensive propulsion, yielding low efficiencies (\eta < 0.5) due to dissipative losses in the surrounding fluid; larvae mitigate this through high-frequency tail beats (20–50 Hz) that generate unsteady flows for thrust.^[88]^[81]^[89] In the context of settlement and dispersal, larvae predominantly undergo passive drift, punctuated by active swimming bursts to counter advection or exploit flow gradients, while interacting with ambient turbulence at Re 10–1000 that influences patchiness and retention. Ontogenetic development triggers a regime shift as body length reaches 10–20 mm, transitioning from viscous-dominated larval hydrodynamics to inertial juvenile flows, altering wake dynamics and locomotor demands. Recent micro-particle image velocimetry (micro-PIV) investigations of larval wakes demonstrate rapid diffusive dissipation of vortices—diffusing broadly without coherent shedding—unlike the persistent, organized structures in adult wakes that enhance momentum transfer.^[90]^[91]^[92]^[88]

Larval Behavior

Larval fish employ rheotaxis, the behavioral alignment with prevailing water currents, to maintain position and navigate, primarily mediated by the lateral line system and visual cues in species such as zebrafish.^[93] Phototaxis, particularly positive responses to light, guides larvae toward illuminated areas, influencing their vertical positioning and potentially leading to aggregation near tank walls in aquaculture settings.^[94] Vertical migrations are enabled by swim bladder inflation, where larvae surface at night to ingest air, achieving neutral buoyancy and facilitating diel movements between surface and deeper layers.^[95] Schooling behaviors emerge in many larval fish at sizes of approximately 5 mm, transitioning from solitary swimming to coordinated groups that reduce individual predation risk through the dilution effect, where predators are less likely to target any single member.^[96] This synchronization is achieved via the lateral line system, which detects hydrodynamic signals from nearby conspecifics, allowing precise alignment and velocity matching within the school.^[97] Foraging involves burst swimming to pursue and capture prey, with some larval reef fish, such as clownfish (Amphiprion melanopus), capable of speeds up to approximately 50 body lengths per second (BL/s) during these accelerations.^[98] Escape responses, such as the C-start, are triggered by Mauthner cells in the brainstem, enabling rapid, high-speed tail flips that propel larvae away from threats, with performance scaling comparably to adults relative to body size.^[99] Dispersal behaviors include active swimming in surface layers to exploit currents for broader distribution, though these are modulated by salinity gradients, where strong haloclines can impede vertical movements and limit horizontal spread.^[100] In reef-associated species, such as clownfish, larvae utilize olfactory cues from terrestrial runoff, like plant-derived chemicals, to orient toward suitable settlement habitats during their final swimming phase.^[101] Recent studies indicate that warming oceans accelerate larval growth rates, shortening the pelagic duration and reducing overall dispersal distances by enabling faster attainment of settlement size, potentially by up to 20% in modeled scenarios for certain species.^[102]

References

[1]
[PDF] Fish Locomotion: Recent Advances and New Directions
Sep 19, 2014 · Many useful review papers and books provide an overview of fish locomotion, beginning with the classic works of Sir James Gray (1953, 1968) ...
[2]
Research Development on Fish Swimming
Sep 5, 2022 · Scientists hope to use both muscle activity and neural activity to interpret fish locomotion mechanism. Williams and Tytell analyzed the ...
[3]
[PDF] Fluid Mechanics of Fish Swimming - Indian Academy of Sciences
Drag force is generally due to contributions from °uid pressure and tangential (viscous) stress acting on the surface of the body. For streamlined bodies, ...
[4]
[PDF] Hydrodynamcs And Energetics of Fish Propulsion - Canada.ca
thrust, and defined kinematic conditions required. 1936. Sir James Gray used hydrodynamic theory of drag for rigid bodies of revolution to calculate drag of a ...
[5]
Towards a standard application of the Reynolds number in studies ...
Feb 24, 2025 · The Reynolds number is one of the most commonly used non-dimensional groups in aquatic and aerial animal locomotion studies.
[6]
Water - Dynamic and Kinematic Viscosity at Various Temperatures ...
Free online calculator - figures and tables with viscosity of water at temperatures ranging 0 to 360°C (32 to 675°F) - Imperial and SI Units.
[7]
Undulatory and oscillatory swimming | Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Jul 4, 2019 · Four classical categories of fish undulatory propulsion illustrated with fish outlines and midlines derived from recent experimental data.
[8]
Review of fish swimming modes for aquatic locomotion - IEEE Xplore
Considering the potential benefits involved, this paper presents an overview of the swimming mechanisms employed by fish. ... (oscillatory or undulatory) employed ...
[9]
Hydrodynamics of Undulatory Propulsion - ScienceDirect.com
The chapter focuses on recent experimental hydrodynamic data on undulatory locomotion in fishes, and provides a general description of the major theoretical ...Missing: mechanisms paper
[10]
Efficient cruising for swimming and flying animals is dictated by fluid ...
We argue that the Strouhal number for peak efficiency is largely determined by fluid drag on the fins and wings.
[11]
Strouhal numbers and optimization of swimming by odontocete ...
Apr 15, 2004 · ... Strouhal number, which for the range between 0.20 and 0.40 has been associated with enhanced swimming efficiency for fish and cetaceans. Yet ...
[12]
Strouhal numbers and optimization of swimming by odontocete ...
A greater proportion of Strouhal values occur between 0.20 and 0.30 (74%) than the 0.25-0.35 (55%) range predicted for maximum swimming efficiency. Within 0.05 ...
[13]
Control surfaces of aquatic vertebrates: active and passive design ...
Dec 1, 2017 · Rotational movements include roll (rotation around the longitudinal axis), pitch (rotation around the transverse axis) and yaw (rotation around ...
[14]
Body and Pectoral Fin Kinematics During Routine Yaw Turning in ...
Jun 22, 2019 · During vertical maneuvering, pectoral fins generate thrust to reorient the body (Wilga and Lauder 2000, 2001), and asynchronous pectoral fin ...
[15]
Neutral buoyancy is optimal to minimize the cost of transport in ...
Jul 16, 2013 · We conclude that neutral buoyancy is likely the best body density to minimize the cost of transport in horizontal swimming by seals.
[16]
Burst-and-coast swimmers optimize gait by adapting unique intrinsic ...
Jan 14, 2021 · The burst phase is a sequence of tail beats with nominally constant frequency and amplitude.
[17]
The effect of temperature on tail beat frequency of fish swimming at ...
Tail beat frequency was measured during steady swimming. Both tail beat frequency and stride length (distance moved per tail beat) increased with increased swim ...
[18]
Fish functional design and swimming performance - Blake - 2004
Nov 3, 2004 · Axial undulatory propulsors in steady (periodic) continuous swimming fall into four groups: anguilliform, sub-carangiform, carangiform and ...
[19]
(PDF) Undulatory Locomotion in Elongate Aquatic Vertebrates
Aug 6, 2025 · Anguilliform locomotion is the mode of undulatory swimming used by eels and other elongate vertebrates in which waves (of shorter length ...
[20]
[PDF] Review of fish swimming modes for aquatic locomotion
Thunniform mode is the most efficient locomotion mode ... Application of this method to PIV data obtained for a swimming mullet yielded a propulsive efficiency.
[21]
Robot Fish Caudal Propulsive Mechanisms: A Mini-Review
The caudal mechanisms were classified by the commonly known five undulation modes: anguilliform, subcarangiform, carangiform, thunniform and ostraciiform. The ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[22]
[PDF] Maximum swimming speeds of sailfish and three other large marine ...
Aug 16, 2016 · ... speed estimated based on rod and reel in another tuna species (i.e. 20.7 m s. −1 in Thunnus albacares) (Walters and Fierstine, 1964). For ...
[23]
(PDF) Hydrodynamics of Bluefin Tuna -A Review - ResearchGate
Feb 18, 2021 · speed from 6 to 10 m/s [30], while as Tuna can swim at 20 to 27 m/s. ... thunniform swimming under self-propulsion." Ocean Engineering 110 ...
[24]
Boxfish swimming paradox resolved: forces by the flow of water ...
This automatic course stabilization is hypothesized to be important to damp perturbations when swimming and to keep boxfish on their desired paths when ...
[25]
Keels of boxfish carapaces strongly improve stabilization against roll
Jun 2, 2022 · Boxfishes usually live in extremely turbulent parts of seas and oceans, with high stability and maneuverability that has caught the ...
[26]
Fish swimming efficiency - ScienceDirect.com
Jun 20, 2022 · One is friction drag and depends on the skin surface, and the other is pressure drag and depends on the body shape. Sharks, tunas and other fast ...Missing: equation | Show results with:equation
[27]
(PDF) Vortex dynamics in wake–body and wake-fin interactions of ...
Aug 4, 2025 · This study investigates the mechanisms of schooling interactions in thunniform swimmers, focusing on body effects, using high-fidelity three- ...
[28]
Rajiform locomotion: three-dimensional kinematics of the pectoral fin ...
Rajiform locomotion in fishes is dominated by distinctive undulations of expanded pectoral fins. Unlike other fishes, which typically interact with the ...
[29]
Numerical study of a self-propelled biomimetic robotic fish driven by ...
Sep 26, 2024 · ... carangiform and thunniform mode fishes during self ... robotic fish in the labriform swimming mode have been investigated numerically.
[30]
Forces, Fishes, and Fluids: Hydrodynamic Mechanisms of Aquatic ...
The first step in measuring locomotor forces generated by swimming fishes is to quantify the water flow pattern in the wake of the body and fins. Figure 1 ...
[31]
Sink and swim: kinematic evidence for lifting-body mechanisms in ...
Sep 1, 2011 · This regression model supports the prediction that the St of horizontal BCF swimming is correlated with disc orientation and body shape, both ...
[32]
Functional Dorsoventral Symmetry in Relation to Lift-Based ...
Oct 22, 2008 · Efficient lift-based swimming in conjunction with neutral buoyancy enables sunfish to travel long distances both horizontally and vertically.
[33]
[PDF] Biomechanics of Locomotion in Sharks, Rays, and Chimaeras
During propulsion and maneuvering in sharks, skates, and rays, both median fins (caudal, dorsal, and anal) as well as paired fins (pectoral and pelvic) play an ...
[34]
Stability Versus Maneuverability in Aquatic Locomotion1
The conflict between stability and maneuverability in aquatic locomotion. The present paper addresses several issues resulting from these opposing requirements.
[35]
[PDF] MIT Open Access Articles Quantitative wake analysis of a freely ...
PIV measurements taken behind steadily swimming fish along the horizontal mid-plane of the body reveal clear reverse Kármán street vortex configurations in the.
[36]
In-line swimming dynamics revealed by fish interacting with a robotic ...
Feb 6, 2023 · We show that trout swim in thrust wakes, reduce their tail-beat frequencies, and synchronize with the robotic flapping mechanism.
[37]
On the role of added mass and vorticity release for self-propelled ...
May 17, 2021 · The added mass plays a crucial role, not only for the initial burst, but also along each manoeuvre, to accelerate the surrounding fluid for generating the ...
[38]
Hydrodynamics of linear acceleration in bluegill sunfish, Lepomis ...
This effect is called 'added mass' (Faber, 1995); it is as if the fish had a larger mass than only its body.Missing: virtual | Show results with:virtual
[39]
Slime-Groove Drag Reduction Characteristics and Mechanism of ...
Mar 14, 2022 · Therefore, it helps to reduce the frictional resistance on the surface of fish scales. ... Turbulent boundary layer drag reduction using riblets .
[40]
Hydrodynamic Function of the Slimy and Scaly Surfaces of Teleost ...
The scales and skin mucus of bony fishes are both proposed to have a role in beneficially modifying the hydrodynamics of water flow over the body surface.
[41]
Not Just Going with the Flow | American Scientist
Drag is produced mainly from frictional and pressure forces resulting from the interaction of the fluid and the body. Frictional drag is caused by friction ...
[42]
The fish tail motion forms an attached leading edge vortex - PMC - NIH
A mechanism that is known to greatly enhance locomotor forces in insect and bird flight is the leading edge vortex (LEV) reattachment, i.e. a vortex (separation ...
[43]
The fish tail motion forms an attached leading edge vortex - Journals
Apr 7, 2013 · A mechanism that is known to greatly enhance locomotor forces in insect and bird flight is the leading edge vortex (LEV) reattachment, i.e. a ...
[44]
Numerical study on the hydrodynamics of thunniform bio-inspired ...
Numerical simulations are employed to study the hydrodynamics of self-propelled thunniform swimming. The swimmer is modeled as a tuna-like flexible body ...
[45]
Numerical study of the thunniform mode of fish swimming with ...
Numerical results demonstrate that the propulsion performance is better when considering turbulence models at higher Reynolds number, because the flow ...
[46]
https://columbian.gwu.edu/shape-fish-holds-key-evolutionary-mystery
[47]
A Bio-Inspired Drag Reduction Method of Bionic Fish Skin Mucus ...
Mar 6, 2024 · The drag reduction effect varied under different bending angles, with the optimal reduction achieved at a bending angle of 120°, reaching 20.56% ...2. Materials And Methods · 2.2. Drag Reduction... · 3. Results And Analysis
[48]
Optimized Fish Locomotion using Design-by-Morphing and ... - arXiv
Sep 27, 2025 · The optimized profile achieves a significantly improved efficiency of 82.4%, while the second- and third-best profiles achieve efficiencies of ...
[49]
Shape of Fish Holds Key to Evolutionary Mystery
Jan 14, 2021 · Fish that transition from bottom-dwellers to midwater swimmers evolve their bodies in predictable ways, shedding deep-torsos and truncate tail fins for slender ...Missing: fusiform tuna depressed rays aspect ratio<|separator|>
[50]
A mechanical analysis of myomere shape in fish - PubMed
An architectural analysis is offered of the trunk muscles in fish, which are arranged in a longitudinal series of geometrically complex myomeres.Missing: zigzag | Show results with:zigzag
[51]
Muscle fibre types of fishes : structural and functional specialization
Oct 5, 1984 · Muscles of fishes are active in a variety of movements that differ in velocity, duration and excursion length. To investigate how muscles ...<|separator|>
[52]
The mechanics of active fin-shape control in ray-finned fishes - PMC
This basic fan-like design allows fishes to change fin area during locomotion, and this architecture provides a balance between stiffness and flexibility, which ...
[53]
the morphology and mechanics behind the fin ray derived limbs of ...
Sep 28, 2020 · Fish fin rays (lepidotrichia) are typically composed of paired and segmented flexible structures (hemitrichia) that help support and change ...
[54]
Simulation and mechanism of the synergistic drag reduction ...
The results indicate that the highest drag reduction rate (37.5 %) is achieved when the mucus secretion velocity is 0.25 m/s in the curved groove.Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage<|separator|>
[55]
Maximum Sustainable Speeds and Cost of Swimming in Juvenile ...
Oct 15, 2000 · The net cost of transport (J km−1), measured at a water temperature of 24 °C, for juvenile kawakawa tuna (Euthynnus affinis), chub mackerel ( ...
[56]
Hox genes control homocercal caudal fin development and evolution
Jan 19, 2024 · Here, we investigated the role of hox13 genes in caudal fin formation as these genes control posterior identity in animals.
[57]
Teleost Hox code defines regional identities competent for ... - PNAS
Jun 11, 2024 · Our study in zebrafish and medaka elucidates how specific hox genes delineate regional identities critical for fin development.
[58]
https://www.fishbase.se/summary/FamilySummary.php?ID=206
[59]
Wing design and scaling of flying fish with regard to flight performance
The wing, as indicated by the aspect ratio, is designed for high lift with low drag characteristics.
[60]
Aerodynamic characteristics of flying fish in gliding flight
Oct 1, 2010 · The flying fish glides over a total distance of as much as 400 m in 30 s by a successive sequence of taxiing and flight, and its maximum flight ...
[61]
FAMILY Details for Exocoetidae - Flyingfishes - FishBase
Nov 29, 2012 · Family Exocoetidae - Flyingfishes ; Order, : Beloniformes ; Class, : Teleostei ; No. in FishBase, : Genera : 7 | Species : 71 Eschmeyer's Catalog ...
[62]
Wing-loading, stability and morphometric relationships in flying fish ...
The 'non-flying' flying fish, Oxyporhamphus micropterus, has very high wing-loadings, but the main reason that it cannot fly is that the centre of gravity of ...Missing: cm² | Show results with:cm²
[63]
(PDF) Mudskipper pectoral fin kinematics in aquatic and terrestrial ...
Crutching (walking) in mudskippers is made possible by a pair of joints in the pectoral fin, analogous to the elbow joint in tetrapods, and increased ...
[64]
[PDF] NON-LEGGED LOCOMOTION ON COMPLEX 3-D TERRAIN AND ...
When using this gait, the mudskipper uses its two pectoral fins in phase with each other to lift the body and crutch forward with minimum to no body bending.
[65]
Behavioral evidence for the evolution of walking and bounding ... - NIH
We found that a species of African lungfish (Protopterus annectens) uses a range of pelvic fin-driven, tetrapod-like gaits, including walking and bounding, in ...
[66]
Functional subdivision of fin protractor and retractor muscles ...
Oct 1, 2014 · ... mechanism that allows lungfish to produce a tetrapod-like walking gait with only two muscles. As one of few extant sarcopterygian fishes, P ...
[67]
Trackways Produced by Lungfish During Terrestrial Locomotion
Sep 27, 2016 · Generally, the animal moved in the direction it was placed and proceeded at a rate of ~1–2 cm/s. Speed was consistently slow, even when attempts ...
[68]
[PDF] Three-dimensional Tracking Method for Water-Hopping ... - bioRxiv
kinematics report of mudskipper locomotion, classifying ... consequently low speed (< 0.5m/s). ... Terrestrial and aerial organisms, such as rabbits moving on land.
[69]
Mudskipper genomes provide insights into the terrestrial adaptation ...
Dec 2, 2014 · Mudskippers are amphibious fishes that have developed morphological and physiological adaptations to match their unique lifestyles.
[70]
Mudskippers and Their Genetic Adaptations to an Amphibious ...
Feb 7, 2018 · Pectoral fins are employed for mudskippers' locomotion on land (Figure 5A,B), while pectoral fins, the axial musculature, and caudal fins are ...Missing: walking | Show results with:walking
[71]
The Fish–Tetrapod Transition: New Fossils and Interpretations
Mar 17, 2009 · Eusthenopteron was entirely typical of early fish in this respect. In 1938, parts of the skull of a fossil fish were found in the same deposits ...
[72]
Lungfish Axial Muscle Function and the Vertebrate Water to Land ...
Lungfish are an ideal group to study the role of axial function in terrestrial locomotion as they are the sister taxon to tetrapods and regularly move on land.
[73]
Mudskipper-inspired amphibious robotic fish enhances locomotion ...
Sep 18, 2023 · Propulsive forces of mudskipper fins and · salamander limbs during terrestrial · locomotion: implications for the invasion of · land. Integr.
[74]
Behaviour and muscle activity across the aquatic-terrestrial ...
Dec 1, 2022 · Amphibious fishes moving from water to land experience continuous changes in environmental forces. How these subtle changes impact ...
[75]
Behaviour and muscle activity across the aquatic–terrestrial ...
Thus, walking appears to be based on swimming-like axial muscle activity whereas kinematic differences between swimming and walking appear to be due to ...
[76]
Burrowing and subsurface locomotion in anguilliform fish
Apr 15, 2011 · Fish are likely to adjust their behaviors depending on substrate mechanics, the speed of movement, the magnitude of forces exerted, and the ...
[77]
If looks could kill… - PMC - NIH
The water exits adjacent to the pectoral fin causing the sand just above the discharge to dance as if there were a small creature there.
[78]
Burrowing behaviour of the European eel (Anguilla anguilla) - PubMed
This study investigated the burrowing behaviour and substrate preference of glass, elver and yellow stages of A. anguilla.Missing: mechanisms anguilliform thrashing pectoral scooping gobies
[79]
[PDF] Burrowing behaviour of the European eel (Anguilla anguilla)
Anguilliformes, burrowing behaviour has been observed. Anguilliform fish possess two. 69. Page 5. mechanisms for burrowing: tail-first and/or head-first ...Missing: thrashing pectoral gobies
[80]
Lateral line system of fish - PubMed
The lateral line is a sensory system that allows fishes to detect weak water motions and pressure gradients.
[81]
(PDF) Burrowing behaviour of the European eel (Anguilla anguilla)
Of the substrates tested, burrowing performance was highest in fine gravel (diameter 1–2 mm; lower burrowing duration, less body movements and/or lower ...Missing: thrashing pectoral
[82]
The effectiveness of resistive force theory in granular locomotion
Oct 29, 2014 · Resistive force theory (RFT) is often used to analyze the movement of microscopic organisms swimming in fluids.
[83]
Amblyopinae) - PMC - PubMed Central
Aug 17, 2023 · How these bony fishes have evolved to adapt to such mudflat burrowing habitats still remains to be elucidated. One group of the bony fishes that ...
[84]
Localized fluidization burrowing mechanics of Ensis directus
Jun 15, 2012 · In this paper, we show that the animal uses the motions of its valves to locally fluidize the surrounding soil and reduce burrowing drag.
[85]
Zebrafish Developmental Staging Series - ZFIN
Zebrafish Developmental Staging Series ; Larval · Days 21-29, 21 d, 7.8 mm total body length, Browse AO ; Juvenile, Days 30-44, 30 d, 10 mm total body length; ...
[86]
Normal Table of Post-Embryonic Zebrafish Development: Staging by ...
... yolk sac (Kelsh et al., 2008). Transformation to the adult melanophore pattern begins at ~6 mm SL with the appearance of a few metamorphic melanophores over ...
[87]
[PDF] TRD 01: Early Life History Descriptions
In preflexion larvae notochord segmentation posterior to the terminal myomere may be mistaken for additional myomeres. Gut. The gut of fish larvae always starts ...
[88]
Body dynamics and hydrodynamics of swimming fish larvae
This study quantifies the flow around a swimming zebrafish (Danio rerio) larva. We used morphological and kinematics data from actual fish larvae aged 3 and 5 ...
[89]
Experimental–numerical method for calculating bending moments in ...
Although they tend to swim at lower relative motion amplitudes than those of larval fish ... The intermediate Reynolds number of the zebrafish larvae (45 ...
[90]
Movement and function of the pectoral fins of the larval zebrafish ...
Sep 15, 2011 · Pectoral fins are known to play important roles in swimming for many adult fish; however, their functions in fish larvae are unclear.Missing: development post- hatch steering thrust flexion
[91]
Movement and function of the pectoral fins of the larval zebrafish ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Pectoral fins are known to play important roles in swimming for many adult fish; however, their functions in fish larvae are unclear.
[92]
Emergence of consistent intra-individual locomotor patterns during ...
Sep 20, 2019 · ... 3 days post fertilization (dpf) that larvae begin to swim spontaneously. Initial movements are in short and infrequent bursts, eventually ...
[93]
From perception to behavior: The neural circuits underlying prey ...
Jan 31, 2023 · In this review we discuss how the larval zebrafish brain processes visual information to identify and locate prey, the neural circuits governing the generation ...
[94]
(PDF) Body dynamics and hydrodynamics of swimming fish larvae
Aug 6, 2025 · Body dynamics and hydrodynamics of swimming fish larvae: A computational study ... dynamics in the intermediate and low Reynolds number regimes.
[95]
Flow patterns of larval fish: undulatory swimming in the intermediate ...
Jan 15, 2008 · ... wake structure, particle image velocimetry, DPIV, fish larvae, Danio rerio ... However, a similar wake to that of larval zebrafish – two separate ...
[96]
Spatiotemporal Transition in the Role of Synaptic Inhibition to the ...
Larval zebrafish tail beat frequency during swimming is mainly between 20 and 40 Hz. A, Four superposed frames recorded during a single swimming episode of a 4- ...
[97]
Using Turbulence to Identify Preferential Areas for Grass Carp ...
Dec 24, 2020 · All larvae develop swimming capabilities to find safe nursery habitat with desirable water temperature and food availability, minimizing ...2.1 Experimental Setup · 3.2 Larvae Swimming Speeds · 3.3 Larvae Spatial...Missing: micro- | Show results with:micro-
[98]
Fish larvae dynamics in temperate estuaries: A review on processes ...
Mar 8, 2023 · Larval retention within estuary involves a range of passive and active drift strategies to avoid being washed out, reduce energy costs and ...
[99]
Biomechanics of swimming in developing larval fish
Jan 11, 2018 · In the intermediate flow regime, fish larvae have to deal with relatively strong viscous effects at low swimming speeds, whereas, at their ...
[100]
Rheotaxis in Larval Zebrafish Is Mediated by Lateral Line ...
We found that zebrafish larvae perform positive rheotaxis and that, similar to adult fish, larvae use both visual and lateral line input to perform this ...Missing: phototaxis bladder
[101]
Positive phototaxis as the cause of jaw malformations in larval ...
Mar 25, 2020 · These results indicate that positive phototaxis elicits larval walling behaviour, causing jaw malformations, and that low-brightness tank walls control this ...
[102]
[PDF] diel changes in swim bladder inflation of the larvae of the northern ...
Laboratory experiments indicated that larvae fill their bladders at night by swallowing air at the water surface and the vertical distribution of sea-caught ...Missing: rheotaxis phototaxis
[103]
Biophysical Simulations Support Schooling Behavior of Fish Larvae ...
Previous studies indicated that Aldrichetta forsteri and Gobiosoma boscifish larvae school at early stages when their size is ~5 mm and their fins are not fully ...Missing: onset | Show results with:onset
[104]
Fish School - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Ablation of the lateral line has been observed to alter the positioning of fish in schools, with individuals being more likely to swim closer together and ...
[105]
Relative swimming speeds in reef fish larvae
Feb 14, 2025 · The ability of late stage reef fish larvae to achieve swimming speeds of over 40 bls–1 is consistent with this gen- eral scaling ...
[106]
A review of Mauthner-initiated escape behavior and its possible role ...
Relative to body size, the speed of the embryonic and larval C-start is comparable with that of the adult. These responses in the zebrafish, Brachydanio ...
[107]
Larval dispersal in a changing ocean with an emphasis on ...
Jan 24, 2020 · Strongly swimming larvae are more impeded by haloclines (strong vertical salinity gradients) than thermoclines (strong vertical temperature ...
[108]
Coral reef fish smell leaves to find island homes - PMC - NIH
One hypothesis is that larvae use olfactory cues to navigate home or find other suitable reef habitats. Here we show a strong association between the ...
[109]
Temperature reduces fish dispersal as larvae grow faster to their ...
This was because, with increasing temperature, larvae grew quicker to their settlement size. Settlement size itself was less affected by temperature and appears ...Missing: 2024 2025