Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Humerus fracture

A fracture is a break in the , the of the upper arm that connects the to the , and it can occur in the proximal (upper) portion near the , the (middle) section, or the distal (lower) portion near the . These fractures represent approximately 4-6% of all fractures in younger patients and 1-3% in the elderly, with higher incidence in young men due to high-energy and in older women from low-energy falls. Causes of humerus fractures typically involve direct , such as falls onto an outstretched hand or , sports-related impacts, accidents, or direct blows to the arm. In older adults, underlying conditions like weaken the bone, increasing susceptibility to fractures from minor falls or ground-level impacts. fractures may also arise from bone tumors or metastatic , compromising the bone's integrity without significant . Symptoms commonly include severe pain at the injury site that intensifies with movement, swelling, bruising, and tenderness, often accompanied by an inability to lift the or rotate the . may be visible if the is displaced, and in distal fractures, , , or bruising around the can occur. Nerve involvement, such as in shaft fractures, may cause weakness or numbness in the hand. Diagnosis begins with a to assess pain, swelling, and neurovascular status, followed by X-rays in multiple views (anteroposterior, lateral, and axillary) to confirm the location, , and type. Advanced imaging like scans is used for complex or intra-articular to evaluate fragmentation and plan . Treatment varies by location and severity, with many cases managed nonoperatively using such as a for proximal or a functional for , promoting through the bone's good and non-weight-bearing nature. Surgical intervention, including open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plates and screws, is indicated for displaced, open, or unstable , particularly in distal cases where stability is crucial. In severe proximal or distal in older patients, options like hemiarthroplasty or total replacement may be employed to restore function. Complications can include nerve injuries (e.g., axillary or damage), blood vessel disruption leading to —an emergency requiring prompt —and joint stiffness from prolonged immobilization. Long-term issues may involve , , or temporary disability, though most fractures heal well with appropriate care.

Clinical Presentation

Signs and Symptoms

A humerus fracture typically presents with severe pain at the site of injury, which is often immediate and intensifies with any movement of the arm. This pain can radiate along the upper arm and significantly limits the patient's ability to use the affected limb, such as lifting or rotating the arm. Patients frequently report a grinding or crunching sensation during attempted motion, reflecting the mechanical disruption of the bone. Swelling and bruising, known as ecchymosis, commonly develop around the fracture site in the upper arm, often extending to adjacent areas like the or . The affected area becomes tender to touch, contributing to further discomfort and reluctance to manipulate the limb. These changes arise from local hemorrhage and following the break. Functional impairment is prominent, with decreased and inability to perform routine tasks like raising the overhead or supporting weight. In severe cases, visible may occur, such as shortening, angulation, or an abnormal contour of the upper due to . If neurovascular structures are compromised by the fragments or associated , patients may experience numbness, tingling, or weakness in the or hand, indicating potential or vascular involvement. Symptoms can vary modestly by location along the , but the primary manifestations of , swelling, and limited function are consistent across cases.

Physical Examination

The physical examination of a suspected humerus fracture begins with a systematic assessment to identify , associated , and neurovascular compromise, while minimizing patient discomfort. Inspection reveals swelling, ecchymosis, and potential skin tenting or open wounds indicating an , with ecchymosis often extending to the chest, , or in proximal injuries due to spread. may present as , varus angulation, or rotational malalignment, particularly in shaft fractures distal to the deltoid insertion, where the appears shortened and adducted. Skin integrity is evaluated for lacerations or punctures, as these suggest and necessitate urgent . Palpation is performed gently along the to localize point tenderness, elicit from bone ends rubbing together, and assess abnormal by rotating the humeral while palpating the proximal or distal segments for unified motion. In proximal fractures, palpation of the humeral head during gentle helps determine stability and detect , while fractures often show focal tenderness and at the mid-. Distal fractures may exhibit tenderness over the with in the . testing is limited by pain, with active and passive , flexion, and eliciting severe discomfort, particularly in proximal injuries where motion is restricted. Neurovascular examination is critical, as up to 18% of shaft fractures involve injury, manifesting as (weakness in wrist and finger extension) and sensory loss over the dorsal hand first web space. The is most commonly affected in proximal fractures, tested by deltoid contraction and sensation over the lateral shoulder, while distal fractures risk , ulnar, or deficits, assessed via motor function (e.g., thumb opposition for ) and sensory testing in dermatomes. Vascular status includes palpation of brachial, radial, and ulnar pulses, with comparison to the contralateral side and monitoring for ; absent pulses warrant immediate or exploration.

Etiology and Risk Factors

Mechanisms of Injury

Humerus fractures result from biomechanical forces that exceed the bone's structural integrity, typically involving direct trauma, indirect forces, or a combination thereof, leading to stress concentrations that propagate cracks in transverse, oblique, spiral, or comminuted patterns depending on the loading direction and magnitude. Direct trauma applies localized perpendicular force, often causing transverse fractures through bending stress at the impact site, while indirect mechanisms like axial loading or torsion generate oblique or spiral patterns due to shear and twisting stresses along the bone's longitudinal axis. High-energy mechanisms, such as motor vehicle accidents, produce comminuted fractures with multiple fragments from explosive force distribution, whereas low-energy events like ground-level falls result in simpler patterns, particularly in osteoporotic bone. For proximal humerus fractures, the most common mechanism is a low-energy fall onto an outstretched hand (FOOSH) with the arm in and external , transmitting axial and varus to the humeral head, often in elderly patients. In younger individuals, high-energy direct impacts from sports or vehicular collisions cause similar but with greater displacement. A specific example is avulsion of the greater tuberosity, resulting from sudden contraction of the muscles (supraspinatus and infraspinatus) during forceful or external , often associated with anterior , where tensile pulls the tuberosity fragment away from the . Humeral shaft fractures predominantly arise from direct blows to the mid-arm, such as in assaults or falls onto the lateral , generating transverse lines perpendicular to the force due to localized bending in the . Indirect mechanisms include FOOSH with the extended, driving the distal proximally and creating oblique or impacted patterns from axial . High-energy scenarios like accidents account for about 30% of cases, leading to comminuted or segmental fractures from combined bending and torsional forces, while low-energy ground-level falls comprise 60%, typically yielding simpler transverse or spiral configurations. Distal humerus fractures often stem from high-energy direct in younger adults, such as dashboard impacts in collisions compressing the posteriorly, resulting in supracondylar or intercondylar patterns with posterior displacement from varus or valgus stress. Low-energy FOOSH in the elderly transmits axial load through the , hyperextending the and fracturing the supracondylar region via tension on the anterior and posteriorly. Indirect varus or valgus forces from falls with the twisted can isolate medial or lateral columns, producing T- or Y-shaped intra-articular fractures due to uneven stress distribution across the trochlea.

Predisposing Factors

Bone health issues, particularly and , significantly increase the susceptibility to humerus fractures, especially fragility fractures of the proximal humerus in older adults. weakens bone density, making it more prone to low-energy trauma such as falls from standing height, and is particularly prevalent among postmenopausal women due to deficiency accelerating bone loss. Similarly, represents a precursor state that heightens fracture risk without the full severity of . Age-related factors contribute distinctly across life stages, with higher incidence of proximal humerus fragility fractures in the elderly over 65 years due to cumulative loss and reduced muscle strength. In children, particularly those aged 5 to 7 years, distal humerus fractures like supracondylar or greenstick types are more common, predisposed by the flexibility of immature bones with thicker that favors incomplete fractures during falls. Comorbidities such as neurological conditions, including , elevate fracture risk through impaired balance and increased fall propensity, with stroke survivors facing 1.4 to 7 times higher odds of humerus fractures compared to the general population. Malignancy-related pathologic fractures of the humerus often stem from metastatic bone lesions weakening the cortex, commonly from primaries like , , or . Lifestyle factors impairing bone integrity include chronic and , which reduce density and healing capacity, thereby increasing humerus fracture susceptibility; for instance, consumption exceeding moderate levels disrupts calcium absorption, while inhibits activity. Participation in high-risk activities, such as contact sports, predisposes individuals to humerus shaft fractures via direct impact or torsional forces. Anatomical variations, including pre-existing deformities or prior fractures, compromise bone strength and elevate the risk of subsequent humerus fractures by creating stress risers or altering load distribution.

Types and Classification

Proximal Humerus Fractures

Proximal humerus fractures involve the upper end of the , including the humeral head, anatomic neck, surgical neck, greater tuberosity, and lesser tuberosity. These fractures are common in older adults due to and in younger patients from high-energy . They are classified primarily using the Neer classification system, which divides the proximal humerus into four segments: the humeral head, , greater tuberosity, and lesser tuberosity. A segment is considered displaced if separation exceeds 1 cm or angulation is greater than 45 degrees.
  • One-part fractures: Nondisplaced or minimally , involving any number of segments without significant separation; these represent the majority of cases and often include impacted fractures.
  • Two-part fractures: of one segment, such as surgical , anatomic , greater tuberosity, or lesser tuberosity fractures.
  • Three-part fractures: of two segments, typically involving the surgical plus one tuberosity.
  • Four-part fractures: of all four segments, often with high risk of due to disrupted blood supply to the humeral head; includes head-split and valgus impaction variants.
The AO/OTA classification provides an alternative, grouping fractures as 11A (extra-articular unifocal), 11B (extra-articular bifocal), or 11C (articular), with subgroups based on location and complexity. In children, proximal fractures are Salter-Harris types I-V, with type II (metaphyseal with plate involvement) most common, allowing for significant remodeling potential.

Humeral Shaft Fractures

Humeral shaft fractures occur in the , defined as the region from the proximal surgical to approximately 5 cm proximal to the fossa in the distal humerus. These represent about 3-5% of all fractures and are often transverse, oblique, spiral, or comminuted, resulting from direct or torsional forces. They are subclassified by location (proximal third, middle third, distal third) and pattern, with Holstein-Lewis fractures (distal third spiral) at higher risk for injury. The primary classification is the AO/OTA system (code 12), which categorizes based on fracture :
  • Type A (simple s): Single fracture line, including spiral (A1), oblique (A2), or transverse (A3) patterns.
  • Type B ( fractures): Multifragmentary with an intact , subdivided into intact (B1), fragmented (B2), or bending (B3).
  • Type C (multifragmentary/complex fractures): Irregular, highly comminuted without a defined , including segmental (C2) or highly irregular (C3) subtypes.
Pathologic fractures in the , often from metastases or tumors, follow the same morphological but require etiology-specific . In pediatric cases, fractures are typically deformations or greenstick types due to the pliability of immature .

Distal Humerus Fractures

Distal humerus fractures involve the and/or articular surface of the lower humerus, from 5 cm above the to the supracondylar ridges. These account for 2% of fractures in s and up to 60% in children (primarily supracondylar), often from falls or varus/valgus stresses. They are intra-articular in 50-70% of cases, complicating management due to involvement. Adult distal humerus fractures are classified using the AO/OTA system (code 13):
  • Type A (extra-articular): Supracondylar or transcondylar without involvement, including simple (A1), wedge (A2), or complex (A3) metaphyseal patterns.
  • Type B (partial articular): Involves part of the articular surface, such as lateral/medial condyle (B1), transcondylar (B2), or frontal plane (capitellar/trochlear, B3).
  • Type C (complete articular): lines separate the articular surface from the shaft and cross both columns, with simple (C1), simple articular/simple metaphyseal (C2), or complex (C3) variants.
In children, supracondylar fractures (85% of pediatric distal fractures) use the Gartland classification:
  • Type I: Nondisplaced or minimally angulated (<5 degrees).
  • Type II: Displaced with intact posterior (IIa: angulated without rotation; IIb: with rotation).
  • Type III: Completely displaced, unstable in all planes.
  • Type IV: Unstable after reduction, with multidirectional instability.
Additional pediatric types include lateral condyle (Milch I/II), medial epicondyle, and T-condylar fractures. As of , the Copenhagen classification has emerged for research, emphasizing articular involvement (Type 1 extra-articular, Type 2 partial intra-articular, Type 3 complete articular).

Diagnosis

History and Clinical Assessment

The history and clinical assessment for a suspected humerus fracture begins with a detailed interview to establish the of and guide preliminary diagnostic judgment. Patients typically report acute onset following , most commonly a fall onto an outstretched hand or direct blow to the upper arm, though insidious onset may suggest a due to underlying bone weakness such as or . Inquiring about prior or surgeries to the affected arm is essential, as previous or can predispose to refracture or complicate . Associated symptoms often include severe localized pain exacerbated by movement, swelling, and limited in the or . Neurologic symptoms such as numbness or in the hand or may indicate radial involvement, particularly in humeral shaft fractures, while coolness or pallor of the extremity suggests vascular compromise. In high-energy injuries, systemic symptoms like , , or petechiae can signal , requiring urgent evaluation. Red flags during history-taking demand immediate attention, including open wounds indicating an , severe or worsening pain disproportionate to injury suggestive of , or acute neurovascular deficits such as absent distal pulses or motor weakness. Differential diagnosis considerations include soft tissue injuries like contusions or muscle strains, glenohumeral dislocation, and from pathology, which can mimic fracture symptoms but lack the acute traumatic history. Rotator cuff tears or impingement syndromes may present similarly in older patients with lower-energy mechanisms. Although no humerus-specific clinical decision rules exist, assessment incorporates standardized elements of and bedside evaluation, such as mechanism, symptom severity, and basic neurovascular checks, akin to the Elbow Extension Test for distal injuries, to determine suspicion level before imaging. Physical examination may reveal tenderness, deformity, or , supporting clinical suspicion.

Imaging and Diagnostic Tests

Diagnosis of humerus fractures typically begins with radiographic imaging to confirm the presence of a and assess its characteristics, complementing clinical suspicion from patient history. Standard X-rays are the initial modality of choice, providing essential details on location, displacement, and alignment. For proximal fractures, orthogonal views including a true anteroposterior () view of the scapula and glenohumeral joint, an axillary view, and a lateral scapular Y view are recommended to evaluate the in three planes and exclude associated glenohumeral . In humeral shaft fractures, and lateral views of the entire , including the and joints, are obtained to determine location (e.g., proximal, middle, or distal third) and type (e.g., transverse, oblique, or comminuted). For distal fractures, and lateral radiographs of the and are standard, with the flexed at approximately 40 degrees for the view to better visualize the joint; these views help identify intra-articular extension and associated injuries. Key radiographic signs of humerus fractures include cortical discontinuity, manifested as a lucency or breach in the bone , along with angulation, impaction, and of fragments. is measured by the degree of separation between fragments, often quantified as greater than 1 cm or angulation exceeding degrees in proximal fractures, while in shaft fractures, acceptable alignment tolerances include up to 20 degrees of anteroposterior angulation and 3 cm of shortening. These features guide further evaluation but do not dictate classification, which is assessed separately. Advanced imaging is employed when X-rays are inconclusive or additional detail is needed. Computed (CT) scans are particularly valuable for comminuted or intra-articular fractures, offering 3D reconstructions for precise characterization and surgical planning; for example, thin-cut coronal and axial CT slices at 1 mm intervals aid in analyzing distal humerus fracture patterns. (MRI) is indicated for evaluating injuries, such as tears in proximal fractures involving the greater tuberosity or nerve involvement, providing superior visualization of tendons, ligaments, and neurovascular structures without . serves as a provisional diagnostic tool, especially in resource-limited settings or for initial assessment of integrity like the , and is particularly useful in pediatric cases to avoid . Special considerations in imaging include the use of stress views to assess instability, such as internal rotation in supracondylar fractures to evaluate fragment displacement under load, and (CTA) when vascular injury is suspected, as in high-energy shaft fractures potentially affecting the . Traction views may also be employed to better delineate fracture fragments in distal injuries. Radiation safety is paramount, particularly in pregnant patients, where the fetal dose from a single diagnostic of the is minimal and unlikely to cause , but ultrasonography or MRI is preferred as non-ionizing alternatives to minimize any . Doses below 50 mGy are considered safe for the , and procedures should be justified only when clinically necessary.

Treatment

Proximal Humerus Fractures

Treatment of proximal fractures depends on fracture displacement, patient age, comorbidities, and functional demands, with the Neer classification guiding decisions by assessing the number of displaced segments. Nonoperative management is indicated for nondisplaced or minimally displaced fractures, classified as Neer one-part, involving sling immobilization for 2-4 weeks followed by pendulum exercises to maintain . This approach achieves successful outcomes in 80-90% of elderly patients, with acceptable pain relief and function despite potential residual stiffness. For displaced fractures, operative intervention is preferred to restore alignment and shoulder mechanics. Open reduction and (ORIF) using locking plates is the standard for two-part displaced fractures, providing stable fixation that supports early mobilization and union rates exceeding 90%. In older patients with four-part fractures or head-split patterns, reverse shoulder arthroplasty is recommended over hemiarthroplasty, as 2025 guidelines highlight its superior functional outcomes, lower revision rates, and reduced dependency on tuberosity healing. Rehabilitation protocols emphasize early passive motion starting within 1-2 weeks post- to prevent , progressing to active-assisted exercises by 4-6 weeks and full strengthening by 12 weeks, with total spanning 6-12 weeks. Recent 2025 evidence supports nonoperative for fractures with less than 5 mm tuberosity , with considered for ≥5 mm or ≥3 mm in superior/posterosuperior displacements, to optimize function and avoid secondary migration. In pediatric patients, displaced proximal humerus fractures are typically managed with closed and pinning to preserve the growth plate, achieving excellent remodeling potential due to the thick and high healing capacity.

Humeral Shaft Fractures

Humeral shaft fractures, involving the diaphysis of the , are typically managed with either nonoperative or operative approaches, selected based on , patient factors, and associated injuries. Nonoperative is often first-line for closed, stable fractures without neurovascular compromise, while operative intervention is indicated for unstable patterns, open wounds, or scenarios. Recent evidence from randomized controlled trials supports surgical options for improved early functional recovery in select cases. Nonoperative primarily involves functional bracing, such as a U-plate orthosis or , to promote union while allowing controlled motion at the and . This approach achieves union in approximately 90% of cases within 12 weeks, with low rates of under 2% in large cohorts. Acceptable alignment includes less than 20° of angulation in the and up to 30° in the , as greater deformity may compromise function without necessitating in most adults. Operative treatment is reserved for fractures that are unstable, length-unstable, open, or associated with palsy, vascular injury, or floating . Intramedullary nailing is preferred for unstable or length-unstable fractures, particularly in or highly comminuted cases, providing reliable stabilization with minimal soft-tissue disruption. Plate fixation is indicated for open fractures to allow thorough and secure , with a 2025 randomized controlled trial (the Humeral Shaft Fracture Fixation RCT) demonstrating superior 3-month Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand () scores with compared to nonoperative bracing (mean difference of 15 points favoring operative, p=0.01), alongside faster early functional gains despite similar 12-month outcomes. Radial nerve palsy, occurring in up to 18% of humeral shaft fractures due to its close anatomic relation in the spiral groove, warrants initial for 6-12 weeks in closed injuries, but is recommended if palsy develops or persists post-injury, especially in open fractures or after failed , to assess for laceration or . Recovery rates exceed 70% with timely , though delayed beyond 8 weeks reduces success to around 68%. begins with for 4-6 weeks, followed by progressive loading and range-of-motion exercises under supervision to restore strength and prevent . Patients should be monitored clinically and radiographically for , which occurs in 5-10% of cases, with if no bridging is evident by 3-4 months. Pathologic humeral shaft fractures, often due to metastases, require preoperative to confirm and guide , followed by surgical stabilization via intramedullary nailing or cemented plating to provide immediate load-bearing and pain relief. This combined approach yields union or stable fixation in over 90% of cases, prioritizing durability over anatomic reduction.

Distal Humerus Fractures

Treatment of distal humerus fractures prioritizes anatomic restoration of the joint due to its intra-articular nature, which demands precise alignment to preserve and minimize complications like or arthrosis. Nonoperative is reserved for rare cases of undisplaced fractures or patients with significant comorbidities precluding , typically involving in a long-arm or splint for 3-6 weeks with serial radiographic monitoring to ensure stability. In children, nonoperative treatment with is standard for Gartland type I supracondylar fractures, which are nondisplaced and stable. Operative intervention is the mainstay for most distal humerus fractures, guided by AO/OTA principles emphasizing anatomic reduction of the articular surface, stable , and early rehabilitation to optimize outcomes. In adults, open reduction and (ORIF) with dual plating—typically one medial and one posterolateral plate at 90 degrees—is recommended for displaced or intra-articular fractures to achieve rigid stability and allow immediate motion. For pediatric supracondylar fractures, closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) is the preferred method for displaced injuries (Gartland types II-IV), performed urgently to restore alignment and neurovascular status. Vascular injury, particularly disruption, complicates up to 20% of displaced pediatric supracondylar fractures and requires prompt intervention. In cases of a pulseless hand—indicating adequate despite absent radial —initial closed reduction and pinning should be attempted, with urgent surgical exploration if pulses do not return postoperatively; for pale, poorly perfused hands, immediate vascular exploration with repair or grafting is mandatory to prevent ischemia. Postoperative rehabilitation focuses on preventing elbow stiffness, a common complication, by initiating protected motion early. Patients are typically fitted with a hinged elbow brace locked in extension initially, progressing to active and passive range-of-motion exercises starting around week 2, with full strengthening by 6-12 weeks depending on healing. Recent advancements emphasize total elbow (TEA) as a viable alternative to ORIF for comminuted fractures in elderly patients over 65 years, offering reliable pain relief and function with lower reoperation rates compared to in low-demand individuals. Studies from 2024-2025 report good Elbow Performance Scores (average around 83) in primary TEA cases, with complication rates similar to secondary after failed ORIF, supporting its expanded role in this demographic.

Complications

Early Complications

Early complications of humerus fractures encompass a range of acute neurovascular, vascular, infectious, systemic, and issues that arise immediately following injury or initial treatment, typically within the first six weeks. These risks are heightened in high-energy or displaced and necessitate prompt recognition to mitigate long-term morbidity. Neurovascular injuries represent one of the most immediate concerns, varying by fracture location. In humeral shaft fractures, radial nerve palsy is a prevalent neurovascular complication, occurring in approximately 8-18% of cases due to the nerve's close anatomical proximity to the bone in the spiral groove. This injury often manifests as wrist drop and sensory deficits in the dorsal hand, with higher incidence in Holstein-Lewis fractures of the distal third. Proximal humerus fractures more commonly involve axillary nerve injury, reported in up to 58% of cases when assessed via electromyography, leading to deltoid weakness and sensory loss over the lateral shoulder. Distal humerus fractures, particularly supracondylar types, carry a risk of compartment syndrome, with incidences of 0.1-0.3%, potentially causing forearm muscle ischemia if swelling elevates intracompartmental pressures. Vascular disruptions are particularly critical in pediatric supracondylar fractures, where injury occurs in 5-10% of cases, often from tethering or laceration by displaced fragments, risking limb ischemia and necessitating urgent vascular exploration. In adults, such injuries are rarer but can accompany high-energy proximal fractures. Infection rates escalate significantly in open fractures, classified by the Gustilo-Anderson system, with type III injuries showing infection risks up to 44% due to extensive contamination and devitalized . Postoperative open reduction and (ORIF) can also lead to wound complications, including superficial or deep infections, especially in contaminated settings. Systemic complications include , a rare but serious event with an incidence of 0.9-11% in fractures like the , characterized by respiratory distress, petechiae, and neurological changes from fat emboli entering the circulation. Venous thromboembolism, including deep vein thrombosis and , affects up to 3% of proximal fracture cases post-surgery, driven by immobility and . High-energy fractures may precipitate from substantial blood loss into surrounding tissues, exacerbating hemodynamic instability in patients. Soft tissue issues, such as tenting over displaced fragments, can progress to pressure within hours if untreated, particularly in proximal or fractures with poor overlying envelope, potentially converting closed injuries to open ones.

Late Complications

and are key late complications of humerus fractures, with rates ranging from 10% to 20% in humeral fractures treated nonoperatively, and up to 15-29% in specific patterns like OTA type A or proximal third fractures. These rates increase in smokers due to nicotine-induced impairing fracture and vascular supply to the . are classified as hypertrophic, featuring abundant but unbridged from , or atrophic, marked by and poor vascularity often linked to or soft tissue stripping. , occurring in about 12% of nonoperatively managed fractures, typically involves angular or rotational deformities from transverse patterns or inadequate alignment, potentially causing functional impairment such as reduced or shoulder weakness. In distal humerus fractures, rates reach 2-10%, particularly in supracondylar regions after ORIF, while can distort the articular surface leading to . Avascular necrosis (AVN) primarily affects the proximal , with rates of 20-30% in three- and four-part fractures due to disruption of the ascending branch of the anterior humeral circumflex artery supplying the humeral head. In displaced four-part fractures, the incidence rises to approximately 45%, often resulting in humeral head collapse and secondary if untreated. Surgical approaches like ORIF may exacerbate AVN risk compared to in certain cases. Stiffness and post-traumatic arthritis frequently develop as delayed issues, with shoulder stiffness arising in proximal humerus fractures from capsular and adhesions post-immobilization, affecting up to 20-30% of patients and limiting forward flexion or external rotation. In distal humerus fractures, contracture occurs in 12-49% of cases, driven by intra-articular damage or prolonged splinting, resulting in flexion-extension deficits. Post-traumatic arthritis ensues in the glenohumeral joint after proximal fractures or the ulnohumeral joint after distal ones, with radiographic changes appearing 1-2 years post-injury due to loss from initial or malreduction. Heterotopic ossification (), the formation of ectopic bone in periarticular soft tissues, is more common after ORIF of distal humerus fractures, with incidences of 8-14% overall and up to 22% in type C patterns. Risk factors include delayed surgery beyond 24-48 hours or severe , leading to clinically significant HO (Brooker class 3-4) that restricts motion in 10-15% of affected patients. Chronic pain syndromes, notably (CRPS) type I, can follow fractures, especially after , with an incidence of about 0.6% in surgeries and reported rates of 1-2% post-fracture due to neurogenic . CRPS presents with disproportionate burning pain, swelling, skin changes, and vasomotor instability, often emerging 4-6 weeks post-injury and persisting if not addressed early.

Prognosis and Outcomes

Prognostic Factors

Prognostic factors for humerus fractures encompass a range of fracture-specific, patient-related, and treatment-related elements that influence healing, functional recovery, and long-term outcomes. These factors help clinicians provide personalized predictions, with outcomes generally favorable for stable fractures in healthy individuals but poorer in complex cases or those with comorbidities. Evidence from systematic reviews and cohort studies highlights the interplay between initial injury severity and host biology in determining success rates, such as union and range of motion restoration. Fracture characteristics significantly affect , particularly and . Greater increases the risk of or , while —especially metaphyseal involvement—predicts poorer functional outcomes in non-surgical management of proximal humerus fractures. In proximal fractures, four-part patterns with extensive and are associated with worse recovery compared to less complex two- or three-part injuries, often leading to and reduced function. Patient factors play a critical role in healing timelines and complication rates. Advanced age, particularly over 70 years, correlates with poorer outcomes due to reduced quality and higher burden, increasing risks of delayed union and mortality. Comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus delay fracture union, with healing times extended up to 2-3 times in affected patients, while impairs and regeneration, elevating risks across fracture sites. Treatment adherence, especially to protocols, directly impacts motion restoration and overall function. Good compliance with physiotherapy predicts improved short-term outcomes up to 3 months and potentially 1 year post-injury in non-surgically managed proximal humerus fractures, whereas poor adherence leads to persistent and suboptimal recovery. Prognosis varies by fracture location. Humeral shaft fractures exhibit high union rates of approximately 94-95% with , though proximal third patterns carry elevated risks. Distal humerus s, particularly intra-articular ones, confer a higher risk of , affecting up to 80% of cases long-term despite surgical intervention. Recent 2025 evidence from a randomized indicates that early surgical fixation for humeral shaft s improves short-term function at 6 weeks and 3 months compared to bracing, but yields no long-term benefits at 6 or 12 months.

Recovery and Rehabilitation

and for humerus s follow phased protocols aimed at protecting the bone while progressively restoring , , and upper extremity function. These protocols are tailored to the fracture location—proximal, humeral shaft, or distal—and typically involve followed by controlled under the guidance of physical and occupational therapists. incorporates modalities such as ice, elevation, and gentle to facilitate adherence to exercises. The acute protection phase, lasting 2-4 weeks post-injury or , emphasizes with a or functional to stabilize the site and minimize pain and swelling. During this period, patients maintain mobility in non-immobilized joints through active range-of-motion (AROM) exercises for the , , and hand, along with contractions for the and . For proximal fractures, a is used for 3 weeks with restrictions on beyond 90° and external rotation to 40°, while pendulums—gentle circular motions—may begin early to prevent adhesions. In humeral fractures, a Sarmiento functional is applied immediately, allowing limited flexion but prohibiting motion beyond pendulums. Distal fractures often involve a splint or hinged for 2-4 weeks, focusing on passive extension to 0° and active flexion to 90° to avoid . The intermediate phase, from 4-8 weeks, transitions to passive and active-assisted range-of-motion (PROM/AROM) exercises to regain joint mobility without compromising union. Sling or brace weaning occurs as tolerated, with progression based on pain-free motion and radiographic evidence of stability. Proximal fracture rehab prioritizes supine forward flexion and side-lying external rotation/abduction, advancing to pulleys and table slides. For shaft fractures, shoulder periscapular isometrics and four-quadrant AAROM (e.g., wall climbs, wand exercises) are introduced while maintaining the brace part-time. Distal fractures emphasize progressive elbow flexion gains of 10° weekly and full forearm supination/pronation, incorporating static progressive splinting if extension lags. Multidisciplinary input from physical therapists (PT) for lower extremity conditioning and occupational therapists (OT) for daily activity adaptations ensures holistic recovery, with modalities like electrical stimulation aiding pain control. Advanced strengthening begins at 6-12 weeks, once full passive motion is achieved and X-rays confirm formation, focusing on resisted exercises to rebuild muscle endurance and power. isometrics progress to theraband rows, external/internal , and stabilization for proximal and shaft fractures, with weight limits starting at 2-5 pounds. Distal rehab includes gentle strengthening at 8 weeks, prioritizing extension to prevent contractures, followed by and work. / sessions, typically 1-2 times weekly, incorporate like simulated work tasks. Return to activity varies by fracture type and patient factors, with desk-based work often resuming at 3-6 months and overhead sports or heavy labor delayed 6-12 months or longer until strength reaches 80% of the uninjured side. Serial X-rays at 4-6 week intervals monitor , with interventions like under considered for persistent beyond 12 weeks. Full , including strength and , may take 6-12 months.

Epidemiology

Incidence and Prevalence

Proximal humerus fractures account for 4-6% of all fractures in young adults and 1-3% in elderly patients. In the United States, the annual incidence of fractures is estimated at approximately 122 per 100,000 persons, with variations by subtype and . Proximal humerus fractures represent about 5% of all fractures and are the third most common type in elderly individuals, often resulting from low-energy falls. Humeral shaft fractures comprise 3-5% of all fractures, with an annual incidence of 13-20 per 100,000 persons. Distal humerus fractures account for roughly 2% of all fractures and one-third of humerus fractures overall. In pediatric populations, distal humerus fractures predominate, with supracondylar fractures representing nearly 60% of all elbow fractures in children. These injuries typically occur in children aged 5-7 years following falls on an outstretched hand. The incidence of humerus fractures, particularly proximal types, has shown an increasing trend in recent years, driven by population aging. In the United States, proximal humerus fracture rates rose from 104.7 per 100,000 in 2008 to 124.7 per 100,000 in 2012 among women over 50, with continued growth projected through 2025. During the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, overall fracture incidence declined due to reduced mobility and lockdowns. In low- and middle-income countries, high-energy trauma such as road traffic accidents contributes to a notable proportion of humeral shaft fractures. For instance, traffic accidents account for about 27% of humeral shaft fractures in China. Humerus fractures exhibit a bimodal age distribution, with peaks in pediatric populations aged 5 to 15 years, primarily involving distal fractures such as supracondylar types from falls or , and in adults over 65 years, where proximal fractures predominate and approximately 80% are associated with osteoporosis-related fragility. In children, the incidence of proximal fractures is around 31.4 per 100,000 annually for those under 16, while distal fractures peak in ages 5 to 9. Among the elderly, proximal fractures account for up to 49.4% of cases in those over 80, with a mean age of 67 to 80 years depending on fracture type and . Gender patterns show males predominating in younger age groups due to high-energy , with boys experiencing humerus fractures at a 2:1 to 4:1 ratio compared to girls in pediatric cases. In contrast, females comprise 67.7% to 81.8% of proximal humerus fractures in postmenopausal and geriatric populations, reflecting a 2:1 female-to-male ratio driven by . Geographic variations indicate higher rates of humeral fractures in settings from assaults and incidents, while rural areas see elevated pediatric distal humerus fractures, such as supracondylar types at 22.5% versus 15.2% in children. Incidence also differs regionally, with populations showing significantly higher humeral fracture rates than eastern ones. Rural elderly populations experience more proximal fractures from falls, contributing to overall geographic disparities in fracture patterns. Socioeconomic disparities are evident in the management of humerus fractures, with lower (e.g., household below $75,000) and ethnic minorities (e.g., patients ~2%, Hispanic ~1%) showing reduced to surgical compared to White patients (~94%). These groups face barriers due to environmental and access-related factors, though pediatric trends remain relatively stable across strata. Emerging trends post- reveal a resurgence in elderly proximal humerus fractures following a 2020 decline, attributed to increased home falls during restrictions, with visits for fall-related fractures rising to 984,000 annually by 2020 from 574,000 in 2001. From to 2022, surgical of complex proximal humerus fractures increased significantly. Pediatric humerus fracture patterns have remained stable, with no significant shifts in incidence.

References

  1. [1]
    Humerus Fractures Overview - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Traditionally, the mainstay of treatment of humerus shaft fractures is nonoperative. Due to the non-weight-bearing nature of the bone and the vast soft tissue ...
  2. [2]
    Broken arm - Symptoms and causes - Mayo Clinic
    Aug 11, 2022 · If the upper arm bone (humerus) fractures into two or more pieces, the jagged ends can injure nearby nerves and blood vessels. Seek immediate ...
  3. [3]
    Distal Humerus Fractures of the Elbow - OrthoInfo - AAOS
    A distal humerus fracture is a break in the lower end of the humerus (upper arm bone), one of the three bones that come together to form the elbow joint.
  4. [4]
    Humerus Fracture (Upper Arm Fracture) - Johns Hopkins Medicine
    What are the symptoms of a humerus fracture? · Pain · Swelling and bruising · Inability to move the shoulder · A grinding sensation when the shoulder is moved.What You Need To Know · What Are The Symptoms Of A... · Proximal Humeral Fracture
  5. [5]
    Humerus Fracture: Types, Symptoms & Treatment - Cleveland Clinic
    A humerus fracture is the medical name for breaking the bone in your upper arm. They're usually caused by traumas like car accidents or falls.Overview · Symptoms And Causes · Management And Treatment
  6. [6]
    Humeral shaft fracture | Radiology Reference Article | Radiopaedia.org
    Dec 4, 2024 · Mechanism. Most frequently humeral shaft fractures occur as a result of a direct blow to the upper arm (transverse fractures). Indirect trauma ...
  7. [7]
    Proximal Humerus Fracture - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Inspection is assessing for signs of open fracture, ecchymosis that may extend to the chest, arm, and forearm. Crepitus and pain are often present over the ...
  8. [8]
    Proximal Humerus Fractures - Medscape Reference
    May 4, 2023 · The most common mechanism for proximal humerus fractures is a fall on an outstretched hand from a standing height. In younger patients, high- ...Practice Essentials · Anatomy · Pathophysiology · Etiology
  9. [9]
    Missed fractures of the greater tuberosity
    Aug 31, 2018 · The most common are avulsion injuries such associated with anterior shoulder dislocation, or direct trauma, as might occur in a fall on the ...
  10. [10]
    Humeral Shaft Fractures - Trauma - Orthobullets
    Sep 13, 2025 · Physical exam. swelling. tenderness over the fracture site. skin tenting. examinination of overall limb alignment for deformity. will often ...
  11. [11]
    Humeral Shaft Fractures - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Dec 13, 2023 · The most common symptom of a humeral shaft fracture is pain on the injured site. The mechanism of injury may prompt the provider to investigate ...
  12. [12]
    Humerus Fracture: Background, Etiology, Epidemiology
    Feb 10, 2025 · Humerus fractures are caused by direct trauma to the arm or shoulder or by axial loading transmitted through the elbow.Background · Etiology · Epidemiology
  13. [13]
    Distal Humerus Fractures - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    Distal humerus fractures are most often the result of trauma to the elbow. This can be in the form of a direct blow to the affected extremity by either foreign ...
  14. [14]
    Distal humeral fracture | Radiology Reference Article
    Oct 1, 2020 · Most distal humeral fractures are a result of a high energy trauma or a fall. Typical mechanisms include the following 3: direct impaction of ...Epidemiology · Mechanism · Radiographic features
  15. [15]
    Proximal Humerus Fractures - Physiopedia
    Signs of distal ischaemia may be absent, but a large expanding haematoma, pulsatile external bleeding, unexplained hypotension, delayed anaemia and associated ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Risk Factors for Proximal Humerus Fracture - Oxford Academic
    Potential risk factors are grouped into those thought to be associated with low bone mass, falls, and frailty.
  17. [17]
    Supracondylar Humerus Fractures - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    Children often utilize an outstretched arm as a protective mechanism when falling, creating a high incidence of fractures about the elbow. Supracondylar ...
  18. [18]
    CUMULATIVE RISK AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS FOR FALL ... - NIH
    Jun 29, 2022 · The risk of fractures in stroke survivors is high (15–21), being 1.4–7 times higher than that of the general population (15–17, 19, 22), with ...
  19. [19]
    Pathological Fracture of the Humerus - Musculoskeletal Key
    May 13, 2017 · Metastases are the most common malignant bone tumors and the most common cause of pathological fractures. In contrast to the weight-bearing ...Diagnostics · Enchondroma · Primary Malignant Tumors
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
    Yes We Can! Reducing the Burden of Proximal Humerus Fractures
    Apr 29, 2025 · Existence of previous fragility fractures and low bone mineral density are risk factors of proximal humerus fractures that can serve as means ...
  22. [22]
    Proximal Humerus Fractures - Trauma - Orthobullets
    Oct 22, 2025 · Physical exam. inspection. extensive ecchymosis of chest, arm, and forearm. neurovascular exam. axillary nerve injury most common. determine ...
  23. [23]
    Nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly
    Jul 7, 2025 · The following review article aims to present a possible treatment algorithm that takes current best evidence into account, and provides guidance ...
  24. [24]
    Contemporary Management of Proximal Humeral Fractures : JAAOS
    Treatment for PHFs remains somewhat controversial. This review article discusses indications, techniques, and outcomes for several modes of contemporary ...Missing: treatment guidelines
  25. [25]
    Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture - NIH
    Mar 19, 2025 · Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has better clinical outcomes [3] and a lower revision rate than hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of ...
  26. [26]
    Proximal humeral fractures in adults - UpToDate
    Mar 31, 2025 · The majority of both proximal and midshaft humeral fractures are nondisplaced and can be treated conservatively (ie, nonsurgically). ... 2025 ...
  27. [27]
    Current Evidence and Surgical Strategies in the Management of ...
    Jul 21, 2025 · Results: A displacement ≥ 5 mm is the standard surgical threshold, though superior or posterosuperior displacement ≥ 3 mm-and ≥2 mm in overhead ...
  28. [28]
    Proximal Humerus Fracture - Pediatric - Orthobullets
    Apr 24, 2024 · risk factors. unstable fractures treated with closed reduction without pinning. Axillary nerve Injuries. occur in <1% of case due to injury ...
  29. [29]
    Supracondylar Humerus Fractures | Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of ...
    Recognize the importance of complete median nerve injury as a possible indicator of brachial artery injury and as a risk factor for compartment syndrome.Supracondylar Humerus... · Clinical Findings · Treatment
  30. [30]
    Distal humerus
    ### Summary of AO Principles for ORIF of Distal Humerus Fractures with Dual Plating
  31. [31]
    Management of Arterial Injury in Children with Supracondylar ... - NIH
    Immediate vascular exploration is the treatment of choice for cold, pulseless hand. A similar approach should be adopted for warm, pulseless hand if there is ...
  32. [32]
    Outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty in the treatment of distal ...
    The various authors suggest that total elbow arthroplasty is the treatment of choice for elderly patients (over 65 years) with a displaced, comminuted, intra- ...
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
    Evaluation and Management of Proximal Humerus Fractures - PMC
    Evaluation of a proximal humerus fracture begins with a thorough history and physical examination. While one may focus attention on the shoulder, it is ...2. Anatomy · 3. Clinical Evaluation · 3.1. History And Physical
  35. [35]
    Humerus Fracture Workup: Imaging Studies - Medscape Reference
    Feb 10, 2025 · All greater tuberosity fractures should, at some point, have an ultrasound examination or an MRI to check the integrity of the rotator cuff.
  36. [36]
    Proximal humeral fracture | Radiology Reference Article
    Jun 11, 2024 · Plain films are usually sufficient to characterize proximal humeral fractures and thus determine management. CT can be useful if adequate views ...On This Page · Radiographic Features · Reporting Checklist
  37. [37]
    Distal Humerus Fractures Workup - Medscape Reference
    Aug 25, 2023 · Computed tomography (CT) of the distal humerus can be performed to further analyze the fracture pattern. Thin-cut coronal and axial cuts at 1 mm intervals ...
  38. [38]
    Distal Humerus Fractures - Trauma - Orthobullets
    Aug 12, 2025 · Diagnosis is made with plain radiographs of the humerus and elbow. ... obtain if elbow injury present or distal tenderness on exam. oblique ...
  39. [39]
    Internal Rotation Stress Testing Improves Radiographic Outcomes of ...
    Background: The purpose of this study was to determine if routine use of an intraoperative internal rotation stress test (IRST) for type 3 supracondylar humerus ...
  40. [40]
    Xrays During Pregnancy - OrthoInfo
    It has been shown that the amount of radiation received from a single diagnostic X-ray is so small that it is unlikely to pose a risk to a developing baby.
  41. [41]
    Radiation Exposure In Pregnancy - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    The fetus radiation dose below 50 mGy is considered safe and not cause any harm. According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), radiation dose between 50 ...
  42. [42]
    Guidelines for Diagnostic Imaging During Pregnancy and Lactation
    Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging are not associated with risk and are the imaging techniques of choice for the pregnant patient.
  43. [43]
    Complications of open reduction and internal fixation of distal ...
    Oct 24, 2018 · Nonunion after ORIF of distal humerus fractures has been reported to be between 2% and 10% with many cases involving the supracondylar region.
  44. [44]
    Avascular Necrosis and Posttraumatic Arthritis After Proximal ... - NIH
    Jan 13, 2023 · The rate of AVN increases to 30–40% in three- and four-part fractures [1••, 8]. PTA, which is even less commonly reported in studies, has an ...
  45. [45]
    Avascular Necrosis of the Shoulder - Shoulder & Elbow - Orthobullets
    Oct 29, 2024 · four-part fracture-dislocations approach 100% AVN. displaced four-part fractures ~45% AVN. valgus impacted four-part ~11% AVN. three-part ~14% ...
  46. [46]
    Avascular necrosis in proximal humeral fractures in patients treated ...
    Apr 27, 2014 · Plate fixation was associated with a higher risk of AVN development than conservative treatment in patients with proximal humeral fractures.
  47. [47]
    How to treat stiffness after proximal humeral fractures? - PMC - NIH
    Aug 1, 2023 · Operative treatment for stiffness included isolated or combined procedures such as arthrolysis, subacromial decompression, or osteosynthesis removal.
  48. [48]
    The posttraumatic stiff elbow: an update - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
    Malunion after an intra-articular fracture of the distal humerus may lead to loss of elbow motion. Malunited articular surface of the distal humerus distorts ...
  49. [49]
    Risk factors for dysfunctional elbow stiffness following operative ...
    Aug 2, 2024 · Dysfunctional elbow stiffness was observed in 49.1% of patients who underwent operative fixation of distal humerus fractures in the present ...<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    Arthritis of the Shoulder - OrthoInfo - AAOS
    Posttraumatic Arthritis. Posttraumatic arthritis is a form of osteoarthritis that develops after an injury, such as a fracture or dislocation of the shoulder.<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Incidence and Risk Factors of Heterotopic Ossification Following ...
    May 25, 2012 · Heterotopic ossification is a common complication of Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) type C distal humerus fractures and ulnohumeral fracture dislocations.
  52. [52]
    Distal Humerus Fractures Treatment & Management
    Aug 25, 2023 · Stable, nondisplaced flexion-type supracondylar humerus fractures should be immobilized in a long arm cast with the elbow in extension. Lateral ...
  53. [53]
    Incidence and risk factors of heterotopic ossification following major ...
    Brooker class 3 or 4 heterotopic ossification occurred following 18 (14%) of 125 distal humerus fractures, 15 (22%) of 69 OTA type C distal humerus fractures, ...Missing: ORIF | Show results with:ORIF<|control11|><|separator|>
  54. [54]
    Incidence and treatment of complex regional pain syndrome...
    The overall incidence of CRPS within 12 months after surgery was 0.34%. With 0.60%, the incidence of CRPS after surgeries of the upper limb was 3 times higher ...
  55. [55]
    Complex regional pain syndrome after right humerus fracture with...
    Background: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a postoperative, misdiagnosed condition highlighted only by pain therapists after numerous failed attempts ...
  56. [56]
    Complex Regional Pain Syndrome - OrthoInfo - AAOS
    CRPS is characterized by intense burning pain, stiffness, swelling and discoloration in the affected limb. Symptoms typically develop after an injury or surgery
  57. [57]
    Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS): Causes & Symptoms
    Symptoms of CRPS typically start within four to six weeks after an injury, fracture or surgery, but they can develop without a known cause. The most common and ...
  58. [58]
    Comorbidities, substance abuse, weight and age are independent ...
    Age and osteoporosis are known risk factors for proximal humeral fractures, with a significant increase in incidence in individuals over the age of 65.
  59. [59]
    Predictive Factors for Poor Prognosis in Non-Surgical Treatment of ...
    Sep 24, 2024 · Conclusion: Metaphyseal comminution and high PCS scores are significant predictors of poor prognosis in elderly patients undergoing non- ...
  60. [60]
    Factors Affecting Time to Healing in Humeral Shaft Fractures ...
    Patients with Diabetes Mellitus had the longest healing time of 29.00 weeks (SD 15.56). Loder demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of delayed union, ...
  61. [61]
    Cigarette Smoking Increases Complications Following Fracture
    Aug 10, 2025 · Smoking has been suggested to increase the rate of perioperative complications including soft-tissue complications, to decrease the rate of ...<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    what is the effect of rehabilitation compliance on clinical outcomes of ...
    Oct 2, 2023 · Rehabilitation compliance predicts short-term clinical outcomes up to 3-months and potentially 1-year outcomes.Missing: prognosis | Show results with:prognosis
  63. [63]
    Study on proximal humerus evaluation of effective treatment ...
    Oct 2, 2023 · Patients reported mean subjective compliance scores of 3.93/5 at 6-weeks post-injury, which reduced to 3.69/5 at the 3-months post-injury. A ...Missing: prognosis | Show results with:prognosis
  64. [64]
    Humeral shaft fractures in - EFORT Open Reviews - Bioscientifica
    Jan 4, 2021 · Ali et al observed an overall union rate of 83% on a series of 138 fractures of the humeral diaphysis treated with functional bracing. Subgroup ...
  65. [65]
    Post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow - ScienceDirect.com
    Osteoarthritis was more common after an intra-articular fracture of the distal humerus or fracture-dislocation than after a fracture of the radial head or ...
  66. [66]
    The Humeral Shaft Fracture Fixation Randomized Clinical Trial
    Mar 27, 2025 · This randomized clinical trial of 70 patients found surgery conferred superior upper limb function at 6 weeks and at 3 months, but not at 6 months or at 12 ...
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Rehabilitation Protocol for Proximal Humeral Fracture Open ...
    This protocol is intended to guide clinicians through the post-operative course for Proximal Humeral Fracture Open. Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF).Missing: rules | Show results with:rules
  68. [68]
    [PDF] Non-Operative Proximal Humeral Fracture Rehabilitation Protocol
    General Principles: 1. Non-displaced means less than 1cm of displacement and less than 45° of angulation. 2. Bony healing occurs usually within 6 to 8 weeks ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Humerus Shaft Fracture Non-Operative Rehab Protocol
    PHASE III: EARLY REHABILITATION. Week 6-10 (following clinical fracture healing and no motion at the fracture site). • No lifting > 5# at the side, or coffee ...
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Rehabilitation Protocol Distal Humerus Fracture Fixation
    Hinged Elbow Brace worn at all times (after the initial dressing removed). • Initiate elbow exercise program 5 times per day: o Passive extension to 0 degrees ...
  71. [71]
    [PDF] Humeral Shaft Fracture – Non-Operative - Chad Myeroff, MD
    Humeral Shaft Fracture – Non-Operative. Three times per day home exercise program including: Phase 1: Week 0-2 (to start immediately after initiation of ...
  72. [72]
    Return to work and sport after a humeral shaft fracture - PMC - NIH
    Mar 16, 2022 · Most patients successfully return to work and sport following a humeral shaft fracture, albeit at a lower level of physical activity.
  73. [73]
    Epidemiology of 936 humeral shaft fractures in a large Finnish ...
    Humeral shaft fractures comprise 1%-3% of all adult fractures, with a reported annual incidence of 13-15/100,000 persons. ... The incidence has a bimodal ...
  74. [74]
    Proximal humerus fractures: epidemiology and trends in surgical ...
    Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are among the most frequent bone fractures in adults, representing about 5.7% of all cases and being the third most common ...
  75. [75]
    Epidemiology of Displaced Supracondylar Fractures
    Supracondylar fractures of the humerus are the most common elbow fracture in the pediatric population and comprise nearly 60% of all elbow fractures.
  76. [76]
    Supracondylar Fracture - Pediatric - Orthobullets
    Aug 29, 2025 · Treatment is usually closed reduction and percutanous pinning (CRPP), with the urgency depending on presence or absence of hand perfusion.
  77. [77]
    Changing Demographic and Treatment Trends of Proximal Humerus ...
    Aug 18, 2025 · The average overall PHF surgical incidence rate between 2016 and 2022 was 10.5%. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was the most common ...
  78. [78]
    Incidence and Mortality after Proximal Humerus Fractures Over 50 ...
    The incidence of fracture increased from 104.7/100,000 in 2008 to 124.7/100,000 in 2012 in women and from 45.3/100,000 in 2008 to 52.0/100,000 in 2012 in men, ...Missing: per | Show results with:per<|separator|>
  79. [79]
    Impact of COVID-19 on orthopedic trauma patients from 2021 ... - NIH
    Feb 12, 2025 · With regard to the severity of trauma, some authors have reported a reduction in high-energy trauma and a relative increase in low-energy falls, ...
  80. [80]
    Assessment of incidence and various demographic risk factors of ...
    Feb 13, 2019 · In men, cigarette smoking (P = 0.002) and a previous history of fracture (P = 0.003) were significant risk factors for humeral shaft fractures.
  81. [81]
    Epidemiology of humerus fractures in the United States: nationwide ...
    Dec 12, 2011 · The incidence rate of proximal humerus fractures followed the shape of an exponential function in the age groups 40–84 years for women (R2 = ...
  82. [82]
    The incidence and treatment trends of pediatric proximal humerus ...
    Nov 27, 2019 · The annual incidence of childhood proximal humerus fractures was mean 31.4/100,000 and no variation trend was found. The majority (92%) was ...Fracture And Treatment Type · Annual Incidence · Injury Types
  83. [83]
    Proximal humerus fractures – epidemiology, comparison of mortality ...
    Feb 1, 2023 · The one-year mortality rate was higher after nonoperative treatment with 16.4% compared to surgical treatment with 9.3%.
  84. [84]
    Distribution of fractured bones among children - ScienceDirect.com
    The boy-to-girl ratio of fractures is 2:1 for all ages from infants to adolescents. · Distal radius and distal humerus are the most frequent fractures during ...
  85. [85]
    Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Pediatric Population - PMC
    Oct 28, 2021 · There is a bimodal distribution of incidence, peaking between ages of 10–14 and again at 80–84 years [14]. Boys are 3–4 times more likely to ...Missing: demographics gender
  86. [86]
    A nationwide analysis of geriatric proximal humerus fractures: trends ...
    Jul 31, 2023 · The non-operative cohort experienced higher rates of AKI, intubation, UTI, MI, DVT, PE, and mortality (all p<0.001). The operative cohort ...
  87. [87]
    Incidence, Prevalence & Types of Fractures in Urban Versus Rural ...
    Jun 18, 2025 · Supracondylar humerus fractures were significantly more common in rural children (22.5%) compared to urban (15.2%) (p = 0.04). Clavicle ...
  88. [88]
    Decreasing Rate of Operative Management of Proximal Humerus ...
    Aug 1, 2022 · Patients who are older, male, or who are treated in rural areas are significantly more likely to receive operative treatment. Further study is ...
  89. [89]
    Comparing Race/Ethnicity and Zip Code Socioeconomic Status for ...
    May 4, 2023 · This study evaluated the effect of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status (SES) on surgical utilization after proximal humerus fractures in a large Medicare ...Missing: geographic | Show results with:geographic<|control11|><|separator|>
  90. [90]
    Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Out-of-Hospital ...
    Conclusions: Among EMS patients with long bone fractures, Black, non-Hispanic patients were substantially less likely to receive out-of-hospital analgesics ...
  91. [91]
    Trend, disparities, and projection analysis of public data on shoulder ...
    Sep 11, 2024 · The COVID-19 pandemic period (2020–2022) presented unique challenges that likely influenced the trends observed in shoulder fracture incidence, ...<|separator|>
  92. [92]
    (PDF) Trends in emergency department visits for fall-related ...
    Sep 27, 2025 · Overall, the estimated number of ED's visits for fall-related fractures increased from 574 000 in 2001 to 9 84 000 in 2020. After adjusting for ...Missing: humerus elderly