Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Loitering munition

A loitering munition is an expendable that combines drone-like endurance for loitering over a target area with missile-like precision guidance and an integrated , enabling it to autonomously or semi-autonomously detect, , and strike high-value targets by self-destructing on impact. These systems, often termed drones due to their one-way mission profile, incorporate onboard sensors for real-time target identification and the option for operators to redirect or abort attacks, distinguishing them from fixed-path missiles or short-duration rounds. Originating in the late era, loitering munitions were initially developed for , with Israel's system—introduced in the 1980s—serving as a pioneering example of autonomous seeker technology tuned to emissions. Subsequent advancements, driven by improvements in , , and , have produced tactical variants like the U.S. and Israel's series, which extend endurance to hours while maintaining low-altitude flight for evasion of defenses. In modern conflicts, these munitions have redefined tactical capabilities by enabling persistent and on-demand engagement, often outperforming manned in contested environments through reduced logistical footprints and operator standoff distances. Their across state and non-state actors underscores a shift toward affordable, attritable weapons, though raises challenges in countermeasures and .

History

Early Development and Terminology

Loitering munitions are expendable unmanned aerial vehicles integrated with warheads, engineered to loiter over predefined areas for prolonged durations while searching for targets, before executing a precision strike via self-destruction. This capability sets them apart from conventional missiles, which follow ballistic trajectories without persistent or adaptive targeting. The origins trace to the late period, when militaries sought affordable means to neutralize elusive air defense radars through extended aerial persistence rather than direct overflight. developed the in the as the first operational loitering munition, optimized for (SEAD) amid threats from radar-guided threats in the ; it achieved initial flight tests around 1989 and emphasized autonomous radar homing for one-way attacks. Concurrently, the pursued similar concepts, exemplified by Northrop's , initiated in the early as a jet-propelled, low-cost anti-radiation system capable of loitering up to several hours over contested zones to engage intermittent emitters. Terminology for these weapons has varied, including "loitering munition" to highlight endurance and selectivity, alongside "," "," or "one-way attack drone," underscoring their non-recoverable, sacrificial mission profile that culminates in upon target impact. Early designations often reflected SEAD specialization, evolving as capabilities broadened beyond suppression. Initial fielding occurred in the early 1990s, with systems like entering service, though U.S. efforts such as Tacit Rainbow faced cancellation in 1991 due to and reliability issues.

Initial Military Applications

The initial military applications of loitering munitions focused on (SEAD), leveraging their ability to autonomously detect and neutralize emitters while minimizing risks to manned platforms. The () Harpy, developed in the late 1980s and entering service around 1989, exemplified this role as the first production loitering munition optimized for anti-radiation attacks. Equipped with passive seekers to identify emissions, the Harpy could loiter for up to 9 hours over pre-designated hunt areas, diving on detected targets with a 32 kg high-explosive upon signal acquisition. In SEAD , the enabled persistent, standoff coverage that forced adversaries to either emit signals—triggering attacks—or remain silent and blind, thereby degrading integrated air defense effectiveness without exposing pilots to surface-to-air threats. adopted the system in the early for exercises simulating conflicts against radar-dense defenses, such as those posed by Syrian or Iraqi systems, validating its utility in creating safe corridors for follow-on strikes. This approach reduced reliance on high-risk manned suppression missions, with empirical tests demonstrating the Harpy's capacity to saturate areas and suppress multiple emitters autonomously. Early operational limitations included dependence on fixed mission parameters, where loiter zones were programmed pre-launch without real-time adjustments or operator retargeting, constraining adaptability to mobile or intermittent threats. Despite these constraints, the Harpy's proven reliability in exercises drove Israel's initial exports starting in the mid-1990s, including a 1994 deal supplying approximately 100 units to China for its own SEAD needs against potential regional adversaries. Such transfers reflected the munitions' causal value in addressing asymmetric vulnerabilities to fortified air defenses, prioritizing expendable persistence over manned assets.

Evolution of Roles and Capabilities


Following initial applications in suppression of enemy air defenses during the 1980s and 1990s, loitering munitions underwent significant technological advancements in the 2000s that broadened their operational roles to encompass long-range strikes, fire support, and tactical precision engagements. These developments included enhanced endurance and sensor suites, enabling sustained loitering over target areas for up to several hours while awaiting optimal engagement opportunities. A key evolution involved the integration of electro-optical and infrared sensors, facilitating man-in-the-loop targeting where operators could receive real-time video feeds for target identification and confirmation. The , publicly unveiled in 2009, exemplifies this with its electro-optic seeker providing high-resolution imagery and allowing dynamic retasking without pre-programmed intelligence. This capability marked a departure from autonomous, pre-set targeting, introducing operator oversight to reduce errors and adapt to evolving battlefield conditions. Doctrinal shifts in the extended loitering munitions to anti-armor and close support roles, leveraging secure datalinks for mid-mission reprogramming and coordinated strikes against mobile threats. Systems like these enabled forces to engage armored vehicles or personnel dynamically, with payloads optimized for penetration or fragmentation effects. In the United States, the , originating from a 2004 program and fielded by 2011, prioritized man-portable design for squad-level use, emphasizing low through abort options and precision guidance. By the mid-2010s, prototypes incorporated swarming tactics and AI-assisted , allowing multiple munitions to operate collaboratively for area suppression or overwhelming defenses. These advancements, explored in U.S. , aimed to enable semi-autonomous selection and coordination, minimizing while maintaining . Such features promised scalability in contested environments, though full implementation remained in developmental stages as of 2017.

Proliferation in Asymmetric and High-Intensity Conflicts

In the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War of September-November 2020, Azerbaijan deployed Israeli Harop loitering munitions alongside other UAVs to neutralize Armenian air defenses and armored formations. These systems contributed to the destruction of over 100 Armenian tanks and artillery pieces, as evidenced by Azerbaijani-released footage and post-conflict analyses, enabling ground advances that shifted territorial control decisively toward Azerbaijan. The integration of loitering munitions overcame Armenia's terrain advantages, demonstrating their role in asymmetric engagements where numerically inferior but technologically adept forces could attrit superior conventional armor. The Russia-Ukraine war from February 2022 onward marked a surge in loitering munition deployment amid high-intensity attrition. Russian variants targeted Ukrainian vehicles systematically, with confirmed strikes eliminating multiple armored combat vehicles in regions like and over 200 pieces of equipment in January-February 2025 alone. responded with adaptations incorporating Western aid, notably the U.S.-supplied Switchblade 600, which proved effective against Russian systems such as the Tor-M1 surface-to-air missile launcher in frontline operations by late 2024. This tit-for-tat escalation highlighted loitering munitions' utility in sustained mechanized warfare, where they enabled precise, standoff engagements against mobile high-value targets. Production scaling amplified their battlefield impact. Russia expanded ZALA facilities post-2023, achieving hundreds of combat uses by mid-2025 through enhanced output despite sanctions, incorporating electronic warfare-resistant modifications. Ukraine's domestic surged correspondingly, manufacturing around 10,000 medium-range munitions in 2024 alongside broader programs, facilitating monthly deployments in the thousands across variants. Such empowered defenders in resource-asymmetric scenarios, as inexpensive munitions—often costing under $100,000 per unit—neutralized multimillion-dollar assets like tanks and SAM batteries, reshaping tactical calculus toward persistent, low-signature attrition over massed maneuvers.

Technical Characteristics

Core Design Principles

Loitering munitions are engineered for extended loiter times ranging from 1 to over 24 hours, achieved through aerodynamic configurations such as fixed-wing, , or delta-wing designs that optimize lift-to-drag ratios for fuel-efficient flight. These systems employ airframes constructed from composites to minimize structural mass while maintaining sufficient strength for sustained airborne persistence, enabling coverage of target areas without frequent repositioning. The expendable, one-way mission profile eliminates requirements for recovery mechanisms, , or reusable components found in recoverable unmanned platforms, thereby reducing overall system weight, complexity, and production costs by up to an compared to manned or retrievable alternatives. Warheads typically constitute 20-50% of total gross takeoff mass, allowing allocation of remaining mass to and for extended endurance rather than durability or reusability features. Autonomy in loitering munitions spans waypoint navigation via GPS for transit and loiter patterns to semi-autonomous functions for target tracking, with design emphasis on retaining human operator override for final engagement decisions to ensure compliance with and mitigate erroneous strikes. This hybrid approach balances operational responsiveness with accountability, as full in target selection remains limited to avoid classification as autonomous weapon systems under international scrutiny. Systems exhibit scalability across size classes, from miniature hand-launched variants under 5 kg for tactical, short-range engagements to medium-range platforms exceeding 50 kg gross weight capable of operational-depth strikes beyond 100 km, adapting core principles to mission scale without fundamental redesign. This range enables deployment from individual soldiers to battalion-level assets, prioritizing modularity in and for varied tactical footprints.

Sensors, Propulsion, and Payloads

Loitering munitions commonly integrate and sensor suites for target detection, identification, and precision engagement, allowing operators to visually confirm in day or night conditions. These gimbaled cameras provide stabilized imagery, often with zoom capabilities up to 30x, enabling discrimination of personnel from at ranges beyond 5 km. Select variants, such as those designed for , employ or anti-radiation seekers for autonomous homing on emitting sources in all-weather scenarios. Secure datalinks transmit video feeds and to ground stations, with line-of-sight ranges typically reaching 40-100 km, extendable via relays in networked operations. Propulsion in loitering munitions favors electric motors for low-acoustic-signature loitering, minimizing detection during extended observation phases, as seen in systems with silent pusher-propeller configurations. Hybrid powerplants, combining batteries with small fuel engines, balance endurance and range, achieving operational radii of 40-200 km while supporting loiter times of 1-10 hours depending on and altitude. or rotary engines provide burst speeds for transit and terminal attack phases, but electric-dominant designs prioritize during patrol. Payloads generally feature modular optimized for specific threats, ranging from 0.5-5 kg high- fragmentation or thermobaric types for anti-personnel and light effects to shaped-charge up to 10-15 kg for penetrating armored vehicles. Anti-tank payloads incorporate tandem charges to defeat reactive armor, delivering equivalent to 155 mm fragments in some configurations. Warhead selection trades yield against size, with smaller munitions like the 300 carrying under 2 kg for man-portable deployment. System designers balance against mission demands, maintaining loiter speeds below 100 km/h to extend by conserving reserves for opportunistic strikes rather than maximizing transit velocity. This approach yields trade-offs where increased or reduces loiter time, necessitating operator decisions on persistence versus responsiveness.

Launch and Deployment Methods

Loitering munitions are typically deployed via man-portable launch tubes suitable for squads, enabling rapid tactical integration without heavy equipment. For instance, the 300 and 600 systems are fired from lightweight, backpack-transportable tubes that require minimal setup, allowing a single operator to launch the munition in seconds after target designation. Vehicle- or ship-mounted canister systems facilitate mass salvos, with configurations supporting multiple munitions per launcher for coordinated strikes, as seen in ground-based or rail setups adapted for trucks and naval platforms. Many systems exhibit compatibility across air and ground platforms, permitting launches from , helicopters, or unmanned aerial vehicles without dedicated runways, which enhances logistical flexibility in austere environments. The Switchblade 600, for example, achieved first air-launch from an MQ-9A Reaper in July 2025, extending effective range beyond 175 kilometers when released from 30,000 feet altitude via control. Similarly, UVision's Hero-120 supports aerial deployment from utility and attack helicopters using modular pods compatible with NATO-standard platforms. This multi-domain adaptability reduces deployment infrastructure needs, with ground variants often employing pneumatic or rail assists for vertical or angled takeoff. Swarming tactics involve synchronized releases from clustered launchers to achieve saturation effects, overwhelming defenses through numerical advantage and distributed targeting. U.S. Marine Corps programs in the early , such as the Long-Range Attack Munition initiative, tested air-launched swarms from platforms like MV-22 Ospreys and F-35s, emphasizing rapid, multi-munition volleys for area denial. Tactical variants prioritize deployment times under five minutes from tube or canister priming to launch, minimizing exposure and response delays in dynamic battlespaces, as validated in operational evaluations of portable systems.

Operational Advantages

Tactical Persistence and Precision Targeting

Loitering munitions provide tactical persistence by maintaining extended airborne endurance, typically ranging from 20 minutes for lightweight systems like the Switchblade 300 to 6-12 hours for advanced models such as the , allowing sustained observation and dynamic target selection over a patrol area. This loiter capability enables operators to delay engagement until optimal conditions arise, such as the emergence of transient high-value targets or favorable attack geometry, thereby exploiting time-sensitive opportunities that fixed-trajectory weapons cannot address. In contrast to ballistic missiles, which expend their on a predetermined path without redirection potential, loitering munitions can orbit, reposition, and abort missions if no suitable targets materialize, enhancing operational flexibility in fluid battlefields. Precision targeting is facilitated by integrated electro-optical and seekers, often augmented with control for final target confirmation, yielding (CEP) accuracies of less than 1-2 meters in systems like the UVision series and IAI Mini Harop. This level of accuracy supports strikes on pinpoint objectives, such as specific components, while substantially reducing the dispersion inherent in unguided fire, which often exceeds hundreds of meters. Empirical data from the illustrates these attributes, with the achieving hit rates of 77-80% against mobile targets including artillery and armored vehicles, despite prevalent electronic countermeasures. The capacity for real-time assessment during loiter phases permits mission abortion or target switching, causally mitigating risks of incidents and civilian collateral by ensuring strikes occur only on verified threats.

Cost-Effectiveness and Force Multiplication

Loitering munitions typically range in unit cost from approximately $6,000 for lightweight models like the Switchblade 300 to $150,000 or more for heavier variants such as the Harop, enabling deployment in quantities unattainable with traditional munitions. In contrast, comparable cruise missiles like the Tomahawk exceed $1.5 million per unit, while the AGM-158 JASSM baseline costs around $700,000. This disparity allows resource-limited forces to employ swarms for saturation attacks, shifting the economics of attrition in favor of the defender or smaller operator against high-value targets like armored vehicles, which can cost tens of millions each. A key aspect of their force multiplication lies in operational scalability, where a single operator or small team can direct multiple units simultaneously via autonomous or semi-autonomous control systems, amplifying strike capacity without linearly increasing personnel requirements. Systems like the Altius exemplify this by enabling one controller to manage several assets, effectively extending the reach and responsiveness of ground units beyond traditional limits. This manpower efficiency reduces logistical burdens and training demands, permitting even squads to execute precision engagements that previously required air support or batteries. In the , Ukrainian employment of munitions such as the series demonstrated marked cost advantages, neutralizing Russian armored assets at expenditures far below those of equivalent high-end strikes like HIMARS-guided munitions, with some models costing under $1,000 per unit for basic FPV variants adapted for roles. Analyses from onward highlight their role as expendable alternatives to pricier missiles, broadening access amid shortages and enabling sustained against numerically superior Russian forces. Similarly, Azerbaijan's use of loitering munitions including the Harop during the 2020 illustrated democratization of high-impact capabilities, allowing a mid-tier to degrade air defenses and armor despite initial numerical disadvantages, with strikes proving economically viable against multimillion-dollar targets. This approach leveraged low per-unit costs to impose asymmetric attrition, compelling adversaries to expend far costlier interceptors or replacements, thereby equalizing force balances for non-superpower actors.

Integration in Combined Arms Warfare

Loitering munitions integrate into operations by providing persistent, on-demand strike capabilities that complement , , and , surveillance, and reconnaissance () assets, enabling synchronized effects across the battlefield. These systems bridge gaps in by loitering over areas of interest, allowing operators to cue strikes based on inputs from ground forces or aerial sensors, thus shortening the sensor-to-shooter timeline in dynamic environments. In doctrinal terms, they function as an extension of maneuver elements, delivering effects without exposing manned platforms to direct threats. A primary arises from pairing munitions with forward observers and platforms for beyond-line-of-sight (BLOS) targeting. Infantry units or dedicated observers designate targets via or digital coordinates, which are relayed to loitering systems for autonomous or semi-autonomous , extending reach without reliance on immediate line-of-sight fires. or networked cueing further enhances this by providing wide-area , allowing munitions to prosecute high-value targets identified remotely, as demonstrated in tactical adaptations where ground elements integrate feeds for persistent surveillance-strike loops. This approach has empirically accelerated kill chains, with observers spotting threats that loitering munitions neutralize before they close on friendly positions. Integration with emphasizes force preservation and efficiency, where loitering munitions supplement tube by engaging counter-battery threats or fleeting targets, thereby conserving barrel life and stocks during sustained operations. In scenarios of scarcity, these systems push strikes to the tactical edge, reducing dependence on massed fires and enabling distributed effects that degrade enemy enablers like command posts or nodes. For instance, they target static positions vulnerable to detection, allowing conventional guns to focus on suppressive roles while preserving operational tempo. This doctrinal shift treats loitering munitions as complementary effectors in planning, integrated via joint targeting cycles that prioritize synergistic allocation. Swarm tactics represent an advanced integration layer, where multiple loitering munitions overwhelm layered defenses through coordinated saturation, as adapted in operations following 2022 doctrinal refinements. These involve launching volleys to divide enemy air defenses and resources, enabling breakthroughs for follow-on strikes by ground or indirect fires. Such employment demands robust command-and-control () architectures to deconflict assets and mitigate risks, often leveraging resilient networks for real-time retasking amid contested electromagnetic spectra. Complementary use with jammers and decoys further amplifies effects, creating windows for munitions to penetrate and strike, though effective remains essential to maintain coherence in multi-domain operations.

Vulnerabilities and Countermeasures

Electronic and Cyber Vulnerabilities

Loitering munitions rely heavily on GPS for precise and targeting, rendering them vulnerable to electronic that denies satellite signals and forces fallback to inertial systems (), which accumulate errors over time and degrade accuracy from meters to potentially hundreds of meters after extended loitering periods. In contested environments, such as those observed in recent conflicts, of GPS and command datalinks can cause these systems to enter modes, including or abort sequences, to mitigate risks of uncontrolled flight or enemy capture. Electronic warfare (EW) systems, including ground-based jammers, have proven effective against loitering munitions in operational settings like Ukraine, where Russian forces employ spectrum denial to disrupt guidance links and reduce hit probabilities, with Ukrainian assessments highlighting EW as a primary countermeasure contributing to mission failures. Many low-cost models lack advanced anti-jam technologies, such as controlled reception pattern antennas (CRPA) or multi-frequency receivers, prioritizing affordability and mass production over resilience, which exacerbates susceptibility in high-threat areas. Cyber vulnerabilities further compound these risks, particularly through GPS spoofing attacks that transmit false signals to deceive onboard receivers, enabling attackers to redirect or hijack munitions mid-flight without physical . Unencrypted or weakly secured datalinks in commercial-off-the-shelf components—common in budget loitering munitions—allow for manipulation, signal , or remote , as demonstrated in controlled tests where spoofed commands overrode . These exploits are feasible at standoff ranges using off-the-shelf software-defined radios, underscoring the trade-offs in designs that favor simplicity and low unit costs over robust or autonomous fallback . Limited of hardened cyber defenses, such as frequency-hopping spreads or AI-driven , persists in proliferated systems due to developmental constraints and export controls on advanced tech.

Physical and Kinetic Defenses

Loitering munitions' small radar cross-section (RCS) and low-altitude flight paths often render them difficult for traditional () systems to detect and engage effectively, as these weapons prioritize higher-altitude, faster-moving threats. Instead, kinetic defenses emphasize direct physical interception via short-range guns, man-portable air-defense systems (MANPADS), and dedicated counter-unmanned aircraft system (C-UAS) interceptors optimized for slow, low-flying targets. Auto-cannons and machine guns, integrated into (SHORAD) platforms, provide point-defense capabilities by delivering high-volume kinetic impacts against loitering threats within visual or electro-optical range. Dedicated kinetic interceptors, such as the , function as expendable unmanned systems launched to collide with or detonate near incoming loitering munitions, extending engagement ranges beyond line-of-sight gun fire. The U.S. reported 170 combat kills using Coyote variants against drone threats, including loitering types, in operational deployments as of November 2024. Coyote's kinetic and high speed (up to 370 mph) enable it to target small to medium unmanned systems that evade larger SAMs. In real-world applications, such as the Ukraine-Russia conflict, low-end loitering munitions like the Iranian-designed Shahed series have been countered kinetically using shotguns and rifles fired from modified Yak-52 propeller aircraft, with crews achieving at least 120 drone intercepts by August 2025. These improvised tactics exploit the munitions' low speed and predictable paths for close-range shotgun blasts effective against lightweight, low-altitude threats. MANPADS, such as the FIM-92 Stinger, supplement guns for slightly larger loiterers, providing shoulder-fired missiles with infrared homing suited to short-range engagements under 5 km. Swarm deployments of loitering munitions exacerbate kinetic challenges by overwhelming point through sheer volume, as defenses like guns or single-use deplete rapidly against massed attacks. Layered kinetic strategies, combining MANPADS, rapid-fire cannons, and reusable or expendable hunters, aim to mitigate saturation, though empirical data from exercises indicate rates drop below 50% against coordinated without of multiple systems.

Adaptive Tactics in Contested Environments

Defenders employ , enhanced , and systems to disrupt the persistent and targeting cycles of loitering munitions, thereby complicating in contested airspace. Thermal suits, which reflect ambient signatures, have proven effective in rendering personnel and vehicles less detectable to sensors on incoming drones, as demonstrated in Ukrainian field applications against Russian Lancet loitering munitions. tactics involve rapid repositioning of assets to evade loitering patterns, while decoys—such as inflatable mockups of high-value targets or electronic mimics—divert munitions toward false positives, depleting attacker inventories without kinetic engagement. Force dispersal represents a core operational shift, dispersing high-value units and logistics to minimize clustering and reduce the payoff for loitering munition strikes. forces, responding to heavy losses from swarms starting in , adopted dispersed formations and fortified positions to maintain defensive lines with lower densities, enabling sustained operations despite persistent aerial threats. This approach trades concentration for survivability, limiting the damage from single munition hits but requiring enhanced for coverage. Data-driven tactics, including protocols integrated into 2025-era command systems, anticipate jamming patterns through , allowing defenders to maintain detection networks amid electronic contests without relying solely on reactive measures. These methods enable coordinated responses, such as timed emission windows for radars, to preserve operational . Such tactics impose escalating costs on attackers by forcing greater munition expenditure and operational complexity, yet they offer no complete solution; loitering munitions retain advantages in scalability and autonomy, compelling ongoing adaptations from both sides.

Comparisons to Other Systems

Versus Traditional Guided Munitions

Loitering munitions provide a capability for extended surveillance and conditional engagement that traditional guided munitions, such as fire-and-forget anti-radiation missiles like the or precision-guided bombs like the JDAM, fundamentally lack. These conventional systems follow a predetermined trajectory after launch, homing on initial target cues without the ability to loiter or retarget if the objective relocates or new intelligence emerges. In contrast, loitering munitions maintain altitude over a designated area for hours, using onboard sensors to detect, identify, and strike evasive or transient threats, thereby addressing the challenges of dynamic battlefield conditions where targets may maneuver to avoid interception. This persistence is particularly advantageous in (SEAD) missions against mobile radar emitters, which can activate intermittently or displace rapidly to evade detection. Traditional guided munitions risk failure if the emitter shuts down or moves post-launch, as they cannot adapt or persist in search patterns; systems, however, can orbit indefinitely until emissions are reacquired, increasing the probability of successful engagement against such elusive assets. For instance, systems like the are designed specifically for autonomous over high-threat zones to neutralize radar-guided surface-to-air missiles that traditional options often miss due to target mobility. Economically, loitering munitions offer superior cost-effectiveness for scenarios involving uncertain or low-value targets compared to high-end traditional guided munitions. A Switchblade 300 loitering munition costs approximately $60,000, far less than a missile at around $150,000 or a cruise missile exceeding $1 million per unit, allowing operators to allocate resources toward multiple persistent patrols rather than expending expensive projectiles on potentially fruitless intercepts. This disparity enables in contested environments, where empirical outcomes in fluid engagements demonstrate higher hit probabilities against moving targets than with commit-on-launch systems like JDAMs, which lack mid-course corrections for relocated assets.

Versus Reusable Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Loitering munitions differ from reusable unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), such as the MQ-1 Predator, primarily in their expendable nature, which enables operations in high-threat environments where the potential loss of a multi-million-dollar recoverable platform would be prohibitive. Reusable UAVs, valued for their longevity and capacity for multiple missions, often prompt operator reluctance to deploy them into contested due to attrition risks from enemy air defenses, limiting their use to safer altitudes or standoff ranges. In contrast, loitering munitions accept inevitable destruction upon impact, allowing deeper penetration into defended areas without the need to prioritize asset preservation. This expendability facilitates tactical persistence at low altitudes, where reusable UAVs face heightened vulnerability to ground-based threats like man-portable air-defense systems or fire, constraining the latter to higher flight profiles that reduce loiter time over targets and increase detectability. Expendable systems thus enable riskier maneuvers, such as terrain-hugging flights for evasion, which are typically denied to recoverable platforms to avoid irrecoverable losses. For instance, small attritable drones can operate without requiring defensive escorts, exploiting low-altitude advantages in cluttered environments. Payload configurations reflect these divergent designs: loitering munitions integrate warheads directly into their for a single, high-impact kinetic strike optimized for terminal precision, whereas reusable UAVs carry modular external munitions for repeated engagements across sorties, trading immediate destructive potential for operational flexibility. This single-use focus allows loiterers to allocate nearly full to , achieving effects comparable to guided bombs in scenarios demanding one decisive hit over sustained campaigning. However, reusable UAVs' multi-mission capability supports broader roles like intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance () alongside strikes, though at the cost of hesitation in expendable-appropriate high-risk profiles.

Versus Artillery and Manned Strikes

Loitering munitions differ from traditional systems, which typically employ with unguided or semi-guided projectiles designed for area suppression rather than pinpoint accuracy. Artillery barrages often necessitate volume fire to compensate for targeting uncertainties, increasing the potential for in contested environments. In contrast, loitering munitions enable operators to loiter over a designated area, conduct surveillance, and execute selective terminal strikes on confirmed targets, thereby minimizing unintended impacts on surrounding structures or personnel. Operational data from the conflict illustrate this distinction, where loitering munitions such as Russia's have achieved engagement times measured in minutes for transient high-value targets, surpassing the setup and fire cycles of tube systems that can require repositioning and ballistic calculations. These munitions maintain standoff ranges of approximately 40 kilometers while providing persistent overwatch, allowing for opportunistic strikes without the logistical dependencies of units, such as ammunition resupply chains vulnerable to . Compared to manned strikes, loitering munitions eliminate risks to aircrews exposed during ingress, , and egress phases, where pilots face threats from surface-to-air missiles and integrated air defenses. Manned platforms, such as jets or attack helicopters, demand recoverable assets and trained personnel, amplifying operational costs in terms of potential losses and generation rates. Loitering munitions, by design, are expendable and remotely controlled from secure locations, incurring no personnel casualties upon impact and supporting casualty-averse doctrines prevalent in Western militaries. In , both and forces have leveraged this attribute for strikes against armored columns and command posts, bypassing the need for forward air controllers or coordination that endangers manned aviation in contested . This approach has facilitated tactical persistence without committing high-value pilots to low-altitude operations, where historical loss rates in similar conflicts exceeded 10% per in denied environments.

Producers and Operators

Israel and Early Innovators

Israel pioneered loitering munitions in response to security challenges posed by adversaries with numerical superiority in conventional forces, necessitating systems capable of persistent aerial surveillance and precision engagement without exposing manned aircraft to high-risk environments. The (IAI) Harpy, operationalized in 1989, represented the first dedicated loitering munition, designed primarily for through autonomous detection and attack on emitters. This system established the core concept of expendable unmanned platforms that could loiter over target areas for extended periods—up to several hours—before self-destructing upon impact. The Harop, an advanced derivative developed by IAI between 2001 and 2003, expanded capabilities to include electro-optical guidance for versatile targeting of high-value assets such as command posts, vehicles, and surface vessels, with endurance exceeding six hours and a of approximately 1,000 kilometers. Complementing strategic systems like Harop, UVision's Hero family—encompassing models such as Hero-30, Hero-90, Hero-120, and Hero-400—focuses on tactical applications, offering man-portable to vehicle-launched options with from 40 to 200 kilometers and payloads tailored for support against fleeting or concealed threats. These innovations stemmed from Israel's emphasis on through affordable, attritable munitions that integrate , , and with kinetic effects. Israeli loitering munitions have been exported to over a dozen countries, including for Harop systems and via a $110 million IAI contract, influencing global military doctrines by demonstrating effectiveness in contested airspace. As of 2025, ongoing refinements by IAI and UVision incorporate enhanced features, such as improved AI-driven target recognition while retaining man-in-the-loop oversight, to counter evolving threats and extend operational flexibility.

United States and Western Allies

The pioneered practical loitering munitions for tactical applications, with AeroVironment's entering operational service with the US Army in 2012 following a $4.9 million contract award in 2011. Initial deployments occurred in for counter-ambush roles, leveraging the system's man-portable design for beyond-line-of-sight targeting. Complementing offensive systems, Raytheon's serves as an expendable counter-unmanned aircraft system (UAS) loitering munition, selected by the US Army for rapid deployment against threats and integrated into naval platforms like Arleigh Burke-class destroyers by 2025. To counter peer adversaries' massed systems, the Department of Defense initiated the on August 28, 2023, aiming to deliver thousands of all-domain attritable autonomous systems—including loitering munitions—within 18-24 months at scale and low cost. This effort prioritizes R&D investments in AI-enabled, expendable platforms to overwhelm high-end defenses, with focusing on autonomous systems deployable across air, sea, and land domains by mid-2025. Western allies emphasize NATO interoperability in their programs, aligning with US standards for joint operations. The United Kingdom advanced a domestic loitering munition initiative in November 2024 via a Prior Information Notice, targeting field-deployable systems for enhanced armed forces capabilities. France's KNDS secured contracts from the Direction Générale de l'Armement (DGA) in July 2024 for short- and medium-range loitering munitions under the Munition Téléopérée – Courte Portée program, building on COLIBRI and LARINAE projects with warhead developments completed by June 2024. These efforts support shared NATO goals, such as optionally manned common launchers for eastern flank deterrence, as outlined in US Army Europe plans from July 2025.

Russia, Ukraine, and Eastern Proliferators

's , under , has produced the Lancet family of loitering munitions, with the Lancet-3 variant featuring a 12 kg takeoff weight, maximum speed of 110 km/h, and operational range exceeding 40 km. These systems incorporate optoelectronic seekers for and have demonstrated a 77.7% hit rate against targets, with over 2,800 launches recorded by early 2025. Production scaled dramatically amid wartime demands and sanctions, rising from 93 units per quarter in prior periods to 535 by mid-2025, equating to thousands annually through expanded facilities. Upgrades to the Lancet in 2025 extended endurance to one hour, enhanced payloads to 1.8 kg for softer targets, and integrated for autonomous target search and identification, enabling operations in GPS-denied environments. These adaptations reflect Russia's push for indigenous manufacturing resilience, circumventing import restrictions on components while prioritizing low-cost, attritable strikes against high-value assets like armored vehicles. Ukraine responded to the 2022 invasion by rapidly scaling domestic loitering munition production, including FPV-based systems from groups like Wild Hornets, which developed the Queen Hornet—a 17-inch frame with a 7 kg capacity for bombing runs—and the interceptor loitering munition reaching speeds of 127 mph at altitudes up to 3,400 feet. Operating as a non-profit reliant on donations, Wild Hornets emphasized quick iterations for countering Russian advances, providing an asymmetric advantage in destroying tanks and through swarming tactics and low-altitude dives. Complementing these are Western-supplied systems, though indigenous efforts like have intercepted incoming threats such as Shahed-136 , highlighting 's adaptation of commercial FPV technology into expendable munitions for sustained frontline attrition. Among other Eastern actors, Turkey's -developed Kargu-2 rotary-wing munition supports autonomous swarm operations and has undergone field tests for armor-piercing warheads, achieving pinpoint strikes as of September 2024. Reports from in documented its use in hunting retreating forces without direct , underscoring capabilities for in asymmetric scenarios. , leveraging imports, deployed Israeli-sourced loitering munitions including Harop and Skystriker systems—acquired in quantities up to 100 units each between 2015 and 2019—to neutralize Armenian air defenses and ground targets during the 2020 , comprising a significant portion of its arsenal for rapid, effects. These proliferations illustrate Eastern states' emphasis on affordable, autonomous systems to conventional disparities under resource constraints.

Emerging Producers in Asia and Elsewhere

has rapidly expanded its loitering munition capabilities through state-backed firms, with Hinaray Technology ranking among the top global manufacturers by 2025 output and innovation in modular designs. The Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) developed the CH-901, a man-portable system with a 1.5 kg warhead and 15-20 km range, entering service around 2016 but scaling production in the 2020s for swarm tactics. In March 2025, completed development of the Feilong-60A, its first rocket-launched modular loitering munition, capable of vertical takeoff and integration with ground vehicles for rapid deployment against armored targets. At IDEX 2025, Chinese exhibitors showcased multiple loitering variants, including NORINCO's Feilong-10 and Sate Defense's Lanhui-30, emphasizing portable, anti-personnel systems akin to Western models. Reports indicate ordered up to one million units in late 2024 to prioritize for saturation attacks, reflecting a doctrinal shift toward affordable, attritable munitions over precision-guided alternatives. India's (DRDO) has pursued indigenous loitering munitions to reduce import dependence, with systems like Nagastra-1 achieving operational status by 2023 for tactical strikes up to 15 km. In June 2025, the contracted domestic firms for Rs 295 crore worth of loitering munitions and mini surveillance drones, including variants with 60-minute endurance and 30 km range for border surveillance and precision hits. DRDO's Rudrastra and Nagastra-3 extend capabilities to long-range (up to 100 km) loitering with loiter times exceeding 2 hours, tested for high-altitude operations in by 2022 and integrated into exercises by 2025. These developments align with India's self-reliance push, demonstrated at Bright Star 2025 with recoverable drones for autonomous target engagement. Iran produces the Shahed-136 loitering munition, a low-cost (under $50,000 per unit) geran-2 variant with 2,000 km range and 40-50 kg warhead, optimized for one-way saturation strikes since its 2019 debut. Developed by HESA, it features GPS/ guidance and has proliferated via exports, influencing regional copies like China's DFX-50 launched in August 2025. advanced its programs in the 2020s, unveiling a Harop-style multi-launcher for six loitering munitions at its October 2025 parade, shifting from prototypes to deployable systems. inspected AI-equipped suicide drones in March 2025 and ordered in November 2024, focusing on tactical attack variants with integration. In , Indonesia's PT DAHANA developed the Bramara by mid-2025, a tactical loitering system for infantry-level strikes without artillery support, complementing imported Turkish munitions like STM's Kargu. The loitering munition market is projected to grow at a 7.4% CAGR from 2025 to 2030, driven by regional tensions and domestic production ramps in and .

Impact on Modern Warfare

Strategic Shifts in Asymmetric Conflicts

Loitering munitions have enabled smaller or resource-constrained forces to impose asymmetric attrition on invaders' high-value assets, thereby altering power dynamics in favor of agile defenders. In the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh War, Azerbaijan's deployment of Harop loitering munitions neutralized Armenian air defenses and decimated ground forces, allowing rapid advances despite Armenia's entrenched positions and Soviet-era equipment advantages. This demonstrated how persistent loiter-and-strike capabilities can erode an adversary's maneuver potential at fractions of the cost of targeted systems, with each Harop priced under $1 million compared to multimillion-dollar tanks and SAM batteries destroyed. In the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict since February 2022, Ukrainian use of inexpensive loitering munitions and adapted commercial drones has inflicted severe losses on Russian armored units, achieving cost-effectiveness ratios where munitions costing hundreds to thousands of dollars disable vehicles valued at millions. Russian analyses acknowledge this disparity, noting that such systems enable sustained , compelling attackers to expend disproportionate resources to maintain offensive tempo. These examples have driven doctrinal adaptations, shifting militaries from reliance on massed armor concentrations to dispersed, operations that prioritize against aerial loiterers. Post-conflict assessments highlight how loitering munitions' ability to loiter for hours and strike opportunistically undermines traditional blitzkrieg-style advances, forcing forces to operate in smaller, hardened units with integrated . In , Russian mechanized thrusts have faced repeated halts due to drone-enabled , evidencing a broader trend where offensive viability diminishes without countermeasures, favoring defenders who can mass-produce and distribute such weapons rapidly.

Lessons from Recent Engagements

In the from 2022 onward, loitering munitions proved highly effective for , with Russian systems alone launching over 2,800 strikes by early 2025, achieving a 77.7% hit rate against and contributing to the destruction of hundreds of armored and high-value . Drones, including loitering types, inflicted more armored vehicle losses than all combined by March 2025, enabling precise, low-cost elimination of exposed assets in contested airspace where manned strikes faced higher risks. Belligerents rapidly adapted via hardening and anti- measures, with deploying EW-equipped munitions to neutralize Russian jammers and adopting fiber-optic guidance to circumvent jamming, achieving ranges up to 50-60 km. tactics emerged as counters, but the endurance of platforms—allowing operators to persist over areas for hours—conferred an operational edge by exploiting intermittent amid evolving defenses. These systems augmented without supplanting them, providing timely firesupport against prepared positions and vehicles while surges addressed volume limitations. Overreliance, however, invited saturation failures, as massed electronic countermeasures and layered air defenses could degrade isolated operations, emphasizing integration with ground maneuvers to avoid doctrinal imbalances. In the 2020 , Azerbaijani loitering munitions like the dismantled Armenian tank formations and air defenses through extended loiter times exceeding six hours and top-attack trajectories, facilitating ground advances by suppressing entrenched positions. Success hinged on synchronizing with reconnaissance drones and , revealing that standalone loitering efficacy diminished without multi-domain coordination against adaptive foes.

Future Proliferation and Arms Race Dynamics

The global loitering munition market, valued at approximately USD 530 million in 2024, is projected to reach USD 815 million by , driven by demand from emerging producers and integration of cost-reducing technologies such as AI-enabled . This expansion lowers entry barriers, as modular designs and components enable rapid scaling by nations with limited industrial bases, fostering widespread adoption beyond traditional powers. Since 2023, announcements of new loitering munition programs have surged in and , indicating accelerated diffusion to over 20 producing states. Countermeasure developments, including advanced and directed-energy systems, intensify an iterative , yet loitering munitions' low marginal costs—often under USD 100,000 per unit—confer advantages to agile proliferators over those constrained by export controls or fiscal treaties. Swarming capabilities and AI-driven target selection further tilt dynamics toward volume over sophistication, enabling smaller forces to saturate defenses and erode high-value assets asymmetrically. States unbound by restrictive arms limitation agreements, such as those in the , outpace treaty adherents in deployment speed, underscoring how proliferation counters conventional disparities. Prohibitive international bans remain implausible, given the entrenched dual-use technologies and verification hurdles akin to those impeding controls, prioritizing empirical trends over normative appeals. Consequently, munitions bolster national by deterring incursions through persistent, low-risk strike options, particularly for nations facing numerically superior adversaries, without reliance on vulnerable manned platforms. This deterrence calculus favors defensive postures, as scalable production democratizes precision effects historically reserved for resource-rich militaries.

Ethical and Legal Considerations

Claims of Indiscriminate Use and Rebuttals

Critics, including organizations such as and the International Committee of the Red Cross, have raised concerns that loitering munitions risk indiscriminate effects due to their potential for autonomous target selection and operation in complex environments, potentially violating principles of distinction under . For instance, reports from in 2020 alleged the use of loitering munitions to target retreating combatants, highlighting fears of reduced human oversight leading to erroneous engagements. These claims often stem from instances where munitions operate with limited control, amplifying risks in densely populated or fluid battlefields, as seen in some engagements where short-range strikes, including loitering variants, contributed to civilian harm. Such allegations overlook the predominant architecture of most loitering munitions, where operators maintain continuous control, enabling target verification, route adjustments, and mission aborts to avoid non-combatants. Systems like the Harop exemplify this, with electro-optical sensors allowing operators to loiter, identify high-value targets, and execute precision strikes or self-destruct if conditions change, achieving pinpoint accuracy against radar emitters and mobile assets. In practice, this capability has yielded high success rates on intended ; Russian Lancet munitions in , for example, reported a 77.7% hit rate against armored vehicles and in 2024, demonstrating operator-guided selectivity rather than blind . Empirical comparisons further rebut indiscriminate characterizations by showing loitering munitions produce lower than unguided , which relies on area . Operators can dwell over areas to confirm targets, aborting strikes upon detecting civilians— a flexibility absent in barrages that caused over 10,000 verified civilian casualties in by mid-2025, often from wide-radius explosions in populated zones. While isolated failures occur, such as FPV-style aborts reducing overall success to 20-30% to prioritize , these reflect safeguards and rather than inherent flaws; misconceptions arise from conflating intent or errors with , ignoring how guidance minimizes blast radii compared to 's 5-10 times greater incidental footprint in similar scenarios. NGO critiques, while highlighting valid risks of proliferation, often emphasize worst-case autonomy scenarios that do not align with deployed systems' operator-centric protocols, potentially influenced by advocacy for broader weapons restrictions. In Ukrainian operations, U.S.-supplied Switchblade munitions have focused on tactical military strikes with verified low civilian impact, underscoring their discriminate potential when integrated with intelligence feeds. This operator-enabled precision positions loitering munitions as a net reducer of unintended harm relative to legacy fire support, contingent on adherence to targeting protocols.

Compliance with International Humanitarian Law

Loitering munitions facilitate compliance with the principle of distinction under (IHL), as their loitering capability allows operators to conduct real-time visual assessments to differentiate between targets and protected s or objects before engagement. This oversight, common in systems like the or , enables abort options if non-combatants are identified, contrasting with unguided munitions lacking such verification. Empirical analyses of deployments, such as in the 2020 where Azerbaijani forces used loitering munitions against Armenian defensive positions, indicate targeted strikes on verifiable assets with limited reported incidental civilian harm attributable to the weapon's precision guidance rather than inherent design flaws. Regarding , these systems support IHL by permitting operators to evaluate anticipated civilian casualties against the concrete military advantage, often employing smaller warheads suited to specific targets, thus minimizing excessive collateral effects compared to broader-area weapons. For instance, munitions' endurance—typically 30 minutes to hours—allows deferral of strikes until conditions favor lower , enhancing judgment over instantaneous decisions in manned or . Studies affirm their superiority to munitions in this regard, as clusters' wide dispersal and rates (up to 40% duds in some models) inherently indiscriminate long-term , whereas systems' directed and self-destruct options reduce unexploded ordnance persistence. Potential challenges to compliance arise primarily from operator or inadequate training rather than systemic weapon attributes, akin to errors in piloted strikes amid fog-of-war conditions; rigorous pre-deployment legal reviews and operator protocols, as mandated under Article 36 of Additional , mitigate these through simulated targeting and . No IHL treaty prohibits loitering munitions outright, and their use remains lawful when integrated into command structures ensuring accountability, with violations attributable to individual or state failures, not the platform itself.

Broader Implications for Lethal Autonomous Systems

Loitering munitions exemplify semi-autonomous systems in which enables functions such as autonomous , , and persistent loitering over designated areas, but the authorization for lethal engagement invariably requires human operator intervention, thereby preserving command accountability and forestalling the emergence of fully independent "killer robots." Directive 3000.09, revised in January 2023, explicitly requires that autonomous and semi-autonomous weapon systems incorporate design features allowing commanders and operators to exercise appropriate levels of human judgment over the application of force. This "" paradigm, evident in operational use, counters hyperbolic portrayals of -driven warfare by ensuring that ethical and tactical decisions remain under human purview, as demonstrated by systems like the , where operators manually confirm and direct impacts after real-time video feeds. By facilitating precision engagements without exposing pilots or infantry to direct fire, loitering munitions reduce risks to military personnel compared to manned airstrikes or ground offensives, offering an ethically superior alternative that prioritizes force protection while neutralizing threats efficiently. In the Ukraine conflict, for example, both the U.S.-supplied Switchblade, deployed since April 2022, and Russian ZALA Lancet munitions have enabled operators to conduct targeted strikes on armor and artillery from standoff distances, averting the need for costlier human-wave assaults or broader bombardments that historically amplify casualties. Such capabilities enhance operational tempo and survivability, as loitering munitions can persist over battlefields for extended periods—up to 40 minutes for Switchblade models—allowing deliberate target validation without committing scarce manned assets. Critics, including entities like the International Committee of the Red Cross, often equate semi-autonomous loitering munitions with fully autonomous weapons, amplifying fears of eroded human control despite empirical retention of operator authority in target selection and strike execution. This conflation overlooks the military imperative for human oversight in current deployments, where augments rather than supplants judgment, and ignores how these systems bolster defensive postures against adversaries employing indiscriminate volumes, such as in ongoing asymmetric engagements. Absent such technologies, forces would revert to higher-risk manned operations, underscoring their role in aligning lethality with necessity rather than dystopian .

References

  1. [1]
    L-297 Loitering Munitions - msiac - NATO
    Loitering munitions (LM) are hybrid weapon systems with characteristics of missiles and drones (UAV´s - unmanned aerial vehicles).
  2. [2]
    Loitering Munitions in Ukraine and Beyond - War on the Rocks
    Apr 22, 2022 · Loitering munitions are one-time-use weapons designed to find a target and crash into it, giving it its “kamikaze” nickname.
  3. [3]
    Loitering Munitions 101: What They Are and Why They Matter - IDGA
    Aug 22, 2025 · Loitering munitions are aerial weapons equipped with some form of built-in warhead. These weapons are designed to loiter around a target area ...
  4. [4]
    Loitering munitions | Unmanned Aerial Weapons - Maris Tech
    Sep 16, 2025 · Loitering munitions sit between cruise missiles and ISR drones. They carry sensors and a warhead like a missile, but can wait, re-route, or ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  5. [5]
    The Evolving Landscape of Loitering Munitions - Defense Security ...
    Feb 28, 2024 · The concept of loitering munitions emerged during the late Cold War, with Israel Aerospace Industries' Harpy being the pioneering model. The ...
  6. [6]
    Loitering Munitions And Its Role In Modern Warfare.
    Apr 6, 2024 · Loitering munitions are aerial weapons that loiter until a target is located, then attack by crashing into it, offering flexibility and ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  7. [7]
    Loitering Munitions - UVision
    Also known as kamikaze drones or suicide drones, loitering munitions are equipped with a range of advanced sensors, guidance systems, and explosive warheads ...HERO 120 · HERO 30 · HERO 400 · HERO 90Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
  8. [8]
    The Panacea of Loitering Munitions - Armada International
    Dec 18, 2024 · The loitering munition (LM) could be defined as a self-contained airborne single use direct attack weapon. The LM uses a ground or aircraft ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    333. The Dawn of the Loitering Munitions Era
    Jun 14, 2021 · Modern loitering munitions are causing a revolution in land warfare similar to the introduction of the machine gun.
  10. [10]
    Loitering munitions preview the autonomous future of warfare
    Aug 4, 2021 · Awkward cousins to armed drones and cruise missiles, loitering munitions were first developed as a specialized weapon to target anti-aircraft ...
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Loitering Munitions | Center for the Study of the Drone
    Feb 10, 2017 · This document provides an overview of loitering munitions currently in use or development, and examines some unanswered questions relating ...
  12. [12]
    Must Have Tactical Loitering Munitions for War - IAI
    Mar 7, 2024 · Loitering munitions enhance combat efficiency, offering autonomous targeting, adaptability, and precise strikes for superior battlefield ...
  13. [13]
    https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/tacit-rainbow-air-forces-aborted-plan-build-missile-drone-hybrid-198031
  14. [14]
    [PDF] AGM-136/RGM-136 TACIT RAINBOW - Archived 10/2000
    Oct 3, 1999 · The unique design feature of the AGM-136A TACIT RAINBOW was its loiter capability. Although the exact duration of the loiter was classified, ...
  15. [15]
    One way attack: How loitering munitions are shaping conflicts
    Jun 5, 2023 · In early 1973, the Defense Advanced Research Agency (DARPA) began working on developing cheap, small drones to attack enemy air defenses. Known ...
  16. [16]
    Loitering ammunition in Special Operations Forces - Defence24.com
    Aug 5, 2021 · The unsuccessful anti-radar missile program conducted in the United States in the years 1982-1991, AGM-136 Tacit Rainbow is also mentioned as ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Leveraging The Operational Effectiveness Of The Israeli Unmanned ...
    Apr 8, 2012 · In 1988, Israel also developed the IAI Harpy UAS to combat hostile surface-to-air missiles (SAM) sites or other radar sites. IAI designed the ...
  18. [18]
    Harpy Israeli Loitering Munition Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)
    Jun 10, 2024 · The IAI Harpy is a loitering munition produced by Israel Aerospace Industries. The Harpy is designed to attack radar systems and is optimized ...Missing: first 1989
  19. [19]
    The Future of the Skies, Part II: The Rise of Loitering Munitions
    Apr 20, 2022 · Fired by truck-mounted canisters, the Harpy was intended to conduct the initial suppression of enemy air defenses (SEAD), allowing more valuable ...
  20. [20]
    Weapons That Watch and Wait - Armada International
    Sep 25, 2024 · The IAI Harpy was the classic example of these first-generation loitering munitions. Usually transported and launched from a truck-mounted ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    Israel Aerospace Systems HARPY loitering munition
    The Harpy is an anti-radiation loitering munition described by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) as an all-weather day/night “Fire and Forget” autonomous ...Missing: first 1989
  22. [22]
    Loitering munitions: Powerful battlefield enabler, now integrated into ...
    Dec 16, 2022 · Starting in the 2000s, loitering weapons have been developed for additional roles ranging from relatively long-range strikes. IAI Harop was one ...
  23. [23]
    HAROP - Advanced Loitering Munition System - IAI
    Nov 23, 2023 · Using its electro-optic seeker and without prior intelligence, HAROP has a 9-hour endurance to seek targets in a designated area, locate and ...Missing: infrared 2009
  24. [24]
    Switchblade Tactical Missile System, USA - Army Technology
    Jul 7, 2023 · The US Air Force awarded a $4.2m order for the Switchblade loitering munition systems and services in early 2012. ATK was subcontracted by ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] AI, Robots, and Swarms - CNA Corporation
    Jan 1, 2017 · This study examines AI, machine-learning, and robot technologies and their military implications for autonomous weapon systems, including AI's ...
  26. [26]
    New Wrinkles to Drone Warfare | Proceedings - U.S. Naval Institute
    The Azerbaijani military released videos, often professionally produced, that showed Armenian tanks and other armored vehicles being struck and destroyed or ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Lessons from the Nagorno-Karabakh 2020 Conflict - Army.mil
    Jan 31, 2023 · The use of UAS by Azerbaijan negated the Armenian advantage of the mountainous terrain concealing forces from observation and indirect fire ...
  28. [28]
    Russian units use Lancet to wipe out Ukrainian combat vehicles in ...
    Russian forces, using a Lancet loitering munition, have wiped out several Ukrainian armored combat vehicles in the Kursk Region, the Russian Defense ...
  29. [29]
    Since the beginning of 2025, 'Lancet' loitering munitions have ...
    Mar 7, 2025 · In the first two months of 2025 alone, 'Lancet' loitering munitions destroyed approximately 200 pieces of UAF combat equipment.
  30. [30]
    https://www.armyrecognition.com/focus-analysis-conflicts/army/conflicts-in-the-world/russia-ukraine-war-2022/us-switchblade-600-kamikaze-drone-proves-highly-effective-in-ukraine-destroying-russian-tor-air-defense-system
  31. [31]
    Russia Promotes New Lancet-E Kamikaze Drone for Export Market ...
    Aug 27, 2025 · According to Zala Aero, the manufacturer of the Lancet-E, the drone was documented in 872 instances of combat use by Russian forces between ...
  32. [32]
    Ukranian Loitering Munitions Market - Teal Group
    Sep 17, 2024 · In 2024, Ukraine expects to manufacture a million of these FPV drones as well as 10,000 medium range loitering munitions and 1,000 long-range ...Missing: domestic surge deployments
  33. [33]
    Russian Force Generation and Technological Adaptations Update ...
    Jul 25, 2025 · A Ukrainian military expert reported on July 9 that Russian forces extended the Lancet's range from 35-40 kilometers to 80-110 kilometers in ...Missing: attrition | Show results with:attrition
  34. [34]
    Performance analysis and design of loitering munitions
    It is known that there are currently six main configurations exist for loitering ammunitions, namely conventional fixed-wing, canard, delta wing, cruciform wing ...Missing: core | Show results with:core<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Loitering Munition Market Size, Share, Trends & Forecast, 2034
    Loitering munitions are lightweight and compact, making them easy to deploy quickly and providing high mobility and tactical flexibility in a fluid theatre of ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Loitering Munitions and Unpredictability
    Feb 19, 2022 · Development history. Briefly summarises the loitering munition's development history, production and funding information, and operational ...
  37. [37]
    HAVE LOITERING MUNITIONS MADE TANKS OBSOLETE?
    Apr 25, 2021 · With autonomous guidance and AI software programmed to recognise specific targets, these can be used to neutralise concentrations of infantry in ...Missing: shift | Show results with:shift
  38. [38]
    Loitering Munitions and Unpredictability: Autonomy in Weapon ...
    Jun 7, 2023 · Loitering munitions—or 'killer drones' as they are often popularly known—are expendable uncrewed aircraft which can integrate sensor-based ...
  39. [39]
    Analysis of Loitering Munition Types, Composition, Advantages, and ...
    Oct 11, 2025 · Loitering Munition is made up of several critical components, including the warhead, guidance system, propulsion system, control system, and ...
  40. [40]
    Loitering Munition Market Size, Share & 2030 Trends Report
    Sep 11, 2025 · Medium-range (50 to 100 km) designs dominate revenues, but long-range (greater than 100 km) variants are scaling quickly as standoff ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  41. [41]
    Loitering Munitions | UAV Navigation
    Compatible with external seekers and EO/IR payloads, it supports autonomous target detection and navigation. Real-time sensor fusion and an enhanced HUD ...
  42. [42]
    Let's Talk About The Israel Air Industries Loitering Munitions And ...
    Jan 7, 2022 · The range and loiter time provided by its silent electrical motor are reduced to 50 km and up to two hours, respectively, and the warhead is of ...
  43. [43]
    UVision - Army Technology
    The Hero-70 smart loitering system is extremely lightweight at only 7kg and has an LOS datalink range of 40km. ... Operational systems for long-range precision ...
  44. [44]
    Lowental Hybrid: HOME
    A drop-in propulsion system delivering stealth, endurance, and reliability - purpose-built for tactical UAVs and loitering munitions. 5× Endurance.
  45. [45]
    https://hinaray.com/who-makes-loitering-munitions/
  46. [46]
    Switchblade® 600 Loitering Munition Systems | Kamikaze Drones | AV
    Anti-Armor and Anti-Personnel Effects. Range. 24.9+ mi (40+ km) 56+ mi (90+ km) w/ Forward Pass. Endurance. 40+ min. Weight. Munition: 33 lb (15 kg) AUR: 65 lb ...
  47. [47]
    WARMATE loitering munitions - WB GROUP
    1,1 m. Maximum take-off weight. 5,7 kg. Pułap operacyjny. 150 - 300 m AGL. Warheads types. High Explosive / Termobaric. Maximum speed during attack. 150 km/h.Missing: personnel | Show results with:personnel
  48. [48]
    HERO 30 Dark - Uvision
    Jun 14, 2023 · The Hero-30 is an anti-personnel/anti-material tactical loitering munition system, optimized for the demands of modern asymmetric warfare, and ...
  49. [49]
    Switchblade® 300 Loitering Munition Systems | Kamikaze Drone | AV
    Loitering Munition ; Range. 30 km (with Extended Range Antenna) ; Endurance. 20+ min ; Weight. Munition: 3.69 lb (1.68 kg) AUR: 7.2 lb (3.27 kg) (Includes payload, ...Missing: tank | Show results with:tank
  50. [50]
    PAS 2023 - UVision introduces new manportable loitering munitions ...
    Jun 25, 2023 · According to available information the HERO-1250 has a range of over 200 km, and can fly for up to 10 hours carrying a 50 kg warhead over a ...<|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Performance analysis and design of loitering munitions
    A more common approach is to use a launch rail. Launch rails for small loitering munitions can be carried and set-up manually. In case the loitering munition is ...<|separator|>
  52. [52]
    AV Switchblade 600 Loitering Munition System Achieves Pivotal ...
    Sep 10, 2025 · “By enabling Switchblade 600 to launch from the MQ-9A with SATCOM control, we're opening up new possibilities for long-range, precision ...
  53. [53]
    UVision unveils aerial launch capability for Hero-120 loitering munition
    UVision Air Ltd. has announced a new capability that allows its Hero-120 loitering munition to be launched from a range of utility and attack helicopters.
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Loitering Munitions (Explosive UAVs) - INSS
    Jun 25, 2025 · • Launch Method: Mostly ground-based; some maritime or airborne launch systems exist, but these are rare;. • Wingspan: 0.5 m to 4.0 m ...
  55. [55]
    Marines Betting Big On "Critical" Air-Launched Swarming Drones
    Jun 5, 2023 · Marines see loitering munitions launched in swarms from many aircraft, including F-35s and MV-22s, as critical to winning a future fight.
  56. [56]
    Loitering with Intent - Asian Military Review
    Dec 26, 2022 · Harop LM 1 The Harop loitering munition from IAI has nine hours of endurance that means it could offer a maximum range of about 270nm (500km) ...<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Loitering munitions: key to future military technology - Arquimea
    Sep 18, 2025 · Loitering munition represents a paradigm shift in modern warfare. Its ability to combine intelligence, persistence, and precision in a single ...
  58. [58]
    Loitering Munitions as a New-Age Weapon System
    Dec 5, 2022 · The incorporation of artificial intelligence (AI) in the military produces new and smart systems that redefine how the combat force is ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  59. [59]
    HERO 30 - UVision
    The HERO 30 is a short-range loitering munition system for dismounted tactical forces requiring selective surgical attack. HERO 30's compact, portable,
  60. [60]
    Mini Harop - Loitering Munition Drone - IAI
    Nov 23, 2023 · This loitering munitions can locate, acquire and dive on operator designated targets and extremely high accuracy (better than 1 m CEP). The ...
  61. [61]
    HERO-400 - Uvision USA
    Precision accuracy, minimal collateral (<1m CEP). Mission adaptable in GPS ... delivers advanced loitering munitions and tailored operational solutions ...
  62. [62]
    Kaatil - Loitering Munition - Dynauton Systems
    KAATIL is an aerial kamikaze UAV designed to carry explosives and strike enemy targets with precision and accuracy. ... Key Specification. Strike Accuracy, CEP 2m.
  63. [63]
    Russia Launches Over 2800 Lancet Drones Targeting Ukrainian ...
    Jan 12, 2025 · Exclusive Report: Russia Launches Over 2800 Lancet Drones Targeting Ukrainian Artillery with 77.7% Hit Rate.
  64. [64]
    Fighting for Information: A Theory of Tactics for the Next Army - CSIS
    Jun 11, 2025 · When combined with a large inventory of loitering munitions, these platforms create the modern day equivalent of skirmishers needed to fix the ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Dispersed, Disguised, and Degradable - RAND
    May 22, 2025 · Persistent surveillance and loitering munitions have sharply increased the difficulty of clearing operations in Ukraine.
  66. [66]
    Loitering munitions: Production scaling kicks into higher gear - Euro-sd
    Aug 29, 2025 · These early LMs were configured for the Suppression of Enemy Air Defences (SEAD) role. Since then, the mission profile has broadened ...Missing: applications | Show results with:applications<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    How Much Does the Switchblade UAV 300/600 Cost in 2025?
    Jun 18, 2025 · Switchblade 300: $6K–$10K ; Switchblade 600: $70K–$90K ; Israeli Harop (loitering munition): $150K+ ; Bayraktar TB2 (full strike UAV): $5M–$10M per ...
  68. [68]
    On Cruise Missiles and White Elephants - War on the Rocks
    May 9, 2016 · A JASSM and Tomahawk costs $1.3 and $1.6 million dollars respectively. For every LRSO, the Department of Defense could buy approximately five ...
  69. [69]
    AGM-158 JASSM - Wikipedia
    Unit cost, $698,000 (JASSM Baseline AGM-158A, FY17). Produced, 1998 ... ^ "US Air Force Takes Delivery of 2,000th JASSM Cruise Missile". deagel.com ...
  70. [70]
    Cheap drones versus expensive tanks: a battlefield game-changer?
    Oct 21, 2020 · With cheaper drones likely to cost around $100,000 each versus a $50 million armoured vehicle, the drone wins the value-for-money test. The ...
  71. [71]
    Altius | Anduril
    Altius leverages autonomy to serve as a true force multiplier. Autonomy enable a single operator to control multiple assets simultaneously and has ...Missing: multiplication | Show results with:multiplication
  72. [72]
    https://dsm.forecastinternational.com/2025/09/05/ukraine-war-highlights-new-role-for-loitering-munitions/
  73. [73]
    Ukraine War Highlights New Role for Loitering Munitions - Defense ...
    Sep 5, 2025 · Russia's invasion of Ukraine has highlighted the prevalence of loitering munitions and forced armies to rethink how they deliver and survive ...
  74. [74]
    The Air and Missile War in Nagorno-Karabakh - CSIS
    Dec 8, 2020 · The conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the disputed Nagorno-Karabakh region included the heavy use of missiles, drones, and rocket artillery.
  75. [75]
    Drones and the Death of Deterrence: Lessons from Nagorno ...
    Aug 26, 2025 · Drones lowered the cost of engagement and shattered the old logic of deterrence. Military planners who once relied on large arsenals and ...
  76. [76]
    Marine Corps Loitering Munitions: Ten Tenets for Future ...
    Jun 11, 2025 · If the company commander takes all 10, that is 150 additional pounds of weight to distribute amongst foot mobile light infantry, corresponding ...
  77. [77]
    Full Speed Ahead: Integrating Kinetic Drones into the Combined ...
    Feb 25, 2025 · There are two types of KD attacks: dropped munitions and loitering munitions. When compared against each other, the number of LM strikes against ...
  78. [78]
    The Meaning of Drone-Enabled Infantry Striking Beyond Line of Sight
    Jun 23, 2025 · Drones used for surveillance and/or as loitering munitions can be quickly repurposed for targeting. When combined with fires, these systems ...
  79. [79]
    5G & Edge Computing: The Future of the DoD and JADC2 - ALSSA
    Jul 1, 2023 · Forward observers can mark targets while immediately pushing data to loitering munitions that are flying autonomously within their own airspace.<|separator|>
  80. [80]
    Deep Dive into Crazy New Infantry TTPs in the Russo-Ukraine War
    Aug 12, 2025 · Ukrainian infantry are holding LPs and OPs, their job is to spot the enemy and radio back. From there drones and artillery do the killing.
  81. [81]
    Russia's Artillery War in Ukraine: Challenges and Innovations - RUSI
    Aug 9, 2023 · When considered against the backdrop of Russia's own ammunition challenges, the use of loitering munitions is therefore a logical alternative.
  82. [82]
    Look Up: The Future of Fire Support and Loitering Munitions
    Jan 21, 2025 · This article explores the potential integration of loitering munitions into U.S. Army fire support capabilities, examining their ...Missing: combined | Show results with:combined
  83. [83]
    The Russia-Ukraine Drone War: Innovation on the Frontlines and ...
    May 28, 2025 · There's training for nascent swarming tactics which is taking place in the Russian military. It's unclear exactly how successful Russians are.
  84. [84]
    [PDF] The First-Person View Revolution and Its Implications for Land ...
    Aug 12, 2025 · ... loitering munitions across 30- to. 50-kilometer ranges. Real ... FPVs have been fully integrated into combined arms battle systems, sup-.<|separator|>
  85. [85]
    Precision Under Fire: BAE Systems Advances Assured PNT (APNT ...
    Jul 11, 2025 · ... navigation and timing (PNT) solutions must withstand jamming, spoofing and degraded visual conditions. For Loitering Munitions and unmanned ...
  86. [86]
    Autopilot for GPS-Denied Navigation in Unmanned Systems
    Jamming and Electronic Warfare: Intentional signal interference can render GPS unusable in a matter of seconds. Spoofing Attacks: False signals can mislead ...
  87. [87]
    https://mwi.westpoint.edu/more-than-modernization-ukraine-and-the-army-transformation-initiative/
  88. [88]
    More than Modernization: Ukraine and the Army Transformation ...
    Oct 10, 2025 · This new capability also allowed Ukraine the ability to degrade Russian forces' artillery advantage by attacking storage sites and reducing ...
  89. [89]
    GPS Anti-Jam Technology | Anti-Spoofing for UAV & Drones
    Find manufacturers of GPS Anti-Jam Technology for Drones, UAV & Unmanned Systems; GNSS Anti Spoofing, Anti Jamming Antennas & Receivers.
  90. [90]
    [PDF] How to Analyze the Cyber Threat from Drones - RAND
    Mar 5, 2020 · Manipulation of these estimates enables an attacker to hijack or crash the target drone. GPS spoofing can be undertaken covertly and from ...
  91. [91]
    Security analysis of drones systems: Attacks, limitations, and ...
    May 8, 2020 · This paper analyzes the exploitation of drones vulnerabilities within communication links, as well as smart devices and hardware, including smart-phones and ...
  92. [92]
    https://www.droneshield.com/c-uas-factbook
  93. [93]
    C-UAS Factbook - DroneShield
    Spoofing, Protocol Manipulation and Cyber. Spoofing or “hacking” involves a form of protocol manipulation. This method includes mimicking the controller and ...
  94. [94]
    The increasing necessity of SHORAD - Euro-sd
    Apr 16, 2025 · Short-range air defence weaponry can prove effective against threats including loitering munitions and cruise missiles. The use of MANPADS by ...
  95. [95]
    What layer of air defense should deal with small drones and loitering ...
    May 30, 2022 · Group 1/2 drones should be dealt with using point-defence style weapons; that can be a radar/EO guided medium-calibre gun, a high-energy laser, or a microwave ...How do you defend against NLOS ATGMs and small ... - Redditr/WarCollege on Reddit: If kinetic defence against missiles involves ...More results from www.reddit.com
  96. [96]
    Army Coyote Drone Hunting Drones Have Scored 170 Combat Kills
    Nov 1, 2024 · The Army has racked up 170 kills with Coyote counter-drone interceptors in operational deployments globally.
  97. [97]
    Pentagon Awards $5.04 Billion Contract to Raytheon for Coyote ...
    Oct 7, 2025 · Coyote is small (about 0.9m long, weighing 5.9kg) but fast – after launch it can reach speeds of roughly 345–370mph to intercept drones at ...
  98. [98]
    How Ukraine Is Destroying Russian Drones Using Modified Yak-52 ...
    Aug 26, 2025 · Ukraine uses modified Yak-52 planes with rifles and shotguns to shoot down Russian drones · Yak-52 crews have shot down 120 drones, including ...
  99. [99]
    Loitering Munitions (Explosive UAVs) - INSS
    Jun 25, 2025 · In Table 1, there is a description and key parameters of several loitering munitions. ... An example is the Russian Gerbera system, which ...
  100. [100]
    Not just drones, but massed swarms of them. Defences can't cope
    Jul 1, 2025 · The defences could not handle the full volume of munitions flying in. Russia's barrages were not an anomaly but the result of a highly ...
  101. [101]
    Ukraine's Thermal Camouflage Is Making Soldiers Vanish from Drones
    Mar 30, 2025 · Ukraine's thermal camouflage uses multilayered suits that reflect ambient thermal energy, making soldiers nearly invisible to thermal drones by ...
  102. [102]
    https://warontherocks.com/2023/01/into-the-pickle-barrel-how-thinking-about-precision-as-a-system-can-expand-the-munition-stockpile/
  103. [103]
    Into the Pickle Barrel: How Thinking About Precision as a System ...
    Jan 25, 2023 · Countermeasures like camouflage, decoys, and electronic warfare help adversaries deplete precision munition stocks. Ukraine is showing the ...
  104. [104]
    Russia's War in Ukraine: Fortification for Drone Warfare
    Sep 9, 2025 · Second, as dispersal will result in reduced force densities, engineering solutions that allow long fronts to be held with minimal manpower must ...
  105. [105]
    (PDF) Russia's Adaptation in the War against Ukraine (2022-2025)
    Sep 8, 2025 · This text provides an analytical overview of the adaptation of the Russian Armed Forces during their full-scale invasion of Ukraine from 2022 to ...
  106. [106]
    [PDF] Small Uncrewed Aircraft Systems (SUAS) in Divisional Brigades
    Apr 8, 2025 · Understanding Spectrum Management and EW is critical for effective SUAS operations: SUAS rely on RF spectrum for remote command and control, are ...
  107. [107]
    Gunline Survival against Loitering Munitions: Lessons from Ukraine
    Oct 26, 2023 · This article advocates for changes in doctrine and procedures to mitigate the growing threat of loitering munitions to artillery.
  108. [108]
    Harpy - Fire and Forget Missile | Weather Weapon - IAI
    Nov 23, 2023 · As a loitering munition system dedicated to the suppression and destruction of enemy air defenses (SEAD/DEAD), HARPY provides a strategic tool ...
  109. [109]
    Why is AeroVironment's Switchblade drone considered cheaper ...
    Sep 6, 2023 · Because it is cheaper. Hellfire missiles cost around $150000 each. Whereas a Switchblade 300 drone is nearly $60000. This is 40% the cost of ...Missing: empirical dynamic
  110. [110]
    [PDF] WINNING IN THE GRAY ZONE - CSBA
    ... or Conventional Air-Launched Cruise Missile (CALCM). These cruise missiles ... A Coyote UAV costs $15,000, and an engine-less loitering munition with a ...
  111. [111]
    Comparing the Cost-Effectiveness of Expendable Versus Reusable ...
    Feb 23, 2021 · Reusable UAVs should be considered as possible alternatives to expendable UAVs for a range of roles, including as decoys, jammers, or ISR ...
  112. [112]
    Replicate Ordnance, Not Cheap Drones | Proceedings
    In certain scenarios, small drones—particularly UAVs at low altitude—can provide advantages. If “attritable” or expendable, they do not need to be defended.<|control11|><|separator|>
  113. [113]
    Loitering Munitions Driving Next-Gen Precision and Autonomy in ...
    Oct 7, 2025 · In such situations, conventional artillery or missile systems often lack the flexibility and precision required to minimize collateral damage ...
  114. [114]
    Accelerating Drone Munition Innovation - National Defense Magazine
    Sep 8, 2025 · The Ukrainian defense industrial base has generated an incredible and rapid modernization of drone munitions. Private firms and volunteer ...Missing: artillery reliance
  115. [115]
    How Suicide Drones Transformed the Front Lines in Ukraine
    Jul 10, 2025 · Drones cost much less than other weapons of equivalent power or range, and they reduced risks to those using them, who operate out of view, ...
  116. [116]
    Military Knowledge: Harop Suicide Drone - Islamic World News
    Jan 5, 2024 · The Harop UAV is actually a developed version based on the Harpy suicide drone (IAI Harpy), which made its first flight in 1989. The Harop ...
  117. [117]
    HERO 120 - UVision
    Built for land, sea and air engagement, HERO 120 integrates on armored vehicles, naval vessels and rotary-wing platforms, such as Combat Helicopters, while.
  118. [118]
    Israel's Uvision looks to cement US Army ties after nearly $1B ...
    Oct 14, 2025 · The Uvision-made Hero 120 loitering munition “is combat-proven and fielded, and we take those lessons learned around the world and they get ...
  119. [119]
    AeroVironment's Switchblade drones are the US Army's latest big bet
    Sep 15, 2024 · Funded by a $4.9 million contract from the US Army in 2011, the Switchblade was deployed in the US War in Afghanistan and used on a limited ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  120. [120]
    What are Switchblade drones, and how do they work?
    Jul 31, 2023 · The Switchblade drone, originally developed as the Lethal Miniature Aerial Missile System, offered an answer to this threat.
  121. [121]
    Coyote | Raytheon - RTX
    Small and expendable, Coyote C-UAS kinetic and non-kinetic variants are able to defeat small to large target unmanned aircraft systems at longer ranges and ...
  122. [122]
    Coyote Loitering Drone Interceptors Have Arrived On U.S. Navy ...
    Aug 11, 2025 · The Navy says it's rushing to install Coyote and Roadrunner-M interceptors on some Arleigh Burke destroyers amid the growing drone threat.
  123. [123]
    The Replicator Initiative - Defense Innovation Unit
    The first iteration of Replicator (Replicator 1), announced in August 2023, will deliver all-domain attritable autonomous systems (ADA2) to warfighters at a ...
  124. [124]
    [PDF] DOD Replicator Initiative: Background and Issues for Congress
    Aug 25, 2025 · Introduction. Replicator, unveiled on August 28, 2023, is a Department of Defense (DOD) initiative, led by DOD's Defense.
  125. [125]
    The Replicator initiative is key to the Army's modernization | Brookings
    Dec 20, 2023 · In August 2023, Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks announced the initiative to develop and “field attritable autonomous systems at scale ...Missing: munitions | Show results with:munitions
  126. [126]
    Year Ahead – The U.S. DoD Replicator Initiative and the Acquisition ...
    Jan 9, 2024 · 2024 will enlighten us about the Replicator Initiative and thus also about DoD's acquisition process for autonomous weapons.Missing: munitions | Show results with:munitions
  127. [127]
    New British loitering munition project moves forward
    Nov 17, 2024 · This initiative aims to provide the UK Armed Forces with cutting-edge loitering munition capabilities, as outlined in a Prior Information Notice ...
  128. [128]
    KNDS makes record-breaking progress on loitering ammunition
    Jun 19, 2024 · 2024. KNDS has developed two new types of warheads for the COLIBRI and LARINAE projects launched by the French Defence Innovation Agency (AID), ...
  129. [129]
    Army Europe chief unveils NATO eastern flank defense plan
    Jul 16, 2025 · The US Army in Europe, along with NATO allies, wants to pursue optionally manned common launchers and munitions to deter Russia on the Eastern flank.<|control11|><|separator|>
  130. [130]
    Lancet Loitering Munition System, Russia - Army Technology
    Sep 12, 2024 · Project Type. Loitering munition system ; Manufacturer. ZALA Aero Group ; Take-Off Weight. 12kg ; Maximum Speed. 110km/h ; Endurance. 40 minutes ...
  131. [131]
    Russian Lancet-3 Kamikaze Drone Filled with Foreign Parts
    Dec 18, 2023 · According to ZALA-Aero Group, the Lancet-3 has a purported range of roughly 40 kilometers (km) and has an advertised maximum speed of 80-110 km/ ...
  132. [132]
    Russia's military production goes into surplus - bne IntelliNews
    Sep 29, 2025 · Lancet Loitering Munitions. 93. 535. 475%. Drone-based; massive scaling ... The current annual production lags Russia's by a large margin ...
  133. [133]
    Russia expands defence industry, increasing production of tanks ...
    Sep 11, 2024 · Notably, the production of Lancet loitering munitions skyrocketed by 475%, from 93 to 535 per quarter. The Kiel Institute noted that 80% of ...
  134. [134]
    Russia Unleashes Next-Gen Lancet Drone With Extended Range ...
    Sep 24, 2025 · This upgrade increases the explosive payload from 1.5 kg to 1.8 kg, allowing more effective strikes on soft targets, though with reduced armor ...
  135. [135]
    IDEX 2025 - Zala Aero showcases improved Lancet loitering munitions
    Feb 24, 2025 · AI elements embedded in the design of the loitering munitions ensure the automatic search and identification of priority targets. The ...
  136. [136]
    Lancet 3: Russia's Spear in the Sky - Grey Dynamics
    Russia is continuously developing upgraded versions of loitering munitions with extended flight times, more powerful warheads, and improved computational power.
  137. [137]
    FPV Drones. Ukrainian UAV Manufacturer, Wild Hornets
    Wild Hornets is a miltech company specializing in the development and production of combat drones. We collaborate with leading donors and elite combat units.Queen Hornet with GSNN... · Queen Hornet, 17-inch FPV... · FPV Bomber Drone
  138. [138]
    Ukraine Launches Queen Hornet Supersized FPV Bomber Drone
    May 30, 2024 · The Queen Hornet has a 17-inch frame and more powerful motors. This gives it a payload of 15 pounds / 7 kilos (not 6 kilos as originally claimed).
  139. [139]
    Ukraine's STING drone interceptor hits 127 mph at 3,400 feet
    Feb 7, 2025 · Wild Hornets is known for developing drones designed to counter Russian threats, particularly Shahed-136 loitering munitions used by Russian ...
  140. [140]
    The Wild Hornets: Ukrainian Volunteer Drone Production
    Mar 26, 2024 · The munition payload often exceeds design specifications by two kilograms so they attach a non-explosive weight to the drone and fly it to ...<|separator|>
  141. [141]
    Wild Hornet attacks: How Ukraine's drones are making their mark on ...
    Sep 28, 2024 · These drones, also known as loitering munitions or "suicide drones," are unmanned aerial systems that can loiter for extended periods before ...
  142. [142]
    KARGU Carrying Armour-Piercing Warhead Hits Target with ... - STM
    Sep 30, 2024 · Following an intensive development phase, the armour-piercing KARGU was tested in the field and hit the specified target with pinpoint accuracy.
  143. [143]
    Kargu Rotary-Wing Attack Drone, Turkey - Airforce Technology
    Jun 4, 2021 · Kargu is a rotary-wing attack drone loitering munition system manufactured by STM for anti-terrorist operations and asymmetric warfare.
  144. [144]
    Was a flying killer robot used in Libya? Quite possibly
    May 20, 2021 · The Turkish made Kargu-2 drone can operate in autonomous mode and may have been used to attack retreating soldiers fighting against the ...
  145. [145]
    Arms Supplies to Armenia and Azerbaijan - EVN Report
    Feb 17, 2021 · Azerbaijan acquired the following loitering munitions between 2015 and 2019: 80 Orbiter-1Ks, 50 Harops and 100 Skystrikers. Azerbaijan ...
  146. [146]
    Israeli weapons quietly helped Azerbaijan retake Nagorno-Karabakh
    Oct 5, 2023 · Israeli long-range missiles and exploding drones known as loitering munitions have made up for Azerbaijan's small air force, Wezeman said, even ...
  147. [147]
    Top 10 Loitering Munitions Manufacturers in the World (2025)
    Jun 24, 2025 · 1. Hinaray Technology (China) · 2. Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) · 3. AeroVironment (USA) · 4. UVision Air (Israel) · 5. Solar Aerospace & ...
  148. [148]
    CASC CH-901 - Wikipedia
    The CH-901, also known as the FH-901, is a type of loitering munition developed by the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC) in 2016, ...
  149. [149]
    China Wraps Up Feilong-60A Loitering Munition Development
    Mar 14, 2025 · China has completed development of the Feilong-60A (Flying Dragon-60), the country's first modular rocket-based loitering munition.
  150. [150]
    IDEX 2025: China attacks the loitering munition market | Shephard
    Feb 20, 2025 · At IDEX 2025, held in Abu Dhabi this week, an array of Chinese attack UAVs, primarily loitering munitions, have been on display.
  151. [151]
    Comprehensive Analysis of China's New Generation Loitering ...
    Oct 9, 2025 · NORINCO's Feilong-10 and Sate Defense's Lanhui-30 are examples of man-portable Loitering Munition similar to the U.S. Switchblade. The Lanhui-30 ...
  152. [152]
    Threat Alarm : China Acquiring 1 million Loitering Munitions
    Dec 24, 2024 · Meanwhile, China's recent order for one million loitering munitions further emphasizes the strategic importance of scale in drone production.
  153. [153]
    India's Top 5 Long-Range Loitering Munitions
    Jun 17, 2025 · Long-range loitering munitions like Rudrastra and Nagastra-3 give India the power to strike deep, avoid radar, and dominate modern combat.
  154. [154]
    Army inks deals worth Rs 295 crore for spy drones & loitering ...
    Jun 24, 2025 · The Indian Army has awarded contracts worth Rs 295 crore to domestic firms for loitering munitions and mini surveillance drones.
  155. [155]
    Successful High Altitude Test Of Loitering Munition Developed By ...
    Apr 10, 2022 · All 3 newly developed Loitering Munitions (LM0, LM1 and Hexacopter) have successfully been tested in Nubra Valley area of Ladakh last month during 21-23 March ...
  156. [156]
    Indigenous Drones and Loitering Munitions at Bright Star 2025
    Sep 1, 2025 · At the heart of India's contribution is its emphasis on indigenous loitering munitions—autonomous, recoverable drones designed for precision ...
  157. [157]
    https://armyrecognition.com/news/army-news/2025/north-korea-rolls-out-harop-type-loitering-munition-launcher-in-pyongyang-parade
  158. [158]
    China launches DFX-50 loitering munition modeled on Iran's ...
    Aug 27, 2025 · Centaur Defense Systems also offers a larger loitering munition inspired by the Shahed-136, known as the DFX-100 or GHQ-100. The DFX-100 is ...Missing: producers | Show results with:producers
  159. [159]
    North Korea rolls out Harop type loitering munition launcher in ...
    Oct 12, 2025 · North Korea unveiled a Harop style loitering munition launcher at the October 10 Pyongyang parade, signaling a move from prototypes to a ...
  160. [160]
    North Korea's Kim Jong Un inspects AI 'suicide attack drones' - BBC
    Mar 27, 2025 · North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has been pictured inspecting new suicide drones, which state media say have been equipped with artificial ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  161. [161]
    Kim Jong Un said to order mass production of suicide drones
    Nov 15, 2024 · North Korean leader Kim Jong Un guided a test of suicide drones and ordered mass production of the aerial weapon, state media reported.
  162. [162]
    IndoDefence 2025: Indonesia develops Bramara Kamikaze drone to ...
    Jun 12, 2025 · The Bramara is one of several loitering munitions currently being developed in Indonesia. The state-owned company PT DAHANA has previously ...
  163. [163]
    Asia Pacific Loitering Munition Market Size & Outlook, 2030
    A compound annual growth rate of 7.4% is expected of Asia Pacific loitering munition market from 2025 to 2030.
  164. [164]
    Drones in the Nagorno-Karabakh War: Analyzing the Data
    “Azerbaijan's UAVs obliterated Armenia's formidable array of ground-based air defences, after which they systematically decimated Armenia's ground force ...
  165. [165]
    Armed UAVs: an asset, but not alone all-conquering
    Jul 5, 2021 · While the 2020 Armenia−Azerbaijan conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh provided ample evidence of the value of armed UAVs and loitering munitions, the ...
  166. [166]
    Chinese Strategists Evaluate the Use of 'Kamikaze' Drones ... - RAND
    Nov 7, 2023 · “Therefore, the Ukrainian army's loitering munitions have a mediocre record in anti-armor operations. ... data links, the loitering munition ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  167. [167]
    Loitering munitions - a revolution in Russian warfare? - Wavell Room
    Oct 18, 2023 · The war in Ukraine has led to the introduction and widespread use of loitering munitions, drone delivered munitions, and First Person View (FPV) drones on both ...
  168. [168]
    The war in Ukraine shows the game-changing effect of drones ...
    Mar 12, 2023 · The loitering munitions seen on the battlefield in Ukraine are smaller than a cruise missile, can carry three or more times the explosive ...Missing: manned | Show results with:manned
  169. [169]
    How to Keep Changing an Army - Army University Press
    Units will need to attrit loitering munitions as a system from logistics to launcher as they will offer redundant targeting capability to the adversary's ...Missing: exercises 2020s
  170. [170]
    The Dawn of the Loitering Munitions Era - DTIC
    Until measures specifically addressing operations in the presence of loitering munitions make their way into Army doctrine, manuals, and training pipelines, our ...
  171. [171]
    Lancets Down: Ukraine Is Destroying The Most Effective Russian ...
    Oct 10, 2024 · Lancet drones have destroyed hundreds of Ukrainian armoured vehicles. These are specialized and very effective weapons.
  172. [172]
    Drones Now Rule the Battlefield in the Ukraine-Russia War
    Mar 3, 2025 · But drones now kill more soldiers and destroy more armored vehicles in Ukraine than all traditional weapons of war combined, including sniper ...
  173. [173]
    https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RRA3100/RRA3141-2/RAND_RRA3141-2.pdf
  174. [174]
    Russian Technological Adaptations, October 9, 2025
    Oct 9, 2025 · Russian forces have been targeting Ukrainian logistics routes and positions using mothership UAVs since at least August 2025.Missing: dispersal 2022
  175. [175]
    [PDF] The Implications of the Fighting in Ukraine for Future U.S.-Involved ...
    May 22, 2025 · Like the United States, China is preparing to counter loitering munitions and UASs by bolstering tactical air defense and EW capabilities.
  176. [176]
    https://www.elsight.com/blog/how-commercial-drones-are-redefining-loitering-munitions/
  177. [177]
    Loitering Munition Market Size, Share, Trends & Industry Growth
    The Loitering munition market is valued at USD 529.9 million in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 815.3 million by 2029, at a CAGR of 9.0% from 2024 to ...Missing: speed conservation
  178. [178]
    How Commercial Drones Are Redefining Loitering Munitions - Elsight
    May 28, 2025 · In this blog post, we'll explore how commercial drone technology has fundamentally reshaped loitering munitions, democratizing access to capabilities.
  179. [179]
    Loitering Munitions Future Trends - Teal Group
    Sep 11, 2024 · Since 2023, there has been an explosion of loitering munitions (LM) program announced by firms in Europe and Asia. These include simple FPV LMs ...
  180. [180]
    AI in warfare: Loitering Munitions – Current Applications and Legal…
    The purpose of this article is to analyze the military applications of weapon systems using AI, specifically loitering munitions.Missing: mid- prototypes
  181. [181]
    Loitering Munitions Proliferate As Tech Changes Battlefield
    Aug 9, 2022 · The SkyStriker has about a 400-kilometer range, he said. He touted its high-resolution target-seeker camera and the 5-kilogram warhead. Like all ...
  182. [182]
    https://www.stopkillerrobots.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/pax-report-slippery-slope.pdf
  183. [183]
    Loitering Munitions: The Convergence of AI, Autonomy, and Lethal ...
    Oct 6, 2025 · Unlike traditional munitions, kamikaze drones are designed to orbit a target area, identify high-value threats, and strike only once the target ...<|separator|>
  184. [184]
    [PDF] The arms industry and increasingly autonomous weapons
    125 China bought the Harpy from Israel in the 1990s, much to the anger of the US.126. The CH-901 is a Chinese loitering munition, produced by China Aerospace ...
  185. [185]
    Drone Warfare: Evolution, Innovation, Future Battlespaces
    In the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Azerbaijan's use of loitering munitions, notably the Israeli-made Harop. They targeted and disabled Armenian air-defense ...
  186. [186]
    https://blogs.icrc.org/law-and-policy/2023/06/29/loitering-munitions-legally-binding-rules-autonomy-weapon-systems/
  187. [187]
    A Hazard to Human Rights: Autonomous Weapons Systems and ...
    Apr 28, 2025 · Autonomous weapons systems present numerous risks to humanity, most of which infringe on fundamental obligations and principles of international human rights ...
  188. [188]
    Loitering munitions: legal rules for autonomy in weapon systems
    Jun 29, 2023 · Read how loitering munitions set problematic precedents for human control over the use of force and underline the urgent need for legally ...
  189. [189]
    Libya, The Use of Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems - View - ICRC
    An autonomous weapon might have been deployed in Libya, where it targeted fleeing fighters. The attack raises concerns about the lawfulness of the deployment ...<|separator|>
  190. [190]
    Short-range drone attacks killed 395 civilians, injured 2635 between ...
    Jun 26, 2025 · Kyiv, 26 June 2025 – Attacks with short-range drones killed at least 395 civilians and injured 2,635 between February 2022 and April 2025, ...Missing: Switchblade | Show results with:Switchblade
  191. [191]
    Russia's Drones Targeting Ukraine with 77.7% Success Rate!
    Jan 25, 2025 · Over 2,800 Lancet drones have been deployed achieving an impressive 77.7% hit rate against high value Ukrainian targets.Missing: ZALA | Show results with:ZALA
  192. [192]
    Loitering munitions impact on precision warfare in future
    Sep 5, 2024 · Current anti-personnel loitering munitions have an operational endurance of between 15 minutes and six hours and a range between five and 50km.
  193. [193]
    [PDF] May 2025 update - UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine
    Jun 11, 2025 · 28 per cent of the civilian casualties were the result of missile strikes and loitering munitions. The same high proportion of casualties.
  194. [194]
    I Fought in Ukraine and Here's Why FPV Drones Kind of Suck
    Jun 26, 2025 · Such loitering munitions provide greater precision in day and night, more ease of use, and higher resistance to electronic interference than ...Missing: disadvantages | Show results with:disadvantages
  195. [195]
    Ukraine is Getting Great Results From the Switchblade Kamikaze ...
    Oct 31, 2024 · Now, Kyiv Post is reporting that a Ukrainian Switchblade 600, the larger kamikaze drone meant to take out armor, destroyed one of Russia's $25 ...Missing: casualties | Show results with:casualties
  196. [196]
    Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems & International Law
    Jan 24, 2025 · State responsibility: States must ensure that LAWS they develop or deploy comply with IHL. Accountability: LAWS require “[c]ontext-appropriate ...
  197. [197]
    Kicking Man Out of the Loop: The Case of Loitering Munitions and ...
    This paper therefore analyses the use of loitering munitions within the context of armed conflicts and their ramifications for international humanitarian law.
  198. [198]
    [PDF] Towards a Two-tiered Approach to Regulation of Autonomous ...
    Aug 3, 2024 · The scenario, involving a loitering munition, which could loiter for up to 20 minutes without human intervention, divided participants equally ...
  199. [199]
    [PDF] Compliance with International Humanitarian Law in the ... - SIPRI
    Mar 3, 2023 · Chapter 3 considers what design characteristics or uses of AWS IHL prohibits, through two aspects of the prohibition against indiscriminate ...
  200. [200]
    Diverging Standards in the Legal Review of LAWS - Lieber Institute
    Jun 6, 2025 · While not binding on the United States, it formally obliges most NATO allies to review new weapons for compliance with IHL before adoption.
  201. [201]
    The Usage of Kamikaze Drones in the Russia-Ukraine Conflict
    May 13, 2023 · Secondly, they assess the legality of their usage under International Humanitarian Law and the various challenges they present. What are ...
  202. [202]
    [PDF] DoD Directive 3000.09, "Autonomy in Weapon Systems
    Jan 25, 2023 · (7) Certify that operators have been trained in system capabilities, doctrine, and TTPs to exercise appropriate levels of human judgment over ...
  203. [203]
    Autonomous weapons are the moral choice - Atlantic Council
    Nov 2, 2023 · These munitions are designed to “loiter” over a battlefield until they can identify a target and then strike it. While many such munitions still ...
  204. [204]
    Loitering Munitions: Redefining Precision Strike Capabilities
    Jul 15, 2024 · Operators can designate specific targets for engagement, ensuring accuracy and effectiveness in striking high-value assets.<|separator|>