Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Ohmic contact

An Ohmic contact is a non-rectifying electrical junction between a metal and a semiconductor that enables low-resistance conduction of current in both directions, exhibiting a linear current-voltage (I-V) characteristic consistent with Ohm's law.^[1]^[2] This contact facilitates unimpeded transfer of majority carriers across the interface, minimizing energy barriers and ensuring efficient electrical connectivity.^[3] In contrast to rectifying Schottky contacts, which form a potential barrier that allows current flow preferentially in one direction, Ohmic contacts are designed to avoid such rectification through specific material and processing choices.^[1]^[4] The formation of an Ohmic contact typically relies on heavy doping of the semiconductor adjacent to the metal (often ≥10¹⁹ dopant atoms/cm³) to narrow the depletion region to tens of nanometers, promoting quantum mechanical tunneling as the dominant conduction mechanism.^[3]^[4] Alternatively, selecting a metal with a work function (Φ_m) lower than that of an n-type semiconductor (Φ_s) or higher for a p-type semiconductor aligns the Fermi levels without creating a significant barrier, resulting in band bending that supports free carrier flow.^[1]^[2] The performance of Ohmic contacts is evaluated using specific contact resistivity (ρ_c), defined as the limit of the voltage drop across the contact divided by current density as voltage approaches zero (ρ_c = lim_{V→0} dV/dJ, in Ω·cm²), with ideal values approaching zero for negligible resistance.^[3] Lower ρ_c is achieved by reducing barrier height (φ_B), increasing doping density (N), and optimizing carrier effective mass (m*), as tunneling probability exponentially depends on these factors (e.g., J ∝ exp[-2 x_d √(2 m* q φ_B)/ℏ]).^[3] Common fabrication techniques include alloying or annealing metals like titanium silicide (TiSi₂) on silicon to form stable interfaces, often with diffusion barriers such as TiN to prevent unwanted reactions.^[3]^[4] Ohmic contacts are indispensable in modern semiconductor devices, including field-effect transistors, solar cells, and light-emitting diodes, where they serve as low-loss electrical terminals to external circuitry, ensuring minimal power dissipation and high-speed operation.^[4]^[3] As device dimensions scale below 50 nm, contact resistance increasingly dominates overall device performance, driving ongoing research into novel materials and nanostructures to further reduce ρ_c.^[3]

Fundamentals

Definition and Principles

An ohmic contact is a non-rectifying electrical junction between a metal and a semiconductor that exhibits linear current-voltage (I-V) characteristics, adhering to Ohm's law with minimal voltage drop across the interface.^[5] This type of contact facilitates unimpeded flow of majority charge carriers, either electrons or holes, without significant rectification or barrier effects.^[5] In contrast to rectifying contacts like Schottky barriers, ohmic contacts ensure symmetric conduction for both forward and reverse biases.^[4] The concept of ohmic contacts emerged during the early development of semiconductor devices in the 1940s and 1950s, particularly in the context of transistor research at Bell Laboratories.^[6] William Shockley advanced the understanding of non-rectifying interfaces in point-contact and junction transistors, where such contacts were essential to avoid energy barriers that could impede device operation.^[7] These early investigations built on foundational work in metal-semiconductor interfaces, emphasizing low-resistance connections for practical amplification and switching applications.^[6] At its core, an ohmic contact relies on the physics of metal-semiconductor junctions, which form at the interface where charge carriers transfer between the two materials.^[5] These junctions serve as critical points for carrier transport, allowing electrons from n-type semiconductors or holes from p-type semiconductors to move freely depending on the doping configuration.^[8] The primary principle underlying ohmic contacts is their ability to enable efficient injection and extraction of charge carriers into and from the semiconductor, which is vital for maintaining high device performance and minimizing power losses.^[9] Without such low-resistance interfaces, external circuitry could not effectively communicate with the active semiconductor regions, leading to degraded functionality in transistors and other devices.^[9]

Electrical Characteristics

Ohmic contacts are characterized by a linear current-voltage (I-V) relationship, following Ohm's law as I = V / R, where R represents the total resistance encompassing both the bulk semiconductor and the contact interfaces, and this linearity holds over a broad voltage range without any rectification effects.^[3] This behavior arises from efficient carrier transport across the interface, ensuring minimal voltage drop at the contact for applied currents.^[10] A key metric for evaluating ohmic contact performance is the specific contact resistivity \rho_c, defined as \rho_c = \lim_{V \to 0} \left( \frac{dV}{dI} \right) \times A, where A is the contact area, measured at zero bias in units of \Omega \cdot \mathrm{cm}^2.^[3] For effective ohmic contacts in semiconductors, \rho_c is typically below $10^{-6} \, \Omega \cdot \mathrm{cm}^2, with values as low as $10^{-8} \, \Omega \cdot \mathrm{cm}^2 achieved in optimized metal-silicon interfaces through heavy doping and appropriate metallization.^[11] Low \rho_c ensures that the contact does not significantly limit device performance by introducing excessive series resistance.^[12] The I-V characteristics of ohmic contacts demonstrate symmetry between forward and reverse bias directions, with current flow proportional to voltage magnitude in both polarities and no exponential rise typical of rectifying junctions.^[3] This bidirectional linearity stems from equivalent transport mechanisms, such as tunneling, operating effectively regardless of bias polarity.^[10] Temperature influences the electrical properties of ohmic contacts, where the contact resistance often increases modestly with rising temperature due to reduced carrier mobility in the semiconductor, though the overall ohmic nature persists without transitioning to rectifying behavior.^[3] In tunneling-dominated contacts, this dependence is weaker compared to thermionic emission mechanisms.^[13] In silicon-based devices, ideal ohmic contacts to heavily doped n-type or p-type regions effectively realize a near-zero barrier height through enhanced field-assisted tunneling, enabling low-resistance current injection and extraction essential for transistor and diode operation.^[3] For instance, doping concentrations exceeding $10^{19} \, \mathrm{cm}^{-3} in silicon yield \rho_c values in the $10^{-7} to $10^{-6} \, \Omega \cdot \mathrm{cm}^2 range using silicide-forming metals like titanium disilicide.^[3]

Comparison to Rectifying Contacts

Schottky Barrier Contacts

A Schottky barrier contact is a rectifying metal-semiconductor junction that forms a potential energy barrier, termed the Schottky barrier height \phi_B, which permits efficient majority carrier transport in the forward direction while significantly restricting it in the reverse direction. This barrier arises from the misalignment of the metal Fermi level and the semiconductor band edges upon contact formation, leading to charge depletion in the semiconductor near the interface. Unlike ohmic contacts, which aim for barrier-free conduction, Schottky barriers are intentionally rectifying and serve as the primary alternative in device structures requiring diode-like behavior.^[14] The formation of the Schottky barrier is described by the Schottky-Mott theory, which posits that the barrier height for an n-type semiconductor is determined by the difference between the metal work function \phi_m and the semiconductor electron affinity \chi_s, expressed as \phi_{Bn} = \phi_m - \chi_s. This ideal model assumes abrupt interfaces without significant charge trapping or dipole effects, though real systems often deviate due to interface states. For p-type semiconductors, the barrier height is \phi_{Bp} = E_g - \phi_{Bn}, where E_g is the semiconductor bandgap. The theory provides a foundational framework for predicting barrier formation based on material properties.^[14] The current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of Schottky barrier contacts display strong rectification, with forward bias current dominated by thermionic emission over the barrier, following the relation I = I_s \left[ \exp\left(\frac{qV}{n k T}\right) - 1 \right], where I_s is the reverse saturation current, q is the elementary charge, V is the applied voltage, n is the ideality factor (ideally 1, but often >1 due to inhomogeneities), k is Boltzmann's constant, and T is temperature. In reverse bias, the current remains low, approaching I_s, which is exponentially sensitive to \phi_B. This exponential dependence in forward bias enables rapid switching compared to p-n junctions.^[15] In the equilibrium energy band diagram of an n-type Schottky contact, the metal-semiconductor interface exhibits upward band bending in the semiconductor, creating a depletion region with a built-in potential V_{bi} = \phi_B - \frac{E_c - E_f}{q}, where E_c is the conduction band edge and E_f is the Fermi level in the bulk semiconductor. This V_{bi} represents the electrostatic potential drop across the depletion region, aligning the Fermi levels across the junction. Applied bias modulates this bending, reducing the effective barrier in forward bias and increasing it in reverse.^[16] Common material systems for Schottky barriers include aluminum on n-type silicon, which forms a barrier height of approximately 0.7 eV, as determined from saturation current and photoemission measurements. This value aligns closely with the Schottky-Mott prediction using \phi_m \approx 4.1 eV for Al and \chi_s \approx 4.05 eV for Si, though slight deviations occur due to interface effects. Such contacts are widely studied for their role in rectifying applications.^[17]

Criteria for Ohmic vs. Rectifying Behavior

The behavior of a metal-semiconductor junction as ohmic or rectifying is primarily determined by the alignment of energy levels at the interface and the resulting potential barrier for carrier transport. In ideal Schottky-Mott theory, an ohmic contact forms when the metal work function (φ_m) is less than the semiconductor work function (φ_s) for n-type materials (φ_m < φ_s), leading to accumulation and negligible barrier, while the opposite (φ_m > φ_s) results in depletion and a rectifying barrier; for p-type semiconductors, the condition reverses to φ_m > φ_s for ohmic behavior.^[18]^[3] However, real interfaces deviate due to interface states and doping effects, often requiring heavy doping to achieve ohmic characteristics despite non-ideal work function alignment.^[19] A key criterion is the doping level of the semiconductor near the interface. High degenerate doping, typically N_d > 10^{19} cm^{-3} for n-type, thins the depletion region to a few nanometers, enabling field emission tunneling and ohmic conduction by effectively reducing the barrier width.^[3]^[20] In contrast, moderate doping levels (around 10^{16}-10^{18} cm^{-3}) maintain a wider depletion region, promoting thermionic emission over a significant barrier and yielding rectifying behavior.^[3] This doping threshold ensures the contact resistance does not limit device performance, with ohmic contacts exhibiting linear current-voltage characteristics indicative of low impedance.^[3] Barrier height modulation further distinguishes ohmic from rectifying contacts. For ohmic operation, the effective Schottky barrier height (φ_B) must approach zero, achieved through heavy doping that narrows the barrier or via interface states that redistribute charge to lower the effective height.^[3] Rectifying contacts, however, feature a substantial φ_B (often 0.5-1 eV), impeding one carrier direction.^[3] Fermi level pinning by interface states complicates work function-based predictions but facilitates ohmic contacts in practice. These states, arising from dangling bonds or defects at the interface, pin the Fermi level (E_f) near the semiconductor mid-gap, rendering the barrier height largely independent of the metal choice and enabling tunneling-dominated transport in heavily doped regions despite pinning.^[19]^[3] Without sufficient doping to support tunneling, pinning leads to consistent rectifying barriers across metals. Practically, a contact is deemed ohmic if its specific contact resistance (ρ_c) is below 10^{-5} Ω·cm², ensuring negligible voltage drop across the interface for most high-speed and power applications.^[3] Higher ρ_c values indicate rectifying or poor ohmic performance, often requiring optimization of the above factors.^[20]

Physics of Formation

Metal-Semiconductor Interface

The metal-semiconductor interface forms the foundational boundary in ohmic contacts, where the atomic arrangement and electronic properties dictate the potential barrier for charge carrier flow. At this junction, the semiconductor surface often undergoes reconstruction, in which surface atoms rearrange to minimize energy by reforming bonds interrupted at the free surface. This reconstruction influences the initial bonding with the overlying metal layer, creating a complex interfacial region that deviates from simple bulk terminations. For instance, in compound semiconductors like GaAs, As-rich surfaces promote the formation of a metallic interlayer through segregation and reaction, which effectively reduces the Schottky barrier height and facilitates ohmic behavior. Electronically, the interface is characterized by localized states arising from dangling bonds, defects, or incomplete passivation, with a typical density of interface states D_{it} \sim 10^{12}-10^{13} \, \mathrm{cm}^{-2} \mathrm{eV}^{-1}. These states, often termed interface traps, lead to Fermi level pinning, where the Fermi energy becomes immobilized near a charge neutrality level within the bandgap, largely independent of the metal's work function. This pinning arises because the high density of states accommodates charge transfer, stabilizing the interface potential and limiting barrier height modulation. In ohmic contacts, particularly to n-type semiconductors, the resulting band bending forms an accumulation layer near the interface when the semiconductor is heavily doped, concentrating majority carriers to thin the depletion region and promote low-resistance conduction.^[14]^[21] The ideal Schottky-Mott model, which predicts barrier height \phi_B solely from differences in metal and semiconductor work functions, fails to describe real interfaces due to chemical reactions between metal and semiconductor atoms, as well as the formation of dipole layers from charge redistribution. These effects introduce additional electronic states and alter the electrostatic potential, causing observed barrier heights to deviate significantly from ideal predictions—often by 0.2-0.5 eV in covalent semiconductors. For ohmic contacts, such deviations are leveraged through interface engineering to achieve near-zero effective barriers, as briefly referenced in the context of Schottky barrier contacts.^[14]

Conduction Mechanisms

In ohmic contacts, low-resistance current flow is facilitated by several primary conduction mechanisms that enable carriers to traverse the potential barrier at the metal-semiconductor interface with minimal hindrance. These mechanisms depend on the semiconductor doping level, barrier height, and temperature, with the goal of achieving a specific contact resistivity \rho_c on the order of $10^{-6} \Omega-cm² or lower for practical applications. The interface band structure, which determines the barrier parameters such as height \phi_B and width d, sets the stage for these transport processes. Tunneling, particularly field emission, dominates in degenerate semiconductors where heavy doping narrows the depletion region to thicknesses below 10 nm, allowing quantum mechanical tunneling of carriers through the barrier. The transmission probability T for this process is approximated by the WKB expression T \approx \exp(-2\kappa d), where \kappa = \sqrt{2m(\phi_B - E)/\hbar^2}, with m as the effective carrier mass, E the carrier energy, \phi_B the barrier height, d the barrier width, and \hbar the reduced Planck's constant. This temperature-independent mechanism is crucial for minimizing \rho_c at room temperature in heavily doped n-type or p-type semiconductors, as it provides a direct path for majority carriers without reliance on thermal activation. For non-degenerate semiconductors with moderate doping, thermionic emission becomes significant, involving carriers gaining sufficient thermal energy to surmount the barrier. The current density J follows a modified Richardson-Dushman equation J = A^* T^2 \exp(-q\phi_B / kT), where A^* is the effective Richardson constant, T the temperature, q the elementary charge, k Boltzmann's constant, and \phi_B the barrier height; in ohmic contacts, thin barriers further enhance this over-barrier flow. In high-mobility materials, carrier diffusion across thin depletion regions contributes to conduction, particularly when the barrier is sufficiently low and the depletion width is minimized, allowing diffusive transport of majority carriers into the neutral semiconductor region. Combined models, such as thermionic-field emission, integrate these effects, but tunneling typically prevails in optimized ohmic contacts to ensure low \rho_c across a wide voltage range. Temperature dependence further distinguishes these mechanisms: tunneling remains largely invariant with temperature due to its quantum nature, while thermionic emission and diffusion currents increase with rising T as more carriers achieve energies above the barrier. This contrast aids in identifying the dominant process experimentally, with practical ohmic contacts engineered to favor tunneling for robust, temperature-stable performance.

Fabrication and Processing

Preparation Techniques

The preparation of ohmic contacts begins with meticulous surface cleaning to remove native oxides and contaminants from the semiconductor substrate, ensuring a clean interface for subsequent metal deposition. For silicon, hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching is commonly employed to dissolve native SiO₂ layers while passivating the surface with hydrogen termination, preventing immediate reoxidation.^[22] In compound semiconductors like gallium arsenide (GaAs), dilute solutions of ammonium hydroxide (NH₄OH, 2.8%) or hydrochloric acid (HCl, 3.7%) are used to strip oxides, followed by deionized water rinsing to achieve a residue-free surface.^[23] Plasma treatments, such as oxygen plasma, are sometimes applied but can introduce defects that degrade contact performance if not controlled.^[23] These cleaning steps are critical to minimize interface states that could otherwise impede carrier transport.^[24] Heavy doping of the semiconductor near the surface is often performed prior to metal deposition to facilitate tunneling conduction, a key mechanism for ohmic behavior. For n-type silicon, phosphorus or arsenic ion implantation creates an n⁺ layer with concentrations exceeding 10¹⁹ cm⁻³, typically to depths of 0.1–0.2 μm, enabling low-resistance contacts without rectification. In III-V materials like n-In₀.₅₃Ga₀.₄₇As, silicon doping via molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) achieves electron concentrations around 6 × 10¹⁹ cm⁻³ by optimizing growth temperature (350°C) and arsenic flux (1.5 × 10⁻⁵ Torr).^[24] Such pre-deposition doping strategies ensure degenerate semiconductor regions that reduce the effective barrier width at the interface. Metal deposition follows cleaning and doping, typically via physical vapor deposition techniques to form thin films (50–200 nm total thickness) directly onto the substrate. Electron-beam evaporation is widely used for its precision and ability to deposit multilayer stacks, such as Ti/Pt/Au (20/20/200 nm) on GaAs, where titanium provides adhesion, platinum acts as a diffusion barrier, and gold serves as a low-resistivity cap to prevent oxidation and electromigration.^[23] Sputtering or thermal evaporation can also be employed for materials like molybdenum or tungsten on InGaAs, with deposition rates of 0.2 Å/s to maintain uniformity.^[24] Multilayer configurations, including adhesion layers like Ti (10–20 nm) and capping layers like Au (100–200 nm), are essential to enhance mechanical stability and inhibit interdiffusion during later processing. All preparation steps are conducted under ultra-high vacuum (UHV) conditions, typically below 10⁻⁷ Torr (often 10⁻⁹ Torr), to avoid atmospheric contamination such as oxygen or carbon that could form insulating layers at the interface.^[25] In-situ deposition immediately following growth or cleaning, as in MBE-integrated systems, further minimizes exposure, achieving base pressures around 2 × 10⁻⁶ Torr during evaporation.^[24] These stringent vacuum requirements are particularly vital for air-sensitive semiconductors, ensuring reproducible low-contact resistivities on the order of 10⁻⁷ Ω·cm².^[25]

Annealing and Optimization Methods

Annealing processes are essential post-deposition steps to refine ohmic contacts by promoting interdiffusion, silicide formation, or defect reduction, thereby facilitating low-resistance charge transport. Rapid thermal annealing (RTA), typically conducted at temperatures between 400°C and 900°C for durations of 30 seconds to 5 minutes, is widely employed to form stable silicides such as TiSi₂ on silicon substrates, where the rapid heating minimizes thermal budget while enabling uniform phase transformation at the metal-semiconductor interface.^[26] This method enhances conduction by creating doping gradients that support tunneling mechanisms.^[27] Furnace alloying, often performed in a forming gas atmosphere (typically 90% N₂ and 10% H₂), serves to reduce interfacial defects and promote atomic intermixing in contacts to compound semiconductors. For instance, alloying AuGe/Ni multilayer stacks on GaAs at around 500°C helps form a heavily doped regrown layer, improving ohmic behavior without excessive lateral diffusion.^[27] Optimization of parameters such as temperature, duration, and ambient composition is critical; excessive temperatures can lead to over-alloying, degrading interface quality, while insufficient annealing may leave barriers intact.^[28] Alternative optimization techniques include laser annealing for localized heating, which allows precise control over thermal exposure to avoid bulk damage, particularly in sensitive substrates like SiC where it forms nickel silicides at energy densities around 1.8–4 J/cm².^[29] Ion implantation prior to annealing enhances doping levels at the interface, as seen in Si-implanted GaN contacts annealed at 800–1000°C to activate dopants and lower barrier heights.^[30] Key challenges in these methods involve preventing deleterious effects like metal spiking, where rapid diffusion (e.g., Au in GaAs-based contacts) penetrates the semiconductor, shorting junctions, or phase segregation that results in non-uniform resistivity.^[31] Careful selection of barrier layers and annealing profiles mitigates these issues, ensuring reproducible low-resistance performance.^[32]

Characterization

Resistance Measurement Methods

The transfer length method (TLM) is a standard technique for quantifying specific contact resistivity (ρ_c) in ohmic contacts by analyzing the resistance of test structures with varying electrode spacings. In this method, multiple metal contacts are fabricated on a semiconductor layer with different gaps (d) between them, and the total resistance (R_T) is measured between pairs of contacts using a two-point or four-point probe setup. Plotting R_T versus d yields a straight line, where the slope corresponds to the semiconductor sheet resistance (R_sh) normalized by contact width (W), and the y-intercept equals twice the contact resistance (2R_c). The transfer length (L_t), defined as the distance over which current density decays under the contact, is extracted from the relationship L_t = R_c / (dR/dd), enabling calculation of ρ_c via ρ_c = R_c × L_t × W.^[33]^[34] The cross-bridge Kelvin resistor (CBKR) method employs a four-terminal configuration to directly isolate the contact resistance from contributions by lead and sheet resistances, making it suitable for low-resistance ohmic contacts where parasitic effects are significant. The structure features a central resistor bridge connecting two large pads, with voltage probes placed at the contact interfaces and current injected through outer pads, ensuring the measured voltage drop occurs solely across the metal-semiconductor interface. This setup minimizes errors from non-uniform current distribution and probe misalignment, allowing precise extraction of ρ_c = R_k × A_c, where R_k is the Kelvin resistance and A_c the contact area. CBKR is particularly effective for sub-micron contacts in integrated circuits.^[35]^[36] For applications requiring measurements on small or irregularly shaped areas, the circular transfer length method (c-TLM) uses concentric circular electrodes to reduce edge effects and current crowding inherent in linear geometries. In c-TLM, an inner circular pad is surrounded by outer ring contacts at varying radial distances (r), and resistance is measured between the inner pad and each ring; the resulting R versus r plot is fitted to a model accounting for cylindrical current spreading, yielding ρ_c and L_t from the slope and curvature. This method is advantageous for high-density devices, as it requires less area and provides more uniform current paths compared to standard TLM.^[37] Current-voltage (I-V) testing serves as an initial verification of ohmic behavior, where a linear relationship between current (I) and voltage (V) at low biases (<0.1 V) confirms non-rectifying characteristics without significant barrier effects. Measurements are typically performed using a source-measure unit across the contact, with the slope of the I-V curve giving the total resistance, from which contact contributions can be inferred after accounting for bulk and access resistances. Linearity indicates ohmic performance, while deviations suggest rectifying or high-resistance contacts.^[3]^[12] These methods adhere to established guidelines, such as IEEE Std 118 for general resistance measurements in semiconductors, which emphasize four-terminal configurations to mitigate contact and lead errors, and ASTM standards like F43 for related resistivity evaluations in wafer characterization. Compliance ensures reproducibility and accuracy in quantifying ρ_c, typically targeting values below 10^{-6} Ω·cm² for high-performance devices.^[38]^[39]

Structural and Compositional Analysis

Structural and compositional analysis of ohmic contacts is essential for ensuring low-resistance interfaces and long-term reliability in semiconductor devices, as defects, diffusion layers, or unintended phases at the metal-semiconductor junction can degrade performance. Techniques such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS), and secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) provide critical insights into the morphology, atomic arrangement, and elemental distribution at these interfaces, enabling quality control without direct electrical testing. These methods reveal how fabrication-induced changes, including those from annealing, influence the physical and chemical makeup of the contact. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is widely employed to image the surface morphology and cross-sectional features of ohmic contacts, highlighting diffusion layers, grain structures, and potential defects like voids or agglomeration. For instance, in nickel-based contacts to 4H-SiC, SEM has shown the evolution of nano-sized graphitic structures and phase formations such as δ-Ni₂Si after annealing, which contribute to uniform interface coverage and ohmic behavior. Similarly, on Au-Ge contacts to n-GaAs, SEM reveals island formation and increased density with prolonged annealing at 320°C, indicating localized reactions that stabilize the contact structure. These observations help identify morphological uniformity essential for scalable device fabrication. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) offers atomic-resolution imaging of cross-sections, allowing detailed examination of interface sharpness, phase distributions, and nanoscale features like silicide formation or barrier layer thinning in ohmic contacts. In Ti/SiC systems, TEM cross-sections have confirmed the development of TiC and Ti₅Si₃ phases at the interface following annealing at 700°C, with sharp boundaries that minimize barrier heights. For Ni/C contacts on 4H-SiC annealed at 950°C, TEM identifies Ni₂Si and graphite phases, elucidating the role of carbon interlayers in promoting uniform silicidation and reducing contact resistance through enhanced carrier tunneling. Such high-resolution views are crucial for correlating microstructure with contact efficacy in compound semiconductors. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) enables depth-profiling of elemental composition and chemical states at the metal-semiconductor interface, detecting oxidation, bonding changes, and contaminant layers that could impede ohmic conduction. In TiW contacts to SiC, XPS profiles reveal approximately 15% oxygen incorporation at the TiC surface after rapid thermal annealing at 950°C, tapering to 1% near the interface, which correlates with compositional shifts affecting interface stability. For Ni/C/4H-SiC interfaces, XPS confirms the presence of graphitic carbon and NiSi bonding post-annealing, stemming from SiC decomposition and aiding in low-barrier formation. This technique is particularly valuable for non-destructive assessment of surface-sensitive chemical alterations. Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS) quantifies metal diffusion depths, layer thicknesses, and stoichiometric ratios in ohmic contacts by analyzing backscattered ions from heavy elements. In TiW/SiC structures, RBS verifies a Ti:W atomic ratio of 0.58:0.42 and a 1250 Å thickness, showing no interfacial reaction up to 500°C but significant mixing and phase evolution at 950°C. For Ni/C/4H-SiC, RBS detects carbon diffusion and Ni₂Si formation between 450–700°C, with a persistent graphite layer at the surface that influences overall composition. RBS's sensitivity to heavy atoms makes it ideal for monitoring diffusion barriers and ensuring stoichiometric integrity in multilayer contacts. Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) excels at detecting trace impurities, dopant profiles, and elemental distributions across the contact interface with high spatial resolution. In Al-implanted 4H-SiC for ohmic contacts, SIMS depth profiles post-1700°C annealing show a surface Al concentration of ~2 × 10¹⁹ cm⁻³ and 60% dose retention, revealing diffusion tails that enhance n-type doping uniformity. On Au-Ge/n-GaAs contacts annealed at 320°C, SIMS imaging uncovers deep Au (~4500 Å) and Ge (~4000 Å) penetration, particularly in reactive island regions, alongside Ge and As interdiffusion. SIMS thus provides indispensable data on impurity segregation that could otherwise compromise contact reliability.

Types and Materials

Contacts to Elemental Semiconductors

Ohmic contacts to n-type silicon are commonly achieved through the deposition of aluminum or phosphorus-doped polycrystalline silicon (poly-Si) layers on heavily doped regions, followed by annealing at temperatures between 400°C and 500°C. This process promotes dopant diffusion and interface optimization, yielding specific contact resistivities (ρ_c) on the order of 10^{-7} Ω·cm², which is suitable for high-performance devices.^[3] The aluminum approach leverages alloying to reduce barrier effects, while phosphorus-doped poly-Si provides a stable, passivating interface that minimizes recombination losses.^[40] For p-type silicon, ohmic contacts often involve boron-doped regions interfaced with metal stacks such as Ti/Pt/Au, which require careful optimization due to the inherently higher Schottky barrier height (φ_B) for holes compared to electrons in n-type material. This elevated φ_B, typically around 0.5-0.6 eV for titanium on p-Si, complicates achieving low-resistance contacts without excessive doping or extended annealing, leading to potential Fermi-level pinning issues. Representative specific contact resistivities for these stacks on boron concentrations exceeding 10^{19} cm^{-3} can reach 10^{-6} Ω·cm² after thermal processing, though uniformity remains a challenge.^[41] In germanium, low-temperature germanide formation enables efficient ohmic contacts, with NiGe or PdGe layers deposited on n-type regions and annealed below 300°C to form stable interfaces with ρ_c values as low as 2.3 × 10^{-6} Ω·cm² for NiGe.^[42] The PdGe process similarly benefits from reduced thermal budgets, avoiding dopant redistribution while maintaining low sheet resistance due to the germanide's metallic properties.^[43] These strategies for elemental semiconductors like silicon and germanium offer mature, CMOS-compatible technologies that integrate seamlessly with standard fabrication flows, enabling scalable production of integrated circuits. However, silicide or germanide formation often necessitates elevated temperatures, which can risk dopant deactivation or segregation, thereby limiting compatibility with temperature-sensitive processes.^[44]

Contacts to Compound Semiconductors

Compound semiconductors, such as III-V materials, present unique challenges for ohmic contacts due to factors like lattice mismatch with metals, polar bonding leading to surface states, and Fermi level pinning near the valence band maximum, which increases Schottky barrier heights for n-type doping.^[45] These issues often necessitate heavy doping or alloying to enable tunneling conduction, contrasting with the simpler interfaces in elemental semiconductors like silicon. For n-type GaAs, a widely used metallization is the AuGe/Ni/Au stack, where Ge acts as an n-type dopant during alloying.^[46] Annealing this stack at 400-450°C forms a highly doped n+ GaAs layer at the interface through Ge diffusion and substitutional incorporation, achieving specific contact resistances (ρ_c) as low as 2.76 × 10^{-6} Ω·cm².^[46] This process involves eutectic melting and metal-semiconductor interdiffusion, reducing the effective barrier for electron transport. For p-type GaAs, ohmic contacts typically employ Zn/Au or Be/Au multilayers, with annealing at around 400-500°C to promote dopant diffusion.^[47] Beryllium, in particular, diffuses deeply to create p+ regions, enhancing hole injection and yielding ρ_c values below 10^{-5} Ω·cm², though Zn/Au offers similar performance with less toxicity concerns.^[48] In wide-bandgap compounds like GaN and AlGaN, higher annealing temperatures are required to overcome larger barrier heights, often exacerbated by Fermi level pinning. The standard Ti/Al/Ni/Au stack for n-type GaN or AlGaN/GaN heterostructures is annealed at 800-900°C in nitrogen ambient, promoting Ti-N bonding and Al diffusion to form a thin nitride layer that facilitates tunneling.^[49] In AlGaN/GaN high-electron-mobility transistors (HEMTs), polarization-induced two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) at the interface further lowers the effective contact resistance to ~10^{-6} Ω·cm² by providing a high-density electron channel near the surface.^[45] For p-type InP, Au/Zn/Au metallizations are common, annealed at 400-450°C to drive Zn acceptor incorporation, but challenges arise from indium segregation and out-diffusion during processing, which can degrade interface uniformity and increase ρ_c to 10^{-5} Ω·cm² or higher without optimization.^[50] Key limitations in these systems include the toxicity of beryllium, restricting its use in production despite effective p-doping, and the elevated annealing temperatures for wide-bandgap materials like GaN, which risk substrate degradation or interdiffusion in multilayer devices.^[48]

Applications and Recent Advances

Role in Electronic Devices

Ohmic contacts play a critical role in transistors by forming low-resistance source and drain connections in metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors (MOSFETs) and bipolar junction transistors (BJTs), enabling efficient carrier injection and minimizing parasitic losses that limit drive current and transconductance. In MOSFETs, these contacts must exhibit very low resistance to ensure that the on-state drain-source resistance (R_ds,on) is dominated by the channel rather than the contacts themselves, with typical targets for contact contributions below 1% of total R_ds to support high-speed switching and low power dissipation. Similarly, in BJTs, low-resistance ohmic contacts to the emitter and collector regions facilitate high current gain and reduce voltage drops, enhancing overall device efficiency in amplification and switching applications. In diodes and light-emitting diodes (LEDs), ohmic contacts serve as anode and cathode connections that minimize series resistance, thereby improving forward voltage characteristics and luminous efficiency. For instance, in GaN-based LEDs, low-resistance p-type ohmic contacts are essential to reduce current crowding and heat generation, allowing higher injection currents without excessive power loss. This is particularly important for optoelectronic devices where series resistance can degrade output power and reliability. For power devices such as insulated-gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs) and high-electron-mobility transistors (HEMTs), ohmic contacts reduce conduction losses by providing low specific contact resistivity (ρ_c), with targets below 10^{-5} Ω·cm² in high-power GaN HEMTs to enable efficient operation at high voltages and currents. In IGBTs, optimized ohmic contacts to the emitter and collector minimize on-state voltage drop, lowering thermal dissipation in applications like motor drives and power conversion. Contact resistivity, as a key device metric often measured via transmission line model methods, directly influences these losses by quantifying the interfacial barrier to carrier flow. In integrated circuits, ohmic contacts significantly impact speed and power efficiency during CMOS scaling, where reduced contact resistance enables faster switching times and lower dynamic power consumption by minimizing RC delays in interconnects and transistors. Poor ohmic contacts can cause over 20% performance degradation in high-frequency devices, primarily through increased parasitic resistance that elevates noise, reduces gain, and limits bandwidth in RF and microwave applications.

Developments in Emerging Technologies

Recent advancements in ohmic contacts have focused on two-dimensional (2D) materials, where edge contacting and phase engineering in monolayer MoS₂ have enabled ultralow specific contact resistivities. For instance, van der Waals epitaxy of 2D Cd metals on MoS₂ yields a tunneling-specific resistivity of approximately 1.7 × 10⁻⁹ Ω·cm², surpassing previous benchmarks and facilitating high-performance transistors by minimizing Schottky barriers through momentum-matched interfaces.^[51] Similarly, copper-intercalated phase engineering transforms 2H-MoS₂ to 1T-MoS₂, achieving contact resistances as low as 16.7 Ω·μm in the zigzag direction, which promotes ohmic behavior via barrier-free charge injection.^[52] In Cu₂Se field-effect transistors, van der Waals stacking with metals like Sb induces efficient ohmic contacts by leveraging metal-induced gap states, reducing vertical Schottky barriers to 0.27 eV and enabling horizontal transport with low resistance.^[53] For gallium nitride (GaN) high-electron-mobility transistors (HEMTs), regrown n⁺ layers have emerged as a key strategy for low-resistance ohmic contacts, particularly in high-power applications. Gold-free regrown InGaN contacts on GaN-on-Si substrates achieve power densities up to 10.2 W/mm at X-band frequencies, with improved thermal stability up to 500°C compared to alloyed contacts, due to reduced interface defects and enhanced doping uniformity.^[54] Integrating graphene interlayers further lowers contact resistance to approximately 2 mΩ·cm² in AlGaN/GaN heterostructures, as the graphene acts as a conductive bridge that facilitates percolating paths through the AlGaN barrier without requiring high-temperature annealing, thus enhancing device reliability.^[55] Ambipolar ohmic contacts, capable of symmetric conduction for both electrons and holes, represent a breakthrough for versatile device architectures. A complementary ohmic contact configuration (COCC) on silicon achieves a specific contact resistivity of 5.4 × 10⁻⁵ Ω·cm² via quantum tunneling in co-doped n⁺/p⁺ subareas, enabling on/off ratios exceeding 10⁶ and supporting programmable photodiodes for brain-inspired image sensors.^[56] This approach excels in neuromorphic computing, where ambipolar 2D material contacts facilitate in-memory sensing with photoresponsivities up to 530 mA/W and energy-efficient weight updates at 61.5 pJ per device, addressing scalability challenges in large-scale sensor arrays.^[56] In ultrananocrystalline diamond (UNCD), nitrogen-incorporated contacts using Ti/Pt/Au stacks demonstrate significant resistivity improvements upon annealing. Vacuum annealing at 700°C reduces the specific contact resistivity (ρ_c) from initial values by enhancing interfacial bonding and minimizing defects, yielding the lowest reported ρ_c for n-type UNCD films grown on single-crystal diamond substrates, which supports high-temperature electronics.^[57] High-throughput computational screening has accelerated ohmic contact design for 2D systems. Density functional theory (DFT) analysis of 1,297 semiconducting 2D monolayers from the C2DB database, paired with metals like PdTe₂ and NbSe₂, identifies optimal van der Waals heterojunctions: 760 n-type ohmic contacts with PdTe₂ and 999 p-type with ScS₂, guided by electrostatic potential differences and charge transfer to predict low-barrier interfaces for scalable nanodevices.^[58] Overall trends emphasize room-temperature processing and scalability, as seen in graphene-enabled contacts and DFT-guided selections, to integrate ohmic contacts into quantum and neuromorphic devices without thermal degradation, paving the way for energy-efficient, high-frequency electronics beyond 2025.^[59]

References

[1]
Metal-Semiconductors Contacts - Engineering LibreTexts
Sep 7, 2021 · Under this situation, when the current can be conducted in both directions of the MS contact, the contact is defined as the Ohmic contact. An ...Introduction · Schottky Barrier Contact · Ohmic Contact · Conclusion
[2]
Metal–Semiconductor Junction – Ohmic Contact - DoITPoMS
This type of contact yields a linear relationship between the voltage applied and the current that flows across the junction. It is therefore called an Ohmic ...Missing: definition properties<|control11|><|separator|>
[3]
[PDF] Metal/Semiconductor Ohmic Contacts
Tunneling - Ohmic Contacts. An ohmic contact is defined as one in which there is an unimpeded transfer of majority carriers from one material to another ...Missing: properties | Show results with:properties
[4]
Metal-Semiconductor Ohmic and Schottky Contacts - BYU Cleanroom
Ohmic contacts conduct the same for both polarities. (They obey Ohm's Law).There are two ways to make a metal-semiconductor contact look ohmic enough to get ...
[5]
[PDF] Metal/Semiconductor Ohmic Contacts
Tunneling - Ohmic Contacts. An ohmic contact is defined as one in which there is an unimpeded transfer of majority carriers from one material to another ...
[6]
[PDF] semiconductor (Review)
Mar 29, 2018 · Historical background. An ohmic contact is such metal–semiconductor contact at which an applied voltage decreases linearly, and the contact ...
[7]
[PDF] W=Shockley, The Transistor Pioneer-Portrait Of An Inventive Genius
In order to obtain ohmic contact it may be desir- able to introduce a large concentration of impurities near the metal semiconductor interfaces. It may also ...
[8]
[PDF] PN and Metal–Semiconductor Junctions
The metal–semiconductor junction can be a rectifying junction or an ohmic contact. The latter is of growing importance to the design of high-performance ...
[9]
[PDF] Lecture 19 - Metal-Semiconductor Junction (cont.) March 19, 2007 ...
Mar 19, 2007 · Ohmic contacts: means of electrical communication with outside world. • Key requirement: very small resistance to carrier flow back and forth ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[10]
Electrical characteristics of Ni Ohmic contact on n-type GeSn
The results show that the I-V characteristics are linear for a wide range of annealing temperatures. The contact resistivity was found to decrease with ...
[11]
Calculation of Ohmic Contact Resistance at a Metal/Silicon Interface
The ohmic contact resistance has been found to be 10ÿ8 to 10ÿ6 Ω cm2 for various metal/Si interfaces [1]. Theoretically, ohmic contact has been represented by ...
[12]
How to Accurately Determine the Ohmic Contact Properties on n ...
Jan 3, 2024 · If the current–voltage (I-V) characteristics are linear, the contacts are ohmic and the resistance associated to each structure can be extracted ...
[13]
Temperature dependence of the contact resistance of ohmic ...
Mar 16, 2012 · A new mechanism describing the rise in the contact resistance ρ c of ohmic contacts to n-n +-n ++-GaAs(GaP, GaN, InP) structures with increasing ...
[14]
The physics and chemistry of the Schottky barrier height
Jan 13, 2014 · The formation of the Schottky barrier height (SBH) is a complex problem because of the dependence of the SBH on the atomic structure of the metal-semiconductor ...
[15]
Description and Verification of the Fundamental Current ... - Nature
Mar 6, 2019 · In this paper, we show that experimental measurements of our Schottky barrier diodes in both forward and reverse bias can be accurately modelled ...Missing: I_s | Show results with:I_s
[16]
[PDF] ECE606: Solid State Devices Lecture 17 Schottky Diode
Built-in Potential: bc @Infinity b. M i. qV χ. ∆. +. = Φ. +. (. ) M. B bi. qV χ ... 3) We use a different technique to calculate the current in a majority carrier ...Missing: source | Show results with:source
[17]
Characteristics of aluminum-silicon schottky barrier diode
The barrier height is determined from the saturation current, temperature dependence of forward current, and photoemission to be0.69±0.01eV.
[18]
2-2. Ohmic contact (Ohmic junction) Φ m < Φ n
When Φ m < Φ n , an ohmic junction is formed when the semiconductor is in contact with the metal. Figure 2-4 shows the band diagram of an ohmic junction.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[19]
Surface States and Rectification at a Metal Semi-Conductor Contact
### Confirmation
[20]
[PDF] A Survey of Ohmic Contacts to 111-V Compound Semiconductors
When the doping levei increases above 1019 cm-3, formation of non-alloyed ohmic contacts through a tunneling mechanism typically occurs and this will provide ...
[21]
Electrical Characterization and Interface State Density Properties of ...
... 1013 to 1.57 × 1013 eV-1 cm-2. ... A simple approach to the capacitance technique for determination of interface state density of a metal-semiconductor contact.
[22]
[PDF] Quarterly Technical Report - DTIC
For silicon, the HF etch has been found to be beneficial in that it not only removes oxides (SiO, or SiO,) from the surface but also passivates the surface by.
[23]
https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-019-3175-8
[24]
[PDF] Development of Ultra-Low Resistance Ohmic Contacts for InGaAs ...
(b) Surface preparation: The second approach was to prepare/clean the semi- conductor surface before contact metal deposition. In this work three types of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[25]
Improved Contacts to MoS2 Transistors by Ultra-High Vacuum Metal ...
Estimated pressures during deposition are approximate, as they typically range from 0.5–5 × 10–9 Torr for high vacuum and 0.5–5 × 10–6 Torr for low vacuum.
[26]
Characterization of TiSi2 Ohmic and Schottky Contacts Formed by ...
Rapid thermal annealing of sputtered titanium on silicon creates ohmic contacts and Schottky diodes. Contact resistance was measured, and the Schottky diode ...
[27]
Alloyed ohmic contacts to GaAs - N. Braslau - AIP Publishing
The alloyed AuGe-based contact is widely used to make ohmic connections to GaAs. It has been presumed that the regrown alloyed region is heavily doped so ...
[28]
GeMoW Refractory Ohmic Contact for GaAs / GaAlAs Self‐Aligned ...
We have formed and ohmic contacts to n‐type using different annealing techniques: rapid thermal annealing (RTA) or thermal furnace annealing under a forming gas ...
[29]
Fabrication of Ohmic Contact on N-Type SiC by Laser Annealed ...
Jul 16, 2023 · In this paper, the laser annealing research for the ohmic contact process of SiC power devices is reviewed, which is mainly divided into four aspects.
[30]
Ohmic contact formation to GaN by Si+ implantation doping
The uniqueness of our approach was to implant GaN through a SiO2 retarding layer, which shifted the dopant distribution, allowing us to obtain a quasi-uniform ...Missing: preparation | Show results with:preparation
[31]
(PDF) A low-resistance spiking-free n-type ohmic contact for InP ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Au spiking is a long-standing problem for Ni/Ge/Au ohmic contacts on n-InP. This becomes more critical when the contacts are deposited on ...
[32]
Suppression of lateral silicide formation in submicron TiSi2 ohmic ...
Oct 1, 1990 · A lateral silicidation problem has been found in the conventional self‐aligned titanium disilicide (TiSi2) process for making ohmic contacts ...
[33]
Models for contacts to planar devices | Semantic Scholar
Feb 1, 1972 · Understanding the sheet resistance parameter of alloyed ohmic contacts using a transmission line model · Using TLM principles to determine MOSFET ...
[34]
[PDF] Transfer Length Measurements For Different Metallization Options ...
Among all the contact resistance methods, the most complete resistance profile of the contacts is given by the transfer length method (TLM). Hence, the transfer ...
[35]
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4773494
[36]
Cross-Bridge Kelvin Resistor Structures for Reliable Measurement ...
Aug 5, 2025 · A convenient test structure for measurement of the specific contact resistance (ρ c) of metal-semiconductor junctions is the CBKR structure.
[37]
(PDF) Merits and limitations of circular TLM structures for contact ...
This paper discusses merits and limitations of CTLM (Circular Transfer Length Method) contact resistance assessment test structures.
[38]
[PDF] IEEE Standard Test Code for Resistance Measurement
A measurement that controls the effects of contact and insulation resistances simultaneously can be referred to as a five-terminal measurement. Some standard ...
[39]
Astm F43-99 | PDF | Electrical Resistivity And Conductivity - Scribd
Rating 5.0 (1) Resistivity of a semiconductor material is an important materials acceptance requirement. Resistivity determinations made during device fabrication are also ...
[40]
Phosphorus-doped polycrystalline silicon passivating contacts via ...
A specific contact resistance of ρc= 2.1±1.4×10^-5 Ω·cm^2 is obtained to ... Free carrier absorption (FCA) of the phosphorus doped poly-Si layers was ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[41]
Investigation of specific contact resistance of ohmic contacts to B ...
In this study, metal (Ti/Pt/Au) contacts to mesa of boron-doped (boron concentration: ∼1018 cm−3) homoepitaxial diamond were fabricated by metal deposition ...
[42]
Ohmic contacts to n-type germanium with low specific contact ...
Jan 13, 2012 · A low temperature nickel process has been developed that produces Ohmic contacts to n-type germanium with specific contact resistivities down to (2.3 ± 1.8) × ...
[43]
Interface Control Processes for Ni/Ge and Pd/Ge Schottky and ...
We present a review of some of the novel interface control processes developed for the fabrication of NiGe/ n -Ge and PdGe/ n -Ge Schottky and ohmic contacts.
[44]
[PDF] Metal Silicides in CMOS Technology: Past, Present, and Future Trends
Jun 24, 2010 · the silicide formation on dopant diffusion, etc. By elevating the ... aligned TiSi2 contacts to Si at low temperatures using. TiCl4 and ...
[45]
Study of Ti/Au, Ti/Al/Au, and Ti/Al/Ni/Au ohmic contacts to n-GaN
Aug 7, 2025 · The effect of annealing temperature on specific contact resistivity has been investigated by changing the annealing temperature from 400 to 900C ...
[46]
Research on rapid thermal annealing of ohmic contact to GaAs
... specific contact resistance. For n-GaAs ohmic contact, the optimized contact resistivity is 2.76×10-6 Ω·cm2 at annealing temperature of 420°C for 60s. Under ...Missing: cm² | Show results with:cm²
[47]
Evolution of the microstructure of Au(Zn) metallization during ...
Pure Zn was found to penetrate the native oxide on GaAs surface and to form an ohmic contact after annealing at 220°C. The addition of Zn into the Au ...
[48]
Pd/Au:Be Ohmic Contacts to p-Type GaAs
Feb 25, 2011 · Comparison was made between Cr/Au, Au:Be and Pd/Au:Be metallizations. Regions of P+ were formed in N-type GaAs by a spin-on source which was ...Missing: beryllium p+
[49]
Modification of the sheet resistance under Ti/Al/Ni/Au Ohmic ...
In particular, the contacts exhibited an Ohmic behaviour after annealing at 800 °C, with a specific contact resistance ρC = (2.4 ± 0.2) × 10−5 Ω cm2, which was ...
[50]
Effect of the first antimony layer on AuZn ohmic contacts to p-type InP
Jul 1, 2000 · The first Sb layer improved the contact resistivity and reduced the optimum annealing temperature, compared with the Au/Zn/Au/Nb contacts whose ...
[51]
2D Cd metal contacts via low-temperature van der Waals epitaxy ...
Apr 29, 2025 · We demonstrate a low-temperature chemical vapor deposition (CVD)-based van der Waals (vdW) epitaxy method to grow 2D metal (Cd) electrodes.
[52]
[PDF] Achieving low contact resistance through copper-intercalated bilayer ...
Dec 24, 2024 · 19–22 The 2H-MoS2 semiconductor is transformed into 1T-MoS2 by phase engineering technology. The RC of the 1T-MoS2/2H-MoS2 junction is 200 Ω·μm.
[53]
Efficient ohmic contact in monolayer C u 2 ⁢ S e field-effect transistors
Aug 12, 2025 · Our findings reveal that metal-induced gap states enable to form Ohmic contacts with all metal electrodes except in the vertical direction.
[54]
High Power Density X-Band GaN-on-Si HEMTs with 10.2 W/mm ...
Sep 22, 2025 · To enhance the RF power properties of CMOS-compatible gold-free GaN devices, this work introduces a kind of GaN-on-Si HEMT with a low parasitic ...
[55]
(PDF) Ohmic Contact Formation Between Metal and AlGaN/GaN ...
Aug 6, 2025 · This new use of graphene offers a simple and reliable method for making Ohmic contacts to AlGaN/GaN heterostructures, circumventing complex ...
[56]
Ambipolar ohmic contact to silicon for high-performance brain ...
Aug 28, 2025 · Although CMOS technology is successful in integrated circuits, the employed ohmic contacts can only transport one type of carriers, failing to ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
[57]
Ohmic contacts to nitrogen-incorporated n-type ultrananocrystalline ...
Jul 28, 2025 · In this paper, we demonstrate the fabrication of Ohmic contacts using a Ti/Pt/Au (10/40/60 nm) metal stack on nitrogen incorporated n-type UNCD ...
[58]
High throughput screening of Ohmic contacts in 2D metal ...
High-throughput DFT calculations have been employed to investigate the contact formation of 1,297 semiconducting two-dimensional (2D) monolayers.Missing: optimal | Show results with:optimal
[59]
Ohmic contact engineering for two-dimensional material-based field ...
Oct 30, 2025 · The low-resistance ohmic contacts is recognized as one of the most critical challenges in the advancement of high-performance ...