Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

SMART-1

SMART-1 was the first mission in the European Space Agency's (ESA) Small Missions for Advanced Research in Technology program, launched on 27 September 2003 as a technology demonstration and lunar science spacecraft that orbited the Moon using solar-electric propulsion. The 367-kilogram minisatellite, powered by gallium arsenide solar arrays generating 1,350 watts, employed a Hall-effect ion thruster (PPS-1350-GA) fueled by xenon to achieve efficient, low-thrust propulsion for its 13-month journey to lunar orbit. The primary objectives of SMART-1 included validating key technologies for future deep-space missions, such as solar-electric propulsion, spectrometry, and miniaturized scientific instruments, while performing a comprehensive study of the Moon's surface, composition, and evolution. Launched from the in , , aboard an Ariane rocket, the spacecraft spiraled outward over 13 months, entering on 15 November 2004 after a series of engine burns totaling over 4,900 hours. It carried seven instruments, including the Advanced Moon Micro-Imager Experiment (AMIE) for high-resolution imaging, the Demonstration of a Compact Imaging Spectrometer (D-CIXS) for elemental mapping, and the SMART-1 Solar Monitor (XSM), enabling the first detailed inventory of lunar chemical elements like magnesium, aluminum, , calcium, and iron. SMART-1's concluded with a controlled impact on the Moon's surface at 34.4°S, 46.2°W on 3 September 2006, creating a visible plume of lunar material for ground-based observations. Among its notable achievements, the contributed compositional data supporting studies of the Moon's origin and evolution, including tests of the for its formation from a collision between and a Mars-sized body about 4.5 billion years ago, mapped mineral distributions such as pyroxenes and feldspars, and searched for water ice in permanently shadowed polar craters, finding indications of hydrated minerals but no widespread ice deposits. As ESA's inaugural lunar orbiter, SMART-1 paved the way for subsequent by proving the viability of for cost-effective exploration beyond orbit.

Mission Overview

Objectives

The SMART-1 mission, the European Space Agency's (ESA) first lunar endeavor, had as its primary objective the demonstration of innovative technologies essential for future deep-space exploration, particularly to enable efficient, low-thrust trajectories to distant targets. This technology validation aimed to prove the viability of miniaturized instruments and autonomous operations in a compact platform, paving the way for cost-effective missions like those to Mercury or , while fostering advancements in European space industry capabilities. Complementing these technological goals, SMART-1 pursued a robust scientific agenda centered on advancing understanding of the Moon's composition and evolutionary history through techniques. Key aims included mapping the global distribution of lunar minerals such as pyroxenes, olivines, and feldspars to create a comprehensive inventory of surface chemical elements, thereby refining models of lunar and resource potential. The also targeted the search for water ice in permanently shadowed polar craters and the study of lunar evolution, including evidence supporting the for the Moon's formation from a collision with approximately 4.5 billion years ago. Specific scientific targets emphasized high-resolution of the lunar polar regions to investigate areas of perpetual and , potentially harboring volatiles like water ice, alongside global elemental mapping via to achieve unprecedented coverage beyond prior missions such as NASA's . These objectives collectively positioned SMART-1 as a foundational step in ESA's lunar program, integrating with to inform subsequent international efforts.

Development and Launch

The SMART-1 mission was approved by the ESA Science Programme Committee in November 1999 as the inaugural entry in the agency's Small Missions for Advanced Research in Technology (SMART) series, part of the broader Horizons 2000 scientific program. This approval followed an Announcement of Opportunity issued in March 1998, which solicited proposals for the mission's scientific payload and received 14 instrument-based submissions. The project emphasized cost-effective innovation, aiming to demonstrate key technologies for future deep-space exploration while conducting lunar science. Development was led by the () as prime contractor, with the spacecraft assembled and integrated at 's facilities in , , from 2000 through 2003. The effort involved nearly 30 subcontractors from 11 European nations, fostering international collaboration under ESA's framework; notable contributions included components from the and , reflecting the mission's pan-European scope. For instance, the Demonstration of a Compact X-ray Spectrometer (D-CIXS) was developed by the Rutherford Appleton in the UK, highlighting specialized expertise from partner institutions. The entire development phase was completed in under four years, aligning with SMART's goal of streamlined project execution. The total mission cost, encompassing development, launch, and operations, amounted to approximately €110 million, representing about one-fifth the budget of a typical major ESA mission. This economical approach validated new management practices for small-scale missions, prioritizing efficiency without compromising technological validation. SMART-1 launched on September 27, 2003, at 23:14 UTC aboard an Ariane 5G rocket from the in , . As a secondary , it shared the flight with India's INSAT-3E and Eutelsat's E-BIRD 1, which occupied the primary slots, allowing SMART-1 to be injected into a for its subsequent spiral trajectory to the Moon. The launch marked Europe's first dedicated lunar mission and successfully initiated the spacecraft's 13-month cruise phase using .

Spacecraft Design

Architecture

The SMART-1 spacecraft featured a compact, three-axis stabilized structure based on a central aluminum box approximately 1 m on each side, with deployed solar array wings extending the total span to about 14 m. This design provided a lightweight platform suitable for technology demonstration in deep space, consisting of four sidewall panels and deck plates to house subsystems and payload. The had a launch of 367 kg, including 82 kg of propellant, resulting in a dry of approximately 285 kg. The allocated for scientific and technological instruments totaled 19 kg, emphasizing the mission's focus on efficiency and minimal resource use. Power was supplied by two deployable solar array wings using GaInP/GaAs/ triple-junction cells, generating 1850 at the beginning of life, with an average operational power of 170 for the bus and subsystems. Lithium-ion batteries, each with 130 Wh capacity, supported operations during the 2.1-hour maximum periods. Communication relied on dual S-band transponders for , tracking, and command, achieving downlink data rates of 2 kbps via the low-gain and up to 65 kbps via the medium-gain , with uplink at 2 kbps. The transponders, weighing less than 10 kg, ensured reliable ground contact from the . Attitude and orbit control was maintained through four reaction wheels in a configuration for primary stabilization, supported by two star trackers, three sun sensors, and five angular rate sensors for precise pointing. Eight 1 N thrusters handled wheel desaturation and fine adjustments, enabling three-axis stabilization with accuracy better than 0.1 degrees. The ion propulsion system was integrated via a gimballed platform mounted on the base for thrust vector control.

Propulsion System

The propulsion system of SMART-1 featured a (SEP) setup based on a single Stationary Plasma Thruster (SPT), specifically the PPS-1350 Hall-effect ion engine developed by Spacecraft Propulsion (formerly Snecma). This thruster ionized propellant using a radial and axial to accelerate ions for thrust generation, marking a significant advancement in efficient deep-space propulsion. Key specifications included a nominal thrust of 68 , a of approximately 1,600 seconds, and operation at up to 1.4 kW of electrical power drawn from the spacecraft's solar arrays, which provided variable input ranging from 0.65 to 1.42 kW across 117 discrete levels to optimize performance under fluctuating solar conditions. The system stored 82 kg of in a high-pressure tank, regulated through a and a xenon flow controller that maintained an average of 4.44 mg/s during operation. This configuration enabled high efficiency, with the electric propulsion delivering far greater change per unit mass of compared to chemical systems due to the elevated exhaust . In operation, the provided continuous low-thrust along a spiral trajectory from to , accumulating a total delta-v of 3.7 km/s over approximately 13 months of mission duration, with about 5,000 hours of active firing and consumption of 82 kg of . Integrated with the architecture via a dedicated power processing unit that converted solar array output to the required discharge voltage and currents, the system demonstrated robust performance despite challenges like radiation-induced transients in the Van Allen belts. As the first application of SEP for a complete , it achieved substantial savings—requiring only 82 kg of versus an estimated 600 kg of for an equivalent chemical system—validating the technology's potential for future low-mass missions while highlighting advantages in propellant storability and reduced launch mass.

Scientific Instruments

AMIE

The Advanced Moon micro-Imager Experiment (AMIE) was the primary visible-light imaging instrument aboard the SMART-1 spacecraft, designed to capture detailed views of the lunar surface for scientific analysis of morphology, topography, and texture. Developed under the European Space Agency's (ESA) Technological Research Programme, AMIE exemplified miniaturization techniques for deep-space missions, combining a lightweight camera unit with advanced electronics to fit within the constraints of a small satellite. AMIE featured a compact design weighing 450 grams overall, comprising an external camera head and an internal electronics pack with ultra-thin, vertically stacked circuit boards using micro-mechanics, micro-optics, and 3D packaging. At its core was a 1-megapixel (CCD) sensor array of 1024 × 1024 pixels, paired with a fixed tele-objective lens providing a 5.3° × 5.3° . The instrument was radiation-hardened to endure launch vibrations, thermal extremes, and cosmic radiation, while consuming just 9 W of power from the spacecraft's bus. It was developed by the Centre Suisse d'Électronique et de Microtechnique (CSEM) in , , led by Jean-Luc Josset, with contributions from international partners in , , , and . The instrument's capabilities centered on high-resolution panchromatic and , enabling both broad surveys and targeted observations. In white-light mode, it produced detailed grayscale images; for color and compositional insights, it employed four fixed filters—a broad red band at 750 nm, bands at 900 nm and 950 nm to detect signatures, and a narrow 847 nm band for supporting laser-link experiments. From SMART-1's pericenter altitude of about 300 km, AMIE delivered a of approximately 27 meters per across a ground coverage of roughly 14 km × 14 km per image. Onboard processing allowed for , to highlight changes, and efficient , maximizing scientific return within the mission's limited . During SMART-1's 18-month lunar operations from November 2004 to September 2006, AMIE acquired around 32,000 images, spanning a wide range of illumination conditions and terrains to map polar regions, craters, and . Among its highlights were the mission's first multispectral close-up images of the , revealing shadowed craters and high-latitude features in unprecedented color detail for a probe. These observations supported navigation experiments like and RSIS, as well as broader studies of lunar surface properties, with AMIE's low-power design ensuring reliable performance integrated with the spacecraft's solar-electric systems.

D-CIXS

The Demonstration of a Compact Imaging Spectrometer (D-CIXS) was a miniaturized instrument designed to perform for mapping the elemental composition of the lunar surface. Developed primarily by the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory in the UK, it featured 24 swept charge device (SCD) detectors arranged in three facets, each with microfabricated gold collimators to provide of 8° for the nadir-facing facet and 12° for the two offset facets. These silicon-based SCDs, a novel evolution of technology, operated without active cooling and covered an energy range of 1–10 keV, enabling detection of lines from key elements. An onboard aluminum helped suppress X-rays, while the design emphasized low mass and volume for technology demonstration purposes. D-CIXS's primary capability was to generate spatially resolved maps of major lunar elements such as , , silicon (Si), calcium (Ca), and , with enhanced sensitivity for Ca and during solar flares that boost excitation. By observing emissions induced by solar radiation on the lunar , the instrument aimed to provide global coverage of these abundances at resolutions down to about 40 km from SMART-1's 300 km orbit, contributing to understanding the Moon's geological evolution and formation history. Complementary visible from the onboard AMIE camera offered contextual support for interpreting D-CIXS's chemical maps. During operations from January 2005 until SMART-1's impact in September 2006, D-CIXS achieved the first orbital detection of from the lunar surface, including unambiguous identification of in the regolith of during an M-class on January 15, 2005. Despite partial degradation of detector energy resolution from 250 at launch to 380 due to sustained during the cruise phase, the instrument successfully collected data on , , , , and abundances across multiple lunar regions, validating the technique under low solar activity conditions. As a unique technology demonstrator, D-CIXS weighed approximately 4.5 kg in total (including supporting solar monitors) and represented a significant reduction in size and power (around 18 W) compared to prior X-ray spectrometers, such as the 21 kg unit on NASA's NEAR mission. Its innovative SCD detectors and design established heritage for subsequent instruments, including the X-ray Spectrometer (C1XS) and the Mercury Imaging X-ray Spectrometer (MIXS) on ESA's mission.

XSM

The X-ray Solar Monitor (XSM) on the SMART-1 mission was a compact designed to measure the solar , serving primarily as a tool for the Demonstration of a Compact Imaging X-ray Spectrometer (D-CIXS). It featured a Peltier-cooled high-purity (HPSi) positive-intrinsic-negative ( detector, which provided high without the need for gaseous amplification, and was hermetically sealed with a entry aperture to protect against the . Developed by a consortium led by the , the XSM operated in the energy range of 1 to 20 keV, achieving an energy resolution of approximately 250 eV at 6 keV at the beginning of the mission, degrading to less than 350 eV by mission end due to . The primary purpose of the XSM was to monitor variations in solar X-ray flux in , enabling accurate correlation with D-CIXS observations by providing contemporaneous solar input data for normalizing lunar measurements; this ensured optimal observation windows during periods of suitable solar activity. Additionally, the instrument supported independent scientific studies of solar coronal activity, including short-term variability and long-term trends over the mission duration. Its wide , a 52-degree , allowed to remain within the detector's sightline for a significant portion of the , facilitating continuous without frequent adjustments. The XSM incorporated an electromagnetic shutter with a built-in Fe-55 calibration source for periodic in-flight verification of its performance. During operations from the mission's launch in September 2003 until SMART-1's impact on the in September 2006, the XSM accumulated over 600 hours of solar and background observations, delivering spectra with a time of 16 seconds to capture dynamic events. It successfully detected multiple solar flares, including events up to the class, allowing analysis of flare spectra and cross-calibration with ground-based instruments like GOES for validation of its sensitivity. This real-time flux monitoring was crucial for scheduling D-CIXS pointings, as higher solar activity enhanced the for lunar surface compositions, though the XSM itself focused solely on the incident solar radiation.

SIR

The SMART-1 Spectrometer () was a compact, low-mass near- spectrometer developed as a for of the lunar surface. Led by the Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie in , with contributions from and tec5, it functioned as a pushbroom imager covering the short-wavelength range of 0.9–2.4 µm across 256 spectral channels, achieving a of approximately 6 nm. The instrument had a mass of 2.3 , a power consumption of 4.1 , and a of 1 mrad, enabling pushbroom scanning along the spacecraft's orbital track. SIR's core capabilities focused on reflectance to map ogical compositions, particularly distributions of pyroxenes and olivines, which are diagnostic of lunar igneous processes and crustal evolution. It targeted hydration features through detection of near-infrared absorption bands associated with and H₂O, as well as broader assemblages including feldspars, with spatial resolutions reaching 300–500 m per depending on orbital altitude. These measurements provided insights into surface processes, effects, and potential volatile signatures without requiring extensive numerical benchmarking, prioritizing spectral band shapes over exhaustive quantitative metrics. In operations, SIR collected over 28 million spectra during the mission's lunar phases from March 2005 to September 2006, achieving near-global coverage of the Moon's crust at varying resolutions to support stratigraphic analyses of features. It mapped variations across central peaks, walls, rims, and blankets of large craters, revealing pyroxene-olivine gradients that informed models of lunar and . While primarily yielding mineralogical data, SIR's observations in shadowed regions contributed to searches for hydration indicators, complementing broader mission goals for volatile detection. A key unique feature of was its co-alignment with the AMIE visible imager, facilitating integrated multi-spectral datasets that combined with panchromatic and filtered for comprehensive surface characterization. This synergy enhanced the interpretation of lunar terrains, such as distinguishing fresh exposures in craters from mature , without relying on spacecraft pointing details beyond nominal orbital stability.

EPDP

The Electric Propulsion Diagnostic Package (EPDP) was a suite of sensors designed to characterize the environment generated by the spacecraft's and assess its interactions with the structure. Developed by Alcatel Alenia Space Italia, the EPDP included four main sensors: a for measuring plasma density and electron temperature, a retarding potential analyzer (RPA) functioning as an ion collector to determine energy and , a (QCM) for detecting material deposition, and a monitor to evaluate performance degradation from plasma exposure. These sensors were strategically positioned on the spacecraft's panels, with the and RPA oriented toward the thruster to capture plume effects, while the QCM and were placed on an outer panel to monitor backflow contamination. The primary purpose of the EPDP was to monitor the plume from the PPS-1350 , quantifying parameters such as divergence and charge-exchange ions, while also studying spacecraft charging in the interplanetary environment to ensure safe operations. By providing in-situ measurements of potential, , and temperature via the , and ion distributions via the RPA, the package helped validate models of thruster- interactions that could not be fully replicated in ground testing. This diagnostic capability was essential for demonstrating the viability of in deep space missions. During operations, the EPDP collected continuous data throughout thrusting phases, with the performing current-voltage sweeps to derive parameters and the RPA scanning energies at rates aligned with firing cycles. Integrated with the propulsion system, it operated in modes such as ready, acquisition, and to correlate plume data with performance. Notably, the package detected unexpected interactions, including cyclic variations in the floating potential of the and , attributed to intermittent charge-exchange fluxes and environmental influences. These observations, combined with low levels of detected and , confirmed that the artificial from the effectively neutralized charging without significant adverse effects.

SPEDE

The Spacecraft Potential, Electron and Dust Experiment (SPEDE) was a plasma diagnostic aboard the SMART-1 , designed to monitor the 's interaction with its surrounding environment. It primarily measured potential, currents, and impacts to assess the effects of the system, while also investigating natural phenomena. Developed collaboratively by the Finnish Meteorological Institute, ESA's Science Department, the Institute of Space Physics (IRFU), and the Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) in , SPEDE weighed 0.8 kg and consumed 1.8 W of power. SPEDE's design featured two electric sensors mounted at the ends of 60 cm deployable booms, which could operate in multiple modes: as Langmuir probes to measure plasma density and temperature, or as electric field probes to detect wave electric fields. The instrument's energy range covered a few tens of eV, with plasma density sensitivity from 0.1 to 1000 particles/cm³, enabling it to capture electron flux variations and spacecraft charging induced by the ion thruster's xenon plasma exhaust. One boom experienced deployment failure during the mission, limiting some dual-probe capabilities, but the remaining sensor still provided valuable single-probe data. During SMART-1's cruise phase , SPEDE mapped density variations around , including interactions with the and . In lunar orbit, it focused on the Moon's environment, studying coupling, the lunar wake, and low-frequency (10 Hz to 5 kHz) using wavelet analysis for processing. The instrument complemented the Electric Propulsion Diagnostic Package (EPDP) by quantifying propulsion-induced effects like surface potentials and , while also detecting dust impacts for environmental characterization. Scientifically, SPEDE contributed to understanding spacecraft-plasma interactions in low-Earth and the lunar vicinity, revealing subtle increases in above 250 Hz within the lunar shadow and confirming no significant frequency shifts in waves across the mission phases. Its measurements highlighted the stability of the lunar environment under varying conditions, providing baseline data for future electric missions. Despite hardware limitations in and power estimation (underestimating by 30-40% for complex signals), SPEDE's observations supported broader studies of -Moon interactions without major disruptions from radiation belts or storms.

KaTE

The (Ka-band Telemetry and Telecommand Experiment) was an experimental deep-space designed to demonstrate advanced high-data-rate for future planetary missions. It operated using X-band uplink at 8 GHz for commands and both X-band and Ka-band downlink at 32/34 GHz for and , incorporating a digital receiver and turbo coding for efficient error correction. Developed by Dornier Satellitensysteme GmbH under ESA's ESTEC management, the subsystem had a of 6.2 kg and consumed approximately 28 W of power, enabling coherent mode operations for enhanced signal processing. The primary purpose of was to validate Ka-band as a precursor for deep-space communication systems, such as those planned for ESA's mission to Mercury, by testing higher-frequency links that offer increased data rates up to 500 kbit/s and reduced susceptibility to compared to lower bands. It also supported radio science investigations, including precise ranging and Doppler tracking to measure acceleration, performance, and lunar physical librations, serving as a bridge for improved in future missions. During SMART-1 operations, was activated primarily in the phase for downlink of scientific data and telecommand uplinks, with tracking sessions conducted using NASA's Deep Space Station 13 (DSS-13) in , and ESA's Villafranca station in to evaluate link stability over extended passes. The experiment demonstrated Doppler tracking with 10 times greater accuracy than traditional S-band systems, achieving range rate precisions on the order of a few micrometers per second over integration times of 100 seconds, which facilitated accurate and thrust vector monitoring without significant signal corruption during propulsion firings. These results confirmed KaTE's viability for , including contributions to the RSIS experiment for analyzing lunar wobble and . Key specifications included a capable of simultaneous X- and Ka-band downlinks locked to the X-band carrier, supporting (VLBI) for precise positioning and turbo-coded modulation to maintain low error rates in variable deep-space conditions. Overall, KaTE's performance validated the shift to Ka-band for future ESA missions by showcasing reliable high-rate data transfer and superior tracking metrics, with ground segment reception at established deep-space antennas ensuring seamless integration into the mission's communication architecture.

Mission Trajectory

Launch and Initial Orbit

SMART-1 was launched on 27 September 2003 at 23:14 UTC aboard an Ariane 5G rocket (Flight V162) from the in , , as an auxiliary payload alongside INSAT-3E and eBIRD-1. The launcher successfully inserted the spacecraft into a (GTO), with SMART-1 separating from the third stage approximately 42 minutes after liftoff at an altitude of about 35,000 km near the orbit's apogee. Immediately following separation, ground controllers at the (ESOC) in , , acquired signals and initiated commissioning. Key initial operations included the deployment of the 14-square-meter solar arrays, which unfolded successfully to provide primary , and the activation of attitude control systems for thermal stabilization, ensuring the spacecraft's components remained within operational temperature ranges during its passage through the Van Allen radiation belts. The propulsion system was briefly referenced for readiness checks, with no immediate firings. These early phases encountered challenges from high-radiation environments, which began degrading the solar arrays by about 8% in output within the first two months, though stabilization occurred as the orbit evolved. The initial orbit was an elliptical with an apogee of 35,781 km and a perigee of 622 km, inclined at 7 degrees. On 30 September 2003 at 12:25 UTC, the system fired for the first time, delivering a low of approximately 0.06 N using the PPS-1350 , initiating a gradual perigee raise through continuous low-thrust maneuvers. This spiral trajectory progressively increased the perigee altitude—from hundreds of kilometers to over 20,000 km by late 2003—while minimizing fuel use and avoiding lunar perturbations during the initial Earth-bound phase.

Lunar Transfer

The lunar transfer of SMART-1 involved a 13-month spiral from its initial around to capture by the Moon's gravity, covering a total distance of over 100 million kilometers while the straight-line distance was only about 350,000–400,000 kilometers. The path exploited the ion engine's low-thrust capability for gradual orbital expansion through continuous thrusting arcs, primarily near perigee passages, divided into operational phases that included escape from Earth's Van Allen belts, an extended cruise period, and final resonance assists with the Moon. This approach achieved the mission objectives with high efficiency in propellant use, consuming 59 kg of over approximately 5,000 hours of engine operation across 289 firings and 332 Earth orbits. Key maneuvers focused on three lunar resonances spaced about 27 days apart in August, September, and October 2004 to leverage the Moon's without direct swingbys, culminating in capture on , 2004, into an initial highly elliptical with a perilune altitude of roughly 5,000 km and apolune of about 60,000 km. Navigation combined ground-based radio tracking for precise via Doppler and ranging data with the KaTE Ka-band experiment, which provided high-accuracy measurements and tested deep-space telecommunications up to 500 kbit/s. Onboard autonomous software, including the OBAN system using star trackers and camera images, handled thrust arc planning, engine restarts, and anomaly recovery to ensure reliable propulsion sequencing. A significant milestone occurred on , 2004, when the AMIE camera captured the first lunar images from approximately 200,000 km away, verifying instrument functionality ahead of capture.

Lunar Orbit Phases

SMART-1 achieved lunar orbit capture on November 15, 2004, through the Lunar Orbit Insertion-1 (LOI-1) maneuver, entering an initial highly elliptical with perigee altitude of approximately 5,000 km and apolune exceeding 50,000 km. The spacecraft's system was immediately engaged for a series of arcs to stabilize and lower the . Post-capture lowering maneuvers, including over 950 hours of cumulative thrusting and consumption of about 5.5 kg of , reduced the apolune from the baseline planned 10,000 km to 3,000 km while adjusting the perigee, transitioning to a more operational elliptical of 300–3,000 km altitude by late 2005. This progressive evolution enabled the nominal lunar science phase starting in March 2005, with further refinements maintaining the 300 × 3,000 km configuration for enhanced mapping resolution during the extended mission period. Mission operations during these phases relied on S-band telemetry, tracking, and command links, with ground station passes typically lasting up to 8 hours twice weekly for uplinks and data downloads, supporting periods of up to 10 days of autonomy. In the lower orbits, the spacecraft completed roughly 12 orbits per day, with orbital periods of about 5 hours in the science configuration. Eclipse seasons, occurring due to the polar orbit alignment with the Sun, were managed using lithium-ion batteries capable of sustaining operations for up to 2.1 hours without solar input, during which thrusting was suspended to conserve power. By August 2005, following the nominal science phase, the orbit had been optimized to a low elliptical configuration approaching 300 km perigee for prioritized scientific , prior to a brief reboost in to extend lifetime.

Operations

Ground Segment

The ground segment for the SMART-1 was centered at the (ESOC) in , , which served as the primary mission control facility responsible for monitoring, command uplink, and downlink. ESOC coordinated all operational aspects, leveraging its established to manage the mission's low-cost, technology-demonstration objectives, including the use of solar-electric and onboard autonomy. A key asset at ESOC was the integration with ESA's network, which provided global coverage for tracking and communication. The tracking network primarily utilized ESA's deep-space antennas, including the 35-meter dish at the New Norcia station (DSA 1) in for high-gain communications and the 35-meter antenna at the Cebreros station in , which was specifically constructed to support missions like SMART-1. Additional support came from other sites, such as the 15-meter antennas at Villafranca () and the 30-meter antenna at Weilheim (), as well as a transportable 5.5-meter station for flexible coverage during critical phases. NASA’s Deep Space Network (DSN) provided supplementary tracking, particularly for radio-science experiments involving X-band and Ka-band observations to measure spacecraft accelerations and lunar gravity fields. The (Ka-band Telemetry and Telecommand Experiment) instrument on SMART-1 further enhanced tracking precision by demonstrating deep-space communications in Ka-band, enabling tests of advanced and very-long-baseline interferometry () techniques. Mission control operations relied on ESA's SCOS-2000 software , a generic platform developed at ESOC for spacecraft monitoring, command generation, and handling, which was adapted for SMART-1 to interface with the spacecraft's CCSDS-compliant and telecommand standards. This facilitated efficient processing of downlink , with up to 65 kbps in X-band, supporting the mission's scientific operations and monitoring. The ground segment emphasized to minimize staffing needs, achieving high efficiency in command procedures and . The operations team at ESOC consisted of a core Flight Control Team (FCT) of about seven engineers, augmented by 2–5 specialists and 1–2 data systems personnel, totaling around 10–14 members for routine activities, with broader involvement from approximately 170 ESA and scientific institute staff during peak phases. To ensure 24/7 coverage, particularly during the 16-month lunar transfer and orbit phases, the team operated in shifts, often using two groups for 12-hour rotations during commissioning and critical maneuvers like lunar capture. This lean structure aligned with SMART-1's cost-effective design, relying on ground automation and reduced human intervention compared to traditional missions.

In-Flight Control

The in-flight control of SMART-1 relied heavily on onboard autonomy to manage the spacecraft's operations during its spiral trajectory from geostationary transfer orbit to lunar orbit and subsequent science phases. The On-Board Control System (OBCS) handled attitude control and determination using star trackers and reaction wheels, ensuring precise pointing for the solar electric propulsion system and scientific instruments without constant ground intervention. The spacecraft employed the European Space Agency's Packet Utilization Standard (PUS) services for telecommand verification, distribution, and execution, enabling structured handling of uplink commands. Electric propulsion thrusting, which accounted for the majority of the 4,958 hours of operation over 16 months, was largely autonomous, with the onboard software executing pre-loaded sequences for up to 10 days between ground contacts, including automatic adjustments for xenon flow and power throttling. This autonomy minimized ground involvement, allowing the flight control team to upload updated command schedules approximately every four days to align with propulsion and science windows. Fault protection was integrated through redundant hardware and software mechanisms to ensure mission resilience. The OBCS featured hot-redundant and telecommand units alongside cold-redundant main controllers, enabling automatic switchover in case of . The Failure Detection, Isolation, and Recovery (FDIR) system autonomously managed single-point , such as the 38 Optocoupler Single Event Transients (OSETs) caused by , by initiating restarts and memory scrubs without ground commands. In-flight software patches addressed recurring issues like anomalies and low-pressure shutdowns during propulsion operations, demonstrating the system's capacity for adaptive recovery. These redundancies allowed SMART-1 to maintain operations for over two months if needed, preserving core functions during uncommanded events. Command uplinks were performed via S-band through ESA's network, supporting telecommands for sequences and instrument activation, while Ka-band links handled high-rate science data downlinks during dedicated windows. Daily operational schedules coordinated science observations with pauses, leveraging ground segment support for pass planning. Key challenges included mitigating radiation effects and optimizing during lunar eclipses. Passage through the Van Allen belts and a in October 2003 caused an 8% degradation in solar array efficiency, impacting availability and necessitating in-flight adjustments. During lunar eclipses, up to 2.1 hours long, thrusting was suspended to conserve battery , with orbit maneuvers planned to minimize eclipse durations and maintain the 300 by 3,000 km science orbit. budgeting involved throttling the ion engine between 462 W and 1,190 W to balance needs with instrument operations under varying solar input.

Scientific Results

Key Discoveries

The Demonstration of a Compact Imaging X-ray Spectrometer (D-CIXS) on SMART-1 achieved the first unambiguous orbital detection of calcium on the lunar surface, identifying it in the of during observations triggered by a on 15 January 2005. This mapping effort confirmed the presence of major rock-forming elements including , , and iron, consistent with known mare and highland compositions and supporting models of lunar crustal evolution. The SMART-1 Infrared Spectrometer () mapped distributions on the lunar surface, detecting pyroxenes and olivines on central peaks, walls, rims, and blankets of large craters, providing insights into the Moon's subsurface and evidence supporting the giant-impact theory of the Moon's formation. data also indicated the presence of hydrated s near the lunar poles, though no widespread water ice deposits were confirmed in permanently shadowed craters. High-resolution images from the Advanced Moon micro-imager Experiment (AMIE) contributed to global mosaics of the lunar surface, enabling comprehensive mapping of geological features from polar regions to equatorial maria, including detailed views of volcanic and impact features.

Data Analysis Methods

The data analysis methods for SMART-1 involved a combination of ground-based and in-flight calibration techniques to ensure accuracy in instrument measurements, particularly for the Advanced Moon micro-Imager Experiment (AMIE) and the SMART-1 Infrared Spectrometer (SIR). Ground calibration for AMIE included pre-launch flat-field corrections using integrating spheres to characterize sensitivity and non-uniformity, while in-flight calibration addressed radiation damage to the CCD during the Earth escape phase by employing dark sky images for dark current removal, median filtering to mitigate vertical noise, and a master flat field derived from averaging multiple lunar images for intensity balancing; these adjustments used Hapke's surface scattering model for brightness scaling. For SIR, ground calibration established spectral response across 938–2390 nm with a third-order polynomial fit for wavelength assignment (λ(PIX) = 937.72 + 6.26791×(PIX-1) - 2.0444×10^{-3}×(PIX-1)^2 - 7.19×10^{-7}×(PIX-1)^3) and radiometric linearity via integrating sphere measurements, with in-flight refinements using Apollo landing sites and non-illuminated lunar farside data to model dark current as I = d + aT^b exp(cT), where parameters (a, b, c, d) varied per pixel (e.g., for pixel 1: a=675, b=2.61, c=-3868, d=59.9). Processing pipelines for and the Demonstration of a Compact Imaging X-ray Spectrometer (D-CIXS) focused on radiometric correction, geometric registration, and unmixing to derive lunar surface properties. data underwent radiometric correction via photometric normalization using Akimov's disk function and Shkuratov's phase function with a shadow-hiding parameter k = 1.07 - 0.00015λ (nm), followed by geometric registration leveraging NASA's toolkit to compute elliptical footprints (major axis up to 3 km) based on and lunar orientation; unmixing then identified end-members like pyroxenes (absorption at 1.82–2.35 μm) and olivines (1.05–1.95 μm) through reflectance factor modeling. D-CIXS processing included radiometric correction calibrated by the onboard X-ray Monitor (XSM) during cruise-phase observations of fluorescence lines, geometric registration via for pixel footprints, and unmixing by fitting theoretical (XRF) models to observed spectra, accounting for input and elemental yields (e.g., , , , lines at 0.7–10 keV). Multi-instrument enhanced interpretability by integrating datasets from AMIE, , and D-CIXS. Co-registration of AMIE panchromatic and filtered images (750–960 ) with near-infrared spectra relied on shared SPICE-derived geometries to overlay visual context onto spectral profiles, enabling correlated analysis of surface features and compositions across ~18% of the lunar surface. For D-CIXS, flare-triggered analysis capitalized on events (e.g., X1-class flares yielding ~3000 counts per second) to boost XRF signals, with XSM monitoring spectra for real-time and with AMIE images for spatial . Processed SMART-1 data, totaling approximately 170 GB, reside in the ESA Archive (PSA), providing public access via web interfaces, FTP downloads, and tools like PDS labels for raw and calibrated products; AMIE and Spacecraft Proton Environment and Doses Experiment (SPEDE) data are fully calibrated, while , D-CIXS, and XSM offer raw formats with accompanying documentation for user processing.

Mission Conclusion

Lunar Impact

As the mission's propellant reserves became depleted, the (ESA) decided to conclude operations with a controlled on the Moon's surface, extending the scientific phase until the final moments. This deliberate end allowed for targeted observations of the event while ensuring the did not pose a to future missions. The took place on September 3, 2006, at 07:42 CEST (05:42 UT), during the 's 2,890th orbit . The selected impact site was in the Lake of Excellence (Lacus Excellentiae), a basaltic plain on the Moon's near side characterized by volcanic features and mineral variations. Located at approximately 34.4° S and 46.2° W , this mid-southern site was chosen for its visibility from observatories and inherent geological interest, while steering clear of established scientific targets like previous sites. Pre-impact maneuvers refined the trajectory to this location, prioritizing a low-risk deorbit that aligned with the mission's near-side orbit constraints. To execute the impact, the operations team performed a series of thruster burns using the spacecraft's system. Major adjustments occurred between June 19 and July 2, 2006, with finer corrections on July 27–28, August 25, and September 1–2, progressively lowering the perilune to intersect the surface. The final descent approached at a of 2 km/s and a shallow incidence of about 1°, resulting in a grazing trajectory from north to south. This produced an elongated crater feature roughly 20 m long and 4 m wide, with forming a fan-shaped deposit. Immediate observations from Earth-based telescopes captured the event's effects. Professional instruments, such as the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope and the 10.4 m , detected a brief flash, followed by a dust plume rising to approximately 80 km altitude and dispersing over about two minutes. Amateur astronomers worldwide also contributed detections, confirming the timing and location through coordinated campaigns. Subsequent high-resolution imaging by the in 2018 verified the site, identifying the linear impact scar and associated debris consistent with the predicted outcome.

Legacy and Follow-On Impacts

The successful demonstration of solar electric ion on SMART-1 paved the way for its adoption in subsequent ESA missions, notably providing critical validation for the propulsion system used on the mission to Mercury. This technology, which enabled efficient low-thrust transfers over extended distances, reduced mission timelines and fuel requirements compared to chemical , influencing the of deep-space explorers. Additionally, the miniaturized instruments on SMART-1, such as the AMIE camera and spectrometer, established a heritage for compact payload designs that were adapted and scaled in later ESA projects, enhancing the feasibility of small-scale scientific missions. SMART-1's scientific archive has contributed to ongoing lunar by integrating with datasets from later missions to refine models of the Moon's surface and interior. For instance, tracking from SMART-1 was incorporated into global lunar gravity field models alongside observations from the mission, improving resolutions of farside gravity anomalies. Furthermore, SMART-1 imagery and spectral have been correlated with GRAIL's gravity measurements to validate crustal thickness variations and volcanic features, aiding in the construction of comprehensive lunar geological frameworks. In 2023, further analysis using images confirmed the impact site's details, contributing to studies of hypervelocity impacts on airless bodies. The mission's controlled impact site on the lunar surface was confirmed in 2017 through high-resolution images from NASA's (LRO), revealing a linear gouge approximately 20 meters long and 4 meters wide, cutting across a small pre-existing , with bright rays extending up to 7 meters and faint streams up to 40 meters. Analysis of the patterns indicated the spacecraft's orientation and velocity at impact, providing insights into collision dynamics on airless bodies. As a pioneering low-cost lunar mission with a of approximately 110 million euros, SMART-1 served as a proof-of-concept for efficient small-satellite exploration, inspiring international efforts such as India's , which adopted similar strategies for miniaturized payloads and resource-constrained operations to achieve its objectives. This approach democratized access to lunar science, encouraging global collaboration on affordable planetary missions.

References

  1. [1]
    ESA - SMART-1 overview - European Space Agency
    SMART-1 was the first of ESA's Small Missions for Advanced Research in Technology. It travelled to the Moon using solar-electric propulsion and carrying a ...
  2. [2]
    SMART-1 - NASA Science
    Nov 2, 2024 · SMART-1 was ESA's first mission to the Moon. · SMART-1 made the first comprehensive inventory of key chemical elements in the lunar surface.
  3. [3]
    SMART-1 mission description and development status - ScienceDirect
    The SMART-1 mission is dedicated to testing of new technologies for future cornerstone missions, using Solar-Electric Primary Propulsion (SEPP) in Deep Space.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] The SMART-1 Mission - European Space Agency
    Following issue of the Announcement of Opportunity (AO) for SMART-1's scientific payload on 6 March 1998, ESA received fourteen proposals for instrument-based ...
  5. [5]
    SMART-1: the first spacecraft of the future - ESA
    Even though it is the first of a kind, SMART-1 has been developed in less than four years, and at about a fifth of the cost of a major science mission for ESA: ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  6. [6]
    SMART-1
    Lunar orbiter, Technology Experiments satellite built by Swedish Space Corporation (SSC) for ESA, Europe. ... The total cost of the spacecraft is estimated ...Missing: development | Show results with:development
  7. [7]
    SMART-1 (Small Mission for Advanced Research in Technology)
    Jun 15, 2012 · SMART-1 is an ESA minisatellite technology mission to the moon (part of the ESA Horizons 2000 Science plan) with the objective to demonstrate innovative and ...Spacecraft · Launch · Mission Status<|control11|><|separator|>
  8. [8]
    ESA - Frequently asked questions - European Space Agency
    How much does the mission cost? In total, SMART-1 will cost approximately 110 million Euros, about one-fifth of the cost of a major science mission for ESA.
  9. [9]
    ESA - SMART-1 - European Space Agency
    SMART-1 is the first of ESA's 'Small Missions for Advanced Research in Technology'. It is heading for the Moon using revolutionary propulsion techniques.
  10. [10]
    ESA - SMART-1 operations - European Space Agency
    Smart-1 was ESA's first Moon mission. In addition to investigating the Moon and studying chemical elements in the lunar surface, the spacecraft successfully ...
  11. [11]
    SMART-1 leaves Earth on a long journey to the Moon - ESA
    In April 2005 SMART-1 will begin the second phase of its mission, due to last at least six months and dedicated to the study of the Moon from a near polar orbit ...
  12. [12]
    SMART-1 Electric Propulsion: An Operational Perspective - AIAA ARC
    Sep 17, 2005 · C.​​ SMART-1 is a 3-axes stabilised spacecraft consisting of a central cubic box, of approximate 1m dimensions, and two Solar Array (SA) wings. ...Missing: architecture | Show results with:architecture
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Electric Propulsion on SMART-1 - European Space Agency
    Sep 3, 2006 · isatellite was all set to use electric propulsion for ... Average discharge power. 1140 W. Average projected thrust. 65.7–9.1 mN.
  14. [14]
    PPS®1350, Hall Effect Thruster - Safran
    Jun 25, 2024 · The PPS®1350 Hall Effet plasma thruster draws on Safran Spacecraft Propulsion' long experience with electric propulsion. It is designed for orbital transfer.
  15. [15]
    Ion engine gets SMART-1 to the Moon - ESA
    Aug 31, 2006 · To reach the Moon observation orbit, the thruster has produced a total delta-V of 3.5 km/s and consumed 74 kg of xenon. The cumulative operating ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] The SMART-1 Electric Propulsion Subsystem In Flight Experience
    The main feature of the Smart-1 system is its variable power supply. Integrated into the whole spacecraft the electric propulsion system was tested at ESTEC ...
  17. [17]
    SMART-1 from Conception to Moon Impact
    This paper provides an overview of the SMART-1 project from cradle to grave: from its conception in. 1997, launch on 27 September 2003, moon arrival on 11 ...
  18. [18]
    Instruments - ESA Science & Technology
    Designers of future solar-electric spacecraft want to know how SMART-1's ion engine performs, what side effects it has, and whether the spacecraft interacts ...
  19. [19]
    ESA - SMART-1's little 'bon AMIE' - European Space Agency
    Nov 26, 2004 · ESA's SMART-1 spacecraft is carrying scientific instruments that make use of state-of-the-art concepts and methods of miniaturisation to save space and ...
  20. [20]
    The advanced Moon micro-imager experiment (AMIE) on SMART-1
    The AMIE micro-imager will provide high resolution CCD images of selected lunar areas and it will perform colour imaging through three filters at 750, 915 and ...Missing: consumption developer
  21. [21]
    The D-Cixs X-Ray Spectrometer On Esa's Smart-1 Mission To The ...
    The D-CIXS (Demonstration of a Compact Imaging X-ray Spectrometer) instrument will provide high quality spectroscopic mapping of the Moon, the primary science ...
  22. [22]
    The D-CIXS X-ray spectrometer on the SMART-1 mission to the ...
    The Si PIN diode had an energy resolution of ∼600 eV (Goldsten et al., 1997). D-CIXS demonstrates a new approach to building this type of X-ray spectrometer.
  23. [23]
    X-ray fluorescence observations of the moon by SMART-1/D-CIXS ...
    D-CIXS used 24 SCD detectors mounted in three facets consisting of eight detectors each. ... Analysis the structural, electronic and effect of light on PIN ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] 1678.pdf - Lunar and Planetary Institute
    Introduction: The D-CIXS Compact X-ray spec- trometer on ESA's SMART-1 mission will provide the first global coverage of the lunar surface in X-rays, providing ...
  25. [25]
    The SMART-1 X-ray solar monitor (XSM): calibrations for D-CIXS ...
    The X-ray solar monitor (XSM) is a calibration instrument of the demonstration of compact imaging X-ray spectrometer (D-CIXS) experiment, with a separate ...
  26. [26]
    Independent science with the XSM (X-ray Solar Monitor) onboard ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · XSM is a calibration subinstrument of D-CIXS onboard the SMART-1 technology mission to the Moon. SMART-1 was launched in September 2003 from ...
  27. [27]
    The in-flight performance of the X-ray Solar Monitor (XSM) on-board ...
    Conclusions. XSM on-board the SMART-1 produced over 600 h of solar and background observations in total. Flares up to level M1 were observed.
  28. [28]
    The in-flight performance of the X-ray Solar Monitor (XSM) on-board ...
    Mar 21, 2025 · A review of the performance and first results of the SMART-1 XSM is presented in [1] and a study of cross calibrations with GOES X-ray detectors ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] smart-1 mission: highlights of lunar results
    AMIE (Advanced-Moon micro-Imager Experiment, PI. J.L. Josset) is a miniature high resolution (35 m pixel at 350 km perilune height) camera, equipped with a.Missing: University Bern
  30. [30]
    Objectives - ESA Science & Technology
    The most difficult task for the SMART-1 scientists is to peer into the darkness with SIR, looking for the infrared signature of water ice and perhaps of frozen ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Charge-Exchange Plasma Contamination on SMART-1
    Two instruments support this analysis: EPDP, consisting of a Langmuir probe, RPA analyser and a solar cell sample, and SPEDE, consisting of two current ...
  32. [32]
    Numerical Simulation of SMART-1 Hall-Thruster Plasma Interactions
    In the langmuir probe mode, the sensor is biased (with respect to the spacecraft floating potential) with either a constant biasing voltage (to obtain the ...
  33. [33]
    SMART-1 EPDP - Co-Investigator on Electric Propulsion Diagnostic ...
    SMART-1, launched in fall 2003, is Europe's first moon satellite. It shall demonstrate Solar-Electric Propulsion using a PPS-1350 hall thruster.
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Evaluation of the SPEDE instrument on SMART-1 - DiVA portal
    The Spacecraft potential, electron and dust experiment (SPEDE) was one of the instruments on-board SMART-1, Europe's first lunar mission.
  35. [35]
    SMART-1 - PSA - ESA Cosmos - European Space Agency
    SIR is a highly compact, grating, near-infrared point spectrometer, covering the wavelength range between 0.9 and 2.4 microns. SIR will analyse the composition ...Missing: specifications | Show results with:specifications
  36. [36]
    Preliminary results from the tracking of Smart-1 in Ka-band
    Ka-band has also clear advantages over X-band for precise spacecraft navigation and radio science experiments, as higher frequency radio links are much more ...
  37. [37]
    SMART-1 Launch - ESA Science & Technology
    Flight V162 launched on 27 September at 23:14 UT from the European Spaceport in Kourou. Forty-two minutes after the flawless launch, SMART-1 seperated from its ...
  38. [38]
    Flight Dynamics Operations during SMART-1 Commissioning
    ... solar arrays deployed, rotating around the sun direction with i revolution per hour. After that, ground took over control of the spacecraft in order to ...
  39. [39]
    SMART-1 ion engine fired successfully - European Space Agency
    SMART-1's revolutionary propulsion system was successfully fired at 12:25 UT on 30 September, 2003, in orbit around the Earth.
  40. [40]
    ESA - SMART-1 science highlights - European Space Agency
    It was the maiden mission to leave Earth orbit solely using solar power, albeit slowly, setting a 13 month record for the longest journey to the Moon. ... SMART-1 ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] SMART-1 ELECTRIC PROPULSION OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE
    Nov 4, 2005 · SMART-1 was launched in September 2003, as the first of the European Space Agency's. Small Missions for Advanced Research in Technology.
  42. [42]
    Lunar Capture - ESA Science & Technology
    On 11 November 2004 at 10:30 UTC, close to the 331st Earth apogee, SMART-1 was at the first Lagrange point of the Earth-Moon system.
  43. [43]
    SMART-1's first images from the Moon - European Space Agency
    Jan 26, 2005 · ESA's SMART-1 captured its first close-range images of the Moon this January, during a sequence of test lunar observations from an altitude between 1000 and ...Missing: hydration | Show results with:hydration
  44. [44]
    ESA To Build A Deep Space Ground Station In Cebreros, Spain
    Jul 18, 2003 · ESA to build a deep space ground station in Cebreros (Spain). Communicating with ESA's spacecraft such as Mars Express, or SMART-1,Missing: DSN | Show results with:DSN
  45. [45]
    [PDF] smart-1: europe's lunar mission paving the way for new cost effective ...
    The price of an ESA middle size scientific mission can oscillate between 400-600 M€. The Smart-1 target cost was set to below 100M€. James R.
  46. [46]
    Smart-1 Ground Operations Automation - AIAA ARC
    SMART-1 is the first of the ESA Small Missions for Advanced Research and Technology which aims to test key technologies for future cornerstone missions.
  47. [47]
    SMART-1 detects calcium on the Moon - European Space Agency
    ESA's SMART-1 spacecraft has made the first ever unambiguous remote-sensing detection of calcium on the Moon.
  48. [48]
    The Aristarchus Plateau on the Moon: Mineralogical and structural ...
    Although in low abundance, olivine-rich materials are found to be widespread in this region of the Moon. Volcanic pyroclastic deposits (DMD) are widely exposed ...
  49. [49]
    The SMART-1 Spacecraft Potential Investigations - ResearchGate
    Aug 5, 2025 · While GIE and HET are mature and well understood, the power consumption of miniaturized thrusters is relatively high, leaving room for ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Calibration and Mosaicing of SMART-1 Images
    The scientific interest of SMART-1 images is historical, as the data offers a snapshot of the lunar surface during the mission period, allowing comparative ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] On the analysis of near-infrared point spectrometer data for ... - MPS
    The SMART-1 carried on board the first high resolution NIR spec- trometer SIR, which had been sent to orbit the Moon together with six other instruments. In ...
  52. [52]
    The D-CIXS X-ray spectrometer on the SMART-1 mission to the moon
    This paper presents a detailed overview of the X-ray/Gamma-ray Spectrometer and describes the science objectives, measurement objectives, instrument design, and ...
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Methods for interpreting D-CIXS X-ray fluorescence data
    The first data analysis method will be to compute theoretical XRF spectra of the lunar surface for a given composition and inducing X-ray solar spectrum. By ...
  54. [54]
    The D-Cixs X-Ray Spectrometer On Esa's Smart-1 Mission To The ...
    D-CIXS will provide the first global coverage of the lunar surface in X-rays, providing absolute measurements of Fe, Mg, Al and Si under normal solar conditions ...
  55. [55]
    [PDF] RAWDAR: Raw Data Repository - ESA Cosmos
    May 14, 2018 · – Available Locally: 170.75 GB / 1,286 Directories / 187,805 Files. – Directory location: /data/RADACER/missions/SMART-1/DATA/. – Data ...
  56. [56]
    About the SMART-1 science archive - ESA Science & Technology
    The data sets that are available (see the table below for a summary) have been calibrated and collated by the SMART-1 project, and are accompanied by extensive ...Missing: analysis | Show results with:analysis
  57. [57]
    SMART-1 Impact Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) - ESA
    Like most of its lunar predecessors, SMART-1 concluded its scientific observations of the Moon through a small impact on the lunar surface.<|control11|><|separator|>
  58. [58]
    ESA - SMART-1 towards final impact - European Space Agency
    SMART-1 was launched on 27 September 2003, and it reached the Moon in November 2004 after a long spiralling around Earth. In this phase, the spacecraft tested ...Missing: details | Show results with:details
  59. [59]
    Identification of the SMART-1 spacecraft impact location on the Moon
    Mar 15, 2019 · ... SMART-1 struck the Moon on 3 September 2006. Its descent path (ESA, 2006) carried it from north to south (azimuth 182°) over Lacus ...Missing: selection execution
  60. [60]
    [PDF] SMART-1 MOON IMPACT OPERATIONS - A. Ayala(1), R. Rigger(2)
    SMART-1 was launched on 27/09/2003. It was the first. ESA mission to use an Electric Propulsion (EP) engine as the main motor to spiral out of the Earth gravity ...
  61. [61]
    The SMART-1 lunar impact - ScienceDirect.com
    The SMART-1 spacecraft impacted the Moon on 3rd September 2006 at a speed of 2 km s−1 and at a very shallow angle of incidence (∼1°). The resulting impact ...Missing: selection | Show results with:selection
  62. [62]
    This is the Exact Spot that ESA's SMART-1 Crashed Into the Moon in ...
    Sep 6, 2018 · We now have the precise coordinates of where the spacecraft impacted and bounced on the lunar surface - 34.262° south by 46.193° west.Missing: GTO 35786 x 632
  63. [63]
    SMART-1 impact flash and debris: Crash scene investigation
    Sep 7, 2006 · Timing, location, detection of a flash and of ejected material, and a firework generated by the lunar impact of ESA's SMART-1, are the latest results gathered.
  64. [64]
    SMART-1 impact flash and debris: crash scene investigation - ESA
    This is also in agreement with the coordinates newly derived from the position of the infrared impact flash observed by the Canada-France-Hawaii telescope (CFHT) ...Missing: exact | Show results with:exact
  65. [65]
    [PDF] bepicolombo - ESA Science & Technology
    Ion propulsion was first demonstrated by ESA's SMART-1 mission to the Moon. The low-thrust nature of the ion propulsion means that it will take a long time ...<|separator|>
  66. [66]
    BepiColombo - Mission Overview and Science Goals
    Dec 8, 2021 · A major milestone was achieved with the selection and successful implementation of SMART-1, an ESA technology demonstration mission, based on ...
  67. [67]
    SMART-1 technology, scientific results and heritage for future space ...
    ESA's SMART-1 mission to the Moon achieved record firsts such as: 1) first Small Mission for Advanced Research and Technology; with spacecraft built and ...Missing: legacy | Show results with:legacy
  68. [68]
    An improved lunar gravity field model from SELENE and historical ...
    Jun 16, 2010 · Some SMART-1 tracking data, taken during January 2006 and a few days in May 2006, were included as well. Prior to SELENE, farside gravity ...
  69. [69]
    SMART-1 & recent missions: results from combining data
    We highlight some results from combined data analysis using SMART-1 archive with other recent lunar missions. We discuss in particular impact craters, volcanic, ...Missing: integration models GRAIL correlations
  70. [70]
    Crash scene investigation reveals resting place of SMART-1 impact
    Sep 25, 2017 · Foing said: "The high resolution LRO images show white ejecta, about seven metres across, from the first contact. A north-south channel has then ...
  71. [71]
    How SMART-1 has made European space exploration smarter
    Jan 31, 2007 · As a result, two of the instruments (D-CIXS and SIR), which mapped the Moon's elemental composition and minerals, are being upgraded and rebuilt ...
  72. [72]
    Lunar science with affordable small spacecraft technologies
    The UK for instance already plays a significant role in lunar science research by participating in the Clementine, SMART-1, Chandrayaan-1 and LRO missions, as ...