Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Animal cognition

Animal cognition refers to the mental processes enabling non-human animals to acquire, process, store, and apply information from perception and experience to guide behavior, including perception, learning, memory, decision-making, and problem-solving. The field draws from comparative psychology and ethology to evaluate cognitive capacities through empirical observation and experimentation, revealing adaptive mechanisms shaped by ecological and social pressures rather than anthropocentric benchmarks. Key demonstrations include chimpanzees' termite fishing, where wild populations exhibit population-level handedness in selecting and modifying plant materials as probes to extract subterranean termites, a behavior involving foresight and cultural variation across groups. Corvids solve multi-step puzzles, such as displacing water levels to access food, indicating causal reasoning, while octopuses transport coconut shells as portable shelters and manipulate objects to access prey, showcasing flexible problem-solving in invertebrates. A subset of species, predominantly social ones like great apes, dolphins, elephants, and Eurasian magpies, pass the mirror self-recognition test by directing behaviors toward marked body parts visible only in reflection, suggesting rudimentary self-concepts, though methodological critiques question its universality and implications for consciousness. Controversies persist over anthropomorphic projections inflating cognitive attributions beyond verifiable mechanisms, contrasted with underappreciation of non-human feats like tool innovation, underscoring the need for rigorous, species-specific paradigms grounded in observable outcomes.

Historical Foundations

Early Inferences and Anecdotes

Ancient Greek philosopher , in his (circa 350 BCE), described behaviors in various species indicative of and associative learning, such as dogs pursuing hares by recollecting past scents and tracks, and bees returning to specific flowers or hives after intervals. He observed that certain birds, like jackdaws, exhibit cautious intelligence in avoiding captured flock members, implying recognition and of consequences, though he attributed such actions primarily to instinct rather than deliberate reasoning. Aristotle emphasized that while animals share sensory and with humans, only humans possess the capacity for voluntary recollection and . In the 19th century, extended these inferences by positing a continuum of mental faculties across in The Descent of Man (1871), arguing that "the difference in mind between man and the higher animals... is one of degree and not of kind." Darwin drew on anecdotes such as recognizing former keepers after 20 years, displaying apparent or guilt upon wrongdoing, and monkeys employing sticks to dislodge from heights, interpreting these as evidence of inherited cognitive traits akin to . He contended that evolutionary descent from common ancestors necessitates shared mental processes, including rudimentary reasoning and , though reliant on unverified reports from travelers and breeders. George Romanes, a collaborator of , systematized in Animal Intelligence (1882), focusing on to infer higher-order . He described chimpanzee behaviors, such as the animal "" spontaneously counting up to five straws when prompted and adapting to barriers by selecting longer tools from available options, as demonstrations of logical inference and foresight. Romanes also recounted instances of orangutans uncoiling wire to retrieve distant objects, positing these as unplanned yet insightful problem-solving, distinct from mere trial-and-error, based on zoo keeper testimonies and personal observations lacking standardized controls. These early accounts, while suggestive of cognitive sophistication, were limited by their dependence on subjective narratives and absence of replicable protocols.

Morgan's Canon and Interpretive Restraint

C. Lloyd Morgan introduced what is known as Morgan's Canon in his 1894 book An Introduction to , stating: "In no case is an animal activity to be interpreted in terms of higher psychological processes, if it can be fairly interpreted in terms of processes which stand lower in the scale of psychological evolution and development." This principle serves as a methodological restraint, prioritizing explanations grounded in observable mechanisms such as , , or simple over unverified attributions of complex faculties like reasoning or . Morgan formulated it amid anecdotal reports of animal intelligence, such as his observation of a retrieving a stick in a seemingly insightful manner, which he reinterpreted as learned rather than deliberate problem-solving to avoid anthropomorphic error. The canon's primary function is to enforce in behavioral interpretation, ensuring that claims of advanced rest on empirical demonstration rather than to human experience. For instance, observations of use in birds, such as New Caledonian crows bending wires to retrieve food, must first be explained via trial-and-error learning or innate predispositions before invoking or causal understanding, as higher inferences risk over-attribution without disconfirming simpler alternatives. This approach counters the tendency to project human-like mental states onto animals, promoting rigorous testing to distinguish between associative processes and genuine . Morgan's Canon contrasts with broader evolutionary continuity arguments, which posit graded similarities in mental capacities across due to shared , potentially justifying assumptions of analogous processes. However, privileges evidential restraint over phylogenetic presumption, insisting that does not license interpreting behaviors as "higher" without excluding lower mechanisms through experimentation; for example, even in exhibiting tool modification, explanations favoring motor habits must be falsified before is accepted. This empirical prioritization guards against unsubstantiated extensions of human psychology, though critics note it may underemphasize comparative or ecological contexts that support in cognition.

Behaviorist Dominance and Denial of Internal States

In the early , behaviorism emerged as the dominant paradigm in , explicitly rejecting the study of internal mental states such as or cognition in favor of observable stimulus-response associations. John B. Watson's 1913 manifesto, "Psychology as the Behaviorist Views It," positioned as a purely objective experimental science aimed at predicting and controlling behavior through environmental stimuli, dismissing and mentalistic explanations as unscientific. Watson argued that animal behavior, like , could be fully accounted for by sensory-motor mechanisms without invoking unobservable , asserting that "the time seems to have come when must discard all reference to " and focus on habits formed through . Ivan Pavlov's experiments, conducted in the late 1890s and early 1900s, provided empirical groundwork for this view by demonstrating how reflexive responses in —such as salivation—could be elicited by neutral stimuli paired with unconditioned triggers like food, without reference to internal . Behaviorists interpreted these findings as evidence that animal learning operated mechanistically via automatic associations, rendering appeals to superfluous and unverifiable. B.F. Skinner's development of in the 1930s further entrenched this stimulus-response framework; in his 1938 book The Behavior of Organisms, Skinner emphasized contingencies shaping voluntary actions in rats and pigeons, analyzing behavior solely through rates of emission under controlled schedules, explicitly avoiding "hypothetical states" within the organism. This approach, rooted in philosophical that denied non-physical mental entities, treated animals as black boxes where inputs directly determined outputs, suppressing into cognitive processes like reasoning or in animal from the through the mid-20th century. Terms evoking internal states, such as "" or "expectancy," were systematically purged from scientific discourse, with funding and publication favoring strict behavioral analyses over interpretive alternatives.

Cognitive Revolution and Empirical Revival

Edward Tolman challenged strict behaviorist interpretations by proposing that rats form cognitive maps—internal spatial representations of their environment—based on experiments demonstrating and flexible navigation in mazes without immediate . In his 1948 paper, Tolman argued that rats' ability to shortcut through unfamiliar paths after prior exploration indicated purposive, goal-directed cognition rather than mere stimulus-response associations, laying groundwork for inferring mental processes from behavioral outcomes. Ethologists Konrad Lorenz and Niko Tinbergen advanced this shift through studies on innate releasing mechanisms (IRMs), hardwired neural circuits triggering species-typical behaviors in response to specific sign stimuli, as detailed in their 1930s-1950s work on imprinting and fixed action patterns. While emphasizing instinctual foundations, their field-based observations highlighted adaptive flexibility and internal motivational states, countering laboratory-bound behaviorism's dismissal of endogenous factors and fostering comparative analyses of behavioral complexity across species. Noam Chomsky's 1959 critique of B.F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior further eroded behaviorist dominance by exposing its inadequacy in explaining generative linguistic rules, influencing animal researchers to prioritize hypothetical cognitive constructs over observable inputs alone. This broader in , peaking in the 1950s-1960s, extended to comparative domains by validating inferences of representation, planning, and problem-solving from patterned behaviors. In the 1970s, empirical studies like David Premack's training of chimpanzee Sarah to use plastic symbols as a lexigram-based language demonstrated capacities for syntax comprehension, conditional relations, and abstract concept formation, such as understanding "same-different" judgments. Sarah's reported vocabulary exceeded 120 symbols by 1970, enabling her to construct novel requests and follow complex instructions, providing behavioral evidence for ape-level symbolic cognition that behaviorists had rejected as anthropomorphic. These paradigms revived rigorous, controlled investigations into internal states, bridging ethological naturalism with psychological experimentation. By the early 1980s, this convergence spurred dedicated research programs in cognitive ethology, though formal journals like Animal Cognition emerged later, reflecting consolidated empirical standards for attributing cognition without direct introspection.

Methodological Frameworks

Laboratory Experiments and Controlled Paradigms

Laboratory experiments in animal cognition employ standardized protocols to test specific hypotheses under controlled conditions, minimizing extraneous variables and enabling high replicability across subjects and studies. These paradigms isolate cognitive by manipulating factors such as stimulus presentation, schedules, and response requirements, often yielding quantitative data like trial-by-trial accuracy rates and measures to infer underlying processes. For instance, success rates above chance levels (e.g., 70-80% correct choices in tasks) indicate learning acquisition, while error patterns—such as perseverative responses—reveal deficits. Discrimination learning tasks require animals to differentiate between stimuli (e.g., visual patterns or odors) associated with rewards versus non-rewards, typically through chambers where responses like pecking or lever pressing are reinforced selectively. In these setups, pigeons or rats might learn to peck a lit for after hundreds of trials, achieving asymptotic around 90% accuracy, which demonstrates associative without confounding ecological factors. Reversal learning extends this by abruptly switching reward contingencies (e.g., the previously unrewarded stimulus now yields ), assessing behavioral flexibility; animals showing rapid adaptation (e.g., fewer than 50 perseverative errors) exhibit stronger cognitive control, as seen in tasks with octopuses reaching in 20-30 trials post-reversal. Delay tasks, or temporal discounting paradigms, present choices between smaller-sooner rewards and larger-later alternatives, quantifying via indifference points where preference shifts (e.g., a pigeon forgoing 4 pellets after 10 seconds for 1 immediate pellet). Pigeons in Ainslie's 1974 experiments demonstrated by committing to delayed options when immediate alternatives were inaccessible, with choice proportions following functions fitted to data from repeated sessions. Mirror self-recognition tests, pioneered by Gallup in 1970, involve anesthetizing subjects, marking visible body parts with odorless , and observing post-recovery behaviors in front of mirrors; chimpanzees directed 10-20% of mark-directed touches toward their reflections after , contrasting with social or control animals' lack of self-touching (less than 1%). These metrics—grooming durations and analyses—support inferences of visual in great apes under isolated lab conditions.

Field Observations and Ecological Validity

![Chimpanzee using a stick for termite fishing in the wild][float-right]
observations prioritize studying animal behaviors in environments to assess cognitive abilities within ecologically relevant contexts, minimizing artifacts from captive conditions. These approaches emphasize long-term and tracking of free-ranging individuals, allowing researchers to document spontaneous problem-solving and under real-world pressures such as predation, resource scarcity, and social dynamics. Playback experiments represent a key method for probing cognitive responses in the field, where natural stimuli like vocalizations are manipulated to elicit behaviors indicative of recognition or deception. For instance, Karl von Frisch's investigations in the 1940s revealed that honeybees communicate food source locations and distances through the performed inside hives, a discovery validated via field manipulations of feeder positions relative to the sun's azimuth. In primates, Jane Goodall's prolonged observations at documented chimpanzees stripping twigs to fashion tools for termite extraction as early as November 4, 1960, highlighting planned modification and use in foraging strategies adapted to seasonal mound availability. Corvids exemplify advanced and foresight in wild caching, with field studies of species like Clark's nutcrackers revealing caches numbering up to 32,000 seeds annually, retrieved accurately after months via hippocampal-dependent mapping of ephemeral conifer booms. Observations in natural habitats show selecting cache sites based on pilferage risk, caching more perishable items in safer locations, behaviors less pronounced in lab aviaries lacking ecological stakes. Ecological validity concerns arise from discrepancies where lab paradigms yield inflated or absent cognitive feats; for example, wild-caught animals often outperform lab-reared counterparts in reversal learning tasks due to habitat variability fostering flexibility. Such gaps underscore the need for , integrating field data with controlled tests to distinguish domain-general from context-specific adaptations, ensuring claims reflect causal mechanisms over methodological confounds.

Technological Innovations in Measurement

Adaptations of (fMRI) for awake, unrestrained animals have enabled non-invasive probing of neural correlates of , particularly in , where protocols allow scans during tasks assessing reward and word . For instance, studies using tailored hemodynamic response functions in canine fMRI have improved detection sensitivity for cognitive activations, such as in responses to novel stimuli, with applications extending into the 2020s for evaluating suitability. (EEG) adaptations, often combined with other modalities, have similarly advanced in small mammals, facilitating real-time measurement of and learning states without anesthesia-induced confounds. Eye-tracking technologies, miniaturized for like fruit flies, have revealed compensatory retinal movements akin to saccades, aiding quantification of visual attention and during tasks. These systems track equivalents through high-resolution , providing on selective that traditional observation overlooks, with resolutions sufficient for dissecting in behaviors as of 2022 implementations. Drone-based platforms, integrated with , have transformed field measurements of collective cognition since 2023, capturing spatial dynamics and social interactions in group-living species like and without human disturbance. Autonomous systems, such as the open-source WildWing deployed in 2025, enable prolonged monitoring of emergent behaviors, linking environmental context to cognitive strategies like . Machine learning algorithms for behavior classification, leveraging on video and data, have surged post-2023, automating detection of subtle indicators like episodic-like in and through pose estimation and . Tools like provide explainable classifications of ethograms, achieving over 90% accuracy in multi-species datasets by 2024, thus isolating cognitive processes from motor confounds in naturalistic settings. These innovations enhance precision in identifying causal links between stimuli and internal states, such as retrieval cues, by processing vast datasets beyond manual capacity.

Definitional and Biological Underpinnings

Defining Cognition: Mechanistic vs. Functional Views

In the field of animal , mechanistic definitions emphasize the underlying causal processes—such as neural circuits and computational algorithms—that transform sensory inputs into adaptive outputs, prioritizing explanations rooted in verifiable biological operations over inferred mental states. This approach aligns with causal realism by focusing on how specific mechanisms, like associative learning networks or in the , generate behaviors that enhance survival, as evidenced by models decomposing into component parts with testable interactions. For instance, mechanistic accounts require delineating how information is encoded, stored, and retrieved at the level of neurons or circuits, enabling predictions about behavioral disruptions under targeted interventions like lesions or pharmacological blocks. Functional definitions, by contrast, characterize cognition through observable, goal-directed performances that solve ecological problems, such as navigating spatial environments or exploiting resources, without presupposing particular internal architectures or . This perspective infers cognitive capacity from behavioral efficiency and adaptability, often employing parsimonious explanations that attribute processes only when simpler sensory-motor reflexes suffice, thereby avoiding unsubstantiated anthropomorphic projections of human-like . However, functional views can become overly permissive, equating any adaptive flexibility with "" and thus diluting specificity, particularly when sources influenced by anthropocentric biases in overextend human analogies without rigorous controls. Central debates contrast anthropocentric definitions, which benchmark animal cognition against human mental faculties like explicit reasoning or , with biocentric ones that ground it in species-typical ecological demands and evolutionary constraints, rejecting human-centric metrics as distorting. Bräuer et al. (2020) contend that anthropocentric frameworks, prevalent in studies emphasizing traits like , impose a singular "human-like" cognition model, whereas biocentric approaches recognize diverse, independently evolved cognitive toolkits tailored to niches, supported by cross-species empirical data on adaptive problem-solving. Empirical rigor demands anchoring both views in testable predictions, such as those from computational simulations of mechanistic processes (e.g., models for ), which generate falsifiable hypotheses about behavioral variance under manipulated conditions, favoring causal explanations over vague invocations of "intelligence." This integration mitigates biases in source selection, privileging data-driven models over narrative-driven interpretations from institutionally skewed research traditions.

Evolutionary and Neural Constraints on Cognitive Capacity

Cognitive capacities in animals are fundamentally constrained by phylogenetic history and neurobiological , where relative to body mass provides a coarse proxy for processing power, though not a direct determinant of behavioral flexibility. Allometric laws dictate that mass increases disproportionately slower than body mass across mammals, with exponents typically around 0.75, meaning smaller-bodied often exhibit relatively larger brains adjusted for metabolic demands. The (EQ), calculated as the ratio of actual brain mass to expected mass for a given body size, has been used to estimate cognitive potential, correlating positively with problem-solving in some lineages, yet it overlooks absolute neuron counts and regional specializations, rendering it an imperfect metric prone to overinterpretation. Recent analyses favor overall brain volume over EQ for predicting cognitive variance in non-human , as relative measures fail to account for developmental and ecological confounders. Neural modularity imposes further limits on generalization, as vertebrate brains comprise semi-independent modules optimized for domain-specific tasks—such as sensory processing or motor control—rather than a unified substrate for abstract reasoning. This architecture enhances efficiency under resource scarcity but restricts transfer of learned representations across modalities, as modular boundaries hinder integrative computation without extensive rewiring. Evolutionary pressures favor such specialization, where cognitive traits emerge as byproducts of selection for immediate survival advantages, like foraging efficiency, rather than scalable intelligence approximating human faculties; claims of unbroken cognitive continuity thus exaggerate adaptive generality, ignoring modular silos that cap performance in novel contexts. Trade-offs between enlargement and somatic maintenance underscore these constraints, as neural demands 10-20 times the metabolic rate of muscle, compelling reallocations from gut size or that can impair viability in nutrient-poor environments. records reveal encephalization proceeded in punctuated phases post-mass extinctions, with placental mammals prioritizing body mass expansion before relative growth around 10-15 million years ago, followed by stasis in many lineages due to on cognitive investment. These reflect causal selection for context-bound adaptations—e.g., predator evasion or resource extraction—over unconstrained flexibility, as oversized brains yield no net gain absent matching ecological pressures, thereby bounding cognitive capacity within species-specific niches.

Sensory and Perceptual Domains

Basic Perception and Sensory Integration

Animals process sensory inputs through specialized receptors and neural pathways tailored to their environments, with psychophysical thresholds varying markedly across species to optimize detection of relevant stimuli. For example, absolute auditory thresholds in the ( jacchus) have been quantified using paradigms, revealing sensitivities comparable to humans at mid-frequencies but elevated thresholds at extremes, underscoring evolutionary adaptations for arboreal communication. Similarly, visual acuity in raptors like eagles exceeds that of mammals by factors of 4 to 8, enabling detection of prey from distances over 2 kilometers, as measured in behavioral tasks. These thresholds, derived from difference limens and absolute detection functions, highlight causal constraints imposed by receptor , neural wiring, and ecological pressures rather than uniform cognitive overlays. Multisensory integration occurs when neural circuits combine congruent inputs from disparate modalities to refine , often yielding superadditive responses beyond individual capabilities. In echolocating bats such as Pipistrellus pygmaeus, vision and biosonar signals are fused during navigation, with experimental manipulations showing that visual landmarks modulate echolocation call rates and improve obstacle avoidance accuracy under varying light conditions. This integration, evidenced by reduced latency in prey capture when both modalities align, demonstrates probabilistic weighting where reliable cues dominate, as per Bayesian-like principles observed in single-unit recordings from analogs. Such processes are foundational, enhancing signal-to-noise ratios without invoking higher-order inference. Certain visual illusions reveal conserved perceptual mechanisms across taxa, indicating that basic sensory integration can produce systematic biases akin to those in s. Pigeons (Columba livia) perceive a reversed Zöllner illusion, misjudging line orientations in the direction opposite to human subjects, as quantified in discrimination training where error rates peaked under illusory conditions. They also succumb to the Ebbinghaus-Titchener effect, over- or underestimating target circle sizes based on surrounding inducers, with psychophysical curves mirroring human susceptibility but scaled by retinal specializations. These findings, from controlled choice tasks, affirm that low-level feature binding—such as and contextual modulation—drives the illusions, independent of linguistic or cultural factors. Cross-modal matching, where animals equate stimuli across senses (e.g., visual to tactile), provides evidence of integrated sensory representations, though proficiency varies phylogenetically. Mammals like rhesus monkeys achieve transfer in matching-to-sample tasks with novel objects, identifying felt shapes via visual cues after delays up to 10 seconds. In non-mammals, capabilities are more constrained; while domestic chicks exhibit space-luminance correspondences, linking brighter regions to "upper" spatial positions innately, full across and touch remains rare, with providing the primary avian example of vocal-visual individual matching. Limits in and reptiles, inferred from failed transfer paradigms, suggest neural bottlenecks in associational cortices, emphasizing that while basic integration occurs subcortically, robust cross-modal equivalence demands expanded telencephalic structures.

Attention Mechanisms and Selective Processing

Selective in animals involves the prioritization of relevant sensory inputs amid competing stimuli, enabling efficient processing of limited cognitive resources. This mechanism filters irrelevant information, as demonstrated in contexts where predators on specific prey types, ignoring others—a observed in and that enhances capture rates for targeted items while temporarily overlooking alternatives. In settings, selective attention manifests in error patterns during tasks with distractors; for example, animals commit fewer errors when salient cues align with goals, indicating top-down control over bottom-up capture. Divided attention studies highlight capacity constraints, with dual-task paradigms showing performance decrements across species. In mice using touchscreen assays, error rates rose from near-baseline levels in single tasks to significantly higher in combined visuospatial and cognitive demands, reflecting resource competition. Nonhuman primates exhibit similar multitasking deficits, where concurrent demands impair accuracy in one or both streams, akin to human limitations but with primates demonstrating some cognitive override of conflicting cues. These findings underscore causal limits in , as neural bottlenecks prevent undivided allocation. Visual search tasks reveal priming effects, where prior exposure accelerates detection. In pigeons, repeating features or locations across trials speeds response times via intertrial priming, reducing search inefficiencies without explicit cuing. monkeys show analogous neural signatures in frontal cortex during popout searches, with primed stimuli eliciting faster behavioral shifts and modulated neuronal firing. Blue jays integrate sequential priming with associative cues, enhancing focal to like . Species differences in attentional capacity emerge in comparative paradigms; rats and pigeons display attention-modulated performance akin to humans but with lower overall efficiency, such as pigeons' constrained input channels leading to overload under high stimulus loads. , conversely, sustain longer, as in optogenetic studies inducing spatially specific deficits without motor confounds. These variations correlate with ecological demands, with rates in dual tasks varying by phylogenetic lineage—e.g., higher in than apes—suggesting evolved differences in rather than uniform mechanisms.

Conceptual and Associative Processes

Category Formation and Discrimination

Animals form categories by grouping stimuli based on shared perceptual features, such as color or shape, or functional attributes, enabling efficient discrimination and decision-making in complex environments. Experimental paradigms, including habituation-dishabituation, reveal this capacity: repeated exposure to exemplars from one category leads to habituation (reduced response), while novel stimuli from a different category elicit dishabituation (renewed response), indicating categorical boundaries. These methods distinguish natural categories, like predator types encountered ecologically, from artificial ones imposed in labs, though associative learning often confounds interpretation by allowing animals to rely on specific feature correlations rather than abstract grouping. Perceptual category formation is evident in fish, where species like guppies (Poecilia reticulata) discriminate shapes and colors, generalizing across variations in size or orientation; for instance, (Toxotes chatareus) categorize human faces by warping perceptual space to emphasize differences between "same" and "different" identities. Similarly, birds such as zebra finches partition hues (e.g., red-orange ) into discrete categories akin to boundaries, supporting perceptual sorting without linguistic mediation. These abilities likely aid or predator avoidance, as integrate shape and color cues to distinguish edible from hazardous objects. More abstract discrimination, such as oddity tasks requiring selection of the unique stimulus among similar ones, has been demonstrated in dolphins (Tursiops truncatus), where bottlenose dolphins generalize "same-different" relations across novel visual arrays, including numerosities like "few" versus "many." In oddity problems, dolphins select the mismatched item from triads, transferring performance to untrained stimuli, suggesting relational processing beyond mere perceptual matching. However, true relational categories remain rare, as many successes are attributable to associative confounds—e.g., learned pairings—rather than rule-based , limiting claims of conceptual equivalence to .

Rule Learning and Abstract Relations

Animals demonstrate rule learning through tasks requiring the abstraction of relations, such as matching-to-sample or oddity , which demand beyond specific stimuli . In same-different judgments, pigeons have been trained to discriminate arrays of identical versus varied icons, achieving to stimuli when exposed to large training sets (e.g., exemplars), though performance declines with fewer stimuli, suggesting reliance on perceptual similarity rather than pure . However, pigeons often fail to acquire fully concepts in matching-to-sample paradigms without contingencies favoring relational rules, instead defaulting to configural cue strategies that associate specific stimulus compounds. Transitive inference tasks, where animals infer untaught relations from a series (e.g., if A > B and B > C, then A > C), provide of relational learning in rats. Rats reliably select the higher-ranked item in novel test pairs after training on overlapping premise pairs in an n-term series, with performance above chance even for endpoint inferences. Empirical from operant chambers show rats prioritizing adjacent premises during acquisition but shifting to relational strategies for non-adjacent inferences, though associative value differences (e.g., stronger for higher ranks) can account for much of the behavior without necessitating symbolic . Functional categories, such as grouping stimuli by predator-like threats for avoidance, test whether animals form abstract classes based on relational properties rather than mere perceptual features. Chickens trained to categorize images as "" or "predator" fail to generalize to real-world equivalents, indicating limited beyond trained exemplars. In , vervet monkeys produce distinct alarm calls for different predators (e.g., leopards vs. eagles), implying by inferred danger, but this may stem from associative chains linking specific cues to escape responses rather than decontextualized rules. Critically, many instances of apparent rule learning reduce to chained associations, where performance emerges from summed pairwise contingencies without explicit relational encoding. Associative models predict transitive choices via differential reinforcement histories, matching empirical patterns in rats and pigeons without invoking higher , thus questioning claims of true in non-primates. This associative parsimony aligns with behavioral data, as animals rarely outperform predictions from simple value-based summation in novel contexts.

Memory and Temporal Cognition

Short-Term and Working Memory

Short-term memory in animals refers to the temporary storage of sensory information lasting seconds to minutes, while involves the active manipulation of that information for ongoing tasks, such as or problem-solving. These processes enable animals to hold transient representations, like the location of a recently seen object or a sequence of stimuli, without relying on long-term . Empirical studies demonstrate capacity limits far below levels, often constrained to 2-4 items across species, reflecting neural and architectural boundaries rather than mere motivational factors. Common experimental paradigms include delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) tasks, where an animal views a sample stimulus, experiences a delay (typically 0-30 seconds), and then selects a matching option from alternatives. In non-human , such as rhesus monkeys, performance in visual DMTS declines sharply with set sizes beyond 2-3 items, indicating a core capacity of approximately 2 elements for complex stimuli like or colored squares. are assessed via radial arm mazes, where they must remember visited arms within a trial to avoid repeats and maximize rewards; mice and rats typically exhibit errors increasing after 4-6 arms, underscoring short-term retention tied to immediate trial demands. These tasks isolate transient memory by enforcing intra-trial retention without inter-trial carryover. In , working memory capacity averages 2 ± 1 items in chimpanzees, contrasting with benchmarks of 7 ± 2, as measured in change-detection tasks adapted for apes. Corvids, such as carrion crows, rival monkeys with capacities around 4 items in analogous visual array tasks, achieving comparable accuracy despite avian nidopallium circuitry differing from mammalian prefrontal structures. This equivalence suggests convergent mechanisms, like divisive of neural activity, underlie limits across taxa, with corvids outperforming expectations scaled by relative to great apes. Neural correlates prominently involve the () in mammals, where delay-period activity in inferior convexity neurons encodes parametric features, such as stimulus strength or position, sustaining representations during retention intervals up to 10 seconds. Lesions or inactivation of impairs DMTS performance proportionally to delay length, confirming causal roles in active maintenance over passive decay. In birds, analogous regions like the avian homologues exhibit similar sustained firing, supporting cross-species parallels in working memory dynamics despite divergent evolutionary paths.

Long-Term and Episodic-Like Memory

Long-term in animals encompasses the storage and retrieval of information over durations ranging from days to years, enabling adaptive behaviors such as and social recognition. Corvids, for instance, maintain spatial records of thousands of cache sites for months, with Eurasian jays recovering hidden food after delays exceeding 17 days while avoiding pilfered locations observed by conspecifics. This capacity relies on hippocampal-dependent processes analogous to declarative in mammals, as lesions disrupt site-specific recall without impairing general spatial navigation.00241-6) Episodic-like memory refers to the integration of contextual details—what occurred, where, and when—evident in tasks requiring flexible retrieval without explicit cuing. In a seminal 1998 study, Western scrub-jays cached perishable wax worms and non-perishable in distinct trays; after 124 hours, experienced birds preferentially recovered worms from sites where degradation had previously occurred, demonstrating sensitivity to temporal decay and item-specific context, unlike naive controls. Similar what-where-when (WWW) appears in , where rats distinguish object sequences and locations across varying intervals in spontaneous exploration paradigms, retrieving novel combinations after 24-hour delays. Recent observations in wild blue and great tits confirm WWW recall, as birds revisited perishable food sites sooner and adjusted based on pilfering risks integrated with caching times. These demonstrations rely on behavioral assays like spontaneous recognition of event-bound cues and interval timing without clock training, distinguishing episodic-like from semantic or . However, such memory lacks verified autonoetic —the subjective "mental " characterizing episodic —remaining inferential from actions rather than introspective reports. Retrospective biases, including overgeneralization of past events, further limit equivalence, as animals prioritize survival-relevant details over veridical reconstruction. A 2025 review underscores that while neural substrates like the support WWW encoding across taxa, causal evidence for conscious reliving remains absent, framing animal episodic-like memory as a functional precursor rather than homolog.

Interval Timing and Circadian Influences

Animals demonstrate the ability to estimate short durations, typically in the range of seconds to minutes, through mechanisms aligned with scalar expectancy theory (SET), which posits an internal clock with a , accumulator, and memory comparator that produces timing variability proportional to the interval length, adhering to Weber's law or ratio invariance. In pigeons, this is evidenced by the peak procedure, where birds are reinforced for responding after a fixed interval (e.g., 10-120 seconds) on signal trials, but on non-reinforced probe trials extending beyond the interval, response rates rise to a peak near the expected reinforcement time and then decline symmetrically, with the remaining constant across durations (around 0.2-0.3). This scalar property holds across species including rats and humans, supporting a shared pacemaker-accumulator model rather than species-specific mechanisms, though quantitative differences exist, such as slightly lower variability in humans. Such interval timing facilitates by enabling to track event durations, like waiting periods between resource renewals, but evidence suggests it operates reactively, driven by immediate sensory accumulation rather than prospective foresight. For instance, pigeons' timing disrupts under dual-task conditions requiring divided , indicating reliance on attentional gating of the rather than pre-planned . Limited inferential support exists for advanced prospective timing in non-human , with most behaviors explained by reactive cue integration over mental time travel-like planning. Circadian influences extend timing to daily cycles, allowing animals to entrain behaviors to predictable environmental periodicities, such as solar or feeding cues, which enhances foraging efficiency by associating locations with temporal resource availability in time-place learning (TPL). In garden warblers and honeybees, TPL manifests as learned visits to feeders at specific times and places, with bees optimizing foraging via time memory entrained to floral nectar cycles, demonstrated in experiments shifting feeding times where bees adjusted arrival by up to 12 hours. This adaptation predicts daily fluctuations, as seen in zebrafish synchronizing activities to variable feeding locales, but relies on circadian system integration rather than isolated interval timers. Notably, TPL persists in clock-deficient mutants, such as Cry1/Cry2 double-knockout mice lacking molecular circadian oscillators, which still master interval-based TPL tasks at suprachiasmatic nucleus-independent scales, suggesting via non-circadian mechanisms like interval summation or masking by activity rhythms rather than a rigid internal clock. These findings indicate circadian timing's evolutionary in reactive of cyclic opportunities, without necessitating higher-order foresight; for example, free-living hummingbirds revisit renewing feeders temporally but fail to for future needs beyond immediate cycles. Aging and hippocampal involvement further modulate TPL accuracy, with declines in linking to circadian desynchronization, underscoring causal ties to neural substrates for temporal cues.

Spatial and Navigational Abilities

Spatial Mapping and Mental Representations

introduced the concept of cognitive maps in 1948, proposing that rats form internal representations of spatial layouts during maze exploration, enabling flexible navigation such as taking shortcuts even without immediate reinforcement, as demonstrated in experiments where rats initially trained without rewards rapidly adopted efficient paths upon reward introduction. This challenged strict stimulus-response theories, suggesting animals construct anticipatory spatial schemata integrating multiple cues beyond simple beacons or chains of associations. Subsequent reappraisals, however, indicate that while such maps facilitate localization, they may not always encode precise geometries but rather hybrid or abstracted forms, as evidenced by behavioral tests revealing reliance on path integration for position tracking. In , —or path integration—exemplifies a foundational for spatial mapping, where desert (Cataglyphis fortis) continuously update their from the nest by integrating outbound steps, directions via cues, and , allowing homing over distances exceeding 100 meters without visual landmarks. This mechanism persists in darkness or featureless arenas, underscoring an internal odometric system independent of external references, though it accumulates errors over long paths, necessitating periodic recalibration. Unlike full cognitive maps, path integration yields a global rather than a detailed layout, yet it forms a core component of broader navigational geometries in . Neural correlates akin to mammalian hippocampal place cells appear in birds, with food-caching species like black-capped chickadees exhibiting hippocampal neurons that fire selectively in specific locations during foraging in enriched environments, mirroring rodent place fields tuned to allocentric positions. In homing pigeons, hippocampal "location cells" activate for familiar sites, though they differ from mammalian counterparts by lacking strict metric tuning and showing sensitivity to goal proximity rather than pure place specificity. These avian analogs suggest convergent evolution of spatial representations, potentially driven by shared selective pressures for cache protection, with sharp-wave ripples observed during rest indicating offline replay for map consolidation. Debates persist on map fidelity, distinguishing metric representations (encoding distances and angles) from topological ones (capturing without precise s), as wild animal studies reveal flexible where topological graphs suffice for route planning in cluttered terrains, avoiding the computational demands of full models. Failures emerge in rotated environments, where rats disoriented by cue rotations prioritize geometric modules—such as wall shapes—over featural landmarks, leading to systematic errors in reorientation and shortcut rejection, implying modular rather than holistic maps vulnerable to misalignment. Such limits highlight that while animals maintain internal geometries for localization, these are often viewpoint-dependent or cue-bound, constraining generalization beyond trained configurations.

Long-Distance Homing and Orientation

Homing pigeons (Columba livia) exhibit exceptional long-distance , routinely returning to home lofts from release points exceeding 500 kilometers away, with success rates often above 90% under favorable conditions. These birds integrate multiple sensory modalities as compasses, including detection of the via magnetite-based receptors in the beak and system, which provides directional information calibrated against other cues. Olfactory cues play a critical role in constructing a navigational , particularly from unfamiliar sites, where pigeons associate windborne odors with loft directions during prior exposure flights, enabling vector-based rather than simple innate reflexes. Experiments depriving pigeons of olfactory input via nasal plugs or treatment result in impaired homing from novel areas, underscoring the learned component of odor-based , though magnetic cues alone suffice for initial in familiar terrains. In insects such as honeybees (Apis mellifera) and desert (Cataglyphis spp.), long-distance homing relies heavily on path integration, an internal odometer-like system that continuously updates position by integrating self-motion cues—primarily optic flow for distance and celestial or polarized light for direction—without requiring external landmarks. Honeybees encode routes up to 10-12 kilometers via this mechanism, employing a celestial compass during outbound trips and compensating for deviations during returns, with stride or flight speed serving as the core for distance measurement, accurate to within 10-20% error over extended paths. The further facilitates collective orientation, where foragers convey vector information—distance proportional to waggle duration (e.g., 0.1 seconds per 100 meters) and direction relative to the sun's —allowing recruits to compute homeward bearings from hive-based dances performed on vertical combs. In , stride integration forms the odometer basis, with systematic underestimation on uneven due to variable angles, yet this innate enables precise returns across featureless deserts spanning kilometers. Debates persist on the interplay between innate sensory compasses and learned overrides in these systems, with evidence favoring predominantly innate mechanisms for core path integration and compass calibration, as juvenile pigeons and insects display functional homing without extensive training, though olfactory maps in birds require experiential learning for refinement. Rare instances of cognitive flexibility emerge, such as bees adjusting waggle dance parameters based on experienced discrepancies between indicated and actual distances, suggesting minimal override of instinctual routines rather than full cognitive mapping. Empirical disruptions, like magnetic field alterations or optic flow denial, consistently impair performance across species, indicating causal primacy of these sensory inputs over higher-order learning, with no robust evidence for abstract cognitive maps in routine long-distance homing.

Physical Manipulation and Causality

Tool Use and Modification

Tool use in animals involves the intentional manipulation of external objects to achieve specific goals, such as obtaining food, with modification occurring when animals alter the object's form to enhance functionality. In primates, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in West Africa employ stones as hammers and anvils to crack hard-shelled nuts, selecting appropriately sized and heavy stones for the task, a behavior observed in wild populations at sites like Bossou, Guinea, where juveniles begin participating around 3.5 years of age. This form of tool use requires precise selection but minimal modification of the stone itself, relying instead on natural properties for percussive action. Among birds, New Caledonian crows (Corvus moneduloides) demonstrate advanced tool modification by crafting hooked sticks from twigs to extract insect larvae from crevices, as documented in wild observations from where birds manufactured and used these tools flexibly for . These crows select straight twigs and carve barbs or bends to create functional hooks, exhibiting stepwise refinement not seen in most avian tool users. Invertebrates also exhibit tool use, notably the veined octopus (), which collects and transports coconut shell halves or similar debris to assemble portable shelters, carrying them despite the energetic cost until a suitable assembly site is found. This behavior qualifies as tool use by extending body reach for protection, though modification is limited to arrangement rather than shaping. Fish tool use remains rare and predominantly opportunistic in the wild; for instance, the (Choerodon anchorago) has been photographed smashing bivalves against rocks to access the flesh, marking one of the first documented wild cases among teleosts. Laboratory settings have induced tool use in species like , where individuals learned to strike prey against objects, but such behaviors seldom persist or evolve in natural populations. Despite these examples, animal tool use rarely involves cumulative modification, where innovations build iteratively across generations to produce increasingly complex technologies, a hallmark absent in non-human species and contrasting sharply with . Chimpanzees, for example, acquire tool skills socially but fail to ratchet improvements beyond basic forms, limiting traditions to static or regressive patterns rather than progressive refinement. This stasis underscores that while individual ingenuity enables immediate goal attainment, sustained cultural transmission of modified s remains uniquely .

Weapon Use and Predatory Innovations

![Chimpanzee using a stick][float-right] Chimpanzees exhibit rare instances of weapon use in predation, distinct from foraging tools, as observed in populations where environmental pressures favor aggressive adaptations. In , researchers documented wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) at Fongoli, , manufacturing and wielding spears from wooden branches to hunt bushbabies ( senegalensis), small nocturnal hidden in tree hollows. The chimpanzees selected straight branches approximately 50-75 cm long, stripped side twigs, and sharpened the tips using their teeth before thrusting the spears into cavities to impale prey; this behavior was observed in 22 independent bouts involving ten individuals, predominantly females and immatures, with at least one confirmed kill. Such predatory tool use appears driven by the scarcity of typical monkey prey in open habitats, prompting innovation beyond opportunistic hand-capture, though success rates remain low and the behavior is not universally transmitted across chimpanzee groups. Archerfish (Toxotes spp.) demonstrate a non-contact predatory by expelling precisely aimed jets of to dislodge from overhanging foliage up to 1.5 meters away, compensating for light refraction at the air- interface to strike targets accurately. This spitting technique, powered by a specialized oral mechanism that compresses and propels through a narrow groove formed by the against the , achieves droplet velocities sufficient to stun or knock prey into the for consumption; laboratory studies confirm archerfish adjust spit trajectories based on prey position and distance, suggesting perceptual-motor calibration honed by for aerial hunting in environments. Unlike modifiable tools, this relies on physiological adaptations rather than , yet it parallels weapon-like projection in exploiting physics for predation without physical contact. Invertebrates occasionally innovate predatory aids resembling weapons, as in assassin bugs (Pahabengkakia piliceps) that apply sticky plant to their forelegs to enhance capture of , effectively turning environmental substances into adhesive traps for prey acquisition. Observations from 2023 indicate this resin use increases hunting efficiency by immobilizing evasive targets, with bugs selectively harvesting and applying the material, though whether this stems from individual learning or remains under study; similar resin application in other reduviid species aids in overcoming prey defenses. These cases highlight immediate ecological utility over cultural propagation, contrasting with mammalian examples. Evidence for advanced planning in animal weapon use is limited, with no verified instances of premeditated ambushes or multi-stage constructions akin to human tactics; spearing, for instance, occurs opportunistically without prior scouting or group coordination beyond individual initiative, constrained by instinctual preferences for pointed objects and immediate environmental cues rather than abstract foresight. Predatory innovations thus reflect convergent adaptations to resource , prioritizing kinetic over strategic , as bounded by species-typical cognitive architectures.

Reasoning and Problem-Solving

Insightful Problem Resolution

Insightful problem resolution refers to the sudden grasping of a novel solution to a puzzle, typically following a period of where trial-and-error fails, contrasting with gradual associative . In animal cognition, this is operationally defined by metrics such as zero or near-zero trials to success after environmental reconfiguration or minimal guidance, indicating a restructuring of mental representations rather than . Empirical challenges include distinguishing true from latent associations or perceptual cues, with critics arguing many apparent cases reflect unobserved prior experience. Early evidence came from Köhler's 1913–1917 experiments with chimpanzees on , documented in The Mentality of Apes (1925), where subjects like stacked boxes or combined poles to reach suspended bananas after initial futile attempts. Köhler interpreted these as Gestalt reorganizations yielding sudden , rejecting Thorndike's connectionist trial-and-error model. Subsequent analyses, however, suggest solutions may arise from associative chaining of familiar elements, such as prior box-climbing, rather than de novo comprehension, as replication often reveals variability tied to motivation or subtle cues. In corvids, a 2002 study by , Chappell, and Kacelnik reported a captive , Betty, spontaneously bending straight wire into a to retrieve a bucket, with experimental subjects succeeding on first trials without prior hook exposure. This was hailed as avian analogous to tool innovation. Later work, including 2016 observations, indicates such bending draws from species-typical leaf-stripping behaviors, reducing claims of novelty, and replication attempts show inconsistent success: some crows fail basic hook tasks without demonstration, succeeding only after multiple trials or social observation, suggesting associative or over pure insight. Such resolutions remain rare across taxa, documented sporadically in great apes, corvids, and isolated cases in capuchins or rats, but absent or equivocal in most vertebrates despite extensive testing. Metrics like duration followed by immediate highlight this scarcity, with failures in cross-species replications underscoring potential confounds from individual differences or unmodeled experiences, fueling ongoing debate on whether constitutes a unique cognitive module or emergent property of advanced associative systems.

Causal Inference and Hypothesis Testing

In the trap-tube task, animals must maneuver a reward through a horizontal tube containing a central trap, avoiding insertion into the trap via tool use or direct manipulation to infer the . Capuchin monkeys initially fail by pushing rewards into traps despite observing demonstrations, suggesting reliance on perceptual cues over causal mechanisms, though some learn to avoid barriers after repeated trials without full to novel configurations. In contrast, rooks (Corvus frugilegus) solve the task more efficiently than many primates, bending wire tools to hook rewards from the non-trapped end on initial trials, indicating sensitivity to the trap's obstructive . Great apes show variable performance in modified versions, succeeding in some barrier-avoidance setups but failing to demonstrate consistent causal understanding beyond trial-and-error. Evidence for animals engaging in hypothesis testing—formulating and revising predictions about causal structures—remains limited, with behaviors often attributable to associative rather than intervention-based . Nonhuman exhibit sensitivity to causally relevant physical features, such as in barrier tasks, but struggle to isolate mechanisms from correlations without extensive training. Experimental probes, including probabilistic contingencies, reveal that like rats and adjust actions based on outcome probabilities, yet fail to systematically test alternative hypotheses, defaulting to habitual responses. Claims of Bayesian-like updating, where animals integrate priors with new evidence to infer hidden causes, find sparse support; while some corvids and demonstrate probabilistic sensitivity in , consistent Bayesian model adherence appears in only eight bird species, three mammals, one , and one across studies, with counterexamples like non-updating in certain corvids. Reinforcement schedules prone to , as in Skinner's 1948 pigeon experiments where random rewards elicited persistent irrelevant actions, underscore this limitation: animals overgeneralize spurious contingencies, mistaking temporal adjacency for causation without disconfirmatory interventions. Such patterns align with simple associative models over deeper causal realism, as behaviors persist under non-contingent , implying heuristic biases rather than mechanistic hypothesis testing. Critics argue these findings reflect methodological constraints in detecting latent inferences, yet replication across taxa favors reinforcement-driven explanations without invoking unverified cognitive depth.

Quantitative and Symbolic Capacities

Numerosity Discrimination and Counting

Animals exhibit numerosity discrimination, the ability to approximate and compare discrete quantities without relying on exact enumeration or symbolic representation, through an (ANS) that adheres to Weber's law, where discriminability depends on the ratio between quantities rather than absolute differences. This capacity is phylogenetically widespread, observed in vertebrates such as , , , and turtles, as well as invertebrates like , enabling relative quantity judgments that support survival decisions. Discrimination accuracy improves with larger ratios (e.g., 2:1 easier than 3:2) and follows the scalar property, with variance scaling linearly with mean numerosity. For small numerosities (typically 1–4 items), many species demonstrate , a rapid, parallel process yielding near-perfect accuracy independent of ratio, akin to pre-attentive object rather than estimation. Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), rats, and pigeons subitize sets up to 4, showing steeper psychophysical functions and faster response times for these compared to larger sets. Beyond this limit, discrimination shifts to approximate estimation, with performance degrading for ratios closer to 1:1, as seen in fish (e.g., guppies discriminating 4:5 poorly but 2:5 accurately) and (e.g., relying on specific visual neurons for ratio-based judgments). Ungulates like and sheep also integrate item number with size cues but remain ratio-limited, rarely exceeding 1:2 reliably without training. Training enhances approximation in primates; rhesus monkeys spontaneously sum large numerosities (e.g., 8+4 vs. 4+4) by matching outcomes to learned representations, though errors increase with magnitude and they favor discrete counts over continuous extent. Symbol-trained macaques add symbolic values (0–25) approximately, normalizing quantities but without exact arithmetic, as summation accuracy drops for sums exceeding trained ranges. Concepts like zero remain elusive or rudimentary; while crows and honeybees distinguish empty sets from 1 (treating zero as smaller than 1 but not a true null cardinality), most species map it to the lowest non-zero end of the number line, lacking evidence of abstract zero as an ordinal or placeholder. Evolutionarily, numerosity discrimination likely arose for ecological demands like foraging, where selecting larger food clusters (e.g., via ratio assessments in bees or primates) boosts energy intake, and anti-predator behaviors, such as evaluating rival group sizes. This non-symbolic system prioritizes adaptive ratios over precision, explaining limits like subitizing thresholds and absence of summation to arbitrary scales without reinforcement, distinct from human exact counting enabled by language.

Proto-Language and Referential Signaling

Animal communication exhibits forms of referential signaling, where signals evoke specific external referents such as predators or food sources, but these systems lack the syntactic complexity and generative capacity of human language. In vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus), distinct alarm calls correspond to different predators: a low, rhythmic bark for leopards prompting ground avoidance, a high-toned "chutter" for eagles eliciting upward looks, and a tonal "rraup" for snakes causing inspection of the ground. Playback experiments by Cheney and Seyfarth in the 1980s demonstrated that these calls elicit predator-specific responses even in the absence of the actual threat, indicating semantic reference rather than mere emotional arousal. However, the calls' meanings appear learned associatively through experience, with juveniles initially responding inappropriately until social observation refines their usage. Attempts to teach apes symbolic communication, such as (ASL) to chimpanzees, have produced sequences of gestures interpreted as proto-linguistic by proponents but critiqued as artifacts of human prompting. R. Allen Gardner and Beatrix Gardner began training the infant Washoe in 1966, raising her in a human-like environment and reporting acquisition of over 100 signs by 1969, including apparent combinations like "" for . Yet, Herbert Terrace's 1970s Project Nim with chimpanzee revealed that signs were largely imitative of caretakers' immediate gestures, with no evidence of novel, rule-governed syntax; sequences averaged 1.1 signs per utterance and showed repetition rather than productivity. Terrace's 1979 analysis concluded that apes mimic for reinforcement without semantic comprehension, akin to the phenomenon where cues from humans drive responses. In honeybees (Apis mellifera), the communicates food location through iconic representation: the dancer's waggle run direction relative to indicates bearing to , while run duration encodes distance, enabling recruits to forage at precise sites up to several kilometers away. Karl von Frisch's decoding in the , confirmed by displacement experiments, showed this as an indexical system tied to sensory-motor calibration rather than arbitrary symbols. Recent studies affirm the dance's innateness with social refinement, but it remains fixed-form without modification for novel contexts. These systems demonstrate referential function—evoking absent referents like distant food or unseen predators—but fall short of proto-language due to absent (embedding clauses) and (infinite novel expressions from finite rules), core design features per Hockett's framework. Animal signals prioritize immediacy and association over or , with caregiver or environmental influences often inflating interpretations of ; empirical transcripts show no displacement beyond basic and high variability attributable to training artifacts rather than innate .

Social and Metacognitive Dimensions

Theory of Mind and Mental State Attribution

(ToM) refers to the capacity to attribute unobservable mental states, such as s and knowledge, to oneself and others, thereby predicting and explaining beyond mere perceptual cues. In animals, ToM is primarily assessed through false- tasks, which test whether subjects anticipate actions based on an agent's outdated or incorrect representation of reality rather than the true state of affairs. for ToM in nonhuman animals remains contentious, with studies on showing behaviors interpretable as attribution but often explainable by simpler mechanisms like behavior reading or associative learning. Primates exhibit gaze-following, where individuals orient toward the direction of another's head or , suggesting sensitivity to visual . Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), for instance, reliably follow conspecific and human gaze in experimental settings, even around barriers, outperforming many non-primate species. However, this does not conclusively demonstrate understanding of mental states like "seeing" or "knowing," as animals may respond to low-level cues such as head turns or contingency between gazes, without meta-representing beliefs. Distinguishing gaze-following from belief prediction requires evidence that subjects differentiate between true and false perceptual access, a threshold unmet in most studies. A landmark study by Krupenye et al. (2016) used anticipatory eye-tracking in great apes (chimpanzees, bonobos, and orangutans) during video scenarios where an witnessed food hidden in one location before being occluded, after which the hiding site changed unbeknownst to the . Apes looked longer toward the location aligned with the 's false belief than the true hiding spot, suggesting prediction of belief-based action. This finding has been replicated in interactive tasks with apes inhibiting actions when experimenters hold false beliefs about food locations. Optimists interpret these results as evidence of implicit comparable to human infants around 15 months. Critics, including Heyes, contend that such performances reflect submentalizing—efficient but non-conceptual prediction—rather than genuine meta-representation of beliefs. Alternative explanations invoke learned associations from competitive , where apes track behavioral contingencies (e.g., agents approaching empty locations when misinformed) without representing propositional attitudes. Failed replications in non-competitive contexts and the absence of flexible generalization across novel belief-violating scenarios support parsimonious accounts over full . Skeptics prioritize these simpler mechanisms, arguing that positive evidence demands ruling out behavioral heuristics, a standard rarely met due to methodological confounds like inadvertent cuing.

Deception, Cooperation, and Reciprocity

Tactical in nonhuman animals involves behaviors that mislead others to gain an advantage, such as concealing resources from competitors. In chimpanzees, individuals have been observed hiding from group members by moving it to less visible locations or using aversion to avoid signaling its presence, as documented in field studies where subordinates concealed valued items upon detecting dominant individuals approaching. Experimental evidence further shows chimpanzees employing manipulative cues to selectively reveal or conceal , adjusting their visual based on the observer's state, which suggests context-dependent tactical adjustment rather than fixed habits. However, critics argue that many such instances may arise from learned associations or simple inhibition rather than premeditated intent, with early compilations of 253 deception cases relying heavily on anecdotal reports prone to . Cooperation among non-kin in animal societies often lacks robust evidence of calculated reciprocity, where individuals track and balance past favors over extended periods. Reviews indicate that firm cases of long-term reciprocity are rare, with most cooperative exchanges better explained by immediate mutual benefits, byproduct , or short-term contingencies tied to ongoing interactions. Experimental tests across six species, including chimpanzees and orangutans, found no significant evidence of calculated reciprocity in food-sharing paradigms, where subjects did not adjust prosociality based on prior receipt of benefits from the same partner. Instead, image-scoring mechanisms—where cooperation builds a general without precise —appear limited, as show inconsistent partner choice favoring past cooperators in novel contexts. Analogs to the in animals, such as sequential decision tasks for resource division, reveal frequent and failure to sustain mutual over repeated trials. Rhesus macaques in paired juice-allocation setups prioritized , yielding suboptimal outcomes akin to Nash equilibria rather than iterated . Chimpanzees occasionally avoid mutual in one-shot dilemmas but do not develop tit-for-tat strategies in iterated versions, with collapsing without immediate enforcement. , essential for stabilizing reciprocity in game-theoretic models, is infrequently observed in natural settings, further undermining claims of strategic long-term partnerships. Overall, short-term associative bonds and proximate cues, such as recent proximity or shared interests, account for most observed reciprocity, precluding the need for complex cognitive tracking.

Metacognition and Uncertainty Monitoring

Rhesus monkeys trained on delayed matching-to-sample tasks demonstrate the ability to of trials following long delays or when matching multiple distractors, selectively declining those with lower success likelihood and thereby increasing overall accuracy when committing to a response. This pattern has been replicated in other and extends to non-primates, including rats avoiding perceptual discriminations near difficulty, pigeons on judgments, and honeybees declining color discriminations with high error . Proponents interpret such uncertainty monitoring as evidence of metacognitive , where animals evaluate their knowledge states to guide under . Alternative explanations, however, attribute opt-out behaviors to first-order associative processes rather than introspective monitoring. Under signal-detection theory, animals learn to emit responses based on stimulus cues correlated with low probability, without representing their own ; retrospective confidence judgments in humans similarly reduce to behavioral habits under divided attention or pharmacological interference. Peter Carruthers argues that across reviewed paradigms, including tasks, the data fit simpler models where performance reflects graded first-order representations of primary task difficulty, not higher-order meta-representations, as opt-outs fail to generalize to untrained contexts or persist under conditions disrupting metacognitive access in humans. Empirical limits underscore these behavioral accounts over subjective . Animals rarely transfer strategies to novel tasks without explicit shaping, and performance aligns more closely with reward maximization than calibrated ; for instance, monkeys show no decrement in efficacy when primary cues are masked, suggesting reliance on learned signals rather than internal appraisal. Recent analyses emphasize interpretive , with patterns evolving via signals in simple but lacking evidence for abstract self-knowledge, prioritizing parsimonious non-metacognitive mechanisms absent convergent support from neural or developmental data.

Consciousness and Sapience Debates

Indicators of Consciousness in Animals

Behavioral proxies for consciousness in animals include flexible responses to adversity, such as prioritizing certain actions under threat or despite competing motivations, which suggest motivational states beyond mere reflexes. For instance, vertebrates exhibit nociceptive behaviors like and vocalization in response to tissue-damaging stimuli, but distinguishing reflexive from conscious requires evidence of cognitive trade-offs, such as enduring discomfort for greater rewards. In mammals and birds, voluntary and tasks—where animals maintain and manipulate sensory information to guide choices—serve as minimal indicators, as these capacities correlate with reportable awareness in humans. Such behaviors diminish under general , providing empirical contrasts; for example, rhesus monkeys under or show reduced transient brain dynamics associated with integrated processing, mirroring loss of in humans. The 2012 Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness asserted that non-human animals, including birds and octopuses, possess the neurological substrates for conscious states, but this has been critiqued as premature advocacy rather than evidence-based consensus, lacking specific citations and overgeneralizing from without causal validation. Counter-declarations, such as the 2021 statement, emphasize that behavioral similarities do not prove subjective and advocate rigorous testing over assumption. Recent critiques highlight overreliance on pain markers, noting that while rats display empathy-like aiding of pained conspecifics, simpler associative explanations persist without direct phenomenal evidence. Theoretical frameworks like (IIT) offer quantitative proxies by measuring informational integration () in neural systems, with 2024-2025 applications testing animal models against human baselines; for example, avian and mammalian brains show varying values correlating with behavioral complexity, though interpretations remain correlative rather than definitive. Evidence gradients exist across taxa: stronger proxies in corvids and cetaceans via adaptive use under uncertainty, weaker in where escape responses align with non-conscious mechanisms. These indicators remain indirect, susceptible to simpler explanations like , underscoring the need for multimodal validation without presuming equivalence to human phenomenology.

Sapience: Cumulative Culture and Innovation Limits

Sapience, understood as the capacity for open-ended, cumulative cultural evolution enabling sustained technological and theoretical advancement, remains a distinctly human trait, with animals exhibiting cultural transmission but failing to achieve the "ratchet effect" of irreversible complexity gains across generations. In humans, this ratchet arises from shared intentionality and linguistic fidelity, allowing modifications to be taught, refined, and built upon indefinitely, as evidenced by the progression from stone tools to modern engineering. Nonhuman animals, despite social learning, consistently lack this accumulation, resulting in static traditions that do not scale to novel domains like systematic experimentation or abstract modeling. Chimpanzee tool use exemplifies these limits: while populations maintain distinct traditions, such as nut-cracking or termite fishing, archaeological and observational data spanning decades show no progressive refinements or cross-technique integrations leading to enhanced efficiency or novel inventions. Experimental attempts to transmit multi-step tool sequences to captive chimpanzees reveal high fidelity in single actions but breakdowns in chaining innovations, underscoring an inability to sustain cumulative modifications without human intervention. Similarly, humpback whale songs demonstrate rapid cultural evolution through imitation and dialect shifts, with entire populations adopting new themes within a season, yet this yields cyclical changes—including periodic simplifications—rather than escalating complexity or extension to material culture like tools. These patterns indicate cultural conformity without the directed ratcheting that propels human innovation beyond ecological niches. Animal innovation thus encounters inherent ceilings, as individuals innovate sporadically (e.g., novel tactics) but cannot propagate or theorize improvements systematically, precluding theory-building or empirical . Human exceptionalism stems from linguistic and pedagogical intent, enabling and hypothesis testing at scale, which animals approximate only in isolated, non-generalizable instances. Recent analyses reinforce this discontinuity, urging recognition of cognitive boundaries in species to avoid overattributing sapient-like capacities based on superficial behavioral parallels. Without such mechanisms, animal cultures stabilize at low-complexity equilibria, contrasting the unbounded trajectory of human sapience.

Skepticism and Counter-Evidence

Anthropomorphism and Over-Attribution Risks

refers to the attribution of human-like mental states, emotions, or intentions to non-human animals, often leading to over-interpretation of behaviors as evidence of advanced cognition. This tendency can undermine scientific rigor by prioritizing intuitive human analogies over empirical validation, as seen historically in George Romanes' 1882 work Animal Intelligence, where anecdotal observations were interpreted through "inverted anthropomorphism," assuming animal actions mirrored human motivations without sufficient controls. Romanes' approach drew criticism for lacking objective criteria, contributing to early fallacies in that blurred associative learning with deliberate reasoning. In contemporary contexts, over-attribution persists through perceptual biases, such as heightened ascription of intentionality to visually appealing or "cute" in media portrayals, which amplify public and sometimes scientific perceptions of cognitive equivalence to humans. Researchers in a 2021 survey identified as a prevalent in animal cognition studies, often influenced by confirmation of preconceived human-like narratives rather than disconfirmatory evidence. Such projections can inflate claims in outlets, where selective anecdotes of animal "" or "" gain traction despite lacking mechanistic detail. These risks manifest in broader methodological vulnerabilities, including diminished replicability; the same 2021 survey of animal cognition experts found 73% anticipating a "" in key subfields if systematic checks were applied, attributing this partly to over-fitted complex models over simpler alternatives. Over-attribution exacerbates selective reporting, where null results on basic mechanisms are underpublished, fostering a skewed toward exceptional interpretations. To mitigate these issues, researchers advocate pre-registering hypotheses and analysis plans prior to , which enforces and curbs post-hoc rationalizations in animal behavior experiments. Incorporating Bayesian frameworks with priors favoring parsimonious explanations—penalizing overly complex cognitive attributions unless overwhelmingly support them—further promotes causal realism by aligning inferences with evidential weight over anthropomorphic defaults. These practices, grounded in empirical , help distinguish genuine cognitive capacities from projections.

Simpler Associative Explanations for Apparent Cognition

Associative learning posits that many behaviors interpreted as evidence of higher in animals can be adequately explained through the formation of stimulus-response associations via , without invoking mental representations or planning. In this framework, complex sequences of actions emerge as chains of reinforced habits, where contiguity and contingency drive behavior rather than or understanding. Reviews of animal emphasize associative processes as a baseline , serving both as a foundational element and a null against which cognitive claims must be tested. A classic demonstration comes from B.F. Skinner's experiments with pigeons, where food delivery on fixed-time schedules, independent of behavior, led to the development of repetitive actions such as circling or wing-flapping that appeared purposeful but were adventitious byproducts of reinforcement timing. These "superstitious" behaviors persisted because random actions coincidentally preceded rewards, illustrating how apparent goal-directedness arises from simple without cognitive mediation. Subsequent analyses confirmed that such responses in pigeons and other animals reflect terminal links in behavior chains maintained by periodic reinforcement, not intentional signaling or belief formation. In tool use, associative accounts frame behaviors like stick-probing for or nut-cracking as extended sequences shaped by repeated of motor patterns in specific contexts, rather than novel problem-solving. For instance, and corvids often exhibit rigid adherence to learned tool manipulations, failing to improvise when environmental cues alter slightly, which aligns with chained associations over flexible comprehension. Empirical studies show that acquisition relies on observational and trial-and-error , producing reliable but context-bound outputs without evidence of abstract rule abstraction. Apparent metacognition, such as uncertainty in perceptual tasks, can similarly be attributed to discriminative cues from stimulus properties rather than self-reflective of mental states. Animals like rats and monkeys avoid difficult trials based on perceptual fluency or signal strength, behaviors that mimic metacognitive judgments but emerge from low-level associative discrimination of easy versus hard stimuli, without requiring higher-order awareness. Critiques highlight that paradigms claiming often confound external perceptual signals with internal , with associative models fitting data more parsimoniously in non-verbal . Media and popular accounts frequently amplify isolated successes as proof of human-like cognition, yet systematic tests reveal failures to generalize associations to novel transfers, underscoring associative limits. For example, animals trained on specific configurations rarely adapt them to unseen variations requiring causal , instead reverting to rote responses or abandoning the task, consistent with stimulus-bound learning over conceptual understanding. Such patterns challenge over-attributions from sources inclined toward anthropomorphic interpretations, favoring explanations grounded in verifiable data.

Failed Replications and Methodological Flaws

Studies purporting advanced cognitive abilities in animals have often failed replication attempts, revealing underlying methodological weaknesses such as inadequate controls for experimenter effects and insufficient statistical power. For example, Herbert Terrace's reanalysis of the language project in the late 1970s demonstrated that sequences of signs attributed to syntactic understanding were instead products of human prompting, , and inconsistent training protocols, undermining broader claims of ape across similar studies. Mirror self-recognition tests in dolphins, initially reported as successful in 2001, have encountered replication difficulties, with subsequent efforts showing inconsistent self-directed mark inspection due to challenges in mark visibility, placement on hard-to-access body parts, and variable motivation, casting doubt on the robustness of self-awareness attributions. Common design pitfalls include small sample sizes, which prevail in animal cognition experiments and yield low statistical power, inflating Type I error rates and hindering generalizability beyond tested individuals or small groups. P-hacking practices, involving selective or exclusion until emerges, further compromise replicability, as evidenced by simulations showing heightened false positives in underpowered behavioral studies. A 2021 survey of animal cognition researchers indicated divided views on influencing outcomes, with 29.6% agreeing that anthropocentric expectations and pressures erode reliability, 23.8% disagreeing, and the remainder neutral, underscoring ongoing debates over field-wide methodological rigor. Efforts to address these issues include advocacy for preregistration, sharing, and larger-scale replications, though a 2024 review emphasized distinguishing genuine cognitive boundaries from artifacts of poor experimental design, such as mismatched tasks or overlooked individual variability, to avoid overinterpreting findings as evidence of incapacity.00218-5)

Taxonomic Comparisons

Mammalian Cognition Profiles

Mammalian cognition varies across taxa, with patterns influenced by ecological niches and neural architecture rather than uniform advancement toward human-like faculties. often display correlated social complexity and manipulative skills, demonstrate efficient spatial learning through associative processes, and cetaceans leverage acoustic sensing for environmental interaction, yet none exhibit the recursive or cultural transmission unique to humans. Empirical measures, such as problem-solving latencies and retention, reveal intra-mammalian disparities, where relative brain size correlates modestly with basic but weakly with abstract relational reasoning. In primates, social group dynamics predict cognitive demands, with larger, more despotic troops fostering tactical and formation, as evidenced by observational data from wild showing delayed tool acquisition until social hierarchies stabilize around age 6-8 years. Tool use, such as termite fishing with modified stems, emerges in like across specific populations, but remains context-bound without hierarchical combinations exceeding two elements in most trials. Studies of capuchin monkeys (Cebus spp.) indicate that extractive correlates with extractive tool , yet replication failures in captive settings highlight motivational confounds over innate depth. Rodents excel in maze navigation, with laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus) achieving 80-90% accuracy in radial arm tasks after 10-15 trials by encoding spatial cues associatively, but performance rigidifies under reversal conditions, yielding only 50-60% success without extended training. Associative explanations suffice for apparent , as mice in multi-choice labyrinths prioritize probabilistic cue-reward links over cognitive , with neuronal ensembles in the hippocampus firing predictably for rewarded paths but failing to generalize to novel configurations. This proficiency supports survival in dynamic habitats but lacks the flexible inhibition seen in , where prefrontal lesions disrupt but do not abolish rule shifts. Cetaceans, particularly dolphins (Tursiops truncatus), utilize echolocation for fine-grained object , resolving targets at 1-2 cm up to 100 meters, enabling of fish schools documented in wild pods via synchronized clicks. Mirror self-recognition passes in bottlenose dolphins by 18-24 months, with individuals directing behaviors toward marked body parts, yet tool use remains absent in natural settings, limited to sporadic sponge-holding for foraging protection in specific populations without transmission to naive groups. Complex vocal repertoires include signature whistles for individual identification, but lack combinatorial syntax, as playback experiments elicit responses to isolated signals without embedded meanings. Across mammals, discontinuities manifest in syntax—enabling infinite propositional embedding absent in call sequences—and cumulative culture, where innovations like sequential tool kits accumulate over generations solely in Homo sapiens, as non-human examples stall at observational without modification or . Brain size metrics predict foraging efficiency but not these relational leaps, underscoring causal gaps in representational flexibility.

Avian and Cephalopod Exceptions

Corvids, such as crows and ravens, demonstrate cognitive abilities that challenge expectations based on their relatively small brain sizes, particularly in causal reasoning tasks. In the Aesop's fable paradigm, where animals must drop stones into a water-filled tube to raise the level and access a floating reward, New Caledonian crows and rooks have succeeded in over 32 controlled experiments, selecting objects based on their sinking properties rather than superstitious behaviors like pecking at water. This indicates an understanding of object displacement and causality, akin to physical reasoning in primates, though limited to immediate problem-solving without evidence of abstract generalization. Parrots, notably African grey parrots, exhibit vocal mimicry that conveys contextual meaning, with trained individuals like Alex labeling over 100 objects, colors, and shapes, and performing basic arithmetic up to eight. However, this mimicry does not extend to syntactic comprehension or novel sentence construction, remaining associative rather than generative, as evidenced by failures in unprompted abstract communication beyond trained repertoires. Cephalopods, especially octopuses, represent another with decentralized nervous systems enabling advanced sensory-motor integration despite lacking a large centralized . Octopuses employ dynamic through rapid changes in chromatophores, iridophores, and papillae, matching complex backgrounds in seconds, which requires predictive environmental assessment and motor planning rather than mere reflexive response. Experimental evidence includes puzzle-box solving and tool use, such as coconut shell carrying for , but these behaviors are individual and ephemeral. Their semelparous life cycles, typically 1-2 years, preclude multi-generational knowledge transmission, as juveniles do not learn from elders before parental , limiting cumulative . Both and intelligences appear modular, excelling in domain-specific adaptations like causal manipulation or sensory , evolved convergently under predation pressures, but without the scalable, domain-general flexibility seen in vertebrates with extended social learning. Corvid reasoning, while analogously causal, does not accumulate innovations across populations, and feats remain instinctually bounded, underscoring that brain complexity alone does not predict human-like sapience. These exceptions highlight evolutionary opportunism in small-bodied lineages but affirm limits in breadth and heritability of cognitive traits.

Invertebrate and Lower Vertebrate Capacities

Invertebrates display domain-specific cognitive adaptations that prioritize efficiency in narrow ecological contexts over broad flexibility. Honeybees, for example, construct routes that minimize travel distance by integrating path integration vectors into long-term memories, enabling shortcuts and approximations of optimal solutions similar to the traveling salesman problem. These capacities stem from specialized neural mechanisms, such as parallel vector storage in the bee brain, rather than generalizable spatial maps; bees rely on route-following heuristics that falter in novel rearrangements of familiar landmarks. Empirical tests reveal no consistent use of nearest-neighbor optimization rules, underscoring instinctual biases tuned to predictable floral distributions over abstract . Such behaviors exemplify high specialization, where performance excels in trained environments but shows poor transfer to untrained variations, as individual bees exhibit consistent strengths in specific sensory modalities without cross-domain . Among fish, cognitive processes support intraspecific competitions, including memory for mating contest outcomes that informs future interactions. Male cichlids retain information on rival dominance hierarchies for weeks, using associative recall to adjust aggression levels and avoid costly repeats of lost bouts. Similarly, subordinate individuals in species like modulate responses based on recent contest history, demonstrating context-bound recognition of conspecifics. These abilities facilitate resource defense and mate access but remain rooted in simple associative learning, with no verified metacognitive uncertainty monitoring—performances align with perceptual fluency models rather than reflective . Limits in generalization are evident; fish excel in social memory within stable groups but fail to apply analogous strategies to non-social or altered perceptual tasks, reflecting ecological tuning to predictable aquatic hierarchies over versatile problem-solving. Reptiles and amphibians exhibit basal learning suited to survival demands, such as spatial for or evasion, yet empirical highlight instinct-dominant profiles with constrained adaptability. Reptiles solve simple puzzle-box tasks via trial-and-error and retain long-term memories for food locations, while amphibians infer basic predator intentions through associative cues. However, these capacities lack metacognitive elements, as low-level mechanisms fully account for observed persistence or opting out in paradigms, without requiring higher-order monitoring absent in their pallial structures. Studies from 2023 confirm domain-specific strengths, like quantity discrimination in , but reveal brittleness: trained responses do not generalize across sensory modalities or ecological shifts, prioritizing innate reflexes over innovative recombination. This specialization aligns with phylogenetic constraints, where cognitive outputs serve immediate fitness needs without the cumulative flexibility seen in endothermic lineages.

Recent Advances and Future Directions

Integration of New Technologies (Post-2023)

In 2024, researchers introduced SUBTLE, an AI-based tool that classifies and analyzes animal behaviors by processing 3D data, enabling precise quantification of subtle movements in species like and enabling detection of previously overlooked patterns in and exploratory activities. Similarly, models for markerless pose estimation have advanced behavioral parsing, allowing automated tracking of complex interactions in free-moving animals without physical markers, as demonstrated in studies on mammalian and . These tools expand datasets by automating ethograms, reducing , but require validation against manual annotations to ensure accuracy in inferring cognitive states. Virtual reality (VR) setups have facilitated controlled ethological experiments post-2023, with the Animal-AI Environment providing a game-based platform for testing and problem-solving in virtual contexts mimicking natural challenges, applicable to both validation against animal benchmarks and direct animal trials in enclosed systems. This approach allows manipulation of environmental variables to isolate causal factors in , such as obstacle navigation in , yielding data on adaptive strategies under standardized conditions. For probing , a 2025 framework emphasizes neural indicators over behavioral proxies, advocating assays that target computations underlying subjective experience, such as integrated metrics from activity in awake , to differentiate from reflexive responses. Complementary methods include contrastive testing of valence-specific neural patterns in response to stimuli, as outlined in interdisciplinary guidelines prioritizing empirical neural correlates across taxa like and cephalopods. Advances in episodic memory assessment include refined rodent paradigms integrating what-where-when elements with temporal context cues, as in 2025 studies showing hippocampal remapping during recall tasks that reveal event-specific flexibility beyond simple association. A 2024 behavioral toolbox enumerates 19 tasks probing integration of object, location, and sequence details, facilitating cross-species comparisons while highlighting developmental sensitive periods in mice. These technologies enhance empirical resolution in detecting cognitive phenomena but do not adjudicate parsimonious explanations, as associative mechanisms can mimic advanced traits in controlled settings, necessitating replication and null-hypothesis scrutiny to avoid overinterpretation.

Bio-Inspired Applications and Limits Recognition

Animal cognition inspires targeted engineering solutions in robotics, particularly for navigation and sensory processing, by replicating discrete behavioral mechanisms rather than holistic mental processes. Dragonfly predatory interception, which achieves 95% success in targeting moving prey through predictive neural algorithms, has guided development of efficient pursuit systems in drones and autonomous vehicles. In 2025, researchers engineered dragonfly-inspired flapping-wing robots capable of liftoff and agile maneuvering, drawing on insect compound eye optics and neuromuscular control for enhanced stability in turbulent environments. Bee and ant path integration strategies, involving dead reckoning via optic flow, similarly underpin collision-avoidance algorithms in micro-aerial vehicles, enabling low-compute terrain navigation without GPS reliance. These applications underscore inherent limits: bio-mimicry extracts modular traits like sensory-motor loops but cannot replicate the integrated, of animals, which relies on physiological constraints absent in systems. Full emulation proves elusive, as animal "intelligence" often emerges from simple associative rules rather than scalable general reasoning, constraining direct translation to architectures. Overlooking these boundaries risks inefficient designs, as evidenced by failed attempts to port planning capacities into robots without analogous homeostatic drives. Cognitive data informs protocols, such as puzzle feeders mimicking to alleviate in captive , yet does not elevate non-human moral status to parity with s, given disparities in reflective and abstract reasoning. Assertions of equivalent rights based on alone overlook empirical thresholds, such as the absence of cumulative cultural transmission or ethical reciprocity in most species, which philosophers argue demarcate . This distinction tempers advocacy for expansive legal protections, prioritizing evidence-based husbandry over anthropocentric projections that inflate demands beyond verifiable needs. Prospective bio-mimicry frameworks, as advocated in 2024, urge explicit acknowledgment of cognitive ceilings to refine applications, favoring mechanistic fidelity over illusory universality. By delineating what animals cannot achieve—such as decontextualized symbolic manipulation—engineers can pursue robust, bounded innovations, averting hype-driven setbacks in fields like .

References

  1. [1]
    https://oxfordre.com/psychology/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.001.0001/acrefore-9780190236557-e-648
  2. [2]
    Animal cognition, past present and future, a 25th anniversary special ...
    Dec 24, 2022 · In this broad sense of the phrase, animal cognition encompasses everything that enables past experience or current perception to guide behaviour ...
  3. [3]
    Old and New Approaches to Animal Cognition: There Is Not “One ...
    Animal Cognition: Describes the mental capacities of nonhuman animals and the study of those capacities. The field developed from comparative psychology, ...
  4. [4]
    Animal Cognition - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Mar 8, 2021 · Animal cognition research challenges philosophers to consider that many capacities and behaviors often assumed to require language, sophisticated technological ...Philosophical Assumptions in... · Simplicity · Animal Cognition Applied to...
  5. [5]
    Wild chimpanzees show population-level handedness for tool use
    Here, we report evidence of population-level handedness in wild chimpanzees for a tool-use task known as termite-fishing.
  6. [6]
    Ecological correlates of chimpanzee termite fishing behavior in ...
    Jul 24, 2024 · When possible, these field biologists noted the species, dimensions, and prey targets for each chimpanzee tool collected. Insect prey target was ...
  7. [7]
    Cephalopod cognition - ScienceDirect.com
    Aug 5, 2019 · Octopuses demonstrate considerable skill when it comes to solving ecological problems, particularly when foraging for prey. They feed on a ...
  8. [8]
    Sociality and self-awareness in animals - PMC - NIH
    One study found that three species, Myrmica rubra, Myrmica ruginodis, and Myrmica sabuleti have shown potential for self-recognition (Cammaerts and Cammaerts, ...
  9. [9]
    Wild recognition: conducting the mark test for mirror self ... - Journals
    Jan 22, 2025 · Our study proposes a novel, controlled mark test in situ and contributes to the evidence that, without extensive training, non-hominid primates are not capable ...
  10. [10]
    The perils of anthropomorphism - Nature
    Apr 8, 2004 · The complexity of animal behaviour naturally prompts us to use terms that are familiar from everyday descriptions of our own actions.
  11. [11]
    Evidence that people are too sceptical about animal sentience
    The findings demonstrate that people underestimate animal minds in a way that can be said to be inaccurate and highlight the role of belief updating in ...
  12. [12]
    A History of Primates Studying Primates (Chapter 2)
    Jul 28, 2022 · When George John Romanes published his book Animal Intelligence in 1882, marking for many the beginning of the study of comparative ...
  13. [13]
    (PDF) Morgan's Canon: Animal Psychology in the Twentieth Century ...
    Sep 9, 2019 · Morgan's Canon instructs us that “in no case is an animal activity to be interpreted in terms of higher psychological processes.
  14. [14]
    [PDF] Lloyd Morgan's Canon - UGA Psychology
    Morgan's Canon. Clearly Morgan's canon was intended to be a stricture to guide the interpretation of evidence pertaining to psychological processes in ani- ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Building a science of animal minds: Lloyd Morgan, experimentation ...
    Honouring the dictates of Morgan's Canon is still widely believed to be a fundamental prerequisite for scientific rigour when investigating the minds of animals ...
  16. [16]
    Morgan's Canon: Is it still a useful rule of thumb? - Wiley Online Library
    May 6, 2018 · Conformity to cultural norms of tool use in chimpanzees. Nature, 437, 737–740. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04047. 10.1038/nature04047. CAS ...
  17. [17]
    Understanding the limits to animal cognition - ScienceDirect.com
    Apr 8, 2024 · In short, we need to know both what they can and cannot do. Broadly, cognition can be defined as the capacities by which animals acquire, ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Against Morgan's Canon - PhilArchive
    Morgan's Canon states that we should not interpret an action as a higher psychical faculty if it can be interpreted as a lower one.
  19. [19]
    a general argument against Morgan's Canon - PMC
    Mar 14, 2016 · Morgan's Canon states that animal activity should not be interpreted using higher psychological processes if lower ones can explain it.
  20. [20]
    Morgan's Canon Revisited* - jstor
    The famous ethological maxim known as 'Morgan's Canon' continues to be an object of interpretive controversy. I reconsider Morgan's Canon in light of two ...
  21. [21]
    Psychology as the behaviorist views it. - APA PsycNet
    The behaviourist views psychology as a purely directive experimental branch of natural science. Its theoretical goal is the prediction and control of ...
  22. [22]
    Commentary on Watson (1913) by R.H. Wozniak
    In this lecture, Watson mounted a scathing attack on the mainstream definition of psychology as the science of mind or consciousness.
  23. [23]
    Watson launches behaviorist school of psychology - PBS
    "Psychology as the behaviorist views it," Watson wrote, "is a purely objective experimental branch of natural science. Its theoretical goal is the prediction ...
  24. [24]
    Classical Conditioning - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf
    In Pavlov's experiment, the ringing of the bell became the conditioned stimulus, and salivation was the conditioned response. Essentially, the neutral stimulus ...
  25. [25]
    Pavlov's Dogs Experiment & Pavlovian Conditioning Response
    Feb 2, 2024 · Pavlov showed that dogs could be conditioned to salivate at the sound of a bell if that sound was repeatedly presented at the same time that they were given ...
  26. [26]
    [PDF] THE BEHAVIOR OF ORGANISMS An Experimental Analysis
    May, 1938. The Behavior of Organisms was the antecedent that led to the use of the objective principles of operant behavior in many diverse disciplines ranging ...
  27. [27]
    Materialism and Behaviorism – Introduction to Philosophy
    In stark contrast to Cartesian substance dualism is materialism. Materialism denies the existence of a “mind” as an entity separate from the body.
  28. [28]
    What Happened to Behaviorism
    Mar 1, 2004 · By the 1990s the domination of cognitive approaches across almost all areas of psychology (even animal learning!) was nearly complete. Look ...
  29. [29]
    The behavior of organisms: an experimental analysis. - APA PsycNet
    Skinner outlines a science of behavior which generates its own laws through an analysis of its own data rather than securing them by reference to a conceptual ...
  30. [30]
    Cognitive maps in rats and men. - APA PsycNet
    This paper is devoted to a description of experiments with rats, mostly at the author's laboratory, and to indicating the significance of these findings on ...
  31. [31]
    Cognitive maps in rats and men - PubMed
    Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol Rev. 1948 Jul;55(4):189-208. doi: 10.1037/h0061626. Author. E C TOLMAN. PMID: 18870876; DOI: 10.1037/h0061626.
  32. [32]
    Innate releasing mechanisms and fixed action patterns
    In the 1930s Konrad Lorenz and Nicolaas Tinbergen developed important ideas of classical ethology: the concepts of innate releasing mechanisms (IRMs), sign ...Missing: cognitive | Show results with:cognitive
  33. [33]
    Review of B. F. Skinner's Verbal Behavior - Chomsky.info
    Skinner divides the responses of the animal into two main categories. Respondents are purely reflex responses elicited by particular stimuli. Operants are ...
  34. [34]
    Behavior: The Education of Sarah - Time Magazine
    Sep 21, 1970 · Premack's prime evidence is Sarah, a seven-year-old female chimp with a working “vocabulary” of more than 120 words. Sarah can not only ...
  35. [35]
    The neural basis of reversal learning: An updated perspective - PMC
    When the screen is raised the monkey is tasked with displacing one of the objects to reveal the reward. Alternatively, animals can be presented with visual ...
  36. [36]
    A Simple Spatial-independent Associative and Reversal Learning ...
    Aug 5, 2021 · Here, we present a rewarded contingency discrimination learning test that minimizes the task's spatial component and contains an element that ...
  37. [37]
    Reversal of a Spatial Discrimination Task in the Common Octopus ...
    Jun 24, 2021 · During a reversal learning task, the animal first has to learn to discriminate between two stimuli to a predefined criterion during the ...
  38. [38]
    Impulse control in pigeons - PMC - NIH
    I thank Richard Herrnstein and Howard Rachlin for advice and Donald Loveland for technical assistance. Reprints may be obtained from G. W. Ainslie ...
  39. [39]
    Chimpanzees: Self-Recognition - Science
    After prolonged exposure to their reflected images in mirrors, chimpanzees marked with red dye showed evidence of being able to recognize their own reflections.
  40. [40]
    Delay Discounting: Pigeon, Rat, Human – Does it Matter? - PMC
    Delay discounting is the decrease in subjective value of an outcome as the time to its receipt increases. All animals discount future outcomes similarly.
  41. [41]
    What animals do not do or fail to find: A novel observational ...
    Aug 16, 2019 · In this review, I discuss the advantages and urgency of field‐based studies on animal cognition and introduce a novel observational approach for ...
  42. [42]
    Beyond the dichotomy between field and lab — the importance of ...
    Jun 28, 2022 · In combination, field and lab research offers great potential for understanding how animals make decisions and use their cognitive capacities ...
  43. [43]
    The Dancing Bees - The University of Chicago Press
    As Karl von Frisch (1886–1982) discovered during World War II, bees communicate the location of food sources to each other through complex circle and waggle ...
  44. [44]
    Waggle Dance - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The zoologist Karl von Frisch (Nobel laureate, 1973) is mainly known for discovering that honeybees can recruit other bees to visit a food source by performing ...
  45. [45]
    Jane Goodall observes a chimpanzee making and using tools
    Jun 2, 2023 · In a groundbreaking discovery, primatologist Jane Goodall witnesses a chimpanzee in the act of making and using tools on November 4, 1960.
  46. [46]
    Gombe 60: Six Decades of Discovery, Innovation & Hope
    Jane Goodall's recorded observation at age 26 that chimpanzees make and use tools is considered a one of the greatest contributions of the 20th century.
  47. [47]
    The Ecology and Life History of Seed Caching Corvids
    This report will review the similarities and differences of four species of pine seed caching members of the avian family Corvidae
  48. [48]
    Context‐dependent seed dispersal by a scatter‐hoarding corvid
    Feb 15, 2016 · Here, we use behavioural field observations of a scatter-hoarding bird to investigate the context dependence of seed caching across two ...
  49. [49]
    Testing two competing hypotheses for Eurasian jays' caching for the ...
    Jan 12, 2021 · Previous research reported that corvids preferentially cache food in a location where no food will be available or cache more of a specific ...
  50. [50]
    Cognition in the field: comparison of reversal learning performance ...
    Oct 11, 2017 · We show that free-ranging great tits (Parus major) perform similarly to deprived, captive birds in a successive spatial reversal-learning task using automated ...
  51. [51]
    (PDF) Beyond the dichotomy between field and lab -the importance ...
    Jun 29, 2022 · Differences between the way in which animals behave under restrained laboratory conditions versus more complex, ideally natural ...
  52. [52]
    Training pet dogs for eye-tracking and awake fMRI - PMC - NIH
    Jul 16, 2019 · A breakthrough in training animals to remain still, wakeful, and attentive during scanning was achieved only a decade ago (Berns, Brooks, & ...
  53. [53]
    Tailored haemodynamic response function increases detection ...
    Jan 1, 2021 · Here, we explore whether dog fMRI studies would benefit from a tailored dog haemodynamic response function (HRF).
  54. [54]
    Editorial: Awake functional imaging of small animals - Frontiers
    The emergence of awake functional imaging in small animals has revolutionized our ability to examine the intricate relationship between brain activity ...<|separator|>
  55. [55]
    Fruit flies move their retinas much like humans move their eyes
    Oct 26, 2022 · fruit flies have evolved a different strategy to adjust their vision without moving their heads—they move the retinas inside of their eyes ...
  56. [56]
    Insect vision: Head saccades to reset the view - Cell Press
    Sep 27, 2021 · A new study has found how fruit flies use head-turning strategies to reset their gaze and stabilize visual images during flight.
  57. [57]
    Drone Observation for the Quantitative Study of Complex Multilevel ...
    Jun 8, 2023 · Aerial observation from unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) is a powerful method of capturing the spatial structures and movements of large animal groups.
  58. [58]
    WildWing: An open‐source, autonomous and affordable UAS for ...
    Mar 10, 2025 · Autonomous drones can assist ecologists in monitoring and responding to complex, emerging collective animal behaviours that are beyond the ...
  59. [59]
    Beyond observation: Deep learning for animal behavior and ...
    This study examines the principles of deep-learning-based tracking, pose estimation, and behavioral analysis, emphasizing their respective strengths, ...
  60. [60]
    Simple behavioral analysis (SimBA) as a platform for explainable ...
    SHAP is a widely cited open-source and post-hoc explainability method which can be applied and compared across any of the current machine learning platforms ...
  61. [61]
    Video Foundation Models for Animal Behavior Analysis | bioRxiv
    Jul 31, 2024 · We investigate the potential of frozen video foundation models across a range of behavior analysis tasks, including classification, retrieval, and localization.<|control11|><|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Human and animal cognition: Continuity and discontinuity - PNAS
    Cognitive studies have found animals to have abilities once thought unique to the human. This suggests a disparity between brain and mind.
  63. [63]
    Towards a scientific definition of animal emotions: Integrating innate ...
    By comparing each of these mechanistic steps in, for example, vertebrate animals vs. ... The relationship of emotion to cognition: a functional approach to a ...
  64. [64]
    Modeling | Seven Challenges for the Science of Animal Minds
    Jan 23, 2025 · Thus, mechanistic explanation involves a decomposition that is both structural (the parts one identifies had better be there) and functional ( ...<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    Brain evolution and development: adaptation, allometry and constraint
    Sep 14, 2016 · Comparative studies identify consistent patterns of covariation, or allometries, between brain and body size, and between brain components, indicating the ...
  66. [66]
    The evolution of mammalian brain size | Science Advances
    Apr 28, 2021 · Allometric shifts do not always represent shifts in cognition. Variation in relative brain size is traditionally associated with cognitive ...
  67. [67]
    A Farewell to the Encephalization Quotient: A New Brain Size ...
    Jul 9, 2021 · The EQ has become a commonly used estimate of the cognitive abilities or intelligence of animal species. Other researchers have argued the slope ...
  68. [68]
    (PDF) Overall Brain Size, and Not Encephalization Quotient, Best ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Overall Brain Size, and Not Encephalization Quotient, Best Predicts Cognitive Ability across Non-Human Primates. February 2007; Brain Behavior ...
  69. [69]
    Neural Modularity Helps Organisms Evolve to Learn New Skills ...
    Apr 2, 2015 · We confirm this hypothesis: modular networks have higher overall performance because they learn new skills faster while retaining old skills more.
  70. [70]
    Brain size, gut size and cognitive abilities: the energy trade-offs ...
    Apr 13, 2022 · Our data indicate that the evolutionary increase of CA in mammals was initially associated with increased BMR and brain plasticity.
  71. [71]
    Brawn before brains in placental mammals after the end-Cretaceous ...
    Mar 31, 2022 · We argue that the placental radiation initially emphasized increases in body size as extinction survivors filled vacant niches. Brains eventually became larger.
  72. [72]
    The economics of brain size evolution in vertebrates - ScienceDirect
    Jun 20, 2022 · Cognitive abilities can only drive brain size evolution in vertebrate lineages where they result in an improved energy balance through favourable ecological ...
  73. [73]
    Measurement of absolute auditory thresholds in the common ...
    ... species has not been measured using modern psychophysical methods. The ... Animal Psychophysics: The Design and Conduct of Sensory Experiments. New ...
  74. [74]
    Sensory Function in Animals - Stebbins - Wiley Online Library
    Jan 1, 2011 · Psychophysical experiments are directed at questions of minimum discriminable stimulus differences (e.g., difference thresholds), as in the ...
  75. [75]
    Psychophysics and the evolution of behavior - ScienceDirect.com
    We describe how a law of psychophysics could influence behavioral evolution. Sensory information allows animals to interpret their environment and make ...
  76. [76]
    Integrating vision and echolocation for navigation and perception in ...
    Jun 26, 2019 · Bats are ideal animal models to study multisensory integration due to their reliance on vision and echolocation, two modalities that allow ...
  77. [77]
    Development of multisensory integration from the ... - PubMed Central
    Multisensory integration not only has substantial survival value but can also create unique experiences that emerge when signals from different sensory channels ...
  78. [78]
    Pigeons perceive a reversed Zöllner illusion - PubMed
    The results suggested that pigeons do perceive an illusion from Zöllner figures, but in the direction opposite to that of humans.Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  79. [79]
    Pigeons perceive the Ebbinghaus-Titchener circles as an ... - PubMed
    A target circle surrounded by larger "inducer" circles looks smaller, and one surrounded by smaller circles looks larger than they really are.
  80. [80]
    Cross-modal matching in monkeys: Altered visual cues and delay
    Two monkeys were capable of matching novel black/white and silhouette photographs to equivalent novel objects which could only be touched.
  81. [81]
    Space-luminance crossmodal correspondences in domestic chicks
    Crossmodal correspondences are spontaneous associations of non-redundant information across different modalities. Infants and some non-human animals (i.e., ...
  82. [82]
    Cross-modal individual recognition in the African penguin and the ...
    Oct 13, 2021 · The only evidence for cross-modal individual recognition in a non-mammalian species thus far has been in crows (Corvus macrorhynchos) [13].
  83. [83]
    Cross-modal object recognition and dynamic weighting of sensory ...
    Jun 16, 2016 · Our results show that spontaneous cross-modal object recognition and dynamic weighting of sensory inputs are present in a nonmammalian ...
  84. [84]
    [PDF] Selective Attention, Priming, and Foraging Behavior
    Animals selectively filter and transform their sensory input, increasing the accuracy with which some stimuli are detected and effectively ignoring others.
  85. [85]
    Selective Attention, Working Memory, and Animal Intelligence - PMC
    Errors in the presence of salient distracters are thought to reflect failures of selective attention, and the number of errors committed by individual animals ...
  86. [86]
    Touchscreen-paradigm for mice reveals cross-species evidence for ...
    While response times did not differ substantially between conditions, error rates (ER) increased from the “ongoing” baseline condition to the most complex ...
  87. [87]
    Primate Cognition: Attention, Episodic Memory ... - PubMed Central
    Nonhuman primates show evidence of cognitive control of attention, even in the face of strong, conflicting stimulus cues. Thus, monkeys and apes manifest ...
  88. [88]
    Sequential priming in visual search: Contributions of stimulus-driven ...
    Sequential priming refers to speeded visual search when target identity or location is repeated within a trial sequence. In two experiments with pigeons, ...
  89. [89]
    Priming in Macaque Frontal Cortex during Popout Visual Search
    In this study, we investigated the neuronal correlates of rapid changes in behavior caused by short-term priming during a popout search task. We found that ...
  90. [90]
    Visual Search and Attention in Blue Jays (Cyanocitta cristata)
    A successful search for complex, natural stimuli usually requires focal visual attention. · Sequential priming is pervasive among animals. · Associative cuing has ...
  91. [91]
    Attention in humans and animals: Is there a capacity limitation at the ...
    Investigators have suggested that pigeons have a limited capacity input channel and that as a result performance suffers when information load is great.
  92. [92]
    Optogenetic Manipulation of Covert Attention in the Nonhuman ...
    Feb 1, 2025 · These data show that optogenetic manipulations can cause brief and spatially specific deficits in covert attention, independent of sensorimotor functions.Methods · Guided-Saccade Task · Optogenetic Versus...
  93. [93]
    Toward an understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying dual ...
    We provide a comprehensive review of behavioral and neurobiological dual-task experiments in animals.
  94. [94]
    Categorization: The View from Animal Cognition - PMC
    Jun 15, 2016 · Drawing on many psychological and anthropological studies, Malt provided a seminal review ... Von Fersen L., Lea S.E. Category Discrimination by ...
  95. [95]
    ASSOCIATIVE CONCEPT LEARNING IN ANIMALS - PMC - NIH
    In this article, we focus on various methods for establishing associative concepts in nonhuman animals and evaluate data documenting the development of ...
  96. [96]
    [PDF] Categorical face perception in fish - UQ eSpace
    Sorting, or categorizing discrete, similar objects into groups based on key characteristics is a well-known basic mechanism which facilitates decision making ...
  97. [97]
    Birds Categorize Colors Just Like Humans Do | Duke Today
    Aug 1, 2018 · Zebra finches partition the range of hues from red to orange into two discrete categories, much like humans do, researchers report.Missing: fish | Show results with:fish
  98. [98]
    What can fish brains tell us about visual perception? - PMC
    In the literature we find a number of studies on the perception of shape and color in fish species, showing for example that several Teleost fishes have ...
  99. [99]
    Generalization of same-different classification abilities in bottlenose ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · Laboratory trials of dolphins indicate their capability to grasp symbolic proxies for objects/events and learn abstract principles, even ...
  100. [100]
    Evidence for a Numerosity Category that is Based on Abstract ...
    Nov 7, 2012 · A previous study (Kilian et al., 2003) had demonstrated that bottlenose dolphins can discriminate visual stimuli differing in numerosity.Missing: problems | Show results with:problems
  101. [101]
    [PDF] Relational Categories - Psychology - Northwestern
    Relational categories are categories where membership is determined by a common relational structure, not common properties, and cohere on a core relationship.
  102. [102]
    Learning Strategies in Matching to Sample: If-then and Configural ...
    Pigeons in the FR0 and FR1 groups did not learn the abstract concept, but learned the MTS task by configural rules. When pigeons (FR20 group) did learn the ...
  103. [103]
    Abstract-Concept Learning Carryover Effects from the Initial Training ...
    Three groups of pigeons were trained in a same/different task with 32, 64, or 1024 color-picture stimuli. They were tested with novel transfer pictures.
  104. [104]
    Transitive inference in non-human animals: An empirical and ...
    In this paper, I begin by describing the transitive inference tasks customarily used with non-human animals and then review the empirical findings.
  105. [105]
    [PDF] Rational versus associative processes - Colin Allen
    Cognitive approaches to transitive inference postulate that animals explicitly represent such orderings and use these representations to infer relationships ...
  106. [106]
    No evidence of real-world equivalence in chickens (Gallus gallus ...
    Jan 24, 2024 · Forming functional categories like “food” and “predator” may require conceptual rather than purely perceptual generalization. We trained ...
  107. [107]
    Cognitive Ethology - jstor
    flowers, but also functional categories such as automobiles or chairs, a task one cannot ... ) to signify different predatory species that prey upon the monkeys.<|control11|><|separator|>
  108. [108]
    Monkey Visual Short-Term Memory Directly Compared to Humans
    The humans' capacity estimates were larger with means of 2.8±0.4 for clip art and 2.5±0.4 for colored squares. Thus, the humans could remember approximately 2 ...
  109. [109]
    On the working memory of humans and great apes: Strikingly similar ...
    We review empirical evidence and conclude that the size of WM in chimpanzees is 2 ± 1 versus Miller's famous 7 ± 2 in humans.
  110. [110]
    Delayed Match-to-Sample - SpringerLink
    May 20, 2022 · Delayed match-to-sample (DMTS) is a procedure where a sample is shown, removed, and after a delay, comparison stimuli are presented, requiring  ...
  111. [111]
    Assessing spatial learning and memory in mice: Classic radial maze ...
    The radial arm maze (RAM) is a common behavioral test to quantify spatial learning and memory in rodents. Prior attempts to refine the standard experimental ...
  112. [112]
    Crows Rival Monkeys in Cognitive Capacity | Scientific Reports
    Aug 18, 2017 · Capacity of crows is remarkably similar to monkeys and estimated at about four items. In both species, the visual hemifields show largely ...
  113. [113]
    Working memory capacity of crows and monkeys arises from similar ...
    Dec 3, 2021 · We report that carrion crows and macaque monkeys share divisive normalization as a neuronal computation that is in line with mammalian models.
  114. [114]
    Neuronal correlates of parametric working memory in the prefrontal ...
    Here we describe neurons in the inferior convexity of the prefrontal cortex whose discharge rates varied, during the delay period between the two stimuli, as a ...
  115. [115]
    Neural correlates of memory updating in the primate prefrontal cortex
    Jun 9, 2025 · Neural activity in the PFC increases during tasks that require working memory, whereas damage worsens task performance. A widely accepted ...
  116. [116]
    Working memory capacity of crows and monkeys arises from similar ...
    Indeed, the working memory of some birds, such as crows, has a similar capacity to humans despite the architecture of their brains being very different to ...
  117. [117]
    Simultaneous timing of multiple intervals: implications of the scalar ...
    Three experiments with pigeons are reported in which the scalar property in simultaneous timing tasks was studied. According to scalar expectancy theory, ...Missing: procedure | Show results with:procedure
  118. [118]
    Using the peak procedure to measure timing and counting ...
    In 4 experiments, it was shown that the peak procedure can be used to study timing and counting in pigeons. In Experiment 1, pigeons were trained to peck at ...
  119. [119]
    Modelling timing performance on the peak procedure - ScienceDirect
    On the peak procedure, a light or tone usually signals a reward for a response after a fixed interval (FI), but occasionally, the signal is left on for a long ...
  120. [120]
    Scalar expectancy theory and peak-interval timing in humans.
    These results demonstrate that humans show the same qualitative timing properties that other animals do, but with some quantitative differences.
  121. [121]
    [PDF] LEARNING TO TIME - ERIC
    Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. Psychological ... Cyclic responding by pigeons on the peak timing procedure. Journal of the ...<|separator|>
  122. [122]
    [PDF] Psychological timing without a timer: The roles of attention and ...
    In one common paradigm, called the peak procedure, rats or pigeons learn to expect reinforcement after a fixed interval (usually on the order of tens of seconds) ...
  123. [123]
    The future of future-oriented cognition in non-humans
    Much research on memory and foresight in animals came to focus on whether some non-human animals are mental time travellers. Ample evidence from both psychology ...
  124. [124]
    Circadian clocks and memory: time-place learning - PMC
    Time-Place learning (TPL) refers to the ability of animals to remember important events that vary in both time and place. This ability is thought to be ...
  125. [125]
    Time-and-place learning by garden warblers, Sylvia borin
    The ability of birds to learn associations between temporal and spatial changes in the daily pattern of food availability was investigated.Missing: influences | Show results with:influences
  126. [126]
    Ingeborg Beling and the time memory in honeybees - PubMed Central
    Mar 12, 2024 · Researchers discovered that honeybees have a remarkable time memory, which they use for optimizing foraging. Ingeborg Beling was the first to examine this time ...
  127. [127]
    Time-place learning in the zebrafish (Danio rerio) - ScienceDirect
    The most noteworthy cyclical behaviors are related to forraging, which generally occur at the same times and locations. The synchronization of animal activities ...
  128. [128]
    Time-Place Learning and Memory Persist in Mice Lacking ...
    Dec 11, 2013 · Previously, we showed that time-place learning in mice depends on the circadian system and Cry1 and/or Cry2 clock genes. We questioned whether ...
  129. [129]
    Time–place learning in wild, free-living hummingbirds | Request PDF
    Aug 8, 2025 · Animals can learn to revisit locations at which foraging resources will renew over time. This ability is known as 'time–place' learning.<|separator|>
  130. [130]
    Role of Aging and Hippocampus in Time-Place Learning - Frontiers
    Animals use an internal sense of time to master TPL, which is circadian system based. Finding indications for a role of the hippocampus and (early) aging- ...
  131. [131]
    COGNITIVE MAPS IN RATS AND MEN[1] Edward C. Tolman (1948)
    (1) First, there is a school of animal psychologists which believes that the maze behavior of rats is a matter of mere simple stimulus-response connections.
  132. [132]
    Do Animals Have Cognitive Maps? - Company of Biologists Journals
    Jan 1, 1996 · The term 'cognitive map' was first coined by Tolman (1948), who defined it as a representation of the environment which indicated the routes, ...ABSTRACT · The cognitive maps of Tolman... · Gallistel and cognitive maps
  133. [133]
    The cognitive map debate in insects: A historical perspective on ...
    According to Lorenz, scientists should not assume that animals reason their way to goals by manipulating mental representations. Rather, physiological forces ...
  134. [134]
    Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis - PNAS
    to navigate by a system of "dead reckoning," or path inte- gration, similarto that used by mariners at sea, a plethora of species, including spiders (2-8) ...
  135. [135]
    Desert ants compensate for navigation uncertainty
    Nov 15, 2005 · Desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis, achieve remarkable orientation feats. Foraging trips may lead a worker ant more than 100 m - or roughly 10 000 ...
  136. [136]
    systematic search and path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis ...
    The main navigational mechanism used by foraging desert ants of the genus Cataglyphis is path integration (dead reckoning).
  137. [137]
    Neural representations of space in the hippocampus of a food ...
    Jul 16, 2021 · Our results suggest that similar features of hippocampal circuitry may give rise to the observed place cells in birds. We also report SWRs in ...Missing: analogs | Show results with:analogs
  138. [138]
    Are There Place Cells in the Avian Hippocampus? - Karger Publishers
    Sep 6, 2017 · Research with homing pigeons has discovered hippocampal cells, including location cells, path cells, and pattern cells, that share some but not ...Missing: analogs | Show results with:analogs
  139. [139]
    Neural representations of space in the hippocampus of a food ...
    Our results suggest that similar features of hippocampal circuitry may give rise to the observed place cells in birds. We also report SWRs in the avian ...Missing: analogs | Show results with:analogs
  140. [140]
    Cognitive maps in the wild: revealing the use of metric information in ...
    Aug 13, 2021 · Route-based maps lacking metric information were categorized as 'topological maps' while those incorporating metric information were ...
  141. [141]
    Thinking outside of the box II: Disrupting the cognitive map
    On the basis of these rotational errors, Cheng (1986) suggested that animals encode a metric frame of the environment formed solely from the geometric ...
  142. [142]
    Neurobiology of the homing pigeon--a review - PubMed
    Several orientation mechanisms and parameters-sun compass, earth's magnetic field, olfactory cues, visual cues-are known to be involved in homing behaviour ...
  143. [143]
    Genomic and Phenotypic Analyses Reveal Mechanisms Underlying ...
    In vitro, a magnetic field stimulates increases in calcium ion concentration in cells expressing pigeon GSR. These findings support the importance of the ...
  144. [144]
    Pigeons use olfactory cues to navigate - ResearchGate
    Aug 10, 2025 · Pigeons acquire the map which allows olfactory navigation by associating windborne odours with the direction from which they reach the loft.<|separator|>
  145. [145]
    Navigational abilities of adult and experienced homing pigeons ...
    Oct 1, 2009 · Our data show that even in trained adult pigeons, olfactory cues are needed for homing from unfamiliar locations and that the lack of magnetic ...
  146. [146]
    Principles of insect path integration - PMC - PubMed Central
    The second input required for the path integrator is an odometer. Which sensory information insects use for measuring distances depends on their mode of ...
  147. [147]
    Path Integration: Combining Optic Flow with Compass Orientation
    Oct 23, 2017 · Path integration in insects is best known from studies on Hymenoptera such as honeybees and desert ants [1]. Once a foraging bee or ant has ...
  148. [148]
    The Honey Bee Dance Language | NC State Extension Publications
    Feb 23, 2016 · A bee that performs a waggle dance runs straight ahead for a short distance, returns in a semicircle to the starting point, runs again through ...Missing: long- | Show results with:long-
  149. [149]
    The desert ant odometer: a stride integrator that accounts for stride ...
    Jan 15, 2007 · Desert ants, Cataglyphis, use path integration as a major means of navigation. Path integration requires measurement of two parameters, namely,direction and ...<|separator|>
  150. [150]
    Homing pigeon navigational ontogeny: no evidence that exposure to ...
    We investigated whether exposure at a novel site is sufficient for learning. We found no evidence that exposure to a novel site improved homing performance.
  151. [151]
    Foraging distance distributions reveal how honeybee waggle dance ...
    Oct 11, 2024 · A series of behavioural rules that determine when, and how much, bees dance mean that choices between feeding sites can be made by the group.
  152. [152]
    Manufacture and use of hook-tools by New Caledonian crows | Nature
    Jan 18, 1996 · Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S. · Parker, S. · Beck, B. B. Animal Tool Behaviour: The Use and Manufacture of Tools by Animals (Garland, New York, 1980).
  153. [153]
    Development of stone tool use by wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
    At the age of 3.5 years, wild chimpanzees at Bossou, Guinea, begin to use hammer and anvil stones to crack oil-palm nuts to get the kernels.
  154. [154]
    Learning curves and teaching when acquiring nut-cracking ... - Nature
    Feb 6, 2019 · In contrast, nut cracking requires the subject to bring three different objects together, the nut, the anvil, and the hammer. Each item must ...
  155. [155]
    Hook tool manufacture in New Caledonian crows - BMC Biology
    Nov 18, 2015 · Two of their tool types have 'hooks': pandanus tools (made from the leaf edges of screw pines, Pandanus spp.) and hooked stick tools (made from ...
  156. [156]
    Defensive tool use in a coconut-carrying octopus - ScienceDirect.com
    Dec 15, 2009 · To carry one or more shells, this octopus manipulates and arranges the shells so that the concave surfaces are uppermost, then extends its arms ...
  157. [157]
    An Octopus' Coconut Home | Nature - PBS
    This octopus has devised an ingenious way to create a moveable shelter by assembling two halves of a coconut shell.
  158. [158]
    Diver Snaps First Photo of Fish Using Tools | Science | AAAS
    Jul 8, 2011 · The first photos of a tool-using fish in the wild show a blackspot tuskfish banging a clam against a rock to crack it open.
  159. [159]
    Fishes Use Problem Solving and Invent Tools - Scientific American
    Jun 1, 2016 · In May 2014 a study highlighted an example of innovative tool use by Atlantic cods being held in captivity for aquaculture research. Each fish ...
  160. [160]
    Chimpanzees use social information to acquire a skill they fail to ...
    Mar 6, 2024 · Acquisition of a socially learned tool use sequence in chimpanzees: implications for cumulative culture. Evol. Hum. Behav. 38, 635–644 (2017) ...
  161. [161]
    Why Humans Have Thousands of Tools and Other Animals Do Not
    Sep 12, 2024 · Much the same can be said of tool use. Humans don't have just one or two tools at their disposal. We have thousands of tools—hammers, ...
  162. [162]
    Human cumulative culture and the exploitation of natural phenomena
    Dec 13, 2021 · Simple technologies such as cutting stone tools, for instance, exploit the effect of hard and sharp edges to slice through softer materials.
  163. [163]
    Savanna chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes verus, hunt with tools
    We observed ten different chimpanzees use tools to hunt prosimian prey in 22 bouts. This includes immature chimpanzees and females.
  164. [164]
    Chimps make spears to catch dinner : Nature News
    Feb 22, 2007 · Chimpanzees can hunt with spears, say researchers who have seen wild chimps in the grasslands of Senegal. The innovative apes fashion weapons from sticks to ...
  165. [165]
    Spear-Wielding Chimps Seen Hunting Bush Babies - Science
    Chimp the Toolmaker. Science, 2004 · Meat Eating in Primates: The Predatory Behavior of Wild Chimpanzees. Geza Teleki. · Meat Eating in Primates: The Predatory ...
  166. [166]
    Inner 'blowpipe' explains how archerfish spit water with such deadly ...
    Mar 22, 2022 · To spit water, the archerfish brings its bony tongue to the roof of the mouth, compressing water at the back and forcing it out through the tube ...
  167. [167]
    The Fluid Dynamics of Spitting: How Archerfish Use Physics to Hunt ...
    Nov 29, 2013 · And they showed that the archerfish is using a few tricks from fluid dynamics to maximize the force with which the water hit its prey. Here's ...
  168. [168]
    Assassin bugs enhance prey capture with a sticky resin - PubMed
    Apr 26, 2023 · Tool-use in assassin bugs has been suggested as several species apply adhesive plant resins to their body, which has been hypothesized to function in enhancing ...
  169. [169]
    Tool use aids prey-fishing in a specialist predator of stingless bees
    May 20, 2025 · In this study, we provide a comprehensive examination of tool use behavior in the assassin bug Pahabengkakia piliceps, a specialist predator of stingless bees.
  170. [170]
    Animal Cognition: Bring Me My Spear - ScienceDirect.com
    Mar 6, 2007 · As they report in this issue of Current Biology, Jill Pruetz and Paco Bertolani [11] watched chimpanzees at Fongoli, Senegal, hunting for lesser ...
  171. [171]
    Tool use by aquatic animals - PMC - PubMed Central
    Tool use among aquatic animals is rare but taxonomically diverse, occurring in fish, cephalopods, mammals, crabs, urchins and possibly gastropods.
  172. [172]
    The irreconcilability of insight - PMC - PubMed Central
    Mar 2, 2024 · Spontaneous problem solving without evident trial and error behavior in humans and other animals has been referred to as insight.” 2011, Hanus, ...
  173. [173]
    Current Understanding of the “Insight” Phenomenon Across ...
    Dec 14, 2021 · A review by Kounios and Beeman (2014) defines insight as any sudden comprehension, realization, or problem solution that involves a ...
  174. [174]
    Gestalt's Perspective on Insight: A Recap Based on Recent ...
    By stacking and ascending the assembled crates, the chimpanzee successfully accessed the bananas. Köhler concluded that the chimpanzee's reorganization of ...
  175. [175]
    Kohler's Work on Insight Learning
    Kohler constructed a variety of problems for the chimps, each of which involved obtaining food that was not directly accessible.
  176. [176]
    Tool bending in New Caledonian crows - PMC - NIH
    Aug 10, 2016 · 'Betty' the New Caledonian crow astonished the world when she 'spontaneously' bent straight pieces of garden wire into hooked foraging tools.
  177. [177]
    Crow that bent wire to retrieve food was acting naturally, scientists ...
    Aug 10, 2016 · A crow that astonished the world by bending a straight piece of wire was simply acting out behaviour in her species' natural repertoire, a study has found.Missing: replications failures<|separator|>
  178. [178]
    Do animals have insight, and what is insight anyway? - PubMed
    The central question in the study of insightful behaviour in any species is whether it is the product of a distinctive cognitive process, insight.Missing: definition metrics zero
  179. [179]
    The irreconcilability of insight | Animal Cognition
    Mar 2, 2024 · In the field of comparative cognition, there is rising interest in the question of whether non-human animals are capable of insightful problem-solving.
  180. [180]
    [PDF] Learning From Others' Mistakes? Limits on Understanding a Trap ...
    Trap-tube tasks have been used to investigate causal understand- ing in capuchin monkeys (Visalberghi & Limongelli, 1994), apes. (Limongelli, Boysen, & ...
  181. [181]
    Avian Cognition: Understanding Tool Use - ScienceDirect.com
    Although rooks are considered non-tool-using animals, a recent study has shown that they learn to solve a 'trap-tube' task faster than many tool-using primates.
  182. [182]
    How great apes perform on a modified trap-tube task. - APA PsycNet
    To date, neither primates nor birds have shown clear evidence of causal knowledge when attempting to solve the trap tube task.Missing: monkeys | Show results with:monkeys
  183. [183]
    [PDF] “Causal Reasoning in Non-Human Animals” by Christian Schloegl ...
    Jun 24, 2019 · Given that at least some species are sensitive to causally relevant features, one may probe if they are indeed able to make causal inferences, ...
  184. [184]
    Causal Cognition in Human and Nonhuman Animals - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · In this article, we review some of the most provocative experimental results to have emerged from comparative labs in the past few years.
  185. [185]
    Are animals capable of Bayesian updating? An empirical review
    Aug 5, 2025 · Eight species of birds, three mammals, one fish and one insect exhibited behavior consistent with Bayesian updating models; one studied bird ...<|separator|>
  186. [186]
    Superstitious learning of abstract order from random reinforcement
    Humans and other animals often infer spurious associations among unrelated events. However, such superstitious learning is usually accounted for by conditioned ...
  187. [187]
    Superstitious learning of abstract order from random reinforcement
    Feb 4, 2022 · Spurious learning is generally explained in terms of simple associative learning that overestimates causal relationships between external events ...
  188. [188]
    a three-dimensional model of causal cognition | Biology & Philosophy
    Feb 19, 2021 · While adult humans typically exploit both kinds of information, young children and non-human animals may be more constrained in this respect.
  189. [189]
    Absolute Numerosity Discrimination as a Case Study in ...
    First, while similar numerical quantities are difficult to discriminate, discrimination performance systematically improves with increasing difference (or ...
  190. [190]
    Neuroethology of number sense across the animal kingdom
    Mar 15, 2021 · ... animals cannot precisely discriminate ... M. (. 2019. ). Honeybees use absolute rather than relative numerosity in number discrimination .Introduction · Number sense in vertebrates... · Number sense in protostomes
  191. [191]
    How animals discriminate between stimulus magnitudes: a meta ...
    Mar 24, 2025 · And (3) Does the magnitude effect vary across species and sensory ... Y. 2012 . The psychophysics of uneconomical choice: non-linear reward ...
  192. [192]
    Subitizing and visual short-term memory in human and non ... - NIH
    Oct 15, 2012 · Several species show a fast and accurate performance in judging the numerosity of small sets of items, an ability termed “subitizing”.
  193. [193]
    Numerical discrimination in Drosophila melanogaster - ScienceDirect
    Jul 25, 2023 · We describe the LC11 neuron as a neuronal type required for numerical discrimination, establishing a starting point in the neuronal circuitry of ...
  194. [194]
    Quantity discrimination in 9 ungulate species: Individuals take item ...
    Full Length Article. Quantity discrimination in 9 ungulate species: Individuals take item number and size into account to discriminate quantities.
  195. [195]
    Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) spontaneously compute addition ...
    This study shows that rhesus monkeys spontaneously compute addition operations over large numbers, as opposed to continuous extents, and that the limit on this ...
  196. [196]
    Symbol Addition By Rhesus Monkeys - Faunalytics
    Nov 7, 2014 · We trained Rhesus monkeys to associate 26 distinct symbols with 0–25 drops of reward, and then tested how they combine, or add, symbolically ...Missing: numerosity summation
  197. [197]
    Animals Count and Use Zero. How Far Does Their Number Sense Go?
    Aug 9, 2021 · Crows recently demonstrated an understanding of the concept of zero. It's only the latest evidence of animals' talents for numerical abstraction.
  198. [198]
    Animals do count: Research sheds light on the evolution of ...
    Jun 13, 2022 · For them, zero is at the bottom of the number line, rather than a distinct concept.
  199. [199]
    The Adaptive Value of Numerical Competence - ScienceDirect.com
    Animals benefit from numerical competence during foraging, navigating, hunting, predation avoidance, social interactions, and reproductive activities.Missing: basis | Show results with:basis
  200. [200]
    Why Are No Animal Communication Systems Simple Languages?
    Mar 19, 2021 · Hockett concluded that some animal communication systems have some of these design features, but none of them have all the design features ...
  201. [201]
    Monkey Responses to Three Different Alarm Calls - Science
    Vervet monkeys give different alarm calls to different predators. Recordings of the alarms played back when predators were absent caused the monkeys to run ...
  202. [202]
    The assessment by vervet monkeys of their own and another ...
    Seyfarth R.M., Cheney D.L.. The ontogeny of vervet monkey alarm calling behavior: a preliminary report. Z. Tierpsychol., 54 (1980), pp. 37 ...
  203. [203]
    (PDF) Can an Ape Create a Sentence? - ResearchGate
    Aug 10, 2025 · Case Studies in Communication Sciences and Disorders · Jun 2024. Dennis Tanner ; Lessons from a Chimp: AI "Scheming" and the Quest for Ape ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
  204. [204]
    Is the honeybee's iconic waggle dance learned or innate? New ...
    Mar 9, 2023 · A new study published in Science reveals honeybees perfect this dance language by learning from more experienced bees.
  205. [205]
    On the lack of evidence that non-human animals possess anything ...
    There is still little consensus on whether or not non-human animals understand anything about the unobservable mental states of other animals.
  206. [206]
    Theory of mind in animals: Current and future directions - Krupenye
    May 17, 2019 · We review the literature on ToM in nonhuman animals ... Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in ...
  207. [207]
    Following Gaze: Gaze-Following Behavior as a Window into Social ...
    Though the most robust evidence for gaze following has emerged from primates, other mammals and birds have also been found to follow gaze. Evidence comes ...
  208. [208]
    The ability to follow eye gaze and its emergence during ... - PNAS
    The ability of monkeys to follow the gaze of other individuals is a matter of debate in many behavioral studies. Physiological studies have shown that in ...
  209. [209]
    Great apes distinguish true from false beliefs in an interactive ... - NIH
    Apr 5, 2017 · A total of 34 great apes participated in this study: twenty-three chimpanzees (mean age = 20 years, 3 months; range = 5 years, 6 months to 48 ...
  210. [210]
    Apes Submentalise - ScienceDirect
    ... chimpanzees, bonobos and orangutans – can accurately anticipate the goal-directed behaviour of an agent that holds a false belief. How do they do it, by ...
  211. [211]
    [PDF] Theory of Mind in the wild - Comparative Cognition Laboratory
    May 2, 2022 · Researchers placed a plastic snake in the path of a group of chimpanzees. When one chimpanzee saw the snake, that individual was significantly ...Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  212. [212]
    https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036782
  213. [213]
    https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/10023/12181/Hall_2016_Deception_AJP_AAM.pdf
  214. [214]
    Tactical Deception and Understanding of Others in Chimpanzees
    ... Chimpanzees | Find, read and cite all the research you ... Byrne and Whiten (1990) compiled 253 reported observations of tactical deception in primates ...
  215. [215]
    [PDF] The Reciprocity Controversy - Animal Behavior and Cognition
    Nov 8, 2014 · Most experimental evidence for short-term contingencies comes from cooperation outside of social bonds (see below), which is consistent with the.
  216. [216]
    [PDF] Calculated reciprocity? A comparative test with six primate species
    Apr 24, 2014 · Abstract Little evidence of calculated reciprocity has been found in non-human primates so far. In this study, we used a simple experimental ...Missing: image | Show results with:image
  217. [217]
    Monkeys in a Prisoner's Dilemma - ScienceDirect.com
    Mar 12, 2015 · In their study, the monkeys sit side by side and make decisions sequentially to obtain different amounts of juice instead of money. They cannot ...
  218. [218]
    Chimpanzees and children avoid mutual defection in a social dilemma
    The results of the current study demonstrate that chimpanzees and children are able to solve (i.e. avoid mutual defection) a social dilemma in which unilateral ...
  219. [219]
    Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) show robust evidence for ...
    Current evidence suggests that rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) selectively decline tests when memory is weak (Hampton, 2001; Smith, Shields, & Washburn, 2003).
  220. [220]
    Honey bees selectively avoid difficult choices - PNAS
    Nov 4, 2013 · Adaptive use of an opt-out option in hard trials has been interpreted as evidence that animals are able to react to their degree of uncertainty ...
  221. [221]
    Metacognition (Chapter 13) - Primate Cognitive Studies
    Jul 28, 2022 · Studies have shown that rhesus monkeys decline difficult memory tests (e.g., Hampton, Reference Hampton2001; Templer & Hampton, Reference ...<|separator|>
  222. [222]
    Animal Metacognition: A Tale of Two Comparative Psychologies - NIH
    The theoretical dispute is the UR's psychological interpretation. It might reflect the animal's judging difficulty or monitoring uncertainty—capacities ...
  223. [223]
    Information seeking by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and ...
    For example, Hampton (2001) trained rhesus monkeys to remember visual ... On some trials, the monkeys were given the choice to opt out of the memory ...
  224. [224]
    When does metacognition evolve in the opt-out paradigm? - PMC
    Oct 22, 2024 · Overall, the results support predictions implicating uncertainty in the evolution of metacognition but suggest metacognition may also evolve in ...
  225. [225]
    Metacognition in nonhuman primates: a review of current knowledge
    Dec 14, 2024 · This review synthesizes current knowledge on the subject, highlighting key experimental paradigms and empirical findings, with an emphasis on the latest ...
  226. [226]
    Fundamentals of pain perception in animals - ScienceDirect.com
    All vertebrate animals can perceive pain, since they respond to noxious stimuli and to other conditions that cause tissue damage.
  227. [227]
    Fish do not feel pain and its implications for understanding ...
    In summary, the idea that fish flee noxious stimuli because they experience phenomenal consciousness (feel pain) is not the best explanation for this behaviour.
  228. [228]
    In search for consciousness in animals: Using working memory and ...
    Working memory and voluntary attention are adopted as minimal behavioral indicators of sensory consciousness.
  229. [229]
    Transient brain activity dynamics discriminate levels of ... - Nature
    Jun 10, 2024 · The monkeys were administered anesthesia using either ketamine, propofol, or sevoflurane. We gauged the depth of anesthesia by employing the ...
  230. [230]
    Craig and his critics: Why the Cambridge Declaration on ...
    Feb 13, 2013 · The authors of the Cambridge Declaration are perfectly correct when they say that not only the neocortex, but also subcortical regions of the ...
  231. [231]
    Frankfurt Declaration on the Cambridge ... - Effective Altruism Forum
    Oct 24, 2021 · A group of neuroscientists signed the Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness, which "unequivocally" asserted that "humans are not unique in possessing the ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
  232. [232]
    Evaluating animal consciousness - Science
    Feb 20, 2025 · Evaluating animal consciousness. An emerging field shows how animal feelings can be studied scientifically.
  233. [233]
    Testing Integrated Information Theory & Predictive…
    Feb 17, 2025. Global Workspace vs. Integrated Information: Testing Consciousness Theories through Animal Models. What kinds of brain activity correspond ...
  234. [234]
    Integrated information theory reveals the potential role of ... - Frontiers
    Jan 29, 2025 · Recent studies have begun to explore the association between core complex structures and cognitive functions, such as consciousness perception ...
  235. [235]
    Dimensions of Animal Consciousness - PMC - PubMed Central
    A minimal level of self-consciousness may be present in a wide range of animals. It involves registering a difference between self and other: registering some ...
  236. [236]
    Indicators and Criteria of Consciousness in Animals and Intelligent ...
    This review article aims to delineate criteria for consciousness especially in animals, while also taking into account intelligent artifacts.
  237. [237]
    Human Teaching and Cumulative Cultural Evolution - PMC - NIH
    Jun 14, 2017 · Here we provide an overview of contrasting perspectives on the relationship between teaching and cultural evolution in humans, and briefly ...
  238. [238]
    Ratcheting up the ratchet: on the evolution of cumulative culture - NIH
    But we still see no solid evidence of accumulating culture in chimpanzees, or any kind of ratchet effect. ... tool use in chimpanzees. Nature 437, 737–740 (doi: ...
  239. [239]
    Cultural revolutions reduce complexity in the songs of humpback ...
    Nov 21, 2018 · Recordings of humpback whale song were made every year from 2002 to 2014 using fixed hydrophone arrays, autonomous recorders and boat-based ...
  240. [240]
    Cumulative culture in nonhumans: overlooked findings from ... - NIH
    Dec 27, 2017 · Recently, reviews of candidates for cumulative culture in nonhuman species have claimed that only humans have cumulative culture. Here, we aim ...
  241. [241]
    Zooming out the microscope on cumulative cultural evolution - Nature
    Jul 17, 2023 · Cumulative cultural evolution is then believed to have led to modern humans and human culture via self-reinforcing gene-culture co-evolution.
  242. [242]
    The origins of human cumulative culture: from the foraging niche to ...
    Human cumulative culture [1–6] differs from the culture in other primates in that it more extensively accumulates over generations without loss, a property ...
  243. [243]
    Anthropomorphism as Cognitive Bias | Philosophy of Science
    Jan 1, 2022 · If we want to understand and control intuitive anthropomorphism, we must treat it as a cognitive bias and look to the empirical evidence.Missing: cute | Show results with:cute
  244. [244]
    The emperor's new anthropomorphism. - APA PsycNet
    It was his protégé, George Romanes, who gave the term wider currency by making “inverted anthropomorphism” his method in, “Animal Intelligence” (1884).
  245. [245]
    Comparative Psychology - Oxford Bibliographies
    Oct 26, 2015 · There was a backlash against Romanes' use of anthropomorphism (i.e., the attribution of humanlike qualities to animals) and also frustration ...
  246. [246]
    [PDF] Scientists' attitudes toward bias, replicability and scientific practice
    Aug 31, 2021 · Researchers indicated several different forms of bias that might affect animal cognition research, ranging from anthropomorphism and confirming ...
  247. [247]
    Scientists' attitudes toward bias, replicability and scientific practice
    This study aimed to survey a wider range of animal cognition researchers to ask about their attitudes towards classic and contemporary issues facing the field.
  248. [248]
    The hidden side of animal cognition research: Scientists' attitudes ...
    ... research, 73.0% of respondents suggested areas of animal cognition research could experience a 'replication crisis' if replication studies were performed.
  249. [249]
    The hidden side of animal cognition research: Scientists' attitudes ...
    Aug 31, 2021 · “While Morgan's canon is useful as a philosophical tool, I do think that it often conflicts with parsimony arguments made from phylogeny, so in ...
  250. [250]
    Preregistration of animal research protocols: development and ... - NIH
    Mar 16, 2022 · By recording the study hypothesis and planned outcomes a priori, preregistration creates transparency and can reduce the risk of several common ...Missing: behavior | Show results with:behavior
  251. [251]
    Probabilistic inference and Bayesian‐like estimation in animals
    Jul 11, 2024 · I show evidence that animals are sensitive to variation in reward options and can make probabilistic inferences, two foundations of Bayesian‐like estimation.
  252. [252]
    Associative learning and animal cognition - PMC - NIH
    Associative learning plays a variety of roles in the study of animal cognition from a core theoretical component to a null hypothesis.
  253. [253]
    Associative learning and animal cognition
    Oct 5, 2012 · Associative learning plays a variety of roles in the study of animal cognition from a core theoretical component to a null hypothesis ...
  254. [254]
    'Superstition' in the pigeon. - APA PsycNet
    "A pigeon is brought to a stable state of hunger by reducing it to 75 percent of its weight when well fed. It is put into an experimental cage for a few ...
  255. [255]
    Superstition revisited: Sex, species, and adventitious reinforcement
    Nov 10, 2019 · Skinner likened the behavior of pigeons under these fixed-time schedules to the superstitious behavior of humans and proposed that both response ...
  256. [256]
    Can associative learning be the general process for intelligent ...
    Dec 16, 2021 · According to the general process view, animal intelligence depends at large upon associative learning. However, many researchers remain skeptic ...Missing: relations chains
  257. [257]
    Metacognition in animals - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
    Metacognition is thinking about thinking. There is considerable interest in developing animal models of metacognition to provide insight about the evolution ...
  258. [258]
    Understanding the limits to animal cognition - Cell Press
    Apr 8, 2024 · To more rigorously verify a true limit to performing a task, once the animal fails within an experiment, it should be retrained or re-.
  259. [259]
    Hanging from the Language Tree | Columbia Magazine
    ... project and returned Nim to the Institute for Primate Studies in Norman, Oklahoma. ... Just last year the book Nim Chimpsky: The Chimp Who Would Be Human came out ...
  260. [260]
    Language-Using Apes | Issue 89 - Philosophy Now
    For example, Washoe is often discussed alongside another chimpanzee, Nim Chimpsky ... ape language project should not be assumed to apply to other projects.Missing: artifacts | Show results with:artifacts
  261. [261]
    The Mirror Test Is Broken - The Atlantic
    Apr 14, 2023 · In the past half century, scientists have tried—and generally failed—to demonstrate self-recognition among monkeys, dolphins, elephants, dogs, ...
  262. [262]
    Mirror Test - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The mirror test is a method used to assess self-awareness in animals by determining if they recognize themselves in a mirror through behaviors like inspection, ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
  263. [263]
    Replications, Comparisons, Sampling and the Problem of ... - NIH
    May 26, 2021 · Animal cognition research often involves small and idiosyncratic samples. This can constrain the generalizability and replicability of a study's ...Missing: discrepancies | Show results with:discrepancies
  264. [264]
    Claims and Statistical Inference in Animal Physical Cognition
    This graph provides weak evidence for larger sample sizes to produce smaller p-values, however some very small p-values were still reported from studies with ...
  265. [265]
    The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science - PMC - NIH
    Mar 13, 2015 · One type of bias, known as “p-hacking,” occurs when researchers collect or select data or statistical analyses until nonsignificant results become significant.
  266. [266]
    [PDF] Replications in Comparative Psychology
    3 A failed replication in the latter case may indicate little about the reliability of the original study, given the many alternative explanations available for ...
  267. [267]
    Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores
    Jan 25, 2016 · Several studies have found an association between absolute or relative brain size and behaviors thought to be indicative of complex cognitive ...
  268. [268]
    Neuronal factors determining high intelligence - PMC
    A much discussed trait is absolute brain size, because many experts were convinced that absolutely bigger brains mean higher intelligence. Another much ...Missing: peer | Show results with:peer
  269. [269]
    Socioecological complexity in primate groups and its cognitive ...
    Aug 8, 2022 · It is this second type of social complexity that probably holds the key to primate social cognition. ... These include social learning, diet, tool ...
  270. [270]
    10 - Progress and Prospects in Primate Tool Use and Cognition
    Jul 28, 2022 · We review the main ecological and socio-cognitive hypotheses explaining the origin and evolution of tool use in primates.
  271. [271]
    Socioecological complexity in primate groups and its cognitive ...
    Social complexity, such as large group size and complex social structures, is associated with brain size in primates and is suggested to have driven primate ...
  272. [272]
    Rodent maze studies: from following simple rules to complex map ...
    When it comes to rule learning in for instance the T-maze (single or repeated), the rodent would be able to solve the task by making just a single body turn.Missing: limits | Show results with:limits
  273. [273]
    Mice in a labyrinth show rapid learning, sudden insight, and efficient ...
    Jul 1, 2021 · A mouse in the labyrinth makes ~2000 navigation decisions per hour. The animal explores the maze, quickly discovers the location of a reward, and executes ...Missing: associative | Show results with:associative
  274. [274]
    Cetaceans Have Complex Brains for Complex Cognition - PMC - NIH
    May 15, 2007 · Dolphins are also aware of their own behaviors, able to understand and act on gestural instructions to repeat or not repeat a previously ...
  275. [275]
    Precocious development of self-awareness in dolphins - PMC
    Jan 10, 2018 · Our findings indicate that dolphins exhibit self-awareness at a mirror at a younger age than previously reported for children or other species tested.
  276. [276]
    Current cognitive studies on cetaceans - J-Stage
    In this paper, I first introduce current studies on cetacean cognition including studies of tool use, object play, self-recognition, and theory of mind ...
  277. [277]
    [PDF] Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds
    1. Indeed, we will argue that the functional discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds pervades nearly every domain of cognition – from reasoning about.
  278. [278]
    Overcoming bias in the comparison of human language and animal ...
    Nov 13, 2023 · This claim is intriguing but it proposes that human language represents a discontinuity in the evolution of animal communication systems: ...
  279. [279]
    Meta-analytic techniques reveal that corvid causal reasoning in the ...
    Aug 21, 2018 · Over the past several years, five articles (over 32 experiments) have examined the ability of corvids (e.g., rooks, crows, and jays) to complete ...
  280. [280]
    Corvid cognition - Taylor - 2014 - Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews
    Mar 7, 2014 · Here I review recent advances in our scientific knowledge of corvid cognition to examine whether this is really the case.
  281. [281]
    Recent developments in parrot cognition: a quadrennial update - PMC
    A detailed review of parrot cognition research over the last 4 years. We aim to capture recent developments and current trends in this rapidly expanding and ...
  282. [282]
    A survey of vocal mimicry in companion parrots | Scientific Reports
    Dec 5, 2022 · Research shows that parrot vocalization length and structure carry signal content, so there may be selective pressures favoring this ability. If ...
  283. [283]
    Octopuses keep surprising us - here are eight examples how
    Octopuses have demonstrated intelligence in a number of ways, says Jon. “In experiments they've solved mazes and completed tricky tasks to get food rewards. ...Missing: corvids | Show results with:corvids
  284. [284]
    Exploring the Effect of Age on the Reproductive and Stress ... - MDPI
    Oct 6, 2023 · Although they tend to be regarded as intelligent animals, cephalopods have rather short life spans, on average living approximately 1.5–2 years ...
  285. [285]
    Lifecycle, culture, and maintenance of the emerging cephalopod ...
    Dec 1, 2022 · Cephalopod research remains limited by the inability to culture species under laboratory conditions for multiple generations to provide ...
  286. [286]
    Convergent evolution of complex brains and high intelligence
    Dec 19, 2015 · High intelligence that characterizes monkeys and apes, including humans, is closely linked to the size and neuronal complexity of the isocortex ...
  287. [287]
    [PDF] Cephalopod Cognition in an Evolutionary Context - Harvard University
    Sep 20, 2012 · Because of their phylogenetic distance from mammals and birds, cephalopods offer a unique point of comparison for domain-general intelligence, ...
  288. [288]
    Convergent evolution of complex brains and high intelligence - PMC
    In contrast, cephalopods possess complex to very complex brains, which may have evolved several times independently [18]. The most complex brains are found in ...
  289. [289]
    Parallel vector memories in the brain of a bee as foundation ... - PNAS
    Jul 15, 2024 · We reveal that multiple vectors learned during path integration can be transferred to parallel long-term memories and that these vectors can be recalled at a ...
  290. [290]
    Parallel vector memories in the brain of a bee as ... - PubMed
    Jul 23, 2024 · Bees in particular exhibit complex navigation behaviors including creating optimal routes and novel shortcuts between locations, an ability hi …
  291. [291]
    Bees do not use nearest-neighbour rules for optimization of multi ...
    Aug 17, 2011 · To test whether bees rely on nearest-neighbour movements, we investigated the travel optimization performance of traplining bumble-bees faced ...Missing: invertebrate | Show results with:invertebrate
  292. [292]
    proficiency is maintained across elemental and higher-order visual ...
    Highlighted Article: Bees show cognitive specialization, with some individuals being consistently better learners than the others within a sensory.
  293. [293]
    Cognitive Ability in Fish | Request PDF - ResearchGate
    Aug 7, 2025 · Here, we test whether loser effects or individual memory mediate contest behaviour in the African cichlid, Julidochromis transcriptus. We ...<|separator|>
  294. [294]
    Subordinate Fish Mediate Aggressiveness Using Recent Contest ...
    Memorizing dominance relationships can help animals avoid unwinnable subsequent contests. However, when competitive ability changes over time—for example, ...
  295. [295]
    adaptive specializations versus general process - PubMed
    The contemporary ecological approach to animal cognition argues that animals have evolved species-specific and problem-specific processes to solve problems.Missing: generalization | Show results with:generalization
  296. [296]
    https://brill.com/view/journals/beh/158/12-13/article-p1057_1.xml
  297. [297]
    The Use of Cognition by Amphibians Confronting Environmental ...
    Amphibians also have a 'cognitive perspective' which means they can infer another animal's intent [35]. This is critical information when that other animal is a ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  298. [298]
    Can Animals or Computers Have Metacognition? - Scientific American
    Sep 1, 2014 · The evidence is not enough to conclude that animals have metacognition. For one thing, the anterior prefrontal cortex, a key brain area for human metacognition ...
  299. [299]
    (PDF) Evidence of mood states in reptiles - ResearchGate
    Aug 10, 2025 · These findings significantly extend contemporary knowledge of the affective and cognitive capacity of reptiles and have important implications, ...
  300. [300]
    Researchers develop new AI tool for advanced animal behavior ...
    May 28, 2024 · SUBTLE classifies and analyzes animal behavior through AI learning based on 3D movement information.Missing: parsing | Show results with:parsing
  301. [301]
    Combining AI and Neuroscience to Enhance Understanding of ...
    Dec 27, 2024 · An AI-based analysis tool called SUBTLE, which can classify and analyze animal behavior by learning from 3D motion data.Missing: parsing | Show results with:parsing
  302. [302]
    The Animal-AI Environment: A virtual laboratory for comparative ...
    Feb 28, 2025 · The Animal-AI Environment is a game-based platform for AI and cognition research, modeling cognition in humans and animals, and building ...Missing: reality ethology
  303. [303]
    The Animal-AI Environment: A virtual laboratory for comparative ...
    The Animal-AI Environment offers a new approach for modelling cognition in humans and non-human animals, and for building biologically inspired artificial ...Missing: parsing | Show results with:parsing
  304. [304]
    A new approach for better understanding animal consciousness
    Feb 20, 2025 · A team of researchers has outlined a new approach for better understanding the depths of animal consciousness, a method that may yield new insights.Missing: probes | Show results with:probes
  305. [305]
    Temporal context-guided memory capabilities in rodents - Nature
    May 28, 2025 · Environmental contexts serve as powerful cues for episodic memory, allowing humans to recall events tied to specific settings.
  306. [306]
    Neuroscientist's Behavioral Toolbox for Studying Episodic-Like ...
    Aug 27, 2024 · This review addresses this gap by presenting an overview of 19 rodent behavioral tasks designed to assess key aspects of episodic memory testable in rodents.
  307. [307]
    Can the insect brain help us develop smarter, faster AI? - NPR
    Mar 8, 2024 · Dragonflies intercept their prey with 95% accuracy. Understanding how their brains function could be the key to building more efficient algorithms and tech.
  308. [308]
    Design of and Experiments on a Dragonfly-Inspired Robot
    Aug 7, 2025 · This paper describes the design of dragonfly-inspired robots. Dragonflies demonstrate unique and superior flight performance compared with ...
  309. [309]
    Animal cognition research reveals a 'treasure trove of innovation'
    May 20, 2025 · Monash University Research Fellow Dr. Scarlett Howard has published new research detailing how animal brains are a treasure trove of innovation.Missing: measurement fMRI EEG tracking drones 2023-2025
  310. [310]
    Animal welfare definitions, frameworks, and assessment tools - NIH
    As moral agents, humans are able to ascribe moral status to animals. This moral status should be the basis for considering animals as morally considerable for ...Missing: boundaries | Show results with:boundaries
  311. [311]
    The Moral Status of Animals - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
    Jul 1, 2003 · Similarly, Lessard (2024) argues that grounding moral status in agency can offer a better alternative than sentience for the legal protection ...
  312. [312]
    Beyond Bio-Inspired Robotics: How Multi-Robot Systems Can ...
    Experiments with multi-robot systems offer a powerful toolkit to deepen our understanding of various forms of swarming and other social animal organizations.