Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Nanoengineering

Nanoengineering is the discipline that applies engineering principles to design, fabricate, and manipulate materials and devices at the nanoscale, typically involving dimensions from 1 to 100 nanometers, where quantum and surface effects dominate material properties.^[1]^[2] This field integrates concepts from physics, chemistry, and materials science to enable bottom-up assembly of atoms and molecules or top-down etching of bulk materials into nanostructures, yielding properties such as enhanced strength, conductivity, or reactivity not achievable at macro scales.^[1] Key applications span nanoelectronics for faster transistors, nanomedicine for targeted drug delivery, and energy systems like efficient solar cells or batteries incorporating nanomaterials.^[3]^[4] The conceptual foundations trace to Richard Feynman's 1959 lecture envisioning atomic-scale manipulation, with the term "nanoengineering" formalized by Norio Taniguchi in 1974 to describe precision machining at nanometer resolutions.^[5] Milestones include the 1981 invention of the scanning tunneling microscope for atomic imaging, the 1985 discovery of fullerenes, and 1991 synthesis of carbon nanotubes, which exhibit tensile strengths over 100 times that of steel at a fraction of the weight.^[6] These advances have driven commercial products, such as nanoparticle-enhanced composites in aerospace and quantum dot displays in consumer electronics, though scalability remains challenged by precise control over nanoscale uniformity.^[3] Empirical achievements underscore causal links between nanostructure and function, as in graphene's ballistic electron transport enabling terahertz-speed devices.^[7] While nanoengineering promises transformative efficiencies—e.g., nanomaterials reducing energy consumption in catalysis by orders of magnitude—potential risks include unintended toxicity from nanoparticle aggregation in biological systems or environmental persistence, with empirical studies showing dose-dependent cellular damage in vitro but variable in vivo outcomes requiring further causal validation beyond correlative data.^[8]^[9] Controversies arise from uneven regulatory frameworks, where optimistic projections from industry sources contrast with cautious assessments emphasizing exposure uncertainties, highlighting the need for prioritized empirical risk modeling over perception-driven narratives.^[10] Despite these, the field's growth, fueled by interdisciplinary programs at institutions like UC San Diego, positions it as a cornerstone for addressing grand challenges in sustainability and computation.^[11]

Fundamentals

Definition and Scope

Nanoengineering constitutes the engineering discipline dedicated to the design, fabrication, and manipulation of materials, structures, and devices at the nanoscale, where dimensions range from approximately 1 to 100 nanometers.^[12] ^[13] This field applies established engineering methodologies to exploit the distinctive physical, chemical, and biological behaviors that emerge at such scales, including quantum confinement effects that alter electronic properties and elevated surface-to-volume ratios that amplify reactivity and mechanical attributes relative to bulk counterparts.^[12] ^[1] In contrast to nanotechnology, which primarily involves the scientific investigation of nanoscale phenomena, nanoengineering prioritizes the practical synthesis and assembly of functional systems, often bridging nanoscale elements with macroscopic applications to yield scalable technologies.^[2] ^[14] Atomic and molecular-level precision enables emergent properties—such as tunable optical responses or superior catalytic efficiency—that cannot be replicated through conventional macroscale engineering, thereby facilitating innovations in targeted drug delivery, high-performance sensors, and energy storage devices.^[12] ^[15] The scope encompasses core activities like nanomaterials synthesis, nanofabrication processes, and device integration, requiring rigorous control over composition, morphology, and interfaces to harness these scale-dependent phenomena reliably.^[1] This interdisciplinary integration draws from physics for quantum modeling, chemistry for molecular assembly, materials science for property optimization, and biology for bio-compatible interfaces, ensuring engineered outcomes align with real-world performance criteria rather than isolated nanoscale curiosities.^[15]

Nanoscale Principles and Phenomena

Quantum confinement arises in semiconductor nanostructures when the physical dimensions approach the de Broglie wavelength of charge carriers, typically 1–10 nm, confining electrons and holes to discrete energy states rather than continuous bands observed in bulk materials. This effect, derived from solving the Schrödinger equation in a finite potential well, widens the effective bandgap inversely with particle size; for example, in CdSe nanocrystals, reducing diameter from 5 nm to 2 nm increases the bandgap from approximately 1.8 eV to over 2.3 eV, blueshifting photoluminescence.^[16]^[17] Such quantization stems causally from the reduced phase space for wavefunctions, elevating ground-state energies without invoking non-physical mechanisms. High surface-to-volume ratios, exceeding 50% of atoms at surfaces for particles below 10 nm, dominate nanomaterial behavior by amplifying interfacial interactions over bulk lattice cohesion. This ratio scales as 3/r for spherical particles of radius r, enhancing reactivity; for instance, a 1 nm gold cluster exposes nearly all atoms to surroundings, altering catalytic sites and coordination numbers compared to bulk gold's close-packed structure.^[18]^[19] Thermodynamically, surface energy contributions depress melting points via the Gibbs-Thomson relation, ΔT_m ∝ 1/r; gold nanoparticles of 2–3 nm melt below 300 K, versus bulk gold's 1337 K, as undercoordinated surface atoms lower the free energy barrier for phase transition.^[20]^[21] In ferromagnetic nanoparticles smaller than single-domain sizes (typically <20 nm for iron oxides), superparamagnetism emerges when thermal energy kT exceeds anisotropy energy barriers, allowing magnetization vectors to fluctuate rapidly without hysteresis. This Néel relaxation time τ = τ_0 exp(KV/kT), with volume V ∝ r^3 and anisotropy K, shortens below milliseconds for 10 nm particles at room temperature, yielding reversible, field-induced alignment akin to paramagnets but with saturation moments of ferrimagnetic domains.^[22]^[23] Localized surface plasmon resonance in noble metal nanoparticles involves coherent oscillations of conduction electrons against the ionic lattice, driven by incident light matching the Mie resonance frequency ω ∝ 1/√(ε_m + 2ε_d) for spheres in dielectric ε_d. For 20 nm gold spheres, this peaks around 520 nm, with damping from electron scattering increasing for r < 10 nm, enabling size-tunable extinction coefficients up to 10^9 M^{-1} cm^{-1} from atomic-scale free carrier dynamics.^[24]^[25] Brownian motion governs nanoparticle dynamics in fluids, with diffusion coefficient D = kT/(6πηr) per Stokes-Einstein, yielding root-mean-square displacements scaling as √(Dt) over microseconds for 10 nm particles, far exceeding bulk sedimentation. This random walk, rooted in momentum transfer from solvent molecules via van der Waals and hydrodynamic forces, persists unhindered in liquid-phase imaging, revealing thermal equilibrium without aggregation barriers in dilute suspensions.^[26]^[27] Empirical validation via scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) spectroscopy resolves discrete density-of-states peaks at atomic scales, contrasting bulk Fermi seas; for example, in low-dimensional metal clusters, dI/dV spectra show quantized levels spaced by ΔE ≈ ħ^2/(2m r^2), confirming confinement from boundary-imposed wavefunction orthogonality rather than averaged continuum approximations.^[28]^[29] These observations underscore causal origins in atomic orbital overlaps and Pauli exclusion, privileging quantum mechanical simulations over phenomenological models for predictive fidelity.

Historical Development

Pre-Modern and Early Concepts

Ancient artisans produced materials exhibiting nanoscale structures through empirical processes, such as controlled heating and alloying, long before theoretical understanding of atomic scales. Damascus steel, derived from Indian wootz ingots exported to the Middle East by the 3rd century CE and forged into blades by the 14th century, contained carbon nanotubes and iron nanowires approximately 10-20 nanometers in diameter, which contributed to exceptional sharpness and resilience.^[30] These structures formed during high-temperature carburization and cyclic forging, where trace impurities like vanadium catalyzed nanotube precipitation, as revealed by transmission electron microscopy on 17th-century specimens preserving earlier techniques.^[31] Similarly, carbon nanostructures appeared in carburizing slags from ancient Indian sites dating to 400 BCE, indicating scalable empirical mastery of carbon diffusion at the nanoscale via bloomery furnaces exceeding 1000°C.^[31] In Roman glassmaking, the 4th-century Lycurgus Cup incorporated colloidal gold and silver nanoparticles (50-100 nm) dispersed in a silica matrix, enabling dichroic effects that shifted from green to red under transmitted light due to plasmon resonance.^[32] This resulted from deliberate addition of minute metal quantities during melting and annealing, followed by reduction in a controlled atmosphere, as confirmed by energy-dispersive X-ray analysis and electron microscopy on the British Museum artifact.^[33] Such techniques paralleled broader ancient uses of fine soot particles—agglomerates of 10-50 nm carbon spheres—from lampblack collected via oil-flame deposition, employed in Egyptian inks from 2000 BCE for durable black pigments on papyrus, where nanoscale morphology enhanced adhesion and opacity without binders.^[34] These examples demonstrate causal efficacy of trial-and-error metallurgy and pyrotechnology, where process parameters like temperature gradients and impurity interactions yielded property-enhancing nanostructures, independent of modern instrumentation or theory. Archaeological metallography links high-heat forging in wootz to carbide banding and nanotube alignment for superior edge retention, outperforming contemporaneous steels by factors of 1.5-2 in hardness.^[35] Absent deliberate nanoscale targeting, these outcomes reflect human adaptation to observable material behaviors, foreshadowing nanoengineering principles through reproducible empirical chains rather than abstract design.

20th-Century Foundations

The development of electron microscopy in the 1930s provided the first tools for visualizing structures at the nanoscale, enabling scientists to observe atomic arrangements and material phenomena previously inaccessible to optical microscopes. Ernst Ruska and Max Knoll constructed the initial transmission electron microscope (TEM) in 1931, achieving resolutions down to approximately 1 nanometer by using electron beams rather than light, which revealed nanostructures such as crystal lattices and particle sizes in metals and biological samples.^[36] This instrumentation shifted microscopy from mere observation toward quantitative analysis of atomic-scale features, laying groundwork for intentional nanoscale engineering.^[37] Richard Feynman's 1959 lecture, "There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom," delivered on December 29 at the American Physical Society meeting in Pasadena, California, articulated a visionary framework for manipulating matter at the atomic level. Feynman proposed building machines small enough to rearrange individual atoms, predicting applications like ultra-dense data storage and biological repair through direct atomic assembly, while emphasizing the physical feasibility given sufficient precision tools.^[38] Although not immediately pursued experimentally, the talk catalyzed theoretical interest in bottom-up fabrication, highlighting that atomic-scale design could bypass traditional bulk processing limitations without violating known physics.^[39] Norio Taniguchi formalized the field in 1974 by coining the term "nanotechnology" in his paper "On the Basic Concept of 'Nano-Technology'," defining it as processes involving the production, separation, consolidation, and deformation of materials by controlling individual atoms or molecules to achieve dimensions of 1 to 100 nanometers.^[40] This conceptualization extended beyond observation to precision machining and synthesis at the nanoscale, particularly in semiconductors, bridging theoretical ideas with engineering applications. In 1981, K. Eric Drexler advanced molecular-scale design in his PNAS paper "Molecular Engineering: An Approach to the Development of General Capabilities for Molecular Manipulation," proposing programmable molecular assemblers capable of self-replication and building complex structures atom-by-atom, inspired by biological systems like ribosomes.^[41] These ideas emphasized causal mechanisms for positional control, though Drexler's self-replicating concepts remained speculative without empirical validation at the time. A pivotal empirical demonstration occurred in 1989 when IBM researchers Don Eigler and Erhard Schweizer used a scanning tunneling microscope (STM), operating at 4 Kelvin, to manipulate individual xenon atoms on a nickel surface, arranging 35 atoms to form the letters "IBM" over 22 hours.^[42] Published in Nature in 1990, this experiment marked the first controlled repositioning of single atoms, validating the feasibility of atomic manipulation predicted by Feynman and enabling precise nanoscale patterning.^[43] The STM, invented in 1981 by Gerd Binnig and Heinrich Rohrer, provided the instrumental precision for such feats, transitioning nanoengineering from conceptual discourse to verifiable atomic design.^[42]

Post-2000 Milestones

The U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI), launched in 2000 under President Clinton to coordinate federal research and development efforts, marked a pivotal institutional commitment to nanoengineering, with cumulative funding exceeding $40 billion from 2001 to 2023 across multiple agencies.^[6]^[44] This initiative was formalized by the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act (P.L. 108-153) in December 2003, establishing priorities for scalable applications in electronics, materials, and energy while emphasizing interagency coordination and environmental health assessments.^[45] The NNI's emphasis on bottom-up assembly and nanoscale fabrication spurred private-sector investment, enabling transitions from laboratory prototypes to manufacturable devices. Globally, the NNI prompted analogous programs: Japan initiated its national nanotechnology R&D strategy in April 2001, South Korea followed in July 2001 with goals to rank among top global leaders by 2015, and the European Union integrated nanotechnology into its Framework Programme 6 (2002–2006) with coordinated funding approaching €1 billion annually by the mid-2000s from national and EU sources.^[44]^[46] China's program, launched post-2000 in response to the NNI, allocated over $1.3 billion by 2013, focusing on high-volume production of nanomaterials.^[47] These efforts collectively invested tens of billions worldwide since 2000, accelerating scalable nanoengineering by funding shared infrastructure like cleanrooms and characterization facilities.^[48] Technological breakthroughs in 2004 exemplified progress toward scalability: researchers demonstrated the first high-speed carbon nanotube field-effect transistors operating at GHz frequencies, achieving switching speeds rivaling silicon devices and hinting at extensions to Moore's Law through atomic-scale channels.^[49] Concurrently, Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov isolated single-layer graphene via mechanical exfoliation, revealing exceptional electron mobility over 200 times that of silicon, which earned the 2010 Nobel Prize in Physics and catalyzed two-dimensional materials for high-density electronics.^[50] These advances directly supported nanoelectronics scaling, with transistor densities in commercial chips increasing from ~100 million per die in 2004 (90 nm nodes) to billions by the 2010s via finFET architectures incorporating nanoscale gates.^[51] Commercialization milestones underscored practical scalability: by 2005, nanoparticle-based sunscreens using 10–50 nm titanium dioxide and zinc oxide particles entered widespread markets, providing transparent UV protection without the opacity of micron-scale predecessors, driven by formulations that dispersed aggregates for uniform film formation.^[52] Government funding facilitated regulatory pathways and safety data, enabling annual production in the thousands of tons while mitigating environmental release concerns through coated nanoparticles.^[53] Such applications validated nanoengineering's role in extending material performance limits, with causal links to funded R&D in dispersion techniques and toxicity profiling.

Education and Professional Training

Degree Programs and Curricula

Bachelor's degree programs in nanoengineering typically integrate foundational sciences such as physics, chemistry, mathematics, and materials science with specialized nanoscale engineering principles, spanning four years and requiring around 180-200 units of coursework.^[54] These programs emphasize core topics including nanomaterials synthesis and properties, nanofabrication techniques, quantum mechanics, and scaling laws governing nanoscale phenomena, often through sequential NanoEngineering-specific courses after initial basic science preparation.^[55] For instance, the University of California, San Diego's B.S. in NanoEngineering mandates 137 major units, including hands-on laboratory components utilizing tools like scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) for characterization, alongside 20 units of technical electives to foster practical skills in device design and integration.^[56] Similarly, the University at Albany's B.S. in Nanoscale Engineering combines biology and engineering design with nanoscale-focused labs to build proficiency in molecular manipulation and fabrication processes.^[57] Master's programs in nanoengineering, often professional-oriented and accessible via online formats, target graduates from science or engineering backgrounds and require 30 credit hours without a thesis or residency, prioritizing applied knowledge over pure research.^[58] North Carolina State University's Master of Nanoengineering (MNAE), launched in 2013, structures its curriculum around 12 credits of core courses in nanoscale properties and processes, 12 credits in concentration areas like nanomaterials or energy applications, and 6 credits of technical electives, incorporating modules on quantum effects and fabrication methods to equip students for industry roles in nanotechnology development.^[59] These programs stress interdisciplinary integration, with coursework addressing ethical considerations in nanoscale manipulation, though hands-on elements may rely on simulations or virtual labs for distance learners rather than physical SEM/AFM access.^[60] Doctoral programs in nanoengineering are research-intensive, preparing students for advanced careers through rigorous coursework, qualifying exams, and dissertation work focused on original contributions in nanoscale design or phenomena.^[61] Curricula build on bachelor's foundations with advanced quantum mechanics, nanofabrication, and characterization, emphasizing experimental labs using SEM and AFM for empirical validation of theoretical models.^[62] UC San Diego's Ph.D. in NanoEngineering, for example, requires comprehensive exams and dissertation research integrating chemical engineering principles with nanoscale innovation, prioritizing causal understanding of material behaviors over compliance-focused training.^[61] Since the early 2000s, such programs have expanded from pilot initiatives to established offerings at over a dozen U.S. institutions by 2025, reflecting demand for expertise in high-tech sectors amid limited ABET accreditation for the field.^[63]^[64]

Key Institutions and Research Centers

The University of California, San Diego's Department of NanoEngineering leads in applied nanoengineering research, with core focuses on biomedical nanotechnology, molecular nanomaterials, and sustainable energy applications, contributing to advancements in nanomedicine and flexible electronics through interdisciplinary projects.^[65]^[66] In 2024, the department received a $21 million endowment to expand research in nanomaterials for human health and energy storage, enabling empirical progress in scalable device fabrication tied to industrial needs.^[67] Georgia Tech's Marcus Nanotechnology Research Center supports bio-nano initiatives through open-access facilities for nanomaterials synthesis and characterization, fostering collaborations that translate nanoscale structures into energy-efficient devices and biological interfaces.^[68]^[69] Its bio-nano programs emphasize directed assembly and testing of nanostructures for real-world biomedical and materials applications, with shared infrastructure enhancing patentable innovations over isolated academic efforts.^[70] NSF-supported centers, such as Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers (MRSECs), drive U.S. nanoengineering via collaborative hubs like Penn State's focus on nanoscale materials assembly, yielding high-impact outputs in device prototyping and process scalability since their inception under the Nanoscale Science and Engineering program.^[71]^[72] These centers prioritize empirical validation through shared facilities, generating patents and publications that bridge fundamental phenomena to technological deployment.^[73] In Asia, Tsinghua University ranks among the global leaders in nanoscience output, second overall per U.S. News metrics, with extensive publications in high-impact journals like Nano Research (impact factor 9.9 as of 2023) advancing bottom-up fabrication and energy nanomaterials.^[74]^[75] Its research emphasizes quantifiable metrics, including over 35,000 citations in nanotechnology fields, supporting China's push for superior tech capabilities via state-industry linkages.^[76] European efforts center at Max Planck Institutes, where the Nanoscale Science Department at the Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research pursues bottom-up paradigms for quantum devices and molecular electronics, producing foundational data on nanostructure stability and interfaces.^[77] The MPI for Intelligent Systems integrates nano-bio interfaces for sensor development, prioritizing causal mechanisms in cell-surface interactions to enable practical advancements without ideological constraints.^[78] Private-sector hubs like Intel's nanoscale fabrication facilities exemplify industry-driven nanoengineering, leveraging proprietary fabs to produce semiconductor nodes below 5 nm, with contributions to over 200,000 global patents informing real-world computing scalability and energy efficiency.^[79] These ties ensure empirical focus on manufacturable outcomes, contrasting academic silos by directly funding applied R&D for military and commercial tech superiority.^[80]

Techniques and Fabrication Methods

Bottom-Up and Top-Down Approaches

Bottom-up approaches in nanoengineering involve constructing nanostructures atom-by-atom or molecule-by-molecule through processes such as chemical synthesis and self-assembly, leveraging thermodynamic driving forces to form ordered structures from smaller building blocks.^[81] In molecular self-assembly, techniques like DNA origami enable precise folding of long single-stranded DNA scaffolds via staple strands into custom shapes, with empirical studies showing single-fold yields limited by hybridization barriers and misfolding defects, often resulting in assembly efficiencies below 90% under optimized thermal annealing conditions.^[82] Similarly, block copolymer self-assembly directs phase separation into periodic nanoscale domains, such as cylinders or lamellae with feature sizes of 10-50 nm, but lab-scale demonstrations reveal defect densities influenced by chain architecture and substrate interactions, typically requiring directed templating to achieve long-range order beyond 1 μm² areas.^[83] These methods prioritize intrinsic molecular recognition for precision at the atomic scale, yet causal factors like kinetic trapping and entropy losses impose empirical limits on yield and uniformity without external guidance.^[84] Top-down approaches, conversely, start with bulk materials and subtract or pattern them to nanoscale dimensions using mechanical or lithographic techniques, enabling parallel fabrication over large areas but constrained by physical resolution limits tied to energy inputs and material removal efficiencies. Extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography, advanced in the 2020s, utilizes 13.5 nm wavelengths and high-numerical-aperture optics to pattern features below 5 nm, as demonstrated in mirror-based interferometric setups achieving 5 nm half-pitch lines with stochastic noise mitigated by dose optimization.^[85] Focused ion beam milling offers sub-10 nm precision for prototyping but suffers from serial processing and gallium implantation artifacts, limiting throughput to individual structures rather than wafer-scale production.^[86] Resolution in these methods is fundamentally bounded by diffraction and beam divergence, where shorter wavelengths reduce but do not eliminate scattering losses, necessitating multi-patterning steps that increase energy costs and defect risks.^[87] The paradigms exhibit trade-offs in precision versus scalability: bottom-up self-assembly affords potential atomic-level control but grapples with stochastic defects and low throughput, often yielding <10¹² structures per cm² in unoptimized runs, while top-down etching provides verifiable high-volume metrics, such as EUV tools processing 200 wafers per hour at >99% overlay accuracy, albeit with feature fidelity degrading below 3 nm due to edge roughness.^[88] Hybrid strategies integrate both, for instance, using top-down lithography to template bottom-up block copolymer alignment for sub-10 nm patterns over wafer areas, achieving defect densities reduced by orders of magnitude compared to pure self-assembly, with throughput metrics approaching 10¹⁴ features per second in directed systems.^[86] Such convergence exploits top-down parallelism to guide bottom-up specificity, as in convergent assembly protocols combining etching with molecular affinity, yielding functional prototypes with empirical uniformity exceeding 95% over 100 μm scales.^[89] These integrations highlight causal dependencies on interface engineering to balance yield against fabrication energy, prioritizing measurable defect rates over idealized atomic perfection.^[90]

Characterization and Measurement Tools

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) utilizes a focused electron beam to generate images of surface topography and composition in nanomaterials, achieving lateral resolutions of 1-5 nm with field emission guns and enabling elemental analysis via energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy.^[91] Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) penetrates samples to reveal internal crystalline structure and defects at atomic scales, with modern aberration-corrected systems providing sub-0.1 nm resolution for direct lattice imaging.^[92] Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) probes surface forces mechanically with a cantilever tip, yielding vertical resolutions of ~0.1 nm and 3D topographic maps suitable for both conductive and insulating samples, often complementing SEM for quantitative height profiling.^[91] Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM) detects quantum tunneling currents between a sharp tip and conductive sample surfaces, delivering atomic resolution (lateral ~0.1 nm, vertical ~0.01 nm) since its demonstration in the mid-1980s, which allows manipulation and spectroscopy of individual atoms.^[93] Raman spectroscopy elucidates molecular composition, phase, and strain in nanomaterials through inelastic light scattering, with tip-enhanced variants improving spatial resolution to below 10 nm for localized vibrational analysis.^[94] These techniques prioritize direct empirical data over computational models, as uncalibrated imaging can produce artifacts mimicking nanoscale features, necessitating validation against physical standards.^[95] Recent advances in Cryo-Electron Microscopy (Cryo-EM) facilitate high-fidelity 3D reconstruction of beam-sensitive nanomaterials like biomolecules and soft matter, attaining sub-nanometer resolutions (e.g., ~0.2 nm) via phase plates and direct electron detectors to minimize radiation damage.^[96] Calibration protocols, including traceable reference materials from bodies like NIST, ensure measurement accuracy across tools by accounting for instrumental drift and environmental factors, thereby distinguishing genuine nanoscale phenomena from measurement errors.^[95] Such empirical rigor underpins reliable nanoengineering outcomes, as simulations alone cannot confirm causal material behaviors observed in calibrated experiments.^[97]

Applications

Biomedical and Health Applications

Nanoengineering has enabled precise control over nanoscale structures for biomedical applications, particularly in enhancing drug efficacy through targeted delivery and reducing off-target effects. Nanoparticles, often engineered with biocompatible materials like liposomes or polymers, facilitate the encapsulation and controlled release of therapeutics, leveraging the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumors to accumulate preferentially at disease sites.^[98] This approach contrasts with conventional bulk drugs, where systemic distribution leads to higher toxicity; empirical studies show nanoparticle formulations can lower peak plasma concentrations and extend circulation half-life, as demonstrated in liposomal doxorubicin systems.^[99] A landmark example is Doxil (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin), the first FDA-approved nanomedicine in 1995 for treating AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma, later expanded to ovarian cancer and multiple myeloma.^[98] Clinical trials established its superiority over free doxorubicin, with reduced cardiotoxicity—incidence of congestive heart failure dropped from 21% to under 7% at cumulative doses up to 550 mg/m²—due to the liposomal coating minimizing uptake by healthy cardiac tissue while exploiting tumor vasculature for delivery.^[100] Subsequent nano-drug approvals, such as Abraxane (nab-paclitaxel) in 2005 for breast cancer, further validated protein-bound nanoparticles, showing improved response rates (33% vs. 19% in phase III trials) and progression-free survival via albumin-mediated transcytosis into tumor cells.^[99] In diagnostics and monitoring, nanoparticle-based biosensors integrated into wearables have advanced real-time health tracking in the 2020s. Gold or silica nanoparticles functionalized with bioreceptors enable detection of biomarkers like glucose or cortisol at picomolar sensitivities, outperforming traditional assays in portability and speed; for instance, nanosensor patches have achieved 95% accuracy in continuous glucose monitoring for diabetes management, correlating with invasive methods.^[101] These devices, often employing plasmonic or electrochemical transduction, support non-invasive sweat or interstitial fluid analysis, with clinical prototypes demonstrating stability over 14-day wear periods.^[102] Tissue engineering benefits from nanoengineered scaffolds, such as electrospun nanofibers that mimic the extracellular matrix's topography to guide cell behavior. Collagen or polycaprolactone nanofibers, with diameters of 100-500 nm, promote fibroblast proliferation and vascularization in wound healing models, yielding 2-3 times faster regeneration rates compared to microscale scaffolds in rodent studies.^[103] In bone regeneration, hydroxyapatite-incorporated nanofibers enhance osteoblast differentiation, with in vivo efficacy shown by 40-60% increased bone volume in critical-sized defects after 8 weeks, attributed to nanoscale surface cues activating mechanotransduction pathways.^[104] The deployment of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in mRNA vaccines marked a pivotal achievement in 2020, with Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna formulations receiving emergency use authorization in December for SARS-CoV-2 prevention. These ionizable LNPs, approximately 100 nm in size, protect mRNA from degradation and facilitate endosomal escape for cytosolic translation, enabling robust immune responses; phase III trials reported 95% efficacy against symptomatic COVID-19, with LNPs comprising 50-60% of the formulation by mass for optimal delivery.^[105] While long-term immunogenicity data remain under study, the causal link between LNP design and spike protein expression has been empirically confirmed in cellular models, underscoring nanoengineering's role in scalable vaccine platforms.^[106]

Electronics and Computing

Nanoscale engineering has enabled the progressive miniaturization of transistors, the fundamental building blocks of integrated circuits, thereby sustaining increases in computational density and performance. Fin field-effect transistors (FinFETs), introduced by Intel in its 22 nm process node in 2011, represented a pivotal shift from planar designs by adopting a three-dimensional fin structure that improved gate control and reduced leakage currents, allowing for denser packing of components.^[107] Subsequent advancements to gate-all-around (GAA) field-effect transistors (GAAFETs), which encase the channel on all sides for superior electrostatic control, are being implemented in sub-2 nm nodes; TSMC initiated risk production for its 2 nm GAA process in 2024, with mass production slated for late 2025, while Samsung targets similar timelines.^[108] These nanoengineered structures have facilitated transistor densities exceeding 100 million per square millimeter, extending the trajectory of Moore's Law—originally predicting doublings of component counts approximately every two years—into the nanoscale regime through empirical scaling demonstrations.^[109] Quantum dots, semiconductor nanocrystals tunable at the nanometer scale, have enhanced display technologies and emerging quantum computing architectures. In displays, quantum dots serve as color converters in quantum-dot light-emitting diode (QLED) systems, enabling wider color gamuts and higher brightness; Samsung commercialized QLED televisions leveraging this technology starting in 2015, achieving efficiencies superior to traditional LCDs by exploiting size-dependent emission wavelengths.^[110] For quantum computing, quantum dots confine electrons to form spin qubits, offering scalability advantages due to compatibility with semiconductor fabrication; demonstrations in gate-defined silicon quantum dots have achieved coherent spin manipulation times exceeding 1 millisecond at cryogenic temperatures, positioning them as viable for fault-tolerant systems.^[111] Nanowire-based phase-change memory (PCM) devices further exemplify nanoengineering's role in advancing storage technologies, where chalcogenide nanowires switch between amorphous and crystalline states to store data with high endurance. Developments such as self-aligned nanotube-nanowire PCM structures have demonstrated switching energies below 1 nanojoule per bit, enabling non-volatile storage densities that double roughly every decade in line with extended Moore scaling trends. These configurations mitigate void formation issues in bulk PCM, supporting multi-level cells with over 10^6 write cycles.^[112] While nanoscale transistors yield energy efficiency gains—such as reduced dynamic power dissipation scaling with the square of voltage and linear with capacitance, empirically verified in sub-5 nm prototypes—their shrinkage confronts quantum tunneling, where electrons leak through thin barriers, increasing off-state currents and limiting subthreshold swing to above 60 mV/decade at room temperature.^[113] Engineering mitigations, including two-dimensional (2D) materials like transition metal dichalcogenides (e.g., MoS2), address this by enabling band-gap engineering for tunnel field-effect transistors (TFETs) that achieve sub-60 mV/decade swings via controlled band-to-band tunneling rather than thermionic emission, with prototypes demonstrating on-currents over 100 μA/μm.^[114] Such 2D channels, with atomic-scale thickness, empirically suppress short-channel effects and sustain performance below 1 nm gate lengths.^[115]

Energy and Materials Engineering

Nanostructured silicon nanowires have been employed as anodes in lithium-ion batteries to address the limitations of traditional graphite electrodes, which offer a theoretical capacity of approximately 372 mAh/g. Silicon's theoretical capacity exceeds 4200 mAh/g, but volume expansion during lithiation causes pulverization; nanowire morphology accommodates this expansion, enabling reversible capacities of up to 3500 mAh/g initially, stabilizing at around 2000 mAh/g after 200 cycles at 0.2C rates.^[116] This represents a potential doubling or more in energy density compared to graphite-based systems, with empirical cycling tests confirming retention over hundreds of cycles when integrated with protective coatings or composites.^[117] In solar energy conversion, perovskite materials, often engineered at the nanoscale for improved crystal structure and defect passivation, have achieved power conversion efficiencies surpassing 25% in single-junction cells and exceeding 33% in tandem configurations with silicon by 2025. For instance, a certified 25.2% efficiency was reported for a perovskite cell in 2025, while tandem devices reached 33.1% with enhanced open-circuit voltages up to 2.01 V.^[118] ^[119] These gains stem from nanoscale grain control and interface engineering, which reduce recombination losses and boost charge extraction, though stability under operational conditions remains a focus for commercialization.^[120] For advanced materials, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) incorporated into polymer composites enhance mechanical properties, with additions as low as 1 wt% yielding up to 35% increases in tensile strength and improved toughness due to their high aspect ratio and load transfer efficiency.^[121] Higher loadings, such as 0.5 wt% multi-walled CNTs in epoxy, have demonstrated 66% flexural strength gains and 41% modulus improvements, outperforming bulk reinforcements in strength-to-weight ratios—up to four times that of conventional carbon fibers axially.^[122] Graphene, with intrinsic in-plane electrical conductivity surpassing copper by about 70% in single-layer form, enables composites that boost copper's conductivity to 104% of the International Annealed Copper Standard at low volume fractions (0.008 vol%), verified through macroscopic foil and wire tests.^[124] ^[125] In fuel cells, nanocatalysts such as platinum nanoparticles reduce precious metal loading while maintaining activity, facilitating commercial adoption in hydrogen vehicles like those from Toyota and Hyundai, where they enhance durability and cut costs by optimizing surface area and alloying (e.g., Pt-Ni).^[126] Despite scalability concerns over production costs, empirical market integration—evident in perovskite tandems scaling to 350 cm² modules at 27% efficiency and CNT composites in aerospace prototypes—demonstrates viability beyond laboratory constraints, countering claims of inherent inoperability with real-world performance metrics.^[127]^[128]

Environmental and Other Uses

Nanoengineered materials, such as titanium dioxide (TiO₂) nanoparticles, enable photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants in water purification systems. Under ultraviolet or visible light, TiO₂ generates reactive oxygen species that mineralize contaminants like dyes and pharmaceuticals, achieving degradation rates exceeding 90% in laboratory and pilot-scale studies for compounds such as methylene blue.^[129] ^[130] Field applications, including nanocomposite filters, demonstrate sustained removal of heavy metals and bacteria, with empirical data from engineered photocatalysts showing up to 95% efficiency in real wastewater under solar irradiation, outperforming conventional methods in scalability and cost-effectiveness.^[131] In agriculture, nano-fertilizers enhance nutrient delivery through controlled release mechanisms, improving uptake efficiency by 20-30% compared to bulk fertilizers and boosting crop yields by similar margins in field trials. For instance, nano-encapsulated urea or zinc formulations have increased wheat and rice productivity by 20-25% while reducing application rates by half, minimizing runoff and soil degradation as evidenced in saline and nutrient-poor soils.^[132] ^[133] Nano-pesticides, via targeted delivery, further cut usage by 30-50% in trials, maintaining pest control efficacy through prolonged adhesion and penetration, which supports sustainable farming without proportional environmental loading.^[134] ^[135] Beyond remediation, nanoengineering finds niche applications in cosmetics and textiles. In cosmetics, silver or silica nanoparticles provide antimicrobial and UV-protective functions in formulations, with stability enhancements allowing deeper skin penetration and reduced irritation in clinical evaluations.^[136] Textile coatings incorporating carbon nanotubes or TiO₂ impart self-cleaning and water-repellent properties, extending fabric lifespan by 2-3 times in durability tests while enabling eco-friendly dyeing processes that lower water and chemical consumption.^[137] These uses leverage nanoscale precision for efficiency gains, with empirical performance data from material trials validating benefits over hype, though controlled synthesis remains key to realizing net positives.^[131]

Challenges and Risks

Technical and Scalability Issues

Bottom-up approaches in nanoengineering, such as self-assembly and chemical synthesis, suffer from inherent stochastic processes that introduce variability in nanostructure formation, leading to defects like irregular particle sizes or incomplete alignments that reduce overall yield.^[138] These defects arise from uncontrolled molecular interactions and environmental factors, often resulting in non-uniform properties that hinder reliable production at scale.^[139] In contrast, top-down methods like photolithography face escalating costs for precision tooling; for instance, full mask sets for 3nm semiconductor processes exceed $40 million, driven by the need for extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography to achieve sub-10nm features.^[140] Integration challenges emerge when connecting nanoscale components to macroscopic systems, where mismatches in mechanical, electrical, or thermal properties cause failures such as delamination or signal loss. Empirical data indicate that fabrication yields frequently fall below 90% in complex nano-devices, like polymer nano-memristors, limiting commercialization due to high defect densities and process variability.^[141] This yield threshold reflects causal limitations in defect correction and alignment precision, as nanoscale irregularities propagate during assembly, increasing scrap rates and costs.^[142] Efforts to address these issues include automation and AI-driven optimization, which have gained traction in the 2020s to enhance process control and predictability. Machine learning algorithms analyze real-time data from nanofabrication tools to predict and mitigate defects, improving throughput in techniques like nanopatterning.^[143] For example, AI integration in nanomanufacturing workflows enables adaptive parameter tuning, reducing variability in bottom-up synthesis and boosting yields toward commercial viability, though full scalability remains constrained by computational demands and validation needs.^[144]

Health and Toxicity Concerns

Engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) present health risks primarily through occupational exposure during synthesis, handling, and fabrication, with inhalation as the dominant route, potentially leading to pulmonary inflammation, oxidative stress, and translocation to secondary organs like the liver and brain.^[145]^[146] A central mechanism involves the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can damage cellular components, induce DNA strand breaks, and trigger apoptosis at elevated concentrations.^[147]^[148] Toxicity manifests in a dose-dependent manner, with significant adverse effects observed in vitro and in animal models only at supra-physiological levels, such as ≥400 µg/ml for certain metallic nanoparticles, far exceeding typical workplace airborne concentrations of 0.01–1 µg/m³.^[149]^[150] Realistic, prolonged low-dose exposure regimens, mimicking occupational scenarios, yield milder or negligible systemic responses compared to acute high-dose administrations, as evidenced by fractionated dosing studies showing reduced inflammation and genotoxicity.^[151]^[152] EU nanosafety initiatives, including the NanoSafety Cluster, have advanced risk assessment protocols emphasizing these exposure-relevant thresholds, revealing low acute systemic toxicity for many ENPs under controlled conditions without widespread epidemiological signals of harm despite decades of industrial use.^[153]^[154] Catastrophic scenarios, such as the "gray goo" hypothesis of uncontrolled self-replication consuming biomass, lack empirical or physical feasibility; nanotechnology pioneer K. Eric Drexler retracted the concept in 2004, citing thermodynamic inefficiencies, replication error rates, and the absence of viable molecular assemblers in current engineering paradigms.^[155]^[156] OSHA guidelines address ENP hazards through general industry standards, advocating engineering controls, ventilation, and personal protective equipment like NIOSH-approved respirators, without nanomaterial-specific permissible exposure limits that could prematurely constrain scalable production—reflecting data that mitigation suffices to keep risks below those of conventional particulates.^[157]^[158] This evidence-based approach prioritizes verifiable exposure data over extrapolations from extreme conditions, enabling nanoengineering advancements while minimizing human health impacts.^[159]

Environmental and Ecological Risks

Engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) released from nanoengineered products, such as through wastewater effluent or agricultural applications, pose potential risks to terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems via accumulation in soil and water bodies.^[160] Field and laboratory studies indicate that silver nanoparticles (AgNPs), commonly used in antimicrobial coatings, can sorb to soil particles and exhibit toxicity to microbial communities at concentrations above 0.14 mg Ag kg⁻¹ soil, disrupting nutrient cycling and enzyme activity like FDA hydrolysis.^[161] However, environmental concentrations of AgNPs in soils remain low, typically in the ng/kg range (0.24–729 ng/kg), and transformation processes, including sulfidation to less bioavailable Ag₂S, accelerate degradation rates beyond initial model predictions, reducing long-term persistence.^[162]^[163] In aquatic systems, ENPs like copper and gold nanoparticles demonstrate trophic transfer across food chains, from algae to zooplankton and higher predators, but empirical data reveal limited biomagnification factors, often below 1, indicating minimal amplification up the chain.^[164]^[165] For instance, studies on CuNPs in simulated chains show transfer efficiency decreasing with organic matter presence, which stabilizes particles and curbs bioavailability, while metal ENPs undergo dissolution or aggregation that diminishes toxicity disparities across trophic levels.^[166] These findings contrast with early modeled fears of indefinite persistence, as real-world exposure scenarios highlight rapid environmental fate changes, such as sedimentation and dietary dilution, over prolonged accumulation.^[167] Critiques from environmental advocacy often emphasize precautionary bans due to modeled bioaccumulation risks, yet countervailing data underscore nano-catalysts' role in mitigating broader ecological harms, such as reducing industrial emissions of volatile organics and NOx by up to 90% in catalytic converters via enhanced surface reactivity.^[168]^[169] U.S. EPA assessments from the 2020s, drawing on occurrence and fate research, classify ENP ecological risks as generally low at predicted environmental release concentrations (PECs), comparable to legacy micropollutants like pesticides, and advocate engineering controls like filtration and recycling to manage releases without curtailing beneficial applications.^[170]^[171] Managed deployment, including end-of-life recovery, thus balances potential localized impacts against net emission reductions from nanoenabled technologies.^[172]

Ethical and Societal Implications

Regulatory Debates and Policy

In the United States, nanoscale materials are regulated under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), which treats them as chemical substances requiring pre-manufacture notices for new nanomaterials to assess potential risks before production or import.^[173]^[174] This framework emphasizes evidence-based evaluation, allowing approvals for applications like silica nanoparticles in tires, which have enhanced fuel efficiency and performance since the early 2000s without documented widespread health incidents from consumer exposure.^[175] In contrast, the European Union's REACH regulation imposes stricter registration, evaluation, and authorization requirements for nanomaterials, including detailed hazard assessments and labeling under CLP, reflecting a precautionary approach that mandates data on potential risks even absent empirical harm.^[176]^[177] Regulatory debates center on balancing the precautionary principle—advocated by groups like the ETC Group, which in 2003 called for a moratorium on commercial nanomaterial production due to unproven long-term risks—with evidence-based regulation that prioritizes observed data over hypothetical concerns.^[178]^[179] Proponents of lighter-touch policies argue that excessive caution, as in moratorium demands, overlooks the empirical safety record of nanomaterials in products like tires, where billions of units have been deployed globally with minimal reported adverse events tied to nano-components.^[175]^[180] Reports such as the 2004 Royal Society assessment rejected broad moratoriums, finding insufficient evidence of unique nano-specific dangers beyond conventional chemical risks and recommending targeted oversight instead.^[181]^[182] In the 2020s, international efforts have focused on harmonization to reduce regulatory divergence, with the OECD promoting information exchange and standardized testing to facilitate innovation while addressing gaps in nanoform assessments.^[183] The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has updated guidelines for REACH testing of nanomaterials, emphasizing non-animal methods and grouping similar nanoforms for efficiency, amid calls for global alignment to avoid trade barriers.^[184]^[185] These initiatives underscore a shift toward data-driven policies, critiquing fear-based restrictions that could stifle applications proven safe through real-world deployment, such as FDA-cleared nano-enabled medical devices evaluated on case-specific evidence rather than blanket presumptions.^[186]

Economic, Military, and Equity Considerations

The global nanotechnology market, encompassing nanoengineering applications, reached approximately $91 billion in 2024 and is projected to expand to $332 billion by 2032, driven by advancements in materials, electronics, and manufacturing processes that enhance efficiency and enable new product categories.^[187] This growth has spurred job creation, particularly in high-tech manufacturing, where nano-enabled production techniques have revolutionized sectors like semiconductors and composites, generating thousands of specialized positions in research, fabrication, and supply chains across industrialized economies.^[188] Empirical evidence from U.S. National Science Foundation investments indicates that two decades of nanotechnology funding have yielded multiplier effects in economic output, with innovations diffusing through private sector commercialization rather than centralized planning.^[188] In military contexts, nanoengineering supports enhanced defense capabilities through developments like nanoscale sensors for surveillance and nanomaterials for lightweight armor, as pursued by the U.S. Department of Defense's nanotechnology research programs.^[189] DARPA-funded projects, such as those developing nanometer-scale semiconductor components for advanced-node integration, aim to enable compact, high-performance systems for battlefield applications, including reconfigurable optical metamaterials for adaptive targeting.^[190] ^[191] These dual-use technologies provide strategic advantages in precision and deterrence, with verifiable successes in sensor networks outperforming macro-scale alternatives in detection range and power efficiency, though proliferation risks from weaponized forms like "smart dust"—microscopic sensor swarms—prompt ongoing assessments of escalation potential versus defensive gains.^[192] Equity considerations reveal intellectual property concentration in Western nations and East Asia, where firms in the U.S., Japan, and South Korea dominate nanoengineering patents, reflecting superior R&D ecosystems and market incentives that accelerate innovation.^[193] Critics highlight a potential "nano-divide," arguing that restricted access to these technologies could exacerbate global disparities in health and economic outcomes between affluent and developing regions.^[194] However, historical patterns of technology diffusion—evident in semiconductors and biotechnology—demonstrate that competitive markets and voluntary trade propagate benefits more effectively than redistributive aid, as proprietary advancements eventually yield generic applications through licensing and reverse engineering, mitigating divides without impeding progress.^[195] This causal dynamic underscores that equitable outcomes arise from sustained innovation rather than enforced sharing, which often stifles invention.

Recent Advances and Future Prospects

Developments from 2020 Onward

The deployment of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 marked a pivotal nanoengineering milestone in 2020, enabling rapid intracellular delivery of genetic material and facilitating the emergency authorization of vaccines like Pfizer-BioNTech's BNT162b2 by December that year.^[196] These ionizable LNPs, optimized for endosomal escape and stability, demonstrated scalability in manufacturing, with billions of doses produced globally by 2021, underscoring nanoengineering's role in crisis response.^[106] This application accelerated investment in LNP formulations beyond vaccines, including for therapeutics targeting rare diseases.^[197] In semiconductor nanoengineering, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) achieved volume production of its 3nm process node in late 2022, leveraging extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography to pattern features at scales enabling denser transistor integration for high-performance chips. This progression from 5nm (ramped in 2020) to 3nm highlighted refinements in EUV multi-patterning and nano-scale etching, driven by demand for AI and mobile processors amid supply chain disruptions from the pandemic.^[198] Geopolitical tensions, particularly U.S.-China competition over semiconductor independence, further propelled such advances, with China filing over 464,000 nanotechnology-related patents cumulatively by 2025, surpassing global peers in volume.^[199] Optical nanoengineering saw breakthroughs in metalenses, flat metasurface-based lenses replacing bulky refractive optics; by 2023-2025, fabrication techniques achieved efficiencies over 80% across visible wavelengths, enabling compact imaging for AR/VR and microscopy.^[200] Advances included scalable nanoimprint lithography for array production, addressing chromatic aberrations via dispersion engineering.^[201] Concurrently, the 2023 Nobel Prize in Chemistry recognized quantum dot (nanocrystal) synthesis methods, refined since the 1990s but commercialized post-2020 for displays; cadmium-free variants improved color gamut in QLED TVs, with synthesis yields exceeding 90% via hot-injection techniques.^[202] These developments, amid U.S. export controls on advanced tools, countered narratives of stagnation by evidencing sustained empirical progress in nano-scale precision.^[203]

Emerging Trends and Predictions

In 2025, atomic-scale manufacturing has gained traction through startups developing precise nanofabrication techniques, such as ATLANT 3D's atomic layer processing combined with 3D printing for semiconductor and space applications, which secured $15 million in funding in March to enable atom-by-atom device creation.^[204] Advances in 2D materials like graphene and carbon nanotubes are driving innovations in flexible electronics and energy storage, with atomic-scale microscopy enabling engineering of materials with tailored properties for enhanced conductivity and strength.^[205] Nanotherapeutics represent another key trend, incorporating nanoparticles for targeted drug delivery systems that integrate AI algorithms to optimize release based on real-time physiological data, as evidenced by rising patent filings in the U.S. for such precision therapies.^[206] Looking toward the 2030s, nanoengineering is projected to underpin quantum devices, including nanoscale silicon qubits that could facilitate compact quantum processors, potentially leading to desktop-scale systems by the decade's end through improved atomic manipulation.^[207] The global quantum computing market, reliant on nano-scale components for qubit stability and interconnects, is forecasted to reach $7.3 billion by 2030 at a 34.6% CAGR, driven by nanomaterials addressing coherence and error correction challenges.^[208] Optimism stems from empirical scaling in nanofabrication tools, mirroring semiconductor progress where feature sizes have shrunk below 2 nm, suggesting continued miniaturization via techniques like inkjet-printed nanoparticles for mass production.^[209] However, predictions temper enthusiasm with recognition of physical limits; while quantum information science advances via nanoengineering, skeptics highlight thermodynamic barriers and error propagation in atomic assembly, questioning the feasibility of fully autonomous molecular assemblers beyond current hybrid methods.^[210] Energy demands for operating nano-quantum devices pose scalability risks, as cryogenic cooling requirements could constrain practical deployment without breakthroughs in room-temperature materials.^[211] Nonetheless, data from ongoing R&D trajectories, including over 1,900 nanotechnology startups focused on empirical validation, indicate that incremental progress in microscopy and deposition will likely yield viable quantum nano-devices rather than revolutionary leaps.^[212]

References

[1]
Nanoengineering - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Nanoengineering is defined as the application of engineering principles to manipulate matter at the nanoscale to create novel materials and systems.
[2]
What is Nanoengineering? Materials, Job Description and Salary.
Nanoengineering is the engineering field focused on the study, development and refinement of materials at a very small scale.
[3]
Nanotechnology: A Revolution in Modern Industry - PMC - NIH
Jan 9, 2023 · This review article will cover the recent advanced applications of nanotechnology in different industries, mainly agriculture, food, cosmetics, ...
[4]
Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities - ScienceDirect
This review is provided a detailed overview of the synthesis, properties and applications of nanoparticles (NPs) exist in different forms.
[5]
From Faraday to nanotubes – timeline - Science Learning Hub
May 20, 2008 · 1959 – A new field of physics · 1974 – First use of term 'nanotechnology' · 1981 – Scanning tunnelling microscope invented · 1985 – Discovery of ...
[6]
Nanotechnology Timeline
Nanotechnology Timeline. Early Examples of Nanostructured Materials. Long before modern science, early craftsmen discovered ways to make nanostructured ...
[7]
Nanoscience in Action: Unveiling Emerging Trends in Materials and ...
Nanoscale catalysts can enhance the efficiency of chemical reactions, leading to greener industrial processes. Nanomaterials can contribute to the development ...
[8]
Risks, Release and Concentrations of Engineered Nanomaterial in ...
Jan 25, 2018 · Risk has been estimated by comparing our environmental predictions to ecotoxicologically significant concentrations that can be derived from ...
[9]
Scientists' Understandings of Risk of Nanomaterials: Disciplinary ...
Aug 3, 2017 · The experts identified health and environmental risks on the one hand, “social risks” (threats to privacy, weapons, and economic bad outcomes) ...Missing: controversies evidence
[10]
The challenges of nanotechnology risk management - ScienceDirect
In the case of chemicals and nanomaterials, risk assessment has historically relied on detailed, empirical data for exposure and hazard (e.g., dose–response ...Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[11]
NanoEngineering Detailed Description
The NanoEngineering graduate degree program prepares students to enter the Nanotechnology workforce, as well as prepare students to enter a wider variety of ...Thesis And/or Dissertation · Final Examination · Sample ProgramMissing: definition | Show results with:definition
[12]
Nanotechnology at NIH | National Institutes of Health (NIH)
Apr 11, 2025 · Nanotechnology is defined as the understanding and control of matter at dimensions of roughly 1 to 100 nanometers, a scale at which unique ...Missing: nanoengineering | Show results with:nanoengineering
[13]
[PDF] Nanoscale reference materials for environmental, health and safety ...
Nanoscale: size range from approximately 1 to 100 nm. (ASTM 2006; ISO ... (1–100 nm). Nano-objects can be further classified into nanoparticles that ...Missing: source:
[14]
What is nanoengineering? - Research & Development World
Jan 12, 2022 · Nanotechnology and nanoengineering are essentially the same thing, but nanotechnology tends to be used more at the fundamental pure science ...
[15]
1: Nanoengineering: At the Center of It All - Books
May 10, 2024 · ... nanoengineering, nanoscience, and nanotechnology. Our working definition of nanoengineering is the development and use of materials and ...
[16]
Semiconductor Nanocrystals: Structure, Properties, and Band Gap ...
Semiconductor nanocrystals are tiny, light-emitting particles with size-dependent properties, exhibiting quantum confinement and size-dependent band gaps.
[17]
Quantum Confinement Effect - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
There is a general rule that the bandgap of group II–VI semiconductors becomes narrower as the constituent atoms become heavier. In the case of nanoparticles ...
[18]
Nanoparticle classification, physicochemical properties ...
Jun 7, 2022 · Larger surface areas and larger surface-to-volume ratios generally increases the reactivity of nanomaterials due to the larger reaction surface ...
[19]
Visualization of the High Surface-to-Volume Ratio of Nanomaterials ...
The easiest way for visualizing the concept of high surface-to-volume ratio is to assemble and disassemble a large cube into many small cubes.
[20]
Can gold melt at room temperature? Melting temperature depression!
Feb 14, 2018 · As we can see, the melting point of gold nanoparticles can be even lower than room temperature (~23-25 °C) when the size decreases to less than ...
[21]
Size-dependent melting point depression of nickel nanoparticles
Apr 21, 2020 · This has a depressive effect on the melting point, and has been shown experimentally for many metals. This effect was first predicted by P.
[22]
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles - PubMed Central - NIH
These particles exhibit the phenomenon of “superparamagnetism”, ie, on application of an external magnetic field, they become magnetized up to their saturation ...
[23]
Superparamagnetism - Engineering LibreTexts
Sep 7, 2021 · Superparamagnetic nanoparticles are used in drug delivery by being attached to a drug and having a magnetic force control its path. Once the ...Properties of Superparamagnets · Neel Relaxation Time · Magnetization Curves
[24]
The Science of Plasmonics - nanoComposix
Plasmonics uses metallic nanoparticles with unique optical properties, where surface plasmon resonance (SPR) causes strong light absorption and scattering.
[25]
Analytical calculation of plasmonic resonances in metal nanoparticles
Jul 1, 2023 · Localized surface plasmons (LSPs) in metal particles are used in medical, chemical, physical, and biological sensing applications.
[26]
Unhindered Brownian Motion of Individual Nanoparticles in Liquid ...
Jul 17, 2020 · We demonstrate how scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) imaging can be used to measure the motion of individual NPs and agglomerates.
[27]
Brownian Motion Helps Reveal Temperature of Nanoscale Objects
May 5, 2014 · One of the key physical forces on the nanoscale is Brownian motion in which particles suspended in a gas or liquid seem to move around randomly ...
[28]
[PDF] Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Spectroscopy
In metals, electrons fill the continuous energy levels up to the Fermi level, EF, which defines an upper boundary, similar to the sea level. Above EF we find.
[29]
Atom Manipulation with the Scanning Tunneling Microscope | NIST
Jun 1, 2012 · These special wave patterns lead to new electron energy levels, which may form the basis of nanotechnology applications. STM of the NIST ...
[30]
Discovery of Nanotubes in Ancient Damascus Steel - ResearchGate
May 28, 2016 · It can be noted that nanotubes were identified in parts made of Damascus steel several hundred years ago, which would justify some of the high ...Abstract · References (13) · Recommended Publications<|separator|>
[31]
Microarchitectured and nanoscale hierarchical structures of carbon ...
May 1, 2024 · In the present investigation, we provide conclusive evidence of the carbon nanostructure in the carburising slag from 400 BCE to 16th century ...
[32]
This 1,600-Year-Old Goblet Shows that the Romans Were ...
Lycurgus Cup, probably taken out only for special occasions, depicts King Lycurgus ensnared in a tangle of grapevines, presumably for evil acts committed ...
[33]
(PDF) The Lycurgus Cup-A Roman Nanotechnology - ResearchGate
Aug 7, 2025 · This remarkable property comes from tiny silver-gold alloy nanoparticles (around 50-100 nanometers in size and in the ratio of 7:3) embedded ...
[34]
Revealing the Nature of Black Pigments Used on Ancient Egyptian ...
Dec 14, 2020 · For each fragment, the carbon-black pigment found in the ink is identified as flame carbon (lampblack or soot). Using X-ray diffraction ...
[35]
https://ansariforge.com/the-hidden-truth-behind-damascus-steel-history-ancient-secrets-finally-revealed/
[36]
Applications of Transmission Electron Microscopy in Phase ...
Aug 29, 2023 · The first transmission electron microscope was constructed in the early 1930s by Ernst Ruska and Max Knoll. ... Using FePt nanoparticles as a ...Figure 1 · 5.1. 4d-Stem Ptychography · 1. Introduction
[37]
Transmission Electron Microscopy | Nanoscience Instruments
Since the first demonstration of electron optics in the early 1930s, nearly a century of research and development has culminated, establishing TEM as an ...
[38]
[PDF] There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom - Caltech Magazine
"There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom" is a transcript of a talk given by Dr. Feynman on December 29 at the annual meeting of the American Physical Society ...Missing: text | Show results with:text
[39]
From an idea to a vision: There's plenty of room at the bottom
Sep 1, 2006 · The after-dinner speech, “There's plenty of room at the bottom,” which was given by Richard Feynman on December 29, 1959 in Pasadena on the ...INTRODUCTION · III. FEYNMAN'S TALK · IV. FEYNMAN'S OBJECTIVES...
[40]
The History of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: From Chemical ...
It is the ability to convert the nanoscience theory to useful applications by observing, measuring, manipulating, assembling, controlling and manufacturing ...
[41]
Molecular engineering: An approach to the development of ... - PNAS
Sep 15, 1981 · Molecular engineering: An approach to the development of general capabilities for molecular manipulation. K. Eric DrexlerAuthors Info & ...Missing: ideas | Show results with:ideas
[42]
Positioning single atoms with a scanning tunnelling microscope
Apr 5, 1990 · Here we report the use of the STM at low temperatures (4 K) to position individual xenon atoms on a single-crystal nickel surface with atomic pre-cision.
[43]
Nanotechnology - IBM
Over the course of 22 hours, Eigler and his colleague Erhard Schweizer painstakingly applied this technique to move the xenon atoms into an arrangement, ...
[44]
[PDF] National nanotechnology initiative at 20 years: enabling new horizons
Sep 18, 2023 · This was the beginning of the NNI, which, with cumulative funding from 2001 to 2023 of about $40 billion, became the largest bottom-up science ...
[45]
[PDF] Public Law 108–153 108th Congress An Act - GovInfo
Dec 3, 2003 · (b) FUNDING.—The National Nanotechnology Coordination. Office shall be funded through interagency funding in accordance with section 631 of ...
[46]
Global Governmental Investment in Nanotechnologies - PMC
According to the source of European Commission 2004, current funding for nanotechnology R&D is about ¤1 billion, two-thirds of which comes from national and ...Abstract · Table 1 · Table 2Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[47]
[PDF] An overview of the state of Chinese nanoscience and technology.
In 2000, the United States took the lead to initiate the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI), which evoked a global boom of nano-related research. China.
[48]
An overview of the European Union's nanotechnology projects
Jul 1, 2013 · The document includes an estimate THAT governments around the world have invested over USD 67 billion in nanotechnology research since 2000 and ...
[49]
Nanotube transistors speed up - Physics World
Apr 30, 2004 · Engineers in the US have made the first high-speed transistor from a carbon nanotube. Peter Burke and colleagues at the University of ...
[50]
[PDF] GRAPHENE - Nobel Prize
Oct 5, 2010 · The breakthrough was done by Geim,. Novoselov and their co-workers; it was their paper from 2004 which ignited the development. For this they ...
[51]
Past, Present, and Future of Moore's Law, which Supports the ...
Jun 2, 2021 · Although transistor count increases for Intel's MPUs for servers temporarily paused between the middle and latter part of the 2000s, it has ...
[52]
[PDF] Photoprotection in the Era of Nanotechnology
Commercial sunscreen based on nano-sized titanium dioxide (TiO2) and zinc oxide (ZnO) delivers superior UV protection and reduces whitening on skin compared ...
[53]
Sunscreens with Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) Nano-Particles: A Societal ...
We argue that the marketing of this TiO 2 nanomaterial in UV protective cosmetics is ethically undesirable, since it violates four reasonable moral conditions.
[54]
B.S. NanoEngineering
The undergraduate curriculum constitutes a four-year accredited program in Engineering leading to a B.S. degree in NanoEngineering and requires completion ...
[55]
Undergraduate NE Curriculum | Department of NanoEngineering
All students follow the same basic science preparation and core set of classes in NanoEngineering during the first two years.
[56]
NanoEngineering Undergraduate Major Requirements
To receive a BS in nanoengineering, students must complete 137 units of coursework required for the major, plus all college general education requirements.
[57]
BS Nanoscale Engineering | University at Albany
The bachelor's in nanoscale engineering curriculum brings together foundational knowledge of physics, mathematics, chemistry, biology and materials science.
[58]
Nanoengineering | NC State Online and Distance Education
The online Master of Nanoengineering is a 30-credit program for science/engineering students, with no thesis, oral exam, or on-campus residency required.
[59]
Master of Nanoengineering (MNAE)
The Master of Nanoengineering (MNAE) is an on-campus and distance education program and is designed for students with an undergraduate degree in a science or ...
[60]
Nanoengineering | NC State Online and Distance Education
Earn the credentials required to build a nanotechnology career with a Master of Nanoengineering degree from NC State ... Online and Distance Education.
[61]
NanoEngineering Doctoral Degree Program
The Ph.D. Program is intended to prepare students for a variety of careers in research and teaching. The emphasis is on research.Missing: hands- labs SEM AFM
[62]
[PDF] An Educational Simulation for Understanding Atomic Force ...
This lab-based course introduces students to various topics in nanoengineering. ... such as the AFM and SEM. The Spring semester version is offered to ...
[63]
NCSU launches master degree in nanoengineering
Jun 28, 2013 · Program is intended to meet the growing demand for workers who can keep pace with emerging nanotechnologies.
[64]
Online Nanoengineering Degree Programs
Jan 30, 2025 · As of early 2025, only a limited number of nanoengineering programs have received accreditation through the Accreditation Board for Engineering ...
[65]
Department Overview - UCSD Nanoengineering
The research activities of the department are focused on four main areas: (a) Biomedical Nanotechnology, (b) Molecular and Nanomaterials, (c) Nanotechnologies ...
[66]
NanoEngineering and Chemical Engineering at UC San Diego
The research interests of the department are highly interdisciplinary—it is known internationally for its strengths in nanomedicine, flexible electronics, and ...
[67]
$$21 Million Gift to UC San Diego Honors Unique Efforts to Link ...
May 21, 2024 · The largest two research focus areas within the department are nanomaterials for human health, and nanomaterials for sustainable energy. “UC San ...
[68]
Marcus Nanotechnology Research Center, Georgia Tech – WSP USA
Bio-Nano program consists of open lab spaces for four research groups, faculty offices, open offices for graduate students and conference room. Open lab concept ...
[69]
Core Facilities | Institute for Matter and Systems
The Institute for Matter and Systems (IMS) operates state-of-the-art electronics and nanotechnology core facilities at Georgia Tech.
[70]
Nanotechnology | Bioengineering - Georgia Institute of Technology
Research Interests: In the Dahlman Lab, we focus on the interface between nanotechology, molecular biology, and genomics. We design drug delivery vehicles that ...
[71]
Welcome to the Penn State MRSEC | MRSEC: The Center for ...
Supported by the National Science Foundation, the center supports collaborative, interdisciplinary research efforts in the area of nanoscale materials.
[72]
Nanoscale Science and Engineering (NSE) - NSF
Aug 12, 2004 · The NSF program supports research and education in nanoscale science and engineering, including biosystems, structures, devices, and processes. ...
[73]
NSF Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers
The US National Science Foundation Division of Materials Research currently supports 20 centers through the Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers ...
[74]
Best Global Universities for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
Best Global Universities for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology ; University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, CAS · Beijing. #1 ; Tsinghua University · Beijing. #2.
[75]
English-language Journal Nano Research Listed in Science Citation ...
Nano Research, an English-language journal of Tsinghua University which is published jointly by Springer and Tsinghua University Press, is now listed in the ...Missing: ranking publications
[76]
World's 100+ best Nanotechnology universities [Rankings] - EduRank
Mar 2, 2025 · 1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology · 2. Tsinghua University · 3. University of California - Berkeley · 4. Nanyang Technological University · 5 ...Europe · The United States · Asia · United Kingdom
[77]
Nanoscale Science Department - Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
May 6, 2023 · Research efforts in the Department are centered on nanoscale science and technology with a focus on the bottom-up paradigm.
[78]
MPI for Intelligent Systems, Stuttgart site - Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
A further focus of their research is the interface between nanotechnology and biology, such as the behaviour of cells on different surfaces. Many of the ...
[79]
Intel Patents – Key Insights and Stats
Intel has a total of 214150 patents globally, out of which 123905 has been granted and more than 48% of these worldwide patents are active.Missing: nanotechnology facilities
[80]
2025 Nanotechnology Patent 100™ List
The Nanotechnology Patent 100 Report is an annual ranking of the top 100 organizations leading in nanotechnology-related U.S. patenting. It highlights ...Missing: facilities | Show results with:facilities
[81]
Fabrication of Nanostructures with Bottom-up Approach and Their ...
The top-down approach involves lateral patterning of bulk materials by either subtractive or additive methods to realize nano-sized structures. Several methods ...
[82]
Failure Mechanisms in DNA Self-Assembly: Barriers to Single-Fold ...
This novel approach to the folding problem elucidates a predicted, but previously unobserved blocked state that acts as a limit on yield for single folds.
[83]
Directed Self-Assembly of Block Copolymers for Nanolithography
Self-assembling block copolymers are of interest for nanomanufacturing due to the ability to realize sub-100 nm dimensions, thermodynamic control over the ...Abstract · Figure 4 · Methods
[84]
Priming self-assembly pathways by stacking block copolymers
Nov 14, 2022 · Block copolymers spontaneously self-assemble into well-defined nanoscale morphologies. Yet equilibrium assembly gives rise to a limited set ...Results · Pathway Priming Bcp... · Molecular Dynamics...
[85]
Extreme ultraviolet lithography reaches 5 nm resolution - Nanoscale ...
Extreme ultraviolet lithography reaches 5 nm resolution† In response, this study introduces a novel EUV-IL setup that employs mirror-based technology and ...Missing: 2020s nanofabrication
[86]
“Top-down” and “bottom-up” strategies for wafer-scaled miniaturized ...
May 4, 2020 · In this work, we combined “bottom-up” (in-situ growth) and “top-down” (MEMS fabrication techniques) strategies for wafer-scale fabrication of ...
[87]
5 things you should know about High NA EUV lithography - ASML
Jan 25, 2024 · EUV lithography allowed us to make a big turn of the wavelength knob: It uses 13.5 nm light, compared to 193 nm for the highest-resolution DUV ...Missing: 2020s nanofabrication
[88]
Performance overview and outlook of EUV lithography systems
Aug 6, 2025 · ... EUV lithography is currently being targeted for insertion at the so-called 7nm mode ( of 13.5nm and NA of 0.33) to provide a d min of about ...
[89]
[PDF] Scalable Architecture for Nanotechnology
May 9, 2017 · Figure 6 outlines an approach to nanostructure assembly that involves a combination of directed top- down and convergent bottom-up assembly ...<|separator|>
[90]
A new way to build nanostructures | MIT News
Jul 6, 2011 · Combining top-down and bottom-up approaches, new low-cost method could be a boon to research with a variety of applications.
[91]
Microscopic Techniques for Nanomaterials Characterization
Jan 8, 2025 · SEM, TEM, and AFM are popular methods for characterizing the morphology of nanomaterials. For instance, Saddam Saqib et al. reported the ...
[92]
(PDF) Characterization Tools and Techniques for Nanomaterials
To understand electron microscopy (viz. SEM, TEM, etc.) concepts of resolution,. magnification, depth ...
[93]
Scanning Tunneling Microscope Introduction | NIST
Apr 29, 2015 · This rapid change of tunneling current with distance results in atomic resolution if the tip is scanned over the surface to produce an image.
[94]
Nano-Raman Scattering Microscopy: Resolution and Enhancement
In this paper, we review the recent progress in the development of Raman scattering microscopy from the viewpoint of spatial resolution and scattering ...Missing: nanoengineering | Show results with:nanoengineering<|separator|>
[95]
Scanning Probe Microscopy Calibrations and Standards | NIST
Summary. This project is tasked with enabling accurate nanomechanical property measurements on materials through calibrations and standards.
[96]
Low-dose cryo-electron ptychography of proteins at sub-nanometer ...
Sep 14, 2024 · Cryo-EM has been shown to only require a few hours to determine the near-atomic resolution structure of proteins that have been frozen as single ...Results · Ptychography Of Cryo-Em... · 4d-Stem Ptychography...<|separator|>
[97]
Techniques for physicochemical characterization of nanomaterials
This review summarizes the techniques that are commonly used to study the size, shape, surface properties, composition, purity and stability of nanomaterialsMissing: nanoengineering | Show results with:nanoengineering
[98]
Doxil®--the first FDA-approved nano-drug: lessons learned - PubMed
Jun 10, 2012 · Doxil, the first FDA-approved nano-drug (1995), is based on three unrelated principles: (i) prolonged drug circulation time and avoidance of the RES due to the ...
[99]
Engineering precision nanoparticles for drug delivery - Nature
Dec 4, 2020 · This review comprehensively examines recent NP systems that are currently clinically approved or under clinical trials. Google Scholar.
[100]
Thirty years from FDA approval of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin ...
In 2025, it will be 30 years since the initial clinical approval of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) by the Food and Drug Administration.
[101]
Nanosensors in Wearable Health Devices | Request PDF
Oct 16, 2025 · These nanosensors enable rapid and precise detection of various diseases, pollutants and contaminants, providing unique insights into human ...
[102]
Advances in Medical Wearable Biosensors: Design, Fabrication and ...
This review focuses on the recent advances made in wearable technology for remote healthcare monitoring.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[103]
Nanofiber Technology for Regenerative Engineering - PMC
Regenerative engineering is powerfully emerging as a successful strategy for the regeneration of complex tissues and biological organs using a convergent ...
[104]
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25740881.2025.2494701
[105]
Lipids: Protecting mRNA so it can protect our body - Merck Group
For the new Covid-19 mRNA vaccines, the solution to this problem came through the development of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs).<|separator|>
[106]
Recent Advances in the Lipid Nanoparticle-Mediated Delivery ... - NIH
Developing highly efficient mRNA delivery systems for vaccines with improved safety against some severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ...
[107]
Device Engineering: Where Ambitions and Real Silicon Collide
May 7, 2025 · In 2011, Intel pioneered FinFET, the first major redesign of the CMOS transistor since its 1960s introduction. By the time Lin joined Intel, it ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
[108]
What are Gate-All-Around (GAA) Transistors? | Synopsys Blog
Apr 22, 2024 · GAA transistors have a gate that wraps around all four sides of the transistor, unlike FinFETs where the gate wraps around three sides.Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
[109]
How Does Moore's Law Relate to Nanotechnology? - AZoNano
Oct 16, 2023 · Researchers are increasingly looking to nanotechnology as a way to extend Moore's law and continue advancing semiconductor technology.
[110]
The Nobel-Winning Material at the Heart of Samsung QLEDs ...
Apr 4, 2025 · The quantum dot film used in Samsung QLED displays is produced by adding a quantum dot solution to a polymer base heated to a very high ...
[111]
Qubits made by advanced semiconductor manufacturing - Nature
Mar 29, 2022 · Spin qubits in gate-defined quantum dots (QDs) offer great potential for quantum computation due to their small size and relatively long ...
[112]
Nanowire phase change memory - Technology
Mar 17, 2020 · Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania have developed a nanowire-based PCM that shows better stress relaxation, and thus better long term ...
[113]
Nanoscale transistors could enable more efficient electronics
Nov 4, 2024 · Nanoscale 3D transistors made from ultrathin semiconductor materials can operate more efficiently than silicon-based devices, leveraging quantum mechanical ...
[114]
2D materials-based nanoscale tunneling field effect transistors
Nov 16, 2022 · However, the minimum SS of MOSFET is restricted by its fundamental limit of 60 mV per decade at room temperature, which is sizably larger for ...
[115]
2D materials readiness for the transistor performance breakthrough
May 19, 2023 · In this review, from the performance breakthrough of 2D transistors, we discuss the opportunities, progress and challenges of 2D materials in transistor ...
[116]
Si Nanowires: From Model System to Practical Li-Ion Anode Material ...
The electrochemical cycling demonstrated initial specific capacities of 3500 mAh g–1, which stabilized to 2000 mAh g–1 after 200 cycles at 0.2C. The high ...Si NWs as a Model System · Si NW/Graphite Composites · Si NWs for Beyond-LIBs
[117]
Single-step fabrication of fibrous Si/Sn composite nanowire anodes ...
Sep 8, 2023 · A Li-ion battery with a Si-nanowire anode maintained a high capacity of 3100 mAh/g for the first 40 cycles.
[118]
Next-gen perovskite solar cells edge closer to market with improved ...
Sep 16, 2025 · Researchers at IMDEA Nanoscience (Madrid) have developed a perovskite solar cell with a certified efficiency of 25.2%, very close to the ...
[119]
Perovskite-Silicon Tandem Solar Cells Achieve Record-Breaking ...
Sep 8, 2025 · The passivated tandem solar cells achieved a conversion efficiency of up to 33.1 percent, with an open-circuit voltage of 2.01 volts. The ...
[120]
34.85%! LONGi Breaks World Record for Crystalline Silicon ...
Apr 15, 2025 · November 2023: Achieved a tandem solar cell efficiency of 33.9%, approaching the SQ limit. June 2024: Broke new ground with 34.6% conversion ...<|separator|>
[121]
Making Stronger, Lighter Composites with Carbon Nanotubes
Sep 18, 2025 · For example, adding just 1% by weight of CNTs to polymer composites can increase tensile strength by 35% and significantly improve toughness and ...
[122]
Effectiveness of multi‐walled carbon nanotube on the improvement ...
Mar 15, 2024 · The addition of MWCNTs by 0.5 wt% to the epoxy enhanced the flexural strength and flexural modulus by 66% and 41%, and by 5% with 0.1 wt% and ...
[123]
[PDF] PROCESSING AND CHARACTERIZATION OF CARBON ...
Jun 27, 2014 · Compared with carbon fibers, the strength to weight ratio of nanotubes in the axial direction is up to four times greater [6]. It is these ...
[124]
Can graphene compete with copper in electrical conductivity?
Feb 3, 2021 · A pristine, single layer of graphene outperforms copper in electrical conductivity by 70%. How much remains of this in macroscopic films or ...
[125]
Enhanced electrical conductivity in graphene–copper multilayer ...
Jan 6, 2022 · We demonstrate that, with an estimated 0.008 vol. % graphene addition, copper's electrical conductivity was improved to 104.2% of International Annealed Copper ...
[126]
Nanocatalysts in the Real World: 5 Uses You'll Actually See (2025)
Oct 2, 2025 · For instance, platinum-based nanocatalysts are used in hydrogen fuel cells to improve durability and reduce platinum loading, cutting costs and ...
[127]
Total-area world-record efficiency of 27.03% for 350.0 cm2 ... - Nature
Jul 1, 2025 · Total-area world-record efficiency of 27.03% for 350.0 cm2 commercial-sized single-junction silicon solar cells | Nature Communications.
[128]
Advancements in carbon nanotube-polymer composites
Aug 30, 2024 · Studies indicate that CNTs significantly boost tensile performance, with CNT composites demonstrating a 69 % increase in tensile strength over ...
[129]
Titanium Dioxide as the Most Used Photocatalyst for Water Purification
Wang et al. reported one of the first studies where TiO2 (P25)-graphene nanocomposites were used for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue. Further ...
[130]
Titanium dioxide based nanoparticles and their applications in water ...
Jul 25, 2025 · Photocatalytic degradation has been used efficiently for the degradation and removal of toxic and harmful chemicals to improve water quality.
[131]
Peer Reviewed: Environmental Technologies at the Nanoscale
Nanotechnology could substantially enhance environmental quality and sustainability through pollution prevention, treatment, and remediation.
[132]
Enhancing sustainability in agriculture with nanofertilizers
Oct 20, 2024 · With potential increases of up to 30% in nutrient use efficiency and 20% in crop yields compared to traditional fertilizers, nanofertilizers ...
[133]
Efficacy of Nano and Conventional Zinc and Silicon Fertilizers for ...
Nanofertilizers have demonstrated the ability to enhance NUE by as much as 20–30% and improve crop yields by up to 25% under saline conditions [9,10].2. Results · 2.1. Agronomic Parameters · 2.3. Nutrient Use Efficiency...
[134]
Nano-Agrochemicals as Substitutes for Pesticides: Prospects and ...
This review delves into the mesmerizing technology of nano-agrochemicals, specifically pesticides and herbicides, and their potential to aid in the ...
[135]
Nanotechnology in Agriculture: A Review of Innovations in Crop ...
Sep 24, 2025 · This review highlights the role of nanotechnology in improves pesticide efficiency by enabling precise targeting, minimizing environmental ...
[136]
Emerging applications of nanotechnology in cosmeceutical health ...
This review has demonstrated that nanotechnology can be used productively in cosmetics by evaluating many studies and articles on the subject.
[137]
Applications of nanotechnology in smart textile industry: A critical ...
The incorporation of nanotechnology enables manufacture of smart and multi-functional textiles with many innovative applications in the areas of health, ...Missing: pesticide | Show results with:pesticide
[138]
Progress in Top-Down Control of Bottom-Up Assembly | Nano Letters
Oct 20, 2017 · Stochastic processes, such as those that govern-bottom up assembly, necessarily produce variability in their end products. While this is ...
[139]
Grand Challenges in Nanofabrication: There Remains Plenty of ...
Many bottom-up approaches also suffer from a relatively high rate of defects that cannot easily be corrected. As such, improving the yield of self-assembled ...Missing: variability | Show results with:variability
[140]
The Dark Side Of The Semiconductor Design Renaissance – Fixed ...
Jul 24, 2022 · With 7nm, the cost increases beyond $10M, and now, as we cross the 3nm barrier, mask sets will begin to push into the $40M range. Special thanks ...
[141]
90% yield production of polymer nano-memristor for in-memory ...
Mar 31, 2021 · A record high 90% production yield of polymer memristors has been achieved with miniaturization and low power potentials.
[142]
[PDF] Design For Manufacturability And Yield For Nano S
Yield, in this context, refers to the percentage of devices produced without defects, which directly impacts cost and scalability. High yield means fewer.
[143]
The convergence of nanomanufacturing and artificial intelligence
May 12, 2025 · In this topical review, we briefly explore the current state-of-the-art of how AI and ML techniques can be employed within nanomanufacturing.
[144]
Bridging Nanomanufacturing and Artificial Intelligence—A ...
The automation and streamlining of processes through AI technologies contribute to overall process optimization. These prospects contribute to the continual ...
[145]
Nanoparticles‐induced potential toxicity on human health
Jul 14, 2023 · Exposure to NPs has been linked to various adverse effects on the respiratory system, such as inflammation, oxidative stress, fibrosis, and even ...
[146]
[PDF] potentially exposed to engineered nanoparticles - CDC
The level of risk resulting from lower exposures to nanomaterials is unknown. Ultimately, epidemiological studies of exposed workers will be needed to help ...
[147]
Mechanisms of nanotoxicity: Generation of reactive oxygen species
An important mechanism of nanotoxicity is the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Overproduction of ROS can induce oxidative stress.
[148]
Mechanisms of nanotoxicity: Generation of reactive oxygen species
The generation of ROS and the subsequent production of oxidative stress is a predominant mechanism leading to nanotoxicity, including DNA damage, unregulated ...
[149]
Biochemical mechanisms of dose-dependent cytotoxicity and ROS ...
Oct 10, 2017 · Experiments showed a high rate of ROS formation upon exposure of a concentrated (≥400 µg/ml) nanoparticles to the human cells. ROS combine with ...
[150]
Inhalation exposure to various nanoparticles in work environment ...
Oct 28, 2019 · Based on NRV levels the number concentration of nanosilver in a work environment should not exceed 20,000 particles/cm3; for carbon black and ...
[151]
Understanding the impact of more realistic low-dose, prolonged ...
Jun 28, 2021 · This study evaluated whether a more realistic, prolonged fractionated and repeated ENM dosing regime induces a significantly different toxicity outcome in ...
[152]
Silica nanoparticle toxicity: cellular mechanisms, neurotoxicological ...
Jul 31, 2025 · ... lower, environmentally relevant levels underscore the need for more sensitive, long-term studies and realistic exposure designs. 3 Health ...<|separator|>
[153]
[PDF] Nanosafety in Europe 2015-2025: Towards Safe and Sustainable ...
Nanotechnology will be one of the key technological drivers in building an innovation European Union (EU) based on smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
[154]
A survey on the state of nanosafety research in the European Union ...
Dec 20, 2018 · The data received from 84 respondents give information on exposure pathways, methods, biologic and toxic effects, dose metrics and range, ...
[155]
Nanotechnology pioneer slays 'grey goo' myths - Phys.org
Jun 11, 2004 · Science fiction writers focused on this idea, and 'grey goo' became closely associated with nanotechnology, spreading a serious misconception ...Missing: debunked | Show results with:debunked
[156]
Science/Nature | Nanotech guru turns back on 'goo' - BBC NEWS
Jun 9, 2004 · A scientist regarded as the father of nanotechnology backs away from his claim that nanomachines could turn the planet into "grey goo".
[157]
https://www.osha.gov/nanotechnology
[158]
https://www.osha.gov/nanotechnology/health-effects
[159]
Health Effects of Occupational Exposure to Silver Nanomaterials
May 18, 2021 · Silver nanomaterials were associated with toxicity (cell death and DNA damage) that varied according to the size of the particles.Missing: levels | Show results with:levels
[160]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725023794
[161]
The Mobility of Silver Nanoparticles and Silver Ions in the Soil‐Plant ...
Nov 1, 2019 · In soil, AgNP concentrations as low as 0.14 mg Ag kg−1 can adversely affect soil biota (6). 7 reported that AgNPs were more toxic than TiO2, ...
[162]
Ecotoxic effect of mycogenic silver nanoparticles in water and soil ...
Mar 28, 2025 · The estimated concentrations of AgNPs in soil are in the range of 0.24–729.23 ng/kg AgNPs. It is predicted that these numbers will have grown up ...
[163]
Environmental Impact of Silver Nanoparticles and its Sustainable ...
Oct 10, 2025 · At elevated concentrations, AgNPs exhibit toxicity toward aquatic organisms, disrupt soil microbial communities, alter nutrient cycling, and ...
[164]
Trophic transfer of Cu nanoparticles in a simulated aquatic food chain
Sep 1, 2022 · The goal of the current study was to quantify the trophic transfer of copper nanoparticles (CuNPs) in a food chain consisting of the microalga ...
[165]
Particle number-based trophic transfer of gold nanomaterials in an ...
Feb 9, 2021 · Previous studies have shown that biofilms and algae could constitute a potential entry route for NMs into aquatic food chains. Herein we show ...
[166]
Trophic Transfer of Metal Nanoparticles in an Aquatic Food Chain ...
Mar 26, 2025 · Engineered nanoparticles (ENP) threaten aquatic ecosystems as they are increasingly released into the aquatic environment, which is the sink ...
[167]
Exposure and Possible Risks of Engineered Nanomaterials in the ...
Oct 13, 2020 · This review outlines progress in understanding the environmental dimensions of ENMs and areas that merit further investigation.
[168]
Engineered nanomaterials in the environment: Are they safe?
May 15, 2020 · Generally, the environmental risk of NMs is of low concern currently, while the risk in specific scenarios such as surface water and soil near ...3.2. Toxicity Of Nms At Ercs · 4. Toxicity Of Nms As... · 4.1. Nanotoxicity Mechanisms<|separator|>
[169]
Environmental and economic benefits of single-atom catalysts in ...
Dec 15, 2023 · SACs offer several benefits including improved stability and energy conversion efficiency, reduced emissions, the ability to incorporate ...
[170]
Research on Nanomaterials | US EPA
Jun 3, 2025 · EPA's research is focused on characterizing the occurrence of nanomaterials, examining the transport and fate of nanomaterials in the environment, and ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[171]
Celebrating 20 years of Nanotechnology Research at EPA
Apr 2, 2024 · EPA develops science and processes to evaluate the human health and ecological safety of products containing nanomaterials to estimate their ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s<|separator|>
[172]
Nanocatalyst in remediating environmental pollutants - ScienceDirect
Utilizing these novel materials can successfully purified pollutants like heavy metals, dyes, chlorinated organic compounds, organophosphorus compounds, ...Missing: emission | Show results with:emission
[173]
Control of Nanoscale Materials under the Toxic Substances ... - EPA
Aug 8, 2025 · The information collection is not intended to conclude that nanoscale materials will to cause harm to human health or the environment. Rather, ...Missing: engineered 2020s
[174]
Regulations of Nanomaterials in USA - ChemSafetyPro.COM
May 10, 2016 · TSCA requires manufacturers of new nanomaterials to submit a pre-manufacture notice to the Agency prior to manufacturing or importing them. In ...
[175]
[PDF] Nanotechnology and Tyres | OECD
The project on Nanotechnology and Tyres: Greening Industry and Transport, the conclusions of which are presented in this volume, was conducted by the OECD ...
[176]
Nanotechnology - Compliance & Risks
In the European Union (EU), nanomaterials are regulated by the REACH and CLP Regulations and a string of other regulatory instruments depending on the ...
[177]
Overview of REACH information requirements and available methods
Apr 3, 2023 · Here you can find an updated list of test guidelines, or ongoing test guideline developments relevant to the safety testing of nanomaterials under the REACH ...
[178]
Nanoregulation: A recent scare involving nanotech products reveals ...
” In 2003, the ETC Group called for a moratorium on nanotechnology, warning that regulators were overlooking the risks of the technology (ETC Group, 2003). …Missing: debunked | Show results with:debunked
[179]
The Ambivalence of Promising Technology | NanoEthics
Aug 17, 2010 · In 2003, the ETC Group, a non-governmental environmental organisation, called for a moratorium on the commercial production of new nanomaterials ...Missing: debunked | Show results with:debunked<|control11|><|separator|>
[180]
Labeling and Warning for Products Containing Engineered ...
Feb 3, 2012 · D. Health risks of nanomaterials currently in consumer products under typical uses are likely to be low for consumers. The major types of ...Missing: incidents | Show results with:incidents<|separator|>
[181]
Nanotechnology: separating fact, fiction, hype and hope
Aug 10, 2004 · A major new report into the impact of nanotechnology finds no need to ban research into the subject, but calls for more work on ...Missing: debunked | Show results with:debunked
[182]
[PDF] UK Report: More Hits than Misses on Nanotech - ETC Group
Jul 29, 2004 · Health, Safety & Environment: The Royal Society's report considered but rejected the need for a moratorium on nanotechnology, which the ETC ...Missing: debunked | Show results with:debunked
[183]
[PDF] C(2025)72 - OECD
Aug 1, 2025 · information exchange, and efforts for harmonisation will support effective regulation and facilitate innovation in the field of nanotechnology.
[184]
ECHA Updates Report on Key Areas of Regulatory Challenge ...
Jun 17, 2024 · A framework for accepted regulatory NAMs to help the assessment of single nanoforms or sets of nanoforms; and; Moving away from animal testing.
[185]
Towards harmonisation of testing of nanomaterials for EU regulatory ...
This paper provides an overview of the information requirements across different EU regulatory areas.
[186]
Nanotechnology Programs at FDA
Oct 31, 2024 · Participation in the NNI provides FDA and other regulatory and research funding agencies the opportunity to define their research needs.Missing: harmonization 2020s
[187]
Nanotechnology Market Size, Share, Value | Forecast [2032]
The global nanotechnology market size is projected to grow from $91.18 billion in 2024 to $332.73 billion by 2032, at a CAGR of 17.6%
[188]
[PDF] Economic Impact Analysis: 20 Years of Nanotechnology Investments
Nov 29, 2023 · Nanotechnology has revolutionized numerous industries across the globe and exists at all levels of the economy, from manufacturing to ...
[189]
[PDF] Defense Nanotechnology Research and Development Program
The military applications envisioned for nanotechnology are numerous and growing as fundamental research and applied research reveal ever more possibilities ...
[190]
Aeluma Wins $11.717 Million DARPA Contract for Nano-Scale ...
Sep 18, 2024 · DARPA aims at high performance, nanometer-scale components that are compatible with leading edge and future advanced-node semiconductor ...
[191]
A2P: Atoms to Product - DARPA
The Notre Dame project aims to design and build optical metamaterials that can be reconfigured to rapidly provide on-demand, customized optical capabilities.
[192]
[PDF] THE FORM, FUNCTION, AND FUTURE OF SMART DUST
Along with the current state of nanotechnology, wireless sensor networks, and MEMS, military leaders must also understand the future and its influence on fusing ...
[193]
(PDF) From Lab to market: Strategies and issues in the ...
Aug 6, 2025 · Chinese performance in nanotechnology patenting and product development is weak relative to its research strength, suggesting a significant gap ...
[194]
Nanotechnology, equity and global health - Nature
Mar 29, 2021 · Misusing or limiting access to medical nanotechnologies could create a 'nano-divide' between wealthy and poor populations and countries, ...
[195]
Harnessing Nanotechnology to Improve Global Equity
Addressing the legitimate concerns associated with nanotechnology can foster public support and allow the technology platform to progress in a socially ...
[196]
Nanomedicine and the COVID-19 vaccines | Nature Nanotechnology
Nov 27, 2020 · Once endocytosed, the lipid nanoparticles promote endosomal escape, and release their genetic cargo in the cytosol, where the mRNA is translated ...
[197]
Endosomal escape and current obstacles in ionizable lipid ...
Oct 10, 2025 · During last pandemic of COVID-19, two vaccines based on ionizable lipid nanoparticles (ILNP) were developed for COVID-19 prevention: Pfizer ...
[198]
[PDF] 2022_tsmc_ar_e_ch5.pdf - TSMC Investor Relations
Feb 28, 2023 · Next-generation lithography. Next-generation EUV lithography and related patterning technology to extend Moore's Law. Long-term research.
[199]
White paper names China as world leader in nanotechnology ...
Sep 2, 2025 · China leads the world in nanotechnology development, with the nation accounting for more than 464,000 related patents over the past 25 years ...
[200]
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41378-025-01064-5
[201]
Latest achievements in metalenses for advanced imaging applications
Metalens technology is rapidly advancing the frontiers of optical imaging by enabling flat, lightweight, and multifunctional alternatives to conventional ...
[202]
Press release: The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2023 - NobelPrize.org
Oct 4, 2023 · The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2023 rewards the discovery and development of quantum dots, nanoparticles so tiny that their size determines their properties.
[203]
China is 'nanoseconds behind' US in chips, Nvidia's Jensen Huang ...
Sep 28, 2025 · China is "nanoseconds behind" the US, "so we've got to go compete", Huang said, highlighting China's progress in chipmaking and its ...
[204]
Danish nanotechnology research startup ATLANT 3D secures $15M ...
Mar 13, 2025 · Danish nanotechnology research startup ATLANT 3D, which specializes in atomic-scale manufacturing technology, has secured $15 million in a ...Missing: nanoengineering | Show results with:nanoengineering
[205]
9 Nanotechnology Trends in 2025 - StartUs Insights
Feb 3, 2025 · Atomic-scale innovations in material sciences and microscopy drive 9 nanotechnology trends in 2025, enabling startups to engineer advanced ...
[206]
2025 Top Technology Trends: Nanotherapeutics - Parola Analytics
Jan 28, 2025 · We explore recent innovations in the field of nanotherapeutics, key patent filing trends in the US, leading innovators and filers, and technology areas on our ...
[207]
Quantum AI in Nanotechnology: the Future at Atomic Scale - LinkedIn
Apr 11, 2025 · Scalable Quantum Chips: Nanoscale silicon qubits may lead to desktop-sized quantum computers by 2030.
[208]
https://www.bccresearch.com/pressroom/ift/global-quantum-computing-market-to-grow-346
[209]
Top 5 Emerging Trends in Nanotechnology for 2025 - LinkedIn
May 28, 2025 · In 2025, researchers at Caltech developed a new method for inkjet-printing nanoparticles that enables mass production of these devices.Missing: nanoengineering | Show results with:nanoengineering
[210]
The Next 25 Years of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: A Nano ...
Aug 27, 2025 · Nanomaterials · Nanoscale · Photonics · Two dimensional materials. 2025 marks the 25th anniversary of Nano Letters, and to celebrate this ...
[211]
Manufacturing Nanoscale Electronics Challenges Now And In The ...
May 10, 2025 · Semiconductors continue to shrink. Nanoscale manufacturing is moving AI and quantum computing from the theoretical to reality.Missing: startups | Show results with:startups
[212]
10 New Nanotechnology Companies - StartUs Insights
Explore 10 new nanotechnology companies from 1.9K+ entrants, offering drug delivery systems, nanocolloids, antimicrobial additives & more.