Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Climate communication

Climate communication refers to the processes and strategies employed to convey scientific understanding of climate change, its causes, and implications to non-expert audiences such as the public, policymakers, and media outlets, with the aim of shaping perceptions, attitudes, and actions toward mitigation and adaptation. This field draws on psychology, linguistics, and media studies to address barriers like cognitive biases and information overload that hinder comprehension of complex probabilistic risks.^[1] Central to climate communication are efforts to highlight the near-unanimous consensus among climate scientists on human-caused warming, as public estimates often fall short of the empirical reality exceeding 97% agreement among experts.^[2] Techniques such as consensus messaging have demonstrated modest success in elevating perceived agreement and concern, yet meta-analyses reveal only small overall effects on policy support or behavioral change, with interventions yielding effect sizes around d=0.15.^[3] Framing messages around gain versus loss or local impacts versus global scales shows variable efficacy, often limited by preexisting worldviews and political affiliations that predict attitudes more strongly than exposure to information.^[4] Controversies persist regarding the field's reliance on alarmist narratives, which empirical evidence suggests can induce defensive responses or skepticism rather than engagement, particularly when diverging from data-driven projections.^[5] Systemic biases in academic and media institutions toward emphasizing worst-case scenarios over balanced risk assessments have been critiqued for eroding trust, as coverage often amplifies uncertainty in impacts while downplaying adaptive capacities or dissenting analyses within credible bounds.^[6] Despite extensive campaigns, global emissions continue to rise, underscoring causal factors like economic incentives outweighing communicative influences in driving outcomes.^[7]

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Principles and Scope

Climate communication encompasses the processes by which findings from climate science—derived from empirical observations, physical models, and peer-reviewed analyses—are conveyed to non-specialist audiences, including the public, educators, and decision-makers, to enable informed comprehension of climatic dynamics. At its core, it prioritizes the accurate representation of data-driven insights, such as the human-induced global surface temperature increase of approximately 1.1°C (with a best estimate of 1.07°C) from 1850–1900 to 2010–2019, as assessed through multiple independent datasets including surface, satellite, and reanalysis records.^[8] This transmission focuses on elucidating causal mechanisms, including the enhanced greenhouse effect from anthropogenic CO2 emissions (which have risen from about 280 ppm pre-industrially to over 410 ppm by 2020), while integrating natural forcings like solar irradiance variations and volcanic aerosols that modulate short-term trends.^[8] Distinguishing climate communication from advocacy is fundamental: the former adheres to principles of neutrality and verifiability, presenting evidence without endorsing particular policies or mobilizing for predefined outcomes, in line with guidelines for scientific summaries to be "policy-relevant but not policy-prescriptive." Advocacy, by contrast, often incorporates normative appeals or selective framing to influence behavior or legislation, potentially introducing biases that undermine source credibility, as seen in instances where alarmist projections diverge from realized outcomes like moderated sea-level rise rates (averaging 3.7 mm/year since 1993, below some early high-end estimates).^[8] Effective communication thus employs first-principles reasoning—rooted in thermodynamics, radiative transfer, and biogeochemical cycles—to explain phenomena like positive feedbacks (e.g., water vapor amplification) alongside countervailing negative feedbacks (e.g., cloud albedo effects), without amplifying unsubstantiated narratives of inevitable catastrophe that lack empirical corroboration in current observations. The scope of climate communication is delimited to fostering clarity on uncertainties, such as equilibrium climate sensitivity estimates ranging from 2.5–4.0°C per CO2 doubling (with medium confidence in the IPCC's 3°C best estimate), and variability from phenomena like El Niño-Southern Oscillation, rather than venturing into prescriptive recommendations.^[8] It excludes direct engagement in political advocacy, prioritizing instead the demystification of complex interactions—e.g., how fossil fuel combustion contributes roughly 75% of recent radiative forcing—to equip audiences for causal evaluation grounded in reproducible evidence, while noting institutional biases in media and academia that may favor dramatized interpretations over balanced probabilistic assessments.^[8]

Relation to Climate Science and Policy

Climate communication serves as the intermediary between empirical climate science findings and policy formulation, yet frequent divergences arise where messaging prioritizes alarmist narratives over central projections from models like those in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). General Circulation Models (GCMs) in IPCC AR6 assessments project global surface temperature increases of approximately 1.5–4.4°C by 2100 relative to pre-industrial levels under low-to-high emissions scenarios (SSP1-2.6 to SSP5-8.5), with medians around 2.0–3.5°C depending on socioeconomic pathways; these ranges reflect uncertainties in climate sensitivity (2.5–4.0°C per CO2 doubling in CMIP6) and emissions trajectories, not inevitable catastrophe.^[9]^[10] However, communication efforts often amplify high-end tails of these distributions, framing outcomes as existential threats despite evidence that models have historically overestimated warming rates—for instance, CMIP5 ensembles simulated 16% faster global surface air temperature rise than observations since 1970, partly due to excessive sensitivity to forcings.^[11] A core element of consensus-building in communication is the assertion of near-unanimous agreement among scientists on anthropogenic warming, with studies like Cook et al. (2013) claiming 97.1% endorsement among papers expressing a position; this figure, derived from abstract ratings of 11,944 climate papers from 1991–2011, has been invoked to justify policy urgency.^[12] Critiques highlight methodological flaws, such as classifying neutral or ambiguous papers as non-endorsing without full-text review and overrepresenting endorsement by assuming silence equates to disagreement, leading to inflated figures that overlook dissenting analyses of natural variability or model limitations.^[13]^[14] Historical precedents, including media-hyped 1970s cooling fears from aerosol effects—which lacked scientific consensus, as peer-reviewed literature leaned toward greenhouse warming—underscore risks of overreliance on incomplete models, a pattern echoed in communication's selective emphasis on projections over verified trends like the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) satellite record showing +0.14°C per decade lower troposphere warming since 1979.^[15]^[16]^[17] Policy interfaces with science through communication's role in translating data into actionable frameworks, such as Paris Agreement targets, but gaps emerge when advocacy diverges from verifiable metrics favoring direct observations over proxy-based reconstructions prone to methodological controversies. Satellite and radiosonde data provide robust, unadjusted global coverage, contrasting with surface proxy networks (e.g., tree rings, ice cores) where screening for correlation with modern temperatures can artifactually flatten pre-20th-century variability, as critiqued in analyses of principal component methods generating "hockey stick" shapes from noise.^[18] Such adjustments, often defended as calibration necessities, fuel skepticism amid documented urban heat island biases and station siting issues in surface records, prompting calls for policy grounded in empirical instrumentation rather than reconstructed narratives that communication amplifies without proportional scrutiny of error margins.^[19] This disconnect risks policies like rapid decarbonization that assume high-confidence catastrophic risks, despite science indicating modest, attributable warming amid natural forcings.

Historical Evolution

Pre-1990s Awareness and Early Warnings

In the 1970s, scientific assessments increasingly warned of potential atmospheric CO2 accumulation leading to global warming, as detailed in the National Academy of Sciences' 1979 Charney report, which projected a temperature rise of 1.5 to 4.5°C for a doubling of CO2 concentrations and emphasized the physical basis of the greenhouse effect with equilibrium climate sensitivity likely between 1.5 and 4.5°C.^[20] This report, chaired by Jule Charney, synthesized modeling and observational data to conclude that fossil fuel emissions would drive detectable warming within decades, though uncertainties in feedbacks like water vapor and clouds persisted.^[21] Concurrently, media outlets amplified concerns over global cooling from sulfate aerosols, with articles in outlets like Newsweek in 1975 speculating on an impending ice age, but peer-reviewed literature revealed no scientific consensus for net cooling—only balanced debate between aerosol masking and CO2 forcing, with greenhouse warming gaining traction by decade's end.^[15]^[22] The 1980s marked a pivot in communicating warming risks, exemplified by NASA climatologist James Hansen's June 23, 1988, testimony before the U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, where he stated with 99% confidence that observed temperature increases were due to the enhanced greenhouse effect from human-emitted trace gases, predicting continued warming even if emissions halted immediately.^[23]^[24] Delivered amid record U.S. heat and droughts, Hansen's presentation—supported by GISS models showing 1988 as the warmest year on record—elevated climate discourse from niche journals to national headlines, though he cautioned against over-alarmism by noting natural variability's role.^[25] Early warnings often invoked extreme scenarios, such as a June 1989 Associated Press report citing UNEP official Noel Brown's projection that a three-foot sea-level rise from polar ice melt could submerge flat island nations like the Maldives by 2000 if trends persisted, a prediction rooted in then-preliminary ice core and tide gauge data but not realized, as subsequent observations showed island stability or growth from sedimentation outweighing modest rises.^[26]^[27] Public engagement prior to 1990 remained constrained by reliance on print media, scientific conferences, and government bulletins, with climate risks overshadowed by immediate issues like acid rain and stratospheric ozone depletion; surveys indicated awareness hovered below 50% in the U.S. until the late 1980s heatwaves spurred coverage.^[28] Communication strategies emphasized factual reporting of geophysical mechanisms over behavioral calls, reflecting a scientific community focused on data validation amid aerosol versus CO2 uncertainties, rather than coordinated advocacy.^[29] This era's efforts, while pioneering, achieved limited societal penetration without mass media amplification or policy mandates.^[28]

1990s-2000s Institutionalization and Advocacy

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), adopted on May 9, 1992, at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro, established a formal international framework for addressing climate change through negotiation and information-sharing mechanisms, including annual Conference of the Parties (COP) meetings that amplified scientific assessments and policy discussions to global audiences.^[30] The convention's emphasis on stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations to prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system marked a shift toward institutionalized communication, with early COPs serving as platforms for disseminating IPCC reports and fostering diplomatic advocacy among 154 initial signatories.^[31] Building on this, the Kyoto Protocol, adopted on December 11, 1997, at COP3 in Kyoto, Japan, introduced the first binding emission reduction targets for developed nations—aiming for at least 5% below 1990 levels by 2008-2012—and was promoted through UN campaigns highlighting the urgency of mitigation to avert projected economic and environmental damages.^[32] These milestones formalized climate communication by integrating scientific consensus with calls for policy action, though implementation relied heavily on advocacy from environmental NGOs like the World Wildlife Fund and Greenpeace, which organized public campaigns tying protocol commitments to immediate threats such as sea-level rise and biodiversity loss. Advocacy efforts peaked with Al Gore's 2006 documentary An Inconvenient Truth, which presented a slideshow-style narrative of observed warming trends, IPCC projections, and human causation, reaching millions via theatrical release and earning an Academy Award for its role in elevating public discourse.^[33] Empirical studies confirmed the film's short-term effects, including increased viewer knowledge of greenhouse gas causes and willingness to support carbon reductions, contributing to heightened media coverage and political momentum.^[33] However, the presentation faced criticism for selective emphasis on alarmist scenarios while downplaying model uncertainties and historical variability, as evidenced by a 2007 UK High Court ruling identifying nine factual inaccuracies for educational use, including overstated sea-level rise predictions and hurricane links.^[34] Public concern in the US rose modestly amid these efforts, with Gallup polls showing the share of Americans viewing global warming effects as a "serious problem" increasing from 35% in 1989 to 49% by April 2000, reflecting growing awareness from UN outputs and media amplification.^[35] Yet policy adoption lagged due to perceived economic burdens; the US Senate unanimously rejected Kyoto ratification in 1997 (95-0 vote) over estimates of multi-trillion-dollar GDP losses and disproportionate costs to American industry, leading to President Bush's 2001 withdrawal announcement.^[36] Skeptic responses emerged, questioning institutional gatekeeping; the 2009 "Climategate" leak of over 1,000 emails from the University of East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit revealed scientists discussing data adjustments and peer-review pressures in ways that appeared to prioritize narrative over transparency, eroding trust in climate research bodies despite subsequent inquiries clearing formal misconduct.^[37] This incident highlighted vulnerabilities in advocacy reliant on centralized expertise, fueling demands for greater data openness.^[38]

2010s-Present: Digital Era and Polarization

The advent of social media platforms in the 2010s facilitated rapid dissemination of climate messages, exemplified by Greta Thunberg's solo school strike in August 2018 outside the Swedish parliament, which inspired the global Fridays for Future movement and mobilized over 1.4 million participants in strikes by March 2019.^[39] However, analyses of social media discourse reveal increased ideological polarization, with discussions often confined to echo chambers that reinforce preexisting views, though some open forums allow mixed interactions.^[40] Exposure to opposing climate opinions on these platforms has been shown to heighten affective polarization rather than foster consensus.^[41] Longitudinal evidence indicates that while social media amplified visibility, it did not independently drive rises in climate skepticism during the decade.^[42] The 2021 IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) Working Group I summary asserted that human influence on climate is "unequivocal," with greenhouse gas emissions responsible for approximately 1.1°C of warming since pre-industrial times, prompting UN Secretary-General António Guterres to describe it as a "code red for humanity."^[43]^[44] This emphatic framing encountered criticism for potentially inducing psychological reactance, where fear-based appeals emphasizing threats without emphasizing efficacy lead to defensive denial, particularly among skeptical audiences, as evidenced in experimental studies on climate doom communication.^[45]^[46] Such reactance contributes to entrenched divides, with social media exacerbating partisan gaps during events like COP26 in 2021.^[47] In the United States, partisan disparities in climate concern persist, with 2024 surveys showing Democrats far more likely than Republicans to attribute warming primarily to human activities and support aggressive mitigation policies.^[48]^[49] Extreme weather events, such as heatwaves, have driven temporary spikes in public interest across regions, yet these do not consistently narrow ideological gaps.^[50] From 2023 to 2025, communication strategies have increasingly shifted toward adaptation messaging, recognizing the inevitability of some impacts and focusing on resilience rather than solely mitigation, amid ongoing polarization.^[51]

Primary Objectives

Enhancing Public Comprehension of Risks

Enhancing public comprehension of climate risks focuses on disseminating verifiable empirical data, such as observed global temperature increases of approximately 1.1°C since pre-industrial levels, to build foundational understanding of ongoing changes.^[9] This approach utilizes concrete observables like sea level rise, which has accelerated to an average rate of 4.5 mm per year as of 2023, derived from satellite altimetry measurements spanning 1993 onward.^[52] By prioritizing such metrics, communication efforts aim to ground public perceptions in measurable trends rather than unverified extrapolations. Event attribution studies provide a rigorous method to link anthropogenic influences to specific extreme weather occurrences, estimating, for example, that climate change has doubled the likelihood of certain heatwaves exceeding historical norms in Europe and North America.^[53] These analyses employ climate models to compare event probabilities in current versus counterfactual warmer-free scenarios, revealing causal contributions without overstating certainty, as not all extremes are solely attributable to human factors.^[54] Presenting these findings through data visualizations and historical comparisons fosters literacy on probabilistic risks, countering tendencies toward binary interpretations of weather variability. Evidence from communication research underscores that factual baselines, including pre-industrial CO2 levels of about 280 ppm contrasted with current concentrations exceeding 420 ppm, outperform vague future-oriented warnings in promoting accurate recall of radiative forcing mechanisms. Emotional overload from hyperbolic scenarios can induce fatigue and skepticism, whereas numerical and historical anchors enhance engagement with core physics like the greenhouse effect.^[55] Metrics of success include reductions in literacy gaps documented in surveys; for instance, global assessments reveal that only around 40% of respondents in select populations correctly identify human-induced consensus on warming, highlighting persistent deficits in grasping basic risk drivers.^[56]

Fostering Behavioral and Policy Shifts

Climate communication strategies aimed at behavioral shifts target actions such as reducing household energy use, adopting low-carbon transportation, and altering consumption patterns like decreasing meat intake, with the goal of lowering personal carbon footprints. Empirical analyses indicate that widespread adoption of high-impact behaviors—such as cutting air travel and shifting to plant-based diets—could theoretically reduce greenhouse gas emissions from developed countries by 40-70%, though actual implementation has achieved far smaller reductions due to limited scale and persistence.^[57] For instance, individual energy conservation efforts, often promoted through public campaigns, have historically yielded modest savings of 5-10% in household energy consumption in targeted programs, but these translate to less than 2% of national emissions in practice, underscoring their marginal global effect without systemic enforcement.^[58] In policy advocacy, communication emphasizes framing mechanisms like carbon taxes and subsidies for renewables to garner public support, contrasting top-down mandates with voluntary incentives. Studies from the early 2020s demonstrate that messages highlighting the efficacy of carbon pricing—such as revenue recycling through rebates—can increase support among lower-income groups by 10-20 percentage points in experimental settings across countries like the US and Canada, as rebates mitigate perceived regressivity.^[59] Voluntary incentives, including subsidies and information campaigns, have shown greater long-term efficacy in fostering sustained behavioral changes compared to coercive mandates, which often provoke backlash and noncompliance, per behavioral economics reviews.^[60] Meta-analyses confirm that policy designs incorporating clear benefits and feasibility perceptions enhance endorsement for mitigation measures, though support varies by revenue use, with direct household rebates outperforming vague environmental funds.^[61] Critiques of these approaches highlight risks associated with aggressive top-down net-zero policies, which communication efforts sometimes downplay, including heightened energy costs and supply vulnerabilities. The 2022 European energy crisis, exacerbated by reliance on intermittent renewables and premature phase-outs of fossil and nuclear capacity amid the Russia-Ukraine conflict, led to gas consumption drops of 19% but also soaring prices that affected millions, with energy poverty rates rising in several EU nations.^[62] From 2022 to 2025, these dynamics illustrated how rapid decarbonization paths, without adequate adaptation to transition costs, can induce blackouts and economic strain, as seen in partial French nuclear outages and hydro shortfalls, potentially undermining public trust in policy shifts.^[63] Evidence suggests that overemphasizing mitigation without balancing adaptation expenses ignores causal trade-offs, where voluntary, incentive-based strategies may better align with realistic behavioral responses than mandates risking energy insecurity.^[64]

Bridging Scientific Consensus with Societal Action

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) synthesizes scientific consensus through its Assessment Reports, with the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) Summary for Policymakers stating that human activities have unequivocally caused approximately 1.1°C of warming since pre-industrial times, with the likely range of human-induced warming exceeding 1.0°C.^[8] This consensus, reflecting near-unanimous agreement among climate scientists (over 99% attributing recent warming primarily to anthropogenic greenhouse gases), is communicated via targeted summaries to inform policy without technical jargon.^[65] However, public perception often underestimates this agreement, with surveys showing average estimates around 65-70% in countries like the UK and US, leading to reduced concern and policy support.^[65] ^[66] Empirical experiments demonstrate that explicitly communicating the consensus level increases public belief in human-caused change, heightens worry, and boosts support for mitigation policies across diverse demographics and 27 countries tested in 2024, without polarizing effects.^[67] Despite these gains in belief, translating consensus awareness into societal action reveals persistent gaps, as high recognition of risks does not consistently yield behavioral or policy shifts. Causal factors include psychological distance, where climate impacts are perceived as remote in time, space, or personal relevance, diminishing urgency; 2024 studies using virtual reality to constrict this distance enhanced engagement and reduced indifference.^[68] Media amplification of IPCC findings, such as the 1.5°C threshold from the 2018 Special Report, often dilutes nuance by hyping irreversible tipping points and "12-year deadlines" for action, whereas IPCC models project risks within probability ranges (e.g., low-likelihood high-impact events) rather than certainties, potentially eroding trust when predictions vary.^[69] This sensationalism, critiqued for overstating immediacy against the report's emphasis on feasible pathways to limit warming, contributes to skepticism about actionable responses.^[69] Bridging requires addressing attribution complexities beyond core consensus, as empirical analyses of natural forcings like solar activity show limited explanatory power for post-1950 warming; solar irradiance peaked mid-20th century and declined slightly since, correlating inversely with temperature trends, per reconstructions and models.^[70] ^[71] While 2010s studies affirm solar variability's historical role (e.g., contributing to centennial-scale changes pre-1750), IPCC assessments attribute less than 0.1°C to it since 1950, highlighting causal dominance of greenhouse gases via radiative forcing balances.^[71] Verifiable pathways to action thus hinge on empirical cost-benefit analyses of interventions, prioritizing those with high efficacy like technological innovation over ideologically driven mandates, to align societal responses with consensus-derived risks without overreliance on uncertain tipping cascades.^[8]

Key Challenges

Cognitive and Psychological Barriers

Cognitive limitations, such as finite attention spans and bounded worry capacity, hinder effective climate communication by reducing receptivity to repeated messaging. Psychological research indicates that individuals possess a restricted capacity for sustained concern, leading to message fatigue where prolonged exposure to climate threats diminishes engagement and persuasion. A 2023 preregistered replication study with 620 participants demonstrated that climate change message fatigue correlates with lower endorsement of pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors, mirroring patterns observed in health campaigns. This fatigue arises from cognitive overload, where the brain prioritizes immediate, tangible concerns over abstract, chronic risks like gradual warming.^[72] Optimism bias further exacerbates these barriers by prompting individuals to underestimate personal vulnerability to climate impacts relative to others. Experimental evidence reveals that people systematically judge adverse climate outcomes as less probable for themselves, fostering inaction despite awareness of broader risks; for instance, surveys show adults believing global warming harms distant populations far more than their own communities. Alarmist messaging, intended to heighten urgency, often invokes psychological reactance—a defensive response to perceived threats to autonomy—resulting in heightened denial or opposition. A 2024 experiment found that fear appeals targeting individual responsibility in climate communication increased perceived freedom threats and reactance, particularly when emphasizing restrictive behaviors over policy solutions, thereby reducing intended persuasive effects.^[73]^[74] Empirical interventions highlight that fostering perceived efficacy—belief in one's capacity for meaningful action—mitigates these barriers more effectively than doom-laden scenarios, which can induce helplessness. Studies analyzing communication strategies recommend emphasizing actionable solutions alongside risks, as pure threat framing amplifies reactance and disengagement without bolstering motivation. For example, research tied to IPCC assessments argues that nurturing efficacy beliefs through evidence of successful mitigation (e.g., renewable transitions) enhances public resolve, outperforming narratives of inevitable catastrophe in driving behavioral shifts, based on meta-analyses of persuasion outcomes. This approach counters optimism bias by personalizing agency, though overuse risks diluting urgency if not grounded in verifiable progress.^[75]

Scientific Uncertainty and Complexity

Climate models estimate future warming through equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS), the expected global temperature rise from a doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentrations after equilibrium is reached. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), published in 2021, assesses ECS as likely ranging from 2.5°C to 4°C, with a central estimate of 3°C, narrowing the upper bound from the 1.5–4.5°C range in the Fifth Assessment Report while retaining substantial spread due to uncertainties in radiative forcings and feedbacks.^[76] ^[77] Observational constraints from the instrumental record and energy budget analyses have increasingly pointed toward values in the lower half of this range, as mid-20th-century warming rates align better with ECS below 3°C when accounting for aerosol effects, though paleoclimate proxies introduce further variability.^[78] The climate system's inherent complexity amplifies these uncertainties, particularly through nonlinear feedbacks that models parameterize imperfectly. Low-level clouds, for instance, represent a dominant source of discrepancy; subtropical marine stratocumulus decks may thin and warm under rising temperatures, reducing their cooling effect and amplifying sensitivity, yet coupled model simulations often underestimate observed cloud-circulation covariability in the tropics.^[79] ^[80] Nonlinear interactions, such as those involving convection, precipitation efficiency, and vegetation responses, further propagate errors across scales, as local processes like turbulence defy resolution in global circulation models and can lead to bistable or threshold behaviors not captured in linear approximations.^[81] ^[82] Historical precedents illustrate how such uncertainties have led to overconfident projections in environmental forecasting. In the 1980s, models predicted severe acidification of soils and waters from sulfur dioxide emissions would cause widespread forest dieback across eastern North America and Scandinavia, yet empirical recovery following emissions controls revealed greater ecosystem buffering capacity from soil bases and biological adaptations than anticipated, with damages confined more to sensitive lakes than broad landscapes.^[83] ^[84] Analogously, early 2000s projections for Arctic summer sea ice, including ice-free conditions by 2013–2016 from some model ensembles, overestimated decline rates; while extents have diminished by about 13% per decade since 1979, persistent multi-year ice and dynamic feedbacks have delayed tipping points beyond initial timelines, highlighting model biases in ice-albedo and ocean heat uptake representations.^[85] ^[86] These cases underscore the risks of communicating simplified scenarios that downplay parametric and structural uncertainties in chaotic systems.

Political and Ideological Divides

In the United States, climate communication exhibits stark partisan divides, with Democrats showing higher concern and support for mitigation measures compared to Republicans, a gap that has widened over time. Data from the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication indicate that from 2008 to 2024, the percentage of Democrats worried about global warming increased, while Republican concern remained relatively stable or declined, resulting in an expanding ideological chasm since around 2010.^[87] ^[88] This polarization manifests in differing interpretations of scientific data, where conservative skepticism often emphasizes empirical policy trade-offs rather than existential threats. Progressive climate messaging, characterized by alarmist framing of imminent catastrophe, has been critiqued for alienating conservative audiences by neglecting observable benefits of elevated CO2 levels, such as global greening. Satellite observations from NASA reveal that rising atmospheric CO2 has driven significant vegetation growth, accounting for roughly 70% of the greening trend between 1982 and 2012, enhancing photosynthesis and contributing to increased leaf area across a quarter to half of Earth's vegetated lands.^[89] This CO2 fertilization effect, which boosts plant productivity and biomass, is frequently omitted in mainstream narratives, potentially undermining credibility among those prioritizing comprehensive causal assessments over selective risk emphasis.^[90] Skepticism among conservatives is empirically linked to the perceived inefficiency of mitigation policies, where trillions in global expenditures yield marginal temperature reductions. Analyses suggest that removing sufficient CO2 to lower temperatures by 0.1°C via direct air capture would require approximately $22 trillion, highlighting the disproportionate costs relative to climatic outcomes.^[91] Such cost-benefit disparities, rooted in economic realism, fuel ideological resistance to policies framed as urgent imperatives without adequate acknowledgment of adaptive alternatives or net impacts.^[48]

Media Distortions and Misinformation Dynamics

Media coverage of climate change frequently employs sensational language, such as "climate crisis" or "climate emergency," which studies indicate heightens perceived urgency but risks overstating immediacy and eroding long-term trust when empirical outcomes diverge from predictions. A 2021 experimental study found that framing news stories with "climate emergency" or "climate crisis" increased public engagement and support for policy action compared to neutral "climate change" terminology, yet it also amplified emotional responses without proportionally improving comprehension of scientific nuances. ^[92] This shift in terminology correlates with a surge in usage; Google search trends show "climate crisis" queries rising sharply post-2018, coinciding with advocacy campaigns, though peer-reviewed analyses caution that such hyperbolic framing can foster fatigue and skepticism when extreme forecasts, like widespread famine or mass migrations by specific dates, fail to materialize as projected. ^[93] Mainstream outlets, which empirical audits reveal exhibit systemic bias toward alarmist narratives due to institutional alignments, contribute to this dynamic, with coverage in liberal-leaning publications increasing over 300% since 2012, often prioritizing dramatic events over balanced risk assessments. ^[94] Social media platforms exacerbate distortions through algorithms optimized for engagement, which amplify both alarmist hyperbole and contrarian skepticism, polarizing discourse and undermining consensus on verifiable data like observed warming trends. Research from 2022 demonstrated Facebook's recommendation systems preferentially surfacing denialist content denying anthropogenic influences, yet subsequent platform policies, including YouTube's 2021 ban on monetizing climate denial videos, have asymmetrically curtailed skeptical viewpoints while permitting unchecked escalation of doomsday scenarios. ^[95] ^[96] A 2025 analysis across platforms revealed higher relative engagement with misinformation sources, where extremes—such as claims of imminent societal collapse or outright dismissal of temperature records—outpace moderate scientific communication, driven by virality incentives rather than evidentiary merit. ^[93] Fact-checking efforts highlight bidirectional exaggerations: alarmist projections have overstated short-term impacts like hurricane frequency intensification, while some skeptic arguments downplay the 97% expert agreement on human causation, though suppression of debate via content moderation has stifled empirical scrutiny, as evidenced by internal platform documents revealing coordinated de-amplification of nonconforming analyses in 2021. ^[97] ^[98] Corporate greenwashing represents another vector of misinformation, with 2020s net-zero pledges often lacking verifiable pathways, misleading stakeholders on emission reductions. For instance, major food conglomerates faced accusations in 2025 reports for touting net-zero ambitions reliant on unproven carbon offsets and lax certifications, while actual Scope 3 emissions from supply chains continued rising, as audited by independent verifiers. ^[99] Regulatory actions, such as the €25 million fine against DWS in 2023 for unsubstantiated ESG claims, underscore how such tactics distort public perception of mitigation feasibility, fostering cynicism toward broader climate initiatives when discrepancies emerge. ^[100] These dynamics collectively erode trust, as surveys link exposure to unbalanced coverage and deceptive claims to diminished faith in institutions, with bidirectional distortions impeding causal understanding of climate feedbacks over ideological entrenchment. ^[101]

Communication Strategies

Evidence-Based Framing Techniques

Evidence-based framing techniques in climate communication draw from psychological experiments testing message structures that enhance perceived efficacy and policy support. Studies from the early 2020s indicate that positive framing, emphasizing gains from action such as improved health outcomes and environmental quality, outperforms negative or fear-based appeals, which can provoke defensive reactions or inaction among audiences.^[102] For instance, a 2022 experiment across multiple countries found that health and environment-focused frames increased public endorsement of carbon taxes and regulations by 5-10 percentage points compared to neutral baselines, while economic frames showed no such gains.^[102] Framing climate risks in terms of immediate community protection and security benefits further amplifies efficacy, as local relevance reduces psychological distance. Research highlights that messages stressing protection of health and local environments elicit stronger intentions for mitigation behaviors than abstract global threats, with efficacy messages mitigating potential backlash from loss-framed content.^[103] Conversely, overemphasizing temporal immediacy without accompanying hope or solutions can exacerbate anxiety without proportional action, as demonstrated in a 2024 BMC Psychology study where fear paired with near-future framing interacted to lower behavioral intentions in certain demographics.^[104] Critiques of these techniques note their frequent omission of economic trade-offs, potentially inflating short-term support for policies with high costs. Peer-reviewed analyses reveal that efficacy-driven moral appeals succeed in lab settings but may falter in real-world contexts where fiscal realism influences sustained public and political buy-in, underscoring the need for integrated cost-benefit framings.^[102] Such approaches, while empirically supported for attitude shifts, require validation against long-term behavioral data to avoid overpromising transformative change.^[74]

Narrative and Visual Approaches

Narrative techniques in climate communication frequently incorporate personal stories and anecdotes to humanize abstract risks, aiming to evoke emotional responses and foster empathy. Experimental evidence indicates that exposure to narratives featuring individuals impacted by weather events can positively influence beliefs about climate change causation and support for mitigation, with studies showing shifts in attitudes comparable to factual information but through heightened engagement.^[105]^[106] However, such storytelling often prioritizes dramatic, low-probability disasters from events like the 2010s floods or heatwaves, potentially skewing perceptions by overlooking empirical trends in declining global vulnerability; weather-related disaster deaths have decreased by a factor of 6.5 since 1920, attributable to advancements in forecasting, infrastructure, and response capabilities amid rising baseline temperatures.^[107] This selective emphasis risks amplifying availability heuristics, where vivid tales overshadow statistical realities of reduced per capita mortality rates despite increased event frequency in some categories.^[108] Visual methods complement narratives by translating complex datasets into accessible formats, such as trend infographics and anomaly maps, which the World Meteorological Organization employed in its 2025-2029 decadal forecast to illustrate an 80% likelihood of at least one record-warm year, using ensemble projections to highlight regional hotspots.^[109] Research on visual communication underscores their efficacy in enhancing message retention and comprehension, with systematic reviews confirming that imagery outperforms text-only presentations in conveying climate projections to diverse audiences.^[110] Despite these strengths, visual representations carry inherent risks of misrepresentation, exemplified by the "hockey stick" graph popularized in the early 2000s, which depicts stable temperatures for the prior millennium followed by abrupt 20th-century warming but has been critiqued for proxy data handling that allegedly truncates medieval warmth and relies on principal component analyses prone to smoothing natural variability.^[111]^[112] Such depictions can mislead by employing cherry-picked baselines or scales that accentuate recent anomalies while compressing historical context, prompting skepticism when independent reconstructions reveal greater pre-industrial fluctuations inconsistent with unprecedented claims.^[113] Empirical assessments of manipulated visuals reveal they can provoke backlash, eroding trust more than neutral data presentations, particularly amid documented institutional biases favoring alarmist framings in academic and media outlets.^[114]

Audience Targeting and Segmentation

The Yale Program on Climate Change Communication delineates public attitudes toward climate change into six segments known as Global Warming's Six Americas: the Alarmed (who view the issue as urgent and support aggressive policies), Concerned (aware but less motivated), Cautious (uncertain and requiring more information), Disengaged (largely unaware), Doubtful (skeptical of human causation and impacts), and Dismissive (rejecting the consensus and opposing action).^[115] As of fall 2024, these groups represent distinct demographic and ideological profiles, with the Alarmed at approximately 25% of U.S. adults, the Dismissive at 15%, and the Doubtful at 18%; conservatives and Republicans predominate in the latter two, while liberals dominate the Alarmed.^[115] This segmentation underscores the need to customize messages, as uniform alarmist appeals often reinforce skepticism among the Doubtful and Dismissive by triggering defensive responses rooted in ideological priors favoring limited government intervention.^[116] Regional variations further necessitate granular targeting, as revealed by Yale's Climate Opinion Maps, which aggregate survey data from 2008 through fall 2024 to depict state- and county-level differences in beliefs, risk perceptions, and policy support.^[56] For instance, higher concentrations of the Dismissive and Doubtful appear in rural Midwest and Southern counties, where economic dependencies on fossil fuels amplify resistance to mitigation narratives, compared to coastal urban areas with larger Alarmed populations.^[56] Communicators leverage these maps to adapt content, such as emphasizing local adaptation benefits in skeptical regions over global catastrophe rhetoric, thereby aligning with audience-specific causal understandings of risks like agriculture or energy costs.^[117] Tailored strategies for conservative-leaning segments prioritize frames invoking economic prosperity, job opportunities in clean technology, and innovation-driven growth, which resonate with values of self-reliance and market solutions.^[118] Experimental evidence indicates that such economic and patriotic framings—portraying climate action as enhancing national competitiveness or technological leadership—elevate support for policies like renewable energy incentives among conservatives more effectively than environmental moral appeals, which can polarize further.^[119] For example, messages highlighting job creation in energy transitions have reduced opposition in trials by shifting focus from regulatory burdens to opportunity costs, avoiding the inefficacy of one-size-fits-all doom narratives that dismiss underlying doubts about alarmist projections.^[116] Empirical assessments of targeted communication reveal modest but consistent attitude shifts, with meta-analyses of framing experiments showing average increases in policy endorsement of 5-15% among non-Alarmed segments, alongside reduced partisan gaps in willingness to act.^[4] These gains stem from causal mechanisms like lowered threat perceptions and heightened efficacy beliefs, though effects diminish without sustained exposure and vary by message source credibility; generic broadcasts, by contrast, often exacerbate divides by confirming ideological stereotypes.^[120] Overall, segmentation mitigates backlash risks, fostering incremental depolarization where broad appeals fail due to heterogeneous priors on scientific uncertainty and policy trade-offs.^[117]

Integration of Economic and Adaptation Realities

Effective climate communication requires incorporating economic analyses to provide a balanced view, highlighting both the substantial costs of aggressive mitigation strategies and potential benefits from technological advancements, rather than focusing solely on emission reductions. Estimates indicate that achieving global net-zero emissions by 2050 would necessitate annual investments of approximately $3.5 trillion to $4 trillion, representing a significant reallocation of global capital toward low-carbon technologies and infrastructure upgrades.^[121]^[122] These figures underscore the trade-offs involved, as such expenditures could strain developing economies and compete with investments in poverty alleviation or health, yet proponents argue they yield long-term savings through avoided climate damages, though empirical validation of these savings remains debated due to uncertainties in damage projections. Technological innovations have demonstrated that emissions reductions can occur through market-driven adaptations rather than regulatory mandates alone, as seen in the United States where hydraulic fracturing enabled natural gas to displace coal in power generation. Between 2005 and 2019, U.S. power sector CO2 emissions fell to levels comparable to the mid-1980s, primarily due to natural gas—produced via fracking—replacing coal, which emits about twice the CO2 per unit of energy.^[123] This shift, driven by economic competitiveness rather than policy alone, highlights how innovation can lower emissions while supporting energy affordability and job growth, countering narratives that frame climate action as inherently zero-sum.^[124] A growing emphasis in climate communication involves promoting adaptation measures, which address inevitable changes through resilient infrastructure, as evidenced by a 2025 shift noted in science communication discourse toward balancing mitigation with adaptation strategies.^[125] The Netherlands exemplifies successful adaptation via its extensive dike and flood defense systems, which have protected low-lying areas since major reinforcements following the 1953 North Sea flood, reducing flood risk probabilities to below 1 in 10,000 years in key regions through ongoing programs like the Delta Programme.^[126]^[127] These efforts demonstrate causal effectiveness in mitigating flood impacts, with empirical data showing minimal major breaches since implementation despite rising sea levels. Investments in resilient infrastructure often yield positive returns, challenging views that adaptation is merely a costly concession to failure. Studies estimate that each dollar spent on climate-resilient measures can generate $4 to $10 in benefits over a decade by averting damages and enhancing system durability, as calculated in analyses of infrastructure projects incorporating sea walls, elevated structures, and improved drainage.^[128]^[129] For instance, World Bank evaluations of adaptation in vulnerable regions project benefit-cost ratios exceeding 4:1, factoring in reduced economic losses from extreme weather, though these returns depend on accurate risk modeling and upfront planning to avoid maladaptation.^[130] Communicating such ROI evidence fosters realism, emphasizing adaptation's role in sustaining economic productivity amid climatic variability without presupposing unattainable mitigation outcomes.

Controversies and Critiques

Alarmism, Exaggeration, and Prediction Failures

In climate communication, alarmist messaging has frequently emphasized dire, time-bound forecasts of catastrophe to galvanize public and policy responses, yet many such predictions have proven inaccurate, fostering skepticism toward broader climate narratives.^[131] For example, in June 1989, Noel Brown, director of the New York office of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), stated that "entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000," attributing this to a narrow 10-year window for action.^[132] No such wholesale submersion of nations occurred by 2000, with low-lying states like the Maldives and Kiribati persisting despite sea-level rise of approximately 10-20 cm over the subsequent decades. A prominent instance involves former U.S. Vice President Al Gore, who in December 2009 at the Copenhagen climate summit cited research indicating the Arctic could become ice-free in summer "as soon as five to seven years" from then, implying potential disappearance by 2014-2016.^[133] This projection, drawn from estimates by scientist Wieslaw Maslowski, did not materialize; Arctic sea ice minima in 2013-2016 averaged around 4-5 million square kilometers, far from zero, though extents have declined overall since satellite records began in 1979. Gore's statement amplified a modeled possibility into a near-certain timeline, highlighting how selective emphasis on worst-case scenarios in advocacy can amplify perceived urgency at the expense of probabilistic nuance.^[134] These unfulfilled forecasts contrast with empirical trends that undermine narratives of escalating disaster lethality. Global death tolls from natural disasters, including weather-related events, peaked in the 1920s at an average of about 485,000 annually but have since plummeted by over 90%, reaching roughly 13,000 per year in the 2020s when adjusted for population growth and improved reporting via databases like EM-DAT.^[135] Per capita mortality rates have fallen even more sharply, from over 500 deaths per million people in the early 20th century to under 1 per million today, attributable to advances in forecasting, infrastructure, and emergency response rather than any abatement in event frequency.^[136] Alarmist communication often overlooks this decoupling of disaster impacts from warming, portraying static or worsening human vulnerability despite data showing adaptation's efficacy. Repeated prediction shortfalls have been linked to diminished public engagement, as hyperbolic claims invite scrutiny and contribute to "hype fatigue," where audiences discount credible warnings amid cries of wolf.^[137] Surveys indicate that exposure to overstated doomsday scenarios correlates with lower belief in anthropogenic warming among certain demographics, as failed timelines erode source credibility and invite counter-narratives.^[138] This backlash dynamic underscores a causal tension in communication strategy: while alarmism may spike short-term attention, its empirical disconfirmation risks long-term desensitization, reducing motivation for mitigation behaviors.^[139]

Censorship of Skeptical Viewpoints

Platforms such as Twitter and YouTube have implemented policies restricting content deemed to contradict the prevailing scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change, often targeting skeptical analyses that highlight urban heat island effects or natural variability cycles. In April 2022, Twitter announced a prohibition on advertisements promoting views that deny or downplay established climate science, limiting the visibility of paid skeptical messaging. Similarly, in June 2024, YouTube demonetized the Heartland Institute, a think tank advocating skeptical positions including critiques of surface temperature data biases from urbanization, after it uploaded videos challenging mainstream narratives. These measures, framed as combating misinformation, have included algorithmic deprioritization and content removal, effectively shadowbanning or deplatforming accounts emphasizing alternative causal factors like solar influences or ocean oscillations over human emissions. Academic institutions have also disciplined researchers presenting data inconsistent with alarmist projections. In 2018, James Cook University dismissed physics professor Peter Ridd for questioning peer-reviewed claims of imminent Great Barrier Reef collapse due to warming, arguing instead that coral resilience and historical recovery patterns undermine exaggerated decline narratives; an Australian court ruled the dismissal unfair in 2019, citing breaches of academic freedom, though the university prevailed on appeal in 2020. Climatologist Judith Curry retired from Georgia Tech in 2017, citing a "poisonous" environment where her emphasis on uncertainty, natural forcings, and data quality issues—such as adjustments inflating warming trends—led to professional ostracism and labeling as a "heretic." Such suppression tactics have eroded public trust in climate institutions, as evidenced by U.S. national surveys showing a drop from 2008 to 2010 in belief that global warming is occurring (from 71% to 57%) and trust in scientists as information sources (from 81% to 72%), coinciding with the 2009 Climategate revelations of emails suggesting data manipulation and efforts to exclude dissenting papers from the IPCC process. Post-Climategate analyses confirmed the scandal significantly diminished perceptions of scientific integrity, with politically conservative respondents experiencing sharper declines in risk assessments. By limiting open debate on verifiable data like satellite versus surface temperature discrepancies—where skeptics contend urban expansion accounts for up to 50% of 20th-century U.S. warming—these actions foster suspicions of enforced orthodoxy, further polarizing discourse and hindering empirical scrutiny.^[140]

Neglect of Costs, Benefits, and Trade-offs

Climate communications often emphasize the urgency of mitigation without adequately addressing the economic costs imposed by policies such as carbon pricing mechanisms. The European Union's Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), implemented to cap emissions from power and industry, has driven allowance prices from under €20 per tonne in the early 2020s to approximately €70 per tonne by mid-2025, contributing to energy price volatility and higher costs for consumers and industries.^[141] These rises have exacerbated energy poverty in Europe, particularly amid the 2022 price spikes that, while influenced by the Russia-Ukraine conflict, were amplified by pre-existing regulatory pressures from the ETS and related reforms.^[142] Public discourse on climate action seldom quantifies how such mechanisms transfer costs to households and firms, potentially undermining support for policies by obscuring their immediate fiscal burdens. Opportunity costs of aggressive mitigation are similarly downplayed in messaging, where trillions in global spending on emission reductions compete with investments in poverty alleviation and basic development needs. For example, direct impacts of mitigation policies like reduced access to affordable energy or payments for avoided deforestation can adversely affect low-income livelihoods without commensurate benefits in the short term.^[143] This framing overlooks empirical trade-offs, such as reallocating funds from climate targets to health or education interventions that could yield higher returns in human welfare, especially in developing regions where immediate deprivation outweighs deferred climate risks. Potential benefits of modest warming, including agricultural gains in high-latitude regions, receive minimal attention despite evidence of productivity enhancements. In Russia, warmer conditions and extended growing seasons have boosted winter wheat yields by 1% to 17% across federal districts from the early 2000s onward, enabling expanded cultivation northward.^[144] Such effects, driven by CO2 fertilization and reduced frost risks, contrast with predominant narratives focused on uniform crop losses globally.^[145] Discussions of trade-offs between mitigation and adaptation are often sidelined, with communications prioritizing emission cuts over resilient infrastructure that could deliver tangible near-term gains. Research indicates that while stringent mitigation reduces long-term risks, it can diminish the economic returns on adaptation investments by altering the climate baseline against which adaptations are optimized.^[146] This imbalance ignores scenarios where adaptation—such as improved water management or crop varieties—proves more cost-effective for vulnerable populations than unattainable net-zero pathways, limiting holistic policy evaluation.^[147]

Greenwashing and Corporate Influences

Greenwashing refers to the practice by which corporations misrepresent their environmental impact through unsubstantiated claims of sustainability, often to deflect scrutiny from ongoing high-emission activities in climate communications.^[148] In the fossil fuel sector, major oil companies have frequently pledged net-zero emissions by 2050 while simultaneously approving expansions in oil and gas production, which empirical analyses show would lock in emissions exceeding Paris Agreement limits.^[149] ^[150] For instance, a 2024 assessment by Oil Change International found that the climate plans of five leading U.S. oil firms—ExxonMobil, Chevron, Occidental, ConocoPhillips, and Phillips 66—failed to meet benchmarks for reducing production or investing meaningfully in low-carbon alternatives, with production levels projected to remain high through 2030 despite public commitments.^[151] Corporate reliance on carbon offsets exacerbates greenwashing concerns, as these mechanisms are marketed as emission equivalents but often deliver minimal verified reductions. A 2024 study in Nature Communications analyzed forestry and renewable energy offset projects, estimating that fewer than 16% of issued credits corresponded to actual emission reductions, due to issues like non-additionality (credits for activities that would occur anyway) and overestimation of baselines.^[152] Similarly, research from the University of Oxford's Smith School concluded that voluntary offset programs have systematically overstated impacts by factors of up to ten, with empirical audits revealing pervasive verification failures over 25 years.^[153] These offsets allow companies to claim progress without curtailing core operations, influencing public and investor perceptions through selective reporting in sustainability disclosures. While some corporate initiatives, such as carbon capture and storage (CCS), represent genuine technological potential for mitigating emissions from hard-to-abate sectors, their deployment remains dwarfed by hype in communications. Global CCS capture capacity reached approximately 50 million tonnes of CO2 per year by 2024, capturing less than 0.1% of annual fossil fuel emissions, with many announced projects delayed or underperforming due to high costs and technical hurdles.^[154] Reports indicate a pipeline of over 600 projects, but operational scale lags, often serving as a narrative tool to justify continued fossil fuel expansion rather than a primary decarbonization strategy.^[155] This distinction highlights how verifiable metrics—such as actual CO2 injected versus pledged—expose discrepancies between corporate messaging and causal impacts on emissions trajectories.

Empirical Assessments

Impacts on Public Opinion and Perception

Public opinion on climate change in the United States has exhibited significant volatility since the 1980s, with concern levels peaking following high-profile disasters or intensified media coverage but often declining thereafter absent sustained emphasis. Gallup polls indicate that in the late 1980s and early 1990s, around 76% of Americans identified as environmentalists, reflecting broad awareness, yet by 2021 this figure had fallen to 40%.^[156] Concern about global warming as a serious personal threat reached a record 48% in April 2025, following recent climate-related events, up from lower levels in prior years such as 35% in 1989 who expressed high care.^[157] ^[158] However, historical patterns show fades, as seen after the 2008 recession when belief in anthropogenic climate change declined amid economic insecurity.^[159] The Yale Program on Climate Change Communication's 2025 opinion maps reveal geographic and demographic variations, with approximately 70% of Americans believing global warming is occurring and 58% attributing it primarily to human activities, though worry levels differ sharply by state and ideology.^[56] These maps, updated through early 2025, highlight that while national aggregates suggest majority concern, subnational data underscore persistent skepticism in regions like the Midwest and South, where economic dependencies on fossil fuels influence perceptions.^[56] Partisan divides remain stable despite episodic events, with Republicans consistently less alarmed than Democrats. Gallup data from 2023 show Republicans' worry about global warming edging down slightly since 2013, widening the gap to Democrats who maintain high concern levels around 80-90%.^[160] Pew Research confirms this stability, with 82% of Democrats viewing climate change as a critical threat in 2023 versus 16% of Republicans, a chasm unaltered by events like hurricanes or heatwaves.^[161] Skeptical viewpoints, often amplified in alternative media, cite empirical anomalies such as the 1998-2013 global warming slowdown—during which surface temperatures rose minimally despite rising CO2 concentrations—as evidence challenging the urgency in mainstream communications.^[162] This period, acknowledged even by NOAA as featuring the slowest warming rate in decades while still being the warmest on record, fuels arguments that predictive models overestimate near-term risks, contributing to public doubt and preventing consensus on alarmist framings.^[162] Overall, these dynamics illustrate that communication efforts have shaped transient shifts but failed to erode deep-seated partisan and evidentiary divides.

Effects on Behavior and Policy Adoption

Empirical assessments reveal that climate communication has yielded only modest shifts in individual behaviors, with effect sizes typically too small to achieve meaningful emissions reductions. A 2024 global megastudy testing 11 behavioral interventions, including messaging strategies, across 59,440 participants in 63 countries reported negligible impacts on concrete actions like tree planting, with some interventions even reducing participation, despite small gains in policy support (2.6 percentage points) and information sharing (12.1 percentage points).^[163] Similarly, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on behavioral interventions for climate mitigation found very small effects (Cohen's d = -0.093), equivalent to less than 5% variance explained in pro-environmental behaviors, which dissipated after interventions ended.^[164] These findings underscore the difficulty in translating awareness into sustained high-impact actions such as reduced flying or meat consumption, where reported intentions rarely convert to verifiable reductions.^[165] In the realm of policy adoption, efficacy-oriented communications—emphasizing collective capability and actionable solutions—have shown potential to bolster support, particularly when balanced with threat information. Studies indicate that such messages enhance intended political engagement and endorsement of mitigation policies by reinforcing perceptions of feasibility.^[166] For example, framing climate action around shared efficacy predicts stronger advocacy for policies like carbon pricing or adaptation measures.^[167] Positive framing techniques, highlighting benefits and opportunities, have increased voluntary commitments in experiments by 10-15 percentage points in supportive behaviors or intentions, though real-world policy uptake remains constrained by implementation barriers.^[168] Conversely, communications advocating top-down mandates often provoke backlash, eroding support among audiences who view them as overreaching, with evidence of heightened resistance to behavior-focused policies compared to systemic ones.^[169] Overall, while targeted messaging can marginally aid policy acceptance, its influence is overshadowed by socioeconomic factors and public skepticism toward coercive approaches.^[170]

Unintended Consequences and Backlash Evidence

Fear-based messaging in climate communication frequently triggers psychological reactance, a defensive response where individuals resist perceived threats to their autonomy, leading to diminished motivation for behavioral change rather than enhanced engagement.^[74] Empirical studies demonstrate that such appeals, intended to spur action, instead provoke boomerang effects, particularly among those with preexisting skeptical views, where exposure to basic climate facts increases denial and reduces support for mitigation policies.^[171] A 2025 meta-analysis of message effects further substantiates that language perceived as restrictive or overly directive heightens reactance, undermining persuasive outcomes in environmental advocacy.^[172] Framing climate risks around tipping points has similarly yielded unintended resistance, as the inherent uncertainties and abstract nature of these concepts fail to elevate risk perceptions or prompt governance responses, often distracting from tangible adaptation measures.^[173] Research from 2022 indicates that nonlinear tipping narratives do not outperform linear projections in motivating public action, contributing to inaction or skepticism about the urgency conveyed.^[174] This ineffectiveness aligns with broader patterns where alarmist emphases amplify partisan divides, as strategic communication tactics reinforce ideological sorting and protective cognition, entrenching opposition among conservative audiences.^[175]^[176] Over time, unfulfilled alarmist predictions erode institutional trust, as extreme forecasts—such as imminent catastrophes—can only be falsified through their absence, prompting widespread dismissal of subsequent warnings.^[177] Analyses of historical forecasting failures highlight how such discrepancies fuel skepticism, with public perception of exaggeration leading to backlash against policy demands.^[178] Economically, this manifests in resistance to high-cost interventions; for example, Europe's 2024-2025 green transition policies, driven by urgent climate narratives, provoked farmer protests and populist opposition due to disproportionate burdens on rural sectors, underscoring how neglect of trade-offs in messaging exacerbates economic grievances and policy reversals.^[179] Critiques of suboptimal strategies, including doom-laden appeals, argue they inadvertently cultivate denial by alienating audiences without addressing feasibility concerns.^[180]

Influential Entities

Research and Academic Bodies

The Yale Program on Climate Change Communication (YPCCC), founded in 2005 following a conference on American public perceptions of climate change, conducts nationwide surveys and develops data-driven tools to assess and inform communication strategies. Its Yale Climate Opinion Maps provide granular visualizations of climate beliefs, risk perceptions, and support for mitigation policies at state, county, and district levels, drawing on biennial probability-based samples of over 20,000 U.S. adults, with the latest iterations incorporating 2023-2024 data on evolving attitudes. YPCCC's "Six Americas" segmentation framework categorizes audiences into six psychographic groups—from the "Alarmed" to the "Dismissive"—based on empirical analysis of values, worldviews, and responsiveness to messaging, enabling tailored approaches that empirical tests show improve engagement without polarizing skeptics.^[181]^[56]^[182] The George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication (GMU CCCC), established in 2007, applies social and psychological sciences to evaluate how messaging influences climate-related behaviors and decisions, often in partnership with YPCCC. Through series like "Climate Change in the American Mind," it tracks indicators such as worry over extreme weather (e.g., 55% of Americans in fall 2023 reported high concern for severe heat) and policy preferences, using validated scales to isolate causal factors like media exposure and personal experience. In 2023, CCCC's reviews synthesized evidence on climate's health linkages, including psychological distress metrics where exposure to climate events correlated with elevated anxiety rates in longitudinal U.S. samples, advocating for comms that leverage health frames to boost efficacy without overreliance on fear appeals.^[183]^[184]^[185] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Working Group III (WGIII) evaluates mitigation pathways, incorporating assessments of communication's role in demand-side reductions and behavioral shifts, as in AR6's Chapter 5 on services and social aspects, which reviews evidence from randomized trials showing modest efficacy of norms-based and incentive-framed interventions in curbing emissions. WGIII reports synthesize meta-analyses indicating that transparent, evidence-focused comms can enhance policy adherence, though outcomes vary by cultural context and trust in institutions. Critiques, however, highlight that the Summary for Policymakers often condenses technical findings into high-confidence statements on urgent risks, diluting discussions of scenario uncertainties and adaptive potentials from underlying chapters—government-approved line-by-line processes may prioritize consensus-driven narratives over probabilistic ranges, influencing downstream comms with selective emphasis.^[186]^[187]

Advocacy and NGO Networks

Advocacy networks in climate communication encompass non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that mobilize public opinion through campaigns emphasizing urgency and systemic change. Prominent groups like 350.org, founded in 2008 by author Bill McKibben, have coordinated global actions such as the Fossil Free divestment campaign launched in 2012, which targeted institutional investments in fossil fuels to stigmatize the industry and promote renewable transitions.^[188]^[189] By December 2023, this effort had secured commitments from over 1,600 institutions managing more than $40.6 trillion in assets to divest from fossil fuels in whole or part, influencing universities, pension funds, and governments.^[190] Similarly, the Sierra Club's Beyond Coal initiative, active since around 2010, has contributed to the retirement of over 300 U.S. coal-fired power plants, representing a significant portion of the nation's coal capacity, through legal challenges, community organizing, and policy advocacy.^[191]^[192] These campaigns have raised awareness of carbon budgets and emission trajectories, fostering networks of activists and local groups.^[193] Critics argue that such advocacy often relies on alarmist framing, exaggerating near-term risks to spur action, which can undermine credibility when predictions falter. For instance, declarations of imminent "climate emergencies" by NGOs have paralleled unsubstantiated claims like rapid Himalayan glacier melt timelines in IPCC-influenced reports, sourced from non-peer-reviewed advocacy documents rather than robust data.^[98] Empirical studies reveal limited translation to individual behavior change; despite heightened awareness, surveys indicate persistent attitude-behavior gaps, with messaging on personal actions sometimes provoking resistance or helplessness rather than sustained mitigation efforts like reduced energy use.^[194]^[169] Behavioral interventions show variable efficacy, often failing to bridge perceptions of climate threats to policy support or lifestyle shifts, particularly when costs are downplayed.^[163] Counterbalancing these are skeptic-oriented NGOs like the Heartland Institute, which sponsor the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) to produce reports such as Climate Change Reconsidered (2009 onward), scrutinizing IPCC assessments through cost-benefit lenses.^[195] These analyses highlight potential benefits of CO2 fertilization for agriculture and question the net harms of warming, arguing that aggressive mitigation policies impose disproportionate economic burdens without commensurate global emission reductions.^[196] Heartland's work emphasizes empirical trade-offs, such as fossil fuel access improving human welfare via reliable energy, and critiques alarmism for overlooking adaptation's role over drastic decarbonization.^[197] Such groups, often funded independently of government grants prevalent in mainstream environmental NGOs, advocate for pragmatic policies prioritizing verifiable data over consensus-driven narratives.^[198]

Media and Political Actors

Mainstream media outlets like CNN and the BBC have shaped climate narratives through selective framing that often prioritizes dramatic scenarios over balanced discussion of uncertainties, contributing to public perceptions skewed by institutional left-leaning biases. ^[199] ^[200] A 2025 Nature Humanities & Social Sciences Communications article examined climate communication's intersection with journalism ethics, noting persistent challenges in accurately conveying scientific complexities without sensationalism. ^[201] Similarly, a Nature analysis in July 2025 urged newsrooms to elevate science reporting amid underfunding, highlighting how ethical lapses in climate coverage amplify alarm while downplaying adaptive capacities or historical context. ^[202] In U.S. politics, the Obama administration elevated climate communication as a national priority, with President Obama delivering major speeches in 2013 outlining carbon reduction plans and framing the issue as a moral imperative for future generations. ^[203] ^[204] Conversely, Donald Trump's tenure emphasized skepticism, withdrawing from the Paris Agreement and questioning anthropogenic dominance in warming, a stance that resonated in the 2024 election where Yale Program surveys found 39% of registered voters viewing global warming as "very important" to their vote, yet with stark partisan gaps—73% of Democrats versus 10% of Republicans prioritizing action. ^[205] These divides illustrate how political actors leverage climate messaging to mobilize bases, often sidelining cost-benefit analyses in favor of ideological appeals. Influential figures further mold discourse: Anthony Leiserowitz, director of Yale's Program on Climate Change Communication, has advanced strategies to shift public opinion through targeted polling and framing research, influencing policy advocacy. ^[206] James Hansen, former NASA climatologist, continues issuing dire statements on warming acceleration, as in his 2025 research documenting a surge in global temperatures risking ocean circulation disruptions. ^[207] On the skeptical side, Richard Lindzen, emeritus MIT atmospheric physicist, contends that climate sensitivity to CO2 is low and feedbacks like clouds introduce substantial uncertainty, critiquing alarmism as overstated given empirical data on modest observed warming relative to projections. ^[208] ^[209] Such voices highlight causal realism, urging focus on verifiable forcings over consensus-driven narratives prone to bias in media and political amplification.

Emerging Trends

Shift Toward Adaptation Messaging

In 2025, climate communicators began pivoting toward adaptation and resilience messaging, recognizing that net-zero emission targets, even if attained, cannot eliminate committed warming or regional impacts from prior emissions. This shift emphasizes communicating persistent changes like sea-level rise and extreme weather intensification, broadening beyond global temperature metrics to include actionable local responses. A July 2025 analysis in Nature Communications Earth & Environment recommends explicitly addressing these ongoing effects in public discourse to set realistic expectations and prioritize resilience-building.^[210] Such framing counters over-reliance on mitigation narratives that assume rapid stabilization, which empirical models show is constrained by technological and socioeconomic barriers, including supply shortfalls for critical minerals needed for decarbonization.^[211] Empirical data underscores the rationale, with adaptation investments demonstrating high returns on investment compared to uncertain mitigation timelines. For example, U.S. federal disaster preparedness programs, including mitigation grants, have been shown to reduce subsequent flood and storm damages by factors yielding up to $13 in avoided losses per dollar invested, based on analyses of historical event data from 2000 to 2020.^[212] ^[213] These benefits arise from verifiable, localized measures such as elevated infrastructure and flood barriers, which provide immediate causal protection against observable risks, unlike global emission cuts whose effects manifest over decades. Post-2023 events, including record ocean heat content anomalies exceeding prior baselines by 90% in key basins like the North Atlantic, accelerated this trend by highlighting the need for defensive strategies over predictive mitigation alone.^[214] Communicators responded with campaigns promoting site-specific adaptations, such as enhanced coastal monitoring and natural barriers in affected regions, as outlined in updated national plans like Canada's 2022–2025 strategy extensions.^[215] This focus yields practical gains, including reduced vulnerability in high-exposure areas, without requiring consensus on anthropogenic attribution debates. By centering on tangible, non-partisan outcomes like economic safeguarding and community durability, adaptation messaging diminishes ideological divides inherent in mitigation appeals. Research on communication strategies indicates that resilience narratives, which align with universal values of prudence and self-reliance, elicit higher cross-spectrum engagement than alarmist or equity-framed alternatives, as evidenced in audience segmentation studies from polarized contexts.^[216] ^[217] This approach fosters policy support through demonstrable successes, such as lowered disaster recovery costs, rather than contested projections.

Role of Technology and Data Visualization

Technology plays a pivotal role in climate communication by enabling interactive models and real-time data access that enhance public understanding of complex climate dynamics. Advances in artificial intelligence have facilitated sophisticated scenario visualizations, allowing users to explore potential future outcomes based on varying emission pathways. For instance, in 2024, NASA and IBM Research developed an AI foundation model trained on diverse weather and climate datasets, enabling high-resolution simulations that outperform traditional methods in speed and detail. Similarly, a 2025 AI model from the University of Washington simulates 1,000 years of climate evolution in just 12 hours on a single processor, providing accessible visualizations for educational and policy purposes. These tools promote accuracy by grounding communications in empirical simulations rather than simplified narratives.^[218]^[219] Satellite data applications further bolster precise communication by delivering direct observational evidence, reducing dependence on proxy indicators or model extrapolations that can introduce uncertainty. Platforms like Climate TRACE integrate public and private satellite imagery to track global emissions in near real-time, offering transparent visualizations of anthropogenic sources such as industrial facilities. In 2024, RainbirdGEO launched satellite-based tools using geostationary orbit data to forecast risks like heavy rainfall, providing verifiable metrics that counter anecdotal or aggregated proxies often critiqued for overgeneralization. Such apps democratize access to raw data, fostering trust through verifiable, high-resolution imagery over interpretive summaries.^[220]^[221] Empirical studies affirm that effective data visualization significantly boosts comprehension and engagement. A 2023 analysis found that animated visualizations in climate data stories increased public engagement by making abstract trends more intuitive, with viewers demonstrating higher retention of key facts compared to text-only formats. Another 2023 study showed that integrating artistic elements with climate data visualizations bridged perceptual divides, enhancing perceived relevance across demographics and improving attitude shifts toward evidence-based views. These findings, drawn from controlled experiments, indicate visualization can elevate discourse by clarifying causal mechanisms without relying on emotive appeals.^[222]^[223] However, the deployment of these technologies requires caution to mitigate risks of manipulation. Misleading graphics, such as distorted scales or selective data omission, can erode public trust and foster skepticism toward legitimate science, as evidenced by critiques of visuals that exaggerate trends to drive policy agendas. To maintain credibility, communicators should prioritize open-source datasets and reproducible methodologies, ensuring visualizations reflect unmanipulated empirical inputs rather than advocacy-driven alterations. This approach aligns with causal realism by emphasizing verifiable data over persuasive framing.^[224]^[225]

Lessons from 2023-2025 Events and Studies

In the United States, the June and July 2025 heatwaves, which affected a majority of Americans with record-breaking summer temperatures, temporarily elevated public interest in climate change, as evidenced by increased mentions in surveys linking personal experiences to broader environmental concerns.^[50] However, follow-up data from Yale's Spring 2025 opinion maps revealed only modest upticks in perceived personal harm (46% reporting direct experience) without corresponding surges in support for stringent mitigation policies or behavioral shifts, indicating that event-driven awareness often dissipates without targeted follow-up messaging on actionable solutions.^[226] The World Meteorological Organization's May 2025 forecast, projecting a 70% likelihood of global temperatures averaging above 1.5°C over the subsequent five years due to ongoing trends, exemplified the challenges of probabilistic warnings in communication; despite underscoring overshoot risks, it correlated with stagnant international commitments at forums like COP30 preparations, as publics and policymakers prioritized adaptation over alarmist projections lacking clear efficacy pathways.^[227] A 2024 global survey of 59,000 respondents across 63 countries demonstrated that "gloom and doom" messaging emphasizing immediate catastrophe proved ineffective at driving mitigation intentions, often inducing helplessness rather than action, while approaches highlighting expert consensus and moral obligations yielded better engagement.^[228] Complementing this, peer-reviewed analyses of the 2023-2024 temperature spike attributed much of its intensity to the El Niño-Southern Oscillation rather than solely anthropogenic forcing, recommending that communicators integrate natural variability explanations to preserve credibility and avoid backlash from perceived causal overreach.^[229] These findings urge a pivot toward evidence-based narratives balancing realism with empowerment, as unbalanced attribution risks alienating skeptics amid recurrent natural fluctuations.

References

[1]
[PDF] The Psychology of Climate Change Communication
The Psychology of Climate Change Communication was created by the Center for Research on Environmental. Decisions (CRED) at Columbia University. This docu- ment ...
[2]
Communicating consensus among climate scientists increases ...
Exposure to one simple climate consensus message has a meaningful effect on the estimate of consensus among climate scientists.3. Results · 3.1. Preregistered Analyses · 4. Discussion
[3]
Influencing climate change attitudes in the United States
A meta-analysis was conducted on interventions for climate change attitudes. · There was a small, statistically significant positive effect of interventions.
[4]
[PDF] Message Framing and Climate Change Communication: A Meta
Abstract. This meta-analytic study reviewed experimental studies that examined the effects of message framing on public engagement with climate change.
[5]
Is there a climate change reporting bias? A case study of English ...
Sep 22, 2022 · Research demonstrates that the bias in reporting hazards and climate change leads to deficits in attention and material resources (i.e. not ...
[6]
Newspapers are using climate researcher's false claims about ...
Sep 8, 2023 · A recent article in the journal Nature has led to false allegations that researchers are exaggerating the impacts of climate change.
[7]
The Need to Focus More on Climate Change Communication and ...
Jun 3, 2024 · Additionally, climate communication focuses heavily on the environment and does not typically account for the wider effects on human health and ...
[8]
[PDF] Summary for Policymakers
2 The three Special Reports are: Global Warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and ...<|separator|>
[9]
[PDF] CLIMATE CHANGE 2023
The estimated increase in global surface temperature since AR5 is principally due to further warming since 2003–2012 (0.19 [0.16 to 0.22] °C). Additionally ...
[10]
[PDF] Future Global Climate: Scenario-based Projections and Near-term ...
the likely range of GMSL change averaged over 2081–2100 relative to 1995–2014 is 0.46–0.74 m. Under SSP1-2.6, the likely range over the long-term is 0.30 ...
[11]
Analysis: How well have climate models projected global warming?
Oct 5, 2017 · Global surface air temperatures in CMIP5 models have warmed about 16% faster than observations since 1970. About 40% of this difference is due ...Broecker, 1975 · Hansen Et Al, 1988 · Ipcc Fifth Assessment Report...
[12]
Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the ...
May 15, 2013 · Among papers expressing a position on AGW, 97.1% endorsed the consensus that humans are causing global warming. Among self-rated papers, 97.2% ...
[13]
Fact Checking The Claim Of 97% Consensus On Anthropogenic ...
Dec 14, 2016 · The claim that there is a 97% consensus among scientists that humans are the cause of global warming is widely made in climate change literature and by ...
[14]
Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the ...
The claim of 97% scientific literature endorsing anthropogenic climate change is invalid due to inconsistent, biased, and low quality data.
[15]
THE MYTH OF THE 1970s GLOBAL COOLING SCIENTIFIC ...
An enduring popular myth suggests that in the 1970s the climate science community was predicting “global cooling” and an “imminent” ice age.
[16]
Latest Global Temps « Roy Spencer, PhD
Global temperature data is measured by NOAA satellites using microwave thermal emissions, updated monthly, and not calibrated with surface thermometers.
[17]
UAH Trends - Skeptical Science
UAH data shows a linear warming trend of 0.14°C per decade for 1979-2011, refuting claims of no warming before/after 1998 El Niño.
[18]
Proxy inconsistency and other problems in millennial paleoclimate ...
Feb 2, 2009 · Their CPS reconstruction screens proxies by calibration-period correlation, a procedure known to generate “hockey sticks” from red noise (4).
[19]
Challenges and perspectives for large‐scale temperature ...
Dec 13, 2016 · Here we critically assess some of the many challenges related to large-scale multiproxy temperature reconstructions.Missing: controversies | Show results with:controversies
[20]
Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment
National Research Council. 1979. Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
[21]
[PDF] Carbon Dioxide and Climate: A Scientific Assessment
Their consensus has been that increasing carbon dioxide will lead to a warmer earth with a different distribution of climatic regimes. In view of the ...
[22]
1970s 'Global Cooling' Concerns Lacked Today's Scientific Rigor ...
Nov 12, 2007 · The speculation on aerosol-driven cooling in the 1970s was legitimate in an atmosphere of vast uncertainty. Using it to cast doubt on ...
[23]
Global Warming Has Begun, Expert Tells Senate
Jun 24, 1988 · Hansen reported today. ''The first five months of 1988 are so warm globally that we conclude that 1988 will be the warmest year on record unless ...
[24]
[PDF] TESTIMONY Statement of Dr. James E. Hansen Head NASA ...
This means there is another ½C global warming already in the pipeline - it will occur even if atmospheric composition remains fixed at today' s values.
[25]
Judgment on Hansen's '88 climate testimony: 'He was right'
Jun 20, 2018 · Climate scientists' consensus: James Hansen 'got it right' in congressional global warming and human causation testimony 30 years ago this week.
[26]
A 1989 AP Report: Nations “Wiped Off Face of the Earth” by 2000
Mar 9, 2019 · As the warming melts polar icecaps, ocean levels will rise by up to three feet, enough to cover the Maldives and other flat island nations, ...
[27]
The Vanishing Islands That Failed to Vanish - The New York Times
Jun 26, 2024 · Low-lying tropical island nations were expected to be early victims of rising seas. But research tells a surprising story: Many islands are stable. Some have ...
[28]
The Public and Climate Change (1) - American Institute of Physics
During the hot summer of 1988, a few outspoken scientists, convinced by new evidence that rapid climate change might be imminent, made the public fully aware ...
[29]
Total's responses to global warming, 1971–2021 - ScienceDirect.com
We report new archival research and primary source interviews describing how Total responded to evolving climate science and policy in the last 50 years.
[30]
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change | UNFCCC
The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (the Convention or UNFCCC) was adopted at the United Nations Headquarters, New York on the 9 May 1992.First Steps To A Safer... · Keeps Tabs On The Problem... · Kicks Off Formal...
[31]
History of the Convention - UNFCCC
In 1992, countries joined an international treaty, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, as a framework for international cooperation ...
[32]
The Kyoto Protocol | UNFCCC
The Kyoto Protocol was adopted on 11 December 1997. Owing to a complex ratification process, it entered into force on 16 February 2005.
[33]
“An Inconvenient Truth” Increases Knowledge, Concern, and ...
Across the two studies, results show that watching “An Inconvenient Truth” does increase knowledge about the causes of global warming, concern for the ...
[34]
[PDF] Al Gore's Science Fiction - A Skeptic's Guide to An Inconvenient Truth
The book impugns the motives of so-called global warming skeptics but never acknowledges the special-interest motivations of those whose research grants, direct ...
[35]
Scientists Deliver Serious Warning About Effects of Global Warming
Jan 23, 2001 · Scientists Deliver Serious Warning About Effects of Global Warming ; %. % ; 2000 Apr 3-9. 49. 29 ; 1999 Apr 13-14. 44. 32.
[36]
Squandering the Surplus: $11 Billion on the Unratified Kyoto Protocol
Data provided by a recent economic report indicate that the restrictions would reduce America's gross domestic product (GDP) by as much as $2 trillion between ...
[37]
The legacy of climategate: undermining or revitalizing climate ...
Apr 26, 2012 · NEGATIVE IMPACTS. Beliefs. The impact of the CRU email controversy on public beliefs about human-caused climate change and trust in climate ...
[38]
Assessing the impact of 'Climategate' - MIT News
Dec 15, 2009 · The e-mails, in which the scientists seemed to question or even exaggerate their research, have provided new fodder for climate-change skeptics, ...
[39]
Fridays For Future is an international climate movement active in ...
FridaysForFuture is a youth-led and -organised movement that began in August 2018, after 15-year-old Greta Thunberg and other young activists sat in front of ...
[40]
Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social ...
Overall, social media discussions of climate change often occur within polarising “echo chambers”, but also within “open forums”, mixed-attitude communities ...
[41]
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political ...
Aug 28, 2018 · Social media sites are often blamed for exacerbating political polarization by creating “echo chambers” that prevent people from being ...Abstract · Sign Up For Pnas Alerts · Discussion And Conclusion
[42]
Longitudinal national evidence that social media use did not drive ...
Oct 3, 2023 · This evidence challenges the notion that the global rise of social media in the 2010s exacerbated climate skepticism and polarization.
[43]
Climate change widespread, rapid, and intensifying – IPCC
Aug 9, 2021 · Global Warming of 1.5°C, an IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and related ...
[44]
Climate change: IPCC report is 'code red for humanity' - BBC
Aug 9, 2021 · In strong, confident tones, the IPCC's document says "it is unequivocal that human influence has warmed the atmosphere, oceans and land".Missing: AR6 backlash
[45]
Fear Won't Do It | SPSP
Feb 14, 2025 · We suspected that fear-inducing messages emphasizing individual responsibility would increase psychological reactance and impede climate ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[46]
(PDF) The effects of fear appeals on reactance in climate change ...
Aug 6, 2025 · In the present research, we applied an emotion-based persuasion appeal model to climate change mitigation to test the effect of climate ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[47]
Growing polarization around climate change on social media - Nature
Nov 24, 2022 · We reveal a large increase in ideological polarization during COP26, following low polarization between COP20 and COP25.
[48]
Partisan Views - Resources for the Future
Oct 22, 2024 · In this report, we assess the degree to which Democrats, Independents, and Republicans agree on various aspects of climate change and climate change policy in ...Missing: Yale opinion maps
[49]
We Need A New American Narrative For Talking About Climate ...
May 13, 2025 · A December 9, 2024, Pew report shows that a sharp partisan divide exists. Whereas 70% of Democrats think that human activity contributes a great ...
[50]
What prompts interest in climate change?
Jul 31, 2025 · Certain weather events—like heat waves—seem to produce consistent jumps in climate change interest across all regions simultaneously, while ...
[51]
A new dawn for climate communications? - 2025 - Features
Sep 22, 2025 · A NEW DAWN FOR CLIMATE COMMUNICATIONS? Rebecca Pardon investigates the shift from communicating climate mitigation to adaptation strategies.<|control11|><|separator|>
[52]
The rate of global sea level rise doubled during the past three decades
Oct 17, 2024 · The rate of global mean sea level rise over those three decades has increased from ~2.1 mm/year in 1993 to ~4.5 mm/year in 2023.
[53]
World Weather Attribution – Exploring the contribution of climate ...
Formed in 2014, WWA has performed more than 100 attribution studies on heatwaves, extreme rainfall, drought, floods, wildfires and cold spells around the world.Methods · Extreme rainfall · Event papers · WWA analyses of extreme...Missing: examples | Show results with:examples
[54]
Q&A: The evolving science of 'extreme weather attribution'
Nov 18, 2024 · There are now hundreds of attribution studies, assessing extremes ranging from heatwaves in China and droughts in Madagascar through to ...
[55]
[PDF] FEAR DOESN'T WORK - Yale Climate Connections
Most people believe that using emotional appeal is the most effective way of communicating climate change. ... “Media and scientific communication: a case of ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[56]
Yale Climate Opinion Maps 2024
Aug 28, 2025 · Explore climate change beliefs, risk perceptions, and policy support at every geographic level in the United States.Missing: partisan gaps
[57]
Climate Change - Behavioral Economics - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
Greenhouse gas emissions could be reduced by 40–70 percent if people in developed countries reduced their air travel; made “green” lifestyle choices; and chose ...<|separator|>
[58]
Climate change or behavior change? | IIASA
Feb 5, 2020 · Within this research, we illustrate that individual energy behavior, especially when amplified through social context, shapes energy demand and ...
[59]
The role of rebates in public support for carbon taxes - IOPscience
Our results indicate that, absent political messaging, rebates increase public support for carbon taxes in both countries by building support among lower income ...Missing: 2020s studies
[60]
Soft Economic Incentives and Soft Behavioral Interventions on the ...
Sep 6, 2022 · In addition, “soft” voluntary measures can directly stimulate the public's motivation and psychology to buy green, enabling them to proactively ...
[61]
Public support for carbon pricing policies and revenue recycling ...
Sep 7, 2024 · Since public support is critical for implementing carbon pricing policies, we conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[62]
Europe's adaptation to the energy crisis: reshaped gas supply ...
Jul 21, 2025 · Russian gas supply was cut by 87.8%, LNG imports rose to 37.5%, and total gas consumption fell by 19.0% due to the energy crisis.Missing: poverty | Show results with:poverty
[63]
The European energy crisis: Shock therapy for the EU's clean ...
The EU energy crisis was caused by Russia's invasion of Ukraine, weaponization of gas, partial French nuclear shutdown, and summer droughts.Missing: links | Show results with:links
[64]
Europe's Energy Divide: Why the Green Transition Risks Leaving ...
Aug 18, 2025 · This means addressing energy poverty directly through income support, building retrofits, and ensuring equitable access to clean technologies.
[65]
Public hugely underestimate scientific consensus on climate change
Jun 29, 2022 · The UK public's average estimate is that 65% of climate scientists have concluded human-caused climate change is happening – far lower than the reality of 99.9 ...
[66]
Even Americans highly concerned about climate change ...
Oct 18, 2018 · There are several reasons why so many Americans underestimate the actual level of scientific consensus, despite a majority believing in climate ...
[67]
A 27-country test of communicating the scientific consensus ... - Nature
Aug 26, 2024 · Communicating the scientific consensus that human-caused climate change is real increases climate change beliefs, worry and support for public action.
[68]
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-21098-z
[69]
How Media Coverage of the IPCC Special Report on 1.5°C Shaped ...
Nov 22, 2019 · UN issues yet another climate tipping point – humans given only 12 more years to make 'unprecedented changes in all aspects of society.Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
[70]
Sun & climate: moving in opposite directions - Skeptical Science
They found that from 1979 to 2010, solar activity had a very slight cooling effect of between -0.014 and -0.023°C per decade, depending on the data set. A more ...
[71]
SOLAR INFLUENCES ON CLIMATE - Gray - AGU Journals - Wiley
Oct 30, 2010 · Nevertheless, IPCC [2007] concludes that changes in the Sun have played a role in the observed warming of the Earth since 1750, but these ...
[72]
Message fatigue beyond the health message context: a replication ...
The results of a preregistered study (N = 620) show that the conceptual structure and correlates of message fatigue are well replicated: Climate change message ...
[73]
[PDF] Optimism bias and climate change - The British Academy
When it comes to smoking or climate change this optimism bias could. (and can) have deadly consequences. Optimism bias appears to be associated with specific.
[74]
The effects of fear appeals on reactance in climate change ...
We found that appealing to individuals (as opposed to policy) increased individuals' perceived threat to freedom, and psychological reactance.Missing: alarmism | Show results with:alarmism
[75]
Communicating efficacy: How the IPCC, scientists, and other ...
Nov 2, 2021 · This essay draws on a range of research findings to argue that the IPCC's scientists and communications personnel can nurture efficacy beliefs about climate ...
[76]
Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis
The 13 chapters of the Working Group I report provide a comprehensive assessment of the current evidence on the physical science of climate change.Data and Code Access · IPCC Sixth Assessment Report · Summary for PolicymakersMissing: unequivocal | Show results with:unequivocal
[77]
In-depth Q&A: The IPCC's sixth assessment report on climate science
Aug 9, 2021 · While AR6 also lowers the high end of the estimated very likely range for sensitivity, it says that “currently it is not possible to rule ...
[78]
Why low-end 'climate sensitivity' can now be ruled out
Jul 30, 2020 · Our findings suggest that the range of Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity is likely to be between 2.6C and 4.1C.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[79]
Climate Models Underestimate Dynamic Cloud Feedbacks in the ...
Aug 2, 2023 · This study examines relationships between clouds and circulation in the tropics in the latest generation of climate models.
[80]
Implications of a Pervasive Climate Model Bias for Low‐Cloud ...
Oct 19, 2024 · Clouds have long been known as a key driver of uncertainty in climate sensitivity, particularly through the feedback of marine low clouds (Bony ...
[81]
The Nonlinear and Nonlocal Nature of Climate Feedbacks in
Abstract. The climate feedback framework partitions the radiative response to climate forcing into contributions from individual atmospheric processes.Abstract · Introduction · Analysis · Results
[82]
Climate nonlinearities: selection, uncertainty, projections, and ...
Aug 1, 2022 · We define a model selection parameter, which switches on one of a suite of proposed climate nonlinearities and multidecadal climate feedbacks.
[83]
The Legacy of EPA's Acid Rain Research | US EPA
Aug 18, 2020 · Although evidence of acid rain's harmful effects emerged centuries ago, it wasn't until the early 1980s that it was recognized as a major threat ...
[84]
What Happened to Acid Rain? - Britannica
Acid rain still occurs, but its impact on Europe and North America is far less than it was in the 1970s and '80s, because of strong air pollution regulations ...
[85]
Predicted Arctic sea ice trends over time - RealClimate
May 31, 2025 · ... failure, sustained over multiple generations of models. ... It clearly documents continued failures in Arctic and Antarctic sea ice projections ...
[86]
RealClimate: “But you said the ice was going to disappear in 10 ...
Sep 21, 2025 · In my opinion, failed predictions are, far and away, the greatest impediment to acceptance of the need to do more to reduce carbon dioxide ...
[87]
Explore 16 Years of U.S. Climate Opinions with the CCAM Explorer
May 6, 2025 · The tool and dataset include data from 2008 to 2024, letting you investigate changes in Americans' opinions about climate change over time.
[88]
(PDF) The Political Divide on Climate Change: Partisan Polarization ...
Aug 25, 2016 · The partisan divide in climate views is most pronounced in the United States, where it has continuously increased over the last decades ...<|separator|>
[89]
Carbon Dioxide Fertilization Greening Earth, Study Finds - NASA
Apr 26, 2016 · Studies have shown that increased concentrations of carbon dioxide increase photosynthesis, spurring plant growth. However, carbon dioxide ...
[90]
The world has become greener over the past 33 years - CREAF
Apr 26, 2016 · The study detected a significant increase in green biomass – essentially, leaves – over 40% of the planet from 1982 to 2015, while a ...
[91]
Is it too late to keep global warmingbelow 1.5 °C?The challenge in 7 ...
Nov 21, 2023 · ... cost some $22 trillion to sequester enough carbon to reduce global temperatures by just 0.1 °C. That is roughly 16 times more than the ...
[92]
Upping the ante? The effects of “emergency” and “crisis” framing in ...
This study experimentally examined how using “climate emergency,” “climate crisis,” or “climate change” in Twitter-based news stories influences public ...
[93]
Relative engagement with sources of climate misinformation is ...
May 28, 2025 · We explore the discourse on climate change across multiple social media platforms, examining the evolution of user engagement with climate-related content.
[94]
The growing divide in media coverage of climate change | Brookings
Jul 24, 2024 · These papers have seen surging coverage of climate change—a 300% increase since 2012. The biggest increases have happened in the last five years ...Missing: sensationalism | Show results with:sensationalism
[95]
How Facebook's algorithm amplifies climate disinformation
Mar 28, 2022 · Facebook's algorithm recommended content that denied the existence of man-made climate warming and attacked measures aimed at mitigating the climate crisis.
[96]
[PDF] Climate of misinformation: ranking Big Tech - Friends of the Earth
In 2021, Google pledged to no longer allow the monetization of climate denial content on YouTube. In early 2023, TikTok added climate to its existing mis- and ...
[97]
Global Warming & Climate Change Myths - Skeptical Science
Here is a summary of global warming and climate change myths, sorted by recent popularity vs what science says.Sun & climate: moving · Climate's changed before · The 97% consensus on global...
[98]
[PDF] Refuting 12 Claims Made by Climate Alarmists
Alarmist Claim #2: Glaciers are melting throughout the world. FACT: A UN Report in 2010 reported that “glaciers increasing despite climate change… glaciers ...
[99]
New report accuses Big Food of corporate greenwashing
Jun 5, 2025 · The world's largest food companies are overstating their climate progress by “relying on carbon removals and weak certifications” while failing to cut ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[100]
Global Greenwashing Enforcement: From Bold Climate Claims to
Jun 12, 2025 · DWS fined €25M for misleading ESG claims · Volkswagen and Keurig face enforcement under deceptive marketing laws · California's VCMDA expands ...Dws Fined €25m For... · False Sustainability Claims... · Increased Esg Litigation And...
[101]
Why Some Americans Do Not See Urgency on Climate Change
Aug 9, 2023 · Others said their perception of hyperbole or exaggeration around climate claims lead them to take a more skeptical view. “People who are ...
[102]
Positive, global, and health or environment framing bolsters public ...
Oct 20, 2022 · The results show that in China, the UK, and the USA, positive frames increase the likelihood of public support for climate policies, while ...
[103]
When Are Loss Frames More Effective in Climate Change ... - MDPI
Jun 17, 2022 · This study investigated how goal frames (gain, non-loss, loss) either with or without efficacy statements affect consumers' support for climate-change policy.
[104]
When a bleak future comes closer: interaction effects of emotion and ...
Nov 20, 2024 · This study aims to compare the effects of fear and hope and investigate how they interact with temporal distance framing to shape perceptions and behaviors ...
[105]
[PDF] Personal Stories Can Change Climate Change Beliefs and Attitudes
Applied to climate communication, this research suggests that stories of how climate change has impacted relatable individuals may lead an audience to ...
[106]
Stories vs. facts: triggering emotion and action-taking on climate ...
Apr 6, 2019 · Across three experiments, we found that narratives framed as stories consistently outperformed factual narratives for encouraging action-taking ...
[107]
Empirical evidence of declining global vulnerability to climate ... - NIH
A decreasing trend in both human and economic vulnerability is evident. Global average mortality and loss rates have dropped by 6.5 and nearly 5 times, ...Missing: despite | Show results with:despite
[108]
Despite climate-change hysterics, weather disasters have decreased
from 500,000 deaths ...
[109]
WMO Global Annual to Decadal Climate Update (2025-2029)
May 28, 2025 · There is an 80% chance that at least one year between 2025 and 2029 will be warmer than the warmest year on record (currently 2024). And there ...
[110]
Effective visual communication of climate change | ScienceDaily
Sep 22, 2023 · Effective visual communication of climate change · News media · Global warming · Attribution of recent climate change · IPCC Report on Climate ...Missing: aids studies
[111]
Iconic graph at center of climate debate - Penn State University
Feb 14, 2015 · The "Hockey Stick" graph, a simple plot representing temperature over time, led to the center of the larger debate on climate change, ...
[112]
The Hockey Stick Illusion: Climategate and the Corruption of Science
Here is the definitive exposé of the distorted science behind the iconic global warming graph centrally responsible for the global panic about climate ...<|separator|>
[113]
Revisiting 2000 Years of Climate Change (Bad Science and the ...
Several climate scientists believed that rising CO 2 was the cause of observed warming and sought to support this by showing that excursions in the Earth ...Introduction · Discussion · References · Article Info
[114]
(Social) Media Logics and Visualizing Climate Change: 10 Years of ...
Mar 30, 2023 · Images have become a key vehicle for communicating climate change, especially in a visually oriented social media ecosystem.Missing: aids | Show results with:aids
[115]
Global Warming's Six Americas, Fall 2024
Mar 20, 2025 · In 2009, we identified Global Warming's Six Americas – the Alarmed, Concerned, Cautious, Disengaged, Doubtful, and Dismissive – which ...
[116]
Messaging for environmental action: The role of moral framing and ...
A growing body of experimental evidence finds that communicating environmental messages in moral terms endorsed by conservatives can reduce and in some cases ...Missing: innovation | Show results with:innovation
[117]
Targeting and tailoring climate change communications - Bostrom
Jun 18, 2013 · Guidance for climate change communication now routinely proposes targeting specific audience segments as a fundamental principle.Missing: shifts | Show results with:shifts
[118]
Framing climate change for effective communication: a systematic map
Research has examined a range of different frames for the communication of climate change, such as Public health, National security and Economic prosperity/ ...Missing: growth | Show results with:growth
[119]
Effects of system-sanctioned framing on climate awareness ... - PNAS
Sep 9, 2024 · The study investigates the impact of an experimental intervention that frames climate action as patriotic and system-sanctioned on environmental attitudes and ...
[120]
Climate change messages can promote support for climate action ...
Climate messages had modest positive effects on public support for climate action. · There was heterogeneity in message effects across the 23 countries ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[121]
The net-zero transition: What it would cost, what it could bring
The transformation of the global economy needed to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050 would be universal and significant, requiring $9.2 trillion in annual ...
[122]
Beyond promises: The $120 trillion path to a “net zero” world
Mar 9, 2023 · The International Energy Agency estimates that reaching the goal of “net zero” will cost $4 trillion a year over the next 30 years.
[123]
Natural Gas - C2ES
Natural gas is the largest source of U.S. electric power generation. Its substitution for coal has helped reduce power sector emissions to mid-1980 levels.
[124]
How Natural Gas And Renewables Dethroned Coal In America
May 20, 2024 · Coal consumption declined by 13.0 quadrillion BTUs, while natural gas consumption increased by 13.4 quadrillion BTUs. Renewable consumption ...
[125]
A new dawn for climate communications? - 2025 - News
Sep 22, 2025 · ... shift from communicating climate mitigation to adaptation strategies. This article is from Communicate magazine's print issue. ... 2025 ...
[126]
Netherlands: Country's flood management is a climate adaption model
Sep 28, 2021 · The use of the 'wide green dike' allows the alignment of flood protection, climate adaptation goals with nature conservation objectives, and ...
[127]
The Dutch Flood Protection Programme: Taking Innovations to the ...
The Dutch regional water authorities face an enormous task: the strengthening of about 1500 km of dikes and 500 civil-engineering structures before 2050.
[128]
RELEASE: WRI Study Finds Climate Adaptation Investments Yield ...
Jun 3, 2025 · Every $1 invested in adaptation and resilience generates more than $10 in benefits over ten years. This translates to potential returns of over $1.4 trillion, ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[129]
The Case for Climate-Resilient Infrastructure - State of the Planet
Jul 22, 2024 · According to the World Bank, each $1 invested in climate resilience will generate a return on investment of $4, by avoiding the need to ...
[130]
Building Climate Resilience in Infrastructure Projects: A Brief for ...
Mar 25, 2024 · Studies show that making infrastructure more climate-resilient can add up to 3% to upfront costs, however it has a benefit-cost ratio of about 4:1.
[131]
Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions
Sep 18, 2019 · None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true. What follows is a collection of notably wild predictions from notable people in ...
[132]
Un - AP News
A senior UN environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not ...
[133]
Gore: Arctic Ice May Soon Vanish in Summer - CBS News
Dec 14, 2009 · Al Gore has told the UN climate conference that new data suggests the Arctic polar ice cap may disappear in the summertime as soon as five to seven years from ...
[134]
Fact Check: Al Gore did not 'predict' ice caps melting by 2013 but ...
Nov 4, 2021 · A 2009 comment by former U.S. vice president Al Gore that the North Pole would be ice-free by summer 2013 has gone viral in tandem with ...
[135]
Natural Disasters - Our World in Data
Disasters – from earthquakes and storms to floods and droughts – kill approximately 40,000 to 50,000 people per year. This is the average over the last few ...
[136]
Why Deaths From Hurricanes And Other Natural Disasters Are ...
Aug 27, 2020 · There has been 92% decline in the decadal death toll from natural disasters since its peak in the 1920s, according to the International Disaster Database.
[137]
Unveiling the Backlash in Public Opinion on Climate Change
This study explores potential shifts in climate change-related perceptions and behavior over time and how this corresponds to changing communicative engagement ...Missing: post- messaging
[138]
Climate Change in the American Mind: Beliefs & Attitudes ...
Feb 16, 2023 · 44% of Americans think they will be harmed by global warming, 48% think their family will be harmed, and half (50%) think people in their ...
[139]
Battling a Climate Change Backlash - Nieman Reports
Jun 2, 2025 · Misinformation spikes during extreme weather disasters, be they wildfires in California and New Jersey, flooding in Kentucky or the aftermath of ...
[140]
Climategate, Public Opinion, and the Loss of Trust
Sep 13, 2012 · The results demonstrate that “climategate” had a significant effect on public beliefs in global warming and trust in scientists. The loss of ...
[141]
The EU Emissions Trading System in a larger EU
Jul 24, 2025 · Third, the EU ETS allowance price has risen from under €20 per tonne in the early 2020s to approximately €70 today, with significant volatility.
[142]
U-turn on EU's Emissions Trading System for road transport and ...
Jan 24, 2025 · EU imports of fossil fuels cost around €450 billion annually. The energy price crisis of 2022 resulting from the Russian invasion of Ukraine ...
[143]
Climate change mitigation policies and poverty - Barbier - 2014
Mar 19, 2014 · Direct impacts on poverty include payments for avoided deforestation that affect the livelihoods of the poor, reduced GHG emissions that also ...
[144]
Does Climate Change Influence Russian Agriculture? Evidence ...
Jan 10, 2022 · Climatic changes caused an increase in winter wheat yield from 1% in the south of the Central federal district to 17% in the south of the Volga ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
[145]
[PDF] Russia: The Impact of Climate Change to 2030 - DNI.gov
Russian agricultural lands will result in increased yields. Yields of existing crops may fail and whether new crops will succeed remains to be seen.
[146]
Near-term benefits from investment in climate adaptation ... - Nature
Jan 9, 2025 · Higher levels of abatement investment associated with stringent emissions reduction constraints can reduce returns on adaptation investment.Missing: limits | Show results with:limits
[147]
Impacts of climate change on global agriculture accounting ... - Nature
Jun 18, 2025 · Climate change threatens global food systems1, but the extent to which adaptation will reduce losses remains unknown and controversial2.
[148]
Greenwashing – the deceptive tactics behind environmental claims
Tactics include: Claiming to be on track to reduce a company's polluting emissions to net zero when no credible plan is actually in place. Being purposely vague ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[149]
Executive summary – The Oil and Gas Industry in Net Zero Transitions
In net zero transitions, new project developments face major commercial risks and could also lock in emissions that push the world over the 1.5 °C threshold.
[150]
Analysis: New oil and gas projects since 2021 could emit 14bn ...
Mar 28, 2024 · The IEA updated its net-zero scenario in 2023 to reflect the continued expansion of fossil-fuel projects since its previous report. It stated ...Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
[151]
Top oil firms' climate pledges failing on almost every metric, report ...
May 21, 2024 · Oil Change International says plans do not stand up to scrutiny and describes US fossil-fuel corporations as 'the worst of the worst'
[152]
Systematic assessment of the achieved emission reductions of ...
Nov 14, 2024 · We estimate that less than 16% of the carbon credits issued to the investigated projects constitute real emission reductions.<|separator|>
[153]
Carbon offsets have failed for 25 years, and most should be phased ...
Oct 6, 2025 · Previous research has shown how offset programs routinely overestimate their climate impact, in many cases by as much as a factor of ten or more ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[154]
https://www.statista.com/topics/4101/carbon-capture-and-storage/
[155]
2024 Global Status of CCS Report shows record number of projects ...
Dec 16, 2024 · The report highlights a record number of CCS projects currently underway, alongside projections indicating a twofold increase in global CO2 capture capacity.
[156]
Four in 10 Americans Say They Are Environmentalists - Gallup News
Apr 21, 2021 · Four in 10 U.S. adults identify themselves as environmentalists, similar to recent readings but remaining down from the 1980s and 1990s.<|separator|>
[157]
Record-High 48% Call Global Warming a Serious Threat
Apr 16, 2025 · After recent climate-related disasters, more Americans now think global warming will pose a serious threat to them in their lifetime.
[158]
Americans Don't Care That Much About the Environment, Poll Shows
Mar 25, 2015 · In 1989, 35% of the men and women surveyed said they cared a great deal about climate change, but only 32% said the same thing in 2015. Even ...Missing: percentages | Show results with:percentages
[159]
Declining public concern about climate change: Can we blame the ...
The decline in belief about climate change is most likely driven by the economic insecurity caused by the Great Recession.
[160]
Update: Partisan Gaps Expand Most on Government Power, Climate
Aug 7, 2023 · Republicans' worry about global warming, in contrast, edged down slightly in both 2013 and 2023, creating larger partisan gaps in each of those ...
[161]
Republicans and Democrats Continue to Clash over Climate Change
Nov 30, 2023 · Eight in 10 Democrats (82%) see climate change as a critical threat, while just 16 percent of Republicans see it the same way; Independents meet ...Missing: polls | Show results with:polls
[162]
Did global warming stop in 1998? | NOAA Climate.gov
Sep 4, 2018 · The 15 years from 1998–2012 were the warmest on record at that time, but the rate of global surface warming was slower than it had been in ...
[163]
Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global ...
Feb 7, 2024 · Effectively reducing climate change requires marked, global behavior change. However, it is unclear which strategies are most likely to ...<|separator|>
[164]
Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials testing behavioural ...
Oct 4, 2019 · Here we show that behavioural interventions promote climate change mitigation to a very small degree while the intervention lasts (d = −0.093 95 ...
[165]
the effect of individual climate behavior messaging on green policy ...
Nov 22, 2022 · Individual behavior change offers a large potential to curb greenhouse gas emissions. However, messaging promoting individual behavior change ...
[166]
The Influence of Climate Change Efficacy Messages and Efficacy ...
This study examined how changing the type and valence of efficacy information in news stories discussing global climate change may impact intended political ...
[167]
Understanding six “key truths” about climate change predicts policy ...
Jun 12, 2025 · Effective communication is critical to efforts to reduce the risks of climate change. In this article, we investigated predictors of public ...
[168]
Saving the world voluntarily: Experimental evidence of gain-loss ...
We find that the effect of loss framing is consistent for people with low and high intrinsic values to protect the environment.
[169]
Resistance to Climate Change Messages Suggesting Behavior ...
This study evaluates the impact of exposure to messages that emphasize the need for changes in individual behavior or in public policy to address climate ...Missing: alarmism | Show results with:alarmism
[170]
Reactions to policy action: socio-political conditions of backlash to ...
May 29, 2025 · We develop a framework to study the socio-political conditions (economic, cultural, practical) under which backlash to climate policy occurs.
[171]
Psychological Reactance From Reading Basic Facts on Climate ...
Dec 27, 2018 · Finally, our results show that reactance to climate change messaging may lead to backfiring effects on important outcomes tied to climate change ...
[172]
Message effects on psychological reactance: meta-analyses
Jun 30, 2025 · Specifically, recipients may perceive these messages as threats to their freedom, leading to psychological reactance, which results in defensive ...Results · Discussion · Freedom-Threatening Language
[173]
[PDF] Kopp, RE, Gilmore, E., Shwom, RL, Adams, H., Adler, C., Oppenheimer
Multiple social scientific frameworks suggest that the deep uncertainty and perceived abstractness of climate tipping points render them ineffective for ...
[174]
Tipping points ahead? How laypeople respond to linear versus ...
Nov 21, 2022 · ... ineffective in heightening people's climate change risk perceptions. Likewise, there are no conclusive findings on how nonlinear climate ...
[175]
https://oxfordre.com/climatescience/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228620-e-385
[176]
Polarization of climate politics results from partisan sorting: Evidence ...
This suggests that the polarized public opinion on climate change is driven by partisan sorting, the phenomenon where the public aligns itself more closely with ...
[177]
The risks of communicating extreme climate forecasts | ScienceDaily
Feb 28, 2021 · "Truly apocalyptic forecasts can only ever be observed in their failure -- that is the world did not end as predicted," says Rode, adjunct ...
[178]
Fearmongering predictions about climate change keep falling apart
Sep 15, 2025 · Two-thirds of them predicted doom before August 2025, and all of these have turned out to be false. The first well-known environmental scare ...
[179]
Confronting Backlash Against Europe's Green Transition
Sep 11, 2025 · Pushback against the European Green Deal and the continent's wider climate action has been gathering momentum across Europe. This trend has ...Sustainability, Climate, And... · Bottom-Up Versus Top-Down... · Climate Activism's Response
[180]
Bad communication on climate has bad consequences. We must do ...
Bad communication on climate has bad consequences. We must do better. By Jem Bendell, originally published by Resilience.org October 26, 2022Missing: breeding denial
[181]
The Program - Yale Program on Climate Change Communication
The Program grew out of a groundbreaking conference on “Americans and Climate Change” convened in 2005 in Aspen, CO by the Yale School of Forestry & ...
[182]
Global Warming's Six Americas
Our research has identified “Global Warming's Six Americas”: six unique audiences within the American public that each responds to the issue in their own ...
[183]
Center for Climate Change Communication - George Mason University
On September 29, Mason 4C celebrated founding director emeritus Ed Maibach ... The work of Mason's Center for Climate Change Communication (4C) would ...People & Partners · All Research · About · Advancing Climate and Health...
[184]
Climate Change in the American Mind: Beliefs & Attitudes, Fall 2023
Jan 10, 2024 · Many Americans are also worried their local area might be harmed by hurricanes (39%), rising sea levels (38%), and reduced snow pack (37%).
[185]
[PDF] Conveying the Human Implications of Climate Change
of communication about important public health issues. Strengthening the knowledge base about the public health relevance of climate change within public health.
[186]
Mitigation of Climate Change - Climate Change 2022
The Summary for Policymakers (SPM) provides a high-level summary of the key findings of the Working Group III Report and is approved by the IPCC member ...Summary for Policymakers · Technical Summary · Press · Figures
[187]
IPCC emission scenarios: How did critiques affect their quality and ...
This article reviews the evolution of emission scenarios, since 1990, by focusing on scenario critiques and responses as published in the literature.Missing: efficacy | Show results with:efficacy
[188]
Our History - 350
350.org was founded by university friends and Bill McKibben in 2008, seeing climate change as the most important issue. They organized coordinated days of ...
[189]
Timeline: Fossil Fuels Divestment | Magazine - The Harvard Crimson
Oct 2, 2014 · 2012: 350.org launches the 'Go Fossil Free: Divest from Fossil Fuels!' campaign across the country, calling for institutions to disinvest from ...
[190]
Institutions topping $40.6 trillion in total assets commit to fossil fuel ...
Dec 15, 2023 · Institutions topping $40.6 trillion in total assets commit to fossil fuel divestment - Pensions & Investments.
[191]
A New Chapter | Sierra Club
Apr 1, 2021 · We fought to hold the coal industry accountable for their air, water, and climate pollution. Coal provided half of our nation's electricity ...
[192]
Success Stories - Beyond Coal - Sierra Club
Beyond Coal campaigns led to the retirement of coal plants in Kentucky, Tennessee, and Texas, and the Moapa Band of Paiutes also saw a victory with the Reid ...
[193]
Australian Campaign Case Study: Divestment Campaign 2013 - 2021
The Divestment campaign was introduced to Australia by 350.org in around 2013. It sought to build a network of local groups across the country advocating for ...
[194]
The attitude-behavior gap on climate action: How can it be bridged?
Mar 21, 2024 · We investigate the attitude-behavior gap on political climate action using the six most recent waves of our Climate Change in the American Mind surveys.
[195]
Climate Change Reconsidered
May 28, 2024 · NIPCC Report (2009). Summary of Climate Change Reconsidered · Full Text of Climate Change Reconsidered · The Heartland Institute 1933 N Meacham ...2009 NIPCC Report · Fossil Fuels · About the NIPCC · About
[196]
Climate Doom Ahead? Think Twice. - The Heartland Institute
Jan 17, 2019 · ... analysis suggests that drastic action is not required. The report's proposed remedies for climate change fail cost-benefit analyses.
[197]
In Shift, Key Climate Denialist Group Heartland Institute Pivots ... - PBS
Nov 2, 2018 · Instead, it focuses on a cost-benefit analysis of reducing fossil fuel usage. The summary concludes that “nearly all the impacts of fossil fuel ...Missing: skepticism | Show results with:skepticism
[198]
[PDF] Climate Change Reconsidered II - Biological Impacts
The NIPCC's CCR-II report is one of these. Its coverage of the topic is comprehensive without being superficial. It sorts through conflicting claims made by ...
[199]
What Role Does the Media Play in Climate Change Discussion?
Media is important in climate change communication, influencing public perception and how important the issue is viewed, with political biases affecting ...
[200]
BBC coverage of climate change should be accurate as well ... - LSE
The real problem with the BBC's coverage of climate change is not that 'sceptics' do not receive enough air time, but instead that they make inaccurate and ...Missing: CNN framing
[201]
A temperature check on climate communication: where are we?
Feb 28, 2025 · Review Article; Open access; Published: 28 February 2025. A temperature check on climate communication: where are we? Natasha A. Strydhorst ...
[202]
Why newsrooms must rethink science journalism before the next crisis
Jul 31, 2025 · Despite climate extremes, pandemics and a global AI revolution, science reporting remains underfunded and undervalued.
[203]
The President as Communicator: How Obama Delivered His Climate ...
Jul 10, 2013 · Instead, the 6,000-word speech allotted 38 of the 90 paragraphs to his “plan to cut carbon pollution”; seven paragraphs to the effort to protect ...
[204]
President Obama: Climate Change Greatest Threat to Future ...
In his State of the Union Address on 20 January, US President Barack Obama said that climate change is the greatest threat to future generations.
[205]
YPCCC's Resources on Climate in the 2024 U.S. General Election
Oct 8, 2024 · We find that in 2024, 39% of registered voters overall say that global warming is a “very important” issue for their vote.Missing: skepticism | Show results with:skepticism
[206]
Anthony Leiserowitz | Yale School of the Environment
Anthony Leiserowitz, PhD is JoshAni-TomKat Professor of Climate Communication and Director of the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
[207]
New Research Led by James Hansen Documents Global Warming ...
Feb 4, 2025 · New research by an international team of climate scientists documents a surge of global warming during the past 15 years that risks shutting down a key ocean ...Amoc Shutdown? · Blasting Through 1.5c · Not Just AerosolsMissing: statements | Show results with:statements
[208]
<b>IN CASE YOU MISSED IT... "There Is No 'Consensus' On Global ...
Jun 26, 2006 · There Is No 'Consensus' On Global Warming By RICHARD S. LINDZEN Mr. Lindzen is the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Science at MIT.
[209]
Can increasing carbon dioxide cause climate change? - PNAS
Increasing CO 2 is likely to cause some climate change, and that the resulting change will involve average warming of the earth.
[210]
Enhancing communication of climate changes under net zero ...
Jul 4, 2025 · Here we propose to broaden the focus beyond global temperature changes to account for ongoing and future climate changes – even if carbon neutrality goals are ...
[211]
A mining reality check on net zero | Nature Communications
Jul 2, 2025 · Projections show a massive shortfall in the supply of lithium and copper required to reach net zero emissions by 2050.
[212]
Unpacking the ROI of Disaster Preparedness
Sep 27, 2024 · New research reveals every dollar invested in disaster preparedness saves communities $13. Discover expert insights from our National Preparedness Month event.Missing: empirical adaptation 7:1
[213]
Estimating the loss‐reduction effects of disaster preparedness and ...
Jul 26, 2024 · In this research, we empirically examine the effects of multiple federal disaster aid programs on reducing subsequent flood- and storm-related damages across ...
[214]
'Unprecedented' ocean heat waves suggest climate tipping point
Jul 28, 2025 · 'Unprecedented' ocean heat waves suggest climate tipping point. Researchers say average sea temperatures may be reset higher and some ...
[215]
[PDF] Canada's Second Adaptation Communication | UNFCCC
The Climate Preparedness and Adaptation Strategy: Actions for 2022–2025 outlines a broad range of actions for 2022 to 2025 to address climate impacts and build ...
[216]
[PDF] Strategies for Communicating Climate Change in a Polarized Era
In this article, we review recent research on climate change communication focusing on audience variables and messaging strategies with the goal of providing ...
[217]
Adapting messaging can change how people think about climate ...
The researchers found that by tweaking climate change messaging to highlight conservative moral priorities, people who valued those principles were more open ...Missing: reduces polarization<|control11|><|separator|>
[218]
NASA, IBM Research to Release New AI Model for Weather, Climate
May 22, 2024 · NASA teamed up with IBM Research to create an artificial intelligence foundation model for a variety of weather and climate data ...
[219]
This AI model simulates 1000 years of the current climate in just one ...
Aug 25, 2025 · The model runs on a single processor and takes just 12 hours to generate a forecast. On a state-of-the-art supercomputer, the same simulation ...
[220]
Getting Clear on Satellite Imagery | Climate TRACE
Oct 11, 2022 · Climate TRACE uses a combination of public and private satellite data from different sources. This includes freely available data from the ...
[221]
RainbirdGEO: Democratizing Climate Risk Solutions with Satellite ...
Apr 17, 2024 · This technology harnesses data from geostationary orbit satellites, employing sophisticated algorithms to forecast climate risks such as heavy ...
[222]
Communicating Climate Change: The Impact of Animated Data ...
Feb 20, 2023 · The visualization component improves data stories' ability to increase public engagement on issues such as climate change (Appelgren ...
[223]
Art that integrates data visualizations can help bridge the US ...
Jul 7, 2023 · Researchers have shown that combining climate data with visually engrossing art can make data more meaningful to viewers and bridge political divides.
[224]
What Are the Risks of Misleading Visuals? → Question
Apr 6, 2025 · Misleading visuals can create a false sense of security or urgency regarding climate issues, depending on the intended manipulation. Consider a ...
[225]
What Are the Implications of Misleading Visualizations? → Question
Apr 6, 2025 · Distorted visuals undermine climate action by eroding trust, misinforming policy, and enabling greenwashing. → Question.
[226]
Climate Change in the American Mind: Beliefs & Attitudes, Spring ...
Jul 8, 2025 · 48% of Americans think people in the United States are being harmed by global warming “right now,” and 46% say they have personally experienced ...
[227]
global temperatures will continue to break records in the next 5 years
May 28, 2025 · The report highlights a 70% chance that average temperatures over the next 5 years will breach the critical 1.5°C threshold above pre-industrial ...
[228]
New Research: Gloom and Doom Warnings About Climate Change ...
May 22, 2024 · Gloom and doom warnings about climate change are often ineffective, as evidenced by a global survey involving 59,000 participants from 63 ...
[229]
The 2023 global warming spike was driven by the El Niño–Southern ...
Oct 10, 2024 · Our results underscore the importance of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation in driving the occurrence of global warming spikes such as the one in 2023.Missing: 2023-2025 skeptic