Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Conservation movement

![Yellowstone_1871b.jpg][float-right]
The conservation movement arose in the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries amid concerns over the rapid exhaustion of natural resources through unchecked exploitation, advocating for their systematic management to support long-term economic productivity and public benefit rather than indefinite preservation without use.
Pioneered by figures like , who emphasized scientific and resource efficiency as the first chief of the U.S. Forest Service, the movement gained momentum under President , who safeguarded approximately 230 million acres of public lands, including national forests, parks, and wildlife refuges, through executive actions and legislative support.
While contrasting with preservationist ideals championed by , which prioritized wilderness sanctity over human intervention, conservation's utilitarian approach—rooted in preventing waste and enabling sustained yield—laid foundational policies for federal land administration and influenced global resource stewardship, though it faced opposition from industrial interests seeking unrestricted access.

Definition and Core Principles

Historical and Philosophical Foundations

The philosophical foundations of the conservation movement trace back to European forestry practices in the 17th and 18th centuries, driven by the depletion of timber resources essential for naval and economic needs. In , John Evelyn's Sylva, or A Discourse of Forest-Trees (1664) urged systematic to replenish oak supplies exhausted by shipbuilding demands during conflicts like the Anglo-Dutch Wars, emphasizing the cultivation of timber as a renewable national asset rather than unchecked exploitation. This work, presented to the Royal Society, laid early groundwork for viewing forests as managed economic resources, influencing subsequent British and continental approaches to woodland husbandry. By the early , foresters formalized the concept of sustained yield, or Nachhaltigkeit, coined by Hans Carl von Carlowitz in 1713 to denote harvesting timber at rates not exceeding natural regrowth, ensuring perpetual supply amid mining and construction pressures in . This principle rested on empirical assessments of forest growth cycles and , prioritizing long-term productivity over short-term gains—a causal framework recognizing that leads to irreversible and , as evidenced by depleted central European woodlands from medieval expansion. Austrian and Prussian administrators implemented these methods around 1800 through state-regulated inventories and rotation systems, establishing conservation as a of balanced extraction grounded in measurable data rather than aesthetic or moral imperatives alone. In the United States, these European ideas were adapted into the core philosophy of the conservation movement by the late , emphasizing utilitarian management for human welfare. , first chief of the U.S. Forest Service (1905–1910), advocated "the greatest good of the greatest number in the long run," defining conservation as the wise use of resources to prevent waste and secure benefits for future generations, informed by his training at the École Nationale Forestière in . This approach contrasted with preservationist views by permitting regulated exploitation—such as selective logging in national forests—while rejecting depletion, as seen in the rapid of American frontiers that halved eastern woodlands between 1600 and 1900. Pinchot's framework, rooted in preventing physical and economic waste, prioritized empirical forest management over romantic ideals, influencing policies like the 1891 Forest Reserves Act that protected 107 million acres by 1907.

Distinction from Preservationism and Radical Environmentalism

The conservation movement distinguishes itself from preservationism primarily through its advocacy for the sustainable, managed utilization of natural resources to benefit human societies over the long term, rather than prohibiting human intervention altogether. Forester , the first chief of the U.S. Forest Service appointed in 1905, exemplified this approach by promoting "the greatest good for the greatest number" via of forests for timber harvesting, protection, and , arguing that resources should be used but not wasted. In contrast, preservationism, as championed by naturalist , sought to safeguard wilderness areas from any extractive or developmental activities, emphasizing nature's intrinsic aesthetic and spiritual value independent of human needs; Muir's efforts led to the establishment of in 1890 but clashed with utilitarian policies, such as his opposition to the Hetch Hetchy Valley dam project authorized by Congress in 1913, which Pinchot supported for San Francisco's water supply. This tension culminated in a philosophical rift, with conservation viewing preservation as economically shortsighted and preservation critiquing conservation as subordinating nature to short-term exploitation. Unlike , which often employs confrontational tactics and prioritizes ecological purity over human welfare, conservation integrates evidence-based practices that accommodate compatible economic activities, such as regulated or , to prevent . , emerging prominently in the 1970s and 1980s through groups like Earth First! founded in 1980, advocates principles that assign moral equivalence to all life forms, sometimes endorsing or —termed "monkeywrenching"—to halt developments like roads or dams, as detailed in Dave Foreman's 1985 book Ecodefense: A Field Guide to Monkeywrenching. Conservationists, by contrast, favor institutional mechanisms like and quotas, as seen in the U.S. Multiple-Use Sustained-Yield Act of 1960, which mandates balancing timber production, wildlife habitat, and recreation on without the that characterizes radical positions, which have been criticized for alienating stakeholders and ignoring human dependencies on ecosystems. This pragmatic orientation aligns conservation with broader societal goals, whereas 's biocentric can lead to policies that undervalue empirical cost-benefit analyses of human-nature interactions.

Emphasis on Sustainable Human Use

In the conservation movement, sustainable human use refers to the managed exploitation of natural resources—such as timber, fisheries, and wildlife—designed to provide economic and societal benefits while preventing depletion and maintaining ecological productivity over the long term. This principle, rooted in utilitarian ethics, prioritizes "the greatest good for the greatest number" through techniques like sustained-yield harvesting, where annual removals do not exceed natural regeneration rates, ensuring perpetual resource availability. , as the inaugural chief of the U.S. Forest Service from 1905 to 1910, championed this ethic by defining conservation as "the wise use of the earth and its resources for the lasting good of men," applying business-like efficiency to public lands to balance development with renewal. This approach starkly contrasts with preservationism, which seeks to shield ecosystems from any extractive human activity to preserve their pristine state; , by contrast, views humans as integral to resource , advocating active to avert waste from unregulated exploitation. In practice, sustainable use in involved establishing national forests for multiple purposes, including timber production, watershed protection, and recreation, with policies mandating after —evident in the U.S. Service's early 20th-century of over 150 million acres by 1910, where cutting cycles were calibrated to tree growth rates. similarly emphasized regulated hunting quotas and enhancement; for instance, under Theodore Roosevelt's administration (1901–1909), initiatives like the establishment of 51 bird refuges and big-game preserves promoted controlled harvests to curb overhunting while supporting rural economies dependent on game. Historical precedents informed these methods, drawing from sustained-yield forestry models developed in the 18th and 19th centuries, where and foresters quantified annual wood increments to guide harvests, influencing American practices amid rapid 19th-century that felled over 100 million acres of U.S. timberland by 1900. In fisheries, applied similar logic through early 20th-century stocking programs and size limits, as seen in the U.S. Fish Commission's efforts from 1871 onward to propagate like for commercial fisheries without exhausting wild stocks. These strategies underscored a causal : unchecked drives , but informed —backed by data and yield models—enables perpetual utility, as validated by long-term forest regrowth metrics showing U.S. timber volumes stabilizing post-1920 after reforms. Critics from preservationist circles, such as , argued that utilitarian use risked commodifying nature, yet empirical outcomes, including averted famines from sustained agriculture and averted extinctions via bag limits, affirm the movement's efficacy in reconciling prosperity with integrity.

Historical Development

Precursors in Traditional Resource Management

Traditional resource management practices in pre-modern societies often involved community-enforced rules to prevent depletion of forests, fisheries, and , laying groundwork for later systematic efforts. In medieval , forest laws regulated access and use to sustain wood supplies for , , and . For instance, the , enacted in in 1217, curtailed expansive claims established under rule, restoring common rights to pasture, gather wood, and hunt small game while prohibiting wasteful practices like unauthorized clear-cutting. This charter represented an early legal framework for balancing elite privileges with communal , influencing subsequent European resource governance. Tree-ring data from indicate that woodland management intensified around the 10th-12th centuries, with and selective harvesting techniques enabling regeneration cycles that maintained timber availability amid growing demand from population expansion and . Common lands, governed by local assemblies across regions like and the , allocated , , and fuelwood rights through rotational use and fines for overuse, fostering resilience against scarcity without centralized state intervention. These systems, rooted in rather than scientific , demonstrated empirical adaptations to local carrying capacities, though vulnerabilities to and commercialization emerged by the . In North America, indigenous groups employed controlled burning for millennia to shape ecosystems, enhancing biodiversity and resource productivity. Archaeological and ethnohistorical evidence shows that practices by tribes such as the Salish, Karuk, and Yurok involved low-intensity fires to clear underbrush, promote nut-bearing trees like oaks, and create habitats for game, thereby reducing catastrophic wildfire risks and sustaining yields of food plants and animals. Seasonal restrictions on hunting and fishing, informed by observations of animal migrations and spawning cycles, prevented local extinctions; for example, Pacific Northwest tribes regulated salmon harvests through communal quotas and taboos during vulnerable periods. These methods, transmitted orally across generations, prioritized long-term viability over short-term extraction, contrasting with post-colonial overexploitation. Similar approaches appeared in other regions, such as sacred groves in , where communities in West African societies protected forested areas through taboos and rituals, preserving watersheds and hotspots as refugia amid . In , Tongan islanders practiced selective harvesting and rotational fallowing, combined with prohibitions (tapu) on reefs, maintaining marine and terrestrial stocks in resource-limited atolls. While not uniformly successful—some practices faltered under population pressures or external shocks—these traditional systems emphasized causal links between human actions and ecological feedback, prefiguring conservation's focus on sustainable yields without modern metrics.

19th-Century Origins in Europe and North America

In , scientific emerged as a cornerstone of early conservation practices during the , emphasizing sustained-yield principles to counteract historical from , , and demands. German foresters, building on 18th-century concepts like those articulated by Hans Carl von Carlowitz in 1713, refined systematic management through yield tables, compartment-based harvesting, and replanting schedules to ensure perpetual resource availability. Heinrich Cotta (1763–1844), a pivotal figure, advanced as a quantitative by developing valuation methods and management plans, founding the Royal Saxon Academy of around 1811 and influencing Prussian policies that prioritized calculated annual cuts matching growth rates. These approaches, formalized in early 19th-century Prussian forest laws, treated forests as economic assets requiring empirical inventory and regulation rather than laissez-faire extraction, yielding measurable recoveries in timber stocks by mid-century. France and other Continental states paralleled these efforts, with post-Napoleonic reforms under the 1827 Forest Code mandating protective and to combat and secure naval timber, informed by hydrological studies linking to flooding and loss. By the 1850s, European forestry schools trained professionals in data-driven practices, exporting models that underscored as compatible with human utility—prioritizing long-term productivity over wilderness sanctity. These systems demonstrated causal links between mismanagement and scarcity, fostering policies that restored degraded lands through state oversight, though often critiqued for prioritizing monocultures over . In , 19th-century conservation origins arose from frontier resource exhaustion and transatlantic exchanges, with forestry informing responses to unchecked logging and agrarian expansion that denuded Eastern woodlands by the 1850s. George Perkins Marsh's (1864) provided an empirical foundation, cataloging historical cases of deforestation-induced , , and shifts—from Mediterranean to contemporary America—and arguing for active human intervention to rehabilitate ecosystems via replanting and . Drawing on precedents, Marsh advocated "judicious use" over exploitation, influencing policymakers to view nature as modifiable yet finite, with data on watershed degradation prompting early federal inquiries into timber famine. This intellectual shift materialized in practical steps, such as New York's 1885 Forest Commission recommending preserved reserves for sustainable harvesting, echoing German models of regulated yield. By 1891, the U.S. General Land Law Revision Act authorized forest reserves on public domains, totaling 13 million acres by 1897, to safeguard water flows and timber against private monopolies—marking a transition from ad hoc preservation, like Yellowstone National Park's 1872 , toward managed multiple-use frameworks. These origins reflected causal realism: empirical evidence of depletion drove policies prioritizing stewardship for societal benefit, though implementation lagged until institutional reforms in the subsequent era.

Progressive Era and Early 20th-Century Institutionalization

The Progressive Era marked a pivotal phase in the institutionalization of the conservation movement in the United States, driven by federal initiatives emphasizing scientific management of natural resources for sustained human benefit. President Theodore Roosevelt, serving from 1901 to 1909, championed policies rooted in utilitarian principles, appointing Gifford Pinchot as the first Chief of the newly formed United States Forest Service on February 1, 1905. This agency, transferred from the Department of the Interior to the Department of Agriculture, was tasked with administering national forests to ensure their productive capacity through practices like selective logging and fire prevention, reflecting Pinchot's doctrine of achieving "the greatest good for the greatest number in the long run." Roosevelt's administration expanded protected lands significantly, designating approximately 150 national forests, 51 federal bird reservations, four national game preserves, five national parks, and 18 s by 1909. The of June 8, 1906, empowered the president to unilaterally proclaim s to safeguard prehistoric ruins, historic sites, and natural features threatened by exploitation, thereby enabling rapid conservation actions without congressional delay. This legislation facilitated the protection of sites like in , the first , underscoring a pragmatic approach to preserving resources amid industrialization's pressures. Further institutionalization occurred through the National Conservation Commission, established by in June 1908 following the White House Conference of Governors in May, where he delivered his "Conservation as a National Duty" address. The commission, comprising experts from government, industry, and , conducted the first of resources, including forests, , and minerals, to inform and prevent waste. Its 1909 report advocated coordinated federal-state efforts for , influencing subsequent legislation like the Weeks Act of 1911, which enabled federal acquisition of forested lands for watershed protection. These developments entrenched conservation within federal bureaucracy, shifting from protections to systematic oversight, though tensions arose between utilitarian and preservationist ideals, as seen in Pinchot's support for the Hetch Hetchy dam project in Yosemite against John Muir's opposition. By the early 1920s, under subsequent administrations, conservation principles had permeated agencies like the Bureau of Reclamation, established via the Newlands Act of 1902 for irrigation projects that balanced with water resource .

Post-World War II Global Expansion

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), founded on October 5, 1948, in , , marked the initial institutionalization of global conservation efforts following World War II, uniting 18 governments, 7 NGOs, and 27 national conservation groups to address threats to nature amid post-war reconstruction and . Initially named the International Union for the Protection of Nature, it evolved into the IUCN in 1956 and established the in 1964, providing the first comprehensive global assessment of species endangerment based on scientific data from member experts. By coordinating international standards for protected areas and advising on policy, the IUCN facilitated the designation of over 1,000 new protected sites worldwide by the 1960s, influencing national strategies in , , and . Complementing the IUCN's framework, the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), established on September 11, 1961, in , , by figures including biologist and IUCN vice-president , focused on fundraising to support field-based conservation projects, raising over $5.6 million in its first decade for grants targeting species like the and populations. This influx of private capital enabled expansion into developing regions, funding anti-poaching initiatives and habitat surveys in and , where WWF projects by 1970 had supported the protection of approximately 10 million hectares of land. The organization's emphasis on drew public engagement, amplifying conservation's reach beyond governmental efforts and establishing model reserves that integrated local communities in sustainable resource use. Post-war decolonization spurred establishments in the Global South, with seeing dozens of new parks by the , such as Kenya's expansion under the 1945 Parks Ordinance leading to Tsavo Park's formal protection in 1948, covering 20,808 square kilometers to safeguard herds and ecosystems amid growing human pressures. In and , European models influenced top-down creations like India's redesignation in 1957 for tiger conservation and Indonesia's Ujung Kulon Park in 1950, protecting the last ; these efforts, often backed by IUCN assessments, increased coverage from under 1% to over 5% of in many nations by 1970, though frequently prioritized wildlife over . The 1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in represented a pivotal escalation, convening 113 nations and resulting in the creation of the (UNEP) headquartered in , which coordinated global monitoring of resource depletion and pollution, leading to 26 conventions on and chemicals by the 1980s. This conference shifted conservation from ad hoc national initiatives to multilateral frameworks, emphasizing empirical data on habitat loss—such as the documented 20-30% decline in global forest cover since 1950—and prompting integrated strategies like the 1980 World Conservation Strategy co-authored by IUCN, , and UNEP, which advocated to balance human needs with ecosystem integrity. By the late , these efforts had fostered over 3,000 international protected areas, reflecting conservation's transition to a worldwide imperative driven by on risks.

Developments Since 1970

The conservation movement gained renewed institutional momentum in the 1970s, catalyzed by widespread public awareness following the first on April 22, 1970, which mobilized an estimated 20 million participants across the to advocate for resource protection and pollution control. This grassroots surge prompted key U.S. legislation, including the , which established federal authority to protect imperiled and habitats through listing, recovery plans, and habitat safeguards, ultimately preventing the extinction of hundreds of taxa. Internationally, the , adopted in 1973, regulated commercial trade in over 38,000 to curb poaching and overexploitation, with enforcement leading to documented declines in illegal trafficking for like African elephants and rhinos. The decade also saw foundational global frameworks emerge from the 1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in , which established the (UNEP) to coordinate efforts and highlighted resource depletion as a planetary concern. Complementary treaties included the 1971 on Wetlands, designating over 2,500 sites covering 250 million hectares by 2023 for , and the 1972 , which by the 1980s expanded protections to natural sites emphasizing ecological integrity over purely cultural value. These instruments shifted conservation from national silos to multilateral cooperation, though implementation varied due to enforcement challenges in developing nations reliant on resource extraction. By the 1980s and 1990s, the movement integrated sustainable use principles, as articulated in the 1987 Brundtland Report's definition of —meeting present needs without compromising future generations—which influenced policies balancing economic growth with ecosystem maintenance. The 1992 (CBD), ratified by 196 parties, set targets for genetic resource access, habitat preservation, and biotechnology benefits-sharing, spurring national biodiversity strategies and the expansion of protected areas from about 3% of global land in 1970 to over 17% by 2020. emerged as a formal discipline in 1978, led by Michael Soulé's synthesis of , , and policy to address risks empirically, fostering data-driven interventions like population viability analysis. Post-2000 developments emphasized measurable outcomes, including the (2005) documenting habitat loss drivers and recoveries, and the REDD+ mechanism under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, which by 2020 incentivized forest conservation in tropical nations through carbon credit payments, reducing deforestation rates in participating areas like the Brazilian Amazon by up to 80% from peak levels. Empirical successes included delistings under the U.S. Endangered Species Act, such as the (delisted 1987 after population rebound from <100,000 to over 1 million via regulated harvesting) and the bald eagle (delisted 2007 following pesticide bans and nesting protections that tripled continental numbers). Globally, community-based models in Africa and Asia, like Namibia's conservancies granting locals wildlife management rights since 1990, boosted elephant populations by 400% in some regions through anti-poaching incentives tied to tourism revenue. Despite these advances, ongoing threats like habitat fragmentation underscore the need for adaptive, evidence-based strategies over ideological prescriptions.

Key Figures and Organizations

Pioneering Thinkers and Activists

John Evelyn's 1664 treatise Sylva, or A Discourse of Forest-Trees, presented to the Royal Society, urged systematic reforestation in England to replenish timber depleted by naval shipbuilding during the English Civil War and subsequent conflicts, emphasizing propagation techniques for oak and other species to ensure long-term supply for economic and strategic needs. This work prompted parliamentary action, including incentives for landowners to plant trees, marking an early application of managed forestry for sustained resource yield rather than unchecked exploitation. George Perkins Marsh, in his 1864 book Man and Nature; or, Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action, provided the first comprehensive empirical analysis of anthropogenic landscape degradation, drawing on Mediterranean examples to illustrate deforestation's causal links to soil erosion, desertification, and hydrological disruption, while advocating restorative human stewardship to prevent irreversible loss. Marsh's data-driven warnings, grounded in historical and geographical evidence, shifted intellectual focus from unlimited exploitation to active conservation, influencing subsequent policies like U.S. forest reserves by underscoring humanity's capacity—and obligation—for sustainable modification of ecosystems. Gifford Pinchot, trained in European forestry schools including in Nancy, France, became the first professional forester in the United States and head of the Division of Forestry in 1898, pioneering scientific management principles for national forests to achieve "the greatest good to the greatest number in the long run" through sustained-yield harvesting. As the inaugural chief of the U.S. Forest Service from 1905 to 1910, Pinchot expanded protected forest lands from 56 million to 172 million acres, implementing inventory-based planning, fire control, and selective logging to balance timber production with regeneration, directly countering wasteful practices like clear-cutting that had depleted resources in the Gilded Age. His utilitarian ethic, prioritizing empirical resource accounting over aesthetic preservation, formalized conservation as a policy framework for perpetual economic viability, as detailed in his 1910 book . These thinkers emphasized causal mechanisms of resource depletion—overharvesting without regeneration—and countered them with verifiable strategies like replanting and yield regulation, laying the groundwork for institutional conservation by integrating human utility with ecological limits, distinct from romantic preservationism.

Influential Political Leaders

Theodore Roosevelt, president from 1901 to 1909, stands as a pivotal figure in institutionalizing conservation through federal policy, emphasizing sustainable resource use informed by his experiences as a hunter and rancher. He established the in 1905 under 's leadership to manage forests for long-term timber production and watershed protection, reflecting a utilitarian approach to prevent resource exhaustion observed in overexploited western lands. During his tenure, Roosevelt designated 150 national forests, 51 federal bird reservations, five national parks, 18 national monuments via the , and four national game preserves, totaling approximately 230 million acres of protected public lands. These actions stemmed from first-hand encounters with habitat degradation during his 1903 train tour of western states, where he witnessed deforestation and erosion, prompting executive withdrawals of land from private exploitation to enable scientific management. Franklin D. Roosevelt, serving from 1933 to 1945, advanced conservation amid the by creating the (CCC) in 1933, which employed over 3 million young men in reforestation, soil erosion control, and park development projects across 828 camps, restoring degraded lands and demonstrating labor-intensive resource stewardship. His administration added 12.9 million acres to the and established the in 1935 to address causes through contour plowing and cover cropping, yielding measurable reductions in soil loss from 3 billion tons annually in the 1930s to stabilized rates post-intervention. These efforts built on progressive-era foundations but prioritized economic recovery via ecological repair, with CCC projects planting 3.5 billion trees and constructing 97,000 miles of erosion barriers. Lyndon B. Johnson, president from 1963 to 1969, signed the on September 3, 1964, designating 9.1 million acres of federal lands as wilderness areas impervious to development, preserving ecological integrity for future generations while allowing minimal human access for recreation and study. This legislation, rooted in 's land ethic, countered post-war expansion pressures by legally entrenching no-trace principles, later expanding to over 111 million acres. Johnson's policies also included the precursors and water quality initiatives, empirically linking habitat protection to species recovery, as evidenced by subsequent bald eagle population rebounds from near-extinction levels. In Europe, political leaders like German Chancellor influenced early forestry policies in the late 19th century by enforcing sustained-yield management in Prussian state forests, which had recovered from medieval overharvesting through systematic replanting and rotation cutting, achieving annual timber yields of 100 cubic meters per hectare by 1900 without depletion. French Third Republic officials under ministers like advanced landscape protection laws in the 1860s, restricting deforestation in alpine watersheds to mitigate flooding, with empirical data showing reduced erosion rates post-1870s regulations. These state-driven measures prefigured global conservation by prioritizing causal linkages between vegetation cover and hydrological stability over aesthetic or ideological motives.

Major Conservation Organizations and Their Roles

The Sierra Club, established on May 28, 1892, by naturalist and a group of Californians, initially focused on exploration and preservation of the Sierra Nevada mountains but expanded to advocate for national parks, forests, and wilderness protection across the United States. Its roles include litigation against development projects, policy lobbying for environmental legislation such as the Clean Air Act amendments, and grassroots mobilization, contributing to the protection of over 100 million acres of public lands through campaigns like the successful effort to block dams in in the 1950s and 1960s. The National Audubon Society, formed in 1905 amid concerns over plume hunting that decimated bird populations, centers on avian conservation through habitat restoration, policy advocacy, and public education. Its efforts have included establishing bird sanctuaries, influencing the , and monitoring threats like climate change impacts on species migration, with programs protecting over 100 Important Bird Areas covering millions of acres. The organization conducts scientific research, such as annual bird counts, to inform federal policies and has restored wetlands and forests critical for species like the , whose population rebounded from near extinction due in part to such targeted interventions. The Nature Conservancy, founded in 1951 as a science-based land trust, specializes in direct habitat protection by acquiring and managing properties, having conserved more than 125 million acres worldwide through purchases, easements, and partnerships. Key roles encompass ecological assessments to prioritize high-biodiversity sites, restoration of degraded lands—such as prairie grasslands and coastal wetlands—and collaboration with governments and private landowners, exemplified by its 2024 acquisition of 12,271 acres in northern Minnesota's boreal forest to safeguard water quality and wildlife corridors. This approach emphasizes sustainable land use compatible with human activities, differing from stricter preservation models by allowing controlled grazing or timber harvesting on protected sites. Internationally, the (WWF), launched in 1961 by conservationists including , raises funds for species and habitat protection, disbursing over $1 billion to more than 12,000 projects since 1995. Its roles involve on-the-ground initiatives like anti-poaching in Africa, debt-for-nature swaps that forgave billions in developing countries' debt in exchange for forest preservation, and global advocacy for treaties such as , which regulates trade in endangered species and has aided recoveries like the . WWF also conducts research on threats like deforestation, partnering with local communities for sustainable agriculture to reduce habitat loss in the and . The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), established in 1948 as the world's first global environmental union uniting governments, NGOs, and scientists, assesses species extinction risks via the , which evaluates over 150,000 species and informs policies like protected area designations. Its roles include providing technical advice on sustainable resource use, developing standards for ecosystem management, and facilitating international agreements, such as advising on the designation of over 1,200 covering 10% of global land area. The IUCN promotes evidence-based conservation, critiquing approaches lacking empirical support, and bridges policy with science through commissions of thousands of experts evaluating threats like invasive species and overexploitation.

Empirical Achievements

Species Population Recoveries

Conservation efforts have demonstrably reversed declines in multiple species populations through targeted interventions such as hunting bans, pesticide regulations, habitat protections, and captive breeding-reintroduction programs. A 2024 analysis of over 3,000 species found that conservation actions halted biodiversity loss in 23% of monitored cases, with population trajectories improving in high-risk species exhibiting smaller ranges and active management. These recoveries underscore causal links between policy enforcement and demographic rebound, though full self-sustainability often requires sustained monitoring amid persistent threats like climate variability and human encroachment. The bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) exemplifies recovery from pesticide-induced reproductive failure; its U.S. continental breeding pairs numbered fewer than 500 by the early 1960s due to DDT bioaccumulation thinning eggshells. The 1972 DDT ban, combined with Endangered Species Act safeguards and habitat acquisition, drove a resurgence to over 10,000 nesting pairs by 2007, when the species was delisted after meeting recovery benchmarks. As of 2023, populations have quadrupled since 2009, exceeding 316,000 individuals nationwide, with breeding pairs surpassing 70,000 in the lower 48 states. Similarly, the peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) plummeted in North America from DDT contamination, with eastern populations virtually extirpated by the 1960s. Post-DDT prohibition and a multi-decade hacking program releasing over 6,000 captive-bred fledglings, breeding pairs reached 1,650 across the U.S. and Canada by 2000, exceeding federal recovery goals of 631 pairs and enabling delisting in 1999 for the anatum subspecies. Annual monitoring confirms ongoing stability, though localized declines linked to avian influenza emerged post-2022. The American bison (Bison bison), reduced to under 1,000 individuals by 1890 from commercial overhunting, benefited from early 20th-century private and federal refuges, including 's remnant herd. Coordinated transfers via the and subsequent grassland restorations expanded herds to approximately 31,000 across the U.S., Canada, and Mexico by 2024, with wild populations fulfilling keystone ecological roles in prairie maintenance. Marine protections yielded gains for the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae), hunted to a global low of about 5,000 by the mid-20th century. The 1985 international whaling moratorium and Endangered Species Act listings facilitated a rebound to nearly 80,000 individuals worldwide, with North Pacific stocks rising from 16,875 in 2002 to a peak of 33,488 in 2012 before stabilizing near historical capacities. Delistings occurred for distinct population segments, such as the non-threatened status granted to southern U.S. stocks in 2016. The California condor (Gymnogyps californianus), down to 22 wild individuals captured for captive breeding in 1987 amid lead poisoning and habitat fragmentation, has grown to over 500 total birds through zoo-led propagation and releases since 1992. Approximately 350 now fly free across California, Arizona, Utah, and Baja California, supported by lead ammunition bans and supplemental feeding; however, lead toxicity persists as a primary mortality factor, necessitating ongoing interventions.
SpeciesEstimated Low PointCurrent Population (approx.)Key InterventionsDelisting Year (if applicable)
Bald Eagle417 pairs (1963)>316,000 individuals (2023)DDT ban, habitat protection2007
Near extirpation (1960s)>1,650 pairs (2000)Captive releases, pesticide ban1999
<1,000 (1890)31,000 (2024)Refuges, herd transfersN/A (not listed)
Humpback Whale~5,000 global (1960s)~80,000 global (recent)Whaling moratoriumPartial (e.g., 2016 for some stocks)
California Condor22 (1987)>500 total, 350 free-flying (2024)Captive breeding, lead reductionN/A (recovering)
These cases highlight empirical successes but also reveal dependencies on continuous , as unmitigated threats like toxins and collisions can erode gains.

Habitat and Ecosystem Restorations

The of degraded and has been a core empirical achievement of the conservation movement, yielding quantifiable gains in , , and hydrological stability through targeted interventions like , canal backfilling, and keystone reintroduction. These efforts often build on first-principles understanding of ecological processes, such as trophic dynamics and watershed connectivity, to reverse anthropogenic degradation from , , and channelization. Success metrics include increased vegetation cover, population rebounds, and reduced rates, as documented in and peer-reviewed assessments. The Restoration Project in , authorized by in 1992 and advanced by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, addressed the ecological collapse following the river's straightening into a 56-mile (C-38) between 1962 and 1971, which had drained 40 square miles of wetlands and diminished and populations by up to 90%. By July 2022, 22 miles of canal were fully backfilled, restoring meandering flow across 44 miles and rehabilitating 20,000 acres of floodplain wetlands, which enhanced nutrient cycling and flood attenuation. Native species responses included a tenfold increase in biomass and surges in wading bird numbers, such as wood storks and snail kites, validating the project's design based on pre-disturbance . Full completion, projected for 2030, will restore an additional 12,000 acres of wetlands, further boosting services like . In China's , one of the world's most eroded regions spanning 640,000 square kilometers, the Grain for Green Program—initiated in 1999 and converting 28 million hectares of cropland to forests and grasslands by 2010—achieved widespread vegetation recovery amid severe soil loss from millennia of farming. Satellite-derived NDVI data from MODIS showed greening trends in over 70% of the plateau from 2000 to 2015, with average vegetation cover rising from 31% in the 1990s to 59% by 2013, slashing sediment yields by 64% in treated watersheds and improving by up to 20%. These outcomes stemmed from terracing, check dams, and native species planting, which not only curbed through eco-compensation but also stabilized at 200 million tons annually. While some analyses note increased drought vulnerability in afforested areas due to higher , overall biophysical metrics confirm net positive function. The 1995–1996 reintroduction of 14 gray wolves (Canis lupus) to , after their extirpation by 1926, triggered a that reshaped and in a 9,000-square-kilometer . Wolf predation reduced (Cervus canadensis) densities by 50% over two decades and shifted their browsing away from riparian zones, enabling willow (Salix spp.) and aspen (Populus tremuloides) heights to increase by 2–5 meters and cover by 45% in key valleys, which fostered (Castor canadensis) colonies—from near absence to over 10 active dams by 2010—and subsequent pond formation benefiting amphibians and songbirds. A 20-year analysis affirmed these linkages, with indices rising across trophic levels, though confounding factors like reduced snowpack and competition moderated the cascade's magnitude in some models.
ProjectScaleKey Metrics
44 miles restored, 20,000 acres wetlands10x bass biomass; bird populations restored to pre-canal levels
28 million hectares converted28% vegetation cover increase; 64% sediment reduction
Yellowstone Wolves9,000 km² 50% elk decline; 45% riparian vegetation recovery
These cases illustrate how conservation-driven restorations, often state-led with adaptive , can yield scalable, evidence-based reversals of , though long-term viability depends on sustained amid pressures.

Quantifiable Economic and Resource Benefits

Visitor spending at U.S. sites generated $55.6 billion in economic output in , supporting 415,400 jobs and $19.4 billion in labor income nationwide. This impact stems from expenditures on lodging, food, transportation, and recreation, with multiplier effects boosting local economies through supply chains and induced spending. Similar dynamics apply to other conserved lands, where on U.S. Forest Service-managed areas contributed over $13 billion to the economy and sustained 205,000 jobs as of 2021. Conservation of working forests and farms yields sustained resource extraction, with privately conserved forests providing timber, , and ecosystem services that enhance long-term profitability. For instance, state investments in land return approximately $9 in economic value per $1 spent, primarily through improved , mitigation, and habitat services that reduce municipal treatment costs and support fisheries. preserved via conservation efforts underpins economic sectors like and pharmaceuticals, delivering $319 billion in annual U.S. benefits from , , and genetic resources. Soil and water conservation practices, integral to the movement's agricultural initiatives, prevent and maintain productivity, averting annual global losses estimated in the hundreds of billions from degraded . In the U.S., such measures enhance water and , yielding savings in and costs while bolstering through resilient ecosystems. These quantifiable returns demonstrate how sustains flows, enabling ongoing economic utilization without depletion.

Criticisms and Empirical Failures

Economic Costs and Inefficiencies

Conservation policies and programs have entailed substantial direct fiscal costs, often with limited measurable returns on investment. In the United States, federal spending on agricultural programs alone averaged between $6.0 and $6.5 billion annually in constant 2023 dollars under recent farm bills, initiatives like habitat restoration and land easements. For recovery under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, estimated annual costs exceed $1.5 billion, covering monitoring, habitat management, and enforcement for over 1,700 listed domestic . Despite these expenditures, recovery success remains low; only about 3% of listed have been delisted due to population since the Act's inception, with analyses indicating that ESA listing without accompanying substantial often hinders rather than aids recovery. Opportunity costs represent another layer of economic inefficiency, as protected areas forego alternative land uses such as , timber harvesting, or urban . Empirical studies quantify these as the expected value of forgone economic activities; for instance, in biodiversity hotspots, opportunity costs can equate to projected agricultural profits or resource extraction revenues displaced by designations. In the U.S., federal ownership of vast lands, including national parks and refuges, imposes ongoing opportunity costs by restricting productive uses, contributing to reduced local economic in high-potential areas where could generate higher returns. Heterogeneity in impacts is evident: protected areas tend to negatively affect in regions with high baseline opportunity costs, such as those suited for intensive resource extraction, while offering neutral or positive effects elsewhere. Planning and implementation inefficiencies exacerbate these costs, as conservation decisions frequently overlook full economic implications, leading to suboptimal . Common errors include underestimating transaction, management, and damage costs, or failing to incorporate opportunity costs into prioritization, which can compromise outcomes and burden local stakeholders, particularly in low-income settings. Lack of transparent reporting in projects hinders replication of effective interventions and perpetuates funding for less viable ones, with many efforts faltering due to unsustainable financing and inadequate long-term . In marine protected areas, for example, forgone fishing revenues impose direct losses on communities without always yielding proportional ecological gains, highlighting the need for rigorous cost-benefit frameworks often absent in policy design.

Property Rights Conflicts and Overregulation

The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 has generated significant property rights conflicts by imposing federal restrictions on private land use to protect endangered and their , often without providing compensation to affected owners. Under Section 9 of the ESA, landowners are prohibited from "taking" listed , which the U.S. interpreted in Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Communities for a Great (1995) to include significant habitat modification that indirectly harms , thereby limiting activities such as , farming, or on . This regulatory approach has led to de takings, where property values decline due to use restrictions, as evidenced by empirical analyses showing reduced land prices and development activity in areas with critical habitat designations. Landowners frequently face economic burdens from these habitat protections, including foregone income from restricted land uses and compliance costs that can exceed millions per . For instance, a study quantified the land market impacts of ESA listings, finding that protections for like the reduced nearby values by up to 20% in affected rural areas, as buyers anticipate future regulatory constraints. In response, some owners engage in "preemptive " to avoid detection and subsequent listings—a practice driven by the lack of incentives for voluntary —resulting in unintended biodiversity losses and heightened enforcement conflicts. These dynamics illustrate how rigid federal mandates prioritize preservation over private , eroding landowner cooperation essential for long-term management on the roughly 60% of U.S. located on private lands. Overregulation exacerbates these conflicts through expansive interpretations and administrative burdens that extend beyond direct species threats, stifling economic activity in resource-dependent sectors. Environmental laws, including those under the ESA and related statutes, have proliferated criminal penalties for inadvertent violations, with federal prosecutors increasingly applying standards that criminalize routine without intent to harm, leading to over 1,000 environmental prosecutions annually by the Department of Justice in the early . Critical designations, required under 4 of the ESA, often cover vast areas with marginal ecological value, imposing consultation requirements under 7 that delay projects by years and increase costs; a analysis estimated that such designations generate compliance expenses primarily borne by private entities, with limited evidence of proportional species recovery benefits. This bureaucratic layering discourages investment in conservation-friendly practices, as landowners perceive regulations as unpredictable and punitive rather than collaborative. Legal challenges highlight the tension between conservation goals and Fifth Amendment takings protections, though courts have upheld many restrictions absent total value diminishment. In Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal (1992), the established that regulations denying all economically beneficial use of constitute compensable takings, influencing subsequent ESA disputes, yet rules rarely trigger compensation due to partial-use allowances. Recent rulings, such as Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (2023), narrowed federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act—often intertwined with ESA protections—restoring some landowner discretion by rejecting vague "significant " tests that expanded regulatory reach over private dry . Despite these precedents, the absence of routine compensation mechanisms perpetuates adversarial relations, with proposals emphasizing property-rights-respecting alternatives like banks to align incentives without coercive overreach.

Policy and Implementation Shortcomings

Conservation policies often suffer from inadequate mechanisms, leading to persistent illegal activities within protected areas. For instance, in Colombian national parks, enforcement challenges include low detection rates and insufficient patrols, resulting in continued and habitat degradation despite legal designations. exacerbates this, as diverts resources and undermines effectiveness, with studies identifying oversight gaps and procedural ambiguities as key risks. Implementation delays between policy designation and action represent another systemic flaw, particularly in marine protected areas (MPAs). A review of global MPA plans revealed average gaps of over five years from establishment to operational management, during which threats like overfishing escalate unchecked. In Europe, the Natura 2000 network exemplifies partial failure, with 81% of assessed habitats and 63% of species in poor or bad conservation status as of 2020, attributable to conflicting agricultural subsidies and insufficient funding for on-ground actions. Funding shortages and mismatched timescales further impede success, as short-term political cycles prioritize immediate economic gains over long-term ecological monitoring. Surveys of conservation stakeholders across 68 countries rank lack of funding for science and implementation as a top barrier (median score 6.0/7), limiting in programs like the EU Water Framework Directive, where only 37% of surface waters achieved good status by 2024. Economic pressures, such as competing interests, often override conservation, as seen in policies where subsidies for and have outpaced protective measures, failing to curb net forest loss in regions like the Brazilian despite expanded reserves. Poor targeting of high-threat areas compounds inefficiencies; for example, Costa Rica's ecopayment scheme for forest preservation yielded minimal deforestation avoidance (less than 0.4% in early phases) because incentives favored low-risk lands selected by landowners, rather than addressing imminent conversion pressures. These shortcomings highlight how policy designs frequently overlook causal drivers like land tenure insecurity and commodity demand, resulting in non-implementation or suboptimal outcomes even where legal frameworks exist.

Major Controversies

Allegations of Social Exclusion and Bias

Critics have alleged that the conservation movement exhibits class-based , originating from its foundational leaders who were predominantly affluent white males prioritizing preservation as a recreational ideal over the economic necessities of working-class resource users. For instance, early 20th-century opposition to market hunting by elite sportsmen groups, such as those influenced by , framed commercial exploitation by lower-income hunters as vulgar, leading to policies that restricted access and livelihoods without accommodating socioeconomic disparities. This perspective, articulated in analyses of the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation, posits that such tenets reinforced exclusionary norms favoring "gentlemen sportsmen" ideals derived from upper-class sensibilities. Racial exclusion allegations center on the movement's historical ties to white supremacist ideologies and practices, including the displacement of and from conserved lands, compounded by segregation-era barriers to public parks and forests. Environmental organizations have faced scrutiny for persistently low representation of people of color; for example, a 2020 analysis highlighted how systemic barriers, from hiring biases to inequitable , have marginalized , , and other minority groups in science and practice. These claims are supported by documentation of early rhetoric that echoed eugenics-era concerns about urban "undesirables," including immigrants and minorities, encroaching on pristine spaces preserved for white elites. However, empirical studies note that while compositional underrepresentation persists— with environmental nonprofits showing levels far below national demographics—causal attributions to intentional bias versus self-selection or cultural mismatches remain debated. Gender bias allegations include documented cases of inequity and harassment within major organizations, such as 2019 reports from employees citing widespread and wage , prompting internal reckonings. Broader surveys of professionals indicate that women encounter barriers like undervalued contributions in male-dominated fieldwork and , exacerbating exclusion in a field historically shaped by patriarchal structures. Peer-reviewed assessments further argue that such biases hinder effective by limiting diverse perspectives, though quantitative evidence linking them directly to policy failures is limited. These critiques, often from academic and nonprofit sources, underscore calls for reform but have been countered by observations of increasing female leadership in recent decades, suggesting partial mitigation.

Tensions with Indigenous and Local Communities

The establishment of protected areas in the late 19th and early 20th centuries frequently involved the displacement of indigenous populations from ancestral lands, as seen in the creation of in 1872, where Native American tribes such as the , , and were forcibly removed to enable exclusive wildlife preservation and tourism, erasing their historical presence from official narratives. Similar patterns occurred in Yosemite and , where millennia of indigenous stewardship were overridden by federal policies prioritizing uninhabited wilderness ideals, leading to loss of access to , gathering, and sacred sites. These actions, rooted in settler colonial frameworks, imposed restrictions on traditional land uses without consent or compensation, fostering long-term grievances over and resource rights. In , contemporary tensions persist through state-led evictions framed as conservation necessities, exemplified by Tanzania's and Loliondo Game Controlled Area, where since 2009, thousands of Maasai pastoralists have been forcibly relocated to accommodate and , resulting in documented abuses including arbitrary arrests, village burnings, and livelihood disruptions from restricted grazing and water access. In Uganda's , Batwa indigenous peoples were evicted in the 1990s without consultation to establish gorilla conservation zones, leading to impoverishment, cultural erosion, and exclusion from benefits like revenues, despite their prior practices. Kenya's Ogiek communities faced repeated evictions from the since the 20th century, culminating in legal battles; a 2025 study highlighted well-being declines including food insecurity and from land loss, underscoring how conservation enforcement often prioritizes metrics over local socio-economic realities. These conflicts extend to Asia, where India's tiger reserves, such as Kanha and Sariska, have displaced tribes since the 1970s under , restricting and nontimber forest product collection, which comprised up to 50% of household incomes in affected areas, prompting increased and . Empirical analyses indicate that such exclusionary models correlate with higher rates due to lost community buy-in, as locals perceive conservation as alien imposition rather than shared . While proponents argue these measures avert —evidenced by tiger population rebounds from 1,411 in 2006 to 3,167 in 2022—critics, including affected communities, contend that top-down policies undervalue , which peer-reviewed syntheses show sustain effectively when integrated, yet are sidelined in favor of fortress-style reserves. Broader data reveal that conservation-related displacements contribute to over 1,000 global conflicts impacting groups, with dispossession and losses as primary drivers, often exacerbating despite gains. In regions like Latin America's , similar dynamics pit expansions against extractive rights, though empirical evidence suggests co-management models—where locals retain usage rights—yield superior outcomes for both ecosystems and , highlighting tensions as stemming from failures rather than inherent incompatibility. Such cases underscore causal links between exclusionary and social unrest, including fortified boundaries and militarized enforcement, which undermine long-term efficacy by alienating stewards whose practices predate modern initiatives.

Debates Over Human-Centric vs. Nature-Centric Priorities

The debate within the conservation movement between -centric (anthropocentric or utilitarian) and nature-centric (biocentric or ecocentric) priorities centers on whether nature's value derives primarily from its utility to s—such as providing resources, economic benefits, and ecosystem services—or from its intrinsic worth independent of needs. Proponents of -centric approaches argue that framing conservation around tangible benefits, like sustainable timber harvesting or wildlife utilization for food and income, fosters broader political support and long-term compliance, as evidenced by Gifford Pinchot's early 20th-century advocacy for "the greatest good of the greatest number in the long run" through managed use of public lands. In contrast, nature-centric advocates, exemplified by John Muir's preservationist ethos, contend that nature possesses inherent rights to exist unaltered, prioritizing protection over any exploitation, a view that influenced the establishment of national parks like Yosemite in 1890 but clashed with utilitarian policies. A pivotal historical flashpoint was the 1906–1913 controversy over the Hetch Hetchy Valley in , where Pinchot supported damming the to supply water to San Francisco's growing population of over 400,000, emphasizing efficient resource allocation for urban needs, while decried it as of a "temple" of , mobilizing public opposition through writings that portrayed the project as sacrilege against pristine landscapes. The dam's approval by in and completion in 1923 provided reliable water and hydroelectric power to millions, averting shortages during California's population boom, yet it flooded 1,700 acres of valley floor, underscoring nature-centric critiques that utilitarian decisions irreversibly sacrifice ecological integrity for short-term human gains. Pinchot's approach, rooted in from his Yale training and in the , contributed to the U.S. Forest Service's creation in 1905 and of 193 million acres by 1940, yielding empirical successes in timber regeneration rates exceeding pre-conservation levels in managed forests. In modern contexts, human-centric strategies emphasize services valued at $125–145 trillion annually globally, integrating with human demands to enhance outcomes, as studies show that plans accounting for resource demand achieve targets 20–30% more efficiently than exclusionary models without compromising protection. -centric initiatives, such as the 2010 "Nature Needs Half" proposal advocating 50% of Earth's land for strict protection, argue for biocentric ethics to counter anthropocentric exploitation, claiming superior long-term preservation by limiting human intrusion, though critics note limited empirical evidence of scalability amid rising global populations exceeding 8 billion in 2022. Utilitarian models have demonstrated pragmatic effectiveness, as in North American where regulated since the 1930s Pittman-Robertson Act has funded restorations recovering populations like from near-extinction lows of under 500,000 in the 1930s to over 30 million by 2010, generating $2.7 billion in annual economic activity while maintaining herd health. These priorities often occupy complementary niches rather than mutually exclusive ones, with anthropocentric incentives driving local participation—such as community-based sustainable use in African savannas yielding 15–20% higher compliance rates than top-down preservation—while nature-centric principles safeguard against in vulnerable ecosystems. However, tensions persist, as biocentric absolutism has been linked to failures, including reduced when benefits are downplayed, whereas overly anthropocentric views risk commodifying nature without safeguards, as seen in debates over "new conservation" since 2014, which prioritizes metrics over pure counts but faces accusations from traditionalists of diluting ecological imperatives. Empirical assessments, including meta-analyses of 100+ protected areas, indicate hybrid approaches balancing both yield the highest success rates in halting habitat loss, with strict nature-centric reserves effective for endemic but utilitarian zones better for widespread dependent on managed landscapes. This ongoing contention reflects causal realities: -centric framing aligns incentives with demographic pressures, yet unchecked utility maximization historically preceded needs, necessitating reasoned integration over ideological purity.

Evidence-Based Conservation

Origins and Methodological Framework

Evidence-based conservation emerged in the early 2000s as a response to the observed deficiencies in traditional conservation practices, which often relied on untested assumptions rather than empirical validation of intervention effectiveness. Drawing inspiration from , particularly the Cochrane Collaboration's methods established in the , conservation biologists sought to apply rigorous scientific scrutiny to actions aimed at protecting and ecosystems. The Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation (CEBC), founded in 2003 at the , represented an early institutional effort to promote of environmental interventions and human impacts, coordinating global efforts through the Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (CEE) and providing training in evidence synthesis. A pivotal development occurred around when Professor William Sutherland of the identified a critical gap in data-driven decision-making within , leading to the initiation of the Conservation Evidence project. This initiative began as an effort to collate and synthesize global research on conservation interventions, evolving into a free, open-access database that now includes over 8,900 summaries of studies testing more than 3,600 actions across 24 groups and habitats, drawn from scans of 1.6 million papers in over 650 journals. The project's goal was to shift conservation from anecdotal or ideologically driven approaches to ones grounded in verifiable outcomes, highlighting that many common practices lack supporting evidence or demonstrate limited efficacy. The methodological of evidence-based centers on systematic , akin to clinical trials and meta-analyses in , but adapted to the complexities of ecological systems where controlled experiments are challenging. Core to this is the production of subject-specific synopses, which follow a pre-registered outlining searches, criteria, and standards; these protocols are reviewed by an international advisory board of experts from academia, practice, and policy, and registered on platforms like the Open Science to ensure transparency and reproducibility. Studies are categorized based on empirical results—such as interventions showing benefits, trade-offs, no effects, or evidence of harm—prioritizing peer-reviewed experimental and observational data over expert opinion alone. Annual publications like What Works in Conservation, first issued in , distill these findings into actionable guidance, emphasizing causal links between actions and outcomes through statistical aggregation where possible. This framework underscores causal by focusing on interventions with demonstrated, context-specific effectiveness, while acknowledging data gaps that necessitate further primary .

Key Empirical Outcomes and Case Studies

A 2024 meta-analysis of 665 conservation s from 186 peer-reviewed studies found that targeted actions improved states or slowed declines in 66% of measured cases relative to no , providing robust for the efficacy of evidence-informed approaches. Successful s spanned control (effective in over 80% of trials), establishment and management, habitat restoration, and sustainable harvesting regimes, with effect sizes often comparable to or exceeding those in medical or social s. These outcomes underscore causal links between deliberate, evidence-guided actions and preservation, though effectiveness varied by context and required ongoing monitoring to counter external threats like . Invasive species eradication exemplifies these outcomes, particularly on islands where removal of non-native predators has triggered rapid recovery. For instance, systematic control on has led to population increases in seabirds and endemic mammals, with meta-analyses confirming rebounds in breeding success and abundance post-eradication, often within 5-10 years. Such interventions, informed by prior experimental evidence on predator impacts, have restored functions in over 70% of documented island cases. Protected area implementation provides another key case, where empirical evaluations from 1970-2019 across global sites demonstrated reduced habitat loss and elevated persistence rates. In tropical forests, protected status correlated with 10-30% lower compared to adjacent unprotected lands, based on satellite-monitored data from hundreds of reserves, enabling population stabilization for threatened taxa like and amphibians. These results, derived from before-after-control-impact designs, highlight the causal role of legal designation and enforcement in averting declines. Sustainable harvesting management, guided by stock assessments and yield models, has empirically sustained fisheries and game populations. In marine contexts, quota systems informed by population modeling data have reversed overexploitation in 60% of evaluated fisheries, restoring biomass levels to pre-decline thresholds within decades, as seen in North Atlantic cod recovery efforts post-1990s reforms. Terrestrial analogs, such as regulated trophy hunting in African savannas, maintained elephant and ungulate numbers while generating revenue for anti-poaching, with long-term monitoring confirming stability absent such evidence-based limits.

Challenges in Applying Evidence to Policy

One primary challenge in applying to stems from the low political priority afforded to relative to immediate economic or developmental imperatives, leading policymakers to favor short-term gains over long-term empirical outcomes. A 2018 analysis identified this as a major barrier, noting that often competes unsuccessfully with sectors like or , where quantifiable returns are more readily apparent to voters and stakeholders. Similarly, mismatches in timescales exacerbate this issue: typically emerges from multi-year studies tracking ecological responses, such as recovery rates following establishment, while cycles demand rapid decisions aligned with electoral or fiscal calendars. For instance, evaluations of marine s, which may require 5–10 years to demonstrate rebounds as seen in studies from the (with fish increases of up to 30% post-implementation in restricted zones by 2012), often outpace review windows. Complexity and uncertainty in conservation evidence further hinder policy translation, as ecological systems involve nonlinear dynamics and confounding variables that defy simple causal models. Evidence-based approaches demand rigorous counterfactual evaluations, yet many policies rely on correlational data or untested assumptions, such as assuming uniform efficacy of habitat corridors across fragmented landscapes without site-specific validation. A 2019 review cataloged over 230 barriers, including inaccessible or irrelevant evidence perceived by practitioners, with surveys indicating that only 20–30% of conservation interventions are supported by high-quality, context-specific trials akin to those in . Publication biases against negative results compound this, distorting the evidence base; for example, ineffective reintroduction programs for species like the (with survival rates below 50% in early releases due to overlooked in initial models) are underreported, leading to repeated policy errors. Political interference poses additional risks to scientific integrity in policy processes, where evidence is selectively interpreted or sidelined to accommodate ideological or economic pressures. A of U.S. and international cases found that aspects like and data transparency are vulnerable, as seen in delistings of species under the Endangered Species Act (e.g., the push to remove gray wolves from protections despite ongoing population viability debates, ignoring longitudinal data showing genetic bottlenecks). Fragmented advisory systems and weak researcher-policymaker communication, highlighted in systematic reviews, result in policies that prioritize precautionary measures over probabilistic evidence, potentially inefficiently allocating resources—such as the $8.1 billion annual U.S. federal spending on in 2020, much of which lacks rigorous . Addressing these requires institutional reforms like mandatory evidence audits, though entrenched interests often resist such accountability.

Global and Regional Applications

North America and Boreal Regions

The conservation movement in began in the United States with the creation of on March 1, 1872, designated by Congress to protect its unique geothermal features, wildlife, and landscapes from commercial exploitation, marking the first in the world. This initiative was driven by concerns over , including overhunting and loss, influencing subsequent policies like the establishment of the U.S. Forest Service in 1905 under , which emphasized for sustained yield of timber, water, and wildlife. President expanded protections through the of 1906, creating 18 national monuments and adding over 230 million acres to forest reserves by 1909, prioritizing pragmatic resource use over absolute preservation. In Canada, early efforts paralleled U.S. developments, with established in 1885 to safeguard Rocky Mountain scenery and hot springs, followed by the formation of in 1911 to manage expanding national parks systems. The region, encompassing about 55% of Canada's landmass and storing vast carbon reserves equivalent to 26 years of global emissions, has seen targeted policies like the 2003 Canadian Boreal Forest Conservation Framework, which proposes protecting at least 50% of the intact forest in interconnected areas while allowing on the rest. Approximately 94% of Canadian forests are publicly owned, enabling federal oversight, though only around 12% of the forest was formally protected as of 2020, with indigenous-led initiatives expanding coverage through Indigenous Protected and Conserved Areas (IPCAs). Empirical outcomes demonstrate mixed success: U.S. protected areas, covering about 13% of land, have contributed to species recoveries, such as grizzly bears in the , where populations stabilized post-1975 Endangered Species Act listings due to habitat safeguards and reduced poaching. In , boreal conservation has preserved biodiversity hotspots, with studies showing protected areas reduce deforestation rates by up to 50% compared to unmanaged lands, though overall decline persists from climate-driven wildfires and outbreaks. A global indicates conservation actions, including North American parks, improve states or slow declines in two-thirds of cases, underscoring causal links between protected status and . Challenges persist, particularly in boreal regions where annual logging exceeds 1 million hectares, often conflicting with ; for instance, Quebec's 2025 forestry reforms prioritized timber quotas over consultations, drawing criticism from for exacerbating and caribou declines. lands overlap 36% of intact forests, and IPCA expansions have enhanced outcomes by integrating , yet enforcement gaps allow industrial activities like to undermine , flipping sinks to sources in disturbed areas. These tensions highlight causal trade-offs between economic extraction and long-term , with evidence favoring expanded for sustainable results.

Latin America and Tropical Forests


Conservation efforts in Latin America's tropical forests, particularly the Amazon basin spanning nine countries, emerged prominently in the late 20th century amid rapid deforestation driven by agriculture, logging, and mining. Brazil's Amazon region alone lost substantial forest cover in the 1970s-1980s due to highway construction and settlement policies, prompting international attention and domestic policy shifts. By the 1990s, initiatives like Brazil's creation of protected areas and enforcement of forest codes began to curb losses, with deforestation rates dropping 80% between 2004 and 2012 through satellite monitoring and governance reforms. Costa Rica exemplifies a successful model in Central America's tropical forests, reversing net deforestation after decades of loss; from 1940 to 1980, forest cover fell from 75% to 25% of the country, but by 2020, it had recovered to over 50% through payments for services (PES) introduced in 1997, which compensated landowners for forest preservation via taxes on and fees. This program, covering 25% of national territory by 2010, correlated with reduced inside protected areas compared to surrounding lands. Strictly protected areas across have avoided more than multiple-use zones under equivalent pressure, though enforcement gaps persist. Indigenous-managed territories have demonstrated lower deforestation rates, with Afro-descendant lands in , , , and showing up to 55% less loss than national averages, highlighting community-led stewardship's role in conservation outcomes. However, challenges include and fires, which drove record loss in 2024 across the region, exacerbated by and weak governance. In , 3.4 million hectares were lost from 2000-2020, mainly in non-flooded rainforests, underscoring uneven policy impacts. Tensions arise when protected areas restrict access without adequate consultation, though empirical data affirm that resistance has historically aided long-term forest retention. Regional regrowth totaled 36.2 million hectares from 2000-2010, driven by recovery and policy interventions, yet South America's annual forest loss, while halved since 1990, remains the highest globally at millions of hectares yearly. Initiatives like 's Reserves emphasize biodiversity conservation alongside sustainable livelihoods, but causal analysis reveals that economic incentives and strict enforcement, rather than solely international pressure, drive verifiable reductions in pressure.

Africa and Savanna Ecosystems

African savanna ecosystems, spanning approximately 13.5 million km² or nearly half the continent, have been focal points for conservation since the early 20th century, with about 10% under formal protection. Early efforts emphasized establishing national parks to safeguard wildlife amid colonial-era hunting pressures, such as Kruger National Park in South Africa, initially protected in 1898 and formalized as the country's first national park in 1926, encompassing 19,485 km² of savanna and supporting large mammal populations through anti-poaching patrols and habitat management. Similarly, Serengeti National Park in Tanzania, designated in 1951, protects migratory herds via fenced and unfenced zones, though empirical data indicate variable efficacy depending on connectivity. Community-based has emerged as a prominent model, particularly in , where communal conservancies established under 1990s reforms devolve rights to locals, generating incentives through and revenues exceeding N$100 million annually by 2022. In these areas, wildlife populations, including and black rhinos, have recovered since 2001 monitoring began, with game counts showing increases in species like oryx and due to reduced and . Transfrontier initiatives, such as the Kavango-Zambezi area spanning , , , , and , aim to link savannas for migration, stabilizing numbers in connected protected zones compared to isolated ones. Despite successes, empirical assessments reveal widespread challenges, with over 80% of savanna conservation lands in failing or concerning states as of 2021, often due to inadequate governance, funding shortfalls, and encroachment. Poaching has declined continent-wide—from peaks exceeding 10% annual elephant mortality in 2011 to under 4% by 2017—yet savanna elephant populations fell 70% on average from 1964 to 2016, driven by habitat fragmentation and illegal trade. Human-wildlife conflicts exacerbate issues, with crop raiding and livestock predation reported in 70-90% of communities near Tanzanian wildlife management areas, leading to retaliatory killings unless mitigated by compensation or barriers. Fencing debates persist: while effective for reducing incursions in South African parks, it disrupts migrations elsewhere, underscoring the need for evidence-based connectivity over rigid exclusion. Overall, savanna conservation outcomes hinge on integrating local incentives with robust enforcement, as disconnected or under-resourced areas show trophic downgrading, including population crashes in fragmented landscapes. Prioritizing data from aerial surveys and ground monitoring reveals that while Namibia's model yields economic benefits—conservancies covering 20% of land and hosting 70% of wildlife—scaling it requires addressing and , which correlate with higher rates.

Asia-Pacific and Island Biodiversity

The region hosts extraordinary , including the Coral Triangle—spanning , , , the , , and —which contains over 600 species and 2,000 reef species, representing 75% of known species globally. However, empirical assessments indicate ongoing declines, with human expansion driving loss in , particularly in , , and , where forest cover reductions and agricultural intensification have accelerated extinctions since 2000. ecosystems in the Pacific, characterized by high endemism, suffer from introductions and sea-level rise, exacerbating erosion documented in long-term monitoring data. Conservation efforts emphasize protected area expansion and regional partnerships. Over the past 25 years, marine protected areas in the region have increased significantly, covering key hotspots, though terrestrial protection lags, with systematic planning suggesting that reallocating efforts could double protected per unit area in areas like . The Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries, and (CTI-CFF), launched in by the six member countries, aims to sustain through national plans for protected areas, sustainable fisheries, and threat reduction, yielding measurable outcomes such as improved in over 20 million square kilometers of . In , the , established in 1975 and expanded to 344,400 square kilometers, enforces that has supported partial ; surveys from 2023-2024 reported region-wide hard cover stabilizing or increasing in southern sectors to 39.1%, attributed to reduced cyclone impacts and crown-of-thorns starfish control, though northern areas remain below 10% due to cumulative bleaching events. Pacific island nations have prioritized invasive species eradication and ecosystem restoration, with initiatives like New Zealand's funding for strategies aligning to Aichi Targets under the , achieving successes in removing rats from over 10 islands since 2010, which boosted populations by up to 500% in treated sites. In , efforts by organizations such as have focused on sustainable fisheries in Pacific waters, enhancing revenues while reducing , though enforcement gaps persist amid that depletes stocks by 20-30% annually in some areas. Empirical evaluations highlight mixed results: while protected areas have curbed some rates—dropping from 2-4% annual forest loss in parts of and between 1973 and 2009—commodity-driven land conversion continues to threaten 50% or more of species-rich landscapes. Challenges include balancing economic development with conservation, as rapid and expansion in and have offset gains, with intactness indices falling below 50% in converted zones per 2020 global assessments. Climate-driven threats, such as episodes reducing live cover by 14% globally since 2019, compound local pressures, underscoring the need for ; failures in policy implementation, often due to weak governance in remote islands, have led to persistent and despite international funding. Nonetheless, evidence from case studies, including reef restoration via coral IVF techniques trialed in —which achieved 100-fold fertilization rate improvements by 2024—demonstrates potential for scalable interventions when integrated with empirical monitoring.

Modern Developments and Future Directions

Technological and Market-Based Innovations

Technological innovations have enhanced conservation efforts by enabling precise, large-scale monitoring of ecosystems and species. via has proven effective for detecting in , as demonstrated by Brazil's DETER system, which uses near-real-time alerts to support enforcement under the Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Deforestation in the Legal (PPCDAm), contributing to measurable reductions in forest loss rates from 2004 onward. Similarly, () satellites monitor insensitive to , allowing consistent tracking in tropical regions where optical imagery fails, with studies showing high accuracy in detecting structural changes indicative of or fires. Drones equipped with thermal imaging and AI algorithms have improved anti-poaching operations by automating patrols and detecting intruders over vast areas. In Zimbabwe's , drone deployments reduced poaching incidents by 65% through rapid response to waterhole threats, where was prevalent. -driven analysis of drone footage and data further refines predictive models for poacher hotspots, integrating behavioral patterns to prioritize ranger deployments, as seen in where enhanced wildlife surveys and herd tracking. Market-based instruments leverage economic incentives to align private interests with conservation goals, though empirical outcomes vary. Reducing Emissions from and (REDD+) projects, which generate carbon credits for verified reductions, slowed by approximately 30% in participating Peruvian communities relative to controls between 2010 and 2018, without altering local economic or conservation attitudes. However, a review of 48 tropical REDD+ initiatives found that only 13.2% of issued credits represented genuine offsets, with many overestimating baselines due to methodological flaws like ignoring natural variability or leakage. Emerging credit markets, such as those piloted in agricultural landscapes, aim to quantify and trade habitat improvements, but case studies in highlight challenges in scaling due to verification costs and additionality concerns. These mechanisms demonstrate potential for funding when paired with rigorous baselines, yet require ongoing scrutiny to avoid inflating conservation impacts.

Recent Policy Shifts and Community-Led Initiatives (2020s)

In December 2022, parties to the adopted the at COP15, establishing targets including the protection of 30% of global land and ocean areas by 2030, alongside restoration of degraded ecosystems and sustainable use practices. Implementation has lagged, with only modest expansions in protected areas reported by 2024, constrained by funding shortfalls and competing land-use pressures. Concurrently, the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2020-2030 integrated plant-specific objectives into broader goals, emphasizing empirical monitoring of recovery amid ongoing . In the United States, the of 2020 allocated $900 million annually through 2025 to the Land and Water Conservation Fund, enabling acquisition of over 1 million acres for public lands and habitat protection by 2023. The of 2021 further directed billions toward restoration, including mitigation and forest health initiatives, though critics noted insufficient safeguards against development offsets. By 2025, adjustments to Endangered Species Act rules under Section 4(d) permitted flexible protections for certain , aiming to balance with economic activities like ranching, based on site-specific threat assessments rather than uniform restrictions. Globally, for shifted toward domestic and private sources, with international declining due to geopolitical tensions and fiscal constraints in donor nations. Community-led initiatives gained traction, particularly those stewarded by and local communities, which empirical studies indicate outperform state-managed efforts in reducing and maintaining . For instance, indigenous-managed forests in the exhibited 2-3 times lower rates than adjacent territories from 2015-2020, a trend persisting into the through territorial titling and . In , the Thaidene Nëné , established in 2023 as an indigenous-Crown covering 26,000 square kilometers, integrates with monitoring to safeguard boreal ecosystems, yielding early successes in caribou habitat recovery. U.S. examples include 2023 designations of national monuments on sacred lands, banning extractive activities and enabling community-monitored stewardship, alongside training programs funded for rangers to track and cultural sites. These approaches emphasize local enforcement and economic incentives, such as eco-tourism, over top-down regulations, correlating with higher compliance and sustained outcomes where formal policies falter.

Prospects for Sustainable Integration with Economic Growth

Payments for ecosystem services (PES) represent a key mechanism for aligning conservation incentives with economic benefits, compensating landowners for maintaining ecological functions such as and preservation. Evaluations of Rica's nationwide PES program, launched in 1997, show it reversed trends, increasing national from 21% in 1987 to 57% by 2017 through contracts prioritizing conservation easements. This expansion occurred alongside robust , with —dependent on conserved ecosystems—generating approximately 5% of GDP by 2019 via visitor spending exceeding $3.4 billion annually. Such programs yield diversified income streams for participants, including stable payments that reduce reliance on extractive activities, though benefits accrue disproportionately to larger landholders without targeted reforms. Ecotourism further illustrates integration potential by monetizing biodiversity without depleting it, as evidenced by randomized trials in where community-based initiatives curbed by 10-20% in treated areas while boosting local employment and income through visitor revenues. In contexts, wildlife-based has diversified economies in countries like and , sustaining such as mountain gorillas—whose populations stabilized post-2000 due to protections funded by —while contributing up to 10% of GDP in high-biodiversity nations by channeling fees into and . These models rely on secure property rights and to prevent leakage, where in one area displaces degradation elsewhere, but empirical outcomes affirm net positive ecological and economic synergies when scaled appropriately. Prospects brighten with extensions of the environmental to , where panel data across countries reveal an N-shaped trajectory: initial growth exacerbates losses, but post-threshold advancements—often above $5,000-10,000 per capita GDP—enable reductions via technological efficiency and policy investments. Emerging credit markets, piloted in regions like and voluntary schemes globally, aim to commodify measurable gains in or quality, potentially mobilizing private capital akin to carbon offsets to fund without growth trade-offs. Success hinges on standardized metrics and avoidance of greenwashing, yet early frameworks suggest to bridge gaps estimated at $700-800 billion annually for nature-positive outcomes. Overall, these instruments underscore that integration thrives under discipline and empirical validation, countering narratives of inherent conflict by demonstrating causal links from prosperity to enhanced .

References

  1. [1]
    Conservation in the Progressive Era | Library of Congress
    Conservation of the nation's resources, putting an end to wasteful uses of raw materials, and the reclamation of large areas of neglected land
  2. [2]
    THE CONSERVATION MOVEMENT GROWS 1898-1917
    Around 1900, the forest conservation movement began to expand greatly under the dynamic leadership of Gifford Pinchot. Pinchot brought the word ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  3. [3]
    Gifford Pinchot: The Father of Forestry (U.S. National Park Service)
    May 9, 2018 · Gifford Pinchot was an important figure in the American conservation movement. As the first chief of the US Forest Service, Pinchot tripled ...Missing: origins Theodore
  4. [4]
    Theodore Roosevelt and Conservation - National Park Service
    Nov 16, 2017 · During his presidency,Theodore Roosevelt protected approximately 230 million acres of public land. Today, the legacy of Theodore Roosevelt is ...
  5. [5]
    Theodore Roosevelt (1858-1919) The Conservation President
    In 1905, Roosevelt created the U.S. Forest Service with Gifford Pinchot as its first Chief Forester. Pinchot's acute eye for habitat helped add critical forests ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  6. [6]
    Preservation versus Conservation – Theodore Roosevelt and the ...
    Conservation focuses on the use and proper management of resources, while preservationist ideas include avoiding affecting the land completely.
  7. [7]
    Conservation vs. Preservation - Population Education
    Jun 5, 2023 · Conservation promotes responsible, sustainable use of natural resources. Meanwhile, preservation aims to protect the environment from all extractive human ...
  8. [8]
    Gifford Pinchot The First Conservationist - Maryland DNR
    Because of his work in forestry, Gifford Pinchot was able to bring the principle and policy of conservation into the world. In the early 1900s, more than 20 ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  9. [9]
    Evelyn's Sylva, or a Discourse on Forest Trees
    He vehemently advocated an extensive reforestation program and the systematic foundation of forests and parks in England. Evelyn received a lot of attention for ...Missing: conservation | Show results with:conservation
  10. [10]
    In retrospect: Sylva - Nature
    Mar 12, 2014 · Gabriel Hemery celebrates the 350th anniversary of John Evelyn's treatise on the science and practice of forestry.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] A conceptual history of 'sustainable development' (Nachhaltigkeit)
    Sustainable development's roots trace back to forestry's 'sustained yield', early Enlightenment, and the word 'Nachhaltigkeit' coined in 1713. It was defined ...
  12. [12]
    The origin and early application of the principle of sustainable forest ...
    The need for sustainable forests was first expressed in Germany in 1713. Methods to achieve sustainability were introduced in Germany and Austria around 1800.
  13. [13]
    European forest ecosystems: building the future on the legacy of the ...
    The scientific approach to the management of forests in Europe has been based upon the maintenance of a sustained yield of wood supply. Modern ideas of ...
  14. [14]
    Gifford Pinchot (1865-1946) - Forest History Society
    Pinchot had a strong hand in guiding the fledgling organization toward the utilitarian philosophy of the "greatest good for the greatest number." Pinchot added ...<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    [PDF] A Brief History of American Conservation Philosophy
    American conservation includes wilderness preservation (Emerson, Thoreau, Muir), resource management (Pinchot), and human harmony with nature (Leopold). Marsh ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] John Muir and Gifford Pinchot - Teach Engineering
    John Muir believed that the wilderness should be preserved. Gifford Pinchot thought that the environment should be conserved. Both men were leaders in the ...
  17. [17]
    Conservation: History and Future of Conservationism
    It is a practice and a philosophy, utilizing scientific tools and methods with applied ethics, and, where necessary, regulation and environmental law to limit ...
  18. [18]
    Conservationism vs. Environmentalism: What's the Difference?
    Jul 26, 2022 · At first glance, the objective of both conservationism and environmentalism appears to be similar: To conserve our planet.Radical Environmentalism as... · Pragmatism Applied to...
  19. [19]
    Radical Conservation: Misdirections, New Directions
    The crucial difference between convivial conservation, mainstream conservation, and the other two radical alternatives is that convivial conservation ...
  20. [20]
    https://www.fs.usda.gov/greatestgood/press/mediakit/facts/pinchot.shtml
  21. [21]
    https://buddtitlow.com/now-is-the-time/f/gifford-pinchot-and-the-us-forest-service
  22. [22]
    Conservation Timeline 1901-2000 - Marsh - National Park Service
    Feb 26, 2015 · Key conservation events include Roosevelt's focus on conservation, the creation of wildlife refuges, the National Park Service, the Wilderness ...
  23. [23]
    Highlights in the history of forest conservation
    best use, for human welfare, the 664 million acres of land most suitable for forest and related purposes. Man has made spectacular gains in the methods for ...
  24. [24]
    History of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    The origins of the US Fish and Wildlife Service began in 1871 with the creation of the United States Commission of Fish and Fisheries.
  25. [25]
    How sustainable forestry evolved from the early 1900s until now
    Jul 16, 2025 · Early forestry lacked sustainability, but overharvesting led to environmental awareness, regulations, and a shift to ecosystem-based management.
  26. [26]
    Conservation or Preservation: Which Is Best?
    Rating 5.0 (20) Feb 18, 2020 · While conservation is aimed at repairing the damage, preservation seeks to prevent it from occurring in the first place. It's said that during ...Missing: distinction | Show results with:distinction
  27. [27]
    The Charter of the Forest: Evolving Human Rights in Nature
    The Charter of the Forest of 1217, is among the first statutes in environmental law of any nation. Crafted to reform patently unjust governance of natural ...Missing: conservation | Show results with:conservation
  28. [28]
    What we have in common: The Forest Charter and shared ...
    Apr 29, 2021 · At least in Europe, the Charter of the Forest may well have been the first environmental statute. The Charter was sealed in St. Paul's.
  29. [29]
    Tree rings reveal signs of Europe's sustainable forest management ...
    Dec 11, 2020 · To satisfy the increasing demand for wood in central Europe during medieval times, a new system of forest management was developed, ...
  30. [30]
    Commons as Traditional Means of Sustainably Managing Forests ...
    The capacity of contemporary commons to economically, ecologically and socially support local sustainable development lies in the long tradition of these ...
  31. [31]
    Indigenous Fire Practices Shape our Land - National Park Service
    Mar 18, 2024 · Native Americans, Alaska Natives, and Native Hawaiians used fire to clear areas for crops and travel, to manage the land for specific species of both plants ...
  32. [32]
    On Controlling Fire, New Lessons from a Deep Indigenous Past
    Jul 24, 2025 · For centuries, the Native people of North America used controlled burns to manage the continent's forests. In an e360 interview, ecologist ...
  33. [33]
    The historical foundations of prescribed burning for wildlife
    Controlled burning has deep historical roots in the South, where the practice was quickly adopted from the Indians by early European settlers.
  34. [34]
    Conservation through Biocultural Heritage—Examples from Sub ...
    In this paper, we review the potential of biocultural heritage in biodiversity protection and agricultural innovation in sub-Saharan Africa.<|control11|><|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Indigenous practices of environmental sustainability in the Tonga ...
    Nov 3, 2016 · The study reveals that selective harvesting, totemism and taboos, organic farming, crop rotation and intercropping, sacredness of water sources ...
  36. [36]
    Indigenous Systems of Management for Culturally and Ecologically ...
    Dec 9, 2020 · Indigenous management systems are placed based and typically govern resource management decisions locally, controlling resource access, land ...
  37. [37]
    Hans Carl von Carlowitz and “Sustainability”
    The concept of “sustainability,” or “Nachhaltigkeit” in German, can be traced back to Hans Carl von Carlowitz (1645–1714), who managed mining on behalf of the ...Missing: 19th century
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Cotta's Preface | Forest History Society
    Heinrich Cotta, born in in Thuringia, said of himself: “I am a child of the forest; no roof covers the spot where I was born.Missing: 19th | Show results with:19th
  39. [39]
    [PDF] The History of Protected Forest Areas in Europe - BFW
    ▫ First forest laws enacted in the 19th century. In parallel: regular ... ⇒ Nature Conservation Movements in the 19th and 20th century. (first modern ...
  40. [40]
    A Brief History of Forestry in Europe, the United States, and Other ...
    The argument of the protective influence of forest cover did not enter into this legislation; this argument belongs to the 19th century. Yet reboisement of ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] EUROPEAN & AMERICAN FORESTRY - Forest History Society
    In the early 19th century, the Napoleonic Code swept away many of the remaining vestiges of feudalism, and opened forests throughout the portion of Europe once ...
  42. [42]
    George Perkins Marsh: The Man Who Loved Nature (U.S. National ...
    May 23, 2018 · The book was published in 1864 and was highly influential on the ... Marsh's book set a literary example for the conservation movement.
  43. [43]
    Man and Nature - University of Washington Press
    In Man and Nature, first published in 1864, polymath scholar and diplomat George Perkins Marsh challenged the general belief that human impact on nature was ...
  44. [44]
    the beginning era of concern about natural resources, 1873-1905
    The beginning of America's concern about the conservation of land for the people can be traced back to George Perkins Marsh.
  45. [45]
    Nineteenth Century Trends in American Conservation (U.S. National ...
    Jul 7, 2020 · As the 19th century progressed, wildlife habitat was dramatically reduced by loss of habitat from deforestation and wetland filling, combined ...
  46. [46]
    A High-grade Paper: Garden & Forest and Nineteenth-Century ...
    Americans who worried about the rapid disappearance of their forests were encouraged to study European models, first by George Perkins Marsh's pathbreaking Man ...Missing: 19th | Show results with:19th
  47. [47]
    Our History | US Forest Service
    ” Responsibility for these reserves fell under the Department of the Interior until 1905 when President Theodore Roosevelt transferred their care to the ...
  48. [48]
    Theodore Roosevelt Timeline: Conservation President | AMNH
    Establishes National Forest Service: Roosevelt appoints the government's most prominent forester, Gifford Pinchot, as chief. Together they create or enlarge 150 ...
  49. [49]
    Teddy Roosevelt Championed Conservation Efforts—That Also ...
    May 11, 2022 · In addition to establishing the National Forest Service in 1905, he also established 18 national monuments under the Antiquities Act of 1906— ...
  50. [50]
    Theodore Roosevelt, "Conservation as a National Duty," Speech Text
    THEODORE ROOSEVELT: “CONSERVATION AS A NATIONAL DUTY” (13 MAY 1908). [1] Governors of the several States; and Gentlemen: [2] I welcome you to this Conference ...
  51. [51]
    About IUCN
    Created in 1948, IUCN is now the world's largest and most diverse environmental network, harnessing the knowledge, resources and reach of our more than ...Conservation Centre · Read more about IUCN · Partners and donors · Governance
  52. [52]
    Background & History - IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
    Established in 1964, the International Union for Conservation of Nature's Red List of Threatened Species has evolved to become the world's most comprehensive ...
  53. [53]
    The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) - UNEP
    Jan 12, 2021 · Created in 1948, IUCN has evolved into the world's largest and most diverse environmental network. Through their affiliation with IUCN, Member ...
  54. [54]
    50 years of environmental conservation | WWF - Panda.org
    WWF was established in 1961 by a group of passionate and committed individuals who sought to secure the funding necessary to protect places and species.
  55. [55]
    About us - World Wildlife Fund
    Since our founding in 1961, WWF has been committed to protecting nature and its resources. We understand that nature is our planet's greatest asset ...Careers · History · Leadership Team · Contact us
  56. [56]
    [PDF] The History and Evolution of National Parks in Kenya
    Apr 24, 2012 · In 1945, the British Protectorate passed the National Parks Ordinance that paved the way for the establishment of more protected areas. This was ...
  57. [57]
    https://oxfordre.com/africanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.001.0001/acrefore-9780190277734-e-195
  58. [58]
    United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm ...
    The 1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment in Stockholm was the first world conference to make the environment a major issue.
  59. [59]
    [PDF] A History Of Conservation
    Conservation, safeguarding species and ecosystems, has ancient roots, but the modern movement began in Europe and North America, with national efforts and  ...
  60. [60]
    The Modern Environmental Movement | American Experience - PBS
    The first national observation of Earth Day took place on April 22, 1970, when an estimated 20 million people across the country took to the streets in protest.
  61. [61]
    Celebrating 50 Years of Success in Wildlife Conservation
    Feb 13, 2023 · The Act has saved hundreds of species from extinction and continues to protect and preserve some of our most beloved animals and plants.
  62. [62]
    Treaties - Society for Conservation Biology
    Key treaties include the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Convention on Migratory Species (CMS), CITES, and IPBES.
  63. [63]
    Multilateral actions to safeguard the environment: A timeline - UNEP
    Aug 15, 2025 · 1971. The accord promotes the conservation and sustainable use of wetlands, one of the world's most biodiverse habitats, by designating ...
  64. [64]
    Convention on Biological Diversity | Laws and Nature Justice
    The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) is the global treaty tasked with protecting and restoring the world's biodiversity. It may be the planet's best ...
  65. [65]
    Conservation biology: four decades of problem- and solution-based ...
    From the 1970s, conservation biology started to characterize the biodiversity crisis and described the main biodiversity threats (Wilson, 1988). The importance ...Missing: milestones | Show results with:milestones
  66. [66]
    American Conservation in the Twentieth Century (U.S. National Park ...
    Jul 7, 2020 · Gifford Pinchot, chief forester during Theodore Roosevelt's administration, promoted use of the term “Conservation” and lobbied for support for ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  67. [67]
    5 Wildlife Conservation Success Stories: 50 Years of the ...
    Dec 6, 2023 · 5 Wildlife Conservation Success Stories: 50 Years of the Endangered Species Act · 1. Bald Eagle · 2. American Alligator · 3. Grizzly Bear · 4.
  68. [68]
    Wildlife Comebacks That Inspire Hope
    Mar 4, 2025 · Celebrate World Wildlife Day with success stories of mountain gorillas, snow leopards, black rhinos, and more—proof that conservation ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] Chapter 1 - Society for Conservation Biology
    The com- mon concern that transcended the disciplinary boundaries was biological diversity: its extent, role, value, and fate. By the mid-1970s, the recurring ...<|separator|>
  70. [70]
    Britain's first great environmentalist used a civil war as an excuse to ...
    Oct 28, 2019 · John Evelyn's 1664 work 'Sylva' called for a mass tree planting campaign.
  71. [71]
    George Perkins Marsh: Man and Nature: Or, Physical Geography as ...
    Aug 20, 2020 · Man and Nature looks at various ways man has transformed the environment, affecting both major and minor components of the earth's overall systems.
  72. [72]
    First Forester: The Enduring Conservation Legacy of Gifford Pinchot
    Sep 21, 2016 · And at a time when conservation ideals barely permeated the nation's consciousness, Pinchot grasped the ecological importance of forests and ...
  73. [73]
    The Father of Conservation - American Forests
    Aug 10, 2012 · Gifford Pinchot, the first chief of the US Forests Service. He is known as the “father of conservation” and credited for launching the conservation movement in ...
  74. [74]
    Who Were the Most Conservation-Minded US Presidents?
    Feb 19, 2024 · Theodore Roosevelt, 1901–1909 · Woodrow Wilson, 1913–1921 · Franklin D. Roosevelt, 1933–1945 · Lyndon B. Johnson, 1963–1969 · Jimmy Carter, 1977– ...
  75. [75]
    13 presidents who were true conservation leaders
    Presidents who worked for conservation · Barack Obama (2009-2017) · Theodore Roosevelt (1901-1909) · Lyndon B. · Franklin Delano Roosevelt (1933-1945) · Benjamin ...
  76. [76]
    Ideas, actors and political practices in the environmental history of ...
    Nov 26, 2020 · In Western Europe, older ideas dating back to the 19th century Heimat and nature conservation movement continued to thrive in the 1950s and ...The rise of nature conservation... · Postwar divisions and...<|separator|>
  77. [77]
    The Politics of Conservation in France in the 19th Century
    Matagne examines French conservation policies in the 19th century with reference to three important issues: i) the protection of landscapes; ...Missing: Europe 20th
  78. [78]
    About the Sierra Club
    The Sierra Club's first members, including John Muir, were originally focused on the conservation of California's Sierra Nevada mountains. Since then, the ...
  79. [79]
    Sierra Club Founders
    John Muir, one of the Sierra Club's founders, sparked the movement to preserve millions of acres of land from logging and mining.
  80. [80]
    History - The Sierra Club Foundation
    In 1977, the Sierra Club led a coalition to preserve Alaska's national-interest lands and persuaded President Jimmy Carter to support a gas pipeline route that ...
  81. [81]
    National Audubon Society
    Migratory birds face threats throughout their lives, and these threats are accelerating. We work in the places where birds, and people, need it most. Read more ...Guide to North American BirdsAudubon Near YouAbout UsOur HistoryConservation
  82. [82]
    The Nature Conservancy: A World Where People & Nature Thrive
    We're working around the world to protect the lands and waters on which all life depends and fight climate change. Join us.Explore the Places We Protect · Protect Oceans, Lands, and · Contact Us · Careers
  83. [83]
    Big Wins in Land Conservation in 2024
    Dec 23, 2024 · As threats to nature continue to mount, The Nature Conservancy's on-the-ground work protecting vital lands and waters is even more critical.
  84. [84]
    https://www.wdio.com/weather-news/the-nature-conservancy-adds-over-12000-acres-to-its-conservation-efforts-in-northern-minnesota/
  85. [85]
    Protect Ocean, Land & Fresh Water - The Nature Conservancy
    Our future depends on protecting 30% of the planet's oceans, lands, and freshwaters by 2030 in the biggest conservation commitment the world has ever seen.
  86. [86]
    WWF's History - World Wildlife Fund
    WWF was established in 1961 by a group of passionate and committed individuals who sought to secure the funding necessary to protect places and species.
  87. [87]
    Our Work | IUCN
    IUCN provides public, private and non-governmental organisations with the knowledge, tools and projects that enable societies, economies and nature to thrive ...Species conservation action · Species conservation science · Science-led approach
  88. [88]
    IUCN
    IUCN monitors the impacts of climate change on nature, and guides the conservation and restoration of ecosystems to help mitigate and adapt to it.About IUCN · Resources · IUCN Global Standard for · IUCN World Conservation
  89. [89]
    First-of-its-kind study definitively shows that conservation actions are ...
    Apr 25, 2024 · This new analysis is the best evidence to date that conservation interventions make a difference, slowing the loss of species' populations and ...
  90. [90]
    Past conservation efforts reveal which actions lead to positive ...
    Almost all species that improved have conservation actions in place, and typically were previously at high risk of extinction, have smaller ranges.
  91. [91]
    Eagle Management | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
    Bald eagles were removed from the endangered species list in August 2007 because their populations recovered sufficiently, and their population has continued to ...Missing: numbers | Show results with:numbers
  92. [92]
    America's Bald Eagle Population Continues to Soar
    the bold national symbol of the United States — have quadrupled since 2009, according to a new report ...
  93. [93]
    From Endangered to Recovered: A Timeline of the Bald Eagle's ...
    The Endangered Species Act established recovery goals that were met years before 1999. The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service determined that the bald eagle's threats ...
  94. [94]
    The Peregrine Falcon Is Back | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
    Aug 20, 2000 · Currently, there are at least 1,650 peregrine breeding pairs in the United States and Canada, well above the overall recovery goal of 631 pairs.
  95. [95]
    Peregrine Falcon Recovery (U.S. National Park Service)
    Nov 3, 2022 · This study provides insight into the unaided, natural recovery of American peregrine falcons in Alaska.
  96. [96]
    Interior Department Strengthens Conservation of American Bison
    Nov 1, 2024 · Approximately 31,000 bison are currently being stewarded by the United States, Canada and Mexico with the goal of conserving the species and ...
  97. [97]
    Protecting Bison - Bison (U.S. National Park Service)
    Jul 14, 2025 · Over the course of the past century, the American bison was saved from extinction and set upon a path of recovery and conservation. While most ...
  98. [98]
    Humpback Whale - NOAA Fisheries
    Before a final moratorium on commercial whaling in 1985, all populations of humpback whales were greatly reduced, most by more than 95 percent.Status Review of the... · Science · Conservation & Management · Resources
  99. [99]
    Humpback Whale - Endangered Species Coalition
    Thanks to global conservation efforts including the Endangered Species Act, the current population has rebounded to nearly 80,000 Humpback whales up from a low ...
  100. [100]
    A.I. Sorts Public Photos to Show Recovering Pacific Humpback ...
    Feb 27, 2024 · Humpback whale numbers in the North Pacific Ocean climbed from about 16,875 in 2002 to a peak of 33,488 whales in 2012. That likely reflected ...
  101. [101]
    California Condor Recovery Program | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
    The Recovery Program is working to establish robust self-sustaining populations of condors within the historical distribution.What We Do · Condor HPAI Information · About Us · Initiatives
  102. [102]
    California condors: rescued from the brink of extinction
    Jul 2, 2025 · There are now approximately 500 California condors in existence. Over half of those (about 350 birds) are flying free in parts of Arizona, ...
  103. [103]
    California Condor | The Peregrine Fund
    We have re-established a free-flying population now numbering 100+ condors from the Grand Canyon into Utah. We annually health-check every condor we can trap.
  104. [104]
    Restoration Success Stories and Outreach | U.S. Department of the ...
    Examples of restoration projects implemented throughout the country include: the addition of habitat to Fish and Wildlife Service Refuges, National Parks, ...
  105. [105]
    The Kissimmee River has been brought back to life—and wildlife is ...
    Apr 6, 2023 · So far, 44 miles of the river's meandering course have been rehabilitated—adding back 20,000 acres of biodiverse wetlands. Orlando. ATLANTIC.Missing: results | Show results with:results
  106. [106]
    [PDF] Kissimmee River | Restoration Project
    When restoration is completed in 2030, more than 40 square miles of river-floodplain ecosystem will be restored, including almost 12,398 acres of wetlands and ...<|separator|>
  107. [107]
    [PDF] experiences from China's Loess Plateau - ESD
    According to the MODIS NDVI data, more than 70% of the LP showed a significant “greening” trend from 2000 to 2015, mainly distributed in the central and ...
  108. [108]
    Ecological restoration stimulates environmental outcomes but ...
    Jul 8, 2022 · The Chinese Loess Plateau was degraded after thousands of years of agricultural exploitation, and it is one of the most degraded areas in the ...<|separator|>
  109. [109]
    History of Wolf Management - Yellowstone National Park (U.S. ...
    Sep 9, 2025 · Wolves have contributed to decreased survival rates of elk calves and older female adults while also influencing elk habitat use. These effects, ...Early Wolf Management · Restoration Efforts · Legal Challenges
  110. [110]
    Reintroducing wolves to Yellowstone helped entire ecosystem thrive ...
    Feb 25, 2025 · The reintroduction of wolves to Yellowstone National Park in the 1990s had a cascading effect that benefited the entire ecosystem, a new study finds.
  111. [111]
    Do wolves fix ecosystems? CSU study debunks ... - The Coloradoan
    Feb 9, 2024 · In Yellowstone's case, it was claimed in a 2004 study that reintroduced wolves preying on elk created a "landscape of fear" and, either through ...
  112. [112]
    Kissimmee River Restoration Project - Jacksonville District
    More than 15 of 22 miles of canal have been backfilled and 6,500 acres of floodplain wetlands have been restored. The response of the natural system has greatly ...
  113. [113]
    Wolves of Yellowstone - National Geographic Education
    May 10, 2024 · Gray wolves were reintroduced into Yellowstone National Park in 1995, resulting in a trophic cascade through the entire ecosystem.
  114. [114]
    Six global success stories on how rewilding key species ... - One Earth
    Oct 6, 2025 · These six stories demonstrate the power of rewilding in restoring the health of ecosystems. By bringing back keystone species and allowing ...
  115. [115]
    National Parks Contributed Record High $55.6 Billion to U.S. ...
    Aug 27, 2024 · This spending supported 415,400 jobs, provided $19.4 billion in labor income, and $55.6 billion in economic output to the U.S. economy. The ...
  116. [116]
    4 Reasons to Value U.S. National Forests | The Pew Charitable Trusts
    May 7, 2021 · Outdoor recreation on lands managed by the Forest Service contributes more than $13 billion to the U.S. economy and supports over 205,000 jobs ...
  117. [117]
    [PDF] Economic Contributions from Conserved Forests: Four Case Studies ...
    Sep 27, 2021 · Privately-owned forests provide important environmental, economic, and cultural benefits to the general public. Resulting impacts from land ...
  118. [118]
    Conservation Economics - Trust for Public Land
    The study found that every $1 invested in land conservation by the state returns $9 in economic value in natural goods and services, such as water quality ...
  119. [119]
    Economic Benefits of Biodiversity - WeConservePA Library
    Biodiversity supports food production, medicine, and tourism. It provides $319 billion in annual benefits in the US and $2,928 billion worldwide. ...
  120. [120]
    Soil Health | Natural Resources Conservation Service
    Our natural resource conservation programs help people reduce soil erosion, enhance water supplies, improve water quality, increase wildlife habitat, and reduce ...
  121. [121]
    Economic Benefits of Land Conservation - WeConservePA Library
    The conservation of natural lands and of working farms and forests can generate financial returns, both to governments and individuals, and create significant ...
  122. [122]
    Conservation Programs | Economic Research Service - USDA ERS
    Apr 22, 2025 · The 2014 and 2018 Farm Acts held total budgeted spending largely level at an average of between $6.0 and $6.5 billion per year in 2023 dollars, ...
  123. [123]
    [PDF] Over $1.5 billion per year is needed to recover Endangered Species ...
    In short, our calculations from newer recovery costs data put the cost of ESA recovery at over $1.5 billion per year to address species protected under the ESA ...
  124. [124]
    Missing the Mark - PERC
    Jul 26, 2023 · Only 3 percent of listed species have ever recovered. Of the 1,732 domestic species listed under the Endangered Species Act in the past 50 years ...
  125. [125]
    [PDF] The Effectiveness of Listing under the U.S. Endangered Species Act
    Our results show that listing a species under the ESA is, on average, detrimental to species recovery if not combined with substantial government funds. In.
  126. [126]
    Mapping the Economic Costs and Benefits of Conservation
    Opportunity costs of conservation were defined as the expected agricultural value of each forested parcel of land, because this was an estimate of the best ...<|separator|>
  127. [127]
    The Land of Many Opportunity Costs | Cato Institute
    The Costs of Federal Land Ownership. There are several reasons why government ownership of this huge resource is detrimental to economic welfare and individual ...
  128. [128]
    The neutral effect of protected areas on county-level economic ...
    Heterogeneity analysis reveals that PAs positively impact counties with low opportunity costs but negatively affect those with high opportunity costs. PAs ...
  129. [129]
    Costs in conservation: Common costly mistakes and how to avoid ...
    Jun 10, 2024 · This work and others emphasized that including economic costs into conservation planning had the potential to improve outcomes through cost- ...
  130. [130]
    Conservation costs are rarely reported, making it difficult to prioritize ...
    Apr 29, 2022 · Conservation has a price tag, but the costs are rarely reported. This lack of transparency makes it difficult for people to decide on the most cost-effective ...Missing: ineffective | Show results with:ineffective
  131. [131]
    Estimating the economic benefits and costs of highly‐protected ...
    Oct 22, 2019 · In this paper, we outline how to evaluate the economic benefits and costs of MPAs and provide examples from the literature to demonstrate the methods described.Introduction · Ecological Challenges in... · Costs of Marine Protected Areas
  132. [132]
    The Endangered Species Act (ESA) and Claims of Property Rights ...
    The federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) has long been one of the major flash points in debates over government interference with property rights.Missing: conflicts | Show results with:conflicts
  133. [133]
    [PDF] The Endangered Species Act - Private Property Rights
    ACT-PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS-The Supreme Court held that the Endangered Species Act prohibits the modification of the habitats of endangered and threatened ...
  134. [134]
    [PDF] THE LAND MARKET IMPACTS OF THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ...
    We examine the economic consequences of the 1973 US Endangered Species Act (ESA)— considered by some as the “most important US law protecting biodiversity” ( ...
  135. [135]
    The Cost of Species Protection: The Land Market Impacts of the ...
    This working paper explores the economic consequences of the US Endangered Species Act, bringing together comprehensive data on species conservation efforts ...
  136. [136]
    Understanding Landowners' Concerns About Endangered Species ...
    The introduction of strict, one-size-fits-all regulations can make landowners and managers wary of the consequences, such as limitations on land use or ...
  137. [137]
    Reform the Endangered Species Act by Respecting Property Rights
    Aug 14, 2019 · By better respecting property rights, the Endangered Species Act can better serve landowners and wildlife advocates alike.
  138. [138]
    The Inevitable Overregulation and Overcriminalization of ... - PERC
    Aug 23, 2017 · Overcriminalization is also rampant in environmental law, with federal prosecutors increasingly taking advantage of relaxed criminal law ...Missing: movement criticisms
  139. [139]
    [PDF] The Economic Impacts of Critical Habitat Designation
    The economic impacts of critical habitat designation are borne mainly by consumers. Cost increases can be passed on to consumers to some degree, and increases ...
  140. [140]
    Lacoste v. Department of Conservation | 263 U.S. 545 (1924)
    1. By right of ownership, and in the exercise of police power, a state may regulate the taking of wild animals within its borders, their subsequent use, ...
  141. [141]
    SCOTUS Ruling Delivers Major Win for Property Rights and ... - PERC
    May 25, 2023 · The ruling in Sackett v. EPA rejected the “significant nexus” test, which applied a vague and unhelpful definition of “navigable waters” ...
  142. [142]
    [PDF] Reconciling Property Rights and the Endangered Species Act
    A key issue of the property rights argument is whether public support for the ESA outweighs the opposition to the Act's conflicts with property rights. The ...
  143. [143]
    Identifying challenges to enforcement in protected areas
    However, several limitations arise from the use of cross-sectional enforcement data. Firstly, challenges in early enforcement steps (e.g. low detection ...Missing: shortcomings | Show results with:shortcomings
  144. [144]
    Assessing how corruption impacts ranger work - World Wildlife Fund
    The often-weak governance systems in which rangers work also create corruption risks, from lack of clear internal oversight or procedures to weakness in the ...
  145. [145]
    Failures in the design and implementation of management plans of ...
    Jul 1, 2020 · Four main failures were identified in the design and implementation of plans: (i) Gaps between MPA designation and plan implementation, with a mean period of ...
  146. [146]
    Identifying Major Factors for Success and Failure of Conservation ...
    Nov 23, 2024 · Our expert survey demonstrated that external factors from economy and policy often hinder success of conservation programs, while societal and ...
  147. [147]
    https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/state-of-nature-in-the-eu
  148. [148]
    The major barriers to evidence‐informed conservation policy ... - NIH
    1. Lack of policy relevant science · 2. Conservation not a political priority · 3. Mismatch of timescales · 4. Complex, uncertain problems · 5. Policy‐makers do not ...Missing: failures | Show results with:failures
  149. [149]
    https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/europes-state-of-water-2024
  150. [150]
    [PDF] Policy Impacts on Deforestation Lessons Learned from Past ...
    National and international efforts within the last few decades to reduce forest loss, while having some impact, have failed to substantially slow the loss.
  151. [151]
    Non-implementation and the challenges of protected area ...
    Highlights. •. Failed MPAs and non-implementation processes are opportunities for learning. •. Evidence exists of adaptive learning between two case studies.
  152. [152]
    Redefining American conservation for equitable and inclusive social ...
    Sep 21, 2022 · We review the seven tenets of the North American Model for Wildlife Conservation, highlighting their limitations and exclusion of other models.
  153. [153]
    Overcoming racism in the twin spheres of conservation science and ...
    Nov 3, 2021 · It is time to acknowledge and overcome conservation's deep-seated systemic racism, which has historically marginalized Black, Indigenous and ...
  154. [154]
    The U.S. Environmental Movement's Long History of Exclusion
    Jul 27, 2020 · The movement's early framing set the stage for decades of racist and heterosexist practice informed by the very language of environmental protection.
  155. [155]
    Race, Diversity, and Transparency in Environmental Organizations
    Environmental spokespersons also argued that people of color did not apply for jobs in environmental nonprofits and would not stay in such workplaces if hired.Missing: bias | Show results with:bias
  156. [156]
    Toppling the Monument to Silence: Racism and the Founding ...
    Jan 10, 2022 · In June 2019, women employed at The Nature Conservancy (TNC) alleged that sexual harassment and wage discrimination were commonplace at the ...
  157. [157]
    Gender bias and inequity holds women back in their conservation ...
    The conservation movement overall, is associated with processes of dispossession and social exclusion of both women and First Nations people across the U.S. ...Missing: allegations | Show results with:allegations
  158. [158]
    Women are rising in the conservation movement, but still face ...
    In a 2014 essay, 240 conservation scientists asserted that "issues of gender and cultural bias" were hindering conservation by fueling divisive arguments over ...Why Diversity Matters In... · About The Author(s) · You Might Also LikeMissing: allegations | Show results with:allegations
  159. [159]
    Indigenous People at Yellowstone: From Erasure to Inclusion
    Jun 17, 2022 · The presence of Indigenous Americans was purposefully erased from the story of Yellowstone National Park through most of the park's history, ...
  160. [160]
    Indigenous Homelands in Yellowstone National Park
    Creation of Yellowstone National park lead to the initial displacement of Indigenous communities off of their traditional territory and onto reserves. The cost ...
  161. [161]
    Indigenous Stewardship and the Legacy of National Parks on Tribal ...
    Mar 24, 2025 · Parks like Yellowstone, Yosemite, and the Grand Canyon were created through the forced removal of Native peoples who had lived there for ...
  162. [162]
    Confronting colonial history: toward healing, just, and equitable ...
    We provide a brief primer of the origins of settler colonial conservation, resulting broadscale disparities, and pathways toward a more just conservation ...
  163. [163]
    Tanzania: Maasai Forcibly Displaced for Game Reserve
    Apr 27, 2023 · Since at least 2009, the government has forcibly evicted thousands of people from Loliondo to open areas for conservation, tourism, and trophy ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  164. [164]
    “It's Like Killing Culture”: Human Rights Impacts of Relocating ...
    Jul 31, 2024 · Tanzania's conservation relocation process has violated the rights of Indigenous Maasai communities in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area and ...Missing: Asia studies
  165. [165]
    Batwa Indigenous Peoples forced eviction for “Conservation” - NIH
    Aug 16, 2023 · No consultation was carried out with local Batwa communities, and they were consequently forcibly evicted from their Forest home.Missing: Asia | Show results with:Asia
  166. [166]
    A qualitative examination on Ogiek community impacts from forced ...
    Jun 25, 2025 · The aim of this research was to better understand the well-being impacts of forced land evictions from an Ogiek perspective.Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
  167. [167]
    Making land grabbable: Stealthy dispossessions by conservation in ...
    Dec 21, 2021 · This paper seeks to answer the question: how does land become grabbable and local people relocatable? It focuses on the historical and current conditions of ...
  168. [168]
    Conflict and conservation: On the role of protected areas for ...
    Our findings show that growth-oriented extractivism and development are major drivers of conflicts in protected areas, where these latter can both jeopardize ...
  169. [169]
    Is it just conservation? A typology of Indigenous peoples' and local ...
    Jun 21, 2024 · By synthesizing empirical evidence about links between governance, equity, and effectiveness, the analysis adds to recent advances in the ...
  170. [170]
    [PDF] The role of Indigenous peoples and local communities in effective ...
    Crucially, most studies presenting positive outcomes for both well-being and conservation come from cases where Indigenous peoples and local communities play a ...
  171. [171]
    Over a third of conflicts over development projects affect Indigenous ...
    Jun 19, 2023 · Loss of landscape, livelihood loss and land dispossession were the most frequent impacts across the 1,044 conflicts affecting Indigenous peoples ...
  172. [172]
    Protected areas and the neglected contribution of Indigenous ...
    Nov 29, 2021 · In this article, we focus on an empirical study of a protected area in Brazil's Caatinga dry forest ecosystem, where similar calls are being ...1 Introduction · 2 Methodology · 4 Discussion
  173. [173]
    Frenemies John Muir and Gifford Pinchot
    For Muir, nature was God, best preserved far from the degrading touch of man. For Pinchot, nature was a resource that ought to be sustainably shared among ...
  174. [174]
    Muir v. Pinchot - Topanga New Times
    Aug 12, 2022 · As John Muir and Gifford Pinchot illustrate, the result was “a productive tension that started changing people's attitudes about land ownership.<|control11|><|separator|>
  175. [175]
    Effects of human demand on conservation planning for biodiversity ...
    Efforts to conserve ecosystem services are more efficient when they account for demand. Demand does not reduce biodiversity outcomes.
  176. [176]
    Diverse values of nature for sustainability
    Aug 9, 2023 · IPBES assessed knowledge on nature's diverse values and valuation methods to gain insights into their role in policymaking and fuller integration into ...Missing: centric
  177. [177]
    Defending ecocentrism and the Nature Needs Half movement
    We conclude that these proposals bring a radically different and more effective approach to conservation than anthropocentric approaches, even though the latter ...
  178. [178]
    Wildlife Conservation, a Pragmatic Approach - PERC
    Sep 3, 2015 · A utilitarian conservation ethic embraces the sustainable use of individual animals so long as evidence demonstrates that this use can protect ...
  179. [179]
    [PDF] The Complementary Niches of Anthropocentric and Biocentric ...
    Both the anthropocentrists and the biocentrists challenge each other's interpretation of the science underlying conservation, but it is important to realize ...
  180. [180]
    Understanding conservationists' perspectives on the new ... - NIH
    Nov 30, 2016 · New conservation is more anthropocentric, emphasizing the benefits of nature to humans and prioritizing the emergent properties of ecosystems ...
  181. [181]
    How are nature-based solutions contributing to priority societal ...
    Oct 21, 2020 · What evidence is there for nature-based solutions and their impacts on human wellbeing for societal challenges related to cost-efficacy, ...
  182. [182]
    The Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation (CEBC) – A brief history
    CEBC, established in 2003, aimed to support conservation decisions through evidence-based practice, research, and training, and was the first in its field.
  183. [183]
    A man with a big idea - University of Cambridge
    Sutherland began collating conservation research data from around the world, and this work grew into Conservation Evidence, an accessible, free and ...
  184. [184]
    Protocol - Conservation Evidence
    The protocol describes the methodology that will be used to produce the synopsis, which is based on the standard subject-wide Conservation Evidence synthesis ...
  185. [185]
    The positive impact of conservation action - Science
    Apr 25, 2024 · This work shows that multiple types of conservation actions are usually beneficial and are needed to curb the loss of biodiversity.
  186. [186]
    Reviewing the science on 50 years of conservation - PubMed Central
    Jul 18, 2024 · We present a systematic review of published empirical studies about site-level biodiversity conservation initiated between 1970 and 2019.
  187. [187]
    The major barriers to evidence‐informed conservation policy and ...
    Apr 20, 2018 · Barriers related to the low priority of conservation were considered to be important, while mainstreaming conservation was proposed as a key ...
  188. [188]
    Shortfalls in Conservation Evidence: Moving from Ecological Effects ...
    Sep 20, 2019 · We review and contrast different evaluation approaches and highlight the advantages of counterfactual approaches over alternative methods.
  189. [189]
    A typology of barriers and enablers of scientific evidence use in ...
    Nov 15, 2019 · In this study, we collated a comprehensive inventory of 230 factors that facilitate or limit the use of scientific evidence in conservation management ...
  190. [190]
    Negative results provide valuable evidence for conservation
    A publication bias limits the dissemination of negative findings. This bias restricts and distorts the evidence used to inform conservation.
  191. [191]
    Defending the Scientific Integrity of Conservation-Policy Processes
    We compared recent challenges to scientific integrity to determine what aspects of scientific input into conservation policy are most at risk of political ...
  192. [192]
    Scientific evidence and public policy: a systematic review of barriers ...
    Results: Major barriers included fragmented advisory systems, limited data infrastructures, and weak communication between researchers and policymakers. Key ...
  193. [193]
    Poor availability of context-specific evidence hampers decision ...
    Evidence-based conservation relies on reliable and relevant evidence. Practitioners often prefer locally relevant studies whose results are more likely to ...
  194. [194]
    Boreal Forest | TNC Canada - The Nature Conservancy
    The boreal forest is the Earth's largest terrestrial carbon sink, storing 208 billion tons of carbon, or the equivalent to 26 years of global carbon emissions.
  195. [195]
    Boreal forest - Natural Resources Canada
    Apr 4, 2025 · Canada's laws protect the boreal forest and ensure its sustainability. About 94% of Canada's forests are on publicly owned land, which enables ...8 facts about Canada's boreal · Cumulative effects in...Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes
  196. [196]
    [PDF] Canadian Boreal Forest Conservation Framework
    Our vision is that Canada's Boreal Forest will become the world's best conserved forest ecosystem, while supporting Northern communities by developing leading ...
  197. [197]
    Historical timeline | U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
    Congress passes and President Richard Nixon signs the Endangered Species Act. The 1973 act repeals and replaces the Endangered Species Conservation Act of 1969.
  198. [198]
    Cutting It Close: How Unsustainable Logging in Canada's Boreal ...
    Jul 25, 2018 · This runaway logging violates the rights of Indigenous Peoples, devastates wildlife, and jeopardizes drinking water sources.
  199. [199]
    Importance of Indigenous Peoples' lands for the conservation of ...
    Jan 6, 2020 · We determined that at least 36% of IFLs are within Indigenous Peoples' lands, making these areas crucial to the mitigation action needed to avoid catastrophic ...
  200. [200]
    In Canada's Boreal Forest, a New National Park Faces the Wrongs ...
    Recent increases in wildfires, insect outbreaks, and human activity risk flipping the ecosystem from carbon sink to source. Between 2001 and 2017 Canada lost ...Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes
  201. [201]
    Lessons from the boreal forest - Hewlett Foundation
    Dec 3, 2018 · Sustainable conservation of the boreal forest can only be achieved by working in partnership with indigenous communities, and by building broad ...<|separator|>
  202. [202]
    Deforestation control in the Brazilian Amazon: A conservation ...
    Brazil's regulations governing deforestation and logging are often circumvented. · Agreements with soy and beef companies are important but need strengthening.
  203. [203]
    Impacts of conservation incentives in protected areas: The case of ...
    During the 2000s, Brazil's environmental governance reform was upheld as a conservation success story as deforestation rates fell by 80% in a few years. This ...
  204. [204]
    How Costa Rica Reversed Deforestation and Became an ... - Earth.Org
    Oct 19, 2021 · It became the first tropical country to have stopped, and subsequently reversed, deforestation. Costa Rica's reforestation was such a success it was recently ...
  205. [205]
    Conservation pays and everyone's benefitting from it (commentary)
    Jul 15, 2024 · Costa Rica's success stems from a shift in the 1990s towards greener environmental legislation, introducing the Payment for Ecosystem Services ...
  206. [206]
    Effectiveness of Costa Rica's Conservation Portfolio to Lower ...
    Nov 4, 2020 · However, widespread deforestation has reduced tropical forest cover by half over the past fifty years, with a net loss of 1.5 million square ...
  207. [207]
    Governance regime and location influence avoided deforestation ...
    We show that, for any given level of deforestation pressure, strictly protected areas consistently avoided more deforestation than sustainable use areas.Missing: Latin | Show results with:Latin
  208. [208]
    Deforestation Rates on Recognized Afro-Descendant Lands in ...
    Jul 22, 2025 · First-of-its-kind study shows Afro-descendant peoples are key environmental stewards; 56% of their lands are top 5% in global biodiversity.
  209. [209]
    Fires Drove Record-breaking Tropical Forest Loss in 2024
    May 21, 2025 · Many other countries in Latin America also saw large spikes in tree cover loss due to fire in 2024 fueled by widespread drought in the region.
  210. [210]
    Two decades of accelerated deforestation in Peruvian forests
    Mar 13, 2024 · It was found that Peru lost 3.4 million ha of forest between 2000 and 2020, mainly in the Not Flooded Rainforest region. National deforestation rates ...Materials And Methods · Forest Cover Data · Discussion
  211. [211]
    Tropical deforestation and Indigenous resistance over the longue ...
    May 22, 2025 · The results highlight that over the longue durée, Indigenous resistance has assisted in the conservation of South American tropical forests.
  212. [212]
    A review of successes, challenges, and lessons from Indigenous ...
    We reviewed the academic literature to synthesize the motivations, successes, challenges, and lessons from protected and conserved areas led by Indigenous ...
  213. [213]
    Conservation of Tropical Forests in the Anthropocene - ScienceDirect
    Oct 7, 2019 · In Latin America and the Caribbean, 36.2 million hectares have regrown between 2000 and 2010 [58], resulting from complex socio-economic and ...
  214. [214]
    https://www.carbonbrief.org/un-report-five-charts-showing-how-global-deforestation-is-declining/
  215. [215]
    Amazon Biosphere Reserves Project - UNESCO
    The Amazon Biosphere Reserves Project seeks to halt the degradation of forest areas, conserve biodiversity and ecosystems, and support alternative livelihoods.
  216. [216]
    Protecting and connecting landscapes stabilizes populations of the ...
    Jan 5, 2024 · African savannahs cover 13.5 million km2, almost half of the continent, of which 10% is protected (1) and 2.2 million km2 (16%) sustain globally ...
  217. [217]
    Brief History - SANParks
    SANParks' history began with Sabie Game Reserve in 1898, the National Parks Board in 1926, and the evolution into SANParks. Mavuso Msimang became the first ...
  218. [218]
    [PDF] 2023 Annual Report - NACSO
    Mar 4, 2025 · Community based conservation institutions such as conservancies and community forests are the most affected by the impact of human wildlife ...
  219. [219]
    [PDF] The State of Community Conservation in Namibia
    Namibia's Community Based Natural Resource Management Programme is one model that provides rural communities with incentives to manage their natural resources.
  220. [220]
    Lessons on the Community Conservancy Model for Wildlife ...
    Aug 28, 2022 · The wildlife monitoring method in conservancies in Namibia has been consistent since 2001, and the results show that populations have recovered ...
  221. [221]
    Wildlife Monitoring - Community Conservation Namibia
    Wildlife populations in communal conservancies are monitored through annual game counts, waterhole counts and the Event Book monitoring system.
  222. [222]
    Protected Areas for Elephants Work Best if They Are Connected
    Jan 5, 2024 · PRETORIA, SOUTH AFRICA – Conservation measures have successfully stopped declines in the African savanna elephant population across southern ...Missing: statistics | Show results with:statistics
  223. [223]
    Over 80% of Africa's savannah conservation land is failing or ...
    Dec 6, 2021 · Only 7% of assessed conservation area land was in a state of success (Figures 3 and 4). Generally, strong government, donor, and/or community ...
  224. [224]
    African elephant poaching rates correlate with local poverty, national ...
    May 28, 2019 · Our analysis reveals a recent decline in annual poaching mortality rate from an estimated peak of over 10% in 2011 to <4% in 2017. Based on ...
  225. [225]
    More than 50 years of survey data confirm African elephant decline
    Nov 11, 2024 · From 1964-2016, forest elephant populations decreased on average by 90%, and savanna elephant populations fell on average by 70%.
  226. [226]
    [PDF] Household livelihoods and conflict with wildlife in community-based ...
    Wildlife management areas, the dominant model of community-based conservation in Tanzania, were devel- oped to improve livelihoods in communities living near.
  227. [227]
    Transfrontier Conservation Areas and Human-Wildlife Conflict - Nature
    May 14, 2020 · Our study deals with human-wildlife conflicts in the Namibian component of the Kavango-Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area (KAZA TFCA).<|control11|><|separator|>
  228. [228]
    Wildlife Fences to Mitigate Human–Wildlife Conflicts in Africa - MDPI
    This review synthesizes current research and case studies to provide a comprehensive understanding of the implications, benefits, and drawbacks of wildlife ...
  229. [229]
    [PDF] conservation and the intensification of uneven wildlife geographies ...
    A recent, continent-wide analysis argues that "lion populations are rapidly disappearing from large parts of Africa, signaling a major trophic downgrading of ...
  230. [230]
    International Affairs Focuses on the Impact of Governance
    Oct 25, 2024 · This study underscores the need for more robust research and better data on governance to guide conservation efforts worldwide.
  231. [231]
    CTI-CFF | Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs Fisheries and ...
    The Coral Triangle Initiative (CTI) is a multilateral partnership of six countries working together to sustain extraordinary marine and coastal resources by ...Missing: Barrier | Show results with:Barrier
  232. [232]
    Human Expansion-Induced Biodiversity Crisis over Asia from 2000 ...
    The results show that human expansion poses widespread threat to biodiversity in Asia, especially in Southeast Asia, with Malaysia, Cambodia, and Vietnam ...<|separator|>
  233. [233]
    Scientists warn of dangerous decline in Asia-Pacific's biodiversity
    Apr 23, 2018 · The report also notes some important biodiversity successes, including increases in protected areas. Over the past 25 years, marine protected ...Missing: empirical outcomes
  234. [234]
    Systematic planning shows more than half of the most species-rich ...
    Systematic conservation planning, as shown here, can lead to at least twice as much biodiversity being protected per area. That at least half of the West ...Missing: empirical outcomes
  235. [235]
    Annual Summary Report of Coral Reef Condition 2023/24 | AIMS
    Aug 7, 2024 · On the Southern GBR, region-wide average hard coral cover increased to 39.1% (33.7% to 44.5% CIs) from 34.0% (29.1% – 38.9% CIs) in 2023.Missing: Triangle conservation protection
  236. [236]
    [PDF] Conservation of Biodiversity in the Pacific Islands of Oceania
    Five key initiatives promise improved conservation effectiveness: 1) alignment of national biodiversity strategies to the Aichi Targets, under the Convention on ...<|separator|>
  237. [237]
    Asia-Pacific - Conservation International
    And Conservation International is working with Pacific Island nations to create more sustainable tuna fisheries that increase revenues and jobs in the region.
  238. [238]
    Understanding the drivers of Southeast Asian biodiversity loss
    Jan 6, 2017 · Most countries within Asia (Thailand, Vietnam, Myanmar) lost between 2% and 4% of their forest cover between 1973 and 2009 (WWF Greater Mekong ...Issues · Deforestation And Tree... · Hunting And Trade
  239. [239]
    [PDF] Status of Coral Reefs of the World: 2020
    The conclusions and recommendations of this report are solely the opinions of the authors, contributors and editors and do not constitute a statement of policy ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  240. [240]
    [PDF] Year in Review - Great Barrier Reef Foundation
    Mar 12, 2025 · This year we've tested and refined the innovative Coral IVF technique and boosted successful coral fertilisation rates by 100-times – raising ...Missing: Triangle | Show results with:Triangle
  241. [241]
    Estimating the Value of Near-Real-Time Satellite Information for ...
    We estimate the amount of avoided deforestation due to the use of near-real-time satellite imagery (DETER) to support the Action Plan for the Prevention and ...
  242. [242]
    Deforestation and Forest Degradation Monitoring with SAR Satellites
    Oct 6, 2020 · Remote sensing is a very effective way to monitor the ongoing worldwide loss of forest as it is very sensible to changes in forest structure and ...
  243. [243]
    How AI is Helping Catch Wildlife Animal Poachers - Cow-Shed Startup
    Sep 17, 2024 · In Hwange National Park, where cyanide poisoning of elephants at waterholes was rampant, the drones helped reduce poaching by an impressive 65% ...
  244. [244]
    Drones and AI can improve wildlife monitoring efforts in Botswana
    Jan 17, 2024 · ... drones and AI for anti-poaching efforts. The team trained computers to recognize herd behavior based on data points for species ...Missing: results | Show results with:results
  245. [245]
    Evaluating the impacts of a large-scale voluntary REDD+ project in ...
    Jan 4, 2024 · We find that REDD+ slowed deforestation by 30% relative to control communities while not changing economic wellbeing and conservation attitudes.
  246. [246]
    Tropical forest carbon offsets deliver partial gains amid ... - Science
    Oct 9, 2025 · We estimated that ~34.8 million carbon credits from these 48 REDD+ projects could genuinely offset emissions, representing 13.2% of the total ...
  247. [247]
    Market-Based Instruments for Biodiversity in Agricultural Landscapes
    Apr 26, 2025 · This study seeks to address this gap, by using MBIs in the German agricultural landscape as a case study.
  248. [248]
    [PDF] Quality Assessment of REDD+ Carbon Credit Projects
    Sep 15, 2023 · In this report, we assess the effectiveness of REDD+ carbon crediting programs at reducing deforestation, generating high-quality carbon ...
  249. [249]
    World must act faster to protect 30% of the planet by 2030 - UNEP
    Oct 28, 2024 · In December 2022, Parties to the Convention on Biodiversity (CBD) agreed to conserve 30% of Earth's land and seas by 2030. This commitment is ...
  250. [250]
    [PDF] The Global Strategy for Plant Conservation 2020-2030 - Plantlife
    Then, 2024 marked the integration of plant specific objectives as com- plementary actions within the Kunming-Montreal Global. Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF).
  251. [251]
    How We Support U.S. Conservation Policy
    Great American Outdoors Act. In July 2020, Congress passed the Great American Outdoors Act, which provides $900M/yr for the Land and Water Conservation Fund ...
  252. [252]
    Decade to Deliver - The Nature Conservancy
    Jun 17, 2025 · Congress has taken action on conservation policies, such as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which has supported conservation and ...
  253. [253]
    White House Gives Ok to Change ESA Rule - YouTube
    Oct 8, 2025 · ... rules for threatened species. The 4(d) rules can carve out ... New 11K views · 54:36. Go to channel · As a BRAIN Doctor, I'm SHOCKED: THIS ...
  254. [254]
    Global shifts conservation organizations need to know about - Maliasili
    May 23, 2025 · Global funding for conservation is shifting rapidly. International aid is declining due to political, economic, and security pressures (e.g., ...
  255. [255]
    (PDF) Community-Based Approaches to Environmental Conservation
    Jan 6, 2025 · The study underscores how CBC initiatives, rooted in indigenous knowledge systems and participatory frameworks, foster greater environmental ...
  256. [256]
    IPLC Success Stories of Conservation - High Ambition Coalition
    Thaidene Nëné is a new model of conservation, one that shows what can be achieved when Indigenous and Crown governments work as equal partners in stewardship.Missing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  257. [257]
    9 Indigenous-led conservation wins and other promising ...
    Nov 22, 2023 · 1. Oil and gas banned from sacred and culturally significant sites · 2. Sacred lands permanently protected as national monuments · 3. Legislation ...Missing: successes 2020s
  258. [258]
    Identifying and developing effective post‐2020 conservation ...
    Consolidated framework of effective community‐based conservation bridging leadership characteristics. In addition to those characteristics identified in the ...
  259. [259]
    [PDF] Increasing Forest Cover for a CO2 Neutral Future: Costa Rica ... - IILA
    Costa Rica successfully increased forest cover from 21% to 57% between 1987 and 2017 through its PES scheme.Missing: GDP | Show results with:GDP<|separator|>
  260. [260]
    [PDF] Program of Payments for Ecological Services in Costa Rica
    Eighty-five percent of contracts in the PES program to date support forest conservation easements (see Table 3), which target the conservation of vegetative.Missing: GDP growth
  261. [261]
    Implementation and Effects of Ecotourism in Panama - Milken Scholars
    Nov 7, 2022 · For example, Costa Rica earned $3.4 billion from tourist spending in 2019, about 5% of their GDP. The Costa Rican government's recognition of ...
  262. [262]
    Payments for ecosystem services programs: A global review of ...
    Jan 15, 2024 · Enhanced security of land tenure, financial benefits, diversification and stable income are typical positive effects from implementing PESPs [29] ...
  263. [263]
    Economic Development and Environmental Conservation: Evidence ...
    Through a randomized controlled trial conducted in Colombia, I empirically investigate the effect of ecotourism on deforestation and economic opportunities.Missing: integrating | Show results with:integrating
  264. [264]
    Growing Wildlife-Based Tourism Sustainably: A New Report and Q&A
    Mar 1, 2018 · Wildlife tourism is a powerful tool countries can leverage to grow and diversify their economies while protecting their biodiversity and meeting ...
  265. [265]
    Ecotourism: An obvious panacea or a looming conundrum?
    May 1, 2024 · The ecotourism industry has been the primary factor ensuring the survival of mountain gorillas in Rwanda and Uganda and has played roles in ...
  266. [266]
    https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0958305X231225295
  267. [267]
    Economic growth, government efficiency, and biodiversity loss
    Nov 4, 2023 · When the economic growth level reaches a certain threshold, increasing it reduces the intensity of the biodiversity loss. Government efficiency ...
  268. [268]
    Biodiversity Credit Markets - NatureFinance
    A range of biodiversity credit markets are emerging across the global economy. These markets can produce the scaled financing and incentives needed for ...
  269. [269]
    Role of Biodiversity Credits in Promoting Conservation Outcomes
    Oct 16, 2024 · Biodiversity credits are a market-based mechanism designed to incentivize the protection and restoration of natural environments.