Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Sustainable Development Goal 1

Sustainable Development Goal 1 (SDG 1), titled "No Poverty," constitutes the initial objective among the seventeen adopted by the in September 2015 through the 2030 Agenda for , with the core aim of eradicating across all dimensions—including extreme deprivation of —by the year 2030. The goal encompasses seven targets, including the elimination of defined as living on less than $2.15 per day (adjusted for ), halving the proportion of individuals in multidimensional , implementing nationally appropriate systems, ensuring equal rights to economic resources, and building against economic, social, and environmental shocks. Indicators track progress via metrics such as the prevalence of , coverage of floors, and access to basic services, with monitoring coordinated by entities like the and national statistical offices. Global extreme poverty has declined substantially since 1990, from approximately 36 percent of the population to around 8.5 percent (affecting nearly 700 million people) as of the latest estimates, largely attributable to rapid economic expansion and market-oriented reforms in countries like and rather than direct interventions tied to the SDGs. However, post-2015 progress has stagnated, with the reversing gains by pushing an additional 70 million into extreme poverty, compounded by conflicts, climate events, and inflationary pressures, particularly in where rates exceed 35 percent. Projections indicate that the 2030 target will not be met, with over 600 million people expected to remain in extreme poverty, highlighting challenges in low-income countries where recovery lags and growth insufficiently targets the poorest. Critics contend that SDG 1's framework underemphasizes causal factors such as secure property rights, , and free-market incentives—which drove prior reductions—while prioritizing expansive government programs and aid that may foster dependency without addressing governance failures. The goal's broad scope risks diluting focus, as trade-offs emerge between poverty alleviation and other SDGs like environmental regulations that could constrain essential for lifting populations out of destitution. Despite partial successes in expanding protections in some regions, the absence of binding mechanisms and overreliance on voluntary efforts underscore the limitations of top-down global targets in overcoming entrenched barriers like and policy distortions.

Origins and Framework

Historical Context of Poverty Reduction Efforts

International poverty reduction efforts originated in the post-World War II period with the establishment of the Bretton Woods institutions, including the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development () in 1944, initially aimed at rebuilding war-torn but expanding to support development in poorer countries by the late 1940s. The contributed through the creation of the Expanded Programme of Technical Assistance in 1949, which merged with the Special Fund in 1965 to form the (UNDP), focusing on technical aid and in developing nations. By the , amid recognition that over 40% of people in developing countries lived in absolute poverty, the redirected lending toward , basic , and to directly target poverty. The formalized development strategies through its International Development Decades, starting with the first in 1961, which prioritized a minimum 5% annual growth rate in developing economies, followed by decade (1971-1980) that introduced a "basic human needs" strategy emphasizing , , , and to alleviate . Grassroots momentum built in the , culminating in the 1987 assembly of over people in to commemorate victims of hunger and , leading to the UN General Assembly's declaration of as the International Day for the Eradication of in 1992. The 1990s saw the and IMF introduce Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) in 1999, requiring countries to develop homegrown plans for aid eligibility, while the UN designated 1997-2006 as the First United Nations Decade for the Eradication of . Empirical data indicate that substantial global poverty declines prior to these formalized efforts, particularly from the 1980s onward, were primarily driven by economic growth and market-oriented reforms in Asia, such as China's opening in 1978 and India's liberalization in 1991, rather than solely international aid or UN initiatives, with poverty rates falling faster before the 2000 Millennium Development Goals than during their implementation period. These national-level causal factors—trade integration, property rights, and investment—underscore that while institutional frameworks provided coordination, endogenous economic policies were key to observed reductions, from 38% of the world's population in extreme poverty in 1990 to lower levels by 2000.

Adoption and Rationale Within Agenda 2030

The 2030 Agenda for , which includes Sustainable Development Goal 1 (SDG 1) on ending poverty, was unanimously adopted by all 193 Member States on September 25, 2015, via Resolution A/RES/70/1 during the in . This followed an intergovernmental negotiation process initiated after the 2012 Conference on (Rio+20), where an Open Working Group drafted the 17 goals and 169 targets over two years of consultations involving governments, , and experts. SDG 1 was explicitly positioned as the first goal to underscore poverty eradication's role as a of the , with the goals entering into force on January 1, 2016. The primary rationale for SDG 1 lay in the Agenda's preamble assertion that "eradicating in all its forms and dimensions, including , is the greatest global challenge and an indispensable requirement for ," positioning it as foundational to achieving , , and for all. This built directly on the (MDGs), which had halved the global rate from 36% in 1990 to about 10% by 2015, reducing the number of affected individuals from 1.9 billion to approximately 736 million living below the international line of $1.90 per day (in 2011 ). Yet, uneven progress—concentrated in regions like —and the recognition that perpetuated vulnerabilities to shocks, inequalities, and barriers to other development outcomes necessitated a more ambitious, universal target to eliminate it entirely by 2030. By prioritizing multidimensional aspects beyond income, such as access to resources and , SDG 1 aimed to address poverty's interconnections with , resilience-building, and , while mobilizing domestic and international financing for pro-poor policies. The goal's targets, including halving national poverty rates and implementing systems, reflected data-driven imperatives from pre-adoption assessments showing poverty's role in stalling and sustainable progress.

Definition and Scope of SDG 1

Sustainable Development Goal 1 (SDG 1), titled "No ," seeks to end in all its forms and manifestations everywhere by 2030. Adopted unanimously by all 193 member states on September 25, 2015, as part of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, the goal builds on the (MDGs) by expanding the focus from primarily developing countries to a framework applicable to all nations. It recognizes poverty not only in monetary terms but also through deprivations in , and living standards, aiming to address root causes such as , vulnerability to shocks, and lack of access to resources. The scope of SDG 1 is defined by seven targets that outline specific, measurable outcomes, including the eradication of —measured as living on less than $2.15 per day in 2017 (PPP) terms—and halving the proportion of people in multidimensional according to national definitions. Additional targets emphasize implementing appropriate systems for all, ensuring equal rights to economic resources and basic services, building resilience against disasters and shocks, mobilizing resources for , and establishing policy frameworks to support poverty eradication. These elements integrate poverty alleviation with broader sustainable development efforts, such as and environmental , while acknowledging that progress depends on national contexts and global partnerships. Indicators for SDG 1, totaling 14, track progress through data on headcount ratios, social protection coverage, and resilience-building measures, primarily sourced from household surveys and national statistics compiled by agencies like the and UN DESA. The goal's universal scope underscores its applicability to both low-income and high-income countries, where relative and vulnerability persist despite overall wealth, challenging the notion that is confined to developing regions.

Objectives and Targets

Core Goal: Ending Poverty Everywhere

Sustainable Development Goal 1 establishes the objective of ending in all its forms everywhere by 2030. This encompasses eradicating , defined under 1.1 as ensuring no person lives below the international poverty line of $2.15 per day, measured in 2017 terms to reflect the bare minimum for survival in low-income countries. The line, updated from $1.90 in 2011 PPP by the in September 2022, accounts for and price changes across 190 countries, focusing on or thresholds for essential needs like food and non-food basics. Beyond monetary metrics, the goal addresses poverty's multidimensional aspects, including lack of access to basic services, , and vulnerability to shocks, though the primary indicator 1.1.1 tracks the proportion of the below this threshold using surveys. Progress monitoring relies on data from national statistical offices and international agencies like the , which estimate that 8.5% of the global —approximately 689 million people—lived in in 2019 before the reversed gains. Empirical evidence attributes historical global poverty declines—from over 40% in 1981 to under 10% by 2015—primarily to rapid in countries like and , driven by market , , and industrialization rather than or regulatory frameworks alone. Cross-country analyses confirm that sustained GDP growth correlates strongly with , with elasticities indicating a 1% increase in mean reducing by 1-2.5% depending on initial inequality levels. The ambition of universal eradication by 2030 faces realism challenges, as projections indicate persistent pockets in and fragile states, where conflict and weak institutions hinder growth; non-binding targets and underfunding further limit enforceability. Achieving the goal would require accelerating growth to lift remaining populations above the line, emphasizing policies that enhance productivity and over aspirational declarations.

Detailed Targets and Associated Indicators

Sustainable Development Goal 1 establishes seven targets aimed at eradicating through measurable outcomes by 2030, with 14 associated global indicators developed by the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators (IAEG-SDGs) and adopted by the UN . These targets address income , multidimensional deprivation, , resource access, , financing, and policy frameworks, while indicators focus on quantifiable metrics disaggregated by sex, age, and other relevant factors where feasible. Target 1.1 seeks to eradicate for all people everywhere by 2030, defined as living below the international line of $2.15 per day (2017 ). The sole indicator is 1.1.1: proportion of the population living below the international line, by sex, age, employment status, and geographic location (urban/rural). Target 1.2 aims to reduce at least by half the proportion of men, women, and children of all living in across all dimensions, as per national definitions. Indicators include 1.2.1: proportion of the living below the national poverty line, by and ; and 1.2.2: proportion of men, women, and children of all living in in all its dimensions according to national definitions. The latter draws on the framework, incorporating deprivations in health, education, and living standards. Target 1.3 calls for implementing nationally appropriate systems and measures for all, including floors, to achieve substantial coverage of the poor and vulnerable by 2030. Indicator 1.3.1 measures the proportion of the covered by floors/systems, by sex, distinguishing ren, persons, older persons, persons with , pregnant women, newborns, work-injury victims, and the poor and vulnerable. Coverage encompasses benefits like benefits, unemployment support, and pensions. Target 1.4 ensures equal for all, especially the poor and vulnerable, to economic resources, basic services, , , natural resources, technology, and including by 2030. Indicators are 1.4.1: proportion of the population living in households with access to basic services (, , , etc.); and 1.4.2: proportion of total adult population with secure tenure to , with legally recognized and perceived , by and tenure type. Target 1.5 focuses on building among the poor and vulnerable, reducing their exposure to climate-related events and other shocks and disasters by 2030. Indicators include 1.5.1: number of deaths, missing persons, and directly affected persons attributed to disasters per 100,000 population; 1.5.2: direct economic loss from disasters relative to global GDP; 1.5.3: number of countries adopting and implementing national strategies aligned with the Sendai Framework (2015–2030); and 1.5.4: proportion of local governments adopting and implementing local strategies in line with national ones. These emphasize vulnerability reduction over mere event frequency. Target 1.a ensures significant resource mobilization from diverse sources, including enhanced development cooperation, to provide predictable funding for developing countries—particularly —to end in all dimensions. Indicators are 1.a.1: total grants targeting as a share of the recipient country's ; and 1.a.2: proportion of total on essential services (, , and ). Target 1.b promotes sound policy frameworks at , regional, and levels, grounded in pro-poor and gender-sensitive strategies, to accelerate eradication investments. Indicator 1.b.1 tracks pro-poor public social spending, assessed through policy coherence and budget allocation favoring low-income groups. This target underscores the role of enabling environments beyond direct aid.

Custodian Agencies and Mechanisms

The primary custodian agency for SDG 1's core poverty eradication indicators, particularly 1.1.1 (proportion of the population living below the international line) and 1.2.1 (proportion below the national line), is the , which develops methodologies, maintains global databases, and produces annual estimates based on household survey data from national statistical offices. For indicator 1.2.2 (proportion in moderate or severe by age, sex, and multidimensional factors), the collaborates with partners to harmonize data standards. Other custodians include the (ILO) for 1.3.1 (coverage of floors/systems), responsible for defining coverage metrics and compiling administrative data; the and UN-Habitat for 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 (access to basic services and secure tenure rights); and the United Nations Office for (UNDRR) for 1.5.1 (number of countries with national strategies). Custodian agencies operate under the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators (IAEG-SDGs), which standardizes methodologies, classifies indicators by tier (e.g., Tier I for established methods like 1.1.1, Tier II/III for those needing further ), and ensures comparability across countries. They provide technical assistance to national statistical systems, validate submissions, and report aggregated global progress to the UN Statistical Commission, with the leading on imputing missing for poverty trends using statistical models. Global monitoring mechanisms center on the UN Global SDG Indicators Database, maintained by the , which integrates custodian-submitted data for biennial reports and tracks progress against the 2030 Agenda. National governments bear primary responsibility for via censuses, surveys, and administrative records, reporting voluntarily through channels like the UN's High-Level Political Forum, while custodians fill gaps and address discrepancies, such as survey coverage limitations in low-income countries. Challenges in monitoring include data disaggregation by vulnerable groups and timeliness, prompting initiatives like the World Bank's Poverty and Inequality Platform for real-time estimates.

Measurement and Data

Defining Extreme and Multidimensional Poverty

, as targeted under Sustainable Development Goal 1 (SDG 1), target 1.1, refers to the condition of individuals living below the World Bank's international line, which measures the minimum level of consumption necessary to meet basic and non-food needs in the world's poorest . As of the June 2025 update using 2021 parities (PPPs), this line is set at $3.00 per person per day, an increase from the prior $2.15 threshold based on 2017 PPPs, reflecting updated price data and national lines from over 160 . This monetary metric relies on household surveys capturing consumption or income expenditures, adjusted for to enable cross-country comparisons, though it primarily emphasizes caloric sufficiency and essential non-food outlays like and . Multidimensional poverty extends beyond to assess overlapping deprivations that measures may overlook, providing a complementary lens for SDG 1's broader aim to end "in all its forms." The Global Multidimensional Index (MPI), jointly produced by the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI) and the (UNDP), identifies acute multidimensional at the level across three dimensions: (nutrition and child/adolescent mortality), (years of schooling and ), and standards of living (cooking , , , , , assets, and ). A is deemed multidimensionally poor if deprived in at least one-third (33.3%) of the ten weighted indicators, with the aggregating both the incidence (headcount , H) and (average deprivation score among the poor, A) of via the formula MPI = H × A, yielding values from 0 (no ) to 1 (maximum ). This approach, covering over 100 developing countries, highlights non-monetary barriers such as lack of affecting 1.1 billion people in 2023, even among those above monetary lines. While correlated, monetary and multidimensional measures diverge empirically: extreme monetary poverty captures resource constraints but ignores direct service access, potentially understating vulnerabilities like despite adequate spending if markets fail to deliver ; conversely, multidimensional metrics can identify deprivations in upper-income contexts due to gaps, though reveals as a primary enabler for escaping deprivations via private or market solutions. In , 1.1 billion people—18% of those in MPI-covered countries—lived in multidimensional poverty, compared to global extreme monetary poverty rates around 8.5% pre-2025 updates, underscoring that while overlaps exist (e.g., in ), multidimensional poverty often exceeds monetary estimates in regions with weak infrastructure. For SDG monitoring, the handles extreme poverty data via indicator 1.1.1, while MPI informs target 1.2's focus on national multidimensional definitions, though global MPI critiques note potential double-counting of deprivations without adjusting for 's foundational role.

Indicators and Data Collection Challenges

The primary indicator for Target 1.1 of SDG 1, which aims to eradicate , is Indicator 1.1.1: the proportion of the living below the international line, currently set at $2.15 per person per day (2017 , PPP), disaggregated by sex, age, employment status, and urban/rural location. This metric relies on household consumption or income surveys conducted by national statistical offices, adjusted to international standards by the . For Target 1.2, which seeks to reduce in all dimensions by half, Indicators 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 measure the proportion of the in , incorporating deprivations in , living standards, and national definitions, often via indices like the (MPI). These indicators extend beyond monetary measures to capture non-income aspects, but require harmonized national data aligned with global frameworks. Data collection for these indicators predominantly depends on nationally representative household surveys, such as Living Standards Measurement Surveys (LSMS) or Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), which are infrequent—often every three to five years in low-income countries—and cover only a fraction of the population due to sampling limitations. In 2024, fewer than half of countries had conducted poverty-relevant surveys post-2020, exacerbating gaps amid events like the that disrupted fieldwork. Coverage is particularly deficient in fragile and conflict-affected states, where up to 80% of is concentrated, as insecurity prevents enumerator access and leads to under-sampling of vulnerable groups like refugees or rural nomads. Self-reported consumption data introduces biases, including recall errors and underreporting of informal incomes, while urban-rural disparities in survey design can skew aggregates. Methodological revisions compound comparability issues; the international poverty line was raised from $1.90 to $2.15 in September 2022 following 2017 PPP updates, and further to $3.00 in June 2025 using 2021 PPPs, which recalibrates historical estimates and reveals slower poverty declines than previously reported—for instance, global at the higher line stood at around 25-30% higher in recent baselines. Multidimensional indicators face additional hurdles, as they aggregate diverse sources (e.g., health records, ) with varying and , leading to incomplete MPIs in over 100 countries lacking recent inputs. National statistical capacities in developing regions often lag, with reliance on donor-funded surveys introducing inconsistencies, and political incentives can incentivize suppression or manipulation to portray progress, as evidenced in discrepancies between official figures and independent audits in select cases. Overall, these challenges result in outdated or proxy-based estimates for up to 40% of the global population, undermining timely monitoring of SDG 1 progress.

Adjustments in Poverty Lines Over Time

The international poverty line (IPL), used to measure under SDG 1 target 1.1, represents the monetary value required to meet in the poorest countries, expressed in () terms. The , as the custodian agency for SDG indicator 1.1.1, periodically adjusts this line to incorporate updated exchange rates from Comparison Program (ICP) benchmarks, ensuring consistency with evolving data on prices and consumption patterns across countries. These revisions maintain the line's anchoring to the median national lines of low-income countries but recalibrate its equivalent, without altering the underlying threshold.
Update YearPPP Base YearIPL Value (per person per day)Key Change
19901985$1.00Initial global standard introduced, anchored to poorest countries' lines.
20082005$1.25Revised upward with new data to reflect updated PPPs.
20112011$1.90Further adjustment incorporating 2005-2011 revisions for better cross-country comparability.
20222017$2.15Updated in September using 2017 PPPs, increasing estimated extreme poor by approximately 70 million for 2019 compared to prior line.
20252021$3.00Announced June 2025 with 2021 data, raising estimates of extreme poor from 713 million to 838 million for , reflecting methodological harmonization rather than welfare decline.
Such adjustments stem from triennial surveys, which compile price from over 190 economies to refine conversions, addressing inflation in reference prices and improvements in coverage for non-tradable goods like services. For SDG monitoring, the UN Statistical Commission adopts these updates, applying them retrospectively to historical series for , though they can shift reported rates—e.g., the 2022 revision elevated the 2019 global rate from 8.7% to 9.3% under the $2.15 line. Critics, including some economists, argue that frequent recalibrations complicate trend analysis and may inadvertently mask or exaggerate progress by altering baselines, but analyses emphasize that core declines in since 1990— from nearly 2 billion to under 700 million—persist across lines when adjusted for comparability. National poverty lines, used complementarily in SDG 1 for country-specific monitoring under indicator 1.2.1, also evolve through domestic methodological reviews, often incorporating updated baskets or equivalence scales, but global aggregates prioritize the IPL for cross-border . These national adjustments vary widely; for instance, India's line rose from about $0.50 daily in 1993-94 PPP to over $1.00 by 2011-12 due to basket revisions, reflecting urban-rural differentials and caloric norms. In SDG reporting, discrepancies between and international lines highlight measurement challenges, with the former sometimes understating multidimensional deprivations captured by the IPL's focus on monetary shortfalls.

Progress and Outcomes

Global Trends Pre- and Post-2015

Prior to the adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals in 2015, global extreme poverty—defined by the World Bank as living below $1.90 per day in 2011 purchasing power parity (PPP) terms—experienced a marked decline. In 1990, approximately 1.9 billion people, or 36 percent of the global population, lived in extreme poverty. By 2015, this figure had fallen to around 689 million people, representing 10 percent of the world population, fulfilling the Millennium Development Goal target of halving poverty from 1990 levels. This reduction was primarily driven by robust economic growth in East Asia, particularly China and India, where market-oriented reforms lifted hundreds of millions out of poverty through expanded employment and income opportunities. Following the baseline, the pace of slowed considerably even before external shocks. From 2015 to 2019, the rate decreased from 10.8 percent to 8.4 percent, averting an estimated 69 million people from during that period. However, absolute numbers remained stagnant around 700 million, as in high-poverty regions offset gains. The World Bank's subsequent update to a $2.15 daily threshold in 2022, reflecting 2017 PPP adjustments, retrospectively raised the 2015 estimate to about 10 percent but confirmed the directional trend of deceleration. The COVID-19 pandemic markedly reversed post-2015 progress, pushing an additional 71 to 124 million people into extreme poverty in 2020 alone—the first global increase since 1998. By 2023, estimates indicated around 712 million in extreme poverty under the updated $2.15 line, with the United Nations' 2025 report projecting 808 million, or 9.9 percent of the population, reflecting stalled recovery amid inflation, conflicts, and uneven economic rebound. Sub-Saharan Africa, where poverty rates exceed 35 percent, accounted for over half of the global total post-2020, highlighting regional concentration of reversals. These trends underscore that while pre-2015 gains were propelled by structural economic shifts, post-2015 outcomes have been vulnerable to exogenous disruptions, with SDG 1's 2030 eradication target now deemed unattainable at current trajectories.

Regional Disparities in Poverty Reduction

East Asia and the Pacific region experienced the most substantial reductions in extreme poverty since 1990, with rates falling from over 50 percent to below 1 percent by 2019, largely attributable to sustained economic growth and market-oriented reforms in China and other economies, which lifted approximately 800 million people out of poverty between 1981 and 2015. In contrast, Sub-Saharan Africa has accounted for an increasing share of the global extreme poor, hosting 67 percent of the world's 700 million people living below $2.15 per day in 2024 despite comprising only 16 percent of the global population, with regional poverty rates at 46 percent that year. This disparity reflects slower per capita income growth, high population expansion rates exceeding economic gains, and recurrent conflicts disrupting agricultural and trade activities. South Asia demonstrated notable progress post-2000, with declining from around 40 percent to under 13 percent by 2020, driven by India's , expanded , and agricultural productivity gains that outpaced . However, reversals occurred during the , with seeing a 2.4 increase in rates by 2021 due to lockdowns halting informal sector . achieved moderate reductions, from 12 percent in 1990 to about 3 percent by 2019, but persistent and commodity price volatility have led to stagnation, with multidimensional affecting over 20 percent in some countries as of 2023. The region, while starting from lower baselines, has regressed since 2010 due to conflicts in , , and elsewhere, pushing shares upward to 5-7 percent by 2023 and displacing millions into fragile states with limited access to basic services. and maintain low rates below 2 percent, bolstered by integration into global markets and social safety nets, though post-Soviet transitions initially exacerbated in some areas. These patterns underscore that declines correlate more strongly with export-led growth and institutional stability than with aid inflows or redistributive policies alone, as evidenced by East Asia's outperformance relative to aid-dependent regions like .
RegionExtreme Poverty Rate (1990)Extreme Poverty Rate (2015)Extreme Poverty Rate (2024 est.)
East Asia & Pacific~50%~1%<1%
~50%~13%~10%
~56%~41%46%
~12%~4%~3%
~5%~2%~6%
Data compiled from World Bank estimates; rates reflect $2.15/day line post-2022 PPP adjustment.

Attributable Factors in Observed Declines

The primary attributable factors in the observed declines in between 1990 and 2015 were sustained, high rates of driven by market-oriented reforms in populous developing economies, particularly and , which together accounted for over 70% of the reduction in the number of people living below the $1.90 international line. During this period, the rate fell from 36% to approximately 10%, lifting over 1 billion people out of , with Asia's catch-up —fueled by into markets, , and incentives for enterprise—serving as the dominant causal mechanism rather than foreign aid or redistributive policies. Empirical analyses indicate that reduces directly through expanded and opportunities, with limited exacerbation of in these contexts. In , the reforms initiated under from 1978 onward— including the that devolved land use rights to farmers, the establishment of special economic zones to attract foreign investment, and the liberalization of —drove annual GDP growth averaging over 9% from 1980 to 2010, reducing the rural poverty rate from nearly 88% in 1981 to under 5% by 2015 and lifting approximately 800 million people out of . These changes shifted resources from state-controlled collectives to individual incentives, boosting agricultural productivity by 50% in the initial reform decade and enabling labor reallocation to higher-productivity manufacturing and services, with efficiency gains from market pricing and competition outweighing any direct poverty alleviation programs. Foreign inflows, averaging less than 0.1% of GDP, played a negligible role compared to domestic liberalization and export-led industrialization. India's 1991 , prompted by a balance-of-payments , dismantled the "License Raj" through tariff reductions from over 80% to around 30%, of industry, and encouragement of , accelerating GDP growth from an average of 3.5% in the to 6-7% in the and , which halved the national headcount ratio from 45% in 1993 to 21% by 2011. Pre-liberalization rural growth from technologies contributed modestly, but post-1991 urban expansion and trade openness generated broader employment gains, with studies attributing up to two-thirds of decline to rising household incomes from rather than subsidies or . Beyond these giants, secondary factors included agricultural modernization and urbanization in and , where selective trade openness correlated with drops of 20-30% in countries like and through garment export booms, though these were dwarfed by China's and India's scale. Cross-country econometric evidence confirms that a 10% increase in GDP typically reduces incidence by 2-3 percentage points, underscoring growth's causal primacy over aid, which often shows insignificant or context-dependent effects after controlling for institutional quality and investment climates. These declines predated the SDG framework, highlighting endogenous policy shifts toward property rights and competition as the core drivers, independent of international targets.

Challenges and Barriers

External Shocks: Pandemics, Conflicts, and Climate Events

![Fruits vendor during COVID-19 pandemic in Kathmandu][float-right] The , emerging in late 2019, reversed decades of under SDG 1 by disrupting economies, supply chains, and , particularly in low-income countries reliant on informal sectors. estimates indicate the crisis pushed an additional 97 million people into in 2020, elevating the global rate from 8.9% in 2019 to 9.7% using the $2.15 daily threshold. This setback, the largest in modern history, stemmed from lockdowns that halved incomes for the bottom 40% of earners compared to pre-pandemic levels, with recovery uneven and protracted in fragile states. Armed conflicts have compounded these challenges by displacing populations, destroying , and inflating prices, thereby entrenching cycles in affected regions. Severe conflicts reduce GDP by approximately 15% after five years, creating a persistent " debt" that hinders poverty alleviation, with the poorest nations experiencing the deepest and longest-lasting impacts. The Russia-Ukraine war, initiated on February 24, 2022, exemplifies this through supply disruptions that spiked global prices by 50% and heightened insecurity by 30% in vulnerable import-dependent countries, driving rises via elevated and costs. Conflicts and related fatalities have more than tripled since the early , fueling persistence, as noted in assessments through mid-2025. Climate events, including floods, droughts, and storms, further exacerbate by eroding livelihoods in agriculture-dependent economies, where the poor allocate a high share of income to weather-sensitive sectors. alone propel 26 million people into annually, with economic losses exceeding $520 billion globally. Projections indicate could drive up to 132 million additional individuals into by 2030, disproportionately burdening and due to limited and high exposure. These shocks interact cumulatively—such as pandemics amplifying conflict-induced scarcities or disasters compounding damage—amplifying reversal risks for SDG 1, with 808 million people remaining in as of 2025 amid ongoing vulnerabilities. Empirical data underscores that without enhanced measures, these exogenous events systematically undermine institutional efforts to eradicate by 2030.

Internal Constraints: Governance and Policy Failures

Poor , manifested in , weak institutional frameworks, and ineffective execution, represents a primary internal barrier to achieving Sustainable Development Goal 1 by diverting resources from alleviation programs and stifling essential for lifting populations out of . Empirical analyses reveal a strong positive between levels—proxied by the —and rates, with a of 0.885 indicating that higher perceived coincides with elevated incidence across countries. mechanisms include the misallocation of public funds, such as those earmarked for social safety nets or , toward or networks, thereby reducing the fiscal space for pro-poor investments and exacerbating through biased tax systems and poor targeting of subsidies. Policy failures compound these issues by prioritizing short-term political gains over , often resulting in fragmented or unimplemented initiatives that fail to address root causes like low productivity in and informal sectors. In , for instance, shortcomings—including a lack of long-term developmental vision, rhetorical rather than substantive commitment to , and pervasive —have undermined the delivery of aid and social programs, leading to inefficiencies in resource distribution and stalled progress despite rates averaging 6% annually from 2010 to 2020. Bureaucratic inefficiencies, characterized by slow and inadequate mechanisms, further delay program rollout, as evidenced by persistent gaps in targeting vulnerable rural populations even amid donor-supported efforts. Weak and institutional deficits amplify these constraints by eroding investor confidence and perpetuating poverty traps, particularly for the poor who lack secure property rights and access to . Research syntheses confirm that such lapses disproportionately harm low-income groups by hindering market efficiencies and , with bad independently linked to slower poverty declines even controlling for economic factors. In sub-Saharan African contexts, for example, and opaque policymaking have neutralized potential gains from foreign , fostering dependency and elite entrenchment rather than broad-based . These internal dynamics underscore that external financing alone cannot compensate for domestic policy and shortcomings, as misgovernance often captures benefits away from intended recipients.

Reversal Risks and 2025 Assessment of Off-Track Status

Reversals in poverty reduction have been observed since 2020, primarily driven by the COVID-19 pandemic, which pushed an additional 70-95 million people into extreme poverty according to World Bank estimates, reversing gains equivalent to three years of prior progress. Ongoing conflicts, such as those in Ukraine, Sudan, and Gaza, exacerbate risks by displacing populations, disrupting food supplies, and inflating commodity prices, with sub-Saharan Africa—home to 60% of the global extreme poor—facing compounded instability from internal governance failures and external pressures. Climate events, including droughts and floods, further threaten agricultural livelihoods in vulnerable regions, where smallholder farmers constitute a significant poverty share, potentially adding 26 million to extreme poverty by 2030 under high-emission scenarios per World Bank projections. High debt levels in low-income countries, averaging 60% of GDP in 2024, constrain fiscal space for social spending, while inflation—peaking at 8.7% globally in 2022—erodes real incomes for the bottom quintile. Internal risks stem from policy missteps, such as subsidies distorting markets and fostering dependency, and weak institutions failing to enforce property rights, which stifle investment and growth essential for sustained escapes from poverty. Economic slowdowns, with global growth projected at 2.3% for 2025—the weakest since 2008 excluding recessions—limit job creation in informal sectors where 60% of the extreme poor are employed. Fragility in conflict-affected states, where poverty rates exceed 40%, amplifies reversal potential, as aid inflows often fail to build resilient economies amid corruption and elite capture. In 2025 assessments, SDG 1 remains severely off-track, with 808 million people—9.9% of the global population—living in under the updated $3.00 per day line, an upward revision from prior $2.15-based estimates of 677 million due to adjustments and stalled reductions. The UN Report 2025 confirms that current trajectories will leave 8.9% of the world in by 2030, far from the zero target, with only 69 million projected escapes between 2024 and 2030 compared to 150 million in the 2013-2019 period. Progress has concentrated in stable economies, but reversals in fragile contexts have offset gains, rendering the goal unattainable without accelerated growth rates exceeding 7% annually in high-poverty regions—a level unseen since the early . analyses attribute the off-track status to insufficient policy reforms prioritizing export-led growth over redistributive measures, which have proven ineffective in scaling exits beyond temporary relief.

Criticisms and Debates

Overambition and Unrealistic Timelines

The target under SDG 1.1 to eradicate —defined as living on less than $2.15 per day (2017 )—for all people everywhere by 2030 has been widely critiqued as overambitious due to the unprecedented acceleration in rates it would require compared to historical precedents. From 1990 to 2015, under the , the global rate fell from 36% to 10%, lifting over 1 billion people out of , primarily through growth in and , but this pace slowed to about 0.6 percentage points per year between 2014 and 2019, far short of the roughly 7-8 percentage points annually needed post-2015 to reach zero by 2030. Critics, including economists at , argue that such targets ignore the concentration of remaining in fragile and conflict-affected states, where over 75% of the world's extreme poor reside and where governance failures and instability hinder rapid progress. Projections from the and confirm the timeline's unattainability under current trends, estimating that 575 million people—about 7% of the global population—will remain in by 2030, even assuming moderate recovery from recent shocks. External events like the reversed years of gains, pushing an additional 70-95 million into by 2020-2021, while the conflict exacerbated food and energy price spikes, particularly in . A 2023 analysis in further underscores the realism deficit, modeling that even optimistic scenarios fail to eliminate globally by 2030 without transformative interventions in high-poverty regions, which historical data shows are improbable given persistent institutional barriers. The UN's own 2025 Sustainable Development Goals Report highlights systemic underestimation of challenges, with only 35% of SDG targets on track overall and SDG 1 explicitly stalled, as poverty eradication demands not just but also addressing "last mile" issues like rural and informal economies, which prior frameworks like the MDGs also struggled to resolve at scale. UN Special Rapporteur Olivier De Schutter has described the 2030 poverty goal as a "fading dream," faulting overreliance on trickle-down growth models that overlook and policy distortions in aid-dependent nations. While proponents contend the ambition mobilizes resources, empirical assessments from bodies like the indicate that without radical shifts—such as doubling annual reduction rates—the deadline functions more as aspirational rhetoric than feasible benchmark, potentially diverting focus from incremental, evidence-based strategies.

Methodological Flaws in Targets and Measurement

The international poverty line used for SDG 1.1, set at $2.15 per day in 2017 (PPP) terms by the , has been criticized for underestimating the resources required for basic human needs in low-income contexts, as it derives from median consumption baskets in the world's poorest countries, which often exclude adequate non-food essentials like and healthcare. This threshold, updated from $1.90 in 2011 PPP to reflect price changes, remains functionally equivalent to severe deprivation even slightly above it, failing to capture deprivations experienced by those marginally exceeding the line, such as inadequate or security. Economists have argued that the line's derivation method skews global distribution by anchoring too low, potentially masking the true scale of extreme deprivation and incentivizing superficial progress reporting over substantive policy shifts. Purchasing power parity adjustments underpinning the metric introduce further distortions, as they rely on standardized consumption patterns from reference nations that do not align with actual spending priorities in surveyed poor , where non-market goods, informal economies, and regional cost variations predominate. surveys, the primary data source for these estimates, systematically underreport incomes compared to due to recall biases, exclusion of transient earnings, and under-sampling of transient populations like migrants, leading to headcount inflation when benchmarked against macroeconomic aggregates. For instance, discrepancies between survey-based rates and GDP-per-capita growth imply underestimation of actual living standards, complicating cross-country comparisons and essential for SDG . Data coverage and timeliness for SDG 1 indicators remain severely limited, with only partial recent surveys available for approximately half of low-income , many relying on predating or extrapolated projections that amplify uncertainty in tracking progress toward 2030 targets. As of 2023, fewer than 25% of report comprehensive across all SDG indicators, including 1.1.1 on proportion, exacerbating gaps in disaggregated metrics by , , or location required for equitable assessment. These deficiencies hinder causal attribution of poverty changes, as incomplete datasets obscure the interplay of factors like or informal sector shifts, rendering targets like full eradication (1.1) practically unmeasurable with current methods. Broader targets, such as building resilience to shocks (1.5) or ensuring access to basic services (1.4), suffer from imprecise indicators that prioritize countable events like disaster deaths over systemic vulnerabilities, such as economic volatility or failures, which lack standardized, verifiable proxies. The reliance on monetary metrics in core targets overlooks multidimensional deprivations——that surveys capture inconsistently due to subjective weighting and aggregation challenges, potentially misdirecting interventions away from integrated solutions. Critics contend this framework's outcome-focused measurability favors quantifiable reductions over addressing root institutional barriers, with arbitrary timelines like 2030 amplifying reporting biases in under-resourced national statistical systems.

Promotion of Dependency Through Aid and Redistribution

Critics of SDG 1 contend that foreign , mobilized under target 1.a to eradicate , frequently engenders dependency by allowing recipient governments to evade fiscal responsibility and institutional reforms. In aid-dependent economies, where constitutes over 10% of GDP—as seen in countries like and in the early 2010s—governments exhibit reduced incentives to broaden bases or enhance domestic , perpetuating reliance on external inflows rather than fostering self-sustaining . This dynamic aligns with the "dependency trap" described in economic analyses, where grants designed for short-term relief prompt adaptive behaviors that prioritize aid capture over productive investment, as evidenced by longitudinal data from low-income African nations showing stagnant despite decades of aid averaging 5-15% of GDP. Empirical studies underscore how such aid inflows undermine and local initiative. For instance, a review of sub-Saharan cases reveals that high aid-to-revenue ratios correlate with diminished responsiveness to citizen needs, as leaders prioritize donor agendas over voter demands, eroding the and public sector efficiency essential for alleviation. Dambisa Moyo argues in her analysis that aid fosters , export limitations, and effects, where currency appreciation from inflows hampers tradable sectors, trapping economies in low-productivity cycles; this is supported by cross-country regressions showing no net growth acceleration from aid in institutionally weak settings. Similarly, in conflict-affected regions like , aid stabilization efforts have entrenched , with foreign inflows propping up reserves without addressing structural deficits, leading to recurrent crises as seen in the 2019-2022 . Redistributive mechanisms under target 1.3, such as universal floors, risk analogous disincentives at the household level by substituting for labor market participation. Unconditional transfers, while providing immediate relief, can reduce work effort and entrepreneurial risk-taking, as demonstrated in randomized evaluations of programs in where beneficiaries exhibited 10-20% lower employment rates post-intervention compared to controls. Intergenerational studies further indicate transmission of reliance, with children of recipients in and U.S. systems showing 15-30% higher of long-term dependence, a pattern likely replicable in scaling SDG 1's safety nets without work requirements or time limits. In humanitarian contexts aligned with SDG goals, repeated aid episodes have been linked to heightened dependence, with recipients in protracted crises prioritizing aid flows over self-reliance, as quantitative models from confirm funding's short-term deprivation reduction but long-term institutional erosion. These effects compound under SDG 1's framework, where and redistribution prioritize over capacity-building, diverting resources from investments in or that could break cycles. Comprehensive IMF assessments find no robust link between and sustained in poor countries, attributing stagnation to where donors enable governance failures. Proponents of these approaches often cite marginal dips from surges, yet overlook counterfactuals where market-driven alternatives—such as trade liberalization—have yielded faster escapes from , as in East Asia's pre-2015 trajectories. Overall, while not universal, the preponderance of evidence from aid-recipient trajectories warns that SDG 1's reliance on transfers risks entrenching the very vulnerabilities it seeks to end.

Root Causes of Poverty

Institutional Weaknesses and Rule of Law Deficits

Weak institutions, characterized by inadequate protection of property rights, unreliable contract enforcement, and pervasive , hinder the mechanisms necessary for sustainable by discouraging private investment and entrepreneurial activity. In extractive institutional frameworks, political and economic power concentrates among elites who prioritize over broad-based growth, trapping populations in cycles of low productivity and dependency. , Simon Johnson, and demonstrate through historical and econometric analysis that such institutions explain long-term disparities in prosperity, with inclusive alternatives—featuring impartial —correlating with higher incomes and lower incidence across former colonies. Deficits in exacerbate these issues by enabling impunity for elite predation and limiting access to , which disproportionately affects the poor who lack resources to navigate dysfunctional systems. The World Justice Project's assessments reveal that in low-rule-of-law environments, common in and parts of , diverts public resources from social programs, while insecure tenure discourages agricultural investment essential for rural livelihoods. For instance, countries scoring below 0.5 on the Index (on a 0-1 scale) exhibit poverty headcount ratios exceeding 40% at $2.15 per day, compared to under 10% in high-scoring peers, underscoring causality beyond mere through reduced and innovation. These institutional failures contribute to SDG 1's off-track status in fragile states, where indicators from the 's predict stalled progress; nations in the bottom for voice and accountability and control of corruption saw rates stagnate or rise between 2015 and 2022, even amid global declines. Resistance to reform persists due to "limited access orders," where elites block to maintain power, as evidenced in resource-dependent economies prone to the "weak curse." analyses emphasize that bolstering could accelerate poverty reduction by 1-2 percentage points annually in affected regions, yet entrenched interests often undermine such efforts.

Economic Policies Inhibiting Growth and Innovation

Excessive business regulations in developing countries, including cumbersome licensing requirements and bureaucratic hurdles for starting and operating enterprises, significantly deter and private , which are critical drivers of economic expansion and poverty alleviation. For instance, in , pre-reform processes for electricity connections and investment approvals imposed high costs and delays, inhibiting business formation until streamlined measures via a benefited over 1,200 firms and generated savings exceeding $721 million for businesses and citizens. Similarly, complex compliance mandates in various low-income economies perpetuate informality, where over 60% of remains unregistered, limiting access to and markets that could foster and job creation. These barriers reduce firm entry rates by up to 20-30% in heavily regulated environments, as evidenced by cross-country analyses linking regulatory stringency to lower entrepreneurial activity in developing nations. High taxation, particularly indirect taxes like value-added taxes (), combined with poorly targeted subsidies, further undermines growth incentives by imposing disproportionate burdens on low-income households and discouraging productive . In two-thirds of low- and middle-income countries, fiscal interventions result in the poorest quintile experiencing reduced consumable after for taxes, transfers, and subsidies, as indirect taxes regressively affect while subsidies—often benefiting non-poor sectors like —deliver only about 20% of to the bottom 40% of the population. Empirical studies confirm that elevated tax rates on exacerbate by curtailing disposable and labor supply among the vulnerable, with net effects turning the poorest households into contributors rather than recipients of . Moreover, high marginal effective rates from overlapping levies and phase-outs can exceed 70% for low-wage earners, creating disincentives to formal and that perpetuate cycles of stagnation. Countries with lower —characterized by such interventionist policies—exhibit persistently higher rates, as restricted markets stifle the and openness needed to lift populations out of destitution. Cross-country data reveal that among the poorest quintile of nations, those scoring higher on indices enjoy incomes approximately 50% greater than their less free counterparts, underscoring how policy-induced barriers to property rights, , and hinder the structural transformations observed in success stories like . In and , where SDG 1 progress lags, protectionist tariffs averaging 10-15% and subsidy distortions equivalent to 2-5% of GDP crowd out dynamism, resulting in annual growth shortfalls of 1-2 percentage points that trap millions below $2.15 daily income thresholds as of 2023. These patterns indicate that prioritizing regulatory ease and fiscal restraint over expansive state controls correlates with faster declines, challenging aid-dependent models that overlook distortions.

Cultural and Incentive Structures Perpetuating Cycles

Cultural norms in impoverished communities often prioritize immediate survival and obligations over long-term investments in and skill development, thereby hindering . For instance, in many low-income settings, early marriage and childbearing disrupt , with studies showing that children from -parent households—prevalent in such environments—face a 2-3 times higher risk of persistence into adulthood compared to those from two-parent families. This pattern is exacerbated by intergenerational transmission, where single parenthood correlates with lower parental and achievement test scores for offspring, as evidenced by longitudinal data from U.S. cohorts spanning 1968-2000. Norms devaluing formal or associating it with external cultural imposition further entrench cycles, particularly in communities where "cultural " discourages of behaviors linked to upward mobility, such as or entrepreneurial risk-taking. Research from low-income areas indicates that pessimistic attitudes toward success—fostered by exposure to chronic disadvantage—reduce motivation for skill-building, with qualitative analyses revealing that familial expectations of reliance or informal economies overshadow aspirations for formal . Economists like Lawrence Mead argue that such cultural adaptations to , including aversion to "bourgeois" work , sustain dependency absent deliberate interventions like targeted behavioral . Incentive structures in welfare systems compound these cultural tendencies by creating "poverty traps" through high effective marginal tax rates on earnings, where benefit phase-outs can reduce for low-wage workers by up to 80-100% initially. In the U.S., for example, a 2025 Congressional Budget Office analysis found that households near the line often receive more from transfers than from , with over 50% of poor families relying primarily on checks rather than work earnings, discouraging labor force participation. proposals emphasize aligning benefits with work requirements to restore self-sufficiency incentives, as unchecked erodes the causal link between effort and reward essential for breaking cycles. These intertwined factors—cultural resignation to scarcity and distorted incentives favoring non-work—perpetuate beyond material constraints, as evidenced by comparative studies showing higher in communities with intact family norms and tapered schedules. While some critiques dismiss as a "," empirical models incorporating behavioral responses demonstrate that unadjusted transfers amplify idleness in responsive populations, underscoring the need for policies addressing root motivational barriers.

Alternative Strategies

Market Liberalization and Trade Openness

Market liberalization entails the reduction of government-imposed , of prices and production, and of state-owned enterprises, fostering and efficient . Trade openness complements this by lowering tariffs, eliminating quotas, and facilitating cross-border flows of goods, services, and capital, enabling countries to exploit comparative advantages. These policies contrast with protectionist measures by prioritizing voluntary exchange over state directives, which empirical analyses indicate drives sustained economic expansion necessary for alleviation. Cross-country studies demonstrate a robust positive correlation between trade openness—measured as exports plus imports over GDP—and per capita income growth, with growth serving as the primary mechanism for reducing absolute poverty. For instance, a comprehensive review of liberalization episodes finds that, in the long run, such reforms are highly likely to alleviate poverty by expanding employment opportunities and lowering consumer prices through imported competition. In developing economies, a 1% increase in trade openness has been associated with 0.5-2% higher growth rates, translating to significant headcount poverty reductions when sustained over decades. Complementary domestic liberalization amplifies these effects by enhancing productivity via innovation and foreign direct investment inflows. Case studies underscore these dynamics. China's shift from isolation to export-led growth post-1978 reforms saw plummet from 88% of the population in 1981 to under 1% by 2015, driven by accession to global markets and domestic that boosted exports from $10 billion in 1980 to over $2 trillion by 2013. Similarly, India's 1991 liberalization dismantled the "License Raj," resulting in GDP growth averaging 6-7% annually and halving rates from 45% in 1993 to 21% by 2011, with trade volumes surging eightfold. In , Chile's tariff reductions from over 100% in the to under 10% by the correlated with falling from 45% to 8% between 1987 and 2017, outperforming regional peers reliant on import substitution. These outcomes reflect causal channels like technology diffusion and scale economies, though short-term dislocations occur without safety nets. While effects vary by initial conditions—such as and —evidence refutes claims of uniform harm, showing no systematic increase from when accounting for spillovers. Critics highlighting rises often overlook that absolute gains for the poor predominate, as median incomes rise with overall expansion. Complementary reforms, including , mitigate risks, but empirically correlates with stagnation, as seen in pre-reform and . Thus, for SDG 1, prioritizing openness over dependency aligns with causal evidence linking market integration to scalable escape.

Property Rights Formalization and Entrepreneurship

Formalizing property rights in developing countries transforms informally held assets—such as and homes held by squatters or customary tenure—into legally recognized that can be used as for loans, traded, or invested in productive enterprises. This process addresses the "dead capital" phenomenon, where the poor possess substantial assets estimated at $9.3 trillion globally but cannot mobilize them due to lack of formal titles, limiting and . By securing tenure against expropriation and enabling asset leverage, titling programs incentivize risk-taking in formation, as owners can borrow against their to startups, expansions, or agricultural improvements without fear of losing underlying assets. Hernando de Soto's framework posits that such formalization integrates informal sectors into the formal economy, fostering as a primary poverty escape mechanism rather than reliance on . Empirical evidence from Peru's urban titling program, initiated in 1998 under the National Program for Urban Poverty (PNPU), demonstrates these effects: over 1.5 million titles were issued by 2007, leading to a 20-30% increase in investments in durable and among titled families, which supported small-scale entrepreneurial activities like home-based workshops. Titled s also experienced improved access to formal , particularly from public banks, with credit usage rising by up to 11 percentage points, enabling investments in income-generating ventures such as informal trading or micro-manufacturing. In rural areas, titling reduced credit constraints for constrained farmers, boosting agricultural investments and income diversification into non-farm entrepreneurship. These outcomes align with broader studies showing titling enhances labor supply toward and reduces size, freeing resources for business initiation. While credit access gains are not universal—often limited to formal lenders and varying by program design—titling consistently correlates with higher rates by lowering transaction costs and perceived risks, as seen in increased land transfers and off-farm in contexts like China's reforms. Critiques note that low asset values in some informal settlements may limit lender interest, yet aggregate evidence supports formalization as a catalyst for private initiative over redistributive policies, with titled owners reporting greater tenure (67% in Peruvian slums) that underpins confidence. This approach prioritizes endogenous growth through individual agency, contrasting with SDG1's emphasis on external interventions.

Private Sector Innovations and Philanthropic Initiatives

Private sector innovations in have shown empirical efficacy in enhancing and reducing in low-income settings. The rollout of , a service launched by in in 2007, exemplifies this approach; a utilizing household survey data from 2008 to 2014 found that expanded access to increased per capita consumption by 2% and lifted approximately 194,000 households—or 2% of the Kenyan population—above the line, with effects concentrated among female-headed households and rural residents due to facilitated remittances and savings. This innovation leveraged private investment in telecommunications infrastructure to bypass traditional banking barriers, enabling transactions via basic mobile phones without requiring formal accounts. Impact investing, which directs private capital toward enterprises targeting poverty alleviation, has supported scalable models such as microenterprises and agricultural supply chains, though outcomes vary by context and measurement rigor. For instance, investments in (SMEs) in developing economies have been linked to job creation and income growth, with some funds reporting poverty reductions through targeted lending in underserved regions; however, systematic reviews highlight that sustained impacts depend on local institutional quality rather than volume alone. Private firms have also innovated in off-grid energy solutions, such as solar-powered lighting and charging systems, which RCTs indicate boost household productivity and by extending usable hours beyond daylight, indirectly mitigating poverty traps in energy-scarce areas. Philanthropic initiatives emphasizing evidence-based interventions, particularly unconditional cash transfers, have delivered verifiable short- to medium-term reductions by empowering recipients' decision-making. , a nonprofit operational since 2009, administers lump-sum transfers via in rural ; randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrate that such programs increase household assets by 58%, food consumption by 20-30%, and overall consumption levels, with sustained effects observed up to nine years post-transfer due to investments in livestock, farming, and businesses. These transfers avoid paternalistic conditions, aligning with causal evidence that liquidity constraints, rather than behavioral failures, often perpetuate in unstable environments. Other philanthropic models, such as poverty graduation programs supported by donors like the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through partners including Village Enterprise, integrate cash with training and assets; independent RCTs in and report 64% poverty graduation rates after two years, with beneficiaries sustaining income gains via market-oriented enterprises like . While effective at scale in select trials, these initiatives underscore the value of private-sector-like incentives—such as asset ownership and —over dependency-inducing , though scalability remains constrained by funding and local governance. Overall, such private and philanthropic efforts succeed where they prioritize measurable, individual-level empowerment over top-down redistribution, complementing broader .

Interlinkages and Broader Impacts

Synergies with Economic Growth-Oriented SDGs

Economic growth under SDG 8 (decent work and economic growth) exhibits strong synergies with SDG 1 by expanding employment opportunities and elevating incomes, thereby enabling households to surpass poverty thresholds. Empirical data from the World Bank demonstrate that global extreme poverty—defined as living on less than $2.15 per day—declined from 36% of the population in 1990 to approximately 8.5% by 2024, a reduction attributable predominantly to sustained GDP per capita increases in high-growth economies like China and India. Analyses confirm that economic growth is generally pro-poor, with a 10% rise in GDP correlating to a 4-5% decrease in multidimensional poverty indices across developing nations. In sub-Saharan Africa, the elasticity of poverty reduction to per capita growth stands at around 2.5, indicating that each 1% GDP increase reduces the poverty headcount by 2.5%. These synergies extend to SDG 9 (industry, innovation, and ), where enhancements in physical and technological infrastructure lower transaction costs and foster among low-income populations. For example, infrastructure development facilitates better market integration for rural poor, amplifying the poverty-alleviating effects of growth; studies link such investments to accelerated poverty declines in , where growth rates above 7% annually halved poverty incidences within decades. Innovation-driven advancements, including digital , further synergize by providing the unbanked with access to credit and remittances, as evidenced by income boosts for smallholder farmers in regions adopting technologies. However, these interlinkages depend on growth being inclusive; without complementary reforms in property rights and openness, poverty persistence can undermine SDG 1 progress despite GDP expansions. Cross-sectional research on SDG interdependencies reinforces that advancements in SDG 8 indicators—such as labor productivity and employment rates—positively covary with SDG 1 outcomes, with synergies observed in over 70% of global indicator pairs when tied to rising GDP . Stagnant growth, as seen post-2019 amid subdued global expansion, has halted reductions, underscoring the causal primacy of economic dynamism over redistributive measures alone. Thus, prioritizing growth-oriented policies yields multiplicative benefits, where eradication reinforces by enlarging labor pools and consumer bases.

Trade-offs with Environmental and Equity-Focused Goals

Efforts to eradicate under SDG 1 often necessitate rapid in low-income nations, which can exacerbate and conflict with goals such as SDG 13 () and SDG 15 (life on land). Empirical analyses reveal an "Environmental ," positing a short-term where reductions in poverty rates correlate with higher carbon emissions and , as industrialization and energy-intensive development lift populations above subsistence levels but increase outputs. For instance, achieving SDG 1 targets in through and agricultural intensification has been linked to elevated and , undermining SDG 15 objectives, as expanded farming to secure encroaches on natural habitats. While eradicating (below $2.15 daily) might add only 0.4-2.4% to global emissions by elevating consumption patterns, sustained growth to prevent relapse demands reliance in energy-poor regions, clashing with stringent decarbonization mandates that raise energy costs and hinder affordability. These tensions extend to land and resource allocation, where poverty alleviation prioritizes immediate human needs over ecological preservation. In developing economies, subsidies for fossil fuels or expansive infrastructure to boost employment and output—key to SDG 1 progress—frequently trade off against renewable transitions or conservation efforts aligned with environmental SDGs, as cheaper, reliable baseload power from coal or gas enables manufacturing booms that double per capita incomes but spike local pollution. Quantitative assessments across countries indicate that synergies exist in the long term via technological leaps, yet initial phases of poverty reduction exhibit negative correlations with indicators like reduced emissions intensity, necessitating policy sequencing that favors growth first despite interim ecological costs. Regarding equity-focused goals like SDG 10 (reduced inequalities), through market-led growth can initially widen income disparities, as and skill-biased technological adoption benefit early adopters disproportionately, conflicting with egalitarian redistribution aims. Panel data from 158 countries (1960-2010) show that a 10 GDP growth spurt reduces headcount by 2-3 points on average, but rises ambiguously by less than 1% in many cases, depending on initial conditions and policy design—high baseline amplifies the growth needed for gains, yet aggressive measures like progressive taxation or asset transfers may dampen investment incentives, slowing the expansion required for broad-based escape. In practice, this manifests as a where prioritizing SDG 10 via heavy state intervention correlates negatively with overall sustainable progress composites, as observed in indicator correlations, potentially perpetuating traps if growth engines are curtailed. Empirical surveys underscore that while lower enhances responsiveness to growth, the causal priority remains expansionary policies over redistribution alone, as the latter's impact on proves context-specific and often modest without complementary efficiency gains.

Long-Term Feasibility in a Market-Driven World

Empirical evidence links higher degrees of —characterized by secure property rights, open trade, and minimal regulatory barriers—to accelerated , suggesting strong long-term feasibility for SDG 1 targets in market-driven systems. Cross-country analyses indicate that countries with greater experience faster GDP growth and lower absolute rates, as markets incentivize , , and job creation that elevate living standards. For instance, nations ranking in the top of the index have rates roughly 50% lower than those in the bottom , driven by mechanisms such as to and diffusion. Global trends reinforce this, with (defined as living below $2.15 per day in 2017 terms) declining from 36% of the in 1990 to approximately 8.5% by 2022, coinciding with widespread market liberalizations post-Cold War, including trade reforms in that boosted export-led growth. Projections under continued market-oriented policies forecast falling below 2% globally by 2050, potentially eradicating it in most regions through productivity gains and technological advancements, such as agricultural innovations and digital finance that markets uniquely scale. Critics, often from and circles emphasizing redistribution over , argue that systems perpetuate structural that undermine absolute elimination, citing persistent Gini coefficients in liberalized economies. However, such views overlook causal evidence that -induced declines outweigh relative effects; for example, episodes in developing countries have reduced headcounts by 1-2 percentage points per year of reform implementation, net of distributional impacts. In a purely -driven , SDG 1's feasibility thus depends less on coercive interventions and more on removing barriers to voluntary , enabling spontaneous that has historically outpaced aid-dependent strategies. Long-term success requires vigilance against and overregulation, which distort signals and hinder the incentive structures essential for sustained prosperity.

Implementation Landscape

Roles of International Bodies and Funding

The coordinates global efforts under SDG 1 through its agencies, with the (UNDP) playing a central role in supporting strategies in developing countries. UNDP focuses on streams such as , generation, local , and systems to address multidimensional , including partnerships for in . As of 2024, UNDP has targeted assisting 100 million people in escaping multidimensional by 2025 via programs emphasizing national policy formulation, implementation, and monitoring aligned with SDG 1 targets like eradicating and building resilience to shocks. The provides substantial financing, technical assistance, and data monitoring for SDG 1, contributing the largest share (26 percent) of tracked multilateral funding in recent reports and prioritizing interventions in low-income countries to alleviate multidimensional through rather than direct economic growth alone. In its 2023 annual report, the committed resources to metrics, noting that pre-pandemic affected 659 million below $2.15 per day, with projections indicating 8.9 percent of the global may remain in by 2030 if trends persist. projects have demonstrated reductions in where implementation increased fiscal capacity for social programs, though outcomes depend heavily on local governance quality. Other international financial institutions, including the (IMF) and regional development banks like the , support SDG 1 through policy advice on fiscal frameworks and concessional lending, with the latter providing 14 percent of certain pools as of 2023. Mechanisms such as the Joint SDG Fund pool resources from multiple donors for integrated support and strategic investments in alleviation, incentivizing shifts toward sustainable financing in areas like . The highlights trade openness as a complementary tool, crediting it with global declines via , though isolated from direct roles. Funding for SDG 1 primarily flows through (ODA), multilateral grants, and loans, with donors increasing allocations to no-poverty initiatives post-2020, though empirical evidence on overall remains mixed. Studies indicate foreign , including multilateral channels, correlates with in contexts with domestic policies fostering , but shows or no impact in many low-income settings due to factors like weak institutions and aid dependency. Multilateral outperforms bilateral in some poverty metrics, particularly grants over loans, yet surveys of aid impacts reveal positive effects only in policy-conducive environments, underscoring that recipient , not donor volume, drives causal outcomes.

National Case Studies of Success and Failure

China's efforts since the late 1970s exemplify a success in achieving SDG 1 targets through targeted economic reforms and sustained growth. Beginning with Deng Xiaoping's market-oriented policies in 1978, which included decollectivization of , rural household responsibility systems, and gradual opening to foreign investment, the country lifted approximately 800 million people out of between 1981 and 2020, reducing the rate from 88% to effectively zero by national standards. This accounted for over 75% of the global decline in during that period, driven primarily by rapid GDP growth averaging 9-10% annually, , and investments that expanded opportunities. Unlike aid-dependent models, China's approach emphasized internal gains and export-led industrialization, though challenges persist in addressing upper-middle-income thresholds, with 17% of the below $6.85 per day (2017 ) as of 2021. Vietnam similarly demonstrates effective poverty alleviation aligned with SDG 1 via Doi Moi reforms initiated in 1986, which transitioned from a centrally planned economy to a socialist-oriented market system. These changes, including land reforms granting farmers usage rights, trade liberalization, and private enterprise encouragement, halved poverty rates ahead of Millennium Development Goal timelines, dropping from 58% in 1993 to under 5% by 2020 using national lines, and from 14% to 1.2% under the $1.90 (2011 PPP) extreme poverty measure. Annual GDP growth exceeding 6% since the 1990s, coupled with public investments in education and rural infrastructure, boosted agricultural productivity and non-farm jobs, enabling the country to graduate from low-income to lower-middle-income status by 2010. Persistent vulnerabilities, such as ethnic minority disparities and climate risks, highlight the need for inclusive growth to sustain gains. In contrast, Venezuela's experience under Hugo Chávez and Nicolás Maduro illustrates policy-induced failure in SDG 1 progress, where extreme poverty rose dramatically despite initial oil-funded social programs. From 1998 to 2013, poverty fell from 49% to 27% amid high oil prices enabling subsidies and missions like Barrio Adentro, but subsequent nationalizations, price controls, and currency mismanagement triggered hyperinflation exceeding 1 million percent by 2018, reversing gains and pushing multidimensional poverty to 96% by independent 2018 surveys. Economic contraction of over 75% GDP from 2013 to 2021, coupled with expropriations deterring investment, eroded formal employment and food security, with extreme poverty surging to affect over 80% of households by 2020 per ENCOVI data. This case underscores how resource dependence without diversification or sound fiscal policies can exacerbate poverty, overriding temporary redistributive measures. Sub-Saharan African nations, such as those in the Sahel region including Mali and Niger, reveal systemic failures in poverty reduction despite decades of international aid exceeding $1 trillion since 1960, with extreme poverty persisting at 40% regionally as of 2019. Aid inflows, often tied to short-term humanitarian relief rather than institutional reforms, have correlated with stagnant per capita growth and wage declines since the 1970s, fostering dependency and elite capture without addressing root causes like weak property rights and conflict fragility. In fragile states, where over 50% of the extreme poor reside, violence and governance deficits have trapped populations in poverty cycles, with SDG 1 targets unmet amid population growth outpacing reductions; for instance, Nigeria's poverty headcount rose from 40% in 2010 to 63% by 2018 despite oil revenues and aid. Empirical analyses indicate aid's limited impact on structural transformation, prioritizing consumption over productive investments, thus perpetuating high vulnerability to shocks like COVID-19, which reversed prior modest gains.

Private and Civil Society Contributions

Private sector entities contribute to SDG 1 primarily through job creation, financial inclusion innovations, and targeted investments that enhance economic opportunities for low-income populations. For instance, small and medium-sized enterprises () in developing contexts have demonstrated capacity to drive by generating sustainable and stimulating local economies, as evidenced by analyses of SME performance in poverty elimination efforts. (IFC) investments, totaling approximately $20 billion annually as of 2017 including mobilized funds, support private sector projects that indirectly address via and in low-income regions. However, (CSR) programs aimed at poverty alleviation, such as those in Peruvian rural communities, show perceived benefits in family welfare but limited of sustained income gains, with outcomes varying by program design and local implementation. Philanthropic initiatives from private foundations have funded evidence-based interventions, including programs that demonstrably improve health, education, and self-reliance among recipients. Organizations like deliver unconditional cash to extremely poor households, with randomized evaluations indicating reduced adult and rates alongside increased asset accumulation and consumption. The Graduation approach, pioneered by entities such as the and scaled by philanthropists, combines asset transfers, training, and savings with consumption support, achieving long-term escapes for participants in rigorous trials across multiple countries since its inception over two decades ago. These efforts prioritize measurable impacts over broad advocacy, contrasting with less effective models like traditional , where randomized controlled trials reveal minimal direct effects on household levels despite expanded access to . Civil society organizations, including non-governmental organizations (NGOs), supplement these efforts through community-level programs focused on and service delivery, though their overall impact on global remains constrained by scale and dependency on external funding. Studies indicate NGOs facilitate via economic and access to in targeted communities, particularly in developing nations, but systemic challenges like weak limit broader efficacy. For example, initiatives distributing productive assets and training have supported holistic development in rural areas, aligning with SDG 1 targets, yet empirical assessments highlight that NGO-driven often fails to significantly lower incidence, underscoring the need for integrated approaches over isolated lending. Credible evaluations emphasize that 's most reliable contributions occur in partnership with private innovations, amplifying job creation and financial tools rather than supplanting market-driven growth.

References

  1. [1]
    Goal 1 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs
    Target 1.1: o Extreme poverty levels returned to pre-pandemic levels in most countries by 2022, except in low-income countries where recovery has been slower.Sustainable Development · 8th Local and Regional... · Poverty eradication · 12
  2. [2]
    Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 1) - United Nations Western ...
    Targets · 1.1 By 2030, eradicate extreme poverty for all people everywhere, currently measured as people living on less than $1.25 a day · 1.2 By 2030, reduce at ...
  3. [3]
    Poverty, Prosperity, and Planet Report 2024 - World Bank
    Today, almost 700 million people (8.5 percent of the global population) live in extreme poverty - on less than $2.15 per day. Progress has stalled amid low ...Overview Figures · Publication · Background Papers
  4. [4]
    No poverty | SDG 1 - World Bank
    The pandemic halted years of progress in ending extreme poverty, expanding the number of extremely poor people by 70 million. Poor countries will need to grow ...
  5. [5]
    Goal 1: End poverty in all its forms everywhere - UN.org.
    If current trends continue, 8.9 per cent of the world's population will still live in extreme poverty by 2030.
  6. [6]
    Five reasons to think twice about the UN's Sustainable Development ...
    Sep 23, 2015 · Five reasons to think twice about the UN's Sustainable Development Goals · 1. The contradiction of growth · 2. Growth does not reduce poverty · 3.
  7. [7]
    10 criticisms of the UN's Sustainable Development Goals
    Sep 18, 2023 · “The criticism of the MDGs were that they were too socially oriented around issues like poverty reduction, as opposed to thinking about ...
  8. [8]
    From MDGs to SDGs: We Need a Critical Awakening to Succeed
    Perhaps the biggest failing of the MDGs was their lack of critical analysis of the fundamental causes of global poverty and the persistently highly levels of ...
  9. [9]
    The World Bank Group's Role in Global Development
    ... global poverty reduction. Established by Western powers in 1944, the World Bank was originally tasked with rebuilding the economies of postwar Europe.
  10. [10]
    About us | United Nations Development Programme
    UNDP is based on the merging of the United Nations Expanded Programme of Technical Assistance, created in 1949, and the United Nations Special Fund, established ...
  11. [11]
    History - World Bank
    THE WORLD BANK CONFRONTS POVERTY. By the 1970s, over 40% of people in developing countries lived in absolute poverty. In response, the World Bank's projects ...Past Presidents · Oral History · Historical Timeline · Exhibits
  12. [12]
    A Prehistory of the Millennium Development Goals: Four Decades of ...
    Dec 1, 2007 · Its overarching goal was the eradication of absolute poverty and the substantial reduction of poverty in the world. In 1996, the ...
  13. [13]
    International Day for the Eradication of Poverty | United Nations
    The observance of the International Day for the Eradication of Poverty can be traced back to 17 October 1987. On that day, over a hundred thousand people ...
  14. [14]
    World Bank Group and IMF launch Poverty Reduction Strategy ...
    A New Approach to Country-Owned Poverty Reduction Strategies​​ The publication discusses the conception and value of country-owned poverty reduction strategies.
  15. [15]
    The United Nations' Fight Against Poverty - The Borgen Project
    Nov 15, 2022 · The United Nations' fight against poverty began as early as 1945. The U.N. General Assembly declared the years 1997 to 2006 as the First ...
  16. [16]
    Poverty reduction during 1990–2013: Did millennium development ...
    While the MDG era has seen a significant decline in income poverty in the developing world, the much larger decline occurred well before the MDG goal setting.
  17. [17]
    The evolution of global poverty, 1990-2030 - Brookings Institution
    Feb 2, 2022 · The last 30 years have seen dramatic reductions in global poverty, spurred by strong catch-up growth in developing countries, especially in Asia.
  18. [18]
    China, the World Bank, and the truth about global poverty - Aeon
    Apr 3, 2025 · Data from the World Bank in 2024 show the number of people living in extreme poverty has shrunk from nearly 2 billion in 1990 – 38 per cent of ...<|separator|>
  19. [19]
  20. [20]
    Goal 1 | Department of Economic and Social Affairs
    ### Summary of SDG 1 within the 2030 Agenda
  21. [21]
    Goal 1: No poverty - United Nations Development Programme
    The SDGs are designed to end poverty, hunger, AIDS, and discrimination against women and girls. The creativity, knowhow, technology and financial resources from ...
  22. [22]
    SDG Goals - No poverty - United Nations Statistics Division
    If current trends continue, 575 million people will still be living in extreme poverty and only one-third of countries will have halved their national poverty ...
  23. [23]
    Publication: Global Poverty and Inequality : A Review of the Evidence
    This paper reviews the evidence on levels and recent trends in global poverty and income inequality.
  24. [24]
    [PDF] Economic growth: the impact on poverty reduction, inequality ...
    Economic growth is the most powerful instrument for reducing poverty and improving the quality of life in developing countries. Both cross-country research ...
  25. [25]
    Macroeconomic Policy and Poverty Reduction
    A number of empirical studies have found that the responsiveness of income poverty to growth increases significantly as inequality is lowered. This is also ...
  26. [26]
    The U.N. Sustainable Development Goals Are Beyond Saving
    Sep 26, 2023 · In many cases, the SDG targets are hopelessly ambitious. The SDGs aim grandly to “end poverty everywhere,” “end hunger,” “end child labor in ...Missing: 1 | Show results with:1
  27. [27]
    The clock is ticking for U.N. goals to end poverty - NPR
    Sep 19, 2022 · Can we end poverty, provide food for all and otherwise make Earth a better place by 2030? By all accounts, the answer is no.Missing: critiques | Show results with:critiques
  28. [28]
    Measuring Poverty Overview - World Bank
    Jun 5, 2025 · The international poverty line was first introduced in 1990. At that time, around 9 out of 10 people living in extreme poverty globally were in ...
  29. [29]
    Are SDGs 1 and 2 diverging? New data innovations to better monitor ...
    Nov 16, 2023 · To gauge progress towards SDG1.1—eradicating extreme poverty by 2030—the UN uses official World Bank estimates of the share of the global ...
  30. [30]
    The World Bank's role in SDG monitoring
    Jan 31, 2019 · The World Bank participates in IAEG-SDGs as an observer and is a custodian or co-custodian (with other agencies) for 20 indicators, and is ...
  31. [31]
    WDI and the Sustainable Development Goals - World Bank
    Different international agencies are assigned as 'custodians' of the SDG targets. In this capacity, they work with national statistical offices to develop ...
  32. [32]
    Labour statistics for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
    As a custodian agency, the ILO reports to the UN data for 14 SDG indicators, grouped under 5 of the 17 Goals. Moreover, the ILO's role in strengthening ...Introduction · Data catalogue · What are the SDGs? · The role of statistics
  33. [33]
    SDG Indicators - United Nations Statistics Division
    As requested by the IAEG-SDGs, custodian agencies must provide their metadata update request documents at least one month in advance of their next scheduled ...Official list of global... · IAEG-SDGs · Metadata repository
  34. [34]
    SDG Indicators - United Nations Statistics Division - UN.org.
    Aug 6, 2025 · To fulfil this request, custodian agencies provided information on their data collection processes and also nominated a focal point for each ...SDG IndicatorsData collection Information ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] National SDG monitoring mechanisms and processes
    Jan 19, 2021 · National SDG indicators are based on national priorities and development plan. The global indicator framework can be a starting point. ❑ A ...
  36. [36]
    June 2025 Update to Global Poverty Lines - World Bank
    Jun 5, 2025 · The update results in a new international poverty line of $3.00 per person per day, which replaces the previous $2.15 poverty line based on 2017 PPPs.
  37. [37]
    June 2025 global poverty update from the World Bank: 2021 PPPs ...
    Jun 5, 2025 · Based on nowcasted estimates, global extreme poverty is projected to decrease from 10.5 percent in 2022 to 9.9 percent in 2025.
  38. [38]
    WDI - Poverty and Inequality - World Bank
    The $3.00 a day poverty line, which reflects the value of the typical national poverty line in the poorest countries, is often referred to as the international ...Where in the world do the poor... · No poverty · Poverty headcount ratio<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Global MPI | OPHI - Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative
    The global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) is an international measure of acute multidimensional poverty. Here you can learn more about the underlying ...
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Technical note. Multidimensional Poverty Index
    The global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) identifies multiple deprivations at the household level in health, education and standard of living. It uses.
  41. [41]
    [PDF] MULTIDIMENSIONAL POVERTY INDEX 2025
    Oct 16, 2025 · Put simply, MPI = H × A. MPI values range from 0 to 1, and higher values imply higher poverty. Global MPI values decline when fewer people are ...<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    [PDF] MULTIDIMENSIONAL POVERTY INDEX 2024
    The global MPI is a key international resource that measures acute multidimensional poverty across more than 100 developing countries (box 1). First launched in ...
  43. [43]
    understanding poverty through the Multidimensional Poverty Index
    Dec 16, 2024 · The MPI measures how people experience poverty in key areas of well-being across more than 100 countries.
  44. [44]
    How does extreme monetary poverty compare to multidimensional ...
    Multidimensional poverty is defined as being deprived in a range of health, education and living standards indicators. Extreme poverty is defined as living ...
  45. [45]
    SDG Goals - United Nations Statistics Division
    In 2025, an estimated 808 million people will be living in extreme poverty—up from the previous estimate of 677 million—representing 9.9 per cent of the world's ...
  46. [46]
    Fact Sheet: An Adjustment to Global Poverty Lines - World Bank
    Sep 14, 2022 · That's why in September 2022 the international poverty line is being updated from $1.90 to $2.15 per person per day.
  47. [47]
  48. [48]
    SDG Indicators - United Nations Statistics Division - UN.org.
    The official indicator list below includes the global indicator framework as contained in A/RES/71/313, the refinements agreed by the Statistical Commission at ...
  49. [49]
    Filling the gaps in survey data for a world free of poverty on a livable ...
    Nov 27, 2024 · World Bank data reveals gaps in poverty and inequality tracking, with fewer than half of countries having post-2020 surveys.
  50. [50]
    SDG Goal 1: No Poverty - UNICEF DATA
    Goal 1 aims to end poverty in all its forms, everywhere. For the first time, as part of the SDGs, countries have committed to reducing child poverty.<|control11|><|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Missing multidimensional poverty data hinders SDGs
    Sep 22, 2023 · The lack of recent poverty data that renders millions unseen and unheard threatens progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals.
  52. [52]
    Critical Data Challenges in Measuring the Performance of ...
    Jul 27, 2023 · Because poor-quality, outdated, and incomplete data will lead to inaccurate SDG findings, insufficient data are a significant obstacle in ...<|separator|>
  53. [53]
    An adjustment to global poverty lines - World Bank Blogs
    May 2, 2022 · As new PPPs have been released, the World Bank has revised the international poverty line from $1 a day in 1985 PPPs to $1.08 with 1993 PPPs, to ...<|separator|>
  54. [54]
    What is the $2.15 poverty line, and based on this new measure, how ...
    The new international poverty line is set at $2.15 (2017 PPP). Based on this new measure, the global extreme poverty rate for 2019 (the last year)Missing: 2022 | Show results with:2022
  55. [55]
    From $1.90 to $2.15 a day: the updated International Poverty Line
    Oct 26, 2022 · In September 2022, the figure at which this poverty line is set shifted from $1.90 to $2.15. This reflects a change in the units in which the ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] international poverty line - SDG indicator metadata
    Aug 14, 2025 · Prior to that, the 2022 update set the international poverty line at $2.15 using the 2017 PPP (and can be accessed at https://pip.worldbank.org/ ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  57. [57]
    The Global Poverty Line: Past, Present and Future
    Nov 13, 2024 · In this blog I explore three sets of challenges in the measurement and use of the international poverty line, and consider five ways to meet these challenges.
  58. [58]
    $$3 a day: A new poverty line has shifted the World Bank's data on ...
    Aug 11, 2025 · According to the June 2025 update, 817 million people lived in extreme poverty in 2024 under the new $3 a day line. This is 125 million more ...
  59. [59]
    Economic poverty trends: Global, regional and national
    Both the proportion and number of people living in extreme poverty (below the $2.15 threshold) has decreased in most regions of the world since 1990. However, ...
  60. [60]
    A history of the World Bank's international poverty lines 1979 "India...
    This section describes each of the major revisions to the international poverty line, which are also synthesized in Table 1.
  61. [61]
    extreme poverty rose - United Nations Statistics Division
    Between 2015 and 2018, global poverty continued its historical decline, with the extreme poverty rate falling from 10.1 per cent to 8.6 per cent. This means ...
  62. [62]
    Poverty - Our World in Data
    In June 2025, the World Bank increased its extreme poverty estimates by 125 million people. This doesn't mean the world has gotten poorer: it reflects a new, ...
  63. [63]
    Poverty Overview: Development news, research, data | World Bank
    From 1990 to 2025, the total number of people worldwide living in extreme poverty declined from around 2.3 billion to around 831 million.Measuring Poverty · Poverty & Equity Assessments · Poverty and Equity Briefs
  64. [64]
    Updated estimates of the impact of COVID-19 on global poverty
    Jun 24, 2021 · In January 2021, we estimated that the pandemic will push between 119 and 124 million people into extreme poverty around the globe in 2020. In ...
  65. [65]
    UN report finds COVID-19 is reversing decades of progress on ...
    Among the key findings: An estimated 71 million people are expected to be pushed back into extreme poverty in 2020, the first rise in global poverty since 1998.
  66. [66]
    [PDF] The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2025
    Extreme poverty persists, affecting 1 in 10 people worldwide. Recent crises have stalled progress, with the burden falling heavily on sub-. Saharan Africa and ...
  67. [67]
    September 2024 global poverty update from the World Bank: revised ...
    Sep 20, 2024 · This surge in extreme poverty was largely driven by South Asia, where extreme poverty increased by 2.4 percentage points, and by 1.27 percentage ...
  68. [68]
    25 Countries Halved Multidimensional Poverty Within 15 Years, but ...
    Jul 11, 2023 · 25 countries successfully halved their global MPI values within 15 years, showing that rapid progress is attainable.
  69. [69]
    September 2025 global poverty update from the World Bank
    Sep 30, 2025 · Based on nowcasted estimates, global extreme poverty is projected to decrease from 10.3 percent in 2024 to 10.1 percent in 2025 (see table below) ...
  70. [70]
    Extreme Poverty Has Been Sharply Cut. What Has Changed?
    Jan 20, 2022 · The share of the world's population living in extreme poverty fell to 12 percent from 36 percent in 1990, a steep decline in just two and a half decades.
  71. [71]
    Publication: Economic Growth, Inequality, and Poverty
    Economic growth reduces poverty because growth has little impact on income inequality. In the data set income inequality rises on average less than 1.0 percent ...
  72. [72]
    A historical perspective on China's success against poverty - CEPR
    Feb 4, 2021 · The extraordinary reduction in poverty that China underwent after 1980 is often attributed to the pro-market reforms of Deng Xiaoping.
  73. [73]
    [PDF] Four Decades of Poverty Reduction in China - The World Bank
    The reforms implemented under Deng Xiaoping's leadership resulted in huge efficiency gains in agriculture, which, in turn, made the reallocation of labor ...
  74. [74]
    China's Post-1978 Economic Development and Entry into the Global ...
    Oct 10, 2023 · Deng Xiaoping took a pragmatic approach to reform. If open markets could help improve life for the Chinese people, then it made sense to try ...
  75. [75]
    Twenty-Five Years of Indian Economic Reform | Cato Institute
    Oct 26, 2016 · In 1991 India embarked on major reforms to liberalize its economy after three decades of socialism and a fourth of creeping liberalization.
  76. [76]
    Poverty reduction in India: Revisiting past debates with 60 years of ...
    Mar 26, 2016 · Pre-1991, poverty reduction was almost entirely driven by rural growth and favourable distributional changes; the contribution of urban growth ...
  77. [77]
    Trade Liberalization, Poverty, and Inequality: Evidence from Indian ...
    This paper uses the sharp trade liberalization in India in 1991, spurred to a large extent by external factors, to measure the causal impact of trade ...<|separator|>
  78. [78]
    Does economic growth reduce multidimensional poverty? Evidence ...
    The empirical analysis indicates that a 10% increase in GDP decreases multidimensional poverty by approximately 4–5%.
  79. [79]
    Poverty Reduction and Economic Growth - Econofact
    Feb 2, 2020 · 1.1 Billion people have been lifted out of extreme poverty in the last 25 years. Broad-based growth is the most important source of poverty reduction.
  80. [80]
    March 2024 global poverty update from the World Bank
    Apr 18, 2024 · We estimate that COVID-19 increased extreme poverty in the world, as measured by the international poverty line of $2.15, from 8.9 percent in 2019 to 9.7 ...
  81. [81]
    Global Progress in Reducing Extreme Poverty Grinds to a Halt
    Oct 5, 2022 · “Progress in reducing extreme poverty has essentially halted in tandem with subdued global economic growth,” said World Bank Group President ...
  82. [82]
    Fragility, Conflict and Violence Overview - World Bank
    Severe conflicts are estimated to lower GDP per capita by about 15% after five years. Fragility is not confined to borders – instability and violence can spread ...
  83. [83]
    [PDF] Conflict and Poverty - World Bank Documents & Reports
    Conflict creates a "conflict debt" that slowly recovers, and the poorest countries suffer most from armed conflict. Repeated violence prevents poverty recovery.
  84. [84]
    The impact of Russia-Ukraine conflict on global food security
    Our modelled results show the conflict would lead to a trade drop (60%), soaring wheat prices (50%), and severe food insecurity (30%). •. Considering the role ...
  85. [85]
    Disentangling the Channels of Impact of the Ukraine War on Global ...
    Jun 11, 2025 · Restrictions in food supply and rising agricultural prices inevitability lead to increasing poverty and undernourishment, more so in developing ...<|separator|>
  86. [86]
    Surge in conflicts fuels extreme poverty: World Bank - Arab News
    Jun 27, 2025 · Conflicts and related fatalities have more than tripled since the early 2000s, fueling extreme poverty, the World Bank said Friday.
  87. [87]
    Natural disasters push 26m into poverty each year, says World Bank
    Nov 14, 2016 · Floods, earthquakes, tsunamis and other extreme natural disasters push 26 million people into poverty each year and cost the global economy more than half a ...
  88. [88]
    COVID, climate change and poverty: Avoiding the worst impacts
    Oct 7, 2020 · New research shows that up to 132 million people could be pushed into extreme poverty by climate change by 2030.
  89. [89]
    Statistical and computational analysis for corruption and poverty ...
    Feb 15, 2024 · In order to know the relationship between the corruption and poverty index, we find the correlation coefficient is (0.885), which is a strong ...
  90. [90]
    [PDF] Does Corruption Affect Income Inequality and Poverty? - WP/98/76
    Corruption increases income inequality and poverty through lower economic growth; biased tax systems favoring the rich and well-connected; poor targeting of ...
  91. [91]
    SDG 1 and Corruption: No Poverty | Center For Global Development
    Aug 21, 2025 · This paper examines the multifaceted ways in which corruption undermines poverty alleviation efforts—by distorting public resource allocation, ...
  92. [92]
    How Bad Governance Impedes Poverty Alleviation in Bangladesh
    Poverty in Bangladesh persists due to governance failures, including lack of vision, weak commitment, and weak implementation capacities.
  93. [93]
    Assessing the evidence of the impact of governance on ... - GSDRC
    The literature widely acknowledges the negative impact on the poor of a weak rule of law, in particular inadequate property rights and dispute resolution ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  94. [94]
    [PDF] Is Governance Associated with Poverty Reduction Independent of ...
    Nov 2, 2024 · In this paper we examine the relationship between three important development goals: good governance, poverty reduction and economic growth.Missing: failures | Show results with:failures
  95. [95]
    The role of good governance in fostering pro-poor and inclusive ...
    Jul 1, 2020 · Djeneba Doumbia provides four recommendations to combat corruption and promote pro-poor and inclusive growth in sub-Saharan Africa.
  96. [96]
    Sustainable development goals and the impact of global conflict ...
    Oct 10, 2024 · The World Bank currently measures “extreme poverty” as affecting those living on less than $2.15 a day using 2017 prices. The World Bank ...<|separator|>
  97. [97]
    The World Bank's latest Global Economic Prospects ...
    Jun 10, 2025 · The World Bank's latest Global Economic Prospects report projects global growth will slow to 2.3% in 2025—the weakest pace since 2008 ...
  98. [98]
    The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2025 - — SDG Indicators
    Jul 14, 2025 · Yet progress has been fragile and unequal. Millions still face extreme poverty, hunger, inadequate housing, and a lack of basic services. Women, ...Missing: challenges | Show results with:challenges
  99. [99]
    Getting back on track to meet the first Sustainable Development Goal
    Jul 16, 2024 · With our current pace of progress, almost 600 million people—around 7 percent of the world's population—will still be living in extreme poverty ...Missing: reversal | Show results with:reversal
  100. [100]
    Ending Poverty is our First Global Goal, and We are Off Track
    Oct 17, 2023 · Between 2014 and 2019, poverty was declining at a rate of only about 0.6 percentage points per year, and the goal of ending extreme poverty by ...Missing: SDG | Show results with:SDG
  101. [101]
    World risks big misses across the Sustainable Development Goals ...
    Jul 10, 2023 · If present trends persist, by 2030, a staggering 575 million people will remain trapped in extreme poverty and an estimated 84 million children ...
  102. [102]
    World Bank says goal of ending extreme poverty by 2030 unlikely to ...
    Oct 5, 2022 · Shocks related to the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine mean the world is unlikely to meet a longstanding goal of ending extreme ...
  103. [103]
    Ending extreme poverty has a negligible impact on global ... - Nature
    Nov 29, 2023 · More ambitious poverty lines require more economic growth in more countries, which leads to notably higher emissions. The challenge to align the ...
  104. [104]
    Ending poverty by 2030 now a fading dream, says UN expert | OHCHR
    Jul 7, 2020 · It criticises the way governments have banked on economic growth to lift people out of poverty. It says the UN's 2030 Agenda to eradicate ...
  105. [105]
    Stress-testing the international poverty line and the official global ...
    Jul 16, 2024 · We investigate the current method of derivation of the international poverty line used for monitoring SDG 1 in two key directions.
  106. [106]
    The current international poverty line is a 'misleading shortcut ...
    Jul 16, 2024 · Current methods for calculating the international poverty line lead to a skewed picture of how poverty is distributed across the world.
  107. [107]
    The World Bank mired in contradictions about poverty - CADTM
    Oct 23, 2024 · This article aims to show that the World Bank has tended for decades to underestimate the number of people affected by poverty.<|separator|>
  108. [108]
    How poverty is measured impacts who gets classified as impoverished
    Feb 5, 2024 · We test whether the classification of households into poverty categories is meaningfully influenced by the poverty measurement approach that is employed.
  109. [109]
    Full Report: Mind the SDG data gaps | OECD
    Sep 19, 2025 · Timeliness of data: Outdated SDG indicators delay policy responses, particularly in critical areas like climate action and social well-being.
  110. [110]
    Are we there yet? Many countries don't report progress on all SDGs ...
    Aug 10, 2021 · No country reported data on more than 90% of the SDG indicators, while 22 countries reported on less than 25% of the SDG indicators. The good ...Missing: issues 1
  111. [111]
    Methodological Issues of Poverty Measurement
    Dec 2, 2024 · The most suitable method to assign weights in multidimensional poverty analysis is difficult to identify (Kumara, 2013). Any weighting system ...Missing: criticisms | Show results with:criticisms
  112. [112]
    Single SDG targets are impractical and unrealistic - SciDev.Net
    Jan 13, 2015 · Setting arbitrary numbers by which to measure SDGs cannot possibly account for such real world complexities. In 1980, management consultancy ...
  113. [113]
    An Aid-Institutions Paradox? A Review Essay on Aid Dependency ...
    The conclusions are two-fold: countries which receive a substantial portion of their revenues from foreign aid may be less accountable to their citizens, and ...
  114. [114]
    [PDF] Aid dependence. Issues and indicators - Openaid
    Another pathological aspect of foreign aid is the dependency trap, whereby grants designed to meet temporary need elicit such successful adaptation to those ...
  115. [115]
    Does foreign aid impede economic complexity in developing ...
    Moyo (2009) argues that aid does not lead to development, but creates problems including corruption, dependency, limitations on exports and Dutch disease, ...
  116. [116]
    [PDF] How International Aid Can Do More Harm than Good - LSE
    This created a critical effect: a dependency on foreign aid for the stabilization of the Lebanese economy.6 In order to stock up its foreign reserves and.
  117. [117]
    [PDF] Causes and Effects of Welfare Dependency - Digital Commons @ IWU
    May 13, 1993 · This research examines the work incentive effects of Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC), using theories to identify determinants of ...Missing: redistribution | Show results with:redistribution
  118. [118]
    Intergenerational Transmission of Welfare Dependency
    In this paper, we therefore investigate the magnitude of the intergenerational effects of welfare programs on average among all children who may be affected by ...Missing: redistribution | Show results with:redistribution
  119. [119]
    Humanitarian Operations and the UN Sustainable Development Goals
    Sep 20, 2021 · The study finds that funding, while crucial for reducing deprivation in the short term, may increase the dependence on humanitarian aid rather ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  120. [120]
    [PDF] Does Foreign Aid Reduce Poverty? Empirical Evidence from ...
    Aid could be increasing consumption rather than investment, which would explain the disappointing results of studies on growth, but still reduce poverty ...
  121. [121]
    Foreign Aid and Economic Development | Cato Institute
    Indeed, a comprehensive study by the IMF found no relationship between aid and growth. Moreover, economic growth in poor countries does not depend on official ...
  122. [122]
    Foreign Aid: Breaking the Cycle of Dependency
    Jan 31, 2014 · The cycle of dependency can be broken. Unfortunately, weak judicial systems and corruption in the public and private sectors greatly impede democratic ...
  123. [123]
    [PDF] INSTITUTIONS AS A FUNDAMENTAL CAUSE OF LONG-RUN ...
    In Acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson (2002) we tested the connection between initial population density, urbanization, and the creation of good economic ...
  124. [124]
    [PDF] They provided an explanation for why some countries are rich and ...
    Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson and James Robinson have contributed innovative research about what affects countries' economic prosperity in the long run. Their ...
  125. [125]
    Rule of law: almost half the world living in poverty
    Mar 17, 2025 · 'However, in contexts where the rule of law is weak, corruption, impunity, and lack of access to justice can perpetuate poverty, as resources ...Missing: weaknesses deficits
  126. [126]
    World Bank's Governance Global Practice
    Governance and institutions are essential to reducing poverty and recovering from various crises. ... New research and experiences guide the best ...
  127. [127]
    Why Developing Countries Prove so Resistant to the Rule of Law
    Most developing countries have proven resistant to the rule of law and good governance in general. This paper addresses the paradox through a framework that ...
  128. [128]
    [PDF] Explaining and Fixing the 'Weak Governance Curse' in Resource ...
    In order to translate their resource wealth into positive development outcomes in the long run, these countries need to have strong domestic governance systems.
  129. [129]
    Business Regulatory Environment - World Bank
    Jun 9, 2021 · Despite a positive reform trend over the past decades, complex requirements or ineffective regulations in many countries continue to stifle ...
  130. [130]
    (PDF) Business regulation, rule of law and formal entrepreneurship
    Sep 3, 2019 · The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of formal rules such as business regulation and rule of law on the level of formal entrepreneurship in ...
  131. [131]
    In many countries, taxes and transfers make the poor poorer, it ...
    May 4, 2023 · The poorest households have 60 percent more consumable income (what they have to spend and save after taxes, transfers and subsidies) than ...
  132. [132]
    Full article: Tax burden and poverty in lower-middle-income countries
    The results indicate that higher tax rates and taxes on goods and services exacerbate poverty, disproportionately affecting low-income households by reducing ...
  133. [133]
    Effective Marginal Tax Rates/Benefit Cliffs - https: // aspe . hhs . gov.
    High marginal tax rates––where most or all of additional earnings are offset by lost benefits––may both impact economic mobility and act as a work disincentive.<|control11|><|separator|>
  134. [134]
    Why Economic Freedom Is the Best Weapon against Poverty
    Aug 29, 2017 · Out of the poorest 20 percent of countries, those with greater economic freedom have incomes that are 50 percent greater than those with less ...
  135. [135]
    Economic Freedom Enables Great Escape From Poverty
    Feb 13, 2018 · This progress has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty and cut the global poverty rate by two-thirds. DS-Index-of-Freedom-2018- ...
  136. [136]
    Rural Poverty in Developing Countries: Implications for Public Policy
    This pamphlet examines how rural poverty develops, what accounts for its persistence, and what specific measures can be taken to eliminate or reduce it.Missing: governance | Show results with:governance
  137. [137]
    Recent trends in the inheritance of poverty and family structure
    Children who grow up poor or spend time in a single-parent family are more likely to experience poverty and single parenthood as adults. Prior research ...
  138. [138]
    Family Structure and the Intergenerational Transmission of ...
    I find that as parents' education increases, children in single mother families experience a lower boost in their achievement test scores.
  139. [139]
    Cultural Norms and Social Mobility - Brookings Institution
    Feb 24, 2014 · Education ... Some analysts are very pessimistic about cultural trends in low-income communities and their impact on mobility.
  140. [140]
    Poverty and Culture by Lawrence M. Mead | NAS
    In the New Hope Project, the most remarkable case, low-income adults in poor areas were offered jobs paying at least the poverty level, plus child and health ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  141. [141]
    Education, Poverty and Culture - Forbes
    Jun 3, 2011 · Poor kids in a high-poverty school can also receive explicit instruction in bourgeois conduct. That's the essence of the 'No Excuses' model, but ...
  142. [142]
    New Report Shows More Americans Dependent on Welfare Checks ...
    Jan 8, 2025 · Families living in poverty relying more on taxpayer-funded welfare checks than income from work, according to a newly released report from the Congressional ...Missing: structures | Show results with:structures
  143. [143]
    Work disincentives hit the near-poor hardest. Why and what to do ...
    May 5, 2022 · First, the Earned Income Tax Credit, the major source of positive work incentives for the very poor, turns to neutral and then to a disincentive ...
  144. [144]
    Fixing the Broken Incentives in the U.S. Welfare System - FREOPP
    The goal of welfare programs should be to provide immediate assistance for basic needs and enable recipients to escape poverty through self-sufficiency over the ...
  145. [145]
    Poverty and Welfare | Cato Institute
    Reforming the welfare system to better align incentives for different levels of government and the participants involved, establishing clearly defined outcome ...
  146. [146]
    Inequality in the intergenerational economic mobility in single ...
    This study examines the underlying pathway of intergenerational economic mobility within single mother-headed families.
  147. [147]
    Wilson perceives social structure and culture as key causes of poverty
    Oct 9, 2008 · “Conservatives tend to emphasize cultural factors, such as attitude, worldview, [and] styles of behavior, whereas liberals pay more attention to ...
  148. [148]
    Trade, Growth, and Poverty - International Monetary Fund (IMF)
    We provide evidence that, contrary to popular beliefs, increased trade has strongly encouraged growth and poverty reduction and has contributed to narrowing ...
  149. [149]
    Trade liberalization and poverty: The evidence so far
    Since trade liberalization tends to increase the opportunities for economic activity, it can very easily increase income inequality while at the same time ...
  150. [150]
    Trade liberalization and poverty reduction - IZA World of Labor
    Both cross-country regression studies and single-country studies support the claim that liberalizing trade will reduce poverty.
  151. [151]
    [PDF] Trade Openness and the Growth–Poverty Nexus
    Jul 12, 2024 · This study examines the relationship between economic growth, poverty reduction, and trade openness by using a new measure of trade openness ...
  152. [152]
    The Nexus Between Trade Openness and GDP Growth
    Nov 4, 2020 · The objective of this study is to explore the empirical impact of trade openness on gross domestic product (GDP) growth.
  153. [153]
    Trade liberalization contributed to reduce poverty in Latin ... - IDB
    The study finds that the effects of trade liberalization on poverty reduction have been positive, even if quite small. It refutes arguments that trade ...
  154. [154]
    (PDF) Trade Liberalisation and Poverty Reduction: A Systematic ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · This study explores the relationship between trade liberalisation and poverty reduction in developing countries. Advocates argue that increased ...
  155. [155]
    Income inequality, poverty, and trade liberalization
    The empirical evidence demonstrates that the effects of trade liberalization are far from uniform and vary widely across countries. Critics contend that trade ...
  156. [156]
    [PDF] The Impact of Trade Liberalization on Poverty - Wilson Center
    Recent research strongly confirms that freer trade boosts economic growth, the primary source of poverty reduction. USAID is well aware of public controversy ...<|separator|>
  157. [157]
    Property rights for world's poor could unlock trillions in 'dead capital'
    Jul 31, 2016 · Providing the world's poor with titles for their land, homes and unregistered businesses would unlock $9.3 trillion in assets, de Soto estimates.Missing: formalization | Show results with:formalization
  158. [158]
    Hernando de Soto: recipient of the 2017 Global Award for ...
    Nov 6, 2017 · Hernando de Soto's analyses have led to new approaches to alleviating poverty and underdevelopment by way of reforming property rights systems ...
  159. [159]
    Property Rights and Investment in Urban Slums - jstor
    Most importantly, past research indicates that the program had a significant effect on perceived tenure security: 67% of title recipients report a large change.
  160. [160]
    The effect of a land titling programme on households' access to credit
    In a different work, Field (2007) showed that the land title programme in Peru increased households' access to credit, but only from public banks. Note that ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  161. [161]
    Titling, Credit Constraints, and Rental Markets in Rural Peru
    Nov 1, 2008 · Land titling had significant impacts on agricultural income and investment in the case of farmers who are quantity constrained; · Use of ...
  162. [162]
    Property Rights for the Poor: Effects of Land Titling - IDEAS/RePEc
    We find that entitled families increased housing investment, reduced household size, and improved the education of their children relative to the control group.Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes
  163. [163]
    The Power of Securing Property Rights: Evidence from China's Land ...
    We provide substantial empirical evidence showing that the land titling reform facilitates land transfers, moves agricultural laborers off farms, and decreases ...
  164. [164]
    Property rights for the poor: Effects of land titling - ScienceDirect.com
    Our results suggest that land titling can be an important tool for poverty reduction, albeit not through the shortcut of credit access.
  165. [165]
    The long-run poverty and gender impacts of mobile money - Science
    Dec 9, 2016 · We estimate that access to the Kenyan mobile money system M-PESA increased per capita consumption levels and lifted 194,000 households, or 2% of ...
  166. [166]
    Study: Mobile-money services lift Kenyans out of poverty | MIT News
    Dec 8, 2016 · A study finds the mobile-money service M-PESA has lifted 194000, or 2 percent, of Kenyan households out of poverty, having greater impact on ...
  167. [167]
    [PDF] Impact Investing and Worker Outcomes - Harvard Business School
    Impact investors are more likely than other private equity firms to fund businesses in economically disadvantaged areas, and the performance of these companies ...
  168. [168]
    [PDF] Infrastructure and Poverty Reduction: Innovative Policies for ...
    Evidence shows that access to basic infrastructure services such as electricity, roads, digital connectivity, and water, sanitation, and hygiene is crucial for ...<|separator|>
  169. [169]
    Overview on Existing Research on Cash Transfers - GiveDirectly
    Dec 22, 2020 · There is strong evidence that cash transfers are associated with reductions in monetary poverty. (source). ODI global think tank logo. Cash ...
  170. [170]
    [PDF] Research on Cash Transfers | GiveDirectly - Edward Miguel
    Cash transfers have arguably the strongest existing evidence base among anti-poverty tools, with dozens of high-quality evaluations of cash transfer ...
  171. [171]
    Village Enterprise — Ending extreme poverty in rural Africa.
    Based on rigorous, independent RCT evidence, Village Enterprise's cost-effective poverty graduation model reduces poverty, promotes gender-equity, and ensures ...What We Do · Contact Us · Our Team · Ways to Give
  172. [172]
    Economic growth and poverty reduction: Is Africa any different?
    Mar 13, 2024 · In the overall sample, the estimated elasticity between growth in GDP per capita and poverty reduction is 2.5 (indicating that a one percent ...
  173. [173]
    Publication: Empirics of the Link between Growth and Poverty
    This note synthesizes the empirical evidence. The data show that economic growth typically reduces poverty and can usually be deemed pro-poor. But there is wide ...
  174. [174]
    [PDF] Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction in a Rapidly Changing World
    Although critical, economic growth alone will not be sufficient to cut the global poverty rate to below 3 % by 2030 unless it is accompanied by policies to ...
  175. [175]
    (PDF) An Empirical Analysis of Synergies and Tradeoffs between ...
    Oct 15, 2025 · For nearly 70% of SDG indicators, status is positively associated with GDP/capita. Progress on SDG indicators, however, occurs in both poorer ...Missing: SDG1 | Show results with:SDG1
  176. [176]
    Interdependencies among SDGs: evidence-based insights for ...
    Key findings reveal that reducing inequalities (SDG 10) significantly drives poverty reduction (SDG 1), while decent work and economic growth (SDG 8) enhance ...
  177. [177]
    Trade‐offs and synergies within Sustainable Development Goals 1st ...
    Jun 5, 2024 · The findings confirm the existence of the Environmental Phillips Curve (EPC), which signifies a trade-off between SDG-1 (poverty), SDG-10th ( ...
  178. [178]
    Trade-offs between social and environmental Sustainable ...
    We analyse the interaction between two social goals (related to SDG1 Poverty and SDG10 Inequality) and three environmental goals (related to SDG13 Carbon, SDG15 ...
  179. [179]
    An empirical investigation of the effects of poverty and urbanization ...
    Feb 23, 2023 · This study empirically investigates the effects of poverty and urbanization on environmental degradation for a sample of 43 sub-Saharan African (SSA) economies ...
  180. [180]
    The climate implications of ending global poverty - World Bank Blogs
    Jun 29, 2023 · There is no conflict between extreme poverty reduction and global emissions: eradicating extreme poverty is an absolute urgency and priority; ...
  181. [181]
    (PDF) Balancing act: Trade‐offs and synergies within Sustainable ...
    The findings confirm the existence of the Environmental Phillips Curve (EPC), which signifies a trade‐off between SDG‐1 (poverty), SDG‐10th (inequality), and ...
  182. [182]
    Growth, inequality and poverty: a robust relationship?
    Nov 23, 2021 · Using a panel of 158 countries between 1960 and 2010, we find that the correlation of growth with poverty is consistently negative: A 10 p.p. ...
  183. [183]
    Publication: Links between Growth, Inequality, and Poverty: A Survey
    The evidence suggests that growth can be effective in reducing poverty, but its impact on inequality is ambiguous and depends on the underlying sources of ...
  184. [184]
    [PDF] Synergies and Trade-Offs in Reaching the Sustainable ...
    Oct 21, 2020 · Based on global data 2000–2016, our results indicate that synergies between and within the SDGs prevail, both in terms of levels and over time ...
  185. [185]
    Only Economic Freedom Pulls People Out of Poverty | AIER
    Jun 20, 2024 · Four mechanisms connect greater economic freedom to poverty alleviation. The first is enhanced economic growth and job creation.
  186. [186]
    The Relationship between Economic Freedom and Poverty Rates
    Aug 27, 2021 · The study found that economic freedom is associated with lower poverty rates. Government integrity and trade freedom are also associated with ...
  187. [187]
    How Much Progress Against Poverty by 2050?
    Mar 6, 2023 · Under the base forecast, the proportion in extreme poverty worldwide falls below 2 percent in 2050 and from 29 to 7 percent on the continent of ...
  188. [188]
    Eradicating extreme poverty by 2050? - The World Economic Forum
    Apr 6, 2023 · A new study from the Center for Global Development (CGD) forecasts that the proportion of people in extreme poverty worldwide will fall below 2% in 2050, from ...
  189. [189]
    [PDF] WHY ECONOMIC FREEDOM MATTERS - The Heritage Foundation
    Improvements in economic freedom are vital if countries are to achieve the rates of economic ex- pansion that the record shows will reduce poverty. Undeniably, ...
  190. [190]
    Poverty and Economic Freedom: Evidence from Cross-Country Data
    This paper explores the empirical relationship between poverty and economic freedom. In doing so, it estimates the levels of absolute poverty for a panel of ...
  191. [191]
    Evaluation of UNDP Support to Poverty Reduction in the LDCs
    The evaluation assessed UNDP's contribution to reducing poverty across five streams of UNDP support: inclusive growth and employment, local economic development ...
  192. [192]
    Empowering lives for a future without poverty
    Oct 18, 2024 · UNDP has set a goal to help 100 million people escape multidimensional poverty by 2025. This would not be possible without our strong partnerships.<|control11|><|separator|>
  193. [193]
    World Bank aid and local multidimensional poverty in Sub-Saharan ...
    We demonstrate that WB aid significantly alleviated multidimensional poverty where projects were implemented by increasing public resources rather than economic ...
  194. [194]
    Joint SDG Fund: Homepage
    The Joint SDG Fund is an inter-agency, pooled mechanism for integrated policy support and strategic financing. We act as a bridge for those taking action to ...
  195. [195]
    The WTO's contribution to achieving the SDGs
    On SDG 1, the report emphasizes that international trade has significantly contributed to reducing poverty and promoting economic development globally by ...
  196. [196]
    Financing Agenda 2030 - AidData
    Donors doubled down on good health (SDG3), no poverty (SDG1), and strong institutions (SDG16). Environmental goals attracted higher than expected funding.
  197. [197]
    [PDF] Aid Effectiveness: A Survey of the Recent Empirical Literature
    However, there is some evidence that aid has had positive effects when the policy environment has been conducive to growth.<|separator|>
  198. [198]
    [PDF] THE EFFECTIVENESS OF FOREIGN AID ON POVERTY REDUCTION
    In the first place, foreign aid is not effective in reducing poverty, neither in the full sample nor when we only consider the low-income countries. Secondly, ...
  199. [199]
    [PDF] Relative Effectiveness of Bilateral and Multilateral Aid on ... - EPAR
    In this paper we review the empirical evidence for whether disbursing aid via bilateral or multilateral channels is more effective at achieving development.
  200. [200]
    [PDF] ODA, poverty reduction and resilience-Latest trends
    ➢ Latest surveys (e.g., Mahembe and Odhiambo, 2019) conclude that foreign aid has had a positive impact on poverty reduction, as reported by the majority of ...
  201. [201]
    Lifting 800 Million People Out of Poverty – New Report Looks at ...
    Apr 1, 2022 · The evolution of China's approach to poverty alleviation, from place-based to country-wide social protection policies, and the targeted poverty ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  202. [202]
    China Poverty and Equity Brief : October 2024 (English)
    Jan 3, 2025 · 17 percent of the population was living below $6.85/day (2017 PPP) in 2021, with close to half residing in urban areas.
  203. [203]
    [PDF] What has made Viet Nam a poverty reduction success story?
    Summary. Viet Nam has achieved its Millennium Development Goal (MDG) of halving its poverty rate - 10 years before the deadline set by UN.
  204. [204]
    [PDF] Vietnam Poverty Assessment - World Bank Documents & Reports
    Apr 24, 2022 · First, several influential poverty updates have been published documenting Vietnam's poverty reduction story. Recent reports include Climbing ...
  205. [205]
    Vietnam's Development Success Story and the Unfinished SDG ...
    Feb 14, 2020 · Despite starting as one of the poorest countries in the mid-1980s, Vietnam has achieved rapid developmental progress, reaching lower ...
  206. [206]
    Venezuela: The Rise and Fall of a Petrostate
    However, after the Venezuelan government's failure to meet conditions for a fair vote and the revival of a centuries-old territorial dispute with Guyana over ...
  207. [207]
    How International Aid Failed Africa and Made Poverty Worse - FEE.org
    Dec 28, 2021 · Data show that wages have declined and poverty has surged in Africa since the 1970s, despite international efforts.
  208. [208]
    Fragility and poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa: two sides of the same coin
    Aug 15, 2023 · Fragility, conflict, and violence, or, more generally, the lack of peace and security, is one of the key barriers to poverty reduction in Sub-Saharan Africa.Missing: armed | Show results with:armed
  209. [209]
    [PDF] Is Aid Good for the Poor in Sub-Saharan Africa?
    Apr 23, 2025 · First, we sidestep the controversial aid-growth- poverty relationship by analysing the direct impacts of aid on poverty in Sub-. Saharan Africa.
  210. [210]
    Private Sector SMEs in Realizing SDG 1- 'No Poverty' in the Context ...
    Mar 24, 2021 · The private sector has proven its capacity in reshaping economic performance and SME including poverty elimination. No poverty- is the first ...
  211. [211]
    Conversations: How can the Private Sector Contribute to the ...
    Nov 10, 2017 · IFC invests with the private sector. We invest roughly twenty billion dollars, including mobilization right now. We are building a framework for ...
  212. [212]
    Poverty Reduction through Corporate Social Responsibility - MDPI
    In this research, the aim was to understand how rural families perceive the contribution of CSR programs, in respect to the decrease in rural poverty.
  213. [213]
    Give more money directly to end extreme poverty - GiveDirectly
    Oct 16, 2023 · Research finds they use these funds to improve their health, education, income, and self-reliance, ultimately driving reductions in adult and child mortality.<|separator|>
  214. [214]
    20 Years of a Transformative Approach to End Extreme Poverty
    May 4, 2022 · This intervention, known as the Graduation approach, is a multifaceted set of time bound interventions that address the complex nature of extreme poverty.
  215. [215]
    Evidence on Microcredit: Rethinking Financial Tools for the Poor | IPA
    In the early 2000s, microcredit received extensive praise as a poverty-fighting tool, while critics claimed it indebted poor households. At the time, however, ...
  216. [216]
    Role of non-governmental organizations in poverty reduction ... - NIH
    Oct 27, 2022 · This model contributes to explaining the need for NGOs to intervene in poverty reduction efforts in the Global South.
  217. [217]
    [PDF] Microfinance and Poverty: Evidence Using Panel Data from ...
    The results suggest that access to microfinance contributes to poverty reduction, especially for female participants, and to overall poverty reduction at the ...
  218. [218]
    Microfinance and poverty reduction: Evidence from Djibouti
    Feb 4, 2022 · Our results show that neither access to microcredit nor its ostensibly productive use is significantly associated with poverty regardless of the duration of ...
  219. [219]
    [PDF] The Role of Civil Society Organizations in Poverty Eradication and the
    May 12, 2023 · This theme calls for urgent actions from everyone to tackle and eradicate poverty in all countries to achieve sustainable development. 2.