Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Database

A database is an organized collection of structured or , typically stored electronically in a and managed by a (DBMS) software that enables efficient storage, retrieval, updating, and deletion of information. This systematic arrangement allows multiple users and applications to access and manipulate the data independently of the underlying storage details, ensuring , consistency, and security through features like and mechanisms. Databases have evolved significantly since their inception in the mid-20th century, originating from file-based systems using magnetic tapes and punched cards in the 1950s and 1960s to handle inventory and records for large projects like the Apollo program. Early models in the 1970s included hierarchical and network databases, which organized data in tree-like or graph-like structures with parent-child relationships, but these were rigid and complex for complex queries. The relational model, introduced by Edgar F. Codd in 1970, revolutionized the field by representing data in tables (relations) with rows and columns linked by keys, enabling declarative querying via languages like SQL and supporting normalization to reduce redundancy. Modern databases encompass diverse types to meet varying needs, including relational databases (e.g., using SQL for structured data in business applications), databases (e.g., document, key-value, or column-family stores for unstructured or in web-scale systems), graph databases (focusing on entities and relationships via nodes and edges), and in-memory databases (prioritizing speed by storing data in ). Cloud-native databases further extend accessibility by providing scalable, across distributed environments, supporting horizontal for billions of records. In contemporary computing, databases are foundational to enterprise operations, powering , , , and real-time while addressing challenges like data volume, velocity, and variety in ecosystems.

Introduction and Terminology

Overview

A database is an organized collection of structured or semi-structured data, typically stored and accessed electronically from a computer system. This setup allows for systematic management of information, distinguishing databases from unstructured file storage by providing mechanisms for efficient organization and interaction. The primary purposes of databases include data storage, retrieval, manipulation, and ensuring data integrity, consistency, and availability. Through a database management system (DBMS), users can perform operations like inserting, updating, and querying data while maintaining rules to prevent errors, such as duplicate entries or unauthorized access. These functions support reliable data handling in multi-user environments, reducing redundancy and enabling concurrent access without conflicts. Databases have evolved from early file-based systems, which often led to data isolation and maintenance challenges, to modern systems capable of managing petabytes of data across distributed environments. The , introduced by E. F. Codd in 1970, serves as a foundational approach for many such systems by organizing data into tables with defined relationships. In , databases enable efficient data-driven decision-making across industries like , where they support secure and risk analysis; healthcare, for managing patient records and improving care delivery; and , by handling customer transactions and inventory in .

Key Concepts and Definitions

A database is an organized collection of structured or , typically stored and accessed electronically from a computer , treated as a unit for collecting, storing, and retrieving related for various applications. In contrast, a database management (DBMS) is the software that interacts with users, applications, and the database itself to capture and analyze ; it serves as the intermediary layer controlling , , and retrieval, encompassing components like query processors, managers, and engines. While the database represents the itself, the DBMS provides the tools and rules for its manipulation, ensuring , security, and efficient access. The defines the structure of the database, including the organization of through elements like tables, columns, types, and constraints, serving as a blueprint for how is logically arranged. It is independent of the actual and remains relatively stable over time. The instance, however, refers to the actual stored in the database at a given moment, representing the current state or snapshot of the schema's population. This distinction allows for separation between design () and (), facilitating updates to without altering the underlying structure. In relational databases, core elements include , which are two-dimensional arrays consisting of and columns for storing related . , also known as or tuples, represent individual entries or instances of within a , each capturing a complete set of information about an . , or columns/attributes, define the specific properties or values associated with each , such as names or dates, with each holding of a predefined type. Keys ensure uniqueness and linkages: a is a for each in a , preventing duplicates and enabling efficient lookups, while a in one references the in another to maintain . Relationships between are established via these keys, categorized as one-to-one (a links to one other), one-to-many (one links to multiple others, like a to employees), or many-to-many (requiring an intermediary ). Databases differ in storage approaches: persistent storage systems save to non-volatile media like disks or SSDs, ensuring across power failures or restarts, whereas in-memory databases keep all in for ultra-fast access, though they risk without additional persistence mechanisms like replication or snapshots. can also be classified by organization: structured adheres to a fixed , easily fitting into rows and columns for relational storage and analysis, such as numerical records in spreadsheets. lacks this predefined format, encompassing varied types like text, images, or videos that require specialized processing for extraction and querying. In modern contexts, a serves as a centralized for storing vast amounts of raw, unstructured or in its native format without upfront enforcement, enabling flexible analysis on ingestion (schema-on-read). This contrasts with traditional databases, which are optimized for processed, structured data under a rigid schema-on-write model, prioritizing query performance and consistency over raw volume handling.

History

Pre-1960s Foundations

The foundations of modern databases trace back to ancient and manual systems designed for organizing and retrieving information, serving as proto-databases long before electronic computing. Library catalogs, emerging as early as the 3rd century BCE in Alexandria with inventories on scrolls, evolved into card-based systems by the late 18th century; the first organized card catalogs were created in 1791 by the French Revolutionary Government using playing cards to index holdings for efficient access. File cabinets and manual indexing systems, widespread in 19th-century offices and archives, functioned similarly by storing records in physical folders with cross-references, enabling basic queries but relying on human labor for maintenance. These analog methods exemplified early data management principles, prioritizing accessibility and categorization without digital automation. Punched-card systems marked a significant mechanized precursor in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, bridging manual and electronic eras. Invented by in 1889 for the U.S. Census, these cards used holes to encode data for tabulating machines, allowing rapid sorting and counting of demographic information. By the 1920s, standardized 80-column punched cards, which became ubiquitous for business , such as payroll and inventory tracking. In the and , amid early electronic , 's punched-card tabulators integrated with machines like the , facilitating electronic for applications including wartime logistics and scientific calculations. The , completed in 1945 as the first general-purpose electronic computer, relied on punched cards and plugboards for initial data input, though its primary focus was numerical computation rather than persistent storage. Theoretical underpinnings from further shaped these foundations. Alan Turing's 1936 paper on computable numbers introduced the , a model demonstrating the limits of algorithmic processing and laying groundwork for systematic manipulation in computing systems. Charles Bachman, during his 1950s tenure at Dow Chemical as manager of the central group, advanced practical data handling by implementing tape-based systems for inter-factory message routing and automating manual record-keeping, highlighting the need for integrated data flows. Pre-1960s systems, however, suffered from inherent limitations that underscored the demand for more robust solutions. File-based storage, whether manual or punched-card, led to data redundancy—duplicate records across files increasing storage costs and error risks—and data isolation, where information in one file was inaccessible without custom programs. Manual indexing was prone to human errors, such as misfiling or inconsistent , while lack of across organizations resulted in incompatible formats and inefficient retrieval. These vulnerabilities, including limited and concurrency issues in shared environments, propelled the evolution toward navigational models in the .

1960s-1970s: Navigational and Relational Models

In the , the development of navigational database management systems (DBMS) marked a significant advancement in structured data handling, primarily through the efforts of the . CODASYL's Data Base Task Group (DBTG), formed in the late 1960s, standardized the network data model, which allowed complex relationships between data records using sets and pointers for traversal. This model built on hierarchical structures but enabled more flexible many-to-many associations, addressing limitations in earlier file-based systems. A pioneering example was Charles Bachman's Integrated Data Store (IDS), released in 1963 at , which introduced pointer-based navigation to link records directly on disk, facilitating efficient access in direct-access storage environments without full file scans. IDS influenced CODASYL's specifications, such as the 1971 DBTG report, which formalized the navigational approach for mainframe applications in business and scientific computing. The , proposed by in 1970, revolutionized database design by shifting from navigational pointers to a declarative based on mathematical relations. In his seminal paper, Codd defined a database as a collection of relations—essentially tables—where each relation consists of tuples (rows) representing entities and attributes (columns) defining their properties, with enforced through keys and to minimize . Unlike navigational systems, the relational model supported declarative querying, allowing users to specify what data they wanted via operations like selection, , and join, without dictating how to navigate physical storage. This abstraction was grounded in and first-order logic, enabling a universal data sublanguage for manipulation. Early implementations of the relational model emerged in the mid-1970s, demonstrating its feasibility despite skepticism from the navigational community. IBM's System R project, initiated in 1974 at the San Jose Research Laboratory, produced the first prototype relational DBMS with a query language called SEQUEL (later SQL), incorporating relational algebra for optimization and proving the model's practicality on System/370 mainframes. Concurrently, the Ingres project at the University of California, Berkeley, started in 1973 under Michael Stonebraker, developed an open-source relational system using a procedural query interface called QUEL, which emphasized modularity and extensibility for research purposes. These prototypes laid the groundwork for commercial relational DBMS, though they required innovations in query optimization to handle real-world workloads. The offered key advantages over navigational approaches, including logical —changes to physical storage did not affect application programs—and reduced programming complexity by eliminating explicit pointer management, which often led to maintenance issues in systems. It also promoted consistency and derivability, as relations could be reconstructed from normalized forms without duplication, contrasting with the redundancy-prone structures in pointer-based navigation. However, early relational implementations faced performance challenges, such as slower query execution due to the overhead of join operations and the nascent state of cost-based optimizers, making them less efficient than direct navigational paths for certain traversals in the 1970s hardware environment.

1980s-1990s: SQL Standardization and Object-Oriented Extensions

The commercialization of relational database management systems (RDBMS) accelerated in the late 1970s and 1980s, driven by the development of SQL as a standardized query language. Oracle released Version 2 in 1979, marking the first commercially available SQL-based RDBMS, which supported multi-user access and portability across platforms. This was followed by the establishment of the ANSI SQL standard in 1986 (SQL-86, or ANSI X3.135), which formalized SQL's syntax and semantics, promoting interoperability among vendors and facilitating broader adoption. The standard's ratification by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in 1987 further solidified SQL's role as the de facto language for relational databases. Desktop databases emerged to make relational technology accessible beyond mainframes, with dBase II launched in 1980 by , enabling file-based data management for personal computers and achieving widespread use in small businesses. 1.0 followed in 1992, integrating relational features with a within the Windows ecosystem, simplifying database creation for end-users. In the enterprise space, 1.0 debuted in 1989 as a with Sybase, initially for , providing scalable SQL processing for client-server architectures. By the late 1980s and , RDBMS adoption surged in sectors like banking, where systems such as and enabled and for financial operations. SQL's declarative paradigm, which specifies desired results without detailing execution steps, empowered non-programmers to query complex datasets, contributing to its ubiquity in business applications. However, pure relational models faced challenges with complex, , prompting the rise of object-oriented database management systems (OODBMS) in the to handle , encapsulation, and polymorphism. Systems like , developed in and commercialized in the early , supported composite objects and type constructors for applications. Similarly, , originating in the and refined through the , used Smalltalk-based objects to manage persistent data, addressing relational limitations in representing hierarchical structures. To bridge relational and object-oriented approaches, hybrid object-relational DBMS (ORDBMS) emerged, exemplified by PostgreSQL's release in 1996, which extended SQL with user-defined types and for complex data like CAD models and . OODBMS and ORDBMS mitigated relational databases' impedance mismatch—where flat tables struggled with object-oriented application semantics—and supported domains requiring rich , such as (CAD) and engineering workflows. These extensions expanded RDBMS applicability while maintaining SQL compatibility, influencing enterprise systems through the decade.

2000s-Present: NoSQL, NewSQL, and Cloud-Native Developments

The rise of NoSQL databases in the 2000s was driven by the need to handle massive, unstructured data volumes at web scale, challenging the scalability limitations of traditional relational systems. Google's BigTable, introduced in 2006, provided a distributed, sparse, multi-dimensional sorted map for managing petabyte-scale data across thousands of machines, influencing subsequent designs. Similarly, Amazon's Dynamo, published in 2007, offered a highly available key-value store emphasizing eventual consistency and fault tolerance for e-commerce workloads. These innovations spurred diverse NoSQL categories: key-value stores like Redis, released in 2009 for high-performance in-memory caching and messaging; document-oriented databases such as MongoDB, launched in 2009 to store JSON-like documents with flexible schemas for agile development; and column-family stores like Apache Cassandra, developed in 2008 from Facebook's needs for wide-column data distribution and linear scalability. In response to NoSQL's trade-offs on guarantees, systems emerged in the 2010s, aiming to deliver distributed scalability while preserving relational SQL semantics. Google's Spanner, detailed in 2012, achieved global through atomic clocks and two-phase commit protocols, supporting external consistency across datacenters. , open-sourced in 2015, built on similar principles with a key-value foundation under SQL, enabling horizontal scaling and survival without single points of failure for cloud applications. These systems addressed critiques of both NoSQL's consistency lapses and traditional RDBMS's partitioning challenges, facilitating transactions over geographically distributed data. Cloud-native developments from the late onward integrated databases into managed, elastic infrastructures, with AWS Relational Database Service () launching in 2009 to automate provisioning and scaling of relational engines like and . Serverless paradigms advanced this further; FaunaDB, introduced in 2018, provided a globally distributed, document-relational database with built-in compliance and no server management, ideal for event-driven architectures. for extended databases to low-latency environments near data sources, as seen in systems like Couchbase Lite for real-time processing in deployments. Meanwhile, the propelled vector databases, with Pinecone launching in 2019 for efficient similarity search on high-dimensional embeddings, and offering open-source scalability for billions of vectors in pipelines. By the 2020s, trends emphasized integration with for enhanced and . Blockchain-infused databases like BigchainDB, developed since , combined decentralized ledgers with capabilities to ensure tamper-proof data . Sustainability efforts focused on energy-efficient designs, such as query optimization to reduce and carbon emissions. Privacy advancements incorporated , allowing computations on encrypted data in databases like CryptDB extensions, mitigating breaches in sensitive sectors through 2025 implementations.

Classifications

By Data Model

Databases are classified by their data models, which define the logical structure for organizing and accessing data. These models range from early hierarchical and network approaches designed for specific navigational patterns to the dominant and modern variants that prioritize flexibility and for diverse data types. Each model balances trade-offs in query efficiency, , and adaptability to complex relationships, influencing their suitability for different applications. The hierarchical model organizes data in a tree-like structure, where each record has a single parent but multiple children, enforcing strict one-to-many relationships. Developed by in the 1960s, it was first implemented in the Information Management System (IMS), released in 1968, to handle structured, hierarchical data such as organizational charts or file systems. This model excels in fast traversal for predefined hierarchies, reducing access times for parent-child queries compared to flat structures, but it struggles with many-to-many relationships, requiring data duplication that can lead to inconsistencies and maintenance challenges. For instance, IMS remains in use for high-volume in industries like , where data fits rigid hierarchies. In contrast, the network model extends the hierarchical approach by allowing many-to-many relationships through a graph-like structure of records connected via sets, as specified by the Conference on Data Systems Languages () Database Task Group in their 1971 report. This enables more flexible navigation across interconnected data, such as in inventory systems linking multiple suppliers to products, outperforming hierarchical models in complexity but demanding explicit pointer-based traversal that complicates queries and increases programming overhead. CODASYL systems like Integrated Data Store (IDS) were influential in the 1970s for mainframe environments, offering better support for complex associations at the cost of rigidity in schema changes and higher risk of data anomalies without . The , introduced by E. F. Codd in , represents data as tables (relations) with rows and columns, where relationships are established via keys and joins, decoupling physical storage from logical to enable declarative querying. This model supports to minimize and ensure through constraints like primary keys and foreign keys, making it ideal for structured data in business applications such as banking or . Its strengths include compliance for reliable transactions and the ability to handle ad-hoc queries efficiently via SQL, though it can incur performance overhead from joins in very large datasets without proper indexing. management systems (RDBMS) like and dominate enterprise use, processing billions of transactions daily while maintaining consistency. NoSQL models emerged in the late 2000s to address limitations of relational systems in handling unstructured or at massive scale, prioritizing and partition tolerance over strict in some cases. Key-value stores, exemplified by Amazon's (2007), treat data as simple pairs where each unique key maps to an opaque value, offering sub-millisecond reads and writes for cache-like use cases such as session management. They excel in horizontal scalability across distributed nodes but lack support for complex queries or relationships, requiring application-level joins. Document stores, like , organize data into self-contained documents (e.g., or format) within collections, allowing schema flexibility for nested structures such as user profiles with varying attributes. This model supports rich indexing and aggregation for in , though it may sacrifice relational integrity without explicit enforcement. Graph databases, such as , model data as nodes, edges, and properties to natively represent and traverse relationships, providing superior performance for connected data like social networks—queries can complete in milliseconds for depth-first traversals that would require costly joins in relational systems. However, they are less efficient for bulk operations on unrelated data. Wide-column stores, inspired by Google's (2006), structure data in dynamic columns grouped by row keys, enabling sparse, massive-scale storage for time-series or log data, as in HBase implementations handling petabytes with column-family . Their strength lies in efficient columnar reads for , but schema evolution can be challenging without careful design. Emerging multi-model databases integrate multiple paradigms within a single system to reduce overhead, allowing seamless querying across key-value, , and data without data migration. , for example, supports these models natively using (), enabling hybrid applications like recommendation engines that combine storage with traversals for improved developer productivity and reduced integration complexity. This approach trades some specialized optimization for versatility, as unified engines may not match single-model performance in extreme workloads, but it facilitates evolving data needs in modern architectures.

By Architecture and Deployment

Databases are classified by their , which refers to the internal structure for and , and by deployment, which describes the hosting and model. Centralized architectures store and manage all on a single node or server, simplifying administration but limiting scalability for large workloads. In contrast, distributed architectures partition a logical database across multiple physical nodes, enabling horizontal scaling and through techniques like sharding. For example, SQLite exemplifies a centralized, single-node system as an embedded library that operates within a single process without network overhead. Meanwhile, Vitess implements distributed sharding for MySQL, dividing across clusters to high-throughput applications like those at YouTube. Another key architectural distinction is between client-server and embedded models. Client-server architectures involve a dedicated that clients access over a , supporting concurrent multi-user access and remote operations. follows this model, where the handles query processing and storage while clients connect via protocols like TCP/IP. Embedded architectures, however, integrate the database directly into the application as a library, eliminating the need for a separate process and reducing for single-user scenarios. is widely used in this embedded form for mobile and desktop applications, such as in and apps, where the entire database fits in a single file. Deployment options further classify databases based on hosting and management. On-premises deployments run databases on organization-owned , providing full over but requiring in-house expertise for . Cloud deployments leverage provider-managed , categorized by service models. (IaaS) offers virtual machines where users install and manage database software, as in SQL Server on Virtual Machines, balancing with cloud scalability. (PaaS) provides fully managed databases with automated patching and backups; examples include Azure SQL Database for relational workloads and Google Cloud SQL for MySQL, , and SQL Server instances. Hybrid deployments combine on-premises and cloud elements, allowing sensitive data to remain local while offloading scalable tasks to the . Serverless deployments represent a modern evolution, automatically scaling compute resources without user-managed servers, ideal for variable workloads. Amazon Aurora Serverless auto-scales or capacity based on demand, pausing during inactivity to optimize costs. In , databases deploy close to data sources for real-time processing, particularly in scenarios with low-latency requirements. These systems handle intermittent connectivity and resource constraints on devices like sensors; RaimaDB, for instance, provides an for embedded applications, ensuring real-time data availability. Multi-tenant architectures are prevalent in () environments, where a single database instance serves multiple isolated customers () to maximize . Common patterns include shared databases with separate schemas for logical , or dedicated databases per tenant for stronger separation. This approach, as implemented in platforms like SQL, balances cost savings with through row-level and .

By Use Case and Scale

Databases are often classified by their intended use cases, which determine the primary workloads they support, and by the scale of data they handle, influencing design choices for performance and storage. This classification emphasizes practical applications, such as in transactional systems or generation in analytical environments, while considering data volumes from personal to massive distributed setups. Transactional databases, known as (OLTP) systems, are optimized for high volumes of short, concurrent read-write operations with low latency to support real-time business activities. These systems ensure atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability ( properties) for each , making them ideal for applications like banking, order processing, and inventory management where and speed are critical. For example, is widely used in OLTP scenarios for its robust support of concurrent transactions in financial systems. In contrast, analytical databases, or (OLAP) systems, focus on read-heavy workloads involving complex queries across large datasets to uncover trends and patterns. They employ multidimensional data models for efficient aggregation and slicing of historical data, often in data warehouses, with slower response times acceptable due to the emphasis on over immediacy. exemplifies OLAP use cases in enterprise data warehousing, enabling scalable analysis of queries on terabyte-scale datasets. Databases can also be categorized by data scale, reflecting the volume and distribution requirements. Small-scale databases, typically under 1 GB, serve personal or lightweight applications like mobile apps or desktop tools, prioritizing simplicity and local storage; is a common example for embedded personal data management. Enterprise-scale databases handle terabytes of structured data for organizational needs, such as systems integrating multiple departments, with often deployed for its scalability in such environments. Big data systems manage petabyte-level volumes across distributed clusters, suited for unstructured or in analytics; the Hadoop ecosystem, including HDFS, exemplifies this for processing vast datasets in research and web-scale applications. Specialized databases address domain-specific needs beyond general-purpose systems. Time-series databases like are designed for real-time ingestion and querying of timestamped data from sensors or monitoring, featuring high write throughput and downsampling for efficient storage of sequential metrics. Geospatial databases, such as —an extension to —enable storage and analysis of location-based data like points, lines, and polygons, supporting queries for mapping and with spatial indexing. Full-text search databases, including , optimize for lexical searching across large text corpora, using inverted indexes for relevance scoring in applications like search engines and log analysis. As of 2025, emerging trends include with vector search capabilities for handling embeddings in recommendation systems and , where databases like Pinecone facilitate similarity searches on high-dimensional data to enhance generative applications. Additionally, blockchain-based databases provide immutable distributed ledgers for secure, tamper-proof record-keeping in supply chains and , leveraging decentralized consensus to ensure without central authority.

Database Management Systems

Core Components

A database management system (DBMS) relies on a set of interconnected software and elements to manage efficiently and reliably. These core components form the foundational , enabling the , , and retrieval of while ensuring and performance. The primary software modules include the query processor, storage engine, and , which work in tandem with hardware resources such as processors, , and devices. Integration mechanisms like and locking further coordinate these elements to support concurrent operations and . The query processor is the central software component responsible for interpreting and executing user queries, typically in declarative languages like SQL. It consists of three main subcomponents: the parser, optimizer, and . The parser analyzes the query , resolves object names using the system catalog, and verifies user authorization before converting it into an internal representation. The optimizer then generates an efficient execution plan by exploring possible dataflow strategies, employing cost-based techniques such as those pioneered in System R to estimate selectivity and minimize resource usage. Finally, the runs the plan using an model, where operators like scans and joins process data in a pipelined fashion, supporting both disk-based and in-memory tuples for optimal performance. This processor interfaces with query languages to translate high-level requests into low-level operations. The storage engine, also known as the storage manager, handles the physical organization and access of on persistent media. It manages disk (I/O) operations, buffering in to reduce , and organizes files using structures like B+-trees for efficient indexing and retrieval. Buffering occurs via a buffer pool that stages pages between disk and main , employing algorithms such as LRU-2 for to hit rates and eviction overhead. The engine supports access methods for heaps, sorted files, and indexes, ensuring sequential I/O—up to 100 times faster than —is prioritized where possible. The , often implemented as a or , serves as a centralized store for descriptive information about the database, including schemas, privileges, and constraints. Stored as specialized tables, it enables the to validate structures and enforce rules during and optimization. High-traffic metadata is cached in memory and denormalized for quick access, supporting extensibility in the and authorization mechanisms. Hardware underpins these software components, with the CPU driving query optimization and execution through memory operations, often becoming the in well-tuned systems despite I/O perceptions. Storage hardware includes traditional hard disk drives (HDDs), solid-state drives (SSDs), and non-volatile memory express (NVMe) devices, which offer varying trade-offs in and throughput; for instance, flash-based reduces times compared to disks. , particularly , facilitates caching via buffer pools, leveraging 64-bit addressing for large-scale data staging to minimize disk accesses. Integration across components is achieved through mechanisms like the log manager for recovery and the lock manager for concurrency. The log manager implements (WAL) protocols, such as , to record transaction changes before commits, ensuring durability and enabling or crash by replaying the log tail. The lock manager coordinates access using a shared lock table and strict (2PL), preventing conflicts in multi-user environments while supporting hierarchical locks for scalability. These elements collectively ensure atomicity and isolation in database operations.

Primary Functions

A database management system (DBMS) serves as the core software layer that orchestrates the lifecycle of data within a database, enabling efficient definition, manipulation, control, and administration. Its primary functions ensure that data remains structured, accessible, and reliable across diverse applications, from traditional relational systems to modern distributed environments. These operations are typically facilitated through specialized languages and subsystems, allowing users and administrators to interact with the database without direct concern for low-level storage details. Data definition encompasses the creation, modification, and removal of database schemas, which outline the structure of data including entity types, attributes, relationships, and constraints. Using a data definition language (DDL), users specify elements such as tables, data types, domains, and keys; for instance, SQL commands like CREATE TABLE establish tables with defined columns and primary keys, while ALTER TABLE allows schema evolution without disrupting existing data. Constraints are integral here, enforcing rules like unique attributes or referential integrity to maintain semantic consistency—such as ensuring no null values in primary keys or valid foreign key references. This function is managed via the DBMS catalog, a metadata repository that stores schema definitions for all users. Data manipulation involves operations to insert, update, delete, and retrieve data, typically through a data manipulation language (DML) that supports both procedural and declarative paradigms. Core DML commands in SQL, such as INSERT for adding records, UPDATE for modifying existing ones, DELETE for removal, and SELECT for querying, enable set-oriented processing where entire relations can be affected efficiently. These operations translate to low-level actions like reading or writing records, ensuring data accuracy during changes; for example, updating an employee's salary propagates through related entities if constraints are linked. The DBMS optimizes these manipulations by decomposing queries into executable steps, supporting efficient data handling in large-scale environments. Data control focuses on safeguarding data integrity and access, enforcing rules that prevent invalid states and unauthorized modifications. Integrity enforcement includes domain constraints (e.g., valid data types and ranges), entity integrity (no null primary keys), and referential integrity (consistent relationships between tables), often implemented via triggers or built-in checks that validate operations in real-time. User permissions are managed through authorization mechanisms, such as granting or revoking privileges on schemas or objects, ensuring role-based access control; for instance, a view can restrict sensitive columns while allowing queries on aggregated data. These controls collectively maintain data quality and compliance, reducing risks from erroneous inputs or malicious actions. Administration involves ongoing oversight of database resources, performance monitoring, and maintenance tasks handled primarily by database administrators (DBAs). This includes allocating storage space, tuning query performance through parameter adjustments, and managing user accounts to balance load and security. Tools within the DBMS facilitate backup scheduling, recovery planning, and resource optimization, such as varying buffer sizes or index configurations to handle varying workloads. In practice, DBAs use system logs and monitoring utilities to detect bottlenecks, ensuring high availability and scalability. In contemporary cloud-native DBMS, additional functions like auto-scaling dynamically adjust computational resources based on demand—such as provisioning more instances during peak loads in Amazon RDS—while federated querying enables seamless access to data across disparate sources without physical relocation, as seen in Google BigQuery's integration with external databases. These enhancements build on traditional functions to support elastic, distributed data management.

Database Languages

Declarative Query Languages

Declarative query languages enable users to specify the desired output of a database query without prescribing the exact steps for retrieval or computation, allowing the database management system to determine the optimal execution strategy. The most prominent example is Structured Query Language (SQL), which serves as the standard for querying relational databases. In SQL, a basic query uses the SELECT clause to specify the columns to retrieve, the FROM clause to indicate the source tables, and the WHERE clause to filter rows based on conditions. For instance, a query might retrieve employee names and salaries from an employees table where the salary exceeds a certain threshold, expressed as SELECT name, salary FROM employees WHERE salary > 50000;. SQL supports combining data from multiple tables through join operations, which link rows based on related columns. Inner joins return only matching rows from both tables, while outer joins (left, right, or full) include non-matching rows with values for . Aggregates summarize data using functions like , , AVG, MIN, and MAX, often paired with GROUP BY to group rows by one or more columns and HAVING to filter groups. For example, SELECT department, AVG(salary) FROM employees GROUP BY department HAVING AVG(salary) > 60000; computes average salaries per department, excluding those below the threshold. These constructs allow complex while remaining declarative, as the user describes the result set rather than the scan or merge order. SQL's standardization began with ANSI approval in 1986 (SQL-86) and ISO adoption in 1987, establishing a core set of features including the SELECT-FROM-WHERE structure and basic joins. Subsequent evolutions expanded its capabilities: SQL:1999 introduced support for (OLAP) through extensions like and for multidimensional analysis. SQL:2003 added window functions for ranking and other analytic operations. SQL:2011 added temporal features, enabling queries over time-varying data with periods and bitemporal tables to track validity and transaction times. Subsequent standards like SQL:2016 introduced support and row , while SQL:2023 added features for property graphs and updates. The theoretical foundation of declarative querying in relational databases lies in , introduced by in 1970 as a procedural query language for the . Key operators include selection (\sigma), which filters tuples satisfying a ; projection (\pi), which extracts specified attributes; and join (\bowtie or \Join), which combines relations based on a condition. SQL queries map to equivalent relational algebra expressions, providing a formal basis for semantics and optimization; for example, a SELECT-WHERE corresponds to \sigma, and joins to \bowtie. Codd's framework ensures completeness, as relational algebra expresses all relational calculus queries. Query optimization in declarative languages relies on cost-based planners, which transform high-level queries into efficient execution plans by estimating resource costs like I/O and CPU. Originating in IBM's System R project, these optimizers use dynamic programming to enumerate join orders and access paths, selecting the lowest-cost plan based on statistics such as table sizes and index selectivity. For a query with multiple joins, the planner might estimate costs for nested-loop versus hash joins, choosing the former for small relations and the latter for larger ones to minimize total operations. This approach, refined since 1979, dramatically improves performance by automating low-level decisions.

Procedural and Schema Definition Languages

Procedural and Schema Definition Languages encompass the tools and extensions within database systems that enable the definition of data structures, enforcement of , and execution of programmatic logic beyond simple queries. These languages are essential for database administrators and developers to build, modify, and maintain the foundational architecture of databases, ensuring and operational efficiency. Unlike declarative query languages focused on , these components prioritize structural modifications and procedural control flows. In relational database management systems (RDBMS), Data Definition Language (DDL) forms the core of schema definition, as standardized by ISO/IEC 9075, which specifies commands for creating, altering, and dropping database objects such as tables, views, and indexes. The CREATE TABLE statement, for instance, defines a table's structure including columns, data types, constraints like primary keys, and relationships, thereby establishing the schema blueprint. ALTER TABLE allows modifications to existing structures, such as adding or dropping columns (e.g., ALTER TABLE employees ADD COLUMN salary DECIMAL(10,2);), renaming elements, or modifying constraints, facilitating schema evolution without full recreation. The DROP statement removes objects entirely, like DROP INDEX idx_name;, which is crucial for cleanup but requires caution to avoid data loss. These DDL operations are executed by the database management system to update metadata and, in some cases, physical storage, ensuring consistency across transactions. To extend SQL's declarative nature with procedural capabilities, vendors have developed language extensions that support control structures, loops, conditionals, and modular code like stored procedures. Oracle's (Procedural Language/SQL) integrates SQL with , allowing developers to write blocks with variables, IF-THEN-ELSE statements, FOR loops, and within stored procedures and functions stored in the database. For example, a PL/SQL procedure might iterate over rows to update salaries based on conditions, enhancing reusability and performance by reducing client-server round trips. Similarly, Microsoft's (T-SQL) extends SQL in SQL Server with procedural features, including WHILE loops, TRY-CATCH error handling, and user-defined functions, enabling complex scripts for tasks like or custom business logic directly in the database . Schema evolution involves managing changes to database structures over time, often through versioning and migrations to maintain backward compatibility and minimize downtime. Techniques include applying incremental ALTER statements in migration scripts to add columns or indexes gradually, with tools tracking versions via metadata tables to rollback if needed. In practice, this might involve a migration script that adds a new column with a default value (e.g., ALTER TABLE orders ADD COLUMN status VARCHAR(20) DEFAULT 'pending';), ensuring existing data remains valid while accommodating new requirements. Versioning strategies embed schema identifiers in tables or use separate logs to handle concurrent deployments in distributed environments. In non-relational databases, particularly systems, schema definition adopts a more flexible "schema-on-read" approach, where data is stored without rigid upfront structures, and schemas are enforced dynamically during queries or validation. exemplifies this with its model, allowing collections to hold JSON-like documents of varying structures; validation rules can be applied post-insertion using Schema to check field types and required elements without altering existing data. This contrasts with rigid schema-on-write in relational systems, enabling rapid iteration in agile applications but requiring application-level enforcement to prevent inconsistencies.

Storage Mechanisms

Physical Data Storage

Physical data storage in databases refers to the mechanisms by which data records are organized and persisted on underlying , such as disks or solid-state drives, to ensure efficient access, durability, and manageability. This layer abstracts the logical from the physical , handling aspects like record placement, space allocation, and recovery from failures. Traditional management systems (DBMS) employ block-oriented , where is divided into fixed-size units aligned with hardware block sizes, typically ranging from 4KB to 64KB, to minimize I/O overhead during reads and writes. File structures determine the overall organization of records within storage files. Heap files store records in the order of insertion without any specific sorting, appending new records to the end of the file for fast inserts but requiring full scans for retrievals. Sorted files, in contrast, maintain records in a predefined order based on a key attribute, facilitating efficient sequential scans and binary searches but incurring higher costs for insertions and deletions due to the need to shift records. Clustered organization places records physically adjacent to one another based on a clustering key, improving locality for range queries on that key, whereas non-clustered structures scatter records independently of any key, offering flexibility but potentially leading to fragmented access patterns. Page-based storage divides files into pages, which serve as the atomic unit for buffer management and I/O operations. Fixed-length pages allocate uniform space for records, simplifying management but wasting space if records vary in size; for example, a 4KB page might hold a fixed number of 100-byte records. Variable-length pages accommodate records of differing sizes by using slotted formats, where a page header tracks free space and offsets to variable fields, allowing dynamic allocation within the page. Overflow handling addresses cases where a record exceeds available space in its assigned page, often by chaining the overflow portion to a separate page or using out-of-line storage for large fields, which can degrade performance due to additional I/O but preserves page boundaries. Techniques such as incremental reorganization mitigate these issues in high-update workloads. Write-ahead logging (WAL) ensures by requiring changes to be recorded in a sequential log file before they are applied to the main data pages, allowing recovery to a consistent state after crashes. In WAL, each log entry includes before-and-after images of modified data, transaction identifiers, and checksums, with the log flushed to stable storage upon commit to guarantee atomicity. This approach, formalized in the recovery algorithm, supports fine-granularity locking and partial rollbacks while minimizing log volume through techniques like physiological logging, where changes are described at both logical and physical levels. Modern physical storage adaptations address evolving hardware. For solid-state drives (SSDs), optimizations exploit their low latency and high random I/O throughput by reducing —such as through log-structured merge-trees adapted for endurance—and learning device-specific parameters like garbage collection thresholds to tune page flushes and prefetching, yielding performance improvements of up to 29% in select workloads. Columnar storage, particularly in analytics-oriented systems, organizes data by columns rather than rows to enhance and selective scans; the format, for instance, uses nested encoding and per column chunk, enabling significant for repetitive datasets while supporting predicate pushdown for faster queries. This format draws from columnar principles in systems like Google's , enabling efficient processing of web-scale analytics without full row materialization.

Indexing and Query Optimization

Indexing structures in databases accelerate by organizing keys in ways that minimize disk I/O and computational overhead, building upon physical mechanisms to enable faster access than sequential scans. These indexes map search keys to pointers or locations of actual records, with the choice of index type depending on query patterns such as checks, scans, or aggregations. Common implementations include tree-based, hash-based, and bit-vector approaches, each optimized for specific access patterns while trading off space and maintenance costs. B-trees, introduced as a self-balancing m-ary structure, are widely used for indexing ordered data in relational databases, supporting efficient range queries, equality searches, and sequential access with O(log n) for insertions, deletions, and lookups. In a B-tree, internal nodes contain sorted keys and pointers to child nodes or leaf s, ensuring that all leaves are at the same level to minimize disk accesses, particularly beneficial for secondary storage where each node represents a disk . This design allows range queries to traverse a contiguous path and scan leaves sequentially without , making s the default index for primary and secondary keys in systems like and . Hash indexes employ a to map keys directly to storage locations via buckets in a , providing constant-time O(1) average-case performance for exact equality queries but unsuitable for operations due to the unordered of the output. To handle dynamic growth and collisions in databases, extendible hashing uses a directory of pointers to buckets that doubles in size as needed, guaranteeing at most two disk accesses for lookups while achieving high utilization without full reorganizations. This technique is particularly effective in scenarios with frequent point queries, such as unique identifier lookups, and is implemented in systems like for non-range indexed columns. Bitmap indexes, suited for columns with low in analytical workloads, represent each distinct value as a —a bit vector where a '1' indicates the presence of that value in a row—enabling fast bitwise operations for set-based queries like AND, OR, and aggregations in OLAP environments. Compression techniques such as (RLE) or word-aligned hybrid (WAH) reduce storage for sparse bitmaps, with query performance scaling linearly with the number of rows but benefiting from hardware-accelerated bit operations on modern CPUs. These indexes excel in data warehousing for multi-dimensional selections, as seen in and implementations, where they can reduce query times by orders of magnitude compared to B-trees on low-distinct-value attributes. Inverted indexes, primarily for full-text search and , map content terms (e.g., words) to lists of documents or rows containing them, facilitating efficient relevance ranking and phrase matching through posting lists that store positions and frequencies. In database contexts, they support complex predicates like LIKE or CONTAINS by inverting the row-term relationship, allowing and union operations on compressed posting lists to prune irrelevant data early. This structure is integral to search-oriented databases like and PostgreSQL's full-text features, where term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) weighting enhances query . Query optimization transforms declarative SQL queries into efficient execution plans by estimating and selecting the lowest-cost sequence of operations, such as joins, scans, and selections, using a combination of heuristics, , and cost models. rules, like pushing selections (predicates) down to the earliest possible point in the plan to reduce intermediate result sizes, simplify the search space and are applied first in dynamic programming algorithms to prune infeasible paths. For instance, in the System R optimizer, selections are pushed past projections and joins where possible, followed by cross-product elimination to avoid generating plans with unnecessary relations. Statistics collection involves sampling to estimate selectivity—the fraction of rows matching a —and of relations, stored in system catalogs to inform optimizer decisions without full scans. Histograms capture value distributions for non-uniform , enabling accurate predictions for predicates, while column statistics track distinct values and counts; updates occur during or via commands like ANALYZE in . These estimates guide join order selection, where underestimating selectivity by even 10% can lead to suboptimal plans with exponential cost increases. Cost models evaluate execution plans by approximating resource consumption, primarily I/O costs (e.g., number of page fetches) and CPU costs (e.g., comparisons and computations), weighted by system parameters like size and seek time. In System R, the for a plan is the sum of operator costs, assuming sequential I/O at 1 unit and random seeks at higher multiples, with selectivity-derived intermediate sizes feeding into downstream estimates. Selectivity s for a is often modeled as s = (number of matching values) / (total distinct values), allowing the optimizer to compare bushy or left-deep join trees and choose the minimum-cost variant, typically within seconds for queries up to 10 relations.

Transactions and Concurrency

Transaction Properties

In database systems, transactions provide a mechanism to ensure reliable execution of operations, particularly in the presence of failures or concurrent access. The core guarantees of transactions are encapsulated in the ACID properties, which were first formalized by Jim Gray in his 1981 paper "The Transaction Concept: Virtues and Limitations." These properties—Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, and Durability—define the expected behavior of a transaction as a logical unit of work that transforms the database from one valid state to another. Atomicity ensures that a transaction is treated as an indivisible unit: either all operations within it are completed successfully, or none of them take effect, preventing partial updates that could leave the database in an inconsistent state. This "all or nothing" guarantee is typically implemented through mechanisms that allow of uncommitted changes in case of failure. Consistency requires that a transaction brings the database from one valid state to another, adhering to all defined rules, constraints, triggers, and conditions, such as uniqueness or . While the database system enforces atomicity, consistency often relies on application logic or constraints to validate state transitions. Isolation guarantees that concurrent transactions appear to execute ly, preventing interference where one transaction's intermediate results affect another, thus maintaining the illusion of sequential execution despite parallelism. Levels of isolation vary, from read uncommitted (allowing dirty reads) to (fully equivalent to serial execution), balancing correctness with . Durability ensures that once a transaction is committed, its effects are permanently persisted, surviving system failures like power outages, typically achieved via to non-volatile storage. In contrast to ACID's emphasis on strict consistency and reliability, NoSQL and distributed databases often adopt the BASE model—Basically Available, Soft state, and —as an alternative paradigm prioritizing and over immediate consistency. Coined by Eric Brewer and colleagues in the late 1990s, BASE allows systems to remain operational (basically available) even under partitions or failures, with data states that may temporarily diverge (soft state) but converge over time () through mechanisms like replication and gossip protocols. This approach is particularly suited for high-throughput applications, such as web-scale services, where ACID's and demands can introduce bottlenecks. To support ACID guarantees in practice, databases implement features like savepoints and rollback mechanisms. Savepoints, introduced in the SQL:1999 standard (ISO/IEC 9075-2:1999), allow marking intermediate points within a transaction, enabling partial rollbacks to a prior state without aborting the entire transaction. For example, in a multi-step update, a savepoint can isolate a faulty sub-operation for rollback while preserving earlier changes. Rollback undoes all changes since the transaction start or a specified savepoint, restoring the database to its pre-transaction state by reversing logged operations, ensuring atomicity. These mechanisms rely on transaction logs to track modifications, allowing recovery without data loss. In distributed systems, strict ACID compliance often trades off against performance and availability, as highlighted by Brewer's , which posits that systems can only guarantee two of , , and partition tolerance. Enforcing full across nodes requires synchronous replication, increasing latency and reducing throughput, whereas relaxing isolation (e.g., via ) enables higher scalability, as seen in systems like Amazon Dynamo. This tension drives choices between for financial transactions requiring precision and BASE for social media feeds tolerating temporary inconsistencies.

Concurrency Control Techniques

Concurrency control techniques in database systems manage concurrent access to shared data by multiple transactions, ensuring the property of the paradigm while maximizing throughput and minimizing conflicts. These methods prevent anomalies such as dirty reads, non-repeatable reads, and lost updates by enforcing , where the outcome of concurrent executions is equivalent to some serial execution of the transactions. The core challenge is balancing concurrency with consistency, often categorized into pessimistic approaches that prevent conflicts proactively and optimistic approaches that detect them reactively. Seminal work by , Hadzilacos, and Goodman formalized these techniques, highlighting their theoretical foundations in serialization graphs and recovery integration.

Locking-Based Techniques

Locking mechanisms require transactions to acquire locks on data items before reading or writing, serializing to prevent interference. The most widely adopted is (2PL), where transactions divide operations into a growing phase of acquiring locks and a shrinking phase of releasing them, with no lock acquisition allowed after the first release. This protocol guarantees conflict serializability, as proven by the absence of cycles in the serialization graph for legal 2PL schedules. Introduced by Eswaran et al. in 1976, 2PL ensures that each transaction views a consistent database state but can lead to blocking and potential deadlocks, which are typically resolved via detection and victim selection. Variants enhance 2PL for practicality. Strict 2PL holds exclusive locks until commit, preventing cascading aborts and simplifying recovery by ensuring completeness. Conservative 2PL (or static 2PL) requires acquiring all locks at the start, reducing deadlocks but increasing wait times for long transactions. These locking strategies are pessimistic, suitable for high-conflict environments like update-heavy workloads, though they incur overhead from lock management and contention.

Timestamp-Based Techniques

Timestamp protocols assign a unique, monotonically increasing to each upon initiation, using these values to order operations and resolve conflicts deterministically. In basic timestamp ordering (TO), for a read operation on item x by T_i ( TS(T_i)), the the write W-timestamp(x); if TS(T_i) < W-timestamp(x), the read is rejected and T_i restarts, ensuring operations execute in order. Write operations similarly validate against read R-timestamp(x). This approach guarantees in the order without locks, avoiding deadlocks entirely. Bernstein and Goodman (1981) extended TO for distributed systems, incorporating site-local and commit protocols to handle network delays. An key optimization is Thomas' write rule, which discards a write operation if its timestamp is older than the current W-timestamp(x), treating it as obsolete and reducing unnecessary aborts in write-write conflicts. Wait-die and wound-wait schemes further manage restarts by prioritizing younger or older transactions, respectively, to prevent . Timestamp methods excel in distributed settings with moderate contention but may suffer from frequent restarts (cascading aborts) in high-conflict scenarios.

Optimistic Concurrency Control

(OCC) assumes low conflict rates and allows to proceed without locks, deferring validation until the commit phase to detect conflicts then. A executes in three phases: read (accessing current data copies), validation (checking for conflicts with concurrent ), and write (applying updates if validated). Conflicts are resolved by aborting and restarting conflicting , making OCC deadlock-free and eliminating lock overhead. Kung and Robinson (1981) proposed two validation algorithms: serial validation, where writes occur in a critical section after sequential checks against prior transactions' read and write sets, and parallel validation, which permits concurrent writes by maintaining an active set and using three conditions to ensure no overlaps in read-write or write-write sets. These methods achieve via forward or backward validation, with parallel validation scaling better on multiprocessors. OCC is particularly effective for read-dominated workloads, such as decision support systems, where conflict probabilities are low (e.g., below 0.001 for large read sets), yielding higher throughput than locking without the blocking costs.

Multiversion Concurrency Control

Multiversion concurrency control (MVCC) addresses reader-writer conflicts by maintaining multiple versions of each data item, each tagged with a creation , allowing readers to access a consistent prior version without blocking writers. This non-blocking read capability boosts concurrency in mixed workloads, as writers create new versions while readers select the one with the largest not exceeding their own. Garbage collection periodically removes obsolete versions to manage storage. Bernstein and Weihl (1983) established a formal theory for MVCC correctness, defining one-copy serializability (1SR) as equivalence to a serial execution on a single-version database, analyzed via multiversion serialization graphs that incorporate version orders. Key algorithms include multiversion timestamp ordering, where reads fetch the latest compatible version and writes are rejected if they would invalidate a younger read; and multiversion two-phase locking, combining locks with version certification to ensure 1SR. A hybrid approach uses timestamps for queries and locks for updates, leveraging Lamport logical clocks for consistency. MVCC reduces aborts for readers and is foundational in systems like , though it increases storage and cleanup overhead.

Security and Privacy

Access Control Mechanisms

Access control mechanisms in databases regulate user interactions with data resources, ensuring that only authorized entities can perform specific operations while preventing unauthorized access or modifications. These mechanisms typically encompass to verify user identities, to define permissible actions, formal models to structure policies, and auditing to monitor and detect irregularities. By implementing layered controls, databases mitigate risks such as data breaches and insider threats, maintaining and confidentiality in diverse environments from relational systems to implementations. Authentication serves as the foundational step in access control, confirming the identity of users or applications attempting to connect to the database. Traditional methods rely on username and password combinations, where users provide credentials that are validated against stored hashes to grant initial access. For enhanced security, (MFA) incorporates additional verification factors, such as one-time passwords generated via tokens or biometric inputs, reducing vulnerabilities to credential theft. (RBAC) integrates authentication with predefined roles, assigning permissions based on job functions rather than individual users, which simplifies administration in large-scale systems. Authorization determines what authenticated users can do within the database, specifying granular permissions on objects like tables, views, or schemas. Common privileges include SELECT for querying , INSERT for adding records, UPDATE for modifying existing , and DELETE for removal, enforced through SQL commands like and REVOKE. Views provide a mechanism for row-level by restricting to subsets of without altering the underlying tables, allowing users to see only relevant rows based on predefined conditions such as user identity or department. These privileges can be hierarchically managed, where roles aggregate multiple permissions, enabling scalable enforcement in enterprise databases. Access control models formalize the policies governing and , with two primary paradigms: (DAC) and (MAC). In DAC, resource owners discretionarily grant or revoke permissions to other users, offering flexibility but relying on user vigilance to prevent over-privileging. Conversely, MAC enforces system-wide rules independent of user decisions, often using security labels assigned to subjects and objects to control access based on classifications like or top-secret. The Bell-LaPadula model exemplifies MAC for , incorporating the simple security property—no read up (subjects cannot access higher-classified objects)—and the *-property—no write down (subjects cannot write to lower-classified objects)—to prevent information leakage in multilevel secure environments. Auditing complements these controls by recording and analyzing database activities to ensure compliance and detect potential threats. Logging mechanisms capture attempts, including successful and failed queries, identities, timestamps, and executed operations, stored in audit trails for retrospective review. detection processes these logs to identify deviations from normal behavior patterns, such as unusual query frequencies or unauthorized privilege escalations, using statistical models or to flag intrusions in . Systems like DEMIDS audit data to build profiles and alert on mismatches, enhancing proactive without impeding legitimate operations. While controls focus on prevention, auditing provides verification, often integrated with complementary protections like for .

Data Protection and Compliance

Data protection in databases encompasses a range of techniques designed to safeguard , , and against unauthorized access, breaches, and loss, while ensuring adherence to legal standards. These measures are essential in modern database management systems (DBMS) to mitigate risks from evolving threats such as cyberattacks and insider misuse. , anonymization, and with regulations form the core pillars, enabling organizations to protect sensitive information throughout its lifecycle without compromising operational efficiency. Encryption at rest protects stored data from unauthorized access if physical media is compromised, typically using the (AES) algorithm, which operates on 128-bit blocks with key sizes of 128, 192, or 256 bits as standardized by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). AES is widely implemented in DBMS for encrypting database files and backups, ensuring that data remains unreadable without the decryption key. For data in transit, (TLS) version 1.3 provides cryptographic protocols to secure communications between clients and servers, preventing interception or tampering during transmission over networks. (TDE) extends these protections by encrypting entire database files or tablespaces at the storage level without requiring application changes, as supported in systems like SQL Server and , where it uses AES to shield data at rest from disk-level threats. To enhance privacy, particularly for shared or analyzed datasets, databases employ data masking and anonymization techniques that obscure sensitive while preserving its for legitimate purposes. Data masking replaces real with fictional but realistic equivalents, such as tokenizing personal identifiers, to prevent exposure in non-production environments. Anonymization goes further by applying methods like generalization or suppression to remove identifiable attributes. A prominent approach is , introduced by in 2006, which adds calibrated noise to query results to ensure that the presence or absence of any individual's does not significantly affect the output, providing a mathematical guarantee against re-identification risks. This technique has been integrated into DBMS for privacy-preserving analytics, balancing utility with protection. Regulatory frameworks mandate these protections to enforce accountability and user rights, profoundly influencing database architecture and operations. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), effective since May 25, 2018, requires organizations to implement data protection by design, including encryption and pseudonymization for personal data processing within the European Union. The California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), enforced from January 1, 2020, grants California residents rights to know, delete, and opt out of data sales, compelling businesses to audit and secure database-stored personal information. Similarly, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), administered by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), imposes security standards for protected health information in databases, mandating safeguards like access logs and encryption to prevent unauthorized disclosures. These regulations impact database design, for instance, through GDPR's "right to erasure" (Article 17), which obligates controllers to delete personal data upon request unless overridden by legal retention needs, necessitating features like soft deletes, audit trails, and efficient purging mechanisms to avoid data leakage across distributed systems. As of 2025, advancements address emerging threats, including quantum computing and sophisticated attacks. NIST has finalized post-quantum encryption standards, such as FIPS 203 (ML-KEM) for key encapsulation and FIPS 204 (ML-DSA) for digital signatures, designed to resist quantum attacks like Shor's algorithm, with recommendations for DBMS to migrate from vulnerable algorithms like RSA by 2030 to protect long-term data at rest and in transit. Additionally, NIST selected the HQC algorithm as a backup for general encryption in March 2025, enhancing resilience in database encryption schemes. AI-driven threat detection in DBMS leverages machine learning models to monitor query patterns, access anomalies, and behavioral baselines in real-time, enabling proactive responses to intrusions that traditional rule-based systems might miss, as evidenced by integrations in modern platforms for automated alerting and mitigation. While access controls remain the first line of defense against unauthorized entry, these data-level protections and compliance measures ensure robust, verifiable security across the database ecosystem.

Design and Modeling

Database Models

Database models provide abstract frameworks for organizing and representing , capturing the structure of , entities, and their interrelationships in a way that supports efficient querying and manipulation. These models vary in complexity and suitability depending on the application's needs, from simple storage to intricate semantic networks. They form the foundation of , influencing how is conceptualized before implementation in specific systems. The model is a seminal for modeling data as entities, attributes, and relationships. Entities represent real-world objects or concepts, such as "" or "Product," while attributes describe their properties, like "name" or "price," which can be single-valued, multi-valued, or derived. Relationships define associations between entities, with cardinalities indicating participation constraints, including (e.g., a and their ), one-to-many (e.g., a and its employees), and many-to-many (e.g., students and courses). This model emphasizes semantic clarity and is widely used in the initial stages of design. For object-oriented database modeling, the (UML) employs class diagrams to depict data structures and behaviors. Classes serve as blueprints for objects, encapsulating attributes (data fields) and operations (methods), with enabling hierarchical relationships among classes. Associations, aggregations, and compositions model entity interactions, supporting complex object in object-oriented database management systems (OODBMS). UML's visual notation facilitates integration with practices, allowing seamless transition from conceptual models to implementation. Semantic models extend traditional approaches by incorporating meaning and interoperability for . The (RDF), a W3C standard, represents data as directed graphs of triples—subject, predicate (property), and object—enabling flexible description of resources via unique identifiers (URIs). This structure supports decentralized data integration across the web, as seen in initiatives. Ontologies, built atop RDF using the (OWL), formalize domain through classes, properties, and axioms, allowing automated reasoning and inference in knowledge graphs for applications like and AI-driven analytics. Database models differ significantly in their ability to handle data complexity, with flat models prioritizing simplicity and speed over relational expressiveness. Key-value models, exemplified by systems like , store data as unstructured pairs where a maps to an opaque value, suitable for caching and high-throughput scenarios but inadequate for querying nested or interconnected data. models, conversely, explicitly model networks using nodes for entities and labeled edges for relationships, as in the property model, which attaches key-value properties to both nodes and edges for rich traversal and in social networks or recommendation systems.

Conceptual Design Processes

The conceptual design phase of database development involves translating high-level user requirements into a structured that captures the essential elements and their interrelationships, serving as a blueprint for subsequent logical and physical . This process emphasizes from implementation details, focusing on entities, attributes, and associations to ensure the database accurately reflects real-world semantics while minimizing redundancy and anomalies. Methodologies in this phase draw from foundational techniques, prioritizing clarity and maintainability to support scalable systems. Entity-relationship (ER) diagramming is a core technique in , introduced by Peter Chen in 1976, where designers identify entities (distinct objects like "" or "") and their attributes (properties such as customer ID or order date), then define relationships between them, such as one-to-many or many-to-many associations. For instance, in a system, entities might include "Product" and "Supplier," connected via a many-to-many relationship to represent multiple suppliers per product. To resolve many-to-many relationships, which cannot be directly represented in relational tables, designers introduce associative entities (e.g., "Supply") with foreign keys linking the primary entities, ensuring and avoiding data duplication. This step facilitates visual representation through diagrams, aiding stakeholder validation and iterative refinement. Following ER modeling, refines the schema to eliminate redundancies and dependency issues, as formalized by E.F. Codd. The process begins with , requiring atomic values in each attribute and no repeating groups, ensuring each table row represents a unique . Second normal form (2NF) builds on 1NF by removing partial dependencies, where non-key attributes depend only on the entire , not subsets— for example, in an order line table, product price should depend on product ID alone, not the composite order-product key. Third normal form (3NF) further eliminates transitive dependencies, mandating that non-key attributes depend solely on the , preventing indirect derivations like calculating employee department from manager details. Boyce-Codd normal form (BCNF) strengthens 3NF by ensuring every determinant is a , addressing cases where non-trivial functional dependencies violate key candidacy, such as in a teaching where professors and subjects both determine schedules. While normalization promotes , denormalization may be selectively applied during design for performance, reintroducing controlled redundancies in read-heavy scenarios, though this trades off update efficiency. Mapping the conceptual ER model to a relational involves systematic conversion rules to generate , , and . Each strong entity becomes a with its attributes, using a as the (e.g., "Employee" with employee_id). Weak entities map to incorporating the owner's as a , forming a composite . Binary relationships translate into : adds the key to one ; one-to-many places the "many" side's key in the "one" side; many-to-many requires a junction with both keys as a composite . Multivalued attributes, like an employee's skills, create separate to maintain . This mapping preserves the semantics of the ER model while enabling relational query optimization. Computer-aided software engineering (CASE) tools automate and enhance these processes, with ERwin Data Modeler exemplifying support for ER diagramming, normalization checks, and forward engineering to relational schemas. ERwin allows visual entity creation, relationship validation, and automated normalization to 3NF or BCNF, generating SQL DDL for implementation. For NoSQL databases, agile adaptations shift from rigid upfront schemas to iterative, schema-on-read designs, where modeling emphasizes denormalized documents or key-value pairs derived from user stories, enabling rapid prototyping in environments like MongoDB without traditional normalization. This approach aligns with agile principles by deferring detailed schema decisions until runtime needs emerge, as explored in modern data modeling practices.

Applications and Maintenance

Common Use Cases

Databases play a pivotal role in enterprise environments, particularly in customer relationship management (CRM) systems where they store and manage vast amounts of customer data to facilitate sales, marketing, and support operations. For instance, Salesforce, a leading CRM platform, relies on an Oracle-powered relational database to handle thousands of concurrent users, enabling real-time data access for features like lead tracking and customer interactions. Similarly, inventory management systems in enterprises utilize databases to track stock levels, supplier information, and order fulfillment in real time, ensuring efficient supply chain operations; Oracle's inventory management tools, for example, integrate with enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems to optimize resource allocation across global operations. In web applications, databases support dynamic content delivery and user engagement, especially in where they manage transient data like shopping carts and user sessions to maintain seamless experiences during high-traffic periods. , an in-memory key-value store, is commonly employed for storing user session data in e-commerce platforms due to its low-latency retrieval, allowing quick access to personalization details and cart contents without overloading primary relational databases. Content management systems () like further exemplify this, using as the backend database to organize posts, user metadata, and media files, enabling scalable publishing for millions of websites worldwide. Scientific research leverages databases to handle complex, large-scale datasets generated from experiments and computations, fostering and . The Ensembl project maintains a comprehensive genomic database that integrates , annotations, and across , supporting biologists in studying functions and evolutionary relationships through tools for querying and visualizing eukaryotic genomes. For simulation , specialized databases such as the Portal store results from scientific simulations and experiments, allowing researchers to query metadata like parameters and outcomes to validate models in fields like physics and biomolecular dynamics. By 2025, databases have evolved to enable applications in critical sectors, including where they power fraud detection systems by processing transaction streams against historical patterns. Financial institutions like employ databases for fraud analysis, using algorithms to flag anomalies in milliseconds and prevent losses exceeding billions annually. In healthcare, patient databases underpin by aggregating electronic health records (EHRs), genomic profiles, and treatment histories to tailor therapies; initiatives like those highlighted in precision medicine trends utilize multi-omics databases to match patients with targeted interventions, improving outcomes through data-driven insights.

Building, Tuning, and Migration

Building a database involves the initial population of data into its , often through (ETL) processes that automate data ingestion from various sources. ETL pipelines extract raw data from external systems, transform it to fit the target database structure (e.g., cleaning, aggregating, or reformatting), and load it into tables for querying. This step ensures and from the outset, preventing issues like inconsistent formats that could arise from manual insertion. Apache Airflow, an open-source workflow orchestration platform, is widely used for managing ETL tasks in database building. It defines pipelines as Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) of tasks, where each task handles a specific ETL phase; for instance, an extraction task might pull data into a , a transformation task computes aggregates like total values, and a load task inserts the results into the database. The TaskFlow API in Airflow 2.0+ simplifies this by decorating functions with @task, enabling automatic dependency management and data passing via XComs, which reduces and errors during initial population. Best practices include configuring retries (e.g., @task(retries=3)) for fault tolerance and using multiple_outputs=True for complex data structures, ensuring reliable scaling for large datasets. Tuning a database focuses on optimizing performance after initial setup, primarily through query analysis, management, and data partitioning to handle growing workloads efficiently. Query analysis begins with tools like PostgreSQL's EXPLAIN command, which generates an execution plan showing how the database optimizer intends to process a SQL statement, including estimated costs, row counts, and types (e.g., sequential vs. scans). For deeper insights, EXPLAIN ANALYZE executes the query and provides actual metrics, such as elapsed time and usage, allowing administrators to identify bottlenecks like full scans on large tables. Best practices include running it within a (e.g., BEGIN; EXPLAIN ANALYZE ...; [ROLLBACK](/page/Rollback);) to avoid permanent changes and ensuring statistics are up-to-date via the ANALYZE command or autovacuum for accurate estimates. Index rebuilding addresses performance degradation from bloat or corruption, using PostgreSQL's REINDEX command to reconstruct from , reclaiming and restoring . This is essential when accumulate empty pages due to frequent updates or deletions, potentially slowing queries by increasing I/O. Administrators invoke REINDEX on specific , , or the entire database; for environments, the CONCURRENTLY option minimizes locking by building a new alongside the old one, though it consumes more resources and takes longer. Cautions include avoiding it in blocks for partitioned and requiring MAINTAIN privileges, with routine checks via views to detect bloat exceeding 30% of size. Partitioning divides large s into smaller, manageable segments based on a , enhancing query speed and in tuned databases. In , declarative partitioning supports (e.g., by date ranges like '2023-01-01' to '2024-01-01'), (e.g., by specific values like regions), or methods, automatically irrelevant partitions during queries to reduce scanned data volume. Benefits include faster bulk operations, as dropping a partition removes old data without affecting the main table, and improved concurrency on high-traffic systems. involves creating a parent table with PARTITION BY and attaching child tables with bounds via CREATE TABLE ... FOR VALUES, followed by indexing each partition separately for optimal . Database migration entails transferring schemas and data between systems, often requiring conversion for heterogeneous environments like to , to support evolving infrastructure needs. Schema conversion uses tools such as AWS Schema Conversion Tool (SCT), which automates translating DDL statements, data types, and stored procedures (e.g., to ), while handling incompatibilities like Oracle's proprietary functions through manual adjustments or extensions. Data transfer follows via AWS Database Migration Service (DMS), which supports full loads for initial copies and ongoing replication, optimizing with parallel tasks for large tables (e.g., setting partitions-auto for sources). For LOB-heavy data, modes like Full LOB ensure complete migration, though Inline LOB suits smaller values under 32 to boost speed. Zero-downtime strategies in migration minimize application interruptions by combining initial bulk transfers with continuous synchronization. For to , AWS employs (CDC) after an Oracle Data Pump export/import at a specific System Change Number (SCN), replicating ongoing changes until validation and cutover during a brief maintenance window. This approach uses Multi-AZ replication instances for and disables target constraints until switchover, achieving near-zero for multi-terabyte databases with high volumes. Benefits include consistency via SCN alignment and reduced source load through row filtering in tasks. Best practices for building, tuning, and migration emphasize proactive monitoring and automation to sustain performance. , a time-series monitoring system, tracks database metrics like active connections and query latencies via HTTP pulls, using PromQL for multidimensional queries (e.g., alerting on CPU spikes over thresholds). Integration involves configuring scrape targets for databases and visualizing with , enabling early detection of tuning needs like index bloat. In cloud environments, AWS Performance Insights automates tuning analysis by providing dashboards of DB load, wait events, and top SQL, filtering by hosts or users to pinpoint issues without manual EXPLAIN runs. It retains up to 24 months of data for trend analysis, supporting proactive optimizations like partitioning adjustments, though migration to CloudWatch Database Insights is recommended post-2026.

Advanced and Emerging Topics

Distributed and Cloud Databases

Distributed databases are systems designed to store and manage data across multiple interconnected nodes, enabling , , and geographic distribution by ing workloads and replicating data to handle large-scale applications. These systems address the limitations of centralized databases by distributing and , often employing techniques like replication and sharding to maintain performance under high loads. Originating from needs in large-scale web services, distributed databases prioritize and tolerance in networked environments, where failures are inevitable. Replication in distributed databases ensures and availability by maintaining copies across , with two primary models: master-slave and . In master-slave replication, a single primary (master) handles all write operations, while secondary (slaves) replicate data asynchronously or synchronously for reads and backups, reducing write contention but introducing potential delays in propagation. allows multiple to accept writes independently, enabling higher throughput and , though it requires mechanisms like last-write-wins or vector clocks to reconcile inconsistencies. These approaches balance load and resilience, as seen in systems where replication factors are configurable to optimize for specific workloads. Sharding, or horizontal partitioning, divides a database into subsets of rows distributed across multiple nodes based on a shard , such as a of user IDs, to storage and query performance linearly with added nodes. This technique avoids the bottlenecks of vertical by localizing data access, though it demands careful key selection to prevent hotspots where certain shards receive disproportionate traffic. Seminal work on horizontal partitioning formalized optimization criteria like minimizing inter-shard joins and access costs, influencing modern implementations that automate sharding for even distribution. Consistency models in distributed databases grapple with trade-offs outlined by the , which posits that a can only guarantee two out of three properties: (all nodes see the same data at the same time), (every request receives a response), and Partition Tolerance (the system continues operating despite network partitions). In practice, most distributed s favor availability and partition tolerance (AP models) over strict consistency, using where updates propagate asynchronously, or tunable consistency levels to meet application needs. The theorem, first conjectured in 2000 and formally proven in 2002, underscores why often sacrifices availability during partitions. Cloud databases extend distributed principles through that abstract complexities, offering auto-sharding and seamless scaling. , for instance, provides a fully managed service with automatic horizontal partitioning via and configurable read/write capacity units, eliminating manual management. Multi-region replication in environments, such as DynamoDB global tables, enables low-latency access by synchronously or asynchronously copying across geographic regions, achieving 99.999% while handling failures through automatic . These services integrate replication and sharding natively, supporting applications requiring reach without operational overhead. Key challenges in distributed and cloud databases include managing from network delays in cross-node communication and ensuring against node or network failures. arises in replication and sharding due to over distances, often mitigated by caching or read replicas, but it can degrade in latency-sensitive applications like real-time analytics. relies on consensus algorithms like , which elects a leader to coordinate log replication across nodes, ensuring and majority quorums for agreement even with minority failures; 's design simplifies understanding over predecessors like while maintaining efficiency. These issues demand robust monitoring and adaptive strategies to sustain reliability at scale.

Integration with AI and Big Data

Databases have increasingly integrated with ecosystems to handle massive-scale and analytics. , a data warehousing solution built on Hadoop, enables SQL-like querying (HiveQL) directly on data stored in the Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS), allowing traditional users to leverage distributed storage without data movement. This integration extends to , which interacts with Hive's metastore to access metadata and execute queries on Hive tables, combining Spark's with Hive's SQL interface for faster analytics on large datasets. A prominent evolution in this integration is the lakehouse architecture, pioneered by , which unifies the flexibility of data lakes for unstructured with the reliability of data warehouses for structured querying and . Built on open formats like Delta Lake and , the Databricks lakehouse supports transactions, schema enforcement, and time travel on petabyte-scale data, enabling seamless SQL, , and operations across environments. As of 2025, this architecture facilitates cost-effective scaling for and workloads by optimizing and compute separately, reducing data duplication and supporting multi-engine . Recent advancements as of November 2025 include Databricks' support for v3, introducing deletion vectors for faster deletes and a variant for handling diverse data formats, further strengthening open standards in lakehouse implementations. In the realm of , databases incorporate directly through in-database execution to minimize transfer latency and enhance security. SQL Server Services allows and scripts to run natively within the using the sp_execute_external_script procedure, supporting scalable libraries like revoscalepy for parallel model training on relational without exporting it. This feature, updated in SQL Server 2022 with 3.10 and 4.2, enables tasks such as predictive modeling and directly on stored . Vector embeddings, numerical representations of data for AI applications like semantic search, are now supported natively in relational databases via extensions such as pgvector for . Pgvector stores high-dimensional vectors alongside traditional columns and performs similarity searches using metrics like cosine distance or norms, leveraging approximate nearest neighbor algorithms such as HNSW for efficient querying on millions of embeddings. This integration allows hybrid queries combining vector similarity with SQL filters, powering recommendation systems and without dedicated vector stores. Federated learning enhances database interoperability by enabling privacy-preserving queries across distributed, siloed datasets. The Secure Approximate Query Evaluator (SAQE) framework combines , , and approximate processing to execute SQL queries over federated private data, using oblivious sampling to limit data exposure while maintaining accuracy. Evaluated on datasets like TPC-H, SAQE scales to terabyte sizes with error rates under 5% and reduces computational overhead by orders of magnitude compared to exact secure methods. Similarly, FedVSE provides a federated vector that guarantees privacy in similarity queries across using secure aggregation, suitable for sensitive applications like healthcare. Emerging trends in database-AI integration emphasize explainability and sustainability. Explainable AI techniques, such as those in the Reqo cost model, use graph neural networks and learning-to-rank to predict query execution costs with quantifiable uncertainty, providing subgraph-based explanations for optimizer decisions to build trust in automated plans. Reqo outperforms traditional models in accuracy and robustness on benchmark queries, aiding database administrators in debugging optimizations. For sustainability, learned indexes—machine learning models that approximate search structures—reduce query latency and space by up to 3x compared to B-trees, indirectly lowering energy consumption in data-intensive AI workloads. Recent adaptive learned indexes further enhance energy efficiency by building incrementally during queries, minimizing training overhead in dynamic environments. Overall, AI hardware efficiency has improved 40% annually as of 2025, supporting greener database operations for big data and ML.

References

  1. [1]
    What is a Database? - Cloud Databases Explained - Amazon AWS
    A database is an electronically stored, systematic collection of data. It can contain any type of data, including words, numbers, images, videos, and files.Missing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
  2. [2]
    Chapter 6 Database Management 6.1 Hierarchy of Data - UMSL
    A database is an organized collection of interrelated data that serves a number of applications in an enterprise.Missing: science | Show results with:science
  3. [3]
    [PDF] ECS 165A: Introduction to Database Systems
    In this class we will learn about Databases (DBs) and Database. Management Systems (DBMSs). • A Database is a (typically very large) integrated collection ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Logic and Databases
    The history of relational databases is the history of a scientific and technological revolution. • The scientific revolution started in 1970 by Edgar (Ted) F.
  5. [5]
    DEFINITIONS OF DATABASE
    A database is a collection of information stored in a computer in a systematic way, such that a computer program can consult it to answer questions. The ...
  6. [6]
    What Is a Database? | Oracle
    Nov 24, 2020 · A database is an organized collection of structured information, or data, typically stored electronically in a computer system.Database system · Database Management System · Oracle United KingdomMissing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
  7. [7]
    What is a Database Management System (DBMS)? - TechTarget
    Jun 25, 2024 · Data manipulation. A DBMS ensures data integrity and consistency by letting users insert, update, delete and modify data inside a database.
  8. [8]
    Introduction of DBMS (Database Management System)
    Aug 8, 2025 · It allows users to create, update, and query databases efficiently. · Ensures data integrity, consistency, and security across multiple users and ...
  9. [9]
    from File Systems to Modern Database Systems | SpringerLink
    Database systems have evolved from simple record-oriented navigational database systems, hierarchical and network systems, into set-oriented systems.
  10. [10]
    Database - Overview, Roles and Components, DBMS
    The database administrator (DBA) is the individual responsible for managing the databases, including database security, access control, backup, and disaster ...What is a Database? · What is the Role of Databases... · Components of a Database<|control11|><|separator|>
  11. [11]
    The Importance of Databases in Healthcare - Knack
    Sep 20, 2023 · In summary, healthcare companies should opt for online databases over spreadsheets to ensure data security, compliance, integrity, scalability, ...
  12. [12]
    Pivotal Role of Databases in Businesses - Svitla Systems
    Jun 13, 2014 · Database is an integral part of any e-commerce application. Without a well-organized and easily accessed DB, it would be impossible to store, analyze and ...
  13. [13]
    Database Concepts
    ### Definitions Extracted from Oracle Database Documentation
  14. [14]
    Architecture of a Database System - ACM Digital Library
    Database Management Systems (DBMSs) are a ubiquitous and critical component of modern computing, and the result of decades of research and development in ...
  15. [15]
    https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1561/1900000002
  16. [16]
    A relational model of data for large shared data banks | Communications of the ACM
    ### Summary of Relational Model Elements from Codd's Paper
  17. [17]
    https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/362384.362685
  18. [18]
    In-Memory Databases Explained | MongoDB
    An in-memory database is a data storage software that holds all of its data in the memory of the host.What is an in-memory database? · How does an in-memory...
  19. [19]
    Structured vs. Unstructured Data: What's the Difference? - IBM
    Structured data has a fixed schema and fits neatly into rows and columns, such as names and phone numbers. Unstructured data has no fixed schema and can have a ...Key differences · What is structured data?
  20. [20]
    What Is a Data Lake? | IBM
    A data lake is a low-cost data storage environment designed to handle massive amounts of raw data in any format.
  21. [21]
    A Brief History of the Library Catalog | wccls.org
    Nov 10, 2021 · 1791 – The first library card catalogs are created by the Revolutionary Government in France. They used playing cards, which were at the ...
  22. [22]
    8 Things that Changed the History of Document Management
    Jan 28, 2013 · The first known system was created by nomadic tribes writing on the walls of caves. Over time, this evolved to the scrolls system employed by ancient Rome.
  23. [23]
    A Brief History of Database Management - Dataversity
    Oct 25, 2021 · Punch cards offered a fast way to enter data and retrieve it. Herman Hollerith is given credit for adapting the punch cards used for weaving ...Missing: library | Show results with:library<|control11|><|separator|>
  24. [24]
    The IBM punched card
    The punched card provided a significant profit stream for IBM and helped propel the company to the forefront of data processing. As late as the mid-1950s, ...
  25. [25]
    ENIAC - CHM Revolution - Computer History Museum
    ENIAC (Electronic Numerical Integrator And Computer), built between 1943 and 1945—the first large-scale computer to run at electronic speed without being slowed ...
  26. [26]
    The dawn of computing - Nature
    Feb 22, 2012 · Alan Turing's bridging of logic and machines laid the foundation for digital computers, says George Dyson.
  27. [27]
    How Charles Bachman Invented the DBMS, a Foundation of Our ...
    Jul 1, 2016 · It became a model for the earliest definitions of “data base management system” and included most of the core capabilities later associated with ...
  28. [28]
    Oral-History:Charles Bachman
    Jan 27, 2021 · The conceptual schema had a consistent means of understanding all of the data modeling concepts used in all of the internal and external schema.
  29. [29]
    Chapter 1 Before the Advent of Database Systems
    Disadvantages of the file-based approach · Data redundancy · Data isolation · Integrity problems · Security problems · Concurrency access.
  30. [30]
    50 Years of Queries - Communications of the ACM
    Jul 26, 2024 · In the late 1960s, CODASYL created a working group called the Data Base Task Group (DBTG) to define a standard sublanguage for database ...
  31. [31]
    CODASYL Data-Base Management Systems - ACM Digital Library
    An in-depth examination of logical data models utilized in data storage systems to facilitate data modeling.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks
    Future users of large data banks must be protected from having to know how the data is organized in the machine. (the internal representation). A prompting.
  33. [33]
    A history and evaluation of System R | Communications of the ACM
    This paper describes the three principal phases of the System R project and discusses some of the lessons learned from System R about the design of relational ...
  34. [34]
    16.Database Management - UC Berkeley
    The INGRES project was initiated in 1973 to design and implement a full-function relational database management system. When the INGRES system was first ...
  35. [35]
    50 years of the relational database - Oracle
    Feb 19, 2024 · That was followed by Oracle's introduction of the industry's first commercial relational database management system (DBMS), Oracle Version 2, in ...
  36. [36]
    The SQL Standard - ISO/IEC 9075:2023 (ANSI X3.135)
    Oct 5, 2018 · In 1986, the SQL language became formally accepted, and the ANSI Database Technical Committee (ANSI X3H2) of the Accredited Standards Committee ...
  37. [37]
    What Is Structured Query Language (SQL)? - IBM
    SQL was standardized by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in 1986 and the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) in 1987.<|control11|><|separator|>
  38. [38]
    C. Wayne Ratliff Programs dBase II, the First Best-Selling Database ...
    ) database product. In early 1980, Ratliff and George Tate Offsite Link entered into a marketing agreement. "Ratliff had given up trying to sell copies of ...
  39. [39]
    New Video: The History of SQL Server - Microsoft
    Feb 15, 2012 · The history of SQL Server dates back to 1989 when the product came about as a result of a partnership between Microsoft, Sybase, and Ashton-Tate.
  40. [40]
    A brief history of databases: From relational, to NoSQL, to distributed ...
    Feb 24, 2022 · Oracle brought the first commercial relational database to market in 1979 followed by DB2, SAP Sysbase ASE, and Informix. In the 1980s and ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Schema and Database Evolution in the 02 Object Database System
    Similar concepts to user-defined database conversion functions can be found in GemStone[3], ObjectStore[l3],. OTGen[lO], whereby Versant [18] and Itasca [9] ...
  42. [42]
    l ationale of the O2 System
    The field of object-oriented database systems started around 1984 with the works on Gemstone [CM84], and during the past 7 years it attracted a lot of attention.<|control11|><|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Documentation: 18: 2. A Brief History of PostgreSQL
    The object-relational database management system now known as PostgreSQL is derived from the POSTGRES package written at the University of California at ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] A Survey of Commercial Object-Oriented Database Management ...
    Jun 4, 1992 · Gemstone provides facilities, called Gateways, that can reference data in other DBMS's. One collection of Gateways is the SQL Gateways. These ...
  45. [45]
    History - ODBMS.org
    The first standard, ODMG 1.0, was released in 1993. Throughout the 1990s, the ODMG works with the X3H2 (SQL) committee on a common query language. Though no ...
  46. [46]
    Multi-model Databases: A New Journey to Handle the Variety of Data
    In this survey, we introduce the area of multi-model DBMSs that build a single database platform to manage multi-model data.Abstract · Cited By · InformationMissing: original | Show results with:original
  47. [47]
    [PDF] An Introduction to IMS - IBM
    Mar 4, 2001 · Chapter 5, “Overview of the IMS Hierarchical Database Model,” on page 41. ... original 4 GB database limits of full-function databases v ...Missing: paper | Show results with:paper
  48. [48]
    Hierarchical Model - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    The hierarchical model was the first database model created by IBM in the 1960s, organizing records in a tree-like structure with unidirectional one-to-many ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] What Goes Around Comes Around
    II IMS Era. IMS was released around 1968, and initially had a hierarchical data model. It understood the notion of a record type, which is a collection of ...
  50. [50]
    [PDF] Network Model - Database System Concepts
    The first database-standard specification, called the CODASYL DBTG 1971 report, was written in the late 1960s by the Database Task Group. Since then, a number.
  51. [51]
    The 78 CODASYL database model - ACM Digital Library
    This paper compares the database model specified by the CODAYSL Data Definition Language Committee in its 1978 Journal of Development and the prior model.Missing: original | Show results with:original
  52. [52]
    The relational database - IBM
    A group of programmers in 1973 undertook an industrial-strength implementation: the System R project. The team included Chamberlin and Boyce, as well as ...Missing: 1974 | Show results with:1974
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Dynamo: Amazon's Highly Available Key-value Store
    This paper presents the design and implementation of Dynamo, a highly available key-value storage system that some of Amazon's core services use to provide an ...
  54. [54]
    What is a graph database - Getting Started - Neo4j
    A Neo4j graph database stores data as nodes, relationships, and properties instead of in tables or documents.How It Works · Why Use A Graph Database · How To Use
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data
    Abstract. Bigtable is a distributed storage system for managing structured data that is designed to scale to a very large size: petabytes of data across ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] What is a multi-model database and why use it? | ArangoDB
    This white paper explains what multi-model databases are, why it makes sense to use them, and illustrates how to apply them using an aircraft fleet management ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Lecture Notes - 21 Introduction to Distributed Databases
    A distributed DBMS divides a single logical database across multiple physical resources. The application is (usually) unaware that data is split across ...
  58. [58]
    Sharding - The Vitess Docs
    Sharding is a method of horizontally partitioning a database to store data across two or more database servers. This document explains how sharding works in ...Overview · Supported Operations · Sharding scheme · Key Ranges and Partitions
  59. [59]
    https://15445.courses.cs.cmu.edu/spring2023/notes/21-distributed.pdf
  60. [60]
    Vitess | Scalable. Reliable. MySQL-compatible. Cloud-native ...
    Vitess provides flexible sharding schemes that are completely transparent to the application. It also enables live resharding with minimal read-only downtime.
  61. [61]
    18.11 Overview of MySQL Storage Engine Architecture
    The MySQL server architecture shields the application from the underlying complexity of the storage engine by presenting a consistent and easy-to-use API that ...
  62. [62]
    MySQL Architecture
    MySQL follows a client-server architecture where clients send SQL queries to the server for processing. MySQL supports a pluggable storage engine that ...
  63. [63]
    Be Sure That's What You Need: Differentiating Embedded Database ...
    Jul 30, 2024 · Embedded databases are easier to deploy and to maintain than their client/server counterparts. An embedded database system is just along for the ...
  64. [64]
    On-Premise vs. Cloud Databases: What's the Difference?
    Sep 20, 2024 · Hybrid clouds combine the advantages of private and public clouds, keeping sensitive data on-premises while leveraging public cloud scalability ...Missing: serverless | Show results with:serverless
  65. [65]
    What Is Azure SQL? - Azure SQL - Microsoft Learn
    Aug 7, 2025 · PaaS options guarantee 99.99% SLA, while IaaS guarantees 99.95% SLA for the infrastructure, which means you also need to implement additional ...Overview · Service comparison
  66. [66]
    What is the Azure SQL Database service? - Microsoft Learn
    Jun 17, 2025 · This article provides an overview of Azure SQL Database, a fully managed platform as a service (PaaS) database engine that handles most of the ...
  67. [67]
    Cloud SQL for MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server - Google Cloud
    Cloud SQL is a service that delivers fully managed relational databases in the cloud. It offers MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQL Server database engines. How is Cloud ...Cloud SQL overviewPricing
  68. [68]
    What are public, private, and hybrid clouds? - Microsoft Azure
    The three types of core cloud deployment models—public, private, and hybrid—have different benefits, trade-offs, and key considerations based on your ...
  69. [69]
    Amazon Aurora Serverless - AWS
    Aurora Serverless v2 supports all manner of database workloads. Examples include development and test environments, websites, and applications that have ...
  70. [70]
    The Database for IoT & Edge Computing | RaimaDB
    Rating 5.0 (5) RaimaDB features an innovative in-memory database that keeps data up to date and available in real time; it is reliable and portable.
  71. [71]
    Multitenant SaaS database tenancy patterns - Azure - Microsoft Learn
    Aug 21, 2025 · Applies to: Azure SQL Database. This article describes the various tenancy models available for a multitenant SaaS application.SaaS concepts and terminology · How to choose the appropriate...
  72. [72]
    Let's Architect! Building multi-tenant SaaS systems - Amazon AWS
    Sep 26, 2024 · In this blog post, we will explore some of the key elements and best practices for designing and deploying secure and efficient SaaS systems on AWS.
  73. [73]
    What is OLAP? - Online Analytical Processing Explained - AWS
    Online analytical processing (OLAP) is a database analysis technology that involves querying, extracting, and studying summarized data. On the other hand, data ...
  74. [74]
    What Is Online Transaction Processing (OLTP)? - Oracle
    Aug 1, 2023 · OLTP is data processing that executes concurrent transactions, like online banking, and involves inserting, updating, or deleting small amounts ...
  75. [75]
    What Is Online Transactional Processing (OLTP)? - IBM
    In OLTP, the common, defining characteristic of any database transaction is its atomicity (or indivisibility)—a transaction either succeeds as a whole or fails ...
  76. [76]
    What Is an OLTP Database? {Concepts & Examples}
    Dec 12, 2024 · An OLTP database stores and manages data related to an organization's day-to-day operations. It focuses on handling transaction-oriented tasks efficiently.Missing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
  77. [77]
    What Is OLAP? Online Analytical Processing Clearly Explained
    Jul 29, 2024 · OLAP is a data processing technique that enables rapid, multidimensional analysis of large datasets to find patterns and trends.
  78. [78]
    OLTP vs. OLAP: Differences and Applications - Snowflake
    OLAP databases process significantly more data, so their response times are slower. Depending on the technology used and the amount of data being processed, ...
  79. [79]
    Types of Databases - GeeksforGeeks
    Jul 4, 2025 · Databases form the backbone of most of the modern applications which allow users to store, retrieve and update data in a reliable and ...Non-Relational Databases · Difference between RDBMS...<|control11|><|separator|>
  80. [80]
    How to Choose the Right Type of Database for your Enterprise?
    Jul 12, 2024 · The wide-column store database can be used for big data analytics ... data warehousing on big data, and for large-scale projects. Key ...Relational Database... · Wide-Column Store · Key-Value Store
  81. [81]
    Time series database explained | InfluxData
    A time series database (TSDB) is a database optimized for time-stamped or time series data. Time series data are simply measurements or events.
  82. [82]
    PostGIS: A powerful geospatial extension for PostgreSQL
    Oct 2, 2025 · It allows users to store, query, and analyze spatial data such as points, lines, and polygons directly in a PostgreSQL database. PostGIS enables ...
  83. [83]
    Full-text search | Elastic Docs
    Full-text search, also known as lexical search, is a technique for fast, efficient searching through text fields in documents. Documents and search queries.Elasticsearch Query · Search and filter with Query DSL · How full-text search works
  84. [84]
    The 7 Best Vector Databases in 2025 - DataCamp
    A comprehensive guide to the best vector databases. Master high-dimensional data storage, decipher unstructured information, and leverage vector embeddings ...Missing: blockchain | Show results with:blockchain
  85. [85]
    [PDF] Architecture of a Database System - University of California, Berkeley
    This paper presents an architectural dis- cussion of DBMS design principles, including process models, parallel architecture, storage system design, transaction ...
  86. [86]
    [PDF] Lecture Notes - 03 Database Storage (Part I) - CMU 15-445/645
    Rather, they are typical NAND flash drives that connect over an improved hardware interface. This improved hardware interface allows for much faster transfers, ...
  87. [87]
    https://db.cs.berkeley.edu/papers/fntdb07-architecture.pdf
  88. [88]
    [PDF] CS54100: Database Systems - CS@Purdue
    Jan 9, 2012 · – A set of operations for managing data; these operations are defined in terms of the data structures of the model. Page 20. CS54100: Database ...Missing: science | Show results with:science
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Integrity Constraints and Security
    Integrity constraints guard against accidental damage to the database, by ensuring that authorized changes to the database do not result in a loss of data ...Missing: functions | Show results with:functions
  90. [90]
    Integrity and Security Constraints
    ... DBMS to help preserve data integrity: a. Facilities to help preserve domain integrity: i. Not null constraints ii. User-defined domains iii. Check constraints b ...
  91. [91]
    [PDF] Database Design and Implementation - Online Research Commons
    Jun 14, 2023 · Table 1.1 Functions of DBMS. FUNCTIONS OF A DBMS. Create database. Create tables. Create supporting structures (e.g., Indexes). Modify (insert ...
  92. [92]
    Introduction to federated queries | BigQuery
    This page introduces how to use federated queries and provides guidance on querying Spanner, AlloyDB, and Cloud SQL data from BigQuery.
  93. [93]
    Documentation: 18: SELECT - PostgreSQL
    The FROM clause specifies one or more source tables for the SELECT . If multiple sources are specified, the result is the Cartesian product (cross join) of all ...
  94. [94]
    Aggregate Functions (Transact-SQL) - SQL Server - Microsoft Learn
    May 23, 2023 · An aggregate function performs a calculation on a set of values, and returns a single value. Except for COUNT(*), aggregate functions ignore null values.
  95. [95]
    [PDF] SQL:1999, formerly known as SQL3
    The features of SQL:1999 can be crudely partitioned into its “relational features” and its. “object-oriented features”. We'll cover them in that sequence for ...
  96. [96]
    What.s new in SQL:2011 | ACM SIGMOD Record
    SQL:2011 was published in December 2011, replacing the former version (SQL:2008) as the most recent update to the SQL standard for relational databases.
  97. [97]
    [PDF] Main Memory Database Systems - Justin Levandoski
    Database pages are a fixed-sized block usually several Kilobytes in size (e.g., 8KB or larger is typical) and have the same representation both on disk and in ...
  98. [98]
    A performance analysis of the gamma database machine
    On Gamma, the two sets of queries were tested with three different storage organiza tions: a heap (no index), a clustered index on the key attribute. (index ...
  99. [99]
    [PDF] Weaving Relations for Cache Performance - VLDB Endowment
    This paper introduces and evaluates Partition. Attributes Across (PAX), a new layout for data records that combines the best of the two worlds and exhibits per-.
  100. [100]
    [PDF] Data Page Layouts for Relational Databases on Deep Memory ...
    This paper introduces PAX (Partition Attributes Across), a new layout for data records on pages that combines the advantages of NSM and DSM. For a given ...
  101. [101]
    Analysis of overflow handling for variable length records
    In this paper we describe and analyze several overflow handling techniques for the case when records are of variable length. We develop analytic models that ...
  102. [102]
    ARIES: a transaction recovery method supporting fine-granularity ...
    ARIES: a transaction recovery method supporting fine-granularity locking and partial rollbacks using write-ahead logging. Editor: Gio Wiederhold.
  103. [103]
    Optimizing databases by learning hidden parameters of solid state ...
    Dec 9, 2019 · In this paper, we demonstrate how a database engine can be optimized for a particular device by learning its hidden parameters. This can not ...
  104. [104]
    [PDF] Organization and Maintenance of Large Ordered Indices
    Organization and maintenance of an index for a dynamic random access file is considered. It is assumed that the index must be kept on some pseudo random ...
  105. [105]
    [PDF] Access Path Selection in a Relational Database Management System
    The OPTIMIZER accumulates the names of tables and columns referenced in the query and looks them up in the System R catalogs to verify their existence and to.
  106. [106]
    [PDF] Jim Gray - The Transaction Concept: Virtues and Limitations
    This paper restates the transaction concepts and attempts to put several implementation approaches in perspective. It then describes some areas which require ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
  107. [107]
    The transaction concept: virtues and limitations (invited paper)
    A transaction is a transformation of state which has the properties of atomicity (all or nothing), durability (effects survive failures) and consistency.Missing: ACID original
  108. [108]
    [PDF] CAP Twelve Years Later: How the “Rules” Have Changed
    The ACID properties focus on consistency and are the traditional approach of databases. My colleagues and I created BASE in the late 1990s to capture the ...
  109. [109]
    [PDF] Perspectives on the CAP Theorem - Research
    Almost twelve years ago, in 2000, Eric Brewer introduced the idea that there is a fundamental trade-off between consistency, availability, and partition ...Missing: BASE | Show results with:BASE
  110. [110]
    SAVEPOINT statement - IBM
    The SAVEPOINT statement is compliant with the ANSI/ISO standard for SQL. Syntax. Read syntax diagram Skip visual syntax diagram >>-SAVEPOINT--savepoint--+----- ...
  111. [111]
    ROLLBACK TRANSACTION (Transact-SQL) - SQL Server
    Oct 27, 2025 · This statement rolls back an explicit or implicit transaction to the beginning of the transaction, or to a savepoint inside the transaction.Missing: standard ISO
  112. [112]
    Defining and Controlling Transactions - Oracle Help Center
    An active savepoint is one that you marked since the last commit or rollback. Your Database Administrator (DBA) can raise the limit by increasing the value of ...
  113. [113]
    The notions of consistency and predicate locks in a database system
    The notions of consistency and predicate locks in a database system. Authors: K. P. Eswaran. K. P. Eswaran. IBM Research Lab, San Jose, CA. View Profile. , ...
  114. [114]
    Concurrency Control in Distributed Database Systems
    Concurrency Control in Distributed Database Systems. Authors: Philip A ... BERNSTEIN, P. A., GOODMAN, N., ROTH- NIE, J B., AND PAPADIMITRIOU, C. A. "The ...
  115. [115]
    [PDF] On Optimistic Methods for Concurrency Control - Computer Science
    Most current approaches to concurrency control in database systems rely on locking of data objects as a control mechanism. In this paper, two families of ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
  116. [116]
    None
    ### Summary of Multiversion Concurrency Control Theory and Algorithms
  117. [117]
    [PDF] Electronic Authentication Guideline
    Jun 26, 2017 · Single-factor versus Multi-factor Tokens. Tokens are characterized by the number and types of authentication factors that they use. (See ...
  118. [118]
    [PDF] Role-Based Access Control Models
    The central notion of RBAC is that permissions are associated with roles, and users are assigned to appropriate roles. This greatly simplifies management of ...
  119. [119]
    [PDF] Security and Authorization Introduction to DB Security Access Controls
    ❖ Together with GRANT/REVOKE commands, views are a very powerful access control tool. Database Management Systems, 3ed, R. Ramakrishnan and J. Gehrke.
  120. [120]
    [PDF] Module 8: Database Security - Jackson State University
    A view can provide restricted access to a relational database so that a user or application only has access to certain rows or columns. Page 7. Relational ...
  121. [121]
    [PDF] Access Control Models - Jackson State University
    Discretionary Access Control (DAC) Model: The DAC model gives the owner of the object the privilege to grant or revoke access to other subjects. • Mandatory ...
  122. [122]
    [PDF] Security Models: BLP, Biba, and Clark-Wilson
    What is integrity in systems? ▫ Attempt 1: Critical data do not change. ▫ Attempt 2: Critical data changed only in “correct ways”.
  123. [123]
    Anomaly Detection in Database Systems - Computer Security Lab
    The system called DEMIDS (DEtection of MIsuse in Database Systems) provides a rich set of tools to derive user profiles from audit logs. Such profiles describe ...
  124. [124]
    [PDF] Detecting Anomalous Access Patterns in Relational Databases
    DEMIDS is a misuse-detection system, tailored for re- lational database systems. It uses audit log data to de- rive profiles describing typical patterns of ...
  125. [125]
    [PDF] Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
    May 9, 2023 · NIST has developed a validation program to test implementations for conformance to the algorithms in this Standard.
  126. [126]
    RFC 8446 - The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3
    This document specifies version 1.3 of the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol. TLS allows client/server applications to communicate over the Internet.Missing: transit | Show results with:transit
  127. [127]
    Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) - SQL Server - Microsoft Learn
    Sep 7, 2025 · TDE encrypts SQL Server, Azure SQL Database, and Azure Synapse Analytics data files. This encryption is known as encrypting data at rest.About TDE · Enable TDE
  128. [128]
    2 Introduction to Transparent Data Encryption - Oracle Help Center
    What Is Transparent Data Encryption? Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) enables you to encrypt sensitive data that you store in tables and tablespaces.
  129. [129]
    Differential Privacy | SpringerLink
    A new measure, differential privacy, which, intuitively, captures the increased risk to one's privacy incurred by participating in a database.
  130. [130]
    Regulation - 2016/679 - EN - gdpr - EUR-Lex - European Union
    Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing ...
  131. [131]
    California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
    Mar 13, 2024 · This landmark law secures new privacy rights for California consumers, including: The right to know about the personal information a business ...
  132. [132]
    HIPAA Home - HHS.gov
    We offer information about your rights under HIPAA and answers to frequently asked questions about the HIPAA Rules.
  133. [133]
    Art. 17 GDPR – Right to erasure ('right to be forgotten')
    Rating 4.6 (10,111) The data subject shall have the right to obtain from the controller the erasure of personal data concerning him or her without undue delay.Restrict processing · Recital 66 · Recital 65
  134. [134]
    [PDF] Understanding and Benchmarking the Impact of GDPR on Database ...
    GDPR gives new rights to EU consumers, causes metadata explosion, and creates new workloads for database systems, leading to poor performance.
  135. [135]
    NIST Releases First 3 Finalized Post-Quantum Encryption Standards
    Aug 13, 2024 · NIST has finalized its principal set of encryption algorithms designed to withstand cyberattacks from a quantum computer.
  136. [136]
    NIST Selects HQC as Fifth Algorithm for Post-Quantum Encryption
    Mar 11, 2025 · The new algorithm will serve as a backup for the general encryption needed to protect data from quantum computers developed in the future.
  137. [137]
    (PDF) AI-Driven Threat Detection: A Brief Overview of AI Techniques ...
    Oct 17, 2025 · Artificial Intelligence (AI) can revolutionize cybersecurity by improving threat detection, response time, and overall security posture. However ...
  138. [138]
    The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data
    A data model, called the entity-relationship model, is proposed. This model incorporates some of the important semantic information about the real world.
  139. [139]
    OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview (Second Edition)
    Dec 11, 2012 · The OWL 2 ontology language is normatively defined by five core specification documents describing its conceptual structure, primary exchange ...Introduction · Overview · Relationship to OWL 1 · Documentation Roadmap<|control11|><|separator|>
  140. [140]
    [PDF] Further Normalization of the Data Base Relational Model
    The objectives of this further normalization are: 1) To free the collection of relations from undesirable insertion, update and deletion dependencies;. 2) To ...
  141. [141]
    https://www.nist.gov/news-events/news/2025/03/nist-selects-hqc-fifth-algorithm-post-quantum-encryption
  142. [142]
    Industry-Leading Data Modeling Tool | erwin, Inc. - Quest Software
    erwin Data Modeler is a data modeling tool for visualizing metadata and database schema to understand complex data sources and design and deploy new ones.Erwin Data Modeler · Request Pricing · Learn More
  143. [143]
    Data Modeling in an Agile World - Dataversity
    Sep 4, 2019 · Agile Data Modeling uses a minimalist philosophy, requiring a minimally sufficient design for the foundation of the desired model.
  144. [144]
    Salesforce Database Management Explained - GRAX
    Oct 21, 2024 · Salesforce uses an Oracle-powered relational database that has been tuned to support thousands of concurrent users and to scale to high volumes ...The Core Components of a... · The Basics of Salesforce... · Salesforce Database...
  145. [145]
    Top 10: Inventory Management Systems | Procurement Magazine
    Feb 12, 2025 · Procurement Magazine takes a look at the top 10 inventory management platforms, including Oracle, Fishbowl, Veeqo and QuickBooks.
  146. [146]
    Session Management | Redis
    Session state is how apps remember user identity, login credentials, personalization information, recent actions, shopping cart, and more.
  147. [147]
    WordPress Database: What It Is and How to Access It - Kinsta
    Oct 1, 2025 · WordPress uses a database management system called MySQL, which is open source software, and also referred to as a "MySQL database".
  148. [148]
    Ensembl genome browser 115
    Ensembl is a public and open project providing access to genomes, annotations, tools and methods. Its goal is to enable genomic science by providing high ...Human · Mouse · Ensembl Tools · Scientific Publications
  149. [149]
    (PDF) DoSSiER: Database of Scientific Simulation and Experimental ...
    If selected DoSSiER will search the database for any experimental results matching the meta data of the test selection. In this case the search finds ...
  150. [150]
    [PDF] Real-Time Fraud Detection using Big Data
    Jul 17, 2025 · Barclays use of real time detection algorithms has helped to mitigate the risk of financial losses for the bank itself and its clients which ...
  151. [151]
    Precision Medicine Trends 2025: Top 6 Powerful Positive Shifts
    Jun 8, 2025 · Discover precision medicine trends 2025: Explore AI, multi-omics, gene therapies, digital health, and data driving tomorrow's personalised ...
  152. [152]
    Pythonic Dags with the TaskFlow API — Airflow 3.1.2 Documentation
    This is a simple data pipeline example which demonstrates the use of the TaskFlow API using three simple tasks for Extract, Transform, and Load.What's Happening Behind The... · Advanced Taskflow Patterns · Handling Conflicting...Missing: population tools
  153. [153]
    EXPLAIN
    ### Summary of EXPLAIN and EXPLAIN ANALYZE for Query Analysis in PostgreSQL
  154. [154]
    REINDEX
    ### Summary of REINDEX Command in PostgreSQL
  155. [155]
    5.12. Table Partitioning
    ### Table Partitioning in PostgreSQL for Performance Tuning
  156. [156]
    Best practices for AWS Database Migration Service
    To convert an existing schema to a different database engine, you can use the AWS Schema Conversion Tool (AWS SCT). It can create a target schema and can ...Missing: downtime | Show results with:downtime
  157. [157]
    Migrating Oracle databases with near-zero downtime using AWS DMS
    Mar 2, 2020 · This post discusses a solution for migrating your on-premises Oracle databases to Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) for Oracle using AWS Database ...Missing: strategies | Show results with:strategies
  158. [158]
    Overview | Prometheus
    ### Summary: Prometheus for Monitoring Databases
  159. [159]
    Monitoring DB load with Performance Insights on Amazon RDS - Amazon Relational Database Service
    ### Summary of AWS Performance Insights for Automated Tuning in Cloud Databases
  160. [160]
    Horizontal data partitioning in database design - ACM Digital Library
    In this paper the problem of horizontally partitioning data on a set of resources is considered.The main optimization parameter is the number of accesses ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
  161. [161]
    [PDF] Brewer's Conjecture and the Feasibility of Consistent, Available ...
    This consistency guarantee will require availability and atomic consistency in executions in which no messages are lost, and is therefore impossible to ...
  162. [162]
    Global tables - multi-active, multi-Region replication
    DynamoDB global tables provide multi-Region, multi-active database replication for fast, localized performance and high availability in global applications.
  163. [163]
    [PDF] In Search of an Understandable Consensus Algorithm
    May 20, 2014 · We used our Raft implementation to measure the per- formance of Raft's leader election algorithm and answer two questions. First, does the ...
  164. [164]
    Spanner: Google's Globally Distributed Database - ACM Digital Library
    Mar 29, 2025 · Spanner is Google's scalable, globally distributed, and synchronously replicated database, designed to shard data across many datacenters ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
  165. [165]
    Apache Hive: Data Warehouse for Hadoop | Databricks
    It provides a SQL-like query language called HiveQL with schema-on-read and transparently converts queries to Apache Spark, MapReduce, and Apache Tez jobs.
  166. [166]
    Hive Tables - Spark 4.0.1 Documentation
    One of the most important pieces of Spark SQL's Hive support is interaction with Hive metastore, which enables Spark SQL to access metadata of Hive tables.
  167. [167]
    Data Lakehouse Architecture - Databricks
    Lakehouse architecture combines the best of data lakes and data warehouses to help you reduce costs and deliver any AI use case.
  168. [168]
    https://raft.github.io/raft.pdf
  169. [169]
    What is SQL Server Machine Learning Services (Python and R)?
    Sep 17, 2025 · Machine Learning Services is a feature in SQL Server that gives the ability to run Python and R scripts with relational data.Execute Python and R scripts... · Get started with Machine...
  170. [170]
    PostgreSQL vector search guide: Everything you need to know ...
    Feb 25, 2025 · pgvector is an extension for PostgreSQL that adds vector similarity search capabilities to this widely-used relational database.<|separator|>
  171. [171]
    [PDF] SAQE: Practical Privacy-Preserving Approximate Query Processing ...
    SAQE is a private data federation system that scales to large datasets by combining differential privacy, secure computation, and approximate query processing.<|separator|>
  172. [172]
    FedVSE: A Privacy-Preserving and Efficient Vector Search Engine ...
    In these privacy-sensitive scenarios, a vector search engine must not only deliver high performance but also guarantee privacy across federated databases.
  173. [173]
    Reqo: A Robust and Explainable Query Optimization Cost Model
    Jan 29, 2025 · We propose a cost model for a Robust and Explainable Query Optimizer, Reqo, that improves the accuracy, robustness, and explainability of cost estimation.
  174. [174]
    The Case for Learned Indexes - mit dsail
    For efficiency reasons, it is common not to index every single key, rather only the key of every nth record, i.e., the first key of a page. This helps to ...
  175. [175]
    [2508.03471] Learned Adaptive Indexing - arXiv
    Aug 5, 2025 · Adaptive indexing is a technique in which an index gets built on the fly as a byproduct of query processing. In recent years, research in ...
  176. [176]
    The 2025 AI Index Report | Stanford HAI
    AI becomes more efficient, affordable and accessible. ... At the hardware level, costs have declined by 30% annually, while energy efficiency has improved by 40% ...Missing: sustainable | Show results with:sustainable