Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Religious wars

Religious wars are violent confrontations between groups where religious ideological differences drive the conflict, often serving as a justification for aggression though frequently masking underlying political or economic agendas.^[1] Such wars typically involve efforts to impose one faith over another, defend doctrinal purity, or expand religious influence through conquest, distinguishing them from disputes where religion plays a secondary role in mobilization or rhetoric. Empirical catalogs of historical conflicts reveal that religious wars constitute only a minor fraction of all warfare, with approximately 7% of 1,763 documented wars classified as primarily motivated by religion, underscoring that territorial expansion, resource competition, and power struggles more commonly precipitate violence.^[2] This low incidence challenges narratives exaggerating religion's role in human conflict, as causal analysis indicates faith often amplifies pre-existing grievances rather than originating them independently.^[2] When religious motivations dominate, however, they can engender particularly ruthless campaigns, including targeting civilian populations for conversion or elimination, as seen in episodes like the Crusades or the Thirty Years' War, where absolutist beliefs fueled prolonged devastation and hindered compromise.^[1] Classifying wars as religious remains contentious, with debates over primary versus contributory causes; for instance, many European "wars of religion" intertwined confessional strife with dynastic ambitions, while modern insurgencies invoke theology to legitimize territorial or ideological goals.^[1] Despite their relative rarity, these conflicts highlight religion's capacity to provide moral certainty and group cohesion, enabling sustained mobilization but also perpetuating cycles of retaliation that secular disputes might resolve through negotiation.

Definition and Conceptual Framework

Defining Religious Wars

A religious war, or war of religion, constitutes an armed conflict where divergences in religious beliefs, doctrines, or practices serve as the principal catalyst for hostilities, with combatants explicitly framing their actions as fulfilling divine mandates, defending orthodoxy, or eradicating perceived heresy. These wars typically involve violence between groups aligned with distinct faiths—such as Christians versus Muslims in the Crusades—or schisms within a single tradition, like Catholic-Protestant clashes in the European Wars of Religion from 1524 to 1648, where theological disputes over salvation, sacraments, and church authority escalated into widespread warfare.^[1] Religious motivations manifest through appeals to sacred texts, prophetic visions, or clerical endorsements that legitimize aggression as holy duty, distinguishing them from secular disputes even when territorial or dynastic elements coexist. Empirical analyses, however, reveal that unambiguous religious wars comprise a minority of historical conflicts, with religion more often amplifying preexisting grievances than originating them in isolation. The Encyclopedia of Wars, cataloging 1,763 conflicts through 2000, classifies only 123 (approximately 7%) as driven primarily by religious causes, underscoring that most wars stem from political, economic, or ethnic rivalries, with faith acting as a mobilizer or post-hoc rationale rather than root cause.^[3] Historiographical criteria for designation emphasize relational dynamics: combatants must identify explicitly with opposing religious traditions, invoke supernatural sanctions for violence, and pursue aims like conversion, purification, or sacralized conquest, as opposed to incidental religious affiliations in otherwise profane struggles.^[4] Yet, causal disentanglement proves elusive, as religious ideologies frequently mask or entwine with material incentives, such as resource control or state-building, prompting scholars to caution against overattributing violence to faith amid institutional tendencies in modern academia to inflate religion's independent role while minimizing secular drivers.^[2]^[5] In practice, religious wars exhibit distinctive features, including indiscriminate targeting of civilian religious communities—evident in the estimated 8 million deaths during the Thirty Years' War (1618–1648), where confessional lines justified mass atrocities—and the sacralization of warfare through rituals, martyrdom cults, and eschatological narratives promising otherworldly rewards. This contrasts with profane wars, where religious symbols may appear but lack causal primacy; for example, while the Taiping Rebellion (1850–1864) invoked Christian millenarianism, its core dynamics revolved around anti-Manchu Han nationalism and socioeconomic upheaval. Such patterns affirm religion's potency in forging collective identities and moral absolutism, enabling total mobilization, but also highlight its instrumentalization by elites for non-theological ends, as seen in alliances across confessional divides, like Catholic France aiding Protestant German states against Habsburg universalism in the seventeenth century.^[6]

Holy War Concepts Across Religions

In Judaism, the concept of holy war is categorized into milchemet mitzvah (obligatory war) and milchemet reshut (permissive war), as delineated in rabbinic literature drawing from biblical precedents. Milchemet mitzvah encompasses divinely commanded conquests, such as the Israelite campaigns against Canaanite nations circa 1200 BCE described in Deuteronomy 20:16-18, where total destruction was mandated to eliminate idolatrous influences, and defensive wars against existential threats, which require no prophetic sanction or popular assembly for legitimacy. Maimonides (1138–1204 CE), in his Mishneh Torah, explicitly includes wars of self-defense against aggressors as milchemet mitzvah, obligating participation without exemptions for scholars or newlyweds, reflecting a causal priority on communal survival over individual piety.^[7]^[8] In contrast, milchemet reshut—for territorial expansion or preemption—demands approval from a king, Sanhedrin, and Urim ve-Tummim oracle in ancient practice, limiting aggressive campaigns post-monarchy era. This framework prioritizes empirical threats and divine imperatives over expansionism, with post-Temple Judaism (after 70 CE) emphasizing defensive necessities amid diaspora vulnerabilities. Christian doctrine eschews unqualified holy war in favor of just war theory, formalized by Augustine of Hippo (354–430 CE) to reconcile Roman pacification needs with New Testament pacifism. Augustine posited war as justifiable only under sovereign authority, for restoring peace against wrongs like invasion or tyranny, with combatants required to adhere to charity and proportionality, explicitly rejecting vengeance or conquest for faith propagation as seen in Old Testament models.^[9] Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274 CE) refined this in Summa Theologica, outlining jus ad bellum criteria: legitimate ruler, just cause (e.g., reparative response to aggression), and right intention (peace, not glory), alongside jus in bello restraints like discrimination between combatants and noncombatants. This theory, rooted in natural law reasoning, contrasts with Crusades-era rhetoric (1095–1291 CE) invoking holy war indulgences, which deviated by blending defensive recovery of territories like Jerusalem with offensive zeal but remained bounded by ecclesiastical oversight rather than doctrinal endorsement of perpetual jihad-like expansion. Empirical historical application, such as in Charlemagne's campaigns (8th century CE), often stretched these limits for political consolidation under religious guise. In Islam, jihad—derived from the Arabic root for "struggle"—encompasses both internal spiritual exertion (greater jihad) and external armed conflict (lesser jihad), with the latter including holy war elements sanctioned by Quranic verses like Surah 9:29, which commands fighting "those who do not believe in Allah" until they pay jizya tribute, reflecting classical juristic views of offensive expansion to establish Islamic dominion. Early Medinan surahs (e.g., 622–632 CE) shifted from Meccan restraint to defensive permissions in Surah 2:190–193, but jurists like those of the Hanafi and Shafi'i schools classified jihad al-talab (offensive jihad) as a communal obligation (fard kifaya) to subdue non-Muslims, contrasting with purely defensive jihad al-daf' as individual duty (fard ayn).^[10]^[11] Medieval scholars such as Ibn Taymiyyah (1263–1328 CE) reinforced militant interpretations, linking jihad to prophetic precedent during Muhammad's campaigns (622–632 CE), which expanded from Medina to Byzantine and Sassanid frontiers, prioritizing causal enforcement of Sharia over mere survival. Modern jihadist movements invoke these texts for global conflict, though mainstream Sunni fatwas post-20th century often emphasize defensive bounds amid geopolitical shifts. Hindu traditions conceptualize righteous warfare as dharma yuddha, emphasizing moral duty (dharma) for warrior castes (kshatriyas) in epics like the Mahabharata (composed circa 400 BCE–400 CE), where Arjuna's battlefield dilemma resolves into obligatory combat against adharma without personal hatred. Codes prohibit strikes on unarmed foes, night attacks, or ambushes, as outlined in Manusmriti (circa 200 BCE–200 CE) and Arthashastra (circa 300 BCE), aiming to minimize civilian harm and restore cosmic order rather than eradicate unbelievers.^[12]^[13] This contrasts with Abrahamic absolutism by integrating ethical reciprocity, though historical applications, such as Chola expansions (9th–13th centuries CE), sometimes prioritized realpolitik. Buddhism and Jainism, emerging circa 5th century BCE, largely reject offensive holy war, advocating ahimsa (non-violence) as causal restraint, with exceptions in Tibetan chos 'khor defenses (e.g., 7th–9th centuries CE) framed as protective dharma rather than conquest.

Historical Development

Ancient and Classical Conflicts

In ancient Mesopotamia and the Levant, conflicts often invoked divine sanction, but explicit religious wars—where theological imperatives drove conquest or defense—emerged prominently in biblical narratives of Israelite campaigns. The conquest of Canaan, traditionally dated to around 1406–1400 BCE under Joshua following the Exodus, is depicted in the Book of Joshua as a series of divinely ordained battles against Canaanite city-states, involving the herem (total destruction) of populations and idols to eradicate polytheistic practices deemed abominable by Yahweh.^[14] These accounts portray the wars as Yahweh's judgment on Canaanite depravity, including child sacrifice and idolatry, rather than mere territorial expansion, with specific victories at Jericho (walls collapsing after priestly marches) and Ai emphasizing obedience to divine commands.^[15] Archaeological assessments, however, indicate limited evidence for widespread destruction layers aligning with a unified invasion, suggesting instead a gradual ethnogenesis of Israelites from local Canaanite groups between the 13th and 11th centuries BCE, though the ideological framework of sacral warfare persisted in Israelite tradition.^[16] In classical Greece, religion intertwined with interstate rivalries in the Sacred Wars, a sequence of four conflicts from the 6th to 4th centuries BCE centered on Delphi's oracle of Apollo. The First Sacred War (c. 595–585 BCE) pitted the Delphic Amphictyony—a league of Greek tribes overseeing sacred sites—against Cirrha (Krisa), whose extortion of pilgrims and naval blockade of the sacred route violated panhellenic religious norms.^[17] The Amphictyons, led by Thessaly and including early Spartan involvement, razed Cirrha after a decade of campaigning, redistributing its lands to Apollo's temple and imposing a sacred fine, thereby reinforcing Delphi's neutrality and the gods' authority over profane encroachments.^[18] Subsequent Sacred Wars, such as the Third (356–346 BCE) involving Philip II of Macedon against Phocian control of Delphi, similarly blended piety with power struggles, where sacrilege accusations legitimized aggression but masked ambitions for influence over the oracle's prophetic sway.^[19] Hellenistic Judaism produced one of antiquity's clearest religious revolts in the Maccabean uprising (167–160 BCE) against Seleucid ruler Antiochus IV Epiphanes. Triggered by decrees banning Torah observance, circumcision, and Sabbath rest—coupled with Temple desecration by a Zeus altar and pig sacrifices—the revolt began with priest Mattathias's refusal to comply and guerrilla warfare by his son Judah Maccabee.^[20] Forces numbering around 6,000 initially defeated larger Seleucid armies through asymmetric tactics and religious fervor, culminating in the 164 BCE Temple rededication after Antiochus's death eased pressure; the Hasmonean dynasty's independence lasted until 63 BCE.^[21] While economic Hellenization and internal Jewish factionalism contributed, primary texts like 1 and 2 Maccabees attribute success to zealous fidelity to Mosaic law over assimilation, framing the conflict as defense against forced idolatry rather than mere nationalism.^[22] The Roman-Jewish Wars, peaking in the First Revolt (66–73 CE), exemplified classical-era clashes where monotheistic exclusivity fueled resistance to imperial cult demands. Sparked by procuratorial corruption, heavy taxation, and provocations like Caligula's aborted Temple statue order, Zealot and Sicarii groups mobilized around messianic expectations and Torah primacy, viewing Roman eagles and emperor worship as idolatrous tyranny.^[23] Jerusalem's rebels, swelling to over 20,000 fighters, briefly controlled the province before Vespasian and Titus's legions—totaling 60,000—besieged the city, resulting in 1.1 million deaths (per Josephus) and the 70 CE Temple destruction amid famine and infighting.^[24] The Bar Kokhba Revolt (132–136 CE), led by Simon bar Kokhba as a purported messiah, similarly invoked religious restoration, deploying 200,000 guerrillas across 50 strongholds before Roman forces under Hadrian crushed it, killing 580,000 and banning circumcision to suppress Judaism.^[25] These wars underscore how religious non-conformism, absent pragmatic compromise, intensified existential threats from polytheistic empires.

Medieval and Early Modern Wars

The medieval phase of religious wars in Europe primarily involved the expansion of Christendom against non-Christian polities and internal suppression of heterodoxy, often sanctioned by papal authority with promises of spiritual indulgences. These conflicts built on earlier Carolingian campaigns but intensified from the 11th century, framing territorial conquests as defensive holy wars against Islamic and pagan threats. Key examples included the Reconquista in Iberia, where Christian kingdoms like Castile and Aragon systematically recaptured territories from Muslim taifas and emirates following the initial Umayyad invasion of 711; by 1085, Toledo had fallen, and the process culminated in the surrender of Granada on January 2, 1492, after centuries of intermittent warfare involving over 700 documented battles and sieges.^[26] Religious motivations were evident in chronicles portraying the struggle as a divinely ordained recovery of Visigothic Christian lands, reinforced by crusader privileges extended by Pope Eugene III in 1147, though political fragmentation among Muslim rulers and Christian alliances with some Islamic states complicated purely theological interpretations.^[27] Parallel to Iberian efforts, the Northern Crusades targeted pagan populations in the Baltic region from 1147 onward, organized by the Papacy and German-Slavic rulers to enforce conversion and incorporate lands into Latin Christendom. Campaigns against the Wends, Prussians, Lithuanians, and Finns involved military orders like the Teutonic Knights, who established fortified outposts and conducted raids resulting in mass baptisms—often coerced—and the depopulation of resistant communities; by 1410, the Battle of Grunwald marked a high point of pagan-Lithuanian resistance, but Christian forces had secured Livonia and Prussia by the late 13th century through sustained warfare estimated to have claimed tens of thousands of lives.^[28] These expeditions, endorsed by bulls like Divina dispensatione (1147), blended evangelization with colonization, as evidenced by the Teutonic Order's charter to rule conquered territories as a theocratic state, though scholarly analyses note that economic incentives, such as access to amber trade routes and arable land, intertwined with ideological zeal.^[29] Late medieval internal conflicts presaged early modern schisms, exemplified by the Hussite Wars (1419–1436) in Bohemia, triggered by the execution of reformer Jan Hus for heresy at the Council of Constance in 1415. Hus's followers, demanding communion in both kinds, vernacular liturgy, and clerical poverty, mobilized urban militias and peasants against five papal crusades led by Holy Roman Emperor Sigismund, employing innovative wagon-fort tactics that repelled invaders at battles like Lipany in 1434, where Hussite forces numbered around 40,000.^[30] The wars caused an estimated 100,000 deaths and fragmented into intra-Hussite civil strife, ending with the Compactata of Basel (1436) granting limited religious concessions, highlighting how theological disputes could ignite widespread rebellion against ecclesiastical and imperial authority.^[31] In the early modern era (c. 1500–1700), the Protestant Reformation catalyzed intra-Christian religious wars, transforming doctrinal disputes into multi-state conflagrations across Europe. The Schmalkaldic League's formation in 1531 pitted Lutheran princes against Catholic Habsburgs, erupting in the Schmalkaldic War (1546–1547), where imperial forces under Charles V defeated Protestant armies at Mühlberg, yet failed to eradicate the schism, leading to the Peace of Augsburg (1555) that enshrined cuius regio, eius religio.^[32] Escalation followed in the French Wars of Religion (1562–1598), involving eight major campaigns between Huguenots and Catholics, marked by atrocities like the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre (1572), which killed 5,000–30,000 Protestants, and resolved only by Henry IV's Edict of Nantes (1598) offering toleration.^[33] The Thirty Years' War (1618–1648), originating in Bohemian Defenestration and expanding into a continental struggle, reduced Germany's population by 20–30% through famine, disease, and combat involving up to 2 million soldiers, underscoring how religious pretexts masked dynastic rivalries, yet papal involvement and confessional armies affirmed ideology's causal role.^[34] These wars, totaling over 8 million deaths continent-wide, drove innovations in state absolutism and diplomacy, as treaties like Westphalia (1648) prioritized territorial sovereignty over universal religious unity.^[34]

Colonial and Imperial Expansion

The onset of European colonial expansion in the late 15th century intertwined religious imperatives with territorial conquest, as Catholic monarchs sought papal endorsement for overseas dominion to propagate Christianity among non-believers. Pope Alexander VI's Inter caetera bull, promulgated on May 4, 1493, granted Spain exclusive rights to colonize and convert indigenous populations in lands west of a meridian 100 leagues beyond the Azores and Cape Verde islands, framing such endeavors as a divine mandate to combat paganism and extend the faith.^[35] This decree, building on earlier explorations like Christopher Columbus's 1492 voyage, positioned conquests as continuations of the Reconquista against Islam, with military campaigns explicitly justified as salvific wars to supplant indigenous spiritual practices deemed idolatrous.^[36] The Treaty of Tordesillas, ratified on June 7, 1494, adjusted the papal demarcation to 370 leagues west, allocating the bulk of the Americas to Spain while reserving eastern routes to India for Portugal, thereby institutionalizing religious rivalry as a basis for imperial partition.^[37] Spanish expeditions exemplified this fusion: Hernán Cortés's invasion of the Aztec Empire from 1519 to 1521 involved alliances with native groups but was underpinned by theological rationales portraying the Aztecs' human sacrifices as infernal abominations warranting eradication through force, resulting in the fall of Tenochtitlán on August 13, 1521, and subsequent mass conversions estimated in the millions via baptism, often under duress. Francisco Pizarro's conquest of the Inca Empire, culminating in the capture of Atahualpa on November 16, 1532, followed suit, with missionaries embedding catechism in subjugation protocols to legitimize the displacement of polytheistic systems.^[38] Parallel Protestant expansions, emerging in the 16th and 17th centuries, reframed missionary outreach amid commercial ventures, though with fewer centralized religious decrees than Catholic efforts. English Puritans in New England, settling from 1620 onward, viewed indigenous resistance as satanic opposition, precipitating conflicts like the Pequot War of 1636–1637, where colonial militias, bolstered by Narraganset allies, annihilated hundreds in Mystic village on May 26, 1637, interpreting victory as providential fulfillment of biblical injunctions to claim promised lands.^[39] King Philip's War (1675–1676) similarly escalated when Metacomet's coalition challenged Puritan hegemony, leading to over 5% of New England's population perishing and framing the bloodshed as a righteous purge of heathen threats to covenanted communities. Dutch and later British activities in Asia and Africa integrated Calvinist chaplains into trading companies, fostering sporadic clashes, such as resistance to conversions in the East Indies, where religious pretexts amplified economic disputes into armed suppressions.^[40] By the 18th and 19th centuries, as secular rationales gained prominence in imperial policies, religious motivations persisted in missionary-led incursions, often igniting localized wars against perceived spiritual adversaries. British evangelical surges post-1790s propelled figures like William Carey to Bengal in 1793, where proselytization provoked Hindu and Muslim backlash, contributing to tensions that underpinned events like the 1857 Indian Rebellion, in which rumors of forced conversions fueled sepoy mutinies against East India Company rule. In Africa, the "civilizing" ethos of the late 19th-century Scramble incorporated Protestant and Catholic missions, with conflicts such as the Zulu Wars (1879) invoking divine sanction for territorial absorption, though economic extraction predominated as the causal driver. Empirical patterns reveal that while theological rhetoric mobilized participants—evidenced by conversion tallies exceeding 100 million by 1900—underlying geopolitical and resource competitions typically precipitated violence, with religion serving as ideological scaffolding rather than sole etiology.^[41]

Key Historical Examples

The Crusades

The Crusades were a sequence of nine major military expeditions sanctioned by the Catholic Church from 1095 to 1291, primarily involving Western European forces seeking to reclaim Jerusalem and adjacent territories in the Levant from Muslim rule following centuries of Islamic expansion into formerly Christian regions.^[42] These campaigns originated with Pope Urban II's sermon at the Council of Clermont on November 27, 1095, which framed participation as a penitential act offering plenary indulgence—full remission of sins—and responded to Byzantine Emperor Alexios I Komnenos's 1095 appeal for military aid against Seljuk Turk incursions that had severed Christian pilgrimage access and threatened the Byzantine Empire's Anatolian frontiers.^[42] While religious ideology provided the unifying rationale, with crusaders taking vows and wearing crosses as symbols of sacred warfare, intersecting factors included feudal land pressures on younger sons, prospects for territorial acquisition, and commercial interests in reopening Eastern trade routes dominated by Muslim intermediaries.^[43] The First Crusade (1096–1099) mobilized an estimated 60,000 to 100,000 participants, including non-combatants, though the disorganized "People's Crusade" vanguard largely perished or was routed by Seljuks at Nicaea in 1096; the principal armies, led by nobles like Godfrey of Bouillon and Bohemond of Taranto, endured severe attrition from starvation, disease, and battles, achieving a documented mortality rate of approximately 35–37% among tracked leaders and knights.^[44] On July 15, 1099, they breached Jerusalem's walls after a five-week siege, resulting in the deaths of an estimated 10,000 to 70,000 Muslim and Jewish inhabitants amid indiscriminate slaughter, though contemporary accounts vary widely in scale due to rhetorical exaggeration.^[42] This established ephemeral Crusader principalities, including the Kingdom of Jerusalem (founded 1099 under Godfrey as Defender of the Holy Sepulchre) and the counties of Edessa, Tripoli, and Antioch, sustained by fragile alliances and reinforcements but vulnerable to counterattacks.^[45] Later Crusades yielded mixed results, often undermined by internal divisions and logistical failures. The Second Crusade (1147–1149), preached after the 1144 fall of Edessa, collapsed without territorial gains despite armies under Louis VII of France and Conrad III of Germany.^[45] Saladin's Ayyubid forces recaptured Jerusalem in 1187 after the Battle of Hattin, prompting the Third Crusade (1189–1192), where Frederick I Barbarossa drowned en route, Philip II withdrew early, and Richard I of England negotiated a truce securing pilgrim access but not the city itself, with combined forces numbering around 20,000–30,000 knights and infantry.^[45] The Fourth Crusade (1202–1204), diverted by Venetian commercial interests, infamously sacked Orthodox Constantinople in 1204, installing a Latin Empire and exacerbating the East-West Christian schism rather than advancing against Muslims.^[45] Subsequent efforts, including the Fifth (1217–1221) targeting Egypt and the Seventh (1248–1254) under Louis IX of France, faltered amid high costs and defeats, culminating in the Mamluk conquest of Acre on May 18, 1291, which extinguished the last Crusader foothold.^[42] Empirical assessments indicate religious conviction as the dominant driver, evidenced by the disproportionate involvement of lower nobility and peasants motivated by spiritual salvation over plunder—many returned destitute, with net economic benefits accruing mainly to Italian maritime republics via fortified trade outposts—contradicting portrayals emphasizing greed amid pervasive contemporary testimonies of piety and vows.^[46] Total fatalities across all Crusades are estimated at 1 to 3 million, encompassing combatants, civilians, and indirect losses from famine and epidemic, though records' incompleteness precludes precision; for context, Europe's population hovered around 60–70 million during this era, rendering the toll significant but not demographically catastrophic.^[47] The expeditions fostered inadvertent advancements in state centralization, urbanization, and commerce in Western Europe by redirecting feudal energies outward, while in the Levant, they unified Muslim resistance under figures like Saladin but ultimately reinforced Islamic dominance without reversing prior conquests of Byzantine, North African, and Iberian Christian territories.^[48]

European Wars of Religion

The European Wars of Religion comprised a series of interconnected conflicts across the continent from approximately 1546 to 1648, pitting Protestant reformers against Catholic authorities amid the upheaval of the Protestant Reformation. These wars arose from theological schisms initiated by figures such as Martin Luther, whose 95 Theses in 1517 challenged papal authority and indulgences, leading to the fragmentation of Western Christendom into Lutheran, Calvinist, and Catholic blocs.^[33] While religious convictions motivated combatants on both sides—Protestants seeking to defend their doctrines against perceived Catholic tyranny, and Catholics viewing Protestantism as heresy—political factors, including imperial ambitions of the Habsburgs and struggles for territorial sovereignty, frequently instrumentalized confessional divides.^[49] Historians emphasize that genuine doctrinal disputes, such as over justification by faith and the sacraments, intertwined with rulers' efforts to consolidate power, rendering pure religious causation incomplete without accounting for state-building dynamics.^[50] Key early conflicts included the Schmalkaldic War (1546–1547), in which Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, a staunch Catholic, sought to suppress the Protestant Schmalkaldic League, resulting in the league's defeat but failing to eradicate Protestantism due to interim religious truces.^[33] In France, the Wars of Religion (1562–1598) unfolded as eight intermittent civil wars between Catholic royalists and Huguenot (Calvinist) factions, exacerbated by the growth of Protestantism to about 10% of the population by 1560, including influential nobles and urban classes.^[51] The 1572 St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre epitomized the violence, with an estimated 5,000–10,000 Huguenots killed in Paris alone amid fears of a Protestant coup, triggering nationwide reprisals that contributed to total war-related deaths of 2–4 million from combat, famine, and disease in a kingdom of roughly 18 million.^[52] These French wars ended with the Edict of Nantes in 1598, granting limited Huguenot toleration and political safeguards under Henry IV, though underlying tensions persisted.^[52] The Eighty Years' War (1568–1648), also known as the Dutch Revolt, saw Calvinist Dutch provinces rebel against Spanish Habsburg rule, blending religious persecution—such as the 1566 Iconoclastic Fury—with quests for economic autonomy and resistance to centralized taxation.^[33] The most devastating episode, the Thirty Years' War (1618–1648), began with the Defenestration of Prague, a Protestant uprising in Bohemia against Habsburg Catholic enforcement, escalating into a Europe-wide conflagration involving Denmark, Sweden, and France.^[50] Divided into Bohemian (1618–1625), Danish (1625–1629), Swedish (1630–1635), and French (1635–1648) phases, it featured brutal tactics like scorched-earth policies and mercenary armies living off the land, causing demographic collapse in the Holy Roman Empire.^[53] Casualties totaled around 4–8 million, with only about 450,000 from direct combat; the majority succumbed to famine, disease, and displacement, reducing Germany's population by up to one-third in affected regions.^[54]^[55] The Peace of Westphalia, concluded on October 24, 1648, in Münster and Osnabrück, terminated the Thirty Years' and Eighty Years' Wars, establishing principles of territorial sovereignty whereby princes determined their realms' religion (cuius regio, eius religio, extended to Calvinism alongside Lutheranism and Catholicism) and granting states rights to form alliances and conduct foreign policy independently of the emperor.^[56] This settlement diminished the Holy Roman Empire's central authority, recognized Dutch independence, and shifted European power toward France and Sweden, while pragmatically curtailing religious uniformity in favor of confessional pluralism within states—though enforcement varied and did not eliminate future sectarian strife.^[57] Overall, these wars accelerated the decline of universal Christendom, fostering modern notions of state sovereignty amid an estimated 10–12 million total deaths across Europe, underscoring how religious zeal, when fused with political opportunism, amplified destruction beyond theological disputes alone.^[54]^[49]

Islamic Conquests and Jihads

The early Islamic conquests began immediately following the death of Muhammad in 632 CE, with the Ridda Wars (632–633 CE) under Caliph Abu Bakr suppressing tribal apostasy and unifying the Arabian Peninsula under Muslim rule through military campaigns that reasserted central authority and expanded taxation systems.^[58] These efforts transitioned into external expansions under Caliph Umar (r. 634–644 CE), targeting the weakened Byzantine and Sassanid empires, which had been exhausted by their mutual war from 602–628 CE, resulting in the collapse of the Sassanid Empire by 651 CE and significant Byzantine territorial losses in the Levant and Egypt.^[59] The conquests were framed within the doctrine of jihad, interpreted as armed struggle to establish Islamic dominance, with Quranic injunctions such as Surah 9:29 mandating combat against non-Muslims until they submitted via conversion, tribute, or subjugation, motivating fighters through promises of martyrdom and divine reward.^[60] Key victories included the Battle of Yarmouk in August 636 CE, where an Arab force of approximately 20,000–40,000 defeated a larger Byzantine army of 40,000–100,000, securing Syria and Palestine and leading to the capitulation of Jerusalem in 638 CE under a treaty allowing Christian worship but imposing the jizya poll tax on non-Muslims.^[61] Concurrently, the Battle of al-Qadisiyyah in November 636 CE saw Rashidun forces under Saad ibn Abi Waqqas overcome a Sassanid army led by Rostam Farrokhzad, with estimates of 30,000 Arab troops prevailing over 50,000–100,000 Persians, paving the way for the fall of the Sassanid capital Ctesiphon in 637 CE and the absorption of Mesopotamia and Persia proper.^[61] The conquest of Egypt followed from 639–642 CE, with Alexandria surrendering after sieges, establishing Muslim control over North African trade routes and imposing dhimmi status on Coptic Christians, who faced periodic forced conversions and discriminatory taxes amid demographic shifts favoring Islamization over centuries.^[62] Under the Umayyad Caliphate (661–750 CE), expansions accelerated, completing the conquest of North Africa by around 700 CE through campaigns against Berber tribes, reaching the Atlantic coast and facilitating further raids into Byzantine territories.^[63] In 711 CE, Umayyad general Tariq ibn Ziyad crossed into Iberia, defeating Visigothic King Roderic at the Battle of Guadalete, which enabled the rapid subjugation of most of the Iberian Peninsula by 718 CE, establishing al-Andalus as a province with policies enforcing jizya on Jews and Christians while promoting Arab settlement and gradual Islamization.^[64] Eastern frontiers saw incursions into the Indus Valley by 712 CE under Muhammad ibn al-Qasim, incorporating Sindh into the caliphate and extending jihad doctrines to justify perpetual warfare against dar al-harb (house of war) regions until submission.^[63] These conquests, spanning from 632 to the mid-8th century, transformed a tribal Arabian polity into an empire controlling over 5 million square kilometers by 750 CE, with religious ideology providing causal primacy through mandates for expansion, though intersecting with opportunistic exploitation of imperial vacancies and economic incentives like booty distribution.^[62] Jihad's offensive application distinguished these wars from mere tribal raids, as evidenced by caliphal fatwas and hadith compilations emphasizing conquest as fard ayn (individual duty) in frontier zones, leading to sustained militarization and the subjugation of diverse populations under Islamic hegemony.^[65] Later jihads, such as Ottoman campaigns into Europe from the 14th century, echoed this pattern but built on the foundational model of religiously sanctioned territorial aggrandizement.^[60]

Causal Factors

Ideological and Theological Drivers

Religious wars have frequently been propelled by theological doctrines that frame conflict as divinely ordained, portraying violence not merely as permissible but as a sacred imperative to advance or defend the faith. Central to these drivers is the concept of holy war, wherein combatants perceive themselves as agents of divine will, combating cosmic evil or fulfilling prophetic mandates. Such ideologies derive from scriptural narratives depicting deities as warriors— for instance, Yahweh in the Hebrew Bible as a "man of war" leading the conquest of Canaan, as described in Exodus 15:3 and the Book of Joshua.^[66] Similarly, Islamic theology incorporates jihad as an obligation to expand God's rule under sharia, with historical caliphs authorizing offensive campaigns to subdue non-believers, rooted in Quranic verses like Surah 9:29 calling for fighting those who do not believe.^[66] In Christianity, apocalyptic visions in the Book of Revelation depict ultimate divine warfare against evil, influencing medieval crusading ideology that promised plenary indulgences—full remission of sins—for participants, as articulated by Pope Urban II in 1095.^[66] Exclusivist truth claims further intensify these drivers by positing one's religion as the sole path to salvation, rendering adherents of other faiths as threats to divine order or eternal damnation-bound. This fosters dehumanization of outgroups, justifying their subjugation or elimination to purify the community or hasten eschatological fulfillment. Empirical evidence from survey experiments in religiously diverse settings, such as Tanzania in 2017-2018 involving 972 respondents, demonstrates that priming perceptions of identity threats from other faiths increases support for defensive violence by approximately 8% above baseline, with effects amplified among those holding intolerant views toward interfaith mixing.^[67] Ideas of religious superiority, while showing weaker direct effects, reinforce this by framing conflict as a moral duty to assert dominance, as seen in historical appeals during the European Wars of Religion where Protestant and Catholic polemics demonized opponents as heretical agents of Satan.^[67] Soteriological incentives, including martyrdom rewards like paradise or spiritual merit, provide personal ideological motivation, transforming warfare into a path for transcendence. In Islam, jihadist traditions promise immediate entry to paradise for those slain in battle (Quran 3:169-170), sustaining prolonged conflicts like the early Arab conquests from 632-750 CE that expanded the caliphate across three continents.^[66] Hindu texts such as the Bhagavad Gita endorse detached warfare as dharma for warriors, exemplified by Krishna's command to Arjuna to fight kin in the Mahabharata war circa 1000 BCE, emphasizing duty over ethical qualms.^[66] Even in Buddhism, doctrines of creating a dharma realm have justified kings' wars, deeming non-Buddhist casualties inconsequential to karmic balance.^[66] These theological elements, often invoked by leaders to legitimize aggression, underscore how absolutist beliefs override pragmatic restraints, enabling mass mobilization despite high costs—evident in the Crusades' estimated 1-3 million deaths from 1096-1291.^[68] While intersecting with political aims, such drivers reveal religion's unique capacity to infuse violence with transcendent purpose, distinct from secular ideologies.^[69]

Intersecting Political and Economic Motives

Political leaders have historically invoked religious justifications to pursue territorial expansion and consolidate authority, framing conquests as divine mandates while advancing state power. Economic incentives, including access to trade networks, arable land, and revenue from tribute or plunder, often intertwined with these efforts, providing material rewards that sustained military campaigns. Empirical analyses indicate that such motives frequently predominate over purely theological drivers, as evidenced by patterns where religious rhetoric mobilizes populations but outcomes prioritize resource allocation and geopolitical dominance.^[70]^[71] In the First Crusade (1095–1099), Pope Urban II sought to assert papal supremacy over secular monarchs and the Byzantine Empire, redirecting feudal knights from European conflicts toward the East to avert threats to Rome, while crusader lords eyed Levantine ports for commercial exploitation. Italian merchant republics, such as Genoa and Venice, supplied fleets and troops in subsequent crusades, securing exclusive trading privileges in captured territories like Acre and Tyre, which boosted their Mediterranean commerce and diminished Byzantine and Muslim intermediaries. The Fourth Crusade's 1204 diversion to sack Constantinople exemplified this fusion, as Venetian Doge Enrico Dandolo leveraged debt obligations to prioritize economic gains over Jerusalem's liberation, yielding control over key Black Sea trade routes.^[43]^[72] The European Wars of Religion, culminating in the Thirty Years' War (1618–1648), transitioned from doctrinal disputes to interstate power struggles, with Habsburg emperors aiming to centralize authority in the Holy Roman Empire against Protestant princes and external powers like Sweden and France. Economic dimensions intensified the conflict, as control over the Rhineland's agricultural wealth and Baltic grain exports fueled interventions; Sweden's Gustavus Adolphus, for instance, intervened in 1630 partly to safeguard Protestant allies while securing toll revenues from German rivers and ports. The war's devastation, reducing the German population by up to 30% in some regions, underscored how intertwined fiscal imperatives—such as funding mercenary armies through plunder and taxation—prolonged hostilities beyond religious lines.^[49]^[73] Early Islamic conquests under the Rashidun Caliphs (632–661 CE) combined tribal unification under Muhammad's successors with expansion into resource-rich Sassanid and Byzantine provinces, where jizya poll taxes on dhimmis (non-Muslims) generated substantial revenue—estimated to have funded further campaigns—and facilitated control over Silk Road trade hubs. Political motives centered on stabilizing Arabia's fractious clans through jihad ideology, enabling Rashidun forces to capture Syria by 636 and Persia by 651, yielding booty and land grants (iqta') that redistributed wealth to warriors while enriching the caliphal treasury. These expansions, spanning over 2 million square miles, prioritized fiscal sustainability over immediate conversion, as tribute systems preserved conquered economies intact for extraction.^[74]^[75]

Empirical Patterns in Religious Conflict

Quantitative analyses of historical conflicts indicate that wars primarily motivated by religious causes represent a minority. The Encyclopedia of Wars, surveying 1,763 recorded conflicts, identifies 123 as religious, comprising 6.98% of the total.^[2] This figure underscores that territorial, dynastic, and resource-driven disputes have dominated warfare across civilizations, with religion serving more often as a rhetorical justification than a primary driver.^[2] In contrast, post-1945 patterns reveal a marked uptick in conflicts featuring religious dimensions, particularly intrastate ones. The Religion and Armed Conflict (RELAC) dataset, covering 1975–2015 and built on Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) foundations, documents religious issue conflicts—those centered on implementing or resisting religious laws or institutions—rising from 3% of active conflict dyads in 1975 to 55% in 2015.^[4] Of these, 75% involve groups advancing Islamist claims, such as demands for sharia governance or caliphate establishment, with revolutionary aims (overthrowing secular states) predominating over separatist or transnational variants.^[4] Geographically, 41% occur in Africa and 38% in Asia, often pitting governments against non-state actors within the same religious tradition rather than across faiths.^[4] Religious conflicts exhibit heightened persistence and intensity compared to secular counterparts. Absent decisive military victories, they endure longer, attributable to absolutist theological stakes that hinder compromise. Islamist revolutionary conflicts, for instance, carry a 23.4% annual risk of escalating to over 1,000 battle-related deaths, versus 11.5% for other types.^[4] A 2013 survey of 35 active armed conflicts found religious elements in 60%, though none were solely religious; instead, they intertwined with political grievances like opposition to central authority.^[76] In Sub-Saharan Africa by mid-2017, eight of ten conflicts displayed religious facets, either through identity divides or ideological demands.^[77] These patterns highlight religion's role as an amplifier rather than originator in most cases, with empirical data emphasizing intersections with ethnic, economic, and governance failures over isolated doctrinal disputes.^[76] UCDP trends confirm the shift toward non-state religious actors, correlating with state fragility in Muslim-majority regions.^[4]

Theoretical Interpretations

Just War Traditions and Ethics

Just War Theory, a cornerstone of Western ethical discourse on warfare, originated in early Christian theology to reconcile biblical pacifism with the realities of governance and defense. St. Augustine (354–430 CE), in works like The City of God, posited that war could be just if authorized by legitimate sovereign authority, pursued for a righteous cause such as self-defense against aggression or rectification of grave wrongs like murder or theft, and directed toward the restoration of peace rather than domination or revenge.^[78] Building on this, St. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274 CE) in his Summa Theologica formalized the doctrine, emphasizing three core jus ad bellum requirements: legitimate authority, just cause (typically response to unprovoked injury), and right intention aligned with peace.^[78] These principles aimed to curb arbitrary violence, including in religiously framed conflicts, by subjecting motives to rational scrutiny. The theory further delineates jus ad bellum conditions like exhaustion of peaceful alternatives (last resort), proportionality (benefits outweigh harms), and probability of success to avoid futile bloodshed. For conduct during war (jus in bello), it mandates discrimination—sparing non-combatants such as civilians, clergy, and the defenseless—and proportionality in tactics to minimize excess suffering.^[78] In the context of religious wars, these criteria were invoked to legitimize the Crusades, launched in 1095 CE by Pope Urban II, who portrayed the expeditions as defensive recovery of sacred sites and aid to Byzantine Christians imperiled by Seljuk Turkish advances, fulfilling just cause and authority via papal mandate while promising spiritual indulgences.^[79] Yet, documented atrocities, including the 1099 sack of Jerusalem where thousands of Muslim and Jewish inhabitants were killed, reveal how religious zeal often undermined discriminatory and proportional restraints, as chronicled in contemporary accounts like those of Raymond of Aguilers.^[80] Analogous ethical traditions appear in other Abrahamic faiths. Islamic jurisprudence derives jihad regulations from Quranic verses like 2:190 ("Fight in the way of God those who fight you, but do not commit aggression") and prophetic hadith, prohibiting mutilation, killing of women, children, or the elderly, and destruction of crops or livestock unless militarily necessary.^[81] Caliph Abu Bakr (r. 632–634 CE) codified these in directives to commanders, mandating humane treatment of prisoners and cessation if enemies sought peace (Quran 8:61), framing permissible jihad primarily as defensive restoration of justice rather than unbridled conquest.^[81] Judaism's biblical framework in Deuteronomy 20 requires peace overtures before sieges, exemptions for fruit-bearing trees to preserve sustenance, and rabbinic expansions (e.g., in Maimonides' Mishneh Torah) limiting offensive wars to existential threats or divine commands, with prophetic approval historically required to prevent discretionary aggression.^[82] ^[83] Non-Abrahamic traditions similarly impose restraints. Hindu texts like the Mahabharata prescribe dharma yuddha (righteous warfare), barring strikes against the unarmed, fleeing, wounded, or surrendering foes, poisoned weapons, or ambushes, while protecting non-combatants including women, children, and ascetics, as exemplified in Bhishma's ethical combat guidelines.^[84] The Manusmriti reinforces proportionality and compassion, viewing war as a duty-bound last resort for upholding cosmic order (dharma).^[84] Across these systems, doctrinal ethics prioritize limitation over glorification of violence, yet historical applications in religious wars—evidenced by patterns of civilian targeting and escalation despite prohibitions—demonstrate that theological commitments to restraint frequently yield to political imperatives or eschatological fervor, as seen in conquests rationalized post hoc as divinely ordained.^[78]

Sociological Explanations of Religious Violence

Sociological perspectives on religious violence typically frame it as a product of group competition, identity formation, and structural tensions rather than inherent doctrinal mandates. Conflict theory, influenced by Karl Marx's view of religion as an "opiate of the masses," posits that religious institutions reinforce social hierarchies by sanctifying inequality, yet they also enable subordinate groups to challenge power through sacred justifications for revolt.^[85]^[86] For example, in colonial contexts, indigenous religious movements mobilized against European dominance by framing resistance as divine imperative, as seen in the 19th-century Ghost Dance among Native American tribes, where spiritual revival intersected with economic dispossession to incite clashes.^[87] Social identity theory further elucidates how religious affiliation creates salient in-group/out-group boundaries, amplifying intergroup bias under conditions of perceived threat or resource scarcity. Individuals derive self-esteem from religious group membership, leading to derogation of outsiders and endorsement of aggression when identities are challenged; laboratory experiments and field studies in ethno-religious conflicts, such as those in Northern Ireland, demonstrate that priming religious identities heightens favoritism toward co-religionists and support for retaliatory violence.^[67]^[88] This dynamic is exacerbated in fragmented societies, where religious cues signal loyalty amid weak national institutions, correlating with higher rates of sectarian clashes—data from post-colonial states like India and Nigeria show religious identity markers predicting 20-30% more violence in multi-ethnic locales compared to secular ones.^[89] Scholars like Mark Juergensmeyer integrate these elements by arguing that religious violence emerges from modernity's disruptions, such as secular governance eroding traditional authority, prompting activists to envision "cosmic wars" against profane forces. In analyses of over 20 cases from 1980 to 2000, including Sikh militancy in India and Aum Shinrikyo's sarin attack in Japan on March 20, 1995, Juergensmeyer documents how perpetrators view violence as theatrical defiance, sustaining morale through narratives of ultimate victory despite tactical defeats.^[90] Empirical patterns reveal this in global jihadist networks, where recruitment leverages identity loss from urbanization—surveys of 1,000+ militants indicate 60% cited social marginalization alongside theological zeal as entry points.^[91] Critiques within sociology note that such explanations risk understating religion's causal autonomy, as absolutist worldviews uniquely motivate self-sacrifice in ways secular ideologies rarely match; quantitative reviews of 1989-2012 conflicts find religious framing doubles persistence in low-win scenarios compared to ethnic or ideological ones.^[92] Resource deprivation models mediate this, with religiosity correlating to violence only via psychological strain, as in Palestinian surveys where economic loss predicted 40% of variance in support for attacks, buffered or amplified by faith-based coping.^[93] Overall, these frameworks underscore religion's role as amplifier of pre-existing fissures, though academic secularism may bias toward materialist reductions over ideational drivers.^[94]

Critiques of Religion-Centric Causation

Scholars critiquing religion-centric explanations of warfare argue that theological differences often function as pretexts or mobilizers for underlying political, economic, and territorial ambitions, rather than as autonomous causal drivers. Quantitative assessments of historical conflicts, such as the Encyclopedia of Wars by Charles Phillips and Alan Axelrod, classify only 123 out of 1,763 wars (approximately 7%) as primarily religious, with the majority driven by disputes over resources, sovereignty, or power dynamics.^[2] Similarly, empirical studies using datasets like the Correlates of War project have found no significant causal role for religious factors in the onset of armed conflicts, attributing violence instead to state interests, ethnic rivalries, and economic grievances.^[95] William T. Cavanaugh's 2009 analysis in The Myth of Religious Violence posits that the modern dichotomy between "religious" and "secular" violence is a constructed narrative originating in Enlightenment thought, which portrays religion as irrational and prone to fanaticism while exempting secular ideologies—like nationalism, imperialism, and state absolutism—from similar scrutiny. Cavanaugh contends this myth serves to legitimize Western liberal states by defining violence as "religious" only when it challenges secular authority, ignoring how secular regimes, such as those in 20th-century Europe, perpetrated conflicts on a scale rivaling or exceeding avowedly religious ones. He examines cases like the European Wars of Religion, arguing they were less about doctrinal purity and more about centralizing monarchical power against fragmented feudal loyalties, with religious rhetoric masking struggles for territorial control and fiscal extraction.^[96] In the Crusades, papal calls for holy war intertwined with pragmatic incentives, including debt relief for participants, promises of land in the East, and redirection of Europe's martial energies from internal feuds to external gains amid Byzantine pleas for aid against Seljuk advances. Analysis of the First Crusade highlights secular papal motives, such as countering imperial rivals and expanding ecclesiastical influence, alongside economic pressures from overpopulation and primogeniture in feudal Europe. Islamic conquests from the 7th century onward similarly blended jihad ideology with imperial expansionism, as caliphal armies pursued tribute, trade dominance, and administrative unification across diverse regions, often accommodating local non-Muslim populations through pragmatic dhimmi systems rather than forced conversion.^[43] Critics further note that overemphasizing religion risks conflating symptom with cause, as ideological commitments—religious or otherwise—typically amplify preexisting material incentives; for instance, United States Institute of Peace assessments of contemporary sectarian strife reveal competition for political dominance and resource allocation as core drivers, with faith serving to legitimize elite agendas among followers. This perspective underscores causal realism by prioritizing verifiable patterns of power consolidation and scarcity over abstract doctrinal clashes, while acknowledging institutional biases in academia that may understate secular violence to uphold narratives favoring state monopoly on legitimate force.^[70]

Consequences and Long-Term Effects

Human and Demographic Toll

The early Islamic conquests from 632 to 750 CE involved intense military campaigns that resulted in substantial casualties, particularly among the armies of the Byzantine and Sasanian Empires. Key battles, such as Yarmouk in 636 CE against Byzantine forces and Qadisiyyah in 636–637 CE against the Sasanians, saw the near-destruction of defending armies, with historical accounts indicating tens of thousands of deaths per engagement, though precise totals remain uncertain due to sparse contemporary records. Civilian impacts included sieges leading to famine and displacement, as in the fall of Ctesiphon in 637 CE, exacerbating losses beyond combatants.^[97] In Persia, the Sasanian population faced acute demographic disruption following the conquest, with the Zoroastrian majority—estimated at over 90% pre-651 CE—undergoing rapid decline due to jizya taxation, forced conversions, and periodic persecutions under Umayyad and Abbasid rule. By the 9th–10th centuries, Zoroastrians had become a minority, shrinking further through emigration and assimilation to fewer than 60,000 in Iran by the 21st century, a drop attributed to systemic dhimmi disadvantages rather than solely direct violence. Similar patterns emerged in Egypt, where Coptic Christians, comprising the bulk of the population at the 641 CE conquest, declined sharply from high taxes (e.g., under Umayyad policies 661–969 CE) incentivizing conversion, reducing their share to around 10% by modern estimates.^[98]^[99] North African campaigns under the Umayyads (647–709 CE) against Berber and Byzantine holdouts involved prolonged resistance and revolts, contributing to localized depopulation through warfare and enslavement, though Arab settlement was limited and Islamization proceeded gradually via incentives over generations. In the Levant and Mesopotamia, pre-conquest Christian majorities eroded post-conquest, with proportional declines linked to fiscal burdens and social pressures, transforming diverse religious landscapes into Muslim-majority regions by the medieval period. These shifts reflect not only immediate war dead—likely in the hundreds of thousands across theaters—but enduring demographic reconfiguration via conversion, migration, and marginalization of non-Muslims.^[100]

Shifts in Governance and Law

The European Wars of Religion, spanning the 16th and 17th centuries, precipitated profound changes in governance by demonstrating the destabilizing effects of transnational religious allegiances, ultimately favoring consolidated state authority over fragmented confessional loyalties. The Thirty Years' War (1618–1648), which devastated Central Europe with an estimated 4–8 million deaths from combat, famine, and disease, exposed the impracticality of enforcing religious uniformity across borders, leading rulers to prioritize territorial control and internal stability.^[101] This culminated in the Peace of Westphalia (1648), comprising treaties signed at Münster and Osnabrück on October 24, which formalized the principle of state sovereignty by affirming that each prince would determine the official religion within their realm, extending the earlier cuius regio, eius religio doctrine from the Peace of Augsburg (1555) to include Calvinists alongside Lutherans and Catholics.^[102] ^[103] Under Westphalia, the treaties prohibited foreign powers from intervening in the domestic religious affairs of other states, thereby curtailing the Holy Roman Emperor's and Papacy's supranational authority and laying the groundwork for the modern interstate system based on non-interference and juridical equality among sovereigns.^[103] This shift empowered absolutist monarchs, as theorized by Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan (1651), who argued that undivided sovereign power—encompassing both civil and ecclesiastical jurisdiction—was essential to avert the anarchy of religious civil wars, influencing the centralization of governance in states like France under Louis XIV.^[104] Legally, Westphalia mandated religious toleration within the Holy Roman Empire, granting private worship rights and exemptions from oaths conflicting with conscience to the three tolerated denominations, though enforcement remained uneven and did not extend to full equality or atheism.^[105] Beyond Europe, religious conflicts reinforced adaptive legal frameworks for managing diversity, such as the Ottoman Empire's millet system, formalized after 16th-century wars with Safavid Persia, which delegated civil and religious jurisdiction over non-Muslim communities to their leaders under overarching Islamic state law, thereby stabilizing multi-confessional rule without full assimilation.^[106] In the longer term, these governance transformations eroded theocratic models, fostering the gradual separation of religious and secular law; for instance, the post-Westphalian era saw the reception of Roman law in Protestant territories, prioritizing rational state codes over canon law, as evidenced by the development of ius naturale doctrines that subordinated divine right to pragmatic sovereignty.^[107] While not immediately secular, this pragmatic realignment reduced religious justifications for interstate war, embedding territorial integrity as a core legal norm in emerging international customary law.^[108]

Cultural and Doctrinal Legacies

The doctrinal legacies of religious wars in Europe prominently include the institutionalization of confessional pluralism following the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, which concluded the Thirty Years' War (1618–1648) and recognized Lutheranism, Calvinism, and Catholicism as coequal faiths within the Holy Roman Empire. This extended the 1555 Peace of Augsburg's cuius regio, eius religio principle—allowing rulers to determine their territory's religion—while introducing protections for dissenting minorities, such as Calvinists previously excluded, thereby shifting Christian ecclesiology from enforced uniformity to state-mediated tolerance as a pragmatic necessity after decades of doctrinal strife.^[109]^[105]^[108] Reformation-era conflicts further entrenched Protestant doctrinal distinctives, including sola scriptura and the priesthood of all believers, which fragmented the unified medieval church structure and prompted Catholic responses via the Council of Trent (1545–1563) that reaffirmed transubstantiation and papal primacy while curbing abuses like indulgences criticized in crusading propaganda. In Reformed circles, these wars codified justifications for armed defense of orthodoxy, viewing preservation of "true religion" against perceived heresy as a moral imperative, as articulated by theologians who saw militancy as compatible with predestination and covenant theology.^[110]^[111] The Crusades (1095–1291) reinforced just war criteria in Christian doctrine, emphasizing papal authorization and holy site recovery, but their repeated failures eroded confidence in indulgences and clerical war-making, indirectly fueling Reformation critiques of sacramental warfare. In Islamic contexts, these invasions solidified narratives of defensive jihad against external threats, embedding a legacy of reciprocal suspicion that persists in mutual perceptions of religious aggression.^[112] Culturally, the Crusades spurred exchanges that integrated Arabic translations of Greek texts—via intermediaries in Sicily and Spain—into European curricula, advancing fields like algebra and optics and laying groundwork for Renaissance humanism by challenging insular medieval scholarship. Religious wars also shaped artistic traditions, with depictions in literature (e.g., Tasso's Jerusalem Delivered, 1581) and visual arts glorifying chivalric piety while wars like the French Wars of Religion (1562–1598) inspired confessional historiography that mythologized national identities tied to faith.^[113] The aggregate toll of these conflicts, including an estimated 20% population decline in the Holy Roman Empire from the Thirty Years' War alone, demonstrated the causal link between doctrinal absolutism and societal ruin, contributing to Enlightenment-era secular doctrines that subordinated religion to state authority and prioritized reason over revelation in public life. This pragmatic pivot, evident in post-Westphalian treaties, marked a causal realism in governance: religious conviction yielded to survival imperatives, influencing modern liberal separations of church and state without eradicating confessional commitments.^[106]

Contemporary Manifestations

Post-1945 Sectarian and Insurgent Conflicts

The Partition of India in 1947 triggered widespread sectarian violence between Muslims, Hindus, and Sikhs, resulting in an estimated 1 million deaths amid mass migrations and communal massacres as British India divided into Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan.^[114] This conflict exemplified how colonial legacies intersected with religious identities to fuel insurgent-style reprisals and ethnic cleansing, though underlying factors included territorial disputes and economic competition rather than purely doctrinal clashes.^[114] In Northern Ireland, the Troubles from 1969 to 1998 pitted Catholic nationalists seeking unification with Ireland against Protestant unionists favoring continued British ties, leading to approximately 3,500 deaths from bombings, shootings, and sectarian killings by paramilitary groups like the IRA and UVF.^[115] Religious affiliation served as a primary social boundary, intensifying conflict through segregated communities and symbolic acts like hunger strikes invoking Catholic martyrdom traditions, even as political grievances over discrimination and governance predominated.^[116] Over 30,000 were injured, with British forces intervening amid accusations of bias toward Protestants.^[117] The Lebanese Civil War (1975–1990) involved multifaceted sectarian strife among Maronite Christians, Sunni and Shiite Muslims, and Druze militias, exacerbated by Palestinian refugee influxes and Syrian interventions, culminating in around 150,000 fatalities and the displacement of nearly a million people.^[114] Factions aligned along confessional lines under Lebanon's power-sharing system, with massacres like those at Sabra and Shatila in 1982 highlighting religiously motivated reprisals, though proxy influences from Israel, Syria, and Iran amplified geopolitical dimensions.^[118] The war's Taif Agreement in 1989 restructured sectarian representation but left enduring militia power vacuums. Sudan's Second Civil War (1983–2005) pitted the Islamist-oriented northern government against southern rebels of the Sudan People's Liberation Army, who opposed the imposition of Sharia law on non-Muslim populations, resulting in about 2 million deaths from combat, famine, and atrocities.^[119] Religious policies, including the 1983 Sharia decrees under President Nimeiry, galvanized southern Christian and animist resistance, intertwining faith-based grievances with demands for autonomy and resource control in oil-rich regions.^[120] The 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement granted southern self-determination, leading to South Sudan's independence in 2011, yet unresolved ethnic-religious tensions persisted. The Yugoslav Wars (1991–2001) featured ethnic-religious cleansing across Orthodox Serbs, Catholic Croats, and Muslim Bosniaks, with over 140,000 deaths and the Srebrenica genocide of 8,000 Bosniak men in 1995 underscoring religion's role in justifying expulsions and forced conversions.^[121] Post-Tito fragmentation revived historical grievances, where religious symbols mobilized militias—Serbian forces targeting mosques, for instance—but economic collapse and nationalist rhetoric were equally causal drivers.^[122] International tribunals later prosecuted leaders for war crimes rooted in these divisions. Other notable post-1945 cases include Nigeria's recurrent Muslim-Christian clashes, such as those from 2001–2004 claiming 55,000 lives amid disputes over Sharia implementation in northern states, and Pakistan's ongoing Sunni-Shiite sectarian violence since 1997, with nearly 5,000 deaths from targeted bombings.^[114] These insurgencies often blend religious ideology with local power struggles, as seen in southern Thailand's Malay-Muslim rebellion (2004–present, over 4,600 deaths) against Buddhist-majority rule.^[114] Empirical data indicate that while religious markers heighten conflict intensity, they rarely operate in isolation from ethnic or resource-based incentives.^[114]

Islamist Movements and Global Jihad

The modern global jihadist movement traces its ideological roots to mid-20th-century Islamist thinkers who advocated takfir (declaring Muslims apostates) and offensive jihad to overthrow secular regimes and establish rule by sharia. Influenced by Sayyid Qutb's writings, such as Milestones (1964), which portrayed contemporary Muslim societies as jahiliyyah (pre-Islamic ignorance) warranting violent purification, groups like the Muslim Brotherhood and Egyptian Islamic Jihad radicalized further after events like the 1967 Arab-Israeli War. This framework evolved into transnational Salafi-jihadism, emphasizing perpetual struggle against "far enemies" (Western powers) and "near enemies" (apostate Muslim governments) to restore a caliphate, as articulated in Abdullah Azzam's fatwas during the Soviet-Afghan War (1979–1989).^[123]^[124] The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan catalyzed the globalization of jihad, drawing over 20,000 foreign fighters trained in camps funded by Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and U.S. aid channeled via the CIA's Operation Cyclone, totaling approximately $3 billion. Osama bin Laden, returning from Saudi Arabia, founded Al-Qaeda in 1988 to extend this "victory" model worldwide, issuing the 1996 Declaration of War against the U.S. for stationing troops on holy Arabian soil and the 1998 fatwa urging Muslims to kill Americans and allies as religious duty under Quranic injunctions of jihad. This culminated in the September 11, 2001, attacks, killing 2,977 people and injuring over 6,000, framed by Al-Qaeda as retaliation for perceived crusader aggression but rooted in doctrinal imperatives to expel infidels from Muslim lands. Subsequent operations, including the 2004 Madrid bombings (191 deaths) and 2005 London bombings (52 deaths), demonstrated Al-Qaeda's franchise model inspiring affiliates like Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb.^[123]^[125]^[126] The Islamic State (ISIS), emerging from Al-Qaeda in Iraq after the 2003 U.S. invasion, declared a caliphate on June 29, 2014, under Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, controlling up to 100,000 square kilometers across Iraq and Syria at its peak and enforcing hudud punishments like beheadings and slavery justified via selective hadith interpretations. ISIS's propaganda, disseminated via 90,000 social media accounts, recruited 40,000 foreign fighters from 110 countries, surpassing Al-Qaeda's scale through apocalyptic eschatology promising end-times battles. Conflicts involving ISIS and affiliates have contributed to over 200,000 deaths in Iraq and Syria alone since 2014, with global attacks like the 2015 Paris assaults (130 deaths) underscoring the movement's religious framing of takfiri violence against Shiites, Yazidis, and Westerners as divinely mandated.^[127]^[128]^[129] Parallel developments include the Taliban's 1996–2001 emirate in Afghanistan, which sheltered Al-Qaeda and imposed strict Deobandi-Wahhabi hybrid sharia, including public executions for blasphemy. Regaining power in August 2021 after U.S. withdrawal, the Taliban has reaffirmed ties to Al-Qaeda, hosting its leaders despite Doha Agreement pledges, while affiliates like Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan continue cross-border jihad. Globally, jihadist groups have caused over 100,000 fatalities since 2001, predominantly in Muslim-majority countries, with primary ideological drivers cited in their own manifestos—such as ISIS's Dabiq magazine invoking Prophetic traditions—contrasting narratives that attribute violence solely to geopolitical grievances.^[130]^[131]^[132]

Regional Hotspots in the 21st Century

In the Middle East, the Syrian Civil War, erupting in March 2011 amid Arab Spring protests, evolved into a multifaceted sectarian conflict pitting Sunni Arab rebels against the Alawite-dominated Assad regime backed by Shia Iran and Hezbollah, with jihadist groups like ISIS exacerbating religious divides through targeted killings of minorities. By May 2023, the conflict had claimed at least 162,390 civilian lives, with the government and allies responsible for over 139,609 deaths, according to Syrian Observatory for Human Rights data cited in UN reports. Religious motivations fueled atrocities, including ISIS's genocide against Yazidis and Christians, as documented by the UN Commission of Inquiry, which identified religion as a core driver alongside political grievances.^[133]^[134] In Iraq, the rise of ISIS in 2014 intensified religious warfare, with the group declaring a caliphate and perpetrating genocide against Yazidis, Christians, and Shia Muslims, motivated by a puritanical Sunni Salafi-jihadist ideology that viewed these groups as apostates. USCIRF reports confirm ISIS's systematic campaign, including mass executions and enslavement, resulting in thousands of deaths and the displacement of over 200,000 from Nineveh Plains Christian communities. By 2017, coalition forces had reclaimed most territory, but ISIS remnants continued low-level sectarian attacks, underscoring persistent religious fault lines exacerbated by post-2003 power vacuums.^[135] Yemen's civil war, ignited in 2014 by Houthi rebels—a Zaydi Shia movement—against the Sunni-led government, has featured pronounced sectarian violence, with Saudi-led coalitions framing interventions as a defense against Iranian Shia expansionism. Iranian support for Houthis, including missile supplies, has deepened Sunni-Shia proxy dynamics, leading to over 377,000 deaths by early 2022, per UN estimates, including indirect famine casualties tied to blockades and strikes. Sectarian rhetoric has reframed territorial disputes as religious wars, with Houthi forces targeting Sunni tribes and vice versa, though economic and tribal factors interweave with faith-based mobilization.^[136]^[137] Sub-Saharan Africa has seen acute religious hotspots, notably Nigeria's Boko Haram insurgency, launched in 2009 by a Salafi-jihadist group rejecting Western education and secular governance in favor of strict Sharia enforcement, resulting in over 37,500 deaths by 2023, primarily civilians in Christian-majority areas of the northeast. The group's ideology, pledged to ISIS, explicitly targets "unbelievers," with attacks on churches and kidnappings like the 2014 Chibok abductions of 276 schoolgirls framed as religious purification. In the Central African Republic, conflict since 2013 between Muslim Seleka rebels and Christian Anti-Balaka militias has killed thousands, with mutual accusations of religious cleansing displacing over one million; UN data records cycles of mosque and church burnings, highlighting how ethnic alliances fused with faith to sustain violence despite peacekeeping efforts.^[138]^[139] In South and Southeast Asia, Myanmar's 2017 Rohingya crisis exemplifies Buddhist-Muslim tensions, as military operations against the Muslim minority—branded "Bengali infiltrators" by nationalists—drove nearly 750,000 refugees to Bangladesh amid documented arson of 392 villages and mass killings. State-backed violence, rooted in Theravada Buddhist majoritarianism and fears of Islamic demographic shifts, qualifies as ethnic cleansing with religious undertones, per UN fact-finding missions. Similarly, Afghanistan's post-2001 Taliban resurgence, culminating in their 2021 victory, enforces a Deobandi Sunni interpretation of Sharia, targeting Shia Hazaras with bombings like the 2021 Kabul school attack killing 90, mostly girls, amid intra-Islamic sectarian strife that has claimed tens of thousands since the U.S. invasion.^[140]^[141]

Ongoing Debates

Religion as Primary Cause vs. Pretext

In historical analysis, the question of whether religion serves as the primary impetus for wars or merely as a mobilizing pretext remains contested, with empirical assessments often favoring the latter while acknowledging religion's amplifying role in specific conflicts. Comprehensive catalogs of warfare, such as Charles Phillips and Alan Axelrod's Encyclopedia of Wars (2004), which surveys 1,763 recorded conflicts spanning human history, identify only 123—roughly 7%—as having religion as the principal cause, with the remainder driven predominantly by territorial, dynastic, or resource-based disputes.^[142] This low proportion underscores that, absent religious framing, many wars would still occur due to underlying geopolitical or economic pressures, though religion frequently provides ideological cohesion for participants. Advocates for religion as a pretext emphasize how elites invoke faith to mask secular aims, as in the European Wars of Religion (1524–1648), where theological schisms between Protestants and Catholics overlaid struggles for monarchical authority and territorial control; the Peace of Westphalia (1648) ultimately prioritized state sovereignty over doctrinal uniformity, revealing political pragmatism as the core driver.^[66] Similarly, the Crusades (1095–1291), proclaimed by Pope Urban II on November 27, 1095, blended pilgrimage ideals with Venetian trade interests and Norman land hunger, with economic incentives—such as control over Eastern Mediterranean routes—evident in the Fourth Crusade's sack of Christian Constantinople in 1204 rather than Muslim-held Jerusalem. These examples illustrate religion's utility in sanctioning violence and fostering in-group loyalty, yet causal primacy lies in material stakes, a pattern echoed in pre-modern conquests where sacred texts retroactively justified expansions already motivated by demographics or scarcity.^[66] Counterarguments posit religion as genuinely causal when doctrines prescribe conquest or exclusivity, fostering irreconcilable worldviews that escalate disputes beyond rational compromise. In the Arab-Islamic conquests (632–750 CE), Muhammad's successors expanded from Arabia to Persia and Spain, with Quranic injunctions like Surah 9:29 mandating struggle against non-believers until submission, intertwining faith propagation with empire-building in a manner where religious conversion was a stated objective alongside tribute extraction. The Taiping Rebellion (1850–1864) in China, led by Hong Xiuquan who claimed to be Jesus's brother, mobilized 30 million adherents in a millenarian Christian heresy against the Qing dynasty, resulting in 20–30 million deaths driven by apocalyptic theology rather than mere class revolt, though intertwined with anti-Manchu ethnic tensions.^[66] Such instances suggest religion can generate endogenous motivations for violence, particularly through absolutist claims to truth that deem opponents eternally damned, distinguishing them from purely instrumental pretexts. Quantitatively, even in the minority of "religious" wars, disentangling faith from confounding factors proves challenging, as leaders rarely act in doctrinal purity; J. William Frost's analysis of religious facilitation notes that while scriptures can sacralize aggression—evident in 66 instances of religiously framed violence across Abrahamic traditions—underlying alliances often reflect power balances over piety.^[66] Critiques of secular-leaning scholarship, which may underemphasize religion to align with post-Enlightenment narratives diminishing faith's agency, highlight potential biases in classifications like those in Phillips and Axelrod, yet the dataset's breadth—drawing from primary chronicles and archaeological records—lends robustness against overattribution.^[2] Ultimately, causal realism points to religion as a frequent catalyst and justifier, but rarely the root absent proximate secular triggers, with modern conflicts like the Yugoslav Wars (1991–2001) blending ethnic-religious identities with nationalist revanchism to similar effect.

Quantitative Prevalence of Religious Wars

Quantitative assessments of historical warfare indicate that conflicts primarily driven by religious motivations represent a small fraction of all wars. The Encyclopedia of Wars, a comprehensive three-volume catalog by Charles Phillips and Alan Axelrod spanning ancient to modern eras, documents 1,763 known conflicts and classifies 121—or 6.87%—as religious wars, defined by religion serving as the principal cause rather than a secondary or instrumental factor.^[2]^[142] Of these, roughly 46 involved Islamic jihad as the core impetus, accounting for about 2.6% of total wars, with the balance linked to Christian, Hindu, or other religious doctrines.^[5] This low prevalence holds under rigorous criteria emphasizing primary causation, distinguishing religious wars from those over territory, resources, dynasties, or secular ideologies, which dominate the catalog at over 93%.^[2] Datasets like the Correlates of War project, which tracks interstate and intrastate wars from 1816 onward without explicit religious tagging, align indirectly by showing most conflicts classified by type (e.g., territorial or civil) rarely isolate religion as the sole driver, though it intersects with ethnic or identity factors in subsets.^[143] Quantitative reviews confirm that even when secondary religious elements are considered, they do not elevate the primary religious share beyond single digits across millennia. In the post-1945 era, the proportion appears diminished for interstate wars, with secular nationalism, ideology, and geopolitics prevailing in major conflicts like the World Wars' aftermath and Cold War proxy battles. Intrastate cases show higher religious involvement, such as sectarian civil wars, but datasets like the Religion and Armed Conflict (RELAC) collection from 1975–2015 indicate these remain exceptional, comprising under 10% of armed conflicts when religion is a core issue rather than a pretext.^[4] Overall, empirical catalogs refute claims of religious dominance in warfare frequency, attributing the majority to non-religious causal chains.^[2]

Implications for Future Conflicts

Religiously motivated conflicts demonstrate a capacity for heightened intensity compared to secular wars, as participants often derive commitment from beliefs in divine sanction or afterlife rewards, reducing aversion to high-casualty tactics such as suicide bombings. This dynamic, observed in historical cases like the Crusades and modern Islamist insurgencies, implies that future engagements involving religious actors may feature prolonged asymmetric warfare, where non-state groups exploit ideological fervor to sustain operations against superior conventional forces. Empirical data from post-conflict surveys indicate that exposure to violence correlates with increased religiosity, potentially perpetuating cycles of radicalization in affected populations.^[144] Global trends suggest religious dimensions will intersect with emerging geopolitical flashpoints, particularly in regions with unresolved sectarian divides, such as the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa. Pew Research Center analysis of 2021 data shows religion-related armed conflicts and terrorism persisting amid peak government restrictions on religion, with social hostilities involving religious attire or mob violence occurring in 139 countries.^[145] In hotspots like Syria, Nigeria, and Myanmar, where ethno-religious insurgencies have displaced millions since 2010, projections indicate escalation risks from demographic shifts and resource competition, amplified by religious narratives framing adversaries as existential threats.^[4] The resurgence of groups like ISIS affiliates, which controlled territory across three continents by 2014 before fragmentation, underscores the adaptability of jihadist networks, likely to exploit state failures or migration crises for recruitment.^[146] Apocalyptic ideologies pose unique risks for escalation to catastrophic scales, as seen in Iranian regime rhetoric invoking messianic end-times since the 1979 Revolution, potentially lowering thresholds for weapons of mass destruction deployment. Unlike secular rational-actor models, such beliefs can incentivize preemptive or sacrificial actions, complicating deterrence strategies reliant on mutual assured destruction. In parallel, rising Christian persecution—documented in over 360 million affected individuals as of 2023—signals bidirectional religious violence, with nationalist regimes in India and China intensifying restrictions that fuel diaspora radicalization.^[147] Overall, while technological advances like drones may alter tactics, religion's role as a mobilizer of identity and sacrifice implies that future conflicts will retain pre-modern ferocity in hybrid forms, demanding policies that address doctrinal incentives rather than solely material grievances.

References

[1]
Religious Conflicts - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Religious conflicts are violent confrontations between groups, often driven by ideological differences, and can be used as a front for hidden political agendas.
[2]
The Myth of Religion as the Cause of Most Wars | Andrew Holt, Ph.D.
Jan 3, 2023 · Thus, only 6.9 percent of the wars they considered are classified as religious wars. ... One presumes they see the remaining 93.1 percent as ...
[3]
Has religion been the cause of most wars in history? | Third Space
Oct 20, 2014 · ... encyclopedia concludes that just 6% of the wars listed throughout human history can be labelled as religious wars. • The three-volume ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[4]
Disputes over the Divine: Introducing the Religion and Armed ...
Oct 30, 2017 · According to Toft (2007), a religious conflict is defined as peripheral when combatants “identify with a specific religious tradition and ...
[5]
Has Religion Been a Chief Cause of Wars Throughout History?
Apr 21, 2016 · Only 6.7% of wars are religious. Rationale Philip & Axelrod's index lists 1763 wars, but only lists 120 wars under the heading “Religious wars”.
[6]
Religion and Violence, War and Peace (Chapter 1)
Feb 23, 2017 · Like the relational criteria for religious war, this simple standard for religious peace highlights the relational, as opposed to the cognitive ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[7]
Milchemet Mitzva and Milchemet Reshut | Yeshivat Har Etzion
Nov 10, 2024 · A milchemet reshut (an optional war) is apparently a war that the people of Israel are permitted to engage in, but they are not obligated to do so.
[8]
What's the Truth about . . . Milchemet Mitzvah? - Jewish Action
Fact: A king is not necessary for a defensive war to be defined as a milchemet mitzvah. Some of the greatest rabbis of the last century have classified Israel's ...
[9]
SUMMA THEOLOGIAE: War (Secunda Secundae Partis, Q. 40)
Wherefore Augustine says (QQ. in Hept., qu. x, super Jos.): "A just war is wont to be described as one that avenges wrongs, when a nation or state has to be ...
[10]
[PDF] Jihad: Holy or Unholy War - UNAOC
They. Page 5. place themselves under the mantle of the Prophet, linking their militant jihadist worldviews to famous earlier interpretations of jihad such as ...
[11]
[PDF] The Quranic Concept of War1 - Institute for Security Policy and Law
They focus on the Quran for jihad a doctrine that harkens back to the time of the Prophet and the classical-jihadist period when Islam enjoyed its most ...
[12]
War Ethics (dharmayuddha)
Oct 29, 2022 · Hence, Hindu kings always preferred Dharmayuddha, a just and righteous war approved by the society. Following the principles laid down by the ...
[13]
Classical Hindu views of 'Righteous Warfare' (Dharma Yuddha) in ...
Sep 16, 2011 · Hindu rules of 'Righteous Warfare' advance distinctive principles of compassion, deference, and respect for religious differences as intrinsic ...
[14]
The Conquest of Canaan | Desiring God
Nov 29, 1981 · The conquest of Canaan was decreed prior to any righteousness in Israel. It was part of the certain promises to Abraham. No generation of Israel ...
[15]
Yahweh War and the Conquest of Canaan – A Biblical Worldview ...
Jan 9, 2011 · In this conquest, three things were being accomplished: the fulfillment of the promise of land, the judgment of the Canaanites, and the ...
[16]
Israel's Incomplete Conquest of Canaan - TheTorah.com
Jan 25, 2022 · In Joshua 1–12, the whole of the Land of Canaan falls to Joshua and the invading Israelites, whose unfailing loyalty to the Teaching (תּוֹרָה) ...<|separator|>
[17]
Were there any wars in ancient Greece where religion played a ...
Nov 27, 2015 · The first true religious wars were the Crusades, the idea being to reclaim places sacred to all Christians from the Muslims, who by then also ...<|separator|>
[18]
The Sacred Wars | Research Starters - EBSCO
The Sacred Wars were a series of conflicts in ancient Greece, primarily revolving around the control of the sacred site of Delphi and the temple of Apollo.
[19]
The ancient roots of the modern holy war - Engelsberg Ideas
Aug 25, 2020 · The crusades, jihad, and wars in defence of intangible ideals all have their origins in a short-lived conflict in the 6th century BC.
[20]
Maccabean Revolt - My Jewish Learning
The revolt launched by the priest Mattathias and later led by his third son, Judah Maccabee, was both a civil war and a war against an outside enemy.Missing: aspects | Show results with:aspects
[21]
Religious Persecution or High Taxes? The Causes of the ...
Oct 18, 2014 · The revolt of the Jews against Antiochus IV is the story at the heart of the Jewish festival of Hanukkah. However, while the festival ...Missing: aspects | Show results with:aspects
[22]
The Maccabean Victory Explained: Between 1 and 2 Maccabees
Dec 15, 2022 · 1 Maccabees emphasizes the zealous killing of sinners as the element that wins God's favor, while 2 Maccabees emphasizes the tragic death of righteous Jewish ...
[23]
Causes of the Jewish War Against the Romans - Josephus.org
The war was caused by Roman cruelty, corruption, extremist religious nationalism, class and ethnic conflicts, and the refusal to sacrifice to the Emperor.
[24]
The First Jewish Revolt against Rome | Religious Studies Center
For a chronologically closer cause of the revolt, some scholars point to the inept, corrupt, and harsh Roman procurators stationed over Judea in the first ...
[25]
A Historical View of Jewish-Roman Wars - Word on Fire
Oct 6, 2025 · These were people who cared deeply about freedom and the will of God , for many of the same reasons that I do. These were terrible events.
[26]
[PDF] THE INTERACTION OF RELIGION AND POLITICS IN ...
Historical Overview The reconquista was made possible because as the Umayyad caliphate broke into a number of taifa, or petty, principalities following a ...
[27]
[PDF] Reconquest and Crusade in Medieval Spain - Reviews in History
Aug 1, 2003 · Christian propaganda depicting the 'Reconquista' as a war to eject ... religious war step by step. This is a very convenient tool for ...
[28]
The Debate on the Baltic Crusades and the Making of Europe - Bombi
Sep 4, 2013 · The Baltic Crusades represent a long-term phenomenon that lasted for about 300 years (1147–1525). The nature of these crusades has been ...
[29]
The Northern Crusades: The Baltic and the Catholic Frontier, 1100 ...
The Northern Crusades: The Baltic and the Catholic Frontier, 1100–1525. By Eric Christiansen. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1980. xv + 273 pp.
[30]
[PDF] Human Agency and the Shift towards Offensive Warfare in the Hussit
The period of the Hussite wars has been well-researched in Hussite historiography, yet largely ignored or taken for granted is the shift in military strategy, ...
[31]
Group Imagination in the Early Hussite Period (1414-1420) | Austin ...
The death of Bohemian preacher and reformer Jan Hus at the Council of Constance in 1415 sparked a long period of religious, political, and cultural conflict in ...
[32]
Chapter 1: Religious Wars – Europe Since 1600: A Concise History
By 1560, Europe was divided by religion as it had never been before. Protestantism was now a permanent feature of the landscape of beliefs.
[33]
Religious Wars in Early Modern Europe
Aug 31, 2018 · Wars of religion meant entire populations were targeted for attack. As a result, they produced an incredible amount of collateral damage. The ...
[34]
Religious War and Religious Peace in Early Modern Europe
Religious War and Religious Peace in Early Modern Europe presents a novel account of the origins of religious pluralism in Europe.<|separator|>
[35]
AD 1493: The Pope asserts rights to colonize, convert, and enslave
Pope Alexander VI issues a papal bull or decree, “Inter Caetera," in which he authorizes Spain and Portugal to colonize the Americas and its Native peoples as ...<|separator|>
[36]
Blog: Christianity in the Age of Exploration | Christian History Institute
Mar 4, 2024 · Christianity motivated expeditions, justified colonial expansion, and spread globally, while also leading to cultural exchange and syncretism.
[37]
Treaty of Tordesillas:1494 Decision Still Influencing Today's World
The bull Inter Caetera and several other bulls from the same era form the basis of the 1494 Treaty of Tordesillas between Spain and Portugal.
[38]
Conquests in the Old World and the New: Just War?
In the case of wars of conquest in Naples and Navarre, Spanish jurists likewise developed rationales for conquest that had a religious basis. But it was ...
[39]
Race Was Religion: Understanding the Role of Religion in Early ...
The English's religious views led to ecclesiastical governance in the colonized world. Education in colonial America focused on Christian education, whether it ...
[40]
https://brill.com/view/journals/jemh/28/1-2/article-p92_5.xml
[41]
[PDF] Christian Missions and Colonial Empires Reconsidered
British Protestant missionaries and overseas expansion, 1700-1914 ... War: The Cultural Mission of the United. States in Austria After the Second World War ...
[42]
1320: Section 15: The Crusades and Medieval Christianity
But for all these underlying causes, the major motivation driving the Crusades—both on the surface and well beneath it—was religious sentiment, something ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
[43]
[PDF] The Secular Motivations of the First Crusade - DTIC
This report, by George Vicari, Jr., discusses the secular motivations of the First Crusade. The views are the author's, not the US government's.
[44]
Modern Scholars on the Casualty Rates for Participants of the First ...
Feb 19, 2019 · 37.3% overall death rate for crusaders during the First Crusade. “So of 217 (or 230) individuals, 37.3% (or 35.2%) died, a mortality which turns out to be not ...
[45]
The Crusades: Motivations, Administration, and Cultural Influence
Jun 25, 2012 · The Crusades were a series of religious and political wars fought between 1096 and 1291 for control of the Holy Land.
[46]
[PDF] The Case for the Crusades
The Crusades are widely seen as motivated by land and loot, not piety, and as a brutal European colonialism, with some calling it a crime.
[47]
Death Estimates for the Crusades | Andrew Holt, Ph.D.
Jan 30, 2019 · “Estimates of the number of people killed in the Crusades begin at 1 million (Wertham…) and go as high as 9 million (Robertson…) passing ...
[48]
[PDF] The Impact of Holy Land Crusades on State Formation - Lisa Blaydes
Abstract. Holy Land Crusades were among the most significant forms of military mobilization to occur during the medieval period.
[49]
[PDF] A Multi-Causal Approach to the Thirty Years' War
The field studying the causes of the Thirty Years' War has changed itself over the years. At the advent of modern historiography in the late 19th century ...
[50]
The Causes of the Thirty Years War 1618-48 - jstor
destructive wars in European history, responsible for the deaths of at least eight million people at a time when the continent numbered only.
[51]
6.3: The French Wars of Religion - Social Sci LibreTexts
Jul 20, 2023 · As of 1560, fully 10% of the people of France were Huguenots, many representing the middle class: merchants, lawyers, and prosperous townsfolk.Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
[52]
The eight wars of religion (1562-1598) - Musée protestant
The wars lasted thirty-six years. The kingdom of France had 18 million inhabitants at that time – indeed, few other European countries had as many. The growth ...The 2 war (1567-1568) · war (1572-1573) · war (1574-1576) · war (1585-1598)
[53]
THE THIRTY YEARS WAR AND YOU
Mar 27, 2025 · Armies in the war fought in, lived off, and destroyed the lands of Bohemia and north Germany during prolonged campaigns with utter disregard for ...Missing: casualties | Show results with:casualties
[54]
Estimating warfare-related civilian mortality in the early modern period
Aug 18, 2021 · Indeed, the Thirty Years' War (1618–48) is estimated to have killed about five million out of a population of roughly 15 million people ...<|separator|>
[55]
The Thirty Years' War: The first modern war? - Humanitarian Law ...
May 23, 2017 · Around 450,000 people died in combat. Disease and famine took the lion's share of the death toll.
[56]
The Thirty Years War, 1618–1648 - Oxford Academic
Germany was dragged into war by the Bohemian uprising against Habsburg rule. The conflict was prolonged by the inability of either Ferdinand II or Ferdinand III ...
[57]
Full article: The Balance of Power from the Thirty Years' War and the ...
May 23, 2022 · After Westphalia, the balance of power tilted in France's favour and Louis XIV eventually took over the role of European aggressor and hegemon.
[58]
The Rashidun and the Early Muslim Conquests
The Rashidun and the Early Muslim Conquests ; Caliph, Reign ; Abu Bakr, 632-634 ; 'Umar ibn al-Khattab, 634-644 ; 'Uthman ibn 'Affan, 644-656 ; 'Ali ibn Abi Talib ...
[59]
Fall of the Sassanid Empire: The Arab Conquest of Persia 633-654 CE
Aug 28, 2022 · The Byzantine-Sassanian War of 602-628 CE had ended with the execution of the Sassanid King Khosrow II. This led to the Sassanid Civil War of ...
[60]
[PDF] The Concept and Practice of Jihad in Islam - USAWC Press
Mar 1, 2003 · “All these crimes and sins committed by the Americans are a clear declaration of war on God, his Messenger, and Muslims. . . . [T]he jihad ...
[61]
Today in Middle Eastern history: the Battle of al-Qadisiyah (636)
The two great Arab military victories of 636, the Battle of Yarmouk against the Byzantines and the Battle of al-Qadisiyah against the Sasanian Persians ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
[62]
The First Caliphs of Islam: Power, Corruption and War in the ...
Nov 22, 2023 · The first caliphs of the Islamic World were the Rashidun, or “rightly guided,” caliphs and they controlled a vast empire.
[63]
Expansion Under the Umayyad Caliphates | World Civilization
The Umayyad caliphate was marked both by territorial expansion and by the administrative and cultural problems that such expansion created.
[64]
The Umayyad Caliphate Invasion of Spain - Medieval History
Feb 21, 2023 · The Umayyad Caliphate expansion into Hispania (Iberian Peninsula) began in 711 and lasted until 718. This period marked the rise of Muslim Arab conquest over ...
[65]
[PDF] Evolving Approaches to Jihad: From Self-defense to Revolutionary ...
These uncorrected contradictions by responsible Muslim clergy have led to the contemporary rationalizations of unbridled violence in the name of Islamic jihad.
[66]
[PDF] Why Religions Facilitate War And How Religions Facilitate Peace
Religion as a concept works rather well in defining modern Christianity but less precisely for Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Native American spirituality.
[67]
Identity threats and ideas of superiority as drivers of religious ...
Nov 8, 2021 · We conclude that appeals by leaders to threats by others and intolerance toward other faiths can contribute to more conflict.
[68]
[PDF] Religion, violence and “holy wars”
The article focuses on this accusation and departs from an analysis of the concept of "holy war" in the three religions.
[69]
War and Religion: An Overview - Oxford Research Encyclopedias
Mar 26, 2019 · Qualitative scholars of religion and war have tried to address this gap by relying on close comparisons, historical cases, and archival ...
[70]
Sources of Conflict: Religion or Economic and Political Power?
Dec 30, 2014 · Religion is cited as the basis for too many conflicts that actually center more on competition over economic advancement and political power.
[71]
https://oxfordre.com/politics/oso/viewentry/10.1093%24002facrefore%24002f9780190228637.001.0001%24002facrefore-9780190228637-e-984
[72]
economic warfare: the rise of the italian merchant states and the ...
Powerful merchant states, especially Genoa and Venice, used the legitimacy of the Crusades to further their own political and economic pursuits, often to the ...
[73]
[PDF] Economic Expansion, Social Change, and Religious Wars, 1550 ...
The usual explanation is “God, gold, and glory,” a mantra that captures the missionary impulse, economic incentives, and personal motives of the conquistadores.
[74]
[PDF] The Early Islamic Conquests | Almuslih
... economic, social, and political structures that flourished over thirteen centuries ago. Not all readers will agree with this approach, and I myself would be ...
[75]
11.2 The Arab-Islamic Conquests and the First Islamic States
Economic motivations. Acquiring wealth through conquest and tribute such as war booty, taxes, and control of trade; Gaining control over important trade ...<|separator|>
[76]
[PDF] Peace-and-Religion-Report.pdf
Surveying the state of 35 armed conflicts from 2013, religious elements did not play a role in 14, or 40 per cent.
[77]
The Rise of Religious Armed Conflicts in Sub-Saharan Africa
As of mid-2017, eight out of ten armed conflicts in the region are displaying a religious dimension. Either warring factions differ by religious identity.
[78]
Just War Theory | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Just war theory deals with the justification of how and why wars are fought. The justification can be either theoretical or historical.
[79]
How was crusading justified? - Smarthistory
Crusading was justified as just warfare, with a just cause, legitimate authority, and right intention, and as holy warfare, and as penitential warfare.
[80]
The First Crusade and Just War Theory - Medievalists.net
Oct 21, 2011 · The paper evaluates if the First Crusade was justified by Just War theory, using medieval sources to determine the criteria for a justified war.
[81]
Islamic law and the rules of war - World | ReliefWeb
Apr 24, 2014 · The actions and statements of the Prophet Muhammad and of the early Caliphs of Islam point to strong humanitarian considerations. In a famous ...
[82]
Biblical Guidelines for Warfare - How Jews Fight - Chabad.org
Many of these laws are derived from Deuteronomy 20 and other Torah sources. They are codified in Maimonides' Mishneh Torah, Laws of Kings and their Wars.
[83]
Rabbinic Limitations on War | My Jewish Learning
Deuteronomy 20 permits wars of aggression, but the talmudic rabbis made it difficult to declare one.
[84]
Charting Hinduism's rules of armed conflict: Indian sacred texts and international humanitarian law
Summary of each segment:
[85]
14.4: The Conflict Perspective on Religion - Social Sci LibreTexts
Jan 8, 2021 · The social-conflict approach to religion highlights how religion, as a phenomenon of human behavior, maintains social inequality by advancing a ...
[86]
Sociological Perspectives on Religion
Religion reinforces and promotes social inequality and social conflict. It helps convince the poor to accept their lot in life, and it leads to hostility and ...
[87]
[PDF] Religious Dimensions of Political Conflict and Violence
Abstract. This paper seeks to develop a nuanced and qualified account of the distinctive ways in which religion can inform political conflict and violence.
[88]
Social Identity Theory and Intergroup Conflict in Israel/Palestine
The conflicting groups often participate in increasingly destructive forms of reciprocating violence, which fuels narratives that lead to further cycles of ...
[89]
Religious fragmentation, social identity and other-regarding ...
The underlying division between the two religious groups has often manifested itself in conflict and violence in regular intervals, with over 7000 deaths ...
[90]
[PDF] Religion and Violence: Social Processes in Comparative Perspective
Mark Juergensmeyer (2000) argues that religious violence sometimes involves symbolic and performative pursuit of a war that cannot be won, in which defeat.
[91]
Three Theories of Religious Activism and Violence
Three Theories of Religious Activism and Violence: Social Movements, Fundamentalists, and Apocalyptic Warriors. Heather Selma GreggDefense Analysis ...
[92]
[PDF] Three Theories of Religious Activism and Violence - CORE
Numerous scholars have investigated religiously motivated violence, particularly in the wake of September 11, including discussions on the role of modernity ...
[93]
Much ado about religion: Religiosity, resource loss, and support for ...
Findings show that the relationship between religion and support of political violence only holds true when mediated by deprivations and psychological resource ...
[94]
(PDF) Social Conflict Among Religious Groups in the Perspective of ...
Dec 16, 2023 · Hall, J. R. (2013). Religion and Violence from a Sociological Perspective. Dalam M. Jerryson,. M. Juergensmeyer, & M.
[95]
Do Religious Factors Impact Armed Conflict? Empirical Evidence ...
Nov 10, 2011 · Quantitative research has failed to find support for the significant causal influence of religious factors on the onset of armed conflict in ...
[96]
The Myth of Religious Violence - William T Cavanaugh
Free delivery 25-day returnsThe Myth of Religious Violence. Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict. William T Cavanaugh. Provocatively and convincingly challenges the ...
[97]
10 - The Rashidun, Umayyad (661–750) and Abbasid (750–1258 ...
Jan 6, 2025 · After twelve years in power, 'Uthman was deposed and murdered in 656, sparking the First Civil War in Islam, known as the Fitna. Successionist ...<|separator|>
[98]
How Have Zoroastrians Been Treated in Muslim Iran? - Britannica
... Arab Muslim invasion in 651 CE. The rise of Islam in Persia coincided with a steep decline in Zoroastrian followers; in 2012 there were reportedly between ...
[99]
[PDF] SELF-SELECTION, RELIGION, AND SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS
Dec 2, 2015 · Whereas the high tax rate in 661-969 caused a rapid decline in Copts' population share and the emergence of a positive Coptic-Muslim SES gap ...
[100]
[PDF] Practice and Theory Population of Early Islamic Egypt
The western Theban area provides a large and diverse body of evidence for a Christian population for the century and a half after the Muslim conquest, and must ...
[101]
https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/jfq/jfq-65/jfq-65_22-26_Devine.pdf
[102]
The Peace of Westphalia | In Custodia Legis
Oct 24, 2017 · On October 24, 1648, the Peace of Westphalia formally ended the Thirty Years' War in Europe. The Peace of Westphalia consists of two different documents.Missing: analysis | Show results with:analysis
[103]
The Peace Treaty of Westphalia (1648) and Its Consequences for ...
By the introduction of the principle of sovereignty, the governments of one state stopped to support their co-religionists in conflict with the rulers of other ...
[104]
[PDF] wars-of-religion-and-the-rise-of-the-state.pdf - Ballyhea Parish
Oct 4, 1995 · Hobbes' aim in uniting Church and State is peace. Without universal obedience to but one sovereign, civil war between temporal and spiritual.
[105]
[PDF] Religious Freedom and the Undoing of the Westphalian State
After a century of religious war, Westphalia's compro- mise on tolerance for religious groups was the best that European rulers could achieve. Today, the vast ...
[106]
Europe: Between Religious War and Peace | EHNE
Jul 17, 2024 · The desire to impose one's own denomination or defend one's religious community sparked the conflicts. None of the wars were entirely about ...
[107]
[PDF] The Religious Foundations of Western Law
Thus the tribal, local, and feudal customs which had prevailed throughout Europe until the 11th and 12th centuries, were transformed into new secular legal ...
[108]
[PDF] The Westphalian Peace Tradition in International Law
In October 1648, after 30 years of war and almost four years of negotiations, two peace treaties were signed in the Westphalian cities of Osnabruck and. Munster ...<|separator|>
[109]
The Peace of Westphalia and Sovereignty | Western Civilization
The Peace of Westphalia, signed in 1648, ended the Thirty Years’ and Eighty Years’ Wars, establishing sovereignty and a new political order in Europe.
[110]
The Reformation and Wars of Religion - Liberty Magazine
The division between Protestant and Catholic caused or intensified numerous conflicts, resulting in some of the longest lasting, bloodiest, and most bitterly ...
[111]
Reformed on War
Dec 11, 2024 · To a man, Reformed theologians believed the defense and preservation of “true religion” constituted a sufficient cause for taking up arms.
[112]
The Crusades by W. Robert Godfrey - Ligonier Ministries
May 1, 2011 · Perhaps most seriously and most lastingly, the Crusades implanted a violent image of Christianity and the West in the minds of Islamic people.Missing: changes | Show results with:changes
[113]
Crusades Impact: Economic & Cultural Effects | StudySmarter
Oct 1, 2024 · Cultural Impact of the Crusades: Exposure to Eastern cultures and new architectural styles influenced European art and architecture. Economic ...Crusades Impact Overview · What Were The Impacts Of The... · Cultural Impact Of The...
[114]
Major Episodes of Political Violence 1946-2019 - Systemic Peace
Major political violence episodes from 1946-2019 include 334 armed conflicts with at least 500 fatalities, and are systematic and sustained.
[115]
Northern Ireland: The Peace Process, Ongoing Challenges, and ...
Mar 7, 2025 · Between 1969 and 1999, roughly 3,500 people died as a result of political violence in Northern Ireland, which is one of four component "nations" ...
[116]
[PDF] Religion and the patterns of conflict in Northern Ireland.1 Jennifer ...
Religion is key to social boundaries in Northern Ireland, making conflict more meaningful, intense, and totalizing, and is not just an 'ethnic marker'.Missing: casualties | Show results with:casualties
[117]
Universal Policing - Counterterrorism Lessons from Northern Ireland
Apr 1, 2010 · Over 30,000 people were injured or maimed. The British Army sustained a total 719 deaths from The Troubles in Northern Ireland during the same ...
[118]
https://sciencespo.fr/mass-violence-war-massacre-resistance/fr/document/historiography-and-memory-lebanese-civil-war.html
[119]
Civil War in Sudan | Global Conflict Tracker
Apr 15, 2025 · The second Sudanese civil war from 1983 to 2005 killed an estimated two million people, with widespread documentation of famine and atrocities.
[120]
Second Sudanese Civil War (1983-2005) - BlackPast.org
Dec 23, 2018 · In 1983, President Nimeiry violated the agreement by imposing Sharia Law across the nation and abolishing the mostly Christian Southern Sudan ...
[121]
https://oxfordre.com/politics/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-679
[122]
[PDF] Religion, Ethnicity, and Political Conflict in Bosnia During the War ...
Specifically, I examine four ways that ethnic cleansing was a religious practice during the Bosnian War (1992-1995). Through this examination, I show there was ...
[123]
The Evolution Of Islamic Terrorism - An Overview | Target America
... Islamic Jihad are representative of fundamentalist Islam. [3] A Note on State Sponsors of Religious Terror Groups Unlike the "secular" national, radical ...
[124]
https://oxfordre.com/religion/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.001.0001/acrefore-9780199340378-e-967
[125]
Global Jihad: Excerpt from Introduction | Stanford University Press
The famous jihadi ideologue 'Abdullah 'Azzam (see chapter 1) captured the centrality of violence for jihadis with a saying he was fond of repeating: “jihad and ...Missing: resource | Show results with:resource<|control11|><|separator|>
[126]
Evolution of Jihadism 20 Years After 9/11 | Wilson Center
Sep 8, 2021 · Jihadists will attempt to recruit the many vulnerable individuals in these camps to their cause. Where is the broader jihadi movement headed?
[127]
Islamic State, al-Qaeda, and the State of Global Jihadist Leadership
Apr 27, 2023 · His remarks focused on the leadership dynamics surrounding the Islamic State's regional affiliate (ISIS-K), al-Qaeda, and the Afghan Taliban, as ...
[128]
The Escalating Terrorism Problem in the United States - CSIS
Jun 17, 2020 · In analyzing fatalities from terrorist attacks, religious terrorism has killed the largest number of individuals—3,086 people—primarily due to ...<|separator|>
[129]
[PDF] Global Extremism Monitor: Islamist Violence after ISIS
ISIS targeted 19 other Islamist extremist groups in nearly one- third of their operations, including the Salafi-jihadist coalition. Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), ...
[130]
Al-Qaeda, the Taliban, and the Future of U.S. Counterterrorism in ...
Sep 8, 2022 · ... Taliban movement. And that vision provides no indication that Akhundzada seeks to limit space for major jihadists like al-Qaeda in Afghanistan.
[131]
The Global State of al-Qa`ida 24 Years After 9/11
Sep 9, 2025 · ... global jihad as al-Qa`ida defines it. As has always been the ... Clarke, “Al-Qaeda is Thrilled That the Taliban Control Afghanistan ...
[132]
Human | Costs of War | Brown University
An estimated over 940,000 people were killed by direct post-9/11 war violence in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, and Pakistan between 2001-2023.Civilians Killed & Displaced · U.S. Military, Veterans... · Economic
[133]
Why has the Syrian war lasted 12 years? - BBC News
May 2, 2023 · It said at least 162,390 civilians had been killed, with the Syrian government and its allies responsible for 139,609 of those deaths. The ...Missing: religious | Show results with:religious
[134]
[PDF] A/HRC/32/CRP.2 Advance Version - ohchr
Jun 15, 2016 · ISIS has committed the crime of genocide as well as multiple crimes against humanity and war crimes against the Yazidis, thousands of whom ...<|separator|>
[135]
Iraq: ISIS Abducting, Killing, Expelling Minorities
Jul 19, 2014 · (Duhok) – The Islamic State of Iraq and Sham (ISIS) is killing, kidnapping, and threatening religious and ethnic minorities in and around ...
[136]
Yemen: Why is the war there getting more violent? - BBC News
Apr 14, 2023 · The UN estimated that by the start of 2022, the conflict in Yemen had caused over 377,000 deaths, with 60% the result of hunger, lack of ...Missing: sectarian | Show results with:sectarian
[137]
Sectarianisation of Yemen: Effects and Implications
Sep 23, 2024 · This paper will conclude that religious discourses transform conflict in three key ways: by changing patterns of violence, enabling parties to reframe conflict ...
[138]
Factsheet: Violent Islamist Groups in Northern Nigeria | USCIRF
Estimates suggest that conflict with groups like Boko Haram and the Islamic State in West Africa Province has resulted in the deaths of more than 37,500 ...
[139]
Conflict in the Central African Republic | Global Conflict Tracker
Jul 9, 2024 · Since gaining independence in 1960, CAR has experienced decades of violence and instability, including six coups.
[140]
What Forces Are Fueling Myanmar's Rohingya Crisis?
Sectarian violence is not new to Rakhine State: security campaigns in the past five years, notably in 2012 and 2016, also resulted in the flight of tens of ...
[141]
The Taliban in Afghanistan - Council on Foreign Relations
The Taliban are a predominantly Pashtun, Islamic fundamentalist group that returned to power in Afghanistan in 2021 after waging a twenty-year insurgency.Introduction · How have the Taliban violated... · How has the world responded...
[142]
Counting “Religious Wars” in the Encyclopedia of Wars
Dec 26, 2018 · If such a small percentage of wars were “religious,” then what is the basis for the claim that religion, even more so than political or socio- ...
[143]
World Religion Data (v1.1) - The Correlates of War Project
The project was developed in three stages. The first stage consisted of the formation of a religions tree. A religion tree is a systematic classification of ...
[144]
[PDF] War increases religiosity - Harvard University
Does the experience of war increase people's religiosity? Much evidence supports the idea that particular religious beliefs and ritual forms can galvanize ...
[145]
Globally, government restrictions on religion peaked in 2021; social ...
Mar 5, 2024 · This includes religion-related armed conflict or terrorism, mob or sectarian violence, harassment over attire for religious reasons and other ...
[146]
Religion in war in the 21st century - Taylor & Francis Online
Sep 10, 2020 · Religious impact on war has reemerged, sometimes with redoubled strength, during the 20th and early 21st centuries. This is true in Islam, in ...
[147]
Global Christian Persecution Reaches New Heights Amid Rising ...
Feb 6, 2025 · Global Christian Persecution Reaches New Heights Amid Rising Nationalism, Conflict, and Repression. The findings align with broader trends in ...